What If It's a Tie? Plus Chutkan, Senate Chances, and Leftist Threats

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hopefully by now most of you are very well aware
that I own a prepper beef company, a company that
specializes and not just long term storage beef, but the
good stuff. We're talking about Ribbi, New York Strip, tenderloin, sirloin.
We're not talking about beef chunks. We're not talking about
beef crumbles, which, to be fair, are absolutely disgusting. We're
talking about the real stuff, the good stuff, the Glen

(00:22):
Garry leads of beef. Okay, and it's all American. There's
no no m r any jabs. It's I want to say,
all American. It's technically it's all Texan. So that just
just to differentiate there, make sure that we know that
it's not not some Connecticut beef. Nothing wrong with people

(00:42):
in Connecticut, but I wouldn't buy Connecticut beef anyway. Sorry.
Everybody I think knows about that. And you can always
go to worldviewbeef dot com, worldviewbef dot com, use promo
code JDR checkout, and you'll get the maximum discount at
any given moment. Okay, know that, But I know that
not everybody likes just beef. I mean, it'd be nice

(01:05):
if you did, but you need more than that. So
we have put together a new page on my website.
Go to Jducker dot com slash food Jdreucker dot com
slash food, and we actually recommend some other products other
companies that do offer long term storage food of various sorts.

(01:28):
As much as I would love to be able to
say man can live by beef alone, that would number
one be blasphemous, but it would also be mostly incorrect
and doesn't add to variety.

Speaker 2 (01:40):
Men.

Speaker 1 (01:40):
As much as I love to eat air beef, I
only eat it probably two or three times a week.
I don't eat it every single day, every single meal,
and Lord Willing, I'll never have to. But go check
it out jdrucker dot com slash food, worldviewbeef dot com.
Either way you win, you win. You're listening to the JD.

(02:27):
Rutgers Show. Let's begin. I've said this before, I'll say
it again. Every morning I wake up and I wonder
it is today the day that I'm gonna have to
be able to have a full blown, totally positive show.
I really do want and pray for that. I might
have to, Lord Willing, we might have to have wait
until the election for that to be the case, of course,

(02:48):
it will be very positive if Trump wins for people
like me. Probably the vast majority of you are hoping
for that to happen. But there are a whole lot
of people who are going to be insane. And here's
the thing, They're already being insane. I mean, it's already
the insanity is already starting. It's been there for a
long time. It's starting to bubble up more now that
it looks more and more likely that Trump could win. Now,

(03:10):
I'm not one of those guys. I don't look at
the polls and think, oh my gosh, we're doing it. Guys,
it's over. We're totally gonna win this. I was telling
a friend of mine, actually a business friend, you know.
He's like, so, you know, what do you think it
looks like Trump's gonna win, right, I'm like, yeah, probably
maybe not, probably not. It's cool. What are you talking about, Like, Well,

(03:30):
Number one, I don't look at the polls. Number two,
the massive widespread voter fraud that took place in twenty
twenty and in twenty twenty two is going to be
be very small compared to what they're going to or
in the process of trying to do with the election
in twenty twenty four, you really only have to do
hit up seven states. You know they're going to try
to do a lot of them. I was on with
Wayne Allen Root yesterday on frank speech, and he got

(03:54):
he disagreed with me. I said, look there, you know,
I would love to see Trump win a few blue
states and then maybe even lose some of the battleground states,
because it would expose, finally exposed to even normies, the
fact that the global sleek cabal, their cronies or subordinates

(04:14):
in the Deep State, and then their cronies and subordinates
in the in the uniparty swamp, and corporate media and
big tech and this whole cabal. Right, they might finally
be exposed as trying to steal elections. How could you
win a blue state but then then magically at three
am lose a battleground state. It didn't happen, And maybe
we can then take that Trump victory and write it

(04:35):
all the way to free and fair elections once again
here in the United States of America. He disagreed. He
said that they cheat every state. You know, blue state,
red state, doesn't matter. They want to win the popular vote.
Too so, and plus they're trying to win control of
the House and Senate. He might be right, maybe I'm delusionable.
Who knows. The point is is that they are crazy.

(04:55):
They're deranged, full blown deranged, and they're getting ugly and
uglier every day. This article blew me away because like,
I didn't have it on my bingo card. It didn't
even it wasn't in consideration in my mind. I knew
that that the radical left they hate us, right, we
know that, okay, and I would say that for many

(05:16):
of us. I haven't be one of them, I'll admit it.
The feeling is mutual. But I would never get violent
or make threats to them, you know, not illegal threats.
I could make threats like hey, you know, we're we're
gonna get into a story here soon where it's like, hey,
I really hope I think that that Jack Smith is
going to lose his job once Trump wins. That that's

(05:39):
a threat of sorts. But it's not like, oh, I'm
going to beat up Jack Smith or whatever whatever. Anyway,
So article by Jim hoffed over at the Gateway Pundit
really highlights this should chap your Khakis Trump supporters in Pennsylvania.
Of course, this is one of the battleground states, one
of the biggest battleground state and arguably the most unhinged

(06:01):
battleground state. It will take about last I checked, they
said that it will take approximately fourteen years for them
to be able to count all the ballots. We'll see
how that goes. Trump supporters in Pennsylvania targeted with threatening
letters from the radical left. And here's a.

Speaker 3 (06:16):
Quote, your visible support comes with a price.

Speaker 1 (06:23):
And should we take these threats seriously? You bet you,
you bet we should. According the article, Trump supporters in
Pennsylvania are reportedly being targeted with threatening letters from radical
leftis warning them that their visible support for the former
president could lead to dire consequences. Residents with Trump signs
in their yards, particularly in Philadelphia, have receiving disturbing letters

(06:44):
through the US Postal Service A complete A complete with
fake Trump campaign letterheads. According to the Post Millennial, the
threatening letters, which start off as a seemingly benign thank
you note for being engaged in the political process, quickly
devolve into dark ominie threats. One Trump supporter or one
Trump voter, Janet from penn Valley, shared her harrowing experience

(07:05):
to the post millennial. She said, after probably displaying Trump
signs in her yard, she received one of these letters
filled with hateful rhetoric and explicit threats to her family
and property. The un selling message was far from an
isolated incident. Janet, who reported the matter to the Lower
Marion Police, revealed that other Trump supporters in her area
had received similar threats. Local law enforcement, however, has been

(07:27):
unable to pursue the matter further as the letters were
delivered through the mail without any available video evidence, because
of course not they got all sorts of video evidence
on January sixth, showing that we don't get me started.
Despite this, Trump supporters in the area have confirmed that
this intimidation campaign is widespread, with reports of the same

(07:49):
threatening letter being delivered both by mail and without postage,
directly into mailboxes. In other words, they're not just oh,
let's go, you know, drive around. You know, oh Trump,
Trump's signed, let's write down that address, let's get this
in the mail. You know. They're not just being total
anonymous cowards in that regard. They're actually physically delivering some
of these to people's homes. HM. The letter, which opens

(08:15):
with pleasantries swiftly transitions into a vitriolic condemnation of Trump supporters,
labeling the former president a fellow rapist desecrator and blaming
him for political violence in the country. We're gonna beat
the crap out of you because you support political violence.
Let's read the letter, shall we, Dear neighbor, a quick

(08:37):
note of thanks for being engaged in the election and
for your participation in that process. We are writing with
a concern about the level of political violence in the
country during this election year, as well as the threats
to our democracy and freedoms. So we're asking you to
take a close look at the truth, facts and the
future for a better America where we can all live

(08:58):
in harmony together. Your candidate is a felon rapist, desecrator
and a moral flawed man. He has a major reason
violence is up. Remember January sixth and Charlottesville. By supporting him,
you are declaring your public support for a disregard of
the lost civil discourse and unity. You're indicating your hatred

(09:19):
for minorities, immigrants, foreigners, minorities, immigrants and foreigners, got it, sorry? Women, Education,
the rights of your fellow citizens, the rights of women
to make decisions over their own health care needs so
that they can kill human beings in their womb. I
added that last part, by the way, and yes, a

(09:39):
hatred for Taylor Swift, who's contributed nothing but joy joy
to the world. And when I read that part, I'm
like thinking, ah, okay, so this is obviously some sort
of like joke, right, except it's clearly not. They might
have thrown that in to give them an out of
this is all we look, we mentioned Taylor Swift, bring

(10:00):
enjoy me. It's haha, funny, you know, don't don't walk
us up for decades. They should be locked up for
a long time. Let's finish it off though.

Speaker 3 (10:08):
However, this is a reminder that your visible support comes.

Speaker 1 (10:12):
With a price, and at a cost. There will be consequences.
Should your candidate win. The consequences will be staggering. The
country will continue to be divided, the economy will falter
and a recession will be accelerated. The deficit ballooned.

Speaker 3 (10:31):
The majority will live under the rule of a minority.
Government will be in my business, the business of my family.

Speaker 1 (10:38):
The deficit will.

Speaker 3 (10:39):
Grow, the rich will get richer, and judging.

Speaker 1 (10:42):
By your house, you don't qualify for rich. My gosh,
they actually get personal as much as you think you may.
But more importantly, we know where you live. You are
in the database and in the debt of a cold
winter night this year, our next, or next and beyond.
There is no knowing what may happen your property, your

(11:03):
family may be impacted, your cat may get shot, and more.
Spend some time with your rabbi or pastor or whatever
religion you follow, and dig into the meaning of morality
and reconcile the hate with your maker. Face the truth
and understand the facts. Stop being lazy, question your commitment
to a cult. He is the biggest threat to the

(11:23):
country and does not understand the idea of America as
defined George Washington by the founding fathers. Your vote for
this guy is seen as treading on my rights. You
tread on me at your perilffort. I mean that just escalately, quickly,
did it not? I mean I don't know what to say.

