June 25, 2025 • 11 mins
Tyler Perry is facing a $260 million sexual harassment lawsuit from actor Derek Dixon—and his legal team wasted no time calling it a “scam” and “shakedown.” That move may work in court. It won’t hold up in the court of public opinion.
In this episode, I break down:
- How aggressive legal statements create reputational damage
- Why pattern recognition is the biggest risk to Perry’s brand
- The Christian Keyes video circulating online and its unspoken implications
- What Perry’s team should have said instead—and why it matters
From the “Lizzo Effect” to the gap between legal and reputation risk, this is a classic case of what happens when a billion-dollar brand forgets that beloved status is earned—and easily revoked.
Strategic Takeaway: Defensive desperation destroys trust faster than the allegation itself.
Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.
Follow Molly → @MollyMcPherson
Subscribe to PR Breakdown on Substack → prbreakdown.media
Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.
This podcast is supported by Muck Rack, the PR management platform I use to monitor media coverage, track journalist activity, and inform high-stakes strategy with real-time data. Click here to try Muck Rack for yourself.
Follow & Connect with Molly:
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Molly McPherson (00:00):
Actor and filmmaker Tyler Perry sued for
$260 million over sexualharassment allegations.
The suit was filed by actorDerek Dixon.
Perry's team says this appearsto be nothing more than setting
up a scam, a $260 millionlawsuit against one of
Hollywood's most beloved figures, and I almost missed it
(00:22):
completely.
Here's what happened and whythe response strategy might be
making everything worse or not.
Welcome to the PR Breakdown,where we reveal the moves behind
the mess.
I'm your host, molly McPherson,and I dissect the viral
scandals, celebrity meltdownsand corporate disasters
dominating headlines to show youthe strategic mistakes and
(00:45):
desperate moves that destroyreputations so you never make
them yourself.
In this episode, breaking downthe Tyler Perry lawsuit and the
strategic decisions that turnedwhispered allegations into a
full-blown reputation crisis,let's dive in.
I have to be honest with you.
I only heard about this TylerPerry lawsuit during a TikTok
(01:10):
live.
I hopped on at the last minute.
In fact, it was right after theKaren Reid trial verdict.
I wanted to cleanse the palatebefore I had to hop on a live
for my subset community.
I like to check in with thecommunity honestly to find out
trending stories, and a numberof people had asked about Tyler
Perry and I was not familiarwith it.
I did a little bit of a diveand the reason why I wanted to
(01:31):
highlight it for this episode isbecause the legal defense is
something that we have seenbefore, so I did what I always
do I went down the researchrabbit hole and what I found was
fascinating from a strategicperspective.
Tyler Perry, the billionairefilmmaker, media mogul and
beloved figure in Hollywoodbesties Friends with Oprah was
(01:54):
hit with a $260 million lawsuitthat normally I would think
would send shockwaves throughthe entertainment industry.
But here's what makes this caseinteresting to me this didn't
come out of nowhere, and the wayit's being handled reveals
everything about crisiscommunication strategy in the
celebrity sphere.
So let me play you somethingthat's been circulating on
(02:17):
social media that adds crucialcontext.
Christian Keys (02:21):
So my brother hit me.
He was a little concerned aboutsafety when dealing with
powerful people.
The good news is several familymembers and my attorney has the
proof, the description, thebreakdown, the audio, the names
of the people, all of that.
(02:42):
So if anything happens then, ifanything happens to me, then
that information will come out.
And so, and I trust God, I'mout here doing setting up
scholarships and doing right bypeople.
God didn't let nobody do dumbstuff here.
So love y'all, I mean Iappreciate y'all.
Molly McPherson (03:05):
That's actor Christian Keys speaking about
harassment from what he calls aquote beloved figure in
Hollywood.
While Keys never names Perrydirectly, the timing and context
have created a perfect storm ofspeculation and reputation
damage.
So here's what we're reallylooking at.
Derek Dixon, an actor fromPerry's show the Oval, filed a
(03:32):
lawsuit alleging sexualharassment, assault and
retaliation spanning from 2019to 2024.
But this isn't just about theallegations themselves.
It's about how a reputationcrisis unfolds when you're
considered untouchable.
Now that I've dug into thestory a bit, here's what jumps
out to me.
Strategically, this case hasall the elements of a typical
(03:56):
perfect storm in Hollywood.
First, you have a powerfulfigure who's built his brand on
being a good guy.
Second, you have allegationsthat directly contradict that
brand and third, you have aresponse strategy that might be
making everything worse.
Perry's legal team immediatelywent on the offensive, calling
(04:17):
the lawsuit a.
Should I just say fill in theblank, calling it a blank and a
blank?
Did you say a scam and ashakedown?
Have we heard this before?
Yes, I'll answer that for you.
His attorney, matthew Boyd, wasquoted.
