All Episodes

September 16, 2025 37 mins
Welcome to the PRESSURISED version of episode 62, just the science, none of the waffle PRESSURISED: Mythbusting Ai with Tyler Greenfield | The Deep-Sea Podcast | Episode 62

Check out our lovely new website where you can find more detailed notes, images and links to the wider reading.

In a follow-up to one of our favourite episodes, Ep 10 Here be Monsters, we bring Tyler Greenfield back for another fascinating chat, this time about Mythbusting in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Our feeds have been filled with images of mermaids, bizarre creatures supposedly from the depths and even strange barnacle washing videos, so we ask Tyler to bring his expertise to weigh in on the prevalence and problems with AI images. 

Guest Interview

Tyler Greenfield is a paleontologist and cryptozoologist whose blog, Incertae Sedis reveals the truth behind some cryptozoological stories and paleontological mistakes. Since his appearance on episode 10, Tyler has finished his bachelor’s, written a good few papers, appeared on other podcasts (none as good as his debut of course) and is almost done with his masters and is about to start his PhD. He was even a credited consultant on the new (2025) Walking with Dinosaurs.

 

Support the show

The podcast is self-sustaining (just) thanks to our lovely listeners. Thom and Alan take no money for the show. All money is put back into running it. Here’s a link to our page on how to support us, from the free options to becoming a patron of the show. We want to say a huge thank you to those patrons who have already pledged to support us:

Hugo Shiboski

Check out our podcast merch here!

 

Join our Patreon to get access to the Discord

https://www.patreon.com/c/deepseapodcast

 

Feel free to get in touch with us with questions or your own tales from the high seas on:

podcast@deepseapod.com

We’d love to actually play your voice, so feel free to record a short audio note on our brand new answerphone!

https://www.speakpipe.com/deepseapodvoicemail

Thanks again for tuning in; we’ll deep-see you next time!

 

Find out more Social media

BlueSky: @deepseapod.com

Twitter: @DeepSeaPod

Instagram: @deepsea_podcast

Keep up with the team on social media Twitter: 

Alan - @Hadalbloke

Thom - @ThomLinley 

Instagram: 

Thom - @thom.linley 

Inkfish - @inkfishexpeditions

BlueSky:

Thom @thomaslinley.com

 

Reference list

The original article for our unfortunate ‘squid’ image 

“Colossal Squid Filmed Alive for the First Time”: Juvenile Deep-Sea Monster Captured on Camera in South Atlantic Stuns Scientists - Sustainability Times

 

How A Golden Nurse Shark Made History

 

Interview

 Tyler’s master’s/doctorate research

 

AI coelacanth hoax

Credits

Logo image: AI image originally us

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Märvel: The Hadal Zone Express The Hadal Zone Express. (00:02):
undefined

Thom: Hello and welcome to the Deep Sea podcast. (00:07):
undefined

Thom: Pressurized, a short, punchy (00:09):
undefined

Thom: version of our main feed that (00:11):
undefined

Thom: gets right to the scientific (00:13):
undefined

Thom: point. (00:14):
undefined

Thom: If you like what you hear, you'd like to hear the full episode. (00:14):
undefined

Thom: You can find it in the same feed. (00:17):
undefined

Thom: And now to get right to the point. (00:18):
undefined

Thom: Episode ten was one of my (00:20):
undefined

Thom: favorite episodes, debunking (00:22):
undefined

Thom: myths with Cryptozoologist Tyler (00:23):
undefined

Thom: Greenfield, and a lot has (00:26):
undefined

Thom: changed in the four years since (00:27):
undefined

Thom: that episode. (00:29):
undefined

Thom: It feels like a lot has changed in the last six months, really. (00:30):
undefined

Thom: My feed is flooded with people (00:32):
undefined

Thom: finding mermaids, giant (00:34):
undefined

Thom: creatures from the depths, and (00:35):
undefined

Thom: for some reason, lots of videos (00:37):
undefined

Thom: of them getting their barnacles (00:39):
undefined

Thom: washed off. (00:40):
undefined

Thom: I don't know why people are into that, with a paragraph of text (00:40):
undefined

Thom: being all that's needed to make a video believable enough to (00:43):
undefined

Thom: fool Nana on Facebook. (00:45):
undefined

Thom: How do any of us hope in (00:47):
undefined

Thom: stemming the tide of (00:48):
undefined

Thom: misinformation? (00:49):
undefined

Thom: I am joined once again by Tyler (00:53):
undefined

Thom: Greenfield, paleontologist and (00:56):
undefined

Thom: cryptozoologist, whose blog (00:57):
undefined

Thom: incertae sedis reveals the truth (00:59):
undefined

Thom: behind some cryptozoological (01:02):
undefined

Thom: stories and paleontological (01:03):
undefined

Thom: mistakes. (01:05):
undefined

Thom: To pick up where we left off, I just need to check one thing. (01:06):
undefined

Thom: Um, could the Meg be out there? (01:09):
undefined

Thom: I just want to check. (01:11):
undefined

Thom: Nothing's changed. (01:12):
undefined

Thom: Are you sure, though? (01:13):
undefined

Tyler: Nothing has changed. (01:14):
undefined

Thom: Nothing has changed. (01:16):
undefined

Thom: It's less likely. (01:17):
undefined

Thom: If anything. (01:18):
undefined

Tyler: It's one of the few things like cryptozoology paleontologically (01:19):
undefined

Tyler: that I can say that I'm one hundred percent certain on. (01:24):
undefined

Tyler: I'm absolutely confident it is extinct. (01:27):
undefined

Thom: I'm sorry, folks. (01:30):
undefined

Thom: I know you want it to be true, and that's kind of the problem. (01:31):
undefined

Thom: That was our thesis on the last (01:34):
undefined

Thom: interview is it doesn't matter (01:35):
undefined

Thom: how much evidence you can (01:37):
undefined

Thom: produce if somebody wants it to (01:38):
undefined

Thom: be true. (01:40):
undefined

Thom: And it's hard to prove a negative. (01:42):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, you can prove a negative, (01:44):
undefined

Tyler: but a lot of people think you (01:45):
undefined

Tyler: can't. (01:46):
undefined

Tyler: And then a lot of people will let their personal feelings (01:47):
undefined

Tyler: override any sort of logic or facts just because they want it (01:49):
undefined

Tyler: to be true. (01:53):
undefined

Thom: And only because of that real human obsession with the (01:54):
undefined

Thom: biggest, the tallest, the deepest, the most ferocious. (01:57):
undefined

Thom: If we found something bigger, (02:00):
undefined

Thom: then that would be, oh, maybe (02:02):
undefined

Thom: that's hiding in the trenches (02:04):
undefined

Thom: like it's obviously based on (02:05):
undefined

Thom: wish fulfillment rather than (02:07):
undefined

Thom: logic then. (02:08):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, yeah. (02:09):
undefined

Tyler: I guarantee you, if we ever (02:10):
undefined

Tyler: found a shark that was predatory (02:11):
undefined

Tyler: and bigger than the megalodon, (02:13):
undefined

Tyler: it would start to become the (02:15):
undefined

Tyler: subject of cryptozoology (02:16):
undefined

Tyler: speculations. (02:18):
undefined

Tyler: People would say, well, maybe the Meg's not out there, but (02:19):
undefined

Tyler: this new big one. (02:22):
undefined

Tyler: Now that's a promising candidate. (02:23):
undefined

Thom: You've got to have scale creep. (02:24):
undefined

Thom: You've got to sort of outdo it each time. (02:26):
undefined

Tyler: Exactly. (02:28):
undefined

Thom: I was lucky enough to watch The Meg two on a research vessel (02:29):
undefined

Thom: with a load of marine biologists and just, oh, the frothing. (02:32):
undefined

Tyler: I didn't like it as much as the first one. (02:35):
undefined

Tyler: The first one was a lot of fun. (02:37):
undefined

Thom: I took a lot of screen grabs of their interface because that's (02:38):
undefined

Thom: quite close to what we do. (02:43):
undefined

Thom: And I just love the idea of (02:44):
undefined

Thom: like, everything's hexagons and (02:45):
undefined

Thom: has just unexplored flashing on (02:48):
undefined

Thom: it. (02:50):
undefined

Thom: That's how I see the world now. (02:50):
undefined

Thom: So the rules of the game have changed since we last chatted. (02:51):
undefined

Thom: Our work cut out for us, and it's a double edged sword as (02:55):
undefined

Thom: well, because then when we publish something that is truly (02:58):
undefined

Thom: remarkable and real, it's pretty much guaranteed in the comments. (03:02):
undefined

Thom: Now we get, oh, is this just AI or nothing can live down there? (03:05):
undefined

Thom: This is just AI. (03:08):
undefined

Tyler: I see that all the time. (03:09):
undefined

Tyler: Even like on videos that are (03:11):
undefined

Tyler: like ten, twenty years old, you (03:13):
undefined

Tyler: know, that have been known and (03:15):
undefined

Tyler: I'm talking specifically like (03:16):
undefined

Tyler: crypto zoological videos like (03:17):
undefined

Tyler: Bigfoot, sea monsters, that kind (03:19):
undefined

Tyler: of thing. (03:20):
undefined

Tyler: Videos that have been around for decades and people have known (03:21):
undefined

Tyler: about you always get comments if you're reposting those videos. (03:23):
undefined

Tyler: Oh, it looks like AI looks like CGI, even though it's way before (03:27):
undefined

Tyler: any of that. (03:30):
undefined

Tyler: So everybody is becoming more (03:31):
undefined

Tyler: cautious, but also less (03:33):
undefined

Tyler: cautious. (03:34):
undefined

Tyler: They're quicker to say AI, but they're also less quick to (03:35):
undefined

Tyler: actually catch it when it is AI. (03:38):
undefined

Thom: It's something we've seen coming over the last few years, but (03:40):
undefined

Thom: there's like post-truth world where just confidence in (03:42):
undefined

Thom: anything has been eroded. (03:46):
undefined

Thom: How have you been managing to like stay hopeful, stay fighting (03:48):
undefined

Thom: the good fight? (03:51):
undefined

Tyler: I mean, I guess with some historical knowledge. (03:52):
undefined

Tyler: At the core of it, nothing has really changed, you know? (03:55):
undefined

Tyler: Fake news has always been around. (03:57):
undefined

Tyler: People have always been making up stories and trying to sell (03:59):
undefined

Tyler: things that are not real as being real, and people have (04:01):
undefined

Tyler: fallen for it. (04:04):
undefined

Tyler: Mass hysteria, that kind of thing. (04:05):
undefined

Tyler: So this kind of thing has always existed. (04:07):
undefined

Tyler: It's just that AI makes it quicker and easier to make. (04:09):
undefined

Tyler: It's the quantity of the (04:12):
undefined

Tyler: material that is the problem, (04:14):
undefined

Tyler: not necessarily the content (04:16):
undefined

Tyler: itself, because it still can be (04:18):
undefined

Tyler: disproven. (04:19):
undefined

Tyler: There's still lots of flaws in the AI that you can pick out. (04:20):
undefined

Tyler: So it's it's doable, but it's (04:24):
undefined

Tyler: just it's an ever increasing (04:25):
undefined

Tyler: tide. (04:27):
undefined

Tyler: The number of AI things (04:28):
undefined

Tyler: increases with every passing (04:30):
undefined

Tyler: month. (04:32):
undefined

Tyler: So it's things have changed, but things also stay the same. (04:33):
undefined

Thom: Yeah you're right. (04:36):
undefined

Thom: Maybe I'm getting a bit too disheartened. (04:37):
undefined

Thom: We had the crazy taxidermy back in the Victorian era with the (04:39):
undefined

Thom: was it Fiji mermaid? (04:42):
undefined

Thom: Yeah, yeah. (04:44):
undefined

Thom: Fish and a. (04:44):
undefined

Tyler: Monkey. Barnum's Fiji mermaid. (04:45):
undefined

Tyler: Well, that's the thing about a little, uh, side tangent here, (04:47):
undefined

Tyler: but the Fiji mermaid. (04:50):
undefined

Tyler: The one that Barnum had was actually not even a monkey. (04:52):
undefined

Tyler: It was a plaster sculpture of a monkey with some possible, like, (04:55):
undefined

Tyler: animal bones mixed in with it. (05:00):
undefined

Tyler: The fish was a real fish, but it (05:02):
undefined

Tyler: wasn't even an actual fish and a (05:04):
undefined

Tyler: monkey. (05:05):
undefined

Tyler: It was a fish and a sculpture of a monkey, which makes it even (05:06):
undefined

Tyler: worse, I guess. (05:10):
undefined

Thom: So maybe we've actually gotten better at spotting things. (05:11):
undefined

Thom: And the same frustration was back then, because then when the (05:13):
undefined

Thom: first platypus was presented to the world, everyone was just (05:15):
undefined

Thom: like, oh no, I've seen this. (05:19):
undefined

Thom: That's just a load of animals glued together. (05:20):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, it's a beaver and a duck stitched together. (05:22):
undefined

Tyler: No, it's actually a real animal. (05:25):
undefined

Thom: Okay, that makes me more hopeful (05:27):
undefined

Thom: that we're just in a (05:29):
undefined

Thom: transitional period, that this (05:29):
undefined

Thom: has always been part of human (05:31):
undefined

Thom: nature. (05:33):
undefined

Thom: Some new tech has come along, (05:33):
undefined

Thom: and it's going to trick people (05:34):
undefined

Thom: for a little while, and then (05:35):
undefined

Thom: we'll we'll hopefully right the (05:36):
undefined

Thom: ship. (05:38):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. Just just recently there was a a prominent AI hoax sort (05:39):
undefined

Tyler: of related to cryptozoology and paleontology back in April, I (05:43):
undefined

Tyler: think it was a living coelacanth has been discovered off the (05:46):
undefined

Tyler: coast of Of California. (05:50):
undefined

Thom: Yes. (05:51):
undefined

Tyler: What? (05:52):
undefined

Tyler: That's, like the greatest (05:53):
undefined

Tyler: zoological discovery of the (05:54):
undefined

Tyler: century. (05:55):
undefined

Tyler: But alarm bells were already starting to ring in my head. (05:56):
undefined

Tyler: Why California? (05:59):
undefined

Tyler: That's not a particularly likely (06:01):
undefined

Tyler: area for a coelacanth to show (06:02):
undefined

Tyler: up. (06:05):
undefined

Tyler: It's not the right habitat you don't get. (06:05):
undefined

Tyler: Like the underwater caves and rocky overhangs that they like. (06:07):
undefined

Tyler: It's a well studied area. (06:09):
undefined

Tyler: There are tons of submersible cruise ROVs, remotely operated (06:11):
undefined

Tyler: cameras of other types, divers, surfers, swimmers, people of all (06:15):
undefined

Tyler: sorts that are frequenting the ocean in that area. (06:20):
undefined

Tyler: How would it remain undetected for so long? (06:23):
undefined

Tyler: So that already didn't make sense to me. (06:25):
undefined

Tyler: So I you know, I'm going through (06:27):
undefined

Tyler: all the people's posts reposting (06:28):
undefined

Tyler: this stuff, but a lot of times (06:30):
undefined

Tyler: they don't repost the original (06:31):
undefined

Tyler: links. (06:32):
undefined

Tyler: So eventually I get to the original link, click on it, and (06:32):
undefined

Tyler: the website is a total farce. (06:35):
undefined

Tyler: It's not a real news site. (06:37):
undefined

Tyler: It's a blogging website called Animals Around the Globe. (06:38):
undefined

Tyler: I've never heard of it before, and from quickly reading through (06:41):
undefined

Tyler: the article, it is so obvious it is AI generated. (06:44):
undefined

Tyler: It's got that classic stilted, (06:47):
undefined

Tyler: vague text where it's clearly (06:49):
undefined

Tyler: like trying to figure out how to (06:52):
undefined

Tyler: say something but never actually (06:53):
undefined

Tyler: says anything that means (06:55):
undefined

Tyler: anything. (06:56):
undefined

Tyler: But the big problem with this one is that it actually drug two (06:56):
undefined

Tyler: real institutes into the mix. (07:00):
undefined

Tyler: Because this this article was (07:02):
undefined

Tyler: claiming that an ROV sent out (07:04):
undefined

Tyler: into a submarine canyon off the (07:06):
undefined

Tyler: coast of California by the (07:07):
undefined

Tyler: Monterey Bay aquarium and the (07:09):
undefined

Tyler: Scripps Institution was the (07:11):
undefined

Tyler: thing that had discovered the (07:14):
undefined

Tyler: coelacanth. (07:15):
undefined

Tyler: And they even said that Scripps and Monterey Bay had put (07:16):
undefined

Tyler: together like a museum exhibition with photographs and (07:19):
undefined

Tyler: video of it. (07:23):
undefined

Tyler: And of course, that's not true at all. (07:23):
undefined

Tyler: I reached out to to both institutions. (07:25):
undefined

Tyler: I didn't get a response from (07:27):
undefined

Tyler: Monterey Bay, but Scripps (07:28):
undefined

Tyler: actually did respond to me and (07:30):
undefined

Tyler: they said, yes, this is not (07:31):
undefined

Tyler: true. (07:32):
undefined

Tyler: It never happened. (07:33):
undefined

Tyler: So so that's really a big problem. (07:34):
undefined

Tyler: Not only when you create (07:37):
undefined

Tyler: something that at first feels (07:38):
undefined

Tyler: real and that will fool a lot of (07:40):
undefined

Tyler: people, but also something that (07:41):
undefined

Tyler: is now dragging the real (07:43):
undefined

Tyler: institutions into the mix and (07:44):
undefined

Tyler: lying about them because they (07:46):
undefined

Tyler: have a scientific reputation to (07:47):
undefined

Tyler: protect. (07:49):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. (07:49):
undefined

Tyler: They should not be involved in (07:50):
undefined

Tyler: this kind of hoax, but (07:51):
undefined

Tyler: fortunately, it blew over very (07:52):
undefined

Tyler: quickly. (07:54):
undefined

Thom: It could be malicious and sort of trying to gain credibility. (07:55):
undefined

Thom: But I also feel like it sounds like the whole article was AI (07:57):
undefined

Thom: generated, and it was just pulling from believable sources (08:01):
undefined

Thom: and emulating those. (08:05):
undefined

Thom: And so it sounds like it had very little human input at all. (08:06):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. My speculation is that it (08:10):
undefined

Tyler: had pulled from a discovery a (08:11):
undefined

Tyler: couple of years ago off the (08:13):
undefined

Tyler: coast of California, not of a (08:13):
undefined

Tyler: coelacanth, but I think it was (08:15):
undefined

Tyler: of some mollusk or like smaller (08:16):
undefined

Tyler: animal that was called like a (08:19):
undefined

Tyler: living fossil. (08:20):
undefined

Tyler: And I think it sort of, you (08:21):
undefined

Tyler: know, picked up with the (08:22):
undefined

Tyler: association between living (08:23):
undefined

Tyler: fossils and coelacanth and then (08:24):
undefined

Tyler: put together this article out of (08:26):
undefined

Tyler: that. (08:27):
undefined

Tyler: This website, animals around the globe. (08:28):
undefined

Tyler: It hasn't stopped. (08:30):
undefined

Tyler: They keep putting out AI generated articles. (08:31):
undefined

Tyler: There was another one about a woolly rhinoceros mummy that was (08:33):
undefined

Tyler: supposedly discovered in Alaska. (08:37):
undefined

Tyler: Woolly rhinoceroses are only known from Eurasia, northern (08:39):
undefined

Tyler: Europe, and northern Asia. (08:42):
undefined

Tyler: So this would be a huge discovery, right? (08:43):
undefined

Tyler: But it's again, it's another AI generated article. (08:45):
undefined

Tyler: And again, they drug real institutions into it. (08:48):
undefined

Tyler: They said that this was a discovery made, I think, by the (08:50):
undefined

