18Jul23 Janet Yellen on Shrooms; Tucker, Tate, RFK, Peterson on God & Jung

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:21):
Using free speech to free minds.You're listening to the David Night Show.

(00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it'sTuesday, the eighteenth of July. You're
of our Lord two thousand twenty three. Well, today we're gonna talk about
rugs, psychedelic drugs. Perhaps thatwas what was behind Jennet Yelling vowing incessantly
to press of shape, and ofcourse as being talked about they're trying to

(01:08):
legalize it. You got aoc occasionalcortex. And also when I McCain are
pushing it real hard, are weheaded back to the sixties because we're talking
about psychedelic drugs? Remember that wasa CIA and their LSD program kicked all
that stuff off. But we've alsogot Germany out there stealing cars and that

(01:30):
civil asset for for Geral though itlooks like that a little bit, but
they want to take everybody's cars everywherebecause the climate change, and want to
begin with that because we just hada and I haven't talked about this just
came out a couple of weeks ago, but it's time to talk about what
a Nobowl laureate said about climate science. He knows a thing or two about

(01:53):
science, and he knows fraud whenhe sees it as well, won't be
right back. Well, we havea doctor John F. Clauser. He
has a Nobel Laureate. He wonthe Nobel Prize in twenty twenty two for

(02:13):
physics, Experimental and theoretical physics.Quantum mechanics and that type of thing.
A very interesting thing that has beenaround for a while. And actually this
is for work that he did quitesome time ago, and they've done in
the nineteen seventies, and I've hearda lot of people talk about this.

(02:35):
You know. It's one of theinteresting things that is evidence for the existence
of God and an intelligence that tiesthings together quite frankly if you look at
it. I've said this about vaccinesand disease theory and contagion theory. We
try to explain things that we can'tsee, and viruses are things that we
can't see. Quantum physics is somethingthat we can't see as well. One

(03:00):
of the things that he discovered fiftyyears ago was that you have these different
quantum particles. He called it quantumentanglement. You have these different quantum particles
and they communicate with each other atgreat distance, like they're being directed at

(03:20):
the same time at a great distance. In other words, for this to
happen, any information that would travelbetween them, any kind of signaling or
anything, would have to travel fasterthan the speed of light. And so
everything about quantum mechanics and quantum physicsis a real mystery. Yeah, they

(03:43):
can look at what is happening,but they can't really explain it. And
if Mike Heisenberg point out, ifyou take a look at it, you
actually measure it, you change itas you're trying to measure it and observe
it, you change it. Soall of it is very, very strange.
It's not the neat, little Neil'sbore Adam thing that you always had

(04:06):
on the desks of the school teachers. You know, where you got the
nucleus and you've got protons and neutrons. They are the nucleus, and you've
got the electrons that are circling aroundit. It's a nice model for understanding
how things work, but it's alot more complicated than that, and we
don't really understand it. In manyways. It's like we don't understand God

(04:29):
either, you know, because ofhis nature, why would we expect that
we would understand God. But whenyou look at certain things, like you
know, how much of our lifeis free will? How much of it
does God predestined and control? What'sthe point of praying? And yet we
see that it works and that Godanswers it. Many times. We have

(04:53):
a lot of these mysteries, don'twe, that we always try to work
out. This is one of them. Doctor John F. Cloud, their
joint recipient of the twenty twenty twoNobel Prize in Physics, has criticized the
climate emergency narrative, calling it quotea dangerous corruption of science that threatens the
world's economy and the well being ofbillions of people. You see, there's

(05:16):
many ways that the the COVID mcguffinand the climate mcguffin are like each other.
They have the same endpoint, don'tthey, And in the same way
they have the same misdirection, we'retold with the COVID mcguffin. And this
is something that's now been revived byRFK JR. I'm very sad to see

(05:38):
that. Oh, you know,look at the lab. It's got to
be the lab. No, itwasn't the virus. It was not the
virus. It was the bioweapon isthe vaccine. I've got a video sent
to me by listener where you've gotthe in Brevard County, Florida. You
got people in the GOP they're nowsaying this. I'm glad to see them

(06:00):
saying it. Why is rfk JrNow directing us to the virus. We
know what the bioweapon is. Heknows that all these games were done for
twenty years, going back to DarkWinter. He knows it's a CIA trap.
Why is he talking about the laband again they're not doing it,
just like Rampaul not doing it inorder to stop gain a function in case

(06:23):
they come up with something really dangerous. We know as a matter of fact
that it wasn't COVID that was killingpeople. It was the political measures that
the Trump administration were taking financially incentivizedmedical malpractice, withdrawal of care, putting
people on ventilators, giving them rimdeservare, eventually masking people up. All
of this stuff harmed people. Andthen Foucha in the CDC provided their line

(06:49):
statistics like they had on an annualbasis for flu shot motivation. This is
the thing that kicked me off withinfo wars and Alec and Mike Adams at
the very beginning of this, whyare you pushing this? Yeah, I
noticed back in December that the onlybiosafety level for lab that they had in
China was in Wuhan, right thereat the spot where they said this begin

(07:12):
at the wet market. Thoh,we better watch this carefully. However,
when we saw the people passing outof the streets and other things like that,
when we saw the lockdown measures,then I realized, No, I've
seen this before. This is whatthey've been practicing for twenty years. And
that's the dangerous thing. That's thepsychological war against us. And they pushed
that psychological war to sell storable foodand the rest of the stuff, and

(07:33):
to sell the panic and to coverfor Trump and all the rest of this
stuff. And so now RFK Jr. Is out there talking about the bioweapon
and how it didn't target Jews inChinese. That's just stupid because you know
what the political effects are going tobe at that, and you know that

(07:54):
you can't prove it and it's notproven. Why go there? And here's
the other side of that. Ashe talks about you know, he's got
everybody starts debate, Well, itis isn't leaving the Jews on the Chinese
alone, or it is leaving themalone or whatever. So they started debating
that, But what is what arethey? How has he moved the narrative
with this, He's moved the narrativeback to it was an engineered bio weapon

(08:18):
coming from the lab. Now theonly question is did it affect everybody equally
or did it target certain ethnic groups? But you're back to that same thing.
Don't look at the vaccine now lookat the lab. No, it
wasn't the lab. The bioweapon wasthe vaccine. Don't lose track of that.
No matter what RFK Junior and alexasand now Alex is somebody said it

(08:39):
to me, Alex has cut avideo say RFK Junior's right. You knew
he's going to do that, right, you know, Alex is going to
push this panic button again. Hewas pushing it at the very beginning.
He's pushing it again for political reasons, to suck up to the expectations of
the audience. Oh, we likeTrump, we like RFK Junior. Okay,
well then I like him as well. Let's see what can I do

(09:01):
to boost them and make you likeme. I'll say good things about them,
even if I have to make itup. So the point I'm making
here is that another aspect to themcguffin is that they will misdirect you as
to what will come up with acrisis, and it really doesn't matter what
the crisis is. They will usethat crisis to get the same things done

(09:22):
at the end, but they'll alsotell you that it's an existential threat to
your life, and they'll misdirect youfrom what the real threat is. The
real threat is not Wu hand.It's not the Chinese flu. It's not
the Wu flu or any of thatother stuff. The real threat was the
vaccine, and in climate stuff,the real threat is not CO two.

(09:48):
The real threat are the measures thatthe government is taking. And in that
regard, the COVID mcguffin and theclimate mcguffin are alike in that regard as
well. The real threat to usthere's not CO two or a virus.
The real threat to us is thegovernment and its plans of what it's doing
to us, and it will killus if they get a chance. These

(10:09):
people will kill for money. Theyhave wars for money, and they've always
killed for money, and it's thecorporations and the governments together a kind of
fascism, the definition of economic fascism. They're the ones who seek to kill
us for money and power. Don'tever forget that they're not like you.

(10:33):
They don't think like you. Don'tproject your thought patterns onto them, because
if you do, you wind updoing this and the people sinned their great
sin. Yeah, or they hadmade them a god of gold. Yeah
yeah. Don't don't project and rejoicesaying this be our god, no Israelity.

(10:58):
Yeah yeah, yeah, don't dothat. That's what we always wind
up doing. So anyway, whatdid this guy says? He's looking at
this, He discovers some aspects ofquantum physics, quantum entanglement, the fact
that these particles are moving together andcoordinated in a certain way. In order

(11:20):
for that to happen, you gotto have stuff that's moving faster than the
speed of light. Yeah, goexplain that. People mean kicking this around
for fifty years and it's like,well, I don't understandable. Let's give
him a prize. I don't havean explanation. Maybe we give him a
prize. I'll give us. Well, he's given us an explanation about something
that he's now focused his attention line. He is now part of the CO

(11:46):
two coalition talking about the value ofCO two. CO two is not a
poison. CO two doesn't have tobe gotten rid of. It doesn't have
to be pushed into the round,and we don't have to have geoengineering to
reflect the sunlight back and change thealbion of the planet. We don't have

(12:09):
to do any of that stuff.As a matter of fact, as he
points out, God already did it. He doesn't give God the credit necessarily.
I don't know if he certainly.Nothing in this article shows him giving
God the credit. But God's alreadydone the geoengineering, and he has the
guy who can observe quantum articles coordinatingwith each other. He's got some interesting

(12:30):
observations to tell us about the importanceof CO two and the importance of clouds
for cooling, for reflecting the sunlightback. You see, God already created
that. It gets hot, getwater, evaporates, it makes clouds.
It's kind of a you know,self sustaining thing here. Now we can
come in as human beings and wecan mess that up. And that's exactly

(12:52):
what Biden and his cronies are tryingto do to make money. They want
to come in and they want tointerfere with sunlight that we need and CO
two that we need because we needthe plants that are the bottom of the
food chain there. So he hascriticized the awarding of the twenty twenty one

(13:15):
Nobel Prize for work in the developmentof computer models predicting global warming. According
to a coalition of scientists and commentatorswho argue that an informed discussion about CO
two would recognize its importance and sustainingplant life. What's the matter with these
people? You know, that's basicscience that people like John Kerry and others

(13:37):
like him don't want you to understand. Yeah, they want you trying to
figure out what gender you are,regardless of what your body is. They
don't want you to understand basic facts. And so CO two must not be
eliminated. But you notice how,especially in journalism, I've talked about it

(13:58):
many times. I'll look at somelittle puff piece to push climate change and
they'll refer to carbon monoxide in theatmosphere. No, that's carbon monoxide is
what's generated and internal combustion engines.If you shut the garage or intern on
the car engine. You can dieof carbon monoxide. A matter of fact,
we've had several situations recently of peoplegoing to some expensive resorts in Central

(14:22):
and South America where the air conditioningsomehow humped CO two back into their room.
People found him the next day dead, foaming at the mouth. They
died in their sleep. CO twois not deadly and carbon monode, but
they confuse it carbon dioxide with carbonmonoxide, and then of course they just

(14:46):
call it carbon. It's carbon,it's dirty carbon. So carbon dioxide,
carbon monoxide, carbon. They don'tcare. They don't know the difference.
They hope you don't know the differenceeither. Well. In a statement issued
by this CO two coalition and againNobel Laureate John Klouser is on the board

(15:07):
of directors, doctor Clouser said,quote, there is no climate crisis and
increasing CO two concentrations will benefit theworld. This is why Biden and his
cronies are doing exactly the opposite,because they don't want to benefit the world.
You see, CO two is notthe problem. Biden's a problem.

(15:31):
The WU flu is not a problem. Trump was the problem, and Biden
as well. He criticized the prevalentclimate models as being unreliable and not accounting
for the dramatic temperature stabilizing feedback ofclouds, which he says are more than
fifty times as powerful as the radiativeforcing effect of CO two. Doctor Clouser

(15:58):
notes that bright white clouds are clearlythe most conspicuous feature and the satellite photos
of the Earth. Do you everthink about that? I guess it was
just kind of lucky that, youknow, clouds are white and not dark
or something. You know, it'salmost like, I don't know, God
designed it in that way or something. Maybe we should leave it alone,

(16:22):
Biden. Uh. Yeah, sothey reflect sunlight, which is why he
wants to put toxic materials in theatmosphere to reflect sunlight. No, it's
already taken care of. Clouds reflectssunlight energy back into space before it can
reach the Earth's surface to heat it. It's already been done, Biden.
God did it thought about it beforeyou did, before Gates did as well.

(16:45):
This creation. And you know,the nice thing about clouds is that
eventually you get particulates to come outof a not particulars. But what's the
word I'm looking for you know,precipitation. Eventually, it precipitates out instead
of like aluminum and whatever else theyput in the aluminum and barium and all

(17:11):
the rest of the stuff they putin their chemtrails. That stuff is not
nice when it lands on the groundand you can see the concentrations of it
places where they've been doing this suddentlyout in California. But you know,
the nice thing about precipitation out ofclouds is it's called rain, and it's
a good thing anyway. According tothe Noble Laureate, this creation of reflective

(17:34):
cloud cover provides a natural thermostat thatregulates there's temperature with a powerful negative feedback
effect. When will we realize thatwe can't improve on God's design for our
planet or our bodies with a bigpharmaceutical products. He asserts that this temperature
regulating effect is more than fifty timesas strong as the warming effect of CO

(17:56):
two. He further adds that theIPCC, that's the government inter Governmental Panel
on Climate Change, this is thisun organization that has become the bane of
our existence. Literally, the unIPCC their detailed analysis of clouds and their
effect on climate. He said,totally misunderstands the effects of clouds and totally

(18:22):
ignores the dominating energy transport process.Well again, this guy is a noble
laureate. He's smart doesn't mean thathe's necessarily right. The common sense tells
you that he is right. Thisis real, simple stuff. It's just
critical thinking tells you these people arelying to you. According to doctor clouds

(18:45):
or the popular narrative about climate changereflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens
the world's economy and the well beingof billions of people, he said,
Misguided climate science has metastasized like acancer metas sence, he said, into
massive shock journalistic pseudoscience, and inturn, this pseudoscience has become a scapegoat

(19:10):
for a wide variety of other unrelatedills. It has been promoted and extended
by similarly misguided business marketing agents,politicians, journalists, government agencies, and
environmentalists. In my opinion, hesaid, there is no real climate crisis.
There is, however, a veryreal problem with providing a decent standard

(19:30):
of living to the world's expanding population, especially given an associated energy crisis,
and the latter the associated energy crisis, he said, is unnecessarily exacerbated by
one, in my opinion, isincorrect climate science. They're trying to starve
us of this stuff. And ofcourse at the UN the Climate Talk guy

(19:57):
who is in charge of it saysthe world must attack all emissions everywhere,
especially those of you with cars.Now, you know, cruise ships were
okay with cruise ships, even thoughjust one cruise line with sixty some odd
giant cruise ships has forty three percentmore emissions than all of the cars in

(20:18):
Europe combine, which is pretty amazing. But you know, as a point
out, yes, they're making thesethings more and more absurdly large. The
new one that's about to HiT's goingto be five times the size of the
Titanic in both length and weight.So I don't know, you know,
maybe they're running these things off ofengines that have got about as much that
are about as clean as a lawnmore or a Chinese power plant, because

(20:48):
they're both about the same thing,Chinese and Indian power plants. They're about
as clean as you're as as anold old lawn mower. Let see the
blue smoke coming at them. Thehead of this year's You and Climate Talks
called for governments and businesses to tackleglobal warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and
all regions, all sectors if theywant to stop the planet from passing a

(21:10):
key temperature limit. Agreed on howmany times we heard this, Oh,
you gotta act right now, Actnow, or you know, we're all
gonna die. The oldest marketing trickin the book, limited time offer.
Don't miss this opportunity because if youdo, we're all gonna die. And
then he says we must be brutallyhonest and just like Adolf out there.

(21:36):
You know, Hitler really got intohis speeches with this authoritarian zeal. These
people are talking carrots and sticks.This is what happened, you know,
the end of last week were carrotsand sticks at Davos and then the UN
we gotta be brutal and honest.Oh yeah, we need to attack all
emissions everywhere, one, two,and three. He said. His name

(21:56):
is al Jabbar, an old bar. Yeah, al shebang quick drama graw.
The European in Stop climate official FranzTimmerman's warned that more public and private
funds are still spent on fossil fuelsand venting and adapting to climate change.

