Embracing Conspiracy Theories... and the Bible

Before the election, the focus of The JD Rucker Show was on politics. Sure, we mixed in discussions about culture and faith, but the show was very much like so many out there in the podcast world.
Not anymore.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
M m.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
M hm, m hm m m hmmmm hm.

Speaker 3 (00:40):
Hello, my friends, and welcome to another episode of The J. D.

Speaker 4 (00:44):
Rutgers Show. The new and revamped J. D. Rutgers Show.

Speaker 3 (00:47):
We uh, we are in the process of making some
pretty darn cool changes. I've I have not been this
excited about doing my show in well weeks. I get
excited for certain shows, it's true, but as far as
the overall direction of the show, this is extremely exciting
to me because for really the last year year and

(01:09):
a half, my focus has been on politics. Culture and
faith has always been the theme of the show, but this.

Speaker 4 (01:15):
Has been so politics heavy.

Speaker 3 (01:17):
Obviously with election season that made a lot of sense.
And I had told myself even before the election, I said,
you know what, when the election comes, you're going to
have to make a decision, and you're going going to
have to decide is this really what you want to do?
Do you want to be a political commentator? And really
the question was do you want to do what so

(01:39):
many hundreds thousands of people are already doing in the
United States, which is starting conservative political podcasts. And look,
I'm not one to shy away from competition. I don't
mind a crowded field. I feel that I can offer
more than than your average average podcaster. But with that said,

(02:00):
it would be different if that was my passion. But
politics has always been just a side distraction for me.
It's always been something where it's like, eh, I mean,
it's important, it effects us. I really should talk about
it because there are so many shenanigans happening. But it's
just my heart's not into it. And that's not to
say that I'm not going to talk about politics. I'm
just not going to focus solely on politics. If you

(02:24):
watch from the beginning, you will notice that we have
a brand new opening, new theme song, new everything, and
I think that really portrays more of the direction of
the show. We are going to be talking more more
about conspiracies, more about the Bible. Those are the two
things that I believe are I'm best suited to discuss. Sure,
I think I've got some excellent, excellent insights when it

(02:47):
comes to breaking down the fifteen hundred page budget or
Continuing Resolution the CR, it's a debacle. I am going
to actually do that today, but I want to really
break it down from the perspective of what this means,
not necessarily oh look at this waste, look at that waste.

Speaker 4 (03:07):
That's easy. What's a little bit.

Speaker 3 (03:09):
More challenge, at least for some but not for me,
is to avoid the narrative and go after the truth.
Is what is really behind this push to get this
up and out there so fast it was so little
time for anybody to be able to digest it. That's
not an accident, that's not a flaw. That's a feature

(03:32):
of how our government operates, and it's a feature that
needs to change. So, yeah, I'm not I'm still gonna
be talking about politics. One of the reasons that I
did stay with politics through the election and even a
little bit after the election, is because when it comes
to sponsorships, when it comes to to sales, look, this
is not just a hobby. This is what I do,

(03:55):
and so it has to be able to generate enough
money to feed my family. Now, being in more of
a political arena, being conservative media that has that has
been very beneficial for us in the past, because, let's
face it, you know, you can get a lot more
sponsorships if you're talking about talking about how bad the

(04:17):
Dems are and how we're going to own the Libs.
It's a lot a lot easier to get sponsorships for
that than if you're talking about, you know, oh my gosh,
what are the the demons doing in our schools? You know,
look at this, look at this crazy vaccine story, or
this this insane you know what they're calling a UFO

(04:38):
or now a ua V or a u v A
or us DA whatever they come up with a new
acronym for for those crazy flying things all the time.
It is harder to get sponsorships. And for those who
didn't know, there's no reason for you that you should know,
because I haven't spoken about it openly, But I think

(05:00):
it's time. You know, we have one of my endeavors,
something that I put a ton of effort into the
last two and a half three years. It appears that
it may be the latest victim of biodonomics. Nothing set
in stone yet. I'm still trying to work through the
details with people that I'm working with, but it's not

(05:23):
looking good. I mean, between inflation and everything that's happening,
the lack of economic stability here in the United States
of America, we have we went from from thriving to
starving in a matter of months. Really, it like the
rug was pulled out from under us, and so trying

(05:46):
to work through that and as a result, it's funny
because it's an endeavor. I would like to say, well,
you know, I've got to be conscious of my time
and my sponsors. But here's the thing is that despite
the fact that we've sold I personally have helped to
sell millions of dollars with the products, I have never
actually received a penny from the company. You know, You're like,

(06:09):
what in the world, how is that possible. I know,
silly me made a bad deal, but I've never actually
been paid for it. And now it looks like there's
a chance that i might not get paid. And I'm
not saying, oh woe is me. I'm telling you that
that this was part of the part of the thought process,
you know, I've gone through for the last year and
a half, two years trying to build this as as

(06:32):
a as a brand, as a business. It's like, look,
you know I can, I can help you sell more
my pillows and nothing. You know, I'm still gonna be
talking to you about my pillows. But but it's not me.
It's not where my heart is. My heart is with
Jesus Christ, my Lord and savior. My heart is with
the United States of America and not just fighting against

(06:54):
the Libs. It really is about the uniparty swamp. And
once we start talking, you know, it's easy to talk
about it's the Democrats are the bad guys and the
Republicans are the good guys.

Speaker 4 (07:04):
But I don't believe that.

Speaker 3 (07:06):
I believe that the vast majority ninety nine point nine
percent of Democrat politicians truly are legitimately the bad guy
bad guys. But unfortunately, probably seventy five eighty ninety percent
maybe of the Republicans are also the bad guys. I
know a lot of you don't want to hear that.
A lot of you want to think, oh, but the
Republicans are doing so good. No, the Republicans fail miserably constantly.

(07:30):
The Democrats are successful with their stupidity, and the Republicans,
who have what should be the moral high ground as
well as the ideological high ground, they fail because they're
not really wanting to fix things. Here's the problem with bureaucrats.
Here's the problems with politicians as well. Is that if
you do well enough, if you're a bureaucrat and you

(07:51):
do well enough, then you are eliminating your job. You
have to have problems in order to run a bureaucracy.
If you eliminate all the problems, if you are a
per bureaucrat, then your necessity is obliterated. Sort of the
same thing with politicians. It's easier to see it from
our perspective. It's easier to see it democrats on the left,
because they will say, you know, look, here's a problem.

