You should just stop breathing for a while

In this episode, we started talking about the Green New Deal and how going green leads countries into a future without energy even to grow food, how rising energy costs affect people in Europe and the US, surprisingly honest article in the LA Times describing the situation with aging solar panels, people playing ostriches on a beach in Australia, electric cars we should be driving, but not charging, where our planet “hides” 95% of all the CO2, oversimplification and the Doomsday Vault.

The Green New Deal Explained
California went big on rooftop solar. Now that's a problem for landfills
California Asks Residents to Avoid Charging Electric Cars Amid Power Grid Strain
UW prof says cyclic ozone hole proves cosmic ray theory
The 'Doomsday' Vault Where the World's Seeds Are Kept Safe

We love receiving your feedback ❤️ Drop us a line anywhere you happen to come across our posts 🙂

We are @episodikal on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, TikTok, and LinkedIn, or email us at [e-mail]

Episode Transcript

Alexey (00:00):
Yes, there is no motion in the Notion.

Taliy (00:03):
My gosh!

Alexey (00:06):
Yeah, so we are in free flight as the last time, no
outlines, no nothing, just theidea of what we want to talk
about. And plenty of disturbingnews, as usual.

Taliy (00:18):
Yeah, we have so much going on, especially in this
fight for the green future,because we all want to live in a
nice bright green future with nodirty plants, with no CO2s, and
everything else that's beingpushed up on us once again. And
we have these different groupsof people like, first of all,

(00:39):
there is a big group of peoplethat understands that climate is
changing, and some action has tobe taken, they are directed in a
certain direction, saying thatthe only cause of the climate
change is CO2. And that's themistake, another group of
people, they do understand thatthis is a complete nonsense,

(00:59):
that we're destroying our energysupplies in a period where we
desperately need them, we'redestroying their economies and
prospering country turns into amess within just a couple of
years after switching to socalled green energy, signing the
New Green Deal. And people ofcourse, who also see that

(01:22):
something's happening withclimate, they understand that
this is much bigger threat tostay without electricity,
without our energy supplies. Butanyone who's advocating for
keeping that automatically isbeing called a fossil fuel
promoter or whatever. Yeah,what's wrong with having energy?

(01:42):
Eventually, in those countrieswhere so called Green New Deal
was signed, people who pushedfor it don't live in there. And
we can just google what'shappening in Ghana, what's
happening in Sri Lanka, lack ofenergy, lead to lack of water
supplies, lack of watersupplies, the lack of farming,

(02:03):
and lack of farming tostarvation. There are huge food
shortages, economicalinstability and political
revolutions. Is that the futurewe really want to have all over
the world? Or, as in the latestepisode, one of the big famous
anchors here in the US said,only the Europeans were dumb

(02:24):
enough to implement this intheir own region. So before this
virus of green environmentalismcompletely takes over the US,
Alex, maybe you could share withus some of your experience
living in the environment, whichwent completely nuts, I'm sorry,
green.

Alexey (02:45):
Yeah, I just wanted to first touch upon what happened
in Ghana and Sri Lanka, what youtalked about in the first place.
It is very similar, the peoplewho vouch for switching to this
green energy, the ones who areliterally yelling in the streets
that we need to do it, you know,like Greta Thunberg, the fire

(03:06):
starters, you know, what they'redoing is similar to those who
are inciting people for a fightsomewhere like in a crowded
place, then they're the first todisappear, and you don't find
them. And the same with thesegreen energy deals. And people I
don't know if they forget, or ifthey didn't think about all the

(03:28):
things that use electricity tofunction, it's not only your
light bulbs, or your fridge,it's also the water pumps, those
pumps that bring water to yourhouse. It's also food processing
plants, they also useelectricity. I mean, we've
stopped using steam for quitesome time already. So it's all
running on electricity. I don'teven know how grown up men

(03:53):
forgot, these kinds of things.
This is really something that'snot only strange, but stupid.
It's really stupid. Speakingabout how it is in Europe,
Switzerland is not the worstcase for the moment, for the
moment, even though prices forthe fuel used for heating,
heating water also as wellbecause individual heating, it

(04:14):
runs on either electricity,which was very trendy in the
80s. And there are someapartments using electric
heaters. Today they're outlawed,people had to sign petitions to
be able to remain with theseheating systems. I mean electric
boilers and electric radiators.

