December 9, 2025 • 41 mins
In this must-listen episode, Josh Hammer pulls no punches as he exposes the bad actors corrupting the conservative movement — including Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and the grifters cheering them on. Josh breaks down Tucker’s latest bizarre comments about buying a house in Doha, Qatar, and torches the delusion behind pretending Qatar is some kind of model society.
Josh also details Qatar’s deep ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and highlights what Florida is doing to push back against creeping sharia influence in the U.S. Then he turns to the Left, calling out Rep. Jasmine Crockett for her latest unhinged proposal on reparations — another desperate attempt to score headlines at the expense of common sense.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
A republic if you can keep it, Benjamin Franklin famously
said in describing the handiwork of the Constitucial Convention in
Philadelphia in seventeen eighty seven. What's not clear is whether
Franklin or any of the founders had in mind the
level of foreign influence and foreign operations currently taking place
on US oil. Some are recent shocking reports and some
(00:20):
shocking details from the DOHAC Autar conference this past weekend.
Shine A spotlights on the extent of foreign operations currently
happening here in these United States. All that and much
more Insdae's episode of The Josh Hammershew. Well, we've hit
this drum beat before, and we're not going to shy
away from We're going to keep on hammering it. No
(00:41):
pun intended for the first suple future, at least as
long as it comes up. Where I'm talking about the
extent of foreign influence operations that are currently having a ruinous,
a ruinous effect when it comes to American politics more broadly,
and above all, when it comes to sowing the seeds
of discords on the America can write. Now, there's numerous
(01:01):
data points, and we're going to hit all of them,
But we will first talk about this bomb show report.
And yes, I tried to use my verbiage a little
more carefully. I'm not one of those guys who goes
on X and does like three siren emojis breaking news.
You know, Donald Trump took a particularly good poop. No,
I mean, that's not how we roll here. We say
we try to save our verbiage for the actual big stuff.
(01:23):
So when I say bombshell, I actually really mean it
to bombshell. So this was a really interesting report that
came out just on Monday from an organization that is
known in the industry as NCRI. It stands for a
Network Contagion Research Institute. They are are loosely affiliated with
Rutgers University in New Jersey, but they are an independent
(01:47):
research organization. They specialize when it comes to to online
extremism and social contagion, as the name would imply, and
trends like that, misinformation, disinformation, a lot of psychology science,
and information warfare. Fundamentally, what they're getting at here is
information warfare. They've done any number of amazing sites in
the past when it comes to various other woke maladies.
(02:09):
When it comes to DEI when it comes to the
transgender phenomenon and things like that. So here is the
report that just came out on Monday from the Network
Contagion Research Industry, is titled America Last How FWENTS is
coordinated raids and foreign fake speech networks inflate his influence.
(02:30):
We're talking here about the extent of Nick Fundas's foreign influence,
social media boosting operations. All of this has been a
source of speculation. Let me kind of back up there
and just say it's been a source of speculation for
a very, very very long time. There have been any
number of debates. I've been privy to these debates. I've
been a participant in these conversation debates. What is the
(02:52):
extent of which all of the garbage that you're currently
seeing from from some elements even of the so called right,
hold aside the left. For the second focus on the right,
what is the extent of which some of the garbage
that you're seeing when it comes to the Hitler apologia
to the Joseph Stalin apologia, when it comes to just
the the the grotesque racism, misogynism, anti semitism, and ultimately
(03:14):
culminating in what we have repeatedly described as this sincere
conscientious information operation, ultimately trying to distance Christians and Jews
and thereby destroy the modern American rights. So one of
the questions all along has been how much of this
actually is organic and how much of it actually is
coming from foreign sources? No doubt some of it actually
(03:37):
is organic. Let me let me say that first and foremost.
I'm not going to just wave my hands here and
say that all of this is just foreign that. I'm
not gonna make that claim because it's simply not true.
Some of it definitely is happening at an organic level,
and that certainly ought to be troubling. For instance, there
have been some some recent turning point USA events. There
(03:57):
was at one event that the Vice President Jaduvans Partition
Paiden at Ole miss in Ox, Mississippi, and you had
someone who certainly was sounding the talking points of a
Nick Fuentes or a so called Krouber. So was that
individual himself influenced by foreigner domestic sources? I don't know,
But certainly some of this actually is happening on the
home front. That's a more complicated topic, and we're going
(04:18):
to hold that aside for present purposes. But for now
I want to talk a little bit more about this
NCR study. So there's a lot of numbers potentially to
break through here. But long story short. The reason that
the Network Contagion Research Institute again, this independent organization based
New Jersey studying online trends, information warfare, and misinformation disinformation.
(04:40):
The way that they are able to actually start to
get some of this data is because of the recent
spotlight that Elon Musk correctly and righteously shines talking about
where the actual accounts on his platform X are basing. So,
in case y all forgot, this was fairly recently, just
a few weeks ago. Really, when Elon one must develop
(05:01):
this new tool over at Twitter xor of whatever we're
calling it. And by the way, as an aside, how
crazy it is that we still say Twitter also XX
and it's been like three years since they rebranded. I mean,
I'm not quite but almost three years since they rebranded,
we're still calling it the old name. Probably a good sign. Frankly, Elon,
you should have kept the old name in the first place.
I digress. So he imfluenced this new feature a few
(05:22):
weeks ago talking about or showing that an an individual
account is based in the United States, Canada, UK, Nigeria, Pakistan,
Who's Beckistan, Japan, India, whatever, And it's because of this
tool that the NCRI is able to get some of
this data. So let's actually get into some of the
data that the good social scientists at NCRI were able
to look at when it comes to who was actually
(05:44):
boosting Nick Flentes and just as important, how is he
being boost relative to similar or larger scale accounts. So
the data that they poured over shows that Flentes is
receiving more retweets than Elon Musk, despite Elon Musk being
literally one hundred times the audience. So in the first
thirty minutes posting a tweet, Nick Flentes dominates what are
(06:07):
known as of velocity charts, which are just the sheer
amount of retweets seemingly done in coorinated fashion. When you
normalize this for a number of followers, you will see
that when Does's account is getting dozens of note hundreds
of times more Twitter velocity, more rapid fire, clearly coronated
retweets done than accounts that are just drastically drastically larger. Again,
(06:30):
Elon Musk being just one particularly example, sixty one percent
of all of when does his retweets in the first
thirty minutes of him posting something on X come from
accounts that did this repeatedly across various posts. Ninety two
percent of the accounts that are actually doing this for
Nick flent days are actually fully anonymous. Ninety two percent
are fully nonymous. And if you spend as much time
(06:52):
in the shall we say, darker places of X as
I do and have done recently, you will see that
the these folks all kind of have the same basic look.
They all have the Pepe the frog. They all have
the name Gwiper in their name. They have a few
things there in their in their bio that give it away.
But there's no photo, there's no location, there's no contact folks.
(07:13):
A lot of these are bots. A lot of these
are bots, by the way, instantally a many of funds
his most viral posts are indeed heavily retweeted by accounts
that we now see are actually based in specific countries.
Those countries are primarily, above all, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Malaysia,
and Indonesia. These countries by definition have no link whatsoever
(07:36):
to the US political conversation. They are simply foreign bot
forms that are attempting to influence the American rights and
the American political conversation more generally. Overall, when you look
at at Nick Funds's tweets over the past year or two,
you will see that the total number of retweets from
Western countries more broadly is roughly fifty one percent compared
(07:59):
to forty nine percent for non Western countries. There's a
lot more where this came from. There are twenty Funds posts,
for instance, that were examined by NCRI. Just over sixty
percent came, as I said, from these same repeated accounts.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
The report says this.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
It says quote there is no organic explanation for this
pattern none. It is consistent with outsourced engagement infrastructure. These
geographies subscribe the same low cost amplification clusters and engagement
farms that foreign actors often use to manufacture virality, distort
platform metrics, and manipulate recommendation systems. So, taken together, the
(08:40):
evidence points to a deliberate, foreign influenced campaign relying on
anonymous and possibly automated accounts to artificially inflate Nick Fundus's reach.
Gaming the platform's algorithm in a systematic effort to elevate
his influence far beyond what genuine grassroots supports could would achieve.
(09:01):
So it's coordinated foreign bot farms from places like India, Pakistan,
Malaysia and Nigeria above all that are essentially engage in
coordinated retweeting of this guy into much greater, far greater
relevance than his organic metrics would otherwise entail or would
otherwise necessitate. And then you have US based organizations that
(09:25):
buy the hype, that see these one hundred thousand views
on a reply and they're like, oh my god, this
guy's got a huge following. Oh yeah, let's go ahead
and do a New York Times puff beast making out
Nick flent Is to look like the next James Dean.
There was that photo of The Times that I think
was a Michelle Goldberg opinion columnies guy like the James
Deans slip back hair. Disgusting, disgusting stuff, folks. This is
(09:46):
all done for a very very simple, insidious reason. This
is coming from hostile sources, These Pakistani bot farms, the Pakistanis,
the Nigerian Muslims, have whoever do doing this there they
do not have the American best interest at heart. They
do not have maga's best interest at heart. They are
(10:09):
trying to make the right go crazy, and they're all
sorts of folks who are obviously falling for it. There
are all sorts of folks who are mistaking online bot
farm for an engagement driven activity and then saying, oh
my god, there's really an organic trend in this country
towards Nazism or Hitlerism.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
Or this or that.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
Have you ever wondered why, maybe there's a lunaticer too,
who's in your social life, who you see at church
or the YMCA or whatever, who maybe listens to Candice
Ownes whatever. But there's really not as much of that
as you tend to see from online. Yeah, because actually
a lot of it really is online until it trickles
out into the real world. That's the more dangerous part.
