19May23 ADL: Defamation, Lies, Provocateurs; GOP Ignores Important Pro-Life Free Speech Case — Will SCOTUS? - The REAL David Knight Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:24):
Using free speech to free minds.You're listening to the David Night Show.

(00:48):
As a clock strikes thirteen, it'sFriday, the nineteenth of May. You're
of our Lord, twenty twenty three. Well, today we're going to take
a look a little bit closer atthe Builderberg. But we're also going to
take a look at GETMO torture.There's been some new revelations about that.
There've been revelations about how the AntiDefamation League sought to destroy the John Burt's

(01:14):
Society back in the sixties. Wasvery effective. They actually infiltrated it and
fed information to the news media tocost people their jobs, that type of
thing. Yeah, there are Marxistorganization that is focused on defamation. Elon
Musk got that right. Just getrid of the a. There a Marxist

(01:34):
organization about defamation. And we're alsogoing to take a look at what is
happening with a border. You've gotIllinois, California are not only opening up
their borders, but they are givingspecial new benefits to illegal aliens and it's
going to bankrupt them. We'll beright back. I want to start today

(02:09):
with food information. You know,we talked a lot about egg prices.
We saw them skyrocket up. Andas they were skyrocketing up, everybody said,
oh, yeah, that's the birdflute, that's what's happening while you're
seeing such expensive eggs. Well they'venow crashed very quickly. And if you
take a look at the chart,pull that up, Travis, so they

(02:29):
can see the trajectory of this thing. They went back to January twenty twenty,
and you know, there'd be alittle bit of a spike here and
there. There was, you know, a spike that happened with got down
there, that first spike that happenedas Trump shut everything down right and people
were destroying food on the farms becausethey couldn't get them to the stores and

(02:52):
they couldn't get them in the formthat they needed to have them in.
So that spike there was the Trumpspike, the fake pandemic spike. But
you notice that it just kind ofbounces along until it started going up significantly.
You see that big peak up there, but it asked drop back down
to where it typically is hostale priceof forty nine since per dozen. And

(03:15):
so they talked about the fact thatwell, you know, we had the
USDA figure show that there were threehundred and fourteen million egg laying hens in
the US in April from three hundredand eight million in December. But that's
still lower than three hundred and twentyeight million in December of twenty twenty one.
So let's break this down. Isit about the number of hens?

(03:37):
The farmers are saying this is pricegauging by the middlemen and perhaps by the
grocery stores. But they said,we're not getting the money, and they
said the egg production has not reallydropped. They said, yes, we
have lost some birds, some hens, but it hasn't really dropped that much.
And so if we go back andwe look at these numbers in terms

(03:58):
of the number of hens, lookingthere at the price has now gone back
to forty nine cents hossail. Ithad gotten up to four dollars and sixty
five cents. They've gone up bya factor of ten, essentially eight hundred
and fifty percent increase. So isit due to birds dying from bird flu?

(04:21):
No, the number of hens ifyou look at it from December to
December, the ones that the USDAgave us figures they gave us they said
it went from high of three hundredtwenty eight million in December twenty twenty one
down to three hundred and eight millionin December of twenty twenty two. It
dropped by six percent number of henssix percent. If it drops by six

(04:46):
percent, why would a six percentdrop in the number of hens cause the
prices to go up by eight hundredand fifty percent. Yeah, nearly ten
times. Why would that happen?And as a matter of fact, the
farmer said, are per capita productionfrom the hens has actually gone up,
So the drop was less than sixpercent. Farmers told us that, and

(05:10):
now you can see it in thenumbers. But of course in New York,
they are continuing down the path veryhard of the c forty path that
was originally forty cities. London andNew York were the ones that were key
in that has all kinds of things, you know, the fifteen minute city,
the smart cities, restricting your travel, restricting what you eat, even

(05:34):
restricting the amount of clothing that you'regetting in a course, restricting building and
all the rest of stuff. Butthey also want to restrict your food.
And so New York is beginning totrack food purchases as we always said,
and they're going to put caps onthe amount of meat that can be served
to the public in the public institutions, so that they're starting with us now.

(05:55):
Once they get to the central bank, digital currency or something like that,
they'll be able to take it tothe individual level. Right now.
The other thing they can do isreduce track and reduce the amount of meat
that public institutions are giving to people. But they're all about this and that
is their agenda. Yeah, stopthe food, stop the car, stop
the building, stop the energy productions. A matter of fact, before I

(06:20):
get into this, let me goback and I had a listener it'd sent
me an email about Agenda twenty oneAgenda twenty one explanation and as Patty,
she said, I've noticed in thepodcast that Agenda thirty is spoken of as
a replacement for Agenda twenty one.I've watched Rosa Correa's videos in which she

(06:43):
was an expert on this topic explainedthis. I've also used to think that
Agenda thirty was a replacement for Agendatwenty one until I saw a video from
Rosa correcting it. Agenda twenty oneis for the twenty first century. Agenda
thirty and Agenda fifty or actually representationsof the years twenty thirty and twenty five
for target goals that are outlined inAgenda twenty one for those years. In

(07:04):
other words, Agenda twenty thirty andtwenty fifty, which is the net zero
thing, are still Agenda twenty one. From what I've learned up to the
year twenty thirty completion date, thegoal is to eliminate all private property external
to our bodies. Year twenty fifty, the goal is when we take they
take over our bodies and to transhumanismcompletion date. Yeah, there's been a

(07:25):
lot of talk about six G andits role in terms of interacting with us
on a very physical level. Letjust put it that way. The details
are very vague, but you know, they imply that that's what it is.
She says, I'm no way judginganyone for the confusion, because it's
unthankful for most people to comprehend theevil plan. The confusion is deliberate because

(07:49):
it's from Satan. I wish Icould go back to being ignorant of these
things. Well, we don't haveto be concerned about being ignorant. I
think we need to double down onthis stuff. But let me just clarify
that and I wanted to read thatbecause if anybody is confused about that,
I want them to understand it.And I need to double down on it
myself, because I have said Inever was under the impression that it was

(08:15):
two different things. It is onelong agenda to take us into transhumanism,
for depopulation, for attack on humanity, enslavement of humanity, and I've said
many times, and I was surprisedthat she thought that I thought it was
two different things. I said,it was always Agenda twenty one, and

(08:35):
they just gave it a more specificyou know, somewhere around twenty fourteen.
Twenty fifteen was when they started talkingabout the UN twenty thirty Agenda for Sustainable
Development. I said, it's nota different thing. They just got more
specific about it. I said,they had this goal that they were telling
us that was kind of nebulous.But of course they have a very specific
date by which they want these benchmarksto happen. And so when they started

(08:58):
talking about twenty third, they startedtalking about a specific date and they gave
us more details about what they wantto do to us. Same thing with
twenty fifty. We're starting to getmore and more details about that as well,
But for now they're getting pretty concreteabout twenty thirty, and so they

(09:18):
want to achieve a thirty three percentreduction carbon emissions from food by twenty thirty.
But again it is a continuum,you know, you and gender twenty
one was sometimes the twenty first century. They added the details, they added
the time frame, and folks wereonly about seven years out. And as
I've said, it's not just theypicked that date. I'm convinced they picked

(09:41):
that date because that is the tailend of the Fourth Turning that we are
in the middle of right now,a complete upheaval of society globally, all
of the institutions, a turning upsidedown of everything. These people want to
use. That's part of the timing. They want to set this up in

(10:05):
the time frame that Strauss and howin their book the Fourth Turning. Previous
to that, they had a bookcalled Generations. That's why everybody talks about
millennials and Generation XYZ, that typeof thing. They noticed this pattern of
every eighty years, all the institutionsare basically reset, and so we can
have a society that is a freersociety. That was the Fourth Turning of

(10:28):
seventeen seventy six, or we canhave a society that moves towards greater centralization
and control and consolidation. We hadthe industrial revolution that happened at the civil
war, civil wars in Europe.As I've mentioned before, this I think
is going to be They're hoping it'sgoing to be a revolution of controlling us

(10:52):
through technology, artificial intelligence and theglobal ID and global coin is all about
that. He calls it world coin, Sam Altman, does I think that's
what they're talking about right now.At Builderberg they said, oh, look,
AI is at the top of theagenda. Well, the list is
there in alphabetical order. But Ithink it's not so much AI as it

(11:13):
is world coin, in my opinion, because Builderberg had focused from their very
beginning. The first time they didit was nineteen fifty four second meeting,
and it was all about how dowe unify Europe? How do we do
it economically. It's one of thereasons why you got the World Economic Forum.
The means of global control that thesepeople have seized. They will use

(11:35):
war if they need to, forsure, but primarily it's about financial control,
financial strings in control. That's whyit's so important to get outside of
that system. I keep you know, putting you know, I like Tony
Arderburn. He's a great supporter ofthe program. And I'm not selling you

(11:56):
gold and silver, you know,to make money. I'm telling you this
is what you need to do totry to get out of the system as
much as you can. So youknow, Tony Harderman is set up David
Knight dot gold and takes you tohis wise Wolf. There's a lot of
different ways that he's got there.You can do it. You can buy
you know, stuff direct or youcan set up on a monthly basis.

(12:16):
But the bottom line is we've gotto start preparing for ourselves because this,
I guess we can say hydra.You know, it's not the password for
buildberg Hil Hydra as a whisper endeach other's ear and they give each other
a hug. We got to protectourselves against hydra as much as we can
because it's everywhere, It really iseverywhere. So anyway, they want thirty

(12:39):
three percent reduction in carbon emissions fromfood by twenty thirty. They set in
New York. They're putting caps onhow much red meat can be served in
public institutions as part of a sweepinginitiative to achieve a thirty three percent reduction
carbon emissions from food by twenty thirty. Now they want to stop food.
You know, they've been very clearthe C forty agenda that New York in

(13:00):
London kind of co started. Nomeat, no dairy. We got to
stop the food. We got tostop the cars, we got to stop
building, we got to stop energyproduction, we've got to stop everything.
Net zero zero you out the additionof household food consumption data. They're now
putting it in right, So they'rebuilding their infrastructure step by step. Right

(13:22):
now, they can only do itto the public institutions, but they're starting
to collect more and more data fromeverybody. And the guy who is doing
it in New York is the guywho founded the Google Smart City subsidiary Sidewalk
Labs. Before the fake pandemic hit, I was a scheduled to go to

(13:43):
Toronto to report on the sidewalk labsup there, because that's at the center
of this stuff. I canceled itbecause I didn't want to get stuck in
Canada could close the borders. I'mnot going that. I was gonna go
in Well, I got very sickin December and you know, from a
flu like thing. I don't knowif it was what they call COVID or

(14:05):
not, but the bottom line isit was very sick in December. I
couldn't go. And then January allthis talk started and it's like, no,
it's likely to happen, especially inCanada. So anyway, Sidewalk Labs
was set up in Toronto and itwas a smart city experiment by Google.

(14:26):
I think the name is very telling, sidewalk Labs. You're going to be
living on the sidewalk. You're gonnabe walking on the sidewalk. There's no
cars. But the people who boughtinto it and volunteered to be a part
of that program, many of themsaid, well, I thought I was
going to be saving the environment,doing something green. They just want to
track everything that I'm doing there.This whole thing is just a surveillance system.

(14:48):
It's like, yeah, yeah,that's what this is about. I
hope we don't have to be thatstupid and that dense to understand this before
what happens to us, because oncethis thing rolls out, and it's not
an experiment that you can opt outof, it's going to be really bad.
People need to understand what this isbefore they get entrapped into it.

(15:11):
But we're sleepwalking into this, justlike the environmentalist did, oh, let's
save the planet. Then they findout it's a technological panoptagon prison surveillance system.
That's what it is. And sothis person agar Walla, there's a
guy's name Roe Hit agar Walla isrunning this in New York City. He's

(15:31):
running the surveillance and the totaling ofwhat people eat. And he was a
guy who founded sidewalk Lambs and he'scelebrated in a press conference the expanded data
collection. He says, we're forgingquote a new standard for what cities have
to do have to do. Soit's going to a track, also track,

(15:54):
not just apply a carbon score toyour food, but it's also going
to track things like air travel andhelp care, help care. Yeah,
the climate mcguffin to kill us.You know, I think when we look
food, they said, is thethird biggest source of cities emissions, right

(16:14):
after building and transportation. Of course, Eric Adams says, it's easy to
talk about emissions coming from buildings,but when we talk about beef, I
don't know if people are ready tohave this conversation. Hey, pal,
there's nothing to discuss. It's noneof your business. Eric Adams is a
vegetarian. He wants to impose thaton you. He likes it, says,
I love it, it's great.Maybe health there, we'll find good
for you. Do what you wantto do. I'd rather have meat.