(04:37):
Imagine when you have the pipesfor the circulation of the
heated water either for heatingyour house and to have the hot
water running from the tap. Youcan put almost anything to boil
the water, you can put any typeof heater is good to do it.
Whatever is trendy today,whatever is being used, but when

(04:58):
you don't have these pipes, andI lived in one such apartment,
how do you install this kind ofsystem? Well, you don't. And
basically, you are paying theprice for the electricity, which
is on the rise constantly on therise without even the
possibility to have anythingelse because you don't have the
pipes. We need to understandthat houses in Europe, they're

(05:19):
built from concrete. It's notlike in North America where you
can basically do anytransformation to a house,
because it's almost all wood,here it's concrete, you can not
just drill any hole that youwant, it takes a lot of time and
effort and money, obviously, totransform this. So this is one
thing. Another thing that isreally disturbing is the rise of

(05:41):
fuel for heating from October2021, till beginning of June
2022, the prices rose one and ahalf times. But I think that the
government is happy because theyget the taxes. The taxes are
levied in percentage, the higherthe price, the higher the amount
of taxes that the governmentperceives. So for them, it's a

(06:04):
win win situation. When you seethe bill for your electricity,
or for this fuel, you will seethe pretty hefty amount like up
to 25, or 30% goes into taxes.
And these taxes are used topromote green energy. So you're
paying for something thatbasically you cannot even use
because there is not enough sun,and there is not enough wind in

(06:28):
most parts of Switzerland. Sowhat are your options? Just
blindly going against all logicagainst all data. I don't even
know how we arrived at thispoint where we're pushing
ourselves towards the edge ofthe cliff where we all just jump
down without any possibility torestore power supply to our

(06:51):
houses. This is crazy.
You know, I remember it wasmaybe maybe even like 20 years
ago, Geneva electricity company,the Industrial Services of
Geneva, they offered thepossibility for you to be a
conscientious citizen and choosewhich kind of energy would you
like to use, they had differentcolor coded names for them, you

(07:15):
could pay more for green, theyhad blue energy, I don't even
know where they got it, how theydispatched the electric
currents. I mean, not a lot ofpeople understand what is
electricity, and that actually,nothing really flows through the
wires. We will not go intodetails, technical details, but

(07:35):
we need to understand that thepower plants, they are the wave
generators that basically moveelectrons in your wires. It's
not like water flowing throughthe pipes. In hindsight, I can
tell that they were using thesemanipulative techniques already
to play on people's feelingsthat oh, I will be using energy

(07:55):
that is better than the energythat you are using. Yes, I'm
doing more for the environment.
Even though the topic was notthat acutely urgent back in the
day. But today, you don't evenhave the choice. I mean,
everyone is paying higher pricesto promote green energy supply.
I don't know how it is in theStates, I haven't seen a single

(08:17):
energy bill, so I don't know.

Taliy (08:21):
Well, the prices for the energy are still quite high here
and they going up. So people areavoiding using too much
electricity for the things thatare not necessary. Sometimes
people even use, used to usediesel generators to produce
energy because it used to becheaper. And then, especially if

(08:41):
you live somewhere remote, anddefinitely not in California,
because in here, it's crazy howit is prices for the fuels went
up once again. And we weretalking to you in one of the
previous episodes how they weretrying to match the biofuel
price with regular fuel price.
Well, right now they aboutmatched and all those things

(09:01):
that we were thinking about,like air flights going to be too
high of a price. It's alreadyhappening there. If you live
somewhere in Tennessee, it'sgonna take you instead of $400
$800 to get to Los Angeles. Sowe already seing where it went.
But also, we will see thatcertain powers still push into

(09:21):
even cut fossil fuels more toraise taxes on them and where
it's gonna go. We can basicallysee on the examples, that what's
more interesting that the verysame people who advocated for
raising taxes on fossil fuelscan going 100% green in those
countries like Sri Lanka andGhana, the very same people