(10:53):
But for now it is imperative. It's important to know
that much of this is coming from online. Again, not
all of it, but a d amount of it is
currently coming from online. Now again, Elon Musk has done
the world really a huge favor by shining this botolne
and allowing us to see which accounts are actually based
the United States, which are foreign there. I can't help
(11:14):
but openly wonder as to whether or not there is
an even more clariant way for Elon Musk to go
about doing this. There is there a way, for instance,
when you click on someone's bio like right, there may
one click away from the bio page to show what
percentage of that account's followers are American or non American?
What percentage are in this country that country, that country?
(11:35):
Can we get like a country by country breakdown, mister Musk,
of a given accounts followers one tweet away, similar to
how you can now get one click away to actually
see where the account is based in the first place.
Something like that I think would be deeply helpful and
deeply productive, an unambiguous good. It would be beneficial for
(11:55):
our contemporary American political conversation. This is a very old tactic,
by the way, a very very very old tactic when
it comes to hostile foreign governments and foreign influencers who
try to meddle in American politics and try to rile
people up, to drive wedges and to ultimately sick certain
(12:17):
Americans on each other, to make them attack each other,
to try to make them hate each other. It is
a very, very very old tactic. These Soviets were infamous
for this during the nineteen sixties, at the heart of
the Cold War, at the heights of the Civil Rights era.
Martin Luther King Junior and all that the Soviets were infamous.
They're having their useful idiot Communist Party USA stooges in
(12:41):
the United States to go into, for instance, heavily black
neighborhoods and to try to prop up radicals like Malcolm
X and to discredit moderates like Martin Luther King Jr.
Because they were trying to empower the crazies thereby sowing
the seeds of discord and trying to make Americans hate
one another. In that particular contest, they were trying to
incite racial animus. Now they're currently trying to undermine Mecca,
(13:03):
trying to undermine the American Right, which is the only
force for good in American politics, by extension, for America's
role on the world stage. The're trying to undermine that.
They're trying to undermine the Jewish Christian Alliance, trying to
undermine US support for Israel.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Things like that.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
It's all coming from a dark, nefarious place that is very,
very very relevant. So I'm just really happy that this,
that this campaign and this and the support has come
out from NCRI for what it's worth. Twent as responding
and saying, oh my god, the NCRI. You know, there's
like a big there's a George Soros operation. I have
no idea where he's gaining this from, no idea. I
(13:39):
don't take a penny from NCRI. I don't work for them.
I know a couple of people that are involved with
the organization from AFAR. They are not a Soros organization.
They've done incredible work on totally unrelated issues in the
past when it comes to DEI, transgenders and various of
the wokes up there, they do a lot of good work.
Go ahead and give them a follow check out the reports,
because this is really really quite damning stuff. When it
(14:02):
comes to Flint Days, I guess the natural follow up
question would be, I would like to see the information
not just for Nick Flint Days, but for a lot
of these other toxic influencers on the American Rife Center
as well. I would love, would absolutely love to see
a country by country breakdown of Candice Owens's followers. I
have a sneaky suspicion that she has a massive, massive,
(14:22):
massive following right now if I had to guess when
it comes to places like Pakistan. I mean, I could
be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I'm not, and I
would love to see that there. So elon Moska, there's
a way to do that. Let's go ahead and make
that happen. By the way, around the same time that
the NCRI was releasing this, so just over this past weekend, actually,
(14:43):
there was a conference in Doha, Qatar that you might
have seen. This was the Doha Forum. It is It
is a major conference every year you get you typically
get various elites from American industry, from media, from technology,
from hollywo They all go over to Doha to kiss
the ring of the Altani family, which is the ruling
(15:04):
family in Qatar, which is a modern day Islamist slave
state essentially. And there's been a lot of speculations, speaking
of speculations, speaking of foreign influence. Has been in a
lot of speculation as to the extent of Tucker Carlson's
personal involvement with Katar. Mark Levin has been calling Tucker
Carlson Kat Charlson, Tucker Cartarlson for months and months now
(15:26):
on his very powerful radio broadcast, Tucker Carlson, we know
interviewed the Amir of Katar, the premiere Alton. He interviewed
him earlier this year in twenty and twenty five. And
we actually also know, as a result of some very
very innovative investigator reporting from the Washington Examiner and others,
(15:47):
that there is a very sketchy mom and pop consulting
firm located in northern Virginia called Lumin eight Advisors, which
you never heard of. They fired a FARA registration aw
so thereby registering as a foreign age and on behalf
of the Embassy of Katar, they were making an obscene
amount of money. It was like close to two hundred
(16:07):
thousand dollars a month or something like that. And on
their far registration paperwork Illuminated Advisors. Their one principal source
of business that they publicly listed in the US government
registration document, their principal place of business that they listed
for doing their work on behalf of the Embassy of
Katar was the Tucker Carlson Show. So the interview that
(16:30):
Tuck Carlson did, what I'm saying with Al Tani, the
Amir of Katar earlier this year was a literal boughtom
paid for interview. How do I know that because the
illuminated advisors people who arranged the interview, literally wrote it
on their far Registration Act form. They got paid oodles
and ools of money to arrange the interview. Tucker, of course,
has been downplaying the extent of Shria law. He has
(16:54):
been making light of Shria law, saying, oh my god,
look at these beautiful cities in the Middle Least. They
have these beautiful skyline and there's no crime, and there's
this and that, there's real law. How bad can it be?
So I think a lot of people started paying attention
when this past weekend it came out that Tucker actually
was going to go to Doha for the Doha Forum
as part of this total boondoggle, this junk kets. Oh wait,
(17:16):
but it actually wasn't just Tucker Carlson. It was actually
also his business partner, Neil Patel, his co founder of
The Daily Caller from way way back in the day,
and unbelievably, unbelievably over the weekend, it was actually on Sunday,
Neil Patel tweets out this photo of him and Tucker
(17:37):
Carlson standing next to each other, and they both have
what looks like a cocktail in their hands, which is
itself a little odd because last I checked, Tucker Carlston
had publicly said that he had gone sober after having
an alcohol problem in past years, So maybe he's back
on the sauce, which itself would explain some of his
recent behavior, at least to an extent.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
So I don't know. I'm just asking questions. What do
I know?
Speaker 1 (17:59):
But anyway, this particular tweet Neil batail the two numbers
he got there, Tucker is flipping his middle finger of
the camera, and the caption that Neielbletel tweets is greetings
from the blood He has a tie with Kevin rypropertly
greens from the blood thirsty terror supporting slave state of Katar.
So there's Tucker drinking some fancy cocktail, but don't worry,
(18:19):
he's totally non alcoholic drinking some fancy cocktail, flipping the camera.
And then Neille Tell's tweet, so who they're actually flipping
off is directed at Mark Levin, Ted Cruz and Laura Lumer.
By the way, in the other photo in this Neebletael tweet,
it shows Tucker just laughing with Donald Trump Junior in
Doha at the Doha Forum, which is itself somewhat disturbing,
(18:42):
to put them mildly. And there are all sorts of
other questions when it comes to the extent of the
Witcoff business enterprises, when it comes to the extent of
the Trump Organization's dealings with Katar. But for present purposes,
let's just say that the single leading vector, the single
leading vector when it comes to doing what Fun is
doing when it comes to trying to sow the seeds
(19:03):
of discord on the American right and implode MAGA from within.
The single most important arrow in this quiver of information
operation arrows is Tucker Carlson, and he is there drinking
in cocktail, flipping off Americans from Katar after having done
a bottom paid interview with the premiere. But wait, it
(19:24):
actually gets worse. It literally gets worse, because Tucker interviewed
the Amir of Qatar again, the second interview he's done
now in less than half a year or something like that,
with the leader of Katar. He did it the Doha Forum,
and he said this utterly utterly shocking thing. Go ahead
and watch this.
Speaker 3 (19:44):
I am, however, tomorrow, buying a place in Qatar because
I am pe Hichech in Doha yah, and I'm doing
that because I like the city. I think it's beautiful,
but also to make the statement that I'm an American
and a free man and I'll be wherever I want
to be.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
So he's there in Doha saying that he's going to
buy a condo, a house, whatever, in Katar, I'm trying
to say, because he's trying to show that he's a
free man, that he's an American. Katar is the number
one financial and ideological sponsor of radical soony Islam the
rolled over. They have been caught red handed connected to
(20:19):
every single radical Islamist terrorist group you can possibly name,
up to and including Al Qaeda and Isis. I mean
to say nothing of Hamas, which they are the number
one patrons of. This is a terrorist state, a terrorist
state involved, as we've discussed in the show, in deep,
deep rooted sprawling, an intricate duplicity when it comes to
(20:42):
their hosting of value, date air.