(16:37):
So he's going to force this onyou. And the sad thing about this
is that, you know, andI talked about much of this a couple
of weeks ago. I think it'sgood for us to go back and revisit
it again. Children's Health Defense arethe ones who wrote this article. They
went into a lot of detail andthey're trying to explain because they buy into

(17:00):
the climate mcguffin. They are saying, well, there's a way that we
can make this work for all ofus, you know, and still reduce
emissions. And so they say alternativegrazing systems like the regenerative agricultural systems that
some people are using to reclaim theland that has been harmed by big factory

(17:23):
type of systems. It said,now let's do it on a different scale,
in a different way, that typeof thing, land that's suitable for
cattle, production is many times notsuitable for growing other types of agriculture and
vice versa. So they said,so, let's let's understand different types of
land had different types of uses,and we don't want to buy into this
thing where we want to just purgeall the animals. Like some radical environmentalists

(17:45):
and of course Children's Health Defenses RFKJunior's organization, they sincerely believe the climate
change is a problem and they've gotto dance around this thing somehow, and
so they're looking at some alternative solutions. They don't understand what this agenda is
about. Their naive just like thepeople who volunteer to go into sidewalk labs

(18:08):
in Toronto. They don't realize realizewhat the real purpose of this thing is.
And I said that about some ofthe great engineers at Toyota and other
places, saying, oh, okay, you need zero emissions. We can
do zero emissions. How about this. No, we don't like that solution.
No, we don't like what.You don't like that. No,

(18:29):
it's got to be the jab No, I've emect it right, it's got
to be the battery electric cars sowe can control them on the grid.
We don't want anything else. Fuelcells, hydrogen, No, we're not
going to look at those technologies,you know, improve those technologies. No,
we're not going to support that atall in any way, shape,
or It's got to be the batterycharged off of the central grid. And

(18:55):
so they don't understand that this isactually an imprisonment system. They're trying to
work within this thing. These peoplealways talking about greenhouse gases. This is
greenhouse gas lighting. Don't buy intothe gas narrative. It's greenhouse gas lighting.
Don't argue about how many angels canfit on the head of a pen,

(19:18):
or how much unicorn farts we canreduce with us, or that it's
nonsense. You gotta attack it headon. That's what's dangerous about this.
You get somebody who's a true believerlike RFKJ, and it gets dangerous because
he's going to propagate the greenhouse gaslighting. He thinks that that's what it's
really about, and these people thatmaybe he understands that it is a lockdown

(19:44):
system, or maybe he's just beenduped. I don't know. Either way,
it doesn't really matter, because thedangerous thing is that if we continue
to propagate this line, they're goingto enslave us. So they go through
this whole thing. They say,you know, if we were to raise
have pasture raised b instead of thisfactory industrial system, we could sequester carbon.
It could become a carbon sink.YadA, YadA, YadA. We

(20:07):
could have regenerative livestock farming. Yeah, whatever works, I don't care,
but stop with the greenhouse gas lighting. They said. Sadly, there's a
percentage of the population that for whateverreason, has decided that animals in the
ecosystem are bad and the way tohave a healthier planet is to give up
on the animal impact for whatever reason. It's the constant propaganda, the lies

(20:32):
in the propaganda coming from the media, coming from the school, is coming
from all of the gang Green right, the green gang that is turned into
Gang Green on our societies. It'skilling us. We got to cut it
off. Organization behind the fifteen MinuteCity is now mapping consumption based emissions from

(20:53):
New York and London. The partnershipis between New York London. The C
forty organization that two of them essentiallyformed initially was proposed in London. Michael
Bloomberg jumped on it with both feets, So you know, New York and
London are the center of that Cforty organization, but also American Express a
big part of this. Why whywould a banking organization getting well because of

(21:17):
CBDC Right, that's how it willultimately be tracked some kind of digital processing
or digital payments. Right, evenif you don't have cbdc American Express can
jump in there and say, yeah, we just measured what you bought,
which you've used, how you traveled, close, you bought, meet,
you bought all the rest of itstuff. The press release does not make

(21:37):
the purpose of emissions mapping inventories explicit. It simply states that the inventories quote
will enable London and New York Cityto develop a suite of actions to incentivize
more sustainable consumption and collaboration with peopleand businesses. Yeah right, it's a
public private partnership, right, PPP, Now think of that as profits,

(22:04):
politicians and propaganda, not a publicprivate partnership. That is nothing but fascism
anyway. It's a merger of governmentand corporations. Is just corporate fascism.
So you see, PPP, thinkcorporate fascism, and the way that works
is profits, politicians and propaganda buildingdata, inventories and partnership with city businesses

(22:27):
is important for cities to measure,plan and act to ensure that our cities
become better places to live for allpeople and sustainable businesses can thrive. The
press release, they said, basisits claims and report by the University of
Leeds and a developer are UP group. Are UP is Rockefeller supported World Economic

(22:49):
Form affiliated organization that uses Fourth IndustrialRevolution technologies to transform cities. They said,
this is the profit part of thefascism, the corporate fascism. They
promise that immense quantities of highly detaileddata can produce a new level of control.
Oh yeah, they will a newlevel of control, a control of

(23:11):
people, not of gases. It'sgreenhouse gas lighting, making possible more efficient
and sustainable use of the world's preciousmaterials. So sea forties cities are shutting
down, food, clothing, transportation, all of the stuff. Three items
of clothing per year. As Imentioned the past, you'll have one plane

(23:33):
flight every three years of less thana thousand miles. This is what they
wanted for. Of course, there'llbe no restriction on what they get.
I'm all going to turn into SamBrittain stealing people's suitcases, right, you'll
get them of the right gender.He's just had another charge but against them,

(23:56):
felony charge. And when you lookat these, he saw the woman
he stole her suitcase in Houston.I don't have the picture here. I
wasn't going to cover the article thatit just came to mind. It's so
comical. He's on the run now. I can just picture him trying to
run in high heels. And ofcourse he does stick out in the crowd,
you know, bald head, mustache, heavy red lipstick. He does

(24:19):
stick out in the crowd wearing adress. But so I don't know how
far he's going to get. Butin this Houston situation, it was a
woman from another country, Nigeria something. She had this real flamboyant dress that
she had designed and it had itwas red, a big flowing skirt that

(24:41):
went out and had had these biggold swishes on it, really big and
all over it. Very distinctive,the fabric, the cut, everything about
it. Very distinctive custom design ofhers. And so he puts it on
and he wears it to a publicevent, gets his picture taking. She
sees it in the paper that that'smy dress. I mean, there's not
another US like that anywhere. Prettyobvious, just the craziest anyway, Sorry,

(25:04):
back to this the Sea forty.Meanwhile, these people are trying to
steal us. That's why I don'twant to get into too far into Sam
Britain. Yes, the tranning agendais a big part of this stuff.
These people are trying to enslave andstarve us of everything, liberty, food,
you name it, energy, TheSea forty Good food cities accelerator,

(25:27):
they said, signatory cities, andthere's just about one hundred of them right
now, just under one hundred.I want to achieve a quote planetary healthy
diet by twenty thirty. To savethe planet, you got to eat plants.
Meat bands, said one person,are the most extreme policy for advancing

(25:49):
environmental impact to meat production. Thinkabout what we ban. We ban toxic
chemicals like agent orange and things thatwe know have bad environmental impacts. Well,
you know that's um. But whenwe think about making policies, we
have to ask what's the issue ofconcern, and we want to try to
target that exact issue. This iswhy I say, you know, this

(26:11):
is children's health defense talking. Theyhave some good things to say. We're
got to say, what is theissue of concern. You're concerned about CO
two? The plants that you sayyou want to eat, Right, we're
only supposed to eat plants. Guesswhat plants need CO two. You're not
going to have plants if you sequesterthe carbon dioxide. They need release the

(26:33):
carbon dioxide. That's what we need, right, We need more carbon dioxide
if you want more plants. It'sjust that simple. What's the matter with
these people? And we have seenas the amount of carbon dioxide has gone
up, their models have failed totemperature has not risen. That certainly not
the way they said it was goingto. And so we have to say,
you know, what is the exactissue here? The exact issue is

(26:55):
that they're lying to us. Yeah, zero point four percent amosphere carbon dioxide?
How much of that is natural?How much of that is man made
by cars? It's just nonsense,nonsense. I think there's other options,
she said, and other opportunities besidesbanning or capping meat products to solve a

(27:18):
nonexistent problem. It's just amazing.So you know, we can go with
things that will create less resistance thanbanning meat to solve our non existent problem.
That is the insanity of where weare right now. Well, if
we look further beyond New York City, in London, we have John Kerry

(27:44):
who is also saying we got toshut down farms. He has a special
Climate Envoy for Biden, and he'sthe envoy to the Climate. I don't
know if he's talked to Mother Earthyet. Perhaps he walks the halls of
the White House stalking to Mother Earthand Eleanor Roosevelt. I don't know what
he's doing. Kerry noted that agriculturalproduction is responsible for roughly one third of

(28:07):
the world's total greenhouse gas emissions,and argued that reducing those emissions must be
front and center in the quest todefeat global warming. Oh well, he
made the remarks of the Department ofAgricultures climate summit in Washington, d C.
That's the thing that should really scareyou, the US Department of Agriculture,
who is right now and as wespeak, coming after an organic Amish

(28:32):
farmer while they green light GMO pigs. And these are the people who want
to tell us what we can eat. It's absolutely and the attack on farming
by Western leaders is beyond shocking,criminal, treasonous. I think it is
a seditious conspiracy. Frankly, ifever there was one. For his part,

(28:55):
carry neglected dimision that though agriculture ispurportedly responsible for roughly a third of
the world's total greenhouse gas emissions,it is undeniably responsible for the sustenance and
the continued existence of one of theworld's roughly eight billion people. But again,
see this is somebody else opposing Kerry. How do they oppose it,
Well, they say that it's notthat bad. You know, the emissions

(29:18):
are we got to have those emissionsor whatever. We got to stop with
this greenhouse gas lighting. We gotto not buy into this and say well
I've got a better solution than youdo. No, you have to attack
the lie at its foundation. Inthe UK, Birmingham Council is going to
turn a ring road into a park, try to get everybody riding bicycles like

(29:40):
they do in Copenhagen, and theydo ride a lot of bicycles in Copenhagen.
The Labor run Council in Birmingham,England said they want to turn what
is already now a famous ring roadthat goes around it into a park that
encircles the city. We don't evenwant to have cars. I mean,
we look at these fifteen minute citythings that are being done in Oxford and

(30:02):
Cambridge and other places like that.They say, well, you can't go
from these We're going to set upthese little sectors here and you can't go
from one to the other unless yougo to the outer ring. Go.
Well, they're gonna get rid ofthe Outer Ring now, you see,
it's always chaos from the inside andincremental. So they said, according to
the plans of how Birmingham might lookby twenty forty, they want to double

(30:25):
their green spaces, built about onehundred and twenty four miles of walking and
cycling routes. We'll create more jobs, We'll have better transport options. Oh
really, a bicycle is a bettertransport option for somebody who's got a disability.
A bicycle is a better transport optionfor somebody who was elderly, or
on and on and on. Whatabout the people who do construction, people

(30:47):
who do maintenance, So you don'twant them in there either. I guess
you know, grab your your stuffthat you've got to get, that you
got to replace. The Well,we won't have an HVAC unit. I'm
gonna say, put that on yourback and and grab your bicycle and bicycle
over to the place we're going toreplace it. Right, they can ballance

(31:08):
it on your head or something.No, but they won't be an HVAC
unit. Anyway. We're gonna mapout how we will become carbon zero and
how we will green our city inthe future. Well, there's another kind
of green. The people running thisscam getting that kind of green, the
green money. Mister Ward said theplan has been very well received by the

(31:32):
people who are going to be gettingthe green money. But they haven't talked
any motorists. He said, theywere really excited about this happening cause they
couldn't find any I don't know.I Meanwhile, in the United States,
back to the United States and Bideadministration, Biden has vetoed legislation to block
solar panel teriffs waivers. You seeall that I concerned about the dead ceiling

(31:55):
nah nah, yeah, And whatis this about. Well, let's say
tariffs that have been put duties thathave been put on solar panels made in
Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand. Why because they're really being made in
China, and China is you know, this was about trying to have If

(32:16):
you think solar panels are good,we need to start making them in the
US instead of forcing everybody to buythem from China. But of course China
has got pretty much a lock onthe most of the metals that are going
to be needed, materials that aregoing to be needed for their green agenda.
The way are stemmed from a CommerceDepartment investigation last year. They found
that major Chinese solar panel makers weretrying to dodge US tariffs on their products

(32:43):
finishing them in Southeast Asian nations.Imports from those countries make up about eighty
percent of the US solar panels supply. So I said, we don't want
to we're going to force everybody tobuy solar panels, but we don't want
to buy them all from China andbecome dependent on them for all of our
energy in that way, So we'regonna put tariffs on them. So trying

(33:04):
to responds by shipping them to tothese other countries in Southeast Asia. Let
them do a little bit of workand pass it on. So what is
the solution? You know, evenif you want to go along with their
greenhouse gas lighting. Look at whatjust happened in Finland. A newly launched
Finnish nuclear plant sees electricity prices plunge, plunge by seventy five. Where have

(33:30):
we seen this before? Everywhere youlook, energy prices going up and up
and up and up because they're tryingto throttle everything down. But they put
just one nuclear power plant online inFinland, and Finland uses a lot of
electricity, they're the highest per capitaelectricity consumption in the European Union. They

(33:52):
put one nuclear power plant online thatthey've been fighting to not have. What
emissions does it have? Is ithaving these greenhouse emis? See, it's
not about that. Yeah, theyfight the nuclear power plants just like they
will fight zeromission fuel cell vehicles orhydrogen zero emission vehicles. They're looking for

(34:13):
things that are going to make moneyprofits for the partners of these politicians,
and so they use the green stuffas propaganda. So the austerity is a
means of control. It's forced,it's fake, and they don't want any
solutions whatsoever. But they caved inFinland. It was getting pretty close to

(34:34):
finishing and they kept delaying it.But because of all the sanctions causing electricity
to go sky high because Finland hasthe highest per capital electricity consumption in the
EU and energy prices had risen veryvery sharply. Well, they backed off.
The chief executive of Finland's National Gridsaid, well, yeah, it's

(34:57):
got its own risks and a nuclearpower plant. We're happy to find follow
up on that, but he saidwind power is expected to be our largest
source still cowtowing to the wind,right, wind and solar. They that's
the ones that they prefer. Hesaid, it's going to be the largest
source of energy production in Finland bytwenty twenty seven. Well, why why
are they waiting so long? Imean, you know they've had these windmills

(35:20):
for a very long time. Thewind's been blowing, They got the windmill
solutions. Why isn't that working?He said, No, nuclear is currently
being a useful and reliable substitute andcheaper cheaper the wind power is anywhere is
not at all free as it wouldwant you to believe. Cost a lot

(35:43):
of money to build those windmills.As we see, they're not lasting,
cost a lot of money to buildwith solar panels, and they don't last
forever either. You know, theyhave a life cycle with them as well.
So anyway, it is useful,it's cheaper, and it is reliable,
and that's the key thing, becausewind power is very unreliable. He

(36:05):
said. Wind power is capable ofattracting greater investment. However, with nuclear
energy seemingly being blacklisted by a numberof environmental investors, he said, nuclear
seems is not very attractive for theinvestors. This is about the bankers,
the elites who are making the moneyoff of this stuff. They're pushing us
into these solutions that they've already boughtinto. It's not that they make any

(36:28):
sense, even with their greenhouse gaslighting. He says. It's an option,
and I'm sure that our politicians wouldbe in favor of these decisions.
But who dares to put billions ofeuros into nuclear? He said, yeah,
who would want to have something thatreduces power by power costs by seventy
five? Oh, we don't wantthat, because this is about chrony capitalism.

(36:51):
Poland has secured four billion dollars inUS funding to help build twenty small
modular nuclear reactors across the country bytwenty twenty nine. Hungry has focused on
expanding it's nuclear power plant. Germany, however, has gone in the other
direction and they have closed there arethree remaining nuclear power plants last month.