(08:14):
There's poverty in the city. We're going to fix the
problem by raising taxes on the rich and giving it
back to the poor. And then as a result, what
ends up happening is the economy tanks in the particular city,
and then all of a sudden, you have more poor.
And then they rinse and repeat, well, look at all
those poverty. We're gonna have to to make some more
regulations and control more businesses and raise more taxes in

(08:35):
this and it just it's a cycle. And this goes
on for years or even decades. Right, they're able to
perpetuate control over cities like Chicago. Right, who hasn't seen
Republican control in not in my lifetime. So they're able
to continue down that path by failing. If they were successful,

(08:58):
if they were able to eliminate poverty, they would probably
lose the majority, but they they know that they can
thrive off poverty. Right, same thing happens on the Republican side.
On the Republican side especially, we'll see it with a
lot of a lot when it comes to war, for example,
or foreign policy. The neo cons still do control a
huge chunk of the GOP, which is why there's so

(09:19):
many Republican lawmakers that are saying, oh, we got to
back Ukraine, Gotta send more aid to Israel, send more
aid to Ukraine, send it to Taiwan, to the Philippines.
We got just kind of send eight everywhere. We need
to put troops in every nation we need to. We
can't turn our back when you know, oh, Mitch mccollins
out there, Oh you know Trump and the mega isolationists,
they're gonna be They're gonna be all and then he freezes,

(09:44):
of course, but you get the idea. I'm not gonna
sit here and just be rah rah for the GOP.
There are certain ones that I like. Obviously, I like
a lot of the people that Trump's putting together in
the White House, not all of them. There are some
that you know, compared to twenty sixteen, it's night and day. Okay,

(10:05):
we are winning big time compared to the people that
he put into the White House in twenty sixteen.

Speaker 4 (10:11):
But it's still not perfect.

Speaker 3 (10:13):
There are still people that we have to watch, people
that I'm concerned about, and so not focusing so much
on Republican politics and focusing more on trying to find
the underlying causes to our problems in politics. That to me,
is a better direction for the J. D Ruckers Show.
But I'm also going to be talking about the things

(10:34):
that you're not supposed to talk about. That's funny. I
put in I'd put in a clip from in the opening.
My wife actually had me put it in. It was
from the I think it was the Air Force, the
tapes they'd released four years ago about them. Look, you know,
here's a UFHO and then all of a sudden, the
UFO phenomenon. The start of Congress is having hearings, Senates

(10:56):
having hearings. You know, all these bombshells are popping out there,
and YadA, YadA, YadA. It seems as if we're being
set up for an extraterrestrial or extra dimensional whichever direction
they choose. Because they're setting out in both directions, either
an extraterrestrial or extra dimensional incursion or announcement.

Speaker 4 (11:17):
We're not alone, not to me.

Speaker 3 (11:19):
I put those things out there, and I am a
firm believer that there are no aliens, there are no
extra dimensional creatures other than if you want to say
aliens or extra dimensional creatures are demonic or otherwise, you know,
Nephelim related, or however you want to word it. You know,

(11:43):
there's I'm not going into specifics about my thoughts at
this point because I just want to let you know
what it is, versus explaining what I believe the reality is.

Speaker 4 (11:57):
In other words, I don't think.

Speaker 3 (11:59):
That it's it's anything that comes from another planet, and
if it does come from a separate or alternate dimension,
that would be coming from behind the veil, the veil
that's described in the Bible. I do you think that
this is more more demonic in nature than anything that

(12:21):
could be attributed to science fiction or spacecraft. Now you
might say, well, but what about all these sightings of this,
that or the other. Okay, well, none of them, None
of the things that we've seen would lead us to
believe that it's It's impossible in other words, there's no
evidence that says it's extraterrestrials or extra dimensionals or even demons,

(12:46):
like there's no evidence of points in one direction or
the other. I choose to take the perspective that aligns
more with a biblical worldview, and it does seem to jibe.
It seems to pan out. So so yeah, so that
is that is the direction that that we are heading

(13:07):
talking about things that would get me banned on YouTube.
I already got a warning last week or last month
about talking about medical misinformation. Of course I was talking
about the jabs, but I'm not I'm no longer going
to care whether YouTube bands me or not. My focus
is gonna be on on Rumble on uh pardon me.

(13:34):
Never eat a Macadamian that before you start a segment
of a show, because you're gonna get that little bit
stuck in your throat.

Speaker 4 (13:42):
It's awful.

Speaker 3 (13:44):
But uh hmm, I'm gonna focus on Rumble, which you
can follow my channel obviously. I'm on World of YouTube,
I'm on a bit shoot, Bridy on Frank Speech, a
bunch of various places, but the only place where you'll
be able to find the entirety of my shows. Uh,
we'll be on my rumble channel at jdrucker dot com

(14:04):
slash rumble that'll redirect you to the I don't want
to tell you it's rumble dot com slash see slash
the you know, jdrucker dot com slash rumble that takes
you directly to my channel. Also, I'll be focusing a
lot on x dot com slash jd rucker my my
Twitter account where somebody had noted yesterday because I have

(14:26):
open dms and it's like, hey, you know you say
you have open dms, but I've been waiting for three
days to get a reply from you. One bad part
about having open dms. For those who don't have open dms, Uh,
you do get dozens of dms per day, and I
do try my best to go go through them all.
The best way to contact me really is jdrucker dot
com slash talk. That'll that sends me a direct email

(14:48):
and then I can I actually get get to keep
it separate.

Speaker 4 (14:52):
All right, So.

Speaker 3 (14:55):
Lots of things changing, changing for the better. We're going
to be talking more about conspiracies, and yes there are theories.
But here's the thing I think most Americans have been
indoctrinated into this concept that conspiracy theories or conspiracy theorists
are bad. That is in itself a psyop from the

(15:20):
CIA to alleviate conspiracy theories. Because here's the reality. There
are conspiracies. There are people in power who conspire against
other people, including those who have enough power to conspire
against all of us or the vast majority of us.

(15:40):
So there are conspiracies period. You know, the conspiracies could
be demonic. Conspiracies could be focused on not just you know,
a powerful group of elites lead cabal members, but they
could also be, for example, a conspiracy from big pharma executives,
from the mill military industrial complex, from members of Congress,

(16:03):
from people in the White House, from.

Speaker 4 (16:05):
Judges across the nation.

Speaker 3 (16:07):
If you think that there are no conspiracies, if you
think that every sitting judge none of them get get
bribed or bullied or blackmailed. If you think that every
vote is only legal, votes are ever counted. If you
think any of those things, then well, number one, you're wrong,
and number two, that's the only point believing those things

(16:29):
to not be true. That's when you can say, okay,
so I don't I'm against conspiracy theories.

