Does Donald Trump REALLY Have This Election "In the Bag"?

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Analysts over at Bank of America recently came out with
a report and analysis that says, by gold basically, now,
I'm not a financial advisor, I'm not giving you financial advice,
but I will say this that the prospects of gold
and silver physical precious metals skyrocketing in the near future
seems to be almost foregone conclusion. Again based upon the analysts,

(00:22):
not anything because I'm not an economist or anything like that.
They're saying by gold, they're telling their clients to buy gold.
They're saying that central banks are going to continue to
buy gold, Countries are going to continue to buy gold,
major investors are going to continue to buy gold, and
as a result, it would behoove Americans to buy gold
and silver as much as they can. Physical gold and silver.

(00:42):
You can always just pay cash, or you can roll
over a transfer, your retirement account, your IRA, your four
O one K, your government accounts. Generally speaking, you can
do so tax free if you contact my good friends
over at Genesis Gold Group. They are a faith driven
precious metals company. They do it the right way. You
can check them out and get your free wealth protection

(01:03):
guide by going to rumblegold dot com. But if you
you know, versus just going out and getting that. If
you want to, I would recommend going to jdrucker dot
com slash Gold. Jdrucker dot com slash gold and read
more about my personal experience what I know, what I
learned about the gold industry having been participating in it

(01:25):
for the last few years. There's a reason why after
vetting out thirty two different companies, I came to the
conclusion that the company that I would want to work
with is Genesis Gold Group. So check them out jdrucker
dot com slash gold or rumblegold dot com or both.
Either way, I mean, might as well check out both.
This is important. This is your retirement, this is your

(01:47):
life's savings. Check them out. See why I like Genesis
Gold Group. And it's more than just because they pay
me money trust me. It's a lot more than that.
It's actually because I trust them. You're listening to the

(02:27):
jd Rucker shows, let's begin, It's pretty certain that somebody,
maybe multiple people, maybe a whole lot of you, maybe
all of you, are going to say that I am Chicken,
little doom and gloom, that I should be celebrating and
super happy about the prospects of Donald Trump winning. After all,
there's some reports that are coming out right now as

(02:47):
we speak, just over the weekend, reports coming out that
Trump has like a ninety three percent chance of winning
the Electoral College, allegedly based upon some super awesome, amazing
pollsters that are all right, never wrong, never basing their
work on any agenda, trying to fill anybody with false hope. Look,

(03:09):
I hope I'm wrong. I do, I truly, I absolutely positively.
I'm not one of those guys that would rather be
right than for the best case scenario to happen. I
want to be wrong. But it's funny because we all
know about Pennsylvania, for example, we know the Pennsylvania for
whatever reason, you know, it takes them to four centuries

(03:33):
to count all the votes because they're just the people
that are running the system there are just really stupid
or maybe just maybe being stupid enough to think that
it's going to take them an extended period of time
to count votes, despite the fact that there are bigger

(03:56):
states with less in Pennsylvania that can easily count votes
and have the results available ready to rock and roll
that night, maybe the next day, you know. So it's
funny you got Pennsylvania. Now we're hearing reports out of Georgia,
and it's odd because of course Georgia is another swing state.

(04:20):
Hearing reports out of Georgia, this time from the Republican
Brad Raffensberger, Secretary of State, person who I have said
for a long time, I believe that he is Obviously
he's part of the uniparty swamp. He's definitely a never Trumper,
and he is even though he's a quote unquote Republican.
I believe that he is part of whatever shenanigans take

(04:45):
place on these various election nights. And there's a reason
that he continues to keep his job despite failing at
it miserably. Well. Now he's saying that, you know what
it's going to be few days after after the election.
A few days after so we still got to count,

(05:07):
you know, the ballots that are coming in from from overseas,
from our our military and stuff like that, and then
we'll be able to get about I'm not kidding you,
is what they said. We'll be able to get about
seventy five percent of the vote counted on election I,
but we won't know the other twenty five percent until
two or three four days later. So they're telling me

(05:28):
that twenty five percent of George's population is overseas or
do they just need enough of a cushion in order
to pull whatever Shenan against they have planned. Look, I
am becoming increasingly confident in Trump winning by a landslide

(05:50):
when it comes to the actual legal votes. I mean,
I've always thought he was going to win. I can
sweep Okay, I true. We believe you take the Wokes
leftist state and I think that he can actually win
in any of them. Any even out here in Comedy Fournia,
I think I see more excitement about Donald Trump. And

(06:12):
it's not even close. I see more excitement about Donald
Trump out in public than I do at all about
Kamala Harris. And don't even get me started on Tim Walls.
They love Trump, they love jd. Vance. They don't like
Kamala and or Tim Walls. And again we're talking about Democrats. Okay,
most of the people around me are Democrats. I am

(06:32):
in Comedy Fournia, the state that not only has a
Democrat majority, but it does everything they can to run
out the They tried to run me out for over
a decade now, so I am very supremely confident that
Trump will win as far as the actual numbers. Confident

(06:57):
about is what will happen with votes that shouldn't be counted,
or perhaps votes that should never even be cast, whether
it's you know, dead people, illegal aliens, dogs, okay, who knows.
I don't know what their plans are, but I do
know that they're desperate. I've said it before. There's far
too many people with an extreme amount of personal skin

(07:21):
in the game. Hey, people like Liz Cheney. She doesn't
really like Kamala Harris. She doesn't agree with a single
one of her policies. She might say, oh, but she's
a rhino, She's a rhino, But Kamala's radical, Okay, I mean,
there's nothing that Kamala would ever implement that that even
even Rhino neo Khan's dick and will be like, hmmm,

(07:41):
that sounds interesting. What about abortion up until after birth?
That's you know, I know, I know, I've been pro life,
always pretending to be prolofed my whole life. But uh,
but maybe maybe she's got a point. I mean, they're
not sitting there thinking that. They just are terrified of
what Trump will do to them. They're terrified about what
a Trump administration will find out now that now that

(08:05):
he knows, he's wiser. I mean, a lot of the
stuff was right there for him to figure out, and
you know, from the Obama administration, there was plenty of
for him to dig up. I truly believe that's the
whole reason they went after General Michael Flynn even before
the inauguration. I mean, they were already going after him.
They got Pence say, hey, Pence, you know you gotta

(08:26):
tell Trump to get rid of And that's what happened
in the very early days. Point being, and I'm not
trying to just rant here, point being is that I
am not confident that Trump is what. I'm not gonna
show it on a screen because I don't want you
guys finding it and doing whatever. But it is as

(08:48):
a tweet from a from a leading source for breaking
news on AX and according to this well they have
six hundred thousand followers, says Trump now has a ninety
three point two percent chance of winning the electoral College.
According to RCP and Silver Bulletin Polling, both of which

(09:11):
are respected right at least in the polling world. They
are they're the they're the gold standard, so to speak,
and they're showing electoral college win probability ninety three point
two percent. We should be rejoicing, right, But again, I
have to remind you the forces against Trump, we'll just satan.

(09:39):
The forces against Trump are desperate. We've had an infusion
of tens of millions of illegal aliens. There are reports
that as many as fourteen percent, and I think could
be higher, but fourteen percent of those illegal aliens that
have recently crossed crossed over the last we'll say four years,

(10:04):
the fourteen percent of them have registered to vote. That
should concern us greatly because guess what they might register
to vote, But you know what they don't do. They
don't take polls. They don't they don't get pulled. They're
not getting called by by Nate Silver or Real Clear
Politics or Ras Mussin or New York Times or anybody else.

(10:29):
And if they did get called, they wouldn't accept the poll.
They don't want to. They're not trying to say, well, hi,
I am a Kamala Harris. Support my check, you know,
where's my where's my debit card? You know, got some
medical bills to pay. I've been stuck in this this
super nice hotel for like four months now, and you
guys keep giving us like expensive, high quality food, but

(10:53):
it's getting a little boring. Can we mix in some caviar? Now?
Obviously that's I'm being facetious, but I don't think I'm
very far off from the truth. So yeah, So I'm
not as confident, and I don't want anybody else on
our side to get that confident. Don't get complacent at
this stage in the game. Two weeks left, two weeks

(11:15):
from tomorrow we go to vote. It's funny, I'm seeing
so many of these reports and I get it. Look,
I understand. I've actually I got a little chastise last Yeah,
last week, I got a little chastise by a show
host you're all familiar with, who you know. He called
me up. You know you you keep saying we're going

(11:40):
to lose, and I'm not saying that at all. I said,
they're going to try to steal it. He said, I agree,
but we need to build up And this was the thinking,
and I don't disagree with it, but we need to
build up the confidence in Republican voters because it's human nature,
especially American human nature, to want to be on the

(12:02):
winning side, and if they think that Trump's going to win,
they're going to be more likely to vote. And I said, huh,
I understand what you're saying, and I'm not going to
completely disagree with that notion, but you're talking about a
certain subset. You're not talking about the people that are
sitting there thinking, hmm, Trump's going to win. Okay, well, uh,

(12:27):
looks like we got it in the bag. I mean,
it's ninety three point two percent chance. What are the chances?
Why does my or hey, you know I'm going to
I would vote, but I'm not too concerned about it
because I'm in a state where I'm not in one
of the seventh vote doesn't even matter anyway I want.

(12:53):
And the reason that I am always Debbie Downer apparently
I'm always e or oh bother. The reason that I'm
so negative about this stuff is not because I want
you to think that we're going to lose. I want
you to think that you need to help us win.
I need you to think that and believe that. And
I truly believe this to be the case. That every

(13:17):
single voter counts, that everybody that you can talk to,
who you can get to vote properly, of course legally,
of course, that every single person that you can persuade
to vote is a positive that we poll watchers badly.

(13:38):
And if people are sitting there thinking, oh, you know
what chance, no worries. I don't need to waste my day,
you know. Back, get the barbecue ready and we'll we'll
pop some Bruskis and be ready to celebrate another four
years of Trump making America great again, saving this nation.

