August 7, 2025 • 14 mins
We want to make sure TDA's content remains relevant and useful. Fill out this 3 minute survey to tell us more about you!
This week, US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr announced he's cancelling 22 vaccine development projects worth $500 million, specifically targeting mRNA technology used in COVID-19 vaccines.
The decision has sparked concern from infectious disease experts who say it could leave America vulnerable to future pandemics.
On today’s podcast, we’re going to dive into what these cuts mean, why we’re seeing such dramatic changes in US health policy, and whether similar changes could come to Australia.
Hosts: Sam Koslowski and Billi FitzSimons
Producer: Orla Maher
Want to support The Daily Aus? That's so kind! The best way to do that is to click ‘follow’ on Spotify or Apple and to leave us a five-star review. We would be so grateful.
The Daily Aus is a media company focused on delivering accessible and digestible news to young people. We are completely independent.
Want more from TDA?
Subscribe to The Daily Aus newsletter
Subscribe to The Daily Aus’ YouTube Channel
Have feedback for us?
We’re always looking for new ways to improve what we do. If you’ve got feedback, we’re all ears. Tell us here.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Before we jump into today's podcast, We've got a really
quick ask of you to ensure this podcast remains really
relevant and useful to everyone listening. We'd love to learn
more about you. We've put a short survey in today's
show notes and would be so grateful if you could
fill it out. It'll only take a couple of minutes.
Thanks in advance for helping TDA. Now let's get into
(00:20):
it already, and this is this is the Daily this
is the Daily ODS.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Oh now it makes sense.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
Good morning, and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Friday,
the eighth of August.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
I'm Sam Kazlowski, I'm Billy Fitzsimon's.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
This week, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior announced
he's canceling twenty two vaccine development projects worth five hundred
million US dollars, specifically targeting mRNA technology used in COVID
nineteen vaccines. The decision has sparked concern from infectious disease experts,
who say could leave a man Erica vulnerable to future pandemics.
(01:02):
On today's podcast, we're going to dive into what these
cuts actually mean, why we're seeing such dramatic changes in
US health policy and where the similar changes could actually
come to Australia.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
So, Sam, this story all centers around RFK Junior, who
is now in charge of America's health policy. For anyone
who's not familiar with him, do you want to just
give us a quick overview about who is RFK Jr.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
Yeah, So this is the main character of this story,
I'd say so. Robert F. Kennedy Junior is Donald Trump's
Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
He's kind of like our Minister for health exactly.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
So it's the Mark Butler of America. He's from the
famous Kennedy political dynasty. He's the nephew of former President
John F. Kennedy. Now, before entering politics, RFK was an
environmental lawyer, but over the past twenty years he's become
a really prominent vaccine skeptic. He's repeatedly questioned vaccine, particularly
(02:01):
during the COVID pandemic, and he linked vaccines to autism
despite overwhelming scientific evidence showing no connection there. He founded
an organization called the Children's Health Defense that spreads what
experts say is vaccine misinformation. And what's really significant now is,
as you said, he is in charge of America's health system,
so he oversees multiple health agencies. The ones that we
(02:24):
would know and be familiar with would be the CDC,
the Center for Disease Control, and the FDA, which regulate
and recommend vaccines and medications.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
I remember the CDC, the Center of Disease Control, was
very prominent during the pandemic, so I think maybe a
lot of us would know it from.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
There Doctor Anthony Fauci, he was the figurehead.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Yes, so this was a pretty dramatic move from RFK
Junior to cut funding for a lot of vaccines in
the US. Do you want to just break down exactly
what that announcement was this week?
