This idea is dead

In this episode, we welcomed our first guest - John Ahn. Together we talked about the attacks that followed the release of the Rotary Report and the forum “Global Crisis. Our Survival is in Unity,” addressed the concerns about us being AI-generated deep-fakes, our first haters as a sign of being right (and becoming popular 😉), and other absurdities of the consumerist format of society.

Urgent Online Report "The Future of Humanity"

Forum "Global Crisis. Our Survival is in Unity", November 12, 2022

Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases

Volcano in Germany recharging with new magma - DW - 02/06/2019

We love receiving your feedback ❤️ Drop us a line anywhere you happen to come across our posts 🙂

We are @episodikal on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, TikTok, and LinkedIn, or email us at [e-mail]

Episode Transcript

Alexey (00:02):
Guys, welcome back to The Episodikal Podcast.
And today is a very specialday because today is the
first time when we havesomeone else with us.
And as you can see, andyou will hear in a moment,
we have John Ahn with us.
Some of you may know himfrom the Rotary report that

(00:23):
we presented not long ago,and we've been talking about
it several episodes back.
So, John, welcometo the podcast!

John (00:30):
Thank you very much.

Alexey (00:31):
And Taliy.
How, things were going?

Taliy (00:33):
Well, it's going quite fun because after the
conference, you know, we hadour streams across all possible
platforms, all possible varietyof channels in 150 languages,
which seems impossible evenfrom technical perspective.
But our amazing volunteerswere able to pull it off,
and that's just amazing.

(00:54):
But then, what's fun, isgoing on different channels
and monitoring comments,like getting people's
feedback, what do they think.
And I have to say it's beenblowing up on TikTok ever since.
It's been a month, and westill see this huge flow of
people's feedback, peoplejust filming videos with their
thoughts about the conference.

(01:15):
And it's amazing, becauseit resonates with so many
people on so many levels, andI'm really happy that people
understand the solution part,that we are not trying to
fearmongering or do whatever.
Usually, it is because peoplegenerally so used to this system
of inhumane capitalization andmaking money on tragedies, and

(01:37):
especially exploiting climatechange and fighting CO2 for
this purpose, that it almostseems artificial to this
world when somebody speaks thetruth and speaks about unity.
And there is actually bringsme into another comment.
There was a thread of commentsand some trolls started posting
comments all over our streamsthat speakers of the conference,

(02:00):
Our Survival Is In Unity, arenot real people, that those
are artificial intelligence.
And I took a look at thosethreads and I find it funny
how they trying to divertpeople's attention from
the essence of what we weresaying to the way people
look, the way they pronouncesounds, something external.
And then I was checkingcomments and people who were,

(02:22):
so people split on the commentssection into two groups.
One were saying thatthese guys are artificial
intelligence, they trying touse AI to hide their faces.
And another group was sayingthat, yeah, we see that they are
AI, but they do it for the goodpurpose, because they trying
to hide their faces, not tobe victims of the system, not

(02:42):
to be harassed by the system.
And I was looking at it andfeeling really sad, because
I know personally that Johnwas harassed by the system,
and specifically under thevery same topic, they accused
him of being AI, that heis not a real participant.
And then I was thinking, howdo I, how do I answer this?
And the best thought thatI had on my mind, regarding

(03:05):
this, was to say that,yeah, guys, we are actually
artificial intelligence.
All the speakers of theforum, "Global Crisis.
Our Survival Is In Unity," areAI, artificial intelligence.
First of all, because all thepeople, and not just speakers,
but it's hundreds and thousandsof people behind the scenes
who made it possible, toorganize, gather information,

(03:26):
edit the videos, do amazing,tremendous amount of efforts
to put it all together.
They are artificial to thisconsumeristic format of living
in which human life worthnothing and money is everything.
People who speak the truthhave not been paid for anything
and just doing it in theirfree from main work time.
They're artificial to thisinhumane system of consuming

(03:50):
people, people's life.
And that's what we mean byconsumeristic system because
we not saying that consuminggoods is bad, but it's bad
to live in the system andagree to live in the system
which consumes humans lives.
And second of all, it'sdefinitely intelligent
artificial intelligencebecause these people are

(04:11):
super, incredibly intelligentand I cannot even express
how much I'm proud ofeach video, each volunteer
that participated in it.
Because when I'm rewatchingthese videos from the forum,
and I've been rewatchingthem multiple times, it
seems impossible to evenwrap it around the head.

(04:33):
How is it possible tobring so much information
in such a condensed form?
And it might not sound likeshort, 12 hours, but the amount
of information is tremendous.
And that's why today we haveone of the speakers, we have
John Ahn with us who also didhis research, did a lot of
research, put a lot of effortsinto research on the topics of

(04:57):
climate change, green energy,CO2 emissions, you name it.
And was accused by the systemof, system of slaves, system
of oppression, system oflies, system of disgrace.
These very slaves of thissystem accused John of

(05:17):
being, what did they say?
That he is not honestor that it's not him.
It's not even him.
They reach out to his employerand try to hurt him financially.
Try to leave him, hisfamily without finances
and means to survive.
This is what system doesfor speaking the truth.

John (05:36):
And also to discredit the report, right?
They said, oh, it's fake.
There's a delay between hismovements and his voice.
Well, that's calledtechnical delays, sorry.
Like, what else?
How, how else can I explain?
I mean this whole situation'squite, I never thought
that I would get certainthreat, I mean, these
kind of threats becauseI'm just a normal person.
I'm not someone famous or any,I'm just an average person

(05:59):
who has spoken against thiswhole, this CO2 theory that,
I mean, like, I, I was alsopart of group of people who
believed in this whole CO2until about two years ago.
I mean, I thought, oh yeahwe need to do better in
terms of environments, likewe're making so much mess.
But I think first thingwe're confusing is that we're
confusing the environmentalissues, ecology with,

(06:19):
with the climate change.
And those are twoseparate things.
For humans, yes, we areruining the environment,
but we're, we are notinfluencing the climate change.
Like how are we influencing,for example, volcanoes
eruptions, seismic activities?
How the hell are we doing that?
And how is CO2 influencing anumber and power of earthquakes?

(06:40):
And how is it that onlywestern part of the
Antarctica is melting?
How's that only, you know,the depth of the ocean
is heating up faster thanthe surface of the ocean?
Why, how, how isCO2 causing that?
And if you look at carefullythe graph of how much CO2
has been emitted from thepast, let's say couple years.
And if you look at 2020, weknow that the economy kind

(07:02):
of shut down at least fora few months, and you would
think that there would besome kind of dent in terms of
CO2 increase in terms of thePPM levels in the atmosphere.
Nothing.
There was no impact.
Zero impact.
Just go look at it.
It's a NOAA website - no impact.

