May 6, 2025 • 27 mins
What if the technologies that could have transformed our world were deliberately buried? This eye-opening exploration reveals the systematic suppression of breakthrough innovations that once promised to liberate humanity from dependency on fossil fuels, pharmaceuticals, and centralized control.
From the moment Nikola Tesla's vision of wireless free energy was shut down by JP Morgan's infamous question "Where do we put the meter?", a pattern of corporate sabotage against revolutionary technologies becomes disturbingly clear. The episode uncovers how compressed air vehicles, once competitive with gasoline cars, were systematically eliminated through the National City Lines Conspiracy. We trace Stanley Meyer's water-fueled engine development and mysterious death after claiming he was poisoned. Most shocking is Royal Raymond Rife's frequency medicine that reportedly cured terminal cancer patients before his laboratory was raided and his reputation destroyed.
These weren't failed technologies—they were targeted because they worked too well, threatening profit models built on scarcity, extraction, and dependency. What connects these innovations wasn't just efficiency or sustainability, but their fundamental harmony with natural principles. They offered humanity a different relationship with energy, transportation, and healing—one based on abundance rather than artificial scarcity.
Today, as environmental crisis looms, the same corporate powers that suppressed these technologies now profit from "green solutions" through carbon credits, greenwashing, and performative environmentalism. This isn't coincidence but strategy—a textbook example of problem-reaction-profit where those who created the crisis position themselves as saviors.
The awakening begins by recognizing these patterns and understanding that reclaiming our technological heritage isn't just about machines, but about reconnecting with an evolved consciousness that sees humanity as part of nature, not separate from it. Ready to see the world through new eyes? This episode will transform how you understand innovation, progress, and our potential future.
Episodes are updated weekly. If you want to support this evolution of consciousness please show me by following, sharing this channel with those you love, and leaving a review.
If you enjoyed our time today please donate on Buy Me a Coffee or automatically support monthly on Buzzsprout.
Let's master your universe together.
One-Time Donation: https://buymeacoffee.com/themanhattanprophet
Monthly Support: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2433170/support
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Hello everyone and welcome back to the Manhattan
Prophet Podcast.
As a reminder, I'm here toensure that all knowledge I give
you finds meaning in apractical place in your everyday
lives.
It's only through properlydigesting knowledge, in this
case of ourselves and the worldaround us, that we see things
clearly enough to break oldpatterns of behavior and begin a
(00:26):
new path forward to aheightened state of
consciousness.
In this episode, we dig deepinto the deliberate suppression
of breakthrough technologies,those that once aligned with
nature, human well-being anduniversal harmony, yet were
systematically buried byindustrial capitalists.
From Tesla's wireless energy tohydrogen engines and frequency
(00:46):
medicine, this episode exploreshow corporate empires rewrote
the blueprint of innovation,replacing it with a
profit-driven model thatenslaved the world to fossil
fuels, pharmaceuticals andscarcity-based thinking.
We expose the coordinatedsabotage, media smear campaigns
and financial blacklisting thatfollowed these inventions.
(01:07):
But more than that, we reframethese technologies as extensions
of an evolved consciousness,tools meant not just to power
machines but to liberate thehuman being from dependency and
control.
This isn't just history.
It's a call to awaken to whatwe've been sold, what we've lost
, and to reclaim our future.
Throughout history, it's a callto awaken to what we've been
sold, what we've lost, and toreclaim our future.
(01:27):
Throughout history, pivotaltechnologies that offered
cleaner, more harmonious anduniversally accessible solutions
have been systematicallysuppressed, not because they
didn't work, but because theydidn't serve the financial and
controlling interests of thosewho had already cornered the
market on more profitableextractive alternatives.
From Nikola Tesla's wirelessenergy transmission to Stanley
(01:49):
Meyer's water-fueled engine andRoyal Rife's frequency-based
healing, we see a recurringpattern.
Technologies that align withthe natural world and are freely
available to humanity oftenvanish under mysterious
circumstances, are discreditedby institutional science or are
bought out and buried.
This suppression was notincidental.
(02:09):
It was strategic.
The industrial capitalists ofthe late 19th and 20th centuries
, often celebrated in mainstreammedia as visionaries, were in
fact consolidators of power.
Jp Morgan pulled funding fromTesla's Wardenclyffe Tower when
he realized it could providefree energy to all, thereby
undermining his copper wireempire.
Oil magnets, like Rockefeller,reshaped medicine to depend on
(02:32):
petrochemical pharmaceuticals,discrediting natural therapies
that couldn't be patented.
In transportation, compressedair and electric cars thrived
briefly in the early 1900s, thatis, until Standard Oil, general
Motors and tire companiesconspired to eliminate them and
make way for gasoline-powereddominance.
In each case, superior andsustainable innovations were
(02:54):
sidelined, not due to technicalfailure, but because they
threatened monopolized markets,guess what.
This is not a history lesson,but a glimpse into the origin
and true function of many of thetechnologies we depend on today
.
What ties many of these losttechnologies together is not
just their efficiency orsustainability, but their
resonance with the deeperrhythms of the universe.
(03:16):
Frequency-based healing works,not by chemical suppression, but
by tuning the body'svibrational field, mirroring how
nature restores balance.
Tesla's theories of energytapped into the Earth's
electromagnetic field, aiming todraw power from the ether, a
concept echoed in ancient andindigenous understandings of the
(03:37):
unseen forces that govern life.
These innovations did notextract or exploit, they
harmonized.
They were not weapons ofdomination, but instruments of
alignment.
In many ways, they amplified,through real-world application,
the inherent link we all have tothe universe that we all too
(03:58):
often incorrectly perceive to bedistant and disconnected.
Nikola Tesla, one of the mostinnovative thinkers of our time,
is, not surprisingly, rarelymentioned in present-day school
curriculum.
He was a Serbian-Americaninventor, engineer and futurist
best known for his pioneeringcontributions to alternating
current, electricity, radio andelectromagnetism.
(04:20):
While Tesla is often creditedfor his work with AC Motors and
the Tesla Coil, one of his mostradical visions was the
development of wireless energytransmission and what many
believe was a blueprint for freeglobal energy.
You see, tesla believed thatthe earth itself was a conductor
of electrical energy and thatit was possible to transmit
(04:41):
power wirelessly through theatmosphere and ground.
He envisioned a world in whichelectricity could be drawn from
the surrounding environment andtransmitted without wires to
power homes, vehicles andindustry.