Speaker 1 (02:56):
Sure? So it was on Tuesday US time and RFK
got up and announced that the Department of Health and
Human Services will cancel contracts and pull funding for twenty
two projects. And when you bundle all of those projects together,
the total amount of funding being pulled is five hundred
million US dollars, which is about seven hundred and seventy
million Australian dollars.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
And is this funding into the rollout of vaccines or
funding into the research of future vaccines.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
It's more in that second bucket, So it's more about
the development of vaccines, particularly the ones that use mRNA
technology to fight respiratory viruses.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
Remind me what that is.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
So mRNA technology I'll get to in a sect. But
the respiratory viruses that we would know about from a
vaccine context would be COVID nineteen, the flu and bird flu. Familiar, yes,
And so the contracts being canceled, they involve some of
America's biggest pharmaceutical companies. We're talking about Pizer and Maderna,
and those are the companies that we know develops the
(03:55):
COVID nineteen mRNA vaccines. And so Kennedy comes out with
this video exp blaming his decision, and he says, to
replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of safer,
broader vaccine strategies like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms
that don't collapse when viruses mutate.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
And to translate that into US non scientific yes, folk.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
So basically what he's saying there is they're putting energy
and money into developing a universal vaccine. So what's one
vaccine that can adapt on the fly within the human
body and fight any virus? That comes along the weakness
with the mRNA vaccine. In Kennedy's view is that with
every iteration of a virus like COVID, you need a
(04:40):
new modification to the vaccine. And so he's looking for
this idea of a universal vaccine, a one stop shot.
Do you like that, I get it, instead of a
vaccine that when a virus mutates, isn't useful anymore.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
Okay, that makes sense. And to go back to my
earlier question, what exactly is MRNS technology?
Speaker 1 (05:01):
So basically, it's a type of technology where scientists create
a snippet of genetic code that carries instructions for how
the body can make a protein that can fight a virus.
So they pick a protein to target from a virus,
they inject the instruction manual into the code of the vaccine,
and your body then makes enough of that protein to
(05:22):
trigger a protection from the virus. So it basically helps
your body produce its own vaccine dose. Now, the big
advantage to mRNA technology is the speed at which it
can be developed, and that's something we talked a lot
about during the pandemic because mRNA vaccines were developed in
record time and in the early stages of the pandemic.
When we were talking about traditional vaccines, we were talking
(05:43):
about years of development time needed. mRNA vaccines can potentially
be created in months now. Infectious disease experts say that
the technology could be crucial for responding to future pandemics,
especially in current concerns around bird flow in the US
where it's potentially spreading to humans. Don't tell us that,
(06:04):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
That you can't tell us there's another pandemic on the way.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Well, I mean this has been a really interesting legacy
from the pandemic is looking at pandemic preparedness, and there's
a really interesting perspective for countries now of how ready
is a country if another pandemic was to arrive on
our doorstep.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
So what I'm hearing about mRNA technology is that the
value of it, its prime value is how speedy it
can be in responding to any new viruses that emerge.
But now RFK Junior has pulled funding from it. Now,
neither you or I are vaccine experts. So what have
the experts said about this?
Speaker 1 (06:41):
It's such an in depth area of science. Let's talk
about what the people who actually not going to talk
about are saying. So I mean, the basic concern is
that America could be caught unprepared for the next pandemic,
and experts argue that the rapid development capability of the
mRNA vaccines could be the difference between containing a new
virus quickly or facing another health crisis. So Jerome Adams,
(07:06):
who was the surgeon General for the bulk of Donald
Trump's first term, he wrote on X this week that
while he has tried to be objective and non alarmist
about recent decisions made by RFK jor, quite frankly, this
move is going to cost lives. And that's somebody who
was appointed by a Trump administration, which I thought was
really interesting. There's a leading academic expert on infectious diseases,
(07:28):
Mike Osterholm, and he said, I don't think I've seen
a more dangerous decision in public health in my fifty
years in the business. Wow.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
And obviously, Donald Trump, the US President, is the person
who appointed RFK Junior, so I imagine that he's in
support of this.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
He is, so he gave Kennedy really significant freedoms to
reshape American health policy. He's previously said he wants RFK
to quote go wild on health and food policy. It's
interesting with Trump because during his first presidency, Trump actually
horted the development of mRNA technology. It was called Operation
Warp Speed, and it was this big investment in funding
(08:07):
to develop COVID vaccines really quickly. At the time, Trump
called mRNA vaccines a medical miracle. Now, in recent years,
especially after the pandemic, he has expressed increasing skepticism about vaccines,
and we can, I guess, look to the fact that
he has appointed RFK Junior in this position as an
indication of where he stands on the issue. There's one
(08:29):
really interesting comment I wanted to tell you about. So
in the press conference this week with RFK Junior, when
asked whether Trump is satisfied with his performance in the
role in the first six months, RFK Junior said Trump
calls him multiple times a week, always with the same question,
why aren't people healthier?
