October 3, 2022 • 44 mins
In this episode, we continued talking about the importance of having reliable energy sources, and why we already can’t fallback to them because of the lack of water, touched upon the hypocrisy of mentioning climate change at Burning Man, the new “There Is No Climate Emergency” petition signed by 1200 scientists and a world map of climate disasters showing the opposite, discussed the disastrous effects of skyrocketing energy costs, NASA studying climate on Earth instead of space, what the canceling of Andrew Tate taught us, and expressed support for the Don’t Pay UK campaign.
1,200 Scientists, Scholars Declare: 'There Is No Climate Emergency'
Map of disasters, global climate change online | Creative Society
Neil Grant on Twitter: "Hi Richard. For the Celtic Ross our Electric Bill in July 2019 was €7,700. July 2021 was €8,324. We today received our July 2022 bill. €18,262 - for a MONTH! This is unsustainable. All due to rate increases. / Twitter"
Don't Pay
We love receiving your feedback ❤️ Drop us a line anywhere you happen to come across our posts 🙂
We are @episodikal on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, TikTok, and LinkedIn, or email us at ask@episodikal.com
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Alexey (00:00):
You know, I've seen this not even a meme, a sticker
(00:04):
on Instagram. And I used it onone of our reels that power
outages are climate change. Andthis made me think that actually
it is through what we'reexperiencing right now and are
about to experience with all thepower outages are climate
change. And I don't mean thatthe power outages that we will
(00:27):
be experiencing, because we areshutting down the coal powered
power plants or nuclear, butbecause we are not able to make
them work again, and why, andthis is something I didn't think
about at first. But actually, wedon't have enough water to cool
(00:49):
them down. Because we havedroughts all over Europe, we
have droughts in China. And thisis really something that even
bright people like Alex Epstein,that we really enjoy talking
about his latest book, fossilfuture, he presents all the
information correctly. And hesays that, yes, we really do
(01:11):
need these fossil energy sourcesto sustain at least at least
sustain the same level of life.
I mean, everything that we have,we owe this to the energy that
we are using. And even if we godeeper, and we can talk about it
today, that all the economy, itis energy transformed, in one
(01:32):
way or another. And first we maythink, well, economy is money,
right? But money is just a meansof exchange. Economy is goods
and services. Money is justsomething that we equate the
amount of these goods andservices that we are exchanging
(01:53):
to. And the limiting factor ofany economy is labor, in by
labor, I don't mean only manuallabor, but machine labor as
well. More and more labor isalready being replaced by
machines. And they all useeither electricity or gasoline.
And here we are, we cannot usethe same old power plants that
(02:17):
we used to not because of co2,because we decided so but
because we don't have water tocall them down. And this is
something that paints thepicture in a totally different
way. And they haven't thoughtabout this before. What do you
think? Hey, Alex,
Taliy (02:37):
it's a huge problem we're facing right now all over the
world. So while one part of theworld has been flooded, like in
Pakistan, 1/3 of the countrywent underwater. And that's a
huge food shortage coming upafter that. It's 100% effect.
But on the other hand, in theEurope, there is that tremendous
(02:59):
drought, the rivers are dry.
There are hungry stones thatshowed up on the bottom of those
rivers that says if you see mecry, because there is not going
to be water there is not goingto be crops there is not going
to be food. It's a hunger andthe famine that's coming up
after and that did not happenfor more than 1000s of years.
And now it is happening. But thesecond problem that it brings is
(03:24):
that all the nuclear plants holdtheir power plants hold their
coal plants, everything thatproduces energy, real energy
when I'm talking about somemoney making schemes on solar
panels and wind turbines thatare not working without
sustainable energy that's comingfrom coal power plants. We don't
have that energy productionbecause it needs water to cool
(03:48):
down. They're either nuclearreactors or for regular power
plants as well. The recentinterview I watched with Alex
Epstein I enjoyed how he calledthem instead of renewables he
said, and reliables. Yeah wereplaced our reliable energy
with unreliable but now none ofthat makes sense because we
(04:11):
cannot get the source of energyand you know what last week was
very interesting the beginningof September the Labor Day
weekend many people here inCalifornia go to Burning Man I
yeah, I went there for a day andthey couldn't stay longer
because I was just feelingguilty stander biking along that
Playa and watching what ishappening oh there are people
(04:33):
from all over the world bring ina lot of diesel generators to
the desert to survive therebecause without those diesel
generators, human body cannotsurvive in there for I don't
know even the day it's super hotconditions under which without
energy, it's impossible tosurvive. So people come there,
bring their energy dieselgenerators, run them for a week
(04:56):
burn a lot of Who then there?
And guess what sign I see in themiddle of the play, it says, We
are the climate problem. And Iwas shocked to see that over
there. Because like, how hard doyou want to try to please? This
(05:16):
liberal agenda of being nice,right? It's a sign of, I don't
want to have any problems. I'mgood. I'm a good person. I
agree. I comply with all that'sbeen pushed up upon me from the
top. You want me to eat insectsfor the sake of the climate
change? Yeah, we will. You wantus to do accept any other
(05:38):
agendas? Yeah, we will, we willnot gonna put our thermostat
over something, we're gonna rollour dress in the front of our
house, we're not gonna flush ourtoilets, whatever, just get off
me, I want to be a good citizen.
In there, it multiplies. Becauseit doesn't make sense. You're in
the middle of the desert, eventogether, you could drive in the
US and AC in your vehicle,you're not gonna get there
(06:00):
without it. And when you getthere, you understand how much
little sense it makes to fightthe only source of energy that
made our planet a livable place,because it's a hostile place
without the energy. And at thesame time, the climate change is
real, although it's not causedby humans, the planet is warming
(06:20):
up, but it's warming up from theinside the co2 levels are
rising, but there are noneanthropogenic. Those are obvious
facts. And at the very sametime, I come across this article
that 1200 Scientists signed apetition that there is no
climate emergency. And asDouglas walked, said, I feel
(06:42):
like I'm in a mental house wherepatients to cover they're not
signing the petition that co2 isnot causing the climate change.
They are not signing thepetition that the whole
anthropogenic climate agenda isfake. From its core from the
very first graph, that hockeystick fake graph by Michael
Mann, we've been talking aboutthat there were not a single
(07:05):
serious study that proves thatclimate change has anthropogenic
nature. Instead of that those1200 Scientists while third of
Pakistan is going underwater.
While there is a biggest droughtin Europe, while we have the
lowest energy production levels,the hydroelectric stations here
(07:28):
because the power Lake Lake madColorado river, the river on the
border with Mexico, all of themdried out, there is no water. At
the very same time, we have thebiggest magnitude of
earthquakes, we have Tongavolcano, we have multiple little
counters, we have the biggestvolcano activity. On the bottom
of our ocean, we have glaciersmelting from the bottom up in
(07:51):
Antarctica and in Greenland,because the volcano activity,
submarine volcanoes on thebottom of our ocean erupt in
warming up the glaciers that aremelting from the bottom up. And
this mountain is happening whileit's getting colder on the top
of the continent, ocean getswarmer and is the biggest
(08:12):
storage of co2. And when it getswarmer, it releases co2, add two
plus two. And you will see thata reason while co2 levels are
going up. But this scientistinstead of bringing in some
sanity, they say that there isno climate emergency.
And to say that I'm shockedbecause those are not stupid
(08:32):
people and they're either that'sa very good quote, you have to
be either ignorant or antihumane to push either one of
these two agendas. Either youpush on that there is
anthropogenic climate emergency,because that's fine and co2
that's fighting that false causeof the climate change that has
nothing to do with the truereasons of the climate emergency
(08:54):
we're getting ourselves into. Oryou say that there is no climate
emergency at all. And you canfind facts I think people find
in facts Yeah, there we havemore forests than ever. Climate
is booming. Like guys, what areyou talking about? Take a look
at this statistics on thecreative society.com amazing
volunteers open the new page onwhich you can find the
(09:18):
interactive map of the worldwith literally all the climate
emergencies that happened sinceDecember 20 and 21. And you can
strike down the magnitude youcan track down the scale of the
events that have been happeningin less than a year we've seen
more than in the past decadethan in past decade. We've seen
(09:39):
more than than in past 100years. And it's not a single
week. Pass and by without thenew extreme climatic event
that's happening somewhere inthe world. It might happen right
next to you as well. It mightcome to your house like it does.