This concept came from hisunderstanding of the Earth
ionosphere cavity and histheories about harnessing
naturally occurring electricalenergy, such as from
(05:03):
thunderstorms and ambientelectrostatic charge.
In the early 1900s, tesla beganwork on the Wardenclyffe Tower
in Shoreham, long Island, newYork.
Funded initially by financierJP Morgan with an investment of
$150,000, the 187-foot tower wasintended to be the first of
many world wireless systemstations.
(05:24):
Tesla's stated purpose was tobuild a system for wireless
communication across the globe,but his deeper and more
ambitious goal was to create awireless power grid that could
supply energy freely to anyoneanywhere.
A quick breakdown of thetechnology itself the
Wardenclyffe Tower was designedto send electrical energy into
the ground, using Earth as aconductor.
(05:44):
Tesla's system relied onresonant inductive coupling, a
principle he demonstrated inlaboratory experiments.
He believed that this naturalresonant frequency of the Earth
could allow power to betransmitted with minimal loss
over vast distances.
Despite the initial excitement,Tesla's ambitions met fierce
resistance.
Tesla's ambitions met fierceresistance when JP Morgan
discovered that the tower wouldbe used not only for
(06:06):
communication but also for freewireless power.
He withdrew further funding.
According to Tesla, morganfamously asked, and I quote If
anyone can draw power from it,where do we put the meter?
End quote Morgan meanwhiledoubled down on his investments
in copper-based wiredelectricity infrastructure NGE.
The financial support pulled,construction ceased and Tesla's
(06:28):
broader plan to build a networkof towers across the globe never
materialized.
The tower was dismantled in1917, and Tesla's notes were
later seized by the USgovernment after his death in
1943.
Today, tesla's vision ofwireless energy transmission is
being explored again, albeit ona smaller scale, through
technologies such as inductivecharging used for electric
(06:50):
toothbrushes and smartphones,and microwave or laser-based
power transmission.
Companies like Y-Tricity andresearchers at MIT have made
significant strides, butlarge-scale open-access energy
systems remain elusive.
Scale open access energysystems remain elusive.
Tesla's dream lives on as botha symbol of unrealized potential
and a critique of howinnovation within the current
scarcity-drivenprofit-above-all-else model of
(07:13):
capitalism infects us all.
Then there is the suppressedtechnology of compressed air as
a source of propulsion, whichdates back to the early 19th
century.
Its principles were simple andpromising Air, when compressed,
can store and release energycleanly, safely and without
combustion.
From the 1820s to the 1830s,french engineer Andrade and
(07:36):
later Charles Bessemerexperimented with air-propelled
engines.
In the 1870s, the Makarskysystem emerged as one of the
first practical uses ofcompressed air in public
transportation.
Louis McCarsky, a Frenchengineer, developed trams
powered by compressed air tanks.
These trams ran quietly,without pollution and didn't
require overhead wires likeelectric trolleys.
(07:57):
Additionally, from 1879 to 1911, the Paris Compressed Air
Tramway operated successfullyusing Makarski's invention.
The system ran on pressurizedtanks and became a quiet, clean
alternative to steam trams.
At the same time, in the early1900s, the New York Pneumatic
(08:17):
Power Company tested compressedair transit systems.
The city even used compressedair drilling and excavation
equipment in the building of itssubway infrastructure, which
proved both effective anddurable.
A related use of the technologywas in the pneumatic mail tubes
that whisked mail and parcelsbetween post offices and
buildings, widely used in NewYork, boston, paris and Berlin,
(08:38):
where, through a vacuum-likesuction, mail placed in the
tubes was sent swiftly tovarious locations.
Before the internal combustionengine we all know quite well
today became dominant,compressed air and electric cars
were serious competitors.
In fact, in 1900, at the firstWorld's Fair in Paris, electric
and compressed air vehiclesoutnumbered gasoline-powered
cars.
(08:58):
And in 1903, the new Mobil, acompressed air car designed in
Europe, demonstrated speed andrange competitive with gasoline
cars of the time.
But then the parasiticindustrialists pushed back and,
despite the promise, compressedair technology never received
large-scale commercial adoption.
Why, you might ask, couldn'tsome company make a ton of money
with this technology?
Well, you see, compressed airvehicles and trams threatened
(09:22):
the already developed oil, coaland gas empires that were
expanding rapidly.
In the early 20th century,powerful industrialists,
including Standard Oil withRockefeller at the helm, and
emerging automotive moguls likeHenry Ford, had heavily invested
in gasoline-powered engines.
Streetcar scandal.
(09:45):
But in the 1930s to the 1950s,gm, standard Oil and Firestone
collaborated to buy anddismantle electric and
alternative-powered streetcarlines in over 45 American cities
, known as the National CityLines Conspiracy.
It replaced clean electrictrams and suppressed air-based
systems with diesel buses thatcreated dependency on oil.
The fact is, compressed airvehicles are non-patentable,
(10:10):
widely reproducible and hard tometer.
It's undermined monopolisticprofit models.
There was actually a recentrevival of this technology In
the 2000s.
Guy Negre, a French engineer,developed the MDI air car, which
caught international attention.
It was licensed by Tata Motorsin India.
Despite successful prototypesand test fleets, the car was
never mass-produced.
Speculation surroundsregulatory barriers, lack of
(10:30):
investor support and pressuresfrom oil-backed interests.
Then again in 2010, the city ofNice, france, piloted
compressed air buses, but againthe technology vanished from
headlines despite positivefeedback.
Here's why this matters.
Compressed air is a clean,renewable energy stored method,
(10:54):
safe, low cost and scalable, butbecause it doesn't create
recurring fuel profits and can'tbe easily monopolized, it was
systematically ignored,sidelined or absorbed into
industries that sought to buryit.
Just as with free energy andelectromagnetic healing, the
story of compressed airpropulsion is not one of
technological failure, but ofindustrial sabotage to preserve
legacy profits.
Within the same transportationindustry, we have the
(11:16):
suppression of hydrogenwater-fueled engine technology.
The science to use is generallyclassified as electrolysis and
hydrogen combustion, where wateror H2O is made up of hydrogen
and oxygen.
Through electrolysis, water canbe split into its components
Hydrogen, a highly combustiblegas, and oxygen, which supports
(11:38):
combustion.
Hydrogen, when burned or usedin a fuel cell, produces energy
and water vapor, making it oneof the cleanest fuels imaginable
.
Hydrogen-fueled vehicles wereproven to work over a century
ago, but scaling the techrequired public infrastructure
investment and criticallychallenged the economic
supremacy of oil.
In the 1980s, a man namedStanley Meyer claimed to invent
(12:01):
a water fuel cell allowing carsto run on nothing but water.
His modified dune buggyachieved 100 plus miles per
gallon of water using highfrequency electrolysis, which he
claimed required minimalelectrical input.
Meyer filed multiple patentsand even appeared on national
television.
He presented the technology asa clean energy solution that
(12:22):
could liberate humanity from oildependence.
So what happened with StanleyMeyer?
Well, his death has been widelyknown as suspicious.
I don't care to opine, but hereare the facts.
While dining with potentialinvestors at a restaurant in
Grove City, ohio, meyer suddenlyran out into the parking lot
clutching his throat andcollapsed, saying, and I quote
(12:51):
they poisoned me.
He died on the spot.
There have been many otherexamples of real-world
application of this technology.
We have Rudolf Ehren, who, inthe 1930s Germany, converted
buses and trucks to run onhydrogen.
We have Rudolf Ehren who, inthe 1930s Germany, converted
buses and trucks to run onhydrogen.
This technology worked, but wasabandoned post-World War II due
to the dominance of petroleuminterests.
We have the Japanese companyGenepax, who, in 2008,
(13:13):
demonstrated how a car usingtheir proprietary membrane to
extract hydrogen could run onnothing but water and air.
Public.
Demonstrations took place, butno commercialization followed
and the company shut downquietly.
So why is this technology, too,suppressed?
Well, because hydrogen can bemade from water anywhere,
anytime.
It poses an existential threatto oil cartels, as there is no
(13:35):
need for drilling, refining orshipping.
A threat to utility monopolies,as hydrogen can be stored and
used off-grid.
And then transportationindustries, because a
non-patented fuel sourceundermines decades of
infrastructure and profit models.
This goes against the entireglobal energy economy, which is
designed around controlleddistribution, not abundance.
(13:56):
Interestingly, today hydrogenfuel cells are slowly emerging.
Toyota, hyundai and Honda haveproduced hydrogen-powered cars.
However, these rely onindustrial hydrogen-made natural
gas, ironically still tied tofossil fuels.
Water power technology has beenproven many times to be real,
(14:16):
reproducible and potentiallyrevolutionary, but it continues
to face systemic suppression dueto the economic, geopolitical
and corporate disruption itwould cause.
Hydrogen could power the future, but only if we first dismantle
the narratives and intereststhat have buried it.
So all of these facts still begthe question.
Surely, if these technologieswere so measurably innovative
(14:39):
and demonstrated suchfundamental alignment with the
protection of the environment,then there is no way that we
would be so blind to it, right?
Well, here's the dealMainstream media, which, as you
know, I hope, is heavily ownedor sponsored by energy companies
, has systematically ridiculed,blacklisted or ignored inventors
proposing alternative systems,despite numerous demonstrations.
(15:00):
Hydrogen on-demand systems wereconsistently labeled as hoaxes
without rigorous investigation,while oil-backed quote-unquote
experts were given authoritativevoice.
The state of industry,innovation and suppressed
technology only furtherillustrates why looking
critically at our educationsystem is so very important.
There has been point-blankeducational curriculum and
research funding gatekeeping.
(15:20):
Oil-funded foundations likeRockefeller and Carnegie shaped
early 20th century universitycurricula.
This, of course, favoredpetrochemical based science.
Even today, research grantsdisproportionately go to
conventional energy,discouraging exploration of
paradigm shifting alternatives.
So as a result, we havegenerations of engineers,
(15:40):
chemists and policymakers thathave been trained within a
fossil-fuel-centric worldview.
This reduces innovation in anydisruptive technology.
Lastly, let's discuss the storyof Royal Raymond Reif.
A bit of a tongue twister,royal Reif was an American
scientist and inventor whodeveloped a revolutionary
(16:01):
universal microscope in the1930s, far more advanced than
anything available at the time.
His microscope, which usedmultiple polarized light sources
and prisms, could magnifyspecimens up to 60,000 times and
allowed Reif to observe liveviruses, something previously
thought impossible.
From these observations, reifdeveloped what he called the
(16:21):
Mortal Oscillary Rate, or MOR,the unique resonant frequency at
which specific viruses,bacteria and pathogens would
shatter, similar to how a wineglass breaks when exposed to a
particular tone.
He then created afrequency-generating device,
what many today call the Reifmachine, designed to emit
precise electromagneticfrequencies to destroy pathogens
(16:43):
without harming healthy tissue.
Reif's most significant claimcame from a clinical trial
conducted in 1934 in SouthernCalifornia.
He worked with doctors from theUniversity of Southern
California and cured 14 out of16 terminal cancer patients,
with the remaining two healedafter minor protocol adjustments
.
Witnesses included respectivepathologists and MDs.
(17:06):
Reif and many other medicalexperts believed that a
non-invasive, side-effect-freemethod of eradicating disease
had been discovered this throughvibrational medicine.
But of course, reif'sdiscoveries pose a direct
existential threat to theburgeoning pharmaceutical
industry.
You see, his method required nodrugs, surgeries or radiation.
(17:28):
His innovations promisedpermanent cures, not symptom
management.
It could also be administratedaffordably and safely.
At the time, pharmaceuticalinterests, particularly those
linked to Rockefeller-financedallopathic medicine, were
consolidating power throughstandardized, patentable
treatments.
Reif's technology, if adoptedwidely, could have destabilized
(17:51):
the entire model of for-profit,symptom-focused healthcare.
By the late 1930s, reif'slaboratory was raided, his
equipment and documentsdestroyed.
Reports indicate that much ofhis work disappeared in fires,
lawsuits and orchestrateddiscreditation.
It's really sick.
What happened here In 1939,under pressure from organized
(18:13):
medical interests, doctors whohad supported Reif were
threatened with licenserevocation if they continued
using his technology.
Reif's partner, dr MilbeakJohnson, who had scheduled a
press conference to announceReif's partner, dr
Milbeck-Johnson, who hadscheduled a press conference to
announce Reif's results, diedsuddenly and the conference was
canceled.
