January 21, 2025 • 29 mins
Join Allison and Joe DuBois as they delve into the complex world of psychic mediums and unsolved murder cases, with a focus on the haunting JonBenet Ramsey case. They explore why, despite the presence of psychics, some mysteries remain unresolved and discuss the challenges that arise when law enforcement and psychic insights intersect. The conversation also touches on the spiritual implications of reincarnation and the afterlife, particularly regarding those who commit heinous crimes against children. With rich insights and personal anecdotes, Allison and Joe aim to shed light on the connections between the living and the deceased, emphasizing the importance of healing and moving forward after loss. Tune in for a thought-provoking exploration of life, death, and the mysteries that linger in between.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:05):
Welcome to the Dead Life.
Here's world renowned mediumAlison Dubois.
Today on the Dead Life, I'llbe taking questions from my listeners
who have questions aboutmurder and about mediums communicating
with victims who have passed.
Joe will be joining me instudio to help field calling questions.
Joe's seen me work enough cases.
(00:25):
He will share his insight.
So stay tuned to book areading with me.
Emailus@bookinglisondubois.com you can
follow me on Instagramediamalison or you can watch me on
YouTube to see new and pastepisodes of the Dead Life.
Please like and subscribe ifyou have a life question for me and
Sophia for my Love Me, Love Menot segment.
(00:48):
Leave your questions at 802-332-3811.
Don't forget to pick up abottle of my Divination 22 money
potion, vodka or love potionat one handsome bastard in Old Town
Scottsdale to set yourintentions for 2025.
Well, Joe, welcome.
(01:08):
Hi.
Hi.
Good to have you back.
It's been a little bit, butI'm excited.
It's been busy.
Yes, it's been busy, yes.
So we had a lot of call insfrom the cold case segments that
we had done in the past last year.
And so we're going to beanswering some of the questions they
(01:29):
have today.
Great.
Okay.
Do you want to jump right in?
Yep, let's do it.
Hi, this is Lyndee calling andI've been a follower of yours for
quite a while and I'm just alittle curious because I am interested
in the JonBenet case and Iwanted to know why it is that there
(01:50):
isn't a psychic out there tothat may have contacted her on the
other side to try to find outthe answers to all of these unsolved
questions that are out thereabout her and maybe others.
I know you have done an awfullot of work with the police and investigations,
so I thought maybe you couldshed some light on that for me because
(02:10):
I'm very confused.
I've been watching a lot ofYouTube videos about it and Netflix
and I'm trying to grasp on tojust that basic question.
Why is it that somebody hasn'talready talked to her?
Because I do know there's apsychic in England that said that
Princess Diana was actually inan accident.
(02:31):
It was not, you know, designedto kill her and all that fun stuff.
Anyway, thank you very much,Allison, and I look forward to hearing
your answer.
Okay, so as far as the psychicin England, I can't really comment
on that because I'm not inthat person's head.
I.
You know, they.
(02:51):
Their sense is that it's an accident.
Other psychics have differenttakes, which is why I teach my students
to always follow your owninformation and not listen to the
information from other peoplethat are in the same business, because
it can skew what your naturalimpressions are that you get on a
(03:13):
case.
So I've actually broughtPrincess Diana through before.
I didn't know that's who I wasgonna bring through, but you'll remember,
Joe.
I do.
When I was studied byscientists at the University of Arizona,
she ended up being one of the people.
And I came out of the lab roomfive minutes after being in there,
and I was just like, if thisisn't Princess Diana, just stop the
(03:37):
test.
Because that's all I keep getting.
And it ended up that on theother side of the partition was a
friend of Princess Dianabecause it was a blind test where
we couldn't see who.
Right.
I remember that because you were.
And they didn't even tell youright away.
You're like, this better bethis, or just stop it.
Well, they still had LaurieCampbell that had to go in and give
her impressions, so they don'twant to taint us.
(04:00):
So she got the same thing.
She walked in the holding roomafterwards, and she's like, did you
get Princess Diana?
She's like, that's all I was getting.
I was like, me, too.
So it's funny, with LaurieCampbell, she and I, our information
always backed up the other one.
We just were on the samewavelength when it came to cases
and bringing through the dead.
(04:21):
As far as JonBenet goes, Iknow that that Netflix special that
they had, and speaking withthe dad.
And then I'm friends withAshley Flowers, who has her own theories
and podcast Crime Junkie.
And so I know a lot's been out there.
I will say I think it'simportant to add JonBenet when she
(04:46):
went missing or not wentmissing when she was murdered.
That was, I believe, like 97or late 90s somewhere in there and
somewhere around there.
And I was a young mom.
I was, like, 25 or 26 at the time.
So everything on her case waspublicized and on the news, which
(05:13):
is why I don't comment onJonBenet, because I was completely
tainted by every news specialthat every network ran at that time.
And so I couldn't come incompletely clear with no information,
which is how I like to workcases, because I had seen everything,
because that predated meactually being a professional psychic
(05:36):
medium.
I was gonna Say that wasbefore you were working cases, and.
And so you.
Yeah, right.
You watch the news likeeverybody else.
I was just a civilian at the time.
And so, yeah, we saweverything on that little girl.
And it was highly, highlypublicized, which even all these
years later, it still isbecause people wanted some conclusion
(06:00):
to it.
In addition to that, in myopinions on her case, any that I
might have, I will say I thinkthe police that were working the
case messed a lot up.