Speaker 2 (20:43):
Based and things like that.
Speaker 1 (20:44):
They're Qatar is an enemy though of the United states,
they are an enemy. I don't care that even the
Trumpdministration has now defined them as a as a as
a NATO Article five worthy an attack on them in
his attack US style quot ungquale.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
They are not. They are not that they are horrific
terror supporters.
Speaker 1 (21:07):
So Tucker Carlton trying to do the so called America
first thing from the number one country that has invested
in American higher education for the worst, trying to turn
American higher education into a broader Muslim Brotherhood Islamist theocracy
Bashim Katar, which along with the Brotherhood, is investing oodles
and ools money according to a brand report when it
comes to getting taxpayer money in the European Union as well,
(21:29):
all for the same goal. Katar's goal is to Islamicize
the West. Their goal is to spread these seeds of
the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the West. Why do you think
the trumpministration finally signed this water down milk toast Muslim
Brotherhood baned recently because there are more reports coming out
about the extent of the Brotherhood's information operations and the
(21:50):
extent to which they are trying to disseminate their propaganda
When it comes to American higher education, media boondoggles parties.
Speaker 2 (21:56):
This at there.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
That is why the administration finally acted in someone half
hour fashion in Middlely. Tucker doesn't care. Tucker doesn't care
at all. I mean, explains me what the America first
cases for buying a condo in Dohak, Katar. There's no
culture in Doha, Qatar.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
It's a slave state.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
The actual Arabs there are like three hundred and thirty
plus thousand. There's a whole indentured servitude, modern slave class
of Pakistani's Indians and people from the Nepal and the
police people who are brought in there to do the
Arabs bidding.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
There's no culture.
Speaker 4 (22:33):
What is this? Like?
Speaker 2 (22:34):
Literally, what is this?
Speaker 1 (22:37):
It's not just Tucker, by the way, he's by far
the worst defender, but all these other so called influencers
who I saw on social media who were on this trip,
Rob Smith, Rob Smith tweeting out like literally copying, pasting
in the dumbest, lowest iq fashion imaginable. He was clearly
given some recommend the talking point about what to say
(22:59):
about katarre do just copies and paste it all over
social media feed?
Speaker 2 (23:03):
What are you doing?
Speaker 1 (23:04):
Bro? I mean, I hope that check cleared and that
there are a lot of zeros that at the end
of that number, because you've sold your soul, all you
people there have sold any morsel of integrity that you
have there. This is the game that Qatar plays. This
is dangerous, dangerous stuff, folks. Either you understand that Western
(23:25):
civilization is besieged by various forces, including Islamism, or you don't.
Tucker Carlson, I said repeatedly, is not playing on team civilization.
Qatar is the number one vector of foreign influence in
the United States, whether it's Tucker Carlson, whether it's Nick
flent As, there is all sorts, all sorts of foreign
influence happening right now in the United States, many many,
(23:48):
many other as well. Again, I call on Elon Musk
to show us a country by country breakdown as to
where exactly a given users followers are located. That should
not be that difficult, That should be easy enough to do.
Make it one click away from your biome and then
let's see it. Because I don't want to stop a
front desk, don't stop a candae own's either. I want
(24:10):
to see where Tucker's followers are. Surely that's not too
much to ask for. By the way, I was just
talking about the extent to which the Trump administrations and
executive order defining certain chapters of the muzzlem Brotherhood was
watered down. They basically said that they are declaring the
Muzzle Brotherhood a terrorist organization in the Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt.
I mean, okay, I mean that's fine as far as goes.
(24:31):
They're already declared a terrorist organization there. For what it's worth,
the House Foreign Affairs Committee in the US House has
already passed out a bill. It's pending in this House
for action. Per Mike Johnson passed it bill to recommend
to designate the entire Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, something
that clearly should happen. Most recently, a few weeks ago,
(24:53):
it was Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, who did that.
In the Lone Star State, declared that the Muslim Brotherhood
and CARE the accounts American Islamic Relations, which was founded
as a Hamas Muslin Brotherhood front group in the United States.
It was Greg Abbot who went ahead and declared that
the Brotherhood and CARE were terrorist organizations. Were purposes of
Texas law and therefore there will be no bank loans
(25:14):
prosecutions as as appropriate things like that. So finally, finally, yesterday,
on Monday December eighth, Ron DeSantis here in the state
of Florida doing the exact same thing.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
The time that this was actually really funny.
Speaker 1 (25:27):
I got drinks with a friend's Sunday night and we
were literally talking about this. We literally said, why is
the Santis not matched Abbot on this? And then sure enough,
literally the next day, on Monday December eighth, Ron de
Santis signing this executive order saying Florida is designating the
Musslim Brotherhood and the Council of Americans Lack Relations aka
CARE as foreign terrorist organizations. Florida agencies are hereby directed
(25:48):
to undertake all lawful measures to prevent unlawful activities by
these organizations, including denying privileges or resources to anyone providing
material support. CARE for what it's worth, was previously designated
a terrorist organization by the notably Arab United Arab Emirates.
The UAE it declared CARE a terrorist organization back in
(26:09):
twenty fourteen, over a decade ago. The Brotherhood itself has
been declared a terrorist organization by any number of Arab countries.
I just named three, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, how about Saudi Arabia,
how about the UAE itself there it's basically katar in Turkey. Okay,
the two leading sponsors of radical Sunni Islamism. Those are
two countries that are that are currently playing footsie, playing
super nice with the Brotherhood. But the santist doesn't really
(26:31):
care for him that He is not saying that CARE
and the Brotherhood are terrorist orgizations and will be treated
as such here in the state of Florida. Just a
little brief history for you about CARE in case you
don't really know the full history here. So CARE was
initially incorporated in the US in nine ninety four by
Omar achenlet Rafik Javert and Nihad Awad. Awad is still
(26:51):
intimately involved with CARE. He infamously after October seventh praised
the Hamas assault.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
This this is what we're talking about here.
Speaker 1 (26:59):
We're talking abou a literal Jihat sympathizers, pro terrorist, pro
jihad Muslim Brotherhood radicals. So this all happened in ninety
four to become his founding director. Nihadawad, the guy who
was praising October seven, twenty twenty three, Nihada Wad becomes
founding director. Left his position as the public relations director
for the Islamic Association for Palestine, which has been described
(27:22):
by the FBI's counter Terrorism chief as a quote front
organization for HAMAS that engages in propaganda for Islamic militants.
The US government itself has described its organization related to
CARE called the Islamic Association of Palestine. The government itself
had described them as a founding mender a founding member
of the Muslim Brotherhood's so called Palestine Committee, which is
(27:43):
a Brotherhood offshoot here in the United States. Within a
month after its formation, CARE received a five thousand dollars check,
followed just weeks later by another five thousand dollars wire
transfer from a group called the Holy Land Foundation. The
Holy Land Foundation was convicted into the in North Texas
in the Dallas for Worth area, providing over twelve million
(28:04):
dollars to Hamas. Okay this is This ends up becoming
the largest terror financi prosecution in the entire history of
the DOJ. It shut down the Holy Land Foundation in
North Texas. During the last year or two of the Bushministration,
CARE What'sworth was named an unindicted co conspirator in that
particular case. So why is every Red state not doing this?
(28:28):
Why is every Red state not listing the Brotherhood not
listing care as terrorist oranizations. There is no conceivable reason
not to do this when we're talking here about the
main themistate show, which is foreign influence in the United States,
foreign influence on the American right, foreign influence trying to
sow the seeds of discord and try to rile us up.
(28:49):
In general, there just anti American bull crap. There is
no more important starting place than Katar and their Islamus
lackeys in the muz Brotherhood. That is ground zero unless
you're willing to get your hands dirty and to crack
down the brothod. Unless you want to give your hands
dirty and to shine a spotlighte if you on Musk
on the extent to which these are Brotherhood afiliated accounts
(29:11):
boosting Funtees and Tucker and all this stuff, unless you're
willing to get your hands dirty and to call out
frauds like Rob Smith for copying and pasting Katari supplied
pr press releases for your all expenses and probably a
nice check as well, boondoggle Doha. Unless you want to
get your hands a ready there, this problem will continue.
You have to understand when your civilization is to know
(29:32):
you're up against. If you understand properly that Western civilization
is the biblical inheritance of the two biblical religions Christianitian Judaism,
then you understand that Islam is incompatible and that radical Islam,
the types of the types of the like switch which
are peddled and propagated by Katar and the Muslim brotherhood Lackeys,
that is definitely incompatible, period, full stop, end of story.
(29:55):
So don't be afraid to call out the frauds, and
don't be afraid to shine a spotlight on the influence
operations on the frauds.
Speaker 2 (30:04):
All of it.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
It's disgusting, honestly, it's genuinely disgusting. And unless and until
we finally have that conversation about the extent to which
these info ops are corrupting and debasing are conversation or politics,
this is gonna fester and fester and fester and fester.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
Awful stuff. Speaking of total frauds.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
By the way, Jasmin Crockett has decided that she is
running for US Senate in Texas.