(22:18):
Now here's where he's brutally honest.You just don't understand what he's being brutally
honest about. He says, weare subsidizing an attack on all of humanity.
That's brutally honest. That's a descriptionof what their policies are. Their
policies, their green agenda policies area subsidization of an attack on all of
humanity. They don't take our food, our energy, our freedom, our

(22:41):
liberty, or travel everything, andthey're subsidizing it. This is one of
the one of the other issues thatI have with RFK Jr. Besides being
a stars in his eyes, truebeliever of the good of government and the
truth of climate change. He says, well, you know, these all
companies and everything, they just goaway if you stop subsidizing them, the

(23:03):
big subsidies to the green companies.You don't see that. I mean just
in Texas. You know we hadthat windmill failure when it got cold,
everything froze up. And you know, Texas has got its own power grid.
They're kind of independent. One ofthe things that they had done is
they spent billions and billions of dollarson building an infrastructure for these windmill fields

(23:30):
that were owned by billionaires who wereconnected to the Texas governors, these Republicans.
Just in case you think it's onlythe Democrats who are doing it,
it was Republicans who did this.And you know, this kind of chrony
capitalism, this corruption. They builtthis massive, expensive network to transfer the

(23:55):
power from the windmills for them.All these guys had to do is show
up, you know, jump intothis investment opportunity that have been set up
for them. Yeah, they're subsidizingan attack on all of humanity. He
said, we are investing in aworse future, not a better one,
and we're paying to put our childrenand grandchildren into harm's way. You couldn't

(24:19):
have a more brutally honest assessment ofwhat these green policies are. But of
course he's supposedly talking about what theylike to call fossil fuels. Understand,
all this peak oil stuff, allthis fossil fuel stuff, this is another
CIA lie. It was a CIAthat was always pushing this peak oil stuff,

(24:47):
and they did it for geopolitical reasons. They're doing it now for still
geopolitical reasons, but really more fornational political reasons in order to enslave us.
Yeah, and the CIA was saying, well, you know, we
got to get those oil supplies.That means that we got to get involved
in the Middle East, and wegot to take this dictatorship out and that
one, let's overthrow that government.They had geopolitical designs at the time.

(25:10):
And if you go back again tothe early twentieth century, Winston Churchill realize
that their navy needed to have oil. They're gonna have planes, they needed
oil things like that, not coal, and he realized that they had to
get control of those areas. Andagain, if you ever have a chance

(25:30):
to see the excellent series Riley Aceof Spies, Sam Neil played Sigmund Riley
several different interesting things in that.You see the military industrial complex, you
see the movement for geopolitical domination,wars for oil and all the rest of
that stuff. You also see thetrust that was set up by Felix Drzynski

(25:55):
to entrap anti Bolsheviks who are abroadand trapped the guy Sigmund Riley who was
in Fleming's model for James Bond.Very very interesting series, well done.
Starts out. The first episode isa little bit slow, so we give
a little bit of time, butit was a very young Sam Neil at
the time it was done. Butagain it begins with him in the early

(26:19):
twenty very early twentieth century going aroundand getting involved in all these spy things.
And now we got the spooks orghostwriting stories about the pandemic and all
the rest of this stuff. Butyeah, the it was interesting to see
how this happened. But let's let'stalk about the lines. I've talked many

(26:41):
times about climate Gate. Had climateGate one, we had climate Gate two,
and there's actually a climate Gate threethat happened in two thirteen. In
two thousand and nine, you hademails that were leaked from the University of
East Anglias Climate Research Center in theUK, and it created quite a stir

(27:04):
because there were all these emails saying, our models don't work. The temperature
is going down instead of going up. With CO two, we got to
find some way to hide the decline. So they admitted that their models didn't
work, they admitted that it wasn'twarming, and they admitted and conspired to
lie to people. And that wasa big deal. And so you know,

(27:29):
they had hearings in the UK.They eventually pooh pooed and said,
well that's that. They didn't reallymean what they said. You know,
it's kind of like what Pence triedto do American cities. That's not my
concern. I want to get thanksto Ukraine. You know, Oh well
I didn't say it that way.You're taking it out of context and that
type of thing. So I triedto explain it away. It looked like

(27:49):
we had them there for a moment, and you know, it created a
big stir and so after they tampedthat down in two thousand and nine,
two years later you got climate Gatetwo. So whoever it was it was
leaking this stuff did it a secondtime. The first time it was about

(28:12):
a thousand emails in two thousand andnine, two years later, after they
had successfully protected themselves from this stuff. Because the government's going to make an
excuse for them, the media isgoing to make an excuse for them.
It is a conspiracy. They're allmaking money, they're all getting power out
of this, so of course they'regoing to explain it away. So you
know, it's not what you thinkit is at all. The same thing,

(28:33):
by the way that Hillary Clinton didwhen Julian Assange exposed to what was
going on with her emails and exposedwhat happened with you know, clinton email
dot com, where anybody could goto get their classified documents. Hillary Clinton
immediately said, who released that?They will release? That? Was that
Trump was he working with Vladimir Putinto release that. So don't look at

(28:57):
my emails. I'm gonna send you, you know, it's a red herring.
I'm going to send you on awild goose chase try to figure out
who released this stuff, but don'tpay attention to my emails. Well,
so what they did with a climategate as well. So two years later,
in two eleven, they had insteadof a thousand, they had another
five thousand emails. But by thattime everybody was, well, I'm not

(29:22):
going to pay an attention to that. They've already told me that that is
you know, I've had fact checkerswho've checked that, and they told me
that even though these people were lyingand you know, cooking the books and
all the rest of the stuff.And again, as I've said before,
you know got involved in it onthis side because Michael Mann, who at
the time was at the University ofVirginia and he was a guy who came
up with the hockey stick thing.Basically just an exponential increase that he predicted

(29:48):
and co two at driving an exponentialincrease in temperature, and that was used
as a centerpiece my al Gore andhis lying documentary that he called an inconvenient
truth is a very convenient lie.And so Michael Mann was a prominent American
who was involved in all of thisstuff, and I was with a group

(30:10):
that tried to rest those that dataout of his hand. And that's one
of the things that really nailed thisin my mind, because if you're a
scientist and you've already published this stuffand it's already been used for public policy,
why are you trying to hide youroriginal data Unless you lied to people.

(30:33):
It just validated that. And eventhough we weren't able to get the
emails from him, the fact thathe fought so hard to keep this quiet
tells you that it wasn't science.Tells you that he was lying. And
so anyway, climate Gate three thenhappened another two years later, two thousand
and nine, two eleven, andthen climate Gate three and twenty thirteen a

(30:57):
third batch of emails referred to asthe climate Gate three and with the third
match of emails, the leaker revealedhis motives or why he did this,
and as Climate Depot, which isMark Rano's site, noted in twenty nineteen,
the ten year anniversary of climate Gateone that despite corporate media's best efforts

(31:22):
to ignore and bury these revelations,scientists faithful to their calling and disciplines can
only shudder what climate Gate revealed.Those who subverted the scientific method were not
fringe players, but they were atthe very pinnacle. These are just like
the people who subverted and lied tous about all the pandemic. They were

(31:45):
not fringe players. They were thepeople at the pinnacle, at the top.
They were doing the archetypal studies quoteunquote proving catastrophic human caused global warming
and shaping the content hent and messagingin six yearly reports of the un running
through the IPCC. So when thisperson released them in two thirteen, included

(32:12):
his own or she included something inthere said releasing the encrypted archive was a
mere practicality. I didn't want tokeep the emails lying around. I prepared
CGI. I'm sorry climate Gate oneand climate Gate two alone. Even skimming
through all of the two hundred andtwenty thousand emails would have taken several more

(32:34):
months of work in an increasingly unfavorableenvironment. First one was one thousand,
the second one was five thousand,the third one was two hundred and twenty
thousand. But of course at alsoincluded things that had nothing to do with
climate gate. So he says,and we'll put this out there for you.
People look at it, and hesays, majority of these emails are

(32:57):
irrelevant, and some of them wereprobably sensitive and socially damaging. But so
what look at what these people aretrying to do to us? He said,
if someone is still wondering why anyonewould take these risks, or if
you only see a breach of privacyhere, which is again the tact that
Michael Mann took. And we said, how is this supposed to be private?

(33:21):
You did this work on a governmentcomputer, at work, on a
government punt funded job. You releasedconclusions based on your so called data,
and that has now been used toput in public policy. Now we want
to see what it was all basedon. There's nothing here, You've already

(33:43):
published your work. The damage hasbeen done. Let us see it.
So yeah, if all you seeis a breach of privacy here, then
you're missing the point. If you'reconcerned. Well, look he's putting out
a bunch of people's private emails.Well, guess what these are, people
who are conspiring to do us harm? He said. The first glimpses I

(34:05):
got behind the scenes did little togarner my trust in the state of climate
science. On the contrary, Ifound myself in front of a choice that
just might have a global impact.Briefly put, when I had to balance
the interests of my own safety,privacy, and career and that of a
few scientists. The well being ofbillions of people living in the coming decades

(34:29):
was on the other side. That'sit wasn't a difficult decision, he said.
It was me or nobody. Itwas now or never, A combination
of several rather improbable prerequisites just wouldn'toccur again for anyone else in the foreseeable
future. The circus was about toarrive in Copenhagen. Later on, it

(34:50):
could be too late. Most wouldargue that climate science has already directed where
humanity puts its capability its innovation.It's mental and material might the scale will
grow ever grander in the coming decades. If things go according to script,
We're dealing with trillions and potentially drasticinfluence on practically everyone. Now you noticed

(35:19):
he says, we're dealing with trillions. And I played for you last week
John Kerry, when he was youknow, traveling around and pushing the climate
stuff. Biden went to the UK. Remember he was using King Charles as
a guide dog, you know,hanging on to him, showing me where
to go. And he's you know, getting lost in the sea of the

(35:39):
Grenadier guards who've got these you know, they got actually thick soles on their
shoes if you've ever seen them upclose, kind of interesting and really tall
hats. When Karen and I wentthere on an honeymoon, they were not
wearing the summer They wear the bigbright red jackets, right. And in
the Winner, they've got these reallylong gray coats which are exactly the coats

(36:05):
that were used and the Wizard ofOz and I kept expecting to see the
guy in the back line, youknow, trying to keep his tail from
well, I can do the split, you know, like when the when
the Cowarded Lion puts on the clothesand goes inside the Witch's castle. You
know that type of coat. Butyeah, it is kind of interesting,

(36:25):
and so you know, they theymake these guys look really big. They
give them really thick souls and havethem stand up really straight, and then
they've got these really tall bear skinhats that they wear and all that kind
of stuff. And you know,mine was just lost in these the sea
of giant soldiers and Charles had tobring him in waiting. Wait. They
there's a clip I played for youlast week where they're inside the castle and

(36:50):
John Kerry, you know, hasgot all these billionaires around him, and
he's addressing Prince Charles. Joe Bidenis also there. I don't know if
you understood what was going on,and John Kerry is saying, uh,
you know, he's addressing King Bidenand King Charles, and he's saying,

(37:12):
we have represented here trillions of dollars, mister President and mister King or whatever
he called him. What cheryls Cylindydoes hey, King King here, King
here, King set King set setBiden. Anyway, Carrie mentioned it and

(37:37):
I played that clip. I pointedout, listen, he said trillions twice.
We got trillions of dollars to investhere, and we got make trillions
of dollars, right, And that'swhat are you're saying here? We got
trillions and potentially drastic influence on practicallyeveryone. Now, this is a guy
who released climate Gate three point adecade ago, twenty thirteen. Here we

(38:00):
are ten years later, twenty twentythree, and it's trillions of dollars,
just like he said. Now they'restill lying about it, just like he
said. We can't pour trillions ofdollars into this massive hole, digging and
filling up endeavor and pretend that it'snot away from something and someone else.
He said, said the person wholeaked the climate gate stuff. It's easy

(38:25):
for many of us in the Westernworld to accept a tiny green inconvenience and
then wallow and that righteous feeling surroundedby our clean technology and energy that is
only slightly more expensive if adequately subsidized. Well, that was a situation ten
years ago, and he's saying,Look for those of us in the Western

(38:45):
world who have a lot of wealth, you know this is going to be
a hit. It's going to bea haircut if you will, right,
they'd like to steal your money,they called a haircut. Well, we
can live with it, especially ifit's subsidized by the government. Except now
it's getting to the point where wecan't live with it. Where now they're

(39:06):
coming in and taking away the thingsthat have inconveniences for us appliances stoves,
air conditioning, heating, which arenot merely conveniences, but they are necessities
for life, and especially for elderlypeople and extreme climates. Whether you're talking

(39:29):
about Texas or you're talking about Minnesota, people die if you take away their
air conditioning or their heat. Peopledied in Florida when the hurricane came through
and cut off the power. Well, you know, these people want to
do all the time what the hurricanedid. They want to cut our power
off permanently. He said. It'seasy for us to accept this in the
Western world, but to millions andbillions who are already struggling with malnutrition,

(39:52):
sickness, violence, illiteracy, theydon't have that luxury. Let me tell
you that when they take away ourpower, we will be struggling with malnutrition,
sickness, violence, especially because we'resuffering from illiteracy. We're suffering from
ignorance. We don't understand science,we don't want to understand it, we

(40:15):
don't want to think, we don'twant to do critical thinking. The price
of climate protection with its cumulative andcollateral effects is bound to destroy and debilitate
in great numbers for decades and forgenerations. And it's going to be of
such magnitude that it's going to dothis to those of us in Western worlds,

(40:36):
the Western world, and so imaginewhat it's going to do to those
people. They will get it evenworse, he said. Even if I
have it all wrong and these scientistshave some good reason to mislead us,
there's no question that they're misleading us. Yeah, what's their motivation? Do
they know something that we don't know? Is are they really doing this for?
And good no, they're not,he said. Even if these scientists

(41:00):
had some good reason to mislead us, instead of making a strong case with
real data, he said, Ithink disciminating the truth is still the safest
bet by far. Well. Thatwas ten years ago in the release of
climate Gate three. So now whereare we with these fifteen minute cities and
the smart cities. It was aninteresting article from Brownstone where he lays it

(41:23):
all out. I didn't realize thatthey'd actually come up a little acronym for
the fifteen minute cities. They callit FMC, spelling out fifteen and he
points out that you know, whenwe look at the gas stove debate that
is being had now, he said, any questioning this is Thomas Buckley with
Brownstone, is it too, hesays, as we see with a gas

(41:45):
stove quote unquote debate, because theydon't want a debate, because if you
question this at all, any questioningof the latest coolest way to reorganize society
is treated as a sign of madness. Your it's been settled, right,
This haughty reality shifting attitude somehow pervadesthe elites, despite the deserved devastation of

(42:08):
the public's trust in its institutions inthe wake of the pandemic, the response
to which involved lies, half truths, spend lies, mistakes, lies,
the threat of force lies, thethreat of unemployment, the ordered home confinement,

(42:29):
the mass destruction of small businesses,and of course lies. This is
why climate gate was so important,and it's why, Yeah, I haven't
gone through all that. God hadprepared me to see what was happening with
this stuff just another mcguffin. Andyou know, now that you've gone through

(42:50):
this, you've seen it as well, and so hopefully you can help other
people to see this and we're goingto stop this pattern of deception. At
its heart, the idea harkens backto the village of your place, a
belonging, of simplicity, of knowingyour neighbors and creating a community that you
can count on. In a pitch, actually, you know that's the vision

(43:12):
they want to sell you, theAmish village, if you will, But
it's really more like the village fromPatrick McGowan's a prisoner because it's all about
surveillance. It's not just about lockingyou down and controlling your movements. Of
course that's the part of the fifteenMinute City. And then as he goes
through and talks about how this isall evolved, and he says, you

(43:34):
know, when you look at thecities, of course, you know you've
got different neighborhoods and big cities,don't you. And sometimes the different neighborhoods
are organized around an activity, forexample, a meatpacking district or a financial
hub, or the fashion center oryou know where it used to be where
the Fleet Street in London or somethinglike that, or Madison Avenue with advertising,

(43:57):
he said, sometimes, so maybeit's organized around that ativity. Sometimes
neighborhoods are organized around in ethnicity.They got Little Italy, or you got
Chinatown or something like that. Ormaybe it is a socio economic cluster,
he said, like the west sideof La versus the east side of La
Or maybe it's around entertainment activity,like Broadway in New York, he said.

(44:22):
But the idea of the FMC isto eventually smooth out these differences and
create a zone after zone of similarlyhomogeneous neighborhoods throughout the city. And isn't
that the hallmark of all these NewWorld Order central planning stuff? Isn't it
always about homogenizing everything. These peopletalk about diversity of multiculturalism, and yet,

(44:44):
as I've said before, when youlook at Europe, when I went
to Europe a high school group innineteen seventy three, it was amazing to
me all these little, tiny countries, and you know, each of them
had very distinctive culture and dress andlanguage and music and architecture and all this
other kind of stuff, and they'reall packed together, and now it's become

(45:07):
more and more homogenized. You don'thave multicultural it's just the opposite. You
don't have diversity, it's just theopposite. Everybody has been dumbed down into
this centrally increasingly centrally controlled sameness.It is boring gray, if you will.

(45:28):
I think it's very fitting that ourcars that used to be all these
bright colors, you know, everywhere, going back and looking at the cars
in the fifties when I was akid, you know, it's like a
candy store looking at them the street, you know, like a bag of
skittles going down the road. Butbut but now everything is white, black,

(45:52):
and shades of gray, with anoccasional red car. I don't know
why, I'll read somehow vibe,but you know, pretty much all the
other colors are out. You have, you know, for the Dodge challenging
charge and they go back and theydid, uh, you know, like
a bright orange and green and purpleand stuff like that. But you know

(46:14):
that's the exception. You know.We we've now got this great existence that
has been imposed on us. Iremember the film Pleasantville. I hated that
film. Hate the message of thatfilm. Yeah, it's like, oh
of the nineteen fifties, everybody's andyou know, we got this fake pretense
of families that work, and youknow, we got this moral standard and

(46:37):
all this other kind of stuff,and you know, and everything was black
and white, and then when thekids discover the reality that, oh,
we don't have to live in thiskind of world, and all of a
sudden for them, everything turns brightcolors. Right. It's that. Boy,
what a twisted version of reality thatis. And it's been just exactly
the opposite, hasn't it. Youknow, we used to watch films that

(46:59):
we're in black and white, andwe had black and white in terms of
good and evil, and now it'sjust the opposite anyway. So in order
to implement this, he says,So, how are you going to get
people to do this because everybody's kindof already in these different neighborhoods and you've
got different activities and stuff, Sohow are you going to homogenize everything?

