December 5, 2022 • 50 mins
In this episode, we discussed the international online forum “Global Crisis. Our Survival is in Unity,” which took place on November 12, 2022, the trip to Washington DC to meet with the legislators, the future we’re being programmed to have, and the one we all can have in the Creative Society, touched upon the role the pyramids have “possibly” played and how it relates to our time and gave some advice on what to watch.
Forum "Global Crisis. Our Survival is in Unity", November 12, 2022
Urgent Online Report "The Future of Humanity"
Global Crisis. Who is the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ for Us? | International Conference, December 10, 2022
Atlantis. The Elite in search of immortality
We love receiving your feedback ❤️ Drop us a line anywhere you happen to come across our posts 🙂
We are @episodikal on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, TikTok, and LinkedIn, or email us at ask@episodikal.com
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Alexey (00:02):
We are live.
Taliy (00:02):
We're live again, and welcome back to
The Episodikal Podcast.
Alexey (00:07):
Yes, welcome back guys.
Before we dive in, we wouldlike to let you know that we
also have a video version,full edit on YouTube.
As usual, all the linksare in the description.
You can go to, our YouTubechannel, Episodikal.
We are @episodikal onevery social platform.
(00:28):
We are also on Rumble, thesame name Episodikal podcast.
Today we will continue expandingon the information that is
very important to every livinghuman being on this planet.
After the report CreativeSociety made for Rotary
and Rotaract Club members.
(00:48):
And, uh, after its releaseto the public, well,
we made something evenbigger, even bigger.
The biggest, and withoutexaggeration, it is the
largest event in thehistory of, humankind.
It was the InternationalOnline Forum, "Global Crisis.
Our Survival is in Unity."And this time it was
(01:10):
simultaneously interpretedinto 150 languages,
all done by volunteers.
And the first part was very,very similar to what was
presented to the members ofRotary and Rotaract clubs.
But then we did something thatwas really, really interesting.
(01:33):
We presented indetail the solution.
We portrayed the CreativeSociety, and the benefits
that everyone will have inthis world if we choose to go
the Creative Society route.
This is something that is reallyimpressive because when you see
(01:54):
these beautiful videos that weremade by the teams showing how
our lives will be improved, andthis is something that we cannot
even imagine in today's world.
It is absolutely mind blowinghow our lives will change.
And for this, all we need,for the moment, is to
(02:16):
choose Creative Society.
This is why it is importantto spread this information.
Well, we are doing alreadysomething even to pitch these
ideas to our politicians,starting with the US, and
you went to WashingtonDC right after the forum.
Can you please tell ourlisteners and viewers a
(02:38):
little bit more about this?
Taliy (02:40):
Yeah.
So first of all, hello everyone.
I guess me and youwill know it very good.
Like how do you start evenexplaining something that
huge as our project tosomebody who has no idea?
So it's like every conferencewe were always like,
what do we start with?
Do we start with benefitsof Creative Society?
Do we start with climate?
Do we start with generalinformation about what's
(03:01):
going on in the world?
And then for Rotary, we reallyhad to push ourselves to put
as much information as possiblein the shortest amount of time.
And we saw that peopleresonated with it.
People were like, okay, nowwe getting why we have to
get all the best scientistsof our civilization on one
table, because it's them who'sgonna deliver to us solutions
(03:24):
for the climate, scientificsolution, technological
solution, free energy that weneed, so necessary right now to
contradict the climate change.
We're not talkingabout CO2, of course.
So, the next thing we seethat people watch the forum,
a lot of feedback, superpositive, and we see that this
is much more understandable.
(03:45):
And then we got invitedto Washington, DC.
It happened very suddenly.
There was this conferenceover there where policy
makers were meeting up, theywere discussing financial
things, upcoming recession,big mass unemployment,
how to deal with it.
And we got invited,because we have a project
that like offeringsolutions to these things.
(04:08):
So we were asked to present,only in amount of 30
minutes, present the project.
And, of course, we hadto start with climate.
And we were closing.
We were closing this meeting.
Before us, some peopletalked about climate.
You know, it more sounded likeritual, when people saying,
yeah, we have to switch to greenenergy and build more windmills.
(04:28):
You know, in Germany I'mwatching the news, they closing,
they shutting down windmills,taking them away, send them
to the yards, and actuallyopening the coal mine that was
underneath these windmills.
So, on practice, it's all goingalready the opposite direction.
But here in the officesthey still talking
about, like a ritual.
(04:49):
What, can we compare it tolike some religious ritual?
You have to bring upthat, yeah, we care about
environment, we care aboutbringing more solar and wind.
So we were closing, and ofcourse we were expecting
like we're gonna presentthis information about the
climate change, about thenatural factors, how we were
able to put so many differentscientists on one table and
(05:10):
get this holistic picture.
And we were expecting to bebombarded by the questions,
wait guys, so it's not CO2?
How is it possible?
We, we always sincerelybelieved this is CO2, and
you're telling us that CO2is not the main driving
factor of the climate change?
So we, talking about this wholeproject, I was closing, I was
(05:30):
speaker number four out of four.
We're expecting questions.
None of them was about CO2!Can you imagine, everybody
in the room already knewthat CO2 has nothing to do
with the climate change,but it's more of a ritual.
It's more of a profitablebusiness for each one of them.
So this is sort of the thingeveryone talks about, just
(05:50):
to say it out loud, thatguys we're on the same page.
We're all, besides otherprojects, we're making money
on this thing, and that's it.
When we communicated withthem, most of the questions
were like as if they alreadyknew that we were saying the
truth, like no one was askingto back it up with more facts,
because it was obvious thatwe were speaking the truth.
(06:12):
Most of the questions were,how do we let the public
know about this withoutraising panic among people.
Like how do we make people know?
There were representativesfrom European Union as well
who invited us to EuropeanUnion Summits next summer.
There were representatives fromAfrican countries, and some
(06:33):
of them asked us questions,which were more theological.
They said, guys, this definitelysounds like apocalypse that
we may face as a civilization,and how do we deal with it?
Because, you know, I'm a Muslim,one man said, and he said, if
Allah allows it, then let it be,but I don't believe that Allah
(06:56):
allows something that bad tohappen to all of the humanity.
And I was like, first ofall, we respect religions
and we are going to havethis amazing event that our
participants from IslamicWorld making on December 10th.
So we invite everyoneto participate in it.
It's going to be called"Who is Prophet Muhammad,
(07:18):
peace be upon him, to us."And, second of all, we cannot
put responsibility for savingour future as a humanity
on divine powers, becausedivine powers already gave
all of us freedom of choice.
We have technologies, when wewake up in the morning, we don't
say that if God wants me tohave breakfast, I'm gonna have
a sandwich on a plate right nextto my bed and the coffee in the
(07:40):
mug, it's all gonna be here.
No, we expect to docertain things ourselves.
So one of the best things I'veheard, best ideas is that here
on our planet, we are kind ofhaving this experiment, this
humanity has to unite andbecome civilization in order
to overcome the challenges.
(08:01):
Why?
Why are we not contacted bythe more advanced civilization
somewhere out there, wesending radio signals?
Apparently, we are not theonly ones in the universe.
Well, because any ofinteractions will be violation
of our freedom of choice,guys, we live on this planet.
It's totally up to us.
We have amazing technologies,we have all financial
resources, we have enough ofeverything to provide amazing
(08:25):
life for everyone on here.
You know, like Jacques Frescoone time said, he calculated
that amount of money spenton World War II and World War
I would be enough to provideeveryone with amazing house.
Everyone on the planetcould be provided with
amazing housing no matterin which country you live.
He was like, how muchof a changer that would
(08:48):
be to our society?
But instead of that, we,humans, decided to execute
our freedom of will in the waythat empowered few psychopaths
to take over our societyand start mass extermination
of humans on our planet.
If anyone would be looking fromaside, they would say, these
people are nuts, at best, butit's their freedom of choice.
(09:10):
It might be a lesson as whenchildren start walking, they
learn how to walk, they mightfall down, they get up and they
try not to fall down again.
But for now, we are seeingthat for some reason our
civilization approaching thisdead end where, oh boy, we
see that more and more peoplestart using the word World
(09:33):
War three, which is terrible.
It shouldn't even be discussed.
And, you know, even two yearsago when I started explaining
Creative Society, many peoplehad little bit of a hard
time understanding why dowe need to change anything.
I think past two yearsreally made us all grow
up as a society and to theunderstanding that we definitely
(09:56):
need to change something.
I can get in more detailsregarding the Washington
trip, and how there was veryinteresting crowd in the room.
And you know, when we had only30 minutes, we had to start
with the climate and we startwith 12,000 year cycle with
all the scientists on theirside of the evidence that
this is happening and none ofthem being at the same table
(10:18):
to actually put differentpieces of the puzzle together.
How did we come up with it?
How we were able to, youknow, see the factors that
are clearly the evidencefrom volcanology when the
volcanoes erupted, we see thatvolcanologists, they say it's a
different consistency of magna.
It consists of differentparticles which coming
(10:41):
way deeper from thecore of our planet.
It's not a surface level magma.
Okay, this is one pieceof puzzle, so something
is pushing this magmaall the way to the top.
Then we tried to communicateto all of them, get them
at the same table and theycouldn't understand each other.
Because each volcanologistonly study certain type of
volcano and only one or twovolcanoes in their whole career.
(11:05):
We tried to speak toseismologists, get them at
the same table, they allhave different databases.
They pick one and they don'tknow about the other ones,
and the other ones for somereason decide to randomly
exclude certain type ofdata, like earthquakes with
magnitude under four are notbeing included in one of the
major databases, how you gonnahave holistic information?
(11:28):
And the funniest thing is thatexcuse, when we asked them, the
scientists, why did they, allof a sudden in 2014, decided
not to include magnitude4.0 and smaller earthquakes?
Their answer was, well,we don't want to have that
much information in thisdatabase, you know, to preserve
the space and whatever.
(11:50):
Like, this doesn'tmake any sense.