We've seen what's happening inMidwest and Tennessee or once in
1000 years climb attic eventsare happening almost every day.
(10:02):
And we see 1200 scientists thatsign in that there is no climate
emergency. Like, I'm happy thatwe have this group of volunteers
that really working on to bringin the truthful facts about the
nature of the climate change.
But at the same time, it's sadto see that this agenda has been
pushed from both sides. And bothsides, whether anthropogenic or
(10:22):
skeptical, they're bothfollowing the false narrative.
And that should be alarming.
That should be really alarmingeither. On one side, we have eco
terrorists that are trying tostop all production, which is
anti humane, it's a criminalactivity. That should be a
responsibility according to thelaw of each country for
(10:44):
ecotourism, or procrastination,of on taking action on studying
the true reason of climatechange, which, which is
cyclicity, which is what hashappened into the core of our
planet, which is why we'reseeing this global change of
number and magnitude of climaticevents. Those are not being
addressed. Yeah, there arescientists who are starting to
(11:10):
speak the truth about the thingsthat are happening to the core
of our planet. And there is hopethere is hope that people are
going to see it althoughinformation is right there,
guys, all that's needs to bedone is for people to start
taking action on this and stopbeing silent. So I think if we
take a little bit more time,doing nothing, as we're doing
(11:32):
right now, we're going to see avery sad consequences of it. One
of the things I've noticed onTwitter, there is this NASA
statistics like apparently NASAhas not been studying space for
decades. Instead of that theyconcentrated on studying climate
change on Earth. Interestingfact, when in 2017, Donald Trump
was trying to put hispersonality as a chief of NASA,
(11:56):
that guy, Jim Bridenstine, hecame into NASA with one agenda
to start studying climate changeon Mars. The backlash that
happened after that wastremendous, for some reason,
crazy equal activists andanthropogenic hysteria,
production campaign, startedturned against him and started
(12:19):
stigmatizing him as the rootcause of all evil as the enemy
of the Society for a couple ofmonths, until he came out and
said that climate change hasanthropogenic reasons, and that
he changed his beliefs onclimate change, and that he is
not going to study climatechange on Mars, and that he's
(12:40):
not going to study white Marslost its magnetic field. Because
his very first words were thatwe should study climate change
on Mars and find out why Mauricelost its magnetic field because
the very same thing can happenon earth. The very same thing
can happen here. The whole worldof anthropogenic words went
against him. But the next year,he was proclaimed as scientific
(13:03):
hero for changing his mind onclimate change. And that was
kind of crazy, because thebacklash that happened against
him says that it's a very bigmoney making spot right there.
The sweet spot that some fakescientists, which we couldn't
call other than scientific ISIS,because they erased the true
(13:25):
history of our humanity. Andthey substituted with a fake
hockey stick graphs, and theystarted making a huge money
laundry schemes on it ongreenwashing, on proclaiming
themselves are the saviors ofour planet. Yeah, that stuff is
totally anti humane, and it'signorant on our side to accept
(13:45):
it. And just to follow this fakenarrative,
Alexey (13:47):
it's really sad that scientists are signing petitions
to negate what is clearlyobservable that you can see with
your own eyes. You don't have tobe a scientist to see that
climate is changing. Thisreminds me how Steve Jobs was
(14:07):
dealing with his pancreaticcancer, because he thought,
Okay, I will not put myattention into it. So it will
somehow disappear, or thisproblem will go away. And we all
know that it didn't help him.
And here we are, having asimilar situation where we see
with our own eyes, you may notbelieve what you see on social
(14:28):
media or on TV regarding Chinaand reverse and droughts and
everything. You can see itaround you. And the problem is
that we are signing petitions tosay, oh, no, nothing is
happening. Everything is cool.
Let's just to do business asusual. There is one thing that I
came across a I haven't foundyet the original recording of
(14:52):
this film. I don't know if itwas a documentary or something
like that. There are scientistswho explained that what we've
talked about So that there areonly point zero 4% of the co2 in
the atmosphere. And 90% ofgreenhouse gas is water vapor,
which is abundant on thisplanet. And what they were
(15:14):
saying that if you look at howthe system works, okay, so if it
was for the greenhouse gases,because they are forming in the
upper levels of the atmosphere,we all know that hot air goes to
the top. So the same happenswith the greenhouse gases. And
(15:34):
sunrays by going down thereflects from the surface of the
planet. And they're beingcaptured by this formation by
these clouds if you wantgreenhouse gases. And this is
not what they observed. And theyshowed they have data, they
launched the balloons, theweather balloons, and they
measured the temperatures, andthey haven't found any
(15:58):
significant changes intemperature, at least not the
ones that would explain thewarming here. And they concluded
that the warming comes from theplanet itself, because the
planet itself warms up much morethan the upper levels of the
atmosphere. So it's notgreenhouse gases, there's that
(16:18):
we also have these kinds ofscientists like, but also what's
interesting, there is thisnarrative that is still
maintained is the main one thatwe should reduce our co2
emissions somehow. But itresulted in a we should use less
energy, which is a completenonsense. So the question
arises, then what do we reallywant, then? Do we want to reduce
(16:43):
our co2 emissions? Or do we wantto use less energy, and by
energy, apparently, it meansalso that we need to eat less,
because it's also energy for ourbodies. And when we put the
pieces of this puzzle together,the situation is really not
pretty. farmers can't usefertilizer, even though they've
(17:04):
significantly reduced its use inthe past 40 years or something,
they have an economic incentiveto do so fertilizer is
expensive. At the same time,they increase the production
yet, they're still beingforcefully hoarded to stop using
fertilizer kill the herds. Well,guys, it really doesn't seem
(17:24):
that we are solving the problemthat we are saying we are
solving for me, it becomes clearthat the goal is not to reduce
our footprint to save theplanet. which by itself is a
fallacy. But to create, youknow, some sort of a Mad Max
situation where people fight forgasoline and food, we are coming
back to this meme, you are thecarbon they want to reuse. But
(17:48):
the same time we see situationsof the same people who proclaim
these things, that they're noteven planning on reducing
anything. And because they sayoh, but you know, I do so much
for the environment. So I canafford to you know, pollute a
little bit by flying privatejets, using the yachts and
stuff. It's a classicalsituation of do as I say, not as
(18:12):
I do. And by the way, don't getdistracted because we are
executing a plan here we aresaving the planet. Who guys i
don't know i for me doesn'treally look pretty and looking
at also people as you said,coming back to the Burning Man.
I have people from all over thecountry driving for 1000s of
miles while maybe like hundredsof miles in gas powered cars. I
(18:35):
don't think that anyone would bedriving electric to the Burning
Man, right? Because you don'thave superchargers there.
It's a completely inhospitableplace for humans without energy
without electricity withoutfossil fuels. People stationed
there for a week or so burningfires then burning this wooden
(18:57):
man sculpture. For the firsttime I think you told me that it
was the first time it waspoliticized this event was
containing some politicalinformation stuff we will not go
into details here but these arethe people who say that they are
fighting the co2 and everythingand doing this I mean, guys,
let's stop absurdity andstupidity in our society. We
(19:19):
don't need to stop using fossilfuels or you know, stop leaving
for the same matter. Let's justget on stupid as our friend
auger said, let's get on stupidtogether. I think this is what
we should be striving for notreducing ourselves to nothing to
net zero. Let's not reduceourselves to net zero
Taliy (19:42):
then because eventually net zero means zero jobs, zero
ability to survives zero energy.
And I think many peopleexperienced this week when their
thermostats and their homesacross America all of a sudden
Alexey (19:57):
became unresponsive.
They were looked
Taliy (20:00):
unresponsive. And they were locked under a certain
temperature and could not goabove that. And here in the US,
I went to a couple of chainrestaurants, it's really hot
inside, like, you know, theyused to open doors they used to
blow out they see on Macs rightnow it's hot inside, and the
doors are closed, but they havethem on like 78 degrees. And
(20:21):
it's really uncomfortable. And Ifeel bad for people who have to
work there. We don't have enoughenergy to to do that. For some
reason, we used to have enoughenergy last year, we used to
have enough food last year, weused to have enough of
everything. And now all of asudden we'll have shortages.