The corrupt American MedicalAssociation led by Dr Morris
Fishbane is believed to haveplayed a significant role in
(18:35):
suppressing Reif's work.
Fishbane had already beeninvolved in the suppression of
non-pharmaceutical therapies,had strong ties to the
pharmaceutical industry.
Reif was eventually draggedinto endless litigation,
suffered emotionally andfinancially and was driven into
obscurity.
He died in 1971, largelyforgotten by mainstream science.
(18:56):
Not surprisingly, today, reif'sname and work are often
dismissed as pseudoscience bymainstream medicine.
However, independentresearchers and holistic
practitioners have continued toexplore frequency-based healing,
citing anecdotal evidence andbioresonance principles.
Despite this mainstreamdismissal, the ideas Reif
explored are resurfacing in aserious way through PEMF therapy
(19:18):
, through bioresonancediagnostics, sound healing
techniques, vibrational andfrequency-based detox methods.
His approach also aligns withconcepts in quantum biology and
cellular coherence.
These are gaining traction inprogressive medical circles with
strong results.
Just as with innovators inother industries mentioned
(19:39):
previously, reif's work revealsa larger pattern of suppression
when non-invasive,non-pharmaceutical healing
technologies emerge.
His story is emblematic of thehistorical struggle between
open-sourced healing, which isgrounded in nature and frequency
, and closed-source, which ispatent-driven medicine grounded
in profit and control.
(20:00):
The erasure of his discoverieswas not a dispassionate
scientific judgment.
It was a deliberate campaign byentrenched powers to protect
monopolies on disease management.
We must understand that whatwas suppressed was never merely
innovation.
It was integration.
These technologies weren't justabout generating power.
They were about attuning topower already present Wireless
(20:24):
energy, water-fueled engines,frequency medicine.
Each of these held the potentialto harmonize human life with
the elegant, non-destructiveintelligence of the natural
world.
They worked in accordance withthe same principles that govern
planetary orbits, cell divisionand spiral galaxies.
But that harmony posed a threatnot to society, but to those
(20:47):
who built their empires onscarcity, dependency and control
.
In place of these regenerativesystems, we were sold
substitutes combustion,pollution, addiction, decay.
The very systems that claim toquote-unquote solve our
environmental crises are theones that engineered them and
now seek to profit again throughartificial scarcity, carbon
(21:08):
credits and performative greenpolicies.
Further, these corporationsfrequently manipulate scarcity
to maintain high prices andcontrol markets.
Utility companies in manystates penalize solar users
through net metering caps,slowing down decentralization In
agriculture.
There are GMO seed monopolieslike Monsanto and Bayer.
(21:30):
They prevent farmers fromsaving seeds.
They require repurchase eachseason.
This is manufactured dependency.
And then there's the Nestlecompany who, with water, has
been accused of over-extractingin poor regions and reselling it
as bottled water.
They commodify an abundantpublic resource.
(21:52):
Not sure if you're familiarwith the carbon credit system,
but it was initially designed tohelp reduce emissions but has
been co-opted into aprofit-making loophole.
Polluters can pay to offsetemissions rather than reduce
them.
Many quote-unquote offsetprojects have been found to be
fraudulent or ineffective, forexample, trees that would have
been protected anyway.
Shell and BP have spent more onmarketing their quote-unquote
(22:16):
green initiatives than onactually transitioning to
renewables.
In 2022, only 1% of Shell'scapital expenditure went to
renewable energy.
The rest went to oil and gas.
There are green bonds, whichare issued by companies with
poor environmental records,using vague metrics and weak
oversight.
But corruption doesn't stopwith the companies.
(22:38):
Governments often pass greenlegislation that allows
polluters to meet targets withaccounting tricks.
This legislation offerssubsidies to large corporations
while blocking smaller,decentralized alternatives.
It focuses on consumer guiltrather than regulating systemic
pollution.
For example, the 2015 ParisAgreement relies on voluntary
(23:01):
national pledges and carbontrading, while allowing the
fossil fuel industry to remainlargely untouched and
unaccountable.
The same industries andpolitical structures that
created the ecological crisisnow present themselves as the
solution, not by dismantlingharmful systems, but by
rebranding them under new profitmodels.
(23:21):
This is a textbook example ofproblem-reaction-profit A cycle
where the cause becomes thesavior and the people continue
to pay the price.
But beneath the deafening,grumbling stomachs of the
endless industrialist appetite,the calming, resonant rhythm of
universal order still pulses,and it invites us back not to
(23:45):
fantasy, but to the embedded,infinite power of the natural
world of the universe.
The true environmental movementdoesn't start in the halls of
government.
It starts in the heart ofconsciousness and alignment.
It remembers that the mostefficient system is not the one
with the most wires or metrics,but the one that aligns with the
(24:06):
rhythm of life itself.
These suppressed technologiesare not relics.
They are resonances stillwaiting to be reclaimed by a
people willing to listen again.
The call now is to awaken notonly to the crimes of the
industrial capitalist, but tothe deeper opportunity of
re-anchoring our livestechnologically, ecologically
(24:26):
and spiritually into thegeometry of truth.
Evolution will not bemanufactured.
It will be remembered, and inremembering, we restore the
future that was stolen.
This is why the suppression ofthese technologies is not merely
a material loss.
It is, in truth, a spiritualone.
Each of these ideas emerged froma deeper level of insight, a
(24:49):
recognition that humanity couldexist in symbiosis with its
environment rather than inconstant conquest.
They represent the veryqualities of an evolved
consciousness Decentralization,integration, harmony and
empowerment.
The tragedy is not that we lostthe machines, but that we
abandoned the mindset thatcreated them.
(25:10):
In this light, reclaimingsuppressed technologies is not
just a technical or politicalact.
It is a conscious act ofawakening.
When we begin to question thesystems that benefit from our
disconnection, whether from theearth, our bodies or our own
awareness, we begin to remember.
We remember that progress isnot linear accumulation but
(25:31):
cyclical alignment, that realpower doesn't lie in controlling
resources but in attuning tothe source itself.
The evolution of consciousnessdemands that we revisit these
suppressed breakthroughs, notonly for what they can do, but
for what they represent thereturn of innovation that honors
life.
It is not coincidence thatthese technologies feel sacred,
(25:54):
holistic or elegant.
They were designed with anunderstanding that we are not
above nature.
We are part of it, and any trueadvancement must reflect that
truth.
Only when our external toolsand internal compass begin to
mirror one another can we saywe've truly evolved.