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Yet?
Speaker 1 (08:47):
That was kind of cool. I mean, that's that very
blunt question, one way to describe it. Very interesting. I
would yeah, yeah, I can only imagine the conversation those
two are having.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
Yeah, And I want to go back to something you
said earlier, because what you're sa said is that RFK
Junior is not saying that we should cut vaccines all together.
From what you said, you're saying that he thinks that
there should be a universal vaccine. What does that look
like and is that possible?
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Well, it's largely theoretical at this stage. That's according to
scientists and experts in the field. Scientists have been trying
to develop an idea of a universal vaccine, even just
a universal flu vaccine, for decades and they haven't been
able to be successful in that. Essentially, a universal vaccine
would mimic natural immunity and it would then be effective
(09:36):
against both coronavirus and flu, but also any other virus
that we might not even know about yet, and it
essentially would stimulate the body's natural immunity function. As I said,
it's a promising idea, but scientists have no timeline on
how this can be developed and if and when it
could be available in the wider market.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
And if we were to bring this back to an
Australian context, is there any signal from the Australian government
that they will move in a similar direction at all
in line with the US.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
No signal at all, really, I mean, there hasn't been
a direct response to rfk's policy changes this week. But
we can look to the investment in vaccine research and
roll out as a pretty safe it's bipartisan as it's
supported by everyone, it's part of our health framework, So
I can pretty safely say that the government would not
be looking to follow this path in Australia.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
It's bipartisan, I meaning it's supported by basically both sides
of Parliament or all sides of Parliament.
Speaker 1 (10:35):
Yes, But what I did think was interesting is that
there has been a number of stories that have come
into the news over the last couple of months about
the changing attitudes of Australians towards the flu vaccine. For example,
there's been a steady decline in the percentage of adults
in Australia who are getting the flu vaccine, and hospital
admissions from flu have spiked this year by up to
fifty percent in some states. And at twenty twenty four
(10:58):
survey published in the Media Journal of Australia found that
about one in five said they would not get a
government offered vaccine in a future public health emergency, while
another seventeen percent said they were uncertain whether they would
or wouldn't. So we can kind of say that about
forty percent of Australians are either hesitant or outright against
(11:18):
a government offered vaccine.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
It would be interesting to know what those stats were
prior to the pandemic and to kind of look at
how it's changed since. But I think from everything that
you've said, it's clear that they kind of are seemingly
changing attitudes about.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Vaccinations definitely, and there's a clear delineation from pre pandemic
attitudes to post pandemic attitudes, particularly in children. And that
was something that our Health Minister Mark Butler touched on
in June when he got up and released a new
national immunization strategy.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Do you mean children getting vaccinations or the attitudes of children?
Speaker 1 (11:55):
No, so I don't the type of age of children
we're talking about here probably don't have vaccine attitudes just
yet at six months to three, right, But the attitude
of their parents to be getting children vaccinated has changed
and it's kind of going down about one or two
percent a year. So Mark Butler got up in June
and released this new national strategy, and part of that
(12:16):
strategy was a direct opposition to another move that RFK did.
RFK had announced a couple of weeks before that that
America would withdraw its funding for GAVY, which is the
Global Vaccine Alliance in Mark Butler's strategy. He announced a
three hundred and eighty six million boost in funding to
that body between twenty twenty six and twenty thirty. One
(12:37):
interesting angle that we can talk about in terms of
the effect of rfk's decision this week is actually the
opportunities it presents in terms of Australia's capabilities to make
and even one day export mRNA vaccines. So CSL and
Maderna they're the two biggest producers of mRNA vaccines in Australia.