What did happen, did the oilgone anywhere? Or was it the bad
(20:41):
policies. So in addition to badclimate change situation, which
has happened, and as you said,scientifically proven because of
the changes inside of ourplanet, not because of the
anthropogenic co2. In additionto that, instead of sustaining
our society, instead of findingnew sources of energy, instead
of producing reliable energy andprotecting our future from
(21:05):
emergencies, we're about towitness and we're already facing
right now instead of all ofthat, we're seeing the
completely opposite, we'reseeing the anti humane agenda
where people are being deprivedof their right to just live a
decent life, and even theability to work, there will be
no jobs that will be net zerojobs that will be net zero
(21:27):
energy and Net Zero ability topay your bills. And we've been
seeing this economical situationgoing tremendously dramatic in
Europe, which when this wokegreen agenda path about a decade
ago, and you know, here in theUS, everybody's always comparing
America only to one country,there's only one country in the
world that America comparesthemselves to its Germany,
(21:50):
because it's the mostprosperous, the most developed
the most the great nation ofEurope. And, you know, Americans
buying their cars buying theirstuff. And that's a good
quality, everybody loves it. AndGermany is facing the biggest
catastrophe economically rightnow, energy wise, and the bills
are for electricity. I know youlive in the Europe, you'll tell
(22:12):
me if that's true, but I'mseeing them went from 200 euros
amongst 2000 euros a month. Andlike in America, it's the same
thing here. We're paying $200for electricity a month. And I
can only imagine how surprisedwill will be people and they get
$1,000 A month electric bill,it's not going to be a pretty
situation considering peoplehave still Second Amendment, and
(22:36):
they're going to fight for theirright to consume on the level
that they get used to. Insteadof sustaining the situation, we
are seeing the completeopposites. And we're seeing that
even if the policies are goingto change to the Humane ones, we
still do not have just aphysical ability to provide
enough water and enough energybecause the hydroelectric
(22:57):
stations are not able to produceenergy anymore, because there is
not enough water. And nuclearplants. They've been already
shut down here. The ones on theCalifornia onshore, there's only
one in operation right now. Theywant to shut that one down this
year. There's a big clashbetween them. And the very same
time we're seeing the governorof California, banning gasoline
(23:20):
vehicles starting in 2035. Therewill be no Oh, first of all, we
have to make it till 2035. Wehave to make it past 2022 and
2023. And with currentleadership, that's a big
question if we're going to makeit as a single country, because
apparently, half of the countryare enemies of the state and 78
(23:41):
Millions of people who voted forthe party that did not win the
election and 2020. Officiallythere are no enemies of the
state, according to Joe Biden,but who knows? Because the next
day when he was asked the samequestion, he said that he does
not consider them. So it alldepends on whoever is writing
the speech or token into his earright now. And that's the
(24:03):
problem we've been having fordecades. It's not the problem
with oh, this liberal Democratover there with his anti human
agenda. We've seen the very samething with George Bush one we
have somebody who's making badpolicies, but decisions and
starting wars. They say oh,that's just a bad politician
here and there who you know,made bad decisions. We're seeing
the same thing with the UnitedNations and IPCC when they forge
(24:26):
in graphs when they make an upscience when they push on
scientists to be silent aboutcertain things. And then they
say, Oh, it was just a baddecision making on one person
side it was just a personality,and then they change the
personality but the agenda keepson going. So it never changes.
We're seeing the same thing withBoris Johnson. We're seeing the
same thing with previous onesTheresa May whoever else was
(24:49):
there, they're all faceless.
There's these are people. You'renot going to remember them.
They're not prominent, there isnothing special about them. They
all look like some sort of Like,you know, mass produced
politicians, the only reasonsfor their existence is to
distract you from what ishappening to our world and
distract our attention. Andthat's a big problem. The
(25:10):
attention span is very shortright now. And it's been
distracted. People do notunderstand what has happened in
because instead of presentingreal facts, like the one you
said about the balloons, theychecked, the co2 has nothing to
do with the rise of temperatureson the surface of our planet,
because it's coming from theinside. We're not hearing about
that. Nobody hears about it.
(25:33):
Whenever somebody startspresenting that truthful
information, there is also aquestion like, will it get to
the people because right nowwe're seeing people are being
banned from social media soeasily. And, you know, I did not
dig much into certain thingslike I'm seeing entertains
cases. It's loud, it's acrossinternet right now. I did not
(25:55):
dig deep into that. But is thatthe way to go? Because if you
just cancel somebody like that,if you make a rule that you can
cancel people, shut them down,delete their accounts, delete
their Gmail, delete theirability to basically survive in
this world, like, what kind ofenvironment is it? It used to be
(26:15):
that there should be legal,legal grounds to making
decisions like that, that canhurt people's lives, there has
to be a court, there has to bejudged decision, there has to be
some sort of legal proceduresthat have to pass in order to
punish a person for doingsomething violent, or something
that broke the law. Right now wecan see complete opposite of
(26:37):
that there is no legal decisionmaking there is this certain
group of people that have power,and they executed the way they
like it, according to theirpolitical views, and nobody
cares if there was those views,they might be anti humane, they
might be anti social, they mightgo against the humanity and only
proceed their own personalagenda. They have the power to
(27:00):
do so. And people are silent.
People are not seeing the thing.
So that's a big problem. We'reliving in that environment where
there is no power authoritiesanymore. And the ones we have
there is so compromised.
compromised with politicized andwith the something very anti
humane about it. And I don'tknow, I don't know, it seems
(27:23):
like we're, we're definitely atthe edge of some huge changes
here. And it's up to people towake up before it goes. Really,
really bad.
Alexey (27:34):
Yeah. I haven't looked also much into the case of
entertainers. But what isnotable here is that everything
at once, as if there was like,some sort of order, but the
thing, so we don't know thedetails. But imagine, these are
(27:54):
separate companies, right?
independent companies looks likeindependent companies. I mean,
we are not talking about Googleand YouTube, because it's it's
the same company, right? Ofcourse, Facebook and Instagram,
it's the same. But when you haveall major platforms all at once,
also tick tock, which isChinese, canceling a person
(28:15):
entirely. This makes you think,do you really own anything? Do
you have any rights, becauseimagine, like Google's
professional email, as well asGmail for personal use, and when
you have no control over it,they can just cut you off the
service at any time. And thismade me think, everything that
(28:36):
we've been offered as a easy andconvenient way to use, right,
let's talk about this a littlebit. Single Sign On with sign in
with Gmail into many services,right? Imagine that your Gmail
account is deleted, or you havelost access, because Gmail cut
(28:57):
you off. You don't have not onlyyour email, there is everything
there is the receipts, all thedocuments and stuff. The main
idea is everything that we areaccustomed to and everything
that we accepted and startedusing, because it was so
wonderful, and so easy to use.
You don't have to rememberpasswords and everything. Just
(29:19):
click sign in with Google. Samething with Google Pay, Apple Pay
and everything. Once you havethis, everything electronic and
easy to use. But as someone whocontrols this service, right, so
they can turn you off, they cancancel with one click of a
button. And this made me thinkwe all hopped on to this because
(29:43):
we wanted things to be easy.
Because when we started I meanwhen we started our company, we
had to have our own servers. Ihad a huge rack just behind my
back at the office with IBMblades and stuff that used to
run web server mail. Serverdatabases and stuff. And of
course, when we started havingall these cloud based solutions
(30:05):
for us, it was oh, man, I don'thave to drive back at the office
during the night. Because thereis a problem with the server.
Now everything works like 99.99%uptime is great. But when you
start seeing these things,immediately thought, Man, I need
to move everything somewhereelse, at least the key
components of my life, I need tobe in control of this. But what
(30:28):
also and rotate said when he wasinterviewed by Tucker Carlson,
that his domain name also wascancelled. So he lost access to
his domain name. So even if youhave your email with the
personal domain name hostedsomewhere, you will still lose
access on this, right? I mean,not the emails themselves, but
(30:50):
access to your domain name. Soyeah, we have some food for
thought regarding this and howwe should be protecting our
information and keeping accessto it in case something like
this happens. I don't want tofrighten anyone. But when you
think that all your life, likeanyone who has already had
(31:11):
experience of a bank, closingthe accounts, as also, in the
case of Andrew rotate, when hesaid, like all the banks,
everything, everything comes up,when you understand that this
can happen to you, while youstart thinking a little bit
differently about things that wetook for granted first, and that
we started using for the sake ofsimplicity. Because in a society
(31:32):
where your happiness and yourwelfare are not the highest
priority, you cannot be surethat you will always have access
to everything that you considerto be yours. And this is really
something that we need to thinkabout.
