Liz Cheney, Government Waste, and ANOTHER Drone Theory

Liz Cheney is in big trouble... at least by House GOP standards. They called for an investigation into her for her shenanigans on the J6 Committee. Will anything come from it? Probably not.

Government waste in Afghanistan is through the roof. On top of all that, here's another drone theory that makes a lot of sense... plus another 18 theories to consider. All of this and more on today's episode of The JD Rucker Show.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:26):
You're listening to the J. D Rucker shows. Let's begin.
Tuesday started off with an absolute bombshell. And I don't
use that word very often. I know a lot of people,
especially in conservative media, like to throw out that everything's
a bombshell. This is a legitimate bombshell, and it involves
one of my favorite people in the world as far

(00:46):
as from a media perspective, because she's just an endless
flow of fun. Okay, of course, I'm talking about Liz Cheney,
a former disgraced congresswoman allegedly a a Republican, but she
really cited it a lot more with the Democrats. She
is a neo CON's neocon and she absolutely hates Donald Trump,

(01:07):
which is why she was She was eager to get
involved with the January sixth Committee, and it appears that
her involvement might actually get her into some trouble. According
to It's funny because I got a text from John Solomon.
There's a there's a name drop for you. Got a
text from John Solomon this morning from just the news,
and he only sends them when he's got something truly

(01:29):
legitimately breaking. So he had this on my radar a
long before it went viral on Twitter, long before it
went viral anywhere else. He had this story super early
in the morning. Good stuff anyway. According to just the News, House,
GOP accuses Liz Cheney of tampering with J six witness,
asks FBI to investigate criminality, and it's been updated so

(01:55):
she is now officially referred for criminal action for a
criminal investigation, I should say, but we'll get into that.
According to the article by who who wrote this, oh,
John and Stephen Richards, John Solomon, Stephen Richards wrote it,
Let's get this out of here. House Administration Oversights Subcommittee
and its chairman, Barry Laudermilk, on Tuesday released and interim

(02:17):
report on the January sixth Capitol ride, including the attack
was preventable and also asking for an investigation into former Rep.
Liz Cheney for criminally tampering with a witness during the
Democrat led congressional inquiry of the tragedy the event. We
should say, that's one thing. I love John Solomon, But

(02:39):
they do refer to it as a riot. Okay, fine,
I guess from a news perspective, you'd say it's a riot,
But let's face it, it was a It was a
protest that was pushed by the FBI. But we'll discuss
that some other time. Let's get back into the report.
This is released by by the House administ Administration Oversight Subcommittee.

(03:03):
Based on the evidence obtained by this subcommittee, numerous federal
laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former vice
chair of the January sixth Select Committee, and these violations
should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Now
do we expect to see anything happen anytime soon? No,
probably not until Cash Betel is officially confirmed in running

(03:23):
the show. But we'll see. Who knows. Maybe Christopher Ray
will do one good thing before you leave. Just give
you one good thing, Chris, just one. Back to the report,
evidence uncovered by the subcommittee revealed that former Congresswoman Liz
Cheney tampered with at least one witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, by
secretly communicating with Hutchinson without Hutchinson's attorney's knowledge. The secret

(03:48):
communication with a witness is improper and likely violates eighteen Usc.
Fifteen twelve. Such action is outside the due function of
the legislative process and therefore not protected by the Speech
and Debate Clause. According to this federal law criminalizes witness
tampering of varying degrees and subjects a defendant to as
many as twenty years in prison. Oh gosh, that'd be great.

(04:11):
What I would give to see Liz Chaney behind bars
for twenty days, let alone twenty years. That would be amazing.
But we'll see, you know, I mean, you know how
these things go. They always get your hopes up. They
always say, Oh, we're going to be opening up an investigation,
and we're gonna be be censuring, and A're gonna be

(04:32):
sending really harshly worded letters. Until I see the Republican
House or the Republican Center for that matter, until I
see actual action taken by any of these guys. I
view this as fun, exciting, great too, you know, for
the imagination to see bars and see Liz Cheney behind them.

(04:55):
But we've had our hopes busted what dozens of time
times before. I don't want to be a Debbie downer. Look,
we've had some great news, great news for the last
month and a half. President Trump won good, great nominees
for the various positions. We've had had lawsuits this, We've
had some good news. It's been a good month, month

(05:16):
and a half for MAGA and for America. But you
can't really attribute any of the good times to the
House or the Senate, or the FBI or anything like that.
As a matter of fact, the only reason that I
think this is a huge story isn't because we learned

(05:38):
anything new. We knew all along that Liz Cheney was corrupt.
We also had heard before, like we've already known that
she was communicating with Cassidy Hutchinson. That's not breaking news.
What's breaking is that apparently there's going to be some
type of action. But until I see it, I'm not

(06:00):
getting my hopes up, until there's an actual grand jury,
their charges filed, until Liz Cheney is actually trying to
leave the country or something. Until that day happens, I'm
just gonna gonna mark this off as it's a This

(06:21):
is the most winning that we're gonna get out of it.
Is it still a bombshell? Absolutely? Hopefully this will be
enough to shut list Chaney up for the rest of
our lives. Uh and maybe there will be repercussions against Hutchinson.
I don't know. All I know is that we're in
a position right now. January sixth, it looks as if
things are going to get better for the January sixth

(06:41):
political prisoners. It looks like things are gonna get better
for the United States of America as a whole. And
all this stuff that we're seeing here is it kabuki theater? Yes?
Is it still fun to watch? You bet?

Speaker 2 (06:52):
You?

Speaker 1 (06:57):
Judicial watches reporting on more rupt and wasteful aid being
sent to the Taliban, this time in a way that
really chapped my khakis. According the article, Afghanistan gets one
hundred twenty two point five million dollars to combat gender
based violence under Taliban with no follow up, no follow
up that alone, I don't even have to get into
the article. That loan should really really tick you off.

(07:19):
It's sort of like like giving a fat man food
stamps and saying, here you go, go go buy healthy
food with this, we trust you.

Speaker 3 (07:26):
Go.

Speaker 1 (07:27):
In the article, and the latest scandals rock the Biden
Administration's massive Afghanistan aid boondoggle, the US government has been
derelict in its duty to measure the effectiveness of a
one hundred and twenty two point five million dollar investment
to combat gender based violence in the Islamic nation. After
the Taliban took over. According to a federal audit. The investigation,
conducted by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, also

(07:49):
reveals that the administration failed, in this case to follow
a government practice for monitoring implementation of its foreign assistance award.
Here you go, we trust you. Here's one undred twenty
two point five million, and use it for gender stuff,
use it not buy dorrito's. That includes collecting required progress reports,
validating the data in those reports through site visits and

(08:12):
other verification means, and assessing the periodic performance reports of
groups receiving taxpayer dollars to implement programs. Additionally, the State Department,
the agency dispersing the cash, did not even include any
goals for preventing and responding to GBV in Afghanistan. Investigators found.

(08:32):
So it's not only do they say, hey, here, use
this to go by buy healthy food. They said, hey,
you don't know what healthy food is. Tough figure it out,
and they get surprised when they come back with doritos. Look,
I gender based violence, okay, basically attacks on women in
Taliban run Afghanistan is a huge problem. I'm not suggesting

(08:55):
we sent aid there. You know, it's a huge problem.
It's just not our problem. Unfortunately. That's something that you know,
AID groups want to help out, but not with taxpayer dollars.
With that said, I can assure you that this one
hundred and twenty two point five million dollars, not a
single not a single Taliban ruled woman had her life

(09:16):
made better as a result of this waste. Democrats have
become the party of the coastal elite. That's according to
Brent Buchanan, a poster who was recently interviewed by Sean
Spicer as they discussed what happened to the Democrat Party?
How do they lose so badly? And they say they
attributed at least a good portion of it to the

(09:37):
fact that they spent a lot of time, energy and
money trying to get these actors and singers and anybody
they could get out there to go on stage and
go to rallies and perform and then, oh, by the way,
vote kam a lat That was the intention, and clearly
it didn't work. Now I wholeheardly agree with him, he
is correct with that said. I think that it's actually

(09:59):
it's it's worse than that. There's more to it than
just money. And favors. But first let's play the segment
from his interview.

Speaker 3 (10:07):
The main problem Democrats have now is the party of
the coastal elites. And the coastal elites thought that all
these artists being condescending to voters was a great idea
and we should put lots of money and effort behind that.
And that's why her campaign spent millions of dollars paying
people to show up at events and either sing a
song or endorse her, and it had no effect.

Speaker 1 (10:29):
I mean, like I said, I wholeheartedly agree. I just
think it goes deeper than that. I think it's telling,
very telling that they were having a hard time getting
a lot of these celebrities. I'm not talking about Robert
de Niro, who would back a coconut if that coconut
was running against Donald Trump. I'm talking about the ones
that many of whom even declared during the campaign that

(10:49):
they weren't going to get very involved, they weren't going
to participate, they weren't going to get political this time around.
But what happened a lot of them that were saying
they weren't going to get political. Shortly after Sean Diddy
Combs was arrested. They were ready to play ball. They
got so super aggressive along the way. I would argue that,

(11:11):
and this is obviously anecdotal, or not anecdotal. What's the
word I'm looking for, circumstantial. There we go, circumstantial evidence.
But it is it is pretty compelling in my humble opinion,
because you did see them flock to come a last
shortly after the arrest of Sean Diddy Combs. Were they

(11:32):
in the tapes? We would assume so, And were those
tapes being used to coerce certain people? I would say
the answer is yes, which is why I am I'm
super excited about the prospects of Cash Bettel being the
FBI director. We'll see if Pam Bondi as Attorney General
will will play ball. But I would say that Cash
might have the authority to release all of it, the

(11:54):
Epstein tapes, the Epstein List, the Diddy tapes, and hopefully
willing we'll actually see some of these sick, depraved people
brought to justice. The economy is arguably the biggest reason
and that President Trump was able to win re election
so easily. He was able to to point to what

(12:16):
the Biden Harris regime has done for the last four years,
and it has been awful. It has been absolutely horrendous.
And despite the fact that many of the indicators are
already popping up, we're already seeing consumer sentiment rise, for example,
as a result of the election, people are starting to
have more faith in the future of the economy. There's
still so much work to do. This isn't going to

(12:36):
be instant. In fact, it's not even going to be fast.
I would argue that if they really work hard and
focus on as much attention as they can to fixing
the economy, it would take at least two years just
to get us back to us to level. Okay, I
know that we all have great and high expectations for
President Trump's second term, and look, we have every reason

(12:59):
to think, but when it comes to the economy, this
is the damage has been tremendous. We're still seeing it today.
There's an article over at Economic Collapse Dot report by
Michael Sneyder look at these prices. Thirty seven percent of
Americans struggled to pay their most basic bills as food
prices accelerate. When one of my readers is from again

(13:20):
from the Economic Collapse blog is where it was originally
published and we have it cross posted with permission over
at Economic Collapse dot Report. When one of my readers
sent me a photo of egg prices at a store
in western Washington State, I could hardly believe what I
was seeing. I clearly remember when I could purchase a
carton of quality eggs at the grocery store for just
ninety nine cents. But thanks to inflation and a bird

(13:41):
flu crisis that never seems to end these days, those
days are long gone. Now it is common to pay five, six, seven,
or even eight dollars for a carton of eggs. And
I'll tell you, buddy, out here in Coymifornia, I have
seen ten dollar eggs. We're not talking like any fru
fru super ultramega awesome special eggs. We're not talking about
ostrich eggs are gold plate today's. These are just regular,

(14:03):
high quality, local farm organic eggs. And yes they are
over ten dollars per dozen out here back to the article.
In fact, it probably won't be too long before we
crack the ten dollars barrier. There you go. In the
old days, eggs were considered to be a very inexpensive
food way to feat your family. But now food price
have gone completely insane. Unfortunately, it isn't just egg prices

(14:28):
that are spiking, and he goes on to explain how
how we're struggling. Americans are definitely struggling right now with
the economy with inflation, and I want to put out
just I just want to be realistic here. You know,
there are certain things, certain aspects of President Trump's presidency
that are going to be dramatically affected starting on day one,

(14:49):
some that have already been dramatically affected even before he
stepped foot back in the Oval office. The economy is
not one of those things. He's not going to be
able to fix on day one. He's not going to
be able to fix it on day ten or week
ten or month ten. The economy is going to be
in a very bad place for a very long time.
I shouldn't say very long. We should be able to

(15:11):
get this thing fixed, if Congress does their job, we
should be able to get everything fixed within the next
two years. And when I say fixed, I'm saying bring
it back to the stable to level, okay, not skyrocketing.
That should That'll probably take a lot longer, but I
do believe we'll get there. I do believe that President
Trump will be able to do as much, if not more,

(15:35):
for the economy than he did during his first term.
But we do need Congress, who has control of the
purse spring strings. We need Congress to act to be diligent,
to be responded. We're not seeing it right now. Right now,
we're seeing anything. But as a matter of fact, there
was a as of right now, they are putting out

(15:57):
the Continuing Resolution, basically the budget, the money that we're
going to be spending in government for the foreseeable future,
that goes up for a vote on Wednesday. It just
got released on Monday. It's fifteen hundred pages. How in
the world is anybody supposed to really dive deep into
it and decide whether or not to they want to

(16:18):
vote for it or not. The answer, of course is
they can't, and they won't, and they don't. The vast
majority of people on Capitol Hill they don't really know
what's in the bill. They sign it anyway. They know
what they're told that, hey, this is supposed to be good,
this is supposed to be bad, but we need to
get a pastor else they'll shut down the government, and YadA, YadA, YadA,

(16:38):
it'll affect this donor that crony will affect our election chances, whatever,
whatever self serving motivation they have to continue to vote
for this stuff. But we're talking about a humongous amount
of money. It's about to be laid upon us right
before President Trump gets back into office. As I noted

(17:00):
X and a semi viral post, what we're seeing Congress
do today by pushing the cr as rapidly as possible,
with as much in it as possible, or seeing as
the equivalent of a fat man eating a jar of
mayonnaise right before he's supposed to go on a diet.

(17:22):
I would say the vast majority of my audience is very,
very hopeful for the future. The election of President Trump
has been just already we're seeing shockwaves, we're already seeing results,
even at this early stage. But there are still concerns
he can't do everything. He's going to do everything in
his vast power to protect us, to protect our nation,

(17:42):
to defend the Constitution, to protect our freedoms. Well, that
doesn't mean that there won't be risks, challenges. We're already
seeing wars popping up and rumors of wars popping up
across the globe. Will he be able to stop all
of them? I think so? What if he can't? What if,
for whatever reason, cooler minds, cooler heads don't prevail, and

(18:05):
we find ourselves in the midst of something tragic. What
about natural disasters? What about just the idiocy of the
globalist regimes across this planet that are trying to do
everything they can to destroy our food supply. They want
to control the food, and they want to make sure
that we're not eating the good stuff, especially as it

(18:26):
pertains to protein, and specifically as it pertains to beef.
Beef cal seemed to be the main culprit for every
boogeyman propagating bad guy out there. As a part owner
of an all American patriotic freeze dried state company, I
am very very blessed, pleased and honor to be able

(18:46):
to offer you all, offer my wonderful audience an opportunity
to take advantage. If you go to Worldviewbeef dot com
and to use promo code JDR, you will get the
maximum possible discount. And there are other kind of codes
out there that are less It's not like with certain
companies where oh, you know, it doesn't matter which promo
codes use use JDR, I own the company, use promo

(19:08):
code JDR and get the maximum discount at any given
moment at worldviewbef dot com. All American, no mRNA jabs.
It's just the good stuff, so so check it out
worldviewbef dot com. Rumors started circulating on Monday that Democrat
Congressman Jared Moskowitz from Florida is being strongly considered for

(19:30):
the role of FEMA director. And obviously a lot of Republicans,
a lot of conservatives are upset by this potential move
because he's a Democrat. But there are good reasons that
we should should consider this as a positive, and I'll
explain all those. Be sure to follow me on x.
If you're watching this video on Rumble or YouTube or whatever,
be sure to subscribe, be sure to give me that

(19:51):
all important thumbs up. So, Jared Moskowitz, let's start off
with number one. He is extremely qualified. He served is
essentially the state why FEMA director, the Florida version of
a FEMA director for two years under Rohnda Santis, and
all accounts he did a fantastic job. Florida, of course,

(20:11):
is one of those areas where yeah, you're gonna need
somebody who can handle emergency situations, especially as it pertains
to weather, and everybody said that he did a fantastic
job there before moving on to Congress. He is a Democrat,
but he is as close to being a moderate Democrat
as they get. I think it was a progressive punch
which monitors and scores the members of House and Senate

(20:35):
based upon their voting record. They had him near the
bottom for Democrats. I think he was like like a
twelfth worst or one hundred ninety eighth best, as they
would put it, because they're progressive. The one hundred ninety
eighth best member of Congress out of was two hundred
and ten to two hundred and nine Democrats that they
were following. So he is a moderate, as moderate as

(20:59):
you can get in today's Democrat party. He is an
anti free speech guy. I don't like that, but again,
we're talking about FEMA. So unless he gets into weaponization
of FEMA as we saw with the current administration, then
that would be bad. But I don't I just don't
see that happening, especially now that FEMA has been so
widely exposed. I would expect Moskowitz to go in there

(21:20):
and do his job and do his job as well
as he possibly can. But here's the real If you
want to call it forty chess, you can. It's it's
really just a political move. Moskowitz is in a district
that is quickly becoming more and more purple. Yes, it
still means Democrat, but he only won his reelection by
about four points. Okay, Florida itself as a state is
becoming more Republican, and his district is becoming more Republican. Now,

(21:44):
in Florida, when a congressional seat comes open, the governor
does not does not fill the seat, a special election
is called. And in the special election, considering how thin
of a margin Republicans have, I would imagine that there
will be a whole lot of money, a whole lot
of effort, a whole lot of people in that small district.
I think it's District twenty three. If I recall a

(22:05):
small district, A lot of people are gonna be trying
to get that vote. And if that vote can flip,
if that seat can be flipped to red, then awesome.
It's just just more ammunition for Mike Johnson and for
President Trump to be able to pass legislation if they
can't flip it. If a Democrat wins again, no loss. Okay,
maybe we get lost by getting somebody more radical than

(22:26):
Moskowitz in there, but still I would consider it a
worthy a worthy risk to take. We need to get
stuff done in Congress, get Agenda forty seven done, and
it'll be easier if they can get just that one
more vote. Every additional House seat counts dramatically considering how
thin the majority is. So I like the move. I think.

(22:52):
I think this again. I wouldn't call a forty chess
like some are, but it's it's a good move. It's
a good move. What do you think, Leave a leave
a comment, Let me know Moscowitz good, bad, indifferent your call.
A report over the weekend got a whole lot of
people anxious. People who have been covering and researching the

(23:13):
drone activity or allegedly drone activity happening in New Jersey
and across the country. Well there's a report that said
that nuclear waste material had been lost where in New Jersey.
It's like, oh, this is it, this is what they
were talking about. And by day I mean those who
are referring to the theories that either a dirty bomb
of some sort, or a radioactive nuclear waste material, or

(23:36):
an actual nuclear warhead itself from Ukraine. That that's why
there's all these drones. They're sniffers. They're supposedly out there
seeking to find this radioactive material, these dirty bombs, these
nuclear bombs, whatever it is that they're looking for. And
when people saw, oh my gosh, you mean they lost
radioactive material, radioactive waste material in New Jersey. This has

(23:59):
got to be the big one. Well, some people did
their research and then dismissed it immediately. Why because the
event happened on December third, Well does that tell us
since since the drone activity has been happening since at
the latest since mid November, Well, this might not be yet.

(24:19):
And the other reason those who looked into it sort
of dismissed that many of them did, was because it
was a small amount, a very small amount of germanium
sixty eight that was being transported, not enough to register.
It was listed as a non emergency on the required report. Okay,
so a lot of people started down that road and
then thought that this couldn't be it. They dismissed it.

(24:42):
Then there were other people, other conspiracy theorists who said,
oh no, wait, this could be used. I saw, I
saw one way. One person said, you could take this
germanium sixty eight and you can expand it and turn
it and it percolates and homogenizes and whatever. You can
turned it into a dirty bomb in like four weeks. Okay, well, yeah,

(25:03):
that's a possibility. But I think there's another another possibility.
And to me, given everything that we've seen, it it's
the right one, or maybe not the right one, but
it's it's plausible, it's viable. This could be what what's happening.
But let's first get some background information. An article that

(25:24):
we have over a based underground dot com. This is
by the New American Nuclear Regulatory Commission reports missing radioactive
waste material. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission released an event
notification report on December thirteenth announcing that a radioactive pin
source was reported missing on December third. Pin source is
a tiny radio active pen used to calibrate medical imaging scanners.

(25:49):
The germanium germanium sixty eight waste material was being transported
for disposal and went missing while in transit in Newfield,
New Jersey. According to the New Jersey Department of Environment
until protection. The shipment container arrived at its destination damaged
and empty. The event reports said the missing material contained
a very small amount of radioactive material. This material event

(26:13):
contains a less than Cat three level of radioactive material.
So it's like, okay, well, this is evidence that it
couldn't be that right because it's too small, happened too late,
just a coincidence. But as we know, there are no coincidences.
Let's assume is where if you need to go find
your tinfoil hat, go ahead and do so, get that

(26:36):
on asap. If we assume that one of or more
than one, possibly of the theories that have been floating
around for a week now, the theories that say that
there is either a dirty bomb or dirty bomb material
or nuclear material of some sword that could be used
for a nuclear bomb or maybe a nuclear warhead itself,

(26:57):
is somewhere in or around New Jersey, or possibly could
have been transported to California or the West Coast somewhere
or anywhere else where we're seeing these drones. Okay, if
that's the case, If that's reality, government starts looking for
it in early November. They realize that what they have
available to them the drones they have on hand, it's

(27:22):
not enough. They're already getting reports. People are already asking questions,
so it's like, well they're gonna ask questions either way.
They're already talking about these suv sized drones flying around,
we're getting news reports about it. We might as well
just get the job done. So we need to go
out and get a lot more of these drones. But
if we to do this, we have to file the

(27:46):
proper reports so that red flags don't raise, so that
alarms aren't going off. We can't just go, hey, you know,
we need all these things out there, and we can't
tell you what it's for. There are certain protocols that
even our own stupid government has to do, and that's
one of them. You have to announce the reason for it.

(28:09):
So they made up a reason. They made up a reason.
They said, oh, well, yeah, we lost some Germanium sixty
eight on the December third, so we need I don't know,
two three, four, eight hundred drones something like that. And
you might say, well, wouldn't somebody question it? No, not
if the PaperWorks file. They don't care. They don't care
what the details are. They don't nobody's said this is

(28:31):
these are government employees. They're not sitting there thinking, oh well,
let me dig deeper into this and make sure that
everything is No, it's like, okay, pampworks filed and trumble
at godd here's your drones requisition. Go go take this
to the whoever, and they'll get your drone set up.
Happy hunting. I'm not trying to down, by the way,
if you work in the government, I'm not saying you're

(28:51):
you're that person. I'm saying there that if you are
in the government, you probably are very well aware that
are there are many people out there working with you
who fit under that description. With my insulting, insulting accent
that I just used. Point being is this is that
if I were to hunt for a nuclear bomb or
a dirty bomb, and if I didn't want to alert

(29:12):
the general public, which obviously they don't, and if I
wanted to get enough drones to it's gonna cause a fuss.
But we if we're gonna do this, we might as
well do it all the way. You know, no half measures.
So let's get some drones. We're gonna have to follow
a report, we're gonna have to make up something in
order to say this is why we need them. That
way we can tell people this is why we need them,

(29:34):
but we can't tell you anything else. It's top secret.
You can't just go straight in with top secret. You
got to give them something, a report, a reason. That's
what I believe this radioactive waste material report is. That's
not the big one. The big one was already taking place.
This is just the paperwork version of calling for reinforcements.

(30:00):
After Trump was elected president, I received a couple of
communications from people, one via phone text and the other
one via Twitter X direct message, people asking me, hey,
now that Trump's back in office, is the economy going
to get better? And I said, yeah, in some of theays,
it definitely will. Obviously. I mean just Trump's presence alone

(30:21):
will have a dramatic impact on the economy, and it
will we'll take things to the next level. But with
that said, the threats still remain. Trump Harris didn't matter.
They're still pushing. They being the powers that be, are
still pushing for central bank digital currencies. They're still pushing
for dedollarization and the rise of bricks. They're still pushing
for the advancement of a worldwide economy, and while Trump

(30:45):
will do everything in its power to prevent that, to
at least slow it down, some of it is not
within even the power of the United States of America itself.
And this is why there is no reason you can
see by the gold prices, there's no reason to doubt
physical pressures metals as a proper way to hedge against
what is coming, because it's still coming. You know, there

(31:09):
were certain scenarios that would have happened if Kamala Harris
had won, and there are certain scenarios that will happen
now that President Trump has won, and those scenarios still
point in the same exact direction. That's the reason why
even central banks are still buying up as much gold
and silver as possible. That's why banks financial institutions are
recommending to their people buy as much gold and silver

(31:29):
as possible. I work with a faith's driven gold company.
There are a lot of gold companies out there that
they get recommended by hosts. The one that I like
happens to be driven by faith and they actually do
a tremendous job versus the competition. You can check out
Genesis Gold Group by going to rumblegold dot com. That's

(31:51):
rumblegold dot com or read my testimony over a JD.
Rutger dot com slash gold. Yeah, it's funny because I
noticed that there's a lot fewer people talking about the
drones today, as if there it's no longer in the

(32:11):
news cycle. It's no longer important, it's been resolved or something.
I know that people today Now, in twenty twenty four,
almost twenty twenty five, the news attention span has dwindled
to nothingness. Okay, and any news story, I don't care
how big it is. It used to be sometimes stories
would last for weeks. Not so much anymore. Now it

(32:36):
seems as if, even before a conclusion has reached about
a story, it's no longer on the radar. Heck. I mean,
even you would think that the Luigi Manngioni story would
be the Brian Thompson murder would be still a bit
huge news, right, except it's not. Once again, it's not.

(32:57):
It seems as if I know the list Cheney story big.
Don't get me wrong, I get that even though again
we already knew that Cassidy Hutchinson was out there, the
only addition to the story was that now now Berry
louder Milk and this subcommittee are calling for an investigation. Okay, great,
but that's all that people are talking about on conservative media,

(33:18):
at least on x other social sites. It bugs me,
I'll admit it bugs me. The lack of attention span,
the lack of follow through. We need to be able
to take these stories to their conclusion, and until there
is a I'm not saying we don't take a break.
I don't want to talk about drones, drones, drones all day, obviously,
I but I do. I mean, we don't have a

(33:40):
conclusion and we are talking about the potential here for
for something catastrophic to the United States of America. Is
Liz Cheney going to jail? Probably not. Is Cassidy Hutchinson
going to jail almost certainly not? So why does that again?
I'm just ranting. You know, I've been strongly can sittering,

(34:01):
and I think today's show might be the last one
where I'm focused on so much on the news cycle.
I've always said, and long before the election, I had said,
I told myself not to you guys, but I had
talked to myself, talked to my wife, prayed about it, said,
you know, is this really what I want to do

(34:21):
do I want to just be a newshound. It fits.
It's a natural fit because as the editor of Theelibertydaily
dot com and America First Report dot com, I am
immersed in the news. So why don't I use that
knowledge to the advantage of you, my viewers. But the
question quickly becomes, just because I'm good at something doesn't

(34:46):
necessarily mean that that's what I should do. It's not.
I'll tell you, it's not what I want to do.
I don't want to sit here and just go through
through news stories and say, oh, look, here's another breaking
news story that's going to be forgotten out of memory
here in a couple of days. I think a lot
of a lot of what I want to do with
this show is to take it more permanent. I guess

(35:09):
you could say dealing with things that are ongoing. But
that's not to say that I wouldn't cover breaking news.
But maybe what we really need is to focus on
the things that are that are happening, ongoing, you know,
focus on the things. Go go more in depth and
not just you know, sound bite, sound bite, news clip,

(35:31):
news clip. Let me know what you think. Please go
to jdrucker dot com slash talk, or you can go
to my open dms on Twitter, x at x dot
com slash jd rucker. So that's jdrucker dot com slash
talk or jd rucker on the X platform. I have

(35:51):
open dms there. I don't have to be following you
to receive your communications, and I do get communications from
often random people every day. This will you know, let
me know, do you think that I've always wanted to
do a show that's focused a lot more on the
faith driven side as well as the conspiratorial side. I'm
not talking about like, oh my gosh, the Earth is flat.

(36:12):
I'm talking about about, holy crap, you know, there really
is a pedophilia ring that's that's amongst our leaders, that's ongoing.
You don't need breaking news to know about that and
to talk about that, you know, talking about fluoride, talking
about the stuff that Alex Jones for example, often talks
about with the New World Order, talking about the stuff
that that Mike Adams over Natural News often talks about

(36:36):
with the various conspiracies that are happening. Again, I'm not
talking about going going totally fringe, but at least going
more towards alternative media instead of just news. Because here's
the thing. At the end of the day, there is
no shortage of people out there on Rumble or even
YouTube or x or any of these other platforms. There's
no shortage of conservatives that are out there talking about

(36:57):
the news cycle. But I think there is a void
to be filled. Call it the I guess lucid and
sensible conspiracy theorist with a focus on biblical prophecy, on
understanding the Gospel, and helping people to see things not
just as the conspiracies in this world that they are,

(37:19):
but also as something bigger, something, something supernatural, something that's
that's more I don't know, focused on the Holy Spirit,
but also that's highlighting the demonic activity, the satanic activity
that's happening in the world. I'm shooting off the cuff here,

(37:41):
Like I literally came out of that break and had
no intention of talking about this. I wanted to talk
about drones, but I had noticed that as I'm on
that break, I'm going through looking at my ex feed
and it's all this Chainey, all of a sudden, drones, no, nothing,
nothing to see here. Brian Thompson slash Luigiman. Nothing to
see there. It's just whatever the news the day is.

(38:05):
And this is gonna be unpopular, especially if you are
an ex I guess X content creator, influencer, you know,
somebody who's who's who gets paid by X, who gets
the the required views. And I see a lot of
them posting the exact same thing, I mean within minutes

(38:26):
seconds of each other. Sometimes. I mean it's literally, ooh,
this is gonna go viral. I will get a lot
of people to like and repost this one. So this
will end up getting me, you know, three hundred thousand,
six hundred thousand and two million impressions, and impressions generate revenue,
and I'm not I want to be clear, Okay, I

(38:47):
want to be clear. I am not insulting them for
their desire to make money on X. God bless them
for it. Let them do it. Okay, awesome. I'll admit
I'm a little jealous that I can't just post a
tweet and make money. I don't know how much money
they make, but but yeah, so so I don't. I
want to be clear. It's not about that, but it is.

(39:07):
The annoying part is that, oh, you know this, it's
like stuff. Oh what was it? There was one yesterday
that really oh right, when when President Trump posted on
social or on truth social, he posted a comment about
how how you know Governor Justin Trudeau from the fifty
first state of Canada is a disaster and you got

(39:30):
to and it was funny. Okay, it was funny, but
on at least the people that I'm following, and a
lot of them are are conservative influencers. It was I'm
not exaggerating when I say it was ninety five percent
of them posted a screenshot of it with a eight
word seven eight nine twelve word comment about it. You know,

(39:58):
and maybe that's why I don't get hundreds of thousands
or millions of I shouldn't say. Maybe that's definitely why
I don't get hundreds of thousands or millions of impressions
on my x account. So again, this was an off
the cuff rant, totally unintended. Didn't even didn't even think

(40:19):
about it until I got here. But here we are.
So is this the end of going through the news
cycle for the jd Rucker Show. Am I going to transition?
As they like to say, not in a transgender way,
but am I going to transition the show to what
I really wanted to be. Here's the thing, and I

(40:41):
had noticed this, probably it was just before the assassination,
the first assassination attempt against President Trump. I remember thinking,
you know what, I'm going to stick with the news
cycle until the election. Once we get President Trump back
in office, we'll do a little clean up post mortem,
and then I'll shift to what I really want to
talk about, which is the crazy things that are happening
in the world that nobody's well not nobody, but very

(41:02):
few people are talking about. Nobody in the mainstream is
talking about it. Nobody in legacy media is talking about it,
and the vast majority of people in conservative media are
not talking about and those types of stories. And again
making sure that it's all biblically driven. Let me know
what you think, and look, I can take it. If

(41:23):
you think Rutger just you. I like your show the
way it is, don't change anything. Send that to me.
Jdrucker dot com, slash talk x dot com, slash jd Rucker.
Either way, it gets directly to me, no filters. So
so let me know, you know, if good bad, I

(41:44):
mean my heart, my mind and my skill set and
my resources are geared towards the news cycle. They really
are again, because I do read through anywhere from fifteen
hundred to twenty five hundred headlines every single day, seven
days a week, three sixty five, three sixty six on
leap years. But that's not what I necessarily want to do.

(42:09):
It's funny because you know, my mother always used to
tell me that I needed to be an engineer. She
was basically grooming me to be an engineer when I
was when I was a child, because I was. I
was good at math. I was I won math contest,
state state math contest when I was in like fourth,
fifth and sixth grade. Math was was everything I used
to I'm that kid that for three years I would

(42:31):
stay after school until six o'clock every day because they
were like, weeer, we're building a math prodigy here this
you know. Yeah, not bragging, and I'm not in ripping
on it either. It was a great time. It was.
I learned a lot. I don't know any of it anymore.
I couldn't remember. I couldn't even spell trigonometry anymore. But

(42:52):
but yeah, she wanted me to be an engineer, and
I probably would have been a good engineer. That was
where my skill set was. But I remember I was
a sophomore in high school when I thought I'll give
the newspaper a try, and the very two first stories
I wrote. This is like the high school newspaper came out,
came out weekly by week, no weekly, it came out weekly.

(43:15):
And the first two stories that I ever wrote, I
got the newspaper. The school paper came in. The editors
never told us where the things were going. The advisor,
the teacher didn't tell us. I got the newspaper and
I saw one of my stories was the top story,
and then the secondary story was the was the other

(43:37):
story I had. I covered the entire front page. I
think that at that moment I was hooked. I was
hooked on the idea that that not the numbers where
my mind was, but not necessarily my heart. I realized
that moment that what I wanted to do was to
talk to people, and I did you know, I actually

(43:58):
did consider politics for about a minute as well going
into college, but decided, you know what, I think, I
want to go into journalism and the rest is history.
So let me know what you think, stay the course

(44:20):
or do what I was thinking. I was going to
be doing anyway after the election, which is shifting towards
talking about the global Sleika ball a lot more, you know,
talking talking less I guess about about wasted aid in
Afghanistan or Liz Cheney getting investigated, and talking more about drones,

(44:44):
talking more about about you know, by the way, just
as far as a visiony I was thinking through this,
it's not just about talking about the conspiracy theories. It's
also debunking the bad ones. Okay, I mean, the CIA,
the Deep State, whoever. They've done a fantastic job of

(45:05):
infiltrating the conspiracy theory movement. Right. They have a lot
of people, even smart people out there, going down rabbit holes,
going in the wrong direction. Okay, this is how you
get flat earthers. And I know some of you out
there flat earthers. I'm not saying that it's funny because
I never insult the intelligence of flat earthers, because that

(45:26):
seems to be the ploy that a lot of the
people that debate flat earthers they well, you know, intellectually, No,
it's not about that, because here's the thing there. It's
one of those things. It's sort of like just how
you see it how you perceive things, because a lot
of the evidence that we see, you know, believing in
the round Earth, is also evidence that from a slightly

(45:49):
skewed perspective, it benefits the flat earth argument. I've debated
flat earthers before, not not like on my show or
anything like that. I had a flat Earth caller back
when I was on shortwave radio. Of course it would
be on shortwave radio, but back when I was on
shortwave radio, I had a long call with a flat
earther who he wasn't rude or anything, but he did

(46:11):
dominate the conversation and he put out a whole bunch
of information. Okay, and I let him go because I
mean I let him continue to let him go. I
let him let him go through it because I was intrigued.
It was good information. Okay. I don't believe the Earth
is flat, but I think that we need to address

(46:35):
the issues that have people believing that the Earth is flat.
You know, So talking about conspiracy theories, there's as much
of it has to do with debunking the incorrect ones.
We have to try to get people focused on what's
actually important, focused on the things that are biblical, focus

(46:56):
on the things that are that are inspired. I'm not
suggesting Oh oh you know, is he talking about about
being a prophet? By no means okay, don't ever somebody
call out you're very prophetic. It's like joa, whoa, take
a step back there, buddy, don't don't don't accuse me
of that. You're gonna get me in trouble. That's not
what I claim to be, nor do I I've never

(47:17):
you know, I'm right about some things. That's that's just
it is what it is.

Speaker 4 (47:24):
Holy crap.

Speaker 1 (47:26):
I used an entire segment talking about myself. I apologize.
I generally don't do that. Uh. We do actually have
a story. You've got a story that I'm going to
talk about, but unfortunately I took so long. It's time
for my last break of the day, so so stay
tuned and then we'll get back to the actual show. Well,

(47:46):
it is Christmas season. Christmas is back this year after
a four year hiatus. Joe Biden, we are We are
now excited to have an actual Christmas. And if you
are seeking the right gift to get, there is one
place where you should definitely be shopping, and that, of
course is MyPillow dot Com. Go to my pillow dot

(48:07):
com slash JDR that automatically puts in the JDR code.
I believe it does double check and make sure that
you put in code JDR at MyPillow dot com. But
they've got they've got specials out the wazoo. Obviously, the
classic collection is on sale for as little as fourteen
eighty eight with with promo code JDR. They've got pricebuster

(48:29):
this and just great stuff. And keep in mind when
you're shopping for people, a lot of this stuff is
truly giftworthy, like the slippers and stuff like that. So
my pillow dot com slash JDR, use promo code JDR,
get the maximum discount and have a merry Christmas. All right,

(48:50):
So the last segment was supposed to be about drones,
but obviously that didn't happen. I end up going off
on on the sorry state of media. You know, this
city deserves a better, better brand of media, and I'm
going to give it to him. Right. An article over
at end Ofthamerican Dream dot Com by Michael Snyder highlights

(49:11):
the eighteen different theories about the mystery drones that are
appearing along the East Coast from eighteen different people. So
let's just cut straight to the theories. Shall we. Let's
start with number one Donald Trump. Good, good place to start.
He says, our military knows, and our president knows, and
for some reason, they want to keep people in suspense.
He said during remarks at mar A Lago on Monday.

(49:32):
Something strange is going on, and for some reason they
don't want to tell people, and they should. I completely
and I wholeheartedly agree with everything that President Trump said
on Monday. Number two James Howard Kuntseler. The theory I
lean toward is the notion that Joe Biden, meaning the

(49:54):
DC blob, is desperately seeking some way to obstruct or
fend off the January twentieth and curation of mister Trump.
I like this theory, but not like I hope that's
not true. But I do like that that people are
understanding that. I'm glad that other Pean and not James
Howard Unstler has that conspiratorial mind anyway. But people are

(50:15):
acknowledging the possibility that maybe this is just an administration
that is trying to hang on. He continues, because well,
to put it bluntly, a whole lot of blobistas I
don't even know the blobistas are are worried about going
to jail. When the likes of Cash Betel, John Ratcliffe,
Tulca g and Pam BONDI get their midst on the

(50:37):
levers of power and start opening up the files. They've
got thirty five days to do something very again, I'm
not saying that that's true, but I wouldn't be surprised
if it were. Number Three, Alejandro mayork Is boo. In
September of twenty twenty three, the Federal Aviation Administration the

(50:57):
FAA change the rules so that drones could fly at night,
and that may be one of the reasons why now
people are seeing more drones than they did before, especially
from dawn to dusk. No, just shut up, man, Okay,
Now that's that's a cover story for days. If I've
ever heard one, it's not a very good one either.
Here's another boo coming. White House National Security Communications Advisor

(51:20):
John Kirby says, we assess that the excitings to date
include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and
law enforcement drones, as well as man fixed wing aircraft, helicopters,
and even stars that are mistakenly reported as drones. Now, granted,
there was one idiot that did report, oh, you know,

(51:40):
there's a there's a look at this twinkling. I got
the video. No, it was definitely a star. It just
zoomed in so close that it looked like it was
big and nearby, but it was actually clearly a star.
But to that point, I mean just trying. They're they're
they're diffusing, They're there, what is it they're or not projecting?

(52:01):
What's the word I'm looking for. They're deflecting. There we go.
They're deflecting the idea, they're gas lighting. US Representative Chris
Smith says, the elusive maneuvering of these drones Listen to
this one. The elusive maneuvering of these drones suggests a
major military power sophistication that makes the question whether they
have been deployed to test our defensive capabilities or worse,

(52:23):
by violent dictatorships, perhaps maybe Russia or China or Iran
or North Korea. Some would argue that's fear mongering or
just a distraction, especially if we believe in the aforementioned
sniffer sniffer nuke theory, but he could be correct. Attorney
Joseph McCully. Mcayley says, I am much calmer than my wife,

(52:47):
but as the days go on, I am getting her
perspective and getting more concerned. Like if I step outside,
am I breathing in? Something? Is something coming off of
these things? Another conspiracy is that it is a kind
of syop event that we are getting subjected to. This
is an experiment and they are going to fly drones
overhead and get people ready for a work where drones

(53:11):
will always fly. A world, not a work, a world
where drones will always fly. That does seem to, just
to be clear, that does jibe with the idea of
giving more power to the federal government, as may Orcus
had requested, giving more power to DHS over who can
and cannot fly drones. It's just NonStop. Every time you

(53:32):
think one has passed over, you turn around and see
a new one hanging overhead. That is how it has
been most nights. Pentagon Press Secretary Major General pat Ryders
is there are thousands of drones flowing around the US
on a daily basis. YadA, YadA, YadA. I don't even
want to hear it. Okay, this whole thing of nothing
to see here, there's something to see here. We know

(53:54):
that President Trump knows that, but apparently they're reaching some
people because a whole lot of people were saying, oh,
I guess there's nothing to see here. Number eight US
Senator Rick Scott. The lack of transparency is exactly why
Americans don't trust their federal government. Not to mention, if
these are the same Chinese drones I fought to ban
from our military, very national security threat, Yes they are.

(54:16):
Number nine John Ferguson, which who we covered, the CEO
of saxon Aaro Space. My own guess is that these
drones are not nefarious in intent. If they are, they are,
but I doubt it. But if they are drones, the
only reason why they would be flying and flying that
low is because they're trying to smell something on the ground.
He had that the drones could be searching for gas

(54:38):
leaks or pockets of radiation. He also said he believed
the drones were seeking something very important. Oh boy, I
do agree. So that's one through nine. I am going
to take a break, but not a break break, I
just station identification. We're doing this switchover. If you're watching

(54:58):
right now on Frank's then here in uh I don't know.
I guess about a minute, I'll be gone. You can
watch the rest of this segment, which I'll continue shortly
after the little station identification. You watch the final final half.
That was the first half. We got the second half
coming up. As far as quotes from various people, but

(55:20):
it's a good time to mention that if you're not
you know, regardless of where you're watching me, if you're
not following me on Rumble and X, those are the
two places that I feel are the most likely to
to not get rid of me in the near future.
So go to jd rutger dot com, slash rumble. Jdrucker
dot com slash rum will be sure to subscribe to
me there get all my shows, the works. It'll be uh.

(55:42):
That's where where you can get literally everything. So check
it out jdrecord dot com, slash rumble or Twitter or
X dot com slash jd Rucker Uh. And I'm gonna
take a short station identification. God bless you. You can
find my channels, my articles, my socials at jd rutger

(56:05):
dot com slash find. That's jd rucker dot com slash find.
All right, let's finish this second half. We've got we
did John Ferguson, All right, we're on to Officer Loo
and again these are theories perspectives of various famous people.

(56:26):
What are the drones? So covered one through nine, last segment.
Now we're on ten through eighteen. Number ten, Officer Lou.
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has confirmed that radioactive material
was lost in transit earlier this month, hiding fears about
public safety and sparking theories about mysterious drone activity in
New Jersey. Officer Lou, a prominent political commentator, highlighted the

(56:49):
NRC's event reports during a review of regulatory alerts, and
he said, or he wrote, while looking at the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission alerts, I can confirm that there is radioactive
material that has gone missing on December second, twenty twenty four,
out of New Jersey. This might be the reason for
the drones. Just speculation at this point, he wrote, Now
I cover this. If you're watching late, you got to

(57:10):
rewind all the way to the beginning of today's show,
and you'll see that we talked about this and I
explained my theory, which is that the alert was put
out there as a basically is the paperwork trail in
order to be able to get the equipment they needed
to go hunt for whatever it is they're hunting for,
possibly a dirty bomb, possibly a nuke. Number eleven former

(57:33):
CIA operation officer Laura Ballman, Now, in terms of who
is behind this, deducing the statements that have been made
by John Kirby, who has said that these objects are
not operating illegally, coupled with the several op eds that
have been out the last twenty four hours about the
need to look at our detection systems, makes me think
perhaps this is actually a classified exercise to test either

(57:55):
evasion technology or detection technology in urban areas. Now, of
all of the theories we've heard so far, this is
the one other than the cover up theories from like
John Kirby and the idiots themselves. But this one by
Laura Bollman that makes no sense at all. Okay, I
get it, you know, but no, not this long note.

(58:19):
Maybe for a day or two, but no, this is
that's idiotic. Number twelve. Deputy Defense Secretary Sabrina Singh says
there is no Iranian ship off the coast of the
United States, and there is no so called mothership launching
drones towards the United States, and I agree. Number thirteen
Jason Sullivan says one of the most critical clues lies

(58:40):
in where these drones are coming from. Witnesses consistently report
seeing the drones are emerging from the Atlantic Ocean, flying
inland in organized formations. If these drones are autonomous UAVs,
they have finite battery life, meaning they cannot be flying
across the ocean from distant foreign shores duh. Moreover, the
Pentagon has explicitly to neither the existence of an Iranian

(59:01):
mothership or any foreign vessel operating off the coast the
Atlantic coast. This leaves only one plausible explanation. These drones
are being launched from US military ship's positioned just off
the coast. Okay, fair possible. Number fourteen Adam Kinzinger, drones exist.

(59:23):
That doesn't mean they're Iran alien or sniffing out nukes. Uh,
just a brilliant statement, Adam. Number fifteen Cobas Schwartz, this
is a syop in and out, and yes, I do
agree about that. I have been tracking flights in and
out of the New York, New Jersey region while these

(59:43):
drones were in the sky and not a single airspace
alert or diversion was issued for flights passing overhead. If
the US governments suspected foreign control possibly hostile drones, they
would have cleared the airspace in minutes and military aircraft
would have intercepted them. Yes, yes, yes, and yes it
is a I mean one way or the other, even
if like being a syopt does not necessarily it's not

(01:00:05):
mutually exclusive from any of the other theories. They could
be sniffing for nukes and it could be a syop.
They could be shooting for to pass legislation or take
control of the skies or whatever, and it still be
a syop just because just say it's a syop. That's
like saying, you know it's a theory. Okay, well what's
the theory. Well it's a theory anyway. Yes, it is

(01:00:28):
a syop though for sure. Number sixteen. Matthew Morello, the
mayor of Washington Township, New Jersey, says, I'm not trying
to stirf anything up, but we all know, we all
know if you just turn on the television, then drones
can be used in an aggressive fashion. They can carry payloads,
they can be used for all kinds of really aggressive

(01:00:48):
type things. And yes, there is that concern about what
are they caring? Are they spraying anything, are they dropping anything?
Are they being used to bring stuff ashore, maybe from
from a boat or a submarine or something out at sea,
bringing in supplies for an invasion. There's all sorts of

(01:01:09):
possibilities there number seventeen. Josh Rogan says, if these really
are Defense Department drones doing radiation sniffing for possible dirty moms,
one could understand why they wouldn't want to admit that
and panic people. But at this point the lack of
disclosure is damaging public trust. Time to come clean. Well,
here's the thing. If it is dirty bombs or nuke

(01:01:30):
then they will never come clean, not once, I mean
fifty years. The only way that we would know if
it's one of those things is if somebody else finds
it and blows the whistle, or if it blows up.
That's it. If they discover them and we're it or
them or whatever, and they're able to contain it or

(01:01:53):
them or whatever, we'll never hear about it. If they
don't discover them, but they're never us used, we'll never
hear about it. So it's only if they blow or
somebody else finds them. That's the only way that anybody's
ever going to come clean. And even then, coming clean
for our government, for any government, really is a matter

(01:02:16):
of telling a part of the truth, surrounding it by lies.
And then, last, but not least, Morgan Phillips at Fox News,
the mysterious drone phenomenon centered in New Jersey has prompted
government officials to issue fresh calls for expanded power as
their counter drone authorization is set to expire this week. Now,
I keep hearing this theory, and I've actually run this

(01:02:37):
theory as a segment of my show before. If that's it,
if that really is it, I would be so disappointed.
I would be happy, sort of, but I would be
so disappointed because that tells me. The way that they're
going about this, the way that the current administration is
going about this, tells me that either there playing a long, long, long,

(01:03:00):
long long game, okay, beyond the four years of President Trump,
or they have intentions of either shortening or not even launching.
Allowing to launch the Trump administration, there'd be no reason
for them to push so hard. I'm talking, you know,
mass hysteria in some cases people concerned it seems to

(01:03:22):
be a pretty huge operation to get a piece of
legislation or a rule passed, when it would be much
easier to just bribe or bully or blackmail whoever would
be used to make that decision. The current continue on that.
The current drone countering authorities authorized as part of the
FAA Reauthorization Accort of twenty eighteen, grant both the Department

(01:03:43):
of Homeland Security the Department of Justice authority to use
advanced detection technology to identify, track, and intercept drones that
aren't complying with the law. The twenty eighteen measure attempts
to the agent exempts the agencies from other laws that
prevent interference with aircraft and wire tapping without a warrant.
It expires on December twentieth, and lawmakers must attach a
last minute extension to a stop gap spending bill to

(01:04:05):
fund the government this week in order to prevent a lapse.
In other words, in other words, and we'll see, we'll talk.
I'm sure we'll talk about the stop gap spending bill tomorrow.
But they don't need to have drones, these huge drones controversy.

(01:04:25):
If it's just to authorize more, more funds, more powers,
or the same powers. That's I'm just not buying that
one at all. So there you go. You know, I'm
very interested in your take. Now, if you're watching on rumble,
don't use the chat, use the comments, because unfortunately rumble

(01:04:46):
chat doesn't stay. Okay, the comments do, so the comments
will stay in the video and even after when I'm
when I'm reading the comments later, I'll be able to
read those and often reply whenever possible. Obviously, if you're
watching on x or any other platform, please leave your theories.
Which theories sound like the most viable? You know, is it?

(01:05:08):
Maybe it's none of these, Maybe you have a different theory.
I've seen a few other theories that weren't included on
this list. All I know is this is that this
is still news, contrary to the lack of attention this
is being paid to it by legacy media, conservative media,
and alternative media. Very little attention is being paid to it,

(01:05:30):
and yet we still don't have answers. We have fewer
answers today than we did yesterday. Okay, there's more questions
that are popping up and not as many answers, and
yet it seems to have been dropped. I get it.
But if we are talking about at least two or
three of those scenarios are massive threats to the United
States of America. So we shouldn't just say, oh, well,

(01:05:51):
I guess I guess that drone thing. Let's time to
move on. Let's talk about Adam Kinsinger, Let's talk about
Cassidy Hutchison. Look, I've been a nothing again. I'm not saying, oh,
it's got to be drones. That's the only news. But
don't ignore it, don't don't stop. That's the only point
I'm trying to make. And again, going back to what
I'd said earlier, this could be the perfect, perfect reason

(01:06:14):
for me to make the final decision to shift the show,
to make this more of a conspiracy slash faith driven show,
not so much driven by the news cycle. Because the
news cycle tells me that I should be talking all
day about about Liz Cheney and all that stuff. That's

(01:06:37):
what just in the news. Let me go to what's
buzzing on X right now, Let's go to the explore tab.
Explore tab says Elon Musk versus federal agencies. That's a
story great Fetterman engaged in bipartisan talks with Trump nominees.
I guess that's a story. Fourteen to ten. Now that

(01:07:01):
that one is the story. As a matter of fact,
I'm gonna let me bring that one up because that
that is definitely a story. So for those who missed
it this morning, police law enforcement in Aurora, Colorado, which
I'm sure many of you should remember, is the place
where the apartment complex that was taken on one of
the apartment complexes that was taken over by trend at

(01:07:22):
Agua Agua. I don't I can't pronounce it, the Venezuelan
street gang that is taking over entire portions of cities
in the United States of America thanks to Biden and
Kamala Harris's open borders. Well, fourteen of them got arrested
and apparently they had busted into an apartment in the

(01:07:44):
in the complex they control, taken the people in there
to another apartment, beat them, pistol whipped them, stabbed one
of the guys, held them captive, and I mean, they
don't care, they don't care, and so so yeah, so
that's something that that I would talk about even if
I was doing more of a conspiracy show, because when

(01:08:05):
it comes to conspiracies. They're everything that we talk about
in the news, there is a conspiracy surrounding it. For example,
in this case, it's not just oh, these criminals are
these criminals are there and they're they're part of a gangs,
and there's always been gangs. This one is just more
more whatever. No, this is they're here for a reason. Okay,
this is part of the globals leak Ball's plan to

(01:08:27):
destroy America. Okay. They want infiltration, they want open borders,
they want us terrified, they want they want us to
be they want American citizens to be a minority in
our own nation. They want this nation to be made
up mostly of illegal aliens or undocumented citizens. I mean,
they really are trying to fundamentally transform the United States

(01:08:48):
of America in a way that's going to weaken us
to the point that they'll be able to either take
us over or or bring us to heal and make
it to where we can be one of one of
the ten regional powers in the North americ Eric and
regional power would be one power amongst the ten that
they've been shooting for. They being the Club of Rome,
Klaus Schwab and Henry Kissinger, have been talking about it
since nineteen seventy three. This is not a conspiracy theory,

(01:09:11):
that's fact. This is acknowledged. They've been wanting to make
the world divide it up into ten regional powers. Now,
if you read your Bible, if you read Daniel, if
you read Revelation, you will notice that that's certainly creepily
aligns with End Times Bible prophecy. Now, are they part

(01:09:33):
of the prophecy? Are they are? Is the global elite
cabal just trying to use the prophecy to get us
thinking in the wrong direction. These are the types of
questions that I want to tackle. And yes, it does
go back to trende arragua, and I will learn how
to pronounce it properly. This is just that's just one
example of how I can still take stories that are

(01:09:56):
relevant today. I don't have to go talk about whether
or not Paul McCartney died in a car accident in
the sixties and was replaced by a doppel ganger so
the Beatles could continue to print money. That doesn't have
to be the points of discussion if I'm talking about
conspiracy theories. There are so many that are happening right now.
In front of us that are relevant, that are absolutely relevant.

(01:10:19):
J six monster conspiracy theories surrounding that, voter fraud, big tech,
big pharma, big AG. We've got a lot of bigs
that need to be taken down and just regurgitating the
news like every other conservative podcaster show host out there.
I don't know. I don't know if I should be

(01:10:42):
doing that anymore. I think I should be focusing more
on the things didn't call you a moron. I'm just
saying I should be focusing more upon the things that
maybe maybe other show hosts aren't willing to discuss. What
you think. You can contact me, reach out to me.

(01:11:03):
Go to jd Rutger dot com, slash talk jd rucker
dot com slash talk that will take you directly, or
that that uh form goes directly to my inbox. You
can also go to X dot com slash jd Rucker.
That's my X account, and I have open DMS, so
if you've got an X account yourself, I don't have

(01:11:23):
to be following you for you to contact me directly.
I strongly encourage you to do so, because between between
Rumble and X and I'm gonna be on getter I'm
gonna be on bit Shoot, I'm gonna be on Bridyon
and Apple Podcast and all those various places as well.
But the two where I'm putting my most effort are

(01:11:45):
going to be X and uh Rumble, my rumble channel
at jdrutger dot com slash rumble. All of this whole
tie into my substack as well as my regular websites
as well as The Liberty Daily and all that good stuff.
But as far as interact with me directly watching my content,
making sure that you never miss any of it. Jdrucker
dot com slash Rumble, It'll take you to my rumble

(01:12:06):
channel and X dot com slash jd Rucker open dms,
reach out to me, follow me, repost my stuff and
like it and all that good stuff. All right, that's it,
Lord Willing. I will be back very soon with another episode.
But in the meantime, stay strong, stay safe, God bless.

Speaker 4 (01:12:27):
I have one kid. You have five kids? How do you?
That's incredible.

Speaker 5 (01:12:31):
It's kind of like being an FBI agent. You're always
kind of monitoring them and making sure everyone's safe.

Speaker 4 (01:12:35):
Makes good sense.

Speaker 2 (01:12:36):
You know, I'm actually a real agent, but an agent,
I'm actually a deputy sheriff.

Speaker 4 (01:12:39):
You really aren't there many many years? Are you serious?
For real life? Real life?

Speaker 5 (01:12:43):
Unbelievable. Yeah, so you're a sheriff, played a Princeton pro
football player, greatest superhero of all time.

Speaker 2 (01:12:51):
Never never drafted to Major League Baseball like you for
the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Speaker 4 (01:12:55):
Knuckleball You hit a knuckleball. You don't, You don't, you don't.
That's the whole point and beauty of it.

Speaker 5 (01:12:59):
You know, we may have always played on different sides,
you know, being the superhero, the super villain, villain, but
we have a lot more in common than I thought
that we did.

Speaker 4 (01:13:07):
Which is shocking. Because one thing's for sure.

Speaker 2 (01:13:10):
Genesis Gold Group is a company that we both trust.
They make safeguarding your IRA or your four oh one
K as simple as possible, and I need simple, to
be honest.

Speaker 5 (01:13:20):
And with their stellar reputation, they're as solid as the
gold that they sell.

Speaker 2 (01:13:24):
Like this gold right here, so call Genesis Gold Group
today at one eight hundred, two hundred gold.

Speaker 4 (01:13:30):
This is what they call prepper bar. So like you
can break off these see these little pieces. Oh, it's
on both sides.

Speaker 5 (01:13:35):
It's great because you can care they're on small and.

Speaker 4 (01:13:37):
You can literally use it to spend this one.

Speaker 5 (01:13:41):
This is a big fella.

Speaker 4 (01:13:42):
This is a really great one, so real, this is
the real one. He won't to hold its heavy holy smoke.
That's pretty great.

Speaker 5 (01:13:48):
You can get that one of those from Genesis gold yourself.

Speaker 4 (01:13:50):
Hey you guys see this look Dean Dean Dean. That's
my kid's call tratuition money.

Speaker 1 (01:13:57):
Hold on, h.

Speaker 3 (01:14:02):
H D.

Speaker 1 (01:14:06):
Who's the supervillain now? Huh yeah, that's my goldening

Speaker 3 (01:14:12):
Hm hm