(13:58):
You know, maybe I'm feeling kind of spicy. Maybe I'll
go down to McDonald's get some magafries. No, I want
you to be realistic. I don't. I'm not trying to
be negative. I'm looking at this realistically. I'm thinking that
we have tens of millions of illegal aliens, fourteen percent
of whom are able to vote. No measures, and in

(14:23):
any of the important states, there are no measures to
prevent this. Okay, there's no recourse, there's no like. Okay, well,
we can identify which ones are can be attributed to
illegal aliens. That can't happen. There's no way to make
that happen, not in the states that matter. Seeing, on

(14:47):
the other hand, people like Brad Raffinsberger out there doing
whatever they can to set up shenanigans. We just keep
seeing this, and I just keep getting this foreboding feeling
that my guy, this variation of the steel is going

(15:07):
to be far worse than anything we've seen. We're fighting
for the future of this nation, and so no, sorry,
I'm not going to get all super excited about some
polsters saying that Trump's got it in the bag. As
editor of The Liberty Daily and America First Report dot com, everything,

(15:33):
all the headlines, okay, literally thousands per day, I read them,
and of those at least dozens of articles I read them.
I see the sentiment media, and right now there's far
too many of us that are saying we got it
in the bag. It's looking great, it's looking awesome. So

(15:54):
to that show host, who again, I'm not disagreeing with
the concept of the sentiment. And here's the thing. If
we were talking about a free and fair election, I
would be all in for that idea, right, I really would.
We don't have free and fair elections in the United
States of America in twenty twenty four, and if we

(16:16):
lose this election, we're never going to have free and
fair elections ever again. As a matter of fact, we're
never going to have elections ever again. It will be
complete and total globalist control before twenty twenty eight. That's
all there is. It's at stake. So no, I'm not
going to sit here and inhale the hopium. I'm not
going to sit here and tell you guys it's all good,

(16:39):
Everything's going to be fine. That's funny. The show host
that I talked to last week, he was giving me
advice on He was trying to help. I mean, he
wasn't chastising me per se. It was more along the
lines of, hey, you know what, the best way that
you can build your audience up to tens of millions
of subscribers, followers, viewers, listeners, whatever. The best way to

(17:03):
do it is when there's good news, pump that up.
And when there's bad news, you can go and get
negative about it, but always bringing back the good news.
We're in good times. It looks like Trump's gonna win.
We need to be focused on that. And if you
do that, you're your viewership's gonna go up. I can't
do that because I don't believe it to be true.

(17:25):
I don't I'm not saying that Trump's gonna I'm saying
that that we have to fight in order for him
to win. I've also said many times that it doesn't
matter necessarily what we or they do, because the results
are gonna be what the results are, and those results
are going to come from God Almighty. He will determine,

(17:48):
He already has determined. He knows he's gonna win. Okay,
it's already there. He already, he's already lived in. He
knows who's going to win. He's going to will. I
shouldn't say nos, he knows who he's going to have win,
and there's nothing you can do to prevent the steal.
If that's the course for America, the godd has chosen

(18:11):
and there's no way for them to steal it from Trump.
If Trump is God's choice to be the next president
of the United States, then you might ask, well, if
it's all in God's hands, what are we supposed to do?
As I always say, we are told to fight the
good fight. We are told to do what we believe

(18:33):
to be God's will. So you don't know what your
place is in any of this. Your vote that you,
with your free will, decided to use. If your vote
will be the vote that was necessary to make Trump win,
or to make Carry Lake win, or to make whoever

(18:54):
pick your politician in your state. There's a legitimate chance
that we could the republic I say, Wes, if I'm
a Republican, I'm an independent, an extremely conservative independent. That
won't be a Republican because they're too weak. But that's
the whole other story. But for the Republicans to win,

(19:14):
there is a true opportunity here to have control of
the House, the Senate, and the White House. Throwing Scotus
on top of that, and things say necessarily great, but
far far, far far better than they would be if
the opposite were true. Of Democrats were able to get
control of the House, the Senate, and the White House,

(19:34):
they would soon have control of control. They would be
able to infuse and massive leftist bias into it because
they think, well, right now, there's this massive conservative bias.
So we're going to reverse that. We're going to add
four count of four Supreme Court justices. We're going to

(19:57):
have Barack and Michelle Obama. They're going to be the
Supreme Court justices. We're gonna get uh, We're gonna retire whoever,
we're gonna get I don't care. You can just pick
out your your favorite Mark Elias. That's his reward. He's
gonna be a Supreme Court justice. Now no wait, never mind,
we need him too much for lawfair. Well, we'll sign
him after the lawfare is done, which it never will be.

(20:18):
But whatever. Again, I'm not trying to be Debbie Downer.
All I'm saying. All I'm saying is yeah, there's gonna
be positive headlines. There might be some negatives too, we
don't know. There's still plenty of time for an October surprise.
But in these last two weeks, we're gonna hear leftist
corporate media saying, oh wow, it really sucks. It looks

(20:40):
like Trump might win. We're gonna hear conservative media saying, heck, yeah,
it looks like Trump's gonna win. And we're gonna have
a whole lot of people out there, a whole lot
of Republicans, Conservatives, Patriots, America First people, MAGA, whatever however
you identify. We're gonna have a whole bunch of you
that are like, wow, looks like we got it in

(21:01):
the bag. No need for me to get involved, no
need for me to go vote, no need for me
to do whatever. I don't need to go spend my
day watching polls. I don't need to do this, as
Trump often says, pretending we're up by one point, that's it.
We're winning. But we're only up by one point. So
everything that you do matters. I don't care what states

(21:22):
you're in. It matters on the down ballot because again,
that opportunity to be able to do what we want
to do with the House and the Senate, and especially
with state legislators because they are exponentially more important than
the vast majority of America. Americans don't even know who
their state legislators are, okay, representing them directly. That's sad,

(21:42):
because they those people, city council members, school board members.
They have more control, more influence over your life than
the president of the United States. But that's a discussion
for another day. We have to fight, We have to
pretend like it's going to go badly if we personally

(22:04):
do not go out there and make it much much better.
So that's the tone of today's show. That's probably the
tone of the show for every day the rest of
the month, and maybe all the way until till election Day,
and maybe even a little bit after election day, depending
on how the election goes, and who knows, maybe I'm

(22:27):
just gonna have this tone for the rest of my life.
I do know two things. Number One, we are going
to finally, finally, Lord willing please let this be it.
Finally get our schedule, my schedule squared away enough with
all the various things that I do, get it squared
away enough to where I can do my show at
eleven am Pacific, two pm Eastern and whatever you in between.

(22:55):
Every day Monday through Friday, people have been begging me,
begging me, chastising me and begging me and ripping on
me and praising me and everything else. They go to
jd rutger dot com slash talk that gets to me directly,
or they go to my dms. I have open dms
over at x Twitter at JD Rutger you can always

(23:16):
contact goes directly to me, and I try to respond
to as many as I can. But I get a
lot of people saying, you know, if you had a
set time and you were consistent Monday through Friday, it'd
be a lot easier for us to watch you instead
of just sometimes in the morning, sometimes in the afternoon.
Sometimes in the evening, sometimes not at all. I had
this one lady. She's like, I cannot believe you know,

(23:37):
there was some big news to the your show. You
did not air your show. I was very disappointed in you,
young man. Boy. Wow. So we are going to shoot
for eleven am Pacific two pm Eastern, and that will
be when the jd Rucker Show airs every day Monday

(23:58):
through Friday. We'll see about weekend too, because we'll see
about weekends. But before we get into the rest of
the show, I want to do a quick it's not
even a shout out. I have a request, So for today, okay,
Monday and Tuesday only. My daughter has a fundraiser. Now

(24:22):
she goes to a charter school. Of course, I'm not
going to send my daughter to private school. There was
my wife and I. It was my wife homeschooled our children.
Now with the third child, you know, things are things
are a little bit different. We have a younger child
to work with. Point being is that I need help.

(24:44):
We've got this cool popcorn and I will actually during
one of the breaks, I'm going to play what I
recorded earlier, but I don't remember what it was, So
just know this help my daughter Monday, Tuesday only, okay,
today and tomorrow only help my daughter with her fundraiser.

(25:05):
Go to JD Rutger dot com slash popcorn. Now you
might be wondering what it is that we're fundraiser. You're
not wondering that because I already told you it's JD
Rutger dot com slash popcorn. I wish I could say,
I wish I could vouch for it and say I

(25:25):
have tried, but I haven't. I just know that I
love my daughter and hopefully, Lord willing you will help
her by being very generous and helping her amazing charter
school out here in Commi Fournia, where the public schools
are even worse than anywhere else where you've got yours.
I can assure you that. So so I'm not gonna

(25:47):
put my kids through that keep her at the charter school.
We need to help with the fundraiser. Jdrucker dot com
slash popcorn. All right, I have the strangest sponsorship I've
ever had. It's my daughter. Okay, my daughter who's currently

(26:08):
at a charter school out here in California, because I
wouldn't put her through through the horrors of public school
out here. She's at a charter school. They need some help,
and they only need it apparently for two days. It's
I don't know, I don't make the rules. They just said, hey,
we're doing the fundraiser. It's going to be Monday and
Tuesday only. So that's the twenty first October, twenty first

(26:30):
and twenty second. That's it. If you're watching the show
after the fact, then then there's nothing you can do
to help anymore. Just feel bad. You don't feel bad.
I would never want anybody to feel bad, but I
do want you to feel good. And one way to
feel good is to go to jd Rucker dot com
slash popcorn. It's jd Rutcker dot com slash popcorn, and

(26:53):
you can help my daughter and her school and her
band by buying popcorn popcorn here, fifty percent of whatever
you buy goes to the school. And again there's a
charter school. You're not helping out public school system in California.
This is actually we're trying to fight the public school
system in California. So so that's why we have this.

(27:15):
Go to Jdrucker dot com slash popcorn, get get the works.
You know what just just get it's like a like
I don't know, it looks like a lot of bags
of popcorn. I wish I could vouch for it. I can't.
I've never tried it. But you know it looks good.
It's great. Cause Okay, look that's that's my daughter with
her saxophone. So so yeah, she looks super happy. So

(27:37):
uh so Jderutcker dot com slash popcorn and yeah, go
go buy some help out a very good, wonderful, amazing cause,
A cause that I could truly and honestly say that
I love. You know, you can buy a lot of
popcorn Elon Musk, and you know who else can buy

(27:59):
a lot ofcorn? One person every day who signs his
free speech petition because he's given away a million bucks
a day between now and election day to anybody, to
one lucky lottery winner. I guess who signs his petition.
I don't even know what the petition's about. I know

(28:20):
it's something to do with gun rights and First Amendment rights.
I haven't seen it, I'll admit. Look, I have been
one of the most critical people when it comes to
Elon Musk. I have just bashed the guy over the years,
even when he was buying Twitter, even after he was
I've been I've been a skeptic, I am, and I've
I've been very clear that. Look, I like the guy.