Taliy (31:53):
Here. Yeah, we're talking about the safety of a person
which becomes more and morefragile. Anyone who's doing
something that might hurtsomebody's political interest,
they might be canceled just aseasily, and we're not gonna even
know about it. We've seen thehuge bullying campaign that went
against so many magazines, somany directors, so many
(32:17):
scientists who were publishingtheir articles, which were
proven that climate has acyclical nature. And we're
seeing this campaigns againstthis people, of course, it's
very easy to tag somebody as amisogynist, or hateful speech.
But excuse me, we don't needcourts for that anymore. We just
what we allow somebody just outof their desire to cancel people
(32:42):
like that. Are there any legalprocedures that have to be done
here? Are we not live in anillegal states anymore? Who is
given the right to cancel peoplewho's given the right to delete
their accounts, who's given theright to delete emails and in
mailboxes with everything thatperson has, it's your identity,
or whether it's your ability tohave access to all your online
(33:04):
accounts. That's a huge part ofour life that is not protected
at all. And there are noprecedents where people would
request the right to protecttheir data, whatever is in
there, it's yours. Yeah, we'vethe biggest thing so far was
that all things God, Facebookand Instagram allows you to
(33:24):
download the information theyhave gathered about you in one
airtime and look through thefolders, but excuse me, they
have their right to deleteanything and anytime and deprive
you of your right to use yourinformation that you decided to
store on their servers.
Temporarily. This is yourinformation. This is your right
you just choose their platformout of their convenience. But
(33:47):
since when they have a right tocancel you as a person because
they do not agree with somethingyou said they don't have to
prove that it went against therules or anything because we've
seen multiple presidents whenthey can delete YouTube
channels, they can deleteYouTube videos for things that
are not even there in the video.
(34:10):
They go it's against ourpolicies, because it was certain
thing and that thing wasn't evenin the video. They just decided
to delete it for mostlypolitical reasons and for
financial reasons, because we'reseeing well, how Mark Zuckerberg
when he was in the recentinterview, he also mentioned
(34:30):
that FBI advised him to docertain things to not post
certain things. And then afterhe said that, I think you had
another conversation with FBIwhere FBI advised him not to
talk about the advices he's beengiven from FBI. So guys, we are
living in the very special timewhere for a very limited of time
(34:53):
we had this freedom to expressourselves on the internet and
have our cute podcast and lie Ifjournals and everything was so
nice and cozy, it's all beengone right now. And your freedom
of speech is disappearing.
That's not the right you can useanymore. And very soon, the
amount of electricity you canconsume, the amount of co2 you
(35:15):
can exhale will be very limited,just as those thermostats in
Colorado State this week, theywill be locked at certain level
and there is nothing you can doabout it. So you better think of
taking action before thathappens. Something tells me that
it's yeah, it's coming to thepoint where people have to do
(35:37):
something.
Alexey (35:40):
Yeah, no, I was surprised to see that there are
several movements. For example,one, because we started talking
about the rising energy pricesin Europe, and UK is also going
to be hit really hard. We'vealready seen we'll post links to
a couple of tweets where a smallcoffee shop in Ireland, they've
(36:01):
got July bill for about 9000euros for electricity. And then
another small hotel owner postedthat, oh, I got an 18,000 euros
bill just for the month of July.
And people they cannot keeptheir business with these costs.
But there is a campaign, don'tpay UK, people are getting
(36:22):
people to subscribe to not paytheir utility bills, electricity
bills starting from first ofOctober, and they want to get to
1 million. There was also thisvideo where an anchor from Sky
News was interviewing one of thegirls who is from this moment,
because as well, but why do youdo this? Maybe you should just
(36:44):
pay? And she says well, youknow, for my mom, it's not you
She has also a shop, small shopor something like that. That,
you know, for my mom, it's not aquestion of not wanting to pay,
she's not able to pay, it's amatter that we will defend
because we are not able to bethese rising energy costs. And
for the moment, I think theywill be passing this new
(37:08):
legislation that would limit themaximum amount that electric
company is able to bill to bearound 5000 pounds per year, not
per month, first will be peryear, right for private for
private homes. At the same time,there is this article in
Bloomberg UK that says that UKsees up to 170 billion pounds,
(37:30):
which is about $199 billion ofexcess profits for energy firms.
So these at the same time whenpeople are struggling to pay
their electricity bills,electricity companies are making
a record profits. So it's notabout rising energy costs to the
(37:52):
energy companies. It is aboutthem billing the people higher
amounts under false protects ofwhat we don't even know any
more. What is it? They'retalking about? Is it rising co2
levels? Is it the geopoliticalsituation in the world? And how
(38:14):
is it even impacting the UnitedKingdom? No one says about that.
But yeah, it's really strange.
And it's really sad that we areat this point in our lives that
people need to choose betweeneating or heating. And this is a
really important thing. We areliving in the 21st century,
(38:37):
almost a quarter, we are thebest. And we are still going
through these stupid thingsdon't have other words, to say
that. We are forbidding farmingwhen we desperately need food.
We are increasing energy pricesfor people who cannot already
pay what they were payingpreviously. Yet we are
(38:57):
increasing energy costs for themand saying guys don't use
electricity and everywhere andthe governments around the
world. I'm seeing it inSwitzerland. I have read the
same things in France. Oh noflushing you know, these things
like oh, yellow, don't flushbrown flush this kind of
instructions. Understand that?
Okay, water, this is somethingthat we are not in control of
(39:22):
yet. When there is drought, youneed to be aware of how much
water you use. I agree. But theelectricity supply what has
changed, because if they haveenough electricity when people
pay them 500% More, it meansthat they have electricity, so
they have electricity to sellbut only when we pay them more
(39:43):
and this is this is not okay. SoI totally support these guys who
are already gathering and theythink that this will be around
Europe. Well, this is happeningalready right now. And for the
US it isn't works, I would say,given that this is an agenda
that's being pushed uponeveryone, because it's the same
(40:05):
thing that apparently that weare fighting against, right? The
co2, the same thing will beimplemented everywhere. I don't
think that people will acquiescethis time, because this time,
it's already hitting reallyhard, too hard. Maybe this will
be the this uniting point of thefirst uniting point of people
(40:26):
against the system fighting fortheir right to eat and heat at
the same time, as we used to do.
Taliy (40:37):
Yeah, that's very interesting. You know that not
so long time ago, we interviewedPeter Clarke, who was one of the
founders of Greenpeace, and whois absolutely against this eco
tourism that Greenpeace havebeen doing lately. And that,
that's why he exactly left thatorganization. And he posted a
post on Twitter saying thatactually, oil is the most
(40:58):
plentiful liquid on Earth,second only to water. And that
it should be super cheap andaffordable for everyone should
be just few cents on the gallonto cover how much it cost, the
drilling, the refiningtransportation and the profit.
But for some reason, just as yousaid, the electricity the price
is going down, the price ofelectricity of the production
(41:21):
didn't go up, it should be supercheaper, especially with
development of the technology.
And especially when we spokeabout the nuclear technologists
they nuanced they allowed toproduce a lot of energy for a
very cheap price, instead ofthat we're seeing the completely
opposite. And that's exactlywhat's happening to oil as well.
It can be produced in normalamounts as it should be. And
right now, we need it more thanever to deal with all the
(41:45):
consequences of naturally drivenclimate changes that are
happening on earth due tocyclicity. But we don't do that.
And you know, it's interestinghow oil becomes more and more
expensive and less affordablefor the people. And that's the
only source of energy we have onour planet right now that can
(42:05):
solve this problem altogetherwith coil and with nuclear
energy, that transition to areally sustainable new sources
of energy. If you would like todevelop them, then please do.