Alexey (07:18):
You know, I want just to address the thing that people
invoking the delay, the syncissues between audio and video.
Actually, if it was the computergenerated video, there would
be no delay, because it isgenerated on one device and
there is no real reason whythere would be a delay, right?

(07:41):
But, once you are dealingwith microphones and cameras
connected to different things,then yes, you need to have
a third-party software thatsyncs the two together.
And it just shows thatwe are normal people.
We don't know all the detailsand we are just plugging
in whatever we have, andwe are speaking the truth.
Another thing I recentlyheard is that, actually CO2,

(08:03):
if you really think about it,it is a gas of life, because
we have this symbiosis withnature when we breathe out CO2,
and plants eat this CO2, andthey give back oxygen to us.
And this is how they grow,but they, we eat the plants,

(08:24):
you know, and this is,everything is connected.
So just saying that, oh guys,we need to stop emitting
CO2 is, yeah, I mean, justlet's stop this you know,
symbiosis thing, just let'sstop life on this planet.
I think this is whatthey're going for.

John (08:40):
Well, it's going to end anyway if we don't do anything
because we're going through this12,000 year cycle, and whether
we emit CO2 or not, whether wejust decide not to live, all
8 billion of us, this is goingto happen, if we do nothing.
Scientists need to come togetherand figure out the solution.
Otherwise, this is theend of every one of us.

Taliy (09:00):
Yeah, guys.
I think the problem is not evenwith the picture or the sound.
The problem is some peoplewho have been infected with
the virus of consumeristicapproach to life, they cannot
wrap their head around thefact that people can gather
together and do tremendousthings, put all these efforts
into something without gainingany financial interest from it.

(09:22):
And that just pisses them off.
So they go video to video,they try to divert people's
attention from the fact thatwe are talking about the
solutions to the climatechange, the solution to our
global crisis that we havein every sphere of our life.
They trying to divert it anddilute the message, and trying
to switch people's attentioninto discussing somebody's

(09:45):
looks and the way people talk,and whether they artificial
or is it real people, whythey have delay, why they
speak with certain accents,take a look at their makeup,
take a look at the eyes.
One of our speakers havesanpaku eyes, apparently.
Yeah, you know that thing?
It is been going viralon YouTube as well.
So they say, apparently, ifyou have white thing around

(10:09):
your eye on three sides.
Like, if you can see thewhite bottom of the eye,
it's called sanpaku eyes.
Those people consideredto be special.
Like Kennedy, Princess Dianaand so on, and they noticed
that one of our speakers alsohave this interesting feature,
and it all diverted there.
I'm like, guys, as longas it's fun, as long as

(10:32):
it's not negative towardscertain people, it's all fun.
And even getting people'sattention, let them
even discuss this.
But still, they get to seethe conference, they get
to hear the message, andit's going to affect them.
I believe that it's gonnakeep people awake, keep them
up at night and get themthinking, what if those guys

(10:53):
were actually trying to saysomething meaningful to me?
Yeah.
Let me check the facts.
Let me verify it.
And this is why even onemonth after the conference,
we see millions of views onTikTok, people's reaction.
It's such a heartwarming thingto watch because for so much,
so much time, we were justgrinding there, making live

(11:16):
conversation videos with ourparticipants from the US getting
like 1, 2, 3 views on stream.
And I was like, do peopleeven care about this?
Do people evenwant to hear this?
And now finally we get thefeedback, and the feedback is
so, so heartwarming that I don'teven care if some people might

(11:38):
not get it fully because thosepeople who understand it, seeing
their reaction is worth millionsof words, millions of comments.
It's priceless, because it'sawakening of the humanity.
It's like as if we would compareour humanity to a human body
that has been sick with thisawful disease of cancer, where

(11:59):
each cell of our body would betrying to get all the resources
to itself and accumulate them,and even without thinking
if the body's gonna survivesuch a, such an impact.
Right now we see more and morehealthy cells occurring around
our planet, and all thesecells, healthy, beautiful cells

(12:20):
uniting clusters, and thereare these beacons of light
all across our planet and theyspeaking up, and they lighting
up more cells, more humancells across all continents,
across all borders, acrossall countries, all cultures.
And there is no way, thereis no way to stop it.

(12:43):
And this is beautiful.
This is a natural healingof our planet, of our
humanity, of our civilization.
And I'm proud to be herewith you at the very, at the
very center of this action.

Alexey (13:00):
People are spreading the information, they're
lighting up, you know,they see the way out.
This is very important.
And, um, , uh, so a coupleof days ago, I I wrote you,
oh man, we must be doingsomething right because
we started having haters.
So people are saying, oh, whois listening to these idiots?

(13:23):
Like, they're, they're stupid.
I was thinking, okay, guys,well, whatever you say.
Looks like just four yearolds in a sandbox, you know,
hitting each other with somestones, and just saying,
that, oh, you are stupid.
Oh, you are stupid.
But, anyway, these guys, theyactually were informed about

(13:44):
Creative Society, and aboutwhat we're doing, no matter
how they responded, even ifthe first reaction was this
repulsive, reflex of sayingthat all the people around
them, they don't know aboutbatteries or I, I don't even,
you know, when people arewriting comments, they usually
think that maybe we understandwhen, at which point of the

(14:06):
video, which is about like onehour long they were commenting.
But anyway.
It's great that more and morepeople are also responding,
and I've seen these videoson TikTok that you are
phishing out using hashtags.
This is really somethingthat you understand.
Okay, we did something greatbecause this person that we

(14:30):
never talked to and we hadnever seen before, they, they're
telling about the things thatwe are telling with the same
passion and they seem to have,like, they, they understood
what we were talking about.
They, they're talking aboutthe, the way out from this
abyss that we are currently in.
And this is really great.

John (14:52):
Yeah, and, some of the comments that I've seen
is that like people don'tseem to distinguish between
the World Economic Forum,the one world government
versus Creative Society.
I mean, like we kindof repeat this message,
but you know, it's.
The WEF, it's about elitecontrolling rest of us.
Yes, it's unity in somesense, but it's this 1%
controlling all of us.
Creative Society, it's 99%driving the world, not this 1%.

(15:15):
So that's a difference.
And I think I, I don't knowhow to get it to people this
message, but it is, it isnot the same because Creative
Society is driven by people.
World Economic Forum 1%.
So.

Taliy (15:30):
Yeah, it's, it's actually a very common question.
Are you guys with WEF or UN,or any of those organization?
Guys, we are the alternative,on completely opposite
side of the spectrum.
They these elites.
So, okay, so let's takea look at this this way.
We are offering somethinghere as the Creative Society,

(15:51):
and some people say, ohguys, you're trying to like
push this narrative, you'retrying to make me join
your, like, belief system.
No, no, I'm notdoing none of them.
I'm not trying to convinceanyone to do anything.
I'm here to presentthe alternative.
Here's the way out.
And it's your freedom of choicegiven to you by right birth

(16:14):
to whether accepted or not.
And from there, all of us,guys, all of us here as a
Creative Society participants,we informing people.
We're not trying to convinceanyone to do anything.
We here to inform you, giveyou information, so you have
an alternative to distinguishfrom United Nations, from
World Economic Forum, and fromthe current state of living.

(16:36):
Because right now wehave three choices.
We can keep the things as theyare in this world, which is
highly fragmented into multiplepieces of a puzzle which are
fighting against each other.
We have these groups of elites.
Many years ago there werelords, warlords, who conquered
the countries, territories.

(16:57):
They put their borders in there.
That evolved into sometimesdemocracy, sometimes
more or less tyranny.
And now, these groups of peoplethey using their territory and
the people living there to kindof compete with each other.
So they're using us regularpeople as horses to compete
in this inhumane racethat eventually leads to
the edge of the cliff.

(17:19):
And we racing there right now.
And this is where we are.
We have another group of elites.
We have this group of elitesrepresented by World Economic
Forum who think that they arethe ones who here to, maybe
from their perspective, savethe humanity because they see
it's going into nowhere and theysay, no, we need to unite these
people and have one leadership.

(17:40):
We are the ones whogonna rule them.
We are the ones who's gonna savethis whole humanity from this
abyss, stop it at the age of thecliff and we're gonna rule them.
And they are verymotivated people.
That's what you haveto understand as well.
These people are highlymotivated and they're
doing anything possible.
They have all the resources,all the money, all the media,
all the political influence,and they're highly persistent

(18:03):
at pushing their agenda.
And then there is alternative.
There is a self-governingsociety project, unification
of all people, where all ofus altogether with no concept
of power, executing our willthrough online platform where
human life is the highest value,where everyone is provided,

(18:26):
where human greed is limited andeveryone is provided with the
ability to thrive and no one ishungry and no one is living in
fear of uncertainty of tomorrow.
So here are thethree alternatives.
Keep the things as they are.
Choose one worldgovernment or build the
self-governing society.

(18:47):
And this is a choice, guys.
We're not here to convinceyou that, hey, stop,
stop being a horse.
Stop being a workhorse inthis ride who's gonna get to
the edge of the cliff first.
Stop listening to KlausSchwab or whatever.
No.
We are not trying to convinceyou by any mean to stop
doing what you're doing.

(19:08):
It's all yours.
But we are here presentingthe alternative.
And it takes all thisweight of our shoulders as a
Creative Society participants,because we respect freedom
of choice of every person.
And if this humanity decidesthat keeping things as they
are is fine, or going with theone world government is fine.

(19:31):
It's a human choice.
But we tried.
We did our best.
No one can say that therewere no other option.
There was, and it's human choiceto execute it, and it takes very
little, you know, to execute it.
I don't think peopleeven realize how
much power they have.
And those TikToks, this oneyoung lady that filmed her

(19:52):
screen during watching theconference and made some
comments, and it went viral onTikTok with 2.9 million views by
now, I think, maybe even more.
Can you realize the power youhave in your hands to influence
millions of people right now?
And what stops youfrom executing it?

(20:13):
Some fears implementing inyour head that people may
judge you, somebody not gonnaunderstand you, that other
people won't support you?
Is this the onlyillusion that stops you
from , from speaking up?
Seriously?
Well, it's hard to be silentwhen you see people speaking
up around you like, like wedo here with Alex and John.

John (20:37):
At the end of the day, doesn't matter if you
do nothing, I mean, we knowwhere the world is heading.
So yeah.
Let people judge, at the endof the day, does it really
matter how people see me?
Like I'm just myself.
Just because my neighbor thinks,oh, this person's just crazy.
Oh, he believes inthis Creative Society.
Okay, that's fine.
What's wrong withCreative Society?
Is this, is there somethingwrong with valuing human life?

(20:58):
Do you not support it?
Right.
And all these eight foundations,they're very, very much
based on basic human needs.
Is this something wrong?
Do you not want to have it?
I think everyone wouldagree other than, oh
no, it's not realistic.
Oh, like it's too difficult.
Move your, move yourfingers, let's go.
We can do it.
Because if it's just ifeverybody thinks this

(21:19):
way or not everybody, butat least if majority of
people start thinking, ohyeah, this really makes
sense, we can make changes.
It's really not that hardto implement it, but it's
just to get to that point,yes, it's difficult, but if
everybody starts spreading thisknowledge that there, there is
an alternative to live, thenit's, again, it's not very hard.

(21:40):
it just takes a bit of effort.
There's probably internalresistance that you've been
living like this for the rest ofyour life, you should not get so
much involved in politics or youshould not get so much involved
in the social activities.
But, what otherchoice do you have?
Do you just wanna letit go and let all these
climate changes happen?
And I mean, quite recentlyall these volcanoes are

(22:00):
erupting as simultaneously.
Is it coincidence?
Maybe.
What do you think?

Alexey (22:06):
The choice is not only between living like
we live right now, actuallythe choice is between
living and dying, right?
So, it, it's not that wehave this choice, oh, guys,
maybe we can choose theworld Economic Forum, but
actually they are countingon reducing the population
to 500 million And feed therest of us to each other.

(22:29):
I'm definitely not supportingthis kind of thing, and I don't
think that anyone who intends tolive for some more time wants to
be eaten or reduced to nothing.
This idea of killing millions ofdogs and cats around the world
because they're eating meatand this is high carbon food.
Guys, already, it's been avery long time since we were

(22:52):
brainwashed about the CO2,but the good thing is that
the more and more I talkto people around, around me
about the CO2, when you'rejust telling, look, okay,
do you know what PPM means?
Like really, it's partsper million, right?

(23:12):
So if you have 400 PPMsso it means that there
are four molecules for10,000 other mo molecules.
What kind of potent molecule isthis CO2 molecule that it really
changes like wrecks the wholeplanet, just four molecules?
And people say, oh, really?
I said, yeah, but the bestpart is not even here.

(23:34):
What we are doing is only onemolecule out of these, right?
So, is really somethingthat makes sense to you?
Oh, no, it doesn't.
Then what is happening then?
Well, if you want reallyto know what is happening,
go watch the report.
If you just want the informationabout what is happening, go
watch the report, the Futureof Humanity Report, and if you

(23:57):
want to have the solution aswell, then go watch the forum.
And yes, it's long, but youknow, just divide it in several
parts and go as you want, whilethe recordings are still there,
you still have the chance.
And a lot of people, theykind of reply, oh yeah,
yeah, okay, I will do it.
And I find it more andmore easy to get to
people with these ideas.