No offense to them.
I'm sure they did the bestthey could, but there seemed to be
some politics involved in thearea that she had disappeared in
(06:22):
in Colorado.
And I.
Psychics and mediums can giveyou their impressions, but if you
don't have law enforcementthat you can work with that's going
to apply your informationdirectly and accurately, you're not
gonna get anywhere on a case.
Because we're not policemen,we're not police detectives.
We have no power in the legalarena when it comes to cases.
(06:47):
So we can only assist if theopportunity is there to do so.
So that would be a problem.
That's a big hurdle with her case.
We did just go into a nine year.
So with it being a year ofendings, you may be seeing cases
such as hers either come to aconclusion or finally have answers
(07:08):
this year.
So I'm very hopeful for thatin 2025.
I know that this case ishighly sensationalized and people
really want some justice for her.
All these years later, themurderer, whoever assaulted and murdered
her, has already gotten, youknow, 25 plus years to actually be
(07:33):
able to live their lives.
And it shouldn't have gonethat way with all the DNA that we
are.
We have at our disposal now,however, because of how it was worked
at the time, and they keptfocusing on her father, I think that
created problems in how it wasworked when it came to that.
(07:56):
But the family's naturally thefirst place for them to look.
Understood.
And of course that's rightful,that they should start there.
You need to eliminate suspects.
And that's what they weretrying to do.
I think the ransom note madethings very confusing and seemed
to maybe point towards theparents, because the ransom note
(08:18):
was in the home.
And how do you not go throughevery square inch of the house that
she disappeared from her bedroom?
I mean, we would say asparents, we would go through every
square inch of the house inthat first hour of recognizing that
she wasn't in her bed.
(08:39):
And that didn't happen.
But even the police wentthrough the house and also didn't
go to that basement room untillater hours, hours into the investigation.
And that raises some questionsright there because there should
have been quite a bit of DNA.
I believe they have some thatwas left behind from the sexual assault.
(09:02):
I don't have all the answersbecause I don't know what they're
doing behind the scenes.
I will say I am shocked thatthey weren't able to run that DNA
and at least plug it into.
I know that they can do familytrees where they plug it in and they
start connecting the dots,working backwards through certain
(09:25):
relatives that pop up untilthey are able to get to a suspect
that they can run DNA on for acomparison to whatever material they
were able to collect from hercrime scene.
So with that being the case, Iam shocked that that hasn't happened,
given that we have the toolsat our disposal now to do that.
(09:48):
And that would be the best betin ironclad being able to say it
was this person that left thegenetic material at the crime scene
where she was murdered.
So I wish they would do that.
They didn't mention that onany of the, on the new shows.
You know, I'm going to have totalk to Ashley about that because
(10:09):
Ashley flowers, because Idon't understand how they weren't
able to run.
And you know, again, she's apodcaster, I'm a podcaster.
We don't have the power or thecontrol the say so or the access
to the actual DNA informationto do what we think would ultimately
give the suspect and put aface and a name to the person that
(10:32):
killed JonBenet.
They're saying that thegenetic material did not belong to
anyone in her family.
I would like they would know that.
They would know that.
But we would all like to seesome of the proof of that, the paperwork,
especially given that thepolice seem to have kind of had a
messy investigation in thepress for years and also saying we're
(10:55):
working on it, and then havingyears and years and more years passed.
And I've seen TV specials, asmany people have, where they do take
the DNA and are able toassemble a family tree and trace
back to a suspect who wasliving in the area at the time that
certain crimes happened.
And so that would give us aconcrete answer.
(11:16):
Now they're saying that theyput the DNA into the system and it
didn't hit, meaning that itwasn't already in the system because
the person was in prison orworked for the government or already
had previously been enteredinto the system.
But even if that's the case,even if they, their DNA wasn't already
in the system, you can stillconstruct a family tree from the
(11:39):
DNA and through process ofelimination, develop a suspect.
So I would like to see that happen.
I don't know if that answersLindsay's question, but I'll say
the psychic mediums can giveimpressions, but at the end of the
day, it comes down to proof,the evidence, and whether or not
our information is actuallyfollowed up on.
Could we talk to JonBenet?
(12:00):
Here's the thing.
If I'm sitting there withsomebody who loves her, that's related
to her, connected to her, Icould bring her through.
She's going to want to talkabout how she feels about that person.
She would talk about memoriesshe made with them.
She would talk about things,the moments that made her happy.
Her versions of heaven on Earth.
(12:21):
That's what she would talk about.
Do they give some detailsaround crimes?
Sometimes if I ask and theywill start giving me impressions
of.
Of what was the motivation toa crime or whether or not they knew
very young and whether or notthey knew the person who was part
(12:42):
of that crime.
But especially with children,they don't want to go back to the
moment they were raped and murdered.
That's the place, the part oftheir life that they stay away from
because they're everythinggood, everything pure.
And it's.
It's scary for them to have torevisit those moments.
So often after they pass, theyabsolutely move on into moments of
(13:02):
their life where life was kindto them, where life was, you know,
warm and happy.
So getting the deceased, theirspirit, to want to revisit the crime
is often difficult in thatthey are repelled by that ending
to their life, especially ifit's violent.
(13:24):
So you did warn me this wasgoing to be a heavy week.
You have delivered next week.
I know you'll have a lighter week.
So everybody stay tuned for that.
So the question, I guess towrap up JonBenet, you kind of said
earlier that maybe somethingwith it being a nine year, there
(13:46):
might be a shift this year.
Do you feel that?
Or is that you're just readingthat the year in itself brings a
lot.
Well, this year is going tobring a lot of conclusion to questions
that we've had.
So who killed jfk?
This would be a year that youwould get the answer to something
like that.
Who killed JonBenet?
(14:06):
This would be a night.
So when people are afraid ofnine years, because as.
As we know, it is a year of endings.
A year of endings can put anend to things that were painful in
the past and had no Conclusion.
So I think you're going to seea lot of secrets be revealed this
year.
I think the news cycle isgoing to be insanely interesting
(14:29):
to follow.
Most importantly, I thinkwe're going to get answers to a lot
of the questions we've had assecrets start to be uncovered, including
in our own government, inother governments, in other countries.
You're going to see a lot ofanswers that will disturb you on
(14:50):
some levels, but give you theanswers you're looking for.
So with JonBenet, no matterwho they are able to connect to her
murder, it will be disturbinggiven that we know all the details
around what was done to thatlittle girl.
And the same goes for with JJ.
(15:11):
Who killed JFK.
And do we really want those answers?
Well, yes, we do.
So one could sort of spitballthat his file's been kept under wraps
for so long because it'shighly likely that there was some
government interference aroundhis assassination.
Yeah, that is a big mysterybecause it has been long enough that
(15:34):
anybody really that was aliveisn't or is certainly not still on
the job.
So.
And then even other countriesthat we dealt with have changed administrations
or even government enough thatthat can't be it.
It has to be an implication ofone of our own bureaucracies, one
(16:00):
of.
Our own government institutions.
Yeah.
Because otherwise, if it wasan individual, they wouldn't have
had a problem unveiling whodid it.
Because they'd be like, yeah,they'd be like, this is who did it.
Not our fault.
We did the best we could.
But that's not what's happenedover the last 60 years.
(16:21):
What we've seen is a lot ofwill get elect me and I'll open the
file.
And then it never gets open.
Well, now we've got a newadministration coming in that doesn't
seem to be afraid of cracking heads.
And so we'll see what happens there.
They could have opened it thelast time too.
I mean, devil's advocate, right?
(16:42):
Timing is everything.
And I'm telling you, this nineyear is gonna reveal a lot.
And I just wanted to reemphasize the astrological episode
that I did with Tom McMullen.
He did talk about the fires.
I talked about it beingCalifornia because unfortunately,
California doesn't do theproper deforestation and the taking
(17:06):
out of dead shrubbery andmaintenance of the land, nor the
do the people around their own homes.
So to me, when he said therewere gonna be fires, it felt obvious
that it was gonna be in California.
I do wanna remind people healso talked about earthquakes.
So maybe Go back and listen tothat episode.
(17:26):
Because the last thingCalifornia needs is an earthquake
on top of that fire in Pacific Palisades.
And after living inCalifornia, there are things, and
they do publish it.
Things for people to beprepared, have some water, have your
little kit of some food andthings that you might need.
(17:48):
A full reservoir would help.
But yeah, for earthquakes, forthe earthquake, yeah, there's everything.
Be prepared, be prepared, asprepared as you can be.
With an earthquake, there's alot less you can do for that than
you could for, say, a fire.
But there is going to be a lotof upheaval in areas in our own country
(18:13):
and in other countries thatwill involve fire and as Tom said,
high winds and then earthquakes.
So I asked him about thatbecause I was getting ready to go
on Danica Patrick's podcastthis week and he said it's not even
close to over.
Oh, no.
So that was hard to hear from him.
(18:35):
So needless to say, we'regoing to see more involved in this.
It is very revealing.
You're going to see peopleshift in their beliefs through their
anger and dissatisfaction.
You will see governments change.
So it's going to be a verypowerful year.
But remember, next year's aone year, a year of new beginnings
(18:57):
and we get to write a wholenew nine year cycle chapter.
So we're just going to see thetrash get taken out this year.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
Little house cleaning.
Okay, let's go on to Felicia.
Great.
Hi, Allison, My name is Felicia.
My question is, and I've beena fan of yours since the medium.
(19:23):
Of course.
Yeah.
So my mom, she passed away 25plus years ago and my sister and
I no longer feel her around.
So we were wondering if she'sbeen reincarnated.
Possibly.
Maybe that's why we don't feelher around anymore.
(19:46):
I felt her in the beginningand maybe sometimes I still feel
her.
My sister no longer feels herat all.
And so we're wondering, maybeshe's been reincarnated.
I thought that you beingreincarnated does not mean that you're
(20:08):
no longer with your loved ones.
I thought that you could split yourself.
Maybe that I heard wrong.
And my next question is, wheredoes one go?
Who harms children sexually?
Do they go to heaven?
Do they have a life review andthen go to heaven?
(20:34):
Yeah.
So wondering where to go.
Who harms children sexually?
Thank you so much.
So I told you it was going tobe a little dark in this week's podcast
episodes, but all importantquestions to be answered at the same
time.
Absolutely.
So Felicia, thank you forcalling in.
(20:56):
I think this is a questionthat will be helpful for a lot of
people to hear that they havethe same question she does.
So Felicia and her sister nolonger feel her mother around.
This is very common.
Often when people die thefirst few years after they die, they
really make their presence known.
(21:17):
They're around.
They give you signs.
They really try and let youknow they're not gone.
You're not an orphan.
I'm still part of your life.
All of those beautifulaspects, too, that there is no end
to our connection or our love.
So sometimes, and actuallyquite often, if someone who passed
(21:40):
feels like you're not healing,you're not moving forward in that
process since they passed,they'll pull their energy back so
that you don't feel them.
It doesn't mean they're notaround, but they'll pull their energy
back to try and get you toengage in life and not sit in the
misery of mourning them and inthe grief of their death.
(22:04):
But rather you're sort offorced to re engage with the living
because you don't have themthere as much to try to engage with.
So people who startdisconnecting with the living world
because they want to be morein the world with the person they
love that died, you'll see apullback from the person that died
(22:27):
of their energy and the signs,because they're trying to get you
to jumpstart your life back tothe land of the living.
Now, once you do that, theymake their presence known again,
and you'll get more of thesigns and the communication, but
for the time being, and mysense is Felicia's sister's having
a really hard time with themother's passing.
(22:49):
If they feel like you're nothealing and that their presence is
somehow hurting you becauseit's making you miss them even more,
and it becomes destructive inthat way, they pull their energy
back.
So I'm not surprised to hearthat happen.
But again, Felicia, it doesn'tmean Mom's not around.
Keep talking to her and justmove through your life and say, hey,
(23:13):
mom, look, I'm taking thatcruise we always wanted to take together
and we didn't get a take.
And when they see that theirpresence in your life is a positive
thing, they'll actually startre engaging with you where you're
able to see that they're therethrough signs and communication.
So, second part, people whoharm children sexually.
(23:37):
So this is what I've seen onthe other side because I have brought
through a few fathers,unfortunately, who molested their
daughters, and now theirdaughters were grown and had come
to me for readings, obviouslyunbeknownst to me what the relationship
was.
But it ended up coming out inthe reading once I started sensing
(23:58):
that there was no remorse fromsome of the.
The men who had passed who hadcommitted these heinous offenses.
So what I saw in thosereadings is that they were around
people that had like energy to theirs.
So in other words, all of thechild molesters, all of the people
(24:20):
who rape were in the samearea, same low frequency energy area
that.
So they all resided in thatsame low energy place which was very
dark.
So you create your own hell.
So in a sense, that's what itseemed to be because they had no
(24:42):
victims there.
So for them, unfortunately,not all souls learn on the other
side or want to evolve.
And I can't explain why thatis, but there is movement in our
souls and some of us feelcompelled to be better people or
(25:05):
to help those around us.
And that grows your soul andit raises your frequency.
Some people choose to notengage in that way and are destructive
in that they want to tear downthings around them that are bright
light or that are higher frequencies.
They resent you.
(25:26):
They want to destroy thathappiness and peace of mind within
you.
And when I see pedophiles andpeople who rape, there seems to be
some sense of enjoyment forthem that they're going to be able
to tear down your soul andlower your energy frequency.
(25:49):
So I just wanted to.
Everything comes back to frequencies.
Oddly, it does.
So I wanted to go over that.
Yeah, I mean, that's really deep.
It was an interesting additionto what we'd just been talking about
with the previous caller.
(26:09):
And as far as people notfeeling their loved ones, I've heard
that I schedule your callsfrom time to time and I hear that
from people.
And do you ever think thatthey get so accustomed to them being
around that it just feels, ina sense, normal?
(26:29):
No, they can feel them aroundand they can feel an energy shift
when their presence isn't felt.
But again, it doesn't meanthey're not there.
They intentionally pull theirenergy back so you can't feel it,
but they're still seeing yourlife unfold.
And then I wanted to add onemore part to people who harm children.
And this is the big questionthat I have that I'd like an answer
(26:52):
to when I die.
I do see that there are somesouls that are destructive and again
exist to tear down biologically.
If somebody's brain isn't puttogether right and I know that they've
started studying the mindslike the brains of killers.
(27:13):
And I know that they had askedfor a donation of Jeffrey Dahmer's
Brain for Science because theywant to look at this biologically.
If you're impeded and you'redoing things that you in a sense
can't control, if you have nobuilt in mechanism in your brain
(27:34):
and that in any way affectsthe decisions you're making and the
crimes you're committing, I dowonder if their souls, if they're
in a healthy physical body, ifthey were to come back, if they would
live a different life.
So I do have a question aroundthat when I pass that, I'll want
(27:56):
to know.
I think if they came back andhad that history, that that would
haunt them at some level.
And then what is that?
You know, if they have thatenergy of guilt that they're born
with, what do they become?
Do they become a priest thatwants to help people or a doctor
(28:17):
who wants to save people tosomehow karmically make up for the
destruction that they causedin a past lifetime?
So there's just so many facetsto the universe.
I can only look at what I knowto be true from my own experience,
but also some questions that Ihave around this particularly difficult
(28:40):
topic.
And I do know that biology canaffect a soul's experience in this
world, but I also know thatsome souls don't have remorse that
are on the other side.
So that leaves me with a lotof questions.
Tune in next week for part twoof our conversations from my Collins
(29:00):
about murder and psychicmediums and how we connect with deceased
victims.
What do they say to us?
What do the souls of murder say?
So, Joe, thank you for yourintellect and time.