(28:42):
I wouldn't mind having a drink with him, but I
don't trust him. I think he's a globalist right well,
obviously for the last couple of months, really the last month,
he has won me over to some extent. I still
don't trust him, Okay, I really I still think of
myself what his endgame is, you know, because he still

(29:04):
is a globalist, but he seems to be at least
a free speech globalist in America first globalist. If that's
even possible, I don't know. But at this stage, he's
done enough, worked very hard to try to get Trump elected,
and so for now I'm gonna I'm not gonna trust him,

(29:26):
but I'm still gonna I'm gonna pause all my complaints
until after the election because and who knows, maybe I'll
pause it him definitely if he proves himself great. Okay,
you know, I give people second chances, and and this
is his But he did make a note during his
one of his his he's doing rallies now. It appears

(29:49):
during one of his rallies, he he said some pretty
astounding things and I want to I want to play that.

Speaker 2 (29:56):
But they just don't seem to like the idea that
people in the right can say what they want to
say within the bounds of the.

Speaker 1 (30:01):
Law, which is startling.

Speaker 2 (30:05):
I mean, the reason for this petition in support of
the Constitution is because the Constitution really is under attack.
One prominent Democrat after another has been saying that freedom
of speech the first moment is is a is a
bad thing. Yeah. John Kerry literally said that, and Tim

(30:26):
Wallas yeah, and Hillary Yeah exactly. It's like a long
lists where they're not like you know, mid level people
in the day. It's like the top people in the
Democrat Party are saying the first Amendments an obstacle, and
then they will refer to it, you know, like they
use the word disinformation Like it's a pretty good indication

(30:51):
that if someone is using the word disinformation a lot,
they are the ones creating the disinformation.

Speaker 1 (31:00):
So, like I said, I still don't trust him, but
I'm going to withhold any criticism until after the election
at the very soon. It's because he is one way
or the other, he's fighting the good fight. Just as
we all must. You know, if I have one minor complaint.
I love Worldviewtube. I love what I do with Logan,

(31:24):
I love Brannon, just the entire team. The lineup is incredible,
It's growing all sorts of awesome stuff. But I just
this thirty minutes thing. This is tough. It's tough for
me to keep it down to thirty minutes. So if
you are watching on Worldviewtube, I will bid you ado.
You can always watch the rest of my show at

(31:44):
Jdrucker dot com slash rumble. If you are watching anywhere else,
then just stay tuned. I'm not even gonna take a break.
I'm just gonna push my little swash button and we'll
be right back.

Speaker 3 (32:00):
He murdered a father of three sentenced to life in prison.
Kamala Harris pushed to use tax dollars to pay for
his sex change.

Speaker 2 (32:07):
I made sure that they changed the policy so that
every transgender inmate would have access.

Speaker 3 (32:13):
It sounds insane, because it is insane. Kamala was the
first to help pay for a prisoner's sex change. The
power that I had, I used it in a way
that was about.

Speaker 1 (32:22):
Pushing for the movement.

Speaker 3 (32:23):
Frankly and the agenda. Kamala's agenda is they them, not you.

Speaker 1 (32:27):
I'm Donald J. Trump and I approved this message. So
sixty minutes is a joke. They are a joke within
a joke because they are at CBS News, which itself
is joke. Now they've released a statement regarding their deceitful
editing of the Kamala Harris interview. So they have somehow
been able to put a joke within a joke within

(32:47):
a joke. And the sad part is none of it's funny.
It's all very bad jokes, jokes that should make you
cringe and cry and be very upset. Just with corporate
media in general, they are arguably they're top tier as
far as the worst amongst corporate media. They believe in
fake news above all other things. They are agenda driven.

(33:11):
They are given their marching orders and they stick to it,
and they promote the agenda, the narrative, the gas lighting DuJour.
I'm going to read to you their statement, which is short,
thankfully to the point, and like I said, pretty darn bad.
Former President Donald Trump is accusing sixty minutes of deceitful

(33:31):
editing of our October seven interview with Vice President Kamala Harris,
that is false. Okay, it's not. It literally is true.
But whatever. Sixty minutes gave an excerpt of our interview
to face the Nation that used a longer section of
her answer than that on sixty minutes, same question, same answer,
but except it's not a different portion of the response. Okay, fine.

(33:51):
When we added any interview, whether a politician, an athlete,
or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate, and
on point. The portion of her answer on sixty minutes
was more sucainct, which allows time for other subjects in
a wide ranging, twenty one minute long segment. Remember, President
Trump pulled out of his interview with sixty minutes, and
the Vice President participated, ooh, we got you back. Our

(34:12):
long standing invitation to foreign President Trump remains open. If
he would like to discuss the issues facing your nation
in the Harris interview, we would be happy to have
him on sixty minutes. By golly, Trump, if you are listening,
please don't do not give them anything. And if you
are out there, if you ever consider watching sixty minutes,
just don't. I mean, they're, like I said, they're the

(34:35):
worst of the worst. Now here's the key. They're saying, well, look,
we added all of their stuff, and you know, we
try to keep it succinct and on point and YadA,
YadA YadA. Here's what they do though, and it's the
part they didn't say in their statement. But this is
the absolute reality, one hundred percent certain. This is actually
how it goes. When they have somebody to like, like
Kamala Harris, they edit it in a way that makes

(34:56):
it to be the most favorable to her. And they
have somebody like Trump or a Republican they don't like,
not a rhino, they like the rhinos, but but a
non member of the Union Party swamp, which is rare.
But when they do get them, they edit it to
make them look as bad as possible. This is where
the deceitfulness comes in. It's not the whole point. Oh
they edited it out. Yeah, they edited the parts out

(35:19):
where Kamala Harris sounded like an absolute idiot. Okay, if
you're a journalist, you should crave those parts. You should
want the person you're interviewing to say things that are
not bland. Number one. Okay, the part they kept in

(35:39):
is like literally the most bland. It's like she the
something kicked in her head and it's like, okay, oh,
there was a part that I memorized. Let me say
that real quick and say it in a way that
is going to be so bland and boring that nobody's
gonna remember it. Great, that's what they're gonna plan. Sixty
minutes in reality, they want to get the juiciest parts,
and they skipped it. It's like, oh, we got Kamala Harris.
We want her to in so badly, and she says

(36:01):
something so stupid. Just now, let's edit that part out
and take the part that nobody actually cares about. The
part was she didn't really say anything, but at least
she doesn't sound like an absolute and total moron when
she's saying it for those seven seconds that we're going
to keep in. Skip the first forty eight seconds where

(36:23):
she's like, just the I mean dumb as rocks. Okay,
take a word salad and shred it up and then
light it on fire. And that's what she said for
like forty eight seconds. Let's take the seven seconds where
she sort of sounds almost like a normal, thinking human
being and not an absolute dim wit moron. Let's put

(36:48):
that part in her interview if the situation was reversed
and it's Trump, they would have taken Oh, he sounded
that was a good answer. Cut that part. Oh wait,
he mentioned Mexicans. Put that in and and then and
then we'll reverse it and we'll cut to a clip
of like of like, uh, I don't know, fine, try
to find some like some like Mexican mother, because we

(37:11):
have to. We have to portray him as racist, because
that's the narrative. It's disgusting. And for them to put
out a state, I mean, have they just said nothing
and just been like okay, fine whatever. If they had
said nothing at all, had been like okay, so CBS
got busted, they're just gonna keep hush hush fine. Instead

(37:33):
they come out with this and they're insultings think and
they hope, at least, they truly hope that the American
people are as stupid or at least close to maybe
not as nobody can be as stupid as Kamala Harris,
but they're hoping that there's a lot of Americans who

(37:53):
are close to being as unintelligent, as mediocre as Kamala Harris.
And that's what the statement is for. It's well, you know,
we always edit stuff out and where that knows they
didn't say anything about fairness on point. Who's point, their point.
That's all they care about. What is the narrative they

(38:14):
want to form with any interview. That's what we get.
They want a Kamla to have as least damaging of
an interview as possible, and so they added it to
make her look slightly less stupid. But if it was Trump,
and that's why I say Trump, if you're watching, do

(38:34):
not even consider it, because it doesn't matter how brilliant
you speak, what you could say. Everything the American people
want to hear in anything that is positive, they will
edit that part out. Anything that could even be manipulated
and construed as negative, they will highlight that and they
will blow it up, and they will probably edit that

(38:57):
in a way that makes you seem even even worse.
So sixty minutes, if I didn't have if I wasn't
running a family friendly show, I would say a lot more.
I would probably use hand gestures and I would probably
be spitting right now because that's how much you discussed me.
Believe it or not, Americans are generally positive thinking people.

(39:19):
I know that's probably hard for you to believe when
you look around and you see all the negativity, but
for the most part, when it pertains to us in
our lives, we don't. We don't necessarily think of ourselves
as as being heading in the wrong direction. For example,
we sometimes we might even get delusional about it, but
we like to think, hey, you know what, it's okay,
It's gonna be okay, We're gonna be okay. Things are

(39:40):
gonna be okay, because generally they usually are, except of course,
right now and for the last couple of years, they've
they've certainly seemed like for for I think most people
they've seen like things are heading in the wrong direction.
Which is why when we see this this poll that
just popped up recently, it is much more discouraging than

(40:00):
it even sounds. It comes from the Epoch Times. I
have it partially published over at jdreucer dot com. Majority
of Americans feel worse off now than four years ago.
A new Gallup poll reveals that more than half of
Americans feel worse off financially than they did four years ago.
The survey, released on October eighteenth, found that fifty two
percent of US adults believe their financial situation has deteriorated

(40:22):
since twenty twenty, while thirty nine percent feel they are
better off. Now here's the thing, the reality, and when
we look at it statistically, the vast majority of Americans
their revenue versus the cost of living, it's everybody's upside
down compared to even twenty twenty, and if we go

(40:43):
back to twenty nineteen, the number goes through the roof.
Of course, twenty twenty with the year of the pandemic, YadA, YadA, YadA.
So I guess there's a little bit there. But even
the fact that fifty two percent recognize how bad things
are for them, the fact that only thirty nine percent
believe that they're better off in reality, that numbers probably

(41:04):
if you take away the hope em or the positive
nature of humans, that number is probably closer to about
twenty twenty five percent. Seriously, in other words, somewhere between
one one in four and one in five Americans believe
that they truly believe that they are better off or
at the very least are better off. Possibly, and you know,
I mean there's a lot of rich people that are

(41:24):
far better off today than they were back in twenty twenty.
But I would say that your average middle class adult
is not better off some you know, perhaps some people
got raises, great, but that the raises compensate for the
increase in cost of living. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Maybe
they got promotions, maybe they got different jobs, maybe they
got their first job. Who knows what made them think that.