They've got large vaccination facilities now in the country. Experts
(13:01):
say that Australia wouldn't be quite prepared today if there
was another pandemic to roll out rapidly and universally a
vaccine program. So we're not quite at the stage where
we would look at exporting it to other countries. But
if you think about how much America produces in this space,
if that was all cut, there would be some openings
in the global export landscape, which is a quirky way
(13:24):
to look at it, but an interesting to take.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
So interesting such a topical story at the moment, Sam,
thank you for explaining it to us. Thanks Billy, and
thank you so much for listening to this episode of
The Daily os. We'll be back this afternoon with your
evening headlines, but until then, have a great day. My
name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda Bungelung
(13:46):
Caalcuttin woman from Gadigol Country. The Daily oz acknowledges that
this podcast is recorded on the lands of the Gadighl
people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Island and nations. We pay our respects to the first
people of these countries, both past and present.
Before we jump into today's podcast, We've got a really
quick ask of you to ensure this podcast remains really
relevant and useful to everyone listening. We'd love to learn
more about you. We've put a short survey in today's
show notes and would be so grateful if you could
fill it out. It'll only take a couple of minutes.
Thanks in advance for helping TDA. Now let's get into
(00:20):
it already, and this is this is the Daily this
is the Daily ODS.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Oh now it makes sense.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
Good morning, and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Friday,
the eighth of August.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
I'm Sam Kazlowski, I'm Billy Fitzsimon's.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
This week, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior announced
he's canceling twenty two vaccine development projects worth five hundred
million US dollars, specifically targeting mRNA technology used in COVID
nineteen vaccines. The decision has sparked concern from infectious disease experts,
who say could leave a man Erica vulnerable to future pandemics.
(01:02):
On today's podcast, we're going to dive into what these
cuts actually mean, why we're seeing such dramatic changes in
US health policy and where the similar changes could actually
come to Australia.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
So, Sam, this story all centers around RFK Junior, who
is now in charge of America's health policy. For anyone
who's not familiar with him, do you want to just
give us a quick overview about who is RFK Jr.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
Yeah, So this is the main character of this story,
I'd say so. Robert F. Kennedy Junior is Donald Trump's
Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
He's kind of like our Minister for health exactly.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
So it's the Mark Butler of America. He's from the
famous Kennedy political dynasty. He's the nephew of former President
John F. Kennedy. Now, before entering politics, RFK was an
environmental lawyer, but over the past twenty years he's become
a really prominent vaccine skeptic. He's repeatedly questioned vaccine, particularly
(02:01):
during the COVID pandemic, and he linked vaccines to autism
despite overwhelming scientific evidence showing no connection there. He founded
an organization called the Children's Health Defense that spreads what
experts say is vaccine misinformation. And what's really significant now is,
as you said, he is in charge of America's health system,
so he oversees multiple health agencies. The ones that we
(02:24):
would know and be familiar with would be the CDC,
the Center for Disease Control, and the FDA, which regulate
and recommend vaccines and medications.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
I remember the CDC, the Center of Disease Control, was
very prominent during the pandemic, so I think maybe a
lot of us would know it from.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
There Doctor Anthony Fauci, he was the figurehead.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Yes, so this was a pretty dramatic move from RFK
Junior to cut funding for a lot of vaccines in
the US. Do you want to just break down exactly
what that announcement was this week?
Speaker 1 (02:56):
Sure? So it was on Tuesday US time and RFK
got up and announced that the Department of Health and
Human Services will cancel contracts and pull funding for twenty
two projects. And when you bundle all of those projects together,
the total amount of funding being pulled is five hundred
million US dollars, which is about seven hundred and seventy
million Australian dollars.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
And is this funding into the rollout of vaccines or
funding into the research of future vaccines.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
It's more in that second bucket, So it's more about
the development of vaccines, particularly the ones that use mRNA
technology to fight respiratory viruses.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
Remind me what that is.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
So mRNA technology I'll get to in a sect. But
the respiratory viruses that we would know about from a
vaccine context would be COVID nineteen, the flu and bird flu. Familiar, yes,
And so the contracts being canceled, they involve some of
America's biggest pharmaceutical companies. We're talking about Pizer and Maderna,
and those are the companies that we know develops the
(03:55):
COVID nineteen mRNA vaccines. And so Kennedy comes out with
this video exp blaming his decision, and he says, to
replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of safer,
broader vaccine strategies like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms
that don't collapse when viruses mutate.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
And to translate that into US non scientific yes, folk.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
So basically what he's saying there is they're putting energy
and money into developing a universal vaccine. So what's one
vaccine that can adapt on the fly within the human
body and fight any virus? That comes along the weakness
with the mRNA vaccine. In Kennedy's view is that with
every iteration of a virus like COVID, you need a
(04:40):
new modification to the vaccine. And so he's looking for
this idea of a universal vaccine, a one stop shot.
Do you like that, I get it, instead of a
vaccine that when a virus mutates, isn't useful anymore.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
Okay, that makes sense. And to go back to my
earlier question, what exactly is MRNS technology?
Speaker 1 (05:01):
So basically, it's a type of technology where scientists create
a snippet of genetic code that carries instructions for how
the body can make a protein that can fight a virus.
So they pick a protein to target from a virus,
they inject the instruction manual into the code of the vaccine,
and your body then makes enough of that protein to
(05:22):
trigger a protection from the virus. So it basically helps
your body produce its own vaccine dose. Now, the big
advantage to mRNA technology is the speed at which it
can be developed, and that's something we talked a lot
about during the pandemic because mRNA vaccines were developed in
record time and in the early stages of the pandemic.
When we were talking about traditional vaccines, we were talking
(05:43):
about years of development time needed. mRNA vaccines can potentially
be created in months now. Infectious disease experts say that
the technology could be crucial for responding to future pandemics,
especially in current concerns around bird flow in the US
where it's potentially spreading to humans. Don't tell us that,
(06:04):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
That you can't tell us there's another pandemic on the way.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Well, I mean this has been a really interesting legacy
from the pandemic is looking at pandemic preparedness, and there's
a really interesting perspective for countries now of how ready
is a country if another pandemic was to arrive on
our doorstep.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
So what I'm hearing about mRNA technology is that the
value of it, its prime value is how speedy it
can be in responding to any new viruses that emerge.
But now RFK Junior has pulled funding from it. Now,
neither you or I are vaccine experts. So what have
the experts said about this?
Speaker 1 (06:41):
It's such an in depth area of science. Let's talk
about what the people who actually not going to talk
about are saying. So I mean, the basic concern is
that America could be caught unprepared for the next pandemic,
and experts argue that the rapid development capability of the
mRNA vaccines could be the difference between containing a new
virus quickly or facing another health crisis. So Jerome Adams,
(07:06):
who was the surgeon General for the bulk of Donald
Trump's first term, he wrote on X this week that
while he has tried to be objective and non alarmist
about recent decisions made by RFK jor, quite frankly, this
move is going to cost lives. And that's somebody who
was appointed by a Trump administration, which I thought was
really interesting. There's a leading academic expert on infectious diseases,
(07:28):
Mike Osterholm, and he said, I don't think I've seen
a more dangerous decision in public health in my fifty
years in the business. Wow.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
And obviously, Donald Trump, the US President, is the person
who appointed RFK Junior, so I imagine that he's in
support of this.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
He is, so he gave Kennedy really significant freedoms to
reshape American health policy. He's previously said he wants RFK
to quote go wild on health and food policy. It's
interesting with Trump because during his first presidency, Trump actually
horted the development of mRNA technology. It was called Operation
Warp Speed, and it was this big investment in funding
(08:07):
to develop COVID vaccines really quickly. At the time, Trump
called mRNA vaccines a medical miracle. Now, in recent years,
especially after the pandemic, he has expressed increasing skepticism about vaccines,
and we can, I guess, look to the fact that
he has appointed RFK Junior in this position as an
indication of where he stands on the issue. There's one
(08:29):
really interesting comment I wanted to tell you about. So
in the press conference this week with RFK Junior, when
asked whether Trump is satisfied with his performance in the
role in the first six months, RFK Junior said Trump
calls him multiple times a week, always with the same question,
why aren't people healthier?
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Yet?
Speaker 1 (08:47):
That was kind of cool. I mean, that's that very
blunt question, one way to describe it. Very interesting. I
would yeah, yeah, I can only imagine the conversation those
two are having.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
Yeah, And I want to go back to something you
said earlier, because what you're sa said is that RFK
Junior is not saying that we should cut vaccines all together.