This is an individual who gotclose to Tyler Perry for what
now appears to be nothing morethan setting up a scam.
(04:41):
Now, I've seen this playbookplenty of times before.
When powerful figures facesexual harassment allegations,
the immediate response is oftento attack the accuser's
credibility and motives.
We saw it with Johnny Depp,garth Brooks and others since
the Me Too movement.
But here's the strategicproblem with this approach
(05:06):
there's a risk of going too hardand too fast in your response.
Courts are increasinglyskeptical of extortion claims in
harassment cases.
Legal experts note thatthreatening to sue or demanding
settlements is standard legalpractice, not extortion.
When you immediately go to thequote, they're just trying to
(05:26):
shake me down, end quote.
You're essentially saying everyharassment victim who seeks
legal recourse is lying, andthat's a dangerous position,
especially when you're asbeloved as Tyler Perry.
The beloved figure problem isone because Perry isn't just
another celebrity billion, ownsa 330-acre studio and has
(05:58):
positioned himself as a championof diversity and opportunity in
Hollywood.
At the 2025 BET Awards, heliterally said he's made more
Black millionaires thanHollywood.
When you're seen as a communityleader, the fall from grace
isn't just personal, it'scultural.
There are people online who arecoming out in his defense, and
not just people on a TikTokcommunity.
(06:19):
It's people in Hollywood aswell.
Here's where Perry's team mayhave made their first mistake.
Instead of a measured responseacknowledging the seriousness of
the allegations whilemaintaining innocence, they went
full attack mode.
But attacking isn't always thebest offense, especially when
there are other voicespotentially waiting in the wings
(06:39):
.
The Christian Keys videocreates a narrative pattern,
even without explicitaccusations and even if that
video is surrounded by a lot ofother people commenting on
social media that they do notbelieve Christian keys.
The internet does what theinternet does.
All the legal pseudo expertscome out and they break down the
(07:01):
case bit by bit because theywant to find guilt in the
accusers, but there are alsoplenty of other people on the
other side as well.
In cases like this, I'm alwayslooking for pattern recognition,
and when I spot it, it is aproblem.
Accusers and their attorneysare smart.
They know that standaloneallegations are easier to
(07:24):
dismiss than patterns ofbehavior.
The Dixon lawsuit specificallymentions that Perry Studios
allegedly paid others, includingpotentially keys, to stay quiet
.
Whether that's true or not, itcreates the impression of a
pattern, and patterns are whatdestroy beloved figure status.
(07:44):
So here's what should havehappened in the ideal crisis
management world.
Now, if I were advising Perry'steam, here's what I would have
recommended.
First, acknowledge the gravityof any harassment allegations
without admitting guilt.
Something like theseallegations are serious and we
(08:05):
take them seriously, though webelieve they are without merit.
Second, avoid the shakedownlanguage entirely.
It's inflammatory and suggestsevery harassment claim is
financially motivated.
Third, let the legal processwork without constantly
attacking in the media or havingyour surrogates do that job for
(08:27):
you.
Every statement calling it ascam becomes a soundbite that
can be used against you.
The reputation reality for TylerPerry is this he has built his
empire on being the good guy,the person who lifts others up,
creates opportunities and standsfor values.
When that image gets challenged, the defensive moves often make
(08:50):
it worse.
The irony is that Perry has theresources for the best crisis
communication in the world, butsometimes, when you've been so
untouchable for so long, youdon't expect to need it.
Interesting to note thatPerry's attorney, matthew Boyd,
is not your typical celebritylawyer.
With a long history ofrepresenting other high-profile
(09:12):
Hollywood figures, his publicprofile is tied primarily to
this case, where he acts as leadcounsel for Perry and his
production company TPS.
Boyd is a labor and employmentattorney who primarily
represents employers andcompanies in complex litigation
and compliance matters, whichmakes him a good choice for this
(09:32):
case.
But in a response like this,tyler Perry feels like other
celebrities who choose to followthe attorney's lead.
Only, legal liability isdifferent than reputation
liability.
Crisis management needs to workhand in hand with legal.
I've dubbed it the Lizzo effect.
Lizzo followed her attorney'sadvice and her reputation still
(09:57):
has not recovered.
So, moving forward, what we'rewatching for as this case
develops, watch for thesestrategic moves.
Will Perry's team soften theirapproach and focus on facts
rather than characterassassination?
Will more accusers come forward, emboldened by Dixon's lawsuit?
How will Perry's high-profilefriends and business partners
(10:18):
respond?
So far, megan Oprah notsurprising nothing.
And most importantly, willPerry himself make any public
statements or let his lawyershandle everything?
I'm assuming the latter lawyershandle everything.
I'm assuming the latter.
That's this week's breakdown ofthe Tyler Perry allegations and
the strategic mistakes that canturn a legal defense into a
(10:41):
reputation disaster.