(41:47):
But the fact that it's thirty nine percent. Usually that number,
by the way, is approximately fifty percent or higher. Okay,
any given year, especially an election year, you ask that
same question, and it's always reversed. In other words, is
always oh, were fifty percent of Americans feel that they're
better off now than they were four years ago? And
you look back, of course, obviously you'd have to go
all the way back to the Jimmy Carter years in

(42:10):
the Reagan election of nineteen eighty when it's like, okay, yeah, no,
it was bad then. People were were not better off
in nineteen eighty than they were in nineteen seventy six.
So yeah, So this poll is a little bit discouraging,
but it makes you wonder how in the world could
there possibly be if fifty two percent realized they're not

(42:31):
better off, why would so many people allegedly be willing
to vote for Kamala Harris back to the article. A
similar Gallup poll taken at the tail end of the
Trump presidency in September twenty twenty found this sentiment roughly reversed,
with fifty six percent saying they were better off and
only thirty three percent saying they were worse off than
four years prior. Partisans partisan divides are were stark in

(42:53):
the latest poll, ninety percent of Republicans feeling worse off
compared to just sixteen percent of Democrats. That's just not true.
They are worse they know they're worse off. They're lying. Crucially,
fifty five percent of Independence, they pivotal voting block in
the close twenty twenty four election, feel worse off, with
only thirty five percent saying their financial situation has improved.

(43:15):
I've said it before and I'll say it again. What
we're facing right now, it's not left versus right. It's
not even technically speaking, if we really want to dig
down deep, it's not even truth versus lies. This really
is a question of good versus evil, and right now
the evil side is taking a whole lot of people.

(43:35):
Because thirty nine percent believing that they're better off, there's
still that means there's millions, tens of millions of Americans
who are either delusional, lying, or both. And this is
what we have to face because if this election doesn't
go the way that we hope it does, if Kamala
Harris allegedly wins, then that number is going to go

(43:58):
way way down. It won't be thirty nine percent claiming
that they're better off. It will be closer to three
percent because the only people that are going to be
better off if Kamala Harris wins are the super rich.
For at least the last oh, I don't know, two years,
let's see, it might have been as early as twenty
twenty one, but at least at the very least in

(44:20):
twenty twenty two, we started talking about and noticing and
talking about all of the crazy things that were happening
with this food supply. Be like, hey, did you notice
that there's been like a sharp increase in food production
Plants that are just sort of burning up, getting sabotaged,
blowing up in some cases. And what about all the
chickens that are getting cold? And what about all the
cows that are mysteriously dying. It's like somebody's attacking your food.

(44:42):
I mean, that seems to be the case, and it
has continued to be the case for a long time.
This is one of the reasons that the food prices
have gone up so much higher, so much faster than
other things. Yes, we're experiencing mega inflation, but food is
getting it hit hard. It is one of the reasons
that we even launched my company in the first place,
and we were very happy to have done that, but

(45:04):
everything happened. Like everything, you can only fight off the
inevitable for so long, and so we are in the
very very near future, not sure what day or anything
like that, but very soon we are going to have
to raise our prices. And so as a result of this,
and I actually have a meeting. I'm not gonna say when,

(45:25):
but I have a meeting to discuss all of this
and how much we're going to raise prices and all
that stuff. But in the meantime, as owner of the company,
I can still offer what I believe to be a good,
awesome deal. So go to worldviewbeef dot com and once
you're there, just use use promo code j d R

(45:47):
No no, yeah, yeah yeah, use promo code JDR to
get the maximum discount As of right now, as I'm
recording to this episode, we are at thirty percent and
we're doing that head of the anticipated price hike. So
do yourself a favor, do your family favor, do everybody favor,
and go to go there now and use a promo

(46:09):
code jd R. There's a gap. It's being formed, obviously.
Gap is being formed in the world of media where
corporate media, mainstream media, what legacy media, whatever you want
to call them, they are failing miserably and people are
stopping are no longer trusting them. They're turning more to

(46:29):
to X, They're turning more to independent journalists, podcasters the like.
To be successful, though, as as an independent journalist, you
need to have three things, and it can be a
combination of those three at any given point. You don't
need all three things for every story. As a matter
of fact, it's very difficult to get all three things

(46:51):
going for you in every single story that you cover.
But you should strive to get as much of all
three as possible. Number One, you have to you have
to intelligence. Okay, it is true that there when it
comes to reporting the news made famous by by that
Will Ferrell movie Anchorman, you don't need to be smart
to just read the news off a teleprompter. Okay, that

(47:12):
doesn't take intelligence. Those people, the news people, they have
to be likable, they have to be compelling, they have
to look good, they have to sound good. They have
to to portray or exude honest Steve like Brian Williams,
for example. You know that guy, until has revealed how
much of a liar he was, he was actually very
well trusted. So you have to have that, especially if

(47:35):
you're doing commentary analysis stuff like that, when the other
two components are often contradictory. You have to be first
sometimes and you have to be extremely accurate. Right, those
those two components sometimes contradict each other. We've seen it,
for example with with like even two of my favorite
journalists right now. Both of them are wicked smart, so

(47:57):
they check off that first box very easily. But you've
got Julie Kelly, who is her sources, her rapidness, her
ability to get to the truth. She's able to be
first on so many stories, it's fantastic, and she's usually
extremely accurate as well. Then you've got John Solomon adjust
the news. He's when he's first, he's first, and he

(48:19):
will give He'll he'll text me some scoops. It's like, hey,
you know first on this one. Great, we'll take it. Well,
we'll get it promoted out there. But for the but
his his stick, so to speak, is the accuracy aspect
of it. He'll publish a story that might be even
a day or two old if it took a day
or two to properly corroborate and confirm a story. Accuracy
is more important to just the news in John Solomon

(48:43):
than speed necessarily, though again they do give me some scoops.
They're very good at both sides, and I think to
be truly successful independent journalists you have to you have
to have all three characteristics at various degrees in pretty
much every story that you report. The reason that I'm
bringing all this up this is a long setup for
a relatively short story, but it's an important one because

(49:06):
this is one that hit my desk well over a
dozen hours ago, coming up on I think sixteen or
seventeen hours ago, and it's a big one, okay, but
I couldn't get any corroboration. I waited, I waited for
other people to corroborate, and I don't do the leftist

(49:26):
thing of where it's like, okay, so one person reports
something and then a bunch of other people report the
same thing in the first person report, and they call
that corroboration. That's a single source. No, I don't care
if fifteen people journalists say, oh, look here, there's a
rumor going around, there's this report, there's this that. If
they're all pulling from the same report, that's still a
single source. The left will say, oh, you know, multiple

(49:47):
multiple sources are reporting and that oh blah blah, I'm now, no,
that's still still a single source. And even after like
fifteen sixteen hours, this particular story is sitting there as
a single source. We did get sort of corrob from
a few small outlets. I think the right scoop picked
it up, but again based upon the single source. Now
I did, and this is a sort of a creepy story.

(50:09):
I did get corroboration, but from an anonymous source, from
one of my favor I have two really excellent anonymous sources.
I can't quote them. I can't divulge any information about
other than that they're separate. It's not like they're they're
not a team. I always want to make that clear,
and they both have their finger on the pulse of

(50:32):
they have Democrats insider information about the Democrats. One of them,
in particular, the one that contacted me yesterday, was the
one that told me well ahead of time that both
Pete Buddha Judge and Amy Klobucher were going to be
dropping out of the twenty twenty race just ahead a
Super Tuesday in order to help Joe Biden be able
to defeat Bernie Sanders. They told me this before the

(50:53):
story ran, before it was even known that the pressure
campaign was on there. So this is the type of
information that I'm getting from these particular sources. I noted.
Here's the creepy part I had noted during yesterday's show
that you know, it's conspicuous that I haven't heard from
either of my two big sources in a long time,
like throughout this entire election season, I haven't heard anything

(51:16):
from not a peep. And then I get a text,
literally just a couple hours later saying Hey, I got
a scoop for you. Blah blah blah blah blah. It's like, wow, Oh,
you must have seen my show, heard me talking about you.
It's like, ah, actually, no, now, just sort of a coincidence,
and it really was because again I mentioned them, and
then all of a sudden, I get a text with

(51:37):
a scoop. Good stuff. Good stuff. So I'm gonna put
this out there, and at this point I'm still considering it,
even though it's a single source with an anonymous corroboration
that's not necessarily good enough. I'm going to put this
at about fifty to fifty being accurate. But it's juicy enough.

(51:59):
And here's the important part. It passes the smell test,
and I'll explain why. So this single source article comes
from or article. This single source report comes from bad Ombray,
an ex user with about one hundred thousand followers. Bad
Ombray has had some scoops in the past, which is
one of the reasons why I do believe there's at

(52:19):
least a fifty to fifty chance it's correct, it's accurate.
This ex user has had some scoops. Sometimes the scoops
have been wrong, so that's why I'm not at a
higher than fifty to fifty chance. But let's go with it.
Here's the report itself. Let's just go straight into it.
Major drama within the Kamala Harris campaign. This morning, a
source reveals that Harris screamed at and angrily berated her

(52:43):
campaign manager Julie Chavez for over thirty minutes on the
phone this morning. The source shares that Chavez advice Kamla
and not to attend the Al Smith dinner because it
could send the wrong message and risk alienating LGBTQ and
pro abortion voters if she was scene cozying up to
the Catholics. Now that there's more, but I'll get to that.