Imagine how much informationis being saved on servers of
some random films and, uh, Idon't know, you name it, what
people have on the internet.
The space and theamount of space to save
information to store ithas never been an issue.
It's just certain informationthat when you look at it,
(12:11):
you see that something ishappening to the planet.
The number of earthquakesand magnitude is rising.
But, uh, by the end ofit, the questions were
mostly not about scientificpart, but about social.
And one of the questions thatone of American representatives
asked, he said, how dowe build this society if
it's a natural thing forpeople to be competitive?
(12:34):
It's a natural thing to havethis testosterone that moves
guys and, you know, makesour society so aggressive.
And I say, what doyou have the gym for?
Your testosterone can perfectlybe maintained by using a gym.
You don't want to haveviolence on the streets,
especially towards you.
But the competitive factoris very important, and it's
(12:55):
not gonna be eliminated.
It's a part of human nature, butit has to be used differently.
Instead of making billionairesto compete with each other
with empty zeros on theirbank accounts, we can make
them compete with good deeds,we can limit the amount of
wealth at, let's say 10 millionmark, and make them, by law,
(13:16):
to have to use the rest forthe benefit of the society,
invest it to any project thatthey choose that really solves
the problem of hunger, solvesthe problem of water, energy,
housing around the world.
And we're gonna have the samepeople, we're gonna praise them
and love them the same, evenmore, because we know these
are the people who helped us.
(13:36):
These are the people whomade our society better,
made our lives better.
And you know, people havethese questions, and once
we start answering them,it was heartwarming to
see that people get it.
You know, doesn't matter ifyou're senator if your advisor
in House of Representatives,when you see this idea, and
(13:59):
there is a good saying, thereis nothing more powerful than
an idea when its time has come.
So the idea of CreativeSociety has its time.
It is the time is rightnow, and we can see
people resonate with it.
Alexey (14:14):
Yeah.
You know, it's like this,uh, Chinese proverb,
the best time to planta tree was 20 years ago.
Next best time is now.
And the same is true, I guess,for the Creative Society.
We need to understand thatthis is something that, we
don't have that much time tobuild, but it can be done very,
(14:36):
very quickly once we decidethat we want to build it.
I just want to go back to acouple of points you talked
about, and of course, themost ridiculous excuse for not
storing data on, earthquakesof magnitude four and below is
lack of space or to save space.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
(14:58):
It's just a spreadsheetand everyone is taking
photos that, would make formany, many spreadsheets.
I mean, we can storeall the information we
need, if we just keep theright information there.
And I wanted to tell you onething also about, this thing,
like, we need to talk about theCO2 because you have to talk
(15:20):
about it is, like a ritual.
Everyone has to do it, right?
Yesterday we brought kidsto the Museum of the Future.
It's a new thing in Dubai,a very beautiful building.
Spent several years building it.
And I didn't do my research.
I didn't know what to expect.
So it is kind of made, you know,like as if you go into a space
(15:43):
shuttle or something like that,that brings you to the orbit.
Well, the thing is that thisspace shuttle uses fossil fuels.
This is very also interestingbecause it shows you like
you're going with the rocket,you know, and then you go to,
uh, the International SpaceStation, which is called Hope.
OSS Hope and, uh,It's beautifully done.
(16:04):
I mean, graphics and everythingand they explain to you
the solar system and stuff,but also they explain the
purpose of this OSS Hope,uh, You will be laughing.
So the idea is that, uh, oh,by the way, one, one thing,
while we were rising fromthe surface of the planet
to go to this orbital spacestation, there were fields
(16:28):
of wind turbines everywhere.
There were solar panelsand wind turbines.
Well, solar panels inDubai totally make sense
obviously, but wind turbines.
Well, man, you mentioned whatGermany is doing with them
and for a good reason, right?
So from this orbitalspace station.
So its goal is that they'reputting solar panels on
(16:52):
the moon, like arrays ofsolar panels on the moon.
And then they collect theenergy of the sun, and then
they beam it as a laser beamto the surface of the planet.
And this is how we solvethe problem with energy.
Taliy (17:09):
It's crazy how much fantasy you have to come up.
But hold on.
There was just another projectby MIT where they wanted to
cover sky from solar raysto stop the global warming.
Alexey (17:21):
Even crazier, they plan to take out pieces of the sun
so that it radiates less energy.
Then we are shown thatwe have all these extinct
species of plants.
You can have a scanner anduh, you know, they have like
3D boxes with all the animalspecies, and plants, and stuff.
(17:44):
They show you what has goneextinct and what hasn't.
Even my kids say, well,why is it like so sad?
Energy is scarce,everything is dying.
The planet is dying.
Why this beautiful new building,the Museum of the Future is
not showing the possibilitiesof what we were showing, for
(18:05):
example, during the forum, thefree energy generators, right,
the fuel free generators.
So free abundantenergy for everyone.
Medical technologies.
I mean, guys, I'm notsaying don't go to the
Museum of the Future, butplease do yourself a favor.
If you want a brightpicture of the future,
(18:27):
go and watch the forum.
You will be amazed andsurprised by what is possible,
what will be possible in justseveral years when we decide
to build the Creative Society.
And, you know, it shows onceagain that people are being
programmed that everythingis scarce, and this idea
(18:49):
of CO2, they also had avery big display showing
how these CO2 levels wouldrise and destroy the planet.
Man, I understand you haveto talk about the CO2.
But actually we don't.
If you are a sensible personwho understands, who did
a little bit of research,you will understand.
And the most shocking thingabout what you told about
(19:13):
this trip to Washington DC isthat there were no questions
about how you would limitthe CO2 emissions, right?
How you would limitthe global warming.
The questions wereall different.
So this proves once again thatwell, yeah, I mean, there is
some sort of information that isnot being let out to the public,
(19:34):
and this will not happen inCreative Society actually, with
transparency of information.
These things will not happen.
And we can see, clearlysee, that all of the eight
foundations of CreativeSociety, they really need
to be applied all at once.
Otherwise we will alwayshave things like, uh,
we are seeing today.
Taliy (19:54):
Yeah.
You know, it's reallyinteresting that they call
it the future, but actuallyin this future, they not
showing the development,they showing the past.
Of course, solarand wind are already
technologies of the past.
It's a failed technology.
It didn't work out, and it'squite obvious right now, right?
Otherwise, we would be workingon developing more of them,
(20:16):
but they're being removedacross our planet right now.
That's a big problem.
When we were preparingthe forum, "Global Crisis.
Our Survival is in Unity," oneof the main lines was do not
show futuristic future as amockery with flying cars and
you know, stuff that's likewhatever from the eighties as if
(20:38):
they would've imagined nowadays.
The point was to show thetechnologies that we already
have right now that candrastically change our current
life, already life that we livein, but are not being applied.
Vertical farms can, of course,solve the problem of food.
Technologies that providedesalinization of water
(20:59):
and others can totallysolve the problem of water.
There will be no need to collectmoney each year to provide food
and water for the hungry in, uh,certain places of our planet.
Huge business for someparts of our when nonprofits
that are working not evenon governmental level, but
(21:19):
intergovernmental level, theones we think would have a plan.
Next thing, next big thingwas uh, the fact that we
are one step away fromimplementing the free energy.
But free energy is collapseof the whole system because
the whole work depends on it.
Another thing is, um, thateven if we solve these
(21:41):
problems of food, hunger,law enforcements, you know,
many people stay unemployed.
And this was alsobeing discussed.
If police station is doingtheir job well, their finance is
gonna be cut for the next year.
So even on global level, wehave the very same organizations
fighting crimes who areinterested in having crimes
(22:01):
in some, at some level.
Otherwise, there is nopoint of their existence
of these organizations.
And, um, medical technologiesthat can cure our bodies on the
molecular level from the inside.
Think about it, in yourtelephone, in your very
cell phone, the size ofthe chip, nano meters.
(22:21):
These technologiesalready exist.
They can fix your body fromthe inside on the molecular
level doing preventative care.
You will never,ever gonna get sick.
You will never have any disease.
And if you do, it's gonnaget fixed right away.
It's not being done.
Even simple things likehaving a watch on your wrist
and having cameras in yourmirror and having a smart
(22:44):
fridge that can track downwhat kind of food did you buy?
Did you consume.
It adds up, calculates it, andcoming up with suggestions.
AI.
Were being told that AI is bad.
That AI is gonna be usedagainst humans, that it's
a huge Terminator machinethat's gonna show up.
So we're being pushed thisnarrative that we have to
kind of limit our developmentof the technologies.
(23:06):
We don't have to develop more.
There is nothingmore to develop.
We peaked as a civilizationthat all possible changes, and
now the only way is to go back.
Our future is gonnalook as our past.
When 20 years ago I was goingto school and I was seeing kids
obsessed with Harry Potter,Lord of the Rings and Hobbit
(23:27):
trilogies, I was like, whatthe heck is, who would be
attracted with a future thatlooks like medieval past?
You don't have technologies,you don't have, you
have to use woods.
You, you live where?
People were obsessed with it.
They were like, look at that.
And they have some kindof magic over there.
And you think, yeah, of coursepeople in the future if they
(23:51):
gonna get live like this.
And I was thinking,it's impossible now.
Now I see it's totally possible.
Now they say youcannot use technologies
because you are evil.
If you wash your body,you have to make a choice.
You either going on the trip andyou use your allowance of carbon
footprints a year to go on atrip or to heat up your house.
(24:12):
It's either one.
You don't get both.
So you better go to a warmcountry and stay there for the
whole year and make sure donot eat meat and do not breed.
The best thing you can do forclimate is not to have a baby.
That's a real article, guys.
I'm not kidding.
That's a real article withreal suggestions for climate
(24:33):
warriors to fight climate.
If you think this is notridiculous enough, there
is a beautiful movie, uh,called "Atlantis, the Elite
in search of immortality."And it suggests as a theory
that previous civilizationof Atlantis actually went to
a very development state oftechnologies, but then most of
the population they purposelymade, it made people dumb.