(24:20):
Something is changing.
Something is changing in ourhive, let's say, mentality,
our hive consciousness, right?
That people are more and morereceptive to these ideas.
You don't have to struggleas much to get to the point.
And this is also whatI noticed recently.

Taliy (24:40):
I noticed it as well.
I think everybody feels likesomething has shifted, and,
possibly, it is this amount ofinformation that has been in
the field, like, you know, inthe mental field of our planet,
there is an idea, and there isnothing more powerful than an
idea when its time has arrived.

(25:01):
You know, people feel likesomething is not working out.
If three, four or five yearsago people were thinking,
okay, we're just gonnachange our leadership and
things gonna get better.
We're just gonna electa new official and they
gonna provide for us.
Now people don'thave that anymore.
And more and more people,they started noticing
what's happening to climatesynchronized activity is

(25:24):
not something that theyused to, things should
not be working this way.
And I know that our humanityhas been scared with these
doomsdays 2012, year 2000.
Yeah, too many times.
But never, never it's beena scientific proven fact,

(25:44):
and this is something Inoticed as well, that we used
to have this Twitter trollthing when our volunteers
created Twitter accounts forCreative Society and Global
Crisis about a year ago.
Back then, we wereyoung and naive.
We were trying to inviteHollywood stars, influencers
to participate in theCreative Society Project.

(26:06):
We had some hopes that thosepeople would reach out to
millions of people, theygonna say a word and save
our humanity, that theygonna move their finger by an
inch to try to help somebodyelse besides themselves.
And, none of them reacted.
But the tweets arestill there, the posts

(26:26):
on Instagram, Facebook,and YouTube still there.
And you can go and check, youcan see what kind of people
they are, the ones we praise,the ones we, we consider to
be special because we liketheir movies, their music, or
the way they perform on sportscompetitions, and you can see
their true face of those people.

(26:47):
And then when the CO2 thingpicked up, when we started
exposing the truth aboutCO2, we started having this
fierce backlash from thisvery tiny but very active
group of Twitter trolls whowent post by post, trying to
smear us everywhere they can.
And they were organized by thisvery person who created the

(27:10):
hockey stick graph, who wasdoing all these nasty things,
trying to smear his colleagues,trying to do whatever.
And we noticed how all thethreads leading to this one
person who, who is the, whowas rewarded by the system
of the human enslavement.
He was rewarded by somefinancial gains and some

(27:33):
pins, some badges, somerewards, praised as a,
as a scientist, whatever.
And what I noticed, I went onTwitter after the conference
and I put the very same hashtagthat's blowing up on TikTok.
It's blowing up#oursurvivalisinunity.
And there is nothing onTwitter except this one post.

(27:54):
This one lady, she waslike, how the heck is this
possible that it's not allover Twitter right now?
And I thought, I was like,yeah, our participants, we
were not really paying thatmuch attention to Twitter,
putting out these hashtags, butthe fact that Twitter trolls
absolutely entirely ignoredthis conference got me puzzled.

(28:18):
Like all of a sudden, becausethe previous ones, they
were so precisely in detailstrying to smear each person.
They were looking up ourparticipants on LinkedIn,
trying to contact theiremployers, trying to hurt
them financially, and so on.
This time, they ignoredthe conference on Twitter.

(28:40):
And I think the part of it isjust because we got so good
at backing up the informationwith the sources, that it's
impossible to smear it.
Because all thesesources are official.
It's the very same official,even, what do they call them?
Peer reviewed articles.

(29:02):
It's the very same articleswe use that these guys, but
it's about the perception.
It's the way you put allthese pieces of puzzle
together that nobody elseis doing in the world.
And this is what made allthese Twitter trolls silent.
It's a moment of silencebecause I believe it's a
death of anthropogenic theory.

(29:25):
We are at the funerals ofconsumeristic format of
living, of the lies aboutCO2, of all this nonsense
that has been happeningin the scientific field.
And this is a moment ofsilence for everyone who were
supporting the idea of CO2because this idea is dead.

John (29:48):
You know, the numbers don't really work out, right.
So, I was just mentioningthat, about 30 gigatons of,
maybe a little more, of CO2is released per year, but
from photosynthesis, aboutover a hundred, a hundred
gigatons are being absorbed.
So, I guess we don'thave to worry about
anthropogenic CO2, right.
The numbers don't,just don't add up.
And again, just going back tothis NOAA graph, look at 2020.

(30:11):
Was there any flinch becausehumans made it a little bit
less than the previous years?
There's nothing.

Alexey (30:18):
Yeah, and how come when all the planes were
grounded, besides some of thecargo planes, manufacturers,
everything closed, everyone athome doing nothing, so the only
thing consuming electricity oranything else were server farms,
right, for Netflix, and peoplestaying at home, and no changes?

(30:44):
I think, it stillwas growing, right?

John (30:46):
Just the same, I mean, you can see the pattern,
every, every, sorry, youcannot see my hands, but you
know, just go to NOAA, justlook at the CO2 concentration.
It grows about the same pattern,so there's a minimum around
I think September, October,and then it just grows until
like, May or something, andthen it peaks down again
until like May timeframe.
But then average is going,like, we're not denying

(31:06):
that CO2 is going down, theconcentration is indeed going
up about, let's say about twoPPM per year in the atmosphere.
But if you look at how much is,how much humans are emitting
if you look at monthly, ifyou look at a pattern, and you
look at how much is changingin the atmosphere, there's,
there's no correlation.
And, and again, like you'reemitting 30 gigatons of

(31:28):
CO2 per year, there's moreCO2 getting absorbed from
just from photosynthesis.
And there's other, you know,the oceans are absorbing or
emitting, I, I don't know,I need to do calculations
on it, but you know, likethe math just don't add up.
And I think there was apaper like where they're
looking at carbon 14 studiesand they estimate that only

(31:49):
about, I don't know, likebetween several percent to
maybe 10% is from humans.
I think that's quite true.
I, I was just doing a very roughcalculation, and I was just
wondering, okay, I know how muchCO2 is dissolved in the ocean.
It's not quite equilibritywith the atmosphere and the
ocean, but, if I used a certainconstant and calculated, okay,

(32:12):
like if I change from say,15 degrees to 16 degrees,
if I change one degree, howmuch CO2 would that release?
I think it's about, it's notquite a hundred, a hundred
times, but it's 50 timesmore, 40 times more than
how much humans have emittedduring this time period.
From I think about 1980 toabout 2020, it's true that
about one degree has goneup at the average global,

(32:33):
the ocean temperature.
And again, this is justa very rough estimate,
and that amount wouldrelease like 1500 gigatons.
And during this time,humans have emitted, I
don't know, about a hundred.
So there's, again, thenumbers don't add up.
Again, I'm just referringback to this 2020 NOA graph.