(37:12):
And so in Germany, you're seeinghigh inflation, you're seeing high energy costs,
you're seeing a sharp decline an industrialoutput, and it's causing the IMF.
To your predict, a recession isin the card for the suicidal Germans
who are being driven by the GangGreen Gang. So we're gonna take a

(37:35):
quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about the CIA's
torture program, We're gonna talk aboutthe Anti Defamation League's defamation program, and
we're going to talk about an updateas to what is going on with David
Delight and he's trying to get thisto the Supreme Court. It is absolutely
amazing what has happened civil trials againsthim, as well as what Laala Harris

(38:00):
and her successor, Javier Bassarah,who is now at HHS buying the baby
parts that he tried to expose atrafficking in and then by his successor as
well. We'll be right back ina world of deceit. Telling the truth

(38:52):
is a revolutionary act. You're listeningto the David Night Show. Yeah,
I'll just say one more thing,saying, you know, there's a couple
of articles not about how Biden isbragging about how his EPA is going to
shut down private car use and forceeverybody into electric vehicles, and the reason
I say it's going to shut everythingdown. In the Conservative article where they

(39:15):
talk about it, they go,well, you know, these these electric
vehicles not zero emission. You haveto power them somehow. And the power
plants that we have have emissions,and so and I've said this years and
years and years ago, talking toDerek Peters, I said, so,
you know, they they think thatthese power plants don't have any emissions.

(39:37):
Maybe you know what we should dois just let us put a big balloon
on our tailpipe and we can drivearound collecting all the gases, and then
we can We'll have to periodically goto one of the power plants and just
take the balloon off and release allthe gases there where nobody sees it,
and it'd be okay, Well,they you know, that's not a good

(39:59):
argument to you to say, well, the power plants are putting out gases.
The power plants is so dirty andIndia and of course in China,
but in India, the stats wereif you had a gasoline car that got
about thirty four miles per gallon,that would be cleaner than electric car that
had zero emissions because it's being poweredby a dirty, cheap and dirty power

(40:24):
plant. But the Biden administration hasnot only ramped up regulations on car emissions
to destroy ownership of internal combustion enginesin just a few years, but at
the same time they said, yeah, we see that. You know you're
gonna make You're gonna try to makearguments to comply with them about the greenhouse

(40:47):
gas lighting. They said, yeah, we're going to shut down the power
plants as well, which is whyI say they're going to shut down all
private cars, because they're putting emissionstandards, first time it's ever been done,
being done by the Biden administration.The EPA within the Biden administration ramping
up to absurd levels, beyond absurdlevels. They were already at absurd levels,
wrapping up to de facto prohibition theemissions on cars, and then starting

(41:14):
with the emission regulations on power plants. So they're going to basically shut the
power plants down because they will notbe able to comply. But let's talk
about what the CIA is doing.We have a GITMO prisoners graphic details of
CIA torture in a new report,and this is Abu Zubaida. And this

(41:37):
is the guy, by the way. You know, he's not someone They
know that they've got somebody who's nota terrorist, but they're not going to
let him go. And he hasbeen kind of the center of the torture
abuses that are there. They kindof used him to practice on to establish

(41:59):
these programs. Report published this weekfeaturing previously unreleased drawings by Abu Zubaida,
a fifty two year old Saudi hasbeen imprisoned by the US for more than
twenty years at CIA black sites andGIPMO. It offers new insight in the
torture suffered by a man caught upin a case of mistaken identity. This

(42:22):
is kind of like Franz Kafka eachGeorge Orwell. The report, titled American
Torturers FBI and CIA Abuses at DarkSites and Guantanamo, is based on sketches
and descriptions by Zubaida and other Waron ter torture victims. Quote. Despite

(42:44):
the efforts of the federal government,particularly in the CIA, to conceal evidence
of this actual operation of the enhancedinterrogation techniques EIS as they call them,
deployed on detainees. Our steady drumbeat of disclosures that have come out,
it provided an unparalleled view into thisdisgraceful episode in our nation's history that continues

(43:08):
to go on. A matter offact, that this whole cynical thing about
enhanced interrogation techniques. John Rizzo wasthe chief lawyer for the CIA. He
said he wrote a book called CompanyMan because they referred to the CIA as
the company. And he said whenhe was watching the Church Committee hearings showing

(43:30):
how the CIA and the NSA hadbeen spying on Americans without a warrant,
so they said, oh, we'llstop that. We will come up with
a Foreign Intelligent Surveillance Act, willcreate a fi as a court, all
the rest of the stuff. No, they should have disbanded these organizations that
were rogue and criminals. One ofthe things we should learn about the FBI
right now. Conservatives understand how corruptthey've been, how politicized they've been.

(43:57):
There isn't any room to form them. There wasn't any room for them in
the constitution. Get rid of themnow because they're just going to keep coming
back. As a matter of fact, we saw how the fires An Act
that was supposed to restrain them fromwhat they've been doing, from their inceptions
spying on Americans without a warrant,they actually used the Fires Act to spy

(44:19):
on Americans and politicians without a warrant. That's what the FBI was using,
is what the CIA was using.And so John Rizzo watched those hearings.
He was a lawyer. He said, he said to myself, the CIA
needs a good lawyer, and saidthat's why he went to work. He
went to work for them because hesaw the abuses and the Frank and the
Church Committee hearings. Frank Church justamazing to look at these guys. I

(44:42):
mean, they truly are. Andyou talk about all this torture stuff and
everything, and you know the pardons. Trump was offering two million dollar pardons
and John Kiriaku talked about that.He blew the whistle and the torture,
went to jail for that. Heis not ashamed to tell people the truth
about this. As a matter offact, you know, when I've interviewed

(45:07):
John several times, and every timewe talk about it, he says,
I'd do it again without even thinkingabout it. And yet this week that
question was asked of an FBI whistleblower. Listen to this exchange. In
congressional testimony, I sworn to defendthis country from enemies, both foreign and
domestic, even if that means sacrificingmy life. I've lived that oath out

(45:30):
since first en listening in the army, consistently saying here am I send me.
My oath, however, did notinclude sacrificing the hopes, dreams,
and livelihood of my family, mystrong, beautiful and courageous wife and our
four sweet and beautiful daughters who haveendured this process along with me, and
weaponized fashion. The FBI allowed meto accept orders to a new position halfway

(45:51):
across the country. They allowed usto sell my families home. They ordered
me to report to the new unitwhen our youngest daughter was two weeks old.
Then on my first day on thenew assignment, they suspended me,
rendering my family homeless. They refusedto release our goods, including our clothes.
For weeks. All I wanted todo was serve my country by stopping

(46:15):
bad guys and protecting the innocent.To my chagrin, bad guys have begun
running parts of the government, makingit difficult to continue to serve this nation
and protect the innocent. But I, for one, will never stop trying.
I'll never forget my oath. Sorry, I couldn't. My foot switch

(46:38):
got twisted around there. Sorry.He was also asked after that, what
would you say to the whistleblowers,and he said, I would tell him
not to do it. He's sayingthat he would do it, continue to
do it, but he would tellother people not to do it because of
what it had cost him. JohnKuyaku said that he would do it again.

(47:04):
Yeah, it had a big effecton his family as well. But
you see people like Rizzo who aredishing the stuff out, and he was
proud of the fact Rizzo that hecame up with the euphanism enhanced interrogation techniques.
It's torture, it's torture. Sothe report notes that Zubaida's drawings viscerally

(47:29):
convey the brutal reality that the CIAsought to hide with his calculating destruction of
video recordings of torture conducted by hisagents, and who was it that led
the cover up and destruction of theinformation. Gina Haspell, who became Trump
Trump picked to head up the CIA. After that she produced the lies of
weapons about weapons of mass destruction thatwere used to start the Iraq War.

(47:52):
Trump acknowledges that those were lies.He talks about how bad it was,
and yet the person who produced thelies and covered up the torture that produced
the lines, he promoted the headof the CIA. It's just you talk
about Trump derangement syndrome, this cognitivedissonance of the MAGA cult to continue to

(48:13):
support this guy, it's just beyondbelief. Zobaido was the first so called
high value detainee to be tortured.They treated him as a human guinea pig.
Previously unseen drawings show the various torturemethods used by the CIA against Abou
Zobaida, including physical sexual assault,waterboarding, and more. Everyone agrees they

(48:37):
tortured the wrong guy. They wentahead anyway so they could get permission to
torture other people. Now, oneperson told the Guardian, and of course
John Kiyaka says the same thing aswell. He said, you know,
he was there when they arrested him. He was the first one to talk
to him, and he said,they got the wrong guy, but they
just keep torturing him. Then VicePresident Dick Cheney, national Security Advisor Condeliza

(49:02):
Rice seeied A Director George Tennant gavethe green light for US agents to torture
Zobaida, even after learning that hewas cooperating. During one discussion on the
matter, then Attorney General John Ashcroftreportedly remarked, why are we talking about
this in the White House. Don'ttalk about the White House. History will

(49:24):
not judge this kindly. Right,Let's talk about this quietly somewhere we can
cover it up. Maybe Zobaida wassubjected to interrupted drownding technique that we call
waterboarding eighty three times rape under thepretext of rectal feeding, shackling and excruciating

(49:45):
stress positions, sleep, sensory andfood deprivation, confinement and small boxes,
exposure to extreme temperatures, loud music, death threats, beatings, being slammed
into walls, sexual and religious humiliation, and other abuses. As if that's

(50:07):
not sufficient. Most of torture techniqueswere approved by the George W. Bush
administration. The people, by theway, you know who pushed in the
Patriot Act I should concern you.Included waterboarding, deprivation, stress positions,
the use of live music, dogs, slamming into walls, solitary confinement,

(50:29):
exposure to extreme temperatures. All ofthese things are illegal under both domestic and
international law. And so According toa two thousand and five report on the
National Library of Medicine, a federalagency, based on reviews of military documents,
twenty six War on ter detainees diedas a result of criminal homicide,

(50:52):
although the paper did not say howmany prisoners died on the battlefield or while
in US custody. As a prisonersdied of torture at Asa dot Ad Bagram
Gardez in Afghanistan and at aboo GharabCamp White Horse, Bazra Mosel Pickrit in

(51:14):
an Iraq another identified facility. Zbidahas never been charged with any crime.
He's never had a trial. Thisis your American government doing this. Think
about it. It's been tortured fortwenty three years, brutally tortured, has
never been charged. Are talking aboutcivil asset forfeiture and the outrates that that

(51:37):
is. And of course you know, people like Joe Biden being proud of
his role in it. You knowhow it began initially, Well, we
had to step things up somehow andget money away from organized crime figures because
they can afford the best lawyers.And so let's start with some confiscation stuff,
but we'll have to have a conviction. Well, let's not have the

(51:57):
conviction. And then after a fewyears they keep adding other things, but
they still have some restrictions as towhat they can confiscate. Then they remove
all restrictions as to what they canconfiscate, and now they're charging inanimate objects
with being accessories to crime and stealingwhatever they wish and splitting it between local

(52:21):
law enforcement and the federal government.Here's a guy, however, who's been
tortured and never convicted, never evencharge of the crime, but they torture
him. This is the way thatit goes when we allow our government to
escape the rule of law. See, all the leftists will tell you democracy
is the core value. It's notthe core value. The law is the

(52:45):
core value. The king in Americais the constitution. When these people do
as they wish, and what dowe see for the last three years,
Oh, we got an emergency here. You know, we got a public
health emergency. We'll do as wewish. There's no law to restrain us
about anything, and every time thathappens, you see unrestrained tyranny. Let's

(53:05):
take a look at what the ADLdid to the John Birt's Society. This
is an article from Information Liberation,but it's actually a couple of interviews,
an interview and a book review.The interview was about the book. It
was George Washington University professor Matthew Dalek, who was doing a book on the

(53:30):
Anti Defamation League, and they gavehim access, they said, to some
of their historical data, and itshowed that they'd set up a very extensive
spying and operation on the John BirtSociety. Infiltration, the same type of

(53:52):
stuff that you see the FBI doit. Maybe this is why the FBI
likes him so much, the kindof vote, you know, private gun
for hire for the FBI. Andthey were pointing the fingers in a lot
of different organizations and calling them terroristorganizations, just like the Southern Priory Law
Center. The FBI love that.Oh look, we got an independent source
out here that points the finger atsomebody, so now we can label them

(54:13):
as domestic terrorists. It's not us, you know, calling them. These
other people agree with us, right, And we got two or three witnesses
out there, we got the SouthernPoorty Law Center, we got the ADL.
They're saying, these people are hateful, they're racist, they're domestic terrorists.
So we're justified in doing whatever wewant to do to them. You
say, they use them that way, it's a partnership. So let's just

(54:35):
call him the Defamation League because that'swhat Elon must said, and he's right,
that's what they do. The DefamationLeague ran an extensive, multidimensional counterintelligence
operation, that's what the person whoinvestigated it say, complete with undercover agents
with code names, in order todestroy the John Birt's Society. And these

(54:57):
are internal ADL documents, and sothis guy, Matthew dolic As George Washington
University professor, given access to thesethings. If you look at their tactics,
see look at their goals, youlook at what they hate. These
people are Marxist. It is theMarxist Defamation League. They use the anti
Semitism charts, they use that toshield themselves. But they act like Stalin.