The strategic lesson here whenyou're beloved, defensive
desperation destroys that statusfaster than any lawsuit.
And if you want deeper analysison stories like this, join my
Substack community you can findme there at Molly McPherson and
join the community where I breakdown the strategic moves behind
(11:02):
these trending disasters andhelp you spot the red flags
before they become headlines andif you enjoyed this episode,
share it with someone who needsto understand what's really
happening behind the spin.
Until next time, remember.
In a world full of reputationdisasters, the best strategy is
learning from everyone else'smistakes.
(11:24):
Bye for now.
Actor and filmmaker Tyler Perry sued for
$260 million over sexualharassment allegations.
The suit was filed by actorDerek Dixon.
Perry's team says this appearsto be nothing more than setting
up a scam, a $260 millionlawsuit against one of
Hollywood's most beloved figures, and I almost missed it
(00:22):
completely.
Here's what happened and whythe response strategy might be
making everything worse or not.
Welcome to the PR Breakdown,where we reveal the moves behind
the mess.
I'm your host, molly McPherson,and I dissect the viral
scandals, celebrity meltdownsand corporate disasters
dominating headlines to show youthe strategic mistakes and
(00:45):
desperate moves that destroyreputations so you never make
them yourself.
In this episode, breaking downthe Tyler Perry lawsuit and the
strategic decisions that turnedwhispered allegations into a
full-blown reputation crisis,let's dive in.
I have to be honest with you.
I only heard about this TylerPerry lawsuit during a TikTok
(01:10):
live.
I hopped on at the last minute.
In fact, it was right after theKaren Reid trial verdict.
I wanted to cleanse the palatebefore I had to hop on a live
for my subset community.
I like to check in with thecommunity honestly to find out
trending stories, and a numberof people had asked about Tyler
Perry and I was not familiarwith it.
I did a little bit of a diveand the reason why I wanted to
(01:31):
highlight it for this episode isbecause the legal defense is
something that we have seenbefore, so I did what I always
do I went down the researchrabbit hole and what I found was
fascinating from a strategicperspective.
Tyler Perry, the billionairefilmmaker, media mogul and
beloved figure in Hollywoodbesties Friends with Oprah was
(01:54):
hit with a $260 million lawsuitthat normally I would think
would send shockwaves throughthe entertainment industry.
But here's what makes this caseinteresting to me this didn't
come out of nowhere, and the wayit's being handled reveals
everything about crisiscommunication strategy in the
celebrity sphere.
So let me play you somethingthat's been circulating on
(02:17):
social media that adds crucialcontext.
Christian Keys (02:21):
So my brother hit me.
He was a little concerned aboutsafety when dealing with
powerful people.
The good news is several familymembers and my attorney has the
proof, the description, thebreakdown, the audio, the names
of the people, all of that.
(02:42):
So if anything happens then, ifanything happens to me, then
that information will come out.
And so, and I trust God, I'mout here doing setting up
scholarships and doing right bypeople.
God didn't let nobody do dumbstuff here.
So love y'all, I mean Iappreciate y'all.
Molly McPherson (03:05):
That's actor Christian Keys speaking about
harassment from what he calls aquote beloved figure in
Hollywood.
While Keys never names Perrydirectly, the timing and context
have created a perfect storm ofspeculation and reputation
damage.
So here's what we're reallylooking at.
Derek Dixon, an actor fromPerry's show the Oval, filed a
(03:32):
lawsuit alleging sexualharassment, assault and
retaliation spanning from 2019to 2024.
But this isn't just about theallegations themselves.
It's about how a reputationcrisis unfolds when you're
considered untouchable.
Now that I've dug into thestory a bit, here's what jumps
out to me.
Strategically, this case hasall the elements of a typical
(03:56):
perfect storm in Hollywood.
First, you have a powerfulfigure who's built his brand on
being a good guy.
Second, you have allegationsthat directly contradict that
brand and third, you have aresponse strategy that might be
making everything worse.
Perry's legal team immediatelywent on the offensive, calling
(04:17):
the lawsuit a.
Should I just say fill in theblank, calling it a blank and a
blank?
Did you say a scam and ashakedown?
Have we heard this before?
Yes, I'll answer that for you.
His attorney, matthew Boyd, wasquoted.
This is an individual who gotclose to Tyler Perry for what
now appears to be nothing morethan setting up a scam.
(04:41):
Now, I've seen this playbookplenty of times before.
When powerful figures facesexual harassment allegations,
the immediate response is oftento attack the accuser's
credibility and motives.
We saw it with Johnny Depp,garth Brooks and others since
the Me Too movement.
But here's the strategicproblem with this approach
(05:06):
there's a risk of going too hardand too fast in your response.
Courts are increasinglyskeptical of extortion claims in
harassment cases.
Legal experts note thatthreatening to sue or demanding
settlements is standard legalpractice, not extortion.
When you immediately go to thequote, they're just trying to
(05:26):
shake me down, end quote.
You're essentially saying everyharassment victim who seeks
legal recourse is lying, andthat's a dangerous position,
especially when you're asbeloved as Tyler Perry.
The beloved figure problem isone because Perry isn't just
another celebrity billion, ownsa 330-acre studio and has
(05:58):
positioned himself as a championof diversity and opportunity in
Hollywood.
At the 2025 BET Awards, heliterally said he's made more
Black millionaires thanHollywood.
When you're seen as a communityleader, the fall from grace
isn't just personal, it'scultural.
There are people online who arecoming out in his defense, and
not just people on a TikTokcommunity.
(06:19):
It's people in Hollywood aswell.
Here's where Perry's team mayhave made their first mistake.
Instead of a measured responseacknowledging the seriousness of
the allegations whilemaintaining innocence, they went
full attack mode.
But attacking isn't always thebest offense, especially when
there are other voicespotentially waiting in the wings
(06:39):
.
The Christian Keys videocreates a narrative pattern,
even without explicitaccusations and even if that
video is surrounded by a lot ofother people commenting on
social media that they do notbelieve Christian keys.
The internet does what theinternet does.
All the legal pseudo expertscome out and they break down the
(07:01):
case bit by bit because theywant to find guilt in the
accusers, but there are alsoplenty of other people on the
other side as well.
In cases like this, I'm alwayslooking for pattern recognition,
and when I spot it, it is aproblem.
Accusers and their attorneysare smart.
They know that standaloneallegations are easier to
(07:24):
dismiss than patterns ofbehavior.
The Dixon lawsuit specificallymentions that Perry Studios
allegedly paid others, includingpotentially keys, to stay quiet
.
Whether that's true or not, itcreates the impression of a
pattern, and patterns are whatdestroy beloved figure status.
(07:44):
So here's what should havehappened in the ideal crisis
management world.
Now, if I were advising Perry'steam, here's what I would have
recommended.
First, acknowledge the gravityof any harassment allegations
without admitting guilt.
Something like theseallegations are serious and we
(08:05):
take them seriously, though webelieve they are without merit.
Second, avoid the shakedownlanguage entirely.
It's inflammatory and suggestsevery harassment claim is
financially motivated.
Third, let the legal processwork without constantly
attacking in the media or havingyour surrogates do that job for
(08:27):
you.
Every statement calling it ascam becomes a soundbite that
can be used against you.
The reputation reality for TylerPerry is this he has built his
empire on being the good guy,the person who lifts others up,
creates opportunities and standsfor values.
When that image gets challenged, the defensive moves often make
(08:50):
it worse.
The irony is that Perry has theresources for the best crisis
communication in the world, butsometimes, when you've been so
untouchable for so long, youdon't expect to need it.
Interesting to note thatPerry's attorney, matthew Boyd,
is not your typical celebritylawyer.
With a long history ofrepresenting other high-profile
(09:12):
Hollywood figures, his publicprofile is tied primarily to
this case, where he acts as leadcounsel for Perry and his
production company TPS.
Boyd is a labor and employmentattorney who primarily
represents employers andcompanies in complex litigation
and compliance matters, whichmakes him a good choice for this
(09:32):
case.
But in a response like this,tyler Perry feels like other
celebrities who choose to followthe attorney's lead.
Only, legal liability isdifferent than reputation
liability.
Crisis management needs to workhand in hand with legal.
I've dubbed it the Lizzo effect.
Lizzo followed her attorney'sadvice and her reputation still
(09:57):
has not recovered.
So, moving forward, what we'rewatching for as this case
develops, watch for thesestrategic moves.
Will Perry's team soften theirapproach and focus on facts
rather than characterassassination?
Will more accusers come forward, emboldened by Dixon's lawsuit?
How will Perry's high-profilefriends and business partners
(10:18):
respond?
So far, megan Oprah notsurprising nothing.
And most importantly, willPerry himself make any public
statements or let his lawyershandle everything?
I'm assuming the latter lawyershandle everything.
I'm assuming the latter.
That's this week's breakdown ofthe Tyler Perry allegations and
the strategic mistakes that canturn a legal defense into a
(10:41):
reputation disaster.
The strategic lesson here whenyou're beloved, defensive
desperation destroys that statusfaster than any lawsuit.
And if you want deeper analysison stories like this, join my
Substack community you can findme there at Molly McPherson and
join the community where I breakdown the strategic moves behind
(11:02):
these trending disasters andhelp you spot the red flags
before they become headlines andif you enjoyed this episode,
share it with someone who needsto understand what's really
happening behind the spin.
Until next time, remember.
In a world full of reputationdisasters, the best strategy is
learning from everyone else'smistakes.
(11:24):
Bye for now.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com