(32:53):
Again, it doesn't make sense.

Taliy (32:56):
And I can hear the frustration in the voice of the
people who were eating grantsfor decades, who were living
a very luxurious lifestylefrom fighting CO2, from taking
money out of our taxes andpockets, and fighting CO2.
And there's this one, one verybrilliant, smart, beautiful,

(33:19):
wonderful person on TikTok.
She was wearing a worker'sjacket, like some kind of
construction that she's workingon, and she was making a video
about the conference, and shewas saying that she's at work
right now, but she has a break,and she wants to use her time
during the break to informpeople to watch "Our Survival
Is In Unity" forum online.

(33:42):
That video got some views andone of the comments was, so what
do you mean the anthropogenicCO2 is not the reason?
Does it mean that allthese organizations that
are fighting, will notgonna be financed anymore?
We're not gonna financethem, we're not gonna
take care of them?
Somebody was asking,who's probably involved
in in receiving moneyin this organizations.

(34:05):
And her answer waslike, of course.
Of course we're not gonnafinance them anymore!
Why do we need this folksto fight four molecules of
CO2 in the atmosphere permillion of other molecules?
Why would we finance themthis nonsense, grant eaters
who's not contributinganything to this society.

(34:26):
And you could see the pain andfrustration in the voice of this
commentator who was apparentlyseeing his whole image of
wealthy future falling apart.
But that's the thing, if youconcentrate only on fighting
CO2 and that is the goal oflife, people are really missing
on all the amazing, tremendousopportunities that they will

(34:49):
have in the Creative Society.
I highly encourage people notto miss the second part, because
some of the comments were like,oh my gosh, I watched first
three hours, it's so dark.
I'm having like anxiety.
Watch the last three hours,you gonna feel so uplifted
like never before in your life.
You're gonna see what areyou missing on right now.
But this lady,she understood it.

(35:11):
She said in her comments,and you can see how
intelligent she is.
She was like, there is noway that it's solar activity
impacting the warming of theocean, because ocean layers
are warming up on the deepestlevel, and it's only the
top 200 meters that solarrays can penetrate, and it's

(35:35):
only 700 meters, includingcirculation of the ocean.
So there is no way the deepestlayers of the ocean are
being heated from the sun.
And she got it.
Like, you know, these facts,these very simple facts,
but all of them combinedtogether, they make sense.
They're logical andthey're verifiable.
Each person can easily check,because everything is in there.

(35:58):
This is what gives me hope.
This is what's warming myheart and makes me feel happy
seeing that people are muchsmarter than we've been told.
We've been convinced thatother people around us are
ignorant, that they don'tunderstand anything, that
they're not able to think.
And think about who'simplanting these thoughts in

(36:20):
your head that people aroundyou are not intelligent.
It's the very same peoplewho have their hands in
your pockets, who haveyour eyes shut for so long,
and manipulated our lives.
And now, that peoplelosing control, they
slowly have to remove theirhands out of our pockets.

(36:44):
We we removing their , theirhands from our eyes, and we
get to see how the world,how the picture of the world
actually is, and that peoplearound us, 99%, 99.9% of
the people are beautiful,wonderful, tremendously
talented people who only needconditions to be created for

(37:05):
our humanity to actually thrive.
And eight foundationsof the Creative Society
passed on legal level willprovide these conditions.
All we have to do isjust to request it.

Alexey (37:18):
Yeah, true, that we are missing on so many opportunities
of people contributing tothe benefit, I mean, for the
benefit of the whole humanity.
The same ideas ofseparation that we are
being told from everywhere.
Someone is benefitingfrom people looking at

(37:38):
each other as enemies.
We just need to understandthat guys, it's actually
easier than we think.
When you start talking topeople, you understand that
everyone is somewhat confusedor very confused about
what's going on in general.

(37:58):
Not only with the climate,maybe some people are not that
impacted by the climate yet,but they don't understand what
is happening in general, whatis happening with this whole
idea of paying a lot morefor energy, for food, farmers

(38:19):
being restricted from working,from growing food and from
producing animal products,while we, at the same time,
we are being told, well guys,please prepare for famine,
because, you know, conditionsare not that great, but I
mean, guys, you are creatingthese conditions yourself.

(38:40):
You are restricting farmersfrom doing their job.
And here, I would like to touchyou up on this thing that, I
was talking to a friend, wespent two days on a business
trip, just returned today.
He understands everythingthat I'm saying because he's
following our, our conferencesand he's also confused, and

(39:02):
he's saying, well, look,when we just, you know, going
around and pointing to theseabsurdities of the consumerist
format everywhere, liketoday at the gas station,
we are drinking coffee.
And, just in front of usthere's prices on the wall
and, I'm telling him, look,anywhere you look, I can
show you the absurdity ofthe consumerist format.

(39:25):
Have a look at the price.
Okay?
We are in Switzerland, sowe have coffee 4.40, and
we have big coffee, 5.60.
I said, do you knowthe difference between
coffee and big coffee?
50 milliliters of water?
So, I mean, this is so absurd.

(39:48):
I mean, 50 milliliters ofboiled water costs 1.20.
How stupid is that?
I mean, they're not makingit, you know, bigger in
terms of coffee beansor anything like that.
They don't spend that muchmoney on heating these,

(40:09):
I don't know, like 50 to70 milliliters of water.
But yet everyone says,well, yeah, okay, this is
normal because it's bigger.
I said, yeah, but guys,let's get unstupid.
Even in these small details.
And everywhere we go,we see these things.
But what he's telling methat, look, if you focus

(40:30):
on these things happeningaround, you will become crazy.
I said, well, look, it's notthe question of only focusing
on these things, but seeingthese things, understanding
that things should not belike they are today, and
that we can change it.

(40:53):
And it's not that complicatedas it seems, because we are
creating everything around us.
It's not the people in powerwho are making these coffee
machines, growing coffee,transporting coffee and
grinding it, and boiling thewater and everything, all the
chairs that we are sittingon, we are doing it already.

(41:15):
Just we need to understandthat everything that
surrounds us is done by us.
We just need to get thisidea that, okay, we also
have the power to say, wellguys, we have elected you.
Well, not everyone, somepeople are self-proclaimed
leaders, we talked aboutthem previously, right?

(41:36):
or they want to beself-proclaimed leaders, and
we can withdraw our votes andjust vote for people who will
understand that the world thatwe live in today is not the
world that we should be livingin, and we can change this.
So, one by one, sometimesmaybe millions of people who

(42:01):
are watching the TikToks orYouTube shorts, or whatever,
they're coming to theseideas, they understand.
And once we have this criticalmass of people who got it,
then we, another thing thatwe need to do is be active.