(47:20):
Well, he says, even theproponents know that this is not going to
occur organically or naturally. It's goingto need significant government intervention. This is
where we get the carrots and thesticks. This is where we get the
bribery and the blackmail. This iswhere we get the coercion and the confiscation.

(47:42):
That's what will happen with all ofthis stuff, And of course it'll
be done forcefully because of some presumedemergency crisis, and we don't have time
to look at don't look at this. There's no time to look at this.
We gotta do it right now.No time to test it, no
time to see if it's safe,time see if it's effective. Just do
it. Get rid of everything yougot, lockdown. We're going to redesign

(48:05):
everything. It's always says. Oneof the most important aspects, of course,
of this is the elimination of personalvehicles. And we know why that
happened as well, because we experiencedit and the pandemic. This is not
critical thinking. It's not a theory. It is a conspiracy. And we
know that the one thing that theycannot control that let us continue to move

(48:30):
around was our automobiles. You can'tmake even for our dumbdown society. They
didn't try to make an argument thatif you're driving around in your car that
you somehow a threat to other people, although I did see plenty of people
with their windows up, husband andwife in the car with masks on.

(48:51):
Made a point of keeping my topdown on my car all the time,
pointing at them and laughing. Anyway, and then you got the smart cities.
What's a smart city about. Well, it's about all the restrictions of
movement combined with surveillance. And whenyou go back and look at the mania
for five G, right, that'sabout what this is all about. Who

(49:15):
was it that was pushing five G? Trump? Trump is pushing it hard.
Now Trump's got his freedom cities.Where is he getting that idea?
Let me tell you, folks,he is a traitor. He's not an
anti globalist. He's the person whois there to repackage this stuff for his
cult, following people who would typicallybe against the unethical, immoral, illegal,

(49:43):
unconstitutional, and impractical things that arebeing pushed out there. People who
would normally see, well, thisis a global scheme here, but they
set it aside because it's been doneby Trump. And we all know that
Trump is antiglobalist. As antiglobalist asthey come. There's nobody who's more antiglobalist

(50:05):
than Trump. And that's why hecan push all of these globalists schemes on
us and the cult doesn't see it, and the people send a great sin
and the consequences of it, thisidol worship are built in. Unfortunately,
you and I are in the sameboat with these clowns or elevating Trump anyway,

(50:30):
The bottom line is even point outhow when people saw this in Toronto
they abandoned the idea because that thatwas Google's smart Labs. I'm sorry,
sidewalk labs, and I said itat the time. You know, when
you look at smart remember that atleast when it comes to the technology,

(50:52):
stuff stands for something. There's anacronym there. It is self monitoring,
analysis, and reporting technology. Andso a smart city is about monitoring everything
that you do and analyzing it andreporting it too who to your masters.
That's what the smart city is about. And he finishes up his article by

(51:17):
talking about a quote by doctor AnthonyFaucci. He wrote this in a pharmact
in a medical publication called Cell Magazinecel l Although really what he's talking about
here is the jail cell that heshould be in, but that he wants

(51:37):
to put all of us in.So in twenty twenty he wrote an article
for Cell Magazine. He said,living in greater homity with nature will require
changes in human behavior because again theonly science and all this stuff was behavioral
science, as well as other radicalchange that may take decades to achieve rebuilding

(52:02):
the infrastructure of human existence, fromcities to homes and workplaces, to water
and sewer systems, to recreational andgathering ventures. So you know, put
your mask on and lock down.Okay, it was all about behavioral changes,
wasn't he? Oh? Yes,his last thought here, he says,

(52:27):
you know, when you look atall of this stuff and the censorship
industrial complex and what was done,that we know that this is not just
censorship of thought, it is censorshipof life. And I said this about
Sidewalk Labs when I saw what wasbeing done there. So I was being
done with Google as a matter offact, I was, you know,
they had already shut it down,but I wanted to go talk to people
in Toronto, and I was Iwas fixing to do it, as they

(52:52):
say. In twenty nineteen December,I got sick and couldn't go, and
then all this stuff happened in beginningof January. It's like, I'm not
going out of the country because whoknows when they're going to lock down the
borders. So I never really goup there to Toronto to do a thing
about it. But I said,when I had been talking about sidewalk labs

(53:13):
for years prior to that. Isaid, Google and Silicon Valley neo Marxist,
as George Gilder calls it. I'vebeen setting up surveillance and control mechanisms
for us all through the Internet andhas just been pervasive. And I said,
what they have done in cyberspace theywant to put into physical space.

(53:36):
I said that for years, andthat's what this is really about. It's
about total Marxist control of all thatstuff. And just to point out,
you know, Sweden at least hascome to their senses on at least this
aspect of it. They are scrappingrenewable energy goal and said, now we're

(54:00):
gonna bring nuclear power in. Youknow, we could freeze to death up
here in Switzerland and Sweden because youknow, according to their game that they
play, the nuclear power doesn't haveany emissions, no emissions at all.
So we're gonna take a quick breakand when we come back, we're gonna
talk about this new trend towards psychedelics. Yeah, and we got top ranking

(54:27):
politicians who are into this, andpeople are pushing this to say, well,
this is you know, we couldget people drugs and we would get
rid of all of this hatred andracism and bigotry stuff like that. We
will be right back. Stay withus. M one who makes you larger

(56:36):
and one who'll makes you small,and the ones mother gets you don't do
anything as when she's well, maybeyou should go ask Bryan Wilson. I

(56:58):
am about LSD about some of theseother things as a victim of that.
He's spoken out about what it hasdone to him. Truly amazing what it
does to people. So, yeah, the sixties drug culture, it looks
like it returning, doesn't. I'mgonna show you just how it is being
applauded by the way before. WhatI was just talking about on Rumble Damnage

(57:21):
said. Trump is a rather overtglobalist when you sit down and examine his
rhetoric. He's calling for fifteen minutecities in his stump speeches. That's right,
and people can't see it. Theycan't make the connections. This is
why we've got to get them tosee what's going on. Yea. Not
only are his freedom cities, smartcities, fifteen minute cities, all the
rest of this stuff. But he'sfully been on board with this, the

(57:42):
five G and all the rest ofthe stuff. For a very long time.
Let's talk about the what else isbeing sold to us? Now we
have And this is an article fromInformation Liberation. I like the headline.
Other people have talked about this ecstasy. The drug should be used to quote
unquote cure people of their hateful andanti Semitic beliefs. And this is coming

(58:07):
from the Jewish Daily Forward, whichis an American publication, Jewish American publication.
And in this article that he quotes, he says, can we cure
anti Semitism with molly? And againit's a nickname for the md m A.

(58:28):
Sometimes they call it ecstasy molly.It's been used as a party drug
because hey, you know, youget it and everybody evidently gets like some
warm and fuzzy feeling, and youknow, it's used against people. You
know, when you look up theterm pharma kia, which is translated in

(58:50):
the Bible as sorcery the Book ofRevelation, it is typically translated sorcery because
it was usually mind altering drugs thatwere used for religious purposes. But of
course I've pointed out that it certainlydoes apply to the big pharmaceutical companies as
well. You know, their stuffis altering people's minds, even asthma drugs

(59:13):
driving kids to suicide, not justsomething like an SSR that's supposed to help
you if you were depressed. Itdrives you further in depression, drives you
to suicide and murder and things likethat. Now they've got a lot of
drugs that are actually messing with yourmind, even if that's not the stated
purpose of it. But these aresome drugs that are specifically set up to

(59:34):
mess with your mind. You know. A DMT is another one that these
people call themselves Psycho knots. Yeah, there's psycho, that's for sure.
DMT bringing them in contact, theythink with spiritual beings, mechanized elves.
They say, you know, wekeep taking this stuff, and these people

(59:57):
who have had these trips on aDMT, they keep seeing a lot of
the same things, and you startcomparing their stories and it's almost like they
have a common experience. So weneed to double down on this. Let's
deliberately take this stuff and try tofind out more information about these mechanized elves
as they call him that they experience. Well, just because it's not something

(01:00:20):
that we normally see, it maybe getting you in touch with something that's
real with a dark spiritual sign.I know somebody who took DMT. He
says the scariest thing of his life, never forget it, and he believed
that he came in contact with demonicforces' is that. I believe it took

(01:00:40):
me to hell, you know.And so you know, I look at
this kind of stuff. I've reallybeen blessed in my life. You know.
God has saved me from drugs andalcoholism. And he did it before
I ever took a pill or hada drink, because I've gone through this
being in bands. I watch peopleat parties, you know, watched them

(01:01:01):
stumbling around on the floor drunk andall the rest of the stuff. I
was like, I don't want that. I watched them throwing up afterwards and
the hangovers that they had afterwards.I've been around that many people who took
drugs, but um, you know, talk to people who have done it.
It was interesting. I saw himand I've said this before. I

(01:01:22):
saw The Days of Wine and Roseswhen I was a very young child,
and it really was a powerful filmfor me. And about the same time,
we had a relative who was inour family married married and married into
the family, married, a cousinof my father, and this guy was

(01:01:45):
in detox as a severe alcoholic,and they were telling me all the stuff
he was going through, and Iwas like, WHOA, So I wasn't
interested in experimenting with any of thatstuff. Why would you want to experiment
with any of that stuff? Iwasn't experienced interested in trying to get in
touch with spiritual beings in another dimension. You know, he played those songs

(01:02:08):
that Audie Modern Retro radio at hisIndie Film festival, and he, you
know, I gave him some musicand he picked the one that split up
into two different things, the UnsquaredDance by M and another one. Both
of the songs were in uh sevenfour time, And you know, I

(01:02:31):
said, I used to always liketo do that kind of stuff, but
it wasn't the type of thing thatwe could play in bands. You know,
we had to play standard Top forty. But people had their drunk on
the dance four. If he startedplaying a seven four tune, we cannot
be responsible for the damage that theydid themselves and others. So he didn't
have any got liability insurance to playseven four songs. But yeah, people

(01:02:54):
like Dave Brubeck and Don Lsu Ireally like to know, do things in
a strange meter. And of coursein the pop area you had Bert Baker
Rock who used to make his songsa lot more interesting by changing the meter
in the middle of the song,changing it back and forth. Of course,
you know, people were not dancingto that type, but it was

(01:03:16):
it was nice to listen to.Anyway. Getting back to this and the
drug scene, this is really lookinglike a blast in the past for me
because I was young when all thisdrug stuff, you know them Jefferson Airplane
and Grace Slick and everything, whenthey were doing all this stuff. And
yeah, I was watching what wasgoing on hate Ashbury and what happened,

(01:03:39):
and you know, the big concertsthat were happening, and I looked with
it, looked at it with asmuch revulsion as a kid as people look
at Seattle and Portland and San Franciscotoday. You know, I just like,
you got all these people on thestreet living in those kind of conditions,

(01:03:59):
and that's what I saw from thehippies and from all this drug scene.
It is like, no thanks,And so just as a real blessing
that I never got drug into thatand it's not to say I'm any better
than anybody who got drug into it. You know, they they may have
looked at it, thought that itwas something that was innocent, and then

(01:04:20):
found out the hard way. Soanyway, this guy who's writing for this
Jewish newspaper said, can we cureanti Semitism with molly? If you learned
that a single pill had led toa neo Nazi to renounce his hateful behavior
and attitude and belief. So wesaid, would you a demand more research

(01:04:44):
to find out if this really works? Or be ignore existing evidence and continue
to outlaw the pill. Well,if you pick the second option, congratulations,
you've just described the folly of Americandrug policy for the past forty years.
Because MDMA molly ecstasy has is stilla Schedule one drug, he says

(01:05:08):
it has been used effectively to treatpost traumatic stress disorder. Israel has used
it for this purpose since twenty nineteen. But there's also some pliminary evidence that
the drug can turn haters and twolovers, making it a powerful potential tool
for de radicalization or a party drug. If you're going to see Jeffrey Epstein,

(01:05:31):
that's good effect as well. TheFDA is expected to approve MDMA and
psilocybin also known as psychedelic mushrooms forPTSD therapy within the next to two years.
But of course with this there's nowarp speed rush anyway. You know,

(01:05:53):
when you look at this, that'sfine. If it can help some
people, fine, you know,don't write me and tell me that you
had PTSD and you took ecstasy andit helped you with it. If it
did, fine, you know,I'm just saying that when we look at
changing a neo Nazi, for example, and you know, they go they

(01:06:13):
talk about one story anecdotally, andthis has people been talking about this for
a couple of months until it waspicked up by this Jewish newspaper and then
Chris Monahan Information Liberation picked it up. You know, we have one story
here that they've really focused on,an anecdotal story about how you know,
this guy was m He was theleader of an anti Semitic group and the

(01:06:42):
Midwest branch of Identity Europa, awhite nationalist group that played a key role
in the twenty seventeen Unite the Rightrally and so forth. And so he
says, um, this guy participatedin a study, a double blind study
on the effects of M M onsocial touch, as they call it.

(01:07:03):
That's so when you stop and thinkabout this, think about how many times
we had anecdotal stories about somebody beinghelped with this twenty twenty flu that they
called COVID. Hey I took HCQor I took ivermectin. And look,
you know how many anecdotal stories dowe have of that. We had thousands

(01:07:26):
of those, and they just dismissedthem. It's just an anecdotal story.
But then they find one story abouta guy who says, well, you
know, I was a neo Nazi, but I took M D M A
and now I just love everybody,he says. They go, they call
him Brandon. Let's go, Brandon. Let's let's go take some of this

(01:07:47):
drug here. It's gonna make usall happy and loving, he says.
Now, he says, love isthe most important thing. Nothing matters without
love. He's turned into a sixtiespop songwriter. Look exactly, all you
need is love. That's it,man, peace love. Let's let's take

(01:08:10):
a flower in your gun there.You know, look, you can do
things like this, and sometimes thesedrugs can't have a permit lasting effect.
Many times like we saw Brian Wilson. They can rewire your brain, and
not in a good way. Butthis is a drug that is affecting somebody
chemically, and I don't know ifit has a lasting a fact or not,

(01:08:34):
or does he have to keep takingthis this ecstasy in order for him
to love everybody. Maybe it's abetter thing for us to learn behavior.
You know, we always said thisabout our kids when our kids were ready
to go into school. This isanother big motivating factor. We had a
lot of different things or motivating usto homeschool them and never put them in
school, and one of them wasthe prevalence of riddlin. Oh well,

(01:08:58):
you know, we need to helpthese kids to concentrate. You know,
we got these boys, and we'regiving the boys lots and lots of riddling
because they don't like to set itin desks and you know, they like
to get outside and move around.I've told a story about one of our
boys who you know, we waswhen I'd be trying to do school with
him, you know, he's justconstantly you know, jumping around the whole

(01:09:20):
time, you know, standing onhis head and all the rest of the
stuff. It's like, hey,hey, are you paying attention to me?
And Karen says, ask him whatyou just said? And so I
ask him and he repeated everything Ijust said. He'd heard all of it,
but he's teachers don't like to havesomebody dancing around and the thing.
And so, you know, quicklywe learned that, you know, well,

(01:09:41):
some people learn in different ways,and some people just don't like to
be confined. And little boys don'tlike to set a desks, girls do.
They didn't get that much riddling,you know, they like to set
it at desk, and I'd liketo get their pencils and their racers all
in order and in the desk.And that's just the way they like it.
You know. The guys want todo something else. So but for
the teachers benefit, they're giving themriddling. And they're like, you know,

(01:10:02):
and oh, well, it helpsthem to concentrate. No, it
doesn't. It also gets them addictedto stuff. But wouldn't it be better
for them to worst case scenario,learn some self control and just centered a
desk if that's going to be requiredof them. It wouldn't it be better
for this guy to really have loverather than to fake it with some chemicals

(01:10:27):
you know, I've seen people willget drunk. Some people will get drunk.
They're happy drunk. Some people whenthey get drunk, they're angry drunk.
It affects different people in different ways. And so maybe you got to
deal with reality instead of trying tomask it over with some substance, whether
it's alcohol or MDMA or whether itis LSD or something like that. So

(01:10:53):
in this article, this paper,they have a Yale graduate who is working
as a social worker. This isthe kind of person that wants Biden to
pay back their school loan. Yalefail that money, yelling a social worker.
But no, now she has movedthat to doing research at Hebrew University

(01:11:16):
developing metrics for exploring MDMA's use andconflict resolution between Palestinians and Israelis. Well,
maybe i'd just kind of get tosome of the fundamental issues here,
you know, about how you're splittingthe land out or something, then focus
on some ethical legal solutions instead oftripping everybody out on drugs. But of

(01:11:39):
course the CIA loved to see whatwould happen if they put the LSD in
the water. Supply, they didit in one city in France, but
she and another person said the resultspoint to a big caveat in psychedelic research
in general. It is not magic. In other words, giving everybody this
pill is not going to solve theissue between Palestinians and as realities. Not

(01:12:00):
a magic pill, but she says, intention is everything. Couples, she
said, could need to have someMPD m A therapy to heal their relationship.
Addicts need to want to kick theirhabit. Oh, they could get
empty m A as well. Farmore effective than traditional therapies. Oh is

(01:12:26):
it is it? She says it'snot a magic pill, but then she
puts it out, there's a magicpill for all of your problems. Ac
cult members need it to be readyto leave their cult. Well, I
said it's far more efficive than traditionaltherapy. This may speak more to how
ineffective their traditional therapies are. Allof it is godless and just well,
you know, you just got towork through things. It's like great,

(01:12:50):
yeah, great advice. Thanks.Well, the other part of it is
is that if it really did work, everybody would be taking it right and
so at all so tells you thatit doesn't work. It's also not a
magic pill. And if she saysit's going to be more effective than a
than traditional therapies. Does it meanit is like this room does of your
thing or fau She says, Well, it doesn't actually cure it, but

(01:13:13):
if you get better, you getbetter a little fast, you get better
thirty percent fast. Right, Sothis isn't going to cure relationship issues,
but you know, hey, ifit helps you, maybe it gets you
there faster they can the pill.I don't know what they say, but
yeah, take this drug. It'sgoing to give us peace and love.
Or maybe it's just going to producea temporary fleeing feeling about peace and love.

