All Episodes

December 3, 2024 • 85 mins
This is The JD Rucker Show for December 3rd, 2024.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
You're listening to the JD Rutgers shows. Let's begin Happy Tuesday, everybody.
Welcome to the JD Rutgers Show. Lots of big news
already to start the day off, and then as we
progressed through the day, even more big news came up.
Of course, there's what's happening in South Korea. Martial law
declared by the President of South Korea, and the opposition

(00:48):
party is fighting back the legislation or parliament, sorry, legilation
parliament there is they're pushing back to people are protesting,
and that's all I'm gonna say about it, because quite frankly,
just freaking deplete transparency. I don't know enough about the
situation in South Korea. It hasn't been on my heat
map before today. So if it is still big news tomorrow,

(01:12):
we'll talk about it then. But I don't like talking
about something I don't have complete control as far as
knowledge and information. If I don't know the story well enough,
I'm not going to cover it. And that's a story.
Then I just don't have the background information sufficiently implanted
in my brain to be able to speak intelligently about it.
So I will leave that to others. What I do

(01:34):
know about is doze and the idea that doze can
and should be bipartisan. Before I get this story itself,
let's be clear. Making government more efficient, there's absolutely possibly
no reason why anyone in government should be posed to it, unless,
of course, just saying unless they are part of the inefficiency. Now, that,

(01:57):
of course, is the punch line of the joke, because
the vast majority of lawmakers are part of the inefficiency.
You can name a few, a handful. You've got a
couple of Kentucky with Rand Paul and Thomas Massey who
are not. You can point to Ron Johnson to some extent,
you could point to to Mike Lee. There's a handful

(02:18):
of congressmen members of Congress who are very good at
opposing the inefficiencies of Washington, d C. But for the
most part, they are all part of the problem. Which
is why it is good and important that the Dosee
team has picked up some bipartisan support from Adam pack
over a Daily Caller news foundation we haven't republished with

(02:41):
permission over at Thelibertydaily dot com. Cutting waste is not
a partisan idea. Trump's Doze secure support from Democrat lawmakers. Yay,
Elon Muskin have a Vagramaswami's plans to cut waste, fraud,
and abuse within the federal government's nearly seven trillion dollar
budget through President elect Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency

(03:02):
is beginning to attract support from a notable group Democratic lawmakers.
Democrat Florida Rep. Jared Moskowitz is the first Democrat lawmaker
to join the House's DOGE Caucus, held by Republican Reps.
Aaron Bean of Florida and Pete Sessions of Texas. According
to Tuesday's press release quick note on Pete Sessions, he

(03:22):
is one of the most wasteful guys in Congress. Just
to be clear, which you know, it is what it is.
They're not going to do as much as they're gonna
hopefully Lord willing, they're going to do what they're told.

Speaker 2 (03:38):
This is.

Speaker 1 (03:39):
Of course, it has to go through Congress, It has
to go through the legislative branch in order to properly cut.
But the ques are supposed to be delivered by this
newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, the DOGE bureaucratic system.
They have what two years, a year and a half
was I guess it'd be two and a half. No, No,
a year and a half. They have a year and
a half on their timeline, which there in itself that

(04:03):
should tell you something amazing about DOSEE is that they've
set themselves basically an expiration date. They will do what
they're going to do for a short period of time,
and when they're done, I believe it's July fourth. As
a matter of fact, when they're done July fourth, twenty
twenty six, they are supposed to be done for good.
We will see how that works out. That would give

(04:23):
them eighteen months to make it happen. If that is
the case, this hopefully will be a paradigm shift. Not
my hopes are low, but we'll see. And not my
hopes for Doze are great. My hopes that other bureaucracies
will will follow sue that's very limited. The bureaucratic state
creates more bureaucratic state. That's how they they are able

(04:45):
to perpetuate their existence. According to Moskowitz, he wrote today
I will join the Congressional Doze Caucus because I believe
that streamlining government processes and reducing ineffective government spending should
not be a Partison issue.

Speaker 3 (04:57):
And he's right.

Speaker 1 (04:59):
I've been clear that there are ways we can reorganize
our government to make it work better for the American people.
Versus reorganizing, I would just say cut, but hey, that's
just me. The Florida Democrat is asking the DOGE to
examine the Department of Homeland Securities budget and has suggested
that the commission recommend establishing the Secret Service and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA, it's currently under DHS control

(05:23):
as independent agencies. According to Moscowitz press release, that sure
doesn't sound very promising, to be clear, but well, we'll
we'll see how that pans out. Moswitz said, for the
people of DOGE, if Vivek and Elan are listening, you
need to look at Homeland Security Department. Mosqwit's Democrat colleagues,

(05:44):
California Rep. Roe Kana, very radical leftist, has also voice
support for the DOGE, particularly regarding the commission's potential to
trim the Department of Defenses nearly nine hundred billion dollar budget.
So we are already seen what this is heading.

Speaker 4 (05:58):
Right.

Speaker 1 (06:00):
You've got the things that the Republicans don't like, they're
gonna try to cut those. You got things that the
Democrats don't like, they're gonna try to cut those. We
have to have trust, hope, and faith that Musk and
Ramaswami are able to cut through the partisan bs and
just cut off as much government as possible. The more

(06:20):
the better. They say they can trum two trillion dollars
from the budget. It's a lot of money. That's a
lot of money, and I don't know how they're gonna
do it. I have seen articles, I've read some that
say here's how you do it, and I've never brought
them up during the show because I didn't agree with him.
They weren't They weren't making a whole lot of sense.

(06:43):
I do know this, though, that we absolutely positively have
to cut government as much as possible. And I've said
it before, I'll say it again. If you were to
take ninety percent or more of the federal government and
make it disappear tomorrow, the vast majority of America would
not even notice. Of course, the employees would notice, because

(07:04):
they would have to go to the private sector, or
to the state offices, or to another federal office. But
you and me, chances are we wouldn't feel the effects
at all. I should tell you something about the amount
of waste that's in government. Got a big show today.
Before we get to that, I want to do a
shout out to my amazing sponsors over at Genesis Gold Group.

Speaker 3 (07:29):
I have one kid. You have five kids.

Speaker 4 (07:32):
How do you?

Speaker 3 (07:32):
That's incredible.

Speaker 5 (07:33):
It's kind of like being an FBI agent. You're always
kind of monitoring them and making sure everyone's safe.

Speaker 3 (07:37):
Makes good sense.

Speaker 6 (07:38):
You know, I'm actually a real agent, not an agent.
I'm actually a deputy sheriff.

Speaker 3 (07:40):
Are you really? Are there? Many many years? Are you serious?
For real life? Real life?

Speaker 5 (07:45):
Unbelievable? Yeah, so you're a sheriff. Played a Princeton pro
football player, greatest superhero of all time.

Speaker 6 (07:53):
Never never drafted to Major League Baseball like you for
the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Speaker 3 (07:57):
Knuckleball hit a knuckleball? You don't, You don't, you don't.
That's the whole point it is, and beauty of it.

Speaker 5 (08:01):
You know, we may have always played on different sides,
you know, being the superhero, the super villain, villain, but
we have a lot more in common than I thought
that we did.

Speaker 6 (08:09):
Which is shocking because one thing's for sure, Genesis Gold
Group is a company that we both trust. They make
safeguarding your IRA or your four oh one k as
simple as possible, and I need simple.

Speaker 3 (08:21):
To be honest.

Speaker 5 (08:22):
And with their sellar reputation, they're as solid as the
gold that they sell.

Speaker 6 (08:26):
Like this gold right here, so called Genesis Gold Group
today at one eight hundred two hundred gold. This is
what we they call prepper bar. So like you can
break off these see these little pieces. Oh, it's on
both sides.

Speaker 5 (08:37):
It's great because you can care they're on small and.

Speaker 3 (08:39):
You can literally use it to spend or tell this one.

Speaker 5 (08:43):
This is a big fella.

Speaker 3 (08:44):
That's a really great one. So real, this is the
real one. He wont to hold it. It's heavy, holy smoke.

Speaker 5 (08:49):
That's pretty great. And you can get that one of
those from Genesis Gold yourself.

Speaker 3 (08:52):
Hey, you guys, see this look.

Speaker 7 (08:54):
Dean Dean Dean.

Speaker 5 (08:57):
That's my kids called tuition money.

Speaker 7 (08:58):
Hold on be back.

Speaker 8 (09:06):
The day.

Speaker 7 (09:08):
Who's the super villain? Now, that's Mike gold Dean.

Speaker 1 (09:21):
Over the weekend, radical leftist show host Sankwiger from The
Young Turks said something that I basically agree with. I mean,
he's not wrong about it, and I would say that
that his sentiment towards the establishment, I share the same
sentiment from obviously the opposite direction. We have the story.

