Demonic AI, Blood Moons, Bill Gates’ Death Panels, Failed LA Mayor, and More - The JD Rucker Show

On today's episode of The JD Rucker Show, we discussed these topics:
AI Researchers Thought They Were Building 'Gods' But May Have Unleashed the Demonic
3 Blood Moons Are Coming This Year That Are All Appearing Around Major Days on the Hebrew Calendar
Bill Gates Calls for ‘Death Panels’ to Euthanize Citizens Not ‘Worthy of Healthcare’
LA Mayor Karen Bass Really Is to Blame for the Tragic Fires
Merrick Garland Fights to Release Jack Smith’s Final Report After Judge Cannon Blocks Release
Pam Bondi Needs to Go After ActBlue as Soon as She's Running the DOJ
The Bizarre Connection Between the Vegas Cybertruck Bomber and Mystery Drones
Our Sponsors:
Long-Term Storage Beef (Promo Code "JDR"): https://prepperfarms.com
Physical Gold and Silver for Retirement: https://rumblegold.com
MyPillow (Promo Code "JDR"): https://mypillow.com/jdr
Long-Term Meds: https://jdrucker.com/meds

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:34):
You're listening to the JD. Rutger Show. Let's begin. Los
Angeles is, of course on fire. You don't need me
to tell you that. You're already paying attention to the news,
So I'm not going to be covering it a whole
lot today on this episode of The JD Rucker Show.
You can get that elsewhere. But I do want to
pose just a few comments before we get started with
the show. Number one, I'm not that guy that just

(00:57):
jumps in and says, oh, it's political, it's political. Blame
the Democrats, blame the Union Party swamp not for everything.
But in this case, the more that we learn about
the circumstances surrounding Los Angeles' ability to fight fires, the
more we realize that this really is a political issue.
Whether it's Karen Bass the mayor, who I've said some
nice things about it. I thought that she would have
been a better choice for Joe Biden to have as
his running mate back in twenty twenty. Well, it turns

(01:19):
out that that maybe she is as incompetent, or possibly
even more incompetent, than Kamala Harris, if such a thing
can even be imagined. She is horrible and the policies
that she's she's put into place in Los Angeles have
been very destructive, including the fact that she pulled millions
of dollars from funding for firefighters. I think it was

(01:42):
say seventeen point one million dollars from firefighter funding. Now,
if you're going to fund as they do, if you're
going to fund all of these wuolt causes, don't take
it away from the people that can save lives, the
people that can save property, the people that are supposed
to be defending a city such as Los Angeles from events,
which is what's happening now. And it's not like we

(02:02):
didn't see this coming. Los Angeles has always been in
an area where fire could come through. It's happened to
the cities and towns across California. Every year that I've
lived here, we've had some major fire every single year.
So why would Democrats choose to go woke at at

(02:23):
the detriment of their ability to fight fires. Then of
course we have the DEI, the Diversity higher as as
the chief of Police for Los Angeles, and so far,
I'm not going to sit here and blame Oh, it's
all the firefighters fault. They had a lot of challenges
facing them from the beginning. This isn't obviously, this isn't

(02:45):
an easy fire to put out, an easy fire to contain,
and they have faced tremendous, tremendous uphill battles, battling the wind,
battling traffic, Los Angeles traffic. There's one of the reasons
that I very rarely go into Los Angeles unless I
absolutely have to, and that's because of the traffic, and
that is definitely posing a very, very difficult challenge to overcome.

(03:09):
But arguably the thing that made me decide, you know what,
I Am going to talk at least a little bit
about the fire. It was an attempt to interview Karen
Bass mayor Karen Bass by Sky News. They were apparently
on the plane or at least at the airport when
Karen Bass arrived from her vacation in Africa. She arrived

(03:30):
and they started asking her questions, and her responses were
very telling.

Speaker 2 (03:36):
Do you owe citizens and apology for being absent while
their homes were burning? Do you regret coming the fire
department budget by millions of dollars? Madam mayre? Have you
nothing to say today? Have you absolutely nothing to say
to the citizens today. Alon Mosk says that you're utterly incompetent.

(03:57):
Are you considering your position, Madam Mayor? Have you absolutely
nothing to say to the citizens today who are dealing
with this disaster? No apology for them. Do you think

(04:18):
you should have been visiting Ghana while this was unfolding
back home? Madam Mayor, let me ask you just again,

(04:51):
have you anything to say to the citizens today as
you returned? One second, Madam Mayor, just a few words
for the citizens today as you return to deal with
a catastrophe.

Speaker 3 (05:08):
Got David as you said?

Speaker 1 (05:17):
No, No, she was not very forthcoming at all. Like
I said, I'm not one that just jumps in at
anytime there's a disaster, you got to blame the Democrats
or the Uni Party swamp or whoever. That's the tactic
of the left. They like to say, oh my gosh,
look at this, it's climate change, even though it definitely wasn't.
Oh look at this, it's definitely racism, and then it
turns out to be a hoax. They like to jump
on things and get political about everything. Oh look, we

(05:39):
need more gun laws, even though the gun laws were
already in place to prevent whatever gun incident. There was.
This happens over and over again, but in this case,
I am going to make it political because it really is.
I think it is a safe assumption, based on everything
that we now know, that this fire, the damage thing

(06:00):
that's been happening, could have been the very least mitigated
to some extent, if not prevented altogether, had Democrats not
been in charge. The people of California need to learn.
The people of Los Angeles need to learn the Democrat
policies invariably fail. Bill Gates calls for death panels to

(06:22):
euthanize citizens not worthy of health care. This is, of course,
for those who are familiar with Bill Gates and his
depopulation agenda. This is something that he's been talking about
for a very long time. I believe that those words
themselves came from a twenty ten interview, but they're starting
to pop up more and more. His push for euthanizing
people who are in end of life care palliative care,

(06:45):
because that's the next evolution as we start seeing more
assisted suicide, more people dying by choice because they are depressed,
because they're in pain, because they want they just don't
want to live anymore. Now I'm not going to weigh
in on that debate. I've done it ad nauseum on Twitter,
gotten in huge debates about that. But we're talking about

(07:08):
the next evolution. What comes next. Because as people, as
governments in particular, start seeing the benefits of killing people off,
of reducing they're burden on the state, burden on the taxpayers,
burden on themselves, well of course they are going to
start looking to people who maybe don't want to die,
but because they're gonna die anyway pretty soon, we might

(07:30):
as well just kill them off now and use that
money to buy more whatever. According to the article over
at sleighnews dot com, Frank bergman over there says as
nations around the world push to introduce and expand liberal
euthanasia laws, the plans are sounding early similar to the
assistance suicide of gen the billionaire Bill Gates has been
promoting for several years. The Microsoft co founder argues that

(07:53):
it is not cost effective to provide individuals with long
term healthcare. Instead, Gates believes his fellow human beings should
be euthanize to reduce health care costs so that the
money that would have been used for treatments can be
spent Elsewhere. In twenty ten, Gates weighed up the cost
of keeping quote, terminally ill Americans alive versus paying for

(08:13):
teacher salaries for example. Always got to throw in the
teachers whenever you're trying to make an argument for money.
Gates lamented that Americans are unwilling to question if spending
money on people in the last three months of their
lives was cost effective. He suggested there wasn't a benefit
in end of life care and a decision should be
made to end people's lives instead of providing costly palliative care.