(01:13:39):
Maybe if we hang apples on atree, a peach tree, maybe
that tree doesn't really become an appletree. Maybe you're just fooling yourself,
you think. But Congress is alreadyworking on legalizing this. On rock fan
John John says, the watershed ofthe timoth Larry turn on, tune in

(01:14:00):
and drop out psyops all along thestreets and homeless encampments of LA and Portland.
Absolutely, Yeah, it's society isstarting to look like that real mess
when I was a kid. SoCongress is is tuning in on this as
well. And I had seen severalarticles about this how AOC Occasional Cortex and

(01:14:27):
Dan Crenshaw One Eyed McCain are crossingthe aisle to try to remove federal barriers
that make it difficult for scientists tostudy this drug MDMA. So there you
go. If the two of themsupport this, has got to be good,
right, A rare bipartisan way forward. Yeah. Look, I'm adamantly

(01:14:49):
opposed to drug war. I'm alsoadamantly opposed to drug use, especially something
that's going to try to hide thereality of what you are, or to
hide reality from you, or toput it out so you can live in
some kind of a virtual reality ofchemicals. I am opposed to alcohol prohibition

(01:15:12):
because of what it does, justlike I'm opposed to drug prohibition drug war.
But I'm also opposed to alcohol usebecause of what it does. So
it isn't one or the other.I mean, you don't have to celebrate
the use of this stuff to realizethat prohibiting it creates very powerful organized crime,

(01:15:33):
whether you're talking about al Capone orthe Mexican drug cartels. It also
corrupts law enforcement and the courts andour politicians who then take money because they
look at it, and they say, well, you know, if anybody
wants to do this stuff, youknow, like Godfather, drugs is a
deity business. But hey, ifthey want it, let's sell it,
thorn. You know, it canmake some money off of this stuff.

(01:15:55):
So again, when you the biggerpicture is and think about this, people
want government and drugs to fix theirproblems in their life. We think Trump
can fix our problems, or Bidencan fix our problems, or RFK Jr.
Can fix our problems. Right,they want government and drugs to fix

(01:16:19):
and to shape them. Help me. I hate people, or I've got
problems with my marriage, or Ihave PTSD. So they're going to turn
to government and to drugs to providethem whatever they need. Don't you think
that's strange. Well, we knowhow harmful drugs are, and we know

(01:16:42):
how harmful government is. Why don'twe turn to God. You want to
know about love, you'll find itthere and you'll find it in the Bible.
As a matter of fact, thatwe'll talk about this coming up.
Tucker had an interesting before all ofthis forum that he did on Friday with

(01:17:03):
Glenn Beck and everything. Before hegot a chance to interview this half dozen
presidential candidates on the Republican side.He sat down with somebody running the one
of these organizations and they interviewed Tuckerand talked to him about some stuff.
Interesting thing to say about the factthat here is at fifty four years old

(01:17:23):
and he read the Bible for thefirst time and drugs are harmful. Drugs,
drugs are harmful. C Z AR. Said, Travis. Yeah,
that's good, Travis. Yeah,drugs are harmful. Drugs are harmful.
Both the drug board drugs are andthe drugs themselves they are harmful.

(01:17:46):
That's good. Yeah, we're againstprohibition and the use of drugs. So
anyway, yeah, this is notsomething that's gonna push you through this.
And just remember all the lines thateverybody sold about LSD, how the CIA
was at the center of all ofthat, and Timothy Larry ken Kesey and

(01:18:09):
his Mary pranksters going around evangelist tellingeverybody you know, tune in, drop
out, and you know it's goingto open mind expanding drugs. It's interesting.
Carrie Grant did a lot of LSDand he talked about it and he
didn't have bad experiences with it,but you know, he was married to
or living with Ianne Cannon and hegave it to her and she said and

(01:18:30):
she just it was horrible for her, and she, you know, was
adamant she was never going to doit again. And then h Yeah.
For years, says John John,I've been saying Joe Rogan as a Timothy
Learry of the millennial generation. That'sright, because he's selling mushrooms. And
you know, we've got Janet Yellenwho did when she went to China.

(01:18:55):
This may explain a lot of peopleare connecting the dots on this. As
soon as I saw that she hadfour portions of a type of wild mushroom
with unpredictable psychedelic effects Xing show Jing. I'm guessing at the pronunciation, but
you know she went to China andI played that video for you a couple

(01:19:18):
of weeks ago. You know,she comes out and she's just bowing over
and over again. That's a littlewoman that she's bowing to a president she
over and over and over again.Now that that's really strange behavior, isn't
it. You know, it isnot protocol for an American official to bow
to anybody. And she was calledout about that. A lot of a
lot of people but it turns outthat this she's seventy six years old,

(01:19:43):
but she's also physically very small,and she ate four portions of psychedelic mushrooms.
Now we understand that's a pretty bigdose for somebody that's small. As
zero Hedge says, Jennet Yelling mayhave been tripping balls when she fervently bowed

(01:20:06):
before Chinese official last week. Goingto CNN, citing Chinese state media,
Yelling nipped into a casual Beijing restaurantright after landing on July sixth, where
she apparently exhibited excellent skills with herchopsticks. What if that was before after
the mushrooms? Right? Anyway,Yelling kept bowing repeatedly to the Chinese vice

(01:20:36):
premiere. Oh, I thought thatwas she who does not reciprocate even once.
One person wrote on a Twitter whatan anti American disgraces administration is?
And yeah, that's right. Andjust as John John said, you look
at Joe Rogan, and I've talkedabout this before. This is a guy
Spotify is paying like what twenty fivemillion dollars a year to him. They

(01:21:00):
don't like his politics, but hetalks a lot about magic mushrooms as you're
ready to point out he's kind ofthe Timothy Leary of magic mushrooms. He's
trying to push this. It's interesting. You got AOC who I do not
trust, Dan Crenshaw, who Ido do not trust, a ten foot
poll, and these people are pushingthis. You got Janet yelling, you

(01:21:24):
know, magic mushrooms by the handfuls. And look, it isn't just something
she's done when she's in China.You know. Okay, but Joe Rogan,
you know, getting twenty five milliondollars a year, I can't.
They won't even carry my program onSpotify. They have banned me multiple times.

(01:21:46):
I've tried on multiple occasions to tryto get on there, and every
time I get on there for acouple of months and then they kick me
off without any explanation, no explanationat all. And you know, it
would be nice to be on therebecause that is either the number one or
number two site for podcasts, andthat's where most people listen to the broadcast
is via podcast. And you know, but Spotify won't even let me on.

(01:22:13):
But they give him lots of moneyand he sells magic mushrooms. So
m one food expert said talking aboutthe mushroom's potent powers, said well,
you thought you were walking straight,but you just fell sideways. I have
a friend who mistakenly ate them andhallucinated for three days, said doctor Peter

(01:22:34):
Mortimer. Yellings stop at an outletat a restaurant chain. The name means
in and out in English, butit's not like in and out burgers.
There those guys are conservatives telling theemployees take the mask off, unless you've
got a doctor's note, take yourmask off. But there they're in and
out mushroom burgers. It's sparked toFloria post on Chinese social media network Wibo,

(01:23:00):
a deluge of reservations as well.The restaurant said of the secretary's visit
quote, it was an extremely magicalday with those magic mushrooms. And a
staffer, senior staffer from the GeorgeW. Bush White House, Bradley Blakeman,

(01:23:23):
said, never ever an American officialdoes not bow. It looks like
she has been summoned to the principal'soffice, and that's exactly the optics that
the Chinese love. Well again,maybe it's the mushrooms there, but she's
had a lot of experience with fantasystuff, right. I mean she was
the FED chair and now the TreasurySecretary for Biden, so she's really big

(01:23:47):
into fantasy finance. And you know, as you look at their economic policies,
maybe you yourself have asked yourself aboutthe FED or the Treasury Department,
what are they smoking? Well,maybe they're not smoking. Maybe they're eating
mushrooms. I don't know. Bythe way, go to David Knight dot
gold and that will take you toTony Harderman's Wise Wolf not Gold, And

(01:24:11):
at that point you can cash inyour fantasy fiat currency into real money.
Stop taking the paper stuff from thismushroom Swelling, Janet Yelling and the rest
of these people. Get rid ofyour fantasy money, change it into real

(01:24:32):
stuff, into real gold. Well, we're going to be right back,
and as we go out with this, when we come back, we got
some more to talk about with pharmaceuticals. We're gonna talk about some mercenary hospitals.

(01:24:53):
Interesting as well. Jim Carrey Inever paid attention to his campaign's pushing
back against vaccines and against vaccine mandatesin the early days. I'll play you
a clip of what he had tosay about that, and when he was
pushing back against that as well.But h and also the GOP in Florida

(01:25:15):
is now really trying to stress thefact that the jab, the Trump shot
is a bio weapon. We'll beright back, Musial whiskey and your wanna

(01:25:36):
sugar in your team? What's alwaysa crazy question asking me this is the
craziest party that could. Don't turnon lace because I don't want to see.

(01:25:57):
Yeah, yeah, i'mma told menot to come to China or to
go to that restaurant, but Idid it. Anyway. I'm telling you
to stay away from the phony illusorymoney as well as I said before,
you know, going back, JimCarrey has been involved in this a lot.
And even before Gavin Newsom, youhad Jerry Brown in California, who

(01:26:17):
was the Trippers back in twenty fifteen. Also in twenty seventeen, he was
opposing the vaccine law that would maketo get rid of any religious exemptions or
medical exemptions and any of the restof the stuff. He said it was
fascism. And I got a clipof him here here we go, right

(01:26:42):
here, this is Jim Carrey andof course he's there with Jenny McCarthy.
He was dating at the time,and she believed that her son's autism was
caused by the vaccines. And sohere's a lot of interesting truth from Jim
Carrey. You know, we gottanot, you know, push somebody out
because we disagree with them on mostissues. When they're right about something,

(01:27:06):
you point out, just like whenRon Wyden showed us that James Clapper and
the intelligence community were spying on Americans. Good for him. I've never seen
anything else I agree with Ron Wydenon. But here's Jim Carrey on talk
shows talking about the jobs. Backin nine shot schedule was ten shots given,

(01:27:28):
ten shots given a kid. Whatdo we get to It's twice as
many as anywhere else in thirty countriesin the Western world, But we give
twice as many shots as any ofthose countries. Why is that you should
educate yourself? We want to empowerparents to educate themselves. Do we need
to have the chicken box? Dowe need to have the tightest be shot
in the second day of life.I don't think we can afford to assume
that the people who are charged withour public health any longer have our best

(01:27:54):
interest at heart all the time.Parents have to have to make their own
decisions, caated decisions when the otherdoctors are here, and they will be
on the other side in a whileafter you leave. I mean, this
is what will they say. Whywould a doctor not want to know more
about something that could save that cansave a life, will prevented disease.
I don't know. The AAP isfinanced by the drug companies. Un schools

(01:28:19):
are financed by the drug companies.This is a huge business vaccine. Vaccines
are the largest growing division of thepharmaceutical industry thirteen billion dollars. They control
medical schools. I mean, thesedoctors are not learning about prevention or vitamins
or diets. What we're asking isfor them to take a loss for the

(01:28:40):
good of our children. That's atough sell in a boardroom. Yeah,
Larry King incredulous. Well why wouldthey do this? Why could there possible
motivation? Be? Well, whereare you on CNN? Did you notice
all these ask your doctor commercials thatare there? Yeah? What you mean,
why would the drug companies wanted tokeep this going? Then? Yeah?

(01:29:02):
Money money. So at the time, this was an article that was
done by the rap and they sayJim carried it and hold back his anger
of the vaccinations on Tuesday, whenhe unleashed his wrath on Twitter. California
governor says yes to poisoning more childrenwith mercury and aluminum and mandatory vaccines.

(01:29:23):
The corporate fascist must be stopped.And then they editorialized and they say said
the dumb and dumber actor. That'sthe way. They kind of dismissed this
though, right, And of courseagain that was Jerry Brown back in twenty
fifteen wanting to eliminate the state's previousexemptions from vaccinations for personal religious police.

(01:29:44):
I don't think that actually happened untilthey got pan in the you know,
this medical doctor who was a sycophantfor the vaccine industry and Gavin Newsom.
I think that's when they actually gotit through. And that was back in
two and nineteen. And of course, you know that was when Trump was
saying they were doing at California,they're doing in the Northeast to get the

(01:30:05):
shot. Vaccinations just so important reallygoing around now they have to get their
shot. Yeah, a corporate fascistright there. So anyway, they said,
the comedian has been a crusader againstvaccination since his relationship with Jenny McCarthy,
who you also saw there, andher son's autism that she believes is

(01:30:27):
created by that. Of course,what does she know. It's just her
kid, right And why did Whyis there? Oh yeah, causal relation,
you know, correlation does not provecausation. But isn't it interesting that
we had this explosion of autism whichnobody had ever heard of before all the
vaccine scheduling for kids. Never heardof it in my life. It was

(01:30:49):
mid two thousands before I knew akid who had autism. But nobody ever
wants to talk about where it comesfrom. Oh, they'll create autism societies,
you know, the whole people's handand parents' hands to some degree with
autism and stuff like that, butthey don't want to know where it comes
from. Don't talk about that.By the way, it reminds me.

(01:31:12):
We've got a listener who's a son, Daniel Jeremiah. Please pray for him.
He's severely injured autism seizures from vaccinesas well, and a string of
messages stating that he is not antivaccine. He says, I'm anti Bimirassaul,
anti mercury. They have taken someof the mercury laden thimirassault out of

(01:31:34):
the vaccines, but not all.And he said this interestingly enough, before
Trump became a thing. Greed Trump'sreason again as Governor Brown moves closer to
signing a vaccine long California. Sorrykids, is just business, that's right,

(01:31:58):
Greed Trump's. Several other celebrities,including Kirsty Ali, Selma Blair,
Jenna Elfman, have also voiced theiropposition to the bill that was back in
twenty fifteen, eight years ago.Jim Carrey says, they say mercury and
fish is dangerous, but forcing allof our children to be injected with mercury
and thimerosol has no risk. Doesthat make a sense as a matter of
fact, that I didn't know whatthy miirosol was when I've told you the

(01:32:24):
story about had some soft contact lensesand I put it in my eyes,
and my eyes a term blood red. And so that's a good thing that
I didn't get thy mirasol when Iwas a kid. Probably would have done
something to me. I didn't understandthat until much later in life, when
I was talking to my optician aboutHe says, you had to get some

(01:32:45):
contact lenses. I said, ohno, I've tried those things that it
turns my eyes blood red. I'mallergic to thy mirasol. He goes,
well, thimirisol is mercury. It'slike, no, but it is.
You never know what these people aregonna do. He said. The CDC
cannot solve a problem that they helpedto start. It's too risky to admit

(01:33:05):
that they've been wrong about mercury andthimerosol. They are corrupt. And of
course if they take that out,they take out the fromaldehyde, they take
out this, they take out,they'll still put something else in there.
And now they've got a new Alzheimer'sdrug, and this is being pushed by
all the mainstream media telling you thatit is now going to be the beginning
of the end for Alzheimer's. Oh, just in time for the baby boomers.