(09:42):
This skip comes from Just the News. We have it
cross posted with permission over at jd rucker dot com.
Progressor media host Sinkwiger says his enemy isn't Maga but
the establishment. Look, I've said similar things before. When you
look at the radical left, Okay, I'm talking about the
sink Wigers of the world. You know, it used to

(10:04):
be like Alexandria Casio Cortez, but now she's been like
becoming a centrist. I guess she's getting ready for her
twenty twenty eight presidential run or whatever. But when you
look at them, they tend to fight based upon ideas, okay,
and we on the radical right, we tend to fight
based upon ideas, whereas the centrist they go not based
around ideas, but around consolidation of power. Whether it's a

(10:25):
centrist Democrat, a centrist Republican in the establishment, the uniparty
swamp will call them. They they don't like either of us, Okay.
Democrats in the center hate sink Wiger as much as
they hate me, okay, and Republicans in the center hate
me as much as they hate sink Wiger. That's we

(10:48):
are the enemies, the collective enemies in their opinion. According
the article, progressive media host sink Wiger says that he
is more optimistic about the future of the US as
he realized MAGA people are not his enemy, but the
establishment is. I've been trying to figure out why I'm
more optimistic now than I was before the election, even
though I was so against the guy who won. I
know now MAGA is not my mortal enemy, and neither

(11:10):
is the extreme left. My mortal enemy is the establishment,
and they have been defeated. We here as the host
of the Young Turks and has been well known for
his far left viewpoints. He did object to the effort
to remove President elect Donald Trump from the ballot in
Maine in Colorado, arguing it would harm democracy. It's not
just that the establishment candidate loss, it's that their media

(11:30):
is mortally wounded. The source of their strength was not
insipid politicians like Mitch McConnell and Joe Biden. The source
of their strength was their propaganda machine, the mainstream media,
or as we like to call it, the legacy media,
the dying legacy media. Look. I would rather debate and
have and and work against the radical left from an

(11:55):
ideological perspective, because I'm not just gonna say they fight
fair because they don't, because there's still delusion there, and
I'm sure they say the same thing about me. There's
still a sense of delusion there. But it's not it's
not a machine, Okay, the uniparty swamp controlled by the
deep state, which is controlled by the Globals League Cabal,
that column of evil. They don't fight based upon ideas.

(12:18):
They fight based around consolidation of power to themselves.

Speaker 4 (12:23):
You know, I truly.

Speaker 1 (12:24):
Believe that that the I'm talking about the legitimate radicals.
I'm not talking about Bernie Sanders or AOC who they utilize,
or or Pocahontas Elizabeth Warren. They utilize leftist ideologies to
fulfill their own dreams, their own desires. Okay, Bernie is
I guess you could say he's sort of a purist sometimes,

(12:47):
but he too has been has been compromised by the
establishment in many ways. I do not consider the radical
leftists to be my mortal enemy anymore than than Saint
Wiger considers the far right or the maga right to
be his mortal enemy. We are both fighting from different directions.

(13:08):
We were fighting the same foe. It is the establishment,
the uniparty swamp that is in control, and they're the
ones that are quickly getting pushed out. Praise God for that.
With the Trump win, hopefully Lord Willing, it will translate
into further defeats for the uniparty swamp, the establishment, the

(13:29):
globalist elite cabal. There's an article that came out last
week that I had intended to cover, but I went
ahead and pushed to forward because well, so many things
were happening. It's a timeless issue, so timeless that I
would argue that it's something we've been dealing with to
some extent for the last two thousand years. With that said,

(13:50):
the last sixty or seventy years, it has risen to
become a real serious challenge here in the United States
of America. And that is our freedom of religion. I've
said it before, I'll say it again. Almost every attack
they're putting against us comes down to this comes down
to ending Christianity. According to an article from End Times Headlines,
bien An Education department accused of forcing woke agenda on

(14:13):
Christian schools. And I think we all know this, but
the statistics are actually pretty breathtaking. The United States Department
of Education is being accused of unjustly targeting Christian colleges
and universities, allegedly to advance a woke agenda. The American
Principles Project, a conservative think tank, published a report earlier
this month that cites the Department's Office of Enforcement actions

(14:34):
against Christian schools. According to the report, all the Christian
colleges and universities have fewer than ten percent of the
students in the US, they make up around seventy percent
of the penalties imposed by the Office of Enforcement. It
is crystal clear to I'm sure many, if not most,

(14:54):
of not all of you, And it's definitely clear to
me that they are attacking the faith, regardless of which
faith it is, but in particular, Christianity is their target.
And I don't care if you're talking about wokeness, if
you're talking about the LGBTQA plus supremacy agenda, you'd be
talking about globalism, abortion, open borders. All of it comes
down to this. All of it is designed to chip

(15:17):
away at Christianity, not just our religious freedoms, okay, but
Christianity itself. They want to diminish it. They do this
not just through laws, not just through through direct attacks
such as this. They do it through obviously, cultural infiltration.
They want people to be watching only fans instead of
reading their Bible. They want people to be glued to

(15:40):
Netflix or whatever instead of something more more wholesome, something
more directly attributable to not just their family, but to
God Almighty. And so these attacks are going to continue.
We're going to continue to highlight them because it's little,
minor things like this that don't make huge headlines, and
you're not they're not going to talk about this on

(16:00):
Fox News. But when you think about it, seventy percent
of the penalties imposed by the Department of Education are
being directed towards ten percent of the colleges, the Christian colleges. Now,
is that going to change under Donald Trump? We can
pray that it will, but do not take it for granted.

(16:22):
There are a lot of things that slip through the cracks,
and this certainly seems like one of those things. There's
an account on x that is quickly becoming one of
my favorites. I have subscribed to this particular account, Artemis.
For now. It's Bernie, and that's all I know about her.
I tried to learn more about her. I could tell

(16:43):
she sounds brittish YouTube challenge weeks and that's it. So
I've reached out to her. We'll see if we can't
get her on the show. But her attacks on the
whole net zero con, the climate change hoax, the scam,
they're spot on. She's whoever, it's funny. I'm I'm gonna
embarrass myself. It's probably gonna be some of you guys
are like, Oh no, that's that's Bernie, Bernie Smith, you know,

(17:06):
world renowned whatever.

Speaker 4 (17:08):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (17:09):
I just I stumbled across her her post a couple
of weeks ago. So so I'm but I'm I want
to learn more because she's brilliant. I mean, she highlights
things in ways that need they need to be highlighted,
especially as it pertains to net zero and climate change.
According to one of her recent posts, Honestly, the net
zero zealots are so wealthilly uninformed, not only about the

(17:30):
financial costs of government policies to ordinary people, but the
enormous environmental costs. And that's the thing that we've been
talking about for a long time. I try to highlight
these anytime I can, and of course I can't ever
post on YouTube because they they just but but I
do post it on X and I posted on Rumble
and my various channels when you can always follow me
by going to JD rutger dot com slash Rumble or

(17:53):
x dot com slash jd Rutger to see all of
my shows all but I try to make sure to
highlight every time there is massive hypocrisy that I can't
keep up with it. It just happens so much, And she's
going to highlight some of us here. So before I
spoil any of it, let's let's just go to her list.

(18:16):
They they mean the zero cultists. They have no idea
the scale of devastation caused by emissions from mining and refining,
such as the mining and refining of lithium to make
their the batteries and their cars that are supposed to
be so environmentally friendly when they're not. Next, they have
no idea about the destruction of forests, watercourses, or communities.

(18:37):
That's especially the community. You know, we we do with
almost every aspect of you know, expansion or or adaptation
by humans, we do have a tendency to cause harm
to fort That's just part of the gig and we should,
as we should strive to as good stewards of our world,

(18:59):
we should strive to plant more trees. Okay, if we're
gonna take some trees down here, we should plant double
as much over there where we're not doing anything. You
get the idea. And of course, potable water is arguably
the most important environmental component out there. When we have
people still in twenty twenty four dying because they don't

(19:23):
have potable water, that's just not acceptable. Number next one,
they have no idea about the increased use of materials
made from oil, which they think we will stop using it.
There's been a couple of viral videos that I posted
over at the Liberty Daily Dot across my various rumble
channels highlighting it's like it's like, you know that sign
that you're holding was made it's made of oil, and

(19:46):
your phone is made of oil, and your clothes are
made of oil, and you know, and the funny part
is this is the part that I've never understood. It's like,
it's like we're gonna ban plastic bags because we're made
of oil, and we're gonna replace them with paper bags.
That requires to cut down trees. It's like, just smack them.
It just doesn't make any sense. But whatever. They have

(20:07):
no idea of the destruction of ecosystems and biodiversity even
within their own country, and that doesn't need any any
expansion upon that. They have no idea the vast sums
of tax payers money flowing into untested technologies which produce
more emissions in their production and lifespan than they will
reduce in this But what's the cost of saving humanity?

Speaker 3 (20:31):
Is the argument there.

Speaker 1 (20:33):
Look, I am all for I really truly quote unquote
conservative environmentalists. I do want us to get to a
point to where the majority I want to get off
of fossil fuels and I want to get onto onto
renewable energy, and scientists that I've talked to we're fifty
to one hundred, maybe even two hundred years away from that.

(20:56):
So in the meantime, yeah, sure, great, awesome. Let's incentivize
work on technology to make it to where it is
not just economically viable, but it's also efficient to be
able to collect or generate power. But until we get
to the drill, baby drill, Okay, I mean, we need

(21:17):
to use fossil fuels and if anything, we can use
fossil fuels to drive the advancement of technology so that
we can get there faster. We can get to the
point to where whether it's soul or hydrogen or nuclear,
wind or air or whatever, geothermal, whatever it is, or
combination thereof, we can get there. I do believe we can,

(21:40):
just not now we're not there, so stop trying to
force it upon us. That's my big thing there, the
yellow toxic waste that is non recyclable and will scar
landfill indefinitely. Have you ever seen one of the one
of the the blade graveyards for the wind turbines. It's

(22:00):
it's horribly sad. Okay, it really is very sad. It's like,
oh my gosh, you know, talk about talk about waste,
and there's no way, as far as I know, there's
no way.

Speaker 3 (22:10):
To properly recycle them.

Speaker 1 (22:12):
So what are we even doing?

Speaker 3 (22:13):
What?

Speaker 1 (22:13):
Why why do they put up these awful, horrible and
forget about the ice ore aspect of it, just the
inefficient wind farms. What is the point They're gonna take
take out a forest that produces oxygen CO two. They're
gonna take that out so they can get a wind farm.
That's going to require mining and shipping and all these

(22:37):
other things. By the time they get it done, it's
going to take you know, all it required was done
to build these wind farms. I saw one estimate that
a standard wind farm is going to take approximate one
hundred and seventy years of continuous use in order to
make up for the destruction of the forest, the travel,
the mining, everything that it takes to build that wind farm.

(22:57):
To be able to to just get to to the
point where the damage is is equal level, Okay, to
where the ecological environmental damage is a wash will take
like one hundred and seventy years. These things have a
maximum lifespan of twenty years. So yeah, I mean, they
are destroying the environment that they claim they are trying

(23:20):
to protect and last but not least, they have no
idea what impact all of the above will have on
climates anywhere. And you know, just to clarify what you're
saying here, it's like we're doing this, we're doing this
where we're using paper straws, and we're got the wind
farms and the solar farms, and we've got you know,
where we're reducing our footprint. But there's not a single

(23:45):
definitive study that shows that any of these actions, not
one of them has been proven to actually make a difference.
We're not talking about you know, oh if you know
they always make fun of they being me and us,
we make fun of it when they say, you know,

(24:06):
well if at this rate, you know, the water temperature
is going to rise by half a degree within the
next six hundred years, It's like, okay, you know, we
make fun of that. But that's like the reason they
put that stuff out there is because that's the closest
they've got for their unhinged actions, their unhinged policies, climate change,

(24:31):
net zero, Green New Deal, none of this, none of
it with protecting the environment, with stopping climate change, with
saving us from the doom that's always ten years away
and has been ten years away for the last fifty years.
It is all about control, and it is all about

(24:54):
financial expansion. And I'm not talking about, oh, making us
more money. I'm talking about pushing the content scept of
modern monetary theory and eventually which will lead to central
bank digital currencies in one world currency. All of these
these conspiracy theories. How they get there is through climate change,

(25:15):
the hoax. It's not because they're stupid, the hoax. Far
too many people out there are stupid. I would say
the vast majority of my audience is very, very hopeful
for the future. The election of President Trump has been

(25:35):
just already we're seeing shock waves, we're already seeing results,
even at this early stage. But there are still concerns
he can't do everything. He's going to do everything in
its vast power to protect us, to protect our nation,
to defend the Constitution, to protect their freedoms. But that
doesn't mean that there won't be risks, challenges. We're already

(25:57):
seeing wars popping up and rumors of wars popping up
across the globe. Will he be able to stop all
of them? I think so? What if he can't? What if,
for whatever reason, cooler minds, cooler heads don't prevail, and
we find ourselves in the midst of something tragic. What
about natural disasters? What about just the idiocy of the

(26:19):
globalist regimes across this planet that are trying to do
everything they can to destroy our food supply. They want
to control the food, and they want to make sure
that we're not eating the good stuff, especially as it
pertains to protein, and specifically as it pertains to beef.
Beef cal seem to be the main culprit for every

(26:40):
boogeyman propagating bad guy out there. As a part owner
of an all American, patriotic freeze dried state company, I
am very very blessed, pleased and honor to be able
to offer you all, offer my wonderful audience an opportunity
to take advantage. If you go to worldview Beef Do

(27:01):
and use promo code JDR, you will get the maximum
possible discount, And there are other discount codes out there
that are less. It's not like with certain companies where
oh you know, it doesn't matter which promo codes use.
Use JDR, I own the company, Use promo code JDR,
and get the maximum discount at any given moment. At
worldviewef dot com all American, no mRNA jabs. It's just

(27:24):
the good stuff. So so check it out worldviewbef dot com.
I think we've all heard plenty of complaints from conservatives.
From Republicans, the vast majority of US are ripping on
Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and the Democrat Party as a
whole for their reactions. Many of them are reacting like

(27:45):
like juveniles.

Speaker 4 (27:46):
Like no, no, when you use because he of course
he pardon Hunter, what when Trump did this? And when
Trump did that? And at least at least Hunters not
like a convicted of six hundred and thirty four felon.

Speaker 1 (28:02):
He's like like Trump, Yeah, we've heard him. They're idiots
and we know that. But there are some leftists, some Democrats,
and some even radical leftists who are very fed up
with a Democrat Party and extremely fed up with Joe Biden.
Even some members of the media oddly enough, who they

(28:24):
generally they're the most loyal, loyal acolytes of the Democrat Party,
but many of them have even spoken out. I'm gonna
do a short, relatively short compilation of some of the
some of my favorite responses to the the pardoning of
Hunter Biden for eleven years. Let's start with Chuck Todd.

(28:46):
Chuck Chuck Todd is actually legitimately he's pissed. I mean,
he's pissed off about this.

Speaker 9 (28:52):
I follow the Hunter Biden trial very closely. I read
every transcript, all the testimony, because that's what you can
all that was made public, and there is you want
to you want to read you want to you want
to get angry just as a as as somebody in
just all these mixed emotions. You read the Hally Biden transcript,
and that's both widow yes and and essentially he turned

(29:17):
her into a crack addict. And this was all happening
in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, and Joe and Joe Biden
were so concerned about their family that they decided to
run for president.

Speaker 3 (29:31):
Yep.

Speaker 9 (29:32):
I just so when you talk about the word selfish,
I it's almost like the word doesn't I mean I.
Their decision to run for president put the entire Democratic
Party and the United States of America in the position
that it's in now.

Speaker 1 (29:49):
Yeah, Chuck Todd is one of my least favorite legacy
media journalists out there. He really is. I've I've ripped
on him probably at least half a dozen times over
the years during my show. But when he's right, he's right,
you know, And I'm a firm believer. It demonstrates the point.
I'm a firm believer in the idea that if you
can get a leftist to sit there and hear the

(30:10):
actual facts, not the not the filtered facts, not the
fake facts, but the actual facts about just about any
topic that if they either they're just so unhinged that
they won't listen, or if they are willing to listen
and have an open mind, they will, they will tend
to come to our side. Now we go to Stephen A. Smith,
who's been I guess you're the most based of the

(30:32):
leftist journalist he is. He's willing to say what he
wants to say at any point, So so this one
isn't a surprise, but still it's interesting to hear. He
went on with Chris Cuomo and laid into the Democrats.

Speaker 10 (30:45):
What's your take on the part?

Speaker 11 (30:49):
You know, the Biden situation disgusted me in terms of
the parting only from this standpoint, Chris, nobody on a
planet you want to be a cynic and you want
to act like you would be offended by something like
that if you were one of those people out there
find but no one within the reason would have a
problem with him saying it's my son.

Speaker 3 (31:08):
I love him.

Speaker 11 (31:09):
There's no way I'm sending him to jail, and I
have the power to avoid it. Nobody would blame him
for that. But that's not where he went. So I
didn't have a problem to answer your question directly with
the decision that he made to part in his son. Buboo,
the fool knew he was going to do that. I
don't care who he stood in front of or sat
in front of him and said that he wasn't going
to part in his son and he was just gonna
go by the letter of the law. Please, everybody and

(31:29):
their grandmother knew he was going to part in his son.
But to come out and to start talking about how
it's been a witch hunt and the Department of Justice
and others were after him or whoever it was, and
you know Gop rather was after him. Well, wait a minute,
what have y'all been doing with Donald Trump all of
these years?

Speaker 2 (31:44):
Now?

Speaker 11 (31:44):
You can make an argument about the legitimacy of the
cases against Donald Trump compared to what wasn't a legitimate
et cetera, that's not the point. The point is it
was clearly politicized. You had folks on the left who
were hell bent on going after Donald Trump because they
would determine to make sure that he couldn't run for
reelection or that these elements would get in the way

(32:05):
of him possibly winning re election. And now we know
why more than ever, because they weren't confident they would
ever be able to beat him. He'd been in Republican
nominee since twenty sixteen. He beat Hillary Clinton with the
electoral College vote. He wouldn't concede defeat in twenty twenty,
but he did receive over seventy four million votes at
that particular moment in time.

Speaker 8 (32:24):
And then you fast.

Speaker 11 (32:24):
Forward four years later, despite the thirty four felony convictions,
the two impeachments, the bevy of crimes that he had
been accused of, the Republican voters out there, the Conservative
voters out there, and a lot of independence from various
communities said he's the guy we want. And I've said
it on many many occasions. It wasn't about him, just
like it wasn't about Biden in twenty twenty. It was

(32:46):
more against Trump. In this particular instance, it was an
indictment against the Biden administration. Would have been going off
for the last four years, some of the things going
on with the border, obviously, inflation, of course, crime in
the streets, of course, walk and cancel Coach and all
of that.

Speaker 3 (33:01):
It all played the role.

Speaker 11 (33:02):
And so for him to come out and to talk
about that this was a witch hunt when clearly it
could be argue that's exactly what you were doing to
Donald Trump. Where you assisted in doing seems beyond hypocritical,
And that was what disgusted me. It wasn't his decision,
it wasn't imparting in his son. It was the weak,
pathetic explanation that he gave, which has most critics just

(33:26):
shaking their heads and raising their eyebrows and saying, what
nerve you have?

Speaker 4 (33:32):
All right?

Speaker 1 (33:33):
Next up we have we have John John Stewart, radical
leftist John Stewart, But he's not even the star of
this clip. It's really Jamie Raskin's quickly becoming my least
least favorite, in the least favorite the democrat I despised
the most in on Capitol Hill.

Speaker 2 (33:53):
He is.

Speaker 1 (33:53):
He's just horrible. He's smart, but he's not a good guy.
But on this issue, he really really blew a watch.

Speaker 6 (34:00):
How confident and eloquent our Democratic representatives were back when
they thought they had the moral high ground on this issue.

Speaker 2 (34:06):
I've not heard a single Democrat anywhere in the country
cry fraud, cry fixed, cry rigged, cry kangaroo court. You
don't hear a single peep out of any Democrat saying that,
why we believe in the rule of law.

Speaker 5 (34:21):
And now look at what even he, one of the
most verbally dexterous attorneys we have on Capitol Hill, has
been reduced to.

Speaker 9 (34:29):
Do you think President Biden should pardon Hunter?

Speaker 7 (34:32):
Biden?

Speaker 12 (34:32):
So there are lots of claims of political prosecution.

Speaker 9 (34:36):
And it was Hunter politically.

Speaker 12 (34:37):
Well, I mean, obviously that's a judicial point, and then
you've got to look at what the evidence is. And
I don't know enough should I mean again, that is
a unilateral executive power that.

Speaker 4 (34:50):
And should he use it?

Speaker 12 (34:51):
Well, you know, the power exists for the president to
show mercy for people. I mean, I mean, we have
an executive and we have a judicial and then a
legislative and then smoke.

Speaker 1 (35:05):
Bomb funny stuff, funny stuff. Oh yeah, uh, he's the worst. Last,
but not least, we have another radical leftist Annikasparian from
the Young Turks. I don't fully agree with her assessment,
but she's she's onto something. She's she definitely she's she's

(35:25):
she's getting close. So watch this.

Speaker 13 (35:27):
When you notice the period of time in which Biden
has provided the blanket pardon for his son the dates
are super fishy. I noticed that it's like this lengthy
eleven year period, So, like, what justifies that? And more importantly,
when did he commit the crimes that he's being prosecuted for.

(35:48):
So I looked into this and luckily Lee Fong did
some excellent reporting on this issue. He writes that the
order grants Hunter a pardon for those offenses against the
United States which he has committed or may have committed
or taken part in during the period from January first,
twenty fourteen through December first, twenty twenty four So that's

(36:12):
ten years, a ten year span. So he writes that
the pardon window extends beyond the period of the crimes
prosecuted by the Department of Justice. Okay, because after all,
the illegal firearm purchase was on October twelfth of twenty eighteen.
Hunter failed to pay his twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen,

(36:34):
and twenty nineteen taxes on time, So what justifies going
all the way back to January first of twenty fourteen. Well,
twenty fourteen is when he was tapped to serve on
the board of the Ukrainian gas company Barisma, and while
Joe Biden has not been found guilty. There's no evidence

(36:57):
to indicate that Joe Biden engaged in any influence and pedaling.
Recent reporting from the New York Times indicates that Hunter
Biden was certainly trying to engage in influence pedaling. Now,
there hasn't been any prosecution on those grounds, and I
think that the Congressional Republicans were so intent on catching
Joe Biden in some sort of criminality that they kind

(37:19):
of didn't pursue prosecution of Biden on these alleged corruption
charges or corruption allegations. But nonetheless, I think that window
is far too long, and to me, it signals that
there's a possibility that Hunter Biden did something illegal, and
Joe Biden is offering this blanket pardon for a lengthier

(37:40):
period of time in order to protect his son. I
could be wrong about that.

Speaker 1 (37:45):
No, I don't think she's wrong. I think that's she
didn't take it far enough. Look, I think it's crystal
clear to me that Joe Biden is protecting himself. He's
not just pardoning Hunter Biden. And I don't think Hunter
Biden's going to be the last member of his family
that he gardens. I think he's going to parton a
lot of people, including possibly himself, because he knows what
he's done. I think he knows, he might not somebody

(38:08):
close to him, maybe doctor Taco Jill knows what he's
done and will encourage him to put out more pardons,
including a pardon for himself. But getting Hunter off the
hook isn't just about keeping Hunter out of jail. It's
about keeping Hunter from from spilling, from turning over information
that could put Joe himself in jeopardy. That it's crystal

(38:29):
clear to me. And maybe you know what is the
thing with these leftists? Who knows? Maybe one of them
is going to wake up and they'll be the next
Tulca Gabber, the next RFK Junior, the next Elon Musk,
the next whoever. Don't forget Donald Trump at one point
was a Democrat as well. So so stranger things have happened.

(38:52):
After Trump was elected president. I received a couple of
communications from people, one via phone text and the other
via Twitter X direct message, people asking me, hey, now
that now that Trump's back in office, is the economy going.

Speaker 3 (39:06):
To get better?

Speaker 1 (39:08):
And I said, yeah, in some ways, it definitely will, obviously,
I mean just Trump's presence alone will have a dramatic
impact on the economy, and it will we'll take things
to the next level. But with that said, the threats
still remain. Trump Harris didn't matter. They're still pushing. They
being the powers that be, are still pushing for central
bank digital currencies. They're still pushing for dedollarization and the

(39:29):
rise of bricks. They're still pushing for the advancement of
a worldwide economy. And while Trump will do everything in
its power to prevent that, to at least slow it down,
some of it is not within even the power of
the United States of America itself.

Speaker 2 (39:46):
And this is.

Speaker 1 (39:47):
Why there is no reason you can see by the
gold prices, there is no reason to doubt physical pressures
metals as a proper way to hedge against what is coming,
because it's still coming. You know, there were certain scenarios
that would have happened if Kamala Harris had won, and
there are certain scenarios that will happen now that President
Trump has won. And those scenarios still point in the

(40:10):
same exact direction. That's the reason why even central banks
are still buying up as much gold and silver as possible.
That's why banks financial institutions are recommending to their people
buy as much gold and silver as possible. I work
with a faith's driven gold company. There are a lot
of gold companies out there that they get recommended by hosts.
The one that I like happens to be driven by

(40:32):
faith and they actually do a tremendous job versus the competition.
You can check out Genesis Gold Group by going to
rumblegold dot com. That's rumblegold dot com, or read my
testimony over JD. Rutger dot com slash gold. When it

(40:54):
comes to the January sixth political prisoners, I am extraordinarily biased.
I think that they should None of them should be
in jail, not a single one of them. I know
a lot of people most the what is it the
lucid conservative perspective is is that you know, you take
each individual one crime. You know, no, look all of them,

(41:16):
all of them, even the ones that committed quote unquote crimes,
All of them should be flat out just wholeheartedly pardoned, release,
just removed from their records completely. Okay, all of them
across the board. Because even the ones that maybe engaged
in activities that they should not have engaged in, even

(41:37):
They have been gravely mistreated, mistreated by the judicial system,
mistreated by the media, mistreated by the local communities, oftentimes
in their own cities. They have been demonized, and they
need to be be made whole, and there's really no
way to make them whole. Okay, for many of them,
their lives are turned upside down, their lives are over

(41:58):
We've seen multiple suicide as a result of this massive
witch on, this massive disgrace. This will be viewed, in
my humble opinion, this will be viewed in the very
near as a major, just ugly moment in our history.
Right now. They want to tell you that the January sixth,

(42:18):
quote unquote insurrection is the ugly thing, but that's not
I mean, were their ugly moments, sure, but we now
know that some, perhaps all of the ugliest moments were
actually instigated by by the deep State, by whether it
was undercover FBI agents or undercover Capitol police or ANTIFA

(42:42):
pretending to be MAGA or whatever, they had their agents
in place to engage in in their hopes were that
there would be an attempted insurrection. That's what they were
trying to stir up. They wanted to be able to
use this as a way to prevent Donald Trump from
ever running for office again, and of course it didn't work,
Praise God for that. But nevertheless, there's been tons of

(43:04):
damage done and as a result, I believe that it
is it is incumbent on us to do whatever we
can to make this right. And I do believe that
in the future history will view this as an ugly
moment of manipulation, a conspiracy, a conspiracy theory, an actual,

(43:25):
full blown, demonstrable conspiracy that we will be able to
demonstrate over time. The truth will come out. You know,
that's not always the case. I'm a big skeptic on Oh,
you know, we'll never know the truth about this, We'll
never know the truth about that. In this case, I
think we will know the truth. I think, especially with
during this with this incoming administration, there's a good chance

(43:47):
that the evidence that hasn't been destroyed because they couldn't
get to all of it, that much of that evidence
that has not been destroyed will be will be examined
and will be released. So I do think that there
will be a degree of venation. Hopefully it's full vindication,
but I'll take some vindication known that these people were

(44:08):
stirred to whatever actions they took as a result of
a plan a conspiracy. Whether it was Nancy Pelosi involved
or Capitol police who know the deep state was involved,
that's that's blatantly obvious. I don't know who else was
in the know. Maybe Mike Pence was, who knows, But
hopefully we will know. Hopefully we'll find out a lot.

(44:30):
Maybe we'll find out that Liz Cheney was involved, or
Adam Kinsinger or Adam Schith or whoever. I am excited
about that. But in the meantime, I think that it
is crystal clear that Donald Trump should pardon them across
the board, blanket pardon, complete and total exoneration on day one.

(44:52):
And if there's one silver lining to this whole hunter
of Biden pardoning thing, it's that now the president has
been set. According to Julie Kelly, oh goodness, I stand by.
Let me, let me, let me fix this real quick.
You can find my channels, my articles, my socials at

(45:15):
jd Rutger dot com slash find. That's jd Rucker dot
com slash find.

Speaker 4 (45:24):
There we go.

Speaker 1 (45:25):
Apologies, I was not prepared. I thought I was prepared.
Actually I was just so so juiced about this topic
that I forgot to actually get it set up to
where I could show my screen. Here we go, is
Julie Kelly over at declassified dot Live straightforward pardon all
J sixers. That's the headline. Joe Biden's sweeping pardon of

(45:45):
his son opened the door for blanket amnesty for every
January sixth defendant. As Biden's doj continues to investigate charge
incarce rate and put on trial J six pro reactions
on both sides is mixed. In response to Joe Biden's
sprawling pardon of his son, Hunter, claiming his son had
been singled out and treated differently by the Department of Justice,

(46:09):
his clear and federal judges, Biden not only absolved Hunter
of the two criminal convictions for which he was said
to be sentenced this month, but any crime over a
period of nearly eleven years. Be it known that this day,
I'm not gonna read it. You probably already heard somebody
read it before. It's it's all bogus eleven years, okay.

(46:31):
As John Stewart noted, I played that earlier. As John
Stewart had noted, what was it? John Stewart, No, I
think it was oh, it was John Stuart, but it
was it was a it was a different clip. I
didn't play it, but he said he was part of
his routine. But he's like, he's like, okay, so so Hunter,

(46:54):
we you know, we'll parton you for what you know,
five ten years and Hunter says, make at eleven?

Speaker 4 (47:01):
Why you know why? Joe?

Speaker 1 (47:04):
Oh, okay, anyway, Yeah, it is very conspicuous. Back to
the article, Thanks Joe. I will leave it to others,
including the Great Miranda Divine, to detail how the decade
long international Biden family crime spree will end without legal
accountability for those including Joe himself involved, or explain how
the pardon represents another lie told by my word as

(47:26):
a Biden Joe, or speculate that more pardons, perhaps for
his brother Jim and every other relative who benefited from
the family's global grift, are in the making instead. And
this is Julie Kelly again, the Great Julie Kelly. I
tip my hat to Joe Biden for laying the groundwork
for president like Donald Trump to offer similarly generous clemency

(47:47):
to all January sixth defendants on day one SUDN See,
that's not to say, Trump is not already considering such
a plan, but Biden's claims that his own DOJ selectively
and unfairly targeted his son will be delicious words for
J six pardoned when the time comes. So too will

(48:07):
Biden's accusations that raw politics has infected this process and
it led to a miscarriage of justice. If there's ever
been a miscarriage of justice on this scale in our
nation's history, it is the January sixth persecution of these
political prisoners. This from the man whose DJ not only
initiated two investigations into his predecessor, which led to an

(48:30):
armed rate of mar Lago and historic federal criminal indictments
against Trump and co defendants, but whose DJ also continues
to investigate, arrest, prosecute, and imprison Americans involved in protesting
the rigged twenty twenty presidential election. Biden's unpresidented persecution of
J six ers rallying cry among the Magabaks. While most

(48:51):
Republican political leaders ignored their plight, Trump did not. On
the campaign trail, Trump often promised to pardon the more
than fifteen hundred in counting am abusive and politically motivated
federal prosecution in the DJ's history. A Trump spokeswoman recently
said pardons would be reviewed on a case by case basis,

(49:12):
but others suggest a broad based pardon could be in
the works for so called non violent offenders convicted or
charged with misdemeanors. How to handle those convicted of violent
crimes such as an assault on law enforcement present or present
a more complicated political calculation for the new administration, one
that may have required a piecemeal approach to ease expected

(49:36):
outrage by the media and among lily livered Republicans in
Washington until yesterday, well in this case two days ago
time before raising the issue of January sixth defendants in
a post on truth Social and this is again Trump
on truth Social. Does the pardon given by Joe to
Hunter include the J six hostages now been in p

(50:00):
in four years? Such an abuse and miscarriage of justice.
Influencers also a flooded x with calls for unequivocal clemency
for all JA sixers. And I'm not going to read
all of them, but James Woods, Mike Ben's d C DRAINA,
that's Rogan o'hanley, and Kurt Schlichter all came out and
Tom Finton all came out in defense of the Jay sixers.

(50:21):
Even regime friendly outlets express shock at the broad nature
of Biden's missive. President Joe Biden's grant of clemency on
Sunday night, an extraordinary political act with extraordinary, extraordinary legal
breadth insulates his son from ever from ever facing federal
charges over any crimes he possibly could have committed over
the path that comes from Politico's Betsy Woodroff Swan Woodruff Swan.

(50:49):
Pardon experts expressed alarm at Biden's move and worried how
it helps Trump make his case for Jick. Samuel Morrison,
a former lawyer for the DJ's Office of the Pardon Attorney, says,
it justifies what Trump wants to do now. He was
going to do it anyway, but it gives him some
political cover. I think some January sixth pardons are probably coming,

(51:11):
at least some, maybe all. Indeed, and it should be
all let's be clear about it. Let's just be I'm
gonna say it fifteen times. Okay, I won't say that much,
but I'm gonna say at least a couple more times.
Every single one of them should be pardoned, all of them.
Across the board period. Hunter did not get DJ six treatment,
despite Biden's whining about an unfair process for a SUN. Hunter,

(51:33):
in reality was handled with kid gloves. Hunter Biden did
not endure a pre dawn armed raid by the Task
Force and see automatic rifles pointed at his wife and children.
Hunter Biden was not hauled off to an inhumane gulag
in the nation's capitol and denied release by the DOJ
and federal judges on charges. Hunter Biden was not left

(51:56):
to the mercy of a public defender overloaded with some
cases in hostile to his political leanings. Hunter Biden did
not face a jury populated by voters who hate his father.
Hunter Biden did not have to fight excessive sentencing recommendations
by a bloodthirsty dj All of that and more, however,
represents the torment endured by every J sixer, who, unlike Hunter,

(52:20):
did not have the political pull, the means, or public
sympathy to successfully prevail over a weaponized legal and judicial system.
And while Hunters escaped Scott free, four trials of JAY
sixers begin in Washington today. That was yesterday. While for
judges with a proven track record of contempt for j

(52:40):
six defendants. If there is any upside to the partnering
of Hunter Biden, is that the task ahead for Trump
and his team just got that much. Pardon them all,
Yes he should. Hey, and again there's we all have
high hopes. Okay, if you watch this show, chances are

(53:02):
you've seen the staff, the cabinet picks, the non cabinet picks,
and maybe you like them, maybe you love them. I
tend to love most of them. I mean, really truly.
I think that, especially compared to his first term when
he picks some abysmal people, this time around, he's picked
some great people. So there's hope there. There's hope with

(53:24):
the idea of DOGE. I mean, just the concept of
doge is refreshing. It's something that you never hear about
in Washington. Said at about Maha about making America healthy
again with Robert F. Kennedy JUNR. Again, you know, the
closest we've seen to that is Michelle Obama saying that

(53:45):
she's gone and then making them awful. Okay, it's this
is this is a sea change. It's a paradigm shift
in Washington, d C. There's really there are reasons to
be excited, reasons to be excited about cash, but tel
there's reason, there are reasons to be excited about pek
hag Seth. It's looking good. I mean, it's looking good.

(54:11):
But this is the issue. This is the issue that
if it's not handled properly, if if and I'm not
expecting it to not I expect it to be handled properly,
to be clear, But I just just got to throw
out a warning. Advisors, maybe some of his anybody who

(54:34):
might be trying to dissuade him or to talk him
down from pardoning the vast majority. If not all I
want all, but you know, if this guy beat up
a cop and we're not going to pardon him, okay,
I mean I'm not okay with that, but I could
understand it. But if anybody else, if any of the

(54:55):
the non violent J sixers are not pardoned, that'll be
huge disappointment. I mean tremendous. It'll be I want to go, oh,
it's unforgivable, and I'll hate the Trump administration. It's all
like that. But I'll be so disappointed. I will be discouraged.
I will start questioning whether or not the promises were real.

(55:16):
Because Donald Trump during his first term fulfilled more of
his campaign promises than I've ever seen a politician do
in my lifetime. I mean, it's not even close. As
far as keeping his promises, he did better than Reagan,
far better than the Bushes, Okay, far better than any Democrat.

(55:37):
President Trump kept his word. He put his effort into everything,
and even though he fell short on he didn't get
all the wall done, he didn't get Obamacare appealed, he
didn't get a lot of things done, but he tried
to get all of them done. And this is one
where he doesn't have to try. He either does or
he does not do. There's no all, well, yeah, can't

(56:00):
do this, You can't do that. You know, you gotta
wait for Congress. You got no, there's no well where
there's gonna be a legal challenge. It's gonna go all
the way to the Supreme Court. No, he has laical
unilateral control over who he pardons, and if he pardons them,
it's done. There is no recourse, There is no unpardoning them.
He makes that decision, and I pray to God that

(56:23):
he makes the right decision. The right decision is to
pardon the vast majority of them. I would prefer if
he pardoned every single one of them, set the J
six ers free, and this political person and wipe it
from the records. And let's try to make these people,
these patriots who were defending him, Let's try to make

(56:48):
them whole again. Please, Well, it is Christmas season. Christmas
is back this year after a four year hiatus under
Joe Biden. We are we are now excited to have
an actual Christmas. And if you are seeking the right
gift to get, there is one place where you should

(57:09):
definitely be shopping, and that, of course is MyPillow dot com.
Go to my pillow dot com slash JDR that automatically
puts in the JDR code. I believe it does. Double
check and make sure that you put in code JDR.
At MyPillow dot com. They've got they've got specials out
the wazoo. Obviously, the classic collection is on sale for

(57:30):
as little as fourteen eighty eight with promo code JDR.
They've got pricebuster this and just great stuff. And keep
in mind when you're shopping for people, a lot of
this stuff is truly giftworthy, like the slippers and stuff
like that. So my pillow dot Com slash JDR use
promo code JDR, get the maximum discount and have a

(57:52):
merry Christmas. All right, So after that serious topic, not
my pill up part, after the serious topic of January sixth,
not that my pill is not serious, but let's let's
have a little bit of fun. I wanna I wanna
have fun. I had a joke on X. I quickly

(58:14):
took it down because nobody laughed at it. So I'm
gonna try it on you guys, and you're not gonna
laugh at it either, because it's not funny. I tried
it on my wife, I tried it on my kids.
Nobody thought it was But I'm gonna tell it anyway.
Because I'm not a comedian. This isn't how I make
my living. I make my living off the news. So
if I dabble in some amateur comedy and fail at it,

(58:36):
it's okay. I feel good. I laughed at myself. So
Robert Muller, Jim Comey, and Christopher Ray walk into a bar.
Jim Comy pulls out his wall and of course he's
got plenty of credit cards because the dude's loaded. Pulls
out a pulls out of credit card, hands it to

(58:57):
the bartender, and he says, so give me, give me
a uh three three Cosmopolitans, and the bartender looks at him,
hands back credit card, says, sorry, guys, this is an
FBI bar and they're like, we were all all former
former FBI, FBI directors. We've we we're we're good here

(59:17):
we still have our FBI cards. It's like, sorry, guys,
this FBI cash only get it with a K. Now
you know why why?

Speaker 4 (59:31):
Now you know.

Speaker 1 (59:34):
Definitively why I don't do comedy thankfully other people do.
Sean Farash, who I think is by far the best
Trump impersonator out there. If you close your eyes, you
will swear that you're listening to Donald Trump. But here
he is. Over the weekend, I think it was the
last week or over the weekend, Justin Trudeau visited Donald Trump.
Now Donald Trump is legitimately funny. He visited Trump and

(59:57):
he says, you can't do those tariffs that will kill us,
and Trump said, well, maybe we'll just make you the
fifty first state. You could even be governor. Well, Sean
did a take on that. Watch.

Speaker 14 (01:00:10):
Well, I just got done with a beautiful meeting with
the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau he sits when
he pease. He doesn't want you to know that, but
he does it. Everybody knows it, but you look at it.
I said, Justin, we're gonna slap you so hard with tariffs.
He said, sir, please don't talk dirty to me. You
know I love being slapped. I said, not like that. Justin.

(01:00:31):
We're gonna hit you so hard with tariffs. Said, you're
not gonna know what hit you. You have to close your border.
You have to help us with our border. He said,
we're not gonna do it. I said, okay, We're gonna
cut off your supply of soy. He said, sir, please
don't do that. I need my soy. Justin Trudeau is
the number one consumer of soy in the entire world.

(01:00:51):
He consumes more soy than any nation or any man
anybody ever thought possible. He consumed so much soy. I said, Justin,
you must take after your mother, because Fidel Castro was
definitely not a soy boy. He said, sir, please don't
cut off my soy. Please don't hit us with tariffs.
It's going to hurt our economy. I said, if that's

(01:01:13):
the case, you could become a fifty first state he said,
but sir, what are you going to do with all
the moose? I said, I've been handling moose for a
very long time, and we're going to change the prowl
of moose to mooses. By the way, I've been handling
mooses for a very long time. Chris Christy, you may
have heard of them, Stacy Abrams Rosy O'donald Thezar. Some

(01:01:35):
of the biggest mooses the world has ever seen. And
we handled them like nothing. I said, Justin, do we
have a deal? No tariffs, no soy if you don't
close the border. He said, sir, you've got yourself a deal,
and we may very well add Canada too. At the
end of the day, they may become a fifty first
state if they don't play ball. But for now, we

(01:01:56):
have a deal and Justin Trudeau returned back to Canada US,
sat down, took a nice leak, and went to bed.
It's the art of the deal at work. We are
making America great again.

Speaker 1 (01:02:07):
Believe me, he's even got Trump's breathing style. Talented dude
right there. Very funny stuff. One more I should have known.
I forgot who these guys are. They're like it's like
patriotic something or I don't remember they're but they're hilarious.

(01:02:27):
The granny is is hilarious. She's a patriot and uh
and yeah, let's have some fun with the shift. The
shift is real, red.

Speaker 3 (01:02:38):
What do you feel?

Speaker 4 (01:02:39):
Its cold front?

Speaker 13 (01:02:40):
Yeah, my shoulders started hurting.

Speaker 8 (01:02:43):
Not that something bigger?

Speaker 4 (01:02:45):
What the shift? The shift?

Speaker 8 (01:02:47):
Yeah? Have you noticed how companies are making pro family,
pro laugh and pro blue collar commercials lately, like Volvo,
Chevy and even Apple. Really, all I saw was that
Jaguar commercial. They look like they shifted in they're a
lost cause. But there has been a shift back to
real American values.