(11:47):
I do know what to say, but you have to
say I don't know what to say, because that sets
the mood. They're crazy, That's all there is to it.
Are absolutely insane, and it's not the type of insanity
that comes with just oh, you know, there's an imbalance

(12:08):
of hormones, or there's a disconnect in the mind, or
there's you know, some of the synopsies aren't firing in
the right direction, or they've been playing too many video
games or smoke too many drugs or anything like that.
The sickness that they're experiencing, it is demonic. I'm certain

(12:29):
of this. They're being driven by demonic forces. And the
reason that it's important to understand this is because we
should be concerned. We should be preparing ourselves to be
able to fight back. Now, this is going to get
me in trouble for saying this. I won't be able

(12:52):
to post today's show on YouTube. Let's just say that,
but it has to be said. Going to come after
us if Trump wins, and here's the thing, They're going
to come after us if Trump loses, one way or
the other. We're the problem. We need to be eliminated

(13:14):
as far as they're concerned. And there's a whole lot
more of them than you think. This isn't some isolated
this could be, by the way, this could be some
crazy dude, crazy lone wolf dude out there expressing his hatred.
But you can't deny that everything he's saying or she
or whoever or they and they is in literally plural,

(13:37):
not theys in some gender bending weirdness. He, she or
they are insane, are hateful, and could engage in the
threats that they're discussing. I mean, they're trying to instill fear.
This is terrorism. This is a form of domestic terrorism
by the very definition of the word. And we're not

(14:00):
even at the election yet. If Trump wins, they're going
to go crazy. If Trump loses, they're going to try
to eliminate us anyway. We will be the the what
needs to be purged in their mind from the nation.
There's going to be violence, folks. I'm not trying to
scare you. I'm not trying to fearmonger you. I'm not representing,

(14:20):
representing whoever block Okay, though, you should get you a
glock six hour whatever. You should be armed. We must
be armed. We must be able to defend ourselves and
defend our nation, defend our family first and foremost. But

(14:42):
we can't just assume that this is just lone wolf
crazies and nothing's going to happen. If if nothing happens, awesome,
if you're prepared and nothing happens, great, praise God. If
you're prepared and something happens, excellent, good shape. If you're
not prepared and nothing happens, you're lucked out. And if

(15:07):
you're not prepared and something happens, that's on you. So
get prepared. That's the moral of the story. I'm gonna
take no, you know what I'm yes, No, I am
going I'm gonna take a very miniature break here, just

(15:29):
just a I got like a twenty eight second clip.
I want to play you just so I can because
I've been eyeballing. Okay, I just got to take a
drink here real quick. I say you should take your
drinks when the camera's off you. But I want you

(15:51):
to know that I'm passionate about this. I want you
to know that my throat is getting dry thinking about
this stuff. Again. I'm not sure trying to pitch you
on a gun or anything like that. I'm just telling
you because I don't have a gun sponsor. But you

(16:12):
don't want to be in America, especially if you live
in a city, which you shouldn't. But you don't want
to be in America after November or even during November.
Of twenty twenty four or beyond without protection. Like I said,

(16:33):
this isn't going on YouTube. This is going on world YouTube,
Frank Speech, Rumble, Apple Podcasts will probably kick me off,
but I'll go ahead and put it on there. Anyway.
We'll see how that goes. Get Ready, folks, it's going
to get crazy. And if it doesn't, and I'm wrong,

(16:55):
and I pray that I'm wrong, no harm, no foul. Right.
Better to assume the worst, prepare for the worst, and
then strive for the best. That's my philosophy when it
comes to life in general. On top of that, prey
a lot. Be right back. Regardless of where you saw

(17:16):
that clip, the best place to watch any of my
stuff is to subscribe to me on Rumble. Jdrucker dot com,
slash Rumble. That's jdrucker dot com slash rumble. Oh you
mark this next story down as very positive news, positive
and multiple fronts. Look for years, many of us, I'm

(17:37):
one of them, and I'm sure many of you have
done the same thing. We have done what we can
to express our opinions to minorities, in particular black voters,
about the truth about the Democrat Party, how the Democrat
Party has for decades, not just years. We're not just
talking about the current woke Democrat Party. We're talking about

(17:59):
even the Democrat Party that was in many ways, like
Joe Biden used to be against illegal immigration, and you
know they even Obama and Hillary clintond pretended that they
were anti gay marriage and all this other stuff. Right,
you know, we're talking about it. Even even when when
the Democrat Party wasn't totally just batcrap crazy, they were

(18:20):
still very destructive, especially in inner cities, especially in any
city where where they had a high level of black voters. Okay,
it was their thing was create the problem, perpetuate the problem,
offer solutions to keep them getting re elected, Blame the
Republicans or corporations or the white man or whoever. Blame

(18:44):
somebody or a bunch of people, and then rense and repeat.
And this is we're going for decades. This is why
cities like Baltimore, Detroit, New Orleans, Chicago, I mean, Atlanta,
these places have over the years, based upon really really
horrible Democrat policies, have just just plummeted. I mean they've

(19:06):
they've they've been turned into two hell holes, cesspools, third
world cities. So we've been trying to go you know,
and been to be fair Republicans, especially, you know, the
Republican Party in general. But we'll just say Republicans as
a as a whole have done a very poor job
of getting the message out. I worked with I'm not

(19:31):
gonna say who, but I worked with a prominent black
conservative Okay, very conservative and uh and very well respected
in all across the board. I mean even Democrats. They
might they might not like him because of his politics,
but they can respect him because you know, this is
a guy who self made man, you know, the American dream,

(19:52):
the whole, the works, right. I'm not gonna say who, No,
but I worked with him for years and we we
one of our intentions, one of our goals was to
reach out to as many black voters as possible, especially
in Democrat run cities, and try to just just make
them aware. It took. You know, if there's one thing
that we could say positive about Joe Biden and Kamala

(20:18):
Harris is that it took the most awful regime in
American history. In my humble opinion, the Biden Harris regime
is the worst for America that has ever been and
we're talking about a whole lot of bad presidency presidencies.
If you go back, you know, throughout the decades, the centuries,
there's been some bad ones. Biden Harris are the worst.

(20:40):
And it took that. If there's one positive thing they did,
it's that they finally were so bad, so awful, and
then became so woke that even those who have been
Democrat voters for years or decades are waking up and
realizing the parties left them. The party has left them,
and praise God for allowing Donald Trump to conversely say,

(21:03):
I'm right here, I can help. And Trump did so
much during his first term to help minorities, to help
help people who, you know, the the Democrats say, oh,
you know, he only helps the rich. That's just not true. Okay,
His his economy, his policies, his his border, his tax cuts.
These helped every American. Maybe not every single American, but

(21:30):
at least most vast majority of American voters. Didn't help
Wall Street. You know, you might be like, well, the
stock marker was through the roof. Yeah, but he didn't
help Wall Street. There's a difference. Didn't help the bankers,
not at all, didn't help a whole lot of the
big corporations that wanted to outsource, They wanted to to

(21:50):
move their stuff to other countries. They wanted to get
the cheap labor, get the cheap rents, get the cheap facilities,
and just play the whole import game. He didn't help them,
but he helped most of us. So that's why it's
no shock at all that he's getting more black votes
now than he got in twenty twenty or twenty sixteen.

(22:11):
But did you know how much he's getting. Let's take
a look at that. According to this article by sa
McCarthy over at Life News, Trump is getting three times,
three times more support for black voters than he got
in twenty sixteen. Praise God for that. Praise God for that.
With less than three weeks to go before the election,
Vice President Kamala Harris's hemorrhaging support from a key demographic

(22:32):
which has historically skewed in favor of Democrats, young black voters.
According to a recent New York Times Siena College poll,
seventy eight percent of likely poll voters intend to cast
their ballots for Harris and fifteen percent intend to vote
for Trump. Already, Trump's support from black voters, is on
track to be almost triple what he received in the
twenty sixteen election, and among the highest percentage of supporter

(22:54):
received by any Republican presidential candidate. Only seven percent of
voters surveyed said they voted for Trump in twenty twenty. However,
the polling data also shows that Trump is polling at
twenty one percent amongst Black voters age eighteen to twenty
nine and twenty percent amongst Black men, much higher than
among any other demographic of black voters. Of the seven
percent of likely black voters who said they don't know

(23:16):
who they are eventually will eventually vote for, only thirteen
percent said that they lean toward Harris, while twenty one
percent said they lean toward Trump. Among black voters age
eighteen to twenty nine who have answered that they don't
know who they'll vote for, zero percent said they lean
towards Harris and fifty percent said they lean toward Trump.
Now polls or polls, polls suck. I've said that many times.

(23:37):
I don't like poles, I don't watch poles, I don't
read polls, I don't care about the polls. So everything
I just said, pretend like it doesn't exist. Just look around,
Watch what's happening, Watch go go through black neighborhoods. Okay,
you're going to see it. You're going to see red
manga hats. You're gonna see now that you know what

(23:58):
is it. They call it dark mag You see a
lot of the dark maga hats. You're gonna see people.
I show this video the other day. No, I didn't
show the video because there's a lot of cursing in
the song that was being played. But it was a
group of black young young black men and women kids.
Even they were out there on a street corner with
Trump signs, dancing dancing on a street corner with Trump signs.