Oh, you're welcome.
And thank you to my listenersfor tuning in.
Tune in next week for part twoof a fresh episode of the Dead Life.
(29:25):
I'm Alison Dubois.
This is the Dead Life Life.
And to all of my believers,don't stop believing.
Join us next week on the Deadlife.
And don't forget to subscribenow to get notified of every new
episode.
Welcome to the Dead Life.
Here's world renowned mediumAlison Dubois.
Today on the Dead Life, I'llbe taking questions from my listeners
who have questions aboutmurder and about mediums communicating
with victims who have passed.
Joe will be joining me instudio to help field calling questions.
Joe's seen me work enough cases.
(00:25):
He will share his insight.
So stay tuned to book areading with me.
Emailus@bookinglisondubois.com you can
follow me on Instagramediamalison or you can watch me on
YouTube to see new and pastepisodes of the Dead Life.
Please like and subscribe ifyou have a life question for me and
Sophia for my Love Me, Love Menot segment.
(00:48):
Leave your questions at 802-332-3811.
Don't forget to pick up abottle of my Divination 22 money
potion, vodka or love potionat one handsome bastard in Old Town
Scottsdale to set yourintentions for 2025.
Well, Joe, welcome.
(01:08):
Hi.
Hi.
Good to have you back.
It's been a little bit, butI'm excited.
It's been busy.
Yes, it's been busy, yes.
So we had a lot of call insfrom the cold case segments that
we had done in the past last year.
And so we're going to beanswering some of the questions they
(01:29):
have today.
Great.
Okay.
Do you want to jump right in?
Yep, let's do it.
Hi, this is Lyndee calling andI've been a follower of yours for
quite a while and I'm just alittle curious because I am interested
in the JonBenet case and Iwanted to know why it is that there
(01:50):
isn't a psychic out there tothat may have contacted her on the
other side to try to find outthe answers to all of these unsolved
questions that are out thereabout her and maybe others.
I know you have done an awfullot of work with the police and investigations,
so I thought maybe you couldshed some light on that for me because
(02:10):
I'm very confused.
I've been watching a lot ofYouTube videos about it and Netflix
and I'm trying to grasp on tojust that basic question.
Why is it that somebody hasn'talready talked to her?
Because I do know there's apsychic in England that said that
Princess Diana was actually inan accident.
(02:31):
It was not, you know, designedto kill her and all that fun stuff.
Anyway, thank you very much,Allison, and I look forward to hearing
your answer.
Okay, so as far as the psychicin England, I can't really comment
on that because I'm not inthat person's head.
I.
You know, they.
(02:51):
Their sense is that it's an accident.
Other psychics have differenttakes, which is why I teach my students
to always follow your owninformation and not listen to the
information from other peoplethat are in the same business, because
it can skew what your naturalimpressions are that you get on a
(03:13):
case.
So I've actually broughtPrincess Diana through before.
I didn't know that's who I wasgonna bring through, but you'll remember,
Joe.
I do.
When I was studied byscientists at the University of Arizona,
she ended up being one of the people.
And I came out of the lab roomfive minutes after being in there,
and I was just like, if thisisn't Princess Diana, just stop the
(03:37):
test.
Because that's all I keep getting.
And it ended up that on theother side of the partition was a
friend of Princess Dianabecause it was a blind test where
we couldn't see who.
Right.
I remember that because you were.
And they didn't even tell youright away.
You're like, this better bethis, or just stop it.
Well, they still had LaurieCampbell that had to go in and give
her impressions, so they don'twant to taint us.
(04:00):
So she got the same thing.
She walked in the holding roomafterwards, and she's like, did you
get Princess Diana?
She's like, that's all I was getting.
I was like, me, too.
So it's funny, with LaurieCampbell, she and I, our information
always backed up the other one.
We just were on the samewavelength when it came to cases
and bringing through the dead.
(04:21):
As far as JonBenet goes, Iknow that that Netflix special that
they had, and speaking withthe dad.
And then I'm friends withAshley Flowers, who has her own theories
and podcast Crime Junkie.
And so I know a lot's been out there.
I will say I think it'simportant to add JonBenet when she
(04:46):
went missing or not wentmissing when she was murdered.
That was, I believe, like 97or late 90s somewhere in there and
somewhere around there.
And I was a young mom.
I was, like, 25 or 26 at the time.
So everything on her case waspublicized and on the news, which
(05:13):
is why I don't comment onJonBenet, because I was completely
tainted by every news specialthat every network ran at that time.
And so I couldn't come incompletely clear with no information,
which is how I like to workcases, because I had seen everything,
because that predated meactually being a professional psychic
(05:36):
medium.
I was gonna Say that wasbefore you were working cases, and.
And so you.
Yeah, right.
You watch the news likeeverybody else.
I was just a civilian at the time.
And so, yeah, we saweverything on that little girl.
And it was highly, highlypublicized, which even all these
years later, it still isbecause people wanted some conclusion
(06:00):
to it.
In addition to that, in myopinions on her case, any that I
might have, I will say I thinkthe police that were working the
case messed a lot up.
No offense to them.
I'm sure they did the bestthey could, but there seemed to be
some politics involved in thearea that she had disappeared in
(06:22):
in Colorado.
And I.
Psychics and mediums can giveyou their impressions, but if you
don't have law enforcementthat you can work with that's going
to apply your informationdirectly and accurately, you're not
gonna get anywhere on a case.