Speaker 6 (01:03:04):
What else has shifted?

Speaker 8 (01:03:06):
The big corporations are finally getting rid of incompetency.

Speaker 6 (01:03:09):
E I is about to d I good.

Speaker 10 (01:03:11):
That was sham.

Speaker 8 (01:03:12):
God is making his way back into public schools hallelujah.
Lord knows they needed. And the YMCA is making a comeback,
especially in sports.

Speaker 3 (01:03:23):
I love winning.

Speaker 8 (01:03:25):
You see, the shift is real.

Speaker 4 (01:03:27):
Things are going back to normal.

Speaker 6 (01:03:29):
Now, let's make America greater than it's ever been.

Speaker 1 (01:03:35):
Down.

Speaker 8 (01:03:38):
If are dancing in this video triggered you, we're probably
not the ones that it called you.

Speaker 1 (01:03:42):
Are Funny stuff, Funny stuff, I mean again, like I
said earlier, the there is a shift. There's not just
a shift away towards more positivity in the United States,
there's a shift of I think what's happening is you're

(01:04:02):
seeing more of these corporations, more of these individuals who
who are scared about before. They're starting to sort of unwind,
unleash their their inner maybe not full blown maga, but
at least their willingness to enjoy things, to to not
be so constrained by the radical leftism that has engulfed

(01:04:25):
this nation for the past past four years. We want
to live, we want to have fun. We want to
tell jokes, even if the audience doesn't laugh at them.
It's okay to tell the joke. Okay, I'm just gonna
keep telling myself that even though none of you laughed,
it's okay. I'm good at other things. Well, I'll just

(01:04:52):
leave it to Glenn Beck and war Clandestein on X
to get my juices flowing. War cland Stein, Glen Beck
is warklan Stein is another very strong and an intelligent
user of X that I don't know who it is actually,
but I do follow their stuff. But Glenn Beck had

(01:05:12):
something on there regarding Ukraine. That got my juices flowing,
at least in my head, not other juices. Glenn Back said,
Here's what we should be asking after Hunter Biden's pardon.
Why does everything revolve around Ukraine? Is it just a
coincidence that the pardon reaches back to twenty fourteen one
Hunters deal with Brisma began. Why did Democrats freak out

(01:05:33):
and impeached Trump after he suggested Zelenski should look into
Joe Biden's connections to Ukraine. Why is Biden still trying
to throw as much money as Ukraine. Maybe that's why
they want this war to destroy the evidence. It's a
good possible point. Now we go to war Clandestein. In

(01:05:56):
twenty fourteen, Obama's CIA State Department destabilized Ukraine, took over
via color revolution, installed a public regime, and turned Ukraine
into an offshore playground for criminal racketeering and money laundering.
And they spent the last ten years covering it up
by any means necessary. This is the reason the last
ten years have been so crazy. This is why they

(01:06:17):
accused Trump of being a Russian asset and tried to
prevent him from talking to Putin. This is why they
impeached Trump over a phone call to Ukraine. This is
why they are so desperate to arm fund and defend Ukraine.
This is why they are willing to start nuclear war
over Ukraine. All the insanity WOP have unleashed over the

(01:06:41):
last decade is because they are terrified that their crimes
will be exposed. And their most heinous crimes were carried
out in the lawless, war ravaged land of Ukraine with
protection from their puppet, the scope of US oversight. Everything
leads back to Ukraine in twenty fourteen. So yes, I

(01:07:02):
would say it is definitely, definitely more than a coincidence
that Joe Biden and his handlers and doctor Jill and
Hunter himself and his attorneys and everybody else specifically picked
January of twenty fourteen, eleven years ago. They've picked this

(01:07:23):
date because they know when they started getting engaged in
I legal activity. Now, one thing that wore clandestein and
that Glenn Beck did not mention that I think is
worth noting about my wild and crazy conspiracy theory. What
if Barisma as an energy company, What if they weren't

(01:07:45):
just an energy company? Energy have access to equipment to
scientists to the right people, and it's very possible in
my humble opinion, and I'm not an expert. But again,
when I start looking at all this, I start thinking

(01:08:06):
to myself, what's the tie that binds here? What is
because money lendering great, that happens everywhere, and I know
it's easier in Ukraine than most places, but not all places.
What makes it special there? Not much? Not much? So
is it the people of Ukraine? Probably not. Do they
have resources in Ukraine that perhaps make them so special?

(01:08:34):
Just Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. But You've got the
Romney's involved there, You've got the pelosis involved there, you
have the Obamas involved there, and yes, oddly enough, have
the Clintons involved there because they're involved apparently everywhere. You
also have people in the medical arena that are greatly

(01:08:57):
involved there. I think you probably know where my head
is going. What if Again, I'm not saying this based
upon evidence. It's all circumstantial there. I mean, there is evidence,
but it's all circumstantial. I don't have any insider information.
But I started thinking, after reading what those two brilliant
people posted, what if it is?

Speaker 4 (01:09:18):
What if there's a.

Speaker 1 (01:09:19):
Tie in between Barisma, the quote unquote energy company, and
the known biolabs. We know there's biolabs. We know that
the United States is funded forty six of them, to
the two hundred million dollars, possibly a lot more than that.
We know that scientists, scientists including doctor Anthony Fauci, were involved.

(01:09:40):
We know the gain of function research is happening there.

Speaker 4 (01:09:44):
See.

Speaker 1 (01:09:45):
We know that there was a House report that said, oh, yes,
it's definitely a lab leak from Wuhan virology lab. But
even that it's like, oh, look, guys, smoking gun, we
got them. What if we didn't. What if all of this?
What if Ukraine is even more important than we think.

(01:10:07):
What if it's not just about money laundering. What if
it's not just about corruption. What if Barisma is not
just an energy company. What if Ukraine is the epicenter
of the West's attempt to control biology itself. To be
able to use games, to be able to create things

(01:10:30):
such as COVID nineteen, such as a hemorrhagic fever or
monkey pox or bird flu or whatever. You need to
be able to do these difficult to do it here
in the United States because of regulations, oversight, cameras, everywhere
just to there's not enough smoke screen here in the

(01:10:51):
United States to be able to do that on a
wide scale, but it could be done in a place
like Ukraine.

Speaker 4 (01:11:01):
Hmmm.

Speaker 1 (01:11:02):
We've seen people on both sides of the political aisle
on Capitol Hill covering for Ukraine. It was very noteworthy.
I thought that Marco Rubio, I don't have the clip.
I should have the clip pulled up. But Marco Rubio
even seemed to be very reticent to talk about anything
that had to do with Ukraine and biolabs. Of course

(01:11:27):
in and out of the health aspect of government, also
very reticent to discuss anything any particulars as it pertains
to biolabin perhaps a tie in with Barisma, the Bidens
and everybody else. As I posted on AX, let's not

(01:11:50):
forget the illegal biolabs engaged in gain and function and
research placed in Ukraine by the United States because they
couldn't get away with it as easily state side.

Speaker 10 (01:12:01):
Hm.

Speaker 1 (01:12:03):
I wonder could this pardon be linked to Barisma, and
then could Barisma be linked to these biolabs, and then
could all these other conspiracy I mean, you could throw
anything out there, and I know people will make fun
of it. But man, little Eastern little But what does

(01:12:26):
this otherwise inconsequential will say that Eastern European nation? Why
do they seem to be the of pretty much everything
bad that's happening in the world. I mean, like, like
both of these guys said, it seems as if the
United States government, under the bidenhairs control is willing to

(01:12:51):
risk nuclear war. They're trying to push for this war
to continue. What is it that they're trying to hide?
It seems like this is a lot more than just
money laundering. It seems like maybe just maybe there's some bigger,

(01:13:11):
maybe even huger fish to fry in all this. So
all I'm trying to say is this is the and
pardon really just about Hunter Biden? Is it really just
about Hunter and Joe and maybe James? Is it really
just about the Biden family or could this be part
of the universal to protect America's government's interests in Ukraine.

(01:13:41):
We may never know, but I certainly hope we do. Well,
here's a story that should really chap your khakis. This
makes me mad, I mean legitimately mad. Not because it's unexpected,
it is expected, but even when we're expecting idiocy, like

(01:14:02):
what you're about to see. I just all I can
do is shake my head.

Speaker 3 (01:14:09):
Watch.

Speaker 10 (01:14:13):
You know that's the right thing for the wealthiest nation
in the world to do. And today I'm announcing over
one billion dollars in new humanitarian support for Africans displaced
from homes by historic droughts and food and security. Well,
we know African leaders and citizens are seeking more than
just aid, you seek investment. So the United States is

(01:14:34):
expanding our relationship all across Africa, from assistance to aid,
investment to trade, moving from patrons to partners. Help bridge
the infrastructure gap. I was told, by the way when
I got elected, I could never get an infrastructure b passed.