(24:19):
Would you have seen that in twenty sixteen or twenty twenty,
of course not. You know, did he have black support?
You bet you, probably more than anybody will ever acknowledge.
But it's nothing compared to today. Today people have woken up.
Harris Biden regime pushed them away, and Trump said, just
take a look at the record, take a look, think

(24:42):
back to where you were compared to where you are today.
Look around you and of course, the two biggest issues
when it comes to you know, why are so many
especially you know, you could say that the older black voters,
it's just it's you know, it's hard for people my

(25:02):
age to change, right. I Mean, I couldn't imagine ever
voting for a Democrat. I mean, it doesn't even cross
my mind. But for younger people it's like, well, you know,
we got to look at both sides, so you but
I would still say, by the way, that there are
many older black voters that would vote for Trump and
maybe they just wouldn't admit it in a poll. Young

(25:22):
black voters, on the other hand, are more open to it.
There's a reason for this. There's a very good reason
for this beyond just logic. It comes down to two
things that are being pushed really hard by the radical left.
Number one, obviously, the open borders. They don't like that, Okay.
We see in Chicago, especially where the people are rising up.
They're saying, look, you know, we're the ones that need help,

(25:46):
and yet you're putting all your effort into helping illegal
aliens and now you're talking about bringing more in. Stop.
So that's issue number one. Issue Number two, of course,
is theos wokeness does not jibe very well when it
comes to the vast majority in the Black community. Okay,
they don't like a whole bunch of lgbtqia plus supremacy

(26:06):
thrown in their face. They don't want to see it,
they don't want to talk about it, and they definitely
don't want it forced upon them. I would say more
so than even even whites or Hispanics or Asians. It
might be a tie with the Asians, but when we're
looking at the demographics the Black community, they don't want
all this wokeness shoved in their face. I'm not talking

(26:27):
about you know, there's a very big difference between like
critical race theory and lgbtqia plus supremacy. Now, according to BLM,
there is really no difference. They're one and the same.
That didn't work out too well for them, and it's
not going to work out for them in the future. However,
when it comes to to those who believe, for example,
you can believe in reparations and that favors the Democrats,

(26:49):
but that doesn't mean that you're going to also believe
that your daughters should be have boys in their bathroom
or boys competing with them in sports. It also doesn't
mean you know that they're going to embrace just because
they embrace certain aspects of the Democrat platform, doesn't mean
that they want LGBTQA plus supremacy thrown in their face
or their kids face, or anybody's face. So between those

(27:11):
two issues, border crisis, open borders and rampant wolkeness. All
it took was a guy like Trump to come along
and say I'm here, I'm not crazy, vote for me,
and I think I think they will. For the last
couple of years, I've built up somewhat of a reputation

(27:34):
as being knowledgeable when it comes to gold and silver,
especially as it pertains to physical gold and silver used
to back retirement accounts. People ask me questions about gold
and silver literally every day, and I appreciate that. But
there was a time, not too long ago, we're talking
within the last couple of years, within the last three years,
we'll say, where I actually was getting out of the

(27:56):
gold business altogether. I was asking too many question I
was working with what I call big gold, okay, working
with various companies, and started asking questions and I didn't
like the answers. I mean, I wouldn't do it myself
the way that they were pushing it. I wouldn't move
my retirement over. So why would I recommend anybody else
get conned? You know, oh, five thousand dollars in free silver,

(28:19):
ten thousand dollars in free silver, you know, tax free, rollover,
low charges, take advantage of us. We're idiots. It just
didn't make any sense. So I was getting out, but
I decided, you know what, let me at least make
sure that you know this bad taste in my mouth.
I could, I could, maybe are there are good companies
out there, And i'vetted out thirty two of them and

(28:40):
I found one. I'd found one one that I work with,
and I've been working with them very happily for the
last couple of years, and I don't foresee that stopping
anytime soon. You can learn more not just about them,
but about, perhaps more importantly, about why I endorsed them,
and why you might not want to listen to other

(29:00):
endorsements that are that are paid endorsements, because I don't
think that these various conservative show hosts or sites. I
don't think they look into it. I think they stick
their head in the sand to be completely transparent. I
don't I can't imagine that they would know what they're recommending,
because if they did. I can't imagine that these people,
these are good, good men and women making these recommendations.

(29:21):
How could they? So you can read my endorsement and
understand the truth about the industry by going to jd
rucker dot com slash gold. That's jdrucker dot com slash gold,
and that we'll take you to a short little blurb
that I put together that just explains why I why
personally back Genesis Gold Group. Or you can just reach

(29:43):
out to them and get your Digital Gold Guide no sorry,
digital Digital Dollar Defense Guide. There we go, and a
separate wealth protection kit, both free, both definitive, both exclusive.
You can go to rumblegold dot com rumblegold dot com
and check that out. But again, if you want to
read my short, short little testimony about my endorsement, go

(30:05):
to jd rucker dot com slash gold. I know nobody
wants to hear this, but getting Trump elected is just
the first step. It really is it. Actually, the fight
is going to go on beyond that. Even if let's
say there's a landslide, okay, and I think that from

(30:28):
a true legitimate voter perspective, there is going to be
a landslide. It's going to be He's going to win
the popular vote if we were, of course, only counting
legal US citizens who are eligible to vote. If those
are the only people that are getting counted, Trumble winning
a landslide popular vote, probably win even in blue states.
But since we're faced with rampant, widespread voter fraud, it

(30:48):
might be close, and as a matter of fact, they
might be able to get enough of it to win.
That's really what it comes down to. Are the Democrats
going to get enough votes enough? Are they going to
be able to manufacture enough ballots, especially in swinging states,
in order to steal another election? I'll say it. That's
what it comes down to. Period. You know, you think

(31:09):
that Kamala Harris or Joe Biden are just so popular
popular at any point actually win the election. No, of
course not. But let's say Trump wins, we still have
to fight well beyond election day, and unfortunately, we're going
to have to fight people in power. It's not just

(31:30):
about fighting the media or fighting our fellow voters, or
defending ourselves against the shenanigans that are going to rise.
It's actually we're gonna have to fight Congress. Democrats in Congress.
If you're watching on Worldviewtube. Then I'm gonna play this
clip and I will see you an hour later. It's Friday.
If you're watching anywhere other than world YouTube, just stay

(31:50):
right there and I'll be right back after I play
this clip.

Speaker 4 (31:56):
So it's gonna be up to us on January sixth,
twenty twenty five, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that
he's disqualified, and then we need bodyguards for everybody in
civil war conditions, all because the nine justices, not all
of them, but these justices who have not many cases
to look at every year, not that much work to do,

(32:18):
a huge staff, great protection, simply do not want to
do their job and interpret what the Great Fourteenth means
that I'm glad that Shirtlin's creating her new center so
we can bring death back to life even as we're
continuing to amend the Constitution, as Professor Hassen has invited
us to do.

Speaker 1 (32:40):
Three weeks less than three weeks until the election, almost
two weeks as a matter of fact, until the election,
and things are already looking insane on election day. It's
going to be crazy after election day because if Pennsylvania,
which takes what two years to count their votes for
some reason. If Pennsylvania is the determining factor, then people
are going to be insane. I mean, it's just craziness
all across the board here in the United States of America.

(33:00):
And the funny part is that the election itself will
come down to seven states. As I'm sure most of
my readers very well aware. You can check this out
over two seventy to win dot com. Most states are
either safe or likely, Okay, save dark blue. California is
going to be Kamala Harris, Utah is going to be
Donald Trump. Then you've got the ones that are likely,
which is, I would say, SAIDNY seventy five eighty percent

(33:20):
chance unless something crazy happens. New Mexico is going to
vote for Kamala Harris and Iowa is going to vote
for Donald Trump. You only actually have one that leans
in one direction when electoral vote, this little little lonely
electoral vote in Nebraska where it is, it leans blue,
which means there's a chance it could be flipped. For

(33:40):
the most part, all the most of the electoral college
votes have been determined. You've got seven states Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pensylvania,
North Carolina and Georgia where it is in question. So
let's look at some scenarios, because folks, things could get
even crazier than you you're aware already. Let's say that
Nevada and Arizona, because they are both rampant widespread voter

(34:01):
fraud central, let's say they both go blue. Okay, let's
put them in the blue column. And then let's start
up top here. Let's go with uh. Let's put Wisconsin.
Let's say Wisconsin goes blue as well. But let's say
Michigan got the auto industry there being decimated by the Democrats.
Let's put it in the red column. Okay, we'll save

(34:22):
Pennsylvania for the end. Let's say that North Carolina, because
of their FEMA debacle, they rally around reality and they
go ahead and vote for vote for Donald Trump. And
then you've got down in Georgia day for whatever reason,
because of the corruption. There many reasons why Georgia, which
should be a red state solidly red, is a battleground state.
Let's say that the Democrats prevail and make that one

(34:44):
that one blue that leaves his Pennsylvania. Trump is currently
up by three to five points, depending upon the pole
you say that that. If the pole says he's up
three points in Pennsylvania thanks to fracking and other things,
he's probably up a lot more than that. Okay, and
you've got Kamala Harris and her team. They're spending money
in Philadelphia, Philadelphia of all places. They're concerned. They think
they're gonna lose Pennsylvania. So let's say that one goes red.