(42:22):
It's not onlyunderstanding, but acting.
And this is the main topicthat tell these things
that you understood tothe person next to you.
And then this person, oncethey understand, they will
tell to someone else, and thisis how we get people to talk
about Creative Society andthe way out of this situation.

(42:42):
So acting is also avery important part
besides understanding.
And so getting involvedis very important.

Taliy (42:50):
Yeah, guys.
Actually, what John startedwith, with this synchronization
of volcanic activity on planetEarth within past weeks, like
basically a month after November12th when "Our Survival Is In
Unity" forum went online, we'reseeing that things have been

(43:10):
changing quite drastically.
And one of the things I wantedto point out is that the
very same thing is happeningnot only on planet Earth,
but across our solar system.
And back in 2016 when NASAdecided to study climate change
on Mars, their leadership hasbeen mocked and laughed at

(43:36):
and forced to shut it down.
They said, why would westudy climate change on Mars
for some laughable reasons,like to avoid the similar
scenario on planet Earth?
Really, why would we need that?
And here we go.
December 5th, 2022, the NatureAstronomy comes up with an

(43:57):
article about magmatic plume,mantle plume on Mars that is
more active than ever before.
Scientists from Universityof Arizona have been studying
the mantle plume on Marsin the Cerberus area.
How funny is it because ofthe analogy from the forum

(44:19):
where we compare the climatechange that is coming from
within of our planet to thismythical creature Cerberus.
So in the Cerberus area ofMars, which is a region on Mars,
they found out that there is ahuge plume of magma coming from
the very core of Mars all theway to the top, heating up the

(44:41):
tectonic plates of Mars, theplanet that was considered to
be dead for such a long time.
And now, they say thatthis is happening on Mars.
What exactly ishappening on Mars?
Exactly the same thingthat is happening on Earth.
So maybe we're just a fewsteps away from our mainstream

(45:02):
scientists actually talkingabout the very same thing
openly that were discussedat the International Online
Forum by Creative Societyin November, that the
heating up of the planetis coming from the within,
from inside of our planet.
The very same thing is happeningon Mars, on other planets.
Those are obvious scientificfacts backed up with all

(45:24):
the evidence and everything.
All it takes is just to startopenly talking about it.
And Creative Society Conferencebroke this ice, broke the
wall of ignorance, brokethe wall of silence around
this topic, and now thisinformation is out there.
It's in people heads already.
People discuss it, people bringit to the information field,

(45:46):
and it becomes impossible.
It becomes really,really hard to ignore it.
Still possible from somebody.
Some people still calculatinghow much money they
gonna make next year fromswitching to green energy and
pushing their CO2 capturingfacilities and so on.
All this nonsense that makeszero sense, that's a waste

(46:08):
of our resources and time.
Meanwhile, in Germany, inEurope, what do you think is
the threat that could affectGermany after a tornado last
year that went through CzechRepublic, Slovakia to the
Western Ukraine, after thetremendous floods that hit
the Europe last year as well,covering most of the Germany,

(46:28):
Belgium, and Netherlands withwater, after the tremendous
droughts of this year with allthe water in so many rivers just
disappearing and exposing thebattle ships from the Second
World War at the bottom ofthose rivers, and the Hungry
Stones from thousand years ago,which says, cry if you see me,

(46:50):
because there will be no food.
What can be more devastating?
How about a volcano in Germany?
Yeah, guys, have you ever heardabout volcanoes in Germany?
What can be more absurd?
Well, look it up.
There is a volcano calledLaach Lake Volcano that has
been active for past decade.

(47:11):
It's been showingsigns of activity much
more than ever before.
And this is not justsome random volcano.
This is the volcano thatexploded guess when?
12 to 13,000 years ago, themost devastating volcano
explosion in Europe, whichstopped River Rhine back then.

(47:33):
This very volcanoactivated right now.
Why would that be happening?
Somebody might ask, somebodywho haven't seen the
International Online Forum,"Global Crisis, Our Survival
Is In Unity," because peoplewho saw the forum, they
don't ask those questions.
They know for sure what ishappening, what's cooking

(47:54):
inside of our planet, and ofcourse, it affects all parts of
our planet, including Germany.
It'll affect our europeancontinent even more with
north Atlantic Stream slowingdown, and eventually going
to a complete stop, which isinevitable right now, and this
is exactly what happened 12,000years ago because it's a cycle.

(48:17):
One by one, taking these piecesof puzzle and looking them
in separation from each otherwouldn't give you the full
picture of what's going on.
But this is what volunteers ofthe Creative Society here for,
to present you all picture, allthis kaleidoscope of different
signs of the times that pushingall of us to make a decision

(48:38):
whether we want to recognizethe truth, be brave, be honest,
or to hope that somebodyelse is gonna fix it for us.
But you know what's interesting,even in Germany, it's been like
three years since they startedringing the bell that we have
to do something about this lake.
We need to actually startmonitoring seismic activity

(49:01):
there, we have to doresearch on this volcano
because it's showingalarming size of activity.
Not much has been done.
They did not invest any moneyinto researching that volcano,
but all of them religiously, I'mtalking about policy makers in
European Union, with religiousfanaticism, called participants

(49:24):
of the CO2 brainwashing agenda,they keep talking about going
green and putting solar panelsand windmills and the wind
turbines, and all that nonsense,while the volcano is about
to blow up on their Germany.
Can you imagine?
And there be in silence?
What a hypocrisy, what aattitude towards people

(49:46):
who live in this area,and what an ignorance.
Simply ignorance.
Because this will affect themost economically developed
regions of our planet.
And the only way to preventit is to use scientists to
actually put science to work andto finance them, and to bring
out this up for discussion.
But they've been silencingthis topic for past three years

(50:07):
because the number of articleson this topic has been reduced,
and that article from 2019in Deutsche Welle, mainstream
German outlet, media outlet, isthe, one of the very last ones.
After that, it's a very smalland narrow group of scientists
who keep studying this volcanospecifically in there, but

(50:30):
it's not being brought up topublic not to raise panic.
Guys, not to raise panic,and then, when, when things
gonna hit the fan, it'sgonna be too late to panic.
In five, six years when it'sgonna be obvious that what
Creative Society has beenwarning us about has been true.
It's gonna be toolate to take action.

(50:52):
That's why speak up now asthey say on the weddings,
you know, if anyone hasanything to say, better
say it now or keep silence.
I would say, guys, if you notsupporting Creative Society or
if you have something to sayagainst it, please be vocal now.
Post your things.
We're taking screenshots.
We are writing them down.
We are creating a list of peoplewho actively going against the

(51:15):
humanity, as I said, you canput yourself alone with all the
main stars, all the Hollywoodstars, everyone out there who
was ignoring Creative Society,and who was trying to smear us.
Those are, so-calledheroes in quotes, that
should be rememberedby our society as well.
So please, don't be silent.