Tyler: University of Fairbanks, Alaska. (08:52):
undefined

Tyler: And of course that's not true. (08:54):
undefined

Tyler: And this was fooling people again, making the rounds. (08:55):
undefined

Tyler: So this whole website seems to have a problem with this. (08:58):
undefined

Tyler: And then the worst fact about it (09:01):
undefined

Tyler: was that it wasn't just this one (09:03):
undefined

Tyler: blogging website. (09:05):
undefined

Tyler: They were getting picked up by MSN, which is Microsoft's news (09:05):
undefined

Tyler: sort of outlet. (09:08):
undefined

Tyler: For whatever reason, Microsoft has a partnership with this (09:09):
undefined

Tyler: random blogging website and promotes all their articles, so (09:13):
undefined

Tyler: that really helps spread it. (09:16):
undefined

Tyler: So that kind of thing is getting to be a problem. (09:18):
undefined

Thom: You talking about the sort of circular language as well, the (09:20):
undefined

Thom: amount of time someone's on a page, the amount they read. (09:24):
undefined

Thom: To be fair, writing has often been this way where you don't (09:27):
undefined

Thom: want to give it all away in the headline, but you have to read a (09:29):
undefined

Thom: long, long way. (09:33):
undefined

Thom: Desperate for substance and realize it never really comes. (09:34):
undefined

Tyler: AI is very repetitive in its (09:37):
undefined

Tyler: language, very vague, but very (09:39):
undefined

Tyler: repetitive. (09:41):
undefined

Tyler: And if you know anything about how language influences people. (09:42):
undefined

Tyler: When something is repeated, more and more and more people are (09:45):
undefined

Tyler: more likely to believe it, even if it's not true. (09:48):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, I think that's a particularly insidious facet of (09:50):
undefined

Tyler: AI, and its writing style is that it just hammers you over (09:54):
undefined

Tyler: the head, repeating the same facts over and over again, and (09:57):
undefined

Tyler: that makes it seem more believable to most people. (10:00):
undefined

Tyler: With that repetition. (10:03):
undefined

Thom: We'll touch on maybe some other aspects of it, but I think the (10:05):
undefined

Thom: important foundation thing to get in is a lot of these things (10:07):
undefined

Thom: that people are using are language models, and it's really (10:10):
undefined

Thom: important to keep focused on what it is trained on and what (10:15):
undefined

Thom: it is for, which is formulating believable human language. (10:19):
undefined

Thom: And I'm seeing a lot of friends (10:24):
undefined

Thom: like really over rely on it in (10:26):
undefined

Thom: scientific publishing. (10:28):
undefined

Thom: You know, it's spitting out really believable citations, (10:29):
undefined

Thom: which are their real authors. (10:33):
undefined

Thom: It's maybe even a real title, but it's a chimera of multiple (10:35):
undefined

Thom: papers stuck together. (10:37):
undefined

Thom: And even like, I was trying to (10:39):
undefined

Thom: do some building in the garden (10:40):
undefined

Thom: and someone said, you know, oh, (10:42):
undefined

Thom: just just use AI to, to generate (10:43):
undefined

Thom: the design. (10:45):
undefined

Thom: And it's a language model. (10:46):
undefined

Thom: So it produced a really (10:48):
undefined

Thom: believable design of the tools (10:49):
undefined

Thom: I'd need and the lengths of (10:51):
undefined

Thom: everything. (10:52):
undefined

Thom: But they didn't marry up. (10:52):
undefined

Thom: It was four different tree houses that had been cobbled (10:53):
undefined

Thom: together, and if you tried to join it up, it didn't match. (10:56):
undefined

Thom: It looked the part, it looked (10:59):
undefined

Thom: like it was human language (11:01):
undefined

Thom: because that's all it's trying (11:02):
undefined

Thom: to do. (11:03):
undefined

Thom: It's not figuring things out, (11:04):
undefined

Thom: it's just sticking bits (11:05):
undefined

Thom: together. (11:06):
undefined

Tyler: It's a language model and it's an aesthetic model. (11:08):
undefined

Tyler: It is not an information or truth model. (11:11):
undefined

Tyler: People would do well to remember (11:14):
undefined

Tyler: that it is not giving you the (11:16):
undefined

Tyler: truth, it is just predicting (11:17):
undefined

Tyler: what is most likely to be said (11:19):
undefined

Tyler: from the language that it has (11:20):
undefined

Tyler: analysed. (11:22):
undefined

Tyler: It's just a predictive algorithm. (11:23):
undefined

Thom: Because it's such a magic box. (11:25):
undefined

Thom: I think if there's any take home, it's it's that it is. (11:26):
undefined

Thom: It is trying to write believably but not accurately. (11:30):
undefined

Thom: How can we equip our listeners (11:33):
undefined

Thom: because they are getting better (11:35):
undefined

Thom: and better? (11:36):
undefined

Thom: What do you look out for in an image or any other output (11:36):
undefined

Thom: really, to figure out if it's been AI generated. (11:39):
undefined

Tyler: Anatomy is a big one, especially (11:42):
undefined

Tyler: when you're dealing with (11:44):
undefined

Tyler: animals. (11:44):
undefined

Tyler: You know, does it have the right the right number of eyes, the (11:45):
undefined

Tyler: right number of legs, the right number of fins? (11:47):
undefined

Tyler: Does it have the right color? (11:50):
undefined

Tyler: Is the texture like too smooth? (11:51):
undefined

Tyler: A lot of AI images are very smooth and almost too perfect. (11:53):
undefined

Tyler: They don't have a lot of the the rough textures. (11:57):
undefined

Tyler: The lighting is too good. (11:59):
undefined

Tyler: But also oftentimes comes from (12:01):
undefined

Tyler: multiple directions when it (12:02):
undefined

Tyler: shouldn't shadows or (12:04):
undefined

Tyler: inconsistent. (12:05):
undefined

Tyler: It's difficult. (12:06):
undefined

Tyler: It's not not an easy thing to learn, but once you see enough (12:07):
undefined

Tyler: of it, you will start to notice, even on an intuitive level, that (12:11):
undefined

Tyler: it just does not look right. (12:14):
undefined

Tyler: And then you really have to look (12:16):
undefined

Tyler: at the details to see if it (12:18):
undefined

Tyler: actually matches the real (12:19):
undefined

Tyler: animal. (12:20):
undefined

Tyler: Because I've seen a lot of AI generated sharks, that's (12:21):
undefined

Tyler: becoming a thing, especially with like megalodon videos. (12:24):
undefined

Tyler: And and they almost always have incorrect anatomical details, (12:26):
undefined

Tyler: the wrong number of fins, the wrong number of gill slits. (12:30):
undefined

Tyler: The teeth are totally wrong. (12:33):
undefined

Tyler: Sharks have very distinctive tooth patterns and shapes. (12:35):
undefined

Tyler: AI never gets them right If you (12:38):
undefined

Tyler: know what to look for, it just (12:40):
undefined

Tyler: becomes a total joke because (12:41):
undefined

Tyler: again, it's it's trying to make (12:42):
undefined

Tyler: something that looks believable, (12:43):
undefined

Tyler: doesn't actually care about any (12:45):
undefined

Tyler: details that are real or (12:46):
undefined

Tyler: anatomically correct. (12:48):
undefined

Tyler: So you do have to really be (12:49):
undefined

Tyler: careful, look out for the (12:50):
undefined

Tyler: anatomical inconsistencies, look (12:52):
undefined

Tyler: out for the texturing and (12:54):
undefined

Tyler: lighting problems. (12:55):
undefined

Tyler: That's what I would say would (12:57):
undefined

Tyler: would be the main giveaways of (12:58):
undefined

Tyler: an AI generated image of an (13:00):
undefined

Tyler: animal. (13:02):
undefined

Tyler: Specifically look for inconsistencies, things that (13:02):
undefined

Tyler: don't make sense, but unfortunately, a lot of people (13:05):
undefined

Tyler: won't even think about it. (13:08):
undefined

Tyler: They'll just look at it, see the surface details, and be (13:10):
undefined

Tyler: convinced by it. (13:14):
undefined

Tyler: So you really got to look deeper, pay attention closely. (13:16):
undefined

Thom: There's that willingness as well that I would like it to be true. (13:19):
undefined

Thom: You know, we all have confirmation bias. (13:22):
undefined

Thom: We all sort of approve of things that align with our (13:24):
undefined

Thom: understanding of the world a little bit quicker. (13:26):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, it's it's easy even for scientists or like very (13:28):
undefined

Tyler: knowledgeable enthusiasts or amateurs to get fooled by this (13:32):
undefined

Tyler: kind of stuff, you know, if it's this amazing scientific (13:35):
undefined

Tyler: discovery or photograph, and it seems at first to be (13:38):
undefined

Tyler: anatomically sound, and it sort of lines up with pre-existing (13:41):
undefined

Tyler: knowledge, and it's easy to fall for it first. (13:45):
undefined

Tyler: It's not until you sit back and look at it and say, oh, there's (13:47):
undefined

Tyler: actually a lot about this image and about this backstory, (13:50):
undefined

Tyler: because usually images come with a backstory, which is oftentimes (13:52):
undefined

Tyler: AI generated as well. (13:55):
undefined

Tyler: But then you start to notice inconsistencies, things that (13:56):
undefined

Tyler: don't make sense. (13:59):
undefined

Tyler: You just got to take the time to look at it and think about it. (14:00):
undefined

Thom: One of our listeners pointed out that suction cups on cephalopods (14:04):
undefined

Thom: are like the fingers. (14:07):
undefined

Thom: If they're not just on the (14:09):
undefined

Thom: underside, if they're sort of (14:10):
undefined

Thom: all over the place in places (14:11):
undefined

Thom: that you couldn't even grab (14:13):
undefined

Thom: anything with. (14:14):
undefined

Thom: That's a good one to look out for with anything. (14:14):
undefined

Thom: Tentacle. (14:16):
undefined

Thom: If the suction cups are over, (14:17):
undefined

Thom: too much of the tentacles and (14:18):
undefined

Thom: arms. (14:20):
undefined

Tyler: Or have the wrong number of rows (14:20):
undefined

Tyler: like if it's an octopus, usually (14:22):
undefined

Tyler: they have like one to two rows (14:23):
undefined

Tyler: of suckers. (14:25):
undefined

Tyler: But you know, there'll be this AI generated monstrosity of an (14:26):
undefined