But the ones that are beingoffered right now they're simply
unreliable, and we cannotreplace the reliable sources of
energy with unreliable urine,the global climate crisis. Guys,
(42:29):
if you would like to suggest usa new topic, or any guests
specialists in the energy fieldand then the food production
field, let us know in thecomment section below. And
hopefully by the next week,we're gonna have something more
positive but most likely, we'regonna continue to discuss the
(42:51):
problems that are beingartificially created as if those
were not enough for us as ahumanity to struggle with. Thank
you so much for being with us.
And see you next week.
You know, I've seen this not even a meme, a sticker
(00:04):
on Instagram. And I used it onone of our reels that power
outages are climate change. Andthis made me think that actually
it is through what we'reexperiencing right now and are
about to experience with all thepower outages are climate
change. And I don't mean thatthe power outages that we will
(00:27):
be experiencing, because we areshutting down the coal powered
power plants or nuclear, butbecause we are not able to make
them work again, and why, andthis is something I didn't think
about at first. But actually, wedon't have enough water to cool
(00:49):
them down. Because we havedroughts all over Europe, we
have droughts in China. And thisis really something that even
bright people like Alex Epstein,that we really enjoy talking
about his latest book, fossilfuture, he presents all the
information correctly. And hesays that, yes, we really do
(01:11):
need these fossil energy sourcesto sustain at least at least
sustain the same level of life.
I mean, everything that we have,we owe this to the energy that
we are using. And even if we godeeper, and we can talk about it
today, that all the economy, itis energy transformed, in one
(01:32):
way or another. And first we maythink, well, economy is money,
right? But money is just a meansof exchange. Economy is goods
and services. Money is justsomething that we equate the
amount of these goods andservices that we are exchanging
(01:53):
to. And the limiting factor ofany economy is labor, in by
labor, I don't mean only manuallabor, but machine labor as
well. More and more labor isalready being replaced by
machines. And they all useeither electricity or gasoline.
And here we are, we cannot usethe same old power plants that
(02:17):
we used to not because of co2,because we decided so but
because we don't have water tocall them down. And this is
something that paints thepicture in a totally different
way. And they haven't thoughtabout this before. What do you
think? Hey, Alex,
Taliy (02:37):
it's a huge problem we're facing right now all over the
world. So while one part of theworld has been flooded, like in
Pakistan, 1/3 of the countrywent underwater. And that's a
huge food shortage coming upafter that. It's 100% effect.
But on the other hand, in theEurope, there is that tremendous
(02:59):
drought, the rivers are dry.
There are hungry stones thatshowed up on the bottom of those
rivers that says if you see mecry, because there is not going
to be water there is not goingto be crops there is not going
to be food. It's a hunger andthe famine that's coming up
after and that did not happenfor more than 1000s of years.
And now it is happening. But thesecond problem that it brings is
(03:24):
that all the nuclear plants holdtheir power plants hold their
coal plants, everything thatproduces energy, real energy
when I'm talking about somemoney making schemes on solar
panels and wind turbines thatare not working without
sustainable energy that's comingfrom coal power plants. We don't
have that energy productionbecause it needs water to cool
(03:48):
down. They're either nuclearreactors or for regular power
plants as well. The recentinterview I watched with Alex
Epstein I enjoyed how he calledthem instead of renewables he
said, and reliables. Yeah wereplaced our reliable energy
with unreliable but now none ofthat makes sense because we
(04:11):
cannot get the source of energyand you know what last week was
very interesting the beginningof September the Labor Day
weekend many people here inCalifornia go to Burning Man I
yeah, I went there for a day andthey couldn't stay longer
because I was just feelingguilty stander biking along that
Playa and watching what ishappening oh there are people
(04:33):
from all over the world bring ina lot of diesel generators to
the desert to survive therebecause without those diesel
generators, human body cannotsurvive in there for I don't
know even the day it's super hotconditions under which without
energy, it's impossible tosurvive. So people come there,
bring their energy dieselgenerators, run them for a week
(04:56):
burn a lot of Who then there?
And guess what sign I see in themiddle of the play, it says, We
are the climate problem. And Iwas shocked to see that over
there. Because like, how hard doyou want to try to please? This
(05:16):
liberal agenda of being nice,right? It's a sign of, I don't
want to have any problems. I'mgood. I'm a good person. I
agree. I comply with all that'sbeen pushed up upon me from the
top. You want me to eat insectsfor the sake of the climate
change? Yeah, we will. You wantus to do accept any other
(05:38):
agendas? Yeah, we will, we willnot gonna put our thermostat
over something, we're gonna rollour dress in the front of our
house, we're not gonna flush ourtoilets, whatever, just get off
me, I want to be a good citizen.
In there, it multiplies. Becauseit doesn't make sense. You're in
the middle of the desert, eventogether, you could drive in the
US and AC in your vehicle,you're not gonna get there
(06:00):
without it. And when you getthere, you understand how much
little sense it makes to fightthe only source of energy that
made our planet a livable place,because it's a hostile place
without the energy. And at thesame time, the climate change is
real, although it's not causedby humans, the planet is warming
(06:20):
up, but it's warming up from theinside the co2 levels are
rising, but there are noneanthropogenic. Those are obvious
facts. And at the very sametime, I come across this article
that 1200 Scientists signed apetition that there is no
climate emergency. And asDouglas walked, said, I feel
(06:42):
like I'm in a mental house wherepatients to cover they're not
signing the petition that co2 isnot causing the climate change.
They are not signing thepetition that the whole
anthropogenic climate agenda isfake. From its core from the
very first graph, that hockeystick fake graph by Michael
Mann, we've been talking aboutthat there were not a single
(07:05):
serious study that proves thatclimate change has anthropogenic
nature. Instead of that those1200 Scientists while third of
Pakistan is going underwater.
While there is a biggest droughtin Europe, while we have the
lowest energy production levels,the hydroelectric stations here
(07:28):
because the power Lake Lake madColorado river, the river on the
border with Mexico, all of themdried out, there is no water. At
the very same time, we have thebiggest magnitude of
earthquakes, we have Tongavolcano, we have multiple little
counters, we have the biggestvolcano activity. On the bottom
of our ocean, we have glaciersmelting from the bottom up in
(07:51):
Antarctica and in Greenland,because the volcano activity,
submarine volcanoes on thebottom of our ocean erupt in
warming up the glaciers that aremelting from the bottom up. And
this mountain is happening whileit's getting colder on the top
of the continent, ocean getswarmer and is the biggest
(08:12):
storage of co2. And when it getswarmer, it releases co2, add two
plus two. And you will see thata reason while co2 levels are
going up. But this scientistinstead of bringing in some
sanity, they say that there isno climate emergency.
And to say that I'm shockedbecause those are not stupid
(08:32):
people and they're either that'sa very good quote, you have to
be either ignorant or antihumane to push either one of
these two agendas. Either youpush on that there is
anthropogenic climate emergency,because that's fine and co2
that's fighting that false causeof the climate change that has
nothing to do with the truereasons of the climate emergency
(08:54):
we're getting ourselves into. Oryou say that there is no climate
emergency at all. And you canfind facts I think people find
in facts Yeah, there we havemore forests than ever. Climate
is booming. Like guys, what areyou talking about? Take a look
at this statistics on thecreative society.com amazing
volunteers open the new page onwhich you can find the
(09:18):
interactive map of the worldwith literally all the climate
emergencies that happened sinceDecember 20 and 21. And you can
strike down the magnitude youcan track down the scale of the
events that have been happeningin less than a year we've seen
more than in the past decadethan in past decade. We've seen
(09:39):
more than than in past 100years. And it's not a single
week. Pass and by without thenew extreme climatic event
that's happening somewhere inthe world. It might happen right
next to you as well. It mightcome to your house like it does.
We've seen what's happening inMidwest and Tennessee or once in
1000 years climb attic eventsare happening almost every day.
(10:02):
And we see 1200 scientists thatsign in that there is no climate
emergency. Like, I'm happy thatwe have this group of volunteers
that really working on to bringin the truthful facts about the
nature of the climate change.
But at the same time, it's sadto see that this agenda has been
pushed from both sides. And bothsides, whether anthropogenic or
(10:22):
skeptical, they're bothfollowing the false narrative.