(01:33:30):
Right, They've got a drug thatthey're pushing now. This is Eli
Lily. They've announced this in May. Of course, most of the pharmaceutical
companies have come up with their ownversion of this stuff. I love the
way they named these things. Thisis donamamab, donamamab. It reminds me
of remember Bill Cosby when he wasfunny and not a predator. He had

(01:33:54):
that routine where he went to thedentist and they gave him novacaine, and
his lips were blah blah blah blahblah blah. You know, let's you're
trying to pronounce these drugs that theycome up, whether you sound like you've
just come back from a dentist withNovaKing anyway, incredibly expensive. They don't
mention in this article how this alonecould bank from people giving it to people

(01:34:17):
who are in Medicare and Medicaid andso incredibly expensive. But you know,
we can't tell the drug companies tosell it cheaper. No, no,
no, they we just have tosuck it up and you know, expand
the debt for this. But itdoesn't really even work. If you read
the fine print, it's got thesame kind of thing that Fauci did with

(01:34:40):
m Deservere. It says it wasfound to slow mental decline by thirty six
percent. This is coming from EliLily, again, one of the best
connected pharmaceutical companies. It was alexAzar who Trump put in as head of
HHS. It was alex'sar who kickedoff his emergency order to kick off the

(01:35:00):
pandemic lockdowns. In January of twentytwenty. There was absolutely no evidence of
a of an epidemic anywhere, letalone a pandemic. Quinn Alexazar from Eli
Lily, former CEO of Eli Lily. You know all these people. Yeah,
the cio CEO of Eli Lily.He goes to the Trump administration,
and you got the Goldman Sachs ceo. He goes to the Trump administration,

(01:35:25):
and on and on. But youknow, Trump says, well, next
time, I'm going to do abetter job of picking people. Who is
he going to buy find a richercrew or something. That's the closest that
Trump has come to admitting that hefailed. He failed to pick good people,
he said, and then he failedto pick good people when he replaced

(01:35:46):
them. And then when he replacedthat replacement, he failed to pick a
good person. How does that work? How did he just keep failing and
yet people believe that he succeeded.I don't think he failed. I think
he got the people that he wanted. I think he got the people that
paid him the most money. Butwhen you're getting back to this, okay,

(01:36:10):
so it's going to slow mental declineby thirty six percent, whoop?
Do you do again. The reddesivair standard. You know, the standard
for a therapeutic type of thing isthat you know, it's supposed to cure
the disease. But Faucci didn't makethat case. You know, it wasn't
like, okay, well, youknow we gave this and it cured the
disease in fifty percent of the cases. No, it didn't cure the disease

(01:36:33):
in anybody's cases, and it wasblowing people's organs out, as we had
already seen when Faucci tried to sellit for AIDS and he tried to sell
it for ebola, and it waskilling people directly. It said. What
he said was, well, nobody'sgetting better doesn't have anything to do with
that. But if you do survivesomehow, you get better thirty percent faster.

(01:36:54):
This is why they're going to sellthe Alzheimer's drugs. They're gonna tell
you that same why, Well,doesn't stop Alzheimer's, but it slows it
my thirty percent. So you know, give me a million dollars a year
out of Medicare and medicaid. Thewho is a real and pleasant danger.
This is from David Bell again onthe Brownstone Institute. This reminds me of

(01:37:17):
the language of this. You know, Tom Clancy came out with that novel,
Clear and Present Danger. I thinkeven made a movie out of it,
I think. I remember I didn'tsee the movie, but I read
the book, and the whole ideawas, you know, we got these
out of control Mexican cartels. They'vebecome extremely powerful because our drug prohibition war

(01:37:38):
has been going on for fifty years. You know, we created al Capone
and the big Chicago gangsters and themafia and everything. We created that with
alcohol probition that only lasted about adecade. This thing's been going on for
five decades now, so it's verypowerful. And so Tom Clancy came up
with the idea in Clear and PresentDanger that you know, we would have
a covert war against the drug cartels, which has now become kind of the

(01:38:00):
pet project of these GOP candidates.Oh yeah, let's in the military into
Mexico. Well, at least TomClancy was thinking about it. Says,
if we were to do that,we'd have to do it covertly. They
want to do it overtly, Iguess. But yeah, the who is
a real and present danger. Itis a clear and present danger. David

(01:38:24):
Bell writes, our governments intend totransfer decisions over our health, our families,
and our societal freedoms to the DirectorGeneral of the World Health Organization.
Whenever he or she declares it necessary, they will take all that away.
And of course, who is itthat is paying the budget of the WHO?

(01:38:45):
Will countries do it? Bill Gatesis one of the biggest financers of
it, and so is Big Pharma. In late twenty nineteen, the WHO
issued a new recommendation for pandemic influenza. They said, in twenty nineteen,
before all this stuff happened, andit's a severe pandemic, they said,
it may be necessary closed businesses forup to seven to ten days. And

(01:39:09):
then in just a few months weheard Fauci say, yeah, yeah,
we got to have two weeks toflatten the cave, right. The WHO
cautioned against strict measures like locking everybodynow, which they had. Yeah.
The intelligence communities, pharmaceutical communities havebeen practicing their germ games to do just

(01:39:29):
that for twenty years, ever sinceDark Winter two months before nine eleven.
But this could be dangerous, Itmight have some unintended consequences, they said,
because it might have a minimal impacton the spread of any aerosolized respiratory
virus, while inevitably increasing poverty,especially harming low income people. And I

(01:39:50):
said that on the Monday following theFriday of the thirteenth, I began with
the statements, you know, fromthe analogy to the Battle of Britain,
keep calm, carry on that sign. You see them t shirts, and
then of course the one that theydon't make into a T shirt, which
is liberty is in peril. Defendit with all your might. And that

(01:40:14):
was a real present danger. TheGermans were right across the little English Channel
and they were going to be comingin, perhaps landing, but bombing and
all the rest of this stuff.I say, keep calm. Freedom is
imperil. Defend it with all yourmight. And I said on that Monday,
look, if we locked down,first of all, if it were

(01:40:36):
a real virus, we would notbe able to respond effectively to it.
We have to have our society working. We have very complicated supply chains.
And then we saw what happened whenTrump locked everything down. We saw people
destroying food on their farms because theycouldn't get it to market, and they

(01:40:56):
couldn't get it to market in theright format. They were selling perhaps to
restaurants, and there's no way thatthey could take the food that they didn't
have any way to package it toput it on the shelves of the grocery
store. So, you know,just nothing left to do but destroy the
food on the farm. It wasinsanity. What Trump did in twenty twenty
was insanity. And I will neverforget or forgive the lies that were told

(01:41:21):
to push people into fear. Ohyeah, we don't have any food in
the grocery store. So by mystorable food here at infullwars dot com.
A few months later, the WHOadvocated for everything they had previously advised against
in order to combat COVID nineteen.Recommendations are based solely on reported experience from
one city in China. This wasfollowed by appropriate propaganda that was taken up

(01:41:45):
by the world's media, people droppingdown the streets. So just yesterday,
as one person pointed that out again, you know, I said it many
times. I knew it was phonywhen I saw the phony falls. I
know a phony fall when I seeit. Yeah, these people that they
had doing these videos in China werenot professional stuntmen. And stunt women.
It was an obvious dive. It'sridiculous. So international public health priorities are

(01:42:11):
currently being set and upended by thespecific aim of allowing the WHO to do
this again. So all this stuffwe've been conditioned with. The first line,
there's a pause because people say wedon't want it again, but that's
there, And they bragged about thefact that once they get you to do
it. You know, we've gotMatt Hancock and the UK saying, yeah,

(01:42:33):
we knew what we were doing.We had had people go through this,
and so now next time we scarethem, they're going to do it
again. This muscle memory, rightin the same way that you know,
you train to defend yourself if there'san intruder in the house, and so
you're going to fall back on it. Public health officials they like, you

(01:42:55):
know, public health itself. Understandjust like the whole of herd immunity,
public health, herd immunity, allof that collectivist stuff. It's not about
our health at all. It's away to control us. If it were
about our health, they'd be concernedabout the health of the individual. But
when they put the quote unquote publichealth, what is that when you divo,

(01:43:17):
when you divorce public health from thehealth of the individuals, what does
that even mean? And in thesame way, you know they talk about
her immunity, Well, you know, you got to have the vaccine,
because if you don't get your vaccine, then I'm not protected even though I
get a vaccine. If you don'twear your mask, I'm at risk even
though I'm wearing a mask. Farmerand their private investors increasingly funded the WHO

(01:43:43):
itself, not just Bill Gates andJohns Hopkins or Sepie out of Switzerland.
They now provide about twenty five percentof its budget discarding basic immunology. The
WHO claimed in late twenty twenty thenonly vaccination could lead to higher herd immunity.
And then they shut up about theherd immunity, did you, Unice?
I pointed that out at the time. I said, how long has

(01:44:03):
it been since they talked about herimmunity. You haven't heard that for a
very long time. They stopped talkingabout that when they know they wanted to
try to justify the mandates and anythingwe herd immunity. But after they started
doing and after everybody realized it didn'twork, they shut up about it.
They couldn't hide the fact that itwasn't doing anything because they they couldn't really

(01:44:26):
control both of the both sides ofthe narrative. They wanted to keep people
panicked about this thing continuing to spread. But then if it's continuing to spread,
that means that your vaccine is notworking. And we saw that,
you know. Anyway, the onlyreal question is whether and how the society
wrecking pandemic train can be stopped.The public health professions want careers, they

(01:44:46):
want salaries, and so they're notgoing to stop this. They're going to
go along with it. Yeah,trying to explain it to Larry King if
he was still around. Right,They have proven that in previous manifestations of
fascist the public has to educate itselfand refused to comply. It's just that
simple. When we refuse to complywith the masks and everything else, that's

(01:45:10):
when it worked. So carry wasright, Jim Carrey was right. It
is just corporate fascism. Healthcare Groupis calling for the return of face masks.
You see. They want all thisto come back, and they want
to do it at a higher level. They want to do it at a
global level. They want global lockdown. It's not enough to have it done

(01:45:32):
at the federal level. And thisis one of the things that the people
in the Trump cult still don't understand. Oh, Donald Trump didn't do it.
It was those bad Democrat governors.It's like, are you kidding me?
He paid them. He paid Republicansto lock people Republican governors are paid
to lock people down. Democrat governorsare paid to lock people down. Take
a look at the deficit if youdon't understand that. But that's the way

(01:45:56):
they get everything done. The federalgovernment has very limited powers and they know
it, and they don't want tohave a direct challenge to their orders.
So what they do is they bribepeople and they give them money to bribe
them to do something. That's whatTrump was doing. He was bribing all
the governors to do the lockdown.And he said, oh, I didn't
do it. They did it becauseyou paid them. They did it,

(01:46:17):
just like you know when Hillary Clintonwent to his wedding, I paid her
to be there. Well, hepaid Newsom to lock people down, and
he paid Whitmer, and he paidCuomo, and he paid Republicans like Brad
Little and Mike DeWine and on andon. He paid them all. He

(01:46:39):
was the producer. So now inthe UK, a lobby group of healthcare
workers has warned against the decision toremove face mask guidance and healthcare settings.
The Scottish Healthcare Workers Coalition, wellmaybe they will, you know. And
this is happening at the same timethat In and Out as to it senses

(01:47:00):
in such a way they said,all right, stop with the face mask.
We want to see your smiling facehere as an employee there behind the
counter at In and Out Burgers.And so if you want to wear a
mask, go get a note fromyour doctors. He got a medical condition
that the doctor is going to tellyou. The mask is going to help
them find. Give us a noteand we'll let you wear it. Other
than that, if you want towork here, you got to take the

(01:47:20):
mask off. These Scottish healthcare workersthey're going to force people to start wearing
kilts as well. I don't knowwhat's going to happen with the Travis got
a quote here from G. K. Chesterton, who he loves. Yeah,
Chesterton is wise. So as thereis no fear that a modern king
will attempt to override the constitution.It is more likely that he will ignore

(01:47:44):
the Constitution and work behind its back. He will take no advantage of his
kingly power. It's more likely thathe will take advantage of his kingly powerlessness
and of the fact that he isfree from criticism and publicity. M yeah,
it sounds like somebody we know.For the king is the most private

(01:48:05):
person of our time. It willnot be necessary for anyone to fight against
the proposal of a censorship of thepress. We do not need a censorship
of the press. We have censorshipby the press. G. K.
Chesterton, early twentieth century. Yeah. Yeah, human nature does not change,

(01:48:27):
does it. So? The CDCin terms of pushing their mask data,
this article from Epic Times by MeganRedshaw says that they used unreliable and
unsupported data from journals to push thelies about the quote unquote science. Same

(01:48:48):
thing we saw with the climate stuff. Remember, a new analysis of studies
at the CDC and their flagship scientificjournal found that the agency promoted the effectiveness
of masks used unreliable data with conclusionsit was totally unsupported by evidence. And
so this journal that they put outis the MMWR. It's the CDC's morbidity

(01:49:13):
and Mortality Weekly Report MMWR, Andso they made positive findings about the efficacy
of masks seventy five percent of thetime, despite listen to this, despite
the fact that only thirty percent ofthe studies actually tested masks, just making
this stuff up, and the sameway they made up. We got the

(01:49:34):
cases here, and we've got testresults, and we got scientific studies he
about masks. Only thirty percent ofthem tested masks, but seventy five percent
of the time, and these arereports they were talking about this, less
than fifteen percent of them having statisticallysignificant results. None of these studies cited

(01:49:58):
by the CDC in their Morbidity MortalityWeekly Report. No studies were random randomized.
Yet the CDC and over half oftheir MMWR studies made misleading statements indicating
a causal relationship between mask wearing anda decrease in cases or a transmission,

(01:50:21):
despite failing to show evidence of maskeffectiveness. The inappropriate use of causal language
and these MMWR studies by the CDCwas directly adopted by then director Rochelle Willinsky
to promote mask and recommendations urging Americansto mask up. The MMWR is often

(01:50:45):
called the voice of the CDC.It is the agency's primary vehicle for quote.
This is how they describe themselves forscientific publication of timely, reliable,
authoritative, accurate, objective, anduseful public help information and recommendations. Ha

(01:51:05):
ha ha ha. It's an antithesisof every one of those. It's unreliable,
it's unauthoritative, it's inaccurate, it'snot objective, and it is timely.
I gotta say they did get ittimely. They used it to push

(01:51:26):
their lives on a timely manner.Of the seventy seven reviews cited by them
to promote masks, they found thefollowing. Only twenty three of seventy seven
studies assessed the effectiveness of masks.Yet fifty eight of the seventy seven studies
claimed that masks were effective, Sotwenty three of them assessed the use of
a fifty eight said was effective.Yeah, because it's just a you gotta

(01:51:48):
just say that. Of the fiftyeight studies, forty one used causal language
and forty misused causal language. Causallanguages where an action or I entity is
explicitly presented as the influencing another,whether it caused it or whatever, not
merely associating, and so it goeson and on the bottom line is that,

(01:52:15):
yeah, we were lied to.I've been saying for the last three
and a half years, and finallyBrevard County is pointing out that the Trump
shots are bioweapons. We vaccine turnsout back in the news, Republican Party
leaders on the Space Coast are minutesaway from officially calling on the governor and

(01:52:35):
other state leaders to ban mRNA basedCOVID vaccines immediately. I Team chief investigator
Mike mcnoli has more on what exactlyis going on, Mike Good Evening everybody.
While in their own words, theleaders of Brevard Counties GOP say that
they believe the vaccines are a biologicalweapon. As you say, this is

(01:52:56):
the executive committee of the party inBrevard. They haven't hit send on this
letter yet, but that vote comingup at six thirty and I'm told it's
fairly likely going to pass. Ifit does, they're asking state leadership to
make it illegal to give or totake m R and N vaccines in Florida.
In this four page letter, completewith footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite

(01:53:18):
sources which led them to a stunningconclusion here it is in their own words,
Government agencies, media and tech companies, and other corporations have committed enormous
fraud by claiming COVID nineteen injections aresafe and effective. Strong and credible evidence
has recently been revealed that COVID nineteenand COVID nineteen injections are biological and technological

(01:53:44):
weapons. If approved, this letterwill be sent to Tallahassee at a time
when a grand jury requested by GovernorDeSantis is investigating those very same vaccines.
That grand jury's job is to determinewhether pharmaceutical giants who brought the m RNA
vaccines to market broke any laws andshould face charges. It's already illegal to

(01:54:05):
require anyone to get the COVID vaccinein Florida, but if state leaders go
along with Brevard's request, no onein Florida would be allowed to get those
vaccines. Today, the federal governmentsent a very different letter to drug companies
calling on them to make the COVIDvaccines cheaper and more accessible, anticipating an

(01:54:25):
increase in demand come flu season.Yeah, is there any evidence that they
have taken this stuff out? Ifeven the batches that they know, are
responsible for all of the injuries anddeaths. They're not banning those. And
this is one of the things thatwe've said about to saying. It's like
we congratulate him for doing more anddoing it sooner than anybody else, we

(01:54:48):
also condemn him for not finishing thejob. You know. He said,
well, there's absolutely no reason forany young people to be taking this.
They don't have any risk from this. It's very dangerous. We know that,
so they benefit. Risk equation doesnot make any sense. We're not
going to allow this to be done. We're not going to allow this to
be mandated. He was the firstone to come out and say corporations can't

(01:55:10):
mandate this. However, he andhis surgeon general, the guy's name was
Latipo, if I remember correctly,they came out they talked about how it
was dangerous, don't take this becauseit is a very risky vaccine ornything.
And yet we know, we knowthat there have been tens of thousands at
the very least of deaths and injuriesworldwide, with this very well documented in

(01:55:33):
the CDC's on database. Why didn'tthey stop it? As Brian Shall Hobby
of Vaccine Impact on Com pointed out, he said, look, you know,
we had situations where we had ninestates ban a previous flu vaccine.
I think it was flu because youhad three people die. We're way beyond
that. I've talked about this foryears. I said, look at they

(01:55:55):
shut down the Boeing seven thirty sevenor seven sixty seven, whatever it was,
the map the Boeing Max, theyshut that down. You had eighty
two hundred flights, only two ofthem crashed, but there was a problem
and they shut it down. Everybodydied on those two flights, but it
was only you know, that's fivehundred deaths. And again that's peanuts compared

(01:56:15):
to what has happened with the Trumpshots. Peanuts. But they shut it
down two flights out of eighty sixhundred. I think it was eighty six
hundred eighty two. Again, it'sbeen in while since I've seen the stats
on it. But you know,if you were fatchy, you would say,
well, it's rare. It's we'renot going to do anything about it,

(01:56:35):
we don't care. And that's whattheir response to all this stuff has
been. It's rare. Well,it was rare when you've only got you
know, two out of over eightthousand flights that happens too. So I'm
very glad that the County Department issaying this is a bioweapon. They're trying
to force the Santists to do somethingabout it. Again, he should not
have kicked this over to the SupremeCourt. Told him set up a grand

(01:56:58):
jury and investigate this. You're thegovenor, you do it. You have
the authority to do that. Youcan set up an investigatory committee to investigate
anything you want. So again,you know he's playing DeSantis. Says all
the right things, but when youlook at some of the things he's done
about censorship, about hate speech inorder to get donors from Israel. You

(01:57:20):
look at how he says, well, okay, look, the vaccine's harmful,
but we're not going to ban it. We're just not going to recommend
it. And then we're going toask somebody else to investigate it. No,
that's your job. That's your job. So again, just calling the
shots as I see them. We'regonna take a quick break and we'll be
right back using free speech to freeminds. It's the David Night Show.

(01:58:00):
Well, I tell you one thingthat the Santist has been good and uncompromising
on and that is a pro lifelegislation, pushing back against the mutilation of
children with the transgender stuff. It'sbeen very good on that, and both
he and his wife, is itCasey, I think are taking a lot
of heat for that from mainstream media, drudge other people like that. But

(01:58:25):
we're talking about abortion. This storythat's on WND actually originally came from Live
Action News, a pro life group. She could have been president, but
the hospital just leaves a baby todie, quote unquote, Well, we
know what this is. This iswhat they cynically call comfort care. This

(01:58:48):
is something that amazed the jury andthe Kermit Gosnel case they had. You
couldn't be on that jury unless youwere fine with abortion. They said,
we're not going to make this trialabout abortion. It's going to be whether
or not Gosnel did things according towhat the standard accepted practices are. And

(01:59:08):
so the jurors in as a matterof fact, if you see the film
that was done had Dean Kane init, and it was a fellow mclaer
who produced it. They'd in hiswife, I believed, had written a
book about the Gosnel case. Andthen they did a movie about it,
and the movie focused on the courtroomaspect of it, the trial aspect of

(01:59:30):
it, and really the key momentin that trial was where a physician who
performed abortions all the time, let'sjust call her an abortionist, not a
physician. So the abortionist who wasan MD explains to the jury what the
standard procedure was of comfort care andsaid, no, when a baby survives

(01:59:55):
the abortion, you stick it overthere on the table and you let it
die. Kermit Gosnell actively killed thechild. And that's what he's on troph
for, and that's what they convictedhim. They convicted him of doing that
twice. Two kids he murdered withhis bare hands after they survived the abortion
that he was doing with his barehands, and four steps or whatever.

(02:00:20):
And then of course there was alsothe death of an illegal immigrant woman of
color who bled to death, andhis clinic because you know, there's a
complications with the thing he called them. You know, he's late, I
guess in terms of calling the emergencyservices. But the key thing was that

(02:00:42):
the ambulance people couldn't get the gurneysthrough the narrow doorways and hallways and so
she died. She died, andhe actively killed two babies who survived his
initial attempt to kill them. Andso in that case, when they were
described in Comfort Care, the juryin real life and also in the movie

(02:01:05):
just gasped. They couldn't believe it. And then later and it was a
couple of years after the book,after the movie, and after I had
interviewed fellow mcileer a couple of timesabout this. You had Governor Ralph northeram
Ralph Norlam out of Virginia, andhe was an MD before he became a

(02:01:26):
dangerous politician, and he talked aboutcomfort Care and that was the first that
many people in the United States hadheard of it, and they were just
amazed at what he had to say. And so this op ed piece is
from a person who was an emergencymedicine resident working in a hospital and she

(02:01:48):
wrote about what she saw. Shesaid, while on my ob g y
n rotation as an outside at anoutside hospital, a woman experiencing a failed
abortion came to the hospital. Themom had an abortion injury, and they
transferred her to the hospital. Whilethere, she ended up going into labor.

(02:02:09):
She was twenty one twenty three weeksalong when she delivered a beautiful baby
girl. You understand the mom wasinjured during the abortion and had to go
to hospital, but the baby wasn'tinjured. She said. The staff expected
the baby to expire immediately, butshe began crying. I walked into my

(02:02:30):
night shift and the baby lay ina bassinet alone. I asked who the
cute baby was, and this iswhat I was told it quote unquote,
it was an abortion attempt and theywere just waiting on it quote unquote to
die. The attending doctor put thedoctor in quotes. The attending doctor claimed

(02:02:53):
palliative care is medical care and leftthe baby to die. You know,
this is something that the Pagan Romansdid. You know, when they had
a baby who had some kind ofa birth to fact or something that was
immediately obvious, they would just takethe baby and take them out and leave
them on the rocks to die,and the Christians would grab the baby and

(02:03:15):
save it and raise it. Aftera while, yeah, they started giving
the babies to the Christians. Andyou know, we have some places where
they have they have a place whereyou can abandon your baby and the fireman
will get it, or the emergencyworkers will get it. I don't remember
if I read that story on airand out, but I read the story

(02:03:39):
about a family that, you know, the guy who they had a baby
that was abandoned and it was thefirst one in that area, and he
took charge of the baby and justfell in love with it. When I
first saw it, you know,it just our eyes locked and there was
just something. And his wife hadtried for a long time have children,

(02:04:00):
and talked about his experience about howhe stayed with the child and got it
and then to his surprise, theyasked cod we adopt the child, and
they eventually were able to adopt thechild. And he said he wrote the
story because he wanted the mother toknow that the child was just fine.
It's fine anyway, she said.The attending doctor claimed it was palliative care.

(02:04:26):
Palliative cares medical care. I'm notgiving medical care to an aborted fetus.
But the child was twenty one totwenty three weeks along, she said.
For the extent of my rotation.The attending ob gyn doctor criticized pro
life states and talked about how sheis working for legislation to have better quote
abortion care unquote. She claimed palliativecares medical care based on the law,

(02:04:50):
and when the baby was born alive, she did nothing. She didn't call
pediatrics or a rapid response, butstated the baby was an abortion attempt and
unwanted, so she would provide Shewould not provide palliative care anyway. I
picked up the baby so this person, and was berated by one of the
residents, who instructed me to quote, put it back. The nurses need

(02:05:14):
to keep checking on it, todocument, document when it dies. I
declined, and I set there cryingfor the remainder of the subsequent shift.
I was helpless, she said,and there was nothing I could do.
She'd already been alive at that pointfor a few hours, but without respiratory
support, I knew she was alreadyexperiencing organ failure. In other words,

(02:05:38):
this is a child that was matureenough to survive on her own for several
hours, but in order to havelong term survival, she needed a little
bit of medical care, which theywould not provide, and she couldn't take
the child in look it up tothe equipment, so she I gave the

(02:06:00):
baby in my mind the name Ada. I often think about the baby's mother
too. The mother who heard herbaby cry before they rushed the baby from
the room. She was later dischargedafter being treated for complications. I know
she's likely suffering and was left withoutany support or counseling. I don't think

(02:06:21):
people realize, she said, thesetypes of situations are happening even in our
hospitals. Oh yes, and ourhospitals, our for profit hospitals, who
have the financially incentivized malpractice, thedeath protocol. They're more than willing to

(02:06:42):
kill. You kill who knows howmany tens of thousands of people for money
that Trump paid them. You identifysomebody as a COVID patient, give you
thirteen thousand dollars. You put themon a VENTI later, I'll give you
a thirty nine dollars and I'll payyou for every day that you keep them
on the ventilator. If they justdidn't pay them for treating them, didn't

(02:07:06):
charge them, if they didn't getpaid for the hospital, visit the treatment,
they think they'd already be in theblack. They pay fifty thousand dollars
for this thing, and just toidentify somebody as a COVID patient, put
them on a ventilator, you getfifty two thousand dollars, but they got
twenty percent on all medical care thatthey gave as a bonus that Trump gave
them. So she said, thislittle girl clearly looked like a baby.

(02:07:30):
I don't understand how anyone could seeher and do nothing. I'm hoping that
Ada's story can shine light on whatis happening every day with these sorts of
things being done, even by medicalprofessionals. Well, again, why would
we expect they wouldn't do that.You look at their death protocol. In

(02:07:53):
the same way that they abandoned thischild and left the child to die.
They did that to adults. Youknow, they had been doing that for
years to babies, and we didn'tcare because it was abortion. How many
times have I said, if youallow them to kill people at the end
of life, or if you allowthem to kill people at the beginning of
life, all in the name ofwell, you know, it's not a

(02:08:16):
there's no quality of life here.If you're going to allow them to kill
old people, young people, sickpeople, handicapped people, they will kill
you. And it's no longer atheory. We saw it happening through the
COVID lockdowns and the hospital death protocolsthat Trump paid for. They abandoned people,

(02:08:43):
They isolated people from their families,left them to die alone, left
them to die of neglect. Andthey also helped it along, just like
they help along the babies that theyabort, you know, the rimdesivir,
the ventilators and all the rest ofthis stuff that Trump is so proud of,

(02:09:03):
just as deadly as forceps or chemicalsto burn the child to death.
Yeah, people are left to diealone, left to die of neglect.
As a matter of fact, youknow, when you look at what is
happening, and you know everybody isis rightfully concerned about child trafficking, and

(02:09:30):
sound of fury has gotten this.You know, it's now become I say,
the sound of fury, sound offreedom. It has become a sound
of fury hasn't signifying nothing, alot of tale told by idiots signifying nothing.
But you know, we look atthat and it's like, how many
different ways do we have to seethe abuse of children sexually with trafficking or

(02:09:54):
sexual abuse with our own schools andlibraries, subjecting them to pornography, gas
lighting them, psychologically, mutilating themwith chemicals and surgery, ripping children apart
all of this across the board,when does it end? That's why when
you look at Tucker Crowlson interviewing thisArkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson. You know,

(02:10:18):
he asked him, as I pointout yesterday, you know, well you
vetoed this legislation. You know,what's the deal with that? And he
says, well, you know,I think that you could go too far
with this. There have been somebills that said you should never have transgender
surgery as a miner. He said, I wouldn't sign that in a minute,
because no parent should be able toconsent to that kind of a permanent

(02:10:41):
change. But this bill did gotoo far. It was unconstitutional, and
it interfered with parents. So Isided with the parents. Parents, if
they want to they commutilate their kid, he said, I stand with the
parents. You see Richie's singaling aboutparental rights to mutilate and sterilize their kids
miners. So Tucker pressed him onthat. He said, but this is

(02:11:07):
permanent physical alteration. Carlson said,I think we've learned that hormone therapy for
pre pubescent children is permanent. Andthen as he continued to press him on
it, and that was a goodthing about Tucker that he pressed people on
these answers. Hutchinson said that hehoped that we'll be able to talk about
some issues. I talked about thatyesterday. But here's what Tucker said.

(02:11:30):
He said, this is one ofthe biggest issues in the country, and
I think every person in this roomwould agree that it is a central issue
because if these are children who arebeing altered permanently, and you can defend
that alteration, that you can changeif you like, but there's really no
debate about whether or not it's permanent, he said, And so I think
that it's fair to ask you,in a calm, rational, and I

(02:11:54):
very much hope polite way, whyyou would support that. But of course
it's not just Asa Hutchinson, butit's also Chris Christie. You know,
the two things that ended these campaignsif they ever had one of Asa Hutchinson
and Mike Pence. Asa Hutchinson endedon, well, I would let parents
mutilate kids. Well, Chris Christieagrees with that. And the thing that

(02:12:16):
ended Mike Pence was well, Ithink that, you know, we got
to just do everything that Ukraine wants, and Chris Christie agrees with that.
As well. Chris Christie said,well, I would tell this to Tucker,
and I'd tell except then when Tuckersaid, well come on, let's
let's have an ayview. Oh wellno, silence, right, he doesn't
want to tell it to Tucker's face. I would like to see that interview.

(02:12:39):
I just like said, that'd bea Tucker Crowson program. I would
watch. Chris Christie prides himself,I'm being a tough guy when it comes
to stuff like that, A toughguy who wants war and he wants to
mutilate kids or let parents do itif they want to. So um.
Anyway, when we look at wherewe're going talking about Tucker, like I

(02:13:03):
said before, it was a veryinteresting thing. I think perhaps maybe the
most interesting thing that happened happened atthe beginning. That's what Tucker Carlson said
about where he is as a person. I certainly hope that things are changing
for him. And you know,he's somebody who is smart enough. He's

(02:13:24):
got a big enough following that ifhe really gets a strong moral foundation underneath
him, it would be really powerful, and I hope that does happen.
Geesebusters, thank you very much.On Rumball I appreciate that. That's very
generous and kind of you. Thankyou. But let's talk a little bit
about what Tucker Carlson had to say. I'm going to play you the clip

(02:13:45):
for it. It's about three minuteslong. But I think it's very interesting
to hear what he had to say. And I think it's interesting that there's
been so much genuine talk about Godlately from RFK Jr. As well.
And you know, it's not thetype of thing where, you know,
it's not the kind of God andcountry mom and apple pie type of stuff

(02:14:07):
that you expect to hear from politiciansor people in public life. But I
mean sincere, soul searching stuff,you know, from Tucker Carlson from RFK
Jr. And we'll talk about thata little bit as well. But here's
what Tucker had to say, Well, important election of our lifetime. How
do you explain you always hear that, don't we Well, I'm clinging to
the hope that elections still matter.I really want to believe that because I'm
American in a very fundamental way,and so I believe in the in the

(02:14:31):
actual mechanics of democracy, like thepeople should rule, you know. So,
but leaving aside the even elections,I think it's clearly a pivot point
in history. And I don't thinkthe issues that we debate and really are
in some ways distractions, are thecore issues at all. I mean,
really, there are forces, unseenforces acting on people. It's funny.

(02:14:54):
In February, I was like tryingto think about what to do for land.
I'm not a particularly faithful virtue aspersonal, but like you, trying
to do something. I already quitsmoking, so like what's next? And
I thought, well, I'm justgonna read the Bible. And no,
I'm not going to do a Biblestudy. I'm a Protestant, so I
feel like I have a right tokind of read it myself. And I
know, I'm sorry I feel thatway. And so I've been reading it

(02:15:18):
since February and I'm like about halfwaydone, and and I haven't talked to
anyone about it, and I haven'tbeen and I've just been myself reading it,
and and I've all kinds. It'slike the most interesting thing I think
I've ever died. It's unbelievable theamount of drama in those books that has
been hidden for me as a regularchurch goer in the Episcopal Church, like,
wait, why didn't you never mentionedthis is unbelievable. Why But the

(02:15:41):
two things I have come away withafter reading the entire New Testament, and
I'm up to Deuteronomy in the OldTestament is the every part, with the
exception of Jesus, every figure islike really flawed, like flawed in a
way where you'd be like, Idon't know if I could be friends of
that person, you know what Imean. Abraham enters the injypant. He's

(02:16:01):
like, oh, it's my sister. Actually. Taker what I was saying
to my wife, who was areligion teacher, I was like, why
didn't anyone what is that? Andshe's like, maybe the point is that
God takes people who are not perfectpeople, not only not perfect people,
like they're so imperfect again, Idon't think I could have dinner with them,
and uses them for these grander purposes. That's the first thing I noticed.

