Prostate Cancer, Political Cover-ups, and Presidential Policies (Ep. 80)

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Unknown (01:09):
Alrighty,
hey folks,
it is
Monday,
May the nineteenth of twenty twenty five at 07:05PM
Central Texas time,
and this
is the Joe Rooz Show.
Folks,
we got a lot to talk about.

(01:32):
A whole lot of stuff to talk about tonight.
And we're gonna get to it here in just a couple of minutes.
Amazing weekend.
A lot of stuff went down this weekend. We had a lot of, a lot of really interesting stories that have popped up

(01:53):
in the news cycle.
Thought it was gonna be a quiet weekend. I thought Monday was gonna be a quiet Monday.
But alas, my friends, no.
No. No. No.
But, of course, as always, before we get into all that mess,
how was your weekend?

(02:14):
What'd you guys getting up doing?
Did you have a good one?
Was it nice and relaxing?
Mine was somewhat relaxing. Saturday was really nice. Got a lot of stuff done around,
around the the old abode.
Changed a few things around here on the studio.
Like, what's in front of me at least. And I got more to do too.

(02:38):
Try to make it a little bit more comfortable for me, and, so far, it seems to be working alright. I hope it, hope it look it's working better for you too, because I I actually had to move the mic a little bit further away.
So,
so I'm not sure if it's picking up as, clearly as it had before with it right smack in front of my face. And, I got more stuff to do too. We're gonna be getting to that later.

(03:02):
But,
then Sunday Sunday was a nice day. Just just kinda hung out here around around the house, did some cleaning,
had,
had some guests
that,
was quite interesting to say to say the least.
But,
it was a lot of fun. And,

(03:23):
and, of course, you know, being a being a a Sicilian
from an from New York,
I had to make my, my sundae sauce,
my sugo,
which came out
spectacular
as usual. I mean, I
you you don't expect anything less. It's from me at least anyway, because I am a phenomenal cook.

(03:45):
And,
you know, I I sometimes I even amaze myself if I could, you know, kinda pat myself on the back a little bit.
But, no. I'm I'm kidding. I'm not.
I'm okay. I'm not great, but
we're getting better. And I and I and I wanna I do that in memory of of mom and and my grandmother and
my dad and everything because, you know, they they were

(04:07):
phenomenal cook. Well, my dad, not so much. My my mom and my grandmother were phenomenal cooks.
So, I learned a lot from them. So so every Sunday, I do my my traditional of late, anyway, my traditional
Italian Sunday dinner.
But, and it it was good. It came out really good. You know, the sauce, and we had some involtini, and we did some, tortellini for the pasta.

(04:28):
It was good. It was good. But, I hope you guys had a great weekend, and I hope you guys, you know, were really paying attention to what was going on out there in the world.
Some really interesting things, and, you know, we're gonna pretty much stick to,
one specific story
mostly through the show tonight
because it is big and, you know, there's there's some debate

(04:51):
out there, you know, is this is this a story? Is this something that we should be hanging on to and and talking about and,
you know, making a deal over?
Or is this something that we should just move on, you know, just make a mention of it and and move on to other things? But,
I think it's pretty significant,
because it just highlights

(05:12):
a lot of the issues that took place with the previous administration
and
a lot of the things that we had talked about with the previous administration.
So, we're gonna we're gonna spend some time talking about it tonight. So I and I so I hope you're you're okay with that.
Just let me know what you think in the comments. Drop one down below, something in the live chat if you like, or you can email me, as usual, just let me know what you're thinking. Alright? But, of course, before we get into any of that, we're gonna do our usual housekeeping. So if you would just head over to our website, joeroos.com.

(05:43):
It's right there up on your screen, joeroos.com
and, open up the web form. Let me know any comments, questions, cares, concerns that you have there and, we'll do the very best we can to address that. Now if you don't wanna use the web form, totally cool with me. You could always just email me directly at info@joeroos.com.

(06:03):
You could also
look for the support page, which is incredibly important to us. You know, I I hate having to bring it up all the time, but we are very dependent upon our listeners for support to help keep this thing going.
You know, we don't have any sponsors,
right now. No corporate sponsorships or anything like that.

(06:24):
There might be sometime down the road. There might be a need for it sometime down the road, you know, if if our,
if our donations don't go up,
because, you know, we gotta pay for this. And, this is, you know, sometimes, you know, we need the extra inflow
of of money. So,
we really do depend upon
our listeners though, because we don't wanna, you know, we don't wanna have commercials, if if you know what I mean. Like, we don't wanna have, you know, stop the show, run a commercial, come back, you know, from that.

(06:52):
You know, I don't mind doing a read, you know, during the show. That's fine. That just takes a minute or two.
But,
you know,
we don't wanna be obligated to running commercials.
So
and of and we absolutely do not
want to put anything behind a paywall
either. So,
that was an option. I was talking to a to a to a buddy of mine about that, and, I really don't wanna do that. I'm

(07:17):
not a fan of doing paywalls mostly because I think
on the whole, a lot of people are,
you know, they have subscription fatigue is what I call it. You know, you gotta subscribe to this to get that. You gotta subscribe to this. You gotta subscribe to that. You know? And it's the same thing also, like, with some of the new sites that I that I go to, you know, they'll only show you a paragraph and or barely half of a paragraph. They want you to subscribe

(07:43):
to the to the to the to the whole site, you know, just to get access and it's not something you use on
an everyday basis.
You know, it's
so if you have a
a $4 subscription
here, a $10 subscription there, you have, you know, it it adds up And it it it can get pretty expensive. So,

(08:04):
and then add to that, you have the, you know, the subscription fees for the platforms and for your hosts and your, you know, service providers and all that stuff. It it just gets to be a lot. So keeping that in mind and subscription fatigue in mind,
I don't wanna do that. I don't wanna put anything behind a paywall. I think all the information that we put out there should remain, you know, publicly accessible to everybody.

(08:26):
And, you know, if we can continue to fund it with donations, then we we we would we wanna do that. We don't really wanna get
too
much into,
again, paywalls and,
advertisers and and so on and so forth. But,
if we have to, we'll we'll do that. You know, try to keep this whole mess going.

(08:47):
So, anyway, I'll I'll find a rabbit trail there.
But you can help us out through donations.
You can do a one time donation any amount. You could also do a monthly recurring donation in any amount. You could subscribe to one of our there's that word. You could, you could sign up for one of those,
producer tiers that we have. We have our associate producer tier for $17.76

(09:09):
a month.
We have our associate we have our producer tier for $18.36
a month, and then we have our executive producer tiers, plural,
at $25 a month and $50 a month. Now the benefits are basically,
all the producer tiers get the shout out on every show included in all the show notes that go out and also,

(09:29):
mentioned in all of the documentation we send out, any emails or or whatnot.
And then we also have at the, at the executive producer level, the executive producers also get to schedule a segment with us live on the show. So you get to be a guest, so to speak, on the show and come on and have a chat with us and talk about the news of the day, whatever's on your mind, whatever you're thinking about. And, that's always a lot of fun and we look forward to doing that a lot more frequently. We're gonna be booking up with we're gonna be booking a date very, very soon with our executive producer, Wayne and Rosanna Rankin. And, so we're gonna be excited about doing that very, very shortly.

(10:05):
And then, of course, at the $50
executive producer level, you get all of the all of that stuff, the shout out, the inclusion of notes,
emails, any documentation we send out, the scheduling a show scheduling a date with us on the show to be a guest, but you also
get a free podcast t shirt.

(10:26):
So,
you know, different little benefits for everybody. So just take a look at it whichever one is best for you. We we ask that you sign up for it and, we would really really appreciate that.
But again, like I said, you don't have to. You could do a one time donation. We appreciate that.
Also,
if you wanna donate, cryptocurrencies,
we,
will very happily

(10:47):
take any, any
any Satoshis, which is a micropayment of Bitcoin,
and also a new crypto that's out there that is growing very quickly.
And,
since, since I since I started purchasing it, the price has almost doubled or at least a little bit more than doubled,
over the last couple of weeks, and so we're excited about that. And that's TEXIT Coin, and you can find the, QR code for that up on our website. And, of course, if you want more information on TEXIT Coin, just visit texitcoin.org.

(11:20):
That's where I get all my information from, and it's,
really, it's it's an up and coming, cryptocurrency, so you should definitely check that out. Don't miss out on these things. You know, look at Bitcoin is a hundred thousand
is, yeah, a hundred thousand dollars for one Bitcoin now when I remember Bitcoin started out as just, like like, $5 for one coin, and everybody kinda sloughed it off and, you know,

(11:43):
didn't really jump on it. Now I kinda kick myself for it because, you know, it would have been nice
to be holding Bitcoin right now at a hundred grand a coin.
So,
but, Satoshis are, like I said, a micro payment of Bitcoin, and really, that's, like, pennies on the on the on the coin. So,
you could you could easily send those over to us or Texacoin.
We prefer the Texacoin, to be quite honest.

(12:05):
Alright. So that those are the ways that you can help us out. You could also help us out by liking, subscribing, following, sharing the show with all your friends, your family, and your followers across all of your social media platforms. You could also help us out by heading over to our,
to our affiliate site at the alexjonesstore.com
and using our link right there, the alexjonesstore.com/joe.

(12:28):
You can get yourself in on some of these great vitamins and supplements,
and, every purchase that you make on the alexjonesstore.com/joe.
10 percent of your purchase comes right back here to the show, and, we really do appreciate all the folks that have been, making purchases through the alexjonesstore.com/joe.
So thanks for and for the person who ordered the, the ultra methylene blue today, thank you so much for that. You're really gonna like that.

(12:53):
I tape mine every day, and, it is just really, really
powerful. So just make sure you moderate it as you take
it. Alright.
And, let's see. It is that time, folks. So what we're gonna do is, we're gonna say goodbye to the folks on YouTube, Twitch, and x,
and, encourage you to come on over to the, to to Rumble. Just head over to the App Store on your phone. Download the Rumble app. It is free.

(13:18):
Sign up for free,
and, you can follow the show at, Joe Ruse. So just look for us there. Alright. Well,
having said all of that, we are going to say goodbye
to the folks on YouTube, Twitch,
and x, and we will see you
tomorrow if you don't follow us over to Rumble. Alright. Talk to you soon. Take care, folks.

