Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
SPEAKER_01 (00:00):
Welcome to the deep
dive.
Today we're getting into thescience of stress, of
motivation, hormones, really thestuff that drives us.
We're going to try and give youa kind of biological shortcut.
SPEAKER_00 (00:11):
Yeah, our mission
here is precision.
We have to cut through all the,you know, the myths around
molecules like testosterone andcortisol.
The key thing to remember isthat in biology, context is
everything.
SPEAKER_01 (00:22):
Aaron Powell It's
not just an on-off switch.
SPEAKER_00 (00:24):
Exactly.
It's not on-off.
It's more like a set ofexquisitely tuned volume knobs.
And understanding what's turningthose knobs, that's the whole
game.
SPEAKER_01 (00:32):
Aaron Powell Right.
And for you, the learner, we'retrying to pin down the very
specific mechanisms that decideif an experien a high arousal
experience is terrifying or justexhilarating.
It's all about that idea ofvalence.
SPEAKER_00 (00:45):
Is it good or is it
bad?
And that decision happens inwhat, milliseconds?
SPEAKER_01 (00:49):
So let's start with
stress.
It always gets painted as thisvillain.
SPEAKER_00 (00:52):
The monolithic
villain, right.
But it's not.
If you think about stress on twodifferent axes, like two graphs,
it gets a lot clearer.
Aaron Powell Okay.
SPEAKER_01 (00:59):
So the first axis
would be duration.
SPEAKER_00 (01:01):
Aaron Powell
Duration.
A little bit of short-termstress is actually good for you.
It can boost your immune system,sharpen your memory for a bit.
SPEAKER_01 (01:08):
But if you slide
over into chronicles, that's the
daily grind, the horriblecommute that just never ends.
SPEAKER_00 (01:14):
That's the
guaranteed downhill slope.
Yeah.
That's what causes real physicaldamage.
Yeah.
The micromanaging boss you haveto deal with for years.
That destroys the system.
SPEAKER_01 (01:23):
But then there's the
second axis, balance, the good
versus the bad, because we don'twant to get rid of all stress.
SPEAKER_00 (01:29):
We pay for the right
kind of stress.
We literally buy tickets for it.
We call it stimulation.
SPEAKER_01 (01:34):
Scary movies, roller
coasters.
SPEAKER_00 (01:36):
A really hard
crossword puzzle.
That's the stuff that makes usfeel alive.
And physiologically, it looksalmost the same as the bad
stuff.
SPEAKER_01 (01:43):
Right.
The heart rate's up, you'rebreathing fast, muscles are
tense, cortisol is spiking.
So if the body's response isidentical, how does the brain
know the difference between, youknow, pure joy and pure terror?
SPEAKER_00 (01:57):
It's a mechanical
checkpoint.
Structure in the brain calledthe amygdala.
SPEAKER_01 (02:00):
The threat detection
center.
SPEAKER_00 (02:02):
Exactly.
If the amygdala is part of thathigh arousal profile, if it's
firing, the brain instantly tagsthe experience as adverse.
It's bad.
SPEAKER_01 (02:12):
But if everything
else is firing high, the heart
rate, everything but theamygdala is quiet.
SPEAKER_00 (02:17):
Then the brain logs
it as excitement.
SPEAKER_01 (02:19):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_00 (02:19):
It's the decider.
Is this terror or is this fun?
SPEAKER_01 (02:22):
In that distinction,
terror versus fun, that's all
interpretation.
So if the amygdala is theswitch, what's the volume knob?
I think that brings us totestosterone.
SPEAKER_00 (02:31):
Yeah, and this is
probably the single biggest
biological myth out there.
The idea that testosterone ortea causes aggression.
SPEAKER_01 (02:38):
Everyone believes
it.
We see the correlation malestend to have higher T, are
statistically more aggressive,and we just connect the dots.
SPEAKER_00 (02:45):
But the evidence is
overwhelming now.
T doesn't create aggressionfrom, you know, a calm state.
It doesn't just invent it.
SPEAKER_01 (02:51):
So it's not the
spark, it's the gasoline.
SPEAKER_00 (02:53):
That's a great way
to put it.
It's an enhancer.
It dramatically lowers thethreshold for things that would
normally make you aggressive.
SPEAKER_01 (02:59):
Okay.
So if you're already prone tobeing competitive or a little
aggressive.
SPEAKER_00 (03:04):
Tea just makes it
way easier for that behavior to
get triggered.
It turns up the volume onwhatever system is already
humming along.
Reactive aggression, sexualdrive, you name it.
It just amplifies what's alreadythere.
SPEAKER_01 (03:16):
Aaron Ross Powell,
which leads to this fascinating
chicken and egg problem, thisparadox of cause and effect.
SPEAKER_00 (03:21):
Aaron Powell Right,
because we assume high tea leads
to aggressive acts.
But it's actually the other wayaround, mostly.
SPEAKER_01 (03:28):
Aaron Powell The
behavior drives the hormones.
SPEAKER_00 (03:30):
Yes.
Sexual activity, winning afight, any successful display of
dominance.
It raises your T levels and itdoes it fast.
Your baseline T on a Tuesdaymorning is barely predictive of
anything.
It's the context, the behavior,that causes the surge.
SPEAKER_01 (03:45):
And it's so
psychological.
It doesn't even have to bephysical, like the studies on
sports fans.
SPEAKER_00 (03:49):
Oh, yeah.
If your team wins a huge game,that feeling of victory, of
status, is enough to raise yourT levels, even if you're just
sitting on your couch.
SPEAKER_01 (03:58):
So it's about the
feeling of winning.
SPEAKER_00 (04:00):
It's the feeling of
successful status defense.
You can see this so clearly inwhat they call the subtraction
studies.
When researchers remove thetestes, the main source of tea,
aggression, and sexual behavior,they drop a lot.
SPEAKER_01 (04:15):
Which at first
glance looks like proof that T
causes it.
SPEAKER_00 (04:18):
Right.
But here's the kicker thebehaviors don't drop to zero,
they don't disappear entirely.
SPEAKER_01 (04:24):
And that's the key
insight.
SPEAKER_00 (04:25):
That's everything.
Because the amount of behaviorthat's left over is predicted
almost perfectly by theindividual's prior history.
If an animal had a long learnedhistory of being aggressive to
get status, that behavior justkeeps coasting.
SPEAKER_01 (04:37):
It's just social
conditioning at that point.
SPEAKER_00 (04:39):
Exactly.
It proves tea isn't necessaryfor the behavior, it just lowers
the barrier to entry.
It makes it easier to learn inpractice in the first place.
SPEAKER_01 (04:47):
So if tea is all
about dominance and competition,
let's talk about status.
How does it work in our world,in the social hierarchy?
SPEAKER_00 (04:54):
This gets us to the
challenge hypothesis.
The idea is that tea is secretedwhen you feel your status is
being challenged.
And it motivates you to dowhatever you need to do to hold
on to that status.
SPEAKER_01 (05:04):
Now for a baboon,
that's pretty simple.
It means get aggressive, fight.
SPEAKER_00 (05:09):
Right.
But for humans, our statusmarkers are so abstract.
This is where the contextdependency just gets wild.
SPEAKER_01 (05:17):
You're talking about
those economic game studies.
SPEAKER_00 (05:19):
A nutty prediction,
yeah.
Yeah.
In these games, status wasn'tabout being aggressive.
Status was achieved by being themost generous, the most
trustworthy person in the group.
And when they gave people tea inthat context, it made them more
generous, more pro-social.
SPEAKER_01 (05:34):
That feels so
backwards, though.
Why would the hormone ofdominance make you give things
away?
SPEAKER_00 (05:39):
Because tea is just
amplifying the motivation for
social status, whatever therules of the game are.
In that context, generosity wasthe high status move to power
play.
SPEAKER_01 (05:49):
Like conspicuous
consumption.
SPEAKER_00 (05:50):
Exactly.
You see it at those fancy schoolauctions, a bunch of you know
half-drunk alpha males trying tooutbid each other, writing these
huge checks.
The generosity is thecompetition.
Tea is just fueling thatspecific display of status.
SPEAKER_01 (06:03):
So it's the hormone
of whatever gets you ahead
that's much more subtle.
And a big part of that isconfidence.
SPEAKER_00 (06:08):
A huge side effect
is increased self-confidence,
which could be great, you know,better than some self-help
books.
But the problem is thatconfidence is often inaccurate.
SPEAKER_01 (06:19):
It makes you think
you don't need help.
SPEAKER_00 (06:21):
Yeah.
I'm on top of this all on myown.
Yeah.
That's the tea mantra.
It makes people lesscooperative, it makes them
cocky, impulsive.
SPEAKER_01 (06:28):
And it skews your
risk assessment.
SPEAKER_00 (06:30):
Totally.
And it leads to profoundmiscalculations.
I mean, some historians andbiologists have seriously
speculated that this kind oftea-driven overconfidence might
have played a role in startingWorld War I.
All these leaders were justabsolutely certain they'd win in
a few weeks.
SPEAKER_01 (06:44):
Okay, let's shift
from T as the amplifier to the
motivation molecule itself,dopamine.
This is another one that needs aserious rewrite.
SPEAKER_00 (06:52):
Oh, a total
revision.
Everyone thinks dopamine is thepleasure molecule.
The reward, it's not.
It's the chase.
It is 100% the chase.
It's the anticipation of thereward.
And maybe more importantly, it'swhat generates the goal-directed
behavior, the raw motivation togo get it.
SPEAKER_01 (07:09):
Like a gambler
pulling the lever on the slot
machine.
The dopamine hit isn't the win,it's the pull, the hope.
SPEAKER_00 (07:16):
That's the core of
it.
And this is why tea and dopamineare so synergistic.
Tea amps up that wholemotivation pathway.
SPEAKER_01 (07:23):
How does it do that
physically?
SPEAKER_00 (07:25):
Well, tea increases
energy, alertness, a sense of
awareness, but at a cellularlevel, it increases glucose
uptake into your skeletalmuscles.
SPEAKER_01 (07:35):
So it's literally
fueling the muscles.
SPEAKER_00 (07:37):
Within minutes of
its release, it's not just a
feeling.
Your body is physically primed,ready to act.
Tea makes sure that when youdecide to go for it, the
resources are there.
SPEAKER_01 (07:47):
So they're
completely intertwined systems.
SPEAKER_00 (07:49):
Deeply.
You can see in lab studies, ratswill press a lever over and over
just to get a little infusion oftea into their bloodstream.
They're basicallyself-medicating to optimize that
dopamine release.
They're fueling the engine.
SPEAKER_01 (08:00):
Okay, so let's
switch gears to a hormone that
often gets left out of theseconversations, but is uh just as
important estrogen.
SPEAKER_00 (08:07):
A hugely important
protector.
I mean, if you look at the data,having a healthy, stable supply
of estrogen is one of the singlegreatest protective forces in
the body, especially for thebrain and the cardiovascular
system.
SPEAKER_01 (08:19):
It seems to have
almost the opposite effect of
those really highnon-physiological levels of tea.
SPEAKER_00 (08:25):
It does.
Where tea can sometimes increaseinflammation, estrogen does the
opposite.
In the brain, it enhancescognition, but it also
stimulates neurogenesis.
SPEAKER_01 (08:36):
Which, for the
listener, that means it's
actually helping to build newneurons.
SPEAKER_00 (08:40):
Rebuilding the
infrastructure for memory,
especially in the hippocampus,it also boosts glucose and
oxygen delivery to the brain.
This is why a sustainedphysiological level of estrogen
is one of the strongestpredictors of protection against
things like Alzheimer's.
SPEAKER_01 (08:55):
And for the heart.
But the key here, and thesources were really clear on
this, is consistency.
It's not something you can justadd in late in life and expect a
miracle.
SPEAKER_00 (09:10):
No, consistency is
everything.
The body thrives on thosepredictable optimal levels over
a long period of time.
SPEAKER_01 (09:16):
Okay, let's bring it
all back to stress mitigation.
Back to that famous ratexperiment.
SPEAKER_00 (09:21):
The running wheel.
SPEAKER_01 (09:22):
Right.
Rat one is running because itwants to.
Rat two is forced to run on aconnected wheel doing the exact
same amount of work.
SPEAKER_00 (09:28):
Aaron Powell And Rat
One gets all the amazing
benefits of exercise.
Lower heart rate, lessinflammation, neurogenesis.
Rat two, it gets all thedownsides of severe chronic
stress, elevated cortisol,inflammation, brain fog.
SPEAKER_01 (09:41):
It's the exact same
physical act.
SPEAKER_00 (09:43):
Which is the
undeniable proof.
It is purely the interpretationin your head, the sense of
control or the lack of it, thatdetermines the entire biological
outcome.
SPEAKER_01 (09:52):
Aaron Powell So the
recipe for making stress less
stressful has to be aboutpsychology, about regaining
control.
SPEAKER_00 (09:59):
That's the
foundation.
A sense of control andpredictability.
Those two things are massivelyprotective.
Then you need an outlet forfrustration.
SPEAKER_01 (10:05):
Aaron Powell Which,
for a rat, is gnawing on a piece
of wood for humans.
SPEAKER_00 (10:09):
It's often
displacement aggression, yelling
at someone lower on the totempole.
It reduces the stress for theaggressor, but it's responsible
for a ton of unhappiness in theworld.
SPEAKER_01 (10:18):
Okay, so control,
predictability, outlet, and
social support.
Yeah.
SPEAKER_00 (10:22):
And finally, the
ability to just cognitively
reframe something is good news.
The hooray interpretation.
SPEAKER_01 (10:28):
It sounds so simple
on paper.
So why are so many people sooverwhelmed?
SPEAKER_00 (10:33):
And that is the huge
critical caveat.