(09:42):
advocating for overpopulatedtheory, the Earth is
overpopulated and they say weneed to make the amount of
people on Earth smaller. Sothat's kind of weird that there
are techniques working exactlyin the green agenda reduces
population of people and leadsto starvation, eventually. It
kind of makes me curious, well,was it just a coincidence or

(10:05):
something else? But let's justtake a look at a wider, broader
look at what's being offered.
So, according to this theory,CO2 is the root of all evil.
Everything that's happening iscaused by CO2. And we're not
going to go right now deep intohistory to talk about the very

(10:26):
same thing that happened toozone layer and the Freon gas
when they said it's Freon. It'sthis very gas. That's the root
of all evil. They got rid of it.
And then I think it was Dupont,the company that made a lot of
money out of switching to thenew technologies they had.

Alexey (10:44):
Yeah, because coincidentally, they were the
only company that had a patentfor something to replace Freon.
Yeah. This is anotherinteresting topic. I just have a
one quick question. When you saythey price match the biofuel?
Did the raise the prices ofnormal fuel to the level of
biofuel? Or did they lower theprice of biofuel to match the

(11:07):
already high prices for dieselor normal gas?

Taliy (11:11):
Yeah, so that's a very good question. So still, a
couple of months ago, the priceof biofuel was about like $7 per
gallon, while regular fuel waslike $3. Well, right now the
regular fuel is $7. But how muchthey're gonna charge for
biofuels we still don't know,because they can say that the
price should be around $10. Andthen they're going to make all

(11:32):
of us pay that amount of money.
And again, why to fight the CO2emissions. But when I went into
like learning about CO2, andeven the biofuels, it's very
interesting that biofuels, theyare not super clean and not
reducing CO2 at all, they reducejust about 50% when burned down,
so in the engine it's going tobe 50% emission. And we know

(11:53):
that the amount of molecules inthe atmosphere is about 414 per
million of other molecules ofCO2. And all these attempts are
going to reduce maybe a half ofa molecule over the year, if all
people switch to, but what'seven funnier, that in the
process of production, biofuels,they produce gases, the you have

(12:17):
to grow certain amount of crops,they're gonna produce gases, you
have to use chemicals on them.
And then the total amount of CO2to produce these things are
gonna be much higher thantraditional fossil fuels it's
just that those things are notcalculated and not included in

(12:37):
the total amount for some reasonexactly the same way, as when we
talking about wind or solarpanels, certain amount of things
are not calculated, like howmuch CO2 was produced during
production of the steel to makethat wind turbine or the plastic
blades, or all that electronicsfor the solar panels. And we're

(13:02):
not even going to bring up thefact that somehow those things
were implemented without eventechnology of recycling them. So
right now LA Times just came upwith an article last week that
says we are on the edge ofcatastrophe here in California
because we have too many solarpanels installed about 10 years
ago that are at the end of theirlifecycle, they are going to be

(13:24):
replaced and a lot of toxicchemicals gonna go into the
ground if they are not going tobe properly recycled, and there
is no such technologies becausenobody cares. So it's just a
huge money making scheme. Again,we see it's not working but for
some reason as you said thenormal logic does not apply
here, and we're being offered tocontinue the same way to close

(13:46):
the factories, to shut down anysort of productions, to stop
heating our houses, stop washingyour bodies, just stop taking
showers. Can you imagine?
Because that's what's needed.
Stop using your car, use abicycle, forget about taking
airplane, stop eating meat andlower that amount of cattle,

(14:08):
just put solar panels, toxicsolar panels on your roof tops,
and just advocate for greenenergy. And you know it doesn't
stop there. Because back in thatvideo that recently picked up on
the internet once again. We'reGreta was on the, yeah, the
notorious Greta Thunberg, Howdare you, was on the beach in

(14:31):
Australia making people to digtheir hands into the sand and
stop breathing for a certainamount of time. So there was a
huge beach of these peoplesitting upside down with their
heads in sand pretending thatthey are not breathing not to
produce CO2, and showing ustheir backs. Apparently, the