Speaker 1 (01:14:53):
I mean, as bad as the Obama administration was, as
bad as the Clinton administration was, both Bush administrations Carter administration.
There's one thing that we can say about Joe Biden,
Kamala Harrison, and all these idiots, idiots in DC right now. Oh,
I'm slurring my words because not because I'm drunk, I'm not,

(01:15:16):
I don't drink, but because I'm I'm pissed. I mean,
there are people in North Carolina and other states that
are still today right now living in tents. Why because
our government refuses to help them. Now they'll say, oh,
we're doing everything we can, but they're not. In many ways,

(01:15:38):
they're getting in the way. They're getting in the way
of American citizens who want to get in there and help.
Now I am Look, if I had my brothers, we
would not get aid from the government for stuff like this.
We would just guys, get out of the way. Let's
we've got these hundreds thousands of tiny homes that we
can put up there, you know, if you want to.

(01:16:01):
It just makes me so mad. A billion dollars going
to help Africans. And look, I feel for everybody, okay,
people suffering in Africa, Asia, Europe, wherever. I feel bad
for them, okay. And that's why they have governments to
help them or themselves. We don't. We don't have a

(01:16:23):
government that's willing to help us. We have the government
that's willing to help everybody else other than American citizens.
And again, I can't stress this enough. It'd be different
if they would let us help ourselves, but they stop
us from helping ourselves, but then refuse to help us
help the people in North Carolina who are currently suffering,

(01:16:45):
currently in desperate need. I don't want government helping, but
don't hurt. Let American citizens help American citizens should be
pretty easy. But here's the thing, and the reason that
they're giving aid to Africa and doing the bare minimum,

(01:17:06):
if anything at all, in North Carolina is because they
can't get anything else out of North Carolina. Okay, there's
no benefit to Joe Biden, Kamala Harris or the globals
to lead cabal to help in North Carolina would be
to do nothing to benefit them them being the uniparty
swamp or the deep state or whoever. Whereas helping Africa,

(01:17:29):
somebody's getting something out of that. Some politicians in DC
are getting something, some deal has been struck, some whatever.
I don't even know. It just pisses me off to
no end. I cannot I might have to cut today

(01:17:52):
show short. That's how annoyed I've gotten. And that's one
of the reasons. It's funny because I was once told
by a I don't want to say a major it wasn't.
They're definitely not a major newsallet or anything like that,
but they they're they're big. You probably heard of them,
probably maybe not, But anyway, I'm not gonna say who

(01:18:13):
because because they turned me down for we were talking
and and we were my show was going to start
appearing there, and they turned me down because they said
that I get too emotional. It's true, I do get
very emotional, especially when there's this type of idiocy, this

(01:18:39):
America last mentality that just the only thing that would
piss me off more would be if they attacked me
and my family, or if they when they I shouldn't
say if when they attack my faith second to the
secondary to those things, are, you know, my patriotism. I
love for this nation, my love for my fellow Americans

(01:19:02):
above anybody else in the world. Again, I'm not insensitive
necessarily to the needs of other people. And maybe someday
Lord Willing will get to a place where the United
States will everybody will be hunky dory, The homeless will
be covered, veterans will be covered, borders will be secure,

(01:19:25):
economy will be sailing, and we could actually say, oh, hey,
you know what, let's go help over here. Okay, I
want that option. I'm not saying that we should necessarily
do anything. I'm just saying it'd be great if we
took care of our own problems. So that we could
go help, but instead we go out and help everywhere else,
but not here. I mean, look at Ukraine. Ukraine is

(01:19:51):
it's a it's a black hole, it's a quagmire where
our money is being sent. I mean, a man, just
picture this. Imagine you're sitting there right and you're struggling.
You know, I think you've gone through some hard times.
You're you're nearly broke, you're in major debt. You're about

(01:20:14):
to lose your house, you're about to lose your car,
you've lost your your health coverage, you've lost your you're hungry,
there's not much food in the house. You call your bank,
you know, you're gonna go go get some money out
of the bank. And the bank said, oh sorry, we
sent We sent most of the money to some oligarchs

(01:20:36):
in Ukraine. That's that's what this nation is doing right now.
We're willing to give millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, billions,
tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars to other people.
Meanwhile we're sitting here with thirty six trillion dollars in
debt we're paying. I mean, Elon Musk put out a

(01:20:57):
post on X this morning, saying that we are on
the verge as a nation, We're on the verge of bankruptcy.
He's absolutely right, and I actually replied, I'm like, we're
already there. I mean, they're just waiting for the paperwork
to get done. We may be at a point of
no return. And when I see in the return, I'm
not saying that it can't be absolutely positively can't be fixed.
We still, mathematically speaking, it can be fixed. We may

(01:21:21):
have to go into a state of severe austerity. I'm
talking about cutting everything, and I'm okay with that. I
know it sucks, okay, because there will be repercussions. We're
talking about the austerity necessary to push our debt down.
We're talking about cutting a lot and that's gonna suck
for a lot of people. And that's the fact that

(01:21:42):
it sucks for a lot of people is why we
have never done it. No politician is willing to destroy
their own career, and not just their career, but the
career of pretty much everybody in the party because because
we can't trust corporate media to put out the right message,
we can't explain that we can't trust the American people
to understand that we have to tighten massively. I mean,

(01:22:06):
I'm talking to the tune of ninety or ninety five percent.
And when you look at the you know, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid,
When you look at all the various massive expenditures, these
technically can't be cut. We are in a massive hole
right now, folks. And yet, oh, we can afford to

(01:22:29):
just draw a billion dollars at some unnamed, nonspecific African need.
Somebody's getting bribed. Okay, somebody's benefiting from it, and it's
not us, and it's probably not even the people in Africa.
Somebody else is getting a benefit from this, the elites,

(01:22:52):
and yes, there are elites throughout Africa as well. I
am going to cut it short today. I apologize. I'm
a kind of short because I'm going to get to
start I'm gonna start spitting and it's just gonna get ugly.
So so let's just let's just call it a day,
Lord Willing. I will be back very soon with another episode.
But in the meantime, you'll stay strong, stay safe, and

(01:23:15):
God bless.

Speaker 3 (01:23:19):
I have one kid, you have five kids? How do
you that's incredible.

Speaker 5 (01:23:23):
It's kind of like being an FBI agent, you're always
kind of monitoring them and making sure everyone's safe.

Speaker 3 (01:23:27):
Makes good sense.

Speaker 6 (01:23:27):
You know, I'm actually a real agent, but an agent,
I'm actually a deputy sheriff.

Speaker 3 (01:23:30):
You really aren't there many many years? Are you serious?
For real life? Real life?

Speaker 5 (01:23:34):
Unbelievable? Yeah, so you're a sheriff. Played at Princeton pro
football player, greatest superhero of all time.

Speaker 6 (01:23:42):
Never never drafted to Major League Baseball like you with
the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Speaker 3 (01:23:46):
Knuckleball You hit a knuckleball. You don't, You don't, you don't.
That's the whole points and beauty of it.

Speaker 5 (01:23:51):
You know, we may have always played on different sides,
you know, being the superhero, the super villain, villain, but
we have a lot more in common than I.

Speaker 6 (01:23:57):
Thought that we did, which is shocking, because one thing's
for sure. Genesis Gold Group is a company that we
both trust. They make safeguarding your IRA or your four
oh one K as simple as possible, and I need simple,
to be honest.

Speaker 5 (01:24:11):
And with their stellar reputation, they're as solid as the
gold that they sell.

Speaker 6 (01:24:16):
Like this gold right here, so called Genesis Gold Group
today at one eight hundred, two hundred gold This is
what they call prepper bar so like you can break
off these see these little pieces.

Speaker 3 (01:24:25):
Oh it's on both sides.

Speaker 5 (01:24:26):
That's great because you can care.

Speaker 3 (01:24:27):
They're on small and and you can literally use it
to spend or tell this one this This is a
big fella.

Speaker 5 (01:24:33):
This is a really great one, so real, this is
the real one.

Speaker 3 (01:24:35):
He won't hold it. He holy smoke. That's pretty great.

Speaker 5 (01:24:40):
You can get that one of those from Genesis gold yourself.

Speaker 3 (01:24:42):
Hey, you guys see this, look.

Speaker 7 (01:24:44):
Dean Dean Dean.

Speaker 5 (01:24:46):
That's my kid's call traituition money.

Speaker 7 (01:24:48):
Hold on, d who's the super villain?

Speaker 2 (01:24:59):
Now?

Speaker 7 (01:24:59):
Huh your year? That's my goldening.

Speaker 4 (01:25:04):
H m hmm.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.