(24:57):
They reduced education,reduced everything, and
took away technologies.
So all technologies wereconcentrated on one island
of Atlantis, and the restof civilization was just
living as we see in themovies, Troy, BradPitt with
a sword attacks somebody.
They have huge armiesand they praying to Gods.
Gods, please help usto defeat their army.
(25:19):
And then Gods from thetechnologically advanced
island, press a buttonand some missiles takeoff.
And peasants be like,wow, Gods helped us.
Now Gods just used missiles.
They finding this evidenceof nuclear explosions all
over Siberia, all over India.
They cannot explain it.
They say, we don't knowwhat happened over there.
Well, it's obvious,guys, for anyone that we
(25:42):
cannot even replicate thetechnologies of the past.
Have you seen thehow much evidence?
I was talking to a friend andyou know, just yesterday she was
asking me about the pyramids.
She says, there are, thesepyramids are so mysterious.
I went to a trip to Egypt.
I saw them.
They are huge.
Like, yeah, but do you knowthey're not the biggest
and not the oldest ones?
(26:02):
And she was like, where?
Where is the oldest one?
Mexican?
Like Indonesia.
Biggest pyramid onEarth is in Indonesia.
It's huge.
It's still covered with land,but they already scanned it.
It's 24,000 years old.
24,000 years old, according toDarwin, we were like monkeys in
(26:24):
the jungle fighting for bananas.
We were on level ofdevelopment of cave people.
But there are thesetechnologies which we cannot
replicate right now, thepolygonal cut of the stones.
Those are not simple bricks.
Those are made withtechnologies, which
we cannot replicate.
We cannot lift them.
And most importantly, what'snot being discussed again, that
(26:47):
all these pyramids, they'renot randomly built somewhere.
Because the counter argumentwould be, well, you know, they
build this pyramids becauseit's the most stable form, and
it's so easy to make a pyramid.
It just stays stable.
You put bricks on top ofanother until you reach
the top of the pyramid.
Yeah, that's it.
You have no idea how, howprecise it is astronomically,
(27:09):
how precise the location,the coordination
with other pyramids.
They not justrandomly out there.
They make perfect system.
And this system alone withunderground pyramids was used
by previous civilizationsto stabilize the core of
our planet when it wasgoing out of control,
just as it is right now.
(27:30):
We can assume that was usedfor these purposes because
it's, uh, it's apparently ithas something to do with it.
But with our selfish, snobby,so-called scientists, who
pin badges on their chestsand praise each other in
their peer reviews, wedon't even learn about this,
that that's such a shame.
(27:52):
And we live in the society whereit's okay to smear someone who
was talking about these things.
I was extremely happyto see Graham Hancock's
documentary on Netflix cameout just uh, month ago.
And in it he was showinglike how much of the things
that happened on our planetwe have even no idea about.
And definitely before that darkpast which we're being portrayed
(28:16):
as a future, as our medievalfuture, there was more advanced
civilization on our planet.
And we can see it through12,000 year cycle that not
all cycles were blackouts ofjust tremendous explosions.
There were cycles on whichplanet went relatively
smooth, there were nomajor volcano eruptions.
(28:37):
There were no black layersand the kerns of ice.
So some civilizations actuallymade it through relatively safe.
The choice is ours.
Which ones we gonna be?
Are we gonna be that blacklayer on the surface of the
ice where or are we gonnabe that layer where future
civilization's gonna belike, oh, these guys made it,
(28:58):
these guys made it through.
Okay, cool.
So we have a chance.
The last point I wanted to makethe, when I start talking about
Creative Society, just yesterdaywas talking to a friend and she
told me, we have so little time.
We have so little time.
How we gonna pull this off?
And I'm saying, well, youknow, for the first time in
history, we're so connectedthat once people really want
(29:21):
others to know something,it spreads really fast.
And she was like, like what?
I was like, rememberwhen Black Lives Matter
protest happened, how fastthis information spread?
Like how fast in one day wewent from chill, calm, staying
at home to completely furiosityaround the whole planet
because something, somethinghappened that really shook off
(29:44):
our matrix of consciousness.
And this, this is whatwe need to happen.
Hopefully we're gonna be ableto do this before any humans
suffer from the climate change.
Do we really have to waituntil Philippines or Japan, uh,
experience the next huge tsunamithat, uh, Creative Society
(30:05):
volunteers were talking aboutand predicted to happen by 2029?
It was predicted in 2014.
It's not like a crystalball predictions.
It's predicted onscientific data.
Do we want to wait untilthat happens or do we want
to take some action before?
That is the question guys.
Alexey (30:25):
Uh, Definitely there is a lot to talk
about the pyramids, right?
Uh, we can maybe do it, uh,another time because, uh, even
without going to much of thedetails, what you said about
the Gunung Padang pyramidin Indonesia, the 24,000, at
least 24,000 year old pyramid.
(30:45):
We can't even build buildings,homes, or anything with the
same precision as the biggestpyramids that we have, I mean,
taking even pyramids of Giza.
And we only have likea couple of cranes
that are able to do it.
They require at least six monthsof preparation for one lifting
(31:05):
of one block of the pyramid.
Taliy (31:07):
Totally.
Well, one last thing I wantedto say regarding the pyramids
is that I was always fascinated,like, uh, you know, around
the planet, they find somany places in which there
are circular stone balls.
And I was like, where theheck is that coming from?
There are so manymysteries around the world.
And then only when you getall the scientists at the
same table, we had roundtable of archeologists like,
(31:28):
guys, this information,it's not a conspiracy.
It's not something that like,you know, we woo woo guys
talking here about it's allproven scientific facts.
Those balls were used inunderground pyramid, which are
reverted there, uh, locatedunderground upside down and
the technologies used inthere, including these stone
circular balls are used tobounce the tectonic energy, so
(31:53):
they used as natural bumpersfor the seismic activity.
Possibly they were usedto also stabilize the
core of our planet.
We don't know exactlyhow, because nobody's even
studying this, but whatwe can say for sure that
it totally makes sense.
If we look at skyscrapersaround our planet, we
can see different cities.
(32:13):
They never have exactly thesame skyscrapers, like New York
City has its own skyscrapers.
Hong Kong has theirown skyscrapers.
They don't lookexactly the same.
But if thousands years fromnow somebody would search those
abandoned cities and leftoversof the skyscrapers, they would
say, these guys, they definitelywere on the same page.
It's all steel structures.
(32:34):
They have a glass.
They have certain standardsup to which they were built.
They don't look theexactly the same, though.
It's not like you copy.
It's definitely notthe very exact plan.
They had different architecturalplans, but the technology
was similar, and this isexactly the same thing here.
Of course, there werecivilizations which put a lot of
(32:55):
efforts into building somethingfor some reason, somehow it can
be connected to today's topic.
We're not even studying this.
You know, one of the things wealso discussed, even when we
put the same scientists from thevery same field at one table,
they don't find common language.
I'm gonna give youanother example.
We have these amazingparticipants from South America.
(33:17):
I was asking like, how crazyis it that one Spanish speaking
blogger made a review aboutthe Creative Society and it
boomed all over South America.
We had hundreds and thousandsof participants and everybody
picked it up so fast makingall these amazing videos.
And there's this, uh, twobrothers, twin brothers from
(33:38):
Monte Video Uruguay, and theyjust blowing up on TikTok.
They making videos each,they're siblings and
they are twin brothers.
So they look exactly the same.
It's confusing part.
You watching , youwatching their videos,
you cannot wrap it around.
Is it the same person?
Is it different one?
Rodrigo and Adrian.
So they made this video aboutthe volcano eruption from
(34:00):
the Rotary presentation.
They presented it in Spanish.
It boomed, it got 2 million,over 2 million views just in
the span of couple of days.
And of course, therewere many people who
were raising questions.
Is it true?
And to actually, to find out ifit's true, you have to watch the
whole Rotary report, which islike three hours, or on TikTok,
you only have a 30 second clip.
(34:21):
And here's the confusion part.
People say, oh, I don't havetime to watch three hours,
but you're not showing meenough evidence in 30 seconds.
Like, guys, you haveto choose either one.
It's either 30 seconds or youwatch at least couple of hours.
And there is this onevolcanologist Spanish
speaking guy who says, I'm avolcanologist or geologist.
(34:41):
He says, I'm a geologist.
I know this stuff.
It's impossible.
Like, what do you know?
What do you know?
You took some classesin the local uh,
university for geology.
You think you.
know Anything abouthow our planet works?
You know, anything about thecore, you know anything about
the magnetic field, you knowanything about the solar
radiation, you know anythingabout the shifts of the North
(35:04):
Pole and what's causing them,what's, what kind of processes
happening in our planet?
What, what kind of volcanicseismic activity, floodings,
why are our planet speedingup and slows down suddenly?
All these things that are bebeing registered out there,
these pieces, pieces of thepuzzle, they not being put
together, not by anyone exceptCreative Society volunteers.
(35:28):
So of course, that guy,that geologist who said,
oh, this cannot be truthbecause I'm a geologist.
And many people in the comment,they started saying, well,
you know, this cannot be truthbecause some geologist said it.
Guys, maybe it'stime to grow up?
Maybe it's time to grow up.
Stop.
Stop being cowards, stopbeing ostriches, stop hiding
our heads in the sand.
(35:49):
And nothing bad is gonna happento you if you start speaking
about Creative Society.
Like nothing bad, and nothingbut fear was preventing people.
So the topic we discussedbefore, it takes courage,
but it's much easier to becourageous where you have
courageous people around you,like my co-host Alex here.
Alexey (36:08):
Yeah.
Uh, I just remembered thefunny joke about ostriches.
You know, there is a signin the zoo that says, don't
frighten the ostriches.
The floor is concrete.
Taliy (36:20):
Oh my gosh.
Exactly guys, thefloor is concrete.
You might think you'regonna hide there.
There is nothing to hide.
The funniest part is that thevery same people who push the
agenda of CO2, they investso much in building bunkers.