Speaker 4 (16:35):
Otherwise you shouldn't be.

Speaker 3 (16:36):
I don't care which side of the political aisle you're on,
what your faith is, what your race is, what anything is.
You should acknowledge there are conspiracies currently in the world,
and that because of the secrecy surrounding most of them,
all we have to address them are theories. So to me,

(16:58):
when people say you're a conspiracy theory, I do not
consider that to be a pejorative. Even if they do,
I do not consider it to be an insult, even
if that's how they intended it. I am a conspiracy
theorist because I have to look at what's happening. I
have to look at the conspiracies, the people that are
conspiring against other people, including me or you, and then
I have to formulate theories about what's really going on.

(17:21):
What's going on with the drones in New Jersey, what's
going on with Ukraine with them their suction black hole,
whatever you want to call it, of aid that's going there.
Why is so much aid going there? Nobody in DC, nobody, nobody,

(17:44):
not a single person in our government legitimately believes that
Ukraine can win the war. It is a lost cause.
It is a matter of time before Russia wins that war,
and outside of will say the the absolute total idiots.
There might be a few of those, but otherwise ninety

(18:05):
nine zero point nine percent of members of Congress, of bureaucrats,
members of the White House, the almost almost one hundred
percent of them believe that Ukraine is going to lose
the word eventually.

Speaker 4 (18:20):
So where is the.

Speaker 3 (18:24):
Where's the kickback, where's the the where's the conspiracy? Who's owned?
How do they get owned? Are they getting anything back
from it?

Speaker 4 (18:42):
All?

Speaker 3 (18:42):
These are questions that need to be answered, and you
can't get that from corporate media. And here's the thing,
you can't really get it from conservative media because conservative
media really wants to say, oh, it's a waste, that's great,
But there's more to it than that. You know, they say, Oh,
Lindsey Graham as a Graham is owned by the military
industrial complex. That's why he's doing it. Yes, that's true,

(19:05):
but what more, There's more to it than that. Why
has he owned? How has he owned? And what repercussions
does that have on you and me? These are the
questions that I want to answer. So thank you so
much for spending your time watching your valuable time watching
or listening to the jd Ruckers Show. I pray that

(19:27):
I am able to deliver what I'm promising. I pray
that I'll be able to hopefully enlighten you and it
won't just be your standard average you know, Okay, we're
gonna own the lips today. Here's what, Here's what, what
what Cash Matello is doing to fight back, Here's what.
Here's what Chuck Schumer's doing to try to destroy the country.

(19:48):
I'm not saying none of that's important. That is important,
and I'm not saying I'm not gonna cover any of it.
I will cover some of it, but only as it
pertains to narratives and agendas that go deeper than just
what we see on the surface. At the end of
the day, what.

Speaker 4 (20:07):
Is a conspiracy theory?

Speaker 3 (20:09):
Conspiracy theory takes what is out there as the official narrative,
and it digs deeper until it finds the truth that,
to me is valuable and honorable. And sometimes the answers
aren't going to be very pleasing. Sometimes the answers could
get us in trouble for even uttering them. But somebody's

(20:29):
got to do it, and there are other great shows
out there talking about conspiracy theories. One thing I'd noticed though,
is that very few of them actually come back around
to understanding the biblical implications.

Speaker 4 (20:44):
There are biblical.

Speaker 3 (20:45):
Implications almost everything that's happening. There are prophetic implications. There
are spiritual spiritual warfare going on. There are many things
that we need to discuss. And I open open my
dms for a reason. I give you my direct email
way to get into my email box for a reason. Yes,

(21:07):
it does end up resulting in a whole out of spam. Okay, Unfortunately,
nine out of ten of the emails I get are
asking me if I'd like to, you know, more resources
on for whatever, And vast majority of open dms that
I get are are are hey, hey, good looking you

(21:27):
know wow. I mean, all these gorgeous you know, fake
AI models seem to like me. But it's worth it
because I get tidbits of information. Sometimes I get tips,
hints direction. It helps, So again Jdrucker dot com slash

(21:51):
talk that'll go directly to me x dot com slash
jd Rucker.

Speaker 4 (21:56):
My dms are open, and.

Speaker 3 (21:57):
I try to get back within a week, sometimes longer,
it depends.

Speaker 4 (22:01):
It is.

Speaker 3 (22:02):
It's not that it's a, I have to keep it open,
but that doesn't necessarily mean I'm gonna be able to
read through everything. And then, of course, if you want
to find where anywhere I am, because I would imagine
the based upon everything that I'm saying here today and
going forward, I'm probably going to get banned here or

(22:22):
banned there. Band wherever, you can always find the various
places I am at jdrucker dot com slash find Let's
take a quick break. When I get back, let's get
into some of these theories. I would say the vast
majority of my audience is very, very hopeful for the future.
The election of President Trump has been just already we're

(22:45):
seeing shockwaves, we're already seeing results, even at this early stage.
But there are still concerns he can't do everything. He's
going to do everything in his vast power to protect us,
to protect our nation, to defend the Constitution, to protect
our freedoms. But that doesn't mean that there won't be risks, challenges.
We're already seeing wars popping up and rumors of wars

(23:09):
popping up across the globe. Will he be able to
stop all of them?

Speaker 4 (23:13):
I think? So?

Speaker 3 (23:14):
What if he can't What if, for whatever reason, cooler minds,
cooler heads don't prevail, and we find ourselves in the
midst of something tragic.

Speaker 4 (23:24):
What about natural disasters?

Speaker 3 (23:25):
What about just the idiocy of the globalist regimes across
this planet that are trying to do everything they can
to destroy our food supply. They want to control the food,
and they want to make sure that we're not eating
the good stuff, especially as it pertains to protein, and
specifically as it pertains to beef. Beef cow seem to

(23:47):
be the main culprit for every boogeyman propagating bad guy
out there. As a part owner of an all American
patriotic freeze dried state company, I am very very very blessed,
please and honor to be able to offer you all,
offer my wonderful audience an opportunity to take advantage. If

(24:07):
you go to Worldviewbeef dot com and use promo code JDR,
you will get the maximum possible discount. And there are
other discount codes out there that are less. It's not
like with certain companies where oh, you know, it doesn't
matter which promo codes you use.

Speaker 4 (24:21):
Use JDR, I own the company.

Speaker 3 (24:23):
Use promo code JDR and get the maximum discount at
any given moment at worldviewbef dot com. All American, no
mRNA Jabs.

Speaker 4 (24:33):
It's just the good.