Speaker 2 (30:34):
She's not gonna win. This is Texas, after all.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
Some people say if Ken Paxton the current very controversial
to a trained general. Some folks say that if he
defeats John Cornyn in the primary, which I hope that
he does. Some folks say that Texas might turn blue
because Paxon is so unpopular.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
I don't buy this.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
I don't think you should buy this either there, especially
if that nominee is Jasmine Crockett, who is making a
really strong play to try to oust Iana Presley a
mess Jesas, to try to become the ringo star of
the squad. You know you've got Ellen O mar You've
got Phia Tulay, You've got aoc. I mean, you know
they're a Paul McCartney, the John Lennon and George Harrison.
Who's the ringo star? At first it was Alona Presley,
(31:09):
she kind of fizzled out. Jasmine Crockett thinking a very
strong play to be the backbencher of the idiot caucus
there in the far left of the House Democratic Caucus.
And this is her latest bits. Go ahead and check
out this dooozy.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
Just this past week, I saw I don't remember which celebrity,
but it was actually a celebrity, and I was like,
I don't know that that's not necessarily a bad idea,
but I'd have to think through it a lot. One
of the things that they proposed is black folk not
have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time,
because then again, that puts money back in your pocket.
Speaker 2 (31:38):
But at the same.
Speaker 4 (31:38):
Time, it may not be as objectionable to some people
about actually giving out dollars, but obviously then you start
dealing with the different tax brackets and things like that,
and that's one of the reasons that, you know, we
argue that reparations makes sense because so many black folk,
not only do you owe for the labor that was
stolen and killed in all the other things, right, but
(32:01):
the fact is, like we end up being so far behind.
Speaker 1 (32:05):
Okay, where to begin? I'm somewhat all strike to where
do you even begin here? First of all, how stupid
is this woman? I mean, I hate to just like mock,
but sometimes you just have to mock, you know. Mockery
is actually very important and it's very powerful if done correctly.
There some of the rights political opponents, some of these
lefting people are just so contemptibly low iq dim with
(32:28):
stupid as you kind of quest yourself as like whether
you should even seriously engage these arguments. You know, some
of these folks in the left have a modicum of
intellectual seriousness. I mean, I don't think Bill and Hillary
Clinton are dumb people. I don't think Rokahanna is a
dumb person. I don't even think Gavin Newsom is probably
(32:49):
a particularly dumb person. But that Jasmine Crockett, I mean,
she probably got one too many swirly back in elementary school.
Her brain food is getting flushed down the toilets on that.
I I mean, how dumb can you be? First of all,
the case against reparations. I can't believe we even having
this discussion still. You know, years after Black Lives Matter
(33:12):
was ousted as a horrifically grifting Marxist subjugationist organization.
Speaker 2 (33:18):
And yes, they were grifting.
Speaker 1 (33:19):
They were grifting the heck out of their oblivious idiot donors.
This was a Black Lives Matter plank of their platform
with the reparation stuff. How in the world are we
even still having this conversation right now?
Speaker 2 (33:33):
Folks.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
It's true that there is a notion in the Bible,
in the Book of Deuteronomy, perhaps above all about holding
the sins of the father responsible and then carrying that
down through some generations. But even in the Bible it
says that past a few generations, you will not hold
anyone responsible for their grandfather's since So, even taking that
(33:56):
at face value, we are now one hundred and sixty
years since General Lee's surrender to General Grant and Atmas
Courthouse in Virginia and warrinked about reparations.
Speaker 2 (34:07):
Now, how are you going to do that?
Speaker 1 (34:10):
By the way, I mean, is a black person who's
an actual descendant slaves? Is he going to be as
entitled reparations as just as much as the black guy
who came as an immigrant from Nigeria like a year ago.
Does a new Nigerian immigrant, What about the Christian fleeing
Bocoharam Islamist genocide in Nigeria? If he got a green
(34:32):
card or a citizenship here recently, does he get reparations?
His failing wasn't here. His failing was not here back
during the Civil War or the slavery period that preceded it.
So there's no practical way to do this. It's also
morally egregious. It is morally egregious to try to racially
divide in this horrific fashion. In the year twenty twenty five,
(34:55):
America did pay its debt in the form of eradicating slavery.
That debt took the form of the United States Civil War.
It took the form of a conflict that was baked
in from the start. It was bound to happen. The
framers probably frankly knew this was bound to happen, if
you ask all of them with some truth serum. The
(35:16):
conflict happened a few generations after the founding generation, and
it was ugly, It was brutal, it was terrible, Well
over six hundred thousand slain brother fighting against brother, horrific,
awful stuff. That is the reparation, That is the toll
that was paid to eradicate the horrific moral evil of
(35:38):
chattel slavery in this country. To start divving up by
race now in the year twenty five, to start trying
to tax certain people according to a certain way based
on your skin color, is egregious. It's morally offensive. And
again it is a talking point of hacks and morons,
which frankly is what Jasmine Crockett is, you know, on
(36:00):
a recent epsiode of the show, we're talking a little
bit about how there are some green shoots, some early
signs that the left might be sobering a little bit
when it comes to the climate change catastrophism conversation. Well,
if this is any indication, I mean Krockett trying to
run for state with office in a red state and
she's doubling down on the race obsession. If this is
(36:23):
any indication, then they are going the wrong wrong way
really really quickly. Yet again when it comes to race.
So even even Republicans lose a politically beneficial winning issue
on the climate change stuff, they're still going to be
able to have the correct position on race. And the
correct position on race just means that you actually believe
that all men are created equal, that you actually believe
(36:46):
in equal protection, that you actually believe, as Martin Luther
King Junior famously said, that you judge all of us
not by the color of our skin, but by the
content of our character. It's not radical claims. They are
the basic moral intuitions that can be formed about our
fellow humanity, rooted in the biblical truth of Genesis, Chapter one,
(37:07):
verse twenty seven, that we are all made in the
divine image of God. But for now, Desmon Crockett is
just a total Looney Tunes nutbag. She is not going
to win. Stay wet, Austin, Texas. I can pretty much
guarantee you that. So we had this orgament yesterday at
the Uspreme Court as well. Final note for today's show.
This argument that we talked about a great length on
yesterday's show, Trump versus Slaughter, pertains to whether or not
(37:29):
the president has the ability to fire for cause or
not for a cause commissioners of what are known as
so called independent agencies. This case pertains to the FTC
the Federal Trade Commission. There have been similar legalist peach
thus far in the first year of the Trump administration
when it comes to the National Labor Relations Board and
various other agencies as well. On yesterday's show, I argued
(37:53):
that this is going to be a pretty straightforward victory
for the Trump administration when it comes to the bread
and butter assertion that the executive power of Article two
of the Constitution clearly vests the ability to make all
personal decisions, all hiring and firing decisions within the executive branch,
and the corollary the similar claim to that is that
(38:14):
when it comes to so called independent agencies, that that
is an oxymoron. There's actually no such thing. You're either
in Article one the Congress. You're either in Article two
the Executive Branch. You're either in Article three the Digital Branch,
or you're not anywhere.
Speaker 2 (38:27):
You're out.
Speaker 1 (38:28):
Pick a door, any door one, two, three, there's no door. Four,
there's no deep state door. There are three doors. So
what that means here is that if daltre one wants
to fire a commissioner on the FDC, wants to fire
someone on the NLRB, or any of these other concocted
New Deal era FDR era agencies where Congress constructs them
(38:50):
to have a certain partisan breakdown, and you can only
fire the commissioner for cause and not for cause. There
what that means is that it's all garbage. It's all
totally unconstitutional. You can't do it enough. Looking at the
tea leaves of yesterday's orl or arguments, it does seem
to me that this is going to end up being
a resounding victory for the trominstration. You had all the
usual suspects you had Katanji Brown, Jackson, Sonya semyor the
(39:13):
usual liberal ladies who are questioning about whether or not
we're going to junk this nine year old president known
as Humphrey Executor.
Speaker 2 (39:18):
Yeah, we are.
Speaker 1 (39:19):
We're going to junk because Humphrey's Executor, which legitimize this
unconstitutional structure. We're going to junk that president because that
case was wrong the day it was decided and is
still wrong today. The practical ramvocations, if Humphrey's Executor is
actually overturned, are going to be massive. Trump will be
able to fire effectively whoever he wants to fire, period,
(39:40):
full stop, end of story. There are the civil service
statues from the late nineteenth century that's a little more complicated,
but at least when it comes to the top ranking
commissioner administrative brass, there will be no for cause removals
that are constitutionally permissible. It is the president's call. Some
folks say that you're in power, worrying the president. It's
(40:01):
a tyranny.
Speaker 2 (40:01):
No, it's not.
Speaker 1 (40:03):
The actual tyranny here is empowering the unelected deep state.
All the justices are set to do in Trump versus Slaughter.
All they're set to do is to empower the actual
elected person, the president of the president United States, to
try to empower someone who is himself accountable to we
the people, because we the people are sovereign in this country,
(40:25):
not the deep state, not these radical woke left revolutionaries
within the administry of state. They're not the sovereigns we are,
and we elect the presidents, not them. Again, the good
news is that the justices seem to very much agree
with my legal analysis, which you would have heard essay
on Josh amershow, and that's also a failiar mind to
folks to make sure to like and subscribe to our
(40:46):
show if you have not already done so, We appreciate
that five so review, drop a comment, let us know
how we're doing. Make sure to watch the show on
YouTube if you're not already doing so, over on Newsweek's
YouTube channel. We are available as well over at the
Salem News Channel. But for now, I'm Josh Hammer. I
hope you enjoyed today's episode of The Josh Hammer Show.
Speaker 2 (41:08):
The Josh Hammer Show is a member of the Trust
Project
A republic if you can keep it, Benjamin Franklin famously
said in describing the handiwork of the Constitucial Convention in
Philadelphia in seventeen eighty seven. What's not clear is whether
Franklin or any of the founders had in mind the
level of foreign influence and foreign operations currently taking place
on US oil. Some are recent shocking reports and some
(00:20):
shocking details from the DOHAC Autar conference this past weekend.
Shine A spotlights on the extent of foreign operations currently
happening here in these United States. All that and much
more Insdae's episode of The Josh Hammershew. Well, we've hit
this drum beat before, and we're not going to shy
away from We're going to keep on hammering it. No
(00:41):
pun intended for the first suple future, at least as
long as it comes up. Where I'm talking about the
extent of foreign influence operations that are currently having a ruinous,
a ruinous effect when it comes to American politics more broadly,
and above all, when it comes to sowing the seeds
of discords on the America can write. Now, there's numerous
(01:01):
data points, and we're going to hit all of them,
But we will first talk about this bomb show report.
And yes, I tried to use my verbiage a little
more carefully. I'm not one of those guys who goes
on X and does like three siren emojis breaking news.
You know, Donald Trump took a particularly good poop. No,
I mean, that's not how we roll here. We say
we try to save our verbiage for the actual big stuff.
(01:23):
So when I say bombshell, I actually really mean it
to bombshell. So this was a really interesting report that
came out just on Monday from an organization that is
known in the industry as NCRI. It stands for a
Network Contagion Research Institute. They are are loosely affiliated with
Rutgers University in New Jersey, but they are an independent
(01:47):
research organization. They specialize when it comes to to online
extremism and social contagion, as the name would imply, and
trends like that, misinformation, disinformation, a lot of psychology science,
and information warfare. Fundamentally, what they're getting at here is
information warfare. They've done any number of amazing sites in
the past when it comes to various other woke maladies.
(02:09):
When it comes to DEI when it comes to the
transgender phenomenon and things like that. So here is the
report that just came out on Monday from the Network
Contagion Research Industry, is titled America Last How FWENTS is
coordinated raids and foreign fake speech networks inflate his influence.
(02:30):
We're talking here about the extent of Nick Fundas's foreign influence,
social media boosting operations. All of this has been a
source of speculation. Let me kind of back up there
and just say it's been a source of speculation for
a very, very very long time. There have been any
number of debates. I've been privy to these debates. I've
been a participant in these conversation debates. What is the
(02:52):
extent of which all of the garbage that you're currently
seeing from from some elements even of the so called right,
hold aside the left. For the second focus on the right,
what is the extent of which some of the garbage
that you're seeing when it comes to the Hitler apologia
to the Joseph Stalin apologia, when it comes to just
the the the grotesque racism, misogynism, anti semitism, and ultimately
(03:14):
culminating in what we have repeatedly described as this sincere
conscientious information operation, ultimately trying to distance Christians and Jews
and thereby destroy the modern American rights. So one of
the questions all along has been how much of this
actually is organic and how much of it actually is
coming from foreign sources? No doubt some of it actually
(03:37):
is organic. Let me let me say that first and foremost.
I'm not going to just wave my hands here and
say that all of this is just foreign that. I'm
not gonna make that claim because it's simply not true.
Some of it definitely is happening at an organic level,
and that certainly ought to be troubling. For instance, there
have been some some recent turning point USA events. There
(03:57):
was at one event that the Vice President Jaduvans Partition
Paiden at Ole miss in Ox, Mississippi, and you had
someone who certainly was sounding the talking points of a
Nick Fuentes or a so called Krouber. So was that
individual himself influenced by foreigner domestic sources? I don't know,
But certainly some of this actually is happening on the
home front. That's a more complicated topic, and we're going
(04:18):
to hold that aside for present purposes. But for now
I want to talk a little bit more about this
NCR study. So there's a lot of numbers potentially to
break through here. But long story short. The reason that
the Network Contagion Research Institute again, this independent organization based
New Jersey studying online trends, information warfare, and misinformation disinformation.
(04:40):
The way that they are able to actually start to
get some of this data is because of the recent
spotlight that Elon Musk correctly and righteously shines talking about
where the actual accounts on his platform X are basing. So,
in case y all forgot, this was fairly recently, just
a few weeks ago. Really, when Elon one must develop
(05:01):
this new tool over at Twitter xor of whatever we're
calling it. And by the way, as an aside, how
crazy it is that we still say Twitter also XX
and it's been like three years since they rebranded. I mean,
I'm not quite but almost three years since they rebranded,
we're still calling it the old name. Probably a good sign. Frankly, Elon,
you should have kept the old name in the first place.
I digress. So he imfluenced this new feature a few
(05:22):
weeks ago talking about or showing that an an individual
account is based in the United States, Canada, UK, Nigeria, Pakistan,
Who's Beckistan, Japan, India, whatever, And it's because of this
tool that the NCRI is able to get some of
this data. So let's actually get into some of the
data that the good social scientists at NCRI were able
to look at when it comes to who was actually
(05:44):
boosting Nick Flentes and just as important, how is he
being boost relative to similar or larger scale accounts. So
the data that they poured over shows that Flentes is
receiving more retweets than Elon Musk, despite Elon Musk being
literally one hundred times the audience. So in the first
thirty minutes posting a tweet, Nick Flentes dominates what are
(06:07):
known as of velocity charts, which are just the sheer
amount of retweets seemingly done in coorinated fashion. When you
normalize this for a number of followers, you will see
that when Does's account is getting dozens of note hundreds
of times more Twitter velocity, more rapid fire, clearly coronated
retweets done than accounts that are just drastically drastically larger. Again,
(06:30):
Elon Musk being just one particularly example, sixty one percent
of all of when does his retweets in the first
thirty minutes of him posting something on X come from
accounts that did this repeatedly across various posts. Ninety two
percent of the accounts that are actually doing this for
Nick flent days are actually fully anonymous. Ninety two percent
are fully nonymous. And if you spend as much time
(06:52):
in the shall we say, darker places of X as
I do and have done recently, you will see that
the these folks all kind of have the same basic look.
They all have the Pepe the frog. They all have
the name Gwiper in their name. They have a few
things there in their in their bio that give it away.
But there's no photo, there's no location, there's no contact folks.
(07:13):
A lot of these are bots. A lot of these
are bots, by the way, instantally a many of funds
his most viral posts are indeed heavily retweeted by accounts
that we now see are actually based in specific countries.
Those countries are primarily, above all, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Malaysia,
and Indonesia. These countries by definition have no link whatsoever
(07:36):
to the US political conversation. They are simply foreign bot
forms that are attempting to influence the American rights and
the American political conversation more generally. Overall, when you look
at at Nick Funds's tweets over the past year or two,
you will see that the total number of retweets from
Western countries more broadly is roughly fifty one percent compared
(07:59):
to forty nine percent for non Western countries. There's a
lot more where this came from. There are twenty Funds posts,
for instance, that were examined by NCRI. Just over sixty
percent came, as I said, from these same repeated accounts.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
The report says this.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
It says quote there is no organic explanation for this
pattern none. It is consistent with outsourced engagement infrastructure. These
geographies subscribe the same low cost amplification clusters and engagement
farms that foreign actors often use to manufacture virality, distort
platform metrics, and manipulate recommendation systems. So, taken together, the
(08:40):
evidence points to a deliberate, foreign influenced campaign relying on
anonymous and possibly automated accounts to artificially inflate Nick Fundus's reach.
Gaming the platform's algorithm in a systematic effort to elevate
his influence far beyond what genuine grassroots supports could would achieve.
(09:01):
So it's coordinated foreign bot farms from places like India, Pakistan,
Malaysia and Nigeria above all that are essentially engage in
coordinated retweeting of this guy into much greater, far greater
relevance than his organic metrics would otherwise entail or would
otherwise necessitate. And then you have US based organizations that
(09:25):
buy the hype, that see these one hundred thousand views
on a reply and they're like, oh my god, this
guy's got a huge following. Oh yeah, let's go ahead
and do a New York Times puff beast making out
Nick flent Is to look like the next James Dean.
There was that photo of The Times that I think
was a Michelle Goldberg opinion columnies guy like the James
Deans slip back hair. Disgusting, disgusting stuff, folks. This is
(09:46):
all done for a very very simple, insidious reason. This
is coming from hostile sources, These Pakistani bot farms, the Pakistanis,
the Nigerian Muslims, have whoever do doing this there they
do not have the American best interest at heart. They
do not have maga's best interest at heart. They are
(10:09):
trying to make the right go crazy, and they're all
sorts of folks who are obviously falling for it. There
are all sorts of folks who are mistaking online bot
farm for an engagement driven activity and then saying, oh
my god, there's really an organic trend in this country
towards Nazism or Hitlerism.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
Or this or that.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
Have you ever wondered why, maybe there's a lunaticer too,
who's in your social life, who you see at church
or the YMCA or whatever, who maybe listens to Candice
Ownes whatever. But there's really not as much of that
as you tend to see from online. Yeah, because actually
a lot of it really is online until it trickles
out into the real world. That's the more dangerous part.
(10:53):
But for now it is imperative. It's important to know
that much of this is coming from online. Again, not
all of it, but a d amount of it is
currently coming from online. Now again, Elon Musk has done
the world really a huge favor by shining this botolne
and allowing us to see which accounts are actually based
the United States, which are foreign there. I can't help
(11:14):
but openly wonder as to whether or not there is
an even more clariant way for Elon Musk to go
about doing this. There is there a way, for instance,
when you click on someone's bio like right, there may
one click away from the bio page to show what
percentage of that account's followers are American or non American?
What percentage are in this country that country, that country?
(11:35):
Can we get like a country by country breakdown, mister Musk,
of a given accounts followers one tweet away, similar to
how you can now get one click away to actually
see where the account is based in the first place.
Something like that I think would be deeply helpful and
deeply productive, an unambiguous good. It would be beneficial for
(11:55):
our contemporary American political conversation. This is a very old tactic,
by the way, a very very very old tactic when
it comes to hostile foreign governments and foreign influencers who
try to meddle in American politics and try to rile
people up, to drive wedges and to ultimately sick certain
(12:17):
Americans on each other, to make them attack each other,
to try to make them hate each other. It is
a very, very very old tactic. These Soviets were infamous
for this during the nineteen sixties, at the heart of
the Cold War, at the heights of the Civil Rights era.
Martin Luther King Junior and all that the Soviets were infamous.
They're having their useful idiot Communist Party USA stooges in
(12:41):
the United States to go into, for instance, heavily black
neighborhoods and to try to prop up radicals like Malcolm
X and to discredit moderates like Martin Luther King Jr.
Because they were trying to empower the crazies thereby sowing
the seeds of discord and trying to make Americans hate
one another. In that particular contest, they were trying to
incite racial animus. Now they're currently trying to undermine Mecca,
(13:03):
trying to undermine the American Right, which is the only
force for good in American politics, by extension, for America's
role on the world stage. The're trying to undermine that.
They're trying to undermine the Jewish Christian Alliance, trying to
undermine US support for Israel.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Things like that.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
It's all coming from a dark, nefarious place that is very,
very very relevant. So I'm just really happy that this,
that this campaign and this and the support has come
out from NCRI for what it's worth. Twent as responding
and saying, oh my god, the NCRI. You know, there's
like a big there's a George Soros operation. I have
no idea where he's gaining this from, no idea. I
(13:39):
don't take a penny from NCRI. I don't work for them.
I know a couple of people that are involved with
the organization from AFAR. They are not a Soros organization.
They've done incredible work on totally unrelated issues in the
past when it comes to DEI, transgenders and various of
the wokes up there, they do a lot of good work.
Go ahead and give them a follow check out the reports,
because this is really really quite damning stuff. When it
(14:02):
comes to Flint Days, I guess the natural follow up
question would be, I would like to see the information
not just for Nick Flint Days, but for a lot
of these other toxic influencers on the American Rife Center
as well. I would love, would absolutely love to see
a country by country breakdown of Candice Owens's followers. I
have a sneaky suspicion that she has a massive, massive,
(14:22):
massive following right now if I had to guess when
it comes to places like Pakistan. I mean, I could
be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I'm not, and I
would love to see that there. So elon Moska, there's
a way to do that. Let's go ahead and make
that happen. By the way, around the same time that
the NCRI was releasing this, so just over this past weekend, actually,
(14:43):
there was a conference in Doha, Qatar that you might
have seen. This was the Doha Forum. It is It
is a major conference every year you get you typically
get various elites from American industry, from media, from technology,
from hollywo They all go over to Doha to kiss
the ring of the Altani family, which is the ruling
(15:04):
family in Qatar, which is a modern day Islamist slave
state essentially. And there's been a lot of speculations, speaking
of speculations, speaking of foreign influence. Has been in a
lot of speculation as to the extent of Tucker Carlson's
personal involvement with Katar. Mark Levin has been calling Tucker
Carlson Kat Charlson, Tucker Cartarlson for months and months now
(15:26):
on his very powerful radio broadcast, Tucker Carlson, we know
interviewed the Amir of Katar, the premiere Alton. He interviewed
him earlier this year in twenty and twenty five. And
we actually also know, as a result of some very
very innovative investigator reporting from the Washington Examiner and others,
(15:47):
that there is a very sketchy mom and pop consulting
firm located in northern Virginia called Lumin eight Advisors, which
you never heard of. They fired a FARA registration aw
so thereby registering as a foreign age and on behalf
of the Embassy of Katar, they were making an obscene
amount of money. It was like close to two hundred
(16:07):
thousand dollars a month or something like that. And on
their far registration paperwork Illuminated Advisors. Their one principal source
of business that they publicly listed in the US government
registration document, their principal place of business that they listed
for doing their work on behalf of the Embassy of
Katar was the Tucker Carlson Show. So the interview that
(16:30):
Tuck Carlson did, what I'm saying with Al Tani, the
Amir of Katar earlier this year was a literal boughtom
paid for interview. How do I know that because the
illuminated advisors people who arranged the interview, literally wrote it
on their far Registration Act form. They got paid oodles
and ools of money to arrange the interview. Tucker, of course,
has been downplaying the extent of Shria law. He has
(16:54):
been making light of Shria law, saying, oh my god,
look at these beautiful cities in the Middle Least. They
have these beautiful skyline and there's no crime, and there's
this and that, there's real law. How bad can it be?
So I think a lot of people started paying attention
when this past weekend it came out that Tucker actually
was going to go to Doha for the Doha Forum
as part of this total boondoggle, this junk kets. Oh wait,
(17:16):
but it actually wasn't just Tucker Carlson. It was actually
also his business partner, Neil Patel, his co founder of
The Daily Caller from way way back in the day,
and unbelievably, unbelievably over the weekend, it was actually on Sunday,
Neil Patel tweets out this photo of him and Tucker
(17:37):
Carlson standing next to each other, and they both have
what looks like a cocktail in their hands, which is
itself a little odd because last I checked, Tucker Carlston
had publicly said that he had gone sober after having
an alcohol problem in past years, So maybe he's back
on the sauce, which itself would explain some of his
recent behavior, at least to an extent.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
So I don't know. I'm just asking questions. What do
I know?
Speaker 1 (17:59):
But anyway, this particular tweet Neil batail the two numbers
he got there, Tucker is flipping his middle finger of
the camera, and the caption that Neielbletel tweets is greetings
from the blood He has a tie with Kevin rypropertly
greens from the blood thirsty terror supporting slave state of Katar.
So there's Tucker drinking some fancy cocktail, but don't worry,
(18:19):
he's totally non alcoholic drinking some fancy cocktail, flipping the camera.
And then Neille Tell's tweet, so who they're actually flipping
off is directed at Mark Levin, Ted Cruz and Laura Lumer.
By the way, in the other photo in this Neebletael tweet,
it shows Tucker just laughing with Donald Trump Junior in
Doha at the Doha Forum, which is itself somewhat disturbing,
(18:42):
to put them mildly. And there are all sorts of
other questions when it comes to the extent of the
Witcoff business enterprises, when it comes to the extent of
the Trump Organization's dealings with Katar. But for present purposes,
let's just say that the single leading vector, the single
leading vector when it comes to doing what Fun is
doing when it comes to trying to sow the seeds
(19:03):
of discord on the American right and implode MAGA from within.
The single most important arrow in this quiver of information
operation arrows is Tucker Carlson, and he is there drinking
in cocktail, flipping off Americans from Katar after having done
a bottom paid interview with the premiere. But wait, it
(19:24):
actually gets worse. It literally gets worse, because Tucker interviewed
the Amir of Qatar again, the second interview he's done
now in less than half a year or something like that,
with the leader of Katar. He did it the Doha Forum,
and he said this utterly utterly shocking thing. Go ahead
and watch this.
Speaker 3 (19:44):
I am, however, tomorrow, buying a place in Qatar because
I am pe Hichech in Doha yah, and I'm doing
that because I like the city. I think it's beautiful,
but also to make the statement that I'm an American
and a free man and I'll be wherever I want
to be.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
So he's there in Doha saying that he's going to
buy a condo, a house, whatever, in Katar, I'm trying
to say, because he's trying to show that he's a
free man, that he's an American. Katar is the number
one financial and ideological sponsor of radical soony Islam the
rolled over. They have been caught red handed connected to
(20:19):
every single radical Islamist terrorist group you can possibly name,
up to and including Al Qaeda and Isis. I mean
to say nothing of Hamas, which they are the number
one patrons of. This is a terrorist state, a terrorist
state involved, as we've discussed in the show, in deep,
deep rooted sprawling, an intricate duplicity when it comes to
(20:42):
their hosting of value, date air.
Speaker 2 (20:43):
Based and things like that.
Speaker 1 (20:44):
They're Qatar is an enemy though of the United states,
they are an enemy. I don't care that even the
Trumpdministration has now defined them as a as a as
a NATO Article five worthy an attack on them in
his attack US style quot ungquale.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
They are not. They are not that they are horrific
terror supporters.
Speaker 1 (21:07):
So Tucker Carlton trying to do the so called America
first thing from the number one country that has invested
in American higher education for the worst, trying to turn
American higher education into a broader Muslim Brotherhood Islamist theocracy
Bashim Katar, which along with the Brotherhood, is investing oodles
and ools money according to a brand report when it
comes to getting taxpayer money in the European Union as well,
(21:29):
all for the same goal. Katar's goal is to Islamicize
the West. Their goal is to spread these seeds of
the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the West. Why do you think
the trumpministration finally signed this water down milk toast Muslim
Brotherhood baned recently because there are more reports coming out
about the extent of the Brotherhood's information operations and the
(21:50):
extent to which they are trying to disseminate their propaganda
When it comes to American higher education, media boondoggles parties.
Speaker 2 (21:56):
This at there.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
That is why the administration finally acted in someone half
hour fashion in Middlely. Tucker doesn't care. Tucker doesn't care
at all. I mean, explains me what the America first
cases for buying a condo in Dohak, Katar. There's no
culture in Doha, Qatar.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
It's a slave state.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
The actual Arabs there are like three hundred and thirty
plus thousand. There's a whole indentured servitude, modern slave class
of Pakistani's Indians and people from the Nepal and the
police people who are brought in there to do the
Arabs bidding.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
There's no culture.
Speaker 4 (22:33):
What is this? Like?
Speaker 2 (22:34):
Literally, what is this?
Speaker 1 (22:37):
It's not just Tucker, by the way, he's by far
the worst defender, but all these other so called influencers
who I saw on social media who were on this trip,
Rob Smith, Rob Smith tweeting out like literally copying, pasting
in the dumbest, lowest iq fashion imaginable. He was clearly
given some recommend the talking point about what to say
(22:59):
about katarre do just copies and paste it all over
social media feed?
Speaker 2 (23:03):
What are you doing?
Speaker 1 (23:04):
Bro? I mean, I hope that check cleared and that
there are a lot of zeros that at the end
of that number, because you've sold your soul, all you
people there have sold any morsel of integrity that you
have there. This is the game that Qatar plays. This
is dangerous, dangerous stuff, folks. Either you understand that Western
(23:25):
civilization is besieged by various forces, including Islamism, or you don't.
Tucker Carlson, I said repeatedly, is not playing on team civilization.
Qatar is the number one vector of foreign influence in
the United States, whether it's Tucker Carlson, whether it's Nick
flent As, there is all sorts, all sorts of foreign
influence happening right now in the United States, many many,
(23:48):
many other as well. Again, I call on Elon Musk
to show us a country by country breakdown as to
where exactly a given users followers are located. That should
not be that difficult, That should be easy enough to do.
Make it one click away from your biome and then
let's see it. Because I don't want to stop a
front desk, don't stop a candae own's either. I want
(24:10):
to see where Tucker's followers are. Surely that's not too
much to ask for. By the way, I was just
talking about the extent to which the Trump administrations and
executive order defining certain chapters of the muzzlem Brotherhood was
watered down. They basically said that they are declaring the
Muzzle Brotherhood a terrorist organization in the Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt.
I mean, okay, I mean that's fine as far as goes.
(24:31):
They're already declared a terrorist organization there. For what it's worth,
the House Foreign Affairs Committee in the US House has
already passed out a bill. It's pending in this House
for action. Per Mike Johnson passed it bill to recommend
to designate the entire Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, something
that clearly should happen. Most recently, a few weeks ago,
(24:53):
it was Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, who did that.
In the Lone Star State, declared that the Muslim Brotherhood
and CARE the accounts American Islamic Relations, which was founded
as a Hamas Muslin Brotherhood front group in the United States.
It was Greg Abbot who went ahead and declared that
the Brotherhood and CARE were terrorist organizations. Were purposes of
Texas law and therefore there will be no bank loans
(25:14):
prosecutions as as appropriate things like that. So finally, finally, yesterday,
on Monday December eighth, Ron DeSantis here in the state
of Florida doing the exact same thing.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
The time that this was actually really funny.
Speaker 1 (25:27):
I got drinks with a friend's Sunday night and we
were literally talking about this. We literally said, why is
the Santis not matched Abbot on this? And then sure enough,
literally the next day, on Monday December eighth, Ron de
Santis signing this executive order saying Florida is designating the
Musslim Brotherhood and the Council of Americans Lack Relations aka
CARE as foreign terrorist organizations. Florida agencies are hereby directed
(25:48):
to undertake all lawful measures to prevent unlawful activities by
these organizations, including denying privileges or resources to anyone providing
material support. CARE for what it's worth, was previously designated
a terrorist organization by the notably Arab United Arab Emirates.
The UAE it declared CARE a terrorist organization back in
(26:09):
twenty fourteen, over a decade ago. The Brotherhood itself has
been declared a terrorist organization by any number of Arab countries.
I just named three, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, how about Saudi Arabia,
how about the UAE itself there it's basically katar in Turkey. Okay,
the two leading sponsors of radical Sunni Islamism. Those are
two countries that are that are currently playing footsie, playing
super nice with the Brotherhood. But the santist doesn't really
(26:31):
care for him that He is not saying that CARE
and the Brotherhood are terrorist orgizations and will be treated
as such here in the state of Florida. Just a
little brief history for you about CARE in case you
don't really know the full history here. So CARE was
initially incorporated in the US in nine ninety four by
Omar achenlet Rafik Javert and Nihad Awad. Awad is still
(26:51):
intimately involved with CARE. He infamously after October seventh praised
the Hamas assault.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
This this is what we're talking about here.
Speaker 1 (26:59):
We're talking abou a literal Jihat sympathizers, pro terrorist, pro
jihad Muslim Brotherhood radicals. So this all happened in ninety
four to become his founding director. Nihadawad, the guy who
was praising October seven, twenty twenty three, Nihada Wad becomes
founding director. Left his position as the public relations director
for the Islamic Association for Palestine, which has been described
(27:22):
by the FBI's counter Terrorism chief as a quote front
organization for HAMAS that engages in propaganda for Islamic militants.
The US government itself has described its organization related to
CARE called the Islamic Association of Palestine. The government itself
had described them as a founding mender a founding member
of the Muslim Brotherhood's so called Palestine Committee, which is
(27:43):
a Brotherhood offshoot here in the United States. Within a
month after its formation, CARE received a five thousand dollars check,
followed just weeks later by another five thousand dollars wire
transfer from a group called the Holy Land Foundation. The
Holy Land Foundation was convicted into the in North Texas
in the Dallas for Worth area, providing over twelve million
(28:04):
dollars to Hamas. Okay this is This ends up becoming
the largest terror financi prosecution in the entire history of
the DOJ. It shut down the Holy Land Foundation in
North Texas. During the last year or two of the Bushministration,
CARE What'sworth was named an unindicted co conspirator in that
particular case. So why is every Red state not doing this?
(28:28):
Why is every Red state not listing the Brotherhood not
listing care as terrorist oranizations. There is no conceivable reason
not to do this when we're talking here about the
main themistate show, which is foreign influence in the United States,
foreign influence on the American right, foreign influence trying to
sow the seeds of discord and try to rile us up.
(28:49):
In general, there just anti American bull crap. There is
no more important starting place than Katar and their Islamus
lackeys in the muz Brotherhood. That is ground zero unless
you're willing to get your hands dirty and to crack
down the brothod. Unless you want to give your hands
dirty and to shine a spotlighte if you on Musk
on the extent to which these are Brotherhood afiliated accounts
(29:11):
boosting Funtees and Tucker and all this stuff, unless you're
willing to get your hands dirty and to call out
frauds like Rob Smith for copying and pasting Katari supplied
pr press releases for your all expenses and probably a
nice check as well, boondoggle Doha. Unless you want to
get your hands a ready there, this problem will continue.
You have to understand when your civilization is to know
(29:32):
you're up against. If you understand properly that Western civilization
is the biblical inheritance of the two biblical religions Christianitian Judaism,
then you understand that Islam is incompatible and that radical Islam,
the types of the types of the like switch which
are peddled and propagated by Katar and the Muslim brotherhood Lackeys,
that is definitely incompatible, period, full stop, end of story.
(29:55):
So don't be afraid to call out the frauds, and
don't be afraid to shine a spotlight on the influence
operations on the frauds.
Speaker 2 (30:04):
All of it.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
It's disgusting, honestly, it's genuinely disgusting. And unless and until
we finally have that conversation about the extent to which
these info ops are corrupting and debasing are conversation or politics,
this is gonna fester and fester and fester and fester.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
Awful stuff. Speaking of total frauds.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
By the way, Jasmin Crockett has decided that she is
running for US Senate in Texas.
Speaker 2 (30:34):
She's not gonna win. This is Texas, after all.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
Some people say if Ken Paxton the current very controversial
to a trained general. Some folks say that if he
defeats John Cornyn in the primary, which I hope that
he does. Some folks say that Texas might turn blue
because Paxon is so unpopular.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
I don't buy this.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
I don't think you should buy this either there, especially
if that nominee is Jasmine Crockett, who is making a
really strong play to try to oust Iana Presley a
mess Jesas, to try to become the ringo star of
the squad. You know you've got Ellen O mar You've
got Phia Tulay, You've got aoc. I mean, you know
they're a Paul McCartney, the John Lennon and George Harrison.
Who's the ringo star? At first it was Alona Presley,
(31:09):
she kind of fizzled out. Jasmine Crockett thinking a very
strong play to be the backbencher of the idiot caucus
there in the far left of the House Democratic Caucus.
And this is her latest bits. Go ahead and check
out this dooozy.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
Just this past week, I saw I don't remember which celebrity,
but it was actually a celebrity, and I was like,
I don't know that that's not necessarily a bad idea,
but I'd have to think through it a lot. One
of the things that they proposed is black folk not
have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time,
because then again, that puts money back in your pocket.
Speaker 2 (31:38):
But at the same.
Speaker 4 (31:38):
Time, it may not be as objectionable to some people
about actually giving out dollars, but obviously then you start
dealing with the different tax brackets and things like that,
and that's one of the reasons that, you know, we
argue that reparations makes sense because so many black folk,
not only do you owe for the labor that was
stolen and killed in all the other things, right, but
(32:01):
the fact is, like we end up being so far behind.
Speaker 1 (32:05):
Okay, where to begin? I'm somewhat all strike to where
do you even begin here? First of all, how stupid
is this woman? I mean, I hate to just like mock,
but sometimes you just have to mock, you know. Mockery
is actually very important and it's very powerful if done correctly.
There some of the rights political opponents, some of these
lefting people are just so contemptibly low iq dim with
(32:28):
stupid as you kind of quest yourself as like whether
you should even seriously engage these arguments. You know, some
of these folks in the left have a modicum of
intellectual seriousness. I mean, I don't think Bill and Hillary
Clinton are dumb people. I don't think Rokahanna is a
dumb person. I don't even think Gavin Newsom is probably
(32:49):
a particularly dumb person. But that Jasmine Crockett, I mean,
she probably got one too many swirly back in elementary school.
Her brain food is getting flushed down the toilets on that.
I I mean, how dumb can you be? First of all,
the case against reparations. I can't believe we even having
this discussion still. You know, years after Black Lives Matter
(33:12):
was ousted as a horrifically grifting Marxist subjugationist organization.
Speaker 2 (33:18):
And yes, they were grifting.
Speaker 1 (33:19):
They were grifting the heck out of their oblivious idiot donors.
This was a Black Lives Matter plank of their platform
with the reparation stuff. How in the world are we
even still having this conversation right now?
Speaker 2 (33:33):
Folks.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
It's true that there is a notion in the Bible,
in the Book of Deuteronomy, perhaps above all about holding
the sins of the father responsible and then carrying that
down through some generations. But even in the Bible it
says that past a few generations, you will not hold
anyone responsible for their grandfather's since So, even taking that
(33:56):
at face value, we are now one hundred and sixty
years since General Lee's surrender to General Grant and Atmas
Courthouse in Virginia and warrinked about reparations.
Speaker 2 (34:07):
Now, how are you going to do that?
Speaker 1 (34:10):
By the way, I mean, is a black person who's
an actual descendant slaves? Is he going to be as
entitled reparations as just as much as the black guy
who came as an immigrant from Nigeria like a year ago.
Does a new Nigerian immigrant, What about the Christian fleeing
Bocoharam Islamist genocide in Nigeria? If he got a green
(34:32):
card or a citizenship here recently, does he get reparations?
His failing wasn't here. His failing was not here back
during the Civil War or the slavery period that preceded it.
So there's no practical way to do this. It's also
morally egregious. It is morally egregious to try to racially
divide in this horrific fashion. In the year twenty twenty five,
(34:55):
America did pay its debt in the form of eradicating slavery.
That debt took the form of the United States Civil War.
It took the form of a conflict that was baked
in from the start. It was bound to happen. The
framers probably frankly knew this was bound to happen, if
you ask all of them with some truth serum. The
(35:16):
conflict happened a few generations after the founding generation, and
it was ugly, It was brutal, it was terrible, Well
over six hundred thousand slain brother fighting against brother, horrific,
awful stuff. That is the reparation, That is the toll
that was paid to eradicate the horrific moral evil of
(35:38):
chattel slavery in this country. To start divving up by
race now in the year twenty five, to start trying
to tax certain people according to a certain way based
on your skin color, is egregious. It's morally offensive. And
again it is a talking point of hacks and morons,
which frankly is what Jasmine Crockett is, you know, on
(36:00):
a recent epsiode of the show, we're talking a little
bit about how there are some green shoots, some early
signs that the left might be sobering a little bit
when it comes to the climate change catastrophism conversation. Well,
if this is any indication, I mean Krockett trying to
run for state with office in a red state and
she's doubling down on the race obsession. If this is
(36:23):
any indication, then they are going the wrong wrong way
really really quickly. Yet again when it comes to race.
So even even Republicans lose a politically beneficial winning issue
on the climate change stuff, they're still going to be
able to have the correct position on race. And the
correct position on race just means that you actually believe
that all men are created equal, that you actually believe
(36:46):
in equal protection, that you actually believe, as Martin Luther
King Junior famously said, that you judge all of us
not by the color of our skin, but by the
content of our character. It's not radical claims. They are
the basic moral intuitions that can be formed about our
fellow humanity, rooted in the biblical truth of Genesis, Chapter one,
(37:07):
verse twenty seven, that we are all made in the
divine image of God. But for now, Desmon Crockett is
just a total Looney Tunes nutbag. She is not going
to win. Stay wet, Austin, Texas. I can pretty much
guarantee you that. So we had this orgament yesterday at
the Uspreme Court as well. Final note for today's show.
This argument that we talked about a great length on
yesterday's show, Trump versus Slaughter, pertains to whether or not
(37:29):
the president has the ability to fire for cause or
not for a cause commissioners of what are known as
so called independent agencies. This case pertains to the FTC
the Federal Trade Commission. There have been similar legalist peach
thus far in the first year of the Trump administration
when it comes to the National Labor Relations Board and
various other agencies as well. On yesterday's show, I argued
(37:53):
that this is going to be a pretty straightforward victory
for the Trump administration when it comes to the bread
and butter assertion that the executive power of Article two
of the Constitution clearly vests the ability to make all
personal decisions, all hiring and firing decisions within the executive branch,
and the corollary the similar claim to that is that
(38:14):
when it comes to so called independent agencies, that that
is an oxymoron. There's actually no such thing. You're either
in Article one the Congress. You're either in Article two
the Executive Branch. You're either in Article three the Digital Branch,
or you're not anywhere.
Speaker 2 (38:27):
You're out.
Speaker 1 (38:28):
Pick a door, any door one, two, three, there's no door. Four,
there's no deep state door. There are three doors. So
what that means here is that if daltre one wants
to fire a commissioner on the FDC, wants to fire
someone on the NLRB, or any of these other concocted
New Deal era FDR era agencies where Congress constructs them
(38:50):
to have a certain partisan breakdown, and you can only
fire the commissioner for cause and not for cause. There
what that means is that it's all garbage. It's all
totally unconstitutional. You can't do it enough. Looking at the
tea leaves of yesterday's orl or arguments, it does seem
to me that this is going to end up being
a resounding victory for the trominstration. You had all the
usual suspects you had Katanji Brown, Jackson, Sonya semyor the
(39:13):
usual liberal ladies who are questioning about whether or not
we're going to junk this nine year old president known
as Humphrey Executor.
Speaker 2 (39:18):
Yeah, we are.
Speaker 1 (39:19):
We're going to junk because Humphrey's Executor, which legitimize this
unconstitutional structure. We're going to junk that president because that
case was wrong the day it was decided and is
still wrong today. The practical ramvocations, if Humphrey's Executor is
actually overturned, are going to be massive. Trump will be
able to fire effectively whoever he wants to fire, period,
(39:40):
full stop, end of story. There are the civil service
statues from the late nineteenth century that's a little more complicated,
but at least when it comes to the top ranking
commissioner administrative brass, there will be no for cause removals
that are constitutionally permissible. It is the president's call. Some
folks say that you're in power, worrying the president. It's
(40:01):
a tyranny.
Speaker 2 (40:01):
No, it's not.
Speaker 1 (40:03):
The actual tyranny here is empowering the unelected deep state.
All the justices are set to do in Trump versus Slaughter.
All they're set to do is to empower the actual
elected person, the president of the president United States, to
try to empower someone who is himself accountable to we
the people, because we the people are sovereign in this country,
(40:25):
not the deep state, not these radical woke left revolutionaries
within the administry of state. They're not the sovereigns we are,
and we elect the presidents, not them. Again, the good
news is that the justices seem to very much agree
with my legal analysis, which you would have heard essay
on Josh amershow, and that's also a failiar mind to
folks to make sure to like and subscribe to our
(40:46):
show if you have not already done so, We appreciate
that five so review, drop a comment, let us know
how we're doing. Make sure to watch the show on
YouTube if you're not already doing so, over on Newsweek's
YouTube channel. We are available as well over at the
Salem News Channel. But for now, I'm Josh Hammer. I
hope you enjoyed today's episode of The Josh Hammer Show.
Speaker 2 (41:08):
The Josh Hammer Show is a member of the Trust
Project
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.