(02:16:22):
The second thing I notice is thatpeople, while they have free will,
of course, and they can makedecisions and they live with the consequences
of those decisions, they're not reallyin charge of the arch of history at
all. They are being acted upona lot okay, and I never really
appreciated that because I'm American and soI grew up with this feeling that we're

(02:16:43):
the sum total of our choices.And well, that's not what I'm reading
at all. People's choices matter.You need to do certain things and not
do other things. On the otherhand, you are not in charge.
You are being acted upon by aworld you can't see. And that,
by the way, is consistent withmy life, like I've seen that,
I've lived that, I'm fifty four, and so I feel like it's really

(02:17:05):
important to approach politics with that inmind. Like a lot of these issues
are symbols of this much larger battle. And the final thing I will say
is, I do think we shouldapproach these questions with humility. Amen,
you know, we don't always know. I was at dinner last night at
eight o one, which I stronglyrecommend, surprisingly good lobster, a kind
of weird for Iowa, like isthis from the coast of Iowa? No,

(02:17:28):
but it was good. But anyway, we were talking about candidates and
I was eating with someone who's aChristian, and I said, I can't
honestly, I can't tell if thisperson is a tool of light or darkness,
you know what I mean. Sowe don't always know actually at all,
and we should always admit that.You know, I've got very strong

(02:17:48):
feelings about all kinds of issues,but it's so important to be open to
the possibility that I'm completely wrong andthat what I'm espousing is actually destructive not
constructive. So just to approach itwith humility, like we're all about a
hundred times more ignorant than we Yeah, well that is interesting, isn't it.

(02:18:11):
I think it's interesting that he's alwaysidentified as a lifelong Episcopalian, and
it's like, why didn't you guysever tell me anything about this? You
know, you know, we're allgoing to answer to God at some point
in our life, and we say, you know, they told me the
wrong thing, And God's gonna say, you know that I gave you a
Bible to read. He didn't wantto bother to open that up and look

(02:18:31):
for yourself. Yeah, you areresponsible for figuring that out yourself. And
that's not just a Protestant thing,you know. That is a God to
you type of thing. I thoughtit was interesting that it begins with this
guy saying, you know, thisis the most important election of our life.
Haven't you heard that every single election, every single and even the off

(02:18:56):
your mid term elections, even whenthere's not a presence, this is the
most important election of our lifetime.Well in the sense, I guess it
is true in the same sense thatyou know, we can't do anything about
tomorrow. We may not even behere tomorrow. We can't do anything about
yesterday. That's done, that's history, and so right now is the most

(02:19:18):
important time. But it's not justthe election. Every day. Today is
the most important day of your lifeto a large extent. It doesn't matter
what you did before, and youdon't have any control over what you're going
to do tomorrow, but today youcan do something about it. And if
you failed yesterday, there is forgivenessin a new beginning in Christ. That's

(02:19:43):
a key part of the message,he said. He realized that human nature
really hasn't changed much, that allthese people were flawed in the Bible,
they except for Christ, they're allpresented right there with all of their failings
for us to see and understand thatwe like them. There are in many

(02:20:05):
ways the same way. But weknow that God can use imperfect vessels.
He doesn't call us to remain imperfect. He calls us to you know,
He takes away the stains and thedirt of the past if we repent.
If we repent, it's not justcheap grace as if you repent, it's

(02:20:28):
based on what Christ did, andso you can move forward with that.
But it's very interesting I thought that. You know, again, he says,
he's fifty four years old, hiswife is a religion major. They
never read the Bible. That's reallykind of strange. He said. It
was hidden from me as a regularchurchgoer. And there's a lot of churches

(02:20:50):
that are like that. It's oneof the reasons why the churches have become
LGBT clubs. They don't read theBible, and a lot of people who
are leading those churches don't want youreading the Bible, and they push against
what the Bible has to say.It's difficult for them to kick against the
goads, but they will do it, and they will hide it from you
if you let them. It isyour personal responsibility because it is the word

(02:21:16):
of life. You're not going tocome to faith unless you read the Bible.
You're not going to know what tobelieve. Or who to believe or
what to do unless you read theBible, and it is a you know,
we talked about this ecstasy drug andit's going to make people love other
people and all the rest of stuff. Well, the real thing is there,

(02:21:37):
The real thing is there. Itcan really change your life. God
can really change you. God cangive you the power to change your life.
But you've got to look for it. You've got to look to him.
And so he said, you know, he's aware now how powerless people
are and how they are bigger thingsthat are active on us, both good

(02:22:01):
and evil. They're acting on us. But doesn't mean that we don't still
have a role to play. Youknow. There's always been this tension and
there always will be this tension interms of the nature of God, the
nature of our relationship with God,the sovereignty of God and man's will.
And people have yeah written a greatdeal about that. You know. One

(02:22:22):
of the big debates early on wasbetween Martin Luther and Erasmus over the free
will of man or the sovereignty ofGod will. Martin Luther explained it and
in the Bondage of the Will hesays, yes, you were free to
do what you want, but isGod free to change what you want?

(02:22:43):
I think that is the case.And it was kind of interesting to see
RFK Jr. Being asked by alistener like in an interview. Rather,
I've got a letter from a listas well, which I thought was kind
of interesting. Let me read thatfirst. This is from Marty, and

(02:23:07):
I thank you Marty for the AndI've already mentioned his name before, but
I didn't read his letter. Itgoes back to June twenty ninth, it's
just before the fourth of July,and he says, my biggest, most
important personal news is that I've begunreading the Bible. You know, it
really is transformational. You know,Tucker couldn't wait to talk about it,

(02:23:30):
made a big deal. Marty wroteme about it. I know from a
personal experience how life changing it is. As well. There's been a lot
of people. One guy who's writtena book called Cold Case Christianity. He
was a cold case detective in California. Is wife became a Christian. He
was determined he was going to gether out of this mind numbing cult and

(02:23:54):
he was going to apply logic andhe was going to deconstruct the Bible.
For he started reading it, andnow he's equipped being a detective and he's
telling people about the Bible, andso it's interesting. And so Marty says,
my biggest, most important personal newsis that I've begun reading the Bible.
I finished reading Dennis Prager's Genesis andExodus. Portions very enlightening in various

(02:24:18):
ways, one being that people haven'tactually changed since ancient times. Psychologically,
he says, well again, spiritually, yeah, spiritually, you haven't changed,
by the way, Marty and everybodyelse, I would suggest, you
know, especially Dennis Prager's got somereal blind spots here. You know.

(02:24:41):
He he came out a couple ofmonths ago. I talked about it.
Bablin b had a lot of funwith it. You know. He was
essentially saying that, you know,pornography is good for a marriage and let
you escape and all this kind ofstuff. And bablin Be said, after
this has gone around, people arereluctant to shake the Dennis Prager's hand.
Think, think meetings and stuff.Now he really he's missing some major major

(02:25:05):
issues here. I would suggest,if you think Genesis is interesting and enlightening,
take a look at some of thestuff that you'll find it answers in
Genesis. I've mentioned many times aboutWerner get and a German scientist who talked
about in the beginning there was information, but they've got a lot of very
interesting stuff there. They contrast theviewpoints about evolution with what the Bible says

(02:25:28):
about creation and give you some veryvery thought provoking insights into Genesis that will
show you that it's not just abunch of made up stories that we tell
kids in Sunday school. It's reallygrounded in reality. It's grounded in history
and geology and archaeology and so manyother things that we see everywhere. But

(02:25:54):
again, you know, when youlook at the Bible, it really is
about necessarily just you're right that peoplehave not changed because we have the same
human nature. But also when youread the Bible, I would suggest that
you look at it first of all, what does this tell me about God?
And wasn't told me about my relationshipwith God? And then secondly,

(02:26:16):
what does it tell me about myself? Not about other people? Yeah,
don't get into the habit of readingthe Bible. Oh yeah, look at
this. Look at this a reallybad person. I know somebody like that
as well. Have you looked inthe mirror, right. It's there to
hold a mirror up to you,not so that you can use it as
a camera to take pictures of otherpeople in your mind. And you won't

(02:26:37):
get anything out of it that's usefulunless you use it as a mirror.
And so I thought it was interestingin this long interview that RFK Junior had
with Lex Friedman. He is ascientist who's you know, worked on artificial
intelligence and other things, but hegets to interview people like Elon Musk and

(02:27:00):
Mark Zuckerberg and you know, sor K Junior went on with him.
They got he got like a millionviews, and it was pushed to me
by YouTube. I thought that waskind of interesting, so I'll watched a
little bit of it, and itwas interesting that he flat out asked rf
K Junior about God. It wasn'tthat he brought it up like Tucker did,
wanting to talk about Wow, Ireally read the Bible and it's really

(02:27:22):
amazing. Instead he was asked andhe didn't shy away from it. He
got into a real philosophical conversation andhe talked about how he had struggled with
drug addiction, how he just couldnot handle it. Said rf K Junior,
and he said, you know,when I was a kid, I
gave up something. He was Catholic, and he said, I gave up
some things for Lynn. I gaveup candy one year and I never went

(02:27:45):
back to it. And then hesaid there was something else that he gave
up. I don't remember what itwas, and never went back to it
until he got into college. Andevidently in college that's where he just kind
of gave it all up, becausewhen he got to college he started doing
drugs. He didn't talk about hissex addiction, which we all learned of
as his diary was discovered and releasedpublicly to his embarrassment before his first wife

(02:28:11):
committed suicide. And he had thislong list of women and he rated him
from one to ten and all thisother kind of stuff. But he also
had these sides in his diary,and he talked about the demons of lusts.
I just can't help myself when I'maround women, you know, I
just and and then he would writethings like, oh, it was a

(02:28:33):
good day to day I didn't Iwas away from women or something like that.
Right, I can't control myself withit, or you'd have a situation
where you'd go off on a tripthat was kind of isolated. It was
good. It was like three orfour days, you know, no women
and that type of thing. Howdo you handle that kind of addiction?
And so he was addicted. Eventhough he may have had an iron will

(02:28:54):
when he was a kid, itjust all flew out the window. And
he got into college, got addictedto sex, addicted to drugs. And
so when he was talking to LexFriedman, he said he had a friend
who he had done drugs with andhe said, they've been apart for some

(02:29:15):
time. He came back later onand he said this guy had become a
mooney. And he said, youknow, we're there and he said,
I started doing drugs. And hesaid the drugs are right in front of
him, and he didn't have anyinterest at all in doing He said,
I just couldn't believe it that hewasn't drawn to this, that he wasn't
compelled to do this. But hesaid didn't and he apologized for what he

(02:29:37):
said. But I decided that Iwould rather die than be a mooney.
But then he started thinking, well, maybe there is a god and maybe
there's something we could do. Hesaid his father RFK senior. He said
they used to take him to Massall the time and he would actually read
them the Bible as kids. Andmy wife Karen grew up Catholic and she

(02:30:00):
thought that was really strange. Yeah, to them, the Bible was just
something you know that you know,you you have it on your coffee table,
you got it in a place ofreverence. But you don't touch it,
you don't read it, you don'tmake notes in it, you don't
do any of that stuff to it. You know, that'd be sacrilegious to
make notes in a Bible that you'rereading or something. And but anyway,

(02:30:22):
he said, yeah, his dad, um, you know, would read
it to him. But he saidhe didn't believe any of it. And
he was into Yungian psychology, andhe said Young Carl Jung had this idea
of synchronicity. And he said Youngbelieved in the supernatural. He believed believed

(02:30:43):
that there were um, you know, things that were syncd up, experiences
that were synced up. And hesaid he'd had kind of some spiritual mystical
things that he couldn't explain any otherway. And he said Young tried to
recreate this with peraments to prove thatthere was God, but he was never
able to do it. But hesaid, but I know that God exists

(02:31:05):
or there's something out there that issupernatural and organizing. And I thought that
was really an interesting take on it, because I've seen and talked to many
times about Krick and Watson who discoveredDNA, and they said, well,
we know that this is an intelligentdesign, but we're going to reject the
God of the Bible. There's gotto be something else. It's gotta be

(02:31:26):
space aliens who came here. We'llcall it pan spermia or something. And
you would do the same thing.I'm not going to look at the Bible.
I know that there's something out there, and of course if they would
read the Bible, the Bibe wouldsay that there is no excuse. We
all know that there's a God.Creation speaks to us night after night,

(02:31:46):
day after day. It utters speechand the way that and the things that
we see. So everybody knows thatthere is a God. But do you
know God as he's spoken, ashe's spoken through the Bible. And unlike
Tucker, Orf k Jr. Didn'tdo that. Instead, he said,

(02:32:07):
I just decided I'm going to livemy life as if there is somebody who's
watching me, somebody that I'm accountableto, even though I'm you know,
not I don't knew who that Godis. Essentially, I thought that's really
strange. But you know, eventhat helped him. It's one of the

(02:32:28):
things I've said about politics and prerequisitesfor having somebody who is a believer in
God. And that was something thatwas written into the law of most states.
You know, when we first beganin the United States, people were
coming here to escape religious persecution.Sorry, Nicole Hannah Jones, it was
not about slavery. They came becausethey wanted to escape religious persecution. And

(02:32:54):
part of the evidence of that,of course, is the fact that you
had different established churches and different states. In Rhode Island it was Baptist,
in Maryland it was Catholic, andmany of the New England states is a
Congregationalist. In Pennsylvania's Quakers, andon and on, and they were very
concerned. First Amendment is to saythat, all right, we're creating this
national government, but the national governmentis not going to establish any church,

(02:33:18):
and it's going to be prohibited fromdoing that because we don't want to fall
in the same thing that we justescaped from in England and other countries,
and so, you know, anestablished church was something that you're going to
have to pay money to and sometimesyou'd be compelled to attend or have to
pay more money, I guess asthe penalty. And so they didn't want

(02:33:39):
that at the federal level, butit didn't do anything really to stop it
at the state level, and itcontinued well into the middle of the twentieth
century that you would have embedded inand again, established state churches continued in
Massachusetts and one other New England state. I think it was Connecticut, but
I'm not sure. Up into theeighteenth they still had a state, an

(02:34:01):
official state church that was supported withstate money. That's what establishment is,
and the First Amendment didn't stop thateven that, so it certainly doesn't put
a mask or a gag on somebodywho wants to freely exercise a religion as
a school teacher or as a governmentemployee. That's not what establishment of religion

(02:34:22):
is about at all. But italso established the idea that we wanted to
have moral people we're going to leadus, and so you had a lot
of state constitutions, the idea.Well, you know, first it said
they've got to be at least aProtestant, okay, and then later on
they said, no, it canbe a Catholic as well, and then
later on it's they said, okay, it's just somebody who believes in God.

(02:34:43):
And then in the nineteen sixties theyremove the last of these and said,
you know, we're not going tohave any moral issues about this.
And of course anybody could lie aboutany of that kind of stuff. You
have to evaluate as a voter.You have to evaluate somebody's character and then
sincerity anybody can you know, doGod talk right? And um, but
it was kind of interesting to me, he said, you know, Yung,

(02:35:07):
Carl Yung could not prove God byhis scientific methods. But again,
the Bible, you know, natureshows us that there's an intelligence that design
things. And the Bible itself asso many different things in it that attest
to it, you know, froma standpoint of fulfilled prophecies or archaeological stuff

(02:35:28):
and all that kind of thing.But you know, it is, it
is. I think I'm absolutely convincedof it. And um, you know
it's not just um that I hada feeling about something. You know it's
both um feeling as well as intellect. You can't trust your feelings. You've

(02:35:48):
got to have something that is absolutestandard and it can withhold that standard.
But anyway, he said, CarlJung said, I can't prove it,
but I'm gonna just but I knowit's there, and so our cage said,
So I decided I would fake ittill I make it. He said,
even though I don't believe in God, I'm going to pretend that there
is a God that's watching me asI do things. And that's one of
the reasons why you would have theserequirements for somebody to have a political office.

(02:36:13):
It's why I've said that even thoughthe mainstream media and the left wants
to panic when they see somebody talkabout God, and you should be concerned
that somebody is going to use thatas a kind of demagoguery. Again,
evaluate their sincerity. But if somebodyreally believes that they are accountable to God,
it's going to change the way theybehave. And even with RFK Jr.

(02:36:35):
He said it changed his drug addictionjust to get up every day and
to act, even if he didn'treally believe it that he was going to
be held accountable that someone was watching. The problem is is that again he
doesn't really ever talk about reading theBible. So one day he really will

(02:36:56):
stand before that God that he's pretendingexists, and he really will be held
account for what he does, andhe'd better find out what it is that.
You know, God offers so muchstuff to us for free, but
he does have some requirements and youmight want to figure out what that is.
But I also thought it was interestingbecause you know, we've had a
lot of back and forth about JordanPeterson, who said, you know,
I had this vision or this orthat, and you know, and I

(02:37:18):
had this idea Jordan Peterson as aUnion psychologist, you know, from the
school, not Freudan He's not SigmundFreud, but he believes in Carl Jung's
idea of psychology. And so therethat to me, that helped explain some
of the disconnected mysticism of Jordan Petersonin terms of talking about that. And

(02:37:41):
the name of the book was thatJung had written was Synchronicity. And I
heard that Synchronicity is that where Stingcame up with that title for you know,
the Police album and everything. Ilooked that up and it's like,
yeah, he did, and heactually he wrote that when he was not
thought that was kind of interesting.Look up and see if you can find
Travis Golden Eye and it's um IanFleming's house. They're in Jamaica. If

(02:38:07):
you actually go to the actual websiteand it's like one of those tabs there,
you can rent it. And Steingrented Golden Eye and he wrote some
songs there and it's where Ian Flemingretired and he built that house and is
really beautifully situated with a bay overlookingit. Yeah, there you go.

(02:38:28):
That's it. Yeah, and goto the one that says the history,
because that's got shots of the house. It's pretty amazing. Actually scrolled down
a little bit. No, notthe history. Look at one of the
other tabs. It's got pictures ofit. Maybe the booking the experience.
There you go the experience. Lookat that, look at that bay there.
It's amazing. People are listening tothis on podbean. Go to look

(02:38:52):
up Golden Eye. It turns outthat that island there is called Golden Head
and he called his house the villathere Golden Eye. But he had also
when he was in the British SecretService. He was part of or head
of, an operation that was calledGolden Eye. He built that there.
It's on the bay there in Jamaica. Imagine it's phenomenally expensive to rent it.

(02:39:18):
But he built that villa there andthere's no windows. Everything is open
and he's got hit as you cansee that. There's shutters and doors and
stuff like that that you can close, but everything is open to get the
sea breeze there. Kind of interesting. But anyway, synchronicity and so I've
gotten way off on a tangent here. Tucker, even as he has been

(02:39:41):
saying that, you know, againwe have to look, as he pointed
out, with all of these peoplethat he's read about in the Bible,
you know, there's this mixture.You know, we don't really know where
people are on these things, whichmakes you know, his interview with Andrew
Tate pretty amazing as well, becauseat the same time he says, yeah,

(02:40:03):
I'm reading the Bible and I'm seeinghow, you know, God is
working and I've got these ideas aboutthis. But again, there has to
be an absolute standard there. AndLife Site News talked about Tucker Carlson's interview
with Andrew Tate. I talked aboutit as well, and they pointed out
the hypocrisy of a lot of thestuff that Andrew Tate was saying. In

(02:40:24):
an apparent attempt to counter the currentfocused to tacks against authentic masculinity in the
West. Tucker Carlson traveled to Romaniato interview former kickboxer and social media celebrity
Andrew Tate, and of course hedid. Two and a half hour interview
offered some useful insights into the importanceof healthy masculinity, but provides a grossly
corrupted view of this important topic inboth theory and in practice. You see,

(02:40:48):
you have to, like I saidwhen I talked about it, I
said, you've got to be carefulthat you don't fall off the horse.
On the other side, Yeah,the left and the society of the establishment
as trying to destroy men, nodoubt about it, And they have vilified
masculine virtue, no doubt about it. But where is masculinity defined? Where

(02:41:13):
is virtue defined? You don't haveto go to Romania, Tucker and talk
to Andrew Tate. He doesn't havethe answers. The answers you'll find in
the Bible that you're reading. Gothrough that think about that. Look for
that. As I said before,when I talked about this the first time,

(02:41:33):
I said, don't use Andrew Tateas an example. Oh he's strong,
he's proud, he's rich, andall these other things. No,
no, no, take a lookat Jesus. Jesus was not weak at
all, strongest man you'll ever find, but he was meek. He didn't

(02:41:56):
point to himself, he didn't boastabout how rich and successful he was,
how strong he was. And thisis a guy who you know he is.
He's a pornographer, he's a pimp. When Carlson inquires about his message,
Tate labels it as traditional masculinity.No, no, it's not.

(02:42:20):
Traditional masculinity is as a protector,not as a pimp, not as somebody
who exploits women that you're supposed toprotect. Andrew Tate is the antithesis of
what Western civilization always held up asthe ideal for masculinity. And in a

(02:42:43):
sense, what Andrew Tate is sellingyou is the phony version of masculinity that
the left, by the way,condemns. He's holding up everything that they
condemn and saying, look, I'mfighting it. No, you are validating
what the left says about evil masculinity. So, according to his traditions,

(02:43:05):
as Life Site News, for aman to be virtuous, he must conform
his soul and behavior to each andevery virtue. Well that's not according to
him, but that's according to theLife Site It said. For example,
let's say that you work really hard, but occasionally you steal or does that
make you a thief? Right?Let's say that you know, you've you're
real friendly to a lot of otherpeople, but you like to get drunk

(02:43:28):
and do other things, right oryou know when that's Life Site News going
through this ray comfort. When hegoes up to people on the street,
he says, so, so,um, yeah, you ever look at
a woman lust after her? AndrewTate? Well, imagine you did,
and you probably made a lot ofmoney by trying to get other people to
do that, right, So whatdoes that make you? It makes you
an adulterer? Right? And youknow, do you ever steal anything?

(02:43:52):
What does that make you? Thatmakes you a thief? And so forth
and so on. He says,So what are you going to do when
you stand before God? You know, what are you going to tell him?
Look, I've got I've done this, this this thing I'm an adulter,
I'm a thief, I'm murderer becauseI hate people and all the rest
of the stuff. So what areyou gonna say to God? He says,
well, you know, the realityis that God can't just let you
go. But somebody's already paid yourpenalty for you. You need to find

(02:44:16):
out about that. And uh so, you know when you look at look
at Imutate, what Life site News, they're they're Catholic, but they're basically
going down the same thing that RayComfort did, saying, you know what,
when you push this stuff out there, what what Tate is doing?
You know, he may not beholding a gun to the head of these
women, but he is exploiting themnevertheless, And he openly says he hates

(02:44:41):
women. And he says, hhe's proud of the fact that he's a
father, No, he's a spermdonor because he doesn't spend any time with
his kids. He says he's notan actual husband. Another place with a
Tucker, he mentioned speaking to themothers of my children quote quote about child
rearing, and sadly he later said, well, quote, I can tell

(02:45:03):
you why I wouldn't want to getmarried in America. I don't see the
point of being married to a womanwho's had so many partners before me that
she can't properly pair bond with me, and then giving her the opportunity to
financially destroy me. I think that'dbe a bad chess movie set unquote.

(02:45:24):
Is that why we had marriage?Was that why we had the idea of
waiting until marriage before he had sexualrelationships? Does he see the wisdom of
that? No, he doesn't.He just sees the wisdom of not ever
getting married. He doesn't see thepurpose of marriage, he doesn't see the
purpose of family, he doesn't seethe relationship with his kids. Instead,
he's just happy that he never gotdrawn in any of that stuff because he
can just live for himself out ofselfishness, pride and greed and then exploit

(02:45:50):
women and you know, provide anavenue of spiritual warfare against men all over
the world. This is the guythat's being held up as a virtue.
Is Tate suggestings as life site thatthis is to be, that this to
be the background of mothers of hischildren. He's conceding that he himself perhaps

(02:46:11):
has not lived a sufficient life ofmasculine excellence. Necessary to securing the love
of a virtuous woman with whom hecould entrust his heart and life. And
they point out as Tucker Carlson apparentlyhash Tucker Carlson has been married for thirty

(02:46:33):
some years or something, or fortyyears. I don't know how long he's
been married, but he's been marriedto one woman. He apparently found somebody
that he that was virtuous, thathe could trust. And yet where are
we now? What are Christians lookingfor? Are we as clueless in our
politics as Tucker is? In termsof masculinity? Christians are likely to put

(02:46:58):
their faith in one presidential candidate.No one else even comes close as a
Christian in politics. This is aDaily News, Daily Caller article. And
so they're talking to people like TonyPerkins. They're talking to people like Robert
Jeffries. Robert Jefferies who worked withCurtis Chang to push pastors to get the

(02:47:24):
vaccine and push the vaccine to theirkids. You know Curtis Chang, as
I've talked about before, He's giventons of money from the AD Council,
from the COVID collaborative. And youremember Trump gave two hundred and fifty million
dollars to the AD Council to pushpeople to get the vaccine. They'd never
had that kind of money. Theseare the people the AD Council that did

(02:47:46):
stuff like, you know, justsay no to drugs. You know,
during the Reagan administration big campaign,you saw those ads all the time,
as useless and as obnoxious as theywere, or the Smokey the Bear campaign.
Only you can say permit for fires, that type of thing. But
they gave way more money to theAD Council to push this stuff, and

(02:48:07):
they were funding people like Curtis Chang, who was getting people like Robert Jeffries,
who's got this big church in Dallasand he's always hanging around with Trump
and getting his picture taken with Trumpand he's very politicized. But you know,
during the lockdown, Robert Jeffers requiredall of his church staff to get

(02:48:28):
the jab. Amazing the lack ofdiscernment. These people who participated with this
political thing that destroyed businesses, destroyedlives, got us in debt as the
government was bribing everybody. But theykilled people in hospitals, They kill people
with the shots, they kill peoplewith lies. And these same people now,

(02:48:56):
people like Tony Perkins. People likeRobert Jeffers are now saying stuff like
this, Donald Trump kind of raisedthe bar, put him behind bars,
which sounds a little odd on hisface because he certainly was not a candidate
when given his background. Yeah,his background was the same as Andrew Tate.

(02:49:18):
And we see conservatives celebrating Andrew Tateas a pimp pornographer. We see
people celebrating Trump as a proud serialadulter, somebody who was so eaten up
with greed for money, it's allhe could ever talk about. Trump's alleged

(02:49:39):
affair with Starry Daniels, his infamousexpletive filled Twitter rants against various media celebrity
political figures, and his more recenttrouble with the law might otherwise preclude him
from gaining support from religious circles.However, however, but but but what

(02:50:00):
has changed? How do we excuseany of that? Why isn't that a
non sequitur? You know, whenhe ran in twenty sixteen, what was
his opposition? Hillary Clinton? And, as Julian Sign said, we know
that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger ina criminal We don't know about Trump yet,
So I was willing to give hima chance then Trump's policies, they

(02:50:22):
said, however, and its stancesduring his first time as presidence. So
what was it that you really likedabout him? Was it the destruction of
the constitution? Was it the poisoningof people? Was it the murder of
people and hospitals, the lies?Was it the globalist agenda that he pushed?
What was it, Robert Jefferson,Tony Perkins that you really loved about
Trump? Which makes him the onlyperson that you would even consider. Trump

(02:50:46):
made waves as a first setting presidentto appear publicly in the March for Life,
But then he also says now thatit's too harsh what's being done by
De Santis and others. He camein braiding, as they pointed out in
twenty twenty, first president come incelebrating same sex mirage, and of course

(02:51:09):
in this article where they're trying tomake a case when they say, well,
his Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended lawslike the Religious Liberty Accommodations Act,
which allowed people to opt out ofthe coercion that was being put on them
to bow down and worship same sexmirage, except that Trump has pushed that.

(02:51:31):
Trump pushed LGBT, He pushed transgendersway back, Michael Flynn pushing him
back in two and fifteen, pushingPride month at the Pentagon, holding up
a Navy seal as an example toeverybody, praising him, and Jim Caviezel
is praising Michael Flynn. Jim Caviezelis going to go to go with Trump

(02:51:54):
and talk about his movie Sound ofFreedom. To somebody who hung out with
Jeffrey Epstein, how can they notconnect the dots? How can Jim Caviezel
not connect the dots on Michael Flynnand what he has done? On Donald
Trump and what he has done?How can he not connect the dots?
How can he not ask them?Are you going to renounce that? Are

(02:52:15):
you going to expose these people?Are you going to talk about that experience?
You're gonna come clean on it?No, So this is the article.
You'll find this a the Daily Call, You'll find it WND. I've
seen it over and over again.There's only one candidate, only one candidate
out there, and you know it'sgot to be Trump. Well, we're

(02:52:39):
gonna take a quick break. We'llbe right back. And the people sinned
a great sin, or they hadmade them a God of gold, and
they bought him upon their shoulders andrejoice saying this be our God. O
Israel. July. Listening to theDavid Night Show on Rock Fan, John

(02:53:56):
John loved to comment. He said, I was raised Catholic. I went
to a parochial school. My siblingsand relatives are Catholic. I was a
devout Roman Catholic until I read theBible at age thirty. No longer was
a papist. I'm a follower ofChrist Jesus. My brothers and sisters who
went to parochial school and go toMass every Sunday, even at ages sixty

(02:54:16):
five through eighty, none of themhave ever cracked open a Bible. Yeah,
I said, you know it wasI don't. I think it was
Wilberforce, but I'm not sure therewas a one historical character whom. You
know, it was a thing witha wealthy people at that time. You
know, you were expected that youwere going to go to Parliament or the

(02:54:39):
House of Lords or something like that. But it was also expected that they
were going to do what they calledthe tour. You know, when you
get to a certain age and finishyour studies at Oxford or Cambridge, or
something like they would take a tourof Europe, because you know, travel
was going to expand the mind andthe experiences and so on that tour.
And I think it was William Wilberforce. I think it's how he became a

(02:55:01):
Christian. He took along a Biblewith him, and of course he read
it in the original languages. Heread Hebrew, he read Greek. This
particular guy, again, I thinkit's Wilberforce. I'm not sure, but
anyway, he's reading it as he'straveling across Europe, you know, slow
travel and carriages and things like that. Maybe an occasional train, still not

(02:55:24):
moving very fast. He's got alot of time on the road, and
so he's reading the Bible and theoriginal Hebrew and the original Greek. And
when he came back he said tosomebody, well, either this isn't the
Bible, or we're not Christians.I say, Hans, are we the
bad guys? There's skulls on oursuits. Can look at that. It

(02:55:45):
is interesting to look at it asan absolute standard. Let's talk a little
bit about money. You know,Jesus talked more about money than he did
anything else, pretty much. RandyAlcorn by the way, it was a
great book called The Treasure Principle.You know, you don't just ignore it.
And money in and of itself isnot bad. It's the love of
money that is the issue. Thisis crypto will transcend international currencies, says

(02:56:07):
Black Rock CEO, now cheerleading it. But see he doesn't want you to
have the actual thing. That's thething that's truly amazes me. You know,
it's just like he wants you toget an ETF. He wants you
to get a derivative of crypto.Don't buy the actual thing, buy a
derivative that I will create. Whata scam this is. I mean,

(02:56:28):
you look at people and I understandthey're concerned about crypto. Do I understand
this? And so he told FoxBusiness last week the role of cryptocurrency was
to largely digitizing gold, suggesting thatUS regulators consider how an ETF directly linked
to bitcoin could democratize finance. Weknow what he's planning on doing. It's
the same thing they did with papergold and paper silver, right, These

(02:56:52):
derivatives they use to manipulate the priceof real gold and real silver. And
he's going to use his ETF tomanipulate the price of bitcoin. I think
he's gone from crypto hater in twentyseventeen, the CEO of the world's largest
asset managers now telling everyone who willlisten the crypto will transcend international currencies.

(02:57:13):
He says, more and more ofour global investors are asking us about crypto.
In his view, they have adifferentiating value versus other asset classes.
He says, it's so international it'sgoing to transcend anyone currency. While I
smell a rat, I smell aFink as a matter of fact, a

(02:57:33):
rat Fink, the CEO of blackRock. He says, even look at
the value of our dollar, howit's depreciated the last two months, and
how much it appreciated over the lastfive years. An international crypto product can
really transcend that. Well again,you know what can transcend it is gold.
And I'll mention you know, DavidKnight dot Goal takes you to Tony,
do business with Tony, don't dobusiness with Larry Fink. It's just

(02:57:58):
the craziest thing I've ever seen.But de Santis in this interview with Tucker
Carlson, he vowed to kill fedcoin on day one. That's what the
foo Reserve wants to call it centralBank digital currency fed coin, and they've
already started with fed now, whichis the hostel version bank to bank type
of thing, supposedly to solve theproblems that's already been solved with cash app

(02:58:18):
and with zell and other things likethat. But fed coin is where they
go retail. And so what hesaid to his credit, he said,
the federal government has responsibility to protectus from foreign threats. But if you're
going to now turn the government onthe American people, that is the worst
nightmare of the founding fathers, saidto Santis. And he says that the

(02:58:41):
FED might try to do something unilaterallyeven if Congress doesn't do it. He
says, if I'm president on dayone, we will nix central bank digital
currency. Done dead, not happeningin this country. He said. They
want to get rid of cash andthey want no cryptocurrency. They want CBDCs
to be the sole form of legaltender. It will allow them to prohibit

(02:59:03):
undesirable purchases like fuel, ammunition,he said, and it is a massive
threat to American liberty. We're certainlysaying all the right things, and again,
you know it's important when you know, somebody is there that they do
the right thing and say the rightthing. But of course he's actually taken
action in Florida, you know,the UCC change that he did. It

(02:59:28):
was something that he said, otherstates need to do this as well.
And he's right. You know,we could shut this thing down at the
state level if we follow the exampleof what the Santists and the GOP in
Florida did. You know, theymay be, you know a little bit
weak on some of these issues,but they did the right thing with the
UCC and we could look at thatand use that as a pattern. States

(02:59:50):
need to assert their authority and shutdown the central control of the federal government.
That might be the most important thingto the santisis thank you for listening.
Let me tell you the David NightShow you can listen to with your
ears. You can even watch itby using your eyes. In fact,

(03:00:16):
if you can hear me, thatmeans you're listening to the David Night Show
right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else.
You can find all the links toeverywhere to watch or listen to the

(03:00:39):
show at the David Nightshow dot com. That's a website

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}18Jul23 Janet Yellen on Shrooms; Tucker, Tate, RFK, Peterson on God & Jung

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

24/7 News: The Latest

All Episodes

18Jul23 Janet Yellen on Shrooms; Tucker, Tate, RFK, Peterson on God & Jung

Stuff You Should Know