Because we're not policemen,we're not police detectives.
We have no power in the legalarena when it comes to cases.
(06:47):
So we can only assist if theopportunity is there to do so.
So that would be a problem.
That's a big hurdle with her case.
We did just go into a nine year.
So with it being a year ofendings, you may be seeing cases
such as hers either come to aconclusion or finally have answers
(07:08):
this year.
So I'm very hopeful for thatin 2025.
I know that this case ishighly sensationalized and people
really want some justice for her.
All these years later, themurderer, whoever assaulted and murdered
her, has already gotten, youknow, 25 plus years to actually be
(07:33):
able to live their lives.
And it shouldn't have gonethat way with all the DNA that we
are.
We have at our disposal now,however, because of how it was worked
at the time, and they keptfocusing on her father, I think that
created problems in how it wasworked when it came to that.
(07:56):
But the family's naturally thefirst place for them to look.
Understood.
And of course that's rightful,that they should start there.
You need to eliminate suspects.
And that's what they weretrying to do.
I think the ransom note madethings very confusing and seemed
to maybe point towards theparents, because the ransom note
(08:18):
was in the home.
And how do you not go throughevery square inch of the house that
she disappeared from her bedroom?
I mean, we would say asparents, we would go through every
square inch of the house inthat first hour of recognizing that
she wasn't in her bed.
(08:39):
And that didn't happen.
But even the police wentthrough the house and also didn't
go to that basement room untillater hours, hours into the investigation.
And that raises some questionsright there because there should
have been quite a bit of DNA.
I believe they have some thatwas left behind from the sexual assault.
(09:02):
I don't have all the answersbecause I don't know what they're
doing behind the scenes.
I will say I am shocked thatthey weren't able to run that DNA
and at least plug it into.
I know that they can do familytrees where they plug it in and they
start connecting the dots,working backwards through certain
(09:25):
relatives that pop up untilthey are able to get to a suspect
that they can run DNA on for acomparison to whatever material they
were able to collect from hercrime scene.
So with that being the case, Iam shocked that that hasn't happened,
given that we have the toolsat our disposal now to do that.
(09:48):
And that would be the best betin ironclad being able to say it
was this person that left thegenetic material at the crime scene
where she was murdered.
So I wish they would do that.
They didn't mention that onany of the, on the new shows.
You know, I'm going to have totalk to Ashley about that because
(10:09):
Ashley flowers, because Idon't understand how they weren't
able to run.
And you know, again, she's apodcaster, I'm a podcaster.
We don't have the power or thecontrol the say so or the access
to the actual DNA informationto do what we think would ultimately
give the suspect and put aface and a name to the person that
(10:32):
killed JonBenet.
They're saying that thegenetic material did not belong to
anyone in her family.
I would like they would know that.
They would know that.
But we would all like to seesome of the proof of that, the paperwork,
especially given that thepolice seem to have kind of had a
messy investigation in thepress for years and also saying we're
(10:55):
working on it, and then havingyears and years and more years passed.
And I've seen TV specials, asmany people have, where they do take
the DNA and are able toassemble a family tree and trace
back to a suspect who wasliving in the area at the time that
certain crimes happened.
And so that would give us aconcrete answer.
(11:16):
Now they're saying that theyput the DNA into the system and it
didn't hit, meaning that itwasn't already in the system because
the person was in prison orworked for the government or already
had previously been enteredinto the system.
But even if that's the case,even if they, their DNA wasn't already
in the system, you can stillconstruct a family tree from the
(11:39):
DNA and through process ofelimination, develop a suspect.
So I would like to see that happen.
I don't know if that answersLindsay's question, but I'll say
the psychic mediums can giveimpressions, but at the end of the
day, it comes down to proof,the evidence, and whether or not
our information is actuallyfollowed up on.
Could we talk to JonBenet?
(12:00):
Here's the thing.
If I'm sitting there withsomebody who loves her, that's related
to her, connected to her, Icould bring her through.
She's going to want to talkabout how she feels about that person.
She would talk about memoriesshe made with them.
She would talk about things,the moments that made her happy.
Her versions of heaven on Earth.
(12:21):
That's what she would talk about.
Do they give some detailsaround crimes?
Sometimes if I ask and theywill start giving me impressions
of.
Of what was the motivation toa crime or whether or not they knew
very young and whether or notthey knew the person who was part
(12:42):
of that crime.
But especially with children,they don't want to go back to the
moment they were raped and murdered.
That's the place, the part oftheir life that they stay away from
because they're everythinggood, everything pure.
And it's.
It's scary for them to have torevisit those moments.
So often after they pass, theyabsolutely move on into moments of
(13:02):
their life where life was kindto them, where life was, you know,
warm and happy.
So getting the deceased, theirspirit, to want to revisit the crime
is often difficult in thatthey are repelled by that ending
to their life, especially ifit's violent.
(13:24):
So you did warn me this wasgoing to be a heavy week.
You have delivered next week.
I know you'll have a lighter week.
So everybody stay tuned for that.
So the question, I guess towrap up JonBenet, you kind of said
earlier that maybe somethingwith it being a nine year, there
(13:46):
might be a shift this year.
Do you feel that?
Or is that you're just readingthat the year in itself brings a
lot.
Well, this year is going tobring a lot of conclusion to questions
that we've had.
So who killed jfk?
This would be a year that youwould get the answer to something
like that.
Who killed JonBenet?
(14:06):
This would be a night.
So when people are afraid ofnine years, because as.
As we know, it is a year of endings.
A year of endings can put anend to things that were painful in
the past and had no Conclusion.
So I think you're going to seea lot of secrets be revealed this
year.
I think the news cycle isgoing to be insanely interesting
(14:29):
to follow.
Most importantly, I thinkwe're going to get answers to a lot
of the questions we've had assecrets start to be uncovered, including
in our own government, inother governments, in other countries.
You're going to see a lot ofanswers that will disturb you on
(14:50):
some levels, but give you theanswers you're looking for.
So with JonBenet, no matterwho they are able to connect to her
murder, it will be disturbinggiven that we know all the details
around what was done to thatlittle girl.
And the same goes for with JJ.
(15:11):
Who killed JFK.
And do we really want those answers?
Well, yes, we do.
So one could sort of spitballthat his file's been kept under wraps
for so long because it'shighly likely that there was some
government interference aroundhis assassination.
Yeah, that is a big mysterybecause it has been long enough that
(15:34):
anybody really that was aliveisn't or is certainly not still on
the job.
So.
And then even other countriesthat we dealt with have changed administrations
or even government enough thatthat can't be it.
It has to be an implication ofone of our own bureaucracies, one
(16:00):
of.
Our own government institutions.
Yeah.
Because otherwise, if it wasan individual, they wouldn't have
had a problem unveiling whodid it.
Because they'd be like, yeah,they'd be like, this is who did it.
Not our fault.
We did the best we could.
But that's not what's happenedover the last 60 years.
(16:21):
What we've seen is a lot ofwill get elect me and I'll open the
file.
And then it never gets open.
Well, now we've got a newadministration coming in that doesn't
seem to be afraid of cracking heads.
And so we'll see what happens there.
They could have opened it thelast time too.
I mean, devil's advocate, right?
(16:42):
Timing is everything.
And I'm telling you, this nineyear is gonna reveal a lot.
And I just wanted to reemphasize the astrological episode
that I did with Tom McMullen.
He did talk about the fires.
I talked about it beingCalifornia because unfortunately,
California doesn't do theproper deforestation and the taking
(17:06):
out of dead shrubbery andmaintenance of the land, nor the
do the people around their own homes.
So to me, when he said therewere gonna be fires, it felt obvious
that it was gonna be in California.
I do wanna remind people healso talked about earthquakes.
So maybe Go back and listen tothat episode.
(17:26):
Because the last thingCalifornia needs is an earthquake
on top of that fire in Pacific Palisades.
And after living inCalifornia, there are things, and
they do publish it.
Things for people to beprepared, have some water, have your
little kit of some food andthings that you might need.
(17:48):
A full reservoir would help.
But yeah, for earthquakes, forthe earthquake, yeah, there's everything.
Be prepared, be prepared, asprepared as you can be.
With an earthquake, there's alot less you can do for that than
you could for, say, a fire.
But there is going to be a lotof upheaval in areas in our own country
(18:13):
and in other countries thatwill involve fire and as Tom said,
high winds and then earthquakes.
So I asked him about thatbecause I was getting ready to go
on Danica Patrick's podcastthis week and he said it's not even
close to over.
Oh, no.
So that was hard to hear from him.
(18:35):
So needless to say, we'regoing to see more involved in this.
It is very revealing.
You're going to see peopleshift in their beliefs through their
anger and dissatisfaction.
You will see governments change.
So it's going to be a verypowerful year.
But remember, next year's aone year, a year of new beginnings
(18:57):
and we get to write a wholenew nine year cycle chapter.
So we're just going to see thetrash get taken out this year.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
Little house cleaning.
Okay, let's go on to Felicia.
Great.
Hi, Allison, My name is Felicia.
My question is, and I've beena fan of yours since the medium.
(19:23):
Of course.
Yeah.
So my mom, she passed away 25plus years ago and my sister and
I no longer feel her around.
So we were wondering if she'sbeen reincarnated.
Possibly.
Maybe that's why we don't feelher around anymore.
(19:46):
I felt her in the beginningand maybe sometimes I still feel
her.
My sister no longer feels herat all.
And so we're wondering, maybeshe's been reincarnated.
I thought that you beingreincarnated does not mean that you're
(20:08):
no longer with your loved ones.
I thought that you could split yourself.
Maybe that I heard wrong.
And my next question is, wheredoes one go?
Who harms children sexually?
Do they go to heaven?
Do they have a life review andthen go to heaven?
(20:34):
Yeah.
So wondering where to go.
Who harms children sexually?
Thank you so much.
So I told you it was going tobe a little dark in this week's podcast
episodes, but all importantquestions to be answered at the same
time.
Absolutely.
So Felicia, thank you forcalling in.
(20:56):
I think this is a questionthat will be helpful for a lot of
people to hear that they havethe same question she does.
So Felicia and her sister nolonger feel her mother around.
This is very common.
Often when people die thefirst few years after they die, they
really make their presence known.
(21:17):
They're around.
They give you signs.
They really try and let youknow they're not gone.
You're not an orphan.
I'm still part of your life.
All of those beautifulaspects, too, that there is no end
to our connection or our love.
So sometimes, and actuallyquite often, if someone who passed
(21:40):
feels like you're not healing,you're not moving forward in that
process since they passed,they'll pull their energy back so
that you don't feel them.
It doesn't mean they're notaround, but they'll pull their energy
back to try and get you toengage in life and not sit in the
misery of mourning them and inthe grief of their death.
(22:04):
But rather you're sort offorced to re engage with the living
because you don't have themthere as much to try to engage with.
So people who startdisconnecting with the living world
because they want to be morein the world with the person they
love that died, you'll see apullback from the person that died
(22:27):
of their energy and the signs,because they're trying to get you
to jumpstart your life back tothe land of the living.
Now, once you do that, theymake their presence known again,
and you'll get more of thesigns and the communication, but
for the time being, and mysense is Felicia's sister's having
a really hard time with themother's passing.
(22:49):
If they feel like you're nothealing and that their presence is
somehow hurting you becauseit's making you miss them even more,
and it becomes destructive inthat way, they pull their energy
back.
So I'm not surprised to hearthat happen.
But again, Felicia, it doesn'tmean Mom's not around.
Keep talking to her and justmove through your life and say, hey,
(23:13):
mom, look, I'm taking thatcruise we always wanted to take together
and we didn't get a take.
And when they see that theirpresence in your life is a positive
thing, they'll actually startre engaging with you where you're
able to see that they're therethrough signs and communication.
So, second part, people whoharm children sexually.
(23:37):
So this is what I've seen onthe other side because I have brought
through a few fathers,unfortunately, who molested their
daughters, and now theirdaughters were grown and had come
to me for readings, obviouslyunbeknownst to me what the relationship
was.
But it ended up coming out inthe reading once I started sensing
(23:58):
that there was no remorse fromsome of the.
The men who had passed who hadcommitted these heinous offenses.
So what I saw in thosereadings is that they were around
people that had like energy to theirs.
So in other words, all of thechild molesters, all of the people
(24:20):
who rape were in the samearea, same low frequency energy area
that.
So they all resided in thatsame low energy place which was very
dark.
So you create your own hell.
So in a sense, that's what itseemed to be because they had no
(24:42):
victims there.
So for them, unfortunately,not all souls learn on the other
side or want to evolve.
And I can't explain why thatis, but there is movement in our
souls and some of us feelcompelled to be better people or
(25:05):
to help those around us.
And that grows your soul andit raises your frequency.
Some people choose to notengage in that way and are destructive
in that they want to tear downthings around them that are bright
light or that are higher frequencies.
They resent you.
(25:26):
They want to destroy thathappiness and peace of mind within
you.
And when I see pedophiles andpeople who rape, there seems to be
some sense of enjoyment forthem that they're going to be able
to tear down your soul andlower your energy frequency.
(25:49):
So I just wanted to.
Everything comes back to frequencies.
Oddly, it does.
So I wanted to go over that.
Yeah, I mean, that's really deep.
It was an interesting additionto what we'd just been talking about
with the previous caller.
(26:09):
And as far as people notfeeling their loved ones, I've heard
that I schedule your callsfrom time to time and I hear that
from people.
And do you ever think thatthey get so accustomed to them being
around that it just feels, ina sense, normal?
(26:29):
No, they can feel them aroundand they can feel an energy shift
when their presence isn't felt.
But again, it doesn't meanthey're not there.
They intentionally pull theirenergy back so you can't feel it,
but they're still seeing yourlife unfold.
And then I wanted to add onemore part to people who harm children.
And this is the big questionthat I have that I'd like an answer
(26:52):
to when I die.
I do see that there are somesouls that are destructive and again
exist to tear down biologically.
If somebody's brain isn't puttogether right and I know that they've
started studying the mindslike the brains of killers.
(27:13):
And I know that they had askedfor a donation of Jeffrey Dahmer's
Brain for Science because theywant to look at this biologically.
If you're impeded and you'redoing things that you in a sense
can't control, if you have nobuilt in mechanism in your brain
(27:34):
and that in any way affectsthe decisions you're making and the
crimes you're committing, I dowonder if their souls, if they're
in a healthy physical body, ifthey were to come back, if they would
live a different life.
So I do have a question aroundthat when I pass that, I'll want
(27:56):
to know.
I think if they came back andhad that history, that that would
haunt them at some level.
And then what is that?
You know, if they have thatenergy of guilt that they're born
with, what do they become?
Do they become a priest thatwants to help people or a doctor
(28:17):
who wants to save people tosomehow karmically make up for the
destruction that they causedin a past lifetime?
So there's just so many facetsto the universe.
I can only look at what I knowto be true from my own experience,
but also some questions that Ihave around this particularly difficult
(28:40):
topic.
And I do know that biology canaffect a soul's experience in this
world, but I also know thatsome souls don't have remorse that
are on the other side.
So that leaves me with a lotof questions.
Tune in next week for part twoof our conversations from my Collins
(29:00):
about murder and psychicmediums and how we connect with deceased
victims.
What do they say to us?
What do the souls of murder say?
So, Joe, thank you for yourintellect and time.
Oh, you're welcome.
And thank you to my listenersfor tuning in.
Tune in next week for part twoof a fresh episode of the Dead Life.
(29:25):
I'm Alison Dubois.
This is the Dead Life Life.
And to all of my believers,don't stop believing.
Join us next week on the Deadlife.
And don't forget to subscribenow to get notified of every new
episode.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com