From what you said, you're saying that he thinks that
there should be a universal vaccine. What does that look
like and is that possible?
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Well, it's largely theoretical at this stage. That's according to
scientists and experts in the field. Scientists have been trying
to develop an idea of a universal vaccine, even just
a universal flu vaccine, for decades and they haven't been
able to be successful in that. Essentially, a universal vaccine
would mimic natural immunity and it would then be effective
(09:36):
against both coronavirus and flu, but also any other virus
that we might not even know about yet, and it
essentially would stimulate the body's natural immunity function. As I said,
it's a promising idea, but scientists have no timeline on
how this can be developed and if and when it
could be available in the wider market.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
And if we were to bring this back to an
Australian context, is there any signal from the Australian government
that they will move in a similar direction at all
in line with the US.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
No signal at all, really, I mean, there hasn't been
a direct response to rfk's policy changes this week. But
we can look to the investment in vaccine research and
roll out as a pretty safe it's bipartisan as it's
supported by everyone, it's part of our health framework, So
I can pretty safely say that the government would not
be looking to follow this path in Australia.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
It's bipartisan, I meaning it's supported by basically both sides
of Parliament or all sides of Parliament.
Speaker 1 (10:35):
Yes, But what I did think was interesting is that
there has been a number of stories that have come
into the news over the last couple of months about
the changing attitudes of Australians towards the flu vaccine. For example,
there's been a steady decline in the percentage of adults
in Australia who are getting the flu vaccine, and hospital
admissions from flu have spiked this year by up to
fifty percent in some states. And at twenty twenty four
(10:58):
survey published in the Media Journal of Australia found that
about one in five said they would not get a
government offered vaccine in a future public health emergency, while
another seventeen percent said they were uncertain whether they would
or wouldn't. So we can kind of say that about
forty percent of Australians are either hesitant or outright against
(11:18):
a government offered vaccine.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
It would be interesting to know what those stats were
prior to the pandemic and to kind of look at
how it's changed since. But I think from everything that
you've said, it's clear that they kind of are seemingly
changing attitudes about.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Vaccinations definitely, and there's a clear delineation from pre pandemic
attitudes to post pandemic attitudes, particularly in children. And that
was something that our Health Minister Mark Butler touched on
in June when he got up and released a new
national immunization strategy.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Do you mean children getting vaccinations or the attitudes of children?
Speaker 1 (11:55):
No, so I don't the type of age of children
we're talking about here probably don't have vaccine attitudes just
yet at six months to three, right, But the attitude
of their parents to be getting children vaccinated has changed
and it's kind of going down about one or two
percent a year. So Mark Butler got up in June
and released this new national strategy, and part of that
(12:16):
strategy was a direct opposition to another move that RFK did.
RFK had announced a couple of weeks before that that
America would withdraw its funding for GAVY, which is the
Global Vaccine Alliance in Mark Butler's strategy. He announced a
three hundred and eighty six million boost in funding to
that body between twenty twenty six and twenty thirty. One
(12:37):
interesting angle that we can talk about in terms of
the effect of rfk's decision this week is actually the
opportunities it presents in terms of Australia's capabilities to make
and even one day export mRNA vaccines. So CSL and
Maderna they're the two biggest producers of mRNA vaccines in Australia.
They've got large vaccination facilities now in the country. Experts
(13:01):
say that Australia wouldn't be quite prepared today if there
was another pandemic to roll out rapidly and universally a
vaccine program. So we're not quite at the stage where
we would look at exporting it to other countries. But
if you think about how much America produces in this space,
if that was all cut, there would be some openings
in the global export landscape, which is a quirky way
(13:24):
to look at it, but an interesting to take.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
So interesting such a topical story at the moment, Sam,
thank you for explaining it to us. Thanks Billy, and
thank you so much for listening to this episode of
The Daily os. We'll be back this afternoon with your
evening headlines, but until then, have a great day. My
name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Arunda Bungelung
(13:46):
Caalcuttin woman from Gadigol Country. The Daily oz acknowledges that
this podcast is recorded on the lands of the Gadighl
people and pays respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Island and nations. We pay our respects to the first
people of these countries, both past and present.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!