And that should be alarming.
That should be really alarmingeither. On one side, we have eco
terrorists that are trying tostop all production, which is
anti humane, it's a criminalactivity. That should be a
responsibility according to thelaw of each country for
(10:44):
ecotourism, or procrastination,of on taking action on studying
the true reason of climatechange, which, which is
cyclicity, which is what hashappened into the core of our
planet, which is why we'reseeing this global change of
number and magnitude of climaticevents. Those are not being
addressed. Yeah, there arescientists who are starting to
(11:10):
speak the truth about the thingsthat are happening to the core
of our planet. And there is hopethere is hope that people are
going to see it althoughinformation is right there,
guys, all that's needs to bedone is for people to start
taking action on this and stopbeing silent. So I think if we
take a little bit more time,doing nothing, as we're doing
(11:32):
right now, we're going to see avery sad consequences of it. One
of the things I've noticed onTwitter, there is this NASA
statistics like apparently NASAhas not been studying space for
decades. Instead of that theyconcentrated on studying climate
change on Earth. Interestingfact, when in 2017, Donald Trump
was trying to put hispersonality as a chief of NASA,
(11:56):
that guy, Jim Bridenstine, hecame into NASA with one agenda
to start studying climate changeon Mars. The backlash that
happened after that wastremendous, for some reason,
crazy equal activists andanthropogenic hysteria,
production campaign, startedturned against him and started
(12:19):
stigmatizing him as the rootcause of all evil as the enemy
of the Society for a couple ofmonths, until he came out and
said that climate change hasanthropogenic reasons, and that
he changed his beliefs onclimate change, and that he is
not going to study climatechange on Mars, and that he's
(12:40):
not going to study white Marslost its magnetic field. Because
his very first words were thatwe should study climate change
on Mars and find out why Mauricelost its magnetic field because
the very same thing can happenon earth. The very same thing
can happen here. The whole worldof anthropogenic words went
against him. But the next year,he was proclaimed as scientific
(13:03):
hero for changing his mind onclimate change. And that was
kind of crazy, because thebacklash that happened against
him says that it's a very bigmoney making spot right there.
The sweet spot that some fakescientists, which we couldn't
call other than scientific ISIS,because they erased the true
(13:25):
history of our humanity. Andthey substituted with a fake
hockey stick graphs, and theystarted making a huge money
laundry schemes on it ongreenwashing, on proclaiming
themselves are the saviors ofour planet. Yeah, that stuff is
totally anti humane, and it'signorant on our side to accept
(13:45):
it. And just to follow this fakenarrative,
Alexey (13:47):
it's really sad that scientists are signing petitions
to negate what is clearlyobservable that you can see with
your own eyes. You don't have tobe a scientist to see that
climate is changing. Thisreminds me how Steve Jobs was
(14:07):
dealing with his pancreaticcancer, because he thought,
Okay, I will not put myattention into it. So it will
somehow disappear, or thisproblem will go away. And we all
know that it didn't help him.
And here we are, having asimilar situation where we see
with our own eyes, you may notbelieve what you see on social
(14:28):
media or on TV regarding Chinaand reverse and droughts and
everything. You can see itaround you. And the problem is
that we are signing petitions tosay, oh, no, nothing is
happening. Everything is cool.
Let's just to do business asusual. There is one thing that I
came across a I haven't foundyet the original recording of
(14:52):
this film. I don't know if itwas a documentary or something
like that. There are scientistswho explained that what we've
talked about So that there areonly point zero 4% of the co2 in
the atmosphere. And 90% ofgreenhouse gas is water vapor,
which is abundant on thisplanet. And what they were
(15:14):
saying that if you look at howthe system works, okay, so if it
was for the greenhouse gases,because they are forming in the
upper levels of the atmosphere,we all know that hot air goes to
the top. So the same happenswith the greenhouse gases. And
(15:34):
sunrays by going down thereflects from the surface of the
planet. And they're beingcaptured by this formation by
these clouds if you wantgreenhouse gases. And this is
not what they observed. And theyshowed they have data, they
launched the balloons, theweather balloons, and they
measured the temperatures, andthey haven't found any
(15:58):
significant changes intemperature, at least not the
ones that would explain thewarming here. And they concluded
that the warming comes from theplanet itself, because the
planet itself warms up much morethan the upper levels of the
atmosphere. So it's notgreenhouse gases, there's that
(16:18):
we also have these kinds ofscientists like, but also what's
interesting, there is thisnarrative that is still
maintained is the main one thatwe should reduce our co2
emissions somehow. But itresulted in a we should use less
energy, which is a completenonsense. So the question
arises, then what do we reallywant, then? Do we want to reduce
(16:43):
our co2 emissions? Or do we wantto use less energy, and by
energy, apparently, it meansalso that we need to eat less,
because it's also energy for ourbodies. And when we put the
pieces of this puzzle together,the situation is really not
pretty. farmers can't usefertilizer, even though they've
(17:04):
significantly reduced its use inthe past 40 years or something,
they have an economic incentiveto do so fertilizer is
expensive. At the same time,they increase the production
yet, they're still beingforcefully hoarded to stop using
fertilizer kill the herds. Well,guys, it really doesn't seem
(17:24):
that we are solving the problemthat we are saying we are
solving for me, it becomes clearthat the goal is not to reduce
our footprint to save theplanet. which by itself is a
fallacy. But to create, youknow, some sort of a Mad Max
situation where people fight forgasoline and food, we are coming
back to this meme, you are thecarbon they want to reuse. But
(17:48):
the same time we see situationsof the same people who proclaim
these things, that they're noteven planning on reducing
anything. And because they sayoh, but you know, I do so much
for the environment. So I canafford to you know, pollute a
little bit by flying privatejets, using the yachts and
stuff. It's a classicalsituation of do as I say, not as
(18:12):
I do. And by the way, don't getdistracted because we are
executing a plan here we aresaving the planet. Who guys i
don't know i for me doesn'treally look pretty and looking
at also people as you said,coming back to the Burning Man.
I have people from all over thecountry driving for 1000s of
miles while maybe like hundredsof miles in gas powered cars. I
(18:35):
don't think that anyone would bedriving electric to the Burning
Man, right? Because you don'thave superchargers there.
It's a completely inhospitableplace for humans without energy
without electricity withoutfossil fuels. People stationed
there for a week or so burningfires then burning this wooden
(18:57):
man sculpture. For the firsttime I think you told me that it
was the first time it waspoliticized this event was
containing some politicalinformation stuff we will not go
into details here but these arethe people who say that they are
fighting the co2 and everythingand doing this I mean, guys,
let's stop absurdity andstupidity in our society. We
(19:19):
don't need to stop using fossilfuels or you know, stop leaving
for the same matter. Let's justget on stupid as our friend
auger said, let's get on stupidtogether. I think this is what
we should be striving for notreducing ourselves to nothing to
net zero. Let's not reduceourselves to net zero
Taliy (19:42):
then because eventually net zero means zero jobs, zero
ability to survives zero energy.
And I think many peopleexperienced this week when their
thermostats and their homesacross America all of a sudden
Alexey (19:57):
became unresponsive.
They were looked
Taliy (20:00):
unresponsive. And they were locked under a certain
temperature and could not goabove that. And here in the US,
I went to a couple of chainrestaurants, it's really hot
inside, like, you know, theyused to open doors they used to
blow out they see on Macs rightnow it's hot inside, and the
doors are closed, but they havethem on like 78 degrees. And
(20:21):
it's really uncomfortable. And Ifeel bad for people who have to
work there. We don't have enoughenergy to to do that. For some
reason, we used to have enoughenergy last year, we used to
have enough food last year, weused to have enough of
everything. And now all of asudden we'll have shortages.
What did happen, did the oilgone anywhere? Or was it the bad
(20:41):
policies. So in addition to badclimate change situation, which
has happened, and as you said,scientifically proven because of
the changes inside of ourplanet, not because of the
anthropogenic co2. In additionto that, instead of sustaining
our society, instead of findingnew sources of energy, instead
of producing reliable energy andprotecting our future from
(21:05):
emergencies, we're about towitness and we're already facing
right now instead of all ofthat, we're seeing the
completely opposite, we'reseeing the anti humane agenda
where people are being deprivedof their right to just live a
decent life, and even theability to work, there will be
no jobs that will be net zerojobs that will be net zero
(21:27):
energy and Net Zero ability topay your bills. And we've been
seeing this economical situationgoing tremendously dramatic in
Europe, which when this wokegreen agenda path about a decade
ago, and you know, here in theUS, everybody's always comparing
America only to one country,there's only one country in the
world that America comparesthemselves to its Germany,
(21:50):
because it's the mostprosperous, the most developed
the most the great nation ofEurope. And, you know, Americans
buying their cars buying theirstuff. And that's a good
quality, everybody loves it. AndGermany is facing the biggest
catastrophe economically rightnow, energy wise, and the bills
are for electricity. I know youlive in the Europe, you'll tell
(22:12):
me if that's true, but I'mseeing them went from 200 euros
amongst 2000 euros a month. Andlike in America, it's the same
thing here. We're paying $200for electricity a month. And I
can only imagine how surprisedwill will be people and they get
$1,000 A month electric bill,it's not going to be a pretty
situation considering peoplehave still Second Amendment, and
(22:36):
they're going to fight for theirright to consume on the level
that they get used to. Insteadof sustaining the situation, we
are seeing the completeopposites. And we're seeing that
even if the policies are goingto change to the Humane ones, we
still do not have just aphysical ability to provide
enough water and enough energybecause the hydroelectric
(22:57):
stations are not able to produceenergy anymore, because there is
not enough water. And nuclearplants. They've been already
shut down here. The ones on theCalifornia onshore, there's only
one in operation right now. Theywant to shut that one down this
year. There's a big clashbetween them. And the very same
time we're seeing the governorof California, banning gasoline
(23:20):
vehicles starting in 2035. Therewill be no Oh, first of all, we
have to make it till 2035. Wehave to make it past 2022 and
2023. And with currentleadership, that's a big
question if we're going to makeit as a single country, because
apparently, half of the countryare enemies of the state and 78
(23:41):
Millions of people who voted forthe party that did not win the
election and 2020. Officiallythere are no enemies of the
state, according to Joe Biden,but who knows? Because the next
day when he was asked the samequestion, he said that he does
not consider them. So it alldepends on whoever is writing
the speech or token into his earright now. And that's the
(24:03):
problem we've been having fordecades. It's not the problem
with oh, this liberal Democratover there with his anti human
agenda. We've seen the very samething with George Bush one we
have somebody who's making badpolicies, but decisions and
starting wars. They say oh,that's just a bad politician
here and there who you know,made bad decisions. We're seeing
the same thing with the UnitedNations and IPCC when they forge
(24:26):
in graphs when they make an upscience when they push on
scientists to be silent aboutcertain things. And then they
say, Oh, it was just a baddecision making on one person
side it was just a personality,and then they change the
personality but the agenda keepson going. So it never changes.
We're seeing the same thing withBoris Johnson. We're seeing the
same thing with previous onesTheresa May whoever else was
(24:49):
there, they're all faceless.
There's these are people. You'renot going to remember them.
They're not prominent, there isnothing special about them. They
all look like some sort of Like,you know, mass produced
politicians, the only reasonsfor their existence is to
distract you from what ishappening to our world and
distract our attention. Andthat's a big problem. The
(25:10):
attention span is very shortright now. And it's been
distracted. People do notunderstand what has happened in
because instead of presentingreal facts, like the one you
said about the balloons, theychecked, the co2 has nothing to
do with the rise of temperatureson the surface of our planet,
because it's coming from theinside. We're not hearing about
that. Nobody hears about it.
(25:33):
Whenever somebody startspresenting that truthful
information, there is also aquestion like, will it get to
the people because right nowwe're seeing people are being
banned from social media soeasily. And, you know, I did not
dig much into certain thingslike I'm seeing entertains
cases. It's loud, it's acrossinternet right now. I did not
(25:55):
dig deep into that. But is thatthe way to go? Because if you
just cancel somebody like that,if you make a rule that you can
cancel people, shut them down,delete their accounts, delete
their Gmail, delete theirability to basically survive in
this world, like, what kind ofenvironment is it? It used to be
(26:15):
that there should be legal,legal grounds to making
decisions like that, that canhurt people's lives, there has
to be a court, there has to bejudged decision, there has to be
some sort of legal proceduresthat have to pass in order to
punish a person for doingsomething violent, or something
that broke the law. Right now wecan see complete opposite of
(26:37):
that there is no legal decisionmaking there is this certain
group of people that have power,and they executed the way they
like it, according to theirpolitical views, and nobody
cares if there was those views,they might be anti humane, they
might be anti social, they mightgo against the humanity and only
proceed their own personalagenda. They have the power to
(27:00):
do so. And people are silent.
People are not seeing the thing.
So that's a big problem. We'reliving in that environment where
there is no power authoritiesanymore. And the ones we have
there is so compromised.
compromised with politicized andwith the something very anti
humane about it. And I don'tknow, I don't know, it seems
(27:23):
like we're, we're definitely atthe edge of some huge changes
here. And it's up to people towake up before it goes. Really,
really bad.
Alexey (27:34):
Yeah. I haven't looked also much into the case of
entertainers. But what isnotable here is that everything
at once, as if there was like,some sort of order, but the
thing, so we don't know thedetails. But imagine, these are
(27:54):
separate companies, right?
independent companies looks likeindependent companies. I mean,
we are not talking about Googleand YouTube, because it's it's
the same company, right? Ofcourse, Facebook and Instagram,
it's the same. But when you haveall major platforms all at once,
also tick tock, which isChinese, canceling a person
(28:15):
entirely. This makes you think,do you really own anything? Do
you have any rights, becauseimagine, like Google's
professional email, as well asGmail for personal use, and when
you have no control over it,they can just cut you off the
service at any time. And thismade me think, everything that
(28:36):
we've been offered as a easy andconvenient way to use, right,
let's talk about this a littlebit. Single Sign On with sign in
with Gmail into many services,right? Imagine that your Gmail
account is deleted, or you havelost access, because Gmail cut
(28:57):
you off. You don't have not onlyyour email, there is everything
there is the receipts, all thedocuments and stuff. The main
idea is everything that we areaccustomed to and everything
that we accepted and startedusing, because it was so
wonderful, and so easy to use.
You don't have to rememberpasswords and everything. Just
(29:19):
click sign in with Google. Samething with Google Pay, Apple Pay
and everything. Once you havethis, everything electronic and
easy to use. But as someone whocontrols this service, right, so
they can turn you off, they cancancel with one click of a
button. And this made me thinkwe all hopped on to this because
(29:43):
we wanted things to be easy.
Because when we started I meanwhen we started our company, we
had to have our own servers. Ihad a huge rack just behind my
back at the office with IBMblades and stuff that used to
run web server mail. Serverdatabases and stuff. And of
course, when we started havingall these cloud based solutions
(30:05):
for us, it was oh, man, I don'thave to drive back at the office
during the night. Because thereis a problem with the server.
Now everything works like 99.99%uptime is great. But when you
start seeing these things,immediately thought, Man, I need
to move everything somewhereelse, at least the key
components of my life, I need tobe in control of this. But what
(30:28):
also and rotate said when he wasinterviewed by Tucker Carlson,
that his domain name also wascancelled. So he lost access to
his domain name. So even if youhave your email with the
personal domain name hostedsomewhere, you will still lose
access on this, right? I mean,not the emails themselves, but
(30:50):
access to your domain name. Soyeah, we have some food for
thought regarding this and howwe should be protecting our
information and keeping accessto it in case something like
this happens. I don't want tofrighten anyone. But when you
think that all your life, likeanyone who has already had
(31:11):
experience of a bank, closingthe accounts, as also, in the
case of Andrew rotate, when hesaid, like all the banks,
everything, everything comes up,when you understand that this
can happen to you, while youstart thinking a little bit
differently about things that wetook for granted first, and that
we started using for the sake ofsimplicity. Because in a society
(31:32):
where your happiness and yourwelfare are not the highest
priority, you cannot be surethat you will always have access
to everything that you considerto be yours. And this is really
something that we need to thinkabout.
Taliy (31:53):
Here. Yeah, we're talking about the safety of a person
which becomes more and morefragile. Anyone who's doing
something that might hurtsomebody's political interest,
they might be canceled just aseasily, and we're not gonna even
know about it. We've seen thehuge bullying campaign that went
against so many magazines, somany directors, so many
(32:17):
scientists who were publishingtheir articles, which were
proven that climate has acyclical nature. And we're
seeing this campaigns againstthis people, of course, it's
very easy to tag somebody as amisogynist, or hateful speech.
But excuse me, we don't needcourts for that anymore. We just
what we allow somebody just outof their desire to cancel people
(32:42):
like that. Are there any legalprocedures that have to be done
here? Are we not live in anillegal states anymore? Who is
given the right to cancel peoplewho's given the right to delete
their accounts, who's given theright to delete emails and in
mailboxes with everything thatperson has, it's your identity,
or whether it's your ability tohave access to all your online
(33:04):
accounts. That's a huge part ofour life that is not protected
at all. And there are noprecedents where people would
request the right to protecttheir data, whatever is in
there, it's yours. Yeah, we'vethe biggest thing so far was
that all things God, Facebookand Instagram allows you to
(33:24):
download the information theyhave gathered about you in one
airtime and look through thefolders, but excuse me, they
have their right to deleteanything and anytime and deprive
you of your right to use yourinformation that you decided to
store on their servers.
Temporarily. This is yourinformation. This is your right
you just choose their platformout of their convenience. But
(33:47):
since when they have a right tocancel you as a person because
they do not agree with somethingyou said they don't have to
prove that it went against therules or anything because we've
seen multiple presidents whenthey can delete YouTube
channels, they can deleteYouTube videos for things that
are not even there in the video.
(34:10):
They go it's against ourpolicies, because it was certain
thing and that thing wasn't evenin the video. They just decided
to delete it for mostlypolitical reasons and for
financial reasons, because we'reseeing well, how Mark Zuckerberg
when he was in the recentinterview, he also mentioned
(34:30):
that FBI advised him to docertain things to not post
certain things. And then afterhe said that, I think you had
another conversation with FBIwhere FBI advised him not to
talk about the advices he's beengiven from FBI. So guys, we are
living in the very special timewhere for a very limited of time
(34:53):
we had this freedom to expressourselves on the internet and
have our cute podcast and lie Ifjournals and everything was so
nice and cozy, it's all beengone right now. And your freedom
of speech is disappearing.
That's not the right you can useanymore. And very soon, the
amount of electricity you canconsume, the amount of co2 you
(35:15):
can exhale will be very limited,just as those thermostats in
Colorado State this week, theywill be locked at certain level
and there is nothing you can doabout it. So you better think of
taking action before thathappens. Something tells me that
it's yeah, it's coming to thepoint where people have to do
(35:37):
something.
Alexey (35:40):
Yeah, no, I was surprised to see that there are
several movements. For example,one, because we started talking
about the rising energy pricesin Europe, and UK is also going
to be hit really hard. We'vealready seen we'll post links to
a couple of tweets where a smallcoffee shop in Ireland, they've
(36:01):
got July bill for about 9000euros for electricity. And then
another small hotel owner postedthat, oh, I got an 18,000 euros
bill just for the month of July.
And people they cannot keeptheir business with these costs.
But there is a campaign, don'tpay UK, people are getting
(36:22):
people to subscribe to not paytheir utility bills, electricity
bills starting from first ofOctober, and they want to get to
1 million. There was also thisvideo where an anchor from Sky
News was interviewing one of thegirls who is from this moment,
because as well, but why do youdo this? Maybe you should just
(36:44):
pay? And she says well, youknow, for my mom, it's not you
She has also a shop, small shopor something like that. That,
you know, for my mom, it's not aquestion of not wanting to pay,
she's not able to pay, it's amatter that we will defend
because we are not able to bethese rising energy costs. And
for the moment, I think theywill be passing this new
(37:08):
legislation that would limit themaximum amount that electric
company is able to bill to bearound 5000 pounds per year, not
per month, first will be peryear, right for private for
private homes. At the same time,there is this article in
Bloomberg UK that says that UKsees up to 170 billion pounds,
(37:30):
which is about $199 billion ofexcess profits for energy firms.
So these at the same time whenpeople are struggling to pay
their electricity bills,electricity companies are making
a record profits. So it's notabout rising energy costs to the
(37:52):
energy companies. It is aboutthem billing the people higher
amounts under false protects ofwhat we don't even know any
more. What is it? They'retalking about? Is it rising co2
levels? Is it the geopoliticalsituation in the world? And how
(38:14):
is it even impacting the UnitedKingdom? No one says about that.
But yeah, it's really strange.
And it's really sad that we areat this point in our lives that
people need to choose betweeneating or heating. And this is a
really important thing. We areliving in the 21st century,
(38:37):
almost a quarter, we are thebest. And we are still going
through these stupid thingsdon't have other words, to say
that. We are forbidding farmingwhen we desperately need food.
We are increasing energy pricesfor people who cannot already
pay what they were payingpreviously. Yet we are
(38:57):
increasing energy costs for themand saying guys don't use
electricity and everywhere andthe governments around the
world. I'm seeing it inSwitzerland. I have read the
same things in France. Oh noflushing you know, these things
like oh, yellow, don't flushbrown flush this kind of
instructions. Understand that?
Okay, water, this is somethingthat we are not in control of
(39:22):
yet. When there is drought, youneed to be aware of how much
water you use. I agree. But theelectricity supply what has
changed, because if they haveenough electricity when people
pay them 500% More, it meansthat they have electricity, so
they have electricity to sellbut only when we pay them more
(39:43):
and this is this is not okay. SoI totally support these guys who
are already gathering and theythink that this will be around
Europe. Well, this is happeningalready right now. And for the
US it isn't works, I would say,given that this is an agenda
that's being pushed uponeveryone, because it's the same
(40:05):
thing that apparently that weare fighting against, right? The
co2, the same thing will beimplemented everywhere. I don't
think that people will acquiescethis time, because this time,
it's already hitting reallyhard, too hard. Maybe this will
be the this uniting point of thefirst uniting point of people
(40:26):
against the system fighting fortheir right to eat and heat at
the same time, as we used to do.
Taliy (40:37):
Yeah, that's very interesting. You know that not
so long time ago, we interviewedPeter Clarke, who was one of the
founders of Greenpeace, and whois absolutely against this eco
tourism that Greenpeace havebeen doing lately. And that,
that's why he exactly left thatorganization. And he posted a
post on Twitter saying thatactually, oil is the most
(40:58):
plentiful liquid on Earth,second only to water. And that
it should be super cheap andaffordable for everyone should
be just few cents on the gallonto cover how much it cost, the
drilling, the refiningtransportation and the profit.
But for some reason, just as yousaid, the electricity the price
is going down, the price ofelectricity of the production
(41:21):
didn't go up, it should be supercheaper, especially with
development of the technology.
And especially when we spokeabout the nuclear technologists
they nuanced they allowed toproduce a lot of energy for a
very cheap price, instead ofthat we're seeing the completely
opposite. And that's exactlywhat's happening to oil as well.
It can be produced in normalamounts as it should be. And
right now, we need it more thanever to deal with all the
(41:45):
consequences of naturally drivenclimate changes that are
happening on earth due tocyclicity. But we don't do that.
And you know, it's interestinghow oil becomes more and more
expensive and less affordablefor the people. And that's the
only source of energy we have onour planet right now that can
(42:05):
solve this problem altogetherwith coil and with nuclear
energy, that transition to areally sustainable new sources
of energy. If you would like todevelop them, then please do.
But the ones that are beingoffered right now they're simply
unreliable, and we cannotreplace the reliable sources of
energy with unreliable urine,the global climate crisis. Guys,
(42:29):
if you would like to suggest usa new topic, or any guests
specialists in the energy fieldand then the food production
field, let us know in thecomment section below. And
hopefully by the next week,we're gonna have something more
positive but most likely, we'regonna continue to discuss the
(42:51):
problems that are beingartificially created as if those
were not enough for us as ahumanity to struggle with. Thank
you so much for being with us.
And see you next week.
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com