We contacting these constructioncompanies all over Texas and
the United States, and theysay, we ask them, why don't you
(36:41):
guys build the vertical farms?
And they say, we would loveto build vertical farms, but
we have thousands, like 2000%raise in customers who want
to build underground bunkers.
And at the conference, wealso showed this at the
Rotary report, it doesn'tmake sense to make bunkers
because magma is coming fromunderneath of our planet.
It's melting the lithosphereplates from underneath.
(37:04):
So whatever bunkers, thedeeper you go, the faster
you're gonna be gone whenthe magma rises up enough.
So it doesn't make sense,guys, you are literally
being ostriches, justbumping your heads against
the concrete when you thinkyou're gonna survive in the
bunker underneath the planet.
So yeah guys, let'sget un stupid.
Alexey (37:25):
Oh yeah, man, when you check the information that's
presented during the forum andthe Rotary report, obviously,
if you want just the scarypart, you would understand that
building a bunker and stayingthere, you will just become
canned food, you know, you justbecome cooked the fastest on the
planet in your beautiful bunker.
(37:47):
But, uh, the, uh, the thingis that when, and this is
another important topic thatwe touched upon in the previous
episode, that it has to be amultidisciplinary approach to
the information because maybefor one geologist somewhere,
he may be a very brilliantguy and a specialist in his
(38:09):
field, but it doesn't meanthat he knows everything
about everything, right?
You, you have to have amultidisciplinary approach with
the goal to find the solution,not to get any grants or to
receive any accolades, youknow, that you were the first
to discover or something.
We need to find the causeof what is creating these
(38:33):
conditions with climate changeand all the natural disasters
occurring on the planet.
And for this, obviously, weneed to unite the scientific
potential and give everythingthey need to do this job, right?
We are talking about lackof money, lack of funds,
yet we always find fundsfor some crazy stuff.
(38:56):
I'm not even talking aboutwars, which is ridiculous.
But, uh, when we look at, we aretrying to go to a dead planet,
Mars spending billions on this.
We are trying to suck outCO2 out of the atmosphere,
spending trillions onfighting the CO2 over the
last decade, and, uh, arerequesting to spend even more.
(39:20):
And when we see that whateverwe are doing, the situation
is just becoming worse, right?
Everything shows that theCO2 continues to rise.
The cataclysms continueto occur more frequently.
The gravity, I meantheir power increases.
Any sensible person wouldstart thinking, well,
(39:42):
obviously, whatever I'mdoing, this is not helping.
You are trying to type thesame password and waiting for
computer to change its mindand to let you in, or something
like that, I don't know.
But, if what you are doingis not working, you have to
change what you are doing.
If you don't have the capacityto understand why what you're
(40:03):
doing is not affecting in anyshape or form the results,
ask other guys who are maybestudying different fields
than you are studying.
Because this alreadyaffects everyone and
everyone should be involvedin finding the solution.
It's not about accolades,it's not about scientific
titles, it's not about grants.
Because if we continuein the same way, I mean,
(40:25):
hurricanes, they don't acceptcash to go another route
not to touch your house.
Floods, they don't accept gold,you cannot barricade yourself
with bricks of gold hoping thatlandslide is not gonna touch
you or any other disaster.
We already touched upon thesetopics that no matter how, how
smart you think you are, andyou are trying to calculate what
(40:48):
is the best spot to build yourbunker well, there was there
is another smart guy, right,who built the banker exactly on
the spot, I mean the seed bankwith the doomsday seed bank
that seats directly where oneof the plumes that is coming up.
So yeah, this will be abig furnace with seeds.
(41:08):
I mean, guys,let's get unstupid.
The more we talk abouthow we behave, we are
really behaving like notvery intelligent monkeys.
So we're not saying thatDarwin was right, but
uh, yeah, something isnot right with our way of
dealing with the situation.
And this not right is ourfixation on money, on profit,
(41:30):
and not seeing everythingelse as if, you know, we,
we had this strange diseaseof selective blindness.
Uh, we just see the things thatwe want to see and we completely
ignore all the other factsjust because it is suits us.
Time has come tochange our approach to
solving the problems.
We tried already the separation.
(41:52):
Everyone tries in hisown corner, tries to
find the solution.
Well, this doesn't work.
It didn't work for many years.
It doesn't work now.
Even if you consider whatwe always like to consider,
right, the progression.
So giving the previous data,there's no chances that anything
will change in the future,unless we change our approach.
(42:12):
And the other approach, it isthe Creative Society where we
unite all our potential and findthis solution to the problem.
I, don't really see anyother way to even approach
the situation that weare finding ourselves in.
Taliy (42:27):
I like how you said, if you just want the scary part,
you should, uh, watch the RotaryReport by Creative Society.
Guys, if you like scary movies,do not turn on Netflix, just
check the weekly Digest ofclimatic events by Global
Crisis, and you can subscribeon TikTok and Twitter to the
Global Crisis accounts andCreative Society accounts.
(42:50):
And you know, specifically formonitoring the situation with
climate that was created, thisproject, Global Crisis, right?
So Creative Societyis the solution part.
It's the way out.
And, uh, the global crisisis where we at right now.
So the starting point andthe point where we want to
be eventually, it's kind oflike logo of Creative Society.
(43:12):
You know, I get many questions.
What does your logo represent?
It has something somethingin it that's people afraid.
I like, so what's scary?
Number eight.
It's triangle and it'sa circle with an arrow.
And people like, well, I'm like,is it number eight that's scary?
They're like, no.
Is it the circle with thenumber ? They're like, no.
Like is it triangle?
(43:33):
They're like, yes, yes!We are afraid of triangle!
I'm like, is it some kindof condition where, where
you fear of triangles?
Like unmotivated fear ofnumber 13 or or a triangle?
And I was like, guys, it'sactually very interesting,
because, can you imagine,it's the only logo in the
history of our humanity thatrepresents just as Global
Crisis and Creative Societyprojects our current point.
(43:57):
It's where we at right now,with the triangle facing up.
And when triangle is facingup, we have eight, we have
eight foundations to implement.
But as you see, the arrowis going clockwise and it
turns the whole triangle.
So when it goes on theside, it becomes infinity
because it's infinitepossibilities for our society.
(44:18):
And the triangle turns to bedifferent one, it's going, you
would say upside down, likereverted pyramid, but it becomes
a completely different symbol.
And this is then it isthe Creative Society in
infinite possibilities.
Well, we can say many thingsabout the symbolics, you
know, triangle with a facingup is the symbol of masculine
(44:41):
power, facing down - feminine.
Yeah, if anything, we couldbuild the world in which we
wouldn't need this aggressionand replace it with love
because the most common answerto our questions was love.
We asked people around theplanet as volunteers of
Creative Society, what unitespeople and what kind of
society you want to live in?
(45:01):
And the answer waslove unites all people.
But love is not a legal term.
You cannot put itin legal terms.
You cannot put in yourConstitution, guys, let's
leave according to love.
How do you put that?
That was the questionfor the Creative Society
volunteers, and they cameup with this amazing answer.
It's mind blowing, how canyou put it in simple words,
put human life over profit.
(45:23):
That's so easy.
That what it means inlegal terms to build a
society in which lovedominates over everything.
It's when human life is moreimportant than greed, than
profit than anything else.
Not just that, it gives you themechanism of observing human
rights, making sure that allthese noble things are actually
(45:47):
observed by the society,because there is no power
concentrated in anyone's hands.
And this is somethingwe've never seen before.
We've seen failed attemptsto make socialistic and
communism and all these things.
And even this thing rightnow where corporations took
over the whole economy and welive in post, I wanted to say
(46:08):
post-industrial, but almost likepost capitalism right now where
you don't have ability to openyour small private business.
You cannot compete with Amazon,or Walmart, or any big chain.
There is no way there is, thisis not a capitalism anymore,
but Creative Society standsfor private ownership over
(46:28):
property and the ability tohave your own businesses.
So Creative Society, the onlything that you lose in it is
the shackles of your slavery.
That's the only thing to lose.
For all the people who cannotwrap their head around the
concept, they, they think,are these guys leftists?
(46:49):
Are they right wing?
Where are they at?
? They're like, this, thisis none of those things.
This is none of those things.
The concept is so great that ithas nothing to be compared with.
You can take a look at theconsumerist society and say it's
a complete opposite of that.
So coming back tothe topic of logo.
Yeah.
When people ask, whydo you have this logo?
(47:09):
It's because it representsour, our now, our
present, and the future.
If you shift it, and it's mindblowing, and no one has this
kind of idea, like somethingthat simple and so wholesome.
No one ever came upwith anything like this!
And once you remember,once you saw it, you're
definitely gonna recall it.
Remember, it's gonnastay in your mind.
(47:31):
And, you see, for eachcountry there is little
bit of differenceinside of number eight.
For United States, it's starsand representation of the flag.
For other cultures, it can betheir, something significant
for certain regions andnationalities around the world.
And it just shows thatit's not unification
by erasing differences.
(47:52):
It's highlighting the bestqualities and celebrating
them in the way thatwe've never seen before.
In Unity, it's diversity,it's differences, it's
all our beautiful featuresthat all of us have around
the planet, all our bestabilities, but just giving
them conditions to thrive.
This is whatCreative Society is.
Alexey (48:12):
Yeah.
And it is, as thetitle of the forum "Our
survival is in Unity."And truly, we invite
everyone to watch this forum.
Don't have time towatch all at once.
No problem, just goat your own pace.
But we strongly, stronglyadvise you to, uh, watch
(48:34):
it and especially all thesebeautiful videos that show
us the possibilities that wehave already and those that
we will have in the nearfuture if we all choose to go
the way of Creative Society.
to everyone who is listening tous and supporting the podcast.
(48:55):
We hope to bring yougood news very soon.
Taliy (48:59):
Yeah.
Thank you so muchfor sticking with us.
And, you know, each podcastis a little bit different
from the previous one.
This one is episode numbertwo that goes on video,
so if you subscribe tous on episodikal.fm, you
can check your favoriteplatforms for listening
podcasts through this link.
(49:20):
You can also watch us onYouTube videos right now,
and this is, this is a greatexperience, and if you know
guests who would be interestedin contributing to the project,
and sharing their opinions.
If you know amazing peoplearound this planet, which
are plenty of them around theplanet, write in the comments
(49:40):
their names, who would youlike to see on our podcast
and which podcasts you thinkwe should collaborate with?
Thank you guys for listeningand have a wonderful...
We are live.
Taliy (00:02):
We're live again, and welcome back to
The Episodikal Podcast.
Alexey (00:07):
Yes, welcome back guys.
Before we dive in, we wouldlike to let you know that we
also have a video version,full edit on YouTube.
As usual, all the linksare in the description.
You can go to, our YouTubechannel, Episodikal.
We are @episodikal onevery social platform.
(00:28):
We are also on Rumble, thesame name Episodikal podcast.
Today we will continue expandingon the information that is
very important to every livinghuman being on this planet.
After the report CreativeSociety made for Rotary
and Rotaract Club members.
(00:48):
And, uh, after its releaseto the public, well,
we made something evenbigger, even bigger.
The biggest, and withoutexaggeration, it is the
largest event in thehistory of, humankind.
It was the InternationalOnline Forum, "Global Crisis.
Our Survival is in Unity."And this time it was
(01:10):
simultaneously interpretedinto 150 languages,
all done by volunteers.
And the first part was very,very similar to what was
presented to the members ofRotary and Rotaract clubs.
But then we did something thatwas really, really interesting.
(01:33):
We presented indetail the solution.
We portrayed the CreativeSociety, and the benefits
that everyone will have inthis world if we choose to go
the Creative Society route.
This is something that is reallyimpressive because when you see
(01:54):
these beautiful videos that weremade by the teams showing how
our lives will be improved, andthis is something that we cannot
even imagine in today's world.
It is absolutely mind blowinghow our lives will change.
And for this, all we need,for the moment, is to
(02:16):
choose Creative Society.
This is why it is importantto spread this information.
Well, we are doing alreadysomething even to pitch these
ideas to our politicians,starting with the US, and
you went to WashingtonDC right after the forum.
Can you please tell ourlisteners and viewers a
(02:38):
little bit more about this?
Taliy (02:40):
Yeah.
So first of all, hello everyone.
I guess me and youwill know it very good.
Like how do you start evenexplaining something that
huge as our project tosomebody who has no idea?
So it's like every conferencewe were always like,
what do we start with?
Do we start with benefitsof Creative Society?
Do we start with climate?
Do we start with generalinformation about what's
(03:01):
going on in the world?
And then for Rotary, we reallyhad to push ourselves to put
as much information as possiblein the shortest amount of time.
And we saw that peopleresonated with it.
People were like, okay, nowwe getting why we have to
get all the best scientistsof our civilization on one
table, because it's them who'sgonna deliver to us solutions
(03:24):
for the climate, scientificsolution, technological
solution, free energy that weneed, so necessary right now to
contradict the climate change.
We're not talkingabout CO2, of course.
So, the next thing we seethat people watch the forum,
a lot of feedback, superpositive, and we see that this
is much more understandable.
(03:45):
And then we got invitedto Washington, DC.
It happened very suddenly.
There was this conferenceover there where policy
makers were meeting up, theywere discussing financial
things, upcoming recession,big mass unemployment,
how to deal with it.
And we got invited,because we have a project
that like offeringsolutions to these things.
(04:08):
So we were asked to present,only in amount of 30
minutes, present the project.
And, of course, we hadto start with climate.
And we were closing.
We were closing this meeting.
Before us, some peopletalked about climate.
You know, it more sounded likeritual, when people saying,
yeah, we have to switch to greenenergy and build more windmills.
(04:28):
You know, in Germany I'mwatching the news, they closing,
they shutting down windmills,taking them away, send them
to the yards, and actuallyopening the coal mine that was
underneath these windmills.
So, on practice, it's all goingalready the opposite direction.
But here in the officesthey still talking
about, like a ritual.
(04:49):
What, can we compare it tolike some religious ritual?
You have to bring upthat, yeah, we care about
environment, we care aboutbringing more solar and wind.
So we were closing, and ofcourse we were expecting
like we're gonna presentthis information about the
climate change, about thenatural factors, how we were
able to put so many differentscientists on one table and
(05:10):
get this holistic picture.
And we were expecting to bebombarded by the questions,
wait guys, so it's not CO2?
How is it possible?
We, we always sincerelybelieved this is CO2, and
you're telling us that CO2is not the main driving
factor of the climate change?
So we, talking about this wholeproject, I was closing, I was
(05:30):
speaker number four out of four.
We're expecting questions.
None of them was about CO2!Can you imagine, everybody
in the room already knewthat CO2 has nothing to do
with the climate change,but it's more of a ritual.
It's more of a profitablebusiness for each one of them.
So this is sort of the thingeveryone talks about, just
(05:50):
to say it out loud, thatguys we're on the same page.
We're all, besides otherprojects, we're making money
on this thing, and that's it.
When we communicated withthem, most of the questions
were like as if they alreadyknew that we were saying the
truth, like no one was askingto back it up with more facts,
because it was obvious thatwe were speaking the truth.
(06:12):
Most of the questions were,how do we let the public
know about this withoutraising panic among people.
Like how do we make people know?
There were representativesfrom European Union as well
who invited us to EuropeanUnion Summits next summer.
There were representatives fromAfrican countries, and some
(06:33):
of them asked us questions,which were more theological.
They said, guys, this definitelysounds like apocalypse that
we may face as a civilization,and how do we deal with it?
Because, you know, I'm a Muslim,one man said, and he said, if
Allah allows it, then let it be,but I don't believe that Allah
(06:56):
allows something that bad tohappen to all of the humanity.
And I was like, first ofall, we respect religions
and we are going to havethis amazing event that our
participants from IslamicWorld making on December 10th.
So we invite everyoneto participate in it.
It's going to be called"Who is Prophet Muhammad,
(07:18):
peace be upon him, to us."And, second of all, we cannot
put responsibility for savingour future as a humanity
on divine powers, becausedivine powers already gave
all of us freedom of choice.
We have technologies, when wewake up in the morning, we don't
say that if God wants me tohave breakfast, I'm gonna have
a sandwich on a plate right nextto my bed and the coffee in the
(07:40):
mug, it's all gonna be here.
No, we expect to docertain things ourselves.
So one of the best things I'veheard, best ideas is that here
on our planet, we are kind ofhaving this experiment, this
humanity has to unite andbecome civilization in order
to overcome the challenges.
(08:01):
Why?
Why are we not contacted bythe more advanced civilization
somewhere out there, wesending radio signals?
Apparently, we are not theonly ones in the universe.
Well, because any ofinteractions will be violation
of our freedom of choice,guys, we live on this planet.
It's totally up to us.
We have amazing technologies,we have all financial
resources, we have enough ofeverything to provide amazing
(08:25):
life for everyone on here.
You know, like Jacques Frescoone time said, he calculated
that amount of money spenton World War II and World War
I would be enough to provideeveryone with amazing house.
Everyone on the planetcould be provided with
amazing housing no matterin which country you live.
He was like, how muchof a changer that would
(08:48):
be to our society?
But instead of that, we,humans, decided to execute
our freedom of will in the waythat empowered few psychopaths
to take over our societyand start mass extermination
of humans on our planet.
If anyone would be looking fromaside, they would say, these
people are nuts, at best, butit's their freedom of choice.
(09:10):
It might be a lesson as whenchildren start walking, they
learn how to walk, they mightfall down, they get up and they
try not to fall down again.
But for now, we are seeingthat for some reason our
civilization approaching thisdead end where, oh boy, we
see that more and more peoplestart using the word World
(09:33):
War three, which is terrible.
It shouldn't even be discussed.
And, you know, even two yearsago when I started explaining
Creative Society, many peoplehad little bit of a hard
time understanding why dowe need to change anything.
I think past two yearsreally made us all grow
up as a society and to theunderstanding that we definitely
(09:56):
need to change something.
I can get in more detailsregarding the Washington
trip, and how there was veryinteresting crowd in the room.
And you know, when we had only30 minutes, we had to start
with the climate and we startwith 12,000 year cycle with
all the scientists on theirside of the evidence that
this is happening and none ofthem being at the same table
(10:18):
to actually put differentpieces of the puzzle together.
How did we come up with it?
How we were able to, youknow, see the factors that
are clearly the evidencefrom volcanology when the
volcanoes erupted, we see thatvolcanologists, they say it's a
different consistency of magna.
It consists of differentparticles which coming
(10:41):
way deeper from thecore of our planet.
It's not a surface level magma.
Okay, this is one pieceof puzzle, so something
is pushing this magmaall the way to the top.
Then we tried to communicateto all of them, get them
at the same table and theycouldn't understand each other.
Because each volcanologistonly study certain type of
volcano and only one or twovolcanoes in their whole career.
(11:05):
We tried to speak toseismologists, get them at
the same table, they allhave different databases.
They pick one and they don'tknow about the other ones,
and the other ones for somereason decide to randomly
exclude certain type ofdata, like earthquakes with
magnitude under four are notbeing included in one of the
major databases, how you gonnahave holistic information?
(11:28):
And the funniest thing is thatexcuse, when we asked them, the
scientists, why did they, allof a sudden in 2014, decided
not to include magnitude4.0 and smaller earthquakes?
Their answer was, well,we don't want to have that
much information in thisdatabase, you know, to preserve
the space and whatever.
(11:50):
Like, this doesn'tmake any sense.
Imagine how much informationis being saved on servers of
some random films and, uh, Idon't know, you name it, what
people have on the internet.
The space and theamount of space to save
information to store ithas never been an issue.
It's just certain informationthat when you look at it,
(12:11):
you see that something ishappening to the planet.
The number of earthquakesand magnitude is rising.
But, uh, by the end ofit, the questions were
mostly not about scientificpart, but about social.
And one of the questions thatone of American representatives
asked, he said, how dowe build this society if
it's a natural thing forpeople to be competitive?
(12:34):
It's a natural thing to havethis testosterone that moves
guys and, you know, makesour society so aggressive.
And I say, what doyou have the gym for?
Your testosterone can perfectlybe maintained by using a gym.
You don't want to haveviolence on the streets,
especially towards you.
But the competitive factoris very important, and it's
(12:55):
not gonna be eliminated.
It's a part of human nature, butit has to be used differently.
Instead of making billionairesto compete with each other
with empty zeros on theirbank accounts, we can make
them compete with good deeds,we can limit the amount of
wealth at, let's say 10 millionmark, and make them, by law,
(13:16):
to have to use the rest forthe benefit of the society,
invest it to any project thatthey choose that really solves
the problem of hunger, solvesthe problem of water, energy,
housing around the world.
And we're gonna have the samepeople, we're gonna praise them
and love them the same, evenmore, because we know these
are the people who helped us.
(13:36):
These are the people whomade our society better,
made our lives better.
And you know, people havethese questions, and once
we start answering them,it was heartwarming to
see that people get it.
You know, doesn't matter ifyou're senator if your advisor
in House of Representatives,when you see this idea, and
(13:59):
there is a good saying, thereis nothing more powerful than
an idea when its time has come.
So the idea of CreativeSociety has its time.
It is the time is rightnow, and we can see
people resonate with it.
Alexey (14:14):
Yeah.
You know, it's like this,uh, Chinese proverb,
the best time to planta tree was 20 years ago.
Next best time is now.
And the same is true, I guess,for the Creative Society.
We need to understand thatthis is something that, we
don't have that much time tobuild, but it can be done very,
(14:36):
very quickly once we decidethat we want to build it.
I just want to go back to acouple of points you talked
about, and of course, themost ridiculous excuse for not
storing data on, earthquakesof magnitude four and below is
lack of space or to save space.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
(14:58):
It's just a spreadsheetand everyone is taking
photos that, would make formany, many spreadsheets.
I mean, we can storeall the information we
need, if we just keep theright information there.
And I wanted to tell you onething also about, this thing,
like, we need to talk about theCO2 because you have to talk
(15:20):
about it is, like a ritual.
Everyone has to do it, right?
Yesterday we brought kidsto the Museum of the Future.
It's a new thing in Dubai,a very beautiful building.
Spent several years building it.
And I didn't do my research.
I didn't know what to expect.
So it is kind of made, you know,like as if you go into a space
(15:43):
shuttle or something like that,that brings you to the orbit.
Well, the thing is that thisspace shuttle uses fossil fuels.
This is very also interestingbecause it shows you like
you're going with the rocket,you know, and then you go to,
uh, the International SpaceStation, which is called Hope.
OSS Hope and, uh,It's beautifully done.
(16:04):
I mean, graphics and everythingand they explain to you
the solar system and stuff,but also they explain the
purpose of this OSS Hope,uh, You will be laughing.
So the idea is that, uh, oh,by the way, one, one thing,
while we were rising fromthe surface of the planet
to go to this orbital spacestation, there were fields
(16:28):
of wind turbines everywhere.
There were solar panelsand wind turbines.
Well, solar panels inDubai totally make sense
obviously, but wind turbines.
Well, man, you mentioned whatGermany is doing with them
and for a good reason, right?
So from this orbitalspace station.
So its goal is that they'reputting solar panels on
(16:52):
the moon, like arrays ofsolar panels on the moon.
And then they collect theenergy of the sun, and then
they beam it as a laser beamto the surface of the planet.
And this is how we solvethe problem with energy.
Taliy (17:09):
It's crazy how much fantasy you have to come up.
But hold on.
There was just another projectby MIT where they wanted to
cover sky from solar raysto stop the global warming.
Alexey (17:21):
Even crazier, they plan to take out pieces of the sun
so that it radiates less energy.
Then we are shown thatwe have all these extinct
species of plants.
You can have a scanner anduh, you know, they have like
3D boxes with all the animalspecies, and plants, and stuff.
(17:44):
They show you what has goneextinct and what hasn't.
Even my kids say, well,why is it like so sad?
Energy is scarce,everything is dying.
The planet is dying.
Why this beautiful new building,the Museum of the Future is
not showing the possibilitiesof what we were showing, for
(18:05):
example, during the forum, thefree energy generators, right,
the fuel free generators.
So free abundantenergy for everyone.
Medical technologies.
I mean, guys, I'm notsaying don't go to the
Museum of the Future, butplease do yourself a favor.
If you want a brightpicture of the future,
(18:27):
go and watch the forum.
You will be amazed andsurprised by what is possible,
what will be possible in justseveral years when we decide
to build the Creative Society.
And, you know, it shows onceagain that people are being
programmed that everythingis scarce, and this idea
(18:49):
of CO2, they also had avery big display showing
how these CO2 levels wouldrise and destroy the planet.
Man, I understand you haveto talk about the CO2.
But actually we don't.
If you are a sensible personwho understands, who did
a little bit of research,you will understand.
And the most shocking thingabout what you told about
(19:13):
this trip to Washington DC isthat there were no questions
about how you would limitthe CO2 emissions, right?
How you would limitthe global warming.
The questions wereall different.
So this proves once again thatwell, yeah, I mean, there is
some sort of information that isnot being let out to the public,
(19:34):
and this will not happen inCreative Society actually, with
transparency of information.
These things will not happen.
And we can see, clearlysee, that all of the eight
foundations of CreativeSociety, they really need
to be applied all at once.
Otherwise we will alwayshave things like, uh,
we are seeing today.
Taliy (19:54):
Yeah.
You know, it's reallyinteresting that they call
it the future, but actuallyin this future, they not
showing the development,they showing the past.
Of course, solarand wind are already
technologies of the past.
It's a failed technology.
It didn't work out, and it'squite obvious right now, right?
Otherwise, we would be workingon developing more of them,
(20:16):
but they're being removedacross our planet right now.
That's a big problem.
When we were preparingthe forum, "Global Crisis.
Our Survival is in Unity," oneof the main lines was do not
show futuristic future as amockery with flying cars and
you know, stuff that's likewhatever from the eighties as if
(20:38):
they would've imagined nowadays.
The point was to show thetechnologies that we already
have right now that candrastically change our current
life, already life that we livein, but are not being applied.
Vertical farms can, of course,solve the problem of food.
Technologies that providedesalinization of water
(20:59):
and others can totallysolve the problem of water.
There will be no need to collectmoney each year to provide food
and water for the hungry in, uh,certain places of our planet.
Huge business for someparts of our when nonprofits
that are working not evenon governmental level, but
(21:19):
intergovernmental level, theones we think would have a plan.
Next thing, next big thingwas uh, the fact that we
are one step away fromimplementing the free energy.
But free energy is collapseof the whole system because
the whole work depends on it.
Another thing is, um, thateven if we solve these
(21:41):
problems of food, hunger,law enforcements, you know,
many people stay unemployed.
And this was alsobeing discussed.
If police station is doingtheir job well, their finance is
gonna be cut for the next year.
So even on global level, wehave the very same organizations
fighting crimes who areinterested in having crimes
(22:01):
in some, at some level.
Otherwise, there is nopoint of their existence
of these organizations.
And, um, medical technologiesthat can cure our bodies on the
molecular level from the inside.
Think about it, in yourtelephone, in your very
cell phone, the size ofthe chip, nano meters.
(22:21):
These technologiesalready exist.
They can fix your body fromthe inside on the molecular
level doing preventative care.
You will never,ever gonna get sick.
You will never have any disease.
And if you do, it's gonnaget fixed right away.
It's not being done.
Even simple things likehaving a watch on your wrist
and having cameras in yourmirror and having a smart
(22:44):
fridge that can track downwhat kind of food did you buy?
Did you consume.
It adds up, calculates it, andcoming up with suggestions.
AI.
Were being told that AI is bad.
That AI is gonna be usedagainst humans, that it's
a huge Terminator machinethat's gonna show up.
So we're being pushed thisnarrative that we have to
kind of limit our developmentof the technologies.
(23:06):
We don't have to develop more.
There is nothingmore to develop.
We peaked as a civilizationthat all possible changes, and
now the only way is to go back.
Our future is gonnalook as our past.
When 20 years ago I was goingto school and I was seeing kids
obsessed with Harry Potter,Lord of the Rings and Hobbit
(23:27):
trilogies, I was like, whatthe heck is, who would be
attracted with a future thatlooks like medieval past?
You don't have technologies,you don't have, you
have to use woods.
You, you live where?
People were obsessed with it.
They were like, look at that.
And they have some kindof magic over there.
And you think, yeah, of coursepeople in the future if they
(23:51):
gonna get live like this.
And I was thinking,it's impossible now.
Now I see it's totally possible.
Now they say youcannot use technologies
because you are evil.
If you wash your body,you have to make a choice.
You either going on the trip andyou use your allowance of carbon
footprints a year to go on atrip or to heat up your house.
(24:12):
It's either one.
You don't get both.
So you better go to a warmcountry and stay there for the
whole year and make sure donot eat meat and do not breed.
The best thing you can do forclimate is not to have a baby.
That's a real article, guys.
I'm not kidding.
That's a real article withreal suggestions for climate
(24:33):
warriors to fight climate.
If you think this is notridiculous enough, there
is a beautiful movie, uh,called "Atlantis, the Elite
in search of immortality."And it suggests as a theory
that previous civilizationof Atlantis actually went to
a very development state oftechnologies, but then most of
the population they purposelymade, it made people dumb.
(24:57):
They reduced education,reduced everything, and
took away technologies.
So all technologies wereconcentrated on one island
of Atlantis, and the restof civilization was just
living as we see in themovies, Troy, BradPitt with
a sword attacks somebody.
They have huge armiesand they praying to Gods.
Gods, please help usto defeat their army.
(25:19):
And then Gods from thetechnologically advanced
island, press a buttonand some missiles takeoff.
And peasants be like,wow, Gods helped us.
Now Gods just used missiles.
They finding this evidenceof nuclear explosions all
over Siberia, all over India.
They cannot explain it.
They say, we don't knowwhat happened over there.
Well, it's obvious,guys, for anyone that we
(25:42):
cannot even replicate thetechnologies of the past.
Have you seen thehow much evidence?
I was talking to a friend andyou know, just yesterday she was
asking me about the pyramids.
She says, there are, thesepyramids are so mysterious.
I went to a trip to Egypt.
I saw them.
They are huge.
Like, yeah, but do you knowthey're not the biggest
and not the oldest ones?
(26:02):
And she was like, where?
Where is the oldest one?
Mexican?
Like Indonesia.
Biggest pyramid onEarth is in Indonesia.
It's huge.
It's still covered with land,but they already scanned it.
It's 24,000 years old.
24,000 years old, according toDarwin, we were like monkeys in
(26:24):
the jungle fighting for bananas.
We were on level ofdevelopment of cave people.
But there are thesetechnologies which we cannot
replicate right now, thepolygonal cut of the stones.
Those are not simple bricks.
Those are made withtechnologies, which
we cannot replicate.
We cannot lift them.
And most importantly, what'snot being discussed again, that
(26:47):
all these pyramids, they'renot randomly built somewhere.
Because the counter argumentwould be, well, you know, they
build this pyramids becauseit's the most stable form, and
it's so easy to make a pyramid.
It just stays stable.
You put bricks on top ofanother until you reach
the top of the pyramid.
Yeah, that's it.
You have no idea how, howprecise it is astronomically,
(27:09):
how precise the location,the coordination
with other pyramids.
They not justrandomly out there.
They make perfect system.
And this system alone withunderground pyramids was used
by previous civilizationsto stabilize the core of
our planet when it wasgoing out of control,
just as it is right now.
(27:30):
We can assume that was usedfor these purposes because
it's, uh, it's apparently ithas something to do with it.
But with our selfish, snobby,so-called scientists, who
pin badges on their chestsand praise each other in
their peer reviews, wedon't even learn about this,
that that's such a shame.
(27:52):
And we live in the society whereit's okay to smear someone who
was talking about these things.
I was extremely happyto see Graham Hancock's
documentary on Netflix cameout just uh, month ago.
And in it he was showinglike how much of the things
that happened on our planetwe have even no idea about.
And definitely before that darkpast which we're being portrayed
(28:16):
as a future, as our medievalfuture, there was more advanced
civilization on our planet.
And we can see it through12,000 year cycle that not
all cycles were blackouts ofjust tremendous explosions.
There were cycles on whichplanet went relatively
smooth, there were nomajor volcano eruptions.
(28:37):
There were no black layersand the kerns of ice.
So some civilizations actuallymade it through relatively safe.
The choice is ours.
Which ones we gonna be?
Are we gonna be that blacklayer on the surface of the
ice where or are we gonnabe that layer where future
civilization's gonna belike, oh, these guys made it,
(28:58):
these guys made it through.
Okay, cool.
So we have a chance.
The last point I wanted to makethe, when I start talking about
Creative Society, just yesterdaywas talking to a friend and she
told me, we have so little time.
We have so little time.
How we gonna pull this off?
And I'm saying, well, youknow, for the first time in
history, we're so connectedthat once people really want
(29:21):
others to know something,it spreads really fast.
And she was like, like what?
I was like, rememberwhen Black Lives Matter
protest happened, how fastthis information spread?
Like how fast in one day wewent from chill, calm, staying
at home to completely furiosityaround the whole planet
because something, somethinghappened that really shook off
(29:44):
our matrix of consciousness.
And this, this is whatwe need to happen.
Hopefully we're gonna be ableto do this before any humans
suffer from the climate change.
Do we really have to waituntil Philippines or Japan, uh,
experience the next huge tsunamithat, uh, Creative Society
(30:05):
volunteers were talking aboutand predicted to happen by 2029?
It was predicted in 2014.
It's not like a crystalball predictions.
It's predicted onscientific data.
Do we want to wait untilthat happens or do we want
to take some action before?
That is the question guys.
Alexey (30:25):
Uh, Definitely there is a lot to talk
about the pyramids, right?
Uh, we can maybe do it, uh,another time because, uh, even
without going to much of thedetails, what you said about
the Gunung Padang pyramidin Indonesia, the 24,000, at
least 24,000 year old pyramid.
(30:45):
We can't even build buildings,homes, or anything with the
same precision as the biggestpyramids that we have, I mean,
taking even pyramids of Giza.
And we only have likea couple of cranes
that are able to do it.
They require at least six monthsof preparation for one lifting
(31:05):
of one block of the pyramid.
Taliy (31:07):
Totally.
Well, one last thing I wantedto say regarding the pyramids
is that I was always fascinated,like, uh, you know, around
the planet, they find somany places in which there
are circular stone balls.
And I was like, where theheck is that coming from?
There are so manymysteries around the world.
And then only when you getall the scientists at the
same table, we had roundtable of archeologists like,
(31:28):
guys, this information,it's not a conspiracy.
It's not something that like,you know, we woo woo guys
talking here about it's allproven scientific facts.
Those balls were used inunderground pyramid, which are
reverted there, uh, locatedunderground upside down and
the technologies used inthere, including these stone
circular balls are used tobounce the tectonic energy, so
(31:53):
they used as natural bumpersfor the seismic activity.
Possibly they were usedto also stabilize the
core of our planet.
We don't know exactlyhow, because nobody's even
studying this, but whatwe can say for sure that
it totally makes sense.
If we look at skyscrapersaround our planet, we
can see different cities.
(32:13):
They never have exactly thesame skyscrapers, like New York
City has its own skyscrapers.
Hong Kong has theirown skyscrapers.
They don't lookexactly the same.
But if thousands years fromnow somebody would search those
abandoned cities and leftoversof the skyscrapers, they would
say, these guys, they definitelywere on the same page.
It's all steel structures.
(32:34):
They have a glass.
They have certain standardsup to which they were built.
They don't look theexactly the same, though.
It's not like you copy.
It's definitely notthe very exact plan.
They had different architecturalplans, but the technology
was similar, and this isexactly the same thing here.
Of course, there werecivilizations which put a lot of
(32:55):
efforts into building somethingfor some reason, somehow it can
be connected to today's topic.
We're not even studying this.
You know, one of the things wealso discussed, even when we
put the same scientists from thevery same field at one table,
they don't find common language.
I'm gonna give youanother example.
We have these amazingparticipants from South America.
(33:17):
I was asking like, how crazyis it that one Spanish speaking
blogger made a review aboutthe Creative Society and it
boomed all over South America.
We had hundreds and thousandsof participants and everybody
picked it up so fast makingall these amazing videos.
And there's this, uh, twobrothers, twin brothers from
(33:38):
Monte Video Uruguay, and theyjust blowing up on TikTok.
They making videos each,they're siblings and
they are twin brothers.
So they look exactly the same.
It's confusing part.
You watching , youwatching their videos,
you cannot wrap it around.
Is it the same person?
Is it different one?
Rodrigo and Adrian.
So they made this video aboutthe volcano eruption from
(34:00):
the Rotary presentation.
They presented it in Spanish.
It boomed, it got 2 million,over 2 million views just in
the span of couple of days.
And of course, therewere many people who
were raising questions.
Is it true?
And to actually, to find out ifit's true, you have to watch the
whole Rotary report, which islike three hours, or on TikTok,
you only have a 30 second clip.
(34:21):
And here's the confusion part.
People say, oh, I don't havetime to watch three hours,
but you're not showing meenough evidence in 30 seconds.
Like, guys, you haveto choose either one.
It's either 30 seconds or youwatch at least couple of hours.
And there is this onevolcanologist Spanish
speaking guy who says, I'm avolcanologist or geologist.
(34:41):
He says, I'm a geologist.
I know this stuff.
It's impossible.
Like, what do you know?
What do you know?
You took some classesin the local uh,
university for geology.
You think you.
know Anything abouthow our planet works?
You know, anything about thecore, you know anything about
the magnetic field, you knowanything about the solar
radiation, you know anythingabout the shifts of the North
(35:04):
Pole and what's causing them,what's, what kind of processes
happening in our planet?
What, what kind of volcanicseismic activity, floodings,
why are our planet speedingup and slows down suddenly?
All these things that are bebeing registered out there,
these pieces, pieces of thepuzzle, they not being put
together, not by anyone exceptCreative Society volunteers.
(35:28):
So of course, that guy,that geologist who said,
oh, this cannot be truthbecause I'm a geologist.
And many people in the comment,they started saying, well,
you know, this cannot be truthbecause some geologist said it.
Guys, maybe it'stime to grow up?
Maybe it's time to grow up.
Stop.
Stop being cowards, stopbeing ostriches, stop hiding
our heads in the sand.
(35:49):
And nothing bad is gonna happento you if you start speaking
about Creative Society.
Like nothing bad, and nothingbut fear was preventing people.
So the topic we discussedbefore, it takes courage,
but it's much easier to becourageous where you have
courageous people around you,like my co-host Alex here.
Alexey (36:08):
Yeah.
Uh, I just remembered thefunny joke about ostriches.
You know, there is a signin the zoo that says, don't
frighten the ostriches.
The floor is concrete.
Taliy (36:20):
Oh my gosh.
Exactly guys, thefloor is concrete.
You might think you'regonna hide there.
There is nothing to hide.
The funniest part is that thevery same people who push the
agenda of CO2, they investso much in building bunkers.
We contacting these constructioncompanies all over Texas and
the United States, and theysay, we ask them, why don't you
(36:41):
guys build the vertical farms?
And they say, we would loveto build vertical farms, but
we have thousands, like 2000%raise in customers who want
to build underground bunkers.
And at the conference, wealso showed this at the
Rotary report, it doesn'tmake sense to make bunkers
because magma is coming fromunderneath of our planet.
It's melting the lithosphereplates from underneath.