(13:44):
Alright. So let's give that a second for some of the folks that come on over. I'll grab some of my coffee here.
I'm using a different cup, but I'm not used to it.
I can't find my tuxed cup. I found my glasses, though,
but I can't find my tuxed cup. So,
we're gonna make do with this one,

(14:04):
which is fine because that's one of mom's.
So,
you know,
we always like using those things.
And,
I got my, my baby right here, ready to go, just in case. You never know.
Right? Always gotta be prepared.
Alright.
Well, let's see. Now that,

(14:26):
I've given everybody enough time to get on over here, let's, let's take a look and see what's going on
and what took place over the weekend
in the news.
Okay.
Well, like I said before, if you've been
following anything going on this weekend,

(14:49):
We learned this weekend that,
the,
former vice president Joe Biden,
has been diagnosed with an advanced
form of prostate cancer.
Now,
and a rapidly spreading and aggressive

(15:13):
prostate cancer.
Now here's the thing,
and, I got a lot
got a lot of a lot I got a lot of video clips that we're gonna we're gonna look at here. So we're gonna just take kinda take our time
as we go through this, and, we're also gonna take a look at some of the things that have come out about the,

(15:38):
about the, the former vice president's
mental status
throughout the presidency because
we now have access to some of the,
the Robert Herr recordings,
that had taken place,
when they were deposing him,
regarding his, possession of classified material.

(16:01):
So, which is very, very, very revealing.
But,
according to US news here, not only did Joe Biden
or not only did the Joe Biden White House and presidential campaign cover up his deteriorating mental abilities,
but, with the announcement that came up over this weekend about,

(16:24):
that he has been he's been diagnosed with stage
four prostate cancer.
It's pretty obvious that the Democrats
also hid that from the public throughout his term. And the reason why I say that is because prostate cancer
is well, you know, first of all, you know,

(16:45):
men have go for regular checks once, I think, you hit 50. I think it is you gotta go for a check every, you know, quite well. And I forget the,
I
forget the,
the amount of time in between checks, but but you have to go regularly for for these checks because as you get older, the possibility of, of coming down with, prostate cancer, of course, increases.

(17:11):
So
at the age of 80,
at the end of his presidency,
Joe Biden had to be going for regular exams and regular physicals. Now, of course, you know, at at the, presidential level, you know, the the the quality of health care you would think would be,

(17:33):
top of the game,
if we could put it that way.
Maybe you could find a better way to to phrase it, but but top of the game. You know, the best you can get.
The best health care, the best treatments, the best everything you can possibly get, you would get as the president of The United States.
Well,

(17:56):
apparently,
the doctors that the president
had been
seeing,
didn't fully disclose
the conditions. Because again, prostate cancer is something, it's very common,
it's very treatable,

(18:17):
but
it moves very very slowly.
So you're not going to just one day come down with stage four prostate cancer.
And,
and on on the Gleason scale, he he's at an a level he's at stage nine on the Gleason scale. Now, now if you don't know what that means, that's that basically means that it's gotten to into his bones,

(18:43):
which, you know, once it gets into your bones, that's it. It's
it's it's not gonna be treated by conventional methods,
and,
it's
more than likely it's a terminal situation.
And,
so so he's been diagnosed with now stage four

(19:04):
prostate cancer and he's done and it's at a
stage nine on on the Gleason scale.
That folks, that just doesn't happen overnight.
That's something
that takes time.

(19:26):
Chances are
chances are Joe Biden had
this,
had prostate cancer
possibly even before
he was
installed as as president
back in 2020.

(19:49):
That's a possibility.
It could have developed,
you know, maybe six months, a year after that, and, you know, over the four years of of his
alleged
administration.
You know,
it it could have progressed,
but that's information that should have been made known to the public.

(20:14):
But it wasn't. It was hidden from the public, just like his his, mental decline was hidden
from the public,
even though it really wasn't, because it was on full display.
But the denials from the Democratic party, the the denials from the folks in the mainstream media, the denials of the people that surrounded him, you know, trying to make basically the American people look like they didn't, you know, that they were fools.

(20:45):
So this is this folks, this is this is extremely
troubling.
Extremely troubling.
Now,
now,
doctor
who do we have first here?
I think we have doctor Emmanuel
first.
Try to expand this out.

(21:06):
Yeah. So first, we have the first clip we have is about a two minute clip
from, doctor Zeke Emanuel, who, joined up with Joe Scarborough, which, by the way,
Joe's we're we're gonna come to some quotes from from Joe Scarborough a little bit later on.
But
Joe Scarborough has been one of the the the main

(21:27):
culprits
in,
in in covering up and and providing cover for Joe Biden
and for the Democrats and and the last administration.
But, here's Joe Scarborough and doctor Zeke doctor
Zeke Emanuel
on, MSNBC's
Morning Joe.

(21:52):
You believe it is likely
if this prostate cancer has spread to the bone
that he could have had
it for up to a decade, but certainly it's likely would it be fair to say it's likely to have had this,
for,
at least,
several years?

(22:12):
Oh, more than several years. You don't get,
prostate cancer.
So I I can I I just I just wanna stop you? So yours you this is this is not speculation.
If you have prostate cancer that is spread to the bone, then he's most certainly,
you are saying, had it when he was president of The United States.
Oh, yeah.

(22:33):
He did not develop it in the last,
hundred, two hundred days. He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency,
in 2021.
Yes. That, I don't think there's any disagreement about that.
So And and and and I I'm I'm just curious again if your

(22:55):
if your,
doctor to
a president of The United States that is a male,
that is an older man,
would
a prostate test and again, we're we're we're just talking about a PSA screening, a blood test
that you could do along with all the other blood tests. And so it's not even that it would be intrusive.

(23:18):
Would would would this not be one of the first tests that you would conduct
as a White House doctor?
If you're a White House doctor in this situation,
I think,
you would certainly discuss it with, the president and talk about the pros and cons.
I think if you then ask, well, if, president Biden says, well, if I'm your father, which has patients often do, you know, what would you recommend?

(23:44):
I think the fact is that most White House doctors would recommend
getting the test.
And again, the evidence is look at president,
Obama, president Bush, younger than president Biden,
and, they both got the test.
Now also and and and that's very that's very telling too, by the way, that,

(24:07):
again, this is a slow progressing cancer. This is not something that's just gonna magically overnight, boom, boom, boom, boom, appear
as a stage four g nine
in the bones.
That's that that is just impossible.
Now, also,
doctor Vin Gupta also,

(24:29):
spoke with Joe Scarborough and said that it is highly unlikely
that White House doctors did not check Biden for prostate cancer.
But then he also said something something else that was very interesting. So let's let's go to that clip. This is, Joe Scarborough and doctor Vin Gupta as well.
Going to,

(24:49):
run
a % accurate, and I've never met a doctor.
You have a little problem here with the video, so let me let me start that. Let me back it up here. Let me restart it.
You believe it is likely

(25:11):
going to
run for for president for another four years.
Obviously, the PSA exam is not a % accurate, and I've never met a doctor
that doesn't say you needed to do the PSA exam and also
have the physical exam as well. I just find it hard to believe that any White House physician

(25:34):
wouldn't say, okay. Well, what my doctor, what every other doctor says, which is, okay. We we've done the PSA test, and that's fine. But at least once a year, we we need to do a physical exam. Again, if you're just talking
about a 78 year old guy that,
is is not running the free world, that's one thing. But if you're a White House physician

(25:55):
and you have any any man over 40 years old, are you not going to at least say, hey, once a year, like every other physician says, once a year,
we need we need to do a physical
exam and check because this is like one of the leading causes,
you know, one of the leading sicknesses for men 40.
Yeah. I mean, Joe, I think a %.

(26:17):
And, you know, did they do a digital rectal exam to to to assess his prostate?
Again, typically, that's done in the presence of symptoms. To your point, he's the leader of the free world. Did they do it and not characterize it?
It's it's hard to know. We're speculating here. I would say in an abundance of caution, probably if you're holistic and comprehensive, that would make sense.
It is interesting to note that president Trump's, president Obama's, and president and president Bush the second,

(26:44):
in their most recent physicals,
in their terms of authors, obviously, 2025 for president Trump, did comment
on their PSA levels. And so they got screened while in office, and they commented on it. It's not easy to access the most recent ones from president Biden. You can read the summary articles. You can't I couldn't access it on the archives in the White House just before I came on. But,

(27:08):
according to to those that were able to, there is not a report
of a PSA test on the most recent physical
that was read out for president Biden's last year in office. And so it's to say what was done, what was not done. You and I would be speculating, but
other three most recent occupants of the White House
had it drawn, and it was reported out in the case of president.

(27:29):
So,
so doctor Gupta very interestingly said as well that that he was denied access
to president Biden's or former vice president Biden's,
medical records.
So that should that I find that to be very, very interesting.

(27:52):
And then, Joe Scarborough also spoke to a a urologist by the name of doctor Shusterman.
And, Shusterman said that basically, it's very unusual
for a person to suddenly be diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer. So so this is the common consensus here that you're you're hearing from three in in this particular section, Eclipse, that I'm showing you. You're hearing from three,

(28:14):
very well known prominent,
doctors who are all saying basically the same thing,
that it is very unusual for a person to be suddenly diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer,
after after, you know, getting examinations
by the top

(28:35):
doctors
in the country.
I mean, to to to
to to be diagnosed with
a Gleason nine
stage of cancer.
With today's medical information and today's medical testing, it's it's it's it's it's virtually impossible.

(29:05):
So here's,
here's, a doctor Shusterman
speaking with, Joe Scarborough.
It's very unlikely that someone could get,
annual checkups and not notice a PSA elevation
over the past,
you know
but this is what I typically would see in a VA hospital

(29:27):
where a patient hasn't had medical attention in ten years,
presents to an emergency room with, bone pain, and then they find that it's metastatic prostate cancer.
But in the modern age of medicine,
especially
the fact that he was a former president,
He had intensive
state of the art,

(29:49):
you know, care where we can
see prostate cancer, you know, ten years in the past.
So this is, I mean, it's it's very unusual to hear that someone has prostate cancer where they're,
annually being followed up.
And the fact that
we just find it at a Gleason nine is just

(30:11):
pretty much unheard of in this day and age of medicine.
Even, in the, you know, even in the inner city populations, we've been seeing it as a Even in a medically neglected population,
it would be surprising to to have a surprise diagnosis diagnosis with a Gleason,
score of nine.
So you're saying that certainly as he was serving in the in in the Oval Office, you believe that he knew that that he had prostate cancer and even potentially as he was running in 2020 before he assumed office?

(30:42):
Well, most likely,
he had prostate cancer for a long time, and the,
aggressive prostate cancers such as this at age 80,
grows over a long period of time. I mean, usually, it takes, from the first diagnosis of prostate cancer
to the to spread,
would take,
five to ten years,

(31:02):
even in the most aggressive form.
It's just to me, it seems very surprising
that, it would the first diagnosis would be a metastatic diagnosis, especially Gleasonine cancer without
I mean, I I would like him to get a

(31:26):
see what it was. I I mean, I'm talking
as I would like to have And and it is not it is It is not standard. We were looking for a PSA score to be released as part of these public, presidential health reports. We didn't get Trump's most recently either. I wanna ask very quickly. So much has been made of his, apparent cognitive decline.

(31:46):
Is there a possibility that neither the cancer itself or any treatments he was undergoing in secret
could affect cognitive function, of a person?
Yeah. Absolutely. Because what happens is is when, when prostate cancer becomes,
like, say, you get treated for prostate cancer and then the,
prostate cancer recurs, what you would do is you would start someone on

(32:09):
a,
kind of a a testosterone blocking hormone such as Lupron.
And, because,
Lupron acts to lower your testosterone, it gives you kind of, like, symptoms of depression,
lower energy,
fatigue.
So there's there's a lot of things that go with being on Lupron treatment. So Lupron is

(32:31):
is a class of medicine that just,
castrates,
you know, chemically castrates
someone so that the prostate cancer doesn't spread.
And so Lupron,
was likely used in in in,
Joe Biden. So so to be very clear, you believe he was silently,
secretly battling this for at least five years?

(32:55):
Well, I think that's yet to be seen. I I mean, it would be very surprising, like I said earlier, for him to have,
prostate cancer
at least in nine spread to bone without,
you know, you know, without being neglected medically.
So the fact that he was seen medically every year,
it's just very surprising. I mean, his PSA must be over 50 at this point,

(33:18):
if not a lot more just because of, bone mets,
you know, is is a sign that it's very aggressive and spreading to other parts of the body. So,
I think there's there's definitely evidence that he probably knew about this for a while.
So
this is

(33:42):
again, he he's he's known about this. This is this is something that they have known about for a long time. That's that's the long and short of the whole thing,
and,
you know, of course,
you know, he brings up the the the whole thing with medication, you know, that it could have affected his cognitive,
abilities.

(34:05):
Maybe. Maybe it contributed to it. You know, I I I firmly believe that
that Joe Biden is and has been dealing with Parkinson's. He's been dealing with dementia.
And,
you know, I look, I'm not an expert on these things, but I I do work, you know, in in a in a care facility that has,

(34:26):
that has a memory care unit
where you have dementia patients and I don't I don't listen, there's a lot of things that that I see on an everyday basis that remind me of some of the behavior patterns that you see in Joe Biden as as he while he's been in office and since.
Again, I'm not a doctor. I'm not an expert in these things. I'm just going off of what I've seen in my observations.

(34:50):
Now,
earlier today,
today being Monday,
Carolyn Levitt, at a press conference,
answered a couple of questions from,
from, Peter Ducey.
And,
you know, he basically, you know, the the the main question is, you know, is is president Trump worried about or is the or is the administration worried about, you know, the expertise level of the doctors,

(35:19):
you know, at the White House since they, you know, allegedly didn't identify
Biden's,
cancer.
Follow-up on former president Biden.
White House doctors may have missed the early stages of his prostate cancer. So

(35:40):
is president Trump worried about the quality of care that presidents get here?
Not as far as president Trump is concerned. The, White House physician we have here is phenomenal, and the team of physicians that take care of the president, particularly at Walter Reed Medical Center, are great. The president had his physical recently, as you know, he had, perfect results. He's in very good shape. I think those of you who traveled to The Middle East with us last week can attest to the president's endurance.

(36:08):
And by the way, I will add, we returned home from a very long and tiring trip last week.
And on Saturday, where was the president? In the Oval Office working all day. He doesn't stop. He doesn't quit. He's in great health, and he trusts his physicians. Two more things.
So,
and and absolutely right. Because
I I remember watching the news and seeing the president and in the White House, in the Oval Office on Saturday, following the trip. Now and and it's great, you know, you know, president Trump has has been very transparent. The administration itself has been extremely transparent

(36:41):
with pretty much everything
that, that that's been going on whether it's, policy or or in his in this case, his personal health.
So,
so but this is this these are the questions that are gonna be asked going forward.
And, you know, I was thinking
and I I remember back.
How many of you how many of you remember

(37:02):
when
Joe
Biden had given
it was back in 02/2022.
He was having a press conference, and he and he was talking about pollution. He was talking about,
you know, environmental concerns.
And he said something very interesting and and,

(37:25):
and generally what happened is a lot of the,
the media especially, you know, the lap dog media covering up for the administration,
and the administration themselves, you know,
said, oh, no. He just made a mistake. It was just another gaffe. It was just, you know,
a misplaced memory, whatever it was they said.
But how many of you remember this?

(37:48):
And because it was a four lane highway
that was accessible,
my mother drove us and rather than us be able to walk.
And guess what?
The first frost, you know what was happening.
It had to put on their windshield wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window.
That's why I and so damn many other people I grew up have cancer.

(38:10):
And why can't for the longest time, Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
Alright. So did you catch what he said there?
He said that's why I
and so many damn other people have cancer.
So my question is,
and that's 02/2022,

(38:32):
was that a was that a a slip of the lip?
You know, was
he
what was it a mistake in the in the in the way he phrased
the statement,
or

(38:54):
was he telling people
that
he had cancer
in 02/2022?
So three years ago.
And he has, in fact, been dealing with this since then.

(39:15):
And then also, I don't know if you maybe you don't remember this.
I I remember this.
His one of his younger brothers, Frank Biden, made a a very interesting statement,
that was reported
on by the by the mainstream news.
And,
and I remember when I when I heard it,

(39:39):
you know, it it to me, it's it sounded like,
you know, the kind of statement you would make when when someone is
on their deathbed or or or terminally ill and and, you know,
stepping out of the public eye.

(39:59):
So I wanna play this for you. It's about two minutes. Alright? This was on, CBS, I believe.
This is what Frank Biden had to say, and they're they're actually reading the statement. So
CBS
News had a brief conversation with Frank Biden,

(40:19):
one of President Biden's two younger brothers, and here's what he told us. He said, I'm incredibly proud of my brother. Selfishly,
I will have him back to enjoy whatever time we have left.
He is a genuine hero.
Country over self
sounds corny in our cynical political environment, but he nor I are cynical. The goal remains the same, defeat Trump and continue the work that Joe has done. My hope is that our party rallies around this heroic act. We asked him

(40:49):
whether he feels that his brother's overall health and vitality
played a major role in this decision,
role in this decision and calling his brother a hero for making the decision to pass the torch to Kamala Harris.

(41:14):
So, Nancy, sorry, can you clarify that that the family is saying his health was or was not a factor?
He's saying that in his humble opinion,
yes. The president's
health and vitality
played a considerable role in his decision. It's important to note, Frank Biden is not speaking for the family writ large. This was simply a conversation between

(41:37):
CBS News and Frank Biden.
Unclear
how,
much input he had in this decision, but he says that says that he believes that his brother's health did play a role, and he says that the goal remains the same to defeat Donald Trump.
Well well, that is notable because today, the family, the White House, the establishment

(41:58):
has rejected the premise that there was anything,
that was challenging the the president's
mental acuity or his health,
and that all these accusations were baseless, that it was just
age and a a few, you know, difficult nights like he had on the debate stage. So that is a change in message.

(42:18):
Yeah. Now do you remember that?
I I do remember that. And,
you know, again, it made me think that, wow, you know what? There there is
a real issue here with his health that, you know, it sounds like he's
not expected to survive much longer,
and

(42:39):
and that and that was the the motivating factor for him to, withdraw from
the, from the race.
So
again and that was in 02/2023.
Right? Yeah. 02/2023
during the campaign.
Oh, 02/2024.
I'm sorry. 02/2024.

(43:00):
So
02/2022,
Joe Biden makes
this slip of the lip that where he says, you know, that that where he and others have can't had cancer because of these environmental
things, you know. And, you know, maybe some people took it as, you know, you know, yeah. It's just Joe Biden. He's, you know, spinning another tale about, you know, trying to tie something tie himself into something with with policy and, you know,

(43:26):
as he has done.
But
did he actually
slip of the lip,
tell everybody that he had cancer
in 02/2022,
withdraws from the race in 02/2024?
Frank Biden, his younger brother, making it seem like, you know, this is it. This is the end of the line. And I'm not laughing that it's funny because it's it's it's a horrible thing.

(43:55):
You know?
When you're dealing with somebody at the end of their life, it's it's, you know, it it it's hard. It's painful.
But the problem here is is the covering up of the whole thing. That's the main issue.

(44:17):
The administration
knew.
The family knew
that he has been sick
and have covered it up. They knew that he had cognitive
issues.
It was
obvious

(44:38):
to everyone
to everyone
that there was an issue, there was a problem here.
And yet the administration,
the mainstream media,

(45:05):
the Democratic Party,
all of these organiz all of these people, all of these organizations.
Did everything they could to gaslight you.
And if that's the case,

(45:26):
do you remember that whole story about the auto pen and all of the pardons that were issued and signed by auto pen and policies that were issued,
and and and laws that were signed by auto pen?
Well, that kinda opens that whole thing up now too, doesn't it?

(45:50):
Earlier today, I saw on truth social and I also saw on x and other posts say stating that,
that, they have
identified the people behind the auto pen
and that we should be expecting to see subpoenas very soon. Well, I I'll believe that when I see it.

(46:11):
The current DOJ under Pam Bondi is not
really
all that impressive.
Still waiting for the Epstein information and the files and
arrests. You know? We still have Doge with all of the,
waste, fraud, and abuse that they've uncovered. Still have yet to see anybody being held accountable for it.

(46:33):
But yet, you know, there's Pam Bondi rolling through all of her, public appearances on
Fox News.
Maybe there's a reason for it. I don't know. But it's another story.
We're not gonna get to that,
tonight.

(46:53):
Or maybe we will. I don't know. We'll see. But
you understand what I'm what I'm saying here. You see where I'm going with this. The cover up is the issue. The cover up is the story,
not the fact that he has cancer.
You know? And and look, I I don't I may not like
Joe Biden's policies or his political stance or the things that we know about him and his personal life and, you know, I may not even like him as a person.

(47:26):
But I feel terrible that this man has been dealing with this.
And these people that had that have been that have surrounded him had been carting him out. This is this is abuse.
This is elder abuse.
Again, not laughing that it's funny, just laughing at at the at the irony of the whole thing. He

(47:48):
so it's the people that and especially his wife,
doctor
Jill Biden,
propping him up
knowing that this man has been sick. He's been dealing with cancer. He's been dealing with cognitive decline. He's been dealing with dementia, Parkinson's.

(48:11):
There's a very interesting clip that I came across,
Jake Tapper
over on CNN,
with Van Jones, and I think it was David Axelrod.

(48:33):
Say what you will about Van Jones.
He's he's not a dumb guy.
You know? He he's he's a pretty smart guy, and and
he knows what he's talking about. I don't agree with him politically, but
I I honestly think he's starting to come around a little bit, and he's starting to see and he's a very powerful voice in the Democratic party. Don't don't

(48:55):
don't misunderstand me on that, and don't mistake that fact. He is not,
you know, somebody who just stands on the sidelines. This man is very, very connected with the Democratic National Party
and, you know, he is very much involved with policy. He is very much involved with their king making process.
So
when you hear him say things like on the clip that I'm gonna play for you right now,

(49:24):
you know that there that that this this whole thing is shaking up and rattling the Democratic Party.
So let's take a listen.
You were on the record in 02/2022
voicing concerns about Biden's,
age and ability.
Whom do you blame,
for the decision of him to run for reelection
and the decision to hide his declining abilities as much as they were able to?

(49:52):
Well, look, at the at the top end, you have to blame him because he made the decision, but he was and your book reflects this, in many different ways. He was shielded
by a of advisers and his family. They were into this confirmation bubble,
and, they shielded they tried to shield the world from his decline, and they tried to shield him from his own standing in his polling numbers and so on. And so I at the end of the day, I I I have to point the finger at the people around him who didn't do him a service

(50:28):
by encouraging him to continue.
I think it was obvious to the public. May not have been obvious to a lot of politicians. I actually think it was, but it wasn't politically,
it it wasn't politically wise in their judgment to speak out. But it was obviously American people even before that debate
that,
the president was just too old. He would have been closer to 90 than 80,

(50:51):
if he had won reelection, and he already was showing
decline. So,
I I blame the people around him because real loyalty
in and it's hard when you work for president Jake to tell them hard truths. But real loyalty demanded that they say, mister president,
it's just not there and it's not in your interest, and it's better for you, the country, and the Democratic party if you, if you leave now.

(51:17):
Van, I remember how emotional you were in the immediate moments after the 06/27/2024
debate
because of what you saw
on the stage.
And with all this new reporting coming out, and I should disclose that I gave both of you copies of the book so you would have a little bit more information.
Do you feel like you were duped, Van? Like, what how do you feel?

(51:42):
First, this this book is extraordinary.
I don't care who you are, left, right, or otherwise.
Anybody who cares about this country and about just the dynamics of of power,
this is the
emperor's new clothes
playing itself out in real time. Everybody
knew,
but everyone was afraid to say, except for Dave David Axelrod

(52:05):
for two years, that something was wrong here. And so, you know, yeah, I was shocked.
I love, Joe Biden. I don't like him. I love him. I got a chance to work with him,
when I was a part of the Obama administration and loved him more every day. I was shocked to see his condition,
when he came out, and so was the world.
And that wasn't the first time he was in that condition. The book makes it very, very clear. There are people who,

(52:29):
knew and said nothing.
And that is a crime against this, republic,
and I think the Democrats are gonna pay for a long time for being a part of what is now being revealed to be a massive cover up.
Did you hear what he said?
That the Democrats are gonna pay a a a price for this because they've been so involved with this cover up.

(53:03):
Again, folks, it's it's absolutely
inconceivable.
That he could just spontaneously develop this this stage of cancer, prostate cancer.

(53:25):
And, yeah, the Democrats are gonna pay a penalty for the they're gonna pay a big price for this. I I
for for a long time coming,
because the trust is not gonna be there anymore.
How would you how do you trust
a political party that would prop up a sick
old man

(53:46):
and try to push him
to serve in one of the most stressful
positions
possible?
His doctor, Kevin O'Connor, I think his name was. Kevin O'Connor, he needs to be subpoenaed, and he needs to be he needs to sit down in front of congress

(54:08):
and explain this.
Because after each and every medical exam
Joe Biden sat through,
O'Connor came out and said he's fit to serve.
He is fit to serve. And the other the other funny thing here too is did you hear Jake Tapper say that that,

(54:30):
that he wrote a book about this cover up?
When he was one of the people that actually was covering it up,
and now he's getting pats on the back for exposing all of this?
I mean, come on, folks. Give me a break.

(54:52):
These people think you're stupid.
These people think that you don't remember things.
It's terrible.

(55:13):
What
this
this is this is a
I I'm I'm trying to think of the right words.

(55:34):
Could you imagine if they stole another election and installed him again as the president
with the level of decline that he has
and that he exhibited and all the cover ups
and all of the,
all the false narratives
of,
you know, that he's in great shape, he's in great shape in the meantime,

(56:00):
the lies,
The the this would have been devastating for the country.

(56:29):
Absolutely devastating. And the the the, you know, not and again, it's funny.
It's serious.
It's funny at the same time.
Here, the, the Babylon Bee actually,
tweeted something out or posted something on x
that, you know, just kinda captures the whole moment there of Jake Tapper talking about his book and

(56:51):
and,
and,
you know, ex and his
exposing, you know, the cover up in while he was part of the cover up. This is the Babylon Bee.
Jake Tapper uncovers startling evidence that Biden's decline was covered up by Jake Tapper.
Yeah.
I mean, yes, I know it's the Babylon Bee. It's satire. I understand that, but that's a very, very true

(57:15):
satirical statement.
Because in a set in essence, that's what he said.
I've uncovered this evidence that Joe Biden was in a state of mental decline,
and he was one of the people who hid it.
He was one of the people who who fostered

(57:36):
that whole narrative that that Joe Biden was perf in perfect health,
strong,
sharp.

(57:59):
You know, it
it just baffles me
how
these people think that the American people are so stupid.

(58:32):
So I have something here for you.
To kinda just back up what I'm saying,
I'm gonna play this here for you. It's it's, it's about three minutes,
But this is just a compilation of of clips of how the media
told the American people and the world

(58:53):
just how perfect and how sharp and how wonderful Joe Biden is
health wise.
Start your tape right now because I'm about to tell you the truth. Joe Scarborough. An f you if you can't handle the truth. This
version
of Biden is the best Biden ever. Do you know who lost? Does he know so long as he was denied?

(59:16):
In fact, I think he's better than he's ever been.
President Biden has a photographic memory.
His understanding and mastery of a complicated
geopolitical
situation is remarkable. He is sharp,
intensely probing,
and detail oriented and focused. Jackie, are you here? Where's Jackie? I I don't think she

(59:37):
was gonna be here. I was sitting, you know, of of two feet from him across the table, and he was, you know, intense. He had trouble walking sometimes. Yeah. So did FDR. He wanted GD WAR, but he's totally focused. He's very sharp. They say he's sharp in meetings and so on. Very lucid will. Very well informed. Biden is state lead. He comes with gravitas. There hasn't been, as far as I know, a single

(01:00:00):
claim
that Biden
made a mistake. Ageism is an issue. Americans have a rich history of holding people's physical characteristics
against them. Okay? You can ask African Americans. He's older. That doesn't mean that he is unfit, and there's a lot of ages in there. Now this age attack, this obsession by the right, Joe Biden may not be able to speak for himself the way that he used to. They wanna think to to take on government if we get out of line, which they're talking again about, and then

(01:00:30):
I'll see him him lying around. I think people should be speaking up for Joe Biden. Americans and reporters in the media are just judging him by a physical appearance, and it's horribly unfair. Age
is an asset. He showed exactly how with it he is. The flip side of this coin is that he has a tremendous amount of wisdom and experience.
Have you heard

(01:00:51):
any concerns from anyone who has met with president Biden about him seeing seeming a little slower? No. More wild speculation from a bunch of people who have probably never been in a room with Joe Biden and certainly don't have medical degrees that I'm aware of. You don't get paid for performance
to be president. You don't the job is not a job of endurance.
I don't see Donald Trump out bike riding like Joe Biden. It's the Hillary's email. All they have is that he's old. He can clear a dementia bar, and that's probably a win. The media are not fair, and they're getting less and less fair, and things are frightening. You have

(01:01:26):
a you have, Wall Street Journal running a horribly sourced piece saying that Biden is unfit. Dubious Wall Street Journal report about the president's acuity. Shoddy story by The Wall Street Journal,
questioning Biden's mental fitness. Wall Street Journal story had a lot of flaws as you said. But Sinclair, they didn't do any original reporting. They didn't follow-up. They didn't do any work.

(01:01:55):
But a huge part of the Mueller report talks about Russian
cycle is that Joe Biden is too old to lead, and so everyone is seizing upon this. And it is a classic disinformation tactic, and I think the best thing that we can do is to prepare the American people for this false narrative.
Yeah. The false narrative. You now you just saw all the clips. You just saw

(01:02:18):
all the media cover up.
You saw even Jake Tapper in
there, who now has a book that says that
there's been this great cover up.
You know, I I was thinking about something while the clip was playing.
Did you ever notice
the way

(01:02:38):
Joe Biden would walk from time to time? Like, he looked like he was very uncomfortable
that or or or, like,
he he would stand awkwardly. Right? Like like, he was kinda like bow legged and people would make comments that he just, you know, crapped his pants or something like that.

(01:03:01):
You know, you know,
prostate cancer, by the way, is is very painful,
especially as it progresses and if it hasn't been treated.
And
when it it it hits the bones,
as in the case with Joe Biden now,
it it it becomes increasingly

(01:03:22):
painful.
So painful that it's hard to walk, it's hard to move, it's hard to stand, it's hard to do
so look back at some of these videos, look back at some of these photos of
of Joe Biden
over the four years that he

(01:03:45):
occupied the White House.
And then you'll you'll start to piece it all together. You'll start to see the timeline. You'll start to see how it progressed
and progressed and got worse and worse and worse.
This man has been dealing with

(01:04:08):
this for a very, very long time.
And in that clip we just played, they mentioned
there was a little a slight mention of the, of of of her,
Robert Herr, the, the Herr report,

(01:04:31):
and I mentioned it earlier,
before we got into all the stories.
But when that report came out
let me
let me do this really quick.

(01:04:56):
Now in case you forgot, or maybe
weren't paying attention,
there's
a newly released audio
from,
if you remember when special counsel,
Robert Herr interviewed Joe Biden

(01:05:20):
over his handling of of, classified materials.
That was released it was when is it released? It was released on Friday.
This particular clip that I have, I'm gonna play for you that was released on Friday.

(01:05:43):
It,
basically what it does, it it,
it it kind of gives you like a firsthand look
at
the problem that Joe Biden was having recalling key facts,
you know, important facts.

(01:06:06):
The particular the particular piece of audio I'm gonna show you, you know, it it basically it shows how he was having a problem trying to remember dates,
significant dates, including,
when his son passed away,
and, certain events that took place while he was the when he was serving as vice president,
and,
and of course,

(01:06:30):
you know, this is all
in the face of the media
who tried to cover up
the obvious evidence of Joe Biden's
cognitive condition.
Now before I play the audio of this for you, I'm I'm gonna place I'm gonna do a little bit backwards. I'm gonna I'm gonna show you some,

(01:06:51):
I'm gonna show you some some clips
of
the reaction
to
the report
that Robert Herb presented to congress where he did mention evidence of,
his inability and difficulty to recall information and and,

(01:07:12):
dates and and
and specific information, important information, and details.
And,
so I'm gonna I'm gonna start. I'm gonna I'm gonna work my way back up to the actual audio clip of from the from the HER investigation.
And, we're gonna start here first with,
with the The comments that were made by that prosecutor,

(01:07:33):
gratuitous,
inaccurate,
and inappropriate.
The way that the president's demeanor
in that report was characterized
could not be more wrong on the facts
and clearly
politically motivated.
Clearly

(01:07:54):
politically motivated.
Here's KJP. Remember her?
The, the mop?
Doctor, when can we talk to the president's doctor, and how come he hasn't been or they haven't been asked to come out here and talk with us given the the her report that challenges the president's mental mental fitness? So look,

(01:08:15):
you know, just to speak to,
the HER report really, really quickly,
special counsel of HER is is, as far as I remember, is a is a, obviously, a a republican, a a
a prosecutor. He's not a he's not a medical doctor.
He's just not.
It's not for him to speak to. It's just not.

(01:08:36):
And, and you've heard from, over over the past couple of days since the report has been out. You've heard from legal experts from across the ideological
spectrum,
even,
a former attorney general. And he says and they have come out to say that the stuff in this report,
that is capturing all of your attention right now is just wrong. It's flatly wrong. It is inappropriate.

(01:09:00):
It is gratuitous.
And so
gonna leave that there, and it is, obviously up for, a medical doctor to decide on that. Talk to his doctor then? But look, I have said the press the the medical doctor the the president's doctor is going to do a physical. He's gonna and he has always put forward in the last two years a detailed,

(01:09:20):
detailed memo on the president's, on the president's,
obviously,
medical,
physical, and so I'm just gonna leave it there. I don't have anything else to add. Go ahead, Jared.
It's good. You know what?
Watching her
makes me appreciate and love Carolyn Levitt even more.

(01:09:42):
Carolyn Levitt goes up to the podium. She has
I don't think she has any notes ever.
She's always looking directly at the press pool,
rarely consulting any kind of notes or anything like that as far as I remember,

(01:10:02):
and doesn't talk in circles like
Corrine
Jean Pierre,
KJP, the
dust mop.
And what exactly did she say? She said nothing. You know, she just basically said, well, it's because,
Robert Hurd's a Republican,

(01:10:24):
and this is a,
a partisan attack on the president, and so on and so forth. And,
then she went on to say how his doctor,
Kevin O'Connor always signed off, you know, that and he's gonna be examined again and so on and so on, blah blah blah blah blah.
Now how many of you, know who Jamie Raskin is?

(01:10:48):
Because he also came out, he also,
criticized her accusing him of taking, you know, cheap shots and,
in in the way he he described the president.
And,
and then he sat down with, Wolf Blitzer,
and, this is what he had to say. These are his comments on it.
Does this raise alarms
about whether president Biden is fit to serve another term in office?

(01:11:13):
Well, undoubtedly, that's what, Robert Herr, who comes from my state, he's a Maryland Republican. Undoubtedly, that's what he intended to do
with those ridiculous cheap shots. I just spent an hour with president Biden and the entire Democratic caucus
where he regaled and entertained everyone for an hour and went through all of the extraordinary accomplishments of his administration,

(01:11:34):
including inflation reduction act. We've got the best economy in the world
right now, the creation of millions and millions of jobs. Just an extraordinary record to run on. So they're they're gonna come up with some cheap shots like that.
Which, by the way, is not true,
because, it's it's been determined that

(01:11:56):
these millions and millions of jobs that the previous administration claims have created
were fabricated.
They they they they never existed.
So they were just inflating the books. And
again,
you know, Jamie Raskin is is just a know nothing
liberal moron

(01:12:17):
and some of the things that he was he was saying during the,
the the
the, campaign,
President Trump's campaign
trying to incite civil war, trying to imply
that
he wasn't gonna be allowed to,
to be reelected
to, the presidency.

(01:12:38):
Just he he's he's just a partisan hack. He's he's a know nothing.
Alright? And,
quite honestly, I don't know how
Marylanders can continue to put this guy in office. I mean, he's he's just a a a moron.
And speaking of morons,
Adam Schiff also,
got in on the, on the bandwagon here.

(01:12:59):
And,
Adam Schiff had a few interesting things to say. Let me let me pull up his clip.
Let me see where is it.
So,

(01:13:20):
during that during the testimony
that, Robert Herr was given
giving
before Congress,
Schiff actually said to him because, you know, you understood what you were doing. It was a choice. You certainly didn't have to include that language. And then he went on to call her's descriptions gratuitous
and suggested that they were crafted to assist political opponents.

(01:13:42):
And then,
then Schiff went off to CNN
and said that,
that that Robert Herb politically slimed the president.
Now it it's and I I don't know if he if he had knowledge of the interview audio at the time that he made the statements or not, but,
but,

(01:14:04):
this is this is Adam Schiff, another
moron. Let's take a look.
Well, what is in the rules, mister Herr, what is in the rules is
you don't gratuitously
do things to prejudice
the subject of an investigation when you're declining to prosecute.
You don't gratuitously
add language that you know will be useful in a political campaign. You were not born yesterday.

(01:14:28):
You understood exactly
what you were doing. It was a choice. You certainly didn't have to include that language. You could have said vis a vis the documents that were found at the university, the president did not recall. There is nothing more common. You know this. I know this. There is nothing more common with a witness of any age when asked about events that are years old to say, I do not recall. Indeed, they're instructed by their attorney to do that if they have any question about it. You understood that. You made a choice. That was a political choice. It was the wrong choice. Mister chairman, I yield back. Gentleman yields back. Gentleman from Arizona, did

(01:15:04):
did did the special counsel wish to respond to that final question? Yes. Congressman, what you are suggesting
is that I shape,
sanitize,
omit portions of my reasoning and explanation of the attorney general for political reasons. No. I suggest that you not shape your report for political reasons, which is what you have to do with the have a response. That did not happen.

(01:15:26):
So you see you see the reactions that that you're getting from the Democrats.
Well,
this is the audio
that was released, to Axios
or released by Axios,
on Friday, and this is just a this is just a portion, a small portion of

(01:15:46):
of the, of the recording
that,
that was made during her interview with
Joe Biden,
regarding this. It's a long clip. It's about four and a half minutes. So but it's important that you hear it.
And I'm gonna be honest with you. It's painful.
It it really is.
So just take a listen,

(01:16:09):
and you form your own opinion.
So so during this time, we were living in Chambers Road, and there were, documents related to the
photoshopped,
before your book.
Where did you keep
papers that related to those things that you were actively working?

(01:16:36):
Well,
I I I I I I don't know.
This is what?
Twenty
seventeen, eighteen, that period? Yes, sir.
Remember, in this time frame,
my son
is

(01:16:57):
either been deployed or is dying.
And,
and
so
if it was
and by the way, there were still a lot of people at the time when I got out of the senate
that
were

(01:17:19):
encouraging me
to run-in this period,
except the president.
I'm not I'm not a mean thing to say. I mean, he just thought that she had a better shot
of winning the presidency than I did.
And so I hadn't
I hadn't at this point, even though I'm at Penn,

(01:17:39):
I hadn't walked away from the idea that I might run for office again.
If I were granted him, I'd be running for president.
And,
and so
what was happening, though,
when when Debo died,
got amazed.
2015.

(01:18:02):
I think it was 2015.
Or you I'm not sure the months are running those.
Yeah. That's right, mister president.
And
what's
happened
in the meantime
is that,
as
Trump gets elected in November.

(01:18:25):
'20 sixteenth.
Sixteenth. '20 '16.
Alright.
So
why did I have 2017
here? That's when you left the office. So that would be January of twenty seventeen. Okay.
But that's when Trump is sworn in in January. Right. Correct. Okay. Yeah. Correct.

(01:18:49):
And,
in 2017,
Beau had passed and,
this is personal.
The genesis

(01:19:11):
of the book
and the title Promise Me Dad
was a,
I know you're all close with your sons and daughters, but
Beau was
like my right arm and that was my left.

(01:19:31):
These guys were
a year and a day apart and they could finish each other's sentences.
Beau, I used to
go home
on the train
in
the period

(01:19:53):
that I was still in the Senate.
Anyway,
I do remember.
There was pressure, not pressure. Beau
knew
how much I adored him.

(01:20:13):
And
I know this sounds maybe this sounds so.
Everybody knew how close you were. There was not anybody in the world who wondered
whether or not
anyway.
And so Sir, I'm wondering if it's a good time to take a break,

(01:20:35):
briefly. No. I let me just keep going and get it done.
Anyway,
whenever whenever Joe Biden would get confused
or lose track of what he's saying
or felt like he was saying too much,

(01:20:58):
he would always default to that.
The
anyway.
Now,
Robert Herr,
in his report,
said that, you know, there were no criminal charges would be pursued,

(01:21:18):
which
I don't see how.
But
what drew a lot of attention was the comment that he made that he noted that Biden,
was a, quote, sympathetic,
well meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.

(01:21:45):
A sympathetic elderly man well meaning elderly man with poor memory.
Folks, you heard
you heard that yourself
and, you know, there there's obviously there's more to the recording just in just a four minute clip.
It's disturbing to know that

(01:22:07):
the president of The United States,
the alleged
president of The United States,
Couldn't even I couldn't even remember or recall, however you wanna put it,
when
his son passed.

(01:22:28):
Couldn't recall
or remember when
he left office
as the vice president,
couldn't remember or recall when,
president Trump was sworn in,
and that was just on that recording. Could you imagine

(01:22:51):
what the rest of the audio
would have? And hopefully,
more of the audio will be released, and I'll, you know, be able to get copies of it so we could
sit here and listen to it together.
But
all of this was covered

(01:23:11):
by the media, by the administration, by the Democratic party
when it was blatantly obvious to the American people that there is something wrong,
that this man is was not fit to be the president of The United States,
and the damage

(01:23:32):
that's been done to this country
because of his administration,
because of the auto pen,
and whoever it was that was running the White House,
because it obviously wasn't him,
is potentially catastrophic.

(01:24:01):
Now thank God we have Donald Trump in office right now, and he's trying to correct
those
issues
that the previous administration brought up,
those bad policy decisions, those
horrible, horrible

(01:24:22):
economic decisions that were made,
and to get The United States back on track.
Thank god for that.
Now you might be thinking to yourself, why are we still talking about Joe Biden? Why are we still talking about this stuff? Because,

(01:24:42):
folks, this is dangerous.
Extremely dangerous,
and we need to keep talking about it because we can't let this happen again.
So as we get more information, we'll talk about it more in upcoming shows.

(01:25:05):
And, you know, we'll, you know, we'll see
how all of this here plays out. But, again,
you know,
our sympathies to
Joe Biden and and his family and, you know, we we we
sincerely
hope that,
whatever treatments are available to him, they'll he'll be able to,

(01:25:28):
make use of and,
you know, and that,
whatever time he has with his family now is it will be something that will be valuable
to his family. And,
you know, we we we
you know, our thoughts and prayers,
go with him and, you know, I hope I hope to God. And I know he's a Roman Catholic.
You know, I'm not, but,

(01:25:49):
you know, I hope to God that,
that that that he comes to that, you
know, that quote unquote come to Jesus moment
when he puts his full faith, trust, and confidence in Jesus Christ and not the Catholic church.
So that's that's our prayer, and that's our hope for him regardless

(01:26:09):
of political background, regardless
of the things that he's accused of.
And,
you know, let's just let's just keep him in our prayers.
Alright. Alright. Well, let's see what else we got here.
Well, this is interesting, actually. This is something that,

(01:26:30):
a long time
coming, and it's actually quite telling, to be to be honest with you.
So Bernie Sanders
has
popped up here,
and,
he,
he was on a a podcast

(01:26:52):
on, Andrew Schultz
Andrew Schultz's podcast,
and
he made a very interesting
acknowledgement.
It was subtle. It it it was,
you know, but
and I'm gonna play it for you in a second here. But,

(01:27:13):
in in this particular situation here with on this show here, you know, Bernie Sanders finally
admits
what we all already know is that
Democrats
are a threat to democracy.
And we all know that, and it's all obvious,
you know, to us, to to normal thinking people.

(01:27:37):
But nine years
after the DNC took away his 2016
presidential nomination
and gave it to Hillary Clinton,
Bernie Sanders finally
finally admits that the Democrats
are a threat to democracy.
So this, this piece here, from what is this?

(01:27:59):
Is this from US News?
Former Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders joined the, quote,
flagrant podcast
this week for a wide ranging discussion where at one point,
the socialist politician said he wouldn't argue with a show host accusing the Democratic party
of being a threat
to democracy for repeatedly

(01:28:22):
rigging
its primaries.
The problem I think a lot of voters had is, like, they didn't even know if it was her. We didn't
points. And we felt that over the last four elections,
Democrats, we felt, that we didn't have a say on who could be president. We talk a lot about the Republicans being autocrats and oligarchs and taking over democracy. But from the democrat

(01:28:48):
perspective, and this I'm a lifelong Democrat, I felt like the Democratic party completely removed the Democratic process from its constituents.
And they I think they need to have some accountability of that. No argument here.
I don't need for you I I mean, I wanted you to like, I 02/2016,
I was like, this is gonna happen. This guy's gonna do it. And it felt like they it felt like they stole it from me. And I'll be honest, it broke my heart when you when you supported him. Look. But you have in the world that I live in, you got a choice.

(01:29:17):
And,
I mean, a lot of people, including my wife, agree with you. But,
you know, you're you're down to a choice. Is it gonna be Hillary Clinton, or is it gonna be
Donald Trump? Not a great choice. But it ended up being him anyway, so why don't we burn it down?
Well, because it's easy to say burning it down means that children are not gonna have,

(01:29:39):
you know, food to eat, that the schools will deteriorate, people will not have health care. I got it. And I you know, I'm an elected official. I gotta represent the people that I'm on, and I can't turn my back on. But then could could we not also say if ostensibly, there hasn't been a fair primary for the Democrats since 02/2008. Are they not also a threat to democracy? We often hear Fair enough. That is that is
yeah. I'm not gonna argue with that point.

(01:30:01):
Not gonna argue with that point. That's good. That's good. Finally.
Finally,
an admission that the Democrats are a threat to democracy.
Now Now, you have to remember that in 02/2016,
the the,
the Democrats,
you know,
nominated Hillary Clinton,
and then in 2020,
Joe Biden,

(01:30:22):
despite Bernie Sanders and I am not, and you should know this, I hope you know this, I am not a fan of Bernie Sanders,
but,
among Democrats, Bernie Sanders, you know, in 2016 and 2020 was clearly the most popular candidate
for the voters from in the in the Democratic side.

(01:30:43):
And then fast forward
to
this past election cycle,
when Joe Biden stepped aside,
there was no primary held,
but
the cackling communist from California, Kamala Harris, was,
appointed
to run

(01:31:04):
on the ticket, top of the ticket,
as
for for the for the, for the presidency for the White House.
And the interesting thing about it was is that nobody pointed it out, at least on the on the left. The right was pointing it out,
but

(01:31:27):
on the left,
they just rallied around, they gathered around, they, you know, they accepted that.
Their party
told them who their candidate was gonna be.
The party told them who their nominee was gonna be.
Not a vote was cast for her. Now remember, when Kamala Harris ran for president,

(01:31:52):
in 2020,
'20 '19, '20 '20,
she dropped out before the first before the first,
primary was held.
Before the first state
went to vote in the primary. She would she dropped out.

(01:32:17):
She didn't get one vote.
No, not one.
And in 2020, the Democratic National Committee said,
Democrat voters, this is your candidate,
not a vote cast for her.

(01:32:38):
They just transferred over the, the money, the coffers over to her account,
to her campaign,
and, of course, she misspent it, mismanaged it,
blew it all, paid $11,000,000
to Beyonce to to go out on a stage and endorse her.

(01:33:00):
If you remember that, and then got booed off the stage because they were told the the audience was told that Beyonce was gonna actually perform for them, but she didn't. She just went out there and said, hey, you vote vote for, vote for my girl over here, collected her $11,000,000
and walked off.
But here, ten years later, Bernie Sanders finally

(01:33:22):
finally shows some frustration with the Democratic party.
And and listen, you know, you might think, what's the big deal? You know, who cares?
And listen,
this is that's that's something important right there.
How it all plays out coming down the road, I I don't I can't tell you that. I am not a prophet nor the son of a prophet. I don't know.

(01:33:48):
But the fact that he's on the record now in expressing his frustration,
that's that's significant, it's important, and it's something to keep an eye on and watch,
because who has he been running around with?
Campaigning. Well, not campaigning, but doing rallies with.
Another socialist.

(01:34:11):
Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.
Right?
Now if he's expressing his frustration here,
and again, he's already
technically he he he runs as an independent, but he caucuses with the Democrats,

(01:34:34):
he is an outright
self avowed
socialist,
do you think there might be a split coming
where the far left socialist aspects of the Democratic party are gonna separate themselves from the DNC,
create it like another party,

(01:34:54):
third, fourth party, whatever it is?
It's a possibility. I I don't know. I'm I'm just speculating here. I'm just, you know,
just thinking
out loud.
You never know.

(01:35:16):
And another thing that, that took place today
let's see where is that.
So let's see. Should I should we talk about this, or should we talk about that first? Let's see.

(01:35:39):
Well,
since we're talking about Hillary and the Democrats and all that stuff, so did you know that Hillary Clinton today
went out and
had a few really
interesting things to say

(01:35:59):
about American women.
So as you know,
there there there there is a,
a decline
in this country,
of of births.
Okay?
A lot of it has to do with, you know, because a lot of women have been told repeatedly and over and over again

(01:36:21):
that, they shouldn't embrace
parenthood,
being a mom, a stay at home mom, that they need to get out there and work and make a name for themselves and and,
you know, and be a have a career and, you know,
you know, that the nuclear family is a thing of the past and and and so on. Well, Hillary Clinton

(01:36:44):
made a couple of comments.
And this I think this took place sometime earlier this month, but,
this video came out of Hillary Clinton at the Newmark Civic Life Series talk
at the 90 Second Street Y in Manhattan. And

(01:37:05):
as somebody who who lived and worked in New York for
for the majority of of their life, 90 Second Street Y in Manhattan is known for its,
very, very, very liberal
schedule.
Let's put it that way. Alright.

(01:37:27):
And now this is going this this, you know, it's making its way around
the interweb over here and
this basically the, you know, Hillary Clinton thinks that the importance of having children is overrated,
and that somehow, someway,
the renewed focus

(01:37:47):
on family
and family life
is is somehow going backwards.
When you listen to when you listen to watch the clip that I'm gonna show you,
it and and this is it's highly insulting, I think, anyway,
because you can you can hear how her voice just is

(01:38:09):
full
of contempt when she talks about,
Donald Trump, she talks about Elon Musk and and, JD Vance, you know, all talking about the virtues of having a of of of a big family
and, you know, and and having a and having a baby. I mean I mean, come on, folks. I mean, that's truly

(01:38:30):
that's like appalling.
Like, how dare you think like that? You Neanderthal.
Let's take a listen.
As I posted the other day,
this
very blatant effort to basically send a message, most exemplified
by Vance and Musk and others,

(01:38:51):
that you know, what we really need from you women are more children.
And what that really means is you should go back to doing what you were born to do,
which is to produce more children.
And they are talking about, you know, cash benefits for chill the more children you have. This has been tried, by the way, in other countries and it has not worked,

(01:39:15):
or medals if you have six children while they're
contemplating,
cutting,
Medicaid,
while they have no interest in paid family leave or funding quality childcare, they're cutting Head Start. I mean, you go down the list
of all the programs that support,

(01:39:35):
child rearing and the care of children and create, you know, some safety net for women who are in the workforce, the formal workforce, as well as, you know, raising children.
So this is another performance
about concerns they allegedly have for,
family life. But if you had read,

(01:39:56):
the Heritage Foundation's Project twenty twenty five, despite Trump saying he knew nothing about it, if you had read it, it's all in there. It's all in there. Return to,
the family, the nuclear family,
return to being a Christian nation,
return to, you know, producing a lot of children,
which is sort of odd because

(01:40:18):
the people who produce the most children in our country are immigrants and they wanna deport them. So none of this adds up.
But, you know, one of the reasons why our economy did so much better than comparable,
advanced economies across the world is because we actually had a replenishment, because we had a lot of immigrants
legally and undocumented,

(01:40:38):
who,
had a, you
know, larger than, normal,
by American standards,
family. So this is just another one of their, you know, make America great again by returning to,
the
lifestyles and the economic arrangements
of not just the nineteen fifties. I mean, let's keep going back as far as we can,

(01:41:02):
and, you know, see what happens.
So
in that in that little
screech that she just did right there, she comes out against the nuclear family.
She comes out against Christianity.
She comes out against babies.
She also
tells you straight out that she supports

(01:41:23):
illegal
immigration to the country.
And she also,
you know, implies
that, you know, the replacement theory that that they all say is just
completely,
a made
up idea that the right wing has,

(01:41:45):
she's basically just advocating for it right there saying that, you know,
that,
that that that immigrant families have more children
and and and and wanna deport them. No. We don't wanna deport
legal
immigrants.
Alright? We want the illegal aliens

(01:42:06):
removed.
Okay? That's the difference. And so what she's showing here is,
she's she's she's base she's showing her support for legal immigration,
And, you know, of course, she tried to tie all this stuff to Donald Trump and,
not I'm sorry, to to the 2025

(01:42:26):
the project 2025 that,
that was put out by the Heritage Foundation that, you know, Donald Trump has nothing to do with whatsoever.
It's not a necessarily bad
idea what Project twenty twenty five,
advocates advocates for. I mean, some of it's a little bit on the extreme side of it, of of of of on right side politics.

(01:42:50):
But there is absolutely nothing wrong with
talking about returning to family.
I mean, it's insulting.
The way she talks about family,
religion,
country,
it's disgusting.
But that's that it but that's not all. There there's another little dig that she throws in here, and and I'm gonna let me play this for you.

(01:43:17):
What advice do you have the first
female president of The United States?
Well,
first of all,
don't be a handmaiden to the patriarchy,
which kind
of eliminates

(01:43:38):
every woman on the other side of the aisle,
except for very few.
Lisa Murphy. Lisa Murphy.
Liz Cheney. Yeah. There's a few.
Look, first we have to get there and it is, you know, obviously so much harder,
than,
it should be.
So,

(01:43:58):
you know, if if if a woman runs who I think would be a good president as I thought Kamala Harris would be and as I knew I would be, I will support that woman.
So, basically, she just called Republican women
handmaidens to the patriarchy.
Okay?

(01:44:21):
That kinda goes in line with
what Joe Biden said about,
black people aren't black if they don't vote Democrat, and Latinos are stupid, and whites are racist, and
women are handmaidens.
Folks, it just never ends.
It never ends.
That is what the Democrats think about you.

(01:44:43):
That is what they think about you.
You know, now I don't have a big family. I have two kids.
Okay?
I would've I would've liked to have more,
just wasn't able to, but
I have my two kids that I love more than anything in the world.

(01:45:10):
I don't look at people who don't have kids or choose not to have kids in in any negative way. If that's what you want, good for you. That's great. I'm not gonna judge them, but don't judge me. And don't judge other people who have larger families.
Four or five kids.
You know,
my good friend, my pastor,

(01:45:32):
has
a huge family.
I have another friend of mine who has 11 12 kids.
12 children.
There's nothing wrong with that.
I think that's beautiful.

(01:45:52):
One of my most fondest memories is growing up
and having
that Sunday dinner,
and having all of my family there, my cousins,
aunts and uncles,
and being surrounded. There's nothing wrong with having a big family.

(01:46:13):
Nothing whatsoever.
Don't judge people for that.
Don't judge people. Don't judge me for that. Don't I wouldn't like I said, I would never judge someone for for deciding that kids aren't what I what aren't for me in my life, and I I don't wanna have children. I would never ever ever point a finger at you and say

(01:46:35):
that there's something wrong with you.
If that's what you want, good for you.
I'm happy that you that you made a decision for
yourself.
But this is the left,
this is what they think of you, they look down their noses at you,
this is why

(01:46:56):
she is so
incredibly unlikable,
this is why she is so incredibly unpopular,
this is why she lost two elections,
and actually can't win unless she cheats.
Or

(01:47:20):
well, I'm not gonna say it.
I'm putting the cart before the horse there,
but we will get to that
momentarily.

(01:47:55):
Okay.
I had to look I had to look for the,
the post
that, ties that to what I wanna tell you next.
So, along the line of the Clintons,
two things came up today

(01:48:15):
at the at the,
at a White House press briefing.
One was the
Clinton body count
and, the other one was Epstein's ties to Israel.
So I'm gonna play this for you from

(01:48:35):
the, from the press conference. This is, Carolyn Levitt answering the question.
The other question for you is, so over the weekend,
president Trump posted through social
a video highlighting what most people call the Clinton body count, which is
the strange number of suicides that had seemed to happen in Clinton circles.
I have a headline here from the Washington Post that said, Trump pedals false conspiracy theories tying the Clintons to several deaths.

(01:49:01):
So I just wanted to highlight highlight real quick. This wasn't in Trump's video, but this is from the Arkansas Times.
And it's the death of Mark Middleton who was a former Clinton White House aide who was found
dead dead on a Clinton Foundation property. And I'll just quote from the Arkansas Times. Middleton apparently shot himself in the chest with a shotgun and also hung himself from a tree with an extension cord. So I have no idea how somebody commits suicide that way, but if the Washington Post is here, maybe you can enlighten us as to how that was actually a suicide.

(01:49:29):
So anyways, that's just a lead in to my question about the most famous Clinton related suicide, which is that of Jeffrey Epstein.
There's still a lot of questions around that case.
You've released phase one of the Epstein files. What was missing from that is any connection to his ties to intelligence agencies, and that's really the whole story
that not just trafficking young girls, but doing it on behalf of intelligence agencies and even potentially,

(01:49:53):
as part of a blackmail ring
with potential ties to the Israeli government. So,
for phase two, when can we expect it? Will it have
information pertaining to those aspects of the Epstein case? I know the attorney general has committed to releasing those files. I would defer you to the Department of Justice on her timeline, but, when she has made a promise in the past, she has kept it, and I'm I'm certain that she will.

(01:50:16):
So,
very interesting question,
on the Clinton body count and, I'm actually gonna play the video for you that, that that he was asking about. And, of course, the other issue is the Epstein files.
Kash Patel and and, Dan Bongino,
the director and deputy director of the FBI now,

(01:50:38):
you know, they
they they had an interview where they were talking about some of these things and,
of the one of the things that came up about Epstein was that how they,
and I was looking for the clip. I thought I had it, but I I don't seem to.
But,
they had mentioned

(01:50:59):
that they
after looking at the reports and the evidence that had been collected that they determined that, yes, Jeffrey Epstein did in fact kill himself by breaking his neck in three places.
So,
which I I basically say is b s,
you know, that's that's
I I don't buy that. I I

(01:51:20):
I I think that Patel and, Bongino are,
not being honest
about that assessment.
Maybe there's a reason for it, maybe, you know, there's
maybe there's,
something to do with the investigation that they can't
say anything other than what the official narrative is.

(01:51:44):
That's a very good possibility,
but I I think that's BS.
And,
just like,
they also had something else to say about, Russiagate, which I'm gonna play for you in a moment, but this is the, this is the Clinton body count video that,
this this reporter was talking about. And just for the record, I am not suicidal in any way. I am I am enjoying my my life, and, I'm very happy doing my my podcast. I'm very happy,

(01:52:11):
spending my time here with you, and I have no interest whatsoever in ending my own life. Alright? Just for the record. Alright. So this is the, Clinton body count.
Remember John f Kennedy junior? He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999.

(01:52:32):
Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his
rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator.
Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements
to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials.
She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997.

(01:52:55):
In 1993,
White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC.
He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found.
Then there's James McDougall, a key witness to White House prosecutors.
He was serving his three year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougall suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement.

(01:53:25):
In 2015,
Walter Shibe, a White House chef hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river. Nearly two miles from the base of the trail, he was reportedly hiking.
An autopsy determined that Shibe's death was accidental drowning,
but he might have known too much.
27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year.

(01:53:52):
There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers
and that he may have been murdered in retaliation.
Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC,
was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2.

(01:54:14):
His death was reported classified
pending the results of an autopsy. To this day
So very, very interesting. Right? All of those people had some connection to Clinton, the Clinton Foundation,
Bill or Hillary Clinton. When I say the Clintons, that's what I'm talking about.
So
very and that's what the reporter was was referencing.

(01:54:36):
Alright. Now I just wanna get off of this, and I just wanna head over to,
Patel and Bongino.
Alright. So,
so Kash Patel and Dan Bongino
went on to,
Maria Bartiromo,
I think it was.
Yeah. That's what it was.

(01:54:59):
Okay. So,
so this is talking about Russiagate.
Alright. So,
Kash Patel and Dan Bongino said that they've uncovered hidden evidence now tied to the Russiagate probe
and that accountability is coming. Alright. I first of all,
I I am I am a fan of Dan Bongino. I think, you know, when when he had his podcast, he he it was

(01:55:25):
a great show. I I I watch it
just about every day.
I would try to catch it live, and if I couldn't, I would I would catch up with it maybe on a weekend or or or so. And
when he was appointed as a deputy director for the FBI, I was really happy about that because I I said, alright, great.

(01:55:49):
Here's a guy that that's that's honorable,
trustworthy,
knowledgeable,
and he's gonna go in there and he's gonna he's gonna work with Kash Patel, who was, I again,
this, you know, think the same of of Kash Patel.
But since they've been there, there's been so little
being done on the issues that they

(01:56:10):
that that were campaigned on. Yes. They've had some great success with,
with the, you know, with drug raids and and and things of that nature and,
immigration
things. I mean, they they've done a a spectacular job,
and I and I'm happy with it. I'm not saying I'm not. I'm not saying anything negative like that, about that aspect of it. But for the things that were campaigned on, like the Epstein files and,

(01:56:39):
Russiagate
and,
the assassination attempts,
on on
on president Trump, things that they made big deals over, they have yet to deliver a thing
on.
Nothing.
So in this clip, they're talking about what they find

(01:57:00):
in in their work on Russiagate,
and
I wanna believe
that they're that that they're
that that they're they're gonna do something about this.
You know,
I just I
I just don't I just don't have the confidence anymore

(01:57:22):
that they're gonna get it done.
Just like I don't have confidence in Pam Bondi now.
I I don't I don't I don't think that she's capable of doing the job.
A lot of promises,
very few results,

(01:57:43):
and I'm starting to see the same thing here with with Kash Patel and and and Bongino.
But this is this is what they had to comment on as far as Russiagate.
I was the lead Russiagate investigator,
for the House Intelligence Committee, and, I've been on both of your shows in a prior life talking about it. And I'm telling you and the American public that we have now found material and information and people who wanted to hide it from the world since we got in these seats. And we, as the direct as the deputy said, we are trying to do it in a fashion where not only are we informing the American public what would happen, but we can have accountability for it. And that takes a little bit more time. And when you layer on the fact that we are rolling out our priorities on violent crime and defending the homeland, You know, we're running a three part animal here, and we're going a hundred miles an hour in each single one. So important. Yeah. Wait. I gotta wanna add to that too, because what the director's saying is right. You gotta remember, we come in in the morning,

(01:58:38):
there's a portfolio
of 100 level 10 items.
If it's a level nine, which is a pretty big freaking deal,
someone else fixed it. The only thing that gets to my desk or his is a level 10. That's the entire day. Look at his schedule. I'll show you the palm card I have. It is filled from 07:30
to he leaves seven at night, six thirty at night.

(01:59:00):
It's filled all day. We just can't focus on one thing. You want New York to go boom? DC to go boom? You want an OC organization to go hack into some cyber network and crack all of Fox News' holdings? We're dealing with all that stuff too. Everything's a priority.
Everything's a priority. This is one of many things we did. It's not an excuse, it's just reality.

(01:59:24):
I don't buy it.
I'm sorry.
I I
I don't buy it. Sorry.

(01:59:44):
That we had this conversation.
This is talking about the,
the attempts on president Trump's life. So I'm gonna screen share this one because I just pulled this one up now.
So let me let me screen share.

(02:00:07):
Okay. Here we go.
If there was a big explosive there there, right, given my history as a secret service agent and my personal friendship as a director does with the president.
Give me one logical sensible reason we would not have to if you can think of one there isn't. There isn't there in some of these cases, the there you're looking for

(02:00:29):
is not there. And I know people
I get it. I understand.
It's not
there. If it was there, we would have told you.
You know what, Maria?
Cash is not kidding. We've been personally briefed extensively
on every single
detail, nugget, tendril of this case.

(02:00:52):
One is actively in court right now. So out of respect for the case, it's probably more appropriate that I stay quiet on that. However,
I'm not gonna tell people what they wanna hear. I'm gonna tell you the truth. And whether whether you like it or not is up to you. If there was a big explosive there there, right, given my history as a Secret Service agent, and my personal friendship as a director does with the president.

(02:01:15):
Give me one logical sensible reason we would not have to if you can think of one there isn't. There isn't there in some of these cases, the there you're looking for.
Okay.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm dealing with a Mandela effect here, but
I distinctly remember

(02:01:38):
again, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm Mandela affecting this whole thing, like I said.
I swear I remember
Dan Bongino talking about
or raising questions as to the involvement of

(02:01:58):
the intelligence agencies
in some way, shape, or form
helping
the two perpetrators of these attempts on president Trump's life
because there really wouldn't be any other way

(02:02:20):
for them to be able to get, number one, so close to the president,
and number two, being able to take effective shots.
I'd I'd like I said, I I maybe I'm mistaken. Maybe I I I heard something that I wanted to hear at the time. I don't know. I'm gonna actually go back and

(02:02:42):
go through the archives of of the show there and and see if I could find it, but
I don't know. I I I I'm I'm just I'm not I'm not impressed.
And
whether
he likes that or not, I don't really care.
Just like he doesn't care if I like it or not.

(02:03:03):
I I I don't give a crap.
Well,
anyway,
I'm gonna close out with this.
I'm gonna leave it for you guys to decide
on that issue,

(02:03:25):
But, we did have a we did have a some some really good news that have has come through,
so let's hit these things here really quick.
So the Supreme Court
has,
lifted, an Obama judge's block on Trump's order to revoke protected status of hundreds of thousands of migrants.
The US Supreme Court on Monday today lifted a lower court's block on President Trump's order to revoke protected status for hundreds of thousands of migrants

(02:03:52):
living in The United States.
The high court allowed the Trump administration to strip approximately three three hundred fifty thousand Venezuelans
currently in The US of their protected status.
Ketanji
Brown Jackson was the lone Supreme Court justice to dissent, so it was an eight one decision.
And,

(02:04:13):
as you see here, the Supreme Court, an eight eight an eight one Supreme Court will allow the Trump administration to rescind a Biden era to rescind a Biden era temporary deportation protections for Venezuelan migrants.
Alright. So that's that's a good win for
for the administration today.
That's always some good news.
And then,
in some more good news for the administration,

(02:04:35):
president Trump today announced that,
that Russia and Ukraine
will resume
ceasefire talks
and,
and, gets Moscow and Ukraine to continue those direct talks. He said that, he had a two hour phone conversation with, Vladimir Putin.

(02:04:57):
Oops. Wrong one. Sorry. There we go.
He said in a, Truth Social post, just completed my two hour call with president Vladimir Putin of Russia. I believe it went very well. Russia and Ukraine will immediately
start negotiations toward a ceasefire and, more importantly, an end to the war. The conditions for that will be negotiated between the two parties as it can only be because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of. Tone and spirit of conversation were excellent. If it wasn't, I would say so.

(02:05:28):
Russia wants to to large wants to do large scale trade with The United States when this catastrophic bloodbath is over, and I agree. There's tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is unlimited.
Likewise, Ukraine can be a great beneficiary on trade. In the process of rebuilding its country, negotiations between Russia and Ukraine will begin immediately.
I have so informed president Zelensky of Ukraine, Ursula Von

(02:05:52):
van der Lijn, president European Commission, which is
another unelected
bureaucrat,
president Emmanuel Macron of France, Prime Minister Georgia Moloney of Italy, Chancellor Friedrich Martz of of, Germany,
and
the, president Alexander Stubb of Finland during a call with me immediately after the call of president Putin. The Vatican, as represented by the pope, has stated it would be very interested in hosting negotiations.

(02:06:18):
Let the process
begin. That's great news for the administration. Let's let's hope it it
does amount to,
to some great success, and we would love to see this thing come to an end. And then last but not least, the one big beautiful bill
has, finally made its way,

(02:06:40):
out of committee,
out of,
and is now on its way to,
it's on its way to,
getting signed off on. So
this is, today at the White House.
The one big beautiful bill passed the House Budget Committee last night, bringing it one step closer to final passage.

(02:07:02):
The one big beautiful bill is perfectly named because it represents a once in a generation opportunity
to deliver on the Make America Great Again agenda responsible for President Trump's landslide victory on November 5. The America First policies in this bill are the reason why Republicans currently have the majority in Congress right now.

(02:07:22):
Passing this bill is what voters sent,
Republicans to Washington to accomplish.
And that's why it's essential
that every Republican
in the House and the Senate unites behind President Trump and passes this popular and essential
legislative package.
This bill will be the single most pro small business,

(02:07:43):
pro family, and pro American worker
legislation
ever.
This bill will give Americans the largest tax cuts in our nation's history.
When Republicans pass the bill, Americans will be keeping more of their hard earned money and taking home much bigger paychecks.
The one big beautiful bill will deliver some of President Trump's central campaign promises.

(02:08:05):
No tax on tips for our hardworking waiters, waitresses, and service workers.
No tax on overtime for our law enforcement officers, our firefighters,
and all those who Americans who are putting in extra hours to make ends meet.
And a large tax deduction on interest payments for Americans
who purchase American made cars.

(02:08:26):
Despite desperate democrat lies, the biggest beneficiary
of this tax cut will be working class Americans and their families.
Americans earning between $30,000
and $80,000
per year will pay about 15%
less in taxes
after this legislation is passed. And according to a brand new paper from the White House Council of Economic Advisors,

(02:08:48):
the average family with two children's take home pay will be up to $13,000
higher
because of the increase in wages and reductions in tax obligations.
The CEA study also said that the average overtime worker receives a tax cut of roughly $2,000.
Again, this is great new news for our nurses, our police officers, and all those who work overtime to make ends meet across our country.

(02:09:14):
Put simply, president Trump's one big beautiful bill will be a boon for working class America.
This one big beautiful bill is also pro family. It will increase the child tax credit to $2,500
per child,
establish optional savings account for newborn babies with a $1,000
credit added, and strengthen paid family leave.

(02:09:35):
This bill also delivers historic tax relief to America's Seniors by allowing middle and low income social security recipients
to deduct an additional $4,000
in payments from their taxable income.
If Democrats get their way and the Trump tax cuts are not extended,
Americans will face the largest tax hike in history to the tune of $4,000,000,000,000.

(02:09:57):
Republicans must not sign with Democrats in helping them raise taxes.
The one big beautiful bill also provides critical protections of Medicaid,
which will strengthen and preserve the program for decades to come through common sense efforts to eliminate
waste, fraud, and abuse.
Medicaid will no longer be used to pay for barbaric gender mutilation procedures on minor children.

(02:10:20):
And the 1,400,000
illegal aliens who are currently improperly receiving Medicaid benefits will be kicked off the program
to preserve it for hardworking American citizens who need
it. President Trump and Republicans are protecting Medicaid benefits for pregnant women, children, disabled individuals,
low income seniors and families, and the most vulnerable Americans in our society.

(02:10:43):
And that's what Democrats are so angry about. Basic
Medicaid protections that will stop the funding of transgender insanity and illegal aliens from ripping off American taxpayers.
As you all know, over his first four months in office, President Trump ended the previous administration's open border crisis and secured our homeland in record time, all using executive authority.

(02:11:06):
Now, Congress needs to act. The one big beautiful bill is the most significant
investment
in our nation's border patrol and law enforcement agents in our nation's history.
The bill ensures that president Trump's popular and successful border security measures are made permanent.
Republicans have the backs of border patrol and ICE agents who were put through hell over the past four years, and have quickly worked to secure our southern border. And that's why this bill gives them more resources to do their jobs, including a $10,000

(02:11:35):
much needed bonus to ICE agents and border patrol agents over the next four years.
To provide those brave agents with desperately needed reinforcements on the ground, the bill allows for the hiring of thousands of new ICE personnel, customs officers, and border patrol agents.
These significant hirings will empower president Trump to continue delivering on his promise to carry out the largest mass deportation

(02:11:58):
in the history of our country.
Again, that is a promise that Republicans made to American voters. It's a promise they were elected on, and it's a promise Republicans on Capitol Hill need to keep, secure our border.
To supplement those efforts, the bill fund the bill's funds,
will fund the completion of President Trump's signature border wall. As a result, 701

(02:12:20):
miles of primary wall, 900 miles of river barriers, 629
miles of secondary barriers, and 141
miles of vehicle and pedestrian barriers will be constructed when this bill passes, along with cutting edge technology to secure our homeland from dangerous illegal alien invaders.
This bill also advances our national security and defense interests by ensuring the United States military has the necessary resources to remain the strongest and most lethal

(02:12:48):
fighting force in the world.
The bill will provide resources for the construction of President Trump's Golden Dome to safeguard Americans from potential tax, give the Coast Guard resources to build more modernized ships, and the Air Force resources to acquire better planes.
If all of those incredible things were not enough, the big beautiful bill also finally modernizes

(02:13:09):
air traffic control in America, a bipartisan issue. The bill will allow president Trump to deliver on his promise to overhaul and update our air traffic control systems to keep Americans flying as safe and efficiently as possible.
The previous administration failed to act and do this themselves despite repeated warnings from the GAO, which has resulted in unacceptable delays at major airports like Newark that the Trump administration is working hard to address.

(02:13:35):
When the one big beautiful bill passes, we will replace the current antiquated system. The FAA will enhance safety in our skies, reduce delays, and power the future of air travel in The United States.
That's just some of what this historic legislation will accomplish. It is absolutely essential that Republicans unite behind the one big beautiful bill and deliver on President Trump's agenda. There is no time to waste.

(02:14:01):
Americans gave Republicans a once in a generation opportunity to course correct our country over many wrongs over the past four years. And Americans are counting on Republicans to work as hard as president Trump is in this White House every day on Capitol Hill. Send this legislation to his desk as soon as possible for his signature.
Alright, folks. So the one big beautiful bill is close to passing.

(02:14:25):
You just heard an outline and a detail of everything that this bill is going to entail
and encompass
and provide.
And, we have a guest in the studio. We have Charlie gnawing on his paw right now next to me. So,
sorry for that grunting noise in the background. Hey, buddy.
Quiet. Thank you. Alright.

(02:14:47):
Alright. Well, with that, folks, I think we're gonna say goodnight.
So, again, thank you so very much for spending your night here with us.
I know it's been a long show, over two hours tonight, but,
got a lot of ground to cover. Alright, folks. So, no show tomorrow. Don't forget, we'll be back on Wednesday night at 7PM
central time. Hope to see you there. Don't forget to follow us on all of our socials.

(02:15:11):
And, don't forget also to like, subscribe, and share the show with all your friends. That's my little girl.
Alright.
Folks, have a great night. God bless you. Take care of yourself. We'll see you tomorrow, Wednesday.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Prostate Cancer, Political Cover-ups, and Presidential Policies (Ep. 80)

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

24/7 News: The Latest

All Episodes

Prostate Cancer, Political Cover-ups, and Presidential Policies (Ep. 80)

On Purpose with Jay Shetty