Speaker 3 (24:33):
Stuff, so check it out worldviewbef dot com. Funny true story.
I just got done with that shpiel about how we're
going to be focusing more on conspiracy theories and faith
and the Bible and solutions, not just talking about politics.
And the first story that I have is about politics,
but in my defense, it's politics from a slightly conspiratorial angle, because.

Speaker 4 (24:59):
We do this needs to be addressed.

Speaker 3 (25:01):
And of course I'm talking about the Continuing Resolution dropping
on Wednesday. You got to be voted on by Friday.
It's just it's an absolute debacle, and some people are
calling it that. But there are a couple of quick
notes that I don't think people are going to talk
about very much. This article comes from Rebecca downs Over
at townhall dot com. Congress releases plan to avoid government shutdown,

(25:23):
and conservatives are not thrilled with the product.

Speaker 4 (25:25):
And that is that is true.

Speaker 3 (25:26):
And to say that they're not thrilled, some of them,
people like Chip Roy, are absolutely fired up, as they
always get every time we get a cr Those who
are fiscally responsible at least or at least more responsible
than their fellow members of Congress. They get upset because
they know what it means. It's like, Okay, here we
go again. You know, we're not going to do the
budget the right way. You know how long it's been

(25:46):
since we've actually done a budget the right way? I
think it was like nineteen ninety seven was the last time.
It's happened, like three or four times in the last
half century that we've actually done at a proper budget
the right way. You know, the way that's it's laid
out as a proper budgeting process. And there's a reason

(26:07):
for that. That alone is a conspiracy. The reason that
it's never done the right way is because they always
have to. They negotiate for months, but then they wait
till last minute to get it out there, and there's
no time to discuss it. There's no time for arguments,
there's no time to expose it for what it is.
That's the key there. They don't want it exposed. They
don't want anybody like me or you going through and saying, well,
what the heck is this? What the heck is this?

(26:28):
Call your congressman, tell them not to vote for a
look at this, go to page twelve thirty nine. They're
trying to get it past not just the conservative members
of Congress, but they're also trying to get it past
you and me and the scrutiny of anybody in journalism
that's actually still still worth it, which they aren't a
whole lot. But we'll see, maybe that will improve here

(26:49):
in the near future. But I want to get to
a couple of quick points from again from a conspiratorial perspective.
Number one is hereous. Other add ons in the legislation
are also in the reauthorization of the counter Unmanned Aerial
Systems Program. Now, we heard people such as Alejandro Majorcis
and John Kirby out there talking about we need to

(27:11):
reauthorize this, we need to expand powers for DHS over
the skies, make it to where we can actually do
something with this, that or the other, blah blah blah
blah blah. And there were a lot of conservatives and
conspiracy theories who are like, that's it, that's what the
drones are about. This isn't about about sniffing nukes or
aliens or anything like that. It's about politics as usual.

(27:32):
They're just trying to get more power. And I remember
when I started hearing about that, I was thinking, well,
number one, you know, may Ork is going to be
gone in a month, and John Kirby's going to be
gone in a month, So why would they really even care?
And then I thought, well, if it is, if that
is the case, they're trying to get this squeezed through,

(27:55):
then surely that must mean they're trying to to stop
President Trump from taking office. And I don't even want
to entertain that thought at this time, because well, there's
nothing we can do about it, right, so why focus
on something that that may or may not be true?
And at this point I think it's not true.

Speaker 4 (28:15):
But here we are.

Speaker 3 (28:16):
You know, they had nothing to do with the drones
they get They just did it. They just threw it
in there into a fifteen hundred page document. So that should,
hopefully Lord Willing debunk any of those out there still
saying well, it's just about a power grab, that's what
the drones are about. No, the drones are much bigger, bigger,
and more concerning than that. But the other thing to
keep in mind, where to go? He said, I don't

(28:40):
even think it's in here. Well, I'll just I don't
need to read, I'll just tell you what it was.
The Mike Johnson had noted that, you know, this is
just gets it through, because this.

Speaker 4 (28:51):
Goes until March.

Speaker 3 (28:52):
This will just get us through until we have full
control or something to that effect, until til we have
a unified government.

Speaker 4 (28:59):
That's what he said.

Speaker 3 (29:00):
Do we have a unified government, Republicans will control the House,
the Senate, and the White House, and then we can
go into the budget process. Great, do that, Okay, my
complaints about Mike Johnson will evaporate, as well as about
John Thune if they actually do this. And we need
to let them know starting today as soon as the

(29:21):
CR has passed. So so after Friday, we'll say, and
then you got Christmas coming, so we'll say after Christmas.
I want you, I'm begging all of you to contact
them and contact your reps, your Republican reps, senators, whatever,
and tell them you guys will have control. You have
no excuses. We want a full appropriate budget process when
massive cuts.

Speaker 4 (29:44):
Next March.

Speaker 3 (29:45):
No more crs, no more pushing kicking the can down
the road.

Speaker 4 (29:50):
Sick of it.

Speaker 3 (29:53):
Let's take a quick break for station identification. We'll be
back in a few seconds. Be sure to follow my
work everywhere that I work by going to JD. Rutger
dot com slash find f I N D. Jd Rucker
dot com slash find. You'll you'll find my socials, my shows,

(30:14):
my substacks.

Speaker 4 (30:16):
The works.

Speaker 3 (30:20):
Story we had at the top of Thelibertydaily dot com
today got a lot of attention surrounding Reuters and and
the bribe, the bribes that are being paid to them
for propaganda, propaganda from the Biden administration. But here's the thing,
and this is this is where the conspiracy comes in.
That this is actually far bigger, far far more, far

(30:41):
deeper than just oh, Biden paid a lot of money.
Now they're attacking Elon Musk. Now they're win winning Pultzer prizes.
That's a great story, don't get me wrong. But if
you dig deeper, you'll realize that this conspiracy has gone
on for for quite a while and the architect of
it is actually still around and it's not Joe Biden.
But let's start off with the news itself. This comes

(31:02):
from Mike Benz, the Great Mike Benz. He says the
Biden administration paid Ruters over three hundred million dollars in
government contracts. Eleven different Biden government agencies targeted Elon Musk's businesses.
All eleven agencies paid millions to Reuters. Reuters then won
the Pulitzer Prize for their work on Elon Musk and
misconduct at his businesses. Of course, Elon Musk is one

(31:25):
of the prime targets of the left right now. They
go after him, not quite as much as they go
aftor Trump, not even close really, but still a lot
of them are hitting him because they feel that he's
doing too much damage, and he is. I would argue
that no individual, no, not Joe Rogan or Alex Jones
or whoever, Tucker Carlson or jd Vance or anybody else,

(31:49):
none of them had as much of an impact on
President Trump's victory as Elon Musk. He helped to deliver
that victory. I would argue that if he had not
bought Twitter, that we might not have a President Trump today,
well president elect Trump technically speaking. But here's the thing
in that particular post, by the way, that that tweet

(32:09):
ended up getting like well over fifteen million views, already
fifteen thousand retweets.

Speaker 4 (32:15):
It's just a huge hit.

Speaker 3 (32:17):
People are are commenting on it, they're outraged, But I
noticed the very few people are talking about this as
a whole. They're looking at it. Well, Biden paid paid
Ruter's three hundred million, and then Reuter's he did a
hit piece on a musk and they won a Pulitzer Prize. Yeah,

(32:38):
that's a big story. But perhaps the bigger story it's
the fact that this is not an isolated incident, and
it's been going on for quite a while. As a
matter of fact, it was Barack Obama who put this
this forth. This was a two thousand and nine contract
that we're talking about it. And it's not just with
Reuters News, it's with Thompson Reuters, the parent company. They

(32:59):
control vast amounts of data.

Speaker 4 (33:03):
I mean, it's they're up there. They're up there, very.

Speaker 3 (33:06):
Similar to Bloomberg for example, very similar to Microsoft. They
Reuters has Thomson Reuters, and there are various various companies.
They have access to extreme levels of data, and that
data is being purchased by the US government. Not only
is it being purchased, but it's being controlled in many
ways by the US government. They get to dictate who

(33:28):
gets to see all of this massive amounts of data,
which data, of course is very powerful tool when you're
trying to control the people. So this isn't just about propaganda,
though that has a great deal to do with everything
we're talking about. It also has to do with the
overall reach of government into Thompson Routers and Thomson Reuters,

(33:49):
their reach into our lives. Yes, propaganda, big deal, and
we need to try to stop it as much as possible,
But it goes deeper than that. This is why I'm
calling on President Trump to end this contract. I mean,
some people are saying, well, President Trump should should use
this the contract and the money paid to them to

(34:10):
control the narrative and to get they wouldn't do it
wouldn't work. Okay, just because they got paid doesn't mean
they wouldn't have been very much in favor of going
after Elon Musk or Donald Trump or or MAGA or whoever.
Anyway they are left leaning legacy media outlet, they're going
to come out of the fact they got paid. That
helped to maybe push them over the edge and maybe

(34:32):
gave them some guidance as to what to actually report.
But that's not enough, and there's no way that Trump
could could successfully to use this to his advantage or
to America's advantage. So my call here, cut it, cancel it,
I might say, but but we need that data. Yes,
the Trump can use that data. But here's the thing,
we can't continue to shoot ourselves in the foot. Just

(34:55):
because a Trump administration might use that data better doesn't
mean we that data out there or in the hands
of government at all, is weaponized. It's currently being weaponized.
It will be weaponized through the Trump administration as well.
It's not like he's sitting there micromanaging and breaking down
everything every way that the data is being used. He

(35:16):
might be able to get the right people to do it,
But I would argue that in this case, the benefits
of four years with Trump having access to that data
are far overshadowed by the concerns that you and I
should all have regarding what somebody else can and will

(35:37):
and already has done with that data. If I were
to tell you that pretty much every action taken by
the left, by Democrats, by the uniparty swamp, even to
some extent, but definitely by Democrats, that every action taken
against the military is designed to weaken it, and he
might ask why would they want to weaken the military,

(35:58):
and it's because.

Speaker 4 (35:58):
They want us to be vulnerable.

Speaker 3 (36:00):
I wouldn't say that they necessarily want us to be
destroyed or taken over, though that's not out of the question.
I would say some of them definitely do they want
to see the United States of America brought down, destroyed
even and perhaps rebuilt under some Marxist worldview, or if
maybe not even rebuilt at all. That is their intention.

(36:23):
But even those who are a little bit more sane,
more self preserving, would still want us to be weakened
because they look at this as a leverage point. And
it really is one of the reasons that the United
States has been able to maintain its supremacy is because
of its military supremacy. Ever since the end of the
Cold War, it was realized that the United States has
the best military in the world, hands down, and that

(36:46):
even combining militaries of certain countries wouldn't be enough to
take us down. Now with our allies, well, things are changing,
Things are changing dramatically, and they are trying to both
weaken us and strengthen the likes of China, North Korea, Russia, Iran,
even Turkey, who's a NATO member for whatever reason. These
are all potential threats to US, and they need to

(37:08):
not only lift those ones up, but they also have
to take hours down. And it's not just about the
wokeness aspect of it, though, I would argue that ever
since the Obama years, that has been one of the
one of the primary ways to try to weaken and
destroy our military is through wokeness, through through lgbtq A
plus supremacy, through through you know, focusing on oh, we

(37:28):
need to have a kinder, gentler military, It's like, no,
we need war fighters. Duh, it's a military. These are
war fighters. These are are people that are supposed to
defend us through lethal force, not through kindness.

Speaker 4 (37:48):
But it's worse than that.

Speaker 3 (37:49):
They are also trying to affect us our military from
a physical perspective. There's an article came out over at
Just the News Pentagon funds alternative meat proteins from fungus
for military food to meet sustainability goals. There it is sustainability.

Speaker 4 (38:10):
You know. I could do an entire series.

Speaker 3 (38:12):
Of shows about how sustainability and the whole climate change
con is designed to destroy the United States of America.

Speaker 4 (38:19):
That's literally.

Speaker 3 (38:20):
Its singular goal has nothing to do with with preventing
global warming. It's all about the economic and physical destruction
of the United States of America.

Speaker 4 (38:29):
But we're not going to talk about that today.

Speaker 3 (38:31):
According to the article, the Pentagon is funding alternatives to
meat protein, which includes using fungi for food for US
service members, as part of the White House's Sustainable Bioeconomy Agenda.
The Department of Defense is focusing on investments into fungi
protein as an alternative to animal protein, after initially seeking

(38:53):
to fund lab grown meat earlier this year in an
effort to reduce carbon emissions. Critics have pushed back on
such initiatives, arguing that they are are negatively affecting the military.
You think, here, have this mushroom burger that'll that'll make
you strong anyway. In November, the dd announced that it

(39:15):
has given thirty four awards holding sixty million dollars to
bio industrial firms under the Distributed bio Industrial Manufacturing Program YadA, YadA, YadA.
The program is part of Joe Biden's Executive Order fourteen
eighty one. I want you to listen carefully with his name,
Advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing innovation for a sustainable, safe, and

(39:36):
secure American bioeconomy. Now look, I'm actually I'm okay with
a sustainable.

Speaker 4 (39:44):
Military.

Speaker 3 (39:44):
I'm also okay with a safe and a secure America.
Once you start throwing in bio into everything, it really
changes the meaning. Let's read that without the word the
prefix bio on three of those words, and you tell
me if this sounds good. Advancing techechnology and manufacturing innovation
for a sustainable, safe, and secure American economy.

Speaker 4 (40:05):
See that makes sense.

Speaker 3 (40:07):
What you throw in biotechnology, biomanufacturing, bioeconomy, all of a sudden,
everything gets spun on its head. None of that makes
sense anymore. It's all doublespeak. It's all about about weakening America.
In August, as part of the DBIMP, the DoD awarded
nearly one point five million to the Better Meat Company,

(40:29):
which harnesses amazing power of fermentation to make delicious, clean
micoprotein ingredients for food companies to use as the basis
of their hybrid and fully animal free meats. Okay, here's
the thing. There's no such thing as an animal free meat. Okay,
there might be animal free proteins, they are weaker than

(40:50):
animal proteins that has been demonstrated through science. They do
not digest as well, they do not produce muscles as well.
This is not something that we should be testing on
our US military, but we are hopefully not for long.
Anybody who has access to Pete Hayseth, please get this
on his radar. I know that he's already in the

(41:12):
process of sort of I'm hoping that it's just, Hey,
let me get confirmed and then let me go out
and do what I said I was going to do,
which is to really fix the military and end wokeness
completely in the military. I hope that him coming out
and talking to certain senators and saying, oh, yeah, you know,
maybe we can't have women in this combat.

Speaker 4 (41:32):
Role or whatever.

Speaker 3 (41:32):
I don't know, we'll see. Hopefully it doesn't go week
on it. But it's not just about any wokeness. There
is a physical attack from our own government against our
war fighters, and it's coming in the ford of poor
in the form of poor nutrition, poor equipment. I mean,
we are we are not giving them everything they need.

(41:53):
These should be the men and women, These should be
the people that we deliver the gredest healthcare, the greatest food,
high quality nutrient food, not fungui protein, not fermented protein alternatives,
meat alternatives. Give them the real stuff. Stick a burger

(42:15):
in front of them, have them eat it and rinse
and repeat. I assure you they'll get stronger and her
enemies will be more fearful of them. Why because because
they will be loaded with fung Guy.

Speaker 5 (42:32):
I have one kid. You have five kids. How do
you That's incredible.

Speaker 6 (42:36):
It's kind of like being an FBI agent. You're always
kind of monitoring them and making sure everyone's safe.

Speaker 4 (42:40):
Makes good sense.

Speaker 5 (42:40):
You know, I'm actually a real agent, not an agent.
I'm actually a deputy sheriff. You really aren't there many
many years? Are you serious?

Speaker 4 (42:46):
For real life? Real life?

Speaker 6 (42:48):
Unbelievable? Yeah, so you're a sheriff. Played a Princeton pro
football player, greatest superhero of all time.

Speaker 5 (42:55):
Never never drafted to Major League Baseball like you for
the Pittsburgh Pirates very much.

Speaker 4 (43:00):
Knuckleball, how do you hit a knuckleball? You don't? You don't,
you don't. That's the whole point, is the beauty of it.

Speaker 6 (43:04):
You know, we may have always played on different sides,
you know, being the superhero, the super villain, villain, but
we have a lot more in common than I thought
that we did.

Speaker 5 (43:11):
Which is shocking because one thing's for sure. Genesis Gold
Group is a company that we both trust. They make
safeguarding your IRA or your four oh one K as
simple as possible, and I need simple.

Speaker 4 (43:24):
To be honest.

Speaker 6 (43:25):
And with their stellar reputation, they're as solid as the
gold that they sell.

Speaker 5 (43:29):
Like this gold right here, So call Genesis Gold Group
today at one eight hundred, two hundred gold. This is
what they call prepper bar so like you can break
off these see these little pieces.

Speaker 4 (43:39):
Oh, it's on both sides.

Speaker 6 (43:40):
It's great because you can care.

Speaker 4 (43:40):
They're on small and you can literally use it to spend.
Or this one.

Speaker 6 (43:46):
This, this is a big fella.

Speaker 4 (43:47):
That's a really great one.

Speaker 5 (43:47):
So real, this is the real one.

Speaker 4 (43:48):
He won't hold its heavy holy smoke.

Speaker 6 (43:52):
That's pretty great. You can get that one of those
from Genesis Gold yourself. Hey you guys, see this, look Dean, Dean,
that's my kids college tuition money.

Speaker 4 (44:01):
Hold on, who's the.

Speaker 5 (44:11):
Super villain now? Huh? That's my golden.

Speaker 3 (44:25):
All right, let's talk about drones. So we've gone through many, many, many,
many different theories regarding the drones in New Jersey and
across the nation. Two of the most prominent ones that
we've discussed are well. Number one, of course, the the
sniffer theory. I've covered that ad nauseum, really the idea
that there is either a nuke from Ukraine or possibly

(44:48):
possibly material radioactive material for a dirty bomb floating around somewhere,
and then these these sniffers sniffer drones are out there
trying to find it. The other big one that we've
discussed is the idea that they're just trying to reauthorize
use this as a scare tactic to reauthorize the through
the CR, the bill, to to extend and advance the

(45:15):
control of the government over our our airspace, their ability
to to go after drones and to do whatever they
want to do with their own drones.

Speaker 4 (45:23):
That seems to be.

Speaker 3 (45:24):
At least the possibility, but we sort of debunked that earlier.
But here's the thing. Yes, it's in the CR. Yes,
the CR is going to pass, and when it does,
the you know everything, that theory will either be proven
correct or it will be proven incorrect, because we will
if we see the drones all of a sudden stop,
then I'll be like, oh, Okay, well, I guess it
really was just to all this this hoop law was

(45:47):
to advance a bill, in which case, at that point
we need to dig deep into the bill and find
out exactly what's what's happening with it. But as far
as the sniffer part, the we've heard some that have
debunked it. The best one I've seen so far, the
best debunking of it came on Joe Rogan's show, We
Have a Story over here by by Tyler Durden over

(46:09):
at Zero Hedge. Former Fateen pilot tells Joe Rogan drones
aren't WMD sniffers, as drone Gate intense fies. Former US
MAYBE lieutenant and FA eighteen f pilot Ryan Graves appeared
on Joe Rogan's podcast to start this week, dismissing rumors
that drone sightings in the New Jersey, New York Skies

(46:30):
were sniffers searching for radioactive devices. Still, he described the
situation as dangerous and scary.

Speaker 4 (46:36):
YadA, YadA, YadA.

Speaker 3 (46:37):
There there's mister Graves himself. He still says that it's scary,
and he says that whatever it is they're pursuing something,
it's just not not the you know, let's just play it,
play this is Ryan Graves on with Joe Rogan.

Speaker 1 (46:55):
Where it is, and to go get it all right,
And so you imagine that would be their number one priority, right,
So I engage with these folks. I ask them, you know,
what's the sense here. You know, people are kind of
starting to panic a little bit, and this message is
getting out there more and more broadly. And they assured
me that's not the case, that there is not a

(47:15):
loose nuke or other type of weapon of mass destruction
that these objects, whatever they are, are pursuing right now.
Otherwise they would be working in a skiff NonStop to
make make that go away, that problem go away. So
you know, that's part of why I have a high
confidence level that this is not a response to a massive, imminent,
you know, weapons of mass destruction threat on the Eastern seaboard.

(47:40):
So I just want to try to dispel that rumor
right now. I've seen a lot of talk of that online,
and I don't, you know, although this is a you know,
I think a dangerous and scary situation that's going on
right now, at least from that particular angle, that's not
the indications I'm receiving.

Speaker 2 (47:56):
So how would they persuade it just by saying that's
not the case, or have they given you any information
that leads to this conclusion.

Speaker 1 (48:06):
Like they would be the people actively working it essentially, right,
and they're not working it right. So yeah, the government
is holding back that secret from the direct resources within
the government that are responsible for finding these systems, or
they're not working the issue because there's an issue there
to work.

Speaker 2 (48:23):
So the thing that I had heard was that it
was a missing nuke from Ukraine, and if that was
the case, they so what could they do? Is there
any truth to this idea that we have the type
of drone capability that we could send these things out

(48:44):
and they would search for gamma radiation and they'd be
able to find a new.

Speaker 1 (48:47):
Is that so there are teams that respond to those
types of potential emergencies, typically within the Department of Energy.
Having you know, potentially one hundreds of drones flying around
trying to identify these isn't necessarily the best way. Gamma
radiation is typically well shielded in weapons, and at very

(49:08):
high altitudes or even moderate altitudes like we're seeing these objects,
it would be pretty difficult to detect them. And the
way that NISS the Deale typically operates in this environment
is ground based teams searching for radiation itself. So it's
not necessarily consistent with how they would do it to
begin with, and then based off of that other information,
that's what leads me to believe that's not the case.

Speaker 2 (49:30):
Well, that makes me feel better because I was freaking
out this week.

Speaker 1 (49:33):
N I think a lot of people were, Yeah, I
got a couple.

Speaker 2 (49:36):
But it's one of those things, is.

Speaker 3 (49:39):
All right, Well you get the idea there. I mean,
he seems trustworthy. You know, this is the guy who
let's re read about him. But er Trump. Trump's words
were very important, but you've already heard them, so I'm
going to skip that. Let's get to the part about
here we go. Certainly, the plot is thickening by the

(50:02):
day as drone Gate becomes a major headache for the
federal government, leaving the American people in a state of panic.
Just before Christmas on Saturday, we explained one theory of
how the purported drone sightings could be a psyop to
manipulate lawmakers into passing the new HR eighty six to ten,
which will include appropriations and enhanced government counter drone powers. Oddly,

(50:23):
President Trump canceled his trip this weekend to his beloved
Bedminster golf course, a decision that in itself suggests the
possibility of an ongoing national security threat. Remember Trump reads
national security briefings. One question we have is what motivated
actually what motivated Graves to go on Rogan's podcast. And

(50:44):
that really is the big question here. You know, he's
gone before Congress. As recall, the former pilot said he
has a number of government contacts after his work of
testifying in a twenty twenty three House hearing about unidentified
aerial phenomenons. Does he have contacts at US Special Operations Command,
the FBI, or other agencies that oversee WND threats.

Speaker 4 (51:06):
It's a good question.

Speaker 3 (51:07):
The lack of disclosure by the FEDS is quickly damaging
public trust. It's time for the FEDS to come clean
about what's really happening. If we had to speculate, it's
entirely possible this could be a manufactured crisis syop designed
to advance HR eighty six.

Speaker 5 (51:21):
Ten.

Speaker 3 (51:24):
Yeah, so it is now included in in drone gate.
It is now all right, I'm sorry, there's always including
drone Gate. It is now included in the continuing resolution,
so I guess mission accomplished.

Speaker 4 (51:40):
Here's the thing.

Speaker 3 (51:41):
If we see drone gate go away, if the drones
just stop all of a sudden and we no longer
start to see them this time next week, then we'll know, Yeah,
it probably really was the getting the getting.

Speaker 4 (51:56):
The drone authority passed.

Speaker 3 (51:58):
If it continues, then I think we can debunk that
because they're going through a whole ton of effort. I
don't know what it is, but the thought that this
has something to do the timing of it leads me
to believe that this does have something to do with
the incoming Trump presidency. And if that's the case, God

(52:21):
help us all pray pray for Trump's safety. You think
that after at least that we know of two assassination attempts,
that they wouldn't try something crazy or desperate using drones
using it to I mean, we have to remember that
these people are extraordinarily desperate. And when I say these people,

(52:42):
I'm referring specifically to the globalist elite cabal. They do
not want certain things to happen, and they are willing
to manipulate things so that their outcome, the outcome that
they want comes to pass. And if that means hurting dozens, undred's, thousands,
tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, even even millions of people,

(53:05):
tens of millions.

Speaker 4 (53:06):
I don't think there's a limit. I think that if they.

Speaker 3 (53:09):
Had an opportunity to advance their agenda and they would
have to kill off ninety eight percent of the population,
they'd be okay with that. You know, as long as
they had their servants around, they would they would be fine.
They hate you, they hate me, and they're willing to
do anything. So don't tell me that, oh, this really

(53:29):
this couldn't have anything to do with with President Trump
coming in office. Lest we forget the whole drone phenomenon,
drone Gates started when, oh around mid November is when
they first started getting cited and reported by by the news.
Awful coincidence that had started a week week and a
half after President Trump won won his reelection. Don't assume,

(53:53):
don't assume anything when it comes to the bad guys,
their willingness to cheat, to cause great harm, to manipulate,
to commit acts of evil, They have no limits. There

(54:13):
was a heck of an idea proposed by former Congressman
Matt Gates today. Earlier today, Gates got the bad news
that the House was going to release the Gates Report,
the alleged whatever he talks about his sexual escapades as
a young man, and they're going to try to smear

(54:36):
him with it. Of course, despite the fact that he
did leave. He did withdraw from being the Attorney General
for President Trump, and he resigned from Congress. But technically
speaking he can undo his resignation and so as as
is properly fitting for somebody like Matt Gates.

Speaker 4 (54:57):
He had an idea he posted on acts.

Speaker 3 (55:00):
If someone suggests the following plan to me, show up
January third to Congress, participate in speaker elections. He was
elected to the one hundred and nineteenth Congress, after all,
take the oath, and then file a privileged motion to
expose every quote unquote me too settlement paid using public
funds even of former members, resign and start my OA

(55:21):
and program on January sixth.

Speaker 4 (55:25):
So, in other words, he'd.

Speaker 3 (55:26):
Go go to Congress, show up, accept his role, and
then out all of the met tours where taxpayer funds
are used to pay off whoever it is accusing some congressman,
some senator past and present, and it's funny that he
noted the even of former members. In other words, he

(55:49):
was pointing to Kevin McCarthy. Kevin McCarthy is the person
behind all of this vindictive nature, right. It's Kevin McCarthy
who's really got a beef with Matt Gates. And understandably so,
it was Gates who got McCarthy out of his dream
job as Speaker of the House. He was only in
for like eight months before Gates was able to oust him,
and then he eventually left Congress because he wasn't going

(56:11):
to take the demotion for long.

Speaker 4 (56:13):
Congress has been a better place ever.

Speaker 3 (56:15):
Since, but McCarthy has has still been persistent in his
attacks on Gates. And I would assume that some McCarthy
loyalists are the ones that are behind they're releasing of
this quote unquote damning report, which Gates doesn't seem too concerned.
He said, look, you know, he was made some statement
about how like you know, in his youth before he

(56:36):
was married, and YadA, YadA, YadA. In other words, there's
probably some pretty juicy stuff in there, but who cares,
especially now that he's out of Congress.

Speaker 4 (56:43):
So I fully.

Speaker 3 (56:44):
Support this idea there is and Marjorie Taylor Green came
out earlier today. She said that she would support releasing
all of the files, any files, all of them. If
you're gonna release the Matt Gates file, then you should
release the ME two files.

Speaker 4 (56:58):
You should release.

Speaker 3 (56:59):
Any investigations against any members of Congress, and I whole
heartedly agree with that as well. The only time where
you would would not want to release that is if
there was a finding of no wrongdoing whatsoever. That doesn't
mean a settlement. The settlement is not an indicator of
no wrongdoing, even if the victims or whoever, even if

(57:21):
they sign a waiver says, oh, you know, we're not
acknowledging wrongdoing. Look, if you're not gonna if you don't
want to acknowledge the wrongdoing, then chances are you did
the wrongdoing. But whatever I mean saying, if you're gonna
pay for pay somebody for it, that might not be
the case. I don't want to say that's a blanket statement,
because there are times when the headache alone is enough,
you know, to maybe a congressman really didn't do anything

(57:45):
with us particular person, but that person files a suit,
and it's like, well, I can't really prove that I
didn't do what she says I did.

Speaker 4 (57:51):
I'll just go out and pay her.

Speaker 3 (57:53):
You know, it's not my money anyway, it's just taxpayer
money after all. And now that I think about it,
that's that's bad too, So you might as well just
spose them all anyway.

Speaker 4 (58:02):
Yeah, we'll see.

Speaker 3 (58:04):
By the time you watched this, we will know whether
or not the vote went down. It looks like it's
not going to It looks like like Kevin McCarthy might
as well be Kevin McCarthy. Looks like Speaker of the
House Mike Johnson might push back his mammoth fifteen hundred
page CR and instead go with a clean CR. In

(58:28):
other words, literally exactly what it is today. Do that
for the next few months. And that's not even good.
But at least you know, there's no seventy thousand dollars
pay raise for members of Congress. At least, there's no
no any of the other porkto's thrown in there for
the sake of trying to get it snuck in before
Elon Musk and Donald Trump and everybody comes in and
starts making changes. They were really trying to sneak one

(58:51):
past us. Thankfully, a handful of it was probably about
twenty or thirty Republicans in the Congress denounced it. And
then you had Elon Musk come out and say, hey,
guess what. He even came out and said that the
bio labs are still being funded in this bill, the
bio labs of all things awful, awful stuff. So praise

(59:15):
God for Elon Musk, Praise God for Matt Gates, Praise
God for Donald Trump, and praise God for the United
States of America. We do still live in the freest nation,
even though I know looking around sometimes it doesn't feel
like it. Lord Willing, I will be back very soon
with another episode. But in the meantime, you all stay strong,
stay safe, and God bless. After Trump was elected president,

(59:39):
I received a couple of communications from people, one via
phone text and the other one via Twitter X direct message,
people asking me, hey, now that Trump's back in office,
is the economy going.

Speaker 4 (59:51):
To get better? And I said, yeah, in some of ways,
it definitely will. Obviously.

Speaker 3 (59:55):
I mean, just Trump's presidence alone will have a dramatic
impact on the economy, and it will. We'll take things
to the next level. But with that said, the threats
still remain. Trump Harris didn't matter. They're still pushing. They
being the powers that be, are still pushing for central
bank digital currencies. They're still pushing for dedollarisation and the
rise of bricks. They're still pushing for the advancement of

(01:00:19):
a worldwide economy. And while Trump will do everything in
its power to prevent that, to at least slow it down,
some of it is not within even the power of
the United States of America itself. And this is why
there is no reason you can see by the gold prices,
there is no reason to doubt physical pressures metals as
a proper way to hedge against what is coming, because

(01:00:43):
it's still coming, you know. Were there were certain scenarios
that would have happened if Kamala Harris had won, and
there are certain scenarios that will happen now that President
Trump has won, and those scenarios still point in the
same exact direction. That's the reason why even central banks
are still buying up as much golden as possible. That's
why banks, financial institutions are recommending to their people buy

(01:01:04):
as much gold and silver as possible. I work with
a faith driven gold company. There are a lot of
gold companies out there that they get recommended by hosts.
The one that I like happens to be driven by
faith and they actually do a tremendous job versus the competition.
You can check out Genesis Gold Group by going to

(01:01:25):
rumblegold dot com. That's rumblegold dot com, or read my
testimony over a JD rutger dot com slash gold