(37:04):
So whatever bunkers, thedeeper you go, the faster
you're gonna be gone whenthe magma rises up enough.
So it doesn't make sense,guys, you are literally
being ostriches, justbumping your heads against
the concrete when you thinkyou're gonna survive in the
bunker underneath the planet.
So yeah guys, let'sget un stupid.
Alexey (37:25):
Oh yeah, man, when you check the information that's
presented during the forum andthe Rotary report, obviously,
if you want just the scarypart, you would understand that
building a bunker and stayingthere, you will just become
canned food, you know, you justbecome cooked the fastest on the
planet in your beautiful bunker.
(37:47):
But, uh, the, uh, the thingis that when, and this is
another important topic thatwe touched upon in the previous
episode, that it has to be amultidisciplinary approach to
the information because maybefor one geologist somewhere,
he may be a very brilliantguy and a specialist in his
(38:09):
field, but it doesn't meanthat he knows everything
about everything, right?
You, you have to have amultidisciplinary approach with
the goal to find the solution,not to get any grants or to
receive any accolades, youknow, that you were the first
to discover or something.
We need to find the causeof what is creating these
(38:33):
conditions with climate changeand all the natural disasters
occurring on the planet.
And for this, obviously, weneed to unite the scientific
potential and give everythingthey need to do this job, right?
We are talking about lackof money, lack of funds,
yet we always find fundsfor some crazy stuff.
(38:56):
I'm not even talking aboutwars, which is ridiculous.
But, uh, when we look at, we aretrying to go to a dead planet,
Mars spending billions on this.
We are trying to suck outCO2 out of the atmosphere,
spending trillions onfighting the CO2 over the
last decade, and, uh, arerequesting to spend even more.
(39:20):
And when we see that whateverwe are doing, the situation
is just becoming worse, right?
Everything shows that theCO2 continues to rise.
The cataclysms continueto occur more frequently.
The gravity, I meantheir power increases.
Any sensible person wouldstart thinking, well,
(39:42):
obviously, whatever I'mdoing, this is not helping.
You are trying to type thesame password and waiting for
computer to change its mindand to let you in, or something
like that, I don't know.
But, if what you are doingis not working, you have to
change what you are doing.
If you don't have the capacityto understand why what you're
(40:03):
doing is not affecting in anyshape or form the results,
ask other guys who are maybestudying different fields
than you are studying.
Because this alreadyaffects everyone and
everyone should be involvedin finding the solution.
It's not about accolades,it's not about scientific
titles, it's not about grants.
Because if we continuein the same way, I mean,
(40:25):
hurricanes, they don't acceptcash to go another route
not to touch your house.
Floods, they don't accept gold,you cannot barricade yourself
with bricks of gold hoping thatlandslide is not gonna touch
you or any other disaster.
We already touched upon thesetopics that no matter how, how
smart you think you are, andyou are trying to calculate what
(40:48):
is the best spot to build yourbunker well, there was there
is another smart guy, right,who built the banker exactly on
the spot, I mean the seed bankwith the doomsday seed bank
that seats directly where oneof the plumes that is coming up.
So yeah, this will be abig furnace with seeds.
(41:08):
I mean, guys,let's get unstupid.
The more we talk abouthow we behave, we are
really behaving like notvery intelligent monkeys.
So we're not saying thatDarwin was right, but
uh, yeah, something isnot right with our way of
dealing with the situation.
And this not right is ourfixation on money, on profit,
(41:30):
and not seeing everythingelse as if, you know, we,
we had this strange diseaseof selective blindness.
Uh, we just see the things thatwe want to see and we completely
ignore all the other factsjust because it is suits us.
Time has come tochange our approach to
solving the problems.
We tried already the separation.
(41:52):
Everyone tries in hisown corner, tries to
find the solution.
Well, this doesn't work.
It didn't work for many years.
It doesn't work now.
Even if you consider whatwe always like to consider,
right, the progression.
So giving the previous data,there's no chances that anything
will change in the future,unless we change our approach.
(42:12):
And the other approach, it isthe Creative Society where we
unite all our potential and findthis solution to the problem.
I, don't really see anyother way to even approach
the situation that weare finding ourselves in.
Taliy (42:27):
I like how you said, if you just want the scary part,
you should, uh, watch the RotaryReport by Creative Society.
Guys, if you like scary movies,do not turn on Netflix, just
check the weekly Digest ofclimatic events by Global
Crisis, and you can subscribeon TikTok and Twitter to the
Global Crisis accounts andCreative Society accounts.
(42:50):
And you know, specifically formonitoring the situation with
climate that was created, thisproject, Global Crisis, right?
So Creative Societyis the solution part.
It's the way out.
And, uh, the global crisisis where we at right now.
So the starting point andthe point where we want to
be eventually, it's kind oflike logo of Creative Society.
(43:12):
You know, I get many questions.
What does your logo represent?
It has something somethingin it that's people afraid.
I like, so what's scary?
Number eight.
It's triangle and it'sa circle with an arrow.
And people like, well, I'm like,is it number eight that's scary?
They're like, no.
Is it the circle with thenumber ? They're like, no.
Like is it triangle?
(43:33):
They're like, yes, yes!We are afraid of triangle!
I'm like, is it some kindof condition where, where
you fear of triangles?
Like unmotivated fear ofnumber 13 or or a triangle?
And I was like, guys, it'sactually very interesting,
because, can you imagine,it's the only logo in the
history of our humanity thatrepresents just as Global
Crisis and Creative Societyprojects our current point.
(43:57):
It's where we at right now,with the triangle facing up.
And when triangle is facingup, we have eight, we have
eight foundations to implement.
But as you see, the arrowis going clockwise and it
turns the whole triangle.
So when it goes on theside, it becomes infinity
because it's infinitepossibilities for our society.
(44:18):
And the triangle turns to bedifferent one, it's going, you
would say upside down, likereverted pyramid, but it becomes
a completely different symbol.
And this is then it isthe Creative Society in
infinite possibilities.
Well, we can say many thingsabout the symbolics, you
know, triangle with a facingup is the symbol of masculine
(44:41):
power, facing down - feminine.
Yeah, if anything, we couldbuild the world in which we
wouldn't need this aggressionand replace it with love
because the most common answerto our questions was love.
We asked people around theplanet as volunteers of
Creative Society, what unitespeople and what kind of
society you want to live in?
(45:01):
And the answer waslove unites all people.
But love is not a legal term.
You cannot put itin legal terms.
You cannot put in yourConstitution, guys, let's
leave according to love.
How do you put that?
That was the questionfor the Creative Society
volunteers, and they cameup with this amazing answer.
It's mind blowing, how canyou put it in simple words,
put human life over profit.
(45:23):
That's so easy.
That what it means inlegal terms to build a
society in which lovedominates over everything.
It's when human life is moreimportant than greed, than
profit than anything else.
Not just that, it gives you themechanism of observing human
rights, making sure that allthese noble things are actually
(45:47):
observed by the society,because there is no power
concentrated in anyone's hands.
And this is somethingwe've never seen before.
We've seen failed attemptsto make socialistic and
communism and all these things.
And even this thing rightnow where corporations took
over the whole economy and welive in post, I wanted to say
(46:08):
post-industrial, but almost likepost capitalism right now where
you don't have ability to openyour small private business.
You cannot compete with Amazon,or Walmart, or any big chain.
There is no way there is, thisis not a capitalism anymore,
but Creative Society standsfor private ownership over
(46:28):
property and the ability tohave your own businesses.
So Creative Society, the onlything that you lose in it is
the shackles of your slavery.
That's the only thing to lose.
For all the people who cannotwrap their head around the
concept, they, they think,are these guys leftists?
(46:49):
Are they right wing?
Where are they at?
? They're like, this, thisis none of those things.
This is none of those things.
The concept is so great that ithas nothing to be compared with.
You can take a look at theconsumerist society and say it's
a complete opposite of that.
So coming back tothe topic of logo.
Yeah.
When people ask, whydo you have this logo?
(47:09):
It's because it representsour, our now, our
present, and the future.
If you shift it, and it's mindblowing, and no one has this
kind of idea, like somethingthat simple and so wholesome.
No one ever came upwith anything like this!
And once you remember,once you saw it, you're
definitely gonna recall it.
Remember, it's gonnastay in your mind.
(47:31):
And, you see, for eachcountry there is little
bit of differenceinside of number eight.
For United States, it's starsand representation of the flag.
For other cultures, it can betheir, something significant
for certain regions andnationalities around the world.
And it just shows thatit's not unification
by erasing differences.
(47:52):
It's highlighting the bestqualities and celebrating
them in the way thatwe've never seen before.
In Unity, it's diversity,it's differences, it's
all our beautiful featuresthat all of us have around
the planet, all our bestabilities, but just giving
them conditions to thrive.
This is whatCreative Society is.
Alexey (48:12):
Yeah.
And it is, as thetitle of the forum "Our
survival is in Unity."And truly, we invite
everyone to watch this forum.
Don't have time towatch all at once.
No problem, just goat your own pace.
But we strongly, stronglyadvise you to, uh, watch
(48:34):
it and especially all thesebeautiful videos that show
us the possibilities that wehave already and those that
we will have in the nearfuture if we all choose to go
the way of Creative Society.
to everyone who is listening tous and supporting the podcast.
(48:55):
We hope to bring yougood news very soon.
Taliy (48:59):
Yeah.
Thank you so muchfor sticking with us.
And, you know, each podcastis a little bit different
from the previous one.
This one is episode numbertwo that goes on video,
so if you subscribe tous on episodikal.fm, you
can check your favoriteplatforms for listening
podcasts through this link.
(49:20):
You can also watch us onYouTube videos right now,
and this is, this is a greatexperience, and if you know
guests who would be interestedin contributing to the project,
and sharing their opinions.
If you know amazing peoplearound this planet, which
are plenty of them around theplanet, write in the comments
(49:40):
their names, who would youlike to see on our podcast
and which podcasts you thinkwe should collaborate with?
Thank you guys for listeningand have a wonderful...
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com