(14:52):
hint is that we all should stopbreathing, stop making new
people, stop giving birth tobabies because breathing is
evil. Eventually that T-shirtthat says "you or the carbon
they try to reduce," it isactually quite obvious. This is
exactly what they go in for. Andthis unequal fight against CO2

(15:13):
has been going for 40 yearsalready. And Greta is not the
first teenager that's been usedby the, you know, elites to
convince us that emotionally getus emotionally involved. Oh,
look at this teenager girl,she's so sincere, not quite, not
really. You know what'sinteresting, despite all the

(15:34):
fights against CO2, the CO2 hasbeen rising for whole 40 years.
But the amount of money wastedis tremendous. Today, I would
like to talk about simple factsabout CO2, that just going to
blow up the whole theory ofreducing carbon.

Alexey (15:55):
For some people, it is really a big, big deal, paying
$3 or paying $8 a gallon, it's abig difference. And it's a
difference that can make orbreak the whole budget. And we
know that especially California,everything's expensive. But the
median salary in California is$75,000 a year. When you look at
all the prices, the housing, theenergy, and taxes are among the

(16:19):
highest in the country, it seemsthat the government wants people
to just pack up and leave. And Ithink this is what some people
were doing. But previously, Ithought it is because there's
the Silicon Valley, and peoplewho work for the tech companies,
they earn a lot of money. Sothis is what drives the prices
up for housing for everything. Alot of people prefer to sell

(16:41):
their house there and go fortheir retirement or before that
in another state. But then whenI visited California, I mean,
the Silicon Valley, and theSouth California, they're so far
away, and they look differently,like two different countries. So
prices of houses up north anddown to the south. What's the
correlation? I mean, it's noteven Silicon Valley down there.

(17:04):
Oh, I understand that there area lot of other companies and
people are working there, butstatistics, the median salary to
offset the differences, becausethere are people who are earning
millions, obviously, inCalifornia, and people who are
earning billions in California,although most of them already
moved to Texas. Still, thesalaries are not high. And when
you see all the prices rising,what would be the idea, as you

(17:28):
said, like, stop washingyourself, stop eating, stop
driving the cars. I mean, youdon't see people walking in the
streets in the States, no one iswalking. It's not like in
Europe, people are walking inthe streets from one place to
another. In the States wellmaybe in the big cities in
downtown, people are walkingfrom a couple of blocks away.

(17:49):
Other than that, you don't seepeople walking, there's no even
walkways along the roads,everything is done to be driven,
all the roads are made to bedriven. This was this idea, the
propaganda of why you should buya car because now you are free,
you are free to traveleverywhere. So now this is
another thing that breaks theAmerican Dream idea that now we

(18:11):
cannot even drive a car. Oh, butthey have an electric, oh but
please don't charge it orrefrain from charging it because
you will overload the powergrid. Like guys, what kind of
perverted world we're living in?
The world is going crazy.
There's always contradictinginformation. I don't know
exactly the term, thepsychological name of this

(18:32):
phenomena when you tell twocontradicting things. And you
know, person's consciousness isjust stuck. It doesn't know what
to do with the informationbecause you said, oh, you should
be driving electric cars, butplease refrain from charging it.
And you're like uhhh, what'snext? I don't understand. So
you're like blocked you have ashort circuit and your computer
hangs.

Taliy (18:54):
404, error 404, the page doesn't exist.

Alexey (18:57):
Yeah, 404 Page Not Found, permanently moved,
redirect 301. But the problem isthat we have people like AOC
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who istalking about power grids and
everything. And as TuckerCarlson said, not a lot of

(19:17):
engineers understand how a powergrid works. Yet we have people
saying that fossil fuels are notcompatible with the future of
humanity. Guys, I think thatanything new that comes with
this Green New Deal, it'sincompatible with human life.
Because when you don't haveelectricity to have water, to

(19:38):
heat your home when it's cold,to cook, well, how do you live?
What we see. And we've beentalking also a little bit about
this lately, and that everythingis sort of aimed to eliminate
humanity, or maybe only thosewho are most resilient to all
the measures to save humanity,only those who will survive all

(20:02):
the measures, will be leftliving on this planet without
running water, withoutelectricity without possibility
to cook. Oh, yeah, it's a verynice future. 1984 is not a
manual. So maybe we shouldn't bedoing this.