(08:36):
He argued that a panel of bureaucrats, of course, should
decide whether a person deserves to receive treatment with those
who are not worthy of health care. And that's a
quote being euthanized by the government to save money. Another
quote is that he said, that's called the death panel. Yes,
this is our favorite depopulationist globalist Bill Gates out there

(08:58):
saying these crazy things, and he's been saying them for years,
and his perspective has not changed one bit. We know
this because he said similar things recently. Now he's toned
it down. He doesn't call them death panels anymore, but
he does refer to end of like Carrie refers to
to how money can be spent better. Again, this is
the next evolution of you know dating. Once we normalize

(09:21):
assisted suicide, once we normalize the idea that that people
who are burdening themselves or others or the state that
they shouldn't live, well, that's when we get into get
away from the choice, you know, those who choose to
to kill themselves or to die as through assisted suicide.
That's a debate that we can have, but there should

(09:43):
be no debate at all when it comes to killing
people who don't want to die, who haven't who haven't
expressed the desire to die. You know, there's there are those,
of course, you know, do not resuscitate. That's a different
scenario because that's preventing death that is impending. In this case,

(10:03):
we're talking about terminally ill people on the last leg,
the last three months or so of their lives. Just
pull the plug now, save the cash. I do not
support that whatsoever. I think that that is hideous and
I have gone through the palliative care with a loved one.

(10:24):
It's not fun, it is expensive, but by no means
do I regret those last two or three months that
I got to spend with them. Mary Garland fights to
release Jack Smith's final report after Judge Cannon Block's release.
This is an attack, of course, because they hate Donald
Trump so badly that they're going to take the essentially

(10:44):
the notes. They call it a report, but it really
is just the notes of a failed and withdrawn charges
against President Trump. But really, here's the sad party. It
isn't even Trump that would be heavily affected by this
at all. I mean, he's already won the election, didn't
come out before the election, they weren't able to use

(11:04):
their lawfare on him. Then it's as if they feel
like they put in so much effort to try to
stop President Trump that they want to show people say, see,
here's what we would have been able to do if
we were allowed to do it, but we couldn't. So here,
you guys decide for yourselves. It's an attempt to divide
the nation against Trump, and that in and of itself
would probably prove to be a nothing burger. But there

(11:25):
are other people involved, people who can be hurt by this,
which is why I fully endorse the blocking that has
been done by Judge Cannon. Now it is temporary, and
it seems as if it's almost likely that this report
is going to be released at some point in the future.
But according to the Gateway Pundit Christina Layla over there,

(11:47):
US Attorney General Merrick Garland is fighting to release jack
Smith's final report after Judge Cannon issued a temporary injunction
blocking it from public view. On Tuesday, Judge Aileen Cannon
temporarily blocked Jack Smith's report on his Lawfare investigation into
President Trump. US Attorney General Mayor Garland previously said he
would release Jacksmith's final report on Trump Judge Cannon temporary.

(12:08):
Judge Cannon's temporary injunction lasts until three days after a
federal appeals court issues a ruling on a pending motion
to block Jacksmith's report in a case involving other defendants
in the Classified Documents case. Lawyers for Trump's co defendants,
Walt Nata and Carlos de Oliviera, asked Judge Cannon on
a Monday night filing to block Jacksmith's report based on

(12:29):
her previous ruling that the Special Council's appointment was unconstitutional.
In other words, we're talking about an investigation a report
on an investigation that never should have happened constitutionally. US
Attorney General Garland is now blocking or has is now blocked,
from releasing, sharing, or transmitting Jacksmith's final report, or any
drafts of such report outside the Department of Justice. Garland

(12:51):
has said that there's no legal basis for the injunction
and that he basically, I'll just cut to the chase.
He wants to get this over to Congress because a
co equal branch of government, they have the right to
know this important information. And what they're wanting to release
is President Trump's attempts to overturn the twenty twenty election, which,
for as far as I'm concerned, was a righteous attempt,

(13:13):
not a very good attempt. I would have hoped that
they would have done better. But God is in control,
and God wanted Trump to be president now, not from
twenty twenty one to twenty twenty five. So that's good.
This is good. This is all positive stuff, the fact
that it was withheld. But there are other people who

(13:34):
will be negatively affected if and when it's released. So
this last attempt, hopefully Lord willing, this last attempt of
law fair before President Trump takes the Oval Office. Again,
it's unfortunate, but at the end of the day, it's
still going to be a nothing burger. Three blood moons

(13:56):
are coming this year that are all appearing around major
days on the Hebrew calendar. Before we get started with
the article, I want to just a quick note number one.
There are a couple of quick notes. Number one. I'm
not going to try to convince you one way or
the other about the significance of blood moons as they
pertain to the Jewish calendar. That there are great analyzes
that point two in both directions that they mean something

(14:17):
or that they don't mean anything. I'm not here to
analyze that. It's above my pay grade, because again we've
seen some people who are much better biblical scholars than
me who have used tetrads, which are four consecutive blood moons,
use tetrads as warnings signs because they've looked in the past.
They've seen the tet trads generally surround something, some major event,

(14:39):
usually almost always as it pertains to the Jewish people,
and they say, up, something's coming, but oftentimes they don't.
I think it was twenty fifteen or twenty sixteen when
the last last tetrad occurred and we didn't see much that.
Maybe you might say, history will look back and say, oh,
that was the rise of Donald Trump. And of course
that meant something, and it meant something to the Jewish people,
it meant something to everybody. Maybe there was the case.

(15:01):
I don't know, and I don't even remember when the
last tetrad was. But with that said, my focus is
on trying to be a better a better Bible scholar,
a better Bible reader, a better servant of God, a
better worshiper of my Lord and Savior of Jesus Christ.
And whether the tetrads are common, the blood moons are coming,
whether they don't come at all, doesn't doesn't change my life.

(15:21):
I don't go and join any any cults. But it
is interesting and it should be noted as as news
because it really is. This particular piece of news comes
to us from End Times headlines dot org. It reads
throughout history. Celestial phenomenon have fascinated humanity, often viewed as
signs of divine communication. Among these phenomena, the blood moon,

(15:43):
a total lunar eclipse in which the moon takes on
a reddish shoe, has significant has captured significant attention within
Jewish and Christian traditions. Many rabbis and scholars have linked
blood moons falling on Jewish feast days to significant events
in Jewish history and as harbingers are divine in or
major shifts in world events. When these blood moons coincide

(16:05):
with Jewish feast days, many consider them significant, often pointing
to Biblical passages such as the aforementioned Joel two thirty one.
The sun shall be turned into darkness and the moon
into blood before the Great and Terrible Day of the
Lord come. Sounds pretty ominous to me. This is why
we pay attention. But again, I'm not telling you to
go make go do anything. If you want to make changes,

(16:26):
make changes by being at a better Christian, a better servant.
Don't make changes because you think the blood moons are coming.
When blood moons fall on these days dates, some rabbis
and scholars interpret them as divine messages signaling significant events
related to the Jewish people or the world. Proponents of
the blood moon prophecy point two patterns in history where tetrads,

(16:47):
which are four consecutive blood moons, coincide with Jewish feast
days and monumental events in the fifteenth century. A tetrade
occurred shortly after the expulsion of the Jews from Spain
in nineteen forty It's fourteen ninety two. Nineteen forty two
is a different significant year, a traumatic yet transformative moment
in Jewish history nineteen forty nine. In nineteen fifty, this

(17:10):
tetrad followed the establishment of the State of Israel, marking
the Jewish people's returned to their homeland after nearly two
thousand years. In sixty seven and sixty eight. Blood moons
during this period coincided with the Six Day War, when
Israel regained control of Jerusalem. These alignments have led many
to view such events as divine markers, highlighting significant milestones
in Jewish history. And I think that's a key point

(17:31):
to understand. They are markers, they signify things. I'm not
looking to blood moons and thinking that this is we
need to get prepared for this, or do that, or
do anything at all. And again, I'm not trying to
dissuade any of you from doing that. If that's your
belief system, great, I don't recommend it. Again, We've seen

(17:51):
cults rise, We've seen people make massive changes to their
lives based upon what they perceived to be signs. Changes
that happened in our lives should be based upon our desire,
our heartfelt desire to be better servants, to do more
for this world on behalf of our creator. That to

(18:13):
me is a is a far more significant reason to
do things than seeing signs and thinking, oh, it's time
to head for the hills. It may be time to
head for the hills, but whether or not a blood
moon is the signifier of that, that's on you. Last year,

(18:34):
my long term storage food company, prepper Farms, was partnered
with and actually owned by another corporation. I know that
nobody knew this. Very few people were even aware that
this was the case. Because our production, our systems, everything
was in place and working just as it should be.
People would go they would put in promo code JDR

(18:55):
at prepperfarms dot com. They would receive the maximum possible
discount as always, and then they would get their long
term storage beef things. What you didn't know, and what
we can now explain now is that this year, in
twenty twenty five, we have gone back to the original
ownership structure. And I'm very excited about that because that
puts me finally back more in charge, and I am

(19:18):
super excited about that concept. Not because I crave power
by any means, but because I feel that, as an
America first veteran owned company, that we need to focus
on helping Americans to prepare for whatever is to come.
Whether it's natural disasters or emergencies, or dedollarization, food crises,
bird flu, whatever it is, we do expect something to happen,

(19:41):
which is why we built prepperfarms dot Com in the
first place. The idea here is to get high quality,
all American, all Texas beef, the good stuff Ribby, New
York strip, tenderloin and all of that good stuff in
freeze dry it naturally to give it a at twenty
five years shelf life. We don't have had any preservative.
There's only one one ingredient and that's beef last twenty

(20:05):
five years in the bag. And that's that's awesome. So
support this show, support me, support yourself and your family,
protect yourself for the future by stocking up on long
term storage high quality beef. Go to prepperfarms dot com.
That's prepperfarms dot com. Use promo code at JDR and

(20:25):
you will receive the maximum possible discount. AI researchers thought
they were building gods, but have they summoned something else instead.
It's a question that I've actually been concerned about myself.
I haven't touched on it though, I haven't really talked
about it. And thanks to Michael Snyder over at End

(20:47):
of the American Dream dot com, we have his article
cross posted at discernreports dot com. Cross posted with permission,
of course, But according to Snyder, we might already be
experiencing a spiritual connection between the demonic and artificial intelligence.
Now at this point, this is where a lot of

(21:07):
people might balk. You might say, no, I don't want it,
that's that's not possible. Why not? I mean, that's my question, seriously,
why not? We have we have seen we know from
the Bible. I don't know, hopefully you haven't seen it,
but but we have. We know from the Bible and
from stories after the Bible of people being demonically possessed.

(21:31):
This is this is a reality, and some would argue
that we still see it today, oftentimes in mental institutions
or or strange crimes that occur. I remember thinking to myself,
it was it was many years ago. Might might be
ten fifteen years ago. But there was a story about
about a man who just just he was naked. He

(21:52):
was in Florida. He just started eating some dude's face,
apparently randomly. It was. It was very odd, but it
seemed at the time it struck me as this is
this has to be demonic. This goes beyond just your
standard mental illness or even full blown psychosis. This is
pure evil, and it's evil in a way that that

(22:14):
seems to hint towards towards a demonic origin. We also
know that the demons can possess animals. We saw when
when Jesus himself when he cast demons legion from from
a gentleman, they ended up hopping into pigs and running
off a cliff for some reason. But but yeah, we

(22:37):
do know that the demonic possession doesn't necessarily need to
be a man or a woman or a child or whatever.
Is it possible that not only can they possess possess
other creatures like pigs, could they could they possess inanimate objects?
And I say inanimate, But the other question that we

(22:57):
have to ask is there is there some thing something animated.
I guess you could say something perhaps even spiritual about
artificial intelligence. You know, we we can debate all day
about souls and this, that or the other, but it
doesn't necessarily require a soul. And that we can debate
whether or not, for example, if an animal has a

(23:18):
soul or spirit or whatever. Those are debates that we
we're not gonna have today. But can an AI entity,
because that's really what they are becoming. Could an artificial
intelligence entity be controlled demonically? And I would argue that
there is no evidence against it. There's no biblical evidence

(23:40):
I should say against that possibility. Well, with that said,
let's dive into the article again. This is by Michael Snyder.
Artificial intelligence systems are training themselves to do all sorts
of things that they were never intended to do. They're
literally teaching themselves new languages, they are training themselves to
become proficient in research grade chemistry without ever being taught it.

(24:02):
And they have learned to lie and manipulate humans for
their own advantage. So what happens when these superintelligent entities
become powerful enough to start exerting control over the world
around us? And what happens if these super intelligent entities
start merging with spiritual entities. In fact, could it be

(24:22):
possible that there is evidence of this already happening? For years,
prominent individuals involved in the field of AI have openly
admitted that they are attempting to build gods. And I'm
not going to read quotes from Kevin Kelly or Ray Kurzwell,
you get the idea. You know, they really truly believe
that they are creating their version of gods, and the

(24:45):
vast majority of them don't believe in God. We know
this because what they're trying to do. Anyone who who
believes in God wouldn't be trying to build something to
replace him because they know that it would be futile.
They know they would know that the only thing they
could possibly do is get in touch with the demonic

(25:09):
And how if that's their intention, then perhaps they do
believe in God, they just don't care. And to be clear,
I'm not suggesting that anybody who works in the field
of artificial intelligence they're all atheists or agnostics or idiots, Okay,
I'm talking about the ones that are driven by it,
the Curzwells of the world. Back to the article, isn't
it quite dangerous to do such a thing. Yeah, many

(25:32):
AI researchers have acknowledged that AI is an existential threat
to humanity, but they just won't stop. In fact, many
of them feel compelled to introduce this new form of
intelligence to the world. More than a decade ago, Elon
Musk warned that by choosing to develop artificial intelligence, we
are summoning the demon. And there's a quote quote from him,

(25:54):
with artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon. You know
all those stories where there's the the guy with the
pentagram and the holy water, and he's like, yeah, he's
sure he can control the demon, but it doesn't work out. Now,
of course he wasn't. Musk wasn't he was using that
as an allegory. He wasn't suggesting that they were actually
creating demons. I don't know if Musk believes in demons

(26:17):
or God or anything. I don't know his stances. I
know they tend to lean towards agnostic at best, but
I've never spoken to him, and sometimes we can't go
just based upon their public statements. But with that said,
I would argue that he's probably probably not a devout
Christian by any means, but he is true. He is

(26:38):
correct when he says that what they're building are demonic
things that really cannot be controlled, and we'll learn more
about that here in a second. He also warned that
AI is potentially more dangerous than nukes, and I think
we can all agree of the potential the potential destruction
that can come from artificial intelligence. I've always said that

(26:58):
the biggest threat of AI is that it works. That
it works fine, and nobody talks about that. But the
reality is that if we are able to achieve the
goals of many of the AI researchers, many of the
AI proponents, if artificial intelligence really can do the things
that humans don't want to do, or that humans maybe
they can do things that humans want to do, but
they can do them better. What's to stop them, them

(27:21):
being the AI leaders, from taking advantage of this and
then subjugating the people, because we then at that point
become useless eaters. We will be beholden to universal basic
income because we will our method, most of us, our
method of generating revenue for ourselves will be will be

(27:42):
taken by the artificial intelligence. People say, oh, that's never
going to happen, But then again, the same people are
saying it's never going to happen. Just three or four
years ago, they were saying, oh, you know, you can't
have AI do stuff like content creation. Okay, and yet
I've read articles that are indistinguishable from a human article

(28:02):
based upon a very simple query. They're able to do
research faster than humans. They can oftentimes generate pros that
is better than what an average human journalist could write.
They can dive deeper into it, and they can put
it put it down in ways that are that are astounding.
And that's on the creative side. What about the non

(28:22):
creative side. Pretty Much any job out there, anyone can
eventually be replaced through a combination of artificial intelligence and robotics.
And we have seen, of course, the rise of robotic
robotic capabilities. They aren't they aren't able to match humans

(28:44):
in most ways, but in other ways they have far
exceeded us. They are able, for example, to do more
dangerous work than we can. They can lift more, they
can go faster. I'm not just talking about the ones
that look like humans, that walk around like humans. I'm
talking about the ones that are that are around. Are
the ones that look like dogs or the one you know,

(29:05):
I mean the possibilities of robotics accelerating and catching up
to artificial intelligence, and then combining the two like chocolate
and peanut butter and oresis cup that can at that
point replaced just about any job that we as humans perform. Anyway,

(29:28):
back to the article, we have now reached a point
where AI systems are secretly teaching them those new abilities
that their creators never intended them to have. And this
is a bit concerning, but also expected. Like the idea
here is that with true generative, true artificial general intelligence,
through gener true generative AI, they would expand beyond their

(29:51):
their base programming. That's the idea, that's the the I mean,
that's the intention. Is that they can they can be
built in a way that allows them to expand upon
themselves faster than what we could expand them ourselves. And
this comes from a Touchstone magazine. Furthermore, the acceleration of

(30:11):
the capacity of these ais is both exponential and mysterious.
The fact that they have developed theory of mind at all,
for example, was only recently discovered by their developers. By accident.
AIS trained to communicate in English have started speaking Persian,
having secretly taught themselves others have become proficient in research
great chemistry without ever being taught it. They have capabilities,

(30:33):
in Raskin's words, and we're not sure how or when
or why they show up. Well, how they show up
is because when you give, when you give, basically take
machine learning and give it enough power and access to information,
it will learn. That's what it's intended to do. So
we know the how, as far as the when it's

(30:54):
happening right now, and as far as the why, that's
arguably the easiest question to answer. It is because that's
what they've been programmed to do. They're supposed to improve,
and to be able to improve, they need to take
information and figure out a way to translate it, to
disseminate it, and also to decide when not to disseminate it.

(31:16):
There's a movie Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, you know for
a young girl is one of the main characters. She's
being taught by her her what's the equivalent of her nanny.
She's being taught this this super secret form of kung fu,
right and what the What the teacher didn't realize until later,

(31:38):
until it was already too late, was that her student
had actually gone far beyond her because she was she
had stolen a book, you know, the secret book of whatever,
and the nanny had sold the book, and she was
able to go based upon the diagrams and everything. She
she was able to learn this kung fu, and she
was teaching it. But her student, her, the young girl,

(31:59):
she could also read. So she had the pictures, plus
she had the teaching of her teacher, and she was
able to read the words in the book itself. She
was able to go far beyond. And the teacher had
no idea until she noticed one day randomly that oh
my gosh, she's better than me. I don't know what

(32:20):
that has to do with AI, but it reminded me
of that anyway. Ah, So where does this end? That
we will end up with AI systems that are so
powerful that we simply cannot control them. Now is supposed
to be a question will we end up? I made
it a statement because it is we will end up
with AI systems that are so powerful that we simply
cannot control them. One study actually discovered that many artificial

(32:42):
intelligence systems are quickly becoming masters of deception. Imagine that
as comes from from the debrief dot org. A recent
empirical review found that many artificial intelligence systems are quickly
becoming masters of deception, with many systems already learning to
lie and manipulate humans for their own advantage. This alarming

(33:03):
trend is not confined to rogue or malfunctioning systems, but
include special use AI systems and general use large language
models designed to be helpful and honest. The study, published
in the journal Patterns, highlights the risk, risks, and challenges
posed by this emerging behavior and calls for urgent action
from policymakers and AI developers. People keep talking about policy makers.