As you continue listening to theManhattan Prophet podcast, I'm
(26:16):
going to unveil the true natureof the world that exists right
under your nose.
I'm going to analyze with you,out in the open, the systems at
play here and the ways we cangrow together and evolve.
My aim To provide you with realways to touch higher levels of
awareness through truth andknowledge.
Episodes are updated weekly.
If you want to change yourworld for the better and support
this evolution of consciousness, please show me by following,
(26:40):
sharing this podcast with thoseyou love and leaving a review.
If you enjoyed our time today,please donate on.
Buy Me A Coffee, linked in theshow notes below.
Until next week, let's level upand master your universe.
Hello everyone and welcome back to the Manhattan
Prophet Podcast.
As a reminder, I'm here toensure that all knowledge I give
you finds meaning in apractical place in your everyday
lives.
It's only through properlydigesting knowledge, in this
case of ourselves and the worldaround us, that we see things
clearly enough to break oldpatterns of behavior and begin a
(00:26):
new path forward to aheightened state of
consciousness.
In this episode, we dig deepinto the deliberate suppression
of breakthrough technologies,those that once aligned with
nature, human well-being anduniversal harmony, yet were
systematically buried byindustrial capitalists.
From Tesla's wireless energy tohydrogen engines and frequency
(00:46):
medicine, this episode exploreshow corporate empires rewrote
the blueprint of innovation,replacing it with a
profit-driven model thatenslaved the world to fossil
fuels, pharmaceuticals andscarcity-based thinking.
We expose the coordinatedsabotage, media smear campaigns
and financial blacklisting thatfollowed these inventions.
(01:07):
But more than that, we reframethese technologies as extensions
of an evolved consciousness,tools meant not just to power
machines but to liberate thehuman being from dependency and
control.
This isn't just history.
It's a call to awaken to whatwe've been sold, what we've lost
, and to reclaim our future.
Throughout history, it's a callto awaken to what we've been
sold, what we've lost, and toreclaim our future.
(01:27):
Throughout history, pivotaltechnologies that offered
cleaner, more harmonious anduniversally accessible solutions
have been systematicallysuppressed, not because they
didn't work, but because theydidn't serve the financial and
controlling interests of thosewho had already cornered the
market on more profitableextractive alternatives.
From Nikola Tesla's wirelessenergy transmission to Stanley
(01:49):
Meyer's water-fueled engine andRoyal Rife's frequency-based
healing, we see a recurringpattern.
Technologies that align withthe natural world and are freely
available to humanity oftenvanish under mysterious
circumstances, are discreditedby institutional science or are
bought out and buried.
This suppression was notincidental.
(02:09):
It was strategic.
The industrial capitalists ofthe late 19th and 20th centuries
, often celebrated in mainstreammedia as visionaries, were in
fact consolidators of power.
Jp Morgan pulled funding fromTesla's Wardenclyffe Tower when
he realized it could providefree energy to all, thereby
undermining his copper wireempire.
Oil magnets, like Rockefeller,reshaped medicine to depend on
(02:32):
petrochemical pharmaceuticals,discrediting natural therapies
that couldn't be patented.
In transportation, compressedair and electric cars thrived
briefly in the early 1900s, thatis, until Standard Oil, general
Motors and tire companiesconspired to eliminate them and
make way for gasoline-powereddominance.
In each case, superior andsustainable innovations were
(02:54):
sidelined, not due to technicalfailure, but because they
threatened monopolized markets,guess what.
This is not a history lesson,but a glimpse into the origin
and true function of many of thetechnologies we depend on today
.
What ties many of these losttechnologies together is not
just their efficiency orsustainability, but their
resonance with the deeperrhythms of the universe.
(03:16):
Frequency-based healing works,not by chemical suppression, but
by tuning the body'svibrational field, mirroring how
nature restores balance.
Tesla's theories of energytapped into the Earth's
electromagnetic field, aiming todraw power from the ether, a
concept echoed in ancient andindigenous understandings of the
(03:37):
unseen forces that govern life.
These innovations did notextract or exploit, they
harmonized.
They were not weapons ofdomination, but instruments of
alignment.
In many ways, they amplified,through real-world application,
the inherent link we all have tothe universe that we all too
(03:58):
often incorrectly perceive to bedistant and disconnected.
Nikola Tesla, one of the mostinnovative thinkers of our time,
is, not surprisingly, rarelymentioned in present-day school
curriculum.
He was a Serbian-Americaninventor, engineer and futurist
best known for his pioneeringcontributions to alternating
current, electricity, radio andelectromagnetism.
(04:20):
While Tesla is often creditedfor his work with AC Motors and
the Tesla Coil, one of his mostradical visions was the
development of wireless energytransmission and what many
believe was a blueprint for freeglobal energy.
You see, tesla believed thatthe earth itself was a conductor
of electrical energy and thatit was possible to transmit
(04:41):
power wirelessly through theatmosphere and ground.
He envisioned a world in whichelectricity could be drawn from
the surrounding environment andtransmitted without wires to
power homes, vehicles andindustry.
This concept came from hisunderstanding of the Earth
ionosphere cavity and histheories about harnessing
naturally occurring electricalenergy, such as from
(05:03):
thunderstorms and ambientelectrostatic charge.
In the early 1900s, tesla beganwork on the Wardenclyffe Tower
in Shoreham, long Island, newYork.
Funded initially by financierJP Morgan with an investment of
$150,000, the 187-foot tower wasintended to be the first of
many world wireless systemstations.
(05:24):
Tesla's stated purpose was tobuild a system for wireless
communication across the globe,but his deeper and more
ambitious goal was to create awireless power grid that could
supply energy freely to anyoneanywhere.
A quick breakdown of thetechnology itself the
Wardenclyffe Tower was designedto send electrical energy into
the ground, using Earth as aconductor.
(05:44):
Tesla's system relied onresonant inductive coupling, a
principle he demonstrated inlaboratory experiments.
He believed that this naturalresonant frequency of the Earth
could allow power to betransmitted with minimal loss
over vast distances.
Despite the initial excitement,Tesla's ambitions met fierce
resistance.
Tesla's ambitions met fierceresistance when JP Morgan
discovered that the tower wouldbe used not only for
(06:06):
communication but also for freewireless power.
He withdrew further funding.
According to Tesla, morganfamously asked, and I quote If
anyone can draw power from it,where do we put the meter?
End quote Morgan meanwhiledoubled down on his investments
in copper-based wiredelectricity infrastructure NGE.
The financial support pulled,construction ceased and Tesla's
(06:28):
broader plan to build a networkof towers across the globe never
materialized.
The tower was dismantled in1917, and Tesla's notes were
later seized by the USgovernment after his death in
1943.
Today, tesla's vision ofwireless energy transmission is
being explored again, albeit ona smaller scale, through
technologies such as inductivecharging used for electric
(06:50):
toothbrushes and smartphones,and microwave or laser-based
power transmission.
Companies like Y-Tricity andresearchers at MIT have made
significant strides, butlarge-scale open-access energy
systems remain elusive.
Scale open access energysystems remain elusive.
Tesla's dream lives on as botha symbol of unrealized potential
and a critique of howinnovation within the current
scarcity-drivenprofit-above-all-else model of
(07:13):
capitalism infects us all.
Then there is the suppressedtechnology of compressed air as
a source of propulsion, whichdates back to the early 19th
century.
Its principles were simple andpromising Air, when compressed,
can store and release energycleanly, safely and without
combustion.
From the 1820s to the 1830s,french engineer Andrade and
(07:36):
later Charles Bessemerexperimented with air-propelled
engines.
In the 1870s, the Makarskysystem emerged as one of the
first practical uses ofcompressed air in public
transportation.
Louis McCarsky, a Frenchengineer, developed trams
powered by compressed air tanks.
These trams ran quietly,without pollution and didn't
require overhead wires likeelectric trolleys.
(07:57):
Additionally, from 1879 to 1911, the Paris Compressed Air
Tramway operated successfullyusing Makarski's invention.
The system ran on pressurizedtanks and became a quiet, clean
alternative to steam trams.
At the same time, in the early1900s, the New York Pneumatic
(08:17):
Power Company tested compressedair transit systems.
The city even used compressedair drilling and excavation
equipment in the building of itssubway infrastructure, which
proved both effective anddurable.
A related use of the technologywas in the pneumatic mail tubes
that whisked mail and parcelsbetween post offices and
buildings, widely used in NewYork, boston, paris and Berlin,
(08:38):
where, through a vacuum-likesuction, mail placed in the
tubes was sent swiftly tovarious locations.
Before the internal combustionengine we all know quite well
today became dominant,compressed air and electric cars
were serious competitors.
In fact, in 1900, at the firstWorld's Fair in Paris, electric
and compressed air vehiclesoutnumbered gasoline-powered
cars.
(08:58):
And in 1903, the new Mobil, acompressed air car designed in
Europe, demonstrated speed andrange competitive with gasoline
cars of the time.
But then the parasiticindustrialists pushed back and,
despite the promise, compressedair technology never received
large-scale commercial adoption.
Why, you might ask, couldn'tsome company make a ton of money
with this technology?
Well, you see, compressed airvehicles and trams threatened
(09:22):
the already developed oil, coaland gas empires that were
expanding rapidly.
In the early 20th century,powerful industrialists,
including Standard Oil withRockefeller at the helm, and
emerging automotive moguls likeHenry Ford, had heavily invested
in gasoline-powered engines.
Streetcar scandal.
(09:45):
But in the 1930s to the 1950s,gm, standard Oil and Firestone
collaborated to buy anddismantle electric and
alternative-powered streetcarlines in over 45 American cities
, known as the National CityLines Conspiracy.
It replaced clean electrictrams and suppressed air-based
systems with diesel buses thatcreated dependency on oil.
The fact is, compressed airvehicles are non-patentable,
(10:10):
widely reproducible and hard tometer.
It's undermined monopolisticprofit models.
There was actually a recentrevival of this technology In
the 2000s.
Guy Negre, a French engineer,developed the MDI air car, which
caught international attention.
It was licensed by Tata Motorsin India.
Despite successful prototypesand test fleets, the car was
never mass-produced.
Speculation surroundsregulatory barriers, lack of
(10:30):
investor support and pressuresfrom oil-backed interests.
Then again in 2010, the city ofNice, france, piloted
compressed air buses, but againthe technology vanished from
headlines despite positivefeedback.
Here's why this matters.
Compressed air is a clean,renewable energy stored method,
(10:54):
safe, low cost and scalable, butbecause it doesn't create
recurring fuel profits and can'tbe easily monopolized, it was
systematically ignored,sidelined or absorbed into
industries that sought to buryit.
Just as with free energy andelectromagnetic healing, the
story of compressed airpropulsion is not one of
technological failure, but ofindustrial sabotage to preserve
legacy profits.
Within the same transportationindustry, we have the
(11:16):
suppression of hydrogenwater-fueled engine technology.
The science to use is generallyclassified as electrolysis and
hydrogen combustion, where wateror H2O is made up of hydrogen
and oxygen.
Through electrolysis, water canbe split into its components
Hydrogen, a highly combustiblegas, and oxygen, which supports
(11:38):
combustion.
Hydrogen, when burned or usedin a fuel cell, produces energy
and water vapor, making it oneof the cleanest fuels imaginable
.
Hydrogen-fueled vehicles wereproven to work over a century
ago, but scaling the techrequired public infrastructure
investment and criticallychallenged the economic
supremacy of oil.
In the 1980s, a man namedStanley Meyer claimed to invent
(12:01):
a water fuel cell allowing carsto run on nothing but water.
His modified dune buggyachieved 100 plus miles per
gallon of water using highfrequency electrolysis, which he
claimed required minimalelectrical input.
Meyer filed multiple patentsand even appeared on national
television.
He presented the technology asa clean energy solution that
(12:22):
could liberate humanity from oildependence.
So what happened with StanleyMeyer?
Well, his death has been widelyknown as suspicious.
I don't care to opine, but hereare the facts.
While dining with potentialinvestors at a restaurant in
Grove City, ohio, meyer suddenlyran out into the parking lot
clutching his throat andcollapsed, saying, and I quote
(12:51):
they poisoned me.
He died on the spot.
There have been many otherexamples of real-world
application of this technology.
We have Rudolf Ehren, who, inthe 1930s Germany, converted
buses and trucks to run onhydrogen.
We have Rudolf Ehren who, inthe 1930s Germany, converted
buses and trucks to run onhydrogen.
This technology worked, but wasabandoned post-World War II due
to the dominance of petroleuminterests.
We have the Japanese companyGenepax, who, in 2008,
(13:13):
demonstrated how a car usingtheir proprietary membrane to
extract hydrogen could run onnothing but water and air.
Public.
Demonstrations took place, butno commercialization followed
and the company shut downquietly.
So why is this technology, too,suppressed?
Well, because hydrogen can bemade from water anywhere,
anytime.
It poses an existential threatto oil cartels, as there is no
(13:35):
need for drilling, refining orshipping.
A threat to utility monopolies,as hydrogen can be stored and
used off-grid.
And then transportationindustries, because a
non-patented fuel sourceundermines decades of
infrastructure and profit models.
This goes against the entireglobal energy economy, which is
designed around controlleddistribution, not abundance.
(13:56):
Interestingly, today hydrogenfuel cells are slowly emerging.
Toyota, hyundai and Honda haveproduced hydrogen-powered cars.
However, these rely onindustrial hydrogen-made natural
gas, ironically still tied tofossil fuels.
Water power technology has beenproven many times to be real,
(14:16):
reproducible and potentiallyrevolutionary, but it continues
to face systemic suppression dueto the economic, geopolitical
and corporate disruption itwould cause.
Hydrogen could power the future, but only if we first dismantle
the narratives and intereststhat have buried it.
So all of these facts still begthe question.
Surely, if these technologieswere so measurably innovative
(14:39):
and demonstrated suchfundamental alignment with the
protection of the environment,then there is no way that we
would be so blind to it, right?
Well, here's the dealMainstream media, which, as you
know, I hope, is heavily ownedor sponsored by energy companies
, has systematically ridiculed,blacklisted or ignored inventors
proposing alternative systems,despite numerous demonstrations.
(15:00):
Hydrogen on-demand systems wereconsistently labeled as hoaxes
without rigorous investigation,while oil-backed quote-unquote
experts were given authoritativevoice.
The state of industry,innovation and suppressed
technology only furtherillustrates why looking
critically at our educationsystem is so very important.
There has been point-blankeducational curriculum and
research funding gatekeeping.
(15:20):
Oil-funded foundations likeRockefeller and Carnegie shaped
early 20th century universitycurricula.
This, of course, favoredpetrochemical based science.
Even today, research grantsdisproportionately go to
conventional energy,discouraging exploration of
paradigm shifting alternatives.
So as a result, we havegenerations of engineers,
(15:40):
chemists and policymakers thathave been trained within a
fossil-fuel-centric worldview.
This reduces innovation in anydisruptive technology.
Lastly, let's discuss the storyof Royal Raymond Reif.
A bit of a tongue twister,royal Reif was an American
scientist and inventor whodeveloped a revolutionary
(16:01):
universal microscope in the1930s, far more advanced than
anything available at the time.
His microscope, which usedmultiple polarized light sources
and prisms, could magnifyspecimens up to 60,000 times and
allowed Reif to observe liveviruses, something previously
thought impossible.
From these observations, reifdeveloped what he called the
(16:21):
Mortal Oscillary Rate, or MOR,the unique resonant frequency at
which specific viruses,bacteria and pathogens would
shatter, similar to how a wineglass breaks when exposed to a
particular tone.
He then created afrequency-generating device,
what many today call the Reifmachine, designed to emit
precise electromagneticfrequencies to destroy pathogens
(16:43):
without harming healthy tissue.
Reif's most significant claimcame from a clinical trial
conducted in 1934 in SouthernCalifornia.
He worked with doctors from theUniversity of Southern
California and cured 14 out of16 terminal cancer patients,
with the remaining two healedafter minor protocol adjustments
.
Witnesses included respectivepathologists and MDs.
(17:06):
Reif and many other medicalexperts believed that a
non-invasive, side-effect-freemethod of eradicating disease
had been discovered this throughvibrational medicine.
But of course, reif'sdiscoveries pose a direct
existential threat to theburgeoning pharmaceutical
industry.
You see, his method required nodrugs, surgeries or radiation.
(17:28):
His innovations promisedpermanent cures, not symptom
management.
It could also be administratedaffordably and safely.
At the time, pharmaceuticalinterests, particularly those
linked to Rockefeller-financedallopathic medicine, were
consolidating power throughstandardized, patentable
treatments.
Reif's technology, if adoptedwidely, could have destabilized
(17:51):
the entire model of for-profit,symptom-focused healthcare.
By the late 1930s, reif'slaboratory was raided, his
equipment and documentsdestroyed.
Reports indicate that much ofhis work disappeared in fires,
lawsuits and orchestrateddiscreditation.
It's really sick.
What happened here In 1939,under pressure from organized
(18:13):
medical interests, doctors whohad supported Reif were
threatened with licenserevocation if they continued
using his technology.
Reif's partner, dr MilbeakJohnson, who had scheduled a
press conference to announceReif's partner, dr
Milbeck-Johnson, who hadscheduled a press conference to
announce Reif's results, diedsuddenly and the conference was
canceled.
The corrupt American MedicalAssociation led by Dr Morris
Fishbane is believed to haveplayed a significant role in
(18:35):
suppressing Reif's work.
Fishbane had already beeninvolved in the suppression of
non-pharmaceutical therapies,had strong ties to the
pharmaceutical industry.
Reif was eventually draggedinto endless litigation,
suffered emotionally andfinancially and was driven into
obscurity.
He died in 1971, largelyforgotten by mainstream science.
(18:56):
Not surprisingly, today, reif'sname and work are often
dismissed as pseudoscience bymainstream medicine.
However, independentresearchers and holistic
practitioners have continued toexplore frequency-based healing,
citing anecdotal evidence andbioresonance principles.
Despite this mainstreamdismissal, the ideas Reif
explored are resurfacing in aserious way through PEMF therapy
(19:18):
, through bioresonancediagnostics, sound healing
techniques, vibrational andfrequency-based detox methods.
His approach also aligns withconcepts in quantum biology and
cellular coherence.
These are gaining traction inprogressive medical circles with
strong results.
Just as with innovators inother industries mentioned
(19:39):
previously, reif's work revealsa larger pattern of suppression
when non-invasive,non-pharmaceutical healing
technologies emerge.
His story is emblematic of thehistorical struggle between
open-sourced healing, which isgrounded in nature and frequency
, and closed-source, which ispatent-driven medicine grounded
in profit and control.
(20:00):
The erasure of his discoverieswas not a dispassionate
scientific judgment.
It was a deliberate campaign byentrenched powers to protect
monopolies on disease management.
We must understand that whatwas suppressed was never merely
innovation.
It was integration.
These technologies weren't justabout generating power.
They were about attuning topower already present Wireless
(20:24):
energy, water-fueled engines,frequency medicine.
Each of these held the potentialto harmonize human life with
the elegant, non-destructiveintelligence of the natural
world.
They worked in accordance withthe same principles that govern
planetary orbits, cell divisionand spiral galaxies.
But that harmony posed a threatnot to society, but to those
(20:47):
who built their empires onscarcity, dependency and control
.
In place of these regenerativesystems, we were sold
substitutes combustion,pollution, addiction, decay.
The very systems that claim toquote-unquote solve our
environmental crises are theones that engineered them and
now seek to profit again throughartificial scarcity, carbon
(21:08):
credits and performative greenpolicies.
Further, these corporationsfrequently manipulate scarcity
to maintain high prices andcontrol markets.
Utility companies in manystates penalize solar users
through net metering caps,slowing down decentralization In
agriculture.
There are GMO seed monopolieslike Monsanto and Bayer.
(21:30):
They prevent farmers fromsaving seeds.
They require repurchase eachseason.
This is manufactured dependency.
And then there's the Nestlecompany who, with water, has
been accused of over-extractingin poor regions and reselling it
as bottled water.
They commodify an abundantpublic resource.
(21:52):
Not sure if you're familiarwith the carbon credit system,
but it was initially designed tohelp reduce emissions but has
been co-opted into aprofit-making loophole.
Polluters can pay to offsetemissions rather than reduce
them.
Many quote-unquote offsetprojects have been found to be
fraudulent or ineffective, forexample, trees that would have
been protected anyway.
Shell and BP have spent more onmarketing their quote-unquote
(22:16):
green initiatives than onactually transitioning to
renewables.
In 2022, only 1% of Shell'scapital expenditure went to
renewable energy.
The rest went to oil and gas.
There are green bonds, whichare issued by companies with
poor environmental records,using vague metrics and weak
oversight.
But corruption doesn't stopwith the companies.
(22:38):
Governments often pass greenlegislation that allows
polluters to meet targets withaccounting tricks.
This legislation offerssubsidies to large corporations
while blocking smaller,decentralized alternatives.
It focuses on consumer guiltrather than regulating systemic
pollution.
For example, the 2015 ParisAgreement relies on voluntary
(23:01):
national pledges and carbontrading, while allowing the
fossil fuel industry to remainlargely untouched and
unaccountable.
The same industries andpolitical structures that
created the ecological crisisnow present themselves as the
solution, not by dismantlingharmful systems, but by
rebranding them under new profitmodels.
(23:21):
This is a textbook example ofproblem-reaction-profit A cycle
where the cause becomes thesavior and the people continue
to pay the price.
But beneath the deafening,grumbling stomachs of the
endless industrialist appetite,the calming, resonant rhythm of
universal order still pulses,and it invites us back not to
(23:45):
fantasy, but to the embedded,infinite power of the natural
world of the universe.
The true environmental movementdoesn't start in the halls of
government.
It starts in the heart ofconsciousness and alignment.
It remembers that the mostefficient system is not the one
with the most wires or metrics,but the one that aligns with the
(24:06):
rhythm of life itself.
These suppressed technologiesare not relics.
They are resonances stillwaiting to be reclaimed by a
people willing to listen again.
The call now is to awaken notonly to the crimes of the
industrial capitalist, but tothe deeper opportunity of
re-anchoring our livestechnologically, ecologically
(24:26):
and spiritually into thegeometry of truth.
Evolution will not bemanufactured.
It will be remembered, and inremembering, we restore the
future that was stolen.
This is why the suppression ofthese technologies is not merely
a material loss.
It is, in truth, a spiritualone.
Each of these ideas emerged froma deeper level of insight, a
(24:49):
recognition that humanity couldexist in symbiosis with its
environment rather than inconstant conquest.
They represent the veryqualities of an evolved
consciousness Decentralization,integration, harmony and
empowerment.
The tragedy is not that we lostthe machines, but that we
abandoned the mindset thatcreated them.
(25:10):
In this light, reclaimingsuppressed technologies is not
just a technical or politicalact.
It is a conscious act ofawakening.
When we begin to question thesystems that benefit from our
disconnection, whether from theearth, our bodies or our own
awareness, we begin to remember.
We remember that progress isnot linear accumulation but
(25:31):
cyclical alignment, that realpower doesn't lie in controlling
resources but in attuning tothe source itself.
The evolution of consciousnessdemands that we revisit these
suppressed breakthroughs, notonly for what they can do, but
for what they represent thereturn of innovation that honors
life.
It is not coincidence thatthese technologies feel sacred,
(25:54):
holistic or elegant.
They were designed with anunderstanding that we are not
above nature.
We are part of it, and any trueadvancement must reflect that
truth.
Only when our external toolsand internal compass begin to
mirror one another can we saywe've truly evolved.
As you continue listening to theManhattan Prophet podcast, I'm
(26:16):
going to unveil the true natureof the world that exists right
under your nose.
I'm going to analyze with you,out in the open, the systems at
play here and the ways we cangrow together and evolve.
My aim To provide you with realways to touch higher levels of
awareness through truth andknowledge.
Episodes are updated weekly.
If you want to change yourworld for the better and support
this evolution of consciousness, please show me by following,
(26:40):
sharing this podcast with thoseyou love and leaving a review.
If you enjoyed our time today,please donate on.
Buy Me A Coffee, linked in theshow notes below.
Until next week, let's level upand master your universe.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
True Crime Tonight
If you eat, sleep, and breathe true crime, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT is serving up your nightly fix. Five nights a week, KT STUDIOS & iHEART RADIO invite listeners to pull up a seat for an unfiltered look at the biggest cases making headlines, celebrity scandals, and the trials everyone is watching. With a mix of expert analysis, hot takes, and listener call-ins, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT goes beyond the headlines to uncover the twists, turns, and unanswered questions that keep us all obsessed—because, at TRUE CRIME TONIGHT, there’s a seat for everyone. Whether breaking down crime scene forensics, scrutinizing serial killers, or debating the most binge-worthy true crime docs, True Crime Tonight is the fresh, fast-paced, and slightly addictive home for true crime lovers.