(51:36):
Either way, speak up yourposition on this topic.
Especially if you livearound Laach Lake in Germany.
I would say you have to beas vocal as ever, because
it's gonna affect you really,really soon, in a really,
really meaningful way.
And, yeah, that's sad.
Little bit sad, but, what'sgood, the best thing we

(51:59):
can do is just simply sharethis information, because
so many people are silentbecause they don't know.
As we said, most people arereally, really good people,
but they just not informedor sometimes misinformed.
So people might be livingright next to that lake,
having no idea about what'sgoing on underneath it.

John (52:20):
Yeah, we should stop with this green energy, because
it's not really green orsustainable as people think.
I mean, we have this imagein our head that, on one hand
you have this solar and windenergy, and then like sunny
skies, and on the other handyou have this picture of like
coal power plants and like allthe smoke coming out, all the
dark skies, red, like drought.

(52:41):
Like, why do wehave in this hit?
Because you know, like I've donethis research and it's false.
This green energy,it's not green.
It looks green on up front justbecause you don't see what's
going on behind the back.
so to me, like when I didthe research, the green
energy is not only notsustainable, but it also makes

(53:02):
the energy more expensive.
And we all know that it'sunreliable, and to make it
reliable, we need batteries.
But if you want to havebatteries, well the cost
is gonna go up quite a lot.
Actually, it's noteven achievable.

Alexey (53:17):
It is not achievable and it's not sustainable.
And you know, it's evenfunny that just near where
I am, in the valley, thereare lonely, lonely wind
turbines, you know, just one.
Then you go about like20 kilometers more, then

(53:37):
there is another one.
And every time I pass,I'm looking at them and
saying, okay, so thisone is not turning, so
there's no wind here.
You, you would think that,oh, you know, in the mountains
when you have the valley, thenthere's always wind, but no,
and sometimes there's one that'sslowly, slowly turning, and

(53:59):
I'm thinking, okay, but howmany of those would you need
to power the whole communityliving there, I mean all the
industries that are there.
And then you see that thereis a thermal power station,
burning, I don't know whatthey're burning, there is one
I know that they are convertingold stuff, they're burning it.

(54:20):
Others may be burning coal,or gas, or wood, I don't know.
And you understand, okay,we see that these are the
power stations that arepowering the whole thing.
And these are just the facadesof this green agenda, because,
oh yeah, it's cool, we havethem, like there is one

(54:40):
for, I don't know how manyinhabitants and, but when
it's mostly stopped, whatare people supposed to do?
And the funny thing that there'smore and more, let's say,
brainwashing about the upcomingenergy restrictions that will

(55:02):
be put in place in Switzerland,and there are several stages
and it's in every elevatorin every, house, and they
say, okay, so don't wash yourclothes on more than 30 degrees.
Don't start the washingmachine until it's full.

(55:23):
Don't use the dishwasherif it's not full.
And then don't heat morethan 19 degrees Celsius.
But then there's more.
Streaming will be restrictedand you would need to turn
off your wifi access pointin case it is needed, well

(55:43):
before the complete shutdownfor several hours per day.
And I'm thinking like, okayguys, why are we looking?
And it's the same, actually.
It goes the sameregarding everything.
Why are we not looking forsolutions how to provide
energy and food and water andeverything for the people?

(56:08):
Why do we always need tosacrifice something or
someone for that matter?
So it's a bit backwards.
So we are going throughthis, let's say difficult
stage when we realized thatwhat we've been trying to
achieve is not achievable.
Okay?
We've talked about it, right?

(56:29):
That we suddenly understood, oh,the sun is not shining at night
and not all the time duringthe day, and the wind is not
blowing all the time either.
Oh, this is strange.
It takes a PhD apparently tounderstand this kind of things.
Or maybe like, I don't know.

(56:49):
And then we say, okay guys,yeah, we need to kill off
the herds and try not to eat.
But then very brave guys comeup and say, oh yeah, you can
eat my fake meat, because I'vebought all the land, all the
farmland in the US and nowI can provide you with great

(57:10):
substitutes made of vegetableoils and I don't know, some kind
of GMO, genetically modifiedmaterials, beans, whatever.
And everywhere you look, yousee this absurdity and people
are saying, yes, yes, we needto make these efforts, I'm
ready, I have my food supplies.
And I have also, in caseit's needed, I have my

(57:33):
camping gas portable cooker.
I said, but have you thethought that actually the
government is there to avoidyou having these issues?
It's not about them justinforming you about the
restrictions and everythingthat you will have to bear

(57:55):
with while someone is just,you know, playing, I don't
know what they're evenplaying, they're playing
God or something like that.
And, people look at me and say,yeah, but you know, it's, it's
due to geopolitical situation,we need to make this effort.
I said, well, yeah, but whyare you making the effort?

(58:17):
There's plenty of energy.
There's plenty of gas, plentyof coal, plenty of everything.
We just need to stop playingthese stupid games, saying
that we need to, first we needto switch to electric cars,
and then people are buyingelectric cars, and then they
say, oh yeah, but you know,guys, by the way, electric cars
charging will be banned becausewe are lacking electricity.

(58:38):
And, this was an advice in LAthis summer, but it's no longer
an advice in Switzerland,because they're saying, no,
no, guys, you will not beable to charge your cars.
We'll just shut down everything.
Just stop doing it and, pleasedon't heat yourself, because
people were rushing, youknow, to buy electric heaters.
And the government was veryquick to post, no, no, guys,

(59:01):
electric heaters are prohibited.
Please, it'lloverload the system.
When you look at how we arebehaving, it looks like it's
a herd, you know, that'strying to run from the wolf.
Oh, there's this problem here.
Oh, we'll run the other way.
Oh, but this is also,there's another wolf
saying, oh, no, no, no.
Like, okay guys, let'srun the other way.

(59:21):
And people are constantlymoving around, trying to find
another way, and this dooris also closing every time.
And no one is stoppingand saying, guys, let's
stop this crazy thing.
Let's just ask the governmentwhat you've been doing all
these, all these years?

(59:44):
Where have you been guys?
Really?
What is going on?
Yeah, this is not happening.
I wonder why?

Taliy (59:53):
Yeah.
Well, don't forget that,you have to really ask
questions about what,what's been happening.
They saying buy electriccars, save the environment
and put the panel.
I'm like, guys, wellwhat about 10 years ago?
What about 20 years ago?
You've been saying me todo for the very same thing
you said, buy diesel car.
The diesel car is the best thingyou can do for environment.
Half of the Europe startedbuying diesel cars.

(01:00:16):
We have all these brands comingup with diesel cars in America.
Here in the USA wehave 2% of cars diesel.
Nobody cares about dieselcars besides the trucks.
In Europe, it's 52% average,and in some countries like
Spain, it's over 60%, becausepeople have been convinced
that the best thing theycan do for the environment
is to buy a diesel car.

(01:00:37):
I want to see who came up withthat policy, how accountable
they are for misleading.
Was it misleading?
Did did it really help or didit just waste our time and
money on buying these dieselcars and what we gonna do
with all these diesel carswe have to replace them with
uh, electric cars right now?
Since when?
Who was thinking likehow much calculated

(01:00:57):
through was that project?
Because we've been convinced,we've been told on the
highest official rostrumsover there, they've been
saying they got a plan.
So who's accountable?
Did the plan notwork out as expected?
What was the plan?
What were the projections?
What did we achieve withthis whole transition?
Because we put so much money,so much resources into it, so

(01:01:19):
many factories were shut down.
So many people lose their jobsbecause of this transition
to diesel cars, and nowit's not a thing anymore?
I wanna hear somebodyanswering for that.
Are we all silent?
Are we not gonna askquestions regarding that?
Then you just silentlygonna expect, expect this
new policy to work betterthan the previous one?
Excuse me, if you have aline of policies that never

(01:01:41):
worked out, none of them,since banning the freon gas.
Wow.
Excuse my rant guys, butI just cannot hold it.
I cannot hold allthese questions.
Are we really going toignore the fact that banning
freon gas did nothing forozone layer and that ozone

(01:02:02):
layer is being destroyed forcompletely different reasons.
And the very same galactic,cosmic rays, look it up,
cosmic rays, galaxy rays,and their effect on the ozone
layer, especially in theequatorial parts of our planet.
Because even at the Antarctica,the ozone hole has been breaking

(01:02:22):
all the records as it comes tothe size in recent years, and it
happened only a few years afterthe scientists started taking
credits and receiving awards forbeing so brilliant and saving
all of us from this tremendousozone hole above South Pole and
North Pole, and they saved us.

(01:02:44):
They saved us, and then, coupleof years after, we receiving
these reports that the ozonehole above South Pole is the
biggest in history, and theylike slowly sweeped under the
carpet, all those articles andtry to forget that couple of
years ago they were praisingthemselves for saving the
humanity and we gonna silentlyaccept these hypocrites, I

(01:03:10):
would suggest us to take all thediesel cars, all of the bills
that have been paid, collecthow much money was spent on
all this nonsense, includingswitching to unreliable energy.
Oh, excuse me, renewableenergy, that's how I'm
supposed to call it, right?
With all the projections, getat people who were calculating

(01:03:31):
them through and so on.
Guys, of course we shouldask these questions, although
we not saying that peoplewho were misled by this
thing that they don't haveanother way to act right now.
Like many people trulybelieved that that was the

(01:03:51):
thing to do because it waspushed on us from above.
And we know why, becausesomebody forged the scientific
evidence right there.
Someone started makinghockey stick graphs to
justify this taxation.
That's fine.
As John said that theconference, it's not
time to point fingers.
And I really like that phrase.
If we gonna start lookingfor somebody who to blame,

(01:04:16):
guys, we can do that, but howproductive is it comparing
to recognizing the fact thatnobody is perfect in the
consumeristic system of living,because this is the whole system
that operates in this way.
You are not taught to be humane.
You are taught to be successful,and to be successful,
you need to live as thesociety lives, by its rules.

(01:04:39):
So don't hate the player,hate the game, as they said.
And if the game is to dowhatever, forge the evidence,
make up schemes, but eventuallyto become a successful,
whatever, politician, scientistor whoever, journalist,
eco activist, and whoeverelse, that all works.

(01:05:00):
That all worked.
But right now it'sa different time.
It's time to switch to humaneway of living, and it's
time not to point fingers.
So we invite all the people,even on that side of the
spectrum, the ones who spentmany, many years fighting for
ecology and so on, to takean example from founder of
Greenpeace, who was also one ofthe speakers at the conference,

(01:05:23):
and who reached out to us,gave us a shout out on Twitter,
reposted the article from BBC,the famous one about Creative
Society, and said, yeah, if BBCguys trying to smear Creative
Society, it means that thereis something of a value for
the humanity in there, becausehe knows all the kitchen of

(01:05:43):
these lies from the inside.
He's been participating in it.
And so as many of you guys,even those who participate
in these schemes, don't beafraid to recognize the fact
that you've been misled.
You've believed inthe wrong thing.
Because we're not here topoint fingers and look who
to blame for doing this.

(01:06:04):
We're here with the solution andthe faster we switch to actually
transition period, the betterit will be for everyone, and
even those haters who now asa successful podcast we have.
We have haters.
Can you believe it?
Guys who go page to page toour videos, to our shorts only

(01:06:26):
to put some negative comments.
And I, I checked the,a couple of likes.
It's the very samepeople putting likes
of all of them too.
So they have, I don't know,it's, it's a couple of people
with a few accounts or thatthe group of some trolls.
But we have thesepeople who paying their
attention to what we say.
And this is the meaningful part.
I don't care if you agreewith me or disagree as long

(01:06:46):
as you've been informedthat there is a solution.
Because there will come timewhen you will recognize the
fact that the current thing isnot working, the next current
thing provided by somebodyelse is not gonna work either.
Switching diesel car thathas been a solution 20
years ago to a new solutionisn't gonna work either.

(01:07:08):
The new solution is tounify humanity on the value
of human life, and thisis what we are here for
as the Creative Society.
So this messageresonates with you.
Share this across all yoursocial media platforms,
speak up yourself, make avideo, make some articles.
Use your imagination to informpeople in the most creative

(01:07:29):
ways you can come up with.
We have sky divers throwingthemselves out of planes with
the huge flags of CreativeSociety, skydiving all the
way down to the ground,holding this huge flag.
How awesome is that?
Nobody knows what kind ofcreative solution you're gonna
come up with, but I know thatwe have some super, extremely

(01:07:53):
talented people among ourlisteners who only yet to show
themselves to the world and howmuch they have to contribute.
So I encourage you to bebrave and take whatever action
you consider to be the mostsignificant for yourself.
But take action either way.
And it might not be perfectfrom the very beginning, but

(01:08:15):
imperfect action is betterthan perfect inaction.
Remember that guys, and I'mlooking forward to seeing
you soon in our next podcast.
It's been a great pleasure tohave John Ahn here with us,
and I believe it's not, it'sthe first, but not the last
time we're having John with us.
So, thank you, John forbeing with us today!

John (01:08:36):
Thank you!

Alexey (01:08:37):
Thank you guys! Next time we will be back when
John comes back to the podcast,he will bring some evidence
that he was gathering, some,some research, and we will
show to those watching us onYouTube, and we'll also, I guess
so we can post the researchin the show notes later.
Thanks to everyone for listeningand we'll be back next time.