Updated: Follow The Finger

Send us a text

Police and Prosecutors are producing false allegations and impossible crimes.
Seattle, King County Prosecutors, City of Enumclaw, Washington State

www.consider.info

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_00 (00:02):
Quote.
Every allegation comes from thedetective.
Dr.
John Ewell, forensicpsychologist.
End quote.
More information with thetranscript statements can be
found at www.consider.clickslash two G Z.
Follow the finger.
Follow the finger.

(00:22):
Prosecutors.
Police and scripted accusations.
Enum Claw Detective Grant McCalland his co-conspirator had been
grooming false accusations forover a year.
The hostile effects of the hatecrime had been going on long
before this scripted accusation.
In short, Enum Claw DetectiveGrant McCall terminated the
recording, and upon resuming,the testimony of the manipulated

(00:45):
accuser had undergone a completetransformation.
The follow-the-finger testimonyserves as compelling evidence of
an orchestrated hate crime.
In a solitary meeting, sittingalone with the manipulated
accuser, City of Enum Clawdetective Grant McCall engages
with the manipulated accuser,introducing inappropriate

(01:07):
suggestions involving both thevagina and anus.
When the manipulated accuserhesitates, McCall abruptly stops
the recording to take a break.
It's important to note thatMcCall has previously deleted
evidence and ignored the actualallegations to the point of
refusing to investigate thelocation where the alleged abuse

(01:30):
had taken place.
Detective Grant McCall knew thatif the home had been examined,
the crime would have beenimpossible to commit.
With the approval of King Countyprosecutors and judges,
Detective McCall prompts theaccuser for specific responses
and pauses the recording to takea little break.
When there is no immediate replyregarding the anal suggestion,

(01:53):
McCall calls for a break,shutting off the recorder once
again, keeping in mind thatMcCall had already deleted
crucial evidence.
During the break, the narrativeof accusations miraculously
alters.
Detective Grant McCall switchesoff the recorder, influences the
false accuser, and uponresuming, the story has

(02:15):
transformed.
The transcript reads as follows.
Detective Grant McCall.
And you're certain his fingersdidn't penetrate your vagina?
Manipulated accuser.
Yes.
Detective Grant McCall.
What about your anus?
It's alright if you want to takea little break.
Manipulated accuser?

(02:35):
Unintelligible.
Just moments after the recordingrestarts, Detective McCall
simply says, okay.
No further commentary fromMcCall.
But now, post-break, themanipulated accuser has crafted
a narrative that alignsperfectly with McCall's
objectives.
Instantly, upon McCall's okay,the manipulated accuser begins

(02:59):
fabricating a story aboutconspiring events.
The manipulated accuserexplicitly stated, never like
penetrated me or anything.
King County prosecutors inSeattle subsequently
misrepresented the assertionbefore a jury that the
manipulated accuser had alwaysclaimed penetration by a finger.
City of Enum Clause Grant McCallcoordinated the false

(03:22):
accusations while his accomplicegroomed the situation, creating
a multi-tiered scenariosurrounding a hate crime.
Prosecutor Jason Simmons and histeam embraced these fabricated
claims and reshaped them into aharmful narrative aimed at a
righteous Christian church theyaimed to undermine.
Judge Laurie K.

(03:44):
Smith colluded with theprosecutors to systematically
obliterate truth and violate therights of the accused.
In his closing arguments,prosecutor Jason Simmons claimed
the manipulated accuser hadpreviously disclosed abuse to
social services.
This disinformation tacticdistorted the truth to an
egregious extent.

(04:05):
The manipulated accuser merelyindicated to social services
that she had been abused,lacking any specific details
other than that no penetrationoccurred again definitively.
No penetration had taken place.
To elevate the allegations to afelony status, Detective McCall

(04:26):
needed to introduce an assertionof penetration.
Detective Grant McCall suggestedand guided the accuser to assert
that a finger had been inserted.
At that instant, the manipulatedaccuser displayed hesitation,
stumbling over her words.
Detective McCall then halted therecording to claim they would

(04:46):
take a break.
Upon resuming, the fabricatednarrative regarding finger
insertion began to take shape.
Judge Lori K.
Smith and prosecutor JasonSimmons solidified this
contrived falsehood during thetrial as if the manipulated
accuser had consistentlymaintained this story from the
outset.

(05:07):
In reality, the claim of afinger event originated entirely
from Enum Claw detective GrantMcCall.
This is not a mere questionableallegation.
It represents a criminal actconcealed by the King County
prosecutors of Seattle,Washington.

SPEAKER_02 (05:25):
And every allegation comes from the detective.
Well, my uh my overall uhcomment was that this is uh an
absolutely terrible interview.

SPEAKER_01 (05:40):
Did Detective McCall ever give an opportunity for a
narrative response?

SPEAKER_02 (05:47):
No.

SPEAKER_01 (05:48):
Does this interview adhere to the basic tenets of
the Washington state guidelines?

SPEAKER_02 (05:54):
No.
I mean, this entire interview isnot acceptable.
Every single act, alleged act,is is suggested first by the
officer and um every act?
Yes, every act.
So the act that just talks abouttouching the chest and touching

(06:14):
the crotch first.
He talks about uh him touching,or excuse me, the complainant
touching the accused first.