You can't preach these tools tosomeone who's in, for lack of a
better term, real hell.
SPEAKER_01 (10:42):
Terminal illness,
homelessness.
SPEAKER_00 (10:44):
Right.
Telling someone in thatsituation they just need more
predictability.
It's privileged heartlessness.
SPEAKER_01 (10:49):
Yeah.
SPEAKER_00 (10:50):
It doesn't work when
the external reality is that
crushing.
The methods are subtle.
SPEAKER_01 (10:55):
And they require
practice.
Things like meditation,exercise, cold showers.
They work, but on average.
SPEAKER_00 (11:02):
And there are two
big provisos.
One, it has to be a techniquethat actually works for you.
If meditating for 20 minutesmakes you want to scream, it's
just more stress.
SPEAKER_01 (11:11):
Find something else.
SPEAKER_00 (11:11):
Find something else.
And two, you can't save it forthe weekend.
The system needs that regulationconsistently, daily or every
other day for 20 or 30 minutes.
SPEAKER_01 (11:21):
And just making that
decision is a huge part of it.
SPEAKER_00 (11:23):
Just deciding that
your well-being is important
enough to stop the grind for afew minutes.
SPEAKER_01 (11:28):
Right.
SPEAKER_00 (11:28):
That's 80% of the
battle right there.
SPEAKER_01 (11:30):
That choice, that
prioritization, that's the human
brain at work, the prefrontalcortex, the PFC.
SPEAKER_00 (11:35):
The PFC is our
evolutionary double-legged
sword.
You know, the deeper parts ofthe brain, the hypothalamus, the
amygdala, they're like hardwiredswitches.
Stimulate one neuron, an animalkills.
Stimulate another, it mates.
SPEAKER_01 (11:48):
But the PFC lets us
plug anything into that system.
SPEAKER_00 (11:51):
Anything.
The shape of the earth, apolitical party, a brand of car.
We can make literally anythingthe object of our deepest fear
or our most profound love.
SPEAKER_01 (11:59):
Aaron Powell, which
lets us play these psychological
games with status.
Being low in the hierarchy isterrible for your health, but
humans can be in more than one.
SPEAKER_00 (12:07):
Aaron Powell We can
be in dozens, and that's our
buffer.
You can have a miserable lowstatus job, but be the captain
of the company softball team.
And you use your PFC to decidethe job is just for money.
The softball team.
That's what really matters.
SPEAKER_01 (12:21):
We also use it to
protect our ego, the attribution
bias.
SPEAKER_00 (12:24):
Oh, constantly.
When we mess up, it was thesituation I was tired, I was
stressed.
When someone else does the exactsame thing, they're just a
rotten person.
That's who they are.
SPEAKER_01 (12:33):
And now this whole
abstract system is being thrown
into overdrive by social media.
SPEAKER_00 (12:37):
It's being wicked
out into infinity.
We evolved in little groups of150 people.
Now we scroll through thisendless landscape of perfect
bodies, genius intellects,exotic vacations.
It's a constant, never-endingstatus comparison across a
thousand different hierarchiesat once.
SPEAKER_01 (12:55):
Which brings us to
the punchline of what it means
to be human.
SPEAKER_00 (12:58):
We're running on the
exact same biological hardware
as every other animal, the samehormones, the same receptors,
the same primal drives.
But we apply that blueprint inthese bizarre abstract ways
across space and time.
SPEAKER_01 (13:10):
So a baboon gets
stressed when a dominant male
steals its food right now.
SPEAKER_00 (13:15):
Right.
But we feel belittled because wesaw a movie character succeed,
or an expensive car drove past,or we read about a party in
Singapore we weren't invited to.
Our capacity for abstraction iswhat makes us feel inadequate in
ways no other creature on theplanet can.
SPEAKER_01 (13:28):
That really frames
the modern challenge.
So the key lessons for you:
stress is about interpretation (13:30):
undefined
and control.
Testosterone is acontext-dependent amplifier of
motivation, and estrogen is apowerful, crucial protector.
SPEAKER_00 (13:41):
And the final
thought to leave you with,
thinking about that PFC.
If our ability to be in multiplehierarchies protects our health
by letting us find statussomewhere else, what happens
next?
What novel, maybe totallydigital hierarchies will our
brains invent in the future?
SPEAKER_01 (13:59):
Through VR or AI
interactions.
SPEAKER_00 (14:01):
Purely for the
purpose of mitigating the stress
of our real world failures.
How will the brain define statusin a context with no physical
body?
But that still triggers thatancient T dopamine system.
SPEAKER_01 (14:12):
That's a lot to
think about.
Thank you for joining us on thisdeep dive.
We'll see you next time.