Challenging the Ethics of Medical Experiments and Transgender Rights

Send us a text

Uncover the untold stories of medical experimentation carried out on vulnerable populations and the tragic outcomes that ensued. We’re about to take a deep look into the notorious Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the disturbing experiments of Dr. John Money. Today's conversation is not for the faint-hearted — we question the rationale behind these heinous acts, and challenge our trust in science and government. It's time to dig into the dark corners of medical history, and question the ethical boundaries that were crossed.

Shifting gears, we also examine the complex issue of gender identity, particularly amongst minors. We zoom in on the Supreme Court ruling regarding LGBTQ rights and consumer choices in the context of these rights. We share our thoughts on the use of puberty blockers, hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries, and we don’t shy away from discussing the profound implications that these choices can have. As we navigate through this heated topic, remember to keep an open mind. 

Towards the end, we grapple with a thought-provoking question: Why isn't the government more proactive in protecting children from potentially harmful decisions? We explore the FDA's stance on puberty blockers for gender dysphoria and the alarming trend of life-altering decisions being made at a young age. As we wrap up, we'll leave you pondering the power of the individual and the collective, and the urgent need for compassion and understanding in our society. It's a lot to take in, but we promise it's worth it.

Support the show

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Questions from the listeners and conspiracies from
Donna.
You're listening to the LastGay Conservative.
I'm your host, chad Law.
Hello America, welcome toanother episode of the Last Gay

(00:44):
Conservative.
It's me, chad Law.
You're host with the mostAmerica's binary brother and the
gayest conservative of all time, sending common sense,
conservative politics throughthe airwaves on the only rainbow
that matters the red, white andblue rainbow Folks.
I want to hear from you.
Don't forget our number 866,last Gay.
866, last Gay.

(01:05):
You can text or leave a messageon the message line.
You can also tweet me at LastGay Cons on Twitter or shoot us
an email.
Podcast atLastGayConservativecom.
Well, this is my final broadcastfrom the Portland area and I am
very excited to leave.
Love Ben and I love sort ofcentral and eastern Oregon, but

(01:26):
man, portland is so bad.
I mean two things I alsorealized.
I know I already gave you mywhole spiel on Portland, but I
think there's a ladies haircolor shortage, a shampoo
shortage and a toothpasteshortage here.
I don't know if the hygienerevolution made its way up the
Pacific Northwest and the women.

(01:46):
Why do you let your hair growout?
Okay, you're not aginggracefully, you're aging grossly
.
You look ridiculous.
We're stringing long gray hairsand your ashy brown color.
Oh God, put some gloss over itor something.
Well, especially the women here, just don't take pride in how
they look.
No lip gloss, cracked lips,gray hair, no earrings on, no

(02:11):
jewelry.
Their purses are like hempsacks.
I mean, the nicest pieces theyhave are the Birkenstocks they
wear.
It's just a semi-expensive shoe.
But man, no wonder there's noolder single men with money here
.
I'm sure they just get on thefirst plane when they can and
get out of here, move up toSeattle or something.
Because I color my hair.

(02:32):
I have a full head of bleachand tone on my hair.
I was grabbing color at theCosmoprof, which is a
professional beauty place.
I have a card and I'm puttingall my stuff in the basket.
I see this hairdresser andshe's got this frizzy brown hair

(02:52):
with big grays going through it.
Who would ever get their haircolored by someone like that?
But anyways, i start talking toher and say, oh, how's the
business here?
And she says I said I know inCalifornia the bread and butter
money is root touch ups andhighlights.
She says, yeah, we do verylittle root touch ups here.
I do some highlights, but it'sall about natural.

(03:13):
I said.
Well, you should probably tellyour clients that natural looks
very good on very few people.
The whole point of having fakestuff is so you look good.
If you have saggy pancake boobs, get a boob job.
If you have a beak for a nose,get a nose job.
If you have a pancake ass, geta BBL, which I'm about to do,

(03:34):
but I have to wait until I losea little bit more weight.
But oh yeah, modern medicineallows us to look and feel the
best way possible and peoplejust ignore it.
No, thank you.
Call me vain, that's okay, i am,i admit it But I think
aesthetic is important.
I mean, trust me, i've gotlooks for radio.
I'm nothing great, but at leastI try.

(03:56):
These people are just giving up.
Don't blame nature.
It's so unnatural to have haircolor on or plastic surgeries So
vain, except what God gave you.
God also made plastic surgerypeople.
It's just a whole other world uphere.
I don't understand why there'sthis fly.

(04:18):
Everything goes up California,goes up to Idaho, goes from
South to North, and then all ofa sudden you get to Portland,
get to Oregon.
It just skips and goes intoWashington, which Seattle's
funky donkey too.
But you've got Bellevue andyou've got other Kirkland and
homes all along Lake Washingtonand Bainbridge Island.
There's tons of places you cango that are nice.

(04:41):
I don't know how people do ithere.
And then the guys here it'slike the teeth are yellow,
yellow, yellow.
And if you live here, nooffense, i'm not saying that's
you, but the level of hygienehere is so low I just can't even
believe it.
And I've gone to dinners withclients who have brought their
boyfriends and girlfriends andthings, and I'm just going do

(05:02):
you know where the shampoo is inyour house?
You know how to use a blowdryer.
You know how to put a littlelip gloss on or even a little
chapstick for a guy.
I mean my friends in SouthernCalifornia.
Like I said, they're allstraight guys.
You all know my group offriends that I hang out with,
which I hope they all miss meJosh and Nick and Max and
everyone down there.
But you know at least they washtheir hair, style it, put

(05:26):
deodorant on, just could nevergo out of the house like that.
I want to get to your questions.
There have been a couple ofadditional big Supreme Court
rulings which will be ontomorrow's show, sunday.
So don't worry, i will betalking about the LGBTQ rights
loss.
You can no longer have someonewho doesn't believe in gay
marriage bake you a wedding cake.

(05:48):
Whatever happened to refusingthe right to serve anyone for
any reason?
I can't even believe it madeits way to the Supreme Court.
It's just so stupid.
What happens is a common sense.
It's like someone doesn't wantto make you a cake, someone
doesn't agree with you.
Right?
Don't buy from them.
Don't go to that store.

(06:08):
It's like we didn't buy BudLight or go to Target.
Why don't you make change withthe power of your wallet instead
of crying and whining andcalling it civil rights?
if a business doesn't want toserve you or your wedding, they
have that option.
It's not discrimination,ridiculous.
They say well, these businessescan't discriminate against
black people, not make a cakefor black people.

(06:31):
Actually, they can refuse tomake a cake for a black person.
Is that wrong?
Yes, is black people need to gothere?
No, we are so far gone fromcommon sense.
It is absolutely astonishing tome that the Supreme Court would
hear a case about graphicdesigners and cake makers not

(06:54):
wanting to do work for gaycouples.
They don't have to do work forany couples, it doesn't matter.
There's a billion otherbakeries and a billion other
graphic designers that they makea stink out of everything And
notice the businesses.
They're not making a stink,they're saying thanks but no
thanks.
And it has to become this wholething and bricks get thrown

(07:15):
through glass.
And, anyways, i'm going to getto your questions.
When we get back we have Donna,for the second half of the show,
going over some medicalexperiments linking it to all
this new COVID data that'sdumped that no one really has an
idea of because it was hiddenin between submarine coverage.
That whole thing was anightmare, a nightmare for the

(07:38):
people, but a nightmare for me.
I had to see it and hear it onthe news 24 seven.
It's like who cares?
Thing went down and didn't comeback up.
There's the coverage.
Why don't we talk about allthese people that are dropping
dead from COVID vaccines, heartproblems, hospitalizations?
Oh no, donna will break thatdown for us later.
All right, i'm going to take aquick break and I'll be right
back.

(08:02):
This episode of the podcast ispresented by Factor Meals.
As you know, i was 317 poundstwo years ago and I just weighed
this morning at 235.
Granted, i've got about another20 to go to get the dad bod.
That is my goal, but FactorMeals helps a lot.

(08:23):
First of all, there's endlessoptions.
Second of all, for those of uswho are truly fat not these
people who are like I need tolose five pounds.
No, no, no.
For us bigger men and women,taste is everything.
The reason we are this fat isbecause we love the taste of
food.
Well, the great news is isFactor Meals tastes fantastic.
They have vegan, they havevegetarian, they have keto, they

(08:47):
have anything you need.
gluten free Doesn't matter.
Right now, factor Meals for youall is offering 50% off your
first box 50%.
And then what are they offering?
another 20% off your second box.
Go to factor75.com, at leastexplore, see if it's for you.

(09:10):
But I'll tell you, if you orderand you truly use the meal plan
as intended I do just mylunches and my dinners the
weight will begin to shed offlike crazy.
Then, folks, factor75.com 50%off your first box and 20% after
that.
All right.

(09:33):
So I'm going to dive into someof your questions that you've
sent in.
There's some funny, someserious.
I did this once before, lastyear, maybe even 18 months ago,
and people really liked it.
I do personally respond quite abit, so that's why I don't
necessarily do it on the air,but when there's a buildup of
questions, i like to answer them.

(09:55):
Let me get the personal onesout of the way.
Yes, i'm so flattered.
Yes, i'm single by choice, andfor those of you who keep asking
me to tag my significant otherin things, there is not one.
So, yes, i am open to marriageproposals from some of you who

(10:15):
have written in.
Look, I have to bring it up.
I've never gotten any sort ofattention like this my entire
life, and so it's kind of funfor me, kind of new for me, but
I look a lot worse in person.
Don't worry, you see the bestof me.
However, i did get two textmessages since I've been in

(10:35):
Portland from a gentleman whosaid oh, i saw you out in public
.
You're much better looking inperson than you are in your
pictures.
I don't know how to respond toall that, but I really
appreciate all the compliments.
One of the best questions I gotis are you or someone you know
suffering from misophilioma?
Oh, it's so good.

(10:56):
I see those commercials when Iwatch the Golden Girls on
Hallmark channel.
Every single commercialMesselfiliuma, messelfiliuma.
I don't even know what that is,but I think it's so funny that
someone wrote that in.
For those of you who'verequested my parents come on the
show because you love mystories, that'll never happen,
not because of me, because ofthem.

(11:17):
My dad sent me an email theother day and said I think you
should follow this story becausehe's the main reason why I'm
conservative the way I am.
So he you know he helps me, soI think you should follow this
story.
And he ends the email by sayingI would help you, but I'm very
busy with your mom and the dogs.
Goodbye, like okay, thanks.

(11:38):
He would never get on the air,neither would my mom, but they
are hysterical And yeah, theylive together in the Santa
Barbara area, a little north ofVentura, in a small town called
Ohai, o-j-a-i.
You ever have an opportunity toget up there, you should, all
right, so I'm gonna get in thefirst serious question here.
Chad, my daughter thinks she'strans.

(11:59):
I want to love her, but I can'tlive with her changing names,
et cetera.
Any ideas?
Now, that's a very seriousquestion, and I'm not a
psychiatrist, nor am I apsychologist.
What I would say to you is thisyou are the parent.
You know what's right in yourheart.
Now my big thing is pubertyblockers, hormones and sexual

(12:20):
reassignment surgery.
I think if you're working withthe right therapist or
psychiatrist and she wants towear boys' clothes, maybe cut
her hair short and see how it isagain.
This is just my opinion of howI would do it if I had kids, i
don't think there's as much harmin that.
It's when you start makingpermanent changes to the body is

(12:40):
where it's rough.
But you'll listen in.
Actually, the interview that Ijust did with Donna When I was
growing up, in order to get asex change, it was like a two or
three year process.
You had to live as that sex, youhad to function in society,
keep a job.
There was all theserequirements before they would
allow you to have a sex change,and I think that you can sort of

(13:01):
implement those things prior.
You didn't mention how old shewas.
I would say you know, i wouldalso look at the symptoms on
true gender dysphoria.
But and the other thing that Iwould recommend that you read is
a book called IrreversibleDamage by Abigail Schreyer that
really breaks down how thismovement of younger girls

(13:22):
wanting to be boys has startedand really snowballed
significantly through society.
But I do apologize, you'regoing through that right now It
sounds like you're a great,great mom.
And also I should tell you thatI have many trans conservative
listeners that believe in what Italk about And for the most

(13:44):
part, you know.
Sometimes they send me thingsthat say that's just not true or
whatever.
But I do believe that you andher together can make these
choices.
And again, what's the harm inwaiting?
What's the harm in taking thesteps very, very slow?
You know it starts with a shortboy haircut or stops wearing
makeup or whatever it is.

(14:04):
Create a plan together andexplain to her what could happen
if she changes her mind later.
All right, another question Iget all the time is how do I
keep my kids safe in universityfrom propaganda?
First of all, you've alreadydone an amazing job with your
kids.
If they're going to universityand they have a strong
conservative Christian backbone,they should be able to sort of

(14:27):
navigate themselves.
However, it's always comes downto three things, in my opinion
choosing the right school,choosing the right major and
choosing the rightextracurricular activities.
So perfect example I wouldn'tsend my kid to a UC or a CSU
school, no matter what.
It just would not happen.
And a lot of people will say tome.

(14:47):
Well, the only realconservative base school is
Hillsdale College in Michiganand that's small and it's
expensive And that's notnecessarily true.
They might be the leader ofconservative education higher
education but there are plentyof schools that offer Christian
based learning.
I know Grand Canyon Universityis one of them.

(15:09):
Concordia universities are alsoChristian based and there's
several schools Baylor, forexample.
Southern Methodist Universityin Texas is another great school
.
They're everywhere And so youfind the school that might sit
in the middle.
Maybe they're just a little bitleft or hopefully on the right,

(15:29):
but most universities are allthe way on the left.
So if you find something in themiddle, then you have to make
sure that y'all choose the rightmajor.
Any liberal arts is just apropaganda, brainwashing major,
that's all it is.
Anything communications,english, all those things are

(15:50):
always gonna incorporate thisstuff.
So you wanna look at the majorand the class requirements for
the major and make sure there'sno gender studies, women's
studies, these woke titles.
That will for sure be bad and awaste of time.
You want your kid to get a goodeducation.

(16:11):
I also think psychology is amajor.
That's gone down the tubes Ifyou can focus on things like
engineering or graphic design ormotion graphics things, where
you can really get a job and theeducation is more focused on
technical training than it isabout theoretical knowledge.
And then, lastly, theextracurriculars.

(16:32):
Greek life is huge.
Make sure that if you'rerushing a sorority or a
fraternity, or your daughter orson is that you understand the
history of those Greekorganizations.
They do have a tendency,especially for males, to be more
on the conservative side.
Fraternities, but you alwayshave these weird ones where they

(16:53):
can't get into regularfraternities so they make their
own weird off-campus fraternity.
I know there's some gayfraternities out there, so keep
an eye out on that.
And then, as far asextracurriculars go as well,
encourage your kids toparticipate in Christian life,
in school, church, helpingpastor.
There was a youth pastorprogram where I went to school

(17:16):
where you could slowly butsurely work on that on the
weekends, et cetera.
Obviously, sports, but it'sjust about dissecting each one
of those three things makingsure that there are the right
extracurriculars available,there's the right majors
available and the right schoolavailable.
Once you find those things,you'll definitely have a ensure

(17:39):
that your child, or you, ifyou're looking as a teen, get a
worthwhile college experience.
Another question I get all thetime.
That makes me absolutely sick.
But a few people wrote in andsaid at college lately sorry, i
read these right off the paperSo college lately has become

(17:59):
more homophobic because of transmen and sports et cetera.
How should I handle it?
Well, first thing you need todo is put Laskey conservative
stickers all over your car andwear Laskey conservative
t-shirts all over school.
I'm teasing, no, listen.
the whole thing is is that justmake sure people are aware that
you don't agree with it And ifsomeone does harass you or say

(18:22):
something weird, say this is nota gay issue, it's a trans issue
.
I just had a major fight withsomeone because they've made
these grocery store stickers tocover Bud Light and make it say
Bud Gay.
And this is not a gay issue.
Dylan Mulvaney is a transperson, a weirdo, and that was

(18:44):
the issue.
But nothing to do with gay.
Nothing to do with gay.
And companies forever have hadrainbow stuff during June with
no real problem, but because ofthe trans war on America it's
really taken gay people a stepback in acceptance.
So there's not a whole lot youcan do directly, i think.

(19:04):
Just make sure that you supportthe right cause, make sure that
your opinion is known.
Make sure that people know thatyou listened to this show.
If people have questions, youcan tell them that there's
hundreds of thousands of peoplewho subscribe to the belief that
there can be gay conservativeson a podcast.
How did I just make this allabout me?

(19:25):
I don't know.
This is so typical of me, sonarcissistic.
No, but honestly, if you'reuncomfortable, just walk away.
Clearly I don't wanna givepsychological advice, but if
it's more something where youfeel like you're getting pushed
into a lump of people, just makesure you step away and don't
allow yourself to get lumped in.

(19:45):
I mean, i had to learn thatmuch later in life than you are,
way after college.
But it's a good practice tomake sure that you don't fall in
line in places where either oneside or the other side wants
you to fall in line with.
Also, make sure you have a goodrange of friends.
I think one of the weirdestthings I thought was all the gay

(20:07):
people at school would all kindof huddle together in their own
little group, and I was notabout that at all.
I like everyone and I like tohear different experiences, so I
always have friends up and downthe rainbow, if you will, and
it's helped keep my eyes openand it's helped keep me
understanding what the otherside is thinking.

(20:30):
And for the most part, whatyou're seeing is people that are
getting protective over somereally scary stuff.
Chicks with dicks is a big dealfor women, and I know
boyfriends get upset and dadsget upset and it blows back on
the LGB community And that'sjust the situation we're in

(20:52):
right now and the only thing wecan do is be strong and be
educated and show people that wedon't buy into the BS either
and make sure that we'repreaching the separation between
trans and sexual orientation.
I always love these.
Looks like a couple in Ohio sentan email saying our son just
came out as gay.

(21:12):
We are right wing Christiansand so happy that we can give
him your podcast as a resourcein order for him to stay
conservative while being gay.
Before we heard your show, weprobably would have been a lot
more resistant to him coming outbecause of our faith and our
political beliefs, but you haveproven to us that is totally

(21:33):
okay to be gay, christian andconservative.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Hey, no, thank you.
That's the whole reason why I'mdoing this show, because I know
that I represent a lot ofpeople out there And I also know
that there are a lot of peopleparents who are really unsure of
how a gay child has fits intothe realm of their family

(21:56):
dynamic, especially with someonewho's focused on conservative
values and Christian values.
So thank you so much for thecompliments The biggest
compliment ever and make sureyour son reaches out If he ever
needs anything.
Send a text or an email,because it is very hard coming
up.
You didn't mention how old heis, but I can tell you that it

(22:18):
is very difficult coming up as agay conservative, not with
other people, but with other gaypeople, because they will try
to force you into the narrativethat they preach.
So, okay, time for one morequick question, and that is
Carla.
Oh, in Pasadena, cool Chad.
I am sick over this new law inCalifornia having to do with

(22:40):
affirming gender and custody.
What can I do to make a changeor take a stand?
Great question, carla.
I'm actually working with someother conservatives on this
issue right now.
We're gonna start to getsignatures and we're gonna
boycott paying our Californiaincome taxes.
That is the only way to send amessage, as we've learned with

(23:02):
Bud Light and Target and some ofthese other woke corporations.
They can't arrest all of us fornot paying taxes.
So we're gonna take a page outof Henry David Thoreau's book
and refuse to pay taxes forthings that we don't agree with.
But in order to do that, weneed power in numbers, and so
we're gonna launch an entirecampaign coming up In the

(23:23):
meantime.
Keep your kids away from anypublic official, any government
entity.
homeschool them, put them inprivate school.
California has gone.
It's not even woke, it'scompletely, completely Marxist.
Well, as you all know, i lovethe sound of my own voice and,
of course, have run over intoDonna's time, so we're gonna

(23:46):
take a quick break and head overto the interview studio.
The following segment of thepodcast is brought to you by the
Wellness Company a fullycomprehensive telemedicine
prescription and more thatfocuses on medical freedom and
patient sanctity, withoutpushing any sort of vaccines or

(24:06):
the pharmaceutical agenda.
Go to twccom, chop around, lookat the memberships, let them
know.
The last gay conservative sentyou.
All right, we're back in theconspiracy corner with the
conspiracy queen herself.
Donna, donna, how are you?

Speaker 3 (24:26):
I'm good Chad, How are you?

Speaker 1 (24:29):
Fantastic.
What do you have for us today?

Speaker 3 (24:31):
Well, you know, it's been quite a week or a week and
a half on the news between thesubmarine explosion and the
Bytesman Biden impeachment dramaand an attempt to coup in
Russia, et cetera, et cetera.
So what would seem more boringand tedious in comparison would
be continuing information andnumbers, released by both the

(24:56):
CDC's website and in the Journalof American Medicine, about the
seriousness and danger ofmyocarditis as a possibility and
, unfortunately, sometimes areality for those who are
injected with mRNA COVIDvaccines.
I can't really even bringmyself to refer to it as a side

(25:16):
effect because it belittles it.
It's demeaning to how troublingthe situation is And yet, even
though it's been documented onour own government's websites,
there's so many people who willimmediately shut it down and
call it fake news, even thoughit's our own government
reporting it now.

(25:36):
And they'll call it fake newsbecause it isn't a headline in
the mainstream media, and I callthem the real fake news.
So when people go into denialabout this, we keep hearing the
same sorts of things over andover again.
That's the science.
The government is protecting it.
So I'm going to pause rightthere and ask a couple of

(25:59):
legitimate questions.
Why should we trust the scienceor the scientists, and why
should we think that thegovernment is protecting us?
So let's take a look at our owndocumented history, at an
experiment which started in 1932, known as the Tuskegee study.

(26:19):
According to the CDC, it wasoriginally known as the Tuskegee
study of untreated syphilis inthe Negro male.
It actually surprises me howmany people today are not aware
of this study, but it is morewidely known amongst the Black
community, and for very goodreason.

(26:40):
It's something that they shouldnever forget and something that
the rest of the populationneeds to know about and be wary
of.

Speaker 1 (26:48):
Historically we don't have a great track record of
medical interference with theAfrican-American community or
the Black community.
We just it's a big stain on ourflag And sadly they don't teach
about it and they don't issuewarnings about this stuff
because they don't want us tolose this supposed faith in

(27:09):
science or the government.

Speaker 3 (27:10):
Yeah well, this study targeted poor Black men in
rural Tuskegee, Alabama, whichwas the area that had the
highest syphilis rate in thecountry at that time, and these
men were persuaded toparticipate in the study because
they were promised freetransportation to and from the
hospitals, free hot lunches,free medical treatment for

(27:35):
ailments other than syphilis andfree burial, and these are
things that poverty-strickenBlack men probably would have
found very difficult to turndown.
So when the study began, itinvolved 600 Black men, 399 of
them had syphilis and 201 didnot.
They were told that they werebeing treated for bad blood, and

(27:58):
that's a term that could havebeen used to describe a number
of things like anemia, forexample.
They were not provided withinformed consent And the ones
that had had syphilis were nottold that they had it.
And according to the AssociatedPress, when the study began,
the discovery of penicillin as acure for syphilis was still 10

(28:20):
years away And the availabilityof the drug was probably a few
more years away to have it morewidely available.
So treatment in the 1930s,prior to the discovery of
penicillin as a cure, thetreatment was doses of arsenic
and mercury.

Speaker 1 (28:40):
Oh God.

Speaker 3 (28:41):
Yeah, and according to public health service data,
half of the men with syphiliswere given the arsenic mercury
treatment, but the other half,which was about 200 men,
received no treatment forsyphilis at all.
And the purpose of the studywas to observe the untreated or
natural course of the diseaseuntil death.
So let me repeat that Untreateduntil death, which included

(29:07):
autopsy findings.
Oh, wow.

Speaker 1 (29:10):
So the entire purpose of this was to watch the
progression of the disease, seehow it responds to this arsenic
mercury cure, two things thathave been found to be completely
carcinogenic and toxic to thebody.
I mean, mercury poisoning is areal, real thing.

Speaker 3 (29:29):
They were not told that they have syphilis.
And by 1943, penicillin was aknown cure for syphilis And it
was a treatment of choice forthe disease.
But a decision was made not totreat the untreated men with
penicillin.
And if syphilis is leftuntreated it can cause blindness
, deafness, it can causedeterioration of bones and teeth

(29:53):
, deterioration of the centralnervous system, insanity, heart
disease and death.

Speaker 1 (29:59):
So this step, so they withheld care from several
people, hundreds of people.
They withheld known, provablecare in order for a scientific
experiment to occur, for Godknows for what reason.

Speaker 3 (30:12):
Yes, and let's not forget, they wanted to take a
look at the autopsies.

Speaker 1 (30:16):
That is scary.

Speaker 3 (30:18):
It's reprehensible.

Speaker 1 (30:20):
Yeah, that makes sense.
Why the?
because I always thoughtmemories are coming back about
the Tuskegee experiment whilewe're speaking And I always
thought the burial sort ofcaveat that was included in the
sales pitch of why to come tothe hospital and do this bad
blood treatment.
I always thought the burialthing was kind of off.
But as we're speaking I'mrealizing they wanted to include

(30:43):
the burial so they had accessto the bodies before they turned
them over.

Speaker 3 (30:46):
Yep, it's so creepy.
So the study was conducted bythe United States Public Health
Service, but the CDC knew aboutit and they refused to stop it,
even after a concerned doctorbrought it to their attention.
The CDC maintained they did notconduct the study, but they
were complicit.

(31:07):
They were absolutely complicit.
This is the same CDC who isfully aware of the complications
and injuries that the COVIDvaccines are causing.
This study continued for 40years until the story was
reported by the Washington Starand subsequently the Associated
Press in 1972.

(31:27):
When it came out, a classaction lawsuit was filed on
behalf of the untreated men anda settlement was reached in 1974
.
When I was doing my research,one source said the amount was
$9 million of the settlement andthe other said there was $10
million.
So it was somewhere in thatneighborhood.

(31:47):
but it wasn't until 1997 thatPresident Bill Clinton issued a
formal apology on behalf of theUnited States government.

Speaker 1 (31:56):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (31:57):
Yes, So I ask you how many other studies like this
have been done on people that wehave no knowledge of?

Speaker 1 (32:04):
Well, and one of the things that I always talk about
is, just because they're notgovernmental studies doesn't
mean they're not experiments.
I mean you see advertising andall over social media and on
billboards etc.
Looking for people to do theseclinical studies.
The whole reason why it was theAmerican Health Association or

(32:25):
it is Pfizer or whatnot, isbecause Congress removed
liability from pharmaceuticalcompanies a long time ago.
However, the CDC and the FDAstill hold liability and
Congress is actually supposed tobe the ones that are overseeing
the testing and the safety dataon certain medications, on

(32:47):
vaccines, especially So when yousee these clinical trials.
Oftentimes the CDC, the FDA arecompletely complicit, know the
risks, but they know that theycan put it through Pfizer,
moderna, johnson, johnson,anything else, because they
can't be held liable legally.
Yep.

Speaker 3 (33:07):
You're so right about that.
That's down with so many things.
Okay, well, we can't do this,so we'll just find a contractor
or a third party or someone elseto do it and we'll disguise it
essentially, but they find a wayto get these things done.
Why would people blindly trustthe science and trust the

(33:31):
government When there isinformation like this out there?
it's because it's not widelyknown, it's not reported by the
mainstream media.
They don't want people to know.
They don't want them to bedistrustful.
The whole thing where peoplekeep saying trust the science,
trust the science.
No, you question the science.

(33:52):
Science is supposed to bequestioned.
That's how it gets done.
That's what science actually is.
It's amazing to me thesetalking points have been pounded
into people's heads and theydon't even realize what they're
saying.
So, for anyone listening, ifyou previously didn't know that

(34:13):
experiments like this have beenconducted and you trusted the
government to act in your bestinterest, you still trust them.
In October of 2021, when I stilluse Facebook a bit I posted
that activists from Black LivesMatter New York chapter were
calling out the city'sleadership over what they felt
were racist COVID-19 vaccinerequirements.

(34:36):
I was immediately called out byan old friend of mine that said
no way, i don't buy that Blackpeople are doing that.
Just show me a legitimate newssource.
So I instantly replied with alink to an article posted on
Yahoo News about the story andhe says thanks, i'll check it
out.
I never heard another word fromhim about it.

(34:56):
Then later on I realized hedeleted his comments.

Speaker 1 (35:03):
Oh, that's so typical .
I remember the BLM pushback andthere was a lot of press and
media and PR that was done tomassage the Black community into
accepting the vaccine, becausethey are, very rightfully so,

(35:23):
very hesitant about anygovernmental mandates of
medication or testing Stuff thathasn't been proven because
they've been screwed over somany times in the past.
But what did they do?
They had commercials and theygot Black celebrities to go into
these neighborhoods and getpeople to accept it and they
paid millions and millions ofdollars to run PR campaigns to

(35:47):
make it better, Essentiallyshaming them into getting a
vaccine instead of recognizingthat their healthy fear of
government interference of theirhealth is okay.

Speaker 3 (36:00):
Well, just so, everyone knows at that time that
that article ran, more than 70%of Black people in New York
City aged 18 to 44 had notgotten the injection.
Who could blame them?
Good for them, Good for them.
But here's the thing no oneshould blame anyone of any race
or ethnicity for not wanting toget a vaccine.
For those non-Blacks who aredefending it and they assume

(36:24):
that nothing like this couldever happen to them.
what's wrong with you?
Wake up.
Wake up Now, Chad.
you were just mentioning that alot of the time, the studies
aren't necessarily governmental,but they're still very much
experiment.
Are you ready for another storythat'll blow your mind?

Speaker 1 (36:43):
Of course, bring it on.

Speaker 3 (36:45):
Okay, it's about one, dr John Money, who is
considered by many to be thefather of the trans movement.
So this one began in 1965 wherethere were twin boys named
Brian and Bruce Reimer that wereborn in Canada to a young
working class couple, and theywere healthy boys, but at seven

(37:07):
months old they began havingtrouble urinating, so their
parents were advised to havethem circumcised.
So they proceeded with that.
However, instead of doing theprocedure with a scalpel like it
was normally done, the doctorsdecided to use an electric
cauterizing pen.
So a surge in the currententirely burnt off baby Bruce's

(37:33):
penis and surgeons wouldn't beable to reconstruct it.
And that in itself was anexperiment and that's a horrible
thing.
And the parents wereunderstandably distraught.
They were from a religiousbackground and a psychiatrist
told them that Bruce would beunable to consummate marriage or

(37:56):
have normal heterosexualrelations, and they were
understandably very distraughtabout this.
But then a year later, they sawa doctor being interviewed on
television.
Enter Dr John Money.
Yep, so he was from New Zealandand he was then working at
Baltimore John HopkinsUniversity and he had

(38:19):
established the first US clinicthat performed sex reassignment
surgeries.
So the parents were watchingthis very charismatic doctor
describe his theory.
He worked with hermaphrodite orwhat we call today intersex
patients who've been born withboth male and female sex organs,

(38:39):
and his theory was that allbabies were gender neutral, no
matter their genitalia.
He said that any baby could bestreamed, thanks to hormone
injections and surgery, into agender chosen by others.
Does that sound familiar?

Speaker 1 (38:56):
Absolutely.
I think I remember he told theparents oh, go ahead and raise
Bruce as a girl.

Speaker 3 (39:02):
Yeah.
So the parents were desperate.
They had a mutilated son andthey wanted him to have some
chance of a normal life, and sothey saw possibly a solution and
they contacted the doctor.
And Dr Money was apparentlypretty excited about this case
because until then he'd onlybeen able to conduct his
experiments on intersex childrenAnd it wasn't easy to find a

(39:26):
test case baby so that he coulddemonstrate his theory applied
to all children And that then,when the world was still
somewhat sane, no parent wouldhave voluntarily submitted to
raising their child as theopposite sex, purely to prove
his point.
But this case was doublyattractive to dr Money because

(39:48):
Bruce had an identical twinbrother, and That was what
researchers call a perfectcontrol group for Dr Money to
compare Bruce's progress toBrian's and, and at the time it
was much easier to surgicallyconstruct a vagina than a penis.
So dr Money convinced theRhymer's that Bruce should be

(40:09):
raised as a female, and Theywere initially very ambivalent.
But they were persuaded by hisIntelligence and his charisma.
And I'll tell you somethingChad, charisma is a killer.
Yeah and so these parentseventually Agreed to this, and
the mother said she looked up todr Money like a god and she

(40:31):
accepted whatever he said.
So Bruce was renamed Brenda andwas castrated at 22 months old,
and a Vulva was fashioned by orfor her at Dr Money's hospital,
and he prescribed that BrendaShould start taking female
hormones when she was 12.

(40:52):
The mother would regularlywrite to dr Money about Brenda's
progress, and Every year,starting when they were, i think
, six years old, they would goand visit him.
He would interrogate them andIn 1972, when the twins were
seven, he published a bookcalled Man and Woman, boy and

(41:16):
Girl, and it was about this case, but he gave the family
fictitious names and he wrotethat the experiment had been a
total success And the girl washappy to wear dresses and play
with dolls, while her brotherloved cars and soldiers and
climbing trees.
It said that isn't what wasreally going on.
However, dr Money woninternational acclaim around the

(41:39):
world and the idea of sexreassignment surgery for
children suddenly became moreacceptable because of this book.
But Brenda would later say ininterviews that both she and her
brother knew early on thatSomething wasn't right and she
used to tear off these lacydresses that her mother made her
wear and she had no interestedMakeup.

(42:02):
At age four She said she wantedto try out her father's razor.
At age six She said she wantedto be a garbage collector.
She hated playing with dollsand she always chose her
brother's toys instead, and hermother kept telling her that she
was just a tomboy, this poorkid.
At school, brenda never fittedin.
She was rejected by both thegirls that she didn't really

(42:24):
want to play with anyway and theboys, and She was bullied and
even the teachers wereuncomfortable around her.
Sir mother said that she wasvery rebellious and she was very
masculine and She couldn'tpersuade her to do anything
feminine.
So this is completely contraryto what dr Money wrote in his

(42:45):
book.
And Brenda had almost nofriends growing up and the kids
Ridiculed her.
Everyone called her a cavewoman and she was very, very
lonely.
So from the age of six, as I wassaying, these twins had annual
visits to go see dr Money and Hewould show the naked pictures

(43:05):
of men and women and boys andgirls and of adults having sex,
and he, you know they wouldn'twant to do certain things and he
would just scream at them.
He was furious until they'dobey with him and he'd force
them to strip off their clothesand examine each other's
genitals.
He often asked them to play atthrusting movements and

(43:27):
copulation.
So he's forcing them to pretendto have sex in various
positions and a lot of the timethese encounters They'd be
photographed, and sometimes hewould summon his academic
colleagues to watch up to likesix of them, and they would all
be watching this horriblepractice going on.

(43:48):
And he himself?
He was the bisexual.
He champion nudity, openmarriage, group sex and hardcore
pornography, and in 1980 he wasaccused of endorsing pedophilia
and incest After he told Timemagazine a childhood sexual
experience, such as being thepartner of a relative or Of an

(44:10):
older person, need notnecessarily affect the child
adversely.

Speaker 1 (44:14):
Oh my god Now, when he was doing the thrusting
movements and all that, was hedoing Brenda and the twins
together, or did yeah, yeahother people.

Speaker 3 (44:24):
No, he had them.
He was encouraging them to doYeah so essentially he was
simulating incest.
Yes, oh.

Speaker 1 (44:31):
God, i know a little bit about this story, but I I've
forgotten some of the details.

Speaker 3 (44:36):
Apparently, this, i, this guy is Evil yes, and he
reportedly told a Dutch academicjournal that he did not see any
problem with a sexualrelationship Between a boy age
10 or 12 who's intenselyattracted toward a man in his
20s or 30s.
So Brenda Reimer told the BBCin 2000 that she thought he was

(44:58):
perverted.
She thought it was a very sickman and as she was going through
all of this horror and she wasgetting older, she increasingly
felt like she was male and Sheadamantly refused any more
surgery to construct a newvagina.
And Dr Money was saying thatwas essential to cementing her

(45:22):
Ecological sex change.
And on the last occasion shewas dragged to see him in her
early teens She ran to the roofof the building to get away from
him.
Although her parents and thedoctors persuaded her to start
taking Hormones when she was 12,which led to her developing
breasts, even though I guess hervoice was getting deeper, she

(45:44):
threatened to commit suicide.
She just had enough.
She threatened to commitsuicide if they ever took her
back to see Dr Money and Theparents and other doctors who
were consulted could see thatshe was serious about this, like
and and so they backed off andIn 1979, when she was 14, she

(46:04):
stopped living as a girl.
Then the following year, theirfather took Brenda out for an
ice cream and dropped thebombshell that She had been born
a boy named Bruce and she'd hada box circumcision and been
raised as a girl on the adviceof This Dr Money.

(46:25):
So within months Brenda changedher name to David.
So instead of going back toBruce, he changed his name to
David and he started taking malehormones and had his breasts
surgically removed and,according to a Friend, the
Reimers appearance would glossover why.
Brenda suddenly disappeared atage 14 and David appeared and

(46:50):
they claimed that Brenda hadactually been a cousin who died
in a car accident and David wasa long lost brother.

Speaker 1 (46:59):
Yeah, that was pretty common, like especially when
daughters got pregnant, forexample, and she went away to
live with family and she wasraised as the mom's daughter or
homes for unwed mothers, andyeah, there was such a social
pressure.
So, especially with the newnessof gender dysphoria or whatever

(47:20):
you wanna call it, this pork itdidn't even suffer from gender
dysphoria that he was justforced into a gender.
Did we ever get any informationor feedback from the brother?

Speaker 3 (47:29):
Brian was also very, very distraught about all of
this.
He's raised that he has a twinsister and then finds out that
he's a brother and he was alongwith these visits to Dr Money.
So he was being abused by thisdoctor as well and he was very
mentally and emotionally messedup because of this.

(47:52):
So David was in his teens andhe tried to have girlfriends but
it didn't work out.
He told one of them he had anaccident with his genitalia and
suddenly the whole school knewabout it and they were laughing
at him.
And it was shortly after thatthat he overdosed for the first
time on antidepressants And hesurvived.

(48:15):
But it was really really, reallytough for him, obviously.
And when he was older hisbrother's wife introduced him to
a friend named Jane, whoalready had three children but
she didn't have a partner.
So they hit it off and they gotmarried in 1990.

(48:36):
But by the time David was inhis 30s he lost his job, he got
defrauded of his savings, heseparated from his wife and he
plunged into a depression andhis relationship with Brian, his
brother, had been difficult.
And then, after they discoveredthey were really brothers and

(48:59):
that he wasn't the girl Brenda,it really messed Brian up and
Brian died from a drug overdosein 2002.
Oh my God, yeah, david's parents.
They held a small funeral andburied Brian in a secret place
because they were worried aboutdisruption from local people who

(49:21):
never understood all of thissituation.
And all these people weresaying that David was better off
dead.
It's just so sad.
So two years later, after allof this stuff happened, he
separated from his wife and allthese financial troubles and
things, he shot himself.
And his parents blamed Dr Moneyfor traumatizing their children

(49:46):
and turning them suicidal.
But they also carried a lot ofguilt.
And so then the motherattempted suicide and the dad
became an alcoholic Poor family.
Yeah, i mean, it's just anawful tragic story.
And this Dr Money, he went on,he was respected.
He pioneered the use of a drugtreatment for sex offenders to

(50:09):
extinguish their sex drives.

Speaker 1 (50:11):
Well, that's what puberty blockers are Right, and
I don't know if you know this,but I would love to know how
much of this information, or hisfake information or whatever,
was being overseen by the FDA,the CDC, who knows while he was
essentially experimenting onpeople in Baltimore And while
that's going on.

(50:32):
Ultimately, after that, he'spublished this book, but how
come the kids were notinterviewed?
How come the publishing was notsubstantiated?
This is exactly how thegovernment and these crazy
doctors that are way more intoself-preservation than they are
into protection get away withessentially, murder.

(50:55):
He's responsible for every oneof those deaths and he created a
mutiny of problems because,just like you said, the public
around oh, he'd be better offdead.
This that they hated him, theycalled her a caveman, him,
whatever it was, and it justforced him to have no reason to

(51:17):
live.
However, he comes to do this DrMoney came to do this stuff
with so much confidence andassurances that he could just
live his life as a girl.
No problem, put a vagina on himand live his life as a girl.
And you know what, when youlisten to these people about the
defend transgenderism at earlyages, still quote the guy, they

(51:38):
still reference him as like he'san exalted scientist and they
don't know that his study wascompletely botched and caused
suicide And he lied.

Speaker 3 (51:49):
He outright lied and made things up.
Yeah, in 2002, he received theMagnus Hirschfield Medal from
the German Society for SocialScientific Sexuality Research.

Speaker 1 (52:03):
Wow, and you would think the Germans would be a
little bit more sensitive to it,because this is no different
than what all the Nazis did tothe Jews when they were
conducting medical experimentsduring the Holocaust.

Speaker 3 (52:13):
Yeah well, apparently they don't learn over there.

Speaker 1 (52:15):
And where's John Hopkins issuing formal apologies
?
Where's the CDC?
And you know, the same stuffhappened with Fauci when he was
doing HIV stuff.
And they knew that the drugsthat they were handing out the
antiviral drugs they werehanding out were killing people
at a higher rate than actual HIVwas in the first place or AIDS.
And again they continued topeddle the stuff and continued

(52:37):
to kill people.
Some people believe they weredoing it on purpose, some
believe that they were juststupid.
I don't know the answer to that, but this is a continuous trend
and a continuous patternbehavior of our government.
And I'm sorry, but the 70sweren't that long ago, the 90s
weren't that long ago.
So this stuff isn't oldfolklore stuff, this is real

(53:00):
stuff.
And the really thing thatpisses me off and upsets me is
that all this information isavailable But you still have
these idiots with masks on inthe car walking around telling
people they're evil for notbeing vaccinated.
Meanwhile which we don't reallysee the government has removed

(53:20):
almost every mandate.
Teachers and public employeesin New York that were eliminated
.
Their positions were eliminatedfor not getting vaccinated.
They've all been paid out theirwages and more and brought back
to work.
The CDC just came out and saidthe hospital rates are way
higher for vaccinated peoplewith the mRNA than they are for
non-vaccinated people.

(53:41):
The heart issue is a really bigproblem that's spreading around.
Yet there's still people likeJoe Idiot, biden and Kamala
Harris and Pete Buttigieg andGavin Newsom all telling us oh
no, no, the vaccine worked, itworked and it didn't work.
And not only that, but nowwe're seeing droves of what they

(54:03):
call vaccine-injured patientsthat are having more problems
than they would have if theyjust had COVID.
And it's very, very scary Thewhole COVID vaccination thing,
because that was the first massrollout of any mRNA vaccine.
That was this experiment aboutmRNA.
That's exactly what it was, andthe man who actually created

(54:26):
the mRNA technology said this isnot how it's supposed to be
used, this is not going to work,this is not good for people.

Speaker 3 (54:32):
They did it anyway.
Isn't that mind-blowing?
Isn't that mind-blowing?
He was out there trying to warnpeople.
He was telling people he's theone who created it.
And he was saying no, don't dothis.
And it was suppressed.
And people say, oh no, you haveto trust the science, You have
to trust the scientists.
Well, what is he?
I'm totally blown away.

(54:55):
And then you have states likeCalifornia was the first one
that declared California a safestate for underage minors who
were not able to get sex changetreatments in their home states
to be able to come to California.
How that's not It gets better.

Speaker 1 (55:16):
It gets better than that.
They just recently passed abill that basically, if you
don't affirm your kid's gender,you disqualify for custody in a
divorce and child protectiveservices can deem that as a form
of abuse, so they could takeyour child away if you don't
affirm their gender.

(55:37):
However, they never define whataffirm means and they don't
really define what gender meanseither, but the specific bill
that was written states thatthey believe seven-year-olds can
consciously identify whatgender they are at seven years
old and, no matter what they say, it's the responsibility of the

(55:57):
parent to then accept thatconclusion by a seven-year-old.

Speaker 3 (56:04):
Okay.
So what happens?
Where does the child get taken?
to That just?

Speaker 1 (56:08):
seems like Hospital care.

Speaker 3 (56:10):
This just seems like a legal kidnapping system.

Speaker 1 (56:13):
It truly is, and I will say, looking at things
holistically andconstitutionally.
Just as I don't agree with theCalifornia statute that it's
considered abuse to withholdgender-affirming care, i also am
not sure that I agree with theFlorida statute that says if you
are going to give a minor anoperation or puberty blockers,

(56:36):
we are going to take the childaway.
Custodial rights is a totallydifferent issue And I understand
why these things are being putinto place from one ideal to the
other, but it's not clearenough or defined enough to
understand what are the stepsthat have to happen in order to
lose custodial rights based onthe state's laws.

(56:59):
So these things are kind ofhaphazardly written And, as we
know, when a statute or a law isleft up to significant amounts
of interpretation, that's whenbad things really happen,
because bad people that areinvolved in the process whether
it be a child protective serviceagent or a judge who's

(57:19):
overseeing the custody, or asocial worker one bad apple in
those bunches with the freedomto interpret this stuff as they
will, will cause major, majorissues psychologically and for
the safety of the kid.

Speaker 3 (57:35):
Yeah, i just I can't believe what's going on.
And yet, at the same time, ifyou're a parent and you have a
12-year-old that commits aheinous crime and causes a lot
of financial damage, as a parentyou're responsible for that
financial damage.

Speaker 1 (57:54):
And in other situations they say oh people,
they really, they're not fulladults or minds not fully
developed until 25 years old,And the crazy thing is is that
they paint the right and theypaint conservatives as these
evil, And when you really lookat the argument, the only thing

(58:15):
that we're saying is just wait,just take some more time.
So the decision that's made isproper.
Don't go into surgery and don'tgo in puberty blockers which,
by the way, the FDA has notapproved for the use of gender
dysphoria and or blockingpuberty.
But the concept that they thinkthat this is a right that we're

(58:39):
taking away from a kid isridiculous, Because all we're
saying is once you're 18, youhave every right in the world to
be whatever gender you want.
You want to transition, youtransition.
But you know it used to be athree to four-year process
before they would even allowthat person to think about
having the surgery, And you hadto live as a woman for a number

(59:00):
of years before.
You had to see a psychiatristand a psychologist for a number
of years before and the decisionwas then made.
Why are we make easier ratherthan harder when it's something
that is so?

Speaker 3 (59:12):
it's just so severe, It's it makes no sense And it's
wicked.
I mean, this story is just aperfect example of what this
does to people.
How many people are going toend up committing suicide later
in life that had this done whenthey were young children,

(59:35):
without their mind fullydeveloped?
They didn't realize what theywere doing, the parents were
unable to protect them and thegovernment condoned and
encouraged this practice.
And how many of these doctorsthat are willing to perform
these surgeries are like this,dr Money Guy?

(59:57):
How many of them are just astwisted and evil?

Speaker 1 (01:00:01):
You know they're ideologues.
But the big question, goingback to the whole government
involvement in these studies, iswhy, as of now, this has been a
buildup process to the pointwhere we're not even at the
brink yet, i don't think.
But this trans conversation hasbeen built up over at least the
last 10 years, probably longer.
This whole entire time, thepuberty blockers that are being

(01:00:23):
used are being used off label,which that's okay.
50% of medications that areprescribed amongst physicians in
the United States areprescribed off label.
That's okay.
Most of those medications don'tmake lasting, massive impacts
on someone's development andsomeone's future as a human
being.
The FDA has had years and yearsto use this drug in trials and

(01:00:49):
actually approve it, stamp itwith the correct side effects,
with the correct warnings, andit's refused to do it.
Why won't the FDA do it?
Why won't they use themedication and actually approve
it for gender affirming care andblocking puberty?
They won't do it.
Why?
Because the results will notmatch what the ideal is.

Speaker 3 (01:01:12):
Yeah Yeah, it's so scary.
I don't understand how anyonedoes a question this.
Any parent would not want toprotect their child against this
.
It's one thing if your kid's 13and they're a boy and they want

(01:01:36):
to dress like a girl and styletheir hair like a girl, but to
do something permanent to theirbody, that's insane.

Speaker 1 (01:01:46):
It's insane.
Listen, if there was a16-year-old in high school with
me and she came back with herboobs done from the summer
between sophomore and junioryear and she came back junior
year and she had a big fake rackof tits, every single parent
teacher would say, oh my God, icannot believe the parents

(01:02:07):
signed off on that.
I can't believe that the doctorwould do that.
They would make that familyfeel like pariahs.
Now they go, oh yeah, go whackhis dick off or glue it on.

Speaker 3 (01:02:19):
It's become trendy.

Speaker 1 (01:02:21):
The conversation that I'm sure you know as well has
always been it's not nurture,it's nature.
Everyone's born this way,everyone's born gay, everyone's
born whatever gender they are.
But now gender is a concept,therefore it is nurture.
I always say why aren't we justletting nature do its job?
I really believe I was born gay.

(01:02:42):
I do.
That's my personal experience.
But now you have all thesepeople coming out at nine years
old, eight years old, 10 yearsold, because they watch an
episode of RuPaul's Drag Race.
And they come out and it's notnaturally occurring and they're
not affirming or making thatdecision on their own, like I
did, because they have all thisoutside influence and rather
making it easier for people toessentially assign themselves a

(01:03:07):
harder life, because it's harderto be gay in a predominantly
straight community not reallyanymore, but it was It's
definitely harder to be trans.
Instead of allowing people tomake that commitment on their
own, it's almost like we'repushing them in that direction
and it's very unsettling, to saythe least.
And this Dr Money is directlyresponsible for a lot of this

(01:03:30):
stuff and it's very sad that hehas not been discredited.

Speaker 3 (01:03:35):
Yes, so do everything you can, people to protect
yourself and protect yourchildren, because the
government's not on your side.
They're just not, and, ifanything, they're the ones you
should be questioning the most.
And people who just accept thisis one thing, but I see people

(01:03:59):
who angrily defend it, andthat's what gets to me.
Why are you defending this?
Why aren't you questioninganything that could be
potentially harmful to yourselfor to the ones that you love?

Speaker 1 (01:04:15):
Let me ask you a question, Donna How many hours
can you spend talking about asubmarine?
Okay, the thing went down, itdidn't come back up.
There's the news They're alldead.
or it's with the Malaysianplane, which is what I think.

Speaker 3 (01:04:27):
Well, and the Navy knew about this basically right
after it happened, but no onewas reporting that.
They just drew out the storyand all this suspense around it.

Speaker 1 (01:04:37):
Oh, and all these experts and were focused on all
the wrong things when it comesto gender and children, instead
of improving what we really needto improve, which is just
everyone's life quality period,and it's disastrous, and I hope
it gets better very soon.

Speaker 3 (01:04:57):
I do too, and, as always, i will be posting links
to my sources.
On my Twitter profile, i can befound as Conspiracy Queen.
My username on Twitter issmartblonde007, and I encourage
anyone to see it for themselves.

Speaker 1 (01:05:18):
Awesome, donna.
As usual, this is a fantasticinterview.
I love what you bring and youget me all fired up, so I think
I'm going to go for a run andthen see if I need to have a
vulva made for myself.

Speaker 3 (01:05:33):
Please don't do that.

Speaker 1 (01:05:35):
Hey, at least I'm over 18.
I don't look like I'm over 18.

Speaker 3 (01:05:39):
Oh yeah, regardless, just don't do that.

Speaker 1 (01:05:44):
All right.
Well, thank you so much forbeing on the show and we'll see
you next week.

Speaker 3 (01:05:49):
Thank you Have a great weekend, thank you.

Speaker 1 (01:05:52):
Well, on that, folks, more exclusive content.
you can't get anywhere elseother than the last gay
conservative.
And, with that being said,we'll be back tomorrow.
This is Chad Law, reminding youof what Reagan once said A
stronger defense is aninvestment in peace.
God bless you, president Reagan, and may God save America.

Speaker 2 (01:06:32):
You just listened to the Last Gay Conservative
podcast hosted by Chad Law.
Please visit us atlastgayconservativecom for this
episode and others.
We're also on Spotify, applePodcasts, u2, and wherever you
listen.
If you like the show, pleaselike, subscribe and share.
Find us on social.
At Last Gay Conservative, weproudly support the following

(01:06:55):
causes the Convention of StatesAction, the National Rifle
Association, the HeritageFoundation and Big Brothers Big
Sisters of America.
Disclaimer the views andopinions expressed in this
program are those of thespeakers and do not necessarily
reflect the views or positionsof any entities they represent.
The Last Gay Conservative is aproduction of Ben Wright Media.

(01:07:16):
All rights reserved 2022.