Taliy (20:18):
Yeah, totally. And for anyone who's interested in
environment and CO2, mysuggestion would be just to
learn history start fromlearning history, and you will
see the graph the correlationbetween temperatures and CO2 in
the past, and there are hugeperiods of time where the
temperature was much lower andmuch higher and CO2 levels were

(20:39):
going from current right now wehave 412. Back in the day, it
was 700 PPM particles permillion. And there were even
periods with 2500 particles permillion of CO2. So it was many
times more than now. And thequestion is, where did all the
CO2 go? Because it was waybefore humans ever inhabited

(21:02):
this planet? The question rightnow I would like to ask
everyone, we hear so much aboutCO2 being released by the fires,
by the forest, by the plants,and by the volcano eruption even
we heard about that. But thequestion is, where did all this
CO2 go? Like we had 2500. Andnow it's 400? Where did all the

(21:23):
CO2 go? Moment of silence... Cananyone say? It's stored in the
ocean? Ocean is the biggeststorage of CO2 on our planet.
And guess what, once in a while,sometimes, occasionally,
nonstop, it keeps on eitherabsorbing CO2 or releasing it?

(21:44):
And what affects the ability ofocean to absorb or release?
Temperature! Oh, wow! So it'snot the CO2 that affects the
temperature is the temperaturethat affects the ability of the
ocean to release or absorb CO2.
And now, okay, what's causingthe temperature change of the
ocean? Of course, there areseasonal changes, right? It's

(22:04):
hotter in the summer, moresunlight, it's colder in the
winter. Yeah, we all know aboutthat. We also know that it's 10
to 12 month gap between thetemperature change and the
change in the levels of CO2. Sowhen the temperature changes in
10 to 12 months, we see adifferent amount of CO2 released
or absorbed by the ocean. Butthe biggest contributing factor

(22:28):
to the change of temperature ofthe ocean for past decades has
been the underwater submarinevolcano activity. So the
geothermal activity underneaththe ocean heats up the water,
and the water is releasing moreCO2 into the atmosphere. And we
can see a direct correlationbetween the temperatures of the

(22:51):
ocean and the release of CO2into the atmosphere 11 to 12
months after, this is the way itgoes. It's not the opposite way,
how they tried to convince usthat getting more CO2 in the
atmosphere to make ice melt, forexample. Well, first of all, the
ice is melting from the bottomup - it's exactly the geothermal
activity. And if you take a lookat the map of Arctic's, and

(23:14):
Antarctica and Greenland, youwill see that ice is melting
very specifically in the veryspots where there are underwater
volcanoes, and it does not melton the opposite side of the very
same continent. In theAntarctic, for example, ignoring
this very basic and very clear101s, anyone who took geography

(23:35):
class should know this,basically. The amounts of CO2
stored in there, once again,it's 95% of whole CO2 we have in
our planet is stored in theocean. Ignoring the fact that
geothermal activity at thebottom of our ocean affects its
temperature, they either have tobe ignorant or premeditated this

(23:57):
thing to ignore the mostimportant factor because if you
talk about that, you will not beable to trick people into
switching to things that damagethe economy that make our life
much, much harder. And insteadof solving the real problems,
the things that are occurring incore of our planet to do things
that make no sense, eventuallyto stop breathing. Other than

(24:20):
that, we do not affect anything,as we said 2500 particles per
million, and this earth wasdoing fine way before us. But
the funniest thing that is beingignored is on the graph, there
is no clear correlation betweenthe level of CO2 and the
temperature, meaning what therewere periods of times in the

(24:44):
past where with high CO2 therewas low temperatures, and
exactly the same high CO2 andhigh temperatures. It is only
the very short period of time inwhich they correlate and not
even the whole 20th century,because that's a myth as well,
we're gonna get back to it. ButI'm just curious, Alex, why do
you think people are so not eveninterested in doing the very

(25:08):
basic research on these things?
This is so obvious, this is 101.

Alexey (25:14):
This is the result of giving away your power to
someone else and later doingwhat you're instructed to do. We
are seeing these results rightnow, because this is exactly
what is happening. People don'teven think, it's like in the
army, you have the order, andyou do it. And I've been asking
myself, and also people aroundme, what needs to happen for

(25:36):
people to stop acceptingeverything that is being thrown
to them, and start telling thatthey are not okay with this. And
apparently, you know, we've beentrained to accept a lot. And the
exercise in obedience that weall had, during recent years, a
couple of years, showed that wewill be doing almost anything we

(26:00):
are told to, like covering ourfaces, injecting all sorts of
stuff that is not tested withvery mediocre results, if any,
and we've been doing this. Also,we need to tell that the release
of the CO2 by the ocean, and bythe plants also that now started

(26:20):
releasing CO2 instead ofaccumulating it and releasing
oxygen, it is the mechanism theplanet has to cool. The CO2 rise
is the response of the planetfor the increasing temperature
so that it can cool down. Andthere's another thing, it
surfaced also, when some peopletried to, you know, go through

(26:42):
all these findings, or theevidence in quotes for the CO2
agenda. These calculationsdidn't include the sun, people
are not talking about this. Howcan you forget about the big
heater that heats your planetand talk about temperature
changes being affected bysomething like cow farts, or

(27:03):
people breathing or notbreathing, or driving their
cars, when there is also a lotof ice cores data from the last
400,000 years showing the graphsand you can clearly see that
there is like 100 years betweenbetween the big changes in
temperatures and CO2. Andsomehow people not breathing for

(27:25):
several seconds on the beach inAustralia - this is an example
to follow. I'm confused.

Taliy (27:31):
Yeah, I totally agree with you. So not only the sun,
but everything else has beenexcluded from their theory, they
openly said we don't understandhow the sun works, so we're not
gonna calculate it, we don'tunderstand how the clouds work,
so we're also not gonna includethem, we don't really understand
the water steam, which is thebiggest, biggest contributing

(27:54):
factor to the greenhouse effect.
We're not going to include that,we only going to study and post
information about the humanemissions of CO2. That's
literally what IPCC isdetermined to do.

Alexey (28:08):
We don't know a lot, so we will not even touch upon
these topics. But we want tostudy these four particles in 1
million of other particles,because they are very mighty
particles that cause all thetrouble on this planet.
Hilarious.

Taliy (28:23):
Exactly. Everything is so oversimplified that it's really
easy to process and kind of likein these recent videos, one
thing I noticed too, thesepeople who stand against the
Green New Deal, they say, Oh,it's all Klaus Schwab and AOC.
That's also oversimplification,right, we say this one person is
to blame for everything, theneventually humans gonna get mad,

(28:47):
and they're gonna get rid ofthese people, but those who
orchestrated it, they will keepon processing with their agenda.
So don't blame it on certainindividuals. And don't blame it
on anyone. This is in fact,consumeristic system in which we
live we in which money is overhuman life, it's more valuable
than human life. So people whowinning in the system, they're

(29:10):
just winning by the game rulesthat we all accepted. So instead
of blaming them for beingwinners in this inhumane game,
why don't we set a differentrules in which human life is
actually valuable? But for that,we should stop expecting
somebody to solve our problemsand actually start thinking

(29:32):
ourselves start doing our ownresearches, how IPCC implemented
this scheme during the signingof Kyoto Protocol during the
late 90s. And then using forgedgraphs looking like hockey stick
or the whole thing just topresent their point of view and
convince people to adopt thismoney making schemes in the

(29:54):
parliaments around the worldratification process and then
basically the very same group ofpeople awarded themselves
with Nobel Prizes, right? Sothis is hilarious we see a very
small group of people, like onehand washes another one. And
this keeps on going. And people,they just so used to

(30:14):
oversimplification theyaccepting this model, because
it's really so easy to say thatyeah, CO2 is to blame, let's cut
everything, let's suffer for afew decades with no energy and
everything and everything'sgonna be fine. This is a lie,
nothing is gonna be fine. Ourlife, we don't have those
decades, because the climate ischanging for a very different

(30:36):
reason the changes in the corethat's causing the heating of
the ocean, which releases moreand more CO2. It's caused by
cyclicity, by the fact that ourplanet is going through that
part of the space with intergalactic rays that affect our
planet. And those are notstudied enough, a few scientists

(30:56):
here and there that do research,the latest one I was watching
just last week was from WaterlooUniversity of Canada, Dr.
Qing-Bin Lu his study wasclearly showing that the ozone
holes are affected by these veryspecific galaxy rays. But this
theory is considered to bedangerous, because if that means

(31:17):
that we were fighting the wrongcause, somebody might lose money
on this very scheme. So if it'sjust one scientist, and we
people, we don't even make itup, we don't show interest in
this, as you said CO2 and thetemperatures, how correlated is
that? There is no scientificground, there is no experimental
ground to this theory, there areonly theoretical conclusions,

(31:42):
and which are not even proved byany experiments. For example,
I've been talking to scientistsinterviewing them who really
studied CO2 and they say,oversimplification is impossible
in studying CO2 effect on theatmosphere, because it works
different in different zones. Intropical closer to the equator,
there is certain amount of CO2,the are solar rays coming at the

(32:05):
specific angle. And there isamount of water, which is very
different, the steam, the amountof steam and the greenhouse
effect from the steam is verydifferent from up north or down
south by the poles. So itdoesn't work exactly the same
way in different parts of ourplanet where in fact, this over
simplified scheme, they pushingup on us says that it's so

(32:26):
simple, just take a simpledecision, share some money of
your paycheck, except a couplemore taxes on ozone layer, on
CO2, on the emissions, on water,reduce basically your ability to
live like a human being, and useall the technological advances
of our civilization and yougonna survive, stop taking

(32:47):
showers, stop going out, stopconsuming food that you used to.
And I have a question and what'snext? I just don't understand
what why we allow thisconsumeristic model because we
can say oh, don't theyunderstand that this is going to
affect them too? Well, that wasa beautiful study, we already
brought that up as well thatbeing in power for so many

(33:07):
years, three to nine yearsreduces ability to think
straight, because people get soself concentrated. They call it
that arrogance syndrome, whenpeople consider themselves as
the center of the universe andeverything spins around them.
You know, like it reminds methis in ancient China, the
emperor of China was a NorthernStar, and the whole space

(33:31):
spinning around him. I thinklike these people who we elected
into power, they considerthemselves to be the Northern
Star, the center of the galaxyand universe. And the whole
everything spins around them.
Whoever is in there, and theythink they build the biggest
bunker they think, Oh, we'regonna survive. It's hilarious,
because 10 to 15 years ago, andBill Gates invested billions of

(33:52):
dollars into building thisDoomsday Shelter in Northern
Norwegian islands. They said,Oh, that's so smart. They are
going to have all the untouchedgrains, all the seeds in there,
everything. Well, now they theysay it was a bad idea and a bad
place to locate that thing,because underwater volcano
activity is super high in thatregion, and there's a good

(34:14):
chance that Doomsday seed bankis not going to survive the
upcoming cataclysms. So yeah, Iwould really question the
ability of a few to makedecisions. But what's also right
that people altogether are ableto make much better decisions
that will benefit all of thehumanity. And it comes to
actually building thisenvironment. It's all about

(34:36):
conditions. It's aboutconditions that will live in.
Why people have not requested ityet? That's the question I don't
understand because we havetechnologies to allow the
systems in which people aregoing to vote for whatever makes
sense for whatever benefits tohumanity. The one thing people
should do is to say we don'twant to be divided by this
political party versus that one.

(34:59):
We want this online platform onwhich we're going to be making
decisions collectively, stopputting the responsibility on a
few and actually take sanedecisions that improve the
quality of human life and thevalue of human life is the
number one priority. Why thathas not been done yet, Alex, I
cannot wrap my head around this.
This is something I really don'tunderstand. I get puzzled each

(35:20):
time I think about it.

Alexey (35:23):
Why this is not being done? Well, because someone
maybe has a room in thisDoomsday Shelter near the grains
of all sorts that they think tobe able to use, but this will
not help them this time.