(35:05):
What does that do? That puts his head? Whoa two
sixty nine to two sixty nine in other words, no winner,
in which case the House of Representatives picks the picks
the president, and the Senate picks the vice president. So yes,
it's actually possible that we could have I know, this
sounds crazy. We could have a Trump Walls administration. We

(35:28):
could have a Harris Vance administration. I would say, crazier
things have happened, but I don't know if they have.
Let's let's look at so that's a very specific scenario, right,
What are the chances of it following like that? Let's
let's try that again. Let's say to Nevada, for for example,
Let's say Nevada go's red. Okay, Arizona still gets stolen
and it turns blue. Wisconsin, wisconsinant they come their senses

(35:52):
and they vote red. Michigan again, Autoworkers they vote red.
Pennsylvania stays red. North Carolina goes blue because they're Republican
voters were washed away and kept swept away thanks to FEMA,
and Georgia goes blue. Wow, that puts it at sixty
and sixty nine. Another scenario here where we could have

(36:15):
a tie in the electoral College. And actually there are
more than just those out there, more examples of how
it is possible for us to have in the craziest
election at least in our lifetimes. It could actually get
crazier on or shortly after election day. Folks, stay frosty.
Things are weird out there. But always remember it's in

(36:38):
God's hands. Let him, let him do the heavy lifting.
We just do our part, fight the good fight, and
we'll we'll see what our role is in all of this.
But but don't sweat it, don't get depressed. Just fight, fight, fight.
You know, this next story really should be the lead
story of the day. It is the Vegas story technically

(37:01):
from yesterday, but it's it still has repercussions today. But
unfortunately it's the type of story where it doesn't sound
interesting enough to draw people in. So here's what I did.
I went ahead and put out a controversial story, one
that would be like, oh my gosh, we gotta that.
I led with that one, and now I'm going to

(37:24):
give you the real stuff. This is the This is
the stuff that you do need to hear, you need
to know about, and you need to, hopefully Lord willing
share it with others who also need to hear it.
Because because this demonstrates the the fallacy of our judicial system,
the fallacy fallacies, multiple fallacies of our election system, and

(37:48):
h and really highlights just how badly, how deeply embedded
the hatred felt towards Trump by those who who who
fear him, because it really does them down to fear.
Those who fear him hate him so much that they're
willing to to break all norms, shatter all forms of decorum,

(38:08):
any any common sense, all of it. Out the door.
Out the door. Now, we don't need any of that stuff.
We've got Trump drangement syndrome and that deny that that
over rules everything else. According to the article, This is
by Sam Dorman over at the Epoch Times, cross posted
with permission over at Jdrucker dot com. Election interference judge

(38:29):
Chuckin denies Trump's request to delay releasing Jack Smith's hit
piece until after the election. All right, now, buckle up,
because this is we're gonna get into some mental gymnastics here,
and not by me. Don't worry. I'm not going to
be doing performing any mental gymnastics. I'm gonna break down.
We'll call him Trump hater number one and Trump Hater

(38:49):
number two. The mental gymnastics they're they're going through in
order to justify their election interference cour in the article
District of Columbia District Judge Tanya Chutkin, also known as
Trump Hater number one, has denied former President Donald Trump's
request to delay the public release of additional portions of
Special Counsel Jacksmith's evidence and we'll call him Trump Hater

(39:12):
number two until after the twenty twenty four election. On
October seventeenth, she issued an order and opinion arguing that
delaying its release would be a form of election interference.
That's like saying, if I don't stab this guy in
the back, that'll be considered a form of violence. Not

(39:35):
stabbing him in the back would be a form of violence.
Stabbing in the back, of course, by this logic, would
not be violence. But not stabbing him in the back,
that would be the violence. This is a quote from
her five page order. If the court withheld information that
the public otherwise had a right to access to access

(39:56):
solely because the potential political consequences of release, releasing it,
that withholding could it self constitute or appear to be
election interference. Now let's be clear. This is it's essentially
it's the evidence that should be presented in a court
of law, public or not, I don't care. But at
the appropriate time and at time if they want to

(40:17):
have the case. Now, great, I have the case. Now,
I have it last week, last month, last year, whenever,
next month, next month, next year, whenever. It doesn't matter.
But it's this is evidence that's supposed to be presented
in a court of law. Okay. Now, Jack Smith, because
he wasn't going to get his trial date before the
election decided, you know what, I'm going to still put

(40:38):
the information out there because I think that the people
need to know about this. And he and Judge Chutkin,
so Trump Hayter a number one and Trump Hayter number
two got together and they decided to get this information
out again before the election, specifically before the election, intentionally
before the election. This is evidence. This isn't like, Okay,

(41:01):
so we're going to detail the conviction. We're going to
detail the all the wrongdoing. No, no, no no. This is
evidence that's supposed to be used to determine help to
determine whether or not Trump is guilty of crimes. But
they want it out now because they know that it's
not going to have the impact that it it can't

(41:25):
have any impact. But if they wait until after the election,
and this really does come down to impacting the election
one hundred percent. This is about impacting the election. This
is not about the truth. This is definitely not about
justice or serving justice. This is about election interference period.

(41:49):
Judge Chuckkin Trump hater number one, total partisan hack, Jack
Smith Trump at number two, and globalist deep stater extraordinay
is an absolute scumbag. I hope some of you got

(42:13):
offended by that. I know that's harsh language for rucker scumbag,
but I need to use the harshest language in my
repertoire when describing Jack Smith. Let's return to the article.
Though the court will therefore continue to keep political considerations
out of its decision making, which is an I mean,
it's a bald faced lie. It's literally the exact opposite

(42:34):
of what this judge is saying. The judge is saying
she's keeping political considerations out of the decision making lie.
That's a lie. She is opposite. She is taking strictly
and solely and totally only political considerations into account. She

(42:55):
is engaging in a move that is one hundred percent political.
We have to give this information, which has not been adjudicated.
We have to give his evidence, which has not been confirmed.
We have to get this trash out to the public
before the election. Why because Trump hater number one and

(43:16):
Trump hater number two hate Donald Trump. They hate America.
To be clear, they hate you, They definitely hate me,
and they want to destroy America. And they can't couldn't
do through lawfair, couldn't get it out in time for
lawfair to work. So they're going to try to attack
him in the court of public opinion. So when this
judge says that she's going to keep political considerations out

(43:43):
of the decision making, the reality is is that she's
saying or she's not saying with her words, but with
her actions, she's saying, I'm participating in a political hit
job against somebody who's probably going to come after me
after he's elected. Jack Smith is definitely going, and Jacksmith's

(44:05):
out once Trump's in office. To be clear, Chutkin, there's
a little bit more there. We'll discuss that another day.
But she's taking essentially her political enemy. She's making a
decision based one hundred on her personal political considerations. Think
about that. Think about the abuse of power that represents

(44:35):
Trump's back the article. Trump's attorney said that if the
appendices are released simultaneously, at least some press outlet will
attempt to report both sides of this case, reducing the
potential for irreversible prejudice. Similarly, the risk to witnesses will
be somewhat reduced, as the public will have a more
balanced picture of their testimony and how connects to the case.

(45:02):
In other words, what they're saying is, look, they have
their evidence, you want to release it, fine, let us
release our evidence. Unfortunately, we can't have our evidence ready
in time. They played a political move, not political, sorry,
they played a legal maneuver against the political move, and
it was a smart smart move. Under normal circumstance, that

(45:23):
would make sense, but it failed because we're not normal circumstances.
They needed to Unfortunately, they needed to play this politically.
And I hate to say that. I don't want any
I mean, they should be two totally separate things that
you got the judiciary, you got justice, you got politics.
That's different. When you start mixing them, you don't want.

(45:47):
We shouldn't want them to be mixed at all. But
the fact that one side, the Trump hating side, they
already mixed it. They're in the process of mixing it.
Our sides should have done the same. They didn't want to.
Now it didn't work, It's gonna come back and bite them,
and not by much. Look, I don't think there's gonna
be a whole lot of people that are like, well,

(46:09):
you know, I was, I'm on the fence about Trump,
but after reading Jack Smith's Jack Smith's report, I don't know. Yes,
I guess I'm just you know, Trump must be bad
or something. It's not about that. It's not about what
Jack Smith says. It's about how press is going to

(46:30):
taint the voters with information about this. They will take
whatever information Smith puts out there they will highlight the
most quote unquote damning piece of quote unquote evidence. That
will be their story. That's what they're going to run with.
It's going to be a distraction because it has absolutely nothing, nothing,

(46:54):
absolutely nothing, no impact on how Trump will be as
president or how Kamala Harris would be as president, zero impact, none,
And yet they're going to make that into the story
because they know that the people. We the people are
starting to realize You and I already knew, but more

(47:16):
people are starting to realize, Hey, Donald Trump's policies make
a lot of sense. Kamala Harris's policies, what little we
know about them, don't make sense, and the ones that
do make sense, she's stole from Trump anyway. So now
corporate media they can't say, oh, look, Kamala is full
of joy because that narrative was busted pretty quickly. They

(47:39):
can't say, oh, look, Kamala is a great leader in
orator because she did three interviews and they were disasters.
They can't say, oh, my gosh, you know Trump, everybody
hates Trump, because every time they try to find people
that hate Trump, they have they struggle. You had, who
was Don Lemon's out there He's like every time I
talk to black people, they're like, hey, hey, we like Trump.

(48:02):
He got, you know, MSNBC going out there, so tell
us how much do you hate Trump? Well? Actually, and
I mean I know that I've voted Democrat for the
last like eight elections, but this time I'm voting for
Trump because Kamal Harris is a disaster. And wait, wait
where are you going? MSNBC? Come back, keep interviewing me.
I have more to say. I mean, they have nothing.

(48:24):
So they've got Chutkin and Jack Smith out there running
a distraction campaign. That's really all this is. It's a
distraction campaign. This is election interference by trying to say, okay,
watch watch, watch very closely. Oh my gosh, did you
see that? It's magic. It's it's magic, corporate media magic.

(48:45):
Oo see. And then then I did that wrong. That
was a SpongeBob move. I couldn't pull off a SpongeBob move.
Very embarrassing. All right, let's let's finish. You know what.
I don't even want to read this. I don't want
to read this. I don't want to read it any
more of this. I'm gonna leave this up. You can
find this over at jd Rucker dot Com. I'll leave

(49:06):
it up over there, but this discuss again again this.
I'm telling you all this because just to get prepared
because this, when it's released, this is gonna be the story.
This is gonna be the big push. This is gonna
be their version of the Access Hollywood story. Okay, they're
going to try to make it into their version of

(49:27):
the current version of the Hillary's emails. Okay, they're going
to try to pretelling this is that big of a deal.
It's not. It's not a big deal at all. I mean,
I've looked at the Jacksmith's case and to be clear,
it's embarrassingly bad. And I'm not an attorney, I'm not

(49:47):
a judge, I'm not an expert in any way, but
I know that if I'm if I'm reading it, I'm like,
if I'm listening to this evidence, I'm thinking to myself, Wow,
this is a political hit job. That's all there is
to This is all a political hit job. But that's
not how it's going to be reported. Thankfully, Thankfully, corporate

(50:10):
media's stranglehold over the news is shifting, and we're going
to get into that. Actually, we're going to take a
quick break. Then we're going to get into the story
about how corporate media stranglehold is essentially dead. Praise God
for that.

Speaker 5 (50:30):
I'm Jonathan Rose, CEO of Genesis Gold Group. As Americans,
we work hard every day to provide for our families
and ensure their future. But with the uncertainty facing our economy,
it is more important than ever to safeguard your wealth
and protect your retirement savings. Educated investors look to save
haven assets to shield themselves from the economic storm. Tangible

(50:53):
assets like gold and silver can provide stability, security, and
most importantly, peace of mind. In eighteen ninety seven, the
Taxpayer Relief Act allowed Americans to hold physical precious metals
like gold and silver in the iras for the first time. Today,
Genesis Gold Group helps our clients transfer existing iras for

(51:14):
one ks and other retirement accounts into physical gold and
silver tax and penalty three. With thousands of satisfied clients,
five star reviews, and fully accredited with the Better Business Bureau,
our experienced team is here to help you navigate the
process start to finish. Now is the time to educate
yourself on the importance of a diversified portfolio. Include in

(51:36):
tangible assets like gold and silver. Call now to receive
our free wealth Protection Kit and digital Dollar Defense Guide.
Call now and will include our extremely popular silver Prepper
bar free when you open your account, add it to
your IRA, or have it sent your home. Call Genesis
Gold Group today an eight hundred two hundred gold Prepper
bar only available through Genesis Gold Group.

Speaker 1 (52:01):
Jeffrey Tucker from Brownstone as well as The Epoch Times
and other publications, is quickly becoming one of my favorites.
I don't agree with him about everything, to be clear. Okay,
there's some of his stuff. He's got a little occasional
neo con leaning, but it's rare. Usually he's pretty spot on.
And he published an article over at the Epoch Times
yesterday that we republished today over at jdorucker dot com.

(52:25):
That really tells a good story. And I love that image,
by the way, great image. Whoever made that image spot on?
Just just good job Rucker. Shifting media landscape? What does
it mean? Why is it happening? I think we all
know the answer to that. Why is independent media superior

(52:45):
to corporate media? It goes beyond the bias. Believe it
or not, it actually does have to do with quality
as well. But let's get into it from mister Tucker.
The Tucker is in Jeffrey A Tucker, not Tucker Carlson.
Laughing there on the screen. Listening to an interview with
journalist Megan Kelly, I was startled to learn that her
private media company beats the mainstream legacy network in traffic

(53:08):
and influence. I would not be surprised by that she
has six employees. When she was fired by NBC in
twenty eighteen, she believed that it was the end of
her career. She went to dark places in her mind,
but she bounced back with her own broadcasting company that
has never been happier, and has never been happier or
more influential. Same story has been told about Tuck by

(53:28):
Tucker Carlson, whose network is gigantic and whose influence is
far beyond even the heights that he obtained at Fox
in the old days. I have no direct knowledge of
how many people work for his personal channel, but it
is reasonable to guess that there is no more than
a dozen. I would actually say that the yeah, that's
probably a good estimate. Everyone knows about the success in

(53:50):
reach of Joe Rogan Show, apart from that, there are
many thousands more with influence on their own sectors of reach.
The share of influence dominated by legacy seems to be
falling dramatically. You can detect their influence in this election
season in which candidates are working the podcast circuit, and
not just because Kamala Hara Hara Kamala Harris feels more

(54:11):
comfortable on podcasts. She does, apparently, but that's not the
only reason you see Trump. Trump was on with Patrick
bet David and that was a great, great interview. I'd
strongly recommend watching that. You might chalk this up to technology.
Everyone has the capacity now to making content and distribute it. Therefore,
of course people do it. The real story, however, is
more complicated. New poll from Gallup offers an intriguing look.

(54:34):
The latest polls show trust in major media is at
an all time low. Go figure. It's fallen from a
post Watergate high in nineteen seventy six of seventy two
percent to just thirty one percent today, less than half.
That is an enormous slide, impossible to dismiss as mere
technological change. Along with that, the pole documents, dramatic documents,

(54:57):
dramatic losses of trust in government and a essentially all
official institutions. And yet they say you got the left.
They say, we don't trust the government, but we want
a lot more of It never made sense to me.
The loss of trust has hit all age groups, but
more profoundly affects people younger than forty years old. These
are folks who have grown up with alternatives and developed

(55:18):
a sophisticated understanding of information flows and are deeply suspicious
of any institution that seeks to control over public culture.
And there is the key. It's not just about trust, folks.
It's not just about they keep lying or they're biased.
It's because they want to control you. Just as Anthony
Fauci says he is the science corporate media they say

(55:39):
we are the news. They say this repeatedly. We're supposed
to tell you what to think. And there might have
been in time when that's true, but praise God, those
days are over. Gallup stated the new news media is
the least trusted a group among ten US civic and
political institutions involved in the democratic process. The allegilated branch

(55:59):
of the federal govern consisting of the US Senate and
House of Representatives, is rated about as poorly as the
media go. Figure. In contrast, majorities of yours adults express
at least a fair amount of trust in their local
government to handle local problems. It's sixty seven two thirds
their state government to address state problems, still fifty five
percent not bad. And the American people as a whole

(56:21):
when it comes to making judgments under our democratic system
with the issues facing the country which we don't have
a democratic system. I hate it when anybody Gallop or
anybody else says that. And know that people don't vote
directly on very much at all. And that's a good thing.
It's a very very good thing. Good topic for another day,

(56:41):
you know what. Let's I want to get into this
a lot more, but we are running out of time
on Frank Speech, so I'm going to break away just
for Frank Speech. If you are watching on Frank Speech
and you want to continue this discussion, you can find
me over at all World of YouTube. You can find
me over at on my personal rumble channel jd Rucker

(57:05):
dot com slash rumble. That'll get you, get you all
this stuff. Otherwise, somebody good is actually follows me. I
was on with Wayne Allen Root, who's before me. On
frank speech, and I forgot who follows me, but it's
somebody good. So you can stay tuned and watch them,
or you can go find me somewhere else and I will.
I'll be talking about this article. So I timed that

(57:27):
out poorly, so I've got to just stare at you
for like four seconds. All right. The frank speech audience
is gone. Now it's just you and me, You and me,
all right, so let's keep going. It seems based on
this pole in people's hearts and oak let's bring the

(57:49):
article back up. It seems based on this pole in
people's hearts and minds, we are defaulting back to America
of Alexis Detokeville, a network of self governing communities of
friends and neighbors, rather than a centrally managed and controlled monolith.
The farther the institutions get from people's direct experiences, the
less they are trusted. This is how it should be,

(58:12):
even aside from other considerations. In this case, the causal
factors are not only the distance and not only the
technology that allows for alternatives. Legacy media has been so
aggressively partisan for at least nine years that it has
alienated vast swaths of the viewing audience. Top executives have
known about this problem for a very long time and

(58:32):
work to fix it sort of, but they faced tremendous
pressure from within from reporters and technicians with ivy educations
and dedication to a woke ideology. We've seen the coup
attempts of these various institutions, including The New York Times.
The New York Times, speaking of which after twenty sixteen,
attempted to repair the damage from having so completely mishandled

(58:53):
and miscalled the election and hired news editors are new
editors and writers, but it was only a matter of
time before they were driven out. In a reminder to
the top brass that there was a cultural revolution afoot
and that the personal is the political and vice versa,
the newspapers defaulted back to extreme partisanship, leaving owners and

(59:15):
managers to figure out other paths to sustaining profitability. In
other words, Hey, we could make money and be a business,
or we could bow to our woke staff and that's
a lot easier. We're going to be woke. You guys,
figure out how to turn this into a profitable business.
Go buy you see if Bezos wants to buy us

(59:36):
or something. As a result, it appears that an entire
industry is in the process of a long meltdown with
no available fixes. Huge audiences have turned away from it
toward alternatives that are not necessarily partisan in the other
side or on the other side, but simply display a
dedication to telling facts and truths about which actual readers

(59:56):
about which actual readers cared 's not's just the readers.
Look our sites between the Liberty Daily, dot Com, America
First Report dot Com, Noqreport dot Com, based on Underground
dot Com, I've got like nineteen of them. If you
we try to stay under the radar because again, Google, Facebook,
anybody in big Tech, most people in government, the entirety
of the globals, League Cabal, and the deep state, they

(01:00:18):
all hate us and they're trying to destroy us. That's
my line in life, and I'm okay with that. But
because if you were to take it all and add
it up, we actually have a pretty significant reach. Not
like we're not like in like Fox News territory or
anything like that. We are reaching tens of millions of
Americans every month. And as a result, you know, and

(01:00:39):
this is one of the reasons why By the way,
I've been trying to promote my show more on the
website because it's like, oh, you know, keep it separate.
Stupid move ucker. Anyway, the point is is that is that, yeah,
we're seeing an increase, and it's not because we're trying
any harder. It's not because we're paying any money or
getting promotion or doing anything like that. It's definitely not
because anything that we're doing on like social media. I

(01:01:00):
wish we could have more social media stuff. By the way,
you should go to America First Report and Theelibertydaily dot
com and share stories from there on ex gab get her,
I don't care if you share it on Facebook. Probably
wouldn't work, but you get the idea. Point being is that, yeah,
people are looking for alternatives and they don't care whether
or not we're partisan. We try to not be partisan

(01:01:21):
when it comes to the news. Unfortunately, you know, as
I've said many times, bias does leak. Okay, you can't
stop it. If you're biased, If you're a human, then
you're gonna be biased. If you're biased, then you're going
to to express that bias one way or the other
in the articles you write. The stories that you publish,
the songs that you write if you're a musician, the
roles that you take if you're an actor, the whatever.

(01:01:41):
It's just part of human nature. We can't hide it.
And no, you can't even make AI because I know
that somebody that I respect that I'm not gonna say who,
because I respect them too much. I was telling me,
you know what, maybe AI is the solution to bias.
Maybe you can you could teach AI to just report
the news. You know, I'm not tying talking about We're
not talking about, you know, replacing like commentators or analys

(01:02:03):
But what if you had like an AI based news service.
And I'm like, that's the worst idea I have ever
heard anybody ever say, ever, in the entirety of ideas,
the entire history of humanity. That's the worst idea possible.
And I do respect this person, but I was not.
I was I was like, uh yeah, yeah, First and foremost,

(01:02:25):
when it comes to artificial intelligence, there is bias. The
bias comes through the algorithm itself. You can't not have
bias if there's an opinion, even if it's artificial, an
artificially created intellect, an artificially created opinion is still an
opinion and therefore subject to bias. And even if it's

(01:02:47):
a fact, the way that the fact is presented can
be subject to bias. There's so many levels. I don't
want to get into it. The idea is this, and
this is where I totally agree with with Jeffrey Tucker's article.
There is this shift towards independent media, and rightly so,
but we have to be discerning because there are Unfortunately
he is right, there are a lot of people out

(01:03:07):
there that can take advantage. I've seen some of the
most popular podcasters, popular influencers, whatever you want to call him,
just spreading the worst possible information. I'm not just talking
about a difference of opinion. I'm saying like, like factually incorrect.
I'm saying that that there's a reason why sometimes we
get lumped in with some of the more let's say,

(01:03:31):
sketchy perspectives out there. You kind of have to if
you're going to play in this realm. Yeah, it's not
that you have to fight it, Okay, Like there are
times when, for example, I will publish articles from a
certain publication with permission, of course, and those articles will

(01:03:52):
I'll have to put an editor's notes because ninety percent
of the article will be correct, and then all of
a sudden it'll be like like, yeah, you know, and
this and then that, and then and this and that
and this and then the aliens they're the ones that
are behind it all. No, we're not talking about illegal aliens. Yeah,

(01:04:13):
So you have to be discerning. You have to put
out content as best you can. It's one of the
things we strive to do here every single day, whether
it's here on the JD. Rutger Show, whether it's on
on the Liberty Daily or America First Report based underground
dot com. We have to stretch the limits as far

(01:04:33):
as you know, our willingness to talk about controversial topics
such as the vaccine, such as massive widespread voter fraud,
such as the climate change hoax, such as faith. Oh
you know, with all the controversial topics that I talk about,
the one that gets me in the most trouble is
when I talk about faith. We have to and as

(01:04:53):
a result of having to do that, we also have
to be mindful of not spreading, not participating in the
spread of true disinformation. I'm talking about what they considered
to be misinformation or disinformation. I'm not talking about censorship.
I'm talking about about falsehoods, okay. And look, if you're

(01:05:14):
trying to if you're in my business and you're trying
to be cutting edge, there's gonna be times where you
make mistakes. I remember I had one. I had a
journalist reach out to me because it posted a scoop
from the the GAO government account and Billy office, and yeah,
this is a big, huge scoop, right, It's like, oh
my gosh, look at this, this is big, big news.

(01:05:36):
And I got a journalist from Red State I believe,
reached out to me and he's like, yeah, you know,
I was investigating and I'm trying to find some corroborating information,
but I can't find any. Can you send me some
of your source material? And I went to the source
material and it turns out that it was a different GEO.
I'd fallen victim to something that soundedly is like, yeah,
it was like McDonald's versus McDowell's. Okay, I went and

(01:05:59):
got me in McDowell's big Mick burger. You know, I
should have known there were no sesame seeds on that burger.
I should have known, but I did. And sometimes we
fall for it. And it does happen, but we have
to try to correct it, and we have to try
to be diligent in our discernment across the board. The

(01:06:20):
reason I'm bringing all this up is because, yes, Joe Rogan,
Tucker Carlson, Megan, Kelly, Glenn Beck, these people that have
been shunned by corporate media, who have rebounded in some
cases in the cases of the everybody other than Rogan
on that list, or have excelled because of their independence
as in with Rogan. That's where you and I and

(01:06:45):
everybody we know should be trying to gather our information.
There's a lot of them out there that I don't like,
and I usually don't talk about them, but the ones
that I like, I do talk about. And here's the
funny part. I've never actually watched this single or listened
to a single episode of Joe Rogan. I've seen thousands clips,
but I've never actually sat there listen and watch an
entire episode. I'm not big on cursing. I'm not big

(01:07:05):
on drugs. I'm not big on any of that stuff.
I'm not against it, Like as far as like, oh
my gosh, we should chastise. I mean, this is not
my thing, not my scene. You know. So I haven't
listened to an entire one, but I would. You know,
maybe one of these days I'll go on a long drive. Now,
listen to a Joe Rogan episode. Point being is this,

(01:07:26):
the shift is happening. We need to perpetuate this, We
need to keep it going, We need to expand upon it.
You need to tell your friends, your relatives, your name.
Just stop tuning into CBS, CNN, Fox News, any of
the corporate media outlets. They're all just wrong. They're just wrong,
especially during election time. But even after the election, they

(01:07:48):
don't get a pass. It was like, Okay, we screwed
up during the election, but come on back. They need
to be stopped altogether. So joy and hope and love
and all those positive things that Kamala Harris used to
attempt to launch your campaign, they have disappeared in recent
recent weeks. In particular, over the last few days, she

(01:08:11):
has gone into full blown attack Trump hate Trump, hate
Trump hate Trump, attacked Trump mode. It's been notable and
even CNN has noticed it, as have pretty much everybody
else who's been paying any attention to it. Why the
shift met Margolus over at PJ Media has some ideas.
I'm going to disagree with him, but I want you

(01:08:31):
to know his ideas before I get into my idea.
According to the article, and then this is titled sorry,
why Kamala Harris is going all in on attacking Trump
and why it won't work? I agree that it won't work,
but as far as the why, I think that there's
something more more conspicuous. But according to Matt, you've probably
noticed that Kamala Harris has abandoned her original campaign strategy

(01:08:52):
of joy and vibes and are replaced with fear, anger
and attacks on Trump. She's been attacking Trump forever, but
there's something markedly different about her tone in the past
few days. Obviously, a big part of the reason is
that her efforts to sell her agenda to the public
aren't working, but it goes deeper than that. At the
core of this strategy shift is the undeniable reality that
Trump is more popular today than he ever has been before,

(01:09:14):
and she's trying to do something about that. CNN's Harrietting
pointed out Friday morning, if you believe that Donald Trump
has somehow become less popular over time, let me change
your mind on that He explained that Trump is more
popular at this point in the campaign than he was
at this point in the twenty twenty campaign or the
twenty sixteen campaign. That's concern concerning reality for Kamala and

(01:09:35):
her team. Despite Trump being underwater with a negative nine
point favorability rating, and it reminds us that it's higher
than he was in twenty twenty at minus twelve when
he nearly won. And some would argue then, actually, Matt
Margle's over at PJA Media goes on to argue that
if it wasn't for the pandemic, that based upon these numbers,
Trump would have won. I would say it's bas upon
voter fraud that he lost. But then again, I'm one

(01:09:58):
of those crazy wacko voter f right. Well, he goes on,
talks about the polls, talks about favorability, talks about this,
talks about that here's the reality, okay, And this isn't
based upon some insider knowledge. I haven't. And it's noticeable
by the way that I haven't had my contacts within
the Democrat Party my secret I got a couple of

(01:10:18):
secret contact, secret sources. They have been just silent on me.
And unfortunately I can't go to them. They have to
come to me with any of their scoops, and they
just haven't given me any for a couple of months,
which is discouraging. If you're watching, you know who you are,
call me, call me anyway. Uh So, So, yeah, this

(01:10:39):
isn't about oh, you know, the popularity in this, that
or the other. This is about the reality that her
campaign is finally starting to realize. And when I say finally,
I think a lot of them knew it from the beginning,
but they wanted to try to go for the whole.
Let's let's pitch come a lot. Let's get people to
like her, to appreciate her, to expect her, to admire her.

(01:11:02):
Let's make her the female Obama. Well, here's the thing,
She's not the female Obama, not even close. Obama. As
much as you and I hate him, he was very
likable's he Well he isn't lately because he's he's out
there doing crazy things. But at least to the Democrat
Party and too many independents, he was an extremely likable president.

(01:11:26):
He was a likable guy. He's the kind of guy
that you want to hang out with, at least if
you're a radical leftist right. Kamala Harris is not that person.
Kamala Harris is not appealing to Democrats, let alone to
independence or Republicans. And they realize that the only thing

(01:11:47):
that keeps her afloat at all, the only thing that
keeps her you know, people say, yeah, you know, I'm
voting for Kamala. They're not. Nobody is. Nobody is voting
for Kamala. They're just voting against Trump. There's people who
love Trump that will vote for him no matter what.
There's people that appreciate Trump and they're staunch Republicans and

(01:12:10):
of course they're gonna vote for him. There's people that
they don't like Trump at all, but they're gonna vote
for him anyway because they see what's been happening the
last four years. They remember what happened the four years before,
and they want to go back to the good times,
not continue with the bad times or what. We all
know that they would be even worse times under Kamala

(01:12:30):
than they were under Sleepy Joe. Then you've got the
people that are voting for Kamala not because they like Kamala,
not because they trust Kamala, not because they think that
she's got the right ideas, not because they think she
can secure the border. They don't think she can fix
the economy. They don't think that she can deal with
Vladimir Putin or Vladimir's Zolenska or Vladimir anybody. It's just

(01:12:52):
she's not Trump. That's it. That's it. The entirety of
her support is based upon the fact that she is
not Donald Trump, and there are people that would vote
for literally anybody other than Trump. There are probably millions
of Americans who believe, at least in their their they're conscious,

(01:13:15):
they believe that they hate Donald Trump more than they
hate any other person living or dead. And there's a
lot of people like that. They've been these you know,
the people that are watching MSNBC. They watched Joy Reed,
they watch CNN, they watched Jake Tapper, they watch Fox News.
They used to watch Chris Wallace. They had to replace
him with somebody, somebody Else's bottom line is there. They
hate Trump, and so they're gonna vote for whoever is

(01:13:38):
not Trump. They realize this. They being the Kamala Harris campaign,
they realize this now. They tried to make her likable,
didn't work. They tried to make her seem smart. Definitely
didn't work. So now they're going for the Hey, by
the way, in case she didn't know, I'm still not Trump.
We hate Trump just as much as you do. They're
going for the for the anti Trump vote. Not they've

(01:14:00):
abandoned the idea of picking up the pro Kamala Harris vote,
which just doesn't exist. It never has and it never will.
Like so many Americans, I am amongst those who are
feeling the financial crunch of this this awful economy. Lord
willing Donald Trump will soon be back in office and

(01:14:23):
we'll be beginning the long road to financial recovery. But
we still have needs. And one of the needs that
I have recently experienced was a need for a new mattress. Well,
I couldn't afford a new mattress. I'll just come out
and say it. So I did something that I really
never thought i'd do. I went to my pillow dot
com slash JDR, MyPillow dot com slash JDR, and I

(01:14:44):
got me one of those my Mattress toppers. It's around
one hundred bucks or so after you use discount code JDR,
depending on the size of the bed, of course, and uh,
just like wow, I am such an idiot. Why didn't
I get this years ago? I should have gotten this
like a mattress or two ago, because it rejuvenates, it replenishes,

(01:15:05):
it is so super comfortable. So MyPillow dot com slash
JDR promo code at JDR. Whether you've been a prepper
for a long time or maybe you're just getting started,
you're just getting looking around and thinking how crazy it is.
We usually cover the basics. You get your foods, you
get your water, you get your ammunition, don't forget your ammo.

(01:15:26):
You get your battery chargers, solar battery chargers or whatever.
But a lot of times I think people will forget
their meds. Okay, whether it's chronic meds, antibiotics, it's I
think a lot of people don't even realize that you
can stock up on that stuff. They go to the doctor,
they go to the pharmacy, and the pharmacists said, oh,
here's your two month supply or whatever. Well, you can
actually stock up on a lot of these meds by

(01:15:47):
going to jd Rucker dot com slash meds. You'll talk
to the good folks over at Jase Medical. They can
get your twelve months supply of certain prescription drugs. They
can get your emergency meds, all sorts of good stuff,
things that you may or may not need. But it's
always good to have it on hand because I guarantee you,
even if you don't think you need it today, you

(01:16:08):
might need it in the future. Jd Rucker dot com
slash meds. Republicans are attempting a slightly different strategy this
year than they've done in the past, and it's a
good thing. When I say they're trying something new, it's
not so much that this is new for them. It's
not new necessarily for the Republican Party. As a matter
of fact, in twenty sixteen, we saw by default, as

(01:16:30):
a result of Donald Trump's run, he was able to
get a whole lot of brand new voters. People are
that had either never voted before or it had been
a while since they'd voted. Well, they came out for
Donald Trump in twenty sixteen. Challenge is that a lot
of them didn't come back out in twenty eighteen, or
twenty twenty or twenty twenty two. These are what the
RNC is calling, anybody is calling low propensity voters. They

(01:16:53):
are now going to focus on these people these people
that would likely vote for Trump if they get out
of vote. Now you just got to make sure they
do get out to vote. It's one of the reasons
that I was so against other than the fact that
she was a total rhino, but another reason from a
strategy perspective that I really did not like Ronal Romney
McDaniel as RNC chairs because her strategies were awful. That's

(01:17:13):
why she lost every single election that she ever participated in.
She lost every single election that she participated in. Well,
hopefully we can do better with our co chairs, Michael
Wattley and of course Laura Trump. Let's look at this
article over at Breitbart dot Com by Hannahknutson titled RNC
Chairman Michael Wattley low propensity voter turnout dramatically higher than

(01:17:36):
usual and it's because of their hopefully at least partially
because their strategy. I think a lot of it also
has to do with the fact that people are struggling
and they're like, oh crap, we really can't suffer through
another four years under a Democrat rule. According the article,
the Republican National Committee is focusing on low propensity voters
and the turnout is already dramatically higher than in the past,
RNC chairman Michael Watley said during an appearance on Breitbart

(01:17:58):
News Daily. He said, we are focused on low propensity voters.
That is really truly the push, and we are combining
door knocks with phone calls, with direct mail, with digital communications,
emails and texts, he said, describing a low propencive voter
as somebody who is very likely to vote for Donald
Trump if they vote, but they haven't voted in two
years or four years or six years. And the Democrats

(01:18:21):
are going to identify somebody the same kind of way.
But it really truly is not a very regular voter.
And so you know, what we're seeing in our first
initial assessment out of Georgia, North Carolina, out of Arizona,
out of Pennsylvania, is that we're having a really good
response rate from the low propensity voters. Now here's the thing,
and I'm not going to try to throw any you know,

(01:18:44):
this is positive news, but I'll believe it when I
see it. I'm fully on board with the strategy. I
get it, Okay, ground game, knock on doors, make phone calls,
send out mailers, make sure that you get in front
of people and explain to them mistakes, because it's what
it comes down to. This isn't just about oh, you know,

(01:19:05):
we gotta we gotta get get people to like Trump.
This is about taking the people that already like Trump,
that already want Trump to win, and actually getting them
off their butts and going to vote. This is the
only reason, by the way, the only reason that I
am at least partially sympathetic to the to the concept
of mail in voting. I don't like it at all.
To be clear, Okay, I think that mail in voting,

(01:19:28):
early voting in general should be just for those who
can't get to the polls on election day. I think
that it should be one day of voting, and as
Vivek Gramaswami and others have said, make it a national holiday.
That makes sense. I mean, hey, it's this important. Everybody
get on vote. Let's make sure that we get the
polls cover. Let's make sure that we get make it

(01:19:48):
to where it's very easy for anybody who who may
have challenges voting. Let's let's make it easy for them.
And for those people that just absolutely positively cannot get
out to vote, let's give them an option to be
able to vote, but not in this whole Just mail
everybody as many ballots out as possible, and then that
way we can destroy the elections. But since it's already here,
since it's already happening, since mail in voting is already

(01:20:10):
a thing, then I guess fine, we have to take
advantage of it. If we're ever going to change it,
then we have to win. And if we're going to win,
we're going to have to take advantage of mail in ballots,
which means that finding these low propensity voters, especially when
the ballots go out, trying to get him as quickly
as possible, say hey, you know, it's probably sitting on

(01:20:31):
your kitchen counter. Why don't you go find it and
fill it out now and mail it in. You know,
just get that message out. You like Trump? Great, awesome
vote for him. Liking him ain't enough. Okay, they're not
mind readers, nobody really is. So so actually get out
there and make it happen again. I'll believe it when

(01:20:52):
I see it. It'd behooves him to say, yeah, you know,
we're seeing really good numbers, really good results. Wouldn't matter
what the results were. That's exactly what he would say,
I'm not calling him a liar. I'm just saying that
that's the narrative. Now let's actually do it. Let's make
sure that this actually happens. And it is at least
in part up to you and me to make sure
that this happens as well. Talking to our friends, our neighbors,

(01:21:13):
our relatives, our co workers, the guy at the laundromat.
Talk to them all. Find out Number one on they
sympathetic Trump. Number two. Explain to them what the stakes are.
Number three, tell them to go vote, and all for
help if you can, if you need to, you know,
especially with his mail inbouting. Look, if we're stuck with it,
might as well use it to our advantage. I can't

(01:21:35):
believe I'm saying that, but that's the truth. It's very
hard to be a Democrat lawmaker right now, especially if
you're an incumbent in a red state. It's almost impossible.
I would say Montana, Montana's finally going to get rid
of Tester. But if you're in a even a battleground
state or even a slightly blue or slightly red state,

(01:21:58):
if you're a Democrat, you're trying to somehow run simultaneously
with the with the specter of Joe Biden and the
current ominous whatever of Kamala Harris on your side of
the fence, that's challenging. And that's why it's no surprise
that Senator Bob Casey Junior out of Pennsylvania, I'm currently

(01:22:22):
in a heated battle against Dave McCormick, the Republican. He
is actually running started running ads that say that, hey,
I'm not with Joe Biden on certain things, and as
a matter of fact, I'm with Trump on certain things.
I backed Trump. It's like, what, You're a Democrat, what
are you saying? You don't really bet Trump? But he's
he's at least trying to position himselves. I'm the centrist.

(01:22:43):
You know, I bucked Biden over here and I supported
Trump over here. Well, Number one, Bob Casey is not
a centrist, Let's be clear about that. Number Two, he's
not a very good senator, never has been. And that's
not a partisan statement. He hasn't been a good senator
for Pennsylvania at all. Ever. Just that's how I feel.

(01:23:03):
But in this particular race, I think he's in deep
trouble because we're not just McCormick's doing well but Pennsylvania,
I believe, is quickly quickly turning redder and redder every day.
Here's an ad that he's running. You tell me this
sounds like somebody who's not terrified of the fact that
he's a Democrat in Pennsylvania.

Speaker 6 (01:23:23):
I'm a Republican and I'm a Democrat. Our marriage pure bliss.
But on politics, we just don't agree except for Bob Casey.

Speaker 1 (01:23:31):
He's independent, that's right.

Speaker 6 (01:23:33):
Casey's leading the effort to stop corporate greedflation and price gouging.
Casey bucked Biden to protect racking, and he's sided with
Trump to and NAFTA and put tariffs on China to
stop them from cheating. So in this house we agree
it's Bob Casey who's doing right by Pennsylvania.

Speaker 1 (01:23:50):
I'm Bob Casey, and I definitely approved this message. Poor
poor Bob Casey. Yeah, he's stuck in a state in
pennsylvani he is one of those states. I said earlier
that that Georgia was a state that should be deep read.
Pennsylvania is a state that should be read. I know
that it's East coast technically speaking, I know that, but
we're talking about working class people. I know, there was

(01:24:12):
a time when the Democrat Party at least pretended to
be for working class people, but I think that illusion
has been dissolved, especially when we consider everything that's happening
with the unions, everything that's happening with the Democrat Party
and the unions, everything that's happening with organized labor in general.
I think people are finally starting to realize that, you
know what, maybe the best thing for the people is

(01:24:33):
freedom instead of being beholden to multiple layers. But that's
a discussion for for another time. We need Bob Casey
to lose, we need John Tester to lose, we need
a whole lot of well not a lot, We actually
all need a couple of Democrats to lose. And we
can't lose any of our Republican senators. Ted Cruz is

(01:24:54):
one in right now who's he's probably amongst those that
are most in jeopardy, and that's add testament to what's
happening in the state of Texas that he would even
be in jeopardy at all. So you know, we need
to we need to pad our potential advantage. I think
that we're going to win the Senate. I think the
Republican Party is going to take over the Senate. I'm

(01:25:16):
not excited about the possible Senate majority leaders, but at
least it's not going to be Mitch McConnell. God forbid it.
Don't let him come back and say, oh, well, you know,
I decided hopefully he's just gone. I just just just
get rid of Mitch McConnell all together. Let's just pretend
like that entire experiment was failed and was not pretended.
It was a failure and an old, old Beijing Mitch

(01:25:38):
needs to go. But that's the future. Today is the president,
and we need to get a strong majority. I'm not
just talking about a tie and hope that JD vance
to the tiebreaker. I'm saying we need to get fifty
two to fifty three Republican senators in there, and they
need to be good ones. And look, I'm not the
biggest fan of David McCormick, but compared to Bob Casey,

(01:25:59):
he is he is exponentially better. So so we'll we'll
stick with Day for a while. Another important race, and
I would say arguably the most important Senate race out
there right now, is happening in Arizona. Arizona is a
state that truly desperately needs carry Lake. She should be
the governor. But God has different plans for different different times.

(01:26:20):
And I would say that if Carrie Lake is able
to win and become a Senator, this may prove to
be actually better for the nation than if she were
governor of Arizona, where she technically should be. But now
she's running for Senate and she's in the midst of
some controversy. You've got you got her opponent who you know,

(01:26:40):
Ruben Diego, who who who walked out on his wife,
served her divorce papers when she was nine months pregnant
just before Christmas. It's a lot of people like her.
A lot of people are rightly thinking, wow, what a
terrible This shouldn't be the type of person that we
have have representing us. But then there's a lot of people,
especially corporate media's out there saying, well, Carrie Lake should

(01:27:04):
apologize for for pushing out this nothing burger. You know,
nobody cares about whether a man has served divorce papers
to his nine month pregnant wife just before Christmas, blindsiding
her and sending her entire family and into disarrange so
that he could go do whatever he was going to do. No,
that's not a big deal. We don't care about his character.
We just care that he's a Democrat. We just love democrats. Yeah,

(01:27:30):
that's the that's corporate media in America in twenty twenty four.
And that's the another reason I covered earlier why the
media landscape is changing. Praise God for that. Hopefully it'll
change much faster. But let's play Carrie Lake's response to
a reporter asking about whether or not she should apologize,

(01:27:50):
which obviously she should not.

Speaker 7 (01:27:54):
Name, and who you're with, Ron Hanson with the Arizona Republic, Carrie.
Yesterday the divorce files that you had wanted unsealed for
some period of time were released. The reaction seemed to
be generally this was confirming a story that was known
years ago. You have said that this was going to

(01:28:15):
be very revelatory about Reuben Diego. They are asking for
an apology. Your reflections on that case and how you've
discussed it previously.

Speaker 2 (01:28:25):
I'm not sure why I should apologize. I didn't walk
out on anybody. I didn't leave my spouse in a
vulnerable state. I don't know what I think. Actually, he
probably should apologize for his behavior, and it's unfortunate that,
you know, nobody's really been covering this. It's unfortunate. I

(01:28:47):
found out that the person responsible for trying to get
these records was a reporter from probably twenty five hundred
and thirty three thousand miles away. Not one of you guys.
Dug into that. He was the first one to start
talking about his divorce, and when a reporter said I
would like to fact check what he said and went
to look for the divorce records, which almost in every

(01:29:09):
case are public, he found out they were sealed, and
so that reporter started digging and said, I'd like to
find out why these are sealed, and a judge agreed,
because he's running for public office, they should not be sealed.
And I had so many really strange messages from many
of you yesterday. They came into our campaign office. There's

(01:29:30):
nothing here, you said that there is a nothing burger.
What's the big deal? What's the big deal? A man
walks out on his wife, serves her divorce papers, broadsides her.
She has no idea this is coming. You know, I
just imagine you know that happened to my daughter if
she was pregnant. And we're days away from expecting our

(01:29:50):
grand baby. And she calls me and I think she's
going to be calling me about some cute little outfit
she might have found. And she's crying and says that
her husband is leaving her, she's just a few days
away from giving birth, serves her with divorce papers right
before Christmas. I'm sorry that you guys don't think that's
a big deal. I think that's a pretty big deal.

(01:30:11):
It tells me a lot about the character of that man.
She had no idea what was coming hit her like
a ton of bricks. She had to go in and
deliver that baby alone. And you and the media think
it's no big deal. You haven't even covered it. If
I had something that revealed such a massive character flaw
like that, you guys should be all over it. It's

(01:30:32):
really sad. It's despicable. The media is so in bed
with the Democrats right now. It's really shocking. I think
there's a time for soul searching. The time is now, guys.

Speaker 1 (01:30:44):
Carrie Lake is arguably my favorite overall politician because she's
not a politician. She hasn't served in public office yet.
But what about Toald trumpled about all these other people
I'm not saying that I agree with one hundred percent
of her policies. I just enjoy when she goes after
the press or when she goes after Democrats. She's just
good at it. Okay. Her time as a reporter, as

(01:31:07):
an anchor, her time in the media has prepared her
for a time such as this, and I would love
to see her taking on battles in Washington, DC. You know,
of all the Republican races that we could win, that's
the one that I'm desperately hoping that we really do
finally win and use that to back control of the Senate.
Lord Willing. I will be back very soon with another episode,
But in the meantime, you all stay strong, stay safe,

(01:31:30):
and God bless. For the last oh four years, coincidentally
lining up with the Biden Harris regime, for the last
four years, it has made sense to a whole bunch
of Americans to move their wealth or their retirement over
to physical precious metals. This is a good, good thing, okay,

(01:31:52):
And I'm not a financial advisor. I'm not giving you
financial advice, just telling you that it's happening. A lot
of Americans are doing it, and they know why. The
doing it between dedollarization, inflation, the potential for recession, everything
that's going on, the turmoil that's going to come with
the presidential election, regardless of who wins, by the way,

(01:32:12):
there's going to be economic turmoil before, during, and after
the election. We know this is this is coming. So
a lot of people are trying to find the higher
ground of physical pressures metals. The challenge there is that
not all gold companies are made the same. Look. I
know that you might seem like the art. It seems like, oh,
everybody's got their their conservative commentators that promote them. The
difference between me and these other conservative commentators and show

(01:32:36):
hosts and whatever is that I actually did my research,
and unfortunately, I've come to the conclusion that the others
once could not have because if they did, many of them,
not one hundred percent, but a lot of them, if
they did their research, if they knew exactly what they
were promoting, there was no way they would they would
touch these companies to the ten foot pull. A lot
of these companies are promoting they're they're gold and silver,

(01:32:57):
but they're doing so at huge markups. I mean we're
talking and sometimes over one hundred percent markup on the
gold and silver they're putting into gold Iras. I work
with a faith driven company, Genesis Gold Group, and they
do not charge enormous premiums on top of the gold
in order to get you your ten thousand dollars in

(01:33:17):
free silver or whatever gimmick is being pushed. They just
deal with you directly, honestly, from a faith driven perspective.
This is the only company I've ever seen in the
industry that actually will sit there and pray with you.
So check them out see if they can help you.
Go to rumblegold dot com, rumblegold dot com and see
what Genesis Gold Group can do for you today.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}What If It's a Tie? Plus Chutkan, Senate Chances, and Leftist Threats

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

What If It's a Tie? Plus Chutkan, Senate Chances, and Leftist Threats

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal