"Journalists" Versus Conspiracy Theorists

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I have one kid.

Speaker 2 (00:01):
You have five kids. How do you That's incredible.

Speaker 3 (00:04):
It's kind of like being an FBI agent. You're always
kind of monitoring them and making sure everyone's safe.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Makes good sense.

Speaker 1 (00:08):
You know, I'm actually a real agent, not an agent.
I'm actually a deputy sheriff. Are you really right there?
Many many years?

Speaker 2 (00:13):
Are you serious? For real life? Real life?

Speaker 3 (00:15):
Unbelievable? Yeah, so you're a sheriff. Played a Princeton pro
football player, greatest superhero of all time.

Speaker 1 (00:23):
Never never drafted to Major League Baseball like you for
the Pittsburgh Pirates. Knuckleball?

Speaker 2 (00:28):
How you hit a knuckleball?

Speaker 4 (00:29):
You don't?

Speaker 2 (00:29):
You don't, you don't. That's the whole points and beauty
of it.

Speaker 3 (00:32):
You know, we may have always played on different sides,
you know, being the superhero, the super villain, villain, but
we have a lot more in common than I thought.

Speaker 1 (00:38):
That we did, which is shocking because one thing's for sure.
Genesis Gold Group is a company that we both trust.
They make safeguarding your IRA or your four oh one
K as simple as possible, and I need simple, to
be honest.

Speaker 3 (00:52):
And with their stellar reputation, they're as solid as the
gold that they sell.

Speaker 1 (00:57):
Like this gold right here, so called Genesis Gold group
today at one eight hundred, two hundred gold.

Speaker 2 (01:03):
This is what they.

Speaker 1 (01:03):
Call prepper bar so like you can break off these
see these little pieces. Oh, it's on both sides.

Speaker 3 (01:07):
It's great because you can care they're on small and
and you can literally use it to spend or like
this one. This, this is a big fella.

Speaker 2 (01:14):
That's a really great one.

Speaker 3 (01:15):
So real, this is the real one. He won't hold
it heavy, Holy smoke. That's pretty great. You can get
that one of those from Genesis Gold yourself.

Speaker 2 (01:23):
Hey, you guys, see this, look.

Speaker 3 (01:25):
Dean, Dean, Dean, that's my kid's college tuition money.

Speaker 5 (01:29):
Hold on back, who's the supervillain now? Huh yeah, that's
my gold Dean.

Speaker 2 (02:16):
You're listening to the J. D. Rutger Shows. Let's begin.
We're going to start today's show off in unprecedented manner.
It is, of course, the day after Thanksgiving, and and
I'm gonna start playing in a Christmas ad. But here's
the thing. Number one, it's not my ad. This isn't

(02:36):
I'm not I'm not getting sponsored by Apple. Number two,
it's Apple, which is crazy that I'll be playing this
in a positive light, but I am Some including Benny
Johnson and others are on X right now saying that
this is the most anti woke and pro family ad
out there. I would say that it might be true
for Apple, but there's definitely there's definitely better ads and

(02:58):
and less woke ads out there. But it is for
sure it's pro family. It's it's why they don't say Christmas.
It's obvious that this is a Christmas ad and uh
and it's it's it is touching. I mean, it's a
good ad. But the key here is that it is
not woke. It is not driven by D E, I, E, S, G,
W T F whatever it is. This is what advertising

(03:22):
used to look like. And I would say that there
are there's a trend that we're going to talk about
here in a second. Let me play the ad first,
but we'll get to the trend, and it's it's a
positive trend. I'm very happy about this.

Speaker 4 (03:33):
Got it last week. I think I know what it is.
Thank you about the.

Speaker 6 (04:00):
Moon, John.

Speaker 7 (04:15):
Weapon light, the fire, you placed the flowers in the
bas that you bought today.

Speaker 8 (04:37):
Happy day.

Speaker 4 (04:40):
Hits off me.

Speaker 5 (04:41):
And you Daddy get the moon.

Speaker 3 (04:49):
I am robot?

Speaker 4 (04:53):
What is that.

Speaker 2 (04:57):
Everything is because.

Speaker 4 (05:02):
I love you. You.

Speaker 2 (05:23):
Sorry, I was posting a tweet forgot to turn the
camera back on. I'd seen the ad before, so I
didn't have to listen to it again, and uh and
some I'm sitting there tweeting, I'm looking over Oh my gosh,
it's a black screen. That's what happens when you when
you self self produce your show. So yeah, So look,

(05:44):
this is a trend, and we saw it brewing even
before the election. There's this trend away from the EI,
away from e s G, away from the the wokeness
in corporate America. Now, it's not universal by any means.
There are many that are absolutely doubling down. Okay, they're
taken and they're trying to salvage what they've alread accomplished.
They are the true believers. But there's a lot and

(06:04):
I would say maybe a majority of executives in these corporations.
I'm not going to say that they're conservative or you know,
closet libertarians or anything like that, but I would say
that they prefer being able to communicate into advertising, to
run their companies without the influences of DEI again, could

(06:26):
be thirty percent, could be sixty percent. I have no idea,
and we won't know until we start seeing more stuff
like this. Now, by no means am I saying, oh,
Apple is not a woke company. They're definitely woke, but
there are elements within, especially when it comes to marketing, advertising,
public relations, where companies they're starting to realize that, you know,
the old adage, go woke, go broke, it's true, and

(06:48):
so they're trying to Many of them are trying to
avoid the wokeness, even if they themselves are woke. At
least they're trying to be more It's funny, but to
be more inclusive, they have to avoid diversity, equity and equality.
The I mean true inclusivity means putting out messages that

(07:11):
are maybe not universally accepted, but that are accepted by
the masses. And right now, the masses become so sick
of what the left has been pushing through DEI that
that this is this is a breath of fresh air.
So I'm not going to say that it was necessarily
influenced by the election, but we will see as a
result of the election going forward, there will be more

(07:31):
and more companies that are willing to to you know,
have a commercial that doesn't just focus completely on race
and gender and trans this and and inclusivity that. And
as a result, by not focusing on the left's version
of inclusivity, they're going to be more inclusive. Trying to

(08:00):
do better at this whole self producing thing, trying to
run everything through a system that allows me to have
everything lined up. It's a lot of work, to be clear.
Anybody who's a producer out there, I feel for you, man,
I have yeah. I mean it's I couldn't imagine doing
it for somebody else, because you know, you never know.

(08:22):
At least I know what I'm thinking, I know where
I'm going with the next Then I don't have to
be catch myself by surprise, where I know that I've
caught my my producers by surprise many times in the past.
It's like, okay, blah blah blah, let's go to break.
And then one time I had a producer this is
gosh Ben twenty twenty two, ish, I had a producer

(08:45):
that I actually asked him a question on air, and
of course I didn't know he was a remote producer
and he was in the restroom, So that didn't go
over very well at all. So with that said, let's
let's move on too too much internal stuff here. There
was a post by doctor Simon Godeck who it was.

(09:08):
It became extremely popular because in this post he's talking
about basically journalists versus corporate media I'm sorry, versus Yeah,
that that's a whole other discussion, journalists versus conspiracy theorists.
And really what he's what they're talking about is legacy
media versus independent media. Because you know, we could say, oh,

(09:29):
conspiracy theorists is conspiracy theorist that I do not consider
the phrase conspiracy theorists to be a pejorative. People can
call me a conspiracy theorist. I know that that at
least half of them are saying so in a way
that is that is supposed to be detrimental or derogatory
towards me. I don't see it like that. I am
a conspiracy theorist. There are conspiracies and we have theories

(09:50):
about them. Okay, if you think that, I mean it's
there has been this this sort of brainwashing, a little
minor indoctrination, sort of a SI that's made conspiracy theory
is bad. It's not. Okay, if you can acknowledge that
there are conspiracies. There are people out there, powerful people
and organizations and governments that conspire against us, against you

(10:15):
or me or both. Then yeah, then there are conspiracies.
And if there are conspiracies, we have to get to
the truth. Which is why I am okay with being
called a conspiracy theorist, because till we have the factual truth,
all we can do is theorize based upon the information
that we have available. And that's why this list by

(10:36):
Simon Godeck and I don't know if he created it,
but it's got thirty nine million views so far thanks
to Elon Musk retweeting it, reposting it, over ten thousand
reposts and thirty thousand likes, and it shows a list.
Let me you pull it up. Here shows a list
of various You know, obviously journalists thought one thing about

(10:57):
a topic, conspiracy theorist thought another thing. Who was right?
And the punchline, of course, is that is a conspiracy
theorists have been right about all these topics. So let's
take them one at a time and go. Well, let's
go down the list. Number one, we got Hunter Biden's laptop.
I think that's a no brainer. You know, it came
out very very early on that there was a dividing line.

(11:22):
As soon as The New York Post published the article
about Hunter Biden's laptop back in October twenty twenty, there was,
you know, it was clear division. Big tech, you know, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube,
they took the side along with corporate media to say
that it's it's not true, it's debunked, it's fake. And

(11:42):
early on conspiracy theorists such as me and well just
about every cognizant independent journalist out there said, no, this
looks real, and especially once we dove into which I
don't recommend diving into it by the way, you know,
but anybody, in my humble opinion, anybody who saw any
of the content that was on images, videos, text messages,

(12:05):
anybody who saw the content would know very very quickly
that it absolutely was real. Once the fifty one intelligence officers,
intelligence officers, members of the intelligence community came out and said,
this is Russian disinformation, this is a Russian hoax. You know,
that's the storyline that that big tech and legacy media
went with all of a sudden. You know, that was

(12:28):
that was the standing order because we were at that
point less than a month from the election, and they
wanted desperately for Joe Biden to win. They wanted there
to be enough, They wanted to be close enough so
that if they had to steal it, which they did,
then then they wouldn't they wouldn't have to stick their
necks out too far. That's one of the reasons, by

(12:49):
the way, that you know, they started sticking the next
out and then I believe they aborted this last election.
They thought, man, man, it's just too insurmountable, so let's
just not even try. Basically, let's not try to cheat.
But that's a that's a discussion for another day. So
Hunter Biden's laptop, it wasn't real according to corporate media,

(13:09):
except a year and a half later they acknowledged that
it was real. So even they are have done a
one to eighty, they reversed themselves on it, and that
to me, that marked the beginning of the end for
legacy media. Many would point to to all the fake
news that's been happening over the years, the decades. They
could point to twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen and throughout

(13:29):
Trump's first term and say, look, fake news. They demolished themselves.
But the real demolishing, I believe the real wake up
call for a lot of people who did at the
time they did still trust corporate media. The real wake
up call for them was later on, when more information
started coming out about the Hunter Biden laptop, more truths,

(13:50):
more acknowledgement started coming out. It became very crystal clear
to more and more people that it was real. And
that's when the New York Times and then others in
corporate media decided, well, can't do any damage now, Joe
Biden's already in office. Let's go and acknowledge that, Yeah,
it looks like it was real. And they did that
again about a year and a half after the initial
report that I think shook some people. It wasn't just

(14:13):
a wake up call. It was like a like a
bullhorn in their face when when they're in deep ram sleep.
This was like, holy crap, you're telling me that you
told us that it was Russian disinformation government or intelligence community,
but people still associate that with government, which is ironic
for many reasons. Government told us that it was fake,

(14:34):
corporate media told us it was fake, but now you're
telling us it's real. Whoa what else have you lied
to us about? And that's the big question that to me,
that's why I say this was the spark of the
beginning of the end for legacy media because they had
to acknowledge that they were not only wrong, but that

(14:55):
they were lying about it. Because even though they didn't
say we lied, was clear. So wait, you had the laptop,
you saw what was on it. Nothing has changed between
then and now. But you're coming out a year and
a half later and saying, yeah, it looks like it
was after further investigation and authentication, it appears that it
was real. You didn't need further investigation. Again, prima fossie,

(15:18):
it was real. Okay, it would have cost I'm not kidding.
I'm not exaggerating here when I say it would have
cost billions of dollars at the time to and and
hundreds of hours, maybe days, hundreds of days literally to
be able to produce that much content through deep fake technology,

(15:38):
because we're talking about gigabytes or of information right to
be able to put out that amount of misinformation disinformation,
make it to where it could not be easily or
even even with difficulty, it could not be demonstrated that
it was that these were deep fakes and some nasty

(16:00):
stuff on there. Again, I don't recommend digging into the
Hunter Biden laptop. If you haven't, don't. Okay, don't dig
into the content because this is a hideous, depraved man. Okay,
the stuff on there, there's there's plenty of illegal stuff
on there. And I would argue that one of the
reasons that Rudy Giuliani has been targeted the way that
he has been so unjustly is because of that, because

(16:24):
he was he was one of the ringleaders behind the
exposed exposing of Hunter Biden's laptop. So take from what
you will, but we can definitely mark that one very
clearly in the in the checkbox area for for the
the conspiracy theorists number two m R and a vax harm.

(16:49):
This of course is a topic that's going to make
this a dangerous video for YouTube, a dangerous video for Facebook.
But it is what it is. You know, we do
what we do, and one of the things we do
is we talk about the truth, even if it could
get us in trouble on certain platforms. Thankfully, you can
always follow my show over at well. The best way

(17:12):
to go is to just find everywhere that I am
over at jd rucker dot com slash find jd rucker
dot com slash find, you can find all of my
work there. Now I'll make it easier. Okay. So that's
that's the that's the first thing you should do. But
the second thing you should do is understand that if
I do get banned, it's I don't know if it's
going to be talking about voter fraud. I don't know
if it's going to be talking about climate change or

(17:34):
the vaccines or any of the other various taboo. It's
but I think someday I will get banned on those networks.
That's why I just I'm not worried about it. Okay,
best way to do it is just just follow me
on Rumble and Twitter and substack in all those various places.
So mRNA vax harm. Where the vaccine's dangerous? Yes they were,
Yes they still are. The boosters are dangerous. Everything about

(17:56):
them is dangerous. They have caused harm. Now that's not
to say look where I'm not going to get into
an argument about effectiveness, efficiency, all of that stuff. We'll
get into that later, but just the very specific topic
of did the vaccines do the vaccines cause harm that
is clearly demonstrated now by peer reviewed science. It's funny

(18:17):
because this peer reviewed science has been out there and
available for years, but it wasn't until very recently this
year in twenty twenty four that these studies that had
been quashed by the various journals out there, they're finally
starting to come out. Okay, they're finally starting to acknowledge
and get the peer review attention that they needed, because

(18:38):
once they are reviewed, it's clear the data doesn't lie.
You can make data lie. This data is not lying. Okay.
They did not torture these numbers to make them say
whatever they want. In many cases, a lot of these
studies were had set out to disprove mRNA vaccine harm,

(18:59):
and while in the process of trying to disprove it,
they're like, oh crap, it really does cause myocarditis, pair
of carditis, heart heart attacks, strokes. It is dangerous to
pregnant women, it is dangerous to fetuses, it is dangerous
to children. But they didn't this for and we're still

(19:22):
hear today. Even today, corporate media is echoing this concept that, oh,
you know, especially with RFK Junior taking over at hhs. Oh,
you know, vaccines are not dangerous. They've been proven beyond
a shadow of doubt that they're safe and effective, including
the COVID nineteen vaccine. Okay, that's just not true. Let's

(19:43):
ballface lie at this point. Okay, And I would argue that,
you know, unlike Hunter Biden's laptop or it was obvious
right off the bat. You know, they didn't need you
didn't need to be a forensic scientist to determine that, yeah,
this is Hunter Biden's laptop with m RINA vaccines. I
would argue that that there is a little bit of

(20:05):
leeway for some people. Okay, early on, at the very least, Now,
as time went on, they should have even the people
that were that were promoting the vaccines before, they should
have come to the conclusion based upon the data those
coming out there whoa whoahoa, hit the brakes, Hit the brakes.
I was wrong. These are bad. There should have been

(20:26):
more people like that, and there are starting to be
more people like that. But again, now we're what four years,
three and a half years after after the rollout. I
hate to say it too little, too late, man. You know,
they should have come to the same conclusion both media
and scientists, and definitely government should have come to the
conclusion that conspiracy theorists came to within days, weeks or

(20:51):
months some of us. Look, I was a skeptic of
the vaccines before they came out. Okay, I'm like, this
doesn't I don't like this at all. I don't like
the direction they're going. I don't like the fact that
they magically were able to come become available what two
weeks after the election, after the twenty twenty election, it's
as if, I mean, it's as if politics played not

(21:13):
just a role, but the role in determining how and
when to roll out the vaccines. And that was a
I mean, alarm bells were ringing in my head when
President Trump came out with the concept of Operation Warp Speed.
I thought to myself, this sounds awful and I'm not
going to support it. But you know, praise God, a

(21:33):
lot more people than I expected were skeptical. And I
think you could think independent media for that, conspiracy theorists
for saying hold off, don't get vaxxed. And it's funny
because if you recall even Joe Biden, Kamala Harris Ter
in the campaign dur in twenty twenty, they're like, we're
not going to take a vaccine that gets rushed through
by Donald Trump. And then as soon as the election
was over, they're like, oh, everybody, get your get chabbed,

(21:55):
get your vaccines. So yes, so that one I think
we can safely mark in the column of that was
a win for conspiracy theorists, even though far too many
eighty something percent of Americans still lost. Even though we
were right, I would say the vast majority of my

(22:18):
audience is very, very hopeful for the future. The election
of President Trump has been just already we're seeing shock waves,
we're already seeing results, even at this early stage. But
there are still concerns he can't do everything. He's going
to do everything in its vast power to protect us,
to protect our nation, to defend the Constitution, to protect

(22:39):
our freedoms. But that doesn't mean that there won't be risks, challenges.
We're already seeing wars popping up and rumors of wars
popping up across the globe. Will he be able to
stop all of them? I think? So what if he can't?
What if for whatever reason, cooler minds, cooler heads don't
prevail and we ourselves in the midst of something tragic.

(23:02):
What about natural disasters? What about just the idiocy of
the globalist regimes across this planet that are trying to
do everything they can to destroy our food supply. They
want to control the food, and they want to make
sure that we're not eating the good stuff, especially as
it pertains to protein, and specifically as it pertains to beef.

(23:24):
Beef cal seem to be the main culprit for every
boogeyman propagating bad guy out there. As a part owner
of an all American patriotic freeze dried state company, I
am very very blessed, pleased and honor to be able
to offer you all, offer my wonderful audience an opportunity
to take advantage. If you go to Worldviewbeef dot com

(23:49):
and to use promo code JDR, you will get the
maximum possible discount. And there are other discount codes out
there that are less It's not like with certain companies
where oh, you know, it doesn't matter which promo codes use.
Use JDR, I own the company. Use promo code JDR
and get the maximum discount at any given moment at
worldviewef dot com, all American, no mRNA jabs. It's just

(24:12):
the good stuff. So check it out worldviewbef dot com.
All right, the next few on the list, let's see,
will be one numbers three, four, five, and six and
seven seven. So three through seven on the list, we're
going to do them rapid fire, because they all mean,
they all stand for the same thing. Number three plandemic.

(24:35):
Of course, the journalists have been saying for this whole
time that there was never an intention that it was
it was bat soup. Somebody at bat soup and it
was the bat soup that actually caused the pandemic. In reality,
we are starting to learn more and more and more
and more that not only was the virus the pandemic,

(24:56):
COVID nineteen, was it was created, We know that beyond
a shadow of doubt at this point. Now the only
question is where was it? Was it created in the
Wuhan lab is a lot of people believe was it
created and there are now reports that it might have
been created in North Carolina. There are other reports that
was created in Ukraine. And that's part of the reason
that there's this whole whole push to try to prevent

(25:18):
Russia from winning the war. Who knows? All we know
is that for sure, those of us conspiracy theorists who
have been saying that it is a pandemic, we have
been proven correct, and the journalists have once again been
proven wrong. Number four lockdowns. Obviously, I'm not gonna dwell
on this one. The lockdowns were stupid. There are needs

(25:43):
from time to time, there are needs for quarantines. Quarantines
are very different from lockdowns. With quarantines, you keep sick
people away from healthy people. With lockdowns, you keep everybody
away from everybody else. And that's the dumbest thing. And
it has been tremendously damaged. You don't even get me
start on what it has done to the children, because
that I can do an entire show, study after study

(26:06):
after study showing that the lockdowns had such a massive
detrimental effect on the mental and physical health of children.
Their learning capabilities, their social skills, their physical fitness, all
of these were detrimentally affected by the lockdowns. And the
number of children who were truly affected by COVID itself
extremely extremely tiny. Okay, I mean we're talking, We're talking

(26:31):
like zero point zero one percent of children, even when
we're not just talking about all children. We're talking about
the ones that contracted COVID nineteen. At some point, the
mortality rate for kids for those under nineteen teens are
below with COVID nineteen was was so small. I mean,
it was less dangerous to them than the flu. We

(26:53):
know that now, of course, and many of us were
saying this from the beginning. One of the reasons that
I'm so very bullish about doctor J. Bodachadiya being the
new NIH director is because he was a critic. He
was one of the original authors of the Barrington Declaration.
He's been a critic of the lockdowns the entire time.
Hopefully Lord Willing, because we do expect there to be

(27:16):
another plandemic at some point in the future. Hopefully it
will happen on his watch and he will say no lockdowns.
And he of course RFK Junior and Trump and we
got a much better staff, a much better support staff
in the White House, so I do imagine that Trump
will do a better job. But again mark that one down.
Journalists still at zero in conspiracy theorist now at four points.

(27:39):
Ivermectin and HCQ. We'll combine numbers five and six hydrox
Clok queen, hydroxychloroquin and ivermectin have been proven not only
effective against COVID nineteen, but very safe. You know. One
of the things that they were pushing, if you all recall,
they were pushing the whole oh you know, they're trying
to get horse the wormer into people. And and don't

(28:00):
you know, look at Joe Rogan, look at what cousin
you know, seeing that actually changed the color of his face.
They altered the video when he said that, yeah, I
threw the kitchen sink at it. Iromacd in the works.
I'm feeling fine, you know, And they they actually made
his face look like a pale, putrid brown. It was.
It was awful, I mean it was it was deceptive.

(28:22):
It was a bald face. Lie. Okay. They were trying
to make him look sickly as a result of him
pushing these these treatments that were were not approved by
Anthony Falci. He wanted people and Denis re den zevir,
Denis vihere whatever, and the the killing drug and uh,

(28:42):
you know everything else, vaccines and all that good stuff.
So so yeah, I mean they were wrong, and in
a way it was somewhat of a blessing they're unhinged
attacks on on IVERMCIN and HCQ, because I would argue,
and I think there is evidence of this that the
way that Joe Rogan was treated by CNN was one

(29:06):
of the tipping points. It really kind of pushed him
over the edge to understand that corporate media is not
just antiquated, that legacy media is evil. And they went
after him and now I think helped to push him
in the direction of becoming more of a of a
Trump supporting show host and eventually at the last minute,

(29:28):
of course, endorsing President Trump. So now we're onto number
one is a six, yeah, number six, No seven face
mask uselessness. You know, over at Thelibertydaily dot com we
often refer to the face masks as slave masks because

(29:49):
it was and still is a fear mongering tactic, but
more importantly, it's a control tactic. In other words, if
they can get people to do things that they don't
want to do, things that go against common sense, such
as wearing masks, double masks, triple masks, going out there

(30:10):
even knowing that the science demonstrated that the that the
COVID nineteen was was so tiny that even even n
ninety five, masks weren't necessarily effective to prevent them from spreading.
But they didn't put us. They didn't mask us up
for the sake of trying to stop the disease. If

(30:31):
they did, then if they still think that, and they're idiots. No,
this was a matter of giving a visual It's something
that you can't you can't avoid. You can see who's
wearing a mask and who's not. I remember I had
posted during the early days of COVID. I thought, you know,
before you would go to the grocery store and if
you if you saw somebody wearing a face mask, you

(30:53):
would think, oh, I wonder what's wrong with him? But
it got to the point where people, you know, if
you went to a store and you weren't wearing a
face people were I wonder, you know, what's wrong with
that guy? What is he thinking? Is he trying to
kill us? He's trying to kill grandma? You know, face
masks were useless. They still are useless. And it's funny
because there's still a whole lot of people to wear them.

(31:14):
I don't get it. They wear them alone in their cars.
It's a it's a strong delusion It's a massive SIOB
but a an indoctrination and brainwashing campaign, and it has
worked wonders on our psyches. If and when they ever
try to force us into masks again, I would hope
and pray that we are lucid enough, smart enough. We've

(31:38):
learned our lessons and we realize now that the face
masks were never about the science and all about the
politics and the control. All right, So number what is this? One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight.
Number eight on the list of who is correct the
journalists versus conspiracy theorist, Number eight is social media censorship. Now,

(32:03):
I think I've covered this ad nauseum over the years.
I mean, it's been a long time. We've been talking
about it, long before the Twitter files, long for Elon
Musk bought Twitter, long before we were watching people like
Alex Jones and Laura Lumer getting banned on social media platforms,
Even before Donald Trump himself was banned. In January of

(32:27):
twenty twenty one, we were talking about how social media
had become a censorship platform, all of them, I mean, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram.
It was the rise of sites like gab Getter. Eventually
truth Social Parlor at the time, which is apparently back.
You know, these sites came around because of the censorship,

(32:50):
and while I don't think any of them were wildly successful,
Truth Social still good. Gab is filling its own role,
Getter is filling its own role. They all have a
place in society. I think that the resurgence of Twitter
now x has changed that. It's made it to where
that's where people go. Even some of the people that

(33:10):
weren't I mean, even Trump posts there now. Granted he
posts the true, he does it the smart way because
it's still his company. He still has an obligation to
the investors, to the people that are to his team.
Just because Elon Musk came along and gave him his
Twitter account back doesn't mean that he has to bow
to Twitter. So even though he posts there and that
was necessary for him to post there for the sake

(33:31):
of the twenty twenty four election, he does post first
and foremost over at truth Social, where there is very
limited censorship. There is still censorship, to be clear, on
almost all the platforms. I don't think there's censorship really
a GAB, but all the other platforms have slight degrees
of censorship, but it's still it's not as bad as

(33:53):
the other other platforms, and you can say the same
thing about X. With that said, social media censorship has
been debunked allegedly by legacy media multiple times over the
last eight years, and they were wrong. I mean, we
learned with the Twitter files especially that not only it
was their social media censorship taking place, and there has

(34:13):
been for a long time, but that the government was involved.
And that I think is the bigger issue here. It's
much much bigger than just that Facebook is censoring people. No,
this is bigger because of what they're doing and how
they're doing it. They're doing it through the government, and
that is illegal. Okay, that is against the constitution. Private
company wants to censor this, censor that. That's fine, that's

(34:35):
their prerogative. It sucks, but they can do that. But
when you have government intervening, when you have government even requesting,
they don't even have to force it, all they have
to do is request. If they request censorship, that goes
against the First Amendment. And we learned that even to
some extent during the Trump administration, not Trump himself, but

(34:55):
members of his administration, especially in the Deep State, they
were participating and so nsworship and then of course after
the twenty twenty election, that's when it just went full boar.
I mean, they didn't care. They thought they had this racket.
You know, they were untouchable, and to some extent they were.
If it wasn't for Elon Musk, we still to this
day would not know for sure, we wouldn't have the evidence.
There's no way that Jack Dorsey or anybody else would

(35:18):
have been willing to acknowledge what they've done. Now this
brings up a point because of course Mark Zuckerberg, CEO
of Meta on our Facebook, he's now all of a
sudden coming Tomorrow logo and saying, hey, I want to help,
I want to be part of the part of the administration,
part of the team.

Speaker 1 (35:37):
You know.

Speaker 2 (35:38):
And I've said said on the show the other day
and I'll repeat it today. You can't trust him, not
a bit. I mean, the dude is wicked smart, that's true.
He's got plenty of assets, not just financial, but he
has tons of data assets. He has still has control
over one of the most powerful social media sites out there,
big tech sites. But he will screw over literally everybody

(35:58):
that he ever deals with, every single person who's ever
dealt with Mark Zuckerberg has gotten screwed over, including the
Democrats who got screwed over when he decided, hey, yeah,
it looks like things are going a little crazy here.
I think I'm gonna go ahead and start start endearing
myself to the possible next administration. And he did this
a couple of months ago, and he's like, oh, yeah, no,

(36:19):
I was totally forced. We were We were bullied, bullied
into censoring. It was a government's fault, not us. You know.
We did what we had to do, and I felt
really bad about it. I'm sorry.

Speaker 4 (36:27):
You know.

Speaker 2 (36:28):
No, he's gonna screw over anybody that he deals with,
including the Trump administration. That's not to say that we
don't want to help, Okay, we do want to help,
but keep him at arm's length. Do not let that
snake into the house. You know, you can have him
scurry around, report back, you know, give you some information,
figure out some some ways to use him. But otherwise,

(36:51):
don't give that man any additional power. He already has
far more than he needs. Next on the list, We've got, Ah,
this is a good one. Yeah, you know, I was
just tweeting about this last night. It was last night
of this morning, one or the other is tweeting about
somebody had posted about Epstein. Let me see if I
can find that tweet posting about Epstein Island and how

(37:16):
they were saying that Bill Gates, Bill Gates should be
should be relegated to Epstein. Who was it? Let me
see if I can find this. Come on, give me,
give me some day to hear. It's not gonna gonna happen,
is it? No? No, okay, here it is. It was

(37:36):
actually James Melville who posted it. Posted a quote from
Bill Gates saying, cow burps, Cows burp and fart methane
to an extreme degree. You can either fix cows to
stop them doing that, or you can make beef without
the cows. That's a quote from Bill Gates. That's an
actual quote from Bill Gates. Yes, he is a depopulationist,

(38:00):
a eugenesist. He wants to legitimately does. And Cernovich posted
Bill Gates belongs on Epstein Island, which prompted my reply.
The most accepting relation with the new Trump administration will
be the full release of the Epstein list. The Diddy
list will be good too. I'll be very hugely disappointed.

(38:21):
And that's true. I really will be I will will
not be very happy if we don't get it. But look,
for years, for decades, Epstein was being protected, Okay. I mean,
it's not like his most recent arrest and faked suicide.
It's not like that was the first time he'd run
into into trouble with Lloyd. He'd faced the law multiple times,

(38:43):
but he always had somebody there to protect him, to
help him circumvent side step repercussions. It wasn't until this
latest move and then of course the faked suicide that
was when that was when things really really got crazy.
But we saw corporate media journalists. I forgot who was somebody.

(39:05):
I think she was at CBS or ABC one or
the other, one of the journals. She's like, I had
this story, I had this story back whenever about Epstein,
and they killed it. They wouldn't let me run it.
You know, now it's coming out and my story is obsolete,
and that sucks. You know, she didn't and she wasn't
the only one. There were other people that had plenty
of dirt on Epstein. Okay, they could demonstrate that he

(39:26):
was not only evil, corrupt pedophile, sex trafficker, but then
he was also being protected by government officials and as
a result, by corporate media. They kept telling us there
was nothing wrong. They kept telling us that there was
nothing to see here until there finally was. Then they
extended the lie. After his faked suicide, they extended the

(39:48):
lie by saying, oh, no, it's totally you know, the
disregard everything that were being told. You know, it couldn't
have been a suicide speaking, but hey, it was a suicide. Yeah,
the autopsy report demonstrats it wasn't a suicide, but hey,
it was a suicide. The camera's going off at the
wrong time. Oh, that's just incompetence. It just you know,

(40:12):
just luck of the draw stuff. That's the narrative that
corporate media is still pushing on us today. Of course,
I don't think anybody believes that anymore. They didn't believe
it shortly after his his whatever. I don't know if
he was murdered or if he was just whisked away
to some secret island. I don't know what happened to
Jeffrey Epstein. I just do know that he didn't kill himself.

(40:33):
Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself. But the conspiracy theories were
proven right then, and they're continuing to be proven right today.
What do we got next? This is a long one.
This is a long one. You know what, Let's go,
let's take a break real quick, because the next one

(40:55):
on the list is it's one that's gonna it's gonna
make me angry, and I want to I want to
prep myself, get some drink, some of my my famous drink,
no alcohol in it, but it still will co me.
Calm me down. Note it's not Camra mill, It's it's

(41:16):
actually uh, it's actually an energy drink. I hate to admit,
but but it's so good. I'm gonna let's take a break.
I'll be right back. After Trump was elected president, I
received a couple of communications from people, one one via
phone text and the other one via Twitter X direct message.

(41:38):
People asking me, hey, now that now that Trump's back
in office, is the economy going to to get better?
And I said, yeah, in some ways, it definitely will, obviously,
I mean just Trump's presence alone will have a dramatic
impact on the economy, and it will well, we'll take
things to the next level. But with that said, the
threats still remain. Trump Harris didn't matter. They're still pushing.

(41:58):
They being the the powers that You're still pushing for
central bank digital currencies. They're still pushing for dedollarisation and
the rise of bricks. They're still pushing for the advancement
of a worldwide economy. And while Trump will do everything
in its power to prevent that, to at least slow
it down, some of it is not within even the

(42:19):
power of the United States of America itself. And this
is why there is no reason you can see by
the gold prices, there is no reason to doubt physical
pressures metals as a proper way to hedge against what
is coming, because it's still coming. You know, there were
certain scenarios that would have happened if Kamala Harris had won,
and there are certain scenarios that will happen now that

(42:41):
President Trump has won. And those scenarios still point in
the same exact direction. That's the reason why even central
banks are still buying up as much gold and silver
as possible. That's why banks, financial institutions are recommending to
their people buy as much gold and silver as possible.
I work with a faith driven gold company. There are
a lot of gold companies out there, that they get

(43:04):
recommended by hosts. The one that I like happens to
be driven by faith and they actually do a tremendous
job versus the competition. You can check out Genesis Gold
group by going to rumblegold dot com. That's rumblegold dot
com or read my testimony over jd Rucker dot com
slash gold. All Right, so I'm gonna make a quick

(43:31):
command decision here, and we're actually gonna skip the two
items that that I was going to talk about next,
the two items on the list, those items being Mapstein Island.
Now we already took sorry elite pedophilia, which it's a
big topic, and child trafficking, child sex trafficking. I'm gonna
save those for the end because they do those are

(43:53):
the two topics that chat my Khaki's the most. They're
the two most divisive topics on the list. And divisive
not that that people doubt. I don't think there's a
whole lot of people anymore, at least my viewers that
doubt that these two things are are legitimate and real.
But there is a lot of the depth, that's all

(44:16):
that's in doubt at this point. You know, we know
there's child sex trafficking happening, especially at our open southern border.
We also know that there is elite pedophilia. We're seeing
this obviously with Epstein Island, with the with the Diddy arrest,
with all these things. The only question is is this
ubiquitous or is it limited? And I obviously believe that
it is fairly ubiquitous. But we're gonna skip that. We're

(44:40):
gonna go to another tough topic. Biolabs in Ukraine. Wow,
that's a good one. I hadn't thought about that one.
But back in I believe that it was twenty twenty two,
approximately March of twenty twenty two, there were reports coming out,
some coming from Russia, others coming from corporate media, and
by corporate media, I mean specifically, if I recall, it
was the Daily Mail that first broke the broke the

(45:00):
story forty six biolabs funded by the US government in
Ukraine that were engaged in illegal gain of function research. Now,
of course they always say, oh, you know, we're just
trying to prepare for to protect the people. That's not
the case. That's a bald faced lie. Okay, it is
that they're not. They're they're preying on the ignorance of

(45:23):
the people. And when I say ignorance, I'm not saying
oh ull or stupid. I'm stupid. We're all stupid. It's
not that, it's just that it's a topic that frankly,
I mean, they don't teach you unless you unless you're
getting into the field and taking advanced college courses on
gain of function research and and you know, the ability
to work at biolaboratories across the world. Unless you're getting

(45:46):
into that, you probably don't know a whole lot about
it need to do. I okay, we don't know what
they're doing. But and they're playing on that day being
the powers that be, or playing on our ignorance of
the field. Because when I talk to people and I God,
who it was. There was somebody that I had spoken
to and it was one of our you know, I
guess Crown achievements of the JD. Rutcker Show, because this

(46:09):
was back way early Okay, I think it was might
have been twenty nineteen, but it was probably like early
twenty twenty. I had a guest on who was explaining
gain of function research and how he believed that that
that's what was was causing I don't and as our call.
It wasn't even called COVID nineteen at the time. It
was just called the the the novel coronavirus. Right. He

(46:32):
was saying, Oh, yeah, this is totally gain of function research.
And I had I had to look it up. I
didn't even know what gain of function research was. Nobody
was talking about. It was months later that people started
finally talking about it. I was like, yeah, hey, we
were we broke that story early. Anyway, the point is
is that, yeah, we there there were these stories that
came out in twenty twenty two, and and both corporate
media journalists, legacy media journalists, as well as our own

(46:55):
government tried very, very very hard to cover this up.
And fortunately one of those people that was that was
very very adamant about covering it up was imbound Secretary
of State Senator Marco Rubio. Which is I'm not saying
I'm just saying that's a little bit of a concern.
It's a sort of a big red flag there, but yeah,

(47:19):
it is what it is. So but somebody else that's
joining the administration inbound d and I Tulca Gabbard, who
they're saying that she's got like a fifty percent chance.
The betting markets are putting her a fifty percent chance
of being confirmed. I would say that she's definitely going
to get confirmed. There's no way they're going to make
this Russia Russia agent thing stick, no matter how hard

(47:44):
they try, and if they do try hard enough, and
then any Republicans that fall for it are going to
they're not going to be happy with the results. But anyway,
so Tulca Gabbard went on as I think three or
four days ago, and she exposed the biolabs even further
and demonstrated how all these lies that have been told

(48:05):
for the last two and a half years are just
that there lies. There are biolabs funded by the United
States government engaged in gain of function research, working with
extraordinarily dangerous pathogens in Ukraine today right now. And that's
a problem. Here's Tulsey.

Speaker 8 (48:26):
Here are the undeniable facts. There are twenty five to
thirty US funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the US government,
these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is
in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery and shelling,
and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could

(48:50):
easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now, like COVID,
these pathogens know no borders. If they are in inadvertently
or purposely breached or compromise, they will quickly spread all
throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world,
causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect

(49:12):
the American people, the people of Europe, the people around
the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately
and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed.
Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris
administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN
to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in

(49:33):
the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these
pathogens are destroyed. In addition to all this, the US
funds around three hundred bio labs around the world who
are engaging in dangerous research, including gain of function, similar
to the lab in Wuhan where COVID nineteen may have
originated from. Now, after realizing how dangerous and vulnerable these

(49:57):
labs are, they should have all been shut down two
years ago, but they haven't. Now this is not a
partisan political issue. The Administration and Congress need to act
now for the health and well being of every American
and every person on this planet.

Speaker 2 (50:19):
Wow, good stuff there, and she is absolutely correct. This
is a big enough issue that hopefully President Trump will
be able to use this to not only gain a
ceasefire of some sort very quickly once he's once he's inaugurated,
but to get this fixed and cleaned up. Okay, even
if it's a temporary ceasefire just to shut these biolabs down.

(50:41):
We have no business messing with this. And let's take
out the politics. Let's take out let's take out the geopolitics.
Let's just look at what it is. We're talking about
a man's manipulation of this world, and manipulation in a
way that we are not capable of handling. If you

(51:02):
think that COVID was bad, that's minor. It's so infinitesimal
compared to what they can and almost certainly will at
some point in the future unleash. When you put the
power to kill the masses in the hands of humans,
it doesn't matter. You could pick out the best people.
Accidents happen, but also evil happens. People can be bribed

(51:27):
it's funny. There's this movie called Twelve Monkeys, I think
it was called that was the twelve some number of Monkeys,
Brad Pitt, Bruce Willis, And in it, you know, you
had this crazy guy who unleashed a population killer. Okay,
he just went and went to an airport and opened
it up, and you know that was that. You know

(51:47):
that can happen. You cannot trust people. We're bad so
so yes, any manipulation by humans or by anybody, Any
manipulation of viruses, pathogens of any sort that could become

(52:08):
hemorrhagic fever, or anything else that could be truly bad,
far worse than COVID. No, I don't care if they
have the best intentions, and there may be scientists in
there that do have the best intentions, but it needs
to be shut down. I'm sorry that might be an
unpopular opinion, but I wholeheartedly agree with Tulsa Gabbard on

(52:29):
that one. Next, we've got Russia Gate, and Russiagate is
the funny one because they're actually it's stirring right back
up again. Even here with Tulsa Gabbard, they are trying
to push the next Russia Gate hoax they're trying to
attach Putin to Trump and to members of the Trump administration.
They're saying that that Tulsa Gabbard could be given information.
They're now saying that Elon Musk has given information to Russia.

(52:51):
Everybody apparently has all these connections with Russia and Russia
is just they're so good at infiltrating and compromising. People. Know,
it's funny because we just went through four years with
the most compromised man to ever sit in the Oval Office.
Joe Biden is compromised. He's compromised by Ukraine, He's compromised

(53:13):
by communists China, He's compromised by I mean a wider
array of bad players, bad actors, including the deep state
that has controlled him. This is I would argue, and
maybe someday I will make the argument that the whole
reason that he was selected to be the Democrat nominee
was because they knew that they could put the maximum

(53:34):
amount of leverage on him to make him do exactly
whatever the heck they wanted him to do, and he
demonstrated that throughout his regime. So yeah, new Russia Gate.
Russia Gate was obviously proven very much false multiple times debunked,
debunk debunked. Okay, Robert Moeller debunked, disgraced, James Comy debunked

(53:55):
and disgraced. Everybody involved, debunked and disgraced in the corporate
media continues even today. The highlight that you had, you had,
you had all the wrong people saying all the wrong things,
and of course, conspiracy theorists like me, we're saying, no,
there's nothing to see here. There is no there There
is no p tape, guys. Which is funny because that's

(54:17):
the next one on the list, the Steele dossier. You
could tie that to to Russia Gate. It's the same thing, Okay,
the Still dossier, which was commissioned by the Hillary Clinton campaign,
which was was authorized as a result of of a
very an oddly simple plan to force to utilize the

(54:38):
Stee dossier in a way that could that could go
after Trump and his people during his first administration, and
it worked. You know, we could say, oh, it's been exposed,
it's been debunked. You know, you fake. Jake Tapper and
his his love of the Stele dossier got debunked. But
Jake Tapper is still on the air. Nobody's been arrested

(55:00):
for their involvement in the Steel dossi. As a matter
of fact, Christopher Steel himself is now back in the news.
You know, he's still still out there participating. There have
been no repercussions from any of this, and that should
should make you mad, especially considering the damage that it
did to this nation. You know, I don't think that
there's enough enough enough credit. I guess it is the

(55:26):
best way to put it, credit given to Russia Gate
and the Steele dossier for their their part in the
massive rise of Trump arrangement syndrome. Okay, people to this day,
ignorant people, probably by the at the very least hundreds
of thousands, if not millions, of Americans still believe that

(55:48):
Russia compromised the Trump administration. Trump's first administration is now
compromising the second administration. They still believe that the Stell
dossier was real. They still think there's a pe tape
out there somewhere, and a lot of these people will
then go out and they will base their actions, base
their votes, base their rhetoric, base their everything around this

(56:09):
notion that Trump must be stopped. No matter what, one
can argue that the whole Russia gains still dossier conspiracy theories,
because they were conspiracy theories, they were embraced. Just because
they were embraced by corporate media doesn't mean they were
weren't conspiracy theories, but they were proven wrong. But yet
there are people that you can make an argument that
is as a result of that that we had now two,

(56:29):
maybe three, maybe multiple more than that Trump assassination attempts.
You can truly blame it on these idiots. Last part
of the list before we I'm going to take a
break after this, and before we get to the two
big ones, but the last one on the list of

(56:49):
who is correct journalists or conspiracy theorists Ukrainian corruption. This
is one where I don't understand it.

Speaker 6 (56:57):
Really.

Speaker 2 (56:57):
I understand the need for corporate media to back, you know,
to back the narrative that Ukraine good, Russia bad, Vladimir
Zelensky good, putin bad. I get it, you know, but
you would think that any self respecting journalist would see
the very blatant and obvious use of American taxpayer dollars

(57:20):
to benefit Russian oligarchs, to benefit Russian politicians. They're getting
rich off of us, and the money's not being used
to help the people, the people that are suffering in Ukraine.
You would think that would be a big story, right
in corporate media. That is what they're supposed to do.
They're suposed to find corruption. Well, if they want to
look for corruption, go to Ukraine. That's where the corruption

(57:45):
really lies. Whether you've been a prepper for a long
time or maybe you're just getting started, you're just getting
looking around and thinking how crazy it is. We usually
cover the basics. You get your foods, you get your water,
you get your ammunition, don't forget tramo. You get your
battery chargers, solar battery chargers or whatever. But a lot

(58:05):
of times I think people will forget their meds. Okay,
whether it's chronic meds, antibiotics, it's I think a lot
of people don't even realize that you can stock up
on that stuff. They go to the doctor, they go
to the pharmacy and the pharmacists said, oh, here's your
two month supply or whatever. Well, you can actually stock
up on a lot of these meds by going to
jd Rucker dot com slash meds. You'll talk to the

(58:27):
good folks over at Jase Medical. They can get your
twelve month supply of certain prescription drugs. They can get
your emergency meds, all sorts of good stuff, things that
you may or may not need. But it's always good
to have it on hand because I guarantee you, even
if you don't think you need it today, you might
need it in the future. Jdrucker dot com slash meds.

Speaker 6 (58:50):
A large retail store just canceled a huge order, leaving
us with a ton of extra My Pillows.

Speaker 2 (58:56):
But you know what, that's their loss.

Speaker 6 (58:58):
I'm gonna make it your gain. For the first time ever,
you get standard Classic My Pillows per wholesale prices only
fourteen eighty eight. I can't believe I'm even saying that,
only fourteen eighty eight. But it gets even better. For
a limited time, I'm going to offer my entire classic
collection at wholesale prices. Upgrade to a Queen size My
Pillow for just eighteen eighty eight, King size only a

(59:21):
dollar more, Get My Body Pills for twenty nine eighty eight,
and multi use My Pillows for only nine eighty eight.
So go to MyPillow dot com or call the number
on the screen. Use your promo code to take advantage
of wholesale pricing for the first time ever on TV,
including my standard size, my pillow only fourteen eighty eight.
They've never been offered this low before. We have limited

(59:44):
quantities at this price, so limit's going to be ten,
and once they're gone, they're gone.

Speaker 2 (59:52):
So we're about to go into some very dark discussions here.
And it's not just the subject matter itself. It's dark.
I'm not going to go into details of regarding elite
pedophilia or child sex trafficking. That's the details. You don't
need to know the details. The details are hideous, and
I'm not going to repeat them. You already know what

(01:00:15):
they are. You don't need you don't need to hear
it from me. But the dark part is the conspiracy itself. Look,
there's a reason that I save these two for last,
and I'm going to combine them because they are they're
very closely aligned. There's a list of fifteen fifteen topics
that the journalists have gotten wrong and conspiracy theorists have

(01:00:35):
gotten right. And I skip these two to the end
to now so that we can discuss it further without
any any constraints on time or anything. Because this is important, obviously,
but also because to do a proper deep dive without
going into discouraging details requires a certain mindset and unfortunately

(01:01:01):
for you, I need you to bear with me because
it's going to require some set up. I'm going to
tell two very brief stories, but they are important to understand.
The first one is it was an eye opener for me,
and this was around the time that the Twitter files
were coming out, when information was coming out about the
government's direct involvement with censorship. You're probably thinking, what does

(01:01:22):
this have to do with with elite pedophilia or child
sex trafficking. Well, the important part, the important takeaway from
all this is that you had on one side, you
had a large number of employees social media company employees
at Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Google, whatever and them who

(01:01:43):
were aware that government was using them telling them what
to censor. Okay. On the other side, of course, you
had the government officials, some at the federal level, but
most of them were actually at the state level. And
that's an important component to understand because then we can

(01:02:04):
start to see the width of the net itself. The
net itself was huge. Now, we did some calculations, this
is this has been obviously a couple of years now,
we did some calculations back then to determine how many
people knew okay, how many people were were either directly
involved in an attack against the constitution, how many of

(01:02:28):
them were were at least aware that it was happening,
whether maybe they weren't the ones that were pushing the
buttons to censor people, or they weren't the ones that
were making the request, but they had to have been
aware that it was happening, okay. And then the people
that were just you know what, the they were whatever bystanders,

(01:02:51):
you know, like, oh, yeah, you know, I thought that
was weird. It was at work today and I got
a request from from you know, California to to take
down this guy's tweet or whatever. And we did some
some calculation, spent some time and put some some science
behind it, and we came to the conclusion that conservatively, okay,

(01:03:12):
the number is probably much higher. But conservatively the censorship
apparatus on both sides, okay, on the on the social
media side and then on the on the government side,
for that to happen, for it to operate the way
that it did, would have required a minimum of sixty

(01:03:34):
thousand Americans. So sixty thousand Americans at a minimum, were
aware about, or involved with, or at least aware about,
aware of the attack on our constitution, an unambiguous attack.
Now you could say, well, but maybe a lot of
them just didn't know, right, They didn't realize that. They thought, oh, well,

(01:03:56):
if the government says it must be okay, fine, okay, fine,
we can let's be generous and say that forty percent
of that group is they're idiots. Okay, So because it's
it's it's blatant. You know, you go to civics class,
you you read the Constitution. I know you're saying, oh,

(01:04:16):
people don't read the Constitution. Yeah, but we do understand
that the government is not supposed to censor Americans. Most
Americans know this, and yet maybe some of them were thinking, oh, well,
it's okay in this case, Okay, we'll give it forty percent.
I don't think it's that many, but we'll say forty percent.
So that's still at least thirty six thousand, minimum, of
thirty six thousand people who were aware of this happening

(01:04:39):
and who said nothing, they continue to allow to happen.
They didn't blow the whistle, They didn't contact media, they
didn't contact an attorney. They didn't contact the police, they
didn't contact anybody. They just participated or were aware of
an attack on the United States Constitution that was being

(01:05:00):
perpetrated by the government and with the assistance of big tech.
Thirty six thousand people. Then you might think that's not
a lot. But certainly, I mean, wouldn't you think that
at least one or two or five or ten or
fifty of them would have been like, wait a second,
this is this is bad. We should report this, we

(01:05:20):
should blow the whistle on this, we should bring this
to light. And yet it was happening for at least
two years and nobody said a word, not a single
one of those people. And again, at thirty six thousand
were being extremely generous. If I were to put you know,
what would I guess if I could somehow magically know
the exact number, I would say it was over one

(01:05:42):
hundred thousand American citizens were engaged in breaking the law
in this regard for no good reason. Mind you, It's
not like, oh, they were stealing or this, or that
these are otherwise honest people who don't break the law.
We assume most of them don't generally break the law.
But they were willing to because you know it was

(01:06:03):
part of the plan. You know, it's like, okay, well
nobody else is saying anything. I guess there's nothing wrong
with what I'm doing, or nobody else is saying anything,
so I don't want to get in trouble, so I'm
just gonna keep doing it. Thirty six thousand Americans minimum involved.
I want to hammer that point home because if it
wasn't for the Twitter files, if it wasn't for Elon
Musk buying Twitter and then the subsequent release of internal

(01:06:28):
documents that demonstrated exactly what was happening, we would still
not know. As a matter of fact, it would probably
be much much bigger than that. There would probably be
tens of thousands more Americans who were directly involved or
or at least aware of this illegal activity with zero whistleblowers.

(01:06:49):
That mindset is it's important to understand because because we
as Americans, it really isn't just Americans, but we're talking
specifically about Americans. We as Americans have a tendency to
to go with the flow, right, you know, the just
following orders. You know, company says do this, government says
do that. You know, why rock the boat, right, Okay,

(01:07:15):
you got that part. It's important to understand because of
the scale of these conspiracies, the scale that's necessary to
pull it off, because I think that a lot of
conspiracies get dismissed by people, a lot of theories about
what's happening. They get dismissed because people Americans tend to

(01:07:35):
think along the lines of, well, it would be just
too hard for them to keep it hush hush, It'd
be too hard for them to cover it up, and
be too hard for them to get this organized, because
it's not like they just need like fifty people or
one hundred people involved, which that itself is difficult in
a conspiracy, especially a criminal conspiracy. They try to keep
the crew tight, right, you know, too many loose lips

(01:07:58):
involved if you the more people that you get. But
they were able to pull it off successfully when zero whistleblowers,
zero acknowledgment, zero knowledge of it at all, other than
after Elon Musk bought Twitter and then Twitter files came
out and then all of a sudden, now it exploded.

(01:08:20):
If it wasn't for a billionaire spending forty billion dollars
on something, we would still never have known. Big conspiracies
can happen. That's the point. So we got that in mind.
Now let's go to the world of fiction, and again
the Zell set up for talking about this whole elite

(01:08:43):
pedophilia and child sex trafficking concept. I'm easing in because
it's a topic that I don't like to talk about,
but it's important context here. So there was a there's
a show called Luther stars Idris Elba. I don't watch
much television. That's one show that I actually I liked it,
enjoyed it. It was pretty good. The end, the I

(01:09:04):
don't know if it's the end, actually might not be,
but the final series season it was actually a movie.
It was a two hour a movie, and the it
opens up. The premise is that you can blackmail people
to pretty much do anything, right if they if you
can catch people doing really bad things, okay, then they

(01:09:27):
would be willing to do almost anything and sometimes literally
anything to keep their secret. There's also I think there
was a Black Mirror or something like that that had
a similar premise. But the idea is that look, you
gotta got some kid, some dude who's who's uh looking
at a child porn and you can catch them and
prove it. Then you can get them to do anything.

(01:09:48):
And to the point, at least in this Luther movie,
to the point that they they were the bad guys,
were able to get these random people blackmailed so much
that they were willing to kill themselves just to keep
their secrets. They would rather die jump off a roof
on camera. They would rather die than have their secrets

(01:10:13):
revealed to their family, their friends. They figured that death
was better than the absolute shame of revealing their depravity.
I think that's pretty realistic, Okay, I think there are
a lot of people would who would rather I'm not
saying everybody. You know, some people think, oh man, that sucks.

(01:10:36):
I'm going to go to jail and get get brutalized
in jail because I'm a kitty porn guy. But oh,
you know, I would still that's better than death. Maybe
you know, I don't know what, It doesn't matter. Just
know that there are people that would rather die then
they have their hideous secrets revealed. All right, So that's

(01:10:59):
the setup. Now, hopefully you understand what is possible here,
because because this this concept of elite pedophilia, the idea
that that those in charge as well as not just
and to be clear, it's not just those in charge
like government or deep state. It's also Hollywood, musicians, celebrities

(01:11:20):
across the board. It's also just generic rich guy, rich girl,
rich whatever. Okay, these powerful people, the elites out there,
there seems to be this, this penchant for for pedophilia.
It's I mean, and again, we can look at the

(01:11:40):
the Diddi files, which hopefully, Lord willing we will get
to see them. Please Pam Bondi, please, Donald Trump, please
whoever get those released. We need to know who's who's
what is, what is did he know and and who
does he know it about? We need that information. Same
thing with Epstein. Of course we'll see. I'll be you're
y disappointed by the way if that information is is

(01:12:03):
kept secret and definitely throughout Trump's Trump's administration. I know
it sounds like I'm stalling. I'm not. I want to
get into this. We know that there is this this whatever,
this subversive, ugly disgusting trend in Hollywood, in music, in

(01:12:29):
the halls of the elites, where they're involved with at
the very least bad sex crimes and possibly the worst
sex crimes, which of course would be child rape. They're
out there, and it's a lot of them. I'm not
saying everybody in Hollywood is a pedophile. Okay, we've heard

(01:12:51):
from even members of Hollywood. They've come out. You know,
Corey Feldman. I know a lot of people say Corey
Feldman's crazy, But why is he crazy? Have you ever
noticed that? Pretty much? What is it? Ninety percent big
Disney stars when they grow up, they turn into like
demonic sex crave craving whatever. I mean, they're they're showing

(01:13:14):
signs of of sex abuse. It looks like they were
abused as children. It's everywhere and it's devastating. But now
imagine imagine this as an industry. If you will, imagine
that the powers that be use this. They try to

(01:13:35):
get powerful people, whether it's a politician or a businessman
or a celebrity or whatever. They try to get them
into compromising positions. They send them to Epstein Island, they
send them one of Dinny's parties, they send them to
some hotel room where they've got cameras. They send them anywhere,
and they get these people under their control because they
know that once they have them, once they say look

(01:14:00):
here you are, We got you on video. Now we
own you and the people they have no choice because again,
if we assume that the Epstein's and the Ditties of
the world are working for whoever, whether it's the CIA
or some other member of the deep state, or some
of the other organization within the globalist lee kabal or
whoever demons, I don't know, whatever it is, the powers

(01:14:25):
that be, we'll call them powers and principalities, but we
just we'll stick with easy. The powers that be, they
have this dirt on people. And again we've seen this
in bits and pieces from various people that have been involved.
We've heard not so much whistleblowers, but but you know,

(01:14:46):
secondary information, secondary knowledge, sometimes it is primary knowledge. Sometimes
some of the worst victims do come out. You look
at and then but you also see, this is an
important point. You also see sometimes those that come out
against these crazy things, they end up being smeared hard.

(01:15:09):
I look at a Dave Chappelle. Dave Chappelle, you know,
there's rumors that he's literally a completely different man now
after he went from from sort of exposing the truth
to all of a sudden now he's kind of different.
Ever since he took his trip, his sabbatical, He's come
back as a completely different person. It seemed as if

(01:15:31):
he was on the verge of unveiling some important stuff,
and yet he didn't. We look at whatever happened to
Andrew Breitbart, What did happen to Andrew Breitbart? What about
Anne Hesh? Okay, and again I'm throwing stuff out there.
I have no insider knowledge, I have no proof, no evidence.

(01:15:52):
I'm just saying that it seems as if the people,
many of the people who could have blown the whistle,
maybe who were on the verge of blowing the missile whistle,
maybe who even tried to blow the whistle, maybe they
went and they tried to tell somebody, and that somebody
was compromised as well. We have to assume that's possibly
the case. If we assume that this, this uh, this plot,

(01:16:18):
this conspiracy is as widespread as I believe it is,
and I believe that it is huge. I believe that
that it does cover even many in the in the
halls of government. You know, we saw what they tried
to do to Madison Cawthorne a couple of years back,
and look at him. Now he was removed. Okay, he

(01:16:38):
was super popular, He was doing great. Everybody loved him,
and but Mitch McConnell and his cronies, they were able
to somehow get him primaried out of office. That's crazy
because he was for all intents and purposes, he There
should have been no reason for him to have have
been taken out, and yet the smears came in his

(01:17:01):
career was destroyed. Why because he went on a podcast
and he said, yeah, they tried to get me to this,
to go to this sex party, and I didn't go.
I was like, oh my gosh, he's exposing us. We
got to get rid of him. Should we have him killed?
Should we call Hillary? Nah, nobody really believes. Let's just
let's just make a threat and then we'll primary him

(01:17:22):
out and then that'll be. We'll be done with the
Madison Cawthorne experiment. We tried to get him. We failed.
You know, he said they were trying to get him
to do cocaine. Members of the Senate, by the way,
not congress member. Apparently a member of the Senate was
trying to get him to do cocaine. They will do
this to pretty much anyone, pretty much anybody. And this

(01:17:43):
is why I have a hard time trusting anyone on
Capitol Hill, and especially if they've been there for long enough,
because it seems as if for them to survive, for
them to stay means that they have to become compromised
in some form or fashion at some point. I don't
know if that's within the first two years, four years,
six years, but any of the guys that have been

(01:18:03):
there for a long long time, you just can't trust them.
And I'm not saying they're all pedophiles, to be clear.
I mean, I'm not saying that that's the only method
through which they're able to bribe, blackmail, or bully people
to be under their control. But they do find some
way to give them under control, and if they try
to speak out, like Madison Cawthorn, then they are removed.

(01:18:24):
So I want you to I want you to put
on your tinfoil hat for a minute, and I'm going
to give you four premises. These are for you to
understand that this is real, that they really are out
there in bulk, these controlled elites, that many of them

(01:18:48):
are pedophiles. The vast majority of them are compromised in
some way. And the reason that the pedophilia comes in
is because Number one it establishes not just that's the easiest,
the most reliable form of control. Number Two, it gives
them a further incentive, which we'll get into here in

(01:19:09):
a second. But here's some Here are four premises that
I need you to open up your mind and to
just accept, because I'm not going to give you a
proof of this, of any of this, because I don't
have it. But I think if you have been paying
attention for long enough, then you will assume that these
these four things are actually correct. Number one, they have

(01:19:34):
they monitor everything. They being again the powers that be,
They monitor everything. They monitor your phones, they monitor your Internet,
they monitor all of it. They know if you're logged
in anywhere. I don't care if you're using a private browser. Oh,
they can monitor you. Now does that mean they're actively

(01:19:56):
monitoring you or me? Probably not. Actually they're probably monitoring me.
But but you know, you average people. They have access.
They can, but they're not like sitting there like like
listening in to six hundred thousand or six hundred million
conversations a day, okay, or reading through everybody's browser history.
They use algorithms, they use artificial intelligence. They try to

(01:20:18):
find people who can be compromised, okay, especially if they're
in congress or congressional candidates. They try to plan things
out ahead of time. It's like, oh, here's a guy
that we can totally compromise. Let's give him a boost,
let's get him, let's get him in office. That's how
they keep the uniparty swamp filled. Sometimes they get him

(01:20:40):
after they've won, sometimes they get him before they won.
But either way, they try their best to get them.
And they don't have to get all of them. They
just have to give most of them. All they need
is a majority. That's how you get stuff passed. How
do you think you know? I've often said to myself that, oh,
Mitch mcconnaugh has so much control because he has control
over the money. And now, of course that would of
course that would be John Thune. No, that's not necessarily

(01:21:00):
the case. It's very likely deeper and darker than just
campaign funds. So they monitor everything. They have access to
almost all of it, okay, ninety nine percent of the
information they can get to it, and nobody knows about it. Nobody,
you know. This isn't like like, oh, you know, here's
a memo that the president's signed that says they can

(01:21:23):
go do this, you know, and you might. Now here's
this important part going back to what I was saying
about having you know, a whole bunch of people compromised,
a whole bunch of people part of the conspiracy. If
we assume you know, you might say, well, but certainly
somebody would have reported it because it's going to take
you know, the little guys, right, it's going to take
people at the telecoms and people at the internet service

(01:21:46):
providers that well, yeah, that's part of the conspiracy. Again,
remember what they were able to do with with the
social media companies and government. Now imagine that at this scale.
But importantly imagine that at this scale with blackmail and
bribery and bullying thrown into the mix. Now, all of
a sudden, they have control over a whole lot more people,

(01:22:07):
So they're monitoring everything. Number Two, they own the dark Web.
They do. And when I say own, I'm not saying
they like physically own it. I'm saying they own it.
Is in as in, oh, the dark web is safe.
That's no, it's not. They're there. They're in every aspect
of the dark web that that you know, new cell
of the dark Web pops up. You know, they are

(01:22:29):
very deeply embedded. They have informants, they have they have
all the people, all the people in the right places
that can actually help. And it's funny because I think
a lot of times I can picture, like, you know,
multiple informants, like this dark room chat room guy. You know,
he's he's actually sets up these these these rooms for
pedophiles share content. He's compromised. He's actually he's like, yeah,

(01:22:53):
set up this room here, bring your guys in that
way you can watch. And you might think, well, if they,
if they, if they own all these why aren't they
busting these people. They don't want to bust them. The
powers that be have no interest in stopping pedophiles. They
have an interest in owning pedophiles. That's it. I'm not
talking about like direct law enforcement saying, oh, the FBI

(01:23:13):
agent finds a pedophile, he's gonna gonna go hand him
over to compromise department. No, it's not like that. I'm
talking about again, the people behind the scenes that that
we don't know about, that that don't aren't on on
the uh on the various spreadsheets. So yes, so they
they're monitoring everything you're doing. And they are monitoring very

(01:23:34):
closely every nearly every aspect of the dark web. Number three,
they operate through a double system. It's not just about blackmail,
it's not just about punishment. It's also about reward. They
are they they operate in a any punishment and reward system.
They find somebody, Okay, they oh, look here, here's a guy,

(01:23:57):
he's a whatever, he's a banker, okay, and the banker
has been been accessing kiddie porn. Okay, so let's get
let's get some monitoring on him. Let's uh, let's get
his web web action going. Let's get some cameras on them.
Let's let's get this guy covered. This guy's a high profile,
high potential asset. Let's grab him. Okay. So they get him,

(01:24:20):
they get him compromised. Then they set up a meeting
or maybe they you know, pick them up, pull them over, whatever,
something happens and they get in contact with him, and
then they explained to them. They give them the options. Look,
we got you here, you're toast. Okay, you're going to jail,
or you could just saying you could help us out,

(01:24:45):
you could become our asset. We're gonna tell you what
to do when to do it, and it won't be often,
might be never. You know, it's not like we're gonna
be calling you on the phone and saying, hey, transfer
fifty thousand dollars to this account. It's not like that. No, no, no, no, no,
no no. Don't worry. We're rarely going to ask you
to do things. But when we do, you need to
do them. And if you do them, not only will

(01:25:06):
you not go to jail for the rest of your life,
you sicko, but will also even help you. I mean,
you're you're looking at the stuff online? Would you would
you be interested in the real thing? I know it's
disgusting to even think about, but it's important. It's important
that we understand the depth of the evil that's involved

(01:25:29):
with all this punishment and reward. Punishment and reward, they
get the choice. Now if you start to understand that this, now,
now you can see, Okay. So it's definitely possible that
they could own people who would never ever, ever ever

(01:25:49):
blow the whistle, who would never talk about this with
friends or buddies, who would never reveal this on any chats.
They would even tell them. Look, ay, you know, you
think you're safe you want to go go here and
talk about it. You know, see if anybody else is
like that, don't you know, first rule of a first
rule of compromised club. You don't talk about compromised club.

(01:26:13):
You're in the club now, whether you like it or not,
or you go to jail. And if you do want
to participate, if you do want the reward instead of
the punishment, then you'll do exactly what we say. And
you'll never mention this to anybody, even if somebody comes
up to you and says, hey, man, the government did
this to me too, and I'm I'm you know, what
do I do? You're supposed to, dude, what the hell?

(01:26:34):
I've never heard of anything like that before. They do this,
and they collect people, they collect them, They collect them,
they collect them. Now, the fourth element, the fourth thing
I need you to stipulate in order to understand this
is they've been doing this for a long long time.
This isn't just the Internet. The Internet made things a
heck of a lot easier for them, But they've been

(01:26:56):
doing this for long before the Internet, long before. I mean,
they've been you know, how did Epstein Island come to be?
It wasn't because of the Internet. It's because, I mean,
they probably wouldn't have needed in Epstein Island if they
had the Internet back way back then. They've been doing
this and collecting people for the very least decades. They

(01:27:19):
figure out ways to compromise as many people as possible,
and then they grow their network. I don't know how
big the network is, but I do know this that
they it has to be huge, which brings us to
the child sex trafficking aspect of it. There's a reason

(01:27:40):
why open borders are here. A lot of people will say, oh,
so that they could establish permanent Democrat rule rights, that's
the talking point. I've said it myself, But it's much
worse than that. The open borders are not just about
stealing American jobs or getting getting Democrat voters. The real

(01:28:00):
eyes for the globals, eleak of cabal, for the powers
to be, for the evil ones, the millions of Satan,
if you would like to think of them as that,
because that's what they are. The real prize there is
the children. Three hundred and three hundred and twenty thousand
that a bare minimum illegal alien children are missing, and

(01:28:25):
as far as the public knows, as far as most
government employees. They don't. They have no idea where these
children are. And it saddens me horribly, I mean just

(01:28:45):
thinking about this because for two reasons. The obvious reason
is because oh my gosh, that means that there are
that there are millions, millions of evil and the braved
people out there whose appetites needed to be fed. And

(01:29:07):
number two, that would mean that there are hundreds of thousands,
if not millions, of assets one way or the other,
some form of asset. I'm not saying that that there's oh,
there's like four million, you know, uh, government assets, you
know at various places across America that are that are

(01:29:28):
being fed, you know, these these children to to fulfill
their desires, and in exchange, they do the evil people's bidding.
I'm not saying that, but I will admit I wouldn't
be shocked. I would be shocked, but I wouldn't. It's
not impossible that it is that big. Now, realistically, I
don't think it is. Gosh, I hope it's not, because

(01:29:51):
if it's. If it is, then then I mean, if
that's the case, then there's nothing we could do. Okay,
we're toast. They would they would rather it would rather
take my show off the air and kill me, then
then let this happen, let this ever get it get out.
I don't have any proof, so I don't think that
I'm at risk, But even if I were, I'd still
be speaking it because because it needs to be said,

(01:30:15):
there's a problem in the United States of America. That
problem does pertain to child sex trafficking. That problem does
pertain to the bulk of the people, the huge number
of people here in the United States of America who
were compromised in some way to do the bidding of

(01:30:37):
the evil ones, the minions of Satan, the powers that be.
Now this is where you know, are the journalists right
or am I right? There is the conspiracy theorist right now?
At this point it really is. You know. I pushed
it as far as I could not because I don't

(01:30:58):
believe it. I do believe it, but it's hard to
get people to accept anything that I just said. Because
Number One, if it's true, like I said, then we're toast.
Number two, if it's true, then my gosh, just destroy
us now, okay, please God, we are not worthy, we

(01:31:18):
don't deserve anything good as a nation, and just destroy us.
But Number three, and this is the part where we're
not going to get into them. So I do want
to be at least a little bit careful. I don't
want to die. But it is ugly, it is evil,

(01:31:43):
and it is widespread. And no, I don't think I've
done a good job of convincing you, and that wasn't
my intention. My intention was to get you thinking and
to maybe get you looking, and hopefully together we can
help to discover the real truth. What is the truth?
I don't know. To me, the evidence seems to point

(01:32:06):
to that they're importing illegal alien children because it's just
easier for them to be able to feed the sexual
depravity of the masses that they have. They have compromised
both within the elites and then regular people, lower people,

(01:32:26):
lower standing people, I should say, not lower people. They're
all low if they're pedophiles, if they're engaged in this
sort of activity, if they've allowed themselves to do this
kind of stuff. So I'm asking you if you have
any information, if you have any anything I need to know.

(01:32:50):
I want to explore this further. I want to be
able to get the truth out there. And I'm not
even sure what the perse would be because again, this
is something that's far above my pay grade. You know,
who can you trust? Could you take this to the police.
Could you take this to the FBI? No, definitely not

(01:33:13):
the FBI. Maybe the police, but definitely not the FBI.
Could you take this to investigative journalists? You know? Could
we can we? Could we take it to Alex jones
On no way, they're trying to take him out. Can
we take it to Tucker Carlson? No, he would probably
you probably think that's crazy. Could we take it to who?
I don't know. I don't know who needs to see this.

(01:33:35):
I don't know who needs to to help. But if
you have information, I encourage you to reach out. You
can go to jd Rutger dot com slash talk jd
Rucker dot com slash talk and that will get the
information directly to me. If you prefer to do it
via Twitter x, I have open DMS at JD Rutger.

(01:33:58):
Uh ping me let me know, and well, let's see
if there's anything we can do this this this little show.
We've we've we've we've shot for bigger things before. We've
had some some good accomplishments, but I would trade all
of them away. If I could just make even the

(01:34:19):
slightest dent in this pure evil endeavor, this this demonic process,
this demonic conspiracy that surrounds us, I would take away
everything I've got if it meant that I could expose
some of it, just the midgeon of it. And if

(01:34:41):
we could expand on that and expose more and more
and get more facts, more more, maybe get finally get
us a whistleblower, that would be great. But if not,
I'm not gonna stop. I'm gonna keep going either way.
So that's it. Jdrucker dot Com, slash talk or Twitter

(01:35:04):
x at jd Rucker, Lord Willing. I'll be back very
soon with another episode. In the meantime, you stay strong,
stay safe, and God bless. I have one kid, you
have five kids? How do you That's incredible.

Speaker 3 (01:35:22):
It's kind of like being an FBI agent. You're always
kind of monitoring them and making sure everyone's safe.

Speaker 2 (01:35:26):
Makes good sense.

Speaker 1 (01:35:26):
You know, I'm actually a real agent, but an agent,
I'm actually a deputy sheriff. You really aren't there many
many years?

Speaker 2 (01:35:31):
Are you serious? For real life? Real life?

Speaker 3 (01:35:34):
Unbelievable? So you're a sheriff played at Princeton Pro football player,
greatest superhero of all time.

Speaker 1 (01:35:41):
Never never drafted to Major League Baseball like you for
the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Speaker 2 (01:35:45):
Knuckleball. You hit a knuckleball.

Speaker 3 (01:35:47):
You don't, you don't, you don't.

Speaker 2 (01:35:48):
That's the whole points and beauty of it.

Speaker 3 (01:35:50):
You know, we may have always played on different sides,
you know, being the superhero the super villain, but we
have a lot more in common than I thought that
we did.

Speaker 1 (01:35:57):
Which is shocking, because one thing's for sure. Genesis Gold
Group is a company that we both trust. They make
safeguarding your IRA or your four oh one K as
simple as possible, and I need simple, to be honest.

Speaker 3 (01:36:11):
And with their sellar reputation, they're as solid as the
gold that they sell.

Speaker 1 (01:36:15):
Like this gold right here, So call Genesis Gold Group
today at one eight hundred, two hundred gold. This is
what they call prepper bar. So like you can break
off these see these little pieces. Oh, it's on both sides.

Speaker 3 (01:36:26):
It's great because you can care they're on small and.

Speaker 1 (01:36:28):
You can literally use it to spend or this one.

Speaker 3 (01:36:32):
This is a big fella. This is a really great one,
so real, this is the real one. He want to
hold it heavy, Holy smoke, that's pretty great. And you
can get that one of those from Genesis gold yourself.

Speaker 2 (01:36:41):
Hey, you guys see this look.

Speaker 3 (01:36:43):
Dean Dean Dean. That's my kids called Tituition money, Hold
on back.

Speaker 5 (01:36:55):
D who's the super villain now? Huh it's my golden

Speaker 1 (01:37:07):
Mhm

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}"Journalists" Versus Conspiracy Theorists

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

"Journalists" Versus Conspiracy Theorists

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal