Doctor Ted's Prescription

Democrats are calling for "unity," but the price is non-negotiable.

The First Amendment protects speech, even hate speech. But there are limits. You can't incite someone to commit a crime. And even without incitement, there are professions where celebrating Kirk's murder demonstrates your lack of fitness. In the military it's criminal to do so. 

The assassination of Charlie Kirk was an act of pure evil. But few truly understand what that word means.

Director of National Intelligence Gabbard has declassified the receipts that expose a massive Deep State Conspiracy. But there are some rules for how a conspiracy theory becomes meaningful.

DNI Gabbard's release of the Russiagate receipts is unleashing a legal tsunami with Barack Obama at its center. We discuss the major legal issues.

There is a constitutional requirement for the nomination of judges, and the Chief of Staff running the autopen isn't it.

Trump's battles in the courts are leading to important wins, but primarily on process. In the Birthright Citizenship case (Trump v CASA), the Supreme Court shut down those nationwide injunctions. Now the issues can percolate through the Courts in proper order.

Every case against Trump is in the "process" stage. Not one of them has actually reached the "merits" stage, where a court looks at the facts and the law together. All of the "restraining orders" and "injunctions" are based on first impressions. 

We tend to think about lawsuits in the sense of who's right. That's merits. But before the court can even think about the merits, it has to go through the process of keeping both sides inside the lines.

Elizabeth Warren may think that we don't have a right to know what the government spend our hard-earned dollars on, but she's dead wrong. There is language in our foundational document that tells us we have an absolute right to that information. 

We don't need to worry about how the court cases will turn out. 

Elon Musk's DOGE has access to virtually every financial record in the US. How is this even remotely legal? (Hint: It's not access, it's how the records are used...)

With President (boy, that sounds good...) Trump's EO stopping birthright citizenship, the predictable legal noise has begun. A judge has declared it unconstitutional, and others are sure to follow. In other courts, we should expect a different answer. Ultimately the Supreme Court will make the decision.

We discuss the key issue in the 14th Amendment. What does, "subject to the jurisdiction of" mean?

It's easy to see the causes of the LA fires, if you are willing to follow the critical incident chain. Governor Hair Gel wants us to blame global warming, which isn't hot enough to start fires. There are multiple causes for the fires and the inability to fight them. Every cause points a finger directly at Democrat governance.