Tyler: octopus and they'll have a dozen rows of suckers on its arm. (14:29):
undefined

Thom: It really likes repeating patterns. (14:32):
undefined

Thom: Yes it does. (14:34):
undefined

Thom: Can I share a link with you? (14:35):
undefined

Thom: And I'll put this in the show notes. (14:36):
undefined

Tyler: Oh, man. (14:38):
undefined

Tyler: That's a that's a terrible image. (14:38):
undefined

Thom: It's awful, isn't it? (14:40):
undefined

Tyler: It's not even close. (14:40):
undefined

Thom: But the press release is that (14:42):
undefined

Thom: we've seen it for the first (14:43):
undefined

Thom: time. (14:44):
undefined

Thom: The whole point of the press release is here is a really high (14:45):
undefined

Thom: quality image of this animal we've never seen alive. (14:47):
undefined

Thom: And they stick that on it. (14:50):
undefined

Thom: It doesn't even have a front. (14:51):
undefined

Tyler: Wasn't this one filmed by (14:53):
undefined

Tyler: Monterey Bay or one of the other (14:54):
undefined

Tyler: institutions? (14:56):
undefined

Tyler: I think they publicly released their images for. (14:56):
undefined

Thom: Yeah. It's mid-ocean. (14:59):
undefined

Thom: I was on it, and I know what it looks like. (15:01):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. I mean, if the images are free to use, just use the real (15:04):
undefined

Tyler: the real photographs. (15:07):
undefined

Tyler: It's almost like people are (15:08):
undefined

Tyler: starting to expect AI generated (15:09):
undefined

Tyler: images to be in in articles like (15:12):
undefined

Tyler: this. (15:14):
undefined

Thom: It's really good for generating (15:14):
undefined

Thom: an image for your story because (15:16):
undefined

Thom: it'll be nicely compositional, (15:18):
undefined

Thom: and most importantly, it'll be (15:20):
undefined

Thom: at least right now, free for (15:22):
undefined

Thom: credit. (15:24):
undefined

Thom: And so even legitimate stories (15:24):
undefined

Thom: I'm seeing behind an AI (15:26):
undefined

Thom: generated banner. (15:28):
undefined

Thom: And if that's a bit of a cartoon (15:29):
undefined

Thom: and a bit of an infographic, not (15:30):
undefined

Thom: so bad. (15:32):
undefined

Thom: But if it's sort of Misleading, (15:33):
undefined

Thom: especially with new species (15:35):
undefined

Thom: discoveries. (15:36):
undefined

Thom: Like there's always an image of the organism, but then a over (15:37):
undefined

Thom: the top, mysterious looking image is used as the clickbait (15:41):
undefined

Thom: to get you to look at it. (15:44):
undefined

Thom: It's a new brittle star, but (15:44):
undefined

Thom: it's always under the heading of (15:46):
undefined

Thom: like, snake armed deep sea (15:47):
undefined

Thom: organism found for the first (15:49):
undefined

Thom: time. (15:51):
undefined

Thom: And it's like it's a new brittle (15:51):
undefined

Thom: star, and it's cute and it's (15:52):
undefined

Thom: pink. (15:53):
undefined

Tyler: I'm starting to see this with paleontological discoveries, (15:54):
undefined

Tyler: too, where they'll even have a press packet with artwork that (15:56):
undefined

Tyler: is accurate to the animal. (16:00):
undefined

Tyler: They'll instead use an AI generated image that looks (16:02):
undefined

Tyler: nothing like the actual animal. (16:05):
undefined

Tyler: So it's a problem that is growing in pretty much every (16:07):
undefined

Tyler: scientific field when it comes to the press side of things. (16:09):
undefined

Thom: It's certainly a tool that I'm dabbling in and trying to bear (16:13):
undefined

Thom: in mind what it is doing and what its limitations are for (16:17):
undefined

Thom: generating a podcast graphic. (16:20):
undefined

Thom: It's so unbelievably easy, and (16:23):
undefined

Thom: it would be so easy to fall into (16:25):
undefined

Thom: that trap. (16:27):
undefined

Thom: We did AI generate one for Edna (16:27):
undefined

Thom: just because it's difficult to (16:30):
undefined

Thom: show that. (16:32):
undefined

Thom: And I really wanted, like Mr. DNA. (16:33):
undefined

Tyler: Jurassic Park? (16:35):
undefined

Thom: Yeah, I wanted him in a scuba kit, but for spitballing and (16:36):
undefined

Thom: sort of designing logos and things like that, you can sort (16:39):
undefined

Thom: of tweak a lot of things, but I would hope then we could get an (16:42):
undefined

Thom: artist to do it properly. (16:46):
undefined

Thom: It's just more about (16:47):
undefined

Thom: storyboarding and throwing (16:47):
undefined

Thom: things around. (16:49):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. I mean, if you're if you're using it for that kind of (16:49):
undefined

Tyler: purpose, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. (16:51):
undefined

Tyler: Just for preliminary. (16:54):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. (16:56):
undefined

Tyler: Like you said, storyboarding (16:56):
undefined

Tyler: kind of things, just getting (16:58):
undefined

Tyler: ideas together. (16:59):
undefined

Tyler: I think, though, when you do (17:00):
undefined

Tyler: have a final version, it's best (17:01):
undefined

Tyler: to get a real photograph or get (17:02):
undefined

Tyler: an actual artist to do something (17:04):
undefined

Tyler: for you. (17:06):
undefined

Thom: We'll see through all this and it'll start to look tacky. (17:06):
undefined

Thom: And then we'll we'll go back to having artists and something a (17:09):
undefined

Thom: bit more human curated. (17:11):
undefined

Tyler: I think it'll happen eventually. (17:13):
undefined

Tyler: The bubbles got to pop sometime. (17:15):
undefined

Thom: Usually I keep my feeds fairly locked down, but I've noticed (17:16):
undefined

Thom: the YouTube homepage seems particularly bad for this. (17:20):
undefined

Thom: Like there was multiple little (17:23):
undefined

Thom: shorts and one of them was like (17:25):
undefined

Thom: a Royal Navy officer, like (17:26):
undefined

Thom: wrestling with this savage (17:28):
undefined

Thom: looking mermaid. (17:29):
undefined

Thom: And for some reason loads of (17:32):
undefined

Thom: people like videos of large (17:33):
undefined

Thom: marine life having the barnacles (17:34):
undefined

Thom: washed off. (17:36):
undefined

Tyler: Yes, yes, I have seen many of those. (17:37):
undefined

Tyler: A varying degrees of of realistic ness. (17:40):
undefined

Tyler: Some are close, others are (17:44):
undefined

Tyler: pretty outlandish and not very (17:46):
undefined

Tyler: convincing that they have become (17:48):
undefined

Tyler: popular. (17:50):
undefined

Tyler: I think they trace their lineage back to an earlier kind of (17:51):
undefined

Tyler: video, the turtle with barnacles glued to its back. (17:53):
undefined

Tyler: A lot of times they're like sort (17:57):
undefined

Tyler: of pet turtles, you know, like (17:59):
undefined

Tyler: tortoises. (18:00):
undefined

Thom: So not even marine. (18:01):
undefined

Tyler: Every once in a while there will be a marine turtle, which is (18:02):
undefined

Tyler: especially concerning, you know. (18:05):
undefined

Tyler: Then they'll scrape them off, which is terrible. (18:07):
undefined

Tyler: Turtles have a very sensitive keratin covering, you know, (18:09):
undefined

Tyler: filled with blood vessels over the top of their shell. (18:12):
undefined

Tyler: But I think this sort of like scrubbing the barnacles off the (18:15):
undefined

Tyler: whale's AI generated videos probably can be traced back to (18:18):
undefined

Tyler: those kinds of videos. (18:23):
undefined

Thom: I think it was a convergence of a few things. (18:24):
undefined

Thom: So there was also the tour guide (18:26):
undefined

Thom: who got quite a lot of criticism (18:28):
undefined

Thom: because they were taking the (18:29):
undefined

Thom: barnacles off the chins of gray (18:31):
undefined

Thom: whales. (18:33):
undefined

Thom: Oh, really? (18:33):
undefined

Thom: Yeah. (18:34):
undefined

Thom: And the whales did appear to be sort of coming in and almost (18:34):
undefined

Thom: asking for this, but it did leave an open wound. (18:37):
undefined

Thom: And I think also there's it's that doctor pimple popper kind (18:39):
undefined

Thom: of thing like that. (18:43):
undefined

Thom: You've got that kind of grossness. (18:44):
undefined

Thom: Yeah. (18:46):
undefined

Thom: We just like, oh, that must feel so much better. (18:46):
undefined

Thom: And we get this sort of weird associated satisfaction. (18:48):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. Relief with it. (18:52):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah. Yeah. There's like an anthropomorphic factor to that. (18:53):
undefined

Thom: Yeah. I bet that feels so much better to have that taken off. (18:57):
undefined

Thom: Is there any other areas you'd like to cover? (18:59):
undefined

Thom: Because this is just so huge. (19:01):
undefined

Thom: I feel so saturated by it. (19:03):
undefined

Tyler: I mean, yeah, AI content is (19:05):
undefined

Tyler: definitely getting battered in (19:07):
undefined

Tyler: like crypto zoological related (19:08):
undefined

Tyler: topics. (19:10):
undefined

Tyler: I'd say more so than other other fields. (19:11):
undefined

Tyler: A lot of AI Bigfoot if you're if (19:13):
undefined

Tyler: you're on any Bigfoot groups (19:15):
undefined

Tyler: anywhere, which I am, because I (19:17):
undefined

Tyler: love that stuff, even though I'm (19:18):
undefined

Tyler: not a believer that the AI (19:19):
undefined

Tyler: images are increasing all the (19:21):
undefined

Tyler: time, you get a lot of people (19:23):
undefined

Tyler: who are calling them out, but a (19:24):
undefined

Tyler: lot of people are like, wow, (19:25):
undefined

Tyler: this is the greatest footage (19:26):
undefined

Tyler: ever. (19:28):
undefined

Tyler: And it's clearly an AI image. (19:29):
undefined

Tyler: It doesn't really have any anatomical fidelity. (19:30):
undefined

Tyler: It's blurry and and misshapen and but it's enough to fool (19:33):
undefined

Tyler: people because it looks enough like a like a real photo. (19:39):
undefined

Tyler: It's got just enough of the texture and lighting, even if (19:42):
undefined

Tyler: it's not quite right. (19:45):
undefined

Tyler: So it's becoming a bigger (19:46):
undefined

Tyler: problem in the crypto world even (19:47):
undefined

Tyler: than like the zoological or (19:49):
undefined

Tyler: paleontological world. (19:50):
undefined

Tyler: I also think zoologists and paleontologists are better (19:52):
undefined

Tyler: equipped generally to handle that kind of thing. (19:55):
undefined

Tyler: They're more skeptical, more cautious. (19:58):
undefined

Tyler: That's not to say they're perfect and they still fall for (20:00):
undefined

Tyler: it, but they're better equipped than most cryptozoologists are. (20:02):
undefined

Tyler: It's just the fact that a lot of (20:05):
undefined

Tyler: Cryptozoologists don't have the (20:06):
undefined

Tyler: background knowledge, are more (20:08):
undefined

Tyler: willing to accept evidence that (20:10):
undefined

Tyler: supports their worldview, even (20:12):
undefined

Tyler: if they take a more skeptical or (20:14):
undefined

Tyler: scientific approach. (20:15):
undefined

Tyler: There's still more of a confirmation bias there, more of (20:16):
undefined

Tyler: a willingness to accept. (20:20):
undefined

Tyler: And I guess what you'd call mainstream scientists. (20:21):
undefined

Tyler: I don't really like the term mainstream because there's a (20:23):
undefined

Tyler: lot, a lot of mainstream scientists who do cryptozoology. (20:25):
undefined

Tyler: Sometimes they say they do, sometimes they don't, but they (20:29):
undefined

Tyler: still do it anyway. (20:31):
undefined

Tyler: Scientists who have more of a (20:32):
undefined

Tyler: critical or skeptical background (20:33):
undefined

Tyler: are generally better equipped to (20:35):
undefined

Tyler: handle it than most (20:36):
undefined

Tyler: cryptozoologists. (20:37):
undefined

Thom: I saw a YouTube ad the other day. (20:39):
undefined

Thom: I'm going into some crunchier (20:41):
undefined

Thom: areas for some research I'm (20:43):
undefined

Thom: doing right now, and I actually (20:44):
undefined

Thom: like the basis of the stuff I'm (20:46):
undefined

Thom: looking at. (20:47):
undefined

Thom: But it's interesting the adverts that come along with it, and (20:48):
undefined

Thom: I've got a forced an ad talking about how I could cure tinnitus (20:50):
undefined

Thom: with baking soda, basically. (20:54):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, there's all sorts of these fake like cure all type ads, and (20:56):
undefined

Tyler: they're usually AI generated. (20:59):
undefined

Tyler: They're usually like videos of real people talking about (21:01):
undefined

Tyler: something else, and then they've aged over their mouths. (21:04):
undefined

Tyler: So to match the the words. (21:06):
undefined

Thom: Oh, that was because it had an uncanny valley thing. (21:08):
undefined

Tyler: There, even like a still image. (21:11):
undefined

Tyler: But they've moved with AI. (21:13):
undefined

Tyler: There's a lot of really tricky, nasty deceptions that these fake (21:15):
undefined

Tyler: medical ads use. (21:19):
undefined

Thom: This was really slick. (21:21):
undefined

Thom: It was a very believable AI avatar and it was a very nice (21:22):
undefined

Thom: voice, very well-spoken. (21:25):
undefined

Thom: Obviously, to keep me on the ad, (21:27):
undefined

Thom: it did that real circular (21:28):
undefined

Thom: language thing where every time (21:30):
undefined

Thom: it went round, it felt like it (21:31):
undefined

Thom: was about to tell you the thing, (21:33):
undefined

Thom: and then it went round again, (21:34):
undefined

Thom: and it was about to tell you (21:35):
undefined

Thom: something important, and it went (21:36):
undefined

Thom: round again. (21:37):
undefined

Thom: And there's the sort of classic (21:38):
undefined

Thom: like neurobiologist has (21:39):
undefined

Thom: published research that showed (21:41):
undefined

Thom: that, wait, no, you don't get to (21:43):
undefined

Thom: say that. (21:45):
undefined

Thom: Who? (21:46):
undefined

Thom: Where can I read it? (21:46):
undefined

Thom: You can't just say it. (21:48):
undefined

Thom: You have to back it up. (21:50):
undefined

Tyler: Stick around till the end of (21:51):
undefined

Tyler: this hour or two hour long video (21:52):
undefined

Tyler: to find out my real, real (21:55):
undefined

Tyler: secret. (21:56):
undefined

Tyler: But the rest of the time, I'm (21:57):
undefined

Tyler: just going to talk at you about (21:58):
undefined

Tyler: nonsense. (21:59):
undefined

Tyler: And then at the end of the video, it's the same thing. (22:00):
undefined

Tyler: It never reveal what the secret is. (22:02):
undefined

Thom: Yeah, I think it was entirely AI generated, both the language and (22:04):
undefined

Thom: the person and the. (22:07):
undefined

Thom: It was horrifying. (22:09):
undefined

Thom: If I'm honest. (22:10):
undefined

Thom: I was upset for the rest of the day. (22:11):
undefined

Tyler: But I guess we could talk about some of my recent research and (22:13):
undefined

Tyler: my consultancy work, if you if you want to. (22:16):
undefined

Tyler: For my master's research that I'm finishing up, I've actually (22:19):
undefined

Tyler: done it on megalodon. (22:21):
undefined

Tyler: But a big surprise. (22:23):
undefined

Tyler: So last time I was on, I talked (22:24):
undefined

Tyler: a bit about how there is (22:25):
undefined

Tyler: actually skeletal material known (22:27):
undefined

Tyler: from megalodon and its (22:29):
undefined

Tyler: relatives. (22:30):
undefined

Tyler: Well, there's this very exceptionally preserved specimen (22:30):
undefined

Tyler: that came from Belgium. (22:33):
undefined

Tyler: It's a vertebral column that has (22:35):
undefined

Tyler: one hundred and forty one (22:37):
undefined

Tyler: vertebrae preserved. (22:38):
undefined

Tyler: We think that most of it is part of the Precaudal column, which (22:39):
undefined

Tyler: means the part of the vertebral column before the tail fin. (22:42):
undefined

Tyler: We think it's mostly complete. (22:45):
undefined

Tyler: It's maybe missing a few, and it (22:46):
undefined

Tyler: may include a few of the caudal (22:48):
undefined

Tyler: vertebrae, but it is a very (22:50):
undefined

Tyler: fantastic specimen, the most (22:52):
undefined

Tyler: complete that we know of, of (22:54):
undefined

Tyler: megalodon. (22:55):
undefined

Tyler: But of course, it's still missing the tail, right? (22:55):
undefined

Tyler: We don't know the exact count (22:57):
undefined

Tyler: for the number of its caudal (22:59):
undefined

Tyler: vertebrae. (23:01):
undefined

Tyler: That's what my research is (23:01):
undefined

Tyler: focused on for my master's (23:02):
undefined

Tyler: thesis. (23:04):
undefined

Tyler: It's actually estimating the total count, the precaudal plus (23:04):
undefined

Tyler: the caudal vertebrae. (23:08):
undefined

Tyler: So I've done this by taking data from modern lamniformes. (23:09):
undefined

Tyler: And that's it's an order of sharks that are commonly known (23:12):
undefined

Tyler: as the mackerel sharks. (23:14):
undefined

Tyler: They're megalodons closest relatives. (23:16):
undefined

Tyler: Megalodon itself is a lamniform, so it's part of that group. (23:18):
undefined

Tyler: So I've gathered all this data (23:21):
undefined

Tyler: from the literature on living (23:22):
undefined

Tyler: lamniformes. (23:24):
undefined

Tyler: It's been a lot of work. (23:25):
undefined

Tyler: I spent over two years just gathering references, so I've (23:26):
undefined

Tyler: managed to get together about seventy specimens from (23:29):
undefined

Tyler: Megalodons living relatives. (23:33):
undefined

Tyler: Looking at their precaudal counts, and then the (23:35):
undefined

Tyler: relationship between the precaudal counts and the number (23:37):
undefined

Tyler: of total counts. (23:40):
undefined

Tyler: And it turns out the relationship between those two (23:41):
undefined

Tyler: things is actually consistent. (23:43):
undefined

Tyler: So I've come up with this mathematical equation. (23:44):
undefined

Tyler: You can actually predict the number of total vertebrae from (23:46):
undefined

Tyler: the precaudal vertebrae. (23:49):
undefined

Tyler: So if we use the number of one (23:51):
undefined

Tyler: hundred and forty one precaudal (23:52):
undefined

Tyler: vertebrae for megalodon, I have (23:54):
undefined

Tyler: now been able to estimate that (23:56):
undefined

Tyler: megalodon would have (23:57):
undefined

Tyler: approximately two hundred and (23:58):
undefined

Tyler: thirty vertebrae. (23:59):
undefined

Tyler: And this tells us quite a bit about it. (24:00):
undefined

Tyler: This count is higher than most other lamniformes, so then I (24:02):
undefined

Tyler: have to come up with ideas on how to explain why. (24:06):
undefined

Tyler: Does it really have such a high count? (24:08):
undefined

Tyler: Unfortunately, I've hit dead ends in answering that question. (24:11):
undefined

Tyler: So I looked at two main hypotheses. (24:14):
undefined

Tyler: One is that it had a high vertebral count because it had a (24:16):
undefined

Tyler: more slender body form. (24:19):
undefined

Tyler: This has been suggested in some (24:20):
undefined

Tyler: recent papers that megalodon may (24:22):
undefined

Tyler: have been skinnier than (24:24):
undefined

Tyler: previously thought, had more of (24:25):
undefined

Tyler: an elongate body form because of (24:27):
undefined

Tyler: how big it was, but I found that (24:28):
undefined

Tyler: there was not any relationship (24:30):
undefined

Tyler: between body slenderness and the (24:32):
undefined

Tyler: vertebral count in the modern (24:34):
undefined

Tyler: lamniformes, so that can't (24:36):
undefined

Tyler: really be used as an (24:37):
undefined

Tyler: explanation. (24:38):
undefined

Tyler: Then I also tested if just (24:39):
undefined

Tyler: overall body size, the large (24:41):
undefined

Tyler: length of megalodon being the (24:44):
undefined

Tyler: largest lamniform. (24:46):
undefined

Tyler: If that could possibly explain the high vertebral count, I (24:47):
undefined

Tyler: could not find a relationship between the maximum length and (24:50):
undefined

Tyler: the total vertebral count in modern lamniformes either. (24:54):
undefined

Tyler: So we know that megalodon now had this high vertebral count. (24:57):
undefined

Tyler: We actually don't know how to explain it yet. (25:00):
undefined

Tyler: I've been able to rule out two (25:03):
undefined

Tyler: of the pre-existing hypotheses, (25:04):
undefined

Tyler: but I still need to be doing (25:06):
undefined

Tyler: some more work, and that'll (25:07):
undefined

Tyler: probably be my doctoral and (25:09):
undefined

Tyler: later. (25:10):
undefined

Tyler: Beyond that, I'll probably through my whole career trying (25:10):
undefined

Tyler: to figure that out. (25:12):
undefined

Tyler: One thing before we go, I should (25:14):
undefined

Tyler: give you a bit of an update on (25:15):
undefined

Tyler: some of the stuff I talked about (25:16):
undefined

Tyler: last time. (25:17):
undefined

Tyler: You know, we talked about the megalodon in cryptozoology. (25:18):
undefined

Thom: Oh yes. (25:20):
undefined

Thom: Please. (25:20):
undefined

Tyler: I have actually published some of my research on that. (25:20):
undefined

Tyler: So in twenty twenty three, I (25:23):
undefined

Tyler: finally got my butt in gear and (25:24):
undefined

Tyler: finished it. (25:26):
undefined

Tyler: I've been working on it since twenty nineteen, and I published (25:26):
undefined

Tyler: this big long paper. (25:29):
undefined

Tyler: It's like twenty pages long. (25:30):
undefined

Tyler: Half of that is references. (25:32):
undefined

Tyler: They're like one hundred and (25:33):
undefined

Tyler: fifty, one hundred and sixty (25:34):
undefined

Tyler: references and then like eight (25:35):
undefined

Tyler: thousand words of text or (25:36):
undefined

Tyler: something. (25:37):
undefined

Tyler: It's the longest thing I've ever written by far. (25:37):
undefined

Tyler: It's basically a monograph on (25:39):
undefined

Tyler: the history of megalodon and (25:41):
undefined

Tyler: cryptozoology. (25:42):
undefined

Tyler: Still pretty proud of it. (25:43):
undefined

Tyler: It's my magnum opus so far, so if you're if you're interested (25:44):
undefined

Tyler: in a more in depth exploration megalodon zoology, the major (25:47):
undefined

Tyler: sightings that are promoted by people, the history of those, an (25:52):
undefined

Tyler: attempt at a reasonable explanation for all of them. (25:55):
undefined

Tyler: Tons of references to the (25:58):
undefined

Tyler: primary cryptozoological (25:59):
undefined

Tyler: literature, but also the modern (26:01):
undefined

Tyler: zoological paleontological (26:02):
undefined

Tyler: literature. (26:03):
undefined

Tyler: I am already working on an addendum to that, though I have. (26:04):
undefined

Thom: Already. (26:07):
undefined

Tyler: Collected collected enough material to publish like a (26:08):
undefined

Tyler: proper update on that. (26:12):
undefined

Tyler: Got more sightings to talk about, more details that I (26:13):
undefined

Tyler: didn't have last time that I need to update. (26:16):
undefined

Tyler: I've discovered like some things in the original that I talked (26:18):
undefined

Tyler: about or actually like hoaxes. (26:20):
undefined

Tyler: They're plagiarized from earlier sources. (26:22):
undefined

Tyler: I found more primary accounts to add details to the originals. (26:24):
undefined

Tyler: I've got a lot of material that I need to get working on to get (26:28):
undefined

Tyler: that addendum up, so hopefully I will also have that soon. (26:31):
undefined

Tyler: I've also published some other (26:33):
undefined

Tyler: research about megalodon and the (26:35):
undefined

Tyler: history of paleontology in (26:37):
undefined

Tyler: general. (26:38):
undefined

Tyler: I've talked about this specimen (26:38):
undefined

Tyler: that I've nicknamed Mitchell's (26:40):
undefined

Tyler: Monster. (26:42):
undefined

Tyler: It was first published by a (26:43):
undefined

Tyler: naturalist named Samuel Latham (26:44):
undefined

Tyler: Mitchell in the early eighteen (26:45):
undefined

Tyler: hundreds. (26:47):
undefined

Tyler: It doesn't have a specimen number. (26:47):
undefined

Tyler: The museum it was at was (26:49):
undefined

Tyler: destroyed in a fire, (26:50):
undefined

Tyler: unfortunately. (26:51):
undefined

Tyler: So we only have historical literature to go off of. (26:51):
undefined

Tyler: And from these accounts I've worked together that it was (26:53):
undefined

Tyler: probably megalodon teeth associated with the whale (26:56):
undefined

Tyler: skeleton, the first ever discovery of that kind of thing. (26:59):
undefined

Tyler: So it is an important historical (27:02):
undefined

Tyler: thing, but I've done all sorts (27:04):
undefined

Tyler: of research on that, (27:05):
undefined

Tyler: reconstructing the story on (27:06):
undefined

Tyler: that, and it does intersect with (27:07):
undefined

Tyler: cryptozoology. (27:08):
undefined

Tyler: It's really interesting because (27:09):
undefined

Tyler: it plays into the megalodon (27:10):
undefined

Tyler: stuff. (27:11):
undefined

Tyler: Even though it was not initially identified as megalodon. (27:11):
undefined

Tyler: This this skeleton was discovered in North Carolina. (27:14):
undefined

Tyler: I think it's one of the (27:18):
undefined

Tyler: Carolinas in around eighteen (27:19):
undefined

Tyler: sixteen on a plantation there, (27:21):
undefined

Tyler: digging for some kind of (27:23):
undefined

Tyler: purpose. (27:25):
undefined

Tyler: They unearthed this this skeleton. (27:25):
undefined

Tyler: It's a vertebral column, and it's got teeth with it. (27:27):
undefined

Tyler: They don't know what it is. (27:29):
undefined

Tyler: There's speculation that it's a (27:30):
undefined

Tyler: giant shark, which is fairly (27:32):
undefined

Tyler: correct. (27:34):
undefined

Tyler: But there's also this idea that (27:35):
undefined

Tyler: it could be a sea serpent, (27:35):
undefined

Tyler: because that's a hot topic in (27:36):
undefined

Tyler: the in the eighteen tens in (27:38):
undefined

Tyler: America, there's sightings of (27:40):
undefined

Tyler: like the Gloucester Sea Serpent (27:40):
undefined

Tyler: in Massachusetts, which are (27:42):
undefined

Tyler: nationwide news. (27:43):
undefined

Tyler: It's a huge, huge topic at the time. (27:45):
undefined

Tyler: There are a lot of major people (27:46):
undefined

Tyler: taking this very, very (27:47):
undefined

Tyler: seriously. (27:48):
undefined

Tyler: So. So maybe it's a sea serpent. (27:49):
undefined

Tyler: So they send it from the (27:50):
undefined

Tyler: Carolinas up to New York to a (27:51):
undefined

Tyler: guy named Samuel Latham (27:53):
undefined

Tyler: Mitchell. (27:54):
undefined

Tyler: He's an early naturalist. (27:55):
undefined

Tyler: He's a Renaissance man, right? (27:56):
undefined

Tyler: He's, he's he does a ton of different things. (27:57):
undefined

Tyler: Like most wealthy people at that time. (27:59):
undefined

Tyler: He's like a senator, congressman of some sort, but he's also (28:01):
undefined

Tyler: involved in all sorts of like, natural history studies. (28:04):
undefined

Tyler: He's one of America's first serious paleontologists. (28:06):
undefined

Tyler: He builds up his huge personal collection, one of the first (28:09):
undefined

Tyler: large scale collections of fossils in the United States. (28:12):
undefined

Tyler: So the specimen is sent to him (28:15):
undefined

Tyler: because he's the guy to send it (28:16):
undefined

Tyler: to, right? (28:17):
undefined

Tyler: He writes up a short description of it in eighteen eighteen. (28:17):
undefined

Tyler: He keeps the original identification. (28:20):
undefined

Tyler: Maybe it's a giant shark. (28:22):
undefined

Tyler: Maybe it's a sea serpent, but (28:23):
undefined

Tyler: it's this huge vertebral column, (28:24):
undefined

Tyler: like thirty four to thirty six (28:26):
undefined

Tyler: feet long, with these big, heavy (28:27):
undefined

Tyler: like backbones, like maybe like (28:29):
undefined

Tyler: twelve pounds or more per (28:31):
undefined

Tyler: backgrounds. (28:32):
undefined

Tyler: They're dense, big bones. (28:33):
undefined

Tyler: And it's got these triangular (28:34):
undefined

Tyler: shaped teeth that are like six (28:36):
undefined

Tyler: inches long. (28:38):
undefined

Tyler: Well, what has teeth that are triangular and six inches long? (28:39):
undefined

Tyler: Nothing but the megalodon. (28:42):
undefined

Tyler: But the vertebrae are too heavy, right? (28:43):
undefined

Tyler: They're not a megalodon. (28:45):
undefined

Tyler: The vertebral column is probably from a whale. (28:46):
undefined

Tyler: Right? (28:48):
undefined

Tyler: So? (28:49):
undefined

Tyler: So they found this association of megalodon teeth and vertebrae (28:49):
undefined

Tyler: from a whale. (28:52):
undefined

Tyler: Unfortunately, the specimen is (28:52):
undefined

Tyler: donated in eighteen twenty six (28:54):
undefined

Tyler: to a museum called the Lyceum of (28:56):
undefined

Tyler: Natural History in New York (28:57):
undefined

Tyler: City. (28:59):
undefined

Tyler: This is one of the first natural (28:59):
undefined

Tyler: history museums in the United (29:01):
undefined

Tyler: States. (29:02):
undefined

Tyler: Latham is one of its first presidents. (29:03):
undefined

Tyler: He's a founding member, so he donates his fossil and rock (29:04):
undefined

Tyler: collection to them. (29:08):
undefined

Tyler: So they store it over a period of many years, but they run into (29:09):
undefined

Tyler: all sorts of financial troubles. (29:11):
undefined

Tyler: They move buildings like once every five to ten years. (29:12):
undefined

Tyler: Everything is left in storage. (29:15):
undefined

Tyler: Then in eighteen sixty six, (29:16):
undefined

Tyler: their latest building burns down (29:17):
undefined

Tyler: their entire collection that (29:19):
undefined

Tyler: they've been gathering for the (29:20):
undefined

Tyler: past fifty or sixty years, the (29:21):
undefined

Tyler: largest natural history (29:22):
undefined

Tyler: collection in the United States (29:23):
undefined

Tyler: and in North America at that (29:25):
undefined

Tyler: time. (29:26):
undefined

Tyler: Gone in a single night, in a fire. (29:27):
undefined

Tyler: And that includes Mitchell's monster. (29:29):
undefined

Tyler: This amazing megalodon and whale specimen. (29:30):
undefined

Tyler: So we only have the historical accounts to base it off of. (29:32):
undefined

Tyler: So that was my job (29:35):
undefined

Tyler: reconstructing that story, (29:36):
undefined

Tyler: because it had never been put (29:38):
undefined

Tyler: together before. (29:39):
undefined

Tyler: Mitchell's original description had been mentioned once or twice (29:39):
undefined

Tyler: in the literature. (29:42):
undefined

Tyler: And even, like in a recent blog post by paleontologist. (29:43):
undefined

Tyler: But nobody had ever put together all the historical material. (29:46):
undefined

Tyler: Oh, I should specify he only had (29:49):
undefined

Tyler: a single vertebrae in two of the (29:50):
undefined

Tyler: teeth. (29:51):
undefined

Tyler: The whole thing wasn't just part, but he still described it (29:52):
undefined

Tyler: based on, like, the oral accounts he received. (29:54):
undefined

Tyler: So all people knew was that it was sent to him. (29:56):
undefined

Tyler: And then there was nothing from there. (29:58):
undefined

Tyler: Well, I found the donation (29:59):
undefined

Tyler: catalog to the Lyceum that he (30:00):
undefined

Tyler: wrote because it was his (30:02):
undefined

Tyler: collection. (30:03):
undefined

Tyler: But then I also had to figure (30:04):
undefined

Tyler: out when and where it was (30:04):
undefined

Tyler: exactly collected. (30:06):
undefined

Tyler: Mitchell did not give a precise (30:07):
undefined

Tyler: date or time frame, and he gives (30:08):
undefined

Tyler: inconsistent details on who even (30:10):
undefined

Tyler: found it. (30:12):
undefined

Tyler: So I actually had to look through old newspaper accounts. (30:12):
undefined

Tyler: And these are some of the oldest (30:15):
undefined

Tyler: possible ones that are currently (30:16):
undefined

Tyler: digitized, right? (30:18):
undefined

Tyler: These are newspaper accounts from eighteen eighteen, eighteen (30:19):
undefined

Tyler: seventeen, eighteen sixteen. (30:21):
undefined

Tyler: And I did find newspaper notes from eighteen sixteen of him (30:22):
undefined

Tyler: receiving the specimen and actually teaching with it, (30:26):
undefined

Tyler: because he did teach a class like a natural history anatomy (30:28):
undefined

Tyler: class at a local college. (30:31):
undefined

Tyler: And there was a notice in a (30:32):
undefined

Tyler: local New York newspaper about (30:33):
undefined

Tyler: it in eighteen sixteen that he (30:35):
undefined

Tyler: had had that specimen by that (30:37):
undefined

Tyler: time and had been teaching with (30:38):
undefined

Tyler: it. (30:39):
undefined

Tyler: So that's how I was able to put (30:40):
undefined

Tyler: more of a date on what it would (30:41):
undefined

Tyler: have been found eighteen, (30:42):
undefined

Tyler: sixteen or maybe like a year or (30:43):
undefined

Tyler: two earlier. (30:44):
undefined

Tyler: But then, even though it had not (30:45):
undefined

Tyler: been initially identified as a (30:47):
undefined

Tyler: megalodon, it had been (30:48):
undefined

Tyler: identified as a giant shark or a (30:50):
undefined

Tyler: sea serpent. (30:52):
undefined

Tyler: It had actually been connected with sightings of giant sharks (30:53):
undefined

Tyler: in the eighteen thirties. (30:57):
undefined

Tyler: And there's two different (30:58):
undefined

Tyler: sightings, but they're both in (30:59):
undefined

Tyler: Southeast Asia, and they both (31:00):
undefined

Tyler: probably represent whale sharks (31:02):
undefined

Tyler: described as being this large, (31:03):
undefined

Tyler: like square headed shark with (31:05):
undefined

Tyler: sort of that, like, spotted (31:06):
undefined

Tyler: pattern. (31:07):
undefined

Tyler: Yeah, probably a probably. (31:08):
undefined

Tyler: That's what has been accepted as the explanation. (31:10):
undefined

Tyler: But there are speculations that (31:12):
undefined

Tyler: it's some sort of prehistoric (31:13):
undefined

Tyler: monster. (31:14):
undefined

Tyler: There's one sighting in, I think like eighteen thirty four and (31:14):
undefined

Tyler: another in eighteen thirty five. (31:17):
undefined

Tyler: The guy in the eighteen thirty (31:18):
undefined

Tyler: four sighting says maybe it's a (31:19):
undefined

Tyler: plesiosaur. (31:21):
undefined

Tyler: Okay. (31:21):
undefined

Tyler: Probably not. (31:22):
undefined

Tyler: That's way off. (31:22):
undefined

Tyler: But the second guy says, what if it's a giant shark? (31:24):
undefined

Tyler: So he had actually heard about Mitchell's monster. (31:26):
undefined

Tyler: He had gotten another, like a second hand account about it. (31:28):
undefined

Tyler: And he said, what if this sighting that I had of this big (31:30):
undefined

Tyler: shark is the same animal that that Mitchell described? (31:33):
undefined

Tyler: What if it's this big prehistoric shark? (31:37):
undefined

Tyler: That's crazy. (31:38):
undefined

Tyler: Right? (31:39):
undefined

Tyler: It's the eighteen thirties, and (31:39):
undefined

Tyler: people are already starting to (31:40):
undefined

Tyler: speculate about giant (31:42):
undefined

Tyler: prehistoric sharks, only known (31:43):
undefined

Tyler: from fossils as being still (31:44):
undefined

Tyler: alive and being sighted by (31:46):
undefined

Tyler: people. (31:47):
undefined

Tyler: But this is like the the origin (31:47):
undefined

Tyler: point for the megalodon thing, (31:49):
undefined

Tyler: right? (31:50):
undefined

Tyler: People have been talking about this idea since the eighteen (31:51):
undefined

Tyler: thirties, you know. (31:53):
undefined

Tyler: And unfortunately, I run into it (31:54):
undefined

Tyler: a lot of times where people are (31:55):
undefined

Tyler: too dismissive of the megalodon (31:57):
undefined

Tyler: stuff. (31:59):
undefined

Tyler: Skeptical scientists who maybe know a lot about sharks but (31:59):
undefined

Tyler: don't know a lot about the history of the megalodon thing, (32:02):
undefined

Tyler: are too quick to dismiss it. (32:04):
undefined

Tyler: They say, well, it's just a recent phenomenon, right? (32:06):
undefined

Tyler: There's not really anything to it. (32:08):
undefined

Tyler: There's not really any sightings. (32:10):
undefined

Tyler: There's not really any literature. (32:11):
undefined

Tyler: Well, no, there's actually a whole ton of literature. (32:12):
undefined

Tyler: It's an old, very complicated idea. (32:15):
undefined

Tyler: It didn't start off as anything big. (32:17):
undefined

Tyler: It snowballed over time. (32:19):
undefined

Tyler: But there's a lot of twists and (32:20):
undefined

Tyler: turns, a lot of branches on the (32:21):
undefined

Tyler: tree that some go places, some (32:22):
undefined

Tyler: don't. (32:24):
undefined

Tyler: It's a really complex, really old idea that has a lot of (32:25):
undefined

Tyler: cultural sticking power. (32:27):
undefined

Tyler: It's not sufficient to debunk it (32:28):
undefined

Tyler: by just saying, well, it's a (32:30):
undefined

Tyler: recent thing. (32:31):
undefined

Tyler: You know, the Meg movies made it (32:32):
undefined

Tyler: up or the documentary made it (32:33):
undefined

Tyler: up. (32:34):
undefined

Tyler: It's not like important. (32:34):
undefined

Tyler: We shouldn't spend time on it. (32:35):
undefined

Tyler: You got to understand the whole history behind it. (32:36):
undefined

Tyler: And that's what I've been (32:38):
undefined

Tyler: working on, publishing these (32:39):
undefined

Tyler: papers and doing all this (32:40):
undefined

Tyler: research. (32:40):
undefined

Tyler: I've still got so much more work to do on it. (32:41):
undefined

Thom: That's what I've always loved about your research is. (32:43):
undefined

Thom: And why I find it fascinating is (32:45):
undefined

Thom: even though you are saying that (32:46):
undefined

Thom: this is something untrue, you (32:49):
undefined

Thom: are researching and uncovering (32:51):
undefined

Thom: that untruth and its origins, (32:53):
undefined

Thom: which is far more informative (32:54):
undefined

Thom: than, oh, this is just a recent (32:56):
undefined

Thom: phenomenon. (32:57):
undefined

Tyler: If you want to be a good skeptical cryptozoologist, you (32:58):
undefined

Tyler: have to be a historian. (33:00):
undefined

Tyler: And I mean, the same goes for any field. (33:02):
undefined

Tyler: You should be at least a (33:04):
undefined

Tyler: competent confident historian of (33:05):
undefined

Tyler: your field. (33:06):
undefined

Tyler: It helps a lot. (33:07):
undefined

Tyler: Even in doing your modern studies in cryptozoology. (33:08):
undefined

Tyler: It's an absolute necessity to do (33:11):
undefined

Tyler: good scholarship, because these (33:13):
undefined

Tyler: ideas, I mean, and megalodon is (33:14):
undefined

Tyler: like this tiny, tiny part of (33:16):
undefined

Tyler: cryptozoology, and cryptozoology (33:17):
undefined

Tyler: itself is sometimes considered (33:19):
undefined

Tyler: like a subculture, considered a (33:20):
undefined

Tyler: fringe thing. (33:22):
undefined

Tyler: So it's a small part of a small thing, but it's actually way (33:23):
undefined

Tyler: more complex than you think. (33:26):
undefined

Tyler: And it's like being a deep sea fisherman to bring it back (33:27):
undefined

Tyler: around to the deep sea, like trawling, trawling the ocean (33:30):
undefined

Tyler: bottom, the depths of obscurity and bringing up some new, weird, (33:33):
undefined

Tyler: totally unheard of fish. (33:38):
undefined

Tyler: Every time you do research, it's it's something new. (33:39):
undefined

Thom: We will include in the show notes, hopefully almost (33:42):
undefined

Thom: everything you've spoken about. (33:45):
undefined

Thom: Thanks so much, Tyler. (33:46):
undefined

Thom: I really enjoyed that. (33:47):
undefined

Tyler: I had fun. (33:48):
undefined

Thom: I don't know if you've come across any particularly (33:51):
undefined

Thom: egregious AI stuff. (33:53):
undefined

Alan: It's not it's not necessarily AI stuff. (33:55):
undefined

Alan: But there was I think we've talked about this before, but (33:56):
undefined

Alan: the goblin shark, right. (33:59):
undefined

Alan: It's only ever been filmed twice. (34:00):
undefined

Alan: The first time, I think the (34:02):
undefined

Alan: Japanese trolled a couple and (34:03):
undefined

Alan: then managed to get them into a (34:04):
undefined

Alan: harbour so they could put a (34:05):
undefined

Alan: diver in. (34:07):
undefined

Alan: And that's where those images of (34:07):
undefined

Alan: using the snout Jotham came (34:09):
undefined

Alan: from. (34:11):
undefined

Alan: And so, yes, they were found (34:12):
undefined

Alan: alive, but not necessarily in a (34:13):
undefined

Alan: natural setting. (34:15):
undefined

Thom: And that red fish it's eating is clearly dead. (34:16):
undefined

Thom: It's clearly given that. (34:18):
undefined

Alan: Yes. And so actually just encountering one in the wild was (34:19):
undefined

Alan: actually as this time last year. (34:22):
undefined

Alan: And there's a piece of footage is about 10s long. (34:24):
undefined

Alan: It's not great, but it's certainly a goblin shark. (34:27):
undefined

Alan: And so even having goblin sharks (34:29):
undefined

Alan: die, their jaw comes out and (34:30):
undefined

Alan: they look. (34:31):
undefined

Alan: Everyone knows what they look (34:31):
undefined

Alan: like when they're relaxed, but (34:32):
undefined

Alan: in real life, they're just like (34:33):
undefined

Alan: sharks. (34:34):
undefined

Alan: But if you go online and say, give me a picture of a goblin (34:35):
undefined

Alan: shark, half of them are obviously just dead samples. (34:38):
undefined

Alan: Which makes sense, because most of the specimens, most of the (34:40):
undefined

Alan: records of this thing have come from washing up on a beach or (34:42):
undefined

Alan: bycatch or whatever it may be, but it's just completely flooded (34:46):
undefined

Alan: with AI generated or just art or interpretations of these things, (34:49):
undefined

Alan: and it makes it really difficult when you're trying to get a (34:54):
undefined

Alan: proper idea on this. (34:56):
undefined

Alan: It's like you're trying to find (34:57):
undefined

Alan: a legitimately good, (34:59):
undefined

Alan: scientifically accurate picture (35:00):
undefined

Alan: or drawing or schematic of this (35:01):
undefined

Alan: animal was really hard because (35:04):
undefined

Alan: of the volume of rubbish you (35:06):
undefined

Alan: have to punch through to get to (35:07):
undefined

Alan: it. (35:09):
undefined

Alan: That's the only time I've ever (35:09):
undefined

Alan: been sort of genuinely (35:10):
undefined

Alan: frustrated by the fluff on the (35:10):
undefined

Alan: internet. (35:12):
undefined

Thom: Some people were trying to sort of quantify that because Google (35:12):
undefined

Thom: image searches, like somebody was actually going through and (35:15):
undefined

Thom: then highlighting the images that were real. (35:17):
undefined

Thom: And as more and more of this content is getting generated, it (35:20):
undefined

Thom: becomes this feedback loop. (35:23):
undefined

Thom: So actually, your Google image results are getting less and (35:25):
undefined

Thom: less accurate because the proportions are changing. (35:28):
undefined

Thom: I think there's a little bit of something in Google image (35:31):
undefined

Thom: searches where it sort of evaluates the quality of the (35:32):
undefined

Thom: image, and because AI generated images are beautifully lit and (35:35):
undefined

Thom: really high resolution and really in focus because they're (35:40):
undefined

Thom: not real, they get sort of bumped to the top example I saw (35:42):
undefined

Thom: was for Baby Peacock, and there's loads of AI generated (35:45):
undefined

Thom: images of what we would assume a baby peacock looks like. (35:48):
undefined

Thom: But of course, that whole (35:52):
undefined

Thom: plumage thing is a sexual (35:53):
undefined

Thom: advertisement, and they don't (35:54):
undefined

Thom: have any of that when they're (35:56):
undefined

Thom: juveniles. (35:57):
undefined

Thom: They're just little brown birds. (35:57):
undefined

Thom: So the amount of images of baby Peacock, which looks like a (35:59):
undefined

Thom: peacock with the big fan tail. (36:02):
undefined

Thom: And the beautiful. (36:04):
undefined

Thom: Blue. (36:04):
undefined

Thom: We know those aren't real, but (36:05):
undefined

Thom: it's the majority of hits on on (36:06):
undefined

Thom: Google Images. (36:08):
undefined

Alan: It's a tough world we live in. (36:08):
undefined

Thom: Tom Tyler was a bit more optimistic. (36:10):
undefined

Thom: We've kind of been through this before, and when the new tech (36:12):
undefined

Thom: comes out, we fall for it for a little while, but then we sort (36:15):
undefined

Thom: of learn to see through it. (36:18):
undefined

Thom: I'm hoping it'll self-right again, and we haven't finally (36:19):
undefined

Thom: invented something so convincing that we can't adapt to it. (36:22):
undefined

Thom: But I feel like that's already happening as well. (36:25):
undefined

Thom: They're like, I can recognize (36:27):
undefined

Thom: the style of language when one (36:29):
undefined

Thom: of these tools has been used and (36:31):
undefined

Thom: that sort of cartoony style they (36:33):
undefined

Thom: do because I enjoyed making some (36:35):
undefined

Thom: images when it first came out, (36:37):
undefined

Thom: but now they all start to feel (36:38):
undefined

Thom: the same. (36:39):
undefined

Thom: There's something about it that (36:39):
undefined

Thom: some uncanny valley thing where (36:41):
undefined

Thom: they still look like really good (36:42):
undefined

Thom: images, but they all feel the (36:43):
undefined

Thom: same. (36:45):
undefined

Thom: That makes sense and I feel like I'm starting to. (36:45):
undefined

Alan: See what it is is you lack all (36:47):
undefined

Alan: the subtle, almost subconscious (36:49):
undefined

Alan: imperfections of a real (36:51):
undefined

Alan: photograph. (36:53):
undefined

Alan: I feel photographs are never really perfect. (36:53):
undefined

Alan: It's that, yeah, the uncanny valley thing is like, it's (36:55):
undefined

Alan: almost too real. (36:58):
undefined

Alan: You. (36:59):
undefined

Alan: It's too perfect. (36:59):
undefined

Alan: Yeah. (37:00):
undefined

Alan: People don't look like that. (37:01):
undefined

Thom: It would have a bit of mud on it. (37:02):
undefined

Thom: It would have a scar. (37:03):
undefined

Thom: It would have a torn feather. (37:04):
undefined

Thom: But these, like, weird, dream like, perfect images. (37:05):
undefined

Thom: There's. (37:09):
undefined

Thom: Yeah. (37:09):
undefined

Thom: It doesn't feel right. (37:09):
undefined

Alan: Is it time we just did a control delete on the entire internet? (37:11):
undefined

Alan: Start again. (37:13):
undefined

Thom: Might be time for a do over. (37:14):
undefined

Thom: We've learned our lessons. (37:15):
undefined

Thom: We'll get it right next time. (37:16):
undefined

Thom: And that was a pressurized (37:18):
undefined

Thom: version of one of our longer (37:20):
undefined

Thom: podcast episodes. (37:22):
undefined

Thom: If you enjoyed that, and you would like to hear the full (37:23):
undefined

Thom: length episode, just match the episode numbers and you'll be (37:26):
undefined

Thom: able to find the full length version in the feed. (37:29):
undefined

Thom: Thanks for listening. (37:32):
undefined

Thom: We'll deep-sea you next time. (37:33):
undefined

Thom: And we abyss you already. (37:34):
undefined

Märvel: Oh, yeah. (37:41):
undefined
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

Cardiac Cowboys

Cardiac Cowboys

The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.