(53:05):
But that right there, that passes the smell test. That
literally sounds like something that could have very conceivably happened.
There's no surprise there, Knowing what we know about Kamala,
knowing that she had the at ninety percent, she had
the highest and most rapid staff turnover in vice presidential history,

(53:27):
Knowing that she has built up a reputation of berating
her staff, of belittling her staff, of blaming her staff
for her own flaws, her own mistakes. She has done
that and this is again corroborated. That's that's the truth
that's coming from her own people or former people. So
we know that. So so when you see a story

(53:49):
like this, it's like yeah, passes the smell test. Let's
keep going with what it says. Though, Instead, Shavi suggested
a compromise of sending in the poorly received video in
lieu of an in person appearance. That received video was
a debacle. If you haven't seen it, don't. It's not
worth it. It's it will literally make you stupider as a
human being if you spend the three minutes or however

(54:12):
long it was watching that video. Chavez was in tears
during the phone call as Kama shredded her to pieces,
called her an idiot, inept horrible at her effing job,
and told her that her stupid advice is going to
be the reason she loses the joy is gone. To

(54:35):
reiterate a single source, no corroboration outside of a couple
of small news outlets, one medium sized news outlet, and
a whole bunch of semi respectable Twitter I think Ryan
forty retweeted it or at least posted about it. But again,
just because multiple people are reporting on the same report
doesn't mean that there's any corroboration. They're all just repeating

(54:56):
the same thing, you know, diment variation of our different
analysis of I can't don't count me as a source,
because all I've got is my anonymous source that said, Yeah,
Kamalo wasn't happy and blame Julie for it. That's what
my source said. And then I saw this, So take
from it what you will. Again, knowing what we know

(55:17):
about Kamala and knowing this pastes the smell test, knowing
that it was a huge mistake for her not to
go and perhaps an even bigger mistake for her to
make that ludicrous, cringe worthy video. I'm at fifty to
fifty on this one. I don't know if people realize
just how much of an effect movies have on us,
on our worldviews. And it's not just movies. It's television shows,

(55:40):
it's songs. Maybe you do, maybe you get it. There
was one movie, one specific line in a movie. And
I'm gonna have to make a confession here because back
in nineteen eighty seven, Back in nineteen eighty seven, I
saw the movie Dirty Dancing. Now you're probably thinking yourself,
oh my gosh, say it isn't so rucker. You know,

(56:03):
you're probably thinking, oh my gosh, is he one of
those one of those dudes for Kamala or something? Now?
Is he is he having LGBTQA plus issues or something. No. No,
I was a kid. Okay, I watched Dirty Dancing, deal
with it. But there was a line in Dirty Dancing
that actually had an effect in my life. And I
think a lot of times we don't realize it until
maybe later, maybe we never realized it. But could be

(56:24):
a movie, could be a song, could be a television show.
We hear something and it actually impacts us for an
extent the period of time this line was actually done,
spoken by Jerry Orbach. He's like he's telling Patrick Swayze.
He's like, I know you weren't the one that got
Penny in trouble. And then he stops and looks at him.
When I'm wrong, I say, I'm wrong. Well, that's been

(56:46):
got embedded in me way back when was it forty
something years ago? Way back when, almost forty years ago,
I got this notion that when you're wrong, you say
you're wrong. Okay, well I was wrong when I first
heard that Donald Trump was going to go go shut
down at McDonald's and throwing an apron and be a

(57:10):
fry cook for however long, I thought, my gosh, what
an awful idea. And I am just an idiot. Okay.
Of course in retrospect, it's like, wow, that was brilliant.
I mean, this is the images, the videos that came
from this holy crap. That's why I'm not a political consultant,

(57:32):
by the way, because I thought that's the dumbest thing.
And then of course it turned out to be absolutely
amazing over the weekend. If you didn't see it, if
you didn't see any of the videos, the Brazilian lady,
you know, please don't let let America become like my
home country of Brazil. I mean, it's like, dude, dude,

(57:55):
that's all I can say. I am blown away by
how beautiful of a move that is. And of course,
over to meet these other they're saying, well, you know,
it was all stage and it was fake, and it
was this and those that and this, and maybe you
know he said something disturbing here or did something bad there.
I don't know. Uh, I just know this, I was wrong.
It was a beautiful, brilliant move. If you're watching on

(58:18):
Frank's speech, I will bid you adu. If you are
watching on on my rumble channel at Jdrucker dot com
slash Rumble, just stay tuned and we will be right back.
The two best places to keep up with my work
are my ex count at jd Rucker or my substack
jd Rucker dot substack dot com. Jdrucker dot substeck dot com.

(58:46):
I am, generally speaking a forgiving person. I do believe
in second chances. Sometimes I even believe in third chances. Okay,
and in the world of politics, second and third chances
are actually pretty common. We see it all the time
where two people who are who are adversaries can become
friends allies will get Ted Cruz and Donald Trump. That
was the most contentious primary in history. Okay, by far,

(59:06):
I don't not even close. I mean Trump's Trump's said
that that Cruise's dad assassinated. Uh A JFK. I mean,
give me a break. It was. It was an ugly primary.
And now they are at the very least allies. I
think they're probably friends from what I could tell. You know,
we don't know what happens behind the scenes. But then

(59:27):
you look at even his his media foes, you look
at a lot of them, so just Glenn Beck, Greg Guttfeld,
they are now one hundred percent aboard the Trump train today.
So we know that that second and third chances can't happen.
But there is a certain type of person that I
don't believe should ever get a second chance. And that
type of person is a neocon that bites you. Look,

(59:47):
there's gonna be. There's far too many neocons out there
in the Republican world to be able to avoid them all.
Some of them are closet neocons, some of them are
light neocons, some of them are whatever. So so you're
gonna have some. But once in neoconn bites you done for,
they're out. Okay, No hr McMaster, No, no Jim Mattis Okay,
no John Kelly, never again, never never, never again. And

(01:00:12):
no Nikki Hayley because she by running she bit him
and she not run. I would have I would have
welcomed her back with open arms. Yeah. I think she
was a She was a decent ambassador. Okay, she's a
smart woman, decent ambassador. She's not a bird brain, even
though Trump called her that. She's she's a pretty clever woman.
But she is. She is a neo konn. She is

(01:00:33):
a card carrying member of the military industrial complex. No,
people will say, well, but yeah, but she's more conservative
she might be kind of she's a rhino, but she's
more conservative than like Elon Musk. He's being considered. He's
almost certainly going to be in the administration if he wins.
If Trump wins, uh rf K Juniors is banking on it, Okay,
he's he's pretty much guaranteed if if Trump wins. R

(01:00:54):
f K Junior's got a spot. They've already talked about it,
they've already declared it. Tulca Gabbett, former Democrat. You know,
she's she's she's still a Democrat. I mean, she's not
a conservative by any means. She might have some libertarian leanings,
but she's she's not a conservative, and I would say
neither is technically Elon Musk. I mean, he's a free
speech guy, sure, you know, but there are certain aspects

(01:01:14):
of him that are very globalist. Okay, so let's be
clear about that. And rf K Junior don't even get
me started. You know, if he stays strictly on make
America healthy again, I'm all in, Okay. If he starts
to deviate and get out of his lane, that's where
I start to get concerned. I mean, his economic policies
were actually to the left of of Joe Biden. So
there was a lot of I have a lot of

(01:01:35):
questions about them, but I'm willing to give all of
them a chance because they have one thing in common.
That is it's a deal breaker if you don't have that.
In my humble opinion, when it comes to being in
a Trump White House, the next Trump White House, he
cannot afford, he cannot afford those who want America involved

(01:01:56):
everywhere else in the world. And Nikki Hayley is that person.
She is She is the military industrial complex, she is
the deep state. She wants she wants war with Russia, China, Iran,
doesn't matter. She wants them all. Bring them all. Give
me all the wars you can, okay. And even if
you say, okay, well maybe Trump's not going to go
to war, okay, but he can still she or anybody

(01:02:19):
else could still influence him to participate in the rest
of the world. We need an American first administration. And
you could say all you want about our of case policies,
Elon Musk's ideologies, Tulsa Gabber's past, you know, don't even
get me started with Syria and Tulsi Gabbert. But but
The one thing that they do share is that they

(01:02:40):
don't want to intervene in Ukraine especially. That's the one
that's I mean, let's face, that's the one that if
things are going to blow up, you know, it could
blow up in Taiwan slash Philippines, with China, it could.
It's almost certainly going to blow up with Iran and Israel. Okay,
but we can stay out of those. I don't think

(01:03:01):
there's enough Neo kon push. I don't think that Trump
can stay out of Ukraine just because the NATO situation. Okay,
So we need those who will not push him in
that direction, who will take his lead, follow his lead
of let's be strong, but let's not interfere. That's what
we need. Desperately. We need to focus for the next

(01:03:24):
four years, eight years, twelve years, however long, maybe indefinitely,
focus on fixing your own problems because they're just too big. Okay.
The rest of the world's suffering. I get it. I'm sorry.
I feel for you, philanthropic private organizations. You know, let
the UN do what the UN does. But just you
guys stay over there. We're gonna handle our stuff, take

(01:03:45):
care of our business. We're in good shape there. So
that's why I am a if she wants to, If
Nikki Haley wants to, wants to do a town hall
with Trump, help him with female voters, help him with
the Bush Cheney Republicans out there. Yeah, it's fine. I mean,
it's not necessary. He doesn't need her. It's negligible any

(01:04:07):
effect that she would have, and there is even a
risk that she could actually do some damage. But I
trust the campaign and if they want to talk to her,
if they want to get her involved in some way
over the next two weeks, fine, I'm okay with that.
I don't want it, but I don't I'm not gonna
oppose it. But if she even hints at being part

(01:04:29):
of the next White House, I'm a hard no no,
I know, and I'm a vote, but I will I
will continuously harp on her. That will be one of
the topics that I discuss, oh every week, as long
as she's there, until til she finally does what she
will invariably do, which is to stab Trump in the

(01:04:50):
back at some point. I don't know it'll take a week,
a month, or a year, but she will, and she
will influence him throughout any her time there and it
won't be a good thing. So I'm a hard pass
on Nikki Neo Khon Hayley. You know, Joe Biden really

(01:05:10):
has done a number to the country. I'm not gonna
rehash that. You all know the damage that he's done.
But on a side note, he has also done quite
a bit of damage to the Democrat Party and it's
a I would say he sort of got his revenge,
so to speak. He didn't want to get pushed out.

(01:05:30):
Doctor Taco Jill definitely didn't want him to get pushed out.
Hunter Biden definitely, definitely, definitely didn't want him to get
pushed out. But Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and maybe maybe
Chuck Schumer, maybe other people went to him and said, hey, Joe,
we're either you're out or you're out one way or
the other. Year out. So we just need you to
just take some time, get your affairs together. We'll give

(01:05:50):
you some verbiage. You put it out there, and that's
how you know it'll be done, and then you can
you can retire with dignity and and you know, we'll
get you a nice little little area with the rest
of the global sleekue cabal they'll put you in. You know,
you can be the mascot. I mean, you could be
an honorable member of the group or whatever. They did

(01:06:14):
to tell him. Either way, he didn't want to go,
but he did.

Speaker 2 (01:06:16):
You know.

Speaker 1 (01:06:16):
He basically they made him an offer he couldn't refuse,
and so he couldn't refuse it. But he's decided, you
know what, if I'm gonna go out, then I'm gonna
go out and kind of stick it to them. So
he went out, and in the same breath he also said,
and he endorses Kamala Harris. What are they gonna do?
Notice that it took Barack Obama a long time before
he actually came out and endorsed Kamala Harris. It wasn't

(01:06:38):
like an instantaneous Oh okay, yeah, No, what Joe said
is right. He went and he checked his options. He said,
you know, if if we go against this is calculus.
If we go against Kamala, go against Joe, then we
got both of them are mad at us. And you know,

(01:06:58):
if we try to push Mark Kelly, who I think
that's who Barack Obama wanted, or Gavin Newsom, who obviously
Nancy Pelosi wanted, or Gretchen Witchmer or whoever, so many
other than Kamala. Well, there would have been division within
the party and they're like, is it worth it? Is
it worth it? Yeah, all right, I guess we'll have

(01:07:20):
to stick with Kamala. That's the calculus. That's what took place.
I don't have any evidence. I don't have any secret
sources telling me this. That's just you know, when I
sniff around, that's the scenario that makes the most sense
to me. Well, as a result, there's a whole bunch
of people that are kind of screwed and who will

(01:07:41):
be especially screwed if Kamala wins and these people happen.
And it's not just, of course the American people. All
of us will be screwed of Kamala wins. But there
are Democrat Democrat leaders who are actually quietly, secretly rooting
for Kamala to lose. I know that's hard to believe,
and they would never come out and say publicly, but
but they are. They are. According to Matt Margolis over

(01:08:04):
at pjmedia dot com, these four Democrats secretly don't want
kama to win. And you can probably think of who
they are. They all have their different reasons, Well, two
of them have basically the same reason, but you can
probably guess who they are. And there's a fifth one
that I'd like to add. We'll get to that person
at the end. Number one, and it is I'm not

(01:08:24):
gonna read the article, but I will will reveal it
as it comes up. So number one, you got Gavin Newsom.
Now Gavin Newsom, he really does not want to wait.
And here's the thing. So the scenario is this, if
Kamala wins, then she's going to be unless she gets
dementia or if something else happens to her, similar to
Joe Biden, She's gonna have to be the nominee for
the Democrats in twenty twenty eight as well. If she

(01:08:46):
wins in twenty twenty four, she's running again in twenty
twenty eight. She just turned sixty, she's not too old.
She'll be the nominee. They won't even allow it allow
her to be contented. So, in other words, if somebody
has an ambition, a Democrat has an ambition to run
for president of the United States, they will have to
wait until twenty thirty two. Now, of course, with Agenda

(01:09:07):
twenty thirty they don't think they're even gonna be here anymore, so,
or at least the United States won their humble opinions.
So they're like, wait, WHOA, that's not gonna work. We
want to run. We want to run in twenty twenty eight.
And that would work for Gavin Newsom. If Kamala Harris loses,
now he's out. He's out of politics pretty much after
twenty twenty six. He gets term limited out as governor,

(01:09:28):
and there are no open Senate seats for him, so
you know he can't He's not gonna run for Congress.
He's not gonna run for mayor anywhere. He's not gonna
He would have to go private sector for six years
and hope that he can still revive his career. Or
he could try to get a cabinet position with Kamala.
But you know who, who in their right mind wouldever

(01:09:52):
want that. I don't think any anyone who knows Kamala
would never want to work for Kamala. So so Gavin
news he's really hoping that she loses and then he'll
get out of governor's twenty twenty six. I'll do some philanthropy,
write a couple of books, whatever, and then he'll run
in twenty twenty eight. He'll actually start his as soon
as his governorship is over, he will start his campaign

(01:10:13):
to run for office if Trump wins. Number Two. Hillary Clinton,
Now this is one I don't know. I mean, is
she really that bitter? Is she's so bitter that since
she lost and she would have been the first woman.
Is she really gonna cheer against Kamala Harris? You bet
she is. She is totally not on board with Kamala winning.
She wants Kamala to lose. She thinks that she is

(01:10:35):
brilliant and to be fair, Hillary Clinton is an intelligent woman.
She thinks that Kamala Harris is an idiot, and to
be fair, she is so for Hillary to lose to Trump,
but then Kamala to beat her to become the first
female president of the United States of America. No Hillary,
Hillary's like, you know what, I just want there to

(01:10:57):
be no female president while I'm alive. If you guys
do what you want to do after I'm in hell.
So so yeah, she doesn't want want her to win either.
She's she's actually secretly cheering for Trump. Yet Gretcha Wichmer
same situation, by the way, So with Gretchen, she too
wants to be president. She doesn't want to wait till
twenty thirty two. She's gonna be be pushed out of

(01:11:19):
office term limited out, and she too cannot run for
Senate because there's not gonna be an open seat for
her available to run between now and then. So so yeah,
she's same situation as Gavin as far as Gretchen is concerned,
she wants Kamala to lose. And then the last person

(01:11:40):
on the list is, of course Joe Biden, and that's
no brainer. He picked her because he thought that she
could lose. He knows, I mean, with what little he
does still retain, he knows enough to know that she is.
She she's horrible. She was a terrible campaigner before or

(01:12:01):
before she dropped out of the twenty twenty race. She
was a terrible vice president terrible vice presidential campaigner. He
knew all this going in. He didn't care because he
knew that he was gonna cheat anyway. So he's just like, Okay,
you know what, I'm not gonna pick anybody competent because
I am kind of getting slow in the brain. They
might try to might try to force me out, let

(01:12:22):
me get somebody that's gonna be even worse than me.
And he picked Kamala as his VP, and then when
they forced him out, he picked her as his replacement,
to facto replacement, to run on the ticket in hopes
that she would lose. Now, I will add a fifth
person to that list, somebody who is a little bit
of a stretch. And I can understand why it's on

(01:12:42):
my He's on my list, but not on this list.
And that person would be Barack Obama. I don't think
he actually truly legitimately wants Kamda to win. I know
he's out there campaigning for I know he's saying, hey,
black guys, you should you should really vote for Kamala.
I know that he's gonna be touring with her, he
and Michelle are, but that's really about them and it
has nothing to do with her. Okay, this is defeat
his ego and too, so he's doing his part because

(01:13:03):
he's still he still wants control over the Democrat Party,
so he still has to do what he can to
maintain an appearance that he's trying to push for her
to win, but he does not want her to win.
He too knows what's at stake. He does not want
to see Kamalot go out there because he doesn't think

(01:13:24):
that she can win in twenty twenty eight, if, if,
if they're able to cheat their way and get her
to defeat Trump in twenty twenty four. He thinks that
the administration, her administration, will be so disastrous, so horrible.
She's such an idiot, she can't handle anything. She's incompetent
on top of being an idiot. He knows this, and

(01:13:45):
he doesn't want her to win. He would rather take
his chances with Mark Kelly or Gretchen Witchmer or Gavin
Newsom or Josh Shapiro or whoever, somebody maybe even Big Mike,
somebody else in twenty twenty eight, take their lumps throughout.
You know, maybe they can figure out a way to
impeach Trump for a third or fourth or fifth time

(01:14:05):
and whatever, you know, just survive, survives, survive, and then
in twenty twenty eight, get the right person, at least
in Barack Obama's opinion, get the right person in there
now again, those first four Hillary, Gavin, Gretchen, Joe, they're definitely,
I mean, there's zero doubt on my mind. The day

(01:14:26):
they don't want him. They don't want Kamala to win. Rather,
Barack Obama is a little bit of a stretch. And
here's why, if all things being equal, I would say,
you know what, he doesn't he really does want He's
playing the long game because he's good at the long game.
He's playing the long game. He's thinking, we need somebody
better in twenty twenty eight. We can't have Kamala ruin

(01:14:47):
a force. Then, the only reason I think there's at
least a chance that he might be rooting for Kamala
is because if he really does believe that the globalst
League Cabal's plans need to be fulfilled before twenty thirty,
which that seems to be the case. That seems what
they're pushing for, right, and he is a part of
the globals elite caball. I don't know if he's up here,
down here, somewhere in between, but he's he's involved. He's

(01:15:08):
either he's above a pawd, but he's definitely not the king.
So he's somewhere in the middle, right, at least in
my humble opinion. So so yeah, if he knows something,
he thinks that you know, they've gotta they're stuck with Kamala.
They got to force her in there, and then they
got to take control and hope that she doesn't mess
it up. Then maybe in that scenario he would rather
have her in there. Otherwise, if he is playing the

(01:15:31):
long game, she's not the long game. She is. She's
the destruction of the long game. She is the she
she If she wins, she changes the path that the
globals elite cabal will have to travel. And I don't
think that that Barack Obama wants that. But again, I
don't know. They have some they have these weird timelines,

(01:15:51):
time time frames or whatever. For all I know, he
could be already plotting to steal this election for her
and and take full control and get his people in
her administration. And who knows, who knows, maybe she's just
gonna be in his eyes. Joe Biden two point zero.
We shall see, all right. I have the strangest sponsorship

(01:16:19):
I've ever had. It's my daughter. Okay, my daughter who's
currently at a charter school out here in California, because
I wouldn't put her through the horrors of public school
out here. She's at a charter school. They need some help,
and they only need it apparently for two days. I
don't know. I don't make the rules. They just said, hey,

(01:16:41):
we're doing the fundraiser. It's going to be Monday and
Tuesday only. So that's the twenty first October twenty first
and twenty second. That's it. If you're watching the show
after the fact, then then there's nothing you can do
to help anymore. Just feel bad. You don't feel bad.
I would never want anybody to feel bad, but I
do want you to feel good. And one way to

(01:17:02):
feel good is to go to JD Rutger dot com
slash popcorn. It's JD Rutger dot com slash popcorn. And
you can help my daughter and her school and her
band by buying popcorn. I got lots of popcorn here.
Fifty percent of whatever you buy goes to the school.
And again there's a charter school. You're not helping out

(01:17:25):
public school system in California. This is actually we're trying
to fight the public school system in California. So that's
why we have this. Go to Jdrucker dot com slash popcorn.
Get get the works, you know what, Just just get
it's like a like, I don't know, it looks like
a lot of bags of popcorn. I wish I could
vouch for it. I can't. I've never tried it, but
you know it looks good. It's great. Cause Okay, look

(01:17:49):
that's that's my daughter with her saxophone, so so yeah,
she looks super happy. So so JD rutger dot com
slash popcorn, and yeah, go buy some hel about a
very good, wonderful, amazing cause, A cause that I could
truly and honestly say that I love. There's an article

(01:18:13):
by Steve McKee over a Daily Signal that cut my eye.
I started reading and I started getting really excited. Okay,
I really did start getting a little bit of a
tingle up my leg because I thought he's onto it,
he's about and then he missed it. He didn't miss
it by much. Don't get me wrong. I mean this
is this is an objective, it's very subjective. But the
title of the article is this really is the most

(01:18:35):
important election of our lifetime. Here's why. And I was like, okay,
I mean I know why. I think most of you
actually know why. But I haven't heard anybody in conservative media,
A little bit of alternative media and a handful of
very strong hosts has said something similar or something at
least close to the truth. But I thought that, Okay,

(01:18:56):
we're finally going to get it. Here's a semi I
would say, mainstream concernedive sight at the daily signal, and
it looks like they're gonna get it. And it got close.
He got so close, but he missed it. But we're
gonna go through and again, this isn't It's not like,
oh my gosh, this guy's a movie. No, his shery's
probably pretty smart, and he does nail some very good

(01:19:16):
and important reasons why this is the most important election
of our lifetimes, arguably the most important election in the
history of humanity. But we'll get to that here in
a second. First, let's go through his list. You know,
I'll get to what I believe to be the the
unspoken or lightly spoken, most important reason. But let's go
through his list because it is solid, and I'm gonna

(01:19:37):
read his opening first and foremost, because I want to
see if you guys catch on to why I started
thinking that he was gonna gonna nail it on the head.
We've heard it so often it's become a cliche. This
is the most important election of our lifetime. But that
doesn't mean it's not true. I believe it really is.
For one overarching reason, this is the only election we
can affect. The outcomes of twenty twenty and twenty sixteen,

(01:20:00):
in all previous campaigns are now in the rearview mirror.
Nothing can be done about them. Not so regarding what
happens on November fifth. And at this point, by the way,
I'm thinking, Okay, he's going there. It's really gonna happen.
The people we choose to next lead our nation are
up to us, and that makes this like any future election.
And I was like, oh crap, he's not going to
get there. He's not going there, And I was right,

(01:20:22):
But we'll get there the most important election of our lifetime.
That said, the stakes are so high this time, and
I can think of nearly a dozen more reasons. So
I'm gonna just buzz through his reasons because they're good. Again,
I don't disagree with any of them. Well, let's buzz
through them. Top one, it's an effect or its effects
maybe more consequential than ever. Okay, so that's kind of

(01:20:42):
a nothing burger, but still it's true. You know, he's
looking at Woodrow Wilson nineteen twelve, Franklin Roosevelt nineteen thirty two,
Reagan in eighty. Those are all important ones. But whether
in these states, whether good or ill, we understand the
hands we've been dealt in the past. In a world
where we're being told that borders are bad, killing babies
is good, and men should be like in women's locker rooms,
the paradigm that we crystallize now under the next administration

(01:21:04):
could be even more game changing. Okay, fair constitution is
under attack more than ever. Wholeheartedly agree that that's the truth.
I don't think I need to elaborate. You'all get to
see it and live it pretty much every single day.
Next Congress is weaker than ever, which, look, I get
it you. You know, Congress's primary role should be oversight
to prevent a tyrannical executive branch. I agree, but I

(01:21:29):
don't want to give them necessarily more power to do so.
I would rather just take down the power of the
administrative state. But I understand the sentiment here. What he's
saying is that Congress should be taking on more responsibility,
take away the administrative states powers, reduce the bureaucratic state
to next to nothing. Okay, that'd be great, but then
you're going to have an overpowered Congress, and that's a

(01:21:50):
whole other set of of problems. Next, the courts are
as sailed more than ever. Yes, but we also have
judicial overreach. So to some extent, I'll disagree a little
bit there too. What he's saying, though, and let's just
read through this one. The one branch of government operating
someone as it should is the recently reconstituted Supreme Court,
which is slowly reigning in decades of abusive legislation from

(01:22:11):
the bench. A proper separation of power, sowever, is unacceptable
to the left, and if it gets its way, it
will expand and pack the court, removing the Constitution's last
line of defense. And we must prevent that from happening.
So he is cracked there when he's he didn't word
it right. The courts are more sale than what he
should say is the Supreme Court is on the verge

(01:22:33):
of losing its essentially its autonomy. Because right now, the
way that this people the left especially and some people
in the right too, but the left especially, they're like, oh,
there shouldn't be a lifetime appointment. Oh they shouldn't have
so much power. Oh, you know, it shouldn't be just nine.
What can we just look if there were six, let's

(01:22:54):
say there were five left wing justices and one neutral
justice and three three right wing justices. Currently they wouldn't care.
So this isn't about the court. This is about getting
their way, and right now they can't get their way
with the current We'll call about about three and a half. Really,

(01:23:16):
I would say, no, not three. So I guess to
do the math, right, you got to two constitutional conservatives,
and really we don't really want to call them conservatives,
we'll just call them originalists. They're both getting old. We've
got three that are I would say, lukewarm, lukewarm originalists,
maybe a little bit a little off from time to time.

(01:23:38):
Then you've got Chief Justice Roberts, who's I mean, he
leans left. They say he's a conservative, he's not. And
then you've got the three radicals. Right, it is fine.
And I would say that, by the way, if it
was the other way around, if it was five, five
to one and three instead of three to one and five,
I would still say that it's fine, leave it the

(01:23:58):
way it is and let's just fight to win the
executive branch where we can name better justices. Anyway, that's
not what they want, and he is right there. So next,
today's voters are more civically ignorant than ever. Duh, very
clear there. Next, our national nation's debt is more gargantuan
than ever. And here's the you know, people say that,
and that's true. I'm not disagreeing with it, but so far,

(01:24:21):
you know, if I have one criticism of Trump said,
he hasn't talked you know, I remember before he was
talking about reducing the DAD. He hasn't really mentioned that much,
not at all, not on the campaign trail. He's talked
about reigning and spending to some extent, but not even
really that. I mean, he is not a physical conservative. Now,
I don't care what anybody says he's he's not a
fiscal conservative. He's he's more concerned. I mean, you could

(01:24:44):
say that he's definitely more conservative than Kamala or Joe
Biden or Obama or anybody like that. Sure, but you
can't call him a fiscal conservative. He's not going to
reduce the DAT. But again, that's not something that's like, wow,
it would be nice if we could, but since we can't.
We Still, we're still gonna support Trump. Our borders Next,
our borders are more poorest than ever. Very true, And

(01:25:04):
we'll get to that assimilation is weaker than ever. Again,
very true. As a matter of fact, assimilation is being
considered somehow racist, which is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
No nation, no other nation, is like that. Okay, no
other nation has ever been like that. There's never been
a nation that that that considers itself to be in
sin just by its very existence. It's no the nations

(01:25:25):
that that has not demanded assimilation. Hey, fine, you want
to come come live here, great, do so, but you're
gonna play by our rules. You're gonna learn our culture.
You want to to diversify and add some culture to ours, great,
but don't don't not assimilate. You gotta assimilate. Next, Drugs
are deadlier than ever, Yes, big deal. But that's not

(01:25:47):
necessarily an election issue because it's not like the left
is there anymore. They were you know, you had some
cities like uh like Seattle and Portland. They're like, oh yeah,
legalized drugs and I was like, whoa, whoa, whoa, this sucks.
You know, Yeah, drugs are deadlier than ever. But that's
not It's an important issue. I don't want to downplay

(01:26:09):
the issue itself. What I'm saying is the partisan repercussions
on the issue are are less unless you tied it
into the border then all of a sudden, of course,
obviously the Trump side has a huge advantage there. Weapons
of war are deadlier than ever. Very true. Well, let's
read it just so that you guys understand why I'm
kind of blowing it off. The world has always been

(01:26:29):
a dangerous place, but the possibility of global destruction is
fewer than one hundred years old. Today. Not only are
we seeing frightening advances in conventional weaponry like hypersonic missiles
and deadly drones, but entirely new kinds of weaponry such
as directed energy and genetic weapons. We must continually enhance
our ability to defend ourselves. And that's true. So I
guess what he's saying is that, Look, Trump is supportive

(01:26:51):
of the military. Kamala is not. The Democrats have. I mean,
as far as the Democrats are concerned, our military should
just be a a laboratory for wokeness and climate change attacks.
That's it, and that makes them very dangerous. Last, but
not least, on his list. The world is more dangerous
than ever. There are hot wars raging in Europe in

(01:27:12):
the Middle East, which of either of which could easily
expand to engulf the region or the world. And while
most of our adversaries are irrational what not wishing to
die any more than we do. Okay, I still disagree.
Some consider martyred him in honor. We need a foreign
policy with teeth that balances the diplomacy with deterrence. That's
a dozen reasons. And okay, he's right, that is his

(01:27:35):
dozen reasons. Now I'm going to explain the number one reason,
the biggest reason. Okay by far hands All those are important, okay,
very important. But why is this particular election the most
important of our lifetimes? Some people have voiced to have
expressed it, and many very strong conservative voices in right

(01:27:56):
leaning as well as alternative media have said that if
we lose this election, this will be the last election.
And they're right. The part where I slightly disagree. They say,
if we will have permanent democrat rule, I disagree. We
won't have permanent democrat rule. We will have permanent globalist rule.
We will be handing this nation over to the globalists

(01:28:17):
open borders. I mean, we can't afford another six months
of open borders, let alone another four years. We cannot
afford to have corporate media out there saying, huh, well,
there's only I mean, we're only talking about a handful
of apartment complexes that have been taken over by a
transnational gang. I mean, the lunacy, the idiocy, the globalism

(01:28:42):
is so rampant already that we won't survive another four
years of it. We won't have another free and fair
election again. Illegal aliens will be voting in the twenty
twenty eight election. If we even make it to twenty
twenty eight. As a nation. It's not just about Democrats winning.

(01:29:05):
It's about the globalist winning. People like Mitch McConnell. I
know that he's allegedly not running again, But people like
Mitch McConnell, they don't have to fear. Okay, it's not like, oh,
it's just going to be you know, one hundred Democrat
senators and we're gonna have seventy five years consecutive Democrats
in the White House. That's not how it's gonna work.

(01:29:26):
There will be There will be uniparty swamp members that
win offices. But they're still going to be globalists. They're
still going to be beholden to the United Nations, the
World Economic form of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, the
World Health Organization. They're still going to hand over a sovereignty.
We will not survive. We will not survive. I cannot

(01:29:47):
stress this enough. To say that this will establish permanent
democrat rule is downplaying the reality of our predicament. It's
basically under selling the true nature of what we're faced with,
and that is pure globalism that will engulf and eventually,
and when I say eventually, I'm not talking about decades.

(01:30:08):
I'm talking about years, possibly even months, possibly even months,
until the specter of globalism is all that we see.
You look up in the sky, you look down on
the ground, you look around you, you look at the military,
the police, you look at everything, and it's all going

(01:30:29):
to be about globalism. And they're going to shield it,
of course, by claiming that it's about about diversity, equity
and inclusion, and it's about climate change, and it's about
all these other work policies that are all all just
smoke screens for the end reality, which is to take
the United States of America and to chop it down

(01:30:52):
as far as possible to where the best case scenario
we have is that we are part of one of
the ten regional powers that the Club of Rome and
Henry Kissinger and Klaus Schwab have dreamed about since the
seventies at the very least maybe before then. They want

(01:31:13):
us to either be part of that ten and again
that's the best case scenario for us in their version
of the world, or if they crush us so bad
that we just disappear altogether, just poof, We're gone. The
United States is just non existent. They're okay with that too,
as long as they get their ten regional powers that
are controlled by one centralized power. And of course, if

(01:31:33):
you read the Book of Revelation, you'll see that their
plans they be in the Globalists and the Book of
Revelation are very well aligned. Okay, I'm not saying they're
not aligned as far as their goals, their intentions or
anything like that. What I'm saying is they're aligned as
far as and I don't know if they did it
on purpose, but I mean if they didn't, then that's

(01:31:56):
spooky and we're probably toast. If they did, then you know,
we keep fighting and maybe we get a reprieve. Maybe
we're we're a decade off, one hundred years off, a
millennium off. Maybe it's we're not there yet. I think
we might be in the end times. I think we
probably are in the end times. But that doesn't mean
that we don't keep fighting the good fight. And right

(01:32:19):
now that good fight means between now an election day
and probably after election day, we expose the truth. We
do our best to unveil any massive widespread voter fraud
that's going to be taking place that we can affect,
whether it's watching polls, getting the word out, getting voters
to the polls, making sure that every friend, relative, co worker,

(01:32:44):
Bob at the convenience store get them to vote. This
is it. This is the most important election of our lifetime,
because if we lose this one, then we won't have
another one that we can correct the issue. This is
our last chance to either get back on track or

(01:33:07):
to say goodbye to the United States of America. When
Trump took office in twenty seventeen, he inherited a pretty
bad economy. We were just coming off eight years of
Barack Obama. Six years of Obamacare, we were six or
seven or eight years removed from the economic downturn that

(01:33:27):
was actually the predicate upon which bricks and dedollarization and
all that stuff got started. People started, people across the globe,
nations started losing faith in America's ability to be the
steward of the world's economy. And then, of course, fast
forward to Joe Biden the swift payment sanctions against Russia,
and that was pretty much the last straw for a

(01:33:48):
whole lot of nations, vast majority of them have been
looking for an alternative to the US dollar as the
world reserve currency. Of course, the petro dollar died back
in June. After fifty years, it's gone. We're in trouble.
An article over at h and the point being, let

(01:34:08):
me let me before we gets the article. Trump, if
he is able to win, if the Republicans are able
to retain control of the House, gain control of the Senate,
We're not looking at a quick turnaround the way that
Trump was able to do in twenty seventeen. Okay, that
was a rapid turnaround. As a matter of fact, that
was one of the major facets, the major things that
Trump did that turned me from somebody who was kind

(01:34:30):
of lukewarm. Okay, I guess, I guess it's Trump that
all of a sudden, it's like, holy cow, this guy's amazing.
I mean, the flip for me, it was it was
pretty fast. Obviously I wasn't going to vote for Hillary Clinton,
but I wasn't happy with Trump until he was actually
in office. That's a true story. Now, of course I
am a die hard fan, but but it was how

(01:34:55):
he was able to turn the economy around to fulfill
his promises. That's what endeared him to me. He's not
going to be able to do the exact same thing,
not as quickly as he did back then. Even if
again he's able to Republicans can get control of pretty
much all of DC, Even if they're able to get
control of many more states, it's going to take a while.

(01:35:16):
We are in that badest shape. Joe Biden and Kamala
Harris have decimated this economy. And anybody who says it
was COVID, Okay, it's twenty twenty four, Okay, we should
be We should have hit rock bottom with COVID and
bounced up way higher. Inflation should not be such an issue,

(01:35:37):
and yet here it is. Dedollarization shouldn't be a foregone conclusion,
and yet it is. And now not just now, but well,
for the last four years it's been truly harming businesses.
But it's getting worse. This article over at We have
it over at jd Rucker dot com. Cross posts with

(01:35:59):
permission from the Economic Collapse blog. Michael Snyder, great writer
over there, says you can't get blood out of a stone.
US consumers have been squeezed bone dry as the US
economy falters, and I'm not going to read the article. Basically,
people are upset. Inflation is horrible. It's rising faster than wages.
That's not a good sign. It means that cost of

(01:36:19):
living and quality of life have cost of living has
gone up, quality of life has gone down as a result.
We can see that in the home improvement industry. Of
course True Value. We've covered this file for bankruptcy. They're
going to be forced to sell to do it best.
They're going to continue to operate their forty five hundred
independently owned locations for now, but they will be pushed

(01:36:42):
out once Chapter eleven is the process is complete. Home
Depot as they're showing a decline in sales by three
to four percent. Now keep in mind, with inflation, generally speaking,
you have increased sales. I'm talking about sales dollars, not
in ssscessarily higher number of sales because people are hurting
and less likely to get involved in, for example, home improvement,

(01:37:06):
but because costs and prices are going up as well,
you shouldn't see that big of a decline in sales.
When it says three to four percent, that's based upon
the new prices, which means that it's probably closer to
ten twelve to fifteen percent actual decrease in true revenue,
bottom line revenue. But that's neither here nor there. What
about PPG, another home improvement giant, the global manufacturer of paints, coatings,

(01:37:29):
and specialty materials, is laying off nearly two thousand workers
as it trims operations, costs and sells off a chunk
of its architectural business. Is it just home improvement? No,
of course, not Walgreens, the drug industry. Look, if there's
any industry that should not be affected by bad economy,

(01:37:52):
it should be pharmaceuticals. It should be the drug industry.
They shouldn't be hurting Unfortunately, because of the way that
they've situated themselves. They being the major major drug stores CVS,
right Aid, Walgreens, they position themselves to where they need

(01:38:15):
all of it. They can't just sell drugs. They also
have to be able to sell their merchandise, groceries even
they have to be kind of that tweener. Right. You
got like grocery stores there there where the primary and
you've got at the bottom, you've got convenience stores. If
you've got to go get a ham and cheese sandwich
wrapped in plastic that you microwave for one minute, nasty,

(01:38:41):
So you got that. And then right in between is
your that's your where your drug stores are. Well, they're hurting.
They're not They're not doing very well because of that.
People are still buying drugs they have to, but they're
just not in For the most part, a lot of
it doesn't cost them as much money, but still they're hurting.
Who else is a restaurant business? This is very well documented.

(01:39:04):
Rest in Peace TGI Fridays. That's such a shame. Who else? Churches?
LifeWay Research is a give it. The giving to churches
has fallen from coast to coast. No surprise there. Everybody's
running out of money. Everybody's hurting right now. And as

(01:39:27):
much as I love to say that we elect Trump
and things are going to be fixed in a day,
a week, a month, a year, I don't think so.
I think we're looking at a long time. And uh.
That means that, you know, number one, tighten your belt.
Number two, fine alternatives ways to make more money. Number three,

(01:39:47):
tighten your belt some more. You know, down, downgrade, downsize,
do whatever it takes. What we don't want is what's
actually happening, which is a whole lot of people going
into a whole lot more debt. We were a debtor
nation before we started borrowing a lot more, before we
started paying for pretty much everything with credit cards. Now

(01:40:09):
we are in deep, deep, deep deep trouble, both as
individuals as well as the nation and everything in between.
Cities are hurting, States are hurting, Counties are hurting, communities
are hurting, businesses are hurting. Everybody's hurting. I'm not trying
to be Debbie Downer here. I just want to set
a realistic expectation. We're gonna fight like hell to try

(01:40:31):
to get Trump in back into the White House where
he belongs. We're going to fight to give him a
majority in the House and the Senate, which he needs.
But even then, in their best case scenario, we're still
a long ways from being able to even mostly recover.
I'm not saying full recovery. I'm saying get to the
point of stability. It's gonna take a while. Keep that

(01:40:53):
in mind and adjust accordingly. The election is nearly upon us.
Will there be any major October surprizes yet to be unleashed?
We will see. One thing people always ask me, because
they know I've now apparently built up a reputations being
knowledgeable about gold and silver and retirement accounts and all

(01:41:15):
that good stuff. People ask me, which is going to
be better for gold and silver, Trump or Kamala, And
I said, look, number one, don't take that into consideration,
because either will be good for gold. Lest we forget,
gold jumped up like fifty one percent during Trump's first term,
So don't say, oh, well, if Trump wins, it's going
to be bad for gold. That's not true. That's just
not true. There's a reason why analysts, even with Trump

(01:41:37):
projected to win, there's a reason why analysts are still
looking at gold hitting three thousand, four thousand, five thousand
dollars per ounce, possibly in the future. Now, I'm not
an economic advisor, so I'm not going to try to
give you advice, but I will tell you this that
there are many, many Americans who are moving their wealth,
their retirement, their life's savings to physical precious metals. And

(01:41:58):
the one company that you should do that with, in
my humble opinion, is Genesis Gold Group. This is a
faith driven company, Okay, I can't get around that. You know,
they are unabashedly faith driven. They're unabashedly America. First, these
guys aren't rooting for Kamala even though Kamala, Yes, Will
Kamala be good for gold in the short term, you
bet you well. Should be good for the economy. Long

(01:42:21):
term absolutely not, not even short term, not at all.
So that's why they're what we trum believe it or not.
A lot of the gold companies that these conservative show
hosts are promoting they back the Democrats. I know that
sounds crazy, but they do because it'll it behooves them
when Democrats are in office. So check out Genesis Gold Group.
You can go to my personal website for them at
JDR goold dot com. That's JDR gold dot com. You'll

(01:42:45):
get a free wealth protection kit, a Gold Guy, the
Definitive twenty twenty five Gold Guides. You'll get all this stuff,
So check it out. JDR goold dot com. All right,
that's it. I'm gonna go watch Dirty Dancing. No, I'm
just kidding. Actually, what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna

(01:43:06):
go to jdrucker dot com slash Popcorn, and I'm gonna
support my daughter and her charter school out here in
California and her band. Okay, you know, the band always
gets the shaft. Did you ever notice that in schools
it's like the football team, which I was on the
football team. But the football team they get all the
money they need, but the band they gotta they gotta

(01:43:27):
sell cookies or in this case, popcorn. Jdrucker dot com
slash Popcorn is only from Monday and Tuesday, so don't
go there on Wednesday. Unfortunately, they made a really tiny window,
lily bitty window for us to be able to help
support my daughter and her charter school. And uh so,
please buy lots of popcorn. Jadrucker dot com slash popcorn.

(01:43:50):
Lord willing I will be back very soon with another episode.
But in the meantime, y'all stay strong, stay safe, and
God bless and don't forget. We are going to be
trying to do a show every day at eleven am Pacific,
two pm Easter, and anywhere in between if you're not
on one of the coasts, So keep that in mind
and spread the word. We're going for consistency at the

(01:44:13):
jd Rucker Show.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Does Donald Trump REALLY Have This Election "In the Bag"?

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Does Donald Trump REALLY Have This Election "In the Bag"?

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal