Are you ready for a reality check on Bidenomics? Buckle up as we dissect President Biden's claims on the economy, tap into the global implications of current economic trends, and reveal the true colors of the National Strategy to Counter Anti-Semitism. We promise, it's going to be a rollercoaster ride as we share our analysis on approval ratings, the national debt and economic indicators that hit home.
But hang on, we've got more for you. We're going to dive deep into the global economy's current state, the strength of the dollar as the world's currency, the potential of the yuan to replace it, and the repercussions if the pound loses its status. Exploring the interesting idea of central banks hoarding gold, we'll also address President Biden's claims of his travels with Zhijing Ping. You don't want to miss our take on these!
Lastly, we'll scrutinize the Supreme Court's ruling on Affirmative Action and its influence on the black community and the Asian American population. Prepare to hear our thoughts on the Democrats' responses and the implications of the elimination of identity factors in admission. We'll also probe the controversial inclusion of the Council on American Islamic Relations in the National Strategy to Counter Anti-Semitism, challenging the administration's commitment to combating anti-Semitism. Join us as we examine these critical issues that impact our everyday lives.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
President Biden claims Bidenomics is working,
while ignoring key facts andindicators that the economy is
failing.
The Supreme Court of the UnitedStates rules.
Affirmative action isunconstitutional And the true
colors on national strategy tocounter anti-Semitism seems to
be anti-Semitic.
If you're listening to The LastGay Conservative, i'm your host
, chad Law.
(00:20):
Hello America, we want to hearfrom you.
(00:57):
Don't forget to text or leave amessage on the message line.
It's 866-LAST-GAY, or tweet medirectly.
At Last Gay Cons, send us anemail at
podcastatlastgayconservativecom.
Oh folks, happy Thursday.
Well, it has been quite the dayfor news.
My phone has been pinging since4am and I'm about ready to jump
(01:21):
out my window.
I'm teasing, but a lot of stuffhappening.
Of course, president Biden hadto get up in Chicago and make a
total fool out of himself.
I mean the guy it is so sad towatch.
Yesterday morning, approvalratings come out from all the
liberal left-arm media 34%approval rating on the economy
(01:41):
And he stands up and he saysBidenomics is working.
Everyone should get a job.
And I really want to break thatdown because really the only
thing the Democrats focus on isjobs and deficit reduction.
Meanwhile, our national debt isnow $32 trillion and he can
chip away at all.
He wants $1 trillion, $2trillion, but we're adding to
(02:03):
the debt faster than we can payit off.
Oh no, but America is a countrythat pays its bills Well.
So is everyone else, until theygo bankrupt.
He's also not focusing on trueindicators.
What's the real estate marketlook like?
What's consumer confidence looklike?
What about the value of thedollar and country's jumping
ship left and right and a verygood chance that we're no longer
(02:26):
going to be The worldwidecurrency that's used for trade
Supply chain is still a disasterand we still have some serious
gaps in the jobs Not well-payingjobs that he's adding.
There's second and third andfourth jobs people are having to
take because all of us havetaken a major hit.
Retirement funds, the stockmarket, local government funding
(02:49):
all of those things are what wecall key performance indicators
of a thriving economy, and theyare all down, other than his
deficit payoff and his jobnumbers, which is ridiculous.
Big news that at the SupremeCourt.
It's a great thing the SupremeCourt finally struck down
affirmative action.
(03:10):
However, the last few dayswe've had two pretty bad rulings
.
Justice Roberts has reallyshown to be a complete moron and
we knew Kavanaugh and Barrettwere going to probably be more
Republican than conservative.
I'm really surprised at AmyComey Barrett.
(03:30):
I knew Kavanaugh was aBush-style big government
Republican going into it.
Regardless of that, the way hewas treated was completely
unacceptable, so I supported himthen, but I've never supported
his values as a justice.
That being said, it's wonderfulthat affirmative action is
finally off the table.
(03:50):
It'll be interesting to seewhat kind of huge uprising we're
going to see from the minoritycommunities and the woke white
communities that have no ideawhat it was like as far as
affirmative action is concerned,and it'll be really interesting
to see if any government bodiesor watchdog groups will come
forward to see if theuniversities are actually doing
(04:13):
what the new ruling says, whichis that affirmative action is
not constitutional, and so Iwant to go through that and go
through the ruling and theopinion, and I also really want
to go through the dissent.
Kenji Brown and Sotomayor bothhad some very, very choice words
to use that I think revealreally what their main motive is
(04:34):
.
Lastly, a couple of months ago,biden launched a coalition
against anti-Semitism, andalready the Jewish community has
some serious questions aboutthe people that they've invited
onto the coalition, includinganti-Semitic Muslim groups that
are known for misogyny, violence, anti-israel remarks and
(04:55):
aggression and all sorts ofthings.
So I want to quickly break thatdown as well, to just show you
that this administration is theepitome of wolves and sheep's
clothing.
This is what they do.
They call something.
Oh, this is great, we'retackling anti-Semitism, but it's
really not about anti-Semitism.
It's probably about Musliminclusion or something else.
(05:16):
So we'll go over that.
We've got a big weekend comingup for you guys, some great
interviews and jam-packedinformation with COVID.
We've got Donna coming on onFriday, so a lot of stuff going
on.
Hope you are all enjoying itand we'll get right into it.
After these words, this episodeof the podcast is presented by
(05:41):
Factor Meals.
As you know, i was 317 poundstwo years ago and I just weighed
this morning at 235.
Granted, i've got about another20 to go to get the dad bod.
That is my goal, but FactorMeals helps a lot.
First of all, there's endlessoptions.
(06:01):
Second of all, for those of uswho are truly fat not these
people who are like I need tolose five pounds.
No, no, no.
For us, bigger men and women,taste is everything.
The reason we are this fat isbecause we love the taste of
food.
Well, the great news is isFactor Meals tastes fantastic.
They have vegan, they havevegetarian, they have keto, They
(06:24):
have anything you need.
Gluten-free Doesn't matter.
Right now, factor Meals for youall is offering 50% off your
first box 50%.
And then what are they offering?
Another 20% off your second box.
Go to factor75.com, at leastexplore, see if it's for you.
(06:46):
But I'll tell you, if you orderand you truly use the meal plan
as intended I do just mylunches and my dinners the
weight will begin to shed offlike crazy.
Again, folks, factor75.com, 50%off your first box and 20%
after that.
Speaker 5 (07:18):
So I came into office determined to change the
economic direction of thiscountry, to move from
trickle-down economics to whateveryone on Wall Street Journal
and Financial Times began tocall by-denomics.
I didn't come up with a name, ireally didn't.
I now claim it, but they're theones who use it first.
But I think it's a plan thatI'm happy to call by-denomics.
(07:39):
And guess what By-denomics isworking?
By-denomics is about the future.
By-denomics is just the otherway of saying restore the
American dream, because itworked before.
It's rooted in what we'vealways worked best at in this
country investing in America.
(08:00):
Investing in Americans, becausewhen we invest in our people,
we strengthen the middle class.
We see the economy grow thatbenefits all Americans.
That's the American dream.
Well, i believe that everyAmerican willing to work hard
should be able to get a job, nomatter where they are.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Well, there you have it folks.
By-denomics is working And hedidn't name it that, by the way.
You know, the biggest problemthat I have with Biden is should
we really have an 80 year oldman talking about the future?
How much future does this guyhave left?
He doesn't care, it's all abunch of malarkey.
80 year old telling us yeah, myplan is about the future.
(08:41):
I bet it is.
Of course, it's easy to talkabout the future when you've got
maximum you know his brainmaybe five, six years left.
The guy could barely get up thestairs and he's got hair coming
out of his ears and littlewispies coming behind his neck.
I mean, he reminds me of mygrandfather when he was 97.
This guy is not doing well.
So don't talk to us about thefuture, mr Biden, and moving
(09:04):
away from trickle down economicsbecause it didn't work right.
So when Carter was in office andyou were a senator and
Americans had depleted savings,inflation was at all time highs,
gas was in huge shortages.
He had to get a number or aletter.
I can't write, i wasn't alive,but I remember my dad telling me
(09:27):
he had to get a number or anassignment and there were huge
lines at the gas station.
They de-incentivized supply,focused 100% on demand, and it
ruined everyone.
I mean, there was no incentiveto save your money, there was no
incentive to invest, there wasno incentive to start new
businesses.
And Reagan came in and said no,we're going to flip this, we're
going to make this work in away that everyone has the
(09:51):
opportunity to build wealth.
That's the American dream.
But Biden, for some reason inhis convoluted head, thinks that
his Bidenomics is working.
And when you really break itdown, how he explains it,
there's only two factors thathe's looking at the deficit and
the job market, which I'vetalked about this 100 times on
the show.
(10:11):
And you guys are smart enoughto realize that the job numbers,
whether it's Republican orDemocrat, the job numbers are so
easy to massage in your favorthat you know when a president
comes in and their primary focusis on the job reports, there's
something else going on, becauseit's so easy to massage.
And if you hear any of themHakeem, jeffries, pete Buttigieg
(10:34):
, any of these other Marxistscoming out oh, biden added X
amount of jobs last month.
Oh, great, i'm glad to see theMcDonald's around the corner
from my house is finally fullystaffed.
Well, he's investing in America.
Well, how, Well?
how are those chip plantscoming along?
I don't know How was all thatinfrastructure spending on green
(10:55):
technology?
You know, half is windmills.
Down south are all collapsing,smoking dead birds everywhere.
It's hysterical.
A Ford Pinto on a dyno couldgenerate more power than these
windmills, turbines, whateveryou want to call it.
So when we want to take aholistic look at the economy not
by dynamics, which is twothings, there's really five
(11:17):
pieces that are the true keyperformance indicators on
whether or not our economy ishealthy Consumer confidence, the
dollar as the worldwide reservecurrency, real estate supply
trends and purchase trends.
Because you know all thosenumbers and all those massive
sales, like, let's say, in theautomotive industry, over COVID,
(11:39):
it's all fake money, it's allgovernment money.
It's just going from one to theother, one to the other.
So it inflated numbers to anunreasonable amount where now
most corporations can't evendream of hitting the numbers
that they did.
Well, excuse me, most consumerfacing corporations like Procter
and Gamble or VoxVagon Group orsome of the major players,
(12:05):
chevy, chevy doesn't even knowtheir own numbers because it's
all our money, i mean, they arecompletely built on government
subsidy.
But what I'm trying to say isthat you saw this mass boom.
You know they couldn't keepcars on the lots, couldn't keep
Pantene on the shelves, and it'scompletely changed because
there was a two year period ofbasically what I call monopoly
(12:26):
money.
People just got to use it, gogangbusters, all those stimulus
checks, getting paid to workfrom home and sit and do nothing
, which then empowered a lot ofgig economy jobs so they could
double dip.
So it's really an anomaly thatwe can't focus on, and most of
those corporations know thatthey're not going to go back to
those numbers for a long time.
(12:46):
However, their prices stillreflect.
I love when they say, oh,inflation is down, inflation is
down.
And I look at them and I goyeah, your stat on inflation may
be down.
It might only be 7% instead of10%, wow.
But what people don'tunderstand is that the peak of
inflation, suppliers raise theirprices, retailers raise their
(13:10):
prices, wholesalers raise theirprices.
Do you think, once theinflation settles, that they go
back and lower their price?
No, they don't.
So we're still paying way morefor the same that we were making
before.
Whether or not the dollar isinflated, it doesn't matter,
because at that point the pricesare already set.
The struggle is already there.
(13:31):
That's not taken into account.
And people say, oh, the economyis getting better, but why are
my grocery bills so high ifinflation is going down?
Because the prices got set atthe highest peak of inflation
and the inflation grew more thanyour salary did, and so you're
still trying to catch up.
But I mean, put the inflationaside and we look at consumer
(13:52):
confidence right here.
Present situation Majority ofconsumers said business
conditions were bad.
Majority of consumers said jobswere hard to get.
Majority of consumers said theyexpect business conditions to
worsen.
Majority of consumers said theyanticipate fewer jobs.
Majority of consumers say theyexpect their homes will decrease
(14:13):
in value.
Majority of consumers say thecurrent family finances are bad.
Majority of consumers expecttheir family finances to be
worse.
Perceived likelihood of a USrecession over the next 12
months.
70% of consumers say recessionis very likely.
What does that tell you folks?
So when Biden sits up there andsays, oh, this is great, this
(14:34):
is great, it's not what it is athome, and then you just combine
that with this 34% approvalrating of how he's handled the
economy, and where are we?
We are where we are today.
Real estate prices overallacross the country just fell
significantly for the first timein 11 years.
The only thing that's kept theprices at bay is the limited
(14:55):
supply of real estate.
Essentially, every single pieceof the real estate market is
down.
Average cost of home down about2% First time in 11 years.
Hit this year.
The affordability index isblack and white.
It shows exactly how muchincome to the size of the
mortgage.
I mean.
(15:15):
Listen to this.
2020, payment as percent ofincome was 14%.
2021, 17%, 2022, 24%.
23 is not done.
However, it's trending to closeat 26%.
Mortgages are growing becauseof A the rates, but also because
the incomes are plateauing ordropping.
(15:38):
See when you have two-yearpandemic to compare against and
those numbers are essentiallyall fake.
A manipulated market based onwelfare.
Essentially it doesn't.
It works to your favor, but itdoesn't tell us anything,
because you hear these thingsand you're like that can't be
true, that there's no way thatcan be true.
The number of home sales isdown.
(15:59):
They just released the data forJune of 2023 and we are
trending downward at about 4.3million transactions.
The median price of existinghome sales has not moved
basically all year, which itdropped almost 2%, i think in
April, and since then it's juststayed.
If you look at percent changein sales from a year ago by
(16:22):
price range homes up to 100K aredown 2.7%, homes from 100K to
250K 18% down.
Homes from 250 to 500, 12% down, 500 to 750, 20% down, 22, 24,
and so on, there is nothing thatindicates we're in a strong
(16:43):
real estate market.
The next thing we have to lookat is the dollar as the world
currency.
I mean, the World Bank justpublished a report I guess at Ms
Biden's desk that by 2025, thedollar is more than likely going
to become irrelevant in theglobal market.
What they're saying is that theemerging market growth rates
that are going up and up and upfor developing countries Brazil,
(17:07):
china, india, indonesia, russiaand South Korea is going to be
half the world economy, and sowhat they're saying is that the
world system, the IMF, will nowbe made up of multi-currency the
euro, the dollar and the yuanyuan, chinese yuan.
A lot of people saying is theyuan is probably going to come
in and replace the dollar, sothat's also an option.
(17:29):
We see, what most people don'trealize is that as the dollar
goes down in value and when it'sno longer traded, our economy
will be destroyed.
Oh, chad, that could neverhappen.
The green back failing is theconservative conspiracy in
Boogeyman Venezuela as anexample.
It's just crazy.
(17:50):
It's a bunch of malarkey.
All you have to do is pick up ahistory book, folks.
Churchill used a creation of aworldwide currency centered
around the dollar as theencouragement to get us to get
involved in World War II.
After World War I, we werepretty much done.
The thought in the UnitedStates was we're not going to
war, we're covered by oceans onboth sides, we're not doing it.
(18:12):
Then, as Germany began to growand the Japanese bombed Pearl
Harbor, fdr called up Churchilland said what am I going to get
for this?
And he said well, you can havethe world currency, because
before that it was the pound.
And so after the war in 1944,it was called the Bretton Woods
Conference 44 countries allagreed to creating the
(18:34):
International Monetary Fund andthe trade currency of the IMF
was the dollar.
Well, what do you thinkhappened to the pound?
I mean, i think the first monthafter it was no longer the
traded currency around the world.
They were at 30% inflation, 30%Decimated their economy,
decimated the value of the pound, incomes dropped, prices soared
(18:56):
, became stagflation.
It was bad, it was really bad.
And the World Monetary Fund andall of these worldwide economic
analysts are pointing to thedollar losing significant amount
of power within the market.
We can already see it TheSaudis don't want to trade in
the dollar anymore.
Indians don't want to trade inthe dollar anymore.
(19:17):
The Indonesians don't want totrade in the dollar anymore
Brazil.
So there's a global call toeliminate the dollar as the
IMF's main global currency, anda lot of it has to do with our
politics.
It's a very realistic picture,folks, very realistic.
The other way we know this isbecause central banks are buying
(19:40):
up gold like crazy.
The other basic number that willtake me 30 seconds to tell you
is to always look at the valueof the average IRA and 401k.
The average IRA and 401k aredown 20%, 20%.
So if you had 100k in the bankand your savings and your 401,
you now have 80k And that is abig swing, huge swing.
(20:04):
It feels like, well, yeah, butif we hold on and we hold on,
it'll bounce back.
But what about the people whoare retiring now, this year?
There's a bunch of people lastyear, next year, who knows
what's gonna happen?
They're all retiring on 20%less than what they had.
It's really scary, but that isa huge indicator that the
(20:25):
economy is not strong.
I mean I could go stat per statper stat to show you what's
happening.
I mean the retail numbers areabysmal, the supply chain is
still destructed.
Nothing is really gettingbetter other than the fact that
we are paying into the deficitto show a balance reduction
before six months to a yearlater spending more The deficit
(20:49):
is insane.
But it's also not this force ofwhether or not the economy is
good.
It's a very small determiningfactor actually of the overall
health of the economy.
This guy is gotta be out of hismind.
I mean, the first thing he sayswas I've flown with Zhijing
Ping 17,000 miles.
Very interesting that hebrought that up when we're
(21:12):
dealing with all this textmessage stuff.
So when I started I was thevice president.
I've traveled 17,000 miles withZ.
I have a great relationshipwith him.
The White House officials saidtraveling with Z is not accurate
but was a reference to thetotal travel back and forth,
both internally in the US andChina and as well as
internationally for meetingsthey held together.
(21:32):
New York Post says the numbersjust don't add up.
Then he goes on to bash,trickle down economics, which I
kind of already talked about,but it's very bizarre because he
says well, i know because I'mfrom Delaware and it's most of
the corporations are in Delaware.
Well, there's a reason whythey're in Delaware, one they
have extremely pro-businessliability laws and financial
(21:56):
laws and regulations.
So Delaware is just a greatplace to incorporate because
it's safer and easier to dobusiness in.
Based on what?
Trickle down economics,deregulation?
The great post in the DailySignal says with regard to
Biden's boast about Delawarehaving the most incorporated
companies, this second smalleststate in the country has more
(22:17):
than 60% of the Fortune 500companies.
That's largely because of thestate's longstanding tax
environment as well as legal andliability protections
established by state law.
Whether these tax andregulatory rules amount to
trickle down economics isdebatable, but they are
certainly favorable to business.
He says the trickle downeconomics has failed the middle
(22:39):
class.
Meanwhile, these numbers, like Italked about when Reagan came
into the office, cut regulation,gave people tax money back that
they paid in for essentiallynothing, created a supply-based
economy versus a demand-basedeconomy.
That equaled 20 million newjobs, increased the middle class
income by 11% over the decadeof his two terms.
(23:01):
Under Reagan, inflation droppedwhen he came in at 13.5% by the
time he left to 4.1%,unemployment fell from 7.6% to
5.5% And real gross nationalproduct rose 26%.
There's no arguing at folks.
Incentive, incentive, incentive.
(23:22):
It works across the board.
If people know that they canwork hard, come up with a great
idea and run with it Andultimately become a millionaire
if they play their cards right,or a billionaire or whatever,
then it doesn't matter.
And when you incentivize thebusinesses, the employees do
better, etc.
Etc.
So his whole thing is crazy.
(23:43):
And then, reducing the deficit,they're eliminating overdrafts.
Let me overdraft for you.
Okay, that's Biden economicsworking.
My team and I have reduced thedeficit by 1.7 trillion.
The deficit is $32 trillion Andthat's the problem.
It's not like consumer spendingwhere you go okay, i'm going to
(24:07):
take a chunk more out of mypaycheck and hit it towards my
credit card balance And you seeit drop dramatically.
But imagine if you had a bunchof auto charges for the next six
months that you didn't knowabout or that were up and coming
.
You can pay off as much as youwant, but all of these programs
have start dates, expirationdates, different levels.
(24:29):
They work through whatever, alot of complexity, and so what
happens is the spending and thepaying doesn't sink when we talk
about the deficit, it does notsink up.
So again, $32 trillion.
You can put as much in as youwant, but the Congressional
Budgetary Office and everyliable economic source says that
(24:50):
we are spending at a rate muchhigher than we're paying off our
debt.
And I think most of youprobably I've been in that
situation when I was younger.
I think most of you probablyhave as well.
I mean, it's not fun, but we'retalking the whole country, not
you or me.
So yeah, his information aboutthe deficit was very strange.
His job creation was very, veryodd.
He said that inflation was down.
(25:12):
He says today, inflation isless than half less than half at
what it was a year ago, andthat inflation was caused by
Russia and by the Ukraine warand by what's going on.
But we knew we had more to do.
There's more than one way tobring down the costs.
Well, again, we're down to 4.9percent inflation.
I think it's the last number Isaw.
(25:32):
However, when he took office,it was 1.7 percent.
How did he cut it in half?
And we know that Ukraine hadnothing to do with it.
Russia had nothing to do withit because his inflation
happened immediately based onthe executive orders that he
signed.
Whoo, i don't know how peopledeal with this, but the guy
(25:53):
cannot get his numbers straightand everything is massaged to
seem like it's something thatit's not.
And I hope Americans are wisingup You guys are, but I hope our
neighbors, our friends,extended family, are wising up
to say God, he stands there andsays this, and all these reports
come out from the Marxist mediathat say everything's so good,
(26:17):
but it's not.
It doesn't feel good.
So you can't trust what's outthere and you especially can't
trust this idiot, joe Biden.
It's absolutely bizarre that hecan see these approval ratings
and still stand by what he'sdoing.
It's no secret that I love theordinary skincare, but what is a
(26:38):
secret is that they justlaunched their new hair care and
boy is it just as good as theirskincare.
They're revitalizing formulas,make my hair feel new and I have
a full head of bleach, so I'mconstantly breaking and losing
hair.
This seems to do the trick.
Go to theordinarycom, check itout.
(27:00):
There's a few products.
You should try them, see whatyou think.
If you like them, keep them.
If you don't, send them back,no pressure.
The ordinary skincare and nowthe ordinary hair care.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
I have a dream that one day, this nation will rise
up and live out the true meaningof its existence.
We hold these truths to beself-evident that all men are
created equally.
I have a dream that one day, onthe Red Hills, the jobs sons of
(27:53):
former slaves and the sons offormer slave owners will be able
to sit down together at thetable of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day,even the state of Mississippi, a
state sweltering with the heatof injustice, sweltering with
(28:17):
the heat of oppression, will betransformed into an oasis of
freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my poorlittle children will one day
live in a nation where they willnot be judged by the color of
their skin but by the content oftheir character.
(28:39):
I have a dream.
Speaker 1 (28:41):
I had to play that.
What a momentous occasion.
Martin Luther King, i know,would be disgusted by how things
have turned out.
He talks about in his I Have aDream speech, which is probably
one of the most famous speechesof all time.
He says I have a dream thatslaves and the sons of slaves
(29:02):
and the sons of slave owners cansit down at the table together.
Notice that he doesn't say Ihave a dream that sons of slaves
will come to sons of slaveowners generations later and ask
for reparations.
He says I have a dream that mychildren are judged not by the
color of their skin but by thecontent of their character.
(29:23):
Notice he doesn't say I have adream that my children and their
children are given preferentialtreatment for the color of
their skin and have theircharacter ignored.
He never said he had a dreamthat the color of skin would be
an excuse for mediocrity.
He never said I have a dreamthat includes whites feeling
(29:45):
perpetually guilty for the sinsof their father.
He doesn't say any of that.
He says all men are createdequal.
He wanted equality, which isexactly what affirmative action
does not do.
I have a dream futuregenerations of black people get
free school.
Future generations of blackpeople have justified means of
(30:07):
discrimination.
He doesn't say that he has adream, that being a minority or
being black is an excuse, moreso a motivation.
That was civil rights, althoughthings like affirmative action
and some of the other federaland the civil rights act, some
of the other federal regulationsthat were put into place, they
(30:29):
were rapid response tools inorder to integrate black,
especially the younger black,communities into traditionally
all white universities,traditionally all white jobs,
without having an issue, withoutthere being any sort of hiccup.
However, obviously I can'tspeak for Reverend King, but if
you've really studied what hepreached not just this speech
(30:50):
but in general none of thoseintegration measures or laws
that were written in the 60s andthe 70s, none of them were made
as permanent solutions.
They were made as tools to getover the hump.
So when you launch a newanti-discrimination set of laws
(31:11):
civil rights you explain whatthat is and define it for
employers, teachers and everyAmerican, and you set the
expectation that the blackcommunity and the white
community cannot be separatedanymore.
Had we not employed some ofthese rapid responses like
affirmative action, had we notemployed those things, it would
have taken a very, very longtime for the populace to catch
(31:36):
up with the legislation, and soat one time, this was meaningful
work.
This was work to integrate, butat some point, as more and more
opportunities arose foreveryone, including black people
, as the gap of equity began toclose and we had more equitable
society between whites andblacks, these things were no
(31:58):
longer needed.
And what happened was is thelonger we used tools that were
created for a very specificreason at a very specific time,
the longer we used those toolsand reworked them and readjust
them, they become crutches andeventually they become
discrimination itself.
(32:19):
That's what happened withaffirmative action, and so
today's ruling is a serious win,and it's not just a Republican
Democrat thing, and it's notjust a black and white thing.
It's about character, not color.
It's about the elimination ofall these superficial qualities
that have nothing to do with howsomeone contributes to the
(32:40):
world.
Sexual orientation doesn'tmatter, skin color doesn't
matter, gender doesn't matter,meaning women, men, not all
these other genders.
It's why that's become thefocus and then why those things
have been able to fall back onold civil rights tools that were
made specifically to integrateblack people that had been
(33:00):
historically discriminatedagainst for a hundred years,
into everyday American life andmake that happen as fast as
possible.
It was a valiant effort, surelywas, but they've become excuses.
They've also become thefoundation for racial Marxist
theory, which is all aboutpropping up those who need more
(33:22):
and keeping down those thatdon't.
But there's no clear definitionof what that actually means.
You can't solve discriminationwith more discrimination.
You can't solve racism withmore racism, and that's exactly
what these programs have evolvedto do.
So you take a system that wasat one time unjust.
You create something to catchthat terrible system pretty
(33:46):
civil rights But once it'scaught up, if you leave it there
, then it's when you see all themisuse and the misapplication
and the university is doingwhatever they can so they can
make the decisions aroundadmissions based on preferential
treatment and not based onmerit.
And boy you can say I mean thecommunities right now are either
(34:08):
cheering or screaming.
I think the most interestingpart about all of this is this
case was actually brought on byAsian Americans, because Harvard
once this case showed andrevealed that Harvard's
admissions policy, as itpertains to diversification, was
(34:31):
completely racist anddiscriminatory towards Asian
Americans, to the point where iteven said in the policy that
Asian Americans did notnecessarily add to diversity the
same way Browns and blacks did.
So racism isn't just a blackissue.
(34:53):
It was when affirmative actionwas created.
But the landscape of ourpopulation has changed.
So, once again, one size fitsall in this country never works.
And of course, the Democrats areall up in arms because they
want federal control ofeverything.
They want to be able to controland tell universities what they
(35:16):
can do.
And let me be very clear,because Biden, the Bozo and
everyone else out there issaying well, it's not a
determining factor, no, thepoint system, it's an additional
point.
So again, no one is arguingthat it's not a determining
factor.
They're arguing that someonethat comes in, let's say, at a
(35:38):
3.5 GPA, and then there's awhite student that comes in at a
4.0 GPA, and they each have theequal amount of points as it
pertains to merit their essay,their referrals, whatever it is,
the deciding factor comes downto that extra point in race, and
that is what isn't fair.
Speaker 3 (36:00):
Well, I would say that I'm disappointed, but I'm
not surprised, When we talkabout holistic admissions, to
say that you can include astudent's identity the student,
the person behind the papers andthe grades and the test scores
that you're not allowed toinclude race, which is such an
encompassing part of at least myidentity as an underrepresented
(36:21):
minority, it makes me feelupset.
We know what happens whenaffirmative action goes away
from universities.
We can look at California, wecan look at Michigan, who was
already banded, and see howtheir state flagships lack a
astounding number of black andLatino students And you'll hear
the liberal media constantlyreferring to the UC system in
(36:44):
California, which is always,always misrepresented by
liberals.
Speaker 1 (36:50):
When California did away with affirmative action,
there was a decrease inenrollment of minorities into
the UC schools.
However, the minorities thatwere accepted had much higher
GPAs and they were morequalified to be there.
Furthermore, the enrollment atcity colleges that fed directly
(37:13):
into the UC system for peoplewho were not technically able to
get in if race wasn't a factorskyrocketed.
those GPAs were higher and thetransfer rate for junior and
senior year to graduate from aUC system skyrocketed.
So they look at one number, onenumber only, which is the
minority acceptance, if you will.
(37:35):
But again, when you're usingsomething superficial to score
someone, of course it's going togo down because they weren't
originally qualified, but theyhave an option to go to a
community college that feedsdirectly into the UC system or
the CSU system and get a greateducation.
And those minorities that didqualify on their own, without
(38:00):
race-based decisions, excelled.
The other big bullshit buzzwordor phrase is it's going to
change the landscape of whatuniversities will look like.
Apparently, we have thousandsand thousands of psychics in
this country.
How can you test the impact ofa ruling that's never happened
(38:23):
before.
You can't use the UC systembecause your facts are flawed.
Furthermore, all the statisticsthat they're talking about are
black and white issues, notAsian.
So it makes you wonder if theliberal movement for all of
these different race-basedboondoggles is to keep us
(38:44):
resegregated.
Ecologists have black and whitedorms now They want to use race
and sexual orientation aspoints up for admission.
They have black and whitecommencement now.
Furthermore, they're teachingcritical race theory, which
completely separates whites fromblacks in elementary schools,
(39:04):
And it seems like the push is toresegregate this society.
Speaker 3 (39:09):
The one thing that really is making me sad, I'll
just say today, is that myidentity has to be my race, The
struggles that I've gone through, the trauma I've gone through
as an African-American woman inthe United States.
if I were applying to collegetoday, I would have to write
(39:29):
about those traumas in mycommon-up essay.
I would have to write aboutthose traumas and those very
hard experiences for admissionsofficers to accept the
overwhelming truth that we allknow, which is that it is hard
to be a black person in America.
Speaker 1 (39:43):
And right there she proves the point that we're all
trying to make She doesn't wanther individualism, her traumas,
her experiences as a black womanto have to be individually
recognized or seen as somethingthat's contributed to the
definition of her character.
No, she thinks that all blackwomen have the same issues and
(40:04):
they should be considered thesame way.
You don't think there's whitewomen that have trauma.
You might have incest in thiscountry, you might have rape,
pedophilia.
You don't think there's whitewomen who have gone through
hardship which has defined theircharacter.
That's the problem, right there.
She thinks that all black womenhave the same struggles and
(40:25):
therefore they should all belooked at the same, based on the
fact that they have trauma andit's hard to be a black woman in
America.
And I can't decide if that'spart of the Marxist Revolution
and they're trying tore-segregate to create more
chaos, or if they really believethat the history of this
(40:47):
country and the people in thecountry today are racist and
want to keep blacks out ofcollege, want to keep blacks out
of society.
Because that's not the case.
100% is not the case.
Every poll, every survey inmodern times has shown that
Americans have become less andless and less racist and more
(41:08):
and more and more colorblind astime goes on.
I'm going to take a quick breakand go deep into the ruling
when I come back after thesewords.
I know you all have beenlistening to me talking about
Ron's progress.
He's all better now.
One funny thing is when we wereat the vet and the vet was
incredible.
But the vet tech was saying youknow well, what do you feed him
(41:31):
?
And I said oh, he eats raw.
He eats Darwin's pet.
So, okay, well, because thewounds on the face and raw food
has a tendency to like have morebacteria.
But I don't want you to feedhim that, i want you to.
And I said no, i'm going tostop you right there.
I said I'll keep salinesolution and spray and I'll keep
it nice and clean, because theonly reason why he's as alive as
(41:51):
he is, the only reason why hesurvived through such a serious
accident, is because he's beenon Darwin's pet.
Now is not the time to abandonhis diet.
And, of course, what did theysay?
He healed a week faster, hisstitches came out earlier, he
has very, very little scarring,he's back full levels of energy
and basically doesn't even seemlike he was down for the few
(42:14):
weeks that he was down.
I cannot tell you how much thisfood helps your dog live longer,
smell better and just havebetter general health.
Darwin's pet you can start.
10 pounds of food, your firstbox, for $14.95.
It is the only and bestdelivery raw food diet that is
made 100% with US ingredients,processed in the United States
(42:38):
and Washington and biologicallyformulated to make sure that
your dog gets every singlenutrient, mineral and vitamin
that it needs.
Again, guys, darwin's petcom,sign up, get a 10 pound box for
$14.95 and let me know what youthink.
(43:00):
I mean, i saw a woman I thinkshe was a senator in Milwaukee,
i can't remember, but she saidokay, well, that's the end of
the black people in America.
They're never going to be ableto win an American based system.
Huh, the guy that was talkingabout the story was a black guy
and he goes wow, so these peoplehave enjoyed being victims.
They want to stay victims.
(43:21):
They don't want to come out andsay, we don't care, we'll still
do great in college.
We'll still do great at ourjobs.
We'll still do great in sports.
We'll still do great by God.
Oh, no, the second.
There's any discrimination,regardless of the party claiming
it is the second, theconversation goes away from
(43:42):
character and back to race orwhatever characteristic that
we're talking about sexualorientation, gender and so on.
Interestingly enough, we havetwo black justices, justice
Thomas and Justice Kenji Brown.
I always say Kenji Brownbecause I'm not exactly sure how
her last name and first namekind of come and go together,
but there are the completeopposite end of the spectrum.
(44:05):
So it's interesting because weget to see in Kenji Brown's
dissent she is of the victimhoodblack mentality.
And then you see Justice Thomassaying no, there should be no
preferential treatment and wecan't use the past to define the
future.
So I'm going to start withJustice Brown's dissent.
(44:27):
She says with let them eat cakeobliviousness.
Today the majority pulls theripcord and announces color
blindness for all by legal fiat.
But deeming race irrelevant inlaw does not make it so in life.
And having so detached itselffrom this country's actual past
and present experiences, thecourt has now been lured into
(44:50):
interfering with the crucialwork that UNC and other
institutions of higher learningare doing to solve America's
real world problems.
No one benefits from ignorance.
Although formal race linkedlegal barriers are gone, race
still matters to the livedexperiences of all Americans in
innumerable ways, and today'sruling makes things worse, not
(45:13):
better.
The best that can be said of themajority's perspective is that
it proceeds ostrich-like fromthe hope that preventing
consideration of race will endracism.
As you can see, she's of theopinion that racial history in
this country and race inequityshould be considered legally,
(45:35):
career in careers and everysingle part of life, because the
United States is not colorblindand it never has been
colorblind.
Here's the problem with thesepeople They never have an
alternative solution.
First of all, it's you can'tsit here and say that
affirmative action is fair.
It's not fair.
Whether you believe thatthere's an equity gap, whether
(45:57):
there is or not, whatever youropinion is or whatever your
facts in front of you, say thatthere's an equity gap.
You don't close that gap bycreating another gap.
And so, yes, she can scathe allshe wants, but everything that
she's talking about istheoretical.
It's race theory.
It has nothing to do witheveryday life.
Then we go to Justice Thomas,who I believe is more in line
(46:17):
with the Martin Luther Kingspeech that we just heard.
He says while I am painfullyaware of the social and economic
ravages which have befallen myrace and all who suffer
discrimination, i hold outenduring hope that this country
will live up to its principles,so clearly enunciated in the
Declaration of Independence andthe Constitution of the United
(46:38):
States, that all men are createdequal, are equal citizens and
must be treated equally beforethe law.
He went on to say anoriginalist defense of the
colorblind Constitution andwrote that all forms of
discrimination based on race,including so-called affirmative
action, are prohibited under theConstitution.
The great failure of thiscountry was slavery and progeny,
(47:00):
and the tragic failure of thiscourt was its interpretation of
the Reconstruction Amendments.
He wrote.
We should not repeat thismistake merely because we think
our predecessors thought thatour present arrangements are
superior to the Constitution.
Then he dives into her and saysJustice Jackson would replace
the Founder's vision with anorganizing principle based on
(47:21):
race.
In fact, in her view, almost allof life's outcomes must be
unhesitantly ascribed to race,even if some whites have a lower
household net worth than someblacks.
What matters to Justice Jacksonis that the average white
household has more wealth thanthe average black household.
This lore is not and has neverbeen true.
(47:44):
Even in the segregated southwhere I grew up, individuals
were not the sum of their skincolor.
Then is now not.
All disparities are based onrace.
Not all people are racist andnot all differences between
individuals are ascribable torace.
There's all over the news.
I see Ed Creston and all thesepeople on Twitter that are
supposedly like moderate, truenews people saying race is a
(48:07):
complicated issue.
Now, it's not.
It's not complicated.
We've made it complicatedbecause the second, the Civil
Rights Act, was passed and wedid create some of these
programs.
There should have beendeadlines on them, just how
there have been deadlines on Roev Wade.
The law is subject to the timeand the law is also subject to
(48:27):
the intention and the need atthe time.
There are very few laws thatcan survive the test of time
forever, which is why ourconstitution is relatively small
, because that's the foundation,that's the basis.
Those are the laws that willlast forever and everything else
stems from them.
So, yeah, very excited aboutthat, when I think you should
(48:51):
all keep an eye on the media andsome of the things that are
going to come up.
We're going to see a lot, a lotof misinformation.
They're continually going todestroy Justice Thomas with all
their false accusations ofpersonal bribes, etc.
I love him and his wife go outon a boat with the guy.
It's like they're just oldfriends, you know.
(49:11):
Oh, he took a boat ride.
He must be influenced.
That was a GOP donor, first ofall.
You'd be hard pressed to findanyone in the seven, eight or
nine figures who is not somekind of donor, regardless of
party, to push their ownpersonal interest.
That's just the way thiscountry works.
Leave the guy alone, you know,just because he's not a race
(49:33):
Marxist and he doesn'tperpetuate the victimhood of
people.
He's right, the Constitutioncalls for equality And, yes, we
have a stain forever on our flag.
Slavery was terrible, and I'mnot one of those people that say
, well, there was white slavery,there's slavery here, slavery
there.
I don't care about any of that.
I'm caring about what we had.
(49:53):
The founders knew it was wrong,jefferson knew it was wrong.
They did it anyways because itwas ingrained in the culture.
It was a terrible, terriblepractice, but we don't get to
stop living and we don't have tobe held accountable for years
And years and years and years tocome.
Furthermore, descendants aren'tborn into situations that makes
(50:17):
them less opportune or moreopportune based on the fact that
they're a descendant of slavery, because, you know, a big
percent of the black communityin America is not descendants of
slavery, which is why thesereparations don't just say you
have to be a descendant ofslavery.
They say you have to be adescendant of slavery or been
caught up on the war on drugs,or been displaced by urban
(50:38):
development.
It's very, very hard to pindown the specific descendants of
slaves, and so it's just becomea catch-all.
What I love about this decisionthe most is that we have seen a
failure of a presidency I meanbeyond anything we could ever
say before And, most importantly, it's because the fact that his
(51:00):
entire cabinet was selectedbased on physical
characteristics or sexualorientation, skin color, and
because of that, and not basedon merit or experience, the
entire country is feeling it.
That's what's happening incollege.
That's what's happening incolleges.
We have to put merit first.
We don't have to put our bestback in order to give someone
(51:24):
else the best seat.
It's not how it works.
This is a competitivecapitalist democracy And we're
either going to be that or we'renot.
Because you know what?
The market is not racist, it'scolorblind.
Actually, it sees one colorgreen.
I happen to see the same coloralways and everywhere.
Let's talk a little bit aboutJoe Biden and his anti-Semitism
(51:45):
task force that has now joinedforces with one of the most
anti-Semitic Muslim groups inthe country.
I'll be right back, Let themknow.
(52:16):
The last gay conservatives sentyou.
All right.
So there's a great story out ofthe daily signal.
It was breaking news and aletter was written from the New
Tolerance Campaign, which is acampaign that works to fight
anti-Semitism.
And the New Tolerance Campaignfound out that the Biden
(52:41):
administration has included theCouncil on Islamic Relations,
care, c-a-i-r, in this newanti-Semitism coalition that he
put together or announced acouple months ago.
I'm just going to read you guysthe letter President Biden,
thank you for your commitment tocombating anti-Jewish hatred in
your administration's naturalstrategy, sort of national
(53:04):
strategy to counteranti-Semitism.
Though noble in its intentions,the genuine impact it will have
appears to be hindered by theinclusion of a recognized
anti-Semitic organization in itsimplementation.
The Council on American IslamicRelations, care, the
Anti-Defamation League,maintains that antipathy towards
(53:25):
Israel has been a CARE staplesince the group was founded in
1994.
But a documented record ofanti-Semitism is not only reason
.
Care's engagement with thisinitiative is troubling.
Care has also been embroiled ina litany of controversies that
call into question the characterof its leadership and genuine
commitment to endinganti-religious bigotry.
(53:47):
A 2021 report by NPR foundchapter leadership at CARE
fostered a toxic workplace inwhich sexual harassment and
bullying were part of theorganizational culture.
Mr Awad ignored warnings fromvictims of sexual harassment in
his organization and turned ablind eye for years.
Even more concerning, mr Awadhimself is alleged to have
(54:09):
engaged in sexual harassmentagainst a former CARE staffer.
Furthermore, in 2018, latinatheologian and interfaith
activist, karen Leslie Hernandez, was terminated from CARE under
the guise that she was notMuslim.
In reality, court documentsattest that the true reason for
her dismissal was because MrAwad was upset.
(54:31):
The new Dallas employee spokeopenly online about being a
survivor of domestic violence.
Care Nationals attorney came upwith an alternative story of
the events and told the localchapter to offer the woman a
payoff using an NDA exchange forher silence on the religious
and gender discrimination shefaced.
At the very least, anorganization engaged to promote
(54:54):
anti-religious hate should nothave a record of anti-religious
discrimination within its ownmarks.
That cannot be said of CARE,which has sadly been accused of
discrimination against otherMuslims.
A 2001 complaint letter to MrAwad from a Tenez Hadid stated
that it may appear unusual toclaim discrimination while
(55:16):
working for a civil rightsorganization.
It may seem even more unusualthat I am Muslim, claiming
religious discrimination whileworking for a Muslim
organization, but that isprecisely what happened,
according to Ms Hadid.
In her letter, she declares shewas demoted after CARE
leadership discovered that mybackground is Shia.
Mr Awad refused to intervene.
(55:37):
Each one of these controversiesalone should be caused for
concern.
Together, they reveal a patternof odious actions at CARE that
would appear to make theirinvolvement with the national
strategy to counteranti-Semitism less of a strength
and more of a liability.
The New Tolerance Campaignrespectfully asks that the White
House alludicate the internalprocess that engaged CARE in the
(55:59):
rollout of the nationalstrategy on counter
anti-Semitism, who was taskedwith vetting the organization in
advance of the rollout, whetherthe controversies described
herein were considered duringsuch vetting and, if they were,
why were they dismissed?
Sincerely Gregory Angelo, thepresident of the New Tolerance
Campaign.
This really is nothing new,folks.
(56:20):
Like I always say, theDemocratic Party is the party of
wolves and sheep's clothing.
This council on fightinganti-Semitism that Biden created
is just another fluffy way thathe can show that he's working
on civil rights.
More and more Jews are movingout of the Democratic Party and
(56:42):
coming to the right because ofthe anti-Israel and anti-Semitic
base of the DNC.
After seeing Trump, who was themost Israel-friendly president
that we've had in manygenerations, jewish factions all
over the country are becomingmore and more conservative.
This is Biden's way to say oh,look at me, look at me.
(57:03):
However, he's also trying to puttogether a peace treaty, if you
will.
This is his lame attempt ofcreating a Yasser Arafat Oslo
Accord.
That Bill Clinton did, butdomestically, but I mean the
Yasser Arafat Oslo Accord is aperfect example.
The Democrats forced Israel togive up control of several
(57:24):
territories, forced Israel toconcede to a known terrorist, a
proponent of terrorism and a Jewkiller.
That's what he was car bombsand all See, the Democratic
Party hates Jews.
They hate Jews.
They hate Israel because theyrepresent something that they
don't like, which is freedom andsuccess.
The Jewish population has beenable to persevere since the
(57:47):
Holocaust and create well aninnovation and business and
commerce employment, more thanany other minority population in
the world.
Democrats don't like that.
They don't want independence.
And so now Joe Biden is usingthe Council on Islamic American
Relations to roll out ananti-Semitic task force, or,
(58:12):
sorry, a counter-counteringanti-Semitism task force.
It's very odd.
So you have daily signal andgot the letter first and
essentially they break it alldown.
And the man who wrote theletter actually was the
secretary for the executiveoffice for President Trump, so
he knows exactly what's going on.
And he says I'm very familiarwith what it takes to bring in a
(58:36):
partner into these coalitionsor these groups, and it's
significant vetting.
So obviously they either didthe vetting or they just didn't
care And they thought, well, wemight as well bring in a Muslim
organization to show that we'rebringing people together to
combat anti-Semitism, which infact he's not.
And I wouldn't be surprised ifPresident Obama had something to
(58:58):
do with all of this as well.
All right, guys, i'm out oftime.
I'll be back tomorrow.
My name is Chad Law, remindingyou of what Reagan once said,
and I have often said that agovernment program, once
launched, is the nearest thingto eternal life we'll ever see
on earth.
Talk about affirmative action.
God bless you, president Reagan, and may God save America.
Speaker 4 (59:38):
You just listened to the Last Gay Conservative
podcast hosted by Chad Law.
Please visit us atlastgayconservativecom for this
episode and others.
We're also on Spotify, applePodcasts, u2, and wherever you
listen.
If you like the show, pleaselike, subscribe and share.
Find us on social.
At Last Gay Conservative, weproudly support the following
(01:00:00):
causes The Convention of StatesAction, the National Rifle
Association, the HeritageFoundation and Big Brothers Big
Sisters of America.
Disclaimer the views andopinions expressed in this
program are those of thespeakers and do not necessarily
reflect the views or positionsof any entities they represent.
The Last Gay Conservative is aproduction of Ben Wright Media.
(01:00:21):
All rights reserved 2022.
President Biden claims Bidenomics is working,
while ignoring key facts andindicators that the economy is
failing.
The Supreme Court of the UnitedStates rules.
Affirmative action isunconstitutional And the true
colors on national strategy tocounter anti-Semitism seems to
be anti-Semitic.
If you're listening to The LastGay Conservative, i'm your host
, chad Law.
(00:20):
Hello America, we want to hearfrom you.
(00:57):
Don't forget to text or leave amessage on the message line.
It's 866-LAST-GAY, or tweet medirectly.
At Last Gay Cons, send us anemail at
podcastatlastgayconservativecom.
Oh folks, happy Thursday.
Well, it has been quite the dayfor news.
My phone has been pinging since4am and I'm about ready to jump
(01:21):
out my window.
I'm teasing, but a lot of stuffhappening.
Of course, president Biden hadto get up in Chicago and make a
total fool out of himself.
I mean the guy it is so sad towatch.
Yesterday morning, approvalratings come out from all the
liberal left-arm media 34%approval rating on the economy
(01:41):
And he stands up and he saysBidenomics is working.
Everyone should get a job.
And I really want to break thatdown because really the only
thing the Democrats focus on isjobs and deficit reduction.
Meanwhile, our national debt isnow $32 trillion and he can
chip away at all.
He wants $1 trillion, $2trillion, but we're adding to
(02:03):
the debt faster than we can payit off.
Oh no, but America is a countrythat pays its bills Well.
So is everyone else, until theygo bankrupt.
He's also not focusing on trueindicators.
What's the real estate marketlook like?
What's consumer confidence looklike?
What about the value of thedollar and country's jumping
ship left and right and a verygood chance that we're no longer
(02:26):
going to be The worldwidecurrency that's used for trade
Supply chain is still a disasterand we still have some serious
gaps in the jobs Not well-payingjobs that he's adding.
There's second and third andfourth jobs people are having to
take because all of us havetaken a major hit.
Retirement funds, the stockmarket, local government funding
(02:49):
all of those things are what wecall key performance indicators
of a thriving economy, and theyare all down, other than his
deficit payoff and his jobnumbers, which is ridiculous.
Big news that at the SupremeCourt.
It's a great thing the SupremeCourt finally struck down
affirmative action.
(03:10):
However, the last few dayswe've had two pretty bad rulings
.
Justice Roberts has reallyshown to be a complete moron and
we knew Kavanaugh and Barrettwere going to probably be more
Republican than conservative.
I'm really surprised at AmyComey Barrett.
(03:30):
I knew Kavanaugh was aBush-style big government
Republican going into it.
Regardless of that, the way hewas treated was completely
unacceptable, so I supported himthen, but I've never supported
his values as a justice.
That being said, it's wonderfulthat affirmative action is
finally off the table.
(03:50):
It'll be interesting to seewhat kind of huge uprising we're
going to see from the minoritycommunities and the woke white
communities that have no ideawhat it was like as far as
affirmative action is concerned,and it'll be really interesting
to see if any government bodiesor watchdog groups will come
forward to see if theuniversities are actually doing
(04:13):
what the new ruling says, whichis that affirmative action is
not constitutional, and so Iwant to go through that and go
through the ruling and theopinion, and I also really want
to go through the dissent.
Kenji Brown and Sotomayor bothhad some very, very choice words
to use that I think revealreally what their main motive is
(04:34):
.
Lastly, a couple of months ago,biden launched a coalition
against anti-Semitism, andalready the Jewish community has
some serious questions aboutthe people that they've invited
onto the coalition, includinganti-Semitic Muslim groups that
are known for misogyny, violence, anti-israel remarks and
(04:55):
aggression and all sorts ofthings.
So I want to quickly break thatdown as well, to just show you
that this administration is theepitome of wolves and sheep's
clothing.
This is what they do.
They call something.
Oh, this is great, we'retackling anti-Semitism, but it's
really not about anti-Semitism.
It's probably about Musliminclusion or something else.
(05:16):
So we'll go over that.
We've got a big weekend comingup for you guys, some great
interviews and jam-packedinformation with COVID.
We've got Donna coming on onFriday, so a lot of stuff going
on.
Hope you are all enjoying itand we'll get right into it.
After these words, this episodeof the podcast is presented by
(05:41):
Factor Meals.
As you know, i was 317 poundstwo years ago and I just weighed
this morning at 235.
Granted, i've got about another20 to go to get the dad bod.
That is my goal, but FactorMeals helps a lot.
First of all, there's endlessoptions.
(06:01):
Second of all, for those of uswho are truly fat not these
people who are like I need tolose five pounds.
No, no, no.
For us, bigger men and women,taste is everything.
The reason we are this fat isbecause we love the taste of
food.
Well, the great news is isFactor Meals tastes fantastic.
They have vegan, they havevegetarian, they have keto, They
(06:24):
have anything you need.
Gluten-free Doesn't matter.
Right now, factor Meals for youall is offering 50% off your
first box 50%.
And then what are they offering?
Another 20% off your second box.
Go to factor75.com, at leastexplore, see if it's for you.
(06:46):
But I'll tell you, if you orderand you truly use the meal plan
as intended I do just mylunches and my dinners the
weight will begin to shed offlike crazy.
Again, folks, factor75.com, 50%off your first box and 20%
after that.
Speaker 5 (07:18):
So I came into office determined to change the
economic direction of thiscountry, to move from
trickle-down economics to whateveryone on Wall Street Journal
and Financial Times began tocall by-denomics.
I didn't come up with a name, ireally didn't.
I now claim it, but they're theones who use it first.
But I think it's a plan thatI'm happy to call by-denomics.
(07:39):
And guess what By-denomics isworking?
By-denomics is about the future.
By-denomics is just the otherway of saying restore the
American dream, because itworked before.
It's rooted in what we'vealways worked best at in this
country investing in America.
(08:00):
Investing in Americans, becausewhen we invest in our people,
we strengthen the middle class.
We see the economy grow thatbenefits all Americans.
That's the American dream.
Well, i believe that everyAmerican willing to work hard
should be able to get a job, nomatter where they are.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Well, there you have it folks.
By-denomics is working And hedidn't name it that, by the way.
You know, the biggest problemthat I have with Biden is should
we really have an 80 year oldman talking about the future?
How much future does this guyhave left?
He doesn't care, it's all abunch of malarkey.
80 year old telling us yeah, myplan is about the future.
(08:41):
I bet it is.
Of course, it's easy to talkabout the future when you've got
maximum you know his brainmaybe five, six years left.
The guy could barely get up thestairs and he's got hair coming
out of his ears and littlewispies coming behind his neck.
I mean, he reminds me of mygrandfather when he was 97.
This guy is not doing well.
So don't talk to us about thefuture, mr Biden, and moving
(09:04):
away from trickle down economicsbecause it didn't work right.
So when Carter was in office andyou were a senator and
Americans had depleted savings,inflation was at all time highs,
gas was in huge shortages.
He had to get a number or aletter.
I can't write, i wasn't alive,but I remember my dad telling me
(09:27):
he had to get a number or anassignment and there were huge
lines at the gas station.
They de-incentivized supply,focused 100% on demand, and it
ruined everyone.
I mean, there was no incentiveto save your money, there was no
incentive to invest, there wasno incentive to start new
businesses.
And Reagan came in and said no,we're going to flip this, we're
going to make this work in away that everyone has the
(09:51):
opportunity to build wealth.
That's the American dream.
But Biden, for some reason inhis convoluted head, thinks that
his Bidenomics is working.
And when you really break itdown, how he explains it,
there's only two factors thathe's looking at the deficit and
the job market, which I'vetalked about this 100 times on
the show.
(10:11):
And you guys are smart enoughto realize that the job numbers,
whether it's Republican orDemocrat, the job numbers are so
easy to massage in your favorthat you know when a president
comes in and their primary focusis on the job reports, there's
something else going on, becauseit's so easy to massage.
And if you hear any of themHakeem, jeffries, pete Buttigieg
(10:34):
, any of these other Marxistscoming out oh, biden added X
amount of jobs last month.
Oh, great, i'm glad to see theMcDonald's around the corner
from my house is finally fullystaffed.
Well, he's investing in America.
Well, how, Well?
how are those chip plantscoming along?
I don't know How was all thatinfrastructure spending on green
(10:55):
technology?
You know, half is windmills.
Down south are all collapsing,smoking dead birds everywhere.
It's hysterical.
A Ford Pinto on a dyno couldgenerate more power than these
windmills, turbines, whateveryou want to call it.
So when we want to take aholistic look at the economy not
by dynamics, which is twothings, there's really five
(11:17):
pieces that are the true keyperformance indicators on
whether or not our economy ishealthy Consumer confidence, the
dollar as the worldwide reservecurrency, real estate supply
trends and purchase trends.
Because you know all thosenumbers and all those massive
sales, like, let's say, in theautomotive industry, over COVID,
(11:39):
it's all fake money, it's allgovernment money.
It's just going from one to theother, one to the other.
So it inflated numbers to anunreasonable amount where now
most corporations can't evendream of hitting the numbers
that they did.
Well, excuse me, most consumerfacing corporations like Procter
and Gamble or VoxVagon Group orsome of the major players,
(12:05):
chevy, chevy doesn't even knowtheir own numbers because it's
all our money, i mean, they arecompletely built on government
subsidy.
But what I'm trying to say isthat you saw this mass boom.
You know they couldn't keepcars on the lots, couldn't keep
Pantene on the shelves, and it'scompletely changed because
there was a two year period ofbasically what I call monopoly
(12:26):
money.
People just got to use it, gogangbusters, all those stimulus
checks, getting paid to workfrom home and sit and do nothing
, which then empowered a lot ofgig economy jobs so they could
double dip.
So it's really an anomaly thatwe can't focus on, and most of
those corporations know thatthey're not going to go back to
those numbers for a long time.
(12:46):
However, their prices stillreflect.
I love when they say, oh,inflation is down, inflation is
down.
And I look at them and I goyeah, your stat on inflation may
be down.
It might only be 7% instead of10%, wow.
But what people don'tunderstand is that the peak of
inflation, suppliers raise theirprices, retailers raise their
(13:10):
prices, wholesalers raise theirprices.
Do you think, once theinflation settles, that they go
back and lower their price?
No, they don't.
So we're still paying way morefor the same that we were making
before.
Whether or not the dollar isinflated, it doesn't matter,
because at that point the pricesare already set.
The struggle is already there.
(13:31):
That's not taken into account.
And people say, oh, the economyis getting better, but why are
my grocery bills so high ifinflation is going down?
Because the prices got set atthe highest peak of inflation
and the inflation grew more thanyour salary did, and so you're
still trying to catch up.
But I mean, put the inflationaside and we look at consumer
(13:52):
confidence right here.
Present situation Majority ofconsumers said business
conditions were bad.
Majority of consumers said jobswere hard to get.
Majority of consumers said theyexpect business conditions to
worsen.
Majority of consumers said theyanticipate fewer jobs.
Majority of consumers say theyexpect their homes will decrease
(14:13):
in value.
Majority of consumers say thecurrent family finances are bad.
Majority of consumers expecttheir family finances to be
worse.
Perceived likelihood of a USrecession over the next 12
months.
70% of consumers say recessionis very likely.
What does that tell you folks?
So when Biden sits up there andsays, oh, this is great, this
(14:34):
is great, it's not what it is athome, and then you just combine
that with this 34% approvalrating of how he's handled the
economy, and where are we?
We are where we are today.
Real estate prices overallacross the country just fell
significantly for the first timein 11 years.
The only thing that's kept theprices at bay is the limited
(14:55):
supply of real estate.
Essentially, every single pieceof the real estate market is
down.
Average cost of home down about2% First time in 11 years.
Hit this year.
The affordability index isblack and white.
It shows exactly how muchincome to the size of the
mortgage.
I mean.
(15:15):
Listen to this.
2020, payment as percent ofincome was 14%.
2021, 17%, 2022, 24%.
23 is not done.
However, it's trending to closeat 26%.
Mortgages are growing becauseof A the rates, but also because
the incomes are plateauing ordropping.
(15:38):
See when you have two-yearpandemic to compare against and
those numbers are essentiallyall fake.
A manipulated market based onwelfare.
Essentially it doesn't.
It works to your favor, but itdoesn't tell us anything,
because you hear these thingsand you're like that can't be
true, that there's no way thatcan be true.
The number of home sales isdown.
(15:59):
They just released the data forJune of 2023 and we are
trending downward at about 4.3million transactions.
The median price of existinghome sales has not moved
basically all year, which itdropped almost 2%, i think in
April, and since then it's juststayed.
If you look at percent changein sales from a year ago by
(16:22):
price range homes up to 100K aredown 2.7%, homes from 100K to
250K 18% down.
Homes from 250 to 500, 12% down, 500 to 750, 20% down, 22, 24,
and so on, there is nothing thatindicates we're in a strong
(16:43):
real estate market.
The next thing we have to lookat is the dollar as the world
currency.
I mean, the World Bank justpublished a report I guess at Ms
Biden's desk that by 2025, thedollar is more than likely going
to become irrelevant in theglobal market.
What they're saying is that theemerging market growth rates
that are going up and up and upfor developing countries Brazil,
(17:07):
china, india, indonesia, russiaand South Korea is going to be
half the world economy, and sowhat they're saying is that the
world system, the IMF, will nowbe made up of multi-currency the
euro, the dollar and the yuanyuan, chinese yuan.
A lot of people saying is theyuan is probably going to come
in and replace the dollar, sothat's also an option.
(17:29):
We see, what most people don'trealize is that as the dollar
goes down in value and when it'sno longer traded, our economy
will be destroyed.
Oh, chad, that could neverhappen.
The green back failing is theconservative conspiracy in
Boogeyman Venezuela as anexample.
It's just crazy.
(17:50):
It's a bunch of malarkey.
All you have to do is pick up ahistory book, folks.
Churchill used a creation of aworldwide currency centered
around the dollar as theencouragement to get us to get
involved in World War II.
After World War I, we werepretty much done.
The thought in the UnitedStates was we're not going to
war, we're covered by oceans onboth sides, we're not doing it.
(18:12):
Then, as Germany began to growand the Japanese bombed Pearl
Harbor, fdr called up Churchilland said what am I going to get
for this?
And he said well, you can havethe world currency, because
before that it was the pound.
And so after the war in 1944,it was called the Bretton Woods
Conference 44 countries allagreed to creating the
(18:34):
International Monetary Fund andthe trade currency of the IMF
was the dollar.
Well, what do you thinkhappened to the pound?
I mean, i think the first monthafter it was no longer the
traded currency around the world.
They were at 30% inflation, 30%Decimated their economy,
decimated the value of the pound, incomes dropped, prices soared
(18:56):
, became stagflation.
It was bad, it was really bad.
And the World Monetary Fund andall of these worldwide economic
analysts are pointing to thedollar losing significant amount
of power within the market.
We can already see it TheSaudis don't want to trade in
the dollar anymore.
Indians don't want to trade inthe dollar anymore.
(19:17):
The Indonesians don't want totrade in the dollar anymore
Brazil.
So there's a global call toeliminate the dollar as the
IMF's main global currency, anda lot of it has to do with our
politics.
It's a very realistic picture,folks, very realistic.
The other way we know this isbecause central banks are buying
(19:40):
up gold like crazy.
The other basic number that willtake me 30 seconds to tell you
is to always look at the valueof the average IRA and 401k.
The average IRA and 401k aredown 20%, 20%.
So if you had 100k in the bankand your savings and your 401,
you now have 80k And that is abig swing, huge swing.
(20:04):
It feels like, well, yeah, butif we hold on and we hold on,
it'll bounce back.
But what about the people whoare retiring now, this year?
There's a bunch of people lastyear, next year, who knows
what's gonna happen?
They're all retiring on 20%less than what they had.
It's really scary, but that isa huge indicator that the
(20:25):
economy is not strong.
I mean I could go stat per statper stat to show you what's
happening.
I mean the retail numbers areabysmal, the supply chain is
still destructed.
Nothing is really gettingbetter other than the fact that
we are paying into the deficitto show a balance reduction
before six months to a yearlater spending more The deficit
(20:49):
is insane.
But it's also not this force ofwhether or not the economy is
good.
It's a very small determiningfactor actually of the overall
health of the economy.
This guy is gotta be out of hismind.
I mean, the first thing he sayswas I've flown with Zhijing
Ping 17,000 miles.
Very interesting that hebrought that up when we're
(21:12):
dealing with all this textmessage stuff.
So when I started I was thevice president.
I've traveled 17,000 miles withZ.
I have a great relationshipwith him.
The White House officials saidtraveling with Z is not accurate
but was a reference to thetotal travel back and forth,
both internally in the US andChina and as well as
internationally for meetingsthey held together.
(21:32):
New York Post says the numbersjust don't add up.
Then he goes on to bash,trickle down economics, which I
kind of already talked about,but it's very bizarre because he
says well, i know because I'mfrom Delaware and it's most of
the corporations are in Delaware.
Well, there's a reason whythey're in Delaware, one they
have extremely pro-businessliability laws and financial
(21:56):
laws and regulations.
So Delaware is just a greatplace to incorporate because
it's safer and easier to dobusiness in.
Based on what?
Trickle down economics,deregulation?
The great post in the DailySignal says with regard to
Biden's boast about Delawarehaving the most incorporated
companies, this second smalleststate in the country has more
(22:17):
than 60% of the Fortune 500companies.
That's largely because of thestate's longstanding tax
environment as well as legal andliability protections
established by state law.
Whether these tax andregulatory rules amount to
trickle down economics isdebatable, but they are
certainly favorable to business.
He says the trickle downeconomics has failed the middle
(22:39):
class.
Meanwhile, these numbers, like Italked about when Reagan came
into the office, cut regulation,gave people tax money back that
they paid in for essentiallynothing, created a supply-based
economy versus a demand-basedeconomy.
That equaled 20 million newjobs, increased the middle class
income by 11% over the decadeof his two terms.
(23:01):
Under Reagan, inflation droppedwhen he came in at 13.5% by the
time he left to 4.1%,unemployment fell from 7.6% to
5.5% And real gross nationalproduct rose 26%.
There's no arguing at folks.
Incentive, incentive, incentive.
(23:22):
It works across the board.
If people know that they canwork hard, come up with a great
idea and run with it Andultimately become a millionaire
if they play their cards right,or a billionaire or whatever,
then it doesn't matter.
And when you incentivize thebusinesses, the employees do
better, etc.
Etc.
So his whole thing is crazy.
(23:43):
And then, reducing the deficit,they're eliminating overdrafts.
Let me overdraft for you.
Okay, that's Biden economicsworking.
My team and I have reduced thedeficit by 1.7 trillion.
The deficit is $32 trillion Andthat's the problem.
It's not like consumer spendingwhere you go okay, i'm going to
(24:07):
take a chunk more out of mypaycheck and hit it towards my
credit card balance And you seeit drop dramatically.
But imagine if you had a bunchof auto charges for the next six
months that you didn't knowabout or that were up and coming
.
You can pay off as much as youwant, but all of these programs
have start dates, expirationdates, different levels.
(24:29):
They work through whatever, alot of complexity, and so what
happens is the spending and thepaying doesn't sink when we talk
about the deficit, it does notsink up.
So again, $32 trillion.
You can put as much in as youwant, but the Congressional
Budgetary Office and everyliable economic source says that
(24:50):
we are spending at a rate muchhigher than we're paying off our
debt.
And I think most of youprobably I've been in that
situation when I was younger.
I think most of you probablyhave as well.
I mean, it's not fun, but we'retalking the whole country, not
you or me.
So yeah, his information aboutthe deficit was very strange.
His job creation was very, veryodd.
He said that inflation was down.
(25:12):
He says today, inflation isless than half less than half at
what it was a year ago, andthat inflation was caused by
Russia and by the Ukraine warand by what's going on.
But we knew we had more to do.
There's more than one way tobring down the costs.
Well, again, we're down to 4.9percent inflation.
I think it's the last number Isaw.
(25:32):
However, when he took office,it was 1.7 percent.
How did he cut it in half?
And we know that Ukraine hadnothing to do with it.
Russia had nothing to do withit because his inflation
happened immediately based onthe executive orders that he
signed.
Whoo, i don't know how peopledeal with this, but the guy
(25:53):
cannot get his numbers straightand everything is massaged to
seem like it's something thatit's not.
And I hope Americans are wisingup You guys are, but I hope our
neighbors, our friends,extended family, are wising up
to say God, he stands there andsays this, and all these reports
come out from the Marxist mediathat say everything's so good,
(26:17):
but it's not.
It doesn't feel good.
So you can't trust what's outthere and you especially can't
trust this idiot, joe Biden.
It's absolutely bizarre that hecan see these approval ratings
and still stand by what he'sdoing.
It's no secret that I love theordinary skincare, but what is a
(26:38):
secret is that they justlaunched their new hair care and
boy is it just as good as theirskincare.
They're revitalizing formulas,make my hair feel new and I have
a full head of bleach, so I'mconstantly breaking and losing
hair.
This seems to do the trick.
Go to theordinarycom, check itout.
(27:00):
There's a few products.
You should try them, see whatyou think.
If you like them, keep them.
If you don't, send them back,no pressure.
The ordinary skincare and nowthe ordinary hair care.
Speaker 2 (27:17):
I have a dream that one day, this nation will rise
up and live out the true meaningof its existence.
We hold these truths to beself-evident that all men are
created equally.
I have a dream that one day, onthe Red Hills, the jobs sons of
(27:53):
former slaves and the sons offormer slave owners will be able
to sit down together at thetable of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day,even the state of Mississippi, a
state sweltering with the heatof injustice, sweltering with
(28:17):
the heat of oppression, will betransformed into an oasis of
freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my poorlittle children will one day
live in a nation where they willnot be judged by the color of
their skin but by the content oftheir character.
(28:39):
I have a dream.
Speaker 1 (28:41):
I had to play that.
What a momentous occasion.
Martin Luther King, i know,would be disgusted by how things
have turned out.
He talks about in his I Have aDream speech, which is probably
one of the most famous speechesof all time.
He says I have a dream thatslaves and the sons of slaves
(29:02):
and the sons of slave owners cansit down at the table together.
Notice that he doesn't say Ihave a dream that sons of slaves
will come to sons of slaveowners generations later and ask
for reparations.
He says I have a dream that mychildren are judged not by the
color of their skin but by thecontent of their character.
(29:23):
Notice he doesn't say I have adream that my children and their
children are given preferentialtreatment for the color of
their skin and have theircharacter ignored.
He never said he had a dreamthat the color of skin would be
an excuse for mediocrity.
He never said I have a dreamthat includes whites feeling
(29:45):
perpetually guilty for the sinsof their father.
He doesn't say any of that.
He says all men are createdequal.
He wanted equality, which isexactly what affirmative action
does not do.
I have a dream futuregenerations of black people get
free school.
Future generations of blackpeople have justified means of
(30:07):
discrimination.
He doesn't say that he has adream, that being a minority or
being black is an excuse, moreso a motivation.
That was civil rights, althoughthings like affirmative action
and some of the other federaland the civil rights act, some
of the other federal regulationsthat were put into place, they
(30:29):
were rapid response tools inorder to integrate black,
especially the younger black,communities into traditionally
all white universities,traditionally all white jobs,
without having an issue, withoutthere being any sort of hiccup.
However, obviously I can'tspeak for Reverend King, but if
you've really studied what hepreached not just this speech
(30:50):
but in general none of thoseintegration measures or laws
that were written in the 60s andthe 70s, none of them were made
as permanent solutions.
They were made as tools to getover the hump.
So when you launch a newanti-discrimination set of laws
(31:11):
civil rights you explain whatthat is and define it for
employers, teachers and everyAmerican, and you set the
expectation that the blackcommunity and the white
community cannot be separatedanymore.
Had we not employed some ofthese rapid responses like
affirmative action, had we notemployed those things, it would
have taken a very, very longtime for the populace to catch
(31:36):
up with the legislation, and soat one time, this was meaningful
work.
This was work to integrate, butat some point, as more and more
opportunities arose foreveryone, including black people
, as the gap of equity began toclose and we had more equitable
society between whites andblacks, these things were no
(31:58):
longer needed.
And what happened was is thelonger we used tools that were
created for a very specificreason at a very specific time,
the longer we used those toolsand reworked them and readjust
them, they become crutches andeventually they become
discrimination itself.
(32:19):
That's what happened withaffirmative action, and so
today's ruling is a serious win,and it's not just a Republican
Democrat thing, and it's notjust a black and white thing.
It's about character, not color.
It's about the elimination ofall these superficial qualities
that have nothing to do with howsomeone contributes to the
(32:40):
world.
Sexual orientation doesn'tmatter, skin color doesn't
matter, gender doesn't matter,meaning women, men, not all
these other genders.
It's why that's become thefocus and then why those things
have been able to fall back onold civil rights tools that were
made specifically to integrateblack people that had been
(33:00):
historically discriminatedagainst for a hundred years,
into everyday American life andmake that happen as fast as
possible.
It was a valiant effort, surelywas, but they've become excuses.
They've also become thefoundation for racial Marxist
theory, which is all aboutpropping up those who need more
(33:22):
and keeping down those thatdon't.
But there's no clear definitionof what that actually means.
You can't solve discriminationwith more discrimination.
You can't solve racism withmore racism, and that's exactly
what these programs have evolvedto do.
So you take a system that wasat one time unjust.
You create something to catchthat terrible system pretty
(33:46):
civil rights But once it'scaught up, if you leave it there
, then it's when you see all themisuse and the misapplication
and the university is doingwhatever they can so they can
make the decisions aroundadmissions based on preferential
treatment and not based onmerit.
And boy you can say I mean thecommunities right now are either
(34:08):
cheering or screaming.
I think the most interestingpart about all of this is this
case was actually brought on byAsian Americans, because Harvard
once this case showed andrevealed that Harvard's
admissions policy, as itpertains to diversification, was
(34:31):
completely racist anddiscriminatory towards Asian
Americans, to the point where iteven said in the policy that
Asian Americans did notnecessarily add to diversity the
same way Browns and blacks did.
So racism isn't just a blackissue.
(34:53):
It was when affirmative actionwas created.
But the landscape of ourpopulation has changed.
So, once again, one size fitsall in this country never works.
And of course, the Democrats areall up in arms because they
want federal control ofeverything.
They want to be able to controland tell universities what they
(35:16):
can do.
And let me be very clear,because Biden, the Bozo and
everyone else out there issaying well, it's not a
determining factor, no, thepoint system, it's an additional
point.
So again, no one is arguingthat it's not a determining
factor.
They're arguing that someonethat comes in, let's say, at a
(35:38):
3.5 GPA, and then there's awhite student that comes in at a
4.0 GPA, and they each have theequal amount of points as it
pertains to merit their essay,their referrals, whatever it is,
the deciding factor comes downto that extra point in race, and
that is what isn't fair.
Speaker 3 (36:00):
Well, I would say that I'm disappointed, but I'm
not surprised, When we talkabout holistic admissions, to
say that you can include astudent's identity the student,
the person behind the papers andthe grades and the test scores
that you're not allowed toinclude race, which is such an
encompassing part of at least myidentity as an underrepresented
(36:21):
minority, it makes me feelupset.
We know what happens whenaffirmative action goes away
from universities.
We can look at California, wecan look at Michigan, who was
already banded, and see howtheir state flagships lack a
astounding number of black andLatino students And you'll hear
the liberal media constantlyreferring to the UC system in
(36:44):
California, which is always,always misrepresented by
liberals.
Speaker 1 (36:50):
When California did away with affirmative action,
there was a decrease inenrollment of minorities into
the UC schools.
However, the minorities thatwere accepted had much higher
GPAs and they were morequalified to be there.
Furthermore, the enrollment atcity colleges that fed directly
(37:13):
into the UC system for peoplewho were not technically able to
get in if race wasn't a factorskyrocketed.
those GPAs were higher and thetransfer rate for junior and
senior year to graduate from aUC system skyrocketed.
So they look at one number, onenumber only, which is the
minority acceptance, if you will.
(37:35):
But again, when you're usingsomething superficial to score
someone, of course it's going togo down because they weren't
originally qualified, but theyhave an option to go to a
community college that feedsdirectly into the UC system or
the CSU system and get a greateducation.
And those minorities that didqualify on their own, without
(38:00):
race-based decisions, excelled.
The other big bullshit buzzwordor phrase is it's going to
change the landscape of whatuniversities will look like.
Apparently, we have thousandsand thousands of psychics in
this country.
How can you test the impact ofa ruling that's never happened
(38:23):
before.
You can't use the UC systembecause your facts are flawed.
Furthermore, all the statisticsthat they're talking about are
black and white issues, notAsian.
So it makes you wonder if theliberal movement for all of
these different race-basedboondoggles is to keep us
(38:44):
resegregated.
Ecologists have black and whitedorms now They want to use race
and sexual orientation aspoints up for admission.
They have black and whitecommencement now.
Furthermore, they're teachingcritical race theory, which
completely separates whites fromblacks in elementary schools,
(39:04):
And it seems like the push is toresegregate this society.
Speaker 3 (39:09):
The one thing that really is making me sad, I'll
just say today, is that myidentity has to be my race, The
struggles that I've gone through, the trauma I've gone through
as an African-American woman inthe United States.
if I were applying to collegetoday, I would have to write
(39:29):
about those traumas in mycommon-up essay.
I would have to write aboutthose traumas and those very
hard experiences for admissionsofficers to accept the
overwhelming truth that we allknow, which is that it is hard
to be a black person in America.
Speaker 1 (39:43):
And right there she proves the point that we're all
trying to make She doesn't wanther individualism, her traumas,
her experiences as a black womanto have to be individually
recognized or seen as somethingthat's contributed to the
definition of her character.
No, she thinks that all blackwomen have the same issues and
(40:04):
they should be considered thesame way.
You don't think there's whitewomen that have trauma.
You might have incest in thiscountry, you might have rape,
pedophilia.
You don't think there's whitewomen who have gone through
hardship which has defined theircharacter.
That's the problem, right there.
She thinks that all black womenhave the same struggles and
(40:25):
therefore they should all belooked at the same, based on the
fact that they have trauma andit's hard to be a black woman in
America.
And I can't decide if that'spart of the Marxist Revolution
and they're trying tore-segregate to create more
chaos, or if they really believethat the history of this
(40:47):
country and the people in thecountry today are racist and
want to keep blacks out ofcollege, want to keep blacks out
of society.
Because that's not the case.
100% is not the case.
Every poll, every survey inmodern times has shown that
Americans have become less andless and less racist and more
(41:08):
and more and more colorblind astime goes on.
I'm going to take a quick breakand go deep into the ruling
when I come back after thesewords.
I know you all have beenlistening to me talking about
Ron's progress.
He's all better now.
One funny thing is when we wereat the vet and the vet was
incredible.
But the vet tech was saying youknow well, what do you feed him
(41:31):
?
And I said oh, he eats raw.
He eats Darwin's pet.
So, okay, well, because thewounds on the face and raw food
has a tendency to like have morebacteria.
But I don't want you to feedhim that, i want you to.
And I said no, i'm going tostop you right there.
I said I'll keep salinesolution and spray and I'll keep
it nice and clean, because theonly reason why he's as alive as
(41:51):
he is, the only reason why hesurvived through such a serious
accident, is because he's beenon Darwin's pet.
Now is not the time to abandonhis diet.
And, of course, what did theysay?
He healed a week faster, hisstitches came out earlier, he
has very, very little scarring,he's back full levels of energy
and basically doesn't even seemlike he was down for the few
(42:14):
weeks that he was down.
I cannot tell you how much thisfood helps your dog live longer,
smell better and just havebetter general health.
Darwin's pet you can start.
10 pounds of food, your firstbox, for $14.95.
It is the only and bestdelivery raw food diet that is
made 100% with US ingredients,processed in the United States
(42:38):
and Washington and biologicallyformulated to make sure that
your dog gets every singlenutrient, mineral and vitamin
that it needs.
Again, guys, darwin's petcom,sign up, get a 10 pound box for
$14.95 and let me know what youthink.
(43:00):
I mean, i saw a woman I thinkshe was a senator in Milwaukee,
i can't remember, but she saidokay, well, that's the end of
the black people in America.
They're never going to be ableto win an American based system.
Huh, the guy that was talkingabout the story was a black guy
and he goes wow, so these peoplehave enjoyed being victims.
They want to stay victims.
(43:21):
They don't want to come out andsay, we don't care, we'll still
do great in college.
We'll still do great at ourjobs.
We'll still do great in sports.
We'll still do great by God.
Oh, no, the second.
There's any discrimination,regardless of the party claiming
it is the second, theconversation goes away from
(43:42):
character and back to race orwhatever characteristic that
we're talking about sexualorientation, gender and so on.
Interestingly enough, we havetwo black justices, justice
Thomas and Justice Kenji Brown.
I always say Kenji Brownbecause I'm not exactly sure how
her last name and first namekind of come and go together,
but there are the completeopposite end of the spectrum.
(44:05):
So it's interesting because weget to see in Kenji Brown's
dissent she is of the victimhoodblack mentality.
And then you see Justice Thomassaying no, there should be no
preferential treatment and wecan't use the past to define the
future.
So I'm going to start withJustice Brown's dissent.
(44:27):
She says with let them eat cakeobliviousness.
Today the majority pulls theripcord and announces color
blindness for all by legal fiat.
But deeming race irrelevant inlaw does not make it so in life.
And having so detached itselffrom this country's actual past
and present experiences, thecourt has now been lured into
(44:50):
interfering with the crucialwork that UNC and other
institutions of higher learningare doing to solve America's
real world problems.
No one benefits from ignorance.
Although formal race linkedlegal barriers are gone, race
still matters to the livedexperiences of all Americans in
innumerable ways, and today'sruling makes things worse, not
(45:13):
better.
The best that can be said of themajority's perspective is that
it proceeds ostrich-like fromthe hope that preventing
consideration of race will endracism.
As you can see, she's of theopinion that racial history in
this country and race inequityshould be considered legally,
(45:35):
career in careers and everysingle part of life, because the
United States is not colorblindand it never has been
colorblind.
Here's the problem with thesepeople They never have an
alternative solution.
First of all, it's you can'tsit here and say that
affirmative action is fair.
It's not fair.
Whether you believe thatthere's an equity gap, whether
(45:57):
there is or not, whatever youropinion is or whatever your
facts in front of you, say thatthere's an equity gap.
You don't close that gap bycreating another gap.
And so, yes, she can scathe allshe wants, but everything that
she's talking about istheoretical.
It's race theory.
It has nothing to do witheveryday life.
Then we go to Justice Thomas,who I believe is more in line
(46:17):
with the Martin Luther Kingspeech that we just heard.
He says while I am painfullyaware of the social and economic
ravages which have befallen myrace and all who suffer
discrimination, i hold outenduring hope that this country
will live up to its principles,so clearly enunciated in the
Declaration of Independence andthe Constitution of the United
(46:38):
States, that all men are createdequal, are equal citizens and
must be treated equally beforethe law.
He went on to say anoriginalist defense of the
colorblind Constitution andwrote that all forms of
discrimination based on race,including so-called affirmative
action, are prohibited under theConstitution.
The great failure of thiscountry was slavery and progeny,
(47:00):
and the tragic failure of thiscourt was its interpretation of
the Reconstruction Amendments.
He wrote.
We should not repeat thismistake merely because we think
our predecessors thought thatour present arrangements are
superior to the Constitution.
Then he dives into her and saysJustice Jackson would replace
the Founder's vision with anorganizing principle based on
(47:21):
race.
In fact, in her view, almost allof life's outcomes must be
unhesitantly ascribed to race,even if some whites have a lower
household net worth than someblacks.
What matters to Justice Jacksonis that the average white
household has more wealth thanthe average black household.
This lore is not and has neverbeen true.
(47:44):
Even in the segregated southwhere I grew up, individuals
were not the sum of their skincolor.
Then is now not.
All disparities are based onrace.
Not all people are racist andnot all differences between
individuals are ascribable torace.
There's all over the news.
I see Ed Creston and all thesepeople on Twitter that are
supposedly like moderate, truenews people saying race is a
(48:07):
complicated issue.
Now, it's not.
It's not complicated.
We've made it complicatedbecause the second, the Civil
Rights Act, was passed and wedid create some of these
programs.
There should have beendeadlines on them, just how
there have been deadlines on Roev Wade.
The law is subject to the timeand the law is also subject to
(48:27):
the intention and the need atthe time.
There are very few laws thatcan survive the test of time
forever, which is why ourconstitution is relatively small
, because that's the foundation,that's the basis.
Those are the laws that willlast forever and everything else
stems from them.
So, yeah, very excited aboutthat, when I think you should
(48:51):
all keep an eye on the media andsome of the things that are
going to come up.
We're going to see a lot, a lotof misinformation.
They're continually going todestroy Justice Thomas with all
their false accusations ofpersonal bribes, etc.
I love him and his wife go outon a boat with the guy.
It's like they're just oldfriends, you know.
(49:11):
Oh, he took a boat ride.
He must be influenced.
That was a GOP donor, first ofall.
You'd be hard pressed to findanyone in the seven, eight or
nine figures who is not somekind of donor, regardless of
party, to push their ownpersonal interest.
That's just the way thiscountry works.
Leave the guy alone, you know,just because he's not a race
(49:33):
Marxist and he doesn'tperpetuate the victimhood of
people.
He's right, the Constitutioncalls for equality And, yes, we
have a stain forever on our flag.
Slavery was terrible, and I'mnot one of those people that say
, well, there was white slavery,there's slavery here, slavery
there.
I don't care about any of that.
I'm caring about what we had.
(49:53):
The founders knew it was wrong,jefferson knew it was wrong.
They did it anyways because itwas ingrained in the culture.
It was a terrible, terriblepractice, but we don't get to
stop living and we don't have tobe held accountable for years
And years and years and years tocome.
Furthermore, descendants aren'tborn into situations that makes
(50:17):
them less opportune or moreopportune based on the fact that
they're a descendant of slavery, because, you know, a big
percent of the black communityin America is not descendants of
slavery, which is why thesereparations don't just say you
have to be a descendant ofslavery.
They say you have to be adescendant of slavery or been
caught up on the war on drugs,or been displaced by urban
(50:38):
development.
It's very, very hard to pindown the specific descendants of
slaves, and so it's just becomea catch-all.
What I love about this decisionthe most is that we have seen a
failure of a presidency I meanbeyond anything we could ever
say before And, most importantly, it's because the fact that his
(51:00):
entire cabinet was selectedbased on physical
characteristics or sexualorientation, skin color, and
because of that, and not basedon merit or experience, the
entire country is feeling it.
That's what's happening incollege.
That's what's happening incolleges.
We have to put merit first.
We don't have to put our bestback in order to give someone
(51:24):
else the best seat.
It's not how it works.
This is a competitivecapitalist democracy And we're
either going to be that or we'renot.
Because you know what?
The market is not racist, it'scolorblind.
Actually, it sees one colorgreen.
I happen to see the same coloralways and everywhere.
Let's talk a little bit aboutJoe Biden and his anti-Semitism
(51:45):
task force that has now joinedforces with one of the most
anti-Semitic Muslim groups inthe country.
I'll be right back, Let themknow.
(52:16):
The last gay conservatives sentyou.
All right.
So there's a great story out ofthe daily signal.
It was breaking news and aletter was written from the New
Tolerance Campaign, which is acampaign that works to fight
anti-Semitism.
And the New Tolerance Campaignfound out that the Biden
(52:41):
administration has included theCouncil on Islamic Relations,
care, c-a-i-r, in this newanti-Semitism coalition that he
put together or announced acouple months ago.
I'm just going to read you guysthe letter President Biden,
thank you for your commitment tocombating anti-Jewish hatred in
your administration's naturalstrategy, sort of national
(53:04):
strategy to counteranti-Semitism.
Though noble in its intentions,the genuine impact it will have
appears to be hindered by theinclusion of a recognized
anti-Semitic organization in itsimplementation.
The Council on American IslamicRelations, care, the
Anti-Defamation League,maintains that antipathy towards
(53:25):
Israel has been a CARE staplesince the group was founded in
1994.
But a documented record ofanti-Semitism is not only reason
.
Care's engagement with thisinitiative is troubling.
Care has also been embroiled ina litany of controversies that
call into question the characterof its leadership and genuine
commitment to endinganti-religious bigotry.
(53:47):
A 2021 report by NPR foundchapter leadership at CARE
fostered a toxic workplace inwhich sexual harassment and
bullying were part of theorganizational culture.
Mr Awad ignored warnings fromvictims of sexual harassment in
his organization and turned ablind eye for years.
Even more concerning, mr Awadhimself is alleged to have
(54:09):
engaged in sexual harassmentagainst a former CARE staffer.
Furthermore, in 2018, latinatheologian and interfaith
activist, karen Leslie Hernandez, was terminated from CARE under
the guise that she was notMuslim.
In reality, court documentsattest that the true reason for
her dismissal was because MrAwad was upset.
(54:31):
The new Dallas employee spokeopenly online about being a
survivor of domestic violence.
Care Nationals attorney came upwith an alternative story of
the events and told the localchapter to offer the woman a
payoff using an NDA exchange forher silence on the religious
and gender discrimination shefaced.
At the very least, anorganization engaged to promote
(54:54):
anti-religious hate should nothave a record of anti-religious
discrimination within its ownmarks.
That cannot be said of CARE,which has sadly been accused of
discrimination against otherMuslims.
A 2001 complaint letter to MrAwad from a Tenez Hadid stated
that it may appear unusual toclaim discrimination while
(55:16):
working for a civil rightsorganization.
It may seem even more unusualthat I am Muslim, claiming
religious discrimination whileworking for a Muslim
organization, but that isprecisely what happened,
according to Ms Hadid.
In her letter, she declares shewas demoted after CARE
leadership discovered that mybackground is Shia.
Mr Awad refused to intervene.
(55:37):
Each one of these controversiesalone should be caused for
concern.
Together, they reveal a patternof odious actions at CARE that
would appear to make theirinvolvement with the national
strategy to counteranti-Semitism less of a strength
and more of a liability.
The New Tolerance Campaignrespectfully asks that the White
House alludicate the internalprocess that engaged CARE in the
(55:59):
rollout of the nationalstrategy on counter
anti-Semitism, who was taskedwith vetting the organization in
advance of the rollout, whetherthe controversies described
herein were considered duringsuch vetting and, if they were,
why were they dismissed?
Sincerely Gregory Angelo, thepresident of the New Tolerance
Campaign.
This really is nothing new,folks.
(56:20):
Like I always say, theDemocratic Party is the party of
wolves and sheep's clothing.
This council on fightinganti-Semitism that Biden created
is just another fluffy way thathe can show that he's working
on civil rights.
More and more Jews are movingout of the Democratic Party and
(56:42):
coming to the right because ofthe anti-Israel and anti-Semitic
base of the DNC.
After seeing Trump, who was themost Israel-friendly president
that we've had in manygenerations, jewish factions all
over the country are becomingmore and more conservative.
This is Biden's way to say oh,look at me, look at me.
(57:03):
However, he's also trying to puttogether a peace treaty, if you
will.
This is his lame attempt ofcreating a Yasser Arafat Oslo
Accord.
That Bill Clinton did, butdomestically, but I mean the
Yasser Arafat Oslo Accord is aperfect example.
The Democrats forced Israel togive up control of several
(57:24):
territories, forced Israel toconcede to a known terrorist, a
proponent of terrorism and a Jewkiller.
That's what he was car bombsand all See, the Democratic
Party hates Jews.
They hate Jews.
They hate Israel because theyrepresent something that they
don't like, which is freedom andsuccess.
The Jewish population has beenable to persevere since the
(57:47):
Holocaust and create well aninnovation and business and
commerce employment, more thanany other minority population in
the world.
Democrats don't like that.
They don't want independence.
And so now Joe Biden is usingthe Council on Islamic American
Relations to roll out ananti-Semitic task force, or,
(58:12):
sorry, a counter-counteringanti-Semitism task force.
It's very odd.
So you have daily signal andgot the letter first and
essentially they break it alldown.
And the man who wrote theletter actually was the
secretary for the executiveoffice for President Trump, so
he knows exactly what's going on.
And he says I'm very familiarwith what it takes to bring in a
(58:36):
partner into these coalitionsor these groups, and it's
significant vetting.
So obviously they either didthe vetting or they just didn't
care And they thought, well, wemight as well bring in a Muslim
organization to show that we'rebringing people together to
combat anti-Semitism, which infact he's not.
And I wouldn't be surprised ifPresident Obama had something to
(58:58):
do with all of this as well.
All right, guys, i'm out oftime.
I'll be back tomorrow.
My name is Chad Law, remindingyou of what Reagan once said,
and I have often said that agovernment program, once
launched, is the nearest thingto eternal life we'll ever see
on earth.
Talk about affirmative action.
God bless you, president Reagan, and may God save America.
Speaker 4 (59:38):
You just listened to the Last Gay Conservative
podcast hosted by Chad Law.
Please visit us atlastgayconservativecom for this
episode and others.
We're also on Spotify, applePodcasts, u2, and wherever you
listen.
If you like the show, pleaselike, subscribe and share.
Find us on social.
At Last Gay Conservative, weproudly support the following
(01:00:00):
causes The Convention of StatesAction, the National Rifle
Association, the HeritageFoundation and Big Brothers Big
Sisters of America.
Disclaimer the views andopinions expressed in this
program are those of thespeakers and do not necessarily
reflect the views or positionsof any entities they represent.
The Last Gay Conservative is aproduction of Ben Wright Media.
(01:00:21):
All rights reserved 2022.
Popular Podcasts
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com