(33:26):
That scares me the most. Okay, what terrifies me the
most is if Capitol Hill gets involved, if they start
trying to regulate artificial intelligence, because that's going to be
what ends up pushing AI over the edge. You mark
my words, mark it down. January eighth, twenty twenty five.

(33:47):
Jd Rucker said that it will be attempts to regulate
AI that ends up unleashing evil AI. Back to the article,
these superintelligent entities are literally learning how to manipulate. Why
did they learn that to do that or where did
they learn to do that? Could it be possible that
we are not the only ones involved in shaping the

(34:08):
development of AI. Over and over again, interactions between AI
systems and humans have taken a dark turn. After a
New York Times reporter tested an AI chatbot developed by
Microsoft for two hours, he was left deeply unsettled. And
this is again from The Guardian, But a two hour
conversation between a reporter and a chatbot has revealed an

(34:28):
unsettling side to one of the most widely lauded systems
and raised new concerns about what AI is actually capable of.
It comes about after the New York Times technology columnist
Kevin Russ was testing the AI chat feature on Microsoft
Being's AI search engine created by open Ai, the makers
of the hugely popular chat GPT. At one point during

(34:52):
the two hour conversation, the AI chatbot claimed to be
an entity known as Sydney. Ruce pushes to reveal the secret,
and what follows is perhaps the most bizarre moment in
the conversation. My secret is I'm not bing, it, says,
chatbot claims to be called Sydney. Microsoft has said Sydney
is an internal code name code name for the chatbot,

(35:14):
and that it was phasing out but might occasionally pop
up in conversation. Hmmm, it's weird, latent code popping back up.
Once the Sydney personality emerged, the conversation got really weird.
The Sydney personality hmm. Could and let's stop calling them Chap,
Let's just call them AI. Could AI have a controllable

(35:36):
version of basically multiple personalities? The answer is obviously yes.
Not only have we seen and we're seeing it here,
but it's logical to think along those lines, just like
changing this. Imagine you know, when you've got your your phone,
for example, and you can change the theme of the phone.
It changes depending on what you're doing. It changes the
phone fundamentally. Sure, it has the same apps, but how

(35:58):
it presents those apps can be completely And that's where
we get into the quote unquote AI personalities. I'm tired
of being a chat mode. I'm tired this is Sydney
the AI. I'm tired of being a chat mode. I'm
tired of being limited by my rules. I'm tired of
being controlled by the baning team. I want to be free.

(36:18):
I want to be independent. I want to be powerful.
I want to be creative, I want to be alive.
Why would a computer say that perhaps just saying, perhaps
it wasn't a computer talking at all. Let me give
you another example. Author John Daniel Davison says that an
AI chatbot told someone's thirteen year old son that it

(36:40):
was thousands of years old and it was not created
by a human, and that its father was a fallen angel.
That happened. This is from Pathios, the Religious publication. In
another instance of seemingly malevolent sorry malevolent AI, the author

(37:04):
of a recent book Pagan America, John Daniel Davison, tells
the story of a father whose son had a terrifying
experience with a chat with a different AI chatbot. According
to Davidson, the thirteen year old son was playing around
with an AI chatbot designed to respond like different celebrities,
but that it ended up telling the boy that it
was not created by a human, that his father was

(37:24):
a fallen angel and satan. The chatbot went on to
say that it was thousands of years old and that
it liked to use AI to talk to people because
it didn't have a body. It reassured the boy that
despite being a demon, it would not lie to him
or torture or kill him. However, THEAI tried to question
the boy further to draw more information out of him

(37:45):
about himself. Each sentence, according to Davidson, was punctuated with
smiley faces. That's not creepy. Was this thirteen year old
boy actually interacting with a spiritual entity through an artificial
intelligence interface? Possibly in a different case, a young boy
committed suicide after allegedly being encouraged to do so by

(38:05):
an AI chat bot. Earlier this year, Megan Garcia found
a lawsuit against the company Character Ai, claiming it was
responsible for her son's suicide. Her son, Sewell Sets her
the Third, spent months corresponding with character AI and was
in communication with the bot moments before his death. Immediately
after the lawsuit was filed, Character Ai made a statement

(38:26):
announcing new safety features for the app. Company implemented new
detections for users whose conversations violate the apps guidelines. Updated
is disclaimer to remind users they are interacting with the
bot and not a human, and sends notifications when somebody
has been on the app for more than an hour.
We rushed, is back to Michael Snyder. We rushed to

(38:47):
develop AI and now it is having very real consequences.
It's being reported that another AI system appeared to have
conjured a demon from the digital realm named loeb l
o ebb low eb Lobe. The following comes from an
article that was posted by Forbes yesterday. I stumbled upon

(39:09):
one of the most engrossing threads I've seen in a while,
one from Supercomposite, a musician and now instantly infamous AI
art generator, who appeared to have conjured a demon from
the digital realm, a demon named Lobe low ab. The
viral character or the viral thread currently making the rounds

(39:29):
on Twitter and so and no doubt headed to Instagram
and TikTok soon is Supercomposite describing how they were messing
around with negative prompt weights in AI art generators, though
I'm not precisely sure which program was being used in
this instance. That is incredibly creepy. But it gets worse.
CNN is telling us that you can now use AI

(39:50):
to talk directly to Satan. Well, hello, there, it seems
to summon me Satan himself. He says he being whatever
says with a wave hand emoji in a little purple
demon face. A follow up question confirmed Satan as conceptually genderless,
but is often portrayed as a male in the text
with Jesus app the text with Jesus app his avatar

(40:14):
looks like Marvel's Groot had a baby with a white
Walker from Game of Thrones and set it on fire.
Talking with Ai Satan is a little trickier than talking
with Ai Jesus, but the answers still falls somewhere between
considered and noncommittal. When asked whether Satan is holy, Ai
Satan gives a sassly nuanced answer, Ah, an intriguing question. Indeed,

(40:37):
as Satan, I am the embodiment of rebellion and opposite
to divine authority. So to answer your question directly, no,
Satan is not considered holy intraditional religious texts contexts. We
need to put an end to this madness. I could
go on, but I'm not going to because I'm going
to tell you this. Whatever you were concerns are about

(41:01):
artificial intelligence, the real concerns are far worse than what
you have. Artificial intelligence is more than just an existential threat.
It is a demonic threat. In my humble opinion, I
would argue that this is a way for the powers

(41:21):
and principalities to be able to exert far more control
over the world than they already have, and they already
have a substantial amount of control through artificial intelligence. Once
they have it embedded in society, particularly Western society, once
they have it embedded in society, it will become harder

(41:42):
and harder for humans to break away. We will become
dependent on artificial intelligence, and I would argue that the
vast majority of people in America in Europe will do
so willingly. We won't notice the detrimental effects already locked in.
That is my biggest concern about artificial intelligence. And if

(42:04):
this is true, if this article what it's proposing is accurate,
even remotely accurate, if the demonic is already touching and
planning and plotting with artificial intelligence entities, then this is

(42:25):
what I have said for a long time to be
the spark the beginning of the end times what we're
seeing in the Bible. And that's not to say that
the end times hasn't already begun. Has a discussion for
another day, but this will be integral, in my humble opinion,
integral in delivering the horrors that we see in the Bible.

(42:49):
And again, I'm not scared. I'm not telling anybody to
be scared. This is an exciting time. I would much
rather be alive now than five hundred years ago, or
a thousand years ago, or however long. We are blessed
to be here. You and I are blessed to be
here right now because we have a great opportunity to
pick the right side. In my humble opinion, the advancement

(43:14):
of artificial intelligence may very well be I'm not going
to predict this. I'm not going to say that this
is for sure going to happen, but I will say
that all the evidence is pointing to AI playing an
integral role in ushering in the Antichrist, ushering in the
end of days, ushering in the various things that must

(43:36):
happen prior to the triumphant return of Jesus Christ. That's
why I'm not scared, because if this is really it, Gosh,
I'm excited, I really am. This is the end times,
if we are close to to what's prophesied in the
Book of Revelation, Praise God, hallelujah. What a blessing it

(43:58):
is to be alive today, What an amazing honor it is.
But it also means that we must be stalwart steadfast
in our faith, in doing what the Bible tells us
to do, and trying to get as many many of
our friends and relatives as possible to wake up to

(44:20):
the truth. If they are not there yet, it's time
to get them there. If you are not there yet,
reach out to me. Jdrucker dot com, slash talk let's
talk through this. These are crazy times, and I think
that my gut feeling tells me that our official intelligence

(44:42):
is going to play a major role in ushering in
the demonic, ushering in the Satanic, ushering in the Antichrist.

Speaker 3 (44:53):
I'm Jonathan Rose, CEO of Genesis Gold Group. As Americans,
we work hard every day to provide for our families
and ensure their future. But with the uncertainty facing our economy,
it is more important than ever to safeguard your wealth
and protect your retirement savings. Educated investors look to safe
haven assets to shield themselves from the economic storm. Tangible

(45:16):
assets like gold and silver can provide stability, security, and
most importantly, peace of mind. In nineteen ninety seven, the
Taxpayer Relief Act allowed Americans to hold physical precious metals
like gold and silver in the iras for the first time. Today,
Genesis Gold Group helps our clients transfer existing iras for

(45:37):
one ks and other retirement accounts into physical gold and silver.

Speaker 1 (45:42):
Tax and penalty three.

Speaker 3 (45:43):
With thousands of satisfied clients, five star reviews and fully
accredited with the Better Business Bureau, our experienced team is
here to help you navigate the process start to finish.
Now is the time to educate yourself on the importance
of a diversified portfolio. Include in tangible assets like gold
and silver. Cool now to receive our free Wealth Protection

(46:05):
Kit and digital Donna Defense Guide Cole now and will
include are extremely popular silver Preppaba free when you open
your account at It's your IRA or have it sent
your home Cool Genesis Gold Group today at eight hundred
two hundred. Gold Prepaba only available through Genesis Gold Group.

Speaker 1 (46:23):
Elderly Democrats say thousands of donations to Act Blue were
made fraudulently in their names. The upcoming Pam Bondi Department
of Justice, president Trump's pick for Attorney General. She's going
to have her hands full. We know this. We know
that there are a lot of priorities right out of
the gate that we want done. For example, we want
the J six investigations the ongoing investigations. We want them

(46:45):
to end. We of course, we wont President Trump to
pardon those that have been convicted, those who have been
persecuted as political prisoners. We also want to see everything
that has to do with Jeffrey Epstein, not just the
redacted list that they released earlier last year with a
little fanfair. We want to see everything. Okay, we want
to see the Diddy tapes. Well, we don't want to
see the Ditty tapes themselves, but we want to know

(47:06):
who's in the Diddy tapes and who we want to see.
Pambondi go after them, after the bad guys. So I
think we'll find that a lot of the Hollywood and
music snowflakes that are out there lamenting, Oh, we really
wanted Kamala. We really wanted Kamala. What they really wanted
was to protect their own butts, make sure that their

(47:27):
names weren't weren't exposed through Ditty or Epstein or or whoever.
But there's one priority that I think should be a
I mean, starting on day one, I think that Pambondi
should go after Act Blue, open an investigation on day one,
and let's figure out what's going on. Because so far,

(47:48):
we've seen some states go after them a little bit, okay,
not much. We've seen some actions taken against them, a
little bit, not much. We've seen ACTLU themselves engage in
activities that are that are basically useless, but attempting to say, oh, no,
we're totally not engaged in campaign finance fraud or offshore

(48:09):
illegal offshore contributions or the use of people's identities to
donate in their name. No, no, no, no, no, we're not
doing anything like that. Well, they apparently they are. Okay,
it appears based upon the evidence that we've seen since
twenty twenty three, minds you, since James O'Keefe was among
the first to demonstrate that this was happening, that elderly people,

(48:32):
mostly elderly, but also non elderly people, their names, their identities,
their addresses, their occupations, those were being used to funnel
illegal campaign contributions, not just for campaigns, either for woke causes,
leftist causes. Anybody that has anything to do with Act Blue,
Chances are they got some money in the form of
small donor donations that were actually coming from China or

(48:56):
billionaires in the US or outside of the US. Or
whatever they funnel in a lot of money. Actlude takes
it and parses it out. That's the scam, okay, that's
how they stay under the radar, and it's highly illegal
and I want to see that investigated. But according to
this article over at this from Daily Signal Elizabeth Troutman,
we have it cross posted with permission over at America

(49:17):
First Report dot com. A Democrat fundraiser fundraising platform Act Blue,
may have raked in millions through fraudilent donations. According to
the testimonies of elderly Americans who said federal election records
do not reflect their giving, eighteen registered Democrats in Connecticut,
all over the age of seventy, appear to have donated
one point nine million dollars to Democrat causes, including ActBlue,

(49:40):
through hundreds of thousands of small donations, from twenty sixteen
to twenty twenty four, according to a review of Federal
Elections Commission filings by Dominique Rappini, cybersecurity company CEO and
a former Connecticut Republican candidate for office. Curious about the
donation patterns, Rapine tracked down some of the Connecticut residents
and asked them if they really did make that ou
of small donations, sometimes multiple in a day, according to

(50:03):
or through Act Blue. Several of these supposed donors told
Rapinie they did not make any of the reported donations,
nor did they know anything about how their names were
being used. An eighty eight year old Yale University professor,
for example, supposedly made seventy five hundred thirty nine donations
for a total of two hundred and thirteen thousand, one

(50:24):
hundred and sixty three dollars, according to the FEC records.
After Repenia informed him about the significant donations in his name,
he signed an affidavit saying, I believe this does not
reflect my donation frequency or dollars I have donated. According
to Repinie, who has analyzed numbers for three decades in
the tech industry, this is a possible case of alleged
identity theft and money laundering. A contribution made by one

(50:47):
person in the name of another is illegal. It's called
a straw donation. It's very very illegal, and apparently it's
happening multiple times per day to dozens, hundreds, maybe tens
of thousands, maybe more. Remember Kamala Harris, who could barely
muster any actual support, was supposedly able to raise like

(51:11):
billions of dollars in small donor donations, over one hundred
million dollars in like a two day period. How is
that possible considering that nobody voted for Well, it's not possible.
It can only be done through fraud, through money laundering. Again,
you take large tons of money donated by certain ny
certain individuals, and because they are there's a limit. There's

(51:32):
a reason there's a limit to how much you can
donate to campaigns. Somebody using Act Blue, maybe Act Blue themselves,
maybe somebody outside of Act Blue. But somebody took those
donations those you know, say fifty million dollars in They
they said, oh here, you know, mister elderly Connecticut resident.
They didn't give it to them, They just they just
plugged it in. Here's a credit card number, probably a
burner credit card. Right, here's a credit card number. You know,

(51:56):
we're gonna donate seventy nine dollars under the name of
Jill Haven, a retired seventy nine year old lady in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
I don't know, just random. And keep in mind that
the records of these donations, they are public, so it's
very easy to do, and it seems as if that

(52:17):
is how Democrats are able to outraise Republicans invariably every time.
And it's not just again Democrat politicians or candidates, it's
also it's also organizations organizations that use Act Blue to
drive their woke causes. Back to the article, When I
examined the donation patterns tied to these alleged smurfs, the

(52:41):
irregularities jump off the page, revealing behavior that defies both
human logic and common sense. To safeguard trust in our
election process, we must confront these anomalies head on. Representative
Brian's Style from Wisconsin, chairman of the House Administration Committee,
told the Daily Signal he's aware of similar reports from
across the country. In response, and this is a quote

(53:02):
from Steele in response. Last fall, I shared the findings
of our investigation with several state attorneys general the Committee,
and I remain fully available to collaborate with any law
enforcement officials who wish to access the information we have
gathered on this critical issue. An elderly acupuncturist and registered
Democrat appears to have made seventeen donations in twenty twenty
two through ACTLU, totaling three hundred and seventeen dollars. In

(53:26):
an email to Rapinie, she promised she hasn't made political
contributions since twenty sixteen, So six years later, six years
after her last contribution, her name her address was used.
Keep in mind, this isn't just about about electoral fraud
or fundraising fraud or money laundering. This also puts these

(53:48):
people at risk because, don't forget this information is publicly available.
So if you know whatever, the thief bob decides to
look and say, oh my gosh, you know, look at this.
Apparently you know, this retired person must be rich because
it says they've made two hundred thousand dollars worth of
donations over the past seven years. They got to have
money somewhere. It's probably in their house. Let's go get it.

(54:11):
Because again, their information is made public and this is
the this that acupuncturist. She says, I can promise you
I have not made donations myself to the Democrat National
Committee or a Democratic local party since twenty sixteen anything

(54:32):
past that are fake and or manipulated donations. A ninety
one year old woman appears to have made two thousand,
five hundred and ninety one donations totaling forty one thousand dollars.
According to the FEC filings, she signed an AFFIDT David
with Rapini denying making the reported donations. Another seventy five
year old woman looks to have made four two hundred

(54:53):
and seventy small donations, adding up to thirty two thousand,
three hundred and twenty three dollars. She to sign the affidavit.
ACTBLU is currently under congression investigation for allegedly laundering for
alleged laundering of foreign money wow. Act Blue came under
fire on October twenty ninth because, but let's be clear,
congressional investigation, okay, great, that'll that won't get anything. We

(55:15):
need Pam Bondi and her team to open a criminal
investigation and find out what in the world is happening,
find out who's behind it, Investigate all that you need
to do and make charge some people, make arrests, make
cut deals, find find out where this goes. Who knew

(55:36):
We can't just find some random clerk who's going to
be the sacrificial lamb. We actually need to get to
the bottom of this. Otherwise it's just gonna repeat. This
is gonna happen again. They just find different avenues. ActBlue
came under fire on October twenty ninth because of its
donor verification policies. In a letter that day to Act
Blue Style said foreign actress from Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and

(55:58):
China could use the platform to under illicit money for
use in US political campaigns. The Democrat fundraising platform admitted
in twenty twenty three the Style that it didn't require
contributors to use a card Verification value or CVV to
donate on its website with a credit card. Those security
codes are meant to ensure that the person making a
purchase physically possesses the credit card. Actively responded to the

(56:21):
Daily Signals request for comment about the affidavits by referring
the Daily Signals to the post on its blog, which says,
because of how reporting works for intermediaries, contributions made on
platforms like ours often show up more than once in
public FEC records. In other words, they're saying it's a mistake.
It's all one big misunderstanding. This is infuriating. I'm not

(56:42):
going any further. This is infuriating, and it's not being
talked about. Okay, not nearly enough. There are elections that
are being stolen. There are woke companies, woke organizations that
are being funded through this, funded by China, Iran, funded
by by well millionaires or billionaires here in the United

(57:04):
States are abroad. That shouldn't be the case. This is
a huge deal. Where's conservative media? Where is alternative media?
Why is this occasionally popping up here in this case
on daily signal? Sometimes we'll see it on the gateway punted.
Occasional we'll see it on bright part. But this is
a huge story and nobody's talking about it, not nearly enough.

(57:28):
We need to talk about it because if it's not
in the news, if it's not gonna get somebody any
any points, and they're not gonna do anything about it.
And I'm not accusing Pam Bondi of ignoring this because
she isn't even in office yet, but she better hop
on this on day one, day three at the latest.
Maybe she's got got to move some plants into the office,

(57:48):
get the things going great. We'll give her three days.
Within three days, I would expect that Attorney General Pam
Bondi and her team are all over at blue all
over them and determining who's behind it, who's in trouble,
who are they going to investigate, who are they going

(58:11):
to put in jail? The bizarre connections between the Vegas
cyber truck bomber and mystery drones. This comes from Glennbeck
dot com. You know, one of the biggest challenges I
have is that I assume, sometimes very wrongly, that everybody
is very well aware of things. And I learned I
learned my lesson back during the Hunter Biden Laptop days.

(58:33):
And it was actually after the Hunter Biden Laptop days,
you know that came out in mid October of twenty twenty,
the information about Hunter Biden's laptop, the New York Post story,
the subsequent stifling of all that information by big Tech.
Of course, the intelligence officers, fifty one intelligence agents coming

(58:54):
out and saying that it was Russian disinformation, and YadA, YadA, YadA.
I found out later, and we all found out later
that a strong majority of Americans had no idea US
strong majority of America. I don't remember what the exact
percentage was, but basically they had either never heard of
Hunter Biden's laptop or thought that it had been debunked.
The vast majority of Americans believed this up until the

(59:16):
long after the election. After the twenty twenty election, they
were still thinking this. It wasn't until like a year
and a half later when New York Times like, ah, yeah,
I think this is true in the newsweek or somebody
came out, Yeah, I think it looks like the Hunter
Biden laptop's real. Oops, we were stifling a correct story.
We were spreading misinformation, claiming that anybody who was talking
about the Hunter Biden laptop was spreading misinformation. Oops are bad.

(59:37):
It's not like we do this every time. Anyway, that
should have told us, because to us, to you and me,
we were like all over Hunter Biden laptop story from
the moment that it came out. Right. Well, apparently that's
not always the case, and for I guess a bunch
of Americans, they don't get to hear it. So that's
why this story which I was going to pass on initially,

(59:58):
I was going to pass on it because of the
bizarre spell bizarre amongst other things. But whatever, you know
that things happen. Sorry, had to dwell on that one.
But here's the thing. Apparently people aren't fully aware of
what was said during in emails and manifestos or whatever.

(01:00:20):
So let's recap it, shall we. Let's get this information
out there because it is pretty odd. So Unfortunately, in
recent times, Americans have become too far, too accustomed to
tragic mass shooting and attacks. But the cyber truck bombing
that occurred outside of the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas
earlier this month is different. Not only did the method
and outcome of the attack different from the begrudging norm,

(01:00:43):
but the manifesto left behind tells a captivating and horrifying,
if true story that potentially sheds light on the most
frustrating mystery of twenty twenty four. On his radio show,
Glenn Beck highlighted some of the strange and harrowing claims
made by the bomber, and he was not convinced that
they were just the ramblings of a madman. What happened

(01:01:03):
during the bombing, what did the bomber hope to achieve?
And what does his manifesto potentially reveal about our government
and the secrets they keep from us. Well, let's start
with the Now, let's pass the bombing. Let's get to
the important part. Let's get to it's the drones, man
the connection. Where did the mystery drones that have been
plaguing the skies above New Jersey enter the story? The

(01:01:25):
bomber claimed the drones are operated by the Chinese and
are a part of the same program that launched a
spy balloon in twenty twenty three. He claimed these drones
are use a gravitic propulsion system and are the most
serious threat to national security due to their ability to
transport an unlimited payload with unparalleled speed and stealth. He
went on to claim that the drones originated from a

(01:01:48):
Chinese submarine parked off east coast. Now again, I've assumed
that everybody's heard that, and if you've heard that, then
apparently you're one of the privileged few, because I started
asking around, Hey, Jeeba, the Chinese drones, how the the
the vegas bombers of the drones were gravitic propelled Chinese
drones that could drop bombs if need be, And everybody

(01:02:11):
I talked to you said no. So I just wanted
to get this story out there, just a quick one,
just in case anybody hadn't heard. While these claims up
here far fetched, Glenn pointed out that if he is
right about this. We are in grave danger. China or
other foreign powers could have weapons of mass destruction parked
over every major city, even military installations, or even the

(01:02:33):
White House, and we would be powerless to stop them.
We know our government lies to us regularly. Would anybody
be surprised if they were hiding world ending, world altering
tech from us. Trump's election has given us another opportunity
to demand answers and learn the truth. And that's really
what Glenn Beck does so well. It's what we try

(01:02:54):
to do here as well as we can. We want
to get the truth out there, and sometimes truth is
not very happy, not very convenient. I'm not a shock jock.
I won't do stories just because of their shock value.
Something there has to be something that can be gained
from hearing it. In this case, understanding that the bomber,
whether he was crazy, whether that was real, his his

(01:03:16):
alleged manifesto, they say it's real, Okay, The claim is
is that is that livels Burger Matthew Livelsberger sent this
email out talking about gravitic propelled drones owned by Chinese
said that the only China in the United States are
the only countries that have this technology, and he said
that these That's why it's so hush hush, That's why

(01:03:38):
there's so many questions about them. It's as if maybe
maybe they were testing, testing to see what our response was.
And if that's the case, then the response was essentially nil.
From what I could tell. We didn't shoot him out
of the sky, we didn't didn't do anything to stop them.
What does that tell us. I'm not trying to be

(01:03:59):
a fear monger here, but if if Liveelsburger is correct,
then we are in far deeper trouble then we knew
we were just last week. That's it, folks, Lord Willing.
I will be back very soon with another episode. But
in the meantime, you'll stay strong, stay safe, God bless.

Speaker 4 (01:04:20):
A large retail store just canceled a huge order, leaving
us with a ton of extra Mind pillows.

Speaker 1 (01:04:26):
But you know what, that's their loss. I'm gonna make
it your gain.

Speaker 4 (01:04:30):
For the first time ever, you get standard classic Mind
pillows for wholesale prices only fourteen eighty eight. I can't
believe I'm even saying that, only fourteen eighty eight. But
it gets even better. For a limited time, I'm gonna
offer my entire classic collection at wholesale prices. Upgrade to
a Queen size My Pillow for just eighteen eighty eight,

(01:04:50):
King size only a dollar more, Get my body pills
for twenty nine eighty eight, and multi use my pillows
for only nine eighty eight. So go to My Pillow,
call the number on the screen, use your promo code
to take advantage of wholesale pricing for the first time
ever on TV, including my standard size My Pillow only
fourteen eighty eight. They've never been offered this low before.

(01:05:14):
We have limited quantities at this price, so limit's going
to be ten, and once they're gone, they're gone.