(55:23):
They act like the KGB. Theyact like the tautalitarian communist. The
book was called Bircher's How the JohnBirt's Society Radicalized the American Right. And
so there's an interview in this article, an interview that he did with a
Jewish newspaper, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, And so they interviewed him about the

(55:47):
book. And so they said,before we get to the Jewish aspect of
the book, meaning the chapter onthe Anti Defamation League's relationship with John Burt
Society, let's take a step back. Who are the so called Bircher's and
why do they matter? They said, well, that it's heyday. It

(56:07):
had sixty thousand, one hundred thousandmembers organized into small chapters. They sent
out literature trying to give members roadmapsor ideas of what they could do.
And you know, I've had Iread The New American online. I've had
many many interviews with the New Americanpeople. The John Burst Society sends me

(56:28):
their magazine on a regular basis.I look at their stuff all the time.
I agree with them, and I'venever seen anything that is racists or
calls for violence from them, nonewhatsoever. All of this is a lie.
All of it is defamation. Theysent out literature trying to give members

(56:49):
roadmaps or ideas of what they coulddo. Yeah, telling people, Hey,
here's what's happening in your area,in your state, in your community,
whatever. This is what you needto do. Write letters and organize
and educate people as to what isgoing on. It's an education and a
citizen involvement movement. They try toportray them as a terrorist organization. The
terrorist organization is the ADL and theFBI. They're the terrorists. They believe

(57:16):
that the mass education of the publicwas needed because their traditional two party politics
is not going to be effective atexposing the communist threat. They would form
front groups such as impeach Earl Warrenor support your local police. That's what
I remember about the John Burst Societyyears and years ago. They're very concerned

(57:37):
about the centralization of law enforcement,federalization of policing in history. Sixty years
of history has shown how far aheadof the curve they were. Yeah,
prophetic, really. They tried toban certain books they saw pushing socialism in

(57:59):
schools way before there was CRT,and they went open about it. Some
vichers ran for school board seats andthey protested at libraries. See, they
were doing the stuff that some peopleare doing today sixty plus years ago,
and they understood the threat at thatpoint in time, way ahead of the

(58:21):
curve. The Nation magazine wrote thatChers essentially had given their followers an invitation
to engage in civil war guerrilla stop. Why did they do that? Why
would they say that? Well,because the John Birt Society would talk about
the Second Amendment and they point outthat the Second Amendment is about a check
on government power. It doesn't haveto be used right Just as one person

(58:43):
was talking about mutual assured destruction andthey said, well, we gotta really
be worried. One person said,we gotta really be worried about nuclear weapon.
The person said, well they arebeing used right now. What Oh,
yeah, nuclear weapons are being usedright now as a deterrent. You
see, the Second Amendment, anindividual ownership of firearms are being used against

(59:07):
our government right now as we speak, as a deterrent because if the federal
government wants to go around like EricSallwell and Beat O'Rourke and Joe Biden boasted
in the last election cycle that theyhad a military and they could go around
take the guns from anybody that theywanted to. Well, if they were

(59:30):
to do something like that, itwould be like a launching nuclear weapons against
the country. If they want tocompletely destroy this country, that's what they
would do. But hopefully cooler headswill prevail, and the Second Amendment is
there as a deterrent to that typeof thing without a shot being fired.

(59:51):
As you're researching, he came acrossa trove of historical internal documents from the
ADL and the archives of the AmericanJewish Historical Society in New York. Why
did you devote a chapter to whatyou found in those documents? What did
those files reveal to you about theJohn Burt Society? And the author said,
well, these papers are a goldmine. They're incredible and often detailed

(01:00:14):
window into the far right, particularlythe John Burt Society. They show the
ADL had an extensive, multidimensional counterintelligenceoperation that they were running against the Burt
Society. They had undercover agents withcode names who were able to infiltrate the
society's headquarters in Belmont, Massachusetts.They dug up financial and employment information about
individual Birchers, and they also fedinformation to the media. Wow. Pretty

(01:00:39):
extensive, huh? So who's thebad guys? Is it the guys who
were talking about the Constitution in thefact that we need to keep law enforcement
local, keep it with an electedsheriff, don't centrally control it, federalize
it. Let's support the constitution.We want you to be active, get
involved in your school board, writeletters to your congressman. Those were the

(01:01:00):
bad guys, right, not theguys who are running this private spy operation
trying to destroy the lives of peopleslanting the information. As a matter of
fact, they had people who joinedthe John Birch Society and would make inflammatory
racial remarks and other things like that, trying to debate them into stuff like

(01:01:22):
this, and I'm sure they wouldrelease that. And so I see this
as a Bircher who's doing this stuff? Yeah, same stuff we're seeing with
January sixth, Same stuff we seethe FEDS doing all the time. So
you know what exactly is the relationshipof the ADL to the FBI and the
Feds. Yeah, two sides ofthe same coin. Quite frankly, they

(01:01:44):
love each other. James Comey declaredhis love for the ADL in twenty fourteen
and again later. Some critics ofthe ADL today, said the paper who's
interviewing him, say, the organizationhas strayed away from its mission of focusing
not just on anti Semitism, buton a wider array of causes. But

(01:02:06):
from reading your work, it soundslike the ADL even then took an expansive
view of its role. Why didthe ADL devote so many resources to a
group like the John Burt Society.Well, because the ADL is not about
anti Semitism. They use it asa shield, They use it as a

(01:02:27):
beard. They use it to shieldthemselves, just like they shield George Soros
for what he's doing. Oh well, don't criticize him. If you do,
you're anti Semitic. They are notagainst they're not anti racism. They're
racist themselves. They're Marxists, andthey are simply Marxists who are using that

(01:02:51):
as a beard is a door.Zach, who helped to lead the spy
operation, at one point wrote tohis colleagues that it was only in a
democracy that the Jewish community had beenallowed to and so if you want to
defend Jewish Americans, you have todefend democracy. We don't have a democracy
in America. We have a republic. We have the rule of law,
and if you're going to have amob control everything, you're going to wind
up having the same types of resultsthat we saw the French Revolution, the

(01:03:15):
Russian Revolution, the Communist revolution,and the revolution that these communists running the
ADL would like to have. Sothere's certainly other threats at the time,
but the Bird Society was seen byliberal critics as a very secretive group that
promoted conspiracy theories about communists who oftenbecame conflated with Jews. So these people

(01:03:39):
are communists who is anti who conflatethemselves. Just what they said about George
Soros. It's like, George Soros, is this corruptible individual? Why would
you conflate yourself with him? Well, so that they can shield him with
the charges of racism, And that'swhat they do. They were communists who

(01:04:01):
conflated themselves as Jews and used thecharge of racism against anybody that they hated.
Don't we see that everywhere today?You see you see how right the
virtures were, and do you seehow the ADL has and these types of
Marxist tactics have completely infiltrated our institutionseverywhere today? Would you consider the ADL

(01:04:26):
successful in its campaign against the virtures. They were successful. They used surreptitious
and in some cases underhanded means thisis the guy who approves of them.
But that's okay. You can usedirty tricks. Underhanded means you can be
dishonest about this as long as youwin, right, And we see that
with lot of Republicans. That's thewhole Donald Trump thing. Yeah, do

(01:04:50):
whatever it takes to win. We'lldo evil, so someday maybe we can
do good. Right. So,so the ADL with the tip of the
spear of a liberal coalition that includedthe White House, the Department of Justice,
Americans for Democratic Action, the NAACP, labor unions, the Union backed

(01:05:10):
Group Research, and so forth.See some of the names have changed,
but it's not really any different today, is it same coalition? White House,
Department of Justice or aust this stuff. The ADO was one of the
most, if not the most effectiveat constraining and discrediting the society. You
know who else was a big opponentof the John versus society. William F.

(01:05:31):
Buckley. He really set himself upto oppose the John Versus society.
WILLYAMU Buckley, the CIA guy,you're for the CIA. He had a
program on PBS. Oh a realrock ribbed conservative, was he really?
You think the Bircher's ideas, however, never died. They lived and made
a comeback. No of what hashappened is people have seen that the Birchers

(01:05:58):
have been right for sixty years.Everything they said is now out in the
open. There's absolutely no question aboutit. They've come back because what they
we're saying is true and somewhat ironic, said the magazine to him, that
you reveal the existence of the spyingapparatus devoted to targeting an extremist anti Semitic
group in the sixties. Given theinfamy the a d L would earn in

(01:06:23):
a later era the nineteen nineties forallegations, this is the first time he's
used the term allegations. You noticethat, Oh, everything that they say
derogatory about the John birsasciety. Oh, that's that's for sure. But then
when he criticizes things that the ADL, that, oh, allegations about that,
allegations of the ADL conlluded with policeagencies in San Francisco to spy on

(01:06:45):
and to harass leftists activists. Yousee the ADL is just an adjunct to
a corrupt so called Department of Justice. They eventually settled with Arab, American,
Black, and American Indian groups thatbrought a federal civil suit against the

(01:07:06):
ADL. He said, I knowyou didn't study these revelations, which are
outside the scope of your book,but you could. Could you perhaps reflect
on why undercover tactics we're seen asnecessary or justified. Oh, well,
it's justified because it's our sign rightlaw enforcement of the US. He said.
It was led by anti Semites orpeople who are much more concerned with

(01:07:29):
alleged internal communist threats, the threatfrom the left, and so they felt
that it was justified to do this. There is a sense in which this
work had to be done at leastoutside the parameters of the government. Again,
you see that the left puts thelabel of racism on everybody at the
same time that they're doing everything theycan to create a race war because they

(01:07:53):
see everything and couch everything in termsof racism. Where they or not,
it is, it is a projectionof what they are. He says,
I know they were doing a lotof spying. You know, they meant
really well, they expose a lotof scary things like easy access to firearms.
You see there it is easy accessto farms, hatred of the government.

(01:08:17):
If you distrust the government, that'shatred. If you have access to
firearms, you are a danger right, You're a dangerous person. You're a
violent person by definition. So that'sthe basis of all this stuff. Again,
the ADL set the standard and setthe template for the Marxists of today,
accusing their enemies of racism anti semitismin that particular case. But now

(01:08:41):
everything is you know, you're racist, racist, I don't even need to
talk to you, when in factthey call everybody racist, When in fact,
the ADL and the Marxist people likethe Weather Underground, Bill Airs,
Bernadine Dorn, they were consciously settingup a race war because class warfare had
not worked in the United States likeit had worked in Europe. So they

(01:09:04):
made it about race. And sowhile they're calling everybody racist, they're doing
everything they can to start a racewar. They're concerned about people owning firearms
because they understand, like Mao did, that power comes out of the barrel
of a gun, and they wantto have all power. So that means
that the ordinary people should have noguns, and if they have guns,

(01:09:26):
you detegrate them as extremist, violent, dangerous, so forth. And so
it goes on to say anti Semitismis on the rise, and the ADL's
budget has almost doubled over the pastseven years. This is why they see
racist under every rock. That's whythey point every person that they target,
they call them a racist. Theyare projecting their values. They're a racist

(01:09:48):
hate group themselves. That is theirraison decked. That is how they grow
by a factor know double in sevenyears by doing that type of thing.
If you go back and you lookat Trump's closing two sixteen campaign, at
its textbook anti semitism, they saidhe shows wealthy Jewish international bankers. The

(01:10:13):
Jewish stuff is irrelevant, in myopinion, their international bankers look at Klaus
Schwamp is he Jewish? But youknow, they don't ever pull back back
and said, you know, theysaid, well, you know, all
this talk about globalism, that's justanti semitism against the guy who is a
literal Nazi, his father and theseother people. It's just a beard.
These there's a conspiracy, these globalelites who are stealing the wealth of honest

(01:10:36):
Americans. They said, well,this is this textbook stuff, they said.
So they said, there's importance ofhaving institutional guardrails. And what they
mean by that, He says,for example, the Department of Justice prosecuting
a thousand January sixth insurrectionists fully onboard of that. In another review of

(01:10:59):
this book, City Journal. Thisis also in the Information Liberation article so
As he notes how the so calledbirch watchers tried to bait JBS leaders by
issuing racist statements in their presence,how they even quote posed as disgruntled virtures
to infiltrate white supremacist groups to assessthe society's existing ties to them. In

(01:11:27):
addition, the FBI and the pressreceived reports that compiled the most unflattering material
that the targets of such operations sometimesfound them their careers and jeopardy. All
the stuff we're seeing today, Ohyou said something hateful on social media,
We're going to get you canceled.I'm gonna get you fired from your jobs.
It's all the same Marxist tactics.They obtained chapter member lists, they

(01:11:50):
ran credit reports on individual birchures.They ferreted out their employment records, They
traced their financial transactions. They wrotedown their license plate numbers. They obtained
a codicil to a Birchard donor aswell. They stumped them with tough questions
during call in radio shows. Theyset up a Birch chapter meeting on false

(01:12:11):
pretenses so the ADL target could beinterviewed quote unquote, and they studied their
personal professional associations. Some of thescariest and most unflattering bits ended up in
the press, which is why they'rerightfully called the Defamation League underhanded criminal.
What they're doing, if not criminal, should be immoral. One suspects of

(01:12:38):
some of the scariest or most unflatteringbits did not enter into this book Galics
book, says Chris Minahan. I'msorry this is the other review. He
notes in his acknowledgements that the ADLkindly allowed me to review some of the
historical records and its archives. Someof the historical records. Maybe there's more

(01:12:59):
stuff that's even worse than this.All these years later, the ADO has
basically merged with the FBI. Together, they're using the same Stazili tactics to
suppress the rights as information liberation.FBI Director Comy and twenty fourteen delivered a
speech in which you described which youdescribed as a love letter to the ADL,
and in twenty seventeen, he toldthe ADL CEO Jonathan Green Black during

(01:13:24):
another speech three years later, Ican say from the perspective of the FBI
that we are still in love withyou again. They love it. It's
a partnership, a public private partnershipfor tyranny. You have fought against anti
Muslim prejudice and cyber bullying. Youhave stood up for LGBT and gender equality,

(01:13:44):
said Comy. You have pushed andprodded for hate crime legislation. The
people who hate everybody push for hatecrime legislation. The people who use racism
charges level at against everybody and useit as a shield. They project they
to fame. You know, theysmeared me back in early April twenty twenty,

(01:14:09):
tried to I took it as acompliment at the time, and I'm
glad that they did it because nowit is on record that I said at
the end of March, as soonas this stuff happened, I said,
there is no pandemic. This ismedical martial law. And they go rent
snooping out that stuff, sending itto the press, and it was reported

(01:14:30):
in some of these left wing magazines. So thank you very much. I
appreciate it. You have shown thatI was right in twenty twenty, you
have shown that the John Bircher's rightin nineteen sixty, and you have shown
yourself for what you truly are,despicable Marxists. We got one more report
here before we take a break.Dya would to Leiden, who is going

(01:14:53):
through an amazing ordeal. He's askedthe Supreme Court his lawyers have to reverse
the decision against him for exposing theabortion industry literal murder for hire and the
real attack is on the First Amendmentas well as life. Okay, Thomas
Moore Society attorneys of SUS Supreme Courtto take up the case of undercover journalist

(01:15:14):
David de Leiden, whose thirty monthinvestigation generated videos and evidence that spurred congressional
hearings, criminal referrals, policy andlaw changes, along with vigorous national debate
on the buying and the selling ofbaby body parts. And so the Thomas
Moore Society is seeking a reversal oflower court decisions that are permanently prohibiting Deliden

(01:15:39):
from publishing videos that he took ofNational Abortion Federation trade shows. These are
trade shows attended public, you know, by the public, big open thing.
No, you can't show any ofthat stuff. They put a gag
order on them in violation the FirstAmendment. So they want the Supreme Court
to get involved. But anyway,the court prohibited these videos of being shown

(01:16:02):
and put a civil judgment against himof six million dollars. So they've hidden
the videos that they don't want youto see about murder for hire and hit
him with six million dollars, andthe National Abortion Federation sued him. In

(01:16:23):
twenty and fifteen, the District Courtentered and the Court of Appeals affirmed a
sweeping permanent injunction against the release ofany of the over five hundred hours of
recording at the NAF conference without applyingany level of First Amendment scrutiny. And
again I go back to Fox Newsfiring Matt Drudge because he showed that pro

(01:16:45):
life video of the little hand grabbingthe pinkie of the surgeon. They don't
want you to see the truth.It's very simple. The truth is very
simple. They will do anything tohide the truth. But it doesn't just
stop there. He is also facingcriminal charges from the state of California,
so they hit him with six milliondollars. They cover the information up,

(01:17:12):
and there's still an ongoing criminal investigationand he's not allowed in his defense to
show the videos to defend himself.As a matter of fact, he was
saying, the reason I did thisinvestigation was because there's already talking congressional hearings
about how this was being done.There was concerns that this is being done,

(01:17:32):
so he set out as an investigativejournalist to show that it was being
done. And then they've gagged itall and of course guess why the people
buying it with the nih Thomas MooreSociety explained how the lower courts ran roughshot
over his First Amendment rights, madeit impermissible. Value judgments against his videos

(01:17:56):
claimed that there was minimal public interest. Really really, and why are you
so adamant about covering them up?They said? The First Amendment prohibits courts
from stopping journalists from publishing their work. Courts were quick to denigrate Delyden's videos
and speech and to silence him onan issue that is of supreme public importance.

(01:18:20):
The American people have a right toall of the relevant information on an
issue, not just what certain judgesthink they should see. And here these
are not private videos. They're videosof an eight hundred person abortion trade show
wow Delden was invited to attend.That David de Lyden is one of the

(01:18:43):
most notable undercover journalists of our time, reporting on one of the most contentious
political issues of our day. Abortion. If the high profile work of someone
like David's stature can be banned,no undercover journalists is safe from the risk
of ruinous financial sanctions and never endlawsuits. The Supreme Court must step in
to save undercover journalism. We're thepoliticians in the GOP supporting David de Lydon.

(01:19:10):
They're running away from abortion as fastas they can. Let's not be
too extreme. That's too harsh,says Trump, all the rest of this
stuff. When Robi Wade disappeared,they ran for the hills, they ran
to scrub their websites, and noneof them are standing with David de Lydon.
If you just from a political standpoint, since Lala Harris was the first

(01:19:35):
one of these California attorney journalists tocome after him, wouldn't you do it
for the political capital that you couldmake out of this by showing what a
criminal she is, because it iscriminal what they're doing. Inn why wouldn't
you do this and get this workwith him to get this information put out.

(01:19:56):
As I've said before, when Karenwas working for a pro life pregnancy
counseling thing, I said, whatthey need to do is they need to
get all their money in. Thisis back in the nineteen eighties. I
said, they need to put theirmoney into into ultrasound and visual stuff so
people could see what's going on.Well, you need to be able to
see what's going on with your owngovernment doing murder for hire, so they

(01:20:19):
can do these Frankenstein transhumanist mice andother things like that that fout you and
the NIH are pushing. We needto be able to see this stuff.
Where are the Republican politicians supporting Davidto Lydon. Where are they demanding to
see what the public needs to knowthat is relevant to this debate. They're
just like Fox News covering it up. I'm so sick and tired of the

(01:20:44):
lies and the hypocrisy, and theTucker Carlson covers it, covers himself by
saying, you know they're lying toyou. Yeah, we know that,
and you know it too, andyou did it as well. It's just
amazing to me. It's amazing theAmerican people deserve to see and hear what
the abortion providers of this country arewilling to say and do, to skirt

(01:21:04):
and to even violate the law.We are asking the High Court to rectify
this situation, to restore respect forthe First Amendment, and to vindicate David
de Lyden. The petition states thatDelightden should be allowed to freely introduce the
court banned video footage in his defenseto pending criminal charges against him instigated by

(01:21:27):
La La Harris and Javier Bassa atthe behest of NAF and Planned Parenthood.
The injunction has already inflicted irreparable harmby forbidding de Lyden from proving his innocence
to the public. He can't evenuse this stuff to defend himself against La
La Harris's baseless persecution. Just amazingto me to see how the Republicans run

(01:21:56):
away from this stuff. We'll beright back. Do you're listening to the

(01:22:49):
Darted Night Show, Welcome back wehave Diane Feinstein was in very bad shape.
But it's not just the corruption ofher body. That happens to all.
Listen. I think in her particularcase, I think she may be
vaccine injured. I mean it's lookinglike they say, well, it's shingles
and so forth. That has beena very common injury from vaccines, but

(01:23:15):
especially from COVID nineteen. She's gotfacial paralysis. She can't walk anymore.
She was gone for quite some time, but let's take a look at what
she did when she still had herfull faculties cheating in broad daylight. Aaron
Rodgers and David Baktri. I guessI think they are a couple of football

(01:23:40):
players. Maybe I don't know AaronRodgers, I know he is. I
don't know who the other guy is. Anyway, they're upset. Oor claim
that Diane Feinstein used unusual trades tobuild massive wealth responded to a tweet from
an account unusual Whales, which postedinformation did they claim shows that Feinstein used

(01:24:02):
unusual trades to build a net worthof over two hundred million dollars very much
like Nancy Pelosi. Is very interesting. You know, the whole thing about
Pelosi and Paul Pelosi making so muchmoney. Nancy Pelosi inside her trading she
was a poster child for all thatstuff. And Pelosi it's very very close

(01:24:23):
to Feinstein. I mean they're they'rein San Francisco and that type of thing,
even to the extent that Pelosi wantsAdam Schiff to replace her in the
Senate, and if she were tostep down now, Gavin Newsom says that
he would replace her with a woman. So you know, Adam Shift is
not quite there yet. You know, he's gonna start sealing dealing suitcases and

(01:24:47):
I do the whole Sam Britton thing. But you know, Adam Shifted close,
but not quite a woman, sohe would not get the tap on
the shoulder to do that. NancyPelosi, however, wants him there.
So she wants to keep Diane Feinsteinthere as much as she can. She's
got her daughter basically as the personalassistant of Diane Feinstein to keep her going,

(01:25:11):
or maybe to keep the illusion goingthat Feinstein is capable of doing the
job, even as people have saidto her. You talked to her about
her absence. Oh, I wasn'tgone. I was working the entire time.
You mean from home, No,I was here. You know,
she doesn't know anything that's going on, and so Pelosi is shielding her from
that. Pelosie has her daughter thererunning Diane Feinstein because she wants Adam Shift

(01:25:38):
in their butt. We look atthis insider trading thing, isn't it interesting
that Diane Feinstein was right there withthe insider trading as well. I think
it's also interesting that Matt Gates andAOC occasional cortex. That's why I call
hercasional cortex. Sometimes she gets itright. The two of them came out
and said, we got to stopthis insider trading stuff. I said,

(01:26:00):
we disagree on pretty much everything,but we're not crooks. The rest of
them are, really I don't knowif AOC is a crook or Gates is
a crook, but they're not acrook when it comes to the insider trading
aspect of this. And so youknow, Feinstein has now a net worth
of two hundred million dollars and shegot all of that from stock trades and

(01:26:25):
other things like that. You know, while this type of stuff is happening,
Thomas Massey is trying yet again tohelp the small people. Right,
these legislators who are doing insider tradingand all the rest making hundreds of millions
of dollars, and yet, ThomasMassey says, I've introduced a bill HR

(01:26:46):
thirty two O six, a SeniorCitizens Tax Elimination Act. This bill will
assist middle class seniors by eliminating theunjust double taxation on Social Security been.
And so, you know, thisis the situation where they want to tax
you on the Social Security money thatyou're already taxed on and you were forced

(01:27:10):
to put into the Social Security system, and then we take it out,
they tax you on it again.Before nineteen eighty four, social Security benefits
were exempt from the federal income tax. Congress then enacted to legislation to tax
a portion of these benefits, witha share gradually increasing as a person's income
rose passed a specific income threshold.Although seniors have already paid tax on their

(01:27:33):
Social Security contributions via the payroll tax, they're still required to list these benefits
as taxable income on their tax returns, said Representative Massy. So while they
make hundreds of millions of dollars oninsider trading, they double tax you and
hit you in retirement. And againthe question is, since these Democrats don't

(01:27:56):
think that the deficit matters, thatwe've got the modern monetary theory, we
spend as much money as we want, doesn't really matter. Why do we
even have a tax, Well,it's because they want to keep you dependent
on them. Cost of living forseniors is rising. He said. This
will bring immediate relief, said oneperson who's signed on to Representative Alex Mooney

(01:28:20):
from West Virginia. Representative Daniel Webster, Republican from Florida, said, for
decades, seniors have paid into SocialSecurity with their tax dollars. Now,
when many seniors are on a fixedincome, struggling financially, they're being double
taxed because of income taxes on theirsoil security benefits. This is wrong.
I'm pleased to once again co sponsorthis legislation to repeal this tax. This

(01:28:43):
isn't the first time it's been done. It's been done over and over and
over again. And the people likeDiane Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi who become nearly
billionaires with their insider trading, don'twant this to happen. They're going to
come after you for your small SocialSecurity stuff and tax it. And of
course it's not just Social Security,it's also railroad retirement benefits. It's just

(01:29:05):
the larger issue there. Senior CitizensTax Elimination Act was originally introduced in two
thousand and three by Ron Paul.That's why I say the real successor to
Ron Paul is not Rand Unfortunately,it's Thomas Massey. Thomas Massey a representative.

(01:29:28):
Massey has introduced this bill in everyCongress since he has taken office in
two thousand and twelve, the realsuccessor to Ron Paul. But there was
an interesting article there was really aboutthe tenth Amendment and I think it's worth
taking a look at us. FromChuck Norris and by the way, comment

(01:29:49):
from Rumbell. I should have mentionedthis the original Karen says. Ron de
Santis was stationed at GETMO. Hewas in on it, and there's been
some testimony. I didn't talk aboutthat. There's been some testimony of some
of the prisoners who were there.As they're talking about the torture stuff and
everything. One of them said,I saw that guy, he said,
I can't forget his face. Iremember when he was standing there and I

(01:30:10):
was being tortured, and he wastalking to some other military personnel and he
said, laughing as I was beingtortured, remember that, thank you for
minding me, I should have talkedabout that, Chuck Norris, when one
hundred and twenty five Feds ran thewhole country, well, it's not a

(01:30:34):
good title. Should say they ranthe whole government. The entire government had
one hundred and twenty five people,and he does understand that's there. It's
just a bad title. Chuck Norrishad This is on WND dot com,
he says. On May fifteenth,eighteen hundred, then President John Adams,
a second president, ordered the federalgovernment to pack up and leave Philadelphia to

(01:30:58):
go to his new location and thenew capital, Washington, d C.
History dot Com reported that even thetransition in the move of the entire federal
government was relatively easy remarkably fast.After Congress adjourned its last meeting in Philadelphia
on May fifteenth, Adams told hiscabinet to make sure that Congress and all
federal offices were up and running smoothlyand their new headquarters by June fifteenth,

(01:31:21):
one month, Philadelphia officially ceased toserve as a nation's capital. As of
June eleventh, eighteen hundred. Canyou imagine an entire federal government moving one
hundred and fifty miles away? Withoutmodern trucks and equipment and being up and
running smoothly one month later. Moreover, official documents and archives are transferred from

(01:31:44):
Philadelphia to the new capital by shipover inland waterways. I guess they didn't
wind up with any of them inBiden's garage either, well made it to
the destination. Most will find thisnext fact fascinating time. In eighteen hundred,
there were only about one hundred andtwenty five federal employees. Today,

(01:32:04):
two hundred and twenty three short yearslater, the federal workforce is composed of
an estimated two point one million civilianworkers. Think about only one hundred and
twenty five federal employees. In theyear eighteen hundred, twenty four years after
declaring independence from England, thirteen yearsafter the US Constitution been written in ratified,

(01:32:26):
there were only five point three millionpeople in the US. But if
you extrapolate that out to now,a population that's gone from five million people
to three hundred thirty one million people, if we had the same ratio of
federal employees to citizens, that wouldmean that we would only have seven thousand,
seven hundred fifty federal employees in governmentinstead of two point one million.

(01:32:49):
That's the bloating this there, andof course if we had put the tenth
Amendment in practice. What he doesn'tsay, which is I think his interesting
this is John Adams an eighteen hundred, the second president, moved the entire
government one hundred and twenty five employees. That Jefferson was the one who succeeded

(01:33:13):
him. And Adams did grow thegovernment. But how much did he grow
it? I mean, if itwas one hundred and twenty five, you
know, while he's there. Andso when Jefferson got in, he started
cutting, as he said, uselessoffices with just one hundred two hundred people.
He thought it was bloated. Jeffersondid, and he said at his

(01:33:38):
inauguration of his second term, hesaid, I've eliminated all internal taxes by
getting shutting down all these useless offices. He said, so that no farmer,
no laborer, no mechanic knows thetax man. All of the taxes
were collected at the border. Therewas no internal taxes, and of course

(01:34:00):
the globalists want to make sure there'sno taxes at the borders. And they
are the ones who turned the machineryin on us, and they're still escalating
it. But again, you know, Chuck Norris understands what's going on here
with this, But I just thinkit's amazing to think that, as small
as it was, Thomas Jefferson sawit as bloated because he understood the Constitution.

(01:34:27):
Norris says, particularly apropos Here's atenth Amendment which is also part of
our Bill of Rights, and itwas ratified in seventeen ninety one. The
powers not delegated to the US bythe Constitution or prohibited to it by the
States, are reserved to the states, respectively or to the people. So
it says, so how do weget past this? And I've always wondered

(01:34:47):
that as well. I mean,of course we just ignore it now.
I talk about it typically when Italk about prohibition and how the entire country
agreed when they did the eighteenth Amendmentto prohibit alcoho hall but he agreed that,
well, the federal government doesn't havethe power to prohibit alcohol, so
we've got to add that power asa constitutional amendment. And then they removed

(01:35:08):
it with the twenty first Amendment.That's a lot of problem to go through,
but they had respect for the Constitutionmuch more than we do today.
Not one hundred percent, but muchmore than we do today today. We
don't care. We just invent explanations. And he points out that the Supreme
Court in nineteen forty one, hesaid, the progressives will say the Tenth

(01:35:28):
Amendment doesn't apply, and they'll quotethe Supreme Court in nineteen forty one.
The Supreme Court said the amendment it'sa us versus derby. The Amendment states
only a truism that all is retainedwhich has not been surrendered. There is
nothing in the history of its adoptionto suggest that it was more than a
ducleatory of the relationship between the nationaland state governments as it had been established

(01:35:51):
by the Constitution. That's an absolutelie. What they're saying is it's just
a truism. It's like, well, if they don't have it, they
don't have it. No, itwas not descriptive. It was not to
describe what the situation was. Itwas to proscribe the federal government from bringing

(01:36:12):
in power to itself that it didnot have. And that was the real
purpose of the Tenth Amendment. Weknow that from history. We know that
from their writings. We know thatit was to prohibit, clearly, to
prohibit it from what they are doingnow, so, Chuck Norris says,
so. Returning to seventeen ninety one, the year the Tenth Amendment was ratified,

(01:36:32):
Thomas Jefferson said, I consider thefoundation of the Constitution as laid on
this ground, that all powers notdelegated to the US by the Constitution,
nor prohibited it to it by theStates, are reserved to the States or
to the people Tenth Amendment. Hesaid, the foundation of the Constitution was

(01:36:53):
the tenth Amendment, you see,and quoted it explicitly. He said,
to take a stingle, single stepbeyond the boundaries thus specifically drawn around the
powers of Congress is to take possessionof a boundless field of power no longer
susceptible of any definition. Nora saysJefferson's concern against the overreaching, bloated federal

(01:37:17):
government was representative of most of theframers. This is why the Tenth Amendment
exists. A decade later, duringhis presidency in eighteen o two. Again,
you know, that was eighteen hundredthat they moved the government and had
one hundred and twenty five people,and he takes office two years later.
How much could they've grown the governmentin just two years from one hundred and
twenty five people, and he saidit was bloated, and he was able

(01:37:40):
to reduce the bloat of the Adamsadministration and get rid of internal taxation.
So an eighteen o two Jefferson stillshared his earlier passion to inhibit an overreaching
federal government. He said, Iwas in Europe when the Constitution was planned,
and I never saw it until afterit was established. Upon receiving it,
I wrote strongly to mister Madison urgingthe want of provision for an express

(01:38:03):
reservation to the states of all rightsnot specifically granted to the Union. So
he was concerned, and others wereconcerned. Maybe anti federalists are concerned that
there were clauses there they were goingto be used, and we've seen those.
Oh well, the commerce clause meansthat we control all commerce. Now,

(01:38:24):
what it meant was that you weren'tgoing to have states set up arbitrary
trade obstacles and interstate commerce. Butno, they say that gives us power
over all commerce. So they useit for power. Instead of using it
to prohibit restrictions of commerce, theyuse it to control commerce, and on

(01:38:45):
and on the general welfare clause.You're here that all the time. Where
the supremacy clause or what they sawthese flaws, and so he contacted Madison,
and Madison wrote, you know,put together the Bill of Rights,
and they got that in. ChuckNorris says, we unfortunately live in an
age of the nanny state, inwhich far too many Americans expect the Feds
to solve their personal problems. Thisis why I said, yeah, let's

(01:39:09):
not federalize the abortion issue. Wegot it out of the Fed's hands,
let's not put it right back in. We don't want the federal government,
in spite of all the abuses ofthis transgender thing, we don't want the
federal government defining what a woman isbecause you know that, just as they
did with marriage, they will redefinewhat a woman is, and they'll do

(01:39:29):
it the wrong way, and itwon't take them but a few years to
do it. We don't want tohave everything solved in Washington. That's why
the tenth Amendment is so important.Jefferson was speaking directly to Washington today just
a few years before his death whenhe wrote the following words at roughly eighty
years of age in eighteen twenty threeto Supreme Court Judge William Johnson, and

(01:39:51):
he said, imagine Miss Chuck Norris, imagine Jefferson setting there a ripe old
age, a wage wise sage,in the very middle seat, between all
Democrats and Republicans. He listens toall the proceedings without uttering a word,
and then right near the end herespectfully calls on the President and others gathered,
and politely and sternly utters these words. This his imagination. If only

(01:40:15):
he could say this today an ajoint session of Congress, like the Hall
of Presidents or something. Right,he stands up. The States supposed,
and this is what he actually wroteto Justice. The States supposed that by
their tenth Amendment they had secured themselvesagainst constructive powers. They have not learned

(01:40:38):
from the past, nor are theyaware of the slipperiness of the eels of
the law. I ask for nostraining of words against the general Government,
nor yet against the States. Ibelieve the States can best govern our home
concerns, and the general government areforeign ones. I wish, therefore,
to see maintained that wholesome distribution ofpowers established by the Constitution, for limitation

(01:41:03):
of both, and never to seeall offices transferred to Washington, which is
what everybody wants. The Democrats wantit now, the Republicans want it.
Everything must be there. We evenwant them to define marriage and what a
woman is for us. It's absolutelypathetic. Tell us when does life begin?

(01:41:24):
When and by what means? Canwe kill babies? Please tell us
further. Withdrawn from the eyes ofthe people, they may more secretly be
bought and sold as at market,which is what we see being bought and
sold the Biden administration. The corruptionof the Biden family. You talk about

(01:41:45):
being bought and sold in secret.Just last week, Comer and other top
Republicans laid out evidence of a vastnetwork of Biden family dealings, ten million
dollars in payments from foreign nationals,a network of shell corp operations. I've
talked about this twenty LLC's while JoeBiden was vice president, at least fifteen
of them after he became vice president. These LLCs accepted payments ranging from five

(01:42:12):
thousand and three million dollars. TheCommittee would like to know what legitimate business
was the Biden family in. Yeah, all of us would like to know
that. We'll be right back analyzingthe globalist next move and now the Deep

(01:43:44):
and Nut Show. I want totalk about what is going on with artificial
intelligence, and when Jerald Slinto joinsus, I think he wants to talk
about that as well. Even beforeall the things that happened, you know,
in going on down Builder, aswell as what was happening at the
end of last week. This coveras about artificial intelligence. That's the focus

(01:44:08):
of this month's or this week's transitjournal. But before we do, and
before we get into what is goingon with artificial intelligence, World Coin,
build a Berg the rest of thestuff, I want to just ask you
again, if you like the program, please click a like button wherever you're
watching it. That helps to boostthe program. And we look at Rumble.

(01:44:33):
I've had some people say, hey, there's a creator revenue sharing,
and yes there is. We lookedinto this and as they set up the
you can get a badge if youare if you pledge support to a monthly
support to a particular program. Throughthe end of twenty twenty three, one

(01:44:54):
percent of the revenue from monthly subscriptionbadges on Rumble. Those are five dollars
per month and there are no feeswith that, so one hundred percent of
that goes through to us. Sojust to let you know, the new
subscription badges award users with a specialbadge for live chat and we do put
the show up live on Rumble.In the near future. It will also

(01:45:16):
turn off advertisements for subscribers on contentby the creators that they support, so
again that is something that helps us. They've put that up there through the
end of twenty twenty three. Otherways that you can support us again,
David N. Dot Gold takes youto Tony Ardeman has been a big supporter

(01:45:36):
of this program. Really to appreciateeverything that Tony does and wisewolf Gold is
where it takes you and you canstart making some preparations for your own And
of course Jeryl Salini will be joiningus at the top of the hour and
he's kindly put up a code ifyou want to subscribe to Trends Journal,

(01:45:56):
you can save ten percent off theprice of Trends Journal if you use the
code. Night and Gerald has alwayssupported us as well in many different ways.
I'm very happy to give you thatinformation and to tell you about what
they provide, because I think Tonydoes a great job. He's got great
prices. Is an honest guy,and Gerald Celenti is honest in his information

(01:46:19):
and comprehensive in it as well.With Trends Journal. Let's take a look
at Builderberg, and at the topof the agenda at a secretive meeting of
Builderberg is AI. But of courseyou know AI is there. From an
alphabetical standpoint, the key thing isSam Altman, who was there last year

(01:46:40):
as well as back. So isHenry Kissinger, and we're not missing you
this year. Kissinger is there.Next year will probably be a big,
big party for him. He'll turnone hundred years old. So I think
that yes, they may be lookingat artificial intelligents, but I think it's

(01:47:02):
also the global crypto thing that SamAltman is putting out. I talked about
yesterday, the IRIS scan, aworld cryptocurrency tying in global ID to universal
basic income that checks all the boxesfor the World Economic Forum, Builderberg,
all the rest of these people.Google CEO Eric Schmidt is there, Deep

(01:47:26):
Mine head is there. Microsoft ceois there, The head of Sissa is
there. And as they point outin Breitbart, they said SISSA played a
key role as a source of governmentpressure in the big tech censorship regime.
That harmed Present Trump's chances in thetwenty twenty election. Well, that's funny.

(01:47:47):
I remember Steve Pachennik saying that Sissawas the ones who set up that
blockchain watermark stuff on all the ballotsto help Trump. Yeah. Right,
Artificial intelligence at this point, Ithink it's really science fiction bologna. And
I'm gonna talk about why that is. There's an interesting article from an individual

(01:48:12):
who worked for many years with selfdriving cars, and of course Branchial Hobby
has also talked about this. He'ssaid, you know, look, we've
had three way this is the thirdwave of hype about artificial intelligence that we've
had since the nineteen eighties. Ithink was the first one, and I
had forgotten about those. You know, I'd heard bits of hype about it,

(01:48:34):
but I didn't realize how much moneywas put into them and then dissipated.
And I guess you could say ifyou include self driving cars and this
article from Wired magazine. Wired magazineis always cheering a big tech and global
control and all the rest of thestuff, and they're very skeptical about AI.
So they interviewed this woman who,as they have former fighter pilot,

(01:49:01):
an engineering and robotics professor at GeorgeMason University, and she used to work
for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. She said, people don't understand how
ridiculous this self driving stuff is.It's just hype, and so she poured
cold water on all of this.But you know, Wired magazine says,
well, you know, just thislast week, we've had U S senators
hearing alarming testimony about how AI isgoing to steal jobs, spread disinformation and

(01:49:28):
in the words of Sam Altman,it's going to go quite wrong, whatever
that means. Right. He andseveral lawmakers agreed that the US may now
need a new federal agency to overseethe development of this technology, so he
says. Interviewed Missy Cummings, engineerrobotics professor. She studies the use of

(01:49:56):
AI and automation and safety critical systemssuch as cars and aircraft, and earlier
this year she went back to academiaafter a period of time at the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and whatshe had to say about it is very
damning to this big hype. AndI think it's one of the reasons why
they're having the congressional hearings. Whythey're telling everybody AI is going to take

(01:50:18):
over everything, and it may cause, you know, maybe more dangerous than
nuclear weapons and all the rest ofthe stuff. They were saying, Yeah,
we got to have something like theFDA, and we need to have
something like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission becauseit's as dangerous as nuclear weapons. That's
a lot of hype to build upwhat they're doing. It will have some
uses, and of course Microsoft andopen Ai want to make sure that they

(01:50:43):
end Google. You know, they'retogether open Ai, Microsoft and their only
competition is Google. They want tomake sure nobody else gets in competition with
them. It will be useful forsome things. It's not going to be
as powerful as extensive as they say. I don't believe. And here's why
Cummings told me this week after sheleft the NHTSA with a sense a profound

(01:51:04):
concern about these autonomous systems being deployedby car manufacturers. She said, We're
in serious trouble in terms of thecapabilities of these cars. We've seen this
over and over again. We're talkingabout Tesla, which is out there first.
You have even people like Steve Wozniak, co founder of Apple, saying
I love my Tesla, but don'tput it on autopilot. It's trying to

(01:51:27):
kill you. Cummings says, they'renot even close to being as capable as
people think they are. As amatter of fact, most of these programs
that are out there, the Cruiseprogram, so I've talked about before in
San Francisco, they did their experimentalprogram. At one point all of the
cars went to one intersection and stopped. And we've heard a lot of the

(01:51:47):
same stuff from these self driving autonomouscar programs that we're hearing about AI.
You know, they would tell us, well, yeah, whenever one of
these cars is driving, it's learning, and as it's learning, it's sharing
that knowledge with all of the othercars. So it's a collective consciousness,
a shared knowledge. And so theywould multiply all the miles driven by all

(01:52:12):
the cars and total those up andsay, you know, you, as
a human, you may have onlydriven, you know, five hundred thousand
or a million miles in your lifetime, but these cars they've done a hundred
million miles. Well, why arethey all going to one intersection and stopping.
Why can't they negotiate how to getacross a four way stop with human
beings if they're so good, shesaid, I was struck when I looked

(01:52:36):
at the autonomous stuff. I wasstruck with the parallels of chat GPT and
with similar chatbots that are stoking excitementand concern about the power of AI.
Automated driving features have been around formuch longer, but like large language models,
they rely on machine learning algorithms.They're inherently unpredictable, hard to inspect,

(01:52:59):
and require a different kind of engineeringthinking to that of the past.
Also like chat GPT, she said, Tesla's autopilot and other autonomous driving projects
have been elevated by absurd amounts ofhype, heavy dreams of a transportation revolution
led by automakers and startups. Itled investors to pour the huge sums into

(01:53:26):
developing and deploying a technology that stillhas many unsolved problems. And there was
a permissive regulatory environment. Remember shewas in the I call it NITZE,
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.She was there the people who are supposed
to be regulating them, like youknow, the FDA is supposed to regulate
FISER, and she saw how theyhad been captured. You know, I

(01:53:47):
mean, well, I think aboutthis this myth that was sold by Google.
You know, where one of thesecars goes, they all go.
Yeah, it sounds just like andon right where we go one we go
all it's another imaginary hype. Justthat's where the Q and on creeps got

(01:54:11):
it from. Anyway, after billionsspent on the technology, self driving cars
are still beset by problems and someauto companies that pull the plug. Cuming
says the public is often unclear abouthow capable semi autonomous technology is. She
said chat can be remarkably good atanswering questions and solving problems, even if

(01:54:31):
they have significant shortcomings, including confidentlyfabricating facts. Yeah, there's that.
You know. It's a big,big red flag, isn't it. My
worst fear, she said, isthat we cause significant I'm sorry she didn't
say that, but Sam Altman said, my worst fear is that we cause

(01:54:53):
significant harm to the world. Itis so dangerous. Protect me, protect
me from myself. I know.We need to protect him from the competition,
and we need to incentivize this iswhat he was saying. Fund him
out of fear that he's putting intothese senators who don't understand Anything's happening.
That's the whole point. And Isaid, hey, the senators need to

(01:55:15):
understand what this stuff is. Let'stalk to somebody who's been using and looking
at and there to regulate artificial intelligencefor a long time and self driving stuff.
And I think and I hope thatall this stuff is going to go
the way of the self driving cars. Cummings warned that there's a significant risk
of regulatory capture if major AI andtech companies have too much influence or the

(01:55:39):
direction the regulators take. She said, quote I heard it said more than
once inside NITZA that they needed toproceed extremely cautiously because they didn't want to
move markets. She said, that'sprobably the best sign that regulatory capture has
happened. Well, no, Actually, if you look at the senators talking

(01:56:01):
to Sam Altman, begging him foradvice as to what he would like to
do, how would you like tohave this new agency that you want created
structure to keep your competition out?How would you like to be incentivized to
do all this stuff? Because youknow, we got to keep up with
the Joneses they've captured. There isn'ta regulatory agency yet. They're talking about
creating he's captured the senators that arethere. Some experts believe the latest AI

(01:56:28):
systems may not only replace office workersand spew out disinformation, but they may
also pose an existential risk if theyget too clever and wolful. However,
Cummings, who has worked with thesethings, is more worried about the risk
that once again we will put toomuch faith in the technology that isn't fully

(01:56:49):
baked. People everywhere are going tostart writing code with generative tools. She
said, there's going to be awhole career field for computer scientists just to
root out bad code. I willhave job security for life. So what

(01:57:12):
you're saying is, even though there'ssome things that it can do good,
like writing code, it's also goingto put a lot of bugs in,
just like it makes stuff up.Yeah, it's not gonna be one hundred
percent accurate. People who trust it, it's gonna be AI is going to
become a machine version of George Santos, you know, just making stuff up,
or you know, you say DonaldTrump, I mean the machine version

(01:57:32):
of Trump or Santos. That's whatwe're looking at here. You know.
The interesting thing about this as well, Brian SHALLHAVEY has been very skeptical of
this stuff as I have been,but also concerned about the potential for deception
and control and propaganda and how itcan be recklessly you know, turnover stuff

(01:57:55):
to it. And when you lookat these autonomous killing machines, and even
Peter Share who I talked to forBattlegrounds and and everything, and they were
talking about how they could do agreat job at dog fights and their simulations
and stuff like that, but hesaid, there's going to be pressure to
turn over fire control to them becausethe other side will if you don't,

(01:58:17):
and so they'll be able to killyou, they'll be able to react more
quickly, and they'll kill your stuff. So there's that arms race aspect.
So if we turn over the killdecisions to the machines, how do we
get it back and what does itdo? And there's another parallel in all
of that to the self driving cars. Right, you turn over the driving

(01:58:39):
of your car and you got tokeep both hands on the steering wheel,
right, Why, Well, becauseif something happens and it doesn't know what's
going on, it's going to turncontrol back over to you. Oh well,
I gotta you know, And you'renot ready to take control of that
thing. I mean, as wewere we went to North Carolina this last
week to see my ninety eight yearold aunt, who was doing better than

(01:59:02):
Diane Feinstein. She didn't get theJAB and so as we were driving back,
we went past a car where awoman was in a tesla and she
was sitting there playing on her phone. It's like, let's get out of
here. I don't trust that.Even though she trusts it, I don't

(01:59:24):
trust it. If anything were tohappen, She's not gonna be able to
get control. The same thing.If they put weapons under the control of
artificial intelligence, how do you getit back? And what if it makes
the wrong decisions? And so BranchellHobby, talking about this, said,
you know, when you look atall the hype that it's coming out,
and Goldman Sachs is really hyping thisstuff. Goldman Sacks is saying we're coming

(01:59:46):
into a major, major recession,perhaps already in it, I don't see,
and laying out the financial issues andall these different areas and say the
only place that it looks like youcan make money right out is investing in
artificial intelligence. And Sam Altman andGoogle want to make sure that they're the
only two out there they want,regardless of whether they produce a product or

(02:00:11):
not. You're going to have allthis investment money which is already happening,
big hype about all this stuff,and the big gains that are coming.
We would have a stock market wasway further down if it wasn't for all
the hype and investment and artificial intelligence. But if that's just a scam,
as we suspect, and if itdoesn't deliver any benefits, as self driving

(02:00:35):
autonomous cars did not deliver on theirproduct promises, then what happens to the
economy in the stock market when thething that is propping it up goes belly
up. That's going to be areal interesting development to see. Well,
who were waiting for Gerald some ofthe participants in twenty twenty three. When

(02:00:57):
you go through and you look ateverything's an alphabetic quarter at the top of
a list was Stacy Abrams. Wellthat's good news because now I guess maybe
we don't have to worry so much. I mean, she's a puppet that
they're grimming right underneath her. SamAltman, you have staff writers for staff
writer for the Atlantic and Applebaum,and of course you look her up you

(02:01:20):
find out that she is an unceasingpropagandist for NATO and the Ukraine War.
Albert Bola, CEO FISER. Youhave the president or the World Economic Forum
is their big military industrial complex likeBASF is there. You have the director
of Sissa jin Esterley, the formerhead of British spy group GHQ. Christia

(02:01:48):
Freeland. You know this World EconomicForum babe who was confiscating the bank accounts
of people when they protested the vaccinemandates that Trudeau had. Christie Freeland is
at Builderberg as well. You know, you have these interlocking people World Economic
Forum and Builderberg. The CEO ofMERK talked about the CEO of FISER.

(02:02:12):
You have the Director of National IntelligenceAvril Haines. You have in terms of
artificial intelligence, the CEO of DeepMind, Alex carp who has become a
fixture at Builderberg for many years.He has he has Palenteer, which is
a big data mining company that worksfor the military industrial complex and also for

(02:02:35):
law enforcement. Here very very well. They again Palanteer, they take the
name from the Lord of the Ringsand they use this data mining technology in
the same way that Saron used thelittle palenteers of crystal balls to communicate Henry
Kissinger of course, there again HenryKravis of kk R in company. But

(02:02:59):
no David Petraeus this year. Youknow, he went with KKR, but
he's not there this time. Yousee the editors in chief of Bloomberg and
the economists, the CEO of Microsoft, the Financial Times of course there as
well. Mark Ruta, Prime Ministerof the Netherlands, who is shutting down
the farms. He's there. Youhave Eric Schmitt, who now is mister

(02:03:24):
Military industrial Complex, probably the personwho has more influence than anybody else because
of this move to artificial intelligence withthe military industrial complex. Peter Thiel that
people say, we'll wait a minute, he's a good guy, right,
he supports Trump and he's a conservative. No, he's a trans humanist and
he makes no bones about it.Goldman Sachs CEO, all of the usual

(02:03:46):
suspects right there at Builderberg. Andwe're gonna take a quick break, and
when we come back, we're gonnatalk to Gerald Silinti again. The cover
of trans Journal this week is aboutartificial intelligans and what they seek to do
to us. We'll be right backanalyzing the globalist next move and now the

(02:05:23):
David Nut Show. Welcome back andjoining us now is Jerrold Sentee. Always
a pleasure to have him Trends Journalat Trendsjournal dot com, always ahead of
the curve and acquirus. He's rightthere on top of it right now with
artificial intelligence as that is the bigtopic at builderberg has been the big topic
and the Senate last week, andI think it is joining hand in glove

(02:05:44):
with this world coin thing. ButI want to get Gerald's take on this.
Thank you for joining us, Gerald, well, thank you and thank
you for that. You do youknow it's listening to you about the Builderbergs.
I almost wasn't going to be ableto make it today because I got
to go over there I'm gonna dowith the Builderbergs. Yeah, it's just
a friendly meeting, you know.Yeah, yeah, you know, I've
told the story to my audience thisweek. But I just I don't know

(02:06:04):
if you know this, but whenwe went to the one in Copenhagen,
we were real close and you know, to it's just you know, a
four lane road between where the journalistswere and where the hotel was. So
we could say everything was going on. Karen got a picture of Ed Balls,
who was a shadow Chancellor of theExchequer, showing up and he didn't
have his ID and he's fumbling throughhis suitcase and his suitcase contents spill out

(02:06:29):
and it's nothing but paperwork. Gerald, no clothes, no toothbrushsion, nothing,
It's all paperwork. And so youknow that it's just a friendly meeting
and it's all off the record andChatham House rules and blah blah blah.
You know, but it's a lotof business is being discussed there for sure.
Yeah, it's George Colin used tosay it's one big club and you
ain't in it, that's right.And you know, I a toy as

(02:06:50):
you will know. You know,I was the first person to call RFK
Junior for president and back in December. And one of the things he's really
coming out against is the Biggs takingover everything. And he even talked about
climate change and it's not climate changethat they're working on, it's the Bill
Gates. It's all the billionaires doingwhat they want to do. Oh yeah,

(02:07:12):
And so he's really coming out againstthese maniacs that are in charge of
our lives, and they are there. They've taken control of the world.
And all we, as I say, all we are plantation workers, on
the global plantation of slave Landian andit's disgusting what's happened. And there's there's
hardly any fight. You know,all this stuff about Tucker Callson the and

(02:07:41):
an article here they called it here. By the way, you talking about
being on the slave plantation. Iwas talking earlier in the program about how
in New York, uh, they'restarting already tracking the meat consumption of people
and limiting it right now through thepublic institutions. They don't have a way
to do it, but once theyget you know, some kind of digital
currency, that'll be their mechanism todo it. But they're gonna, you

(02:08:03):
know, they're in the process nowof making New York City a fifteen minute
city, of controlling whether or notyou know what you eat and how much
you eat, and all the restof this stuff is part of the c
forties agenda. Yeah again, it'sit's it's we've lost our freedom. Yeah,
you know, I want to mentionthis because the importance of people listening
to your program and subscribing to theTrends Journal because we don't do what anybody

(02:08:28):
tells us to do. We justspeak for ourselves and the facts we put
out. You know, I don'tmake up stuff. It's a magazine.
I put the facts in there asthey're being reported, and then we give
you our analysis and forecasts. Butthis is a headline in yesterday Wednesday's New
York Times without causing a fox farright loses foothold in the main stream.

(02:08:58):
Huh again? Do you like TuckerCarlson agreed? Disagree with him? Not?
The issue? Far right loses afoothold in the mainstream, which means
it's not only far right, it'sanybody that doesn't agree with the mainstream.
How dare you? Yeah, we'retalking one guy, one guy that's not

(02:09:22):
repeating what ninety nine point nine ninenine nine nine nine of the prostitutes,
the media wars that get paid toput out by their corporate pimps and government
hornmasters repeat one person and it's news. That's right. Yeah, everybody's got
to say the same thing, eatthe same thing. We can't have got

(02:09:43):
to drive the same thing, right. It's just like we saw with a
pandemic. No, no, wecan't have any other alternative forms of treatment.
I remating his horse medicine. You'vegot to have the shot. We
can't have any electric cars that arehydrogen or fuel cell. You gotta have
the one that charges off of thegrid. And oh, by the way,
we're going to shut the grid down, that's what they're doing. You

(02:10:03):
know, you've got to have there'sone thing that they're going to push on
you, and you've got to saythe same thing that everybody else says,
or you get purged out. Andthat's the cover vown magazine. It's the
chat GPTM. We'll tell you whatto think, don't think for yourself,
that's right. Yeah, I thinkthat you know, with all the stuff
that we've seen over the last threeyears, this whole idea that we've got

(02:10:26):
experts and we've got authorities that's beendriven into the ground with people like Fouci
and the rest of them, youknow, doctor Scarf and Redfield and all
the rest of them. And sowhat are we going to do to have
some kind of a believable authority.Oh well, chat GPT and they're going
around shopping this stuff around as ifthis is you know, they're inventing some
superhuman intelligence and we're all going tobow down and serve the machine. That

(02:10:50):
is the thing that's really dangerous,because I know a lot of people are
going to fall for that. Ofcourse they are, They've already done it.
Yea. You know, you lookat you look at you know.
I don't carry a cell phone.And the reason I owned is because the
research on it that shows how deadlythey are, not my research, University
California at Berkeley University, Berkeley,California. Rather, if you're want it
for seventeen minutes a day for tenyears, your chances are getting a brain

(02:11:13):
to him only increased by sixty percent. Again, again, going back to
everybody, this is how you walkdown the street, This is how your
life is. This is how littlekids, little infants playing with the screen.
They're addicted to it already, it'salready. So the chat is just

(02:11:35):
taking him to another level of obedience. And you know, now the governments
are trying to stop some of it. And you know why why because only
the governments are allowed to tell youwhat to think and how to think.
And now they're fighting against chat.They don't want Chat to take over their

(02:12:01):
roles in telling us what to think. Yeah, yeah, it'll be pretty
easy for them, though they've gotyou know, one of the things that
we're saying to the senator as well, you know, we want to make
sure that we got licenses. Noteverybody can get into this. It's just
too important, it's too powerful.Not everybody should be allowed to do this.
And so one of them says,well, you know, the concerns
that I've got is that we're goingto have a concentration. We're gonna have
like this little monopoly or oligarchy orduopoly or whatever. And he goes,

(02:12:24):
well, that's actually a good thing, said Sam Altman, because now they'll
have fewer companies to oversee. Couldyou believe this? Yeah, no,
it isn't that amazing. And that'swhat everything's become. Monopolies. Yeah,
yeah, I mean, what's thebig news in the markets? Oh?
Home depost sales went down, Targetsales went down. Yeah, oh my

(02:12:46):
god. You know, but howabout the mom and pops? Who cares
about them? Nobody cares because they'vebeen taken over the big zone everything.
Yeah. Again, as we justtalked many times when we were young guys
that were hardways stories, sationary stores, drug stores, grocery stores, and
other world chains, drug chains,stationary chains, drug chains, grocery chains,

(02:13:11):
to chains own everything, and we'rein chainsave land. You would chain
chained by Wall Street. And that'san interesting point as well. Um Brian
Shall Hobby made the point when hewas talking about all of this mad rush
of Wall Street to invest in artificialintelligence and to funnel all this money into

(02:13:33):
just one or two country companies,and yet you know, we've had these,
um, you know, pump anddump stories about artificial intelligence going back
to the eighties. This is actuallya third wave. It'd be the fourth
wave if you count self driving incars and the failed promises of those things.
But before people really saw how thatwas failing, they brought on chat

(02:13:54):
GPT and that may be one ofthe reasons why they rolled it out so
quickly, because they didn't want peopleto start to get skeptic all of this
autonomous stuff. And so, youknow, they roll that out and I
think it's probably going to go thesame way as these other two waves.
I think it's going to go thesame way as the autonomous cars. But
if that happens and it turns outthat this is you know, the lot
of the games are illusionary and itisn't going to be the big deal that

(02:14:16):
they're telling everybody that's gonna have bigimplications for the stock. I think it's
going to keep going. You thinkit will? I really do? You
know? I have to. Iplayed with it a bit, you know.
I you know, I'm a writer. I've been writing, you know
for a long time. That's sellingbooks a magazine. And I wrote it,
and I said, let me seewhat CHAT says about what I wrote.

(02:14:37):
And one of the things I wrote, and we put the information and
could you improve what we just puthere and make it more blah blah blah
blah. And I gotta tell youwhat it did was holy. I couldn't
believe it. I could not believeit. They gave us some really good
strong points. Yeah, and whatyou're going to see that's on one end.

(02:14:58):
I mean, and I know howto write. But young people aren't
going to learn how to write.Yes, they're not going to learn how
to think. They're going to goto Chat for everything. Look at the
dependence, tell you look at thething it. You know, does it
do a perfect job? No,but it's giving it's going to take for
people that don't know how to doit to do certain things. They're going

(02:15:22):
to rely on this again, particularlythe younger kids. That's their lives.
Their lives are high tech. Youknow, we grew up when there was
nothing, you know, I remember, you know, I'll never forget.
The guy's name was mister Sarantino.In the tenth grade and I there were
academic students in general students in NewYork, and I was a general student.

(02:15:46):
I barely got out of high school, like I left back in the
fifth grade. And he said,you know, most of your kids aren't
going to learn much here. Hesaid, you really learn. You should
learn how to do something, whetheryou take a shop class. You used
to have shop classes in those days. We learn to make things and fix
things, or or become a secretary. You learn out of type. I

(02:16:09):
took a typing class and I becamea writer. But anyway, now you
don't have to take a typing class. People go on these things like this.
Boo ye, it's their lives again. One time, one time,
you how to learn how to type. You don't have to do that.
It's so what I'm saying to you, David, is no this this artificial

(02:16:33):
intelligence. It's the cover of ourmagazine one of the top trends for twenty
twenty three. AI we own you. It's real, and it's only going
to get worse because the people don'tthink for themselves already that's right, and
they want others to think for themthat's right. That's the key thing.

(02:16:56):
I think it's going to drive it. They don't care if it's accurate,
as you know as much and I'vehad people will send me stuff and say,
hey, that's did a great jobof computer coding for me. Did
a great job of circuit design.Had a listener who's an engineer said,
hey, we gave it this circuitdesign, did a great job of that.
The woman who was interviewed by Wiredmagazine that I talked about just before

(02:17:16):
you came on, said that asshe was looking at autonomous vehicles and things,
she says, it's the same typeof hype. She said that I've
seen with chat GPT that I sawthat people don't see the flaws, they
don't talk about the flaws. Andshe said, when you start using this
for writing code, she said,people who are going to debug that stuff,

(02:17:37):
we're going to have a long careerbecause it's got to be really precise
and it's going to be interesting tosee how this breaks out. But as
you're pointing out, people have alower standard of what they're looking for as
well. Yes, and when youlook at what has happened with GPS,
we use our phones for directions andthat type of stuff. People have forgotten
how to use a map, evento an extent that fifth years ago when

(02:18:01):
I went with a high school groupto Europe and we were all on a
bus and we had a tour driverand she, you know, would get
disoriented wherever we would go somewhere andshould start to take us to and we
would say, no, no,the bus or wherever is over this direction
and she say, oh, youknow Americans have such a great sense of
direction. Well that was because wewere driving cars, you know, and

(02:18:24):
we were you know, we wereactively engaged to that. You can actually
see what happens with the London taxidriver. There's certain parts of the brain
that get developed and when you don'tuse that, they atrophy and they die
and they shrink. And that's what'shappening right now. We got shrinking.
Yeah, exactly. Yeah, Andagain I had maps all over guys,
buy you everywhere I go I'd buya map and take all the back roads

(02:18:46):
and you know, try to dodifferent things. And I don't. Again,
I don't carry a phone. Iwouldn't know how to use a GPS
would if my life's depended on it. I wouldn't know how to use a
cell phone. I got an oldflip phone that I take with me when
I travels. I could, youknow, tell the car to pick me
up at the airport. But again, you know, so this this chat,

(02:19:11):
GPT and the others, they're puttingcountless billions of dollars into this,
and in a lot of levels,it's going to work. There's a study
that came out and they're showing Ithink it was gold and Sacks and one
of them, over three hundred millionjobs will be lost globally because of this,
and then the robotic thing picking upas well. You know, you're

(02:19:35):
but you know, as they were, they were they made a big point
of I think it was IBM laidoff seventy five people or something, that
we're gonna maybe replace these jobs withour official intelligence. Within the next week.
They and other companies like Google thathave big layoffs, they go to
Washington. They're lobbing for more Hone B VSS so they can get in
cheap foreign technical help. Yeah,so part of that, they got their

(02:19:58):
own agenda. You know, they'retwo things going on. There's something that's
real there, but there's also somethingthat is being used by these people for
their own purposes to try to monopolizethis, to try to have an excuse
for firing people and bringing in cheaplabor all the rest of this type of
thing. Oh, that's why,you know, that's what happened with Bill
Clinton that gave us the H oneB visas if I'm number correct, and

(02:20:22):
it was Lyndon Johnson may He rottenHell who gave us the Vietnam War.
And then what happened was, againI'm of that age, we were either
going to college to be to draftor getting drafted, so you didn't have
a lot of young workers. Andthat's when they that's the guy that did
away with our immigration rules. Theywere very tough before that. Yeah,

(02:20:46):
and he's the one that killed itand they're doing that's one of the reasons
why they're letting so many people inis to bring in more cheap labor.
Again, you don't have to believeme. You could listen to the words
spewing out of the crap head craphead mouth of Jerome Powell and Janet Yelling.
They're blaming inflation, not on thezero interest rate policy or the trillions

(02:21:13):
and trillions, countless trillions of dollars, well over seven trillion that the government's
jumped into the economy to fight theCOVID War. No, that didn't coise
inflation. Stay home, he hasfree money. I think COIs inflation.
Well, coise inflation, according tothese two clowns, are higher wages.

(02:21:33):
Yeah, I know, I knowwhat a joke that is. And then
higher wages. They only people gettinghigher wages of the CEOs, and they're
getting a lot higher wages. Youknow, their wages went up seven percent,
almost eight percent this last year,but they've gone up twenty or thirty
percent the year prior. I mean, it's just amazing how much they're making.
But the workers aren't getting a raise. But that's what the working The
rais of the work is about fourpoint two percent. The official inflation number

(02:21:58):
is five point nine. When youlook at the real inflation, I mean,
you go to John Williams shadow stats, you got it at what it's
it's about fourteen percent. Wow,so your wages are way below inflation.
And that's the other important thing.When they report the retail sales, they're

(02:22:20):
not putting any inflation into it.So they're saying that, you know,
people spent you know, one pointthree percent more in the last quarter.
No, they didn't. They spentone point three percent more to buy less.
Yeah, because the prices went up, right, But they don't say

(02:22:41):
that, yeah, right, yeah, they don't adjusted for inflation. You
know, when you look at what'shappening with the border, it's a crisis.
And even in New York on LongIsland, where Caring is from the
same same county she was in,they've declared a state of emergency because there
are so many people that are comingin. They said, we can't handle
this. We don't have the eastfacilities, who don't have the housing facilities,
we don't have the medical facilities.And it's happening everywhere. They're trying

(02:23:05):
to stop it there, but ofcourse most of the places are not in
Illinois. Gerald they are going tospend a billion dollars on Medicaid, and
they put it in the headlines herefor undocumented seniors. No they're they're aliens,
they're foreign citizens who have come hereillegally. But they're gonna give them
Medicare. They're going to give themMedicaid. They put this out about a

(02:23:30):
year ago, and they spent morethe first month than they anticipated they were
going to spend for the entire year. And then you've got California. They're
extending unemployment benefits to illegal aliens whocome across the border. This is an
entitlement program for everybody in the world. And again, look at the freaks
we have running the show. Yeah. And by the way, it's not

(02:23:52):
only in America. Yeah, it'sthey're flooding into Europe. That's right.
And here's the deal. When theywhen the Nobel piece of crap prize went
a Barack Obama and Hitlery Clinton,Samantha Power, Susan Rice. I love
this Boulogna. If only women werein charge, there'd be peace. What

(02:24:16):
a load of crap that is.How about a Rice the next mushroom cloud?
You see, we have to stopSaddam Hussein from launching it, right,
Yeah, anyway, going back tothat, Paddafi warned when they overthrew
Libya, he warned the Europeans.Anything happens to me, you are going

(02:24:39):
to have a refugee crisis you willnot be able to handle. Because he
had made a deal with Italy andother countries that he would not allow people
to come out through Libya and theninto Europe because that was the short cut
right in and he stopped it afterthe assassin needed him. Oh, I

(02:25:01):
go to last time I was inItaly. I couldn't believe. I couldn't
believe all the these Once upon atime, Germany had German people, the
French had French people, the Spanishhad Spanish people. Right, no more,
no more you got because of thebecause of the other Bill Clinton and

(02:25:26):
the murderous what they did to Syria. We want that guy has saw it
out of there. They have fivemillion refugees have left five million, and
now the Ukraine war. So whatI'm saying to you, David, this
is global and it's going to getworse because let's look at the economic data.

(02:25:48):
Now hear this. You don't haveto wait until it becomes quote official,
before they announced we're in a recession. We're in one and it's global.
The numbers came out today in Austria. I think the inflation number is
like nine point five percent. Inthe UK it's over ten percent. Your

(02:26:13):
unemployment rate of young people in Chinais over twenty percent. Wow. Yeah,
so the recessions already begun. Now, let's look at the economy.
When they raised interest rates in earlyMay May third twenty five basis points as

(02:26:37):
a street head forecast, the wordwas they weren't going to raise interest rates
again. They're going to pause whenthey meet next month. I think it's
about June thirteenth. Now the streetschanging their mind and they say the Federal
Reserve is going to raise interest rates? Really they yeah, if they raise

(02:26:58):
interests strates. That's why you're seeinggold prices going down. Gold prices are
going down because the bed is they'regoing to raise interest rates. So when
interest rates go up, the dollargets stronger, that's all it is.
When the interest rates go down,the dollar gets weak or goal gets stronger.
So now the bed on the streetis they're going to raise interest rates

(02:27:18):
on the twenty five basis points.If they do that, this recession is
going to get a lot worse.It's very important to understand this that when
they start raising interest rates, youdon't feel the effect right away. It
takes months and months and months andmonths, and now that time has come.
Yeah. Yeah, it's been abig avalanche that's been building and they

(02:27:43):
just keep pouring more and more snowon the end of the pack that's going
to come crashing down on it.So, you know, if they if
the word on the street is thatthey're going to continue to raise interest rates,
it's creating something of a little bitof a buying opportunity for goal.
I guess the silver lining that wecould look at it the golden silver lining.
Yeah, gold is going to pricesare going to get weaker as interest
rates go up. And the storyand another important thing again, you know,

(02:28:09):
we don't we look at things tothe way they are, not the
way we want them to be.And following the midterm elections, we said
that the standard and pours the SMPfive hundred would go up. And the
reason we said it is because ofthe facts over the last past forty midterm

(02:28:30):
elections. Forty midterm elections, theSMP five hundred's gone up over sixteen percent.
Now we're halfway a little more thanhalfway through November, right December,
January, February March April May six. Halfway through, it's up almost eight
percent the SMP. Yeah, theygot to look at us facts. The

(02:28:56):
data doesn't make a difference. It'show the game is played, right,
That's right. They'll find a wayto pump it up, just like you
know, whatever they gotta do,they gotta empty out the Strategic Petroleum Reserve,
they'll do that. Whatever they needto do, they'll find some way
to jack it up for the electionpurposes. You're absolutely right. Yeah,

(02:29:18):
now talking about the election. Whatthey're going to do, and I will
bet my life on it is theywill start to radically lower interest rates in
the run up to the presidential realityshow next year. They do it all
the time because the person in powerthey want to keep in power because they're
running the show and they don't wantto deal with anybody else. So again,

(02:29:41):
the person playing out with Treasury secretaryhas fatch up brute as we call
her an Italian that means a dumbugly face. The Janet Yellen, what
was the last job sitting at thehead of the Federal Reserve, and now
she's out a Treasury secretary. Youcall her fascist brute, the fascist root

(02:30:05):
force. But anyway, So they'regoing to lower them, there's no question
about it. When interest rates godown, gold prices spike. We could
see gold easily hitting two thousand,two hundred dollars announced easily, easily easily,
And you got to also understand thatthe game is rigged. And I'm
not making that up. They findJap Morgan Chase nine hundred million dollars are

(02:30:30):
egging the precious metals market in twentynineteen, which is an ancient history,
that's right. Yeah, And ofcourse the big thing you're talking about rigged
markets. You know, you lookat you look at the derivatives, you
know, like LD and silver andthat type of thing. You know,
where they're selling those things and they'resupposedly holding them on the Shanghai Gold Exchange
and stuff like that, and peoplefind out that there's not really any gold

(02:30:54):
behind those paper gold stocks and stuff. You know, there's only a small
fraction of it. It is afractional system, like a fractional reserve system.
When they sell those that paper goldversion of it, right, and
think about it, they won't letus look at go into Fort Knox to
see what's in there. That's right. Yeah, it won't allow us.
That's right. The plantation work isof slave land. You are not allowed
to see it. Yeah, yeah, you can't see You can't see this

(02:31:18):
Shanghai Gold Exchange, Fort Knox,you can't it. The Federal Reserve and
that that stuff. Oh no,how dare you ask? Well, you
know one thing that you've been rightabout for a very long time, and
every time I talked to you,every couple of weeks, there's big news
about commercial real estate. San Franciscojust had a major auction last week,

(02:31:39):
the Union Bank building. It wentfor seventy five percent less per square foot
than comparable building cells prior to thepandemic. This is gradually rolling out.
You know, first we see thisfrom one corporation. Another corporation drops all
the money that they're losing in incommercial real estate. You've been saying this

(02:32:00):
forever, and it is a tricklingout. Bit by bit. We're starting
to see where the true crisis hasbeen. Now seventy five percent down in
San Francisco, or here's the dealthey in San Francisco, they have nearly
I'm not talking about people going backto work. That's only about I think
it's about forty five percent around thereforty three percent of the people returning to

(02:32:24):
work. So but they have that'sthe office occupancy rate is around forty forty
five percent globally and globally nationally theten largest cities is forty nine point six
percent. That's office occupancy, meaningpeople going back to the office. The
vacancye rate VACAN buildings in San Franciscoin LA around thirty percent vacant. Wow,

(02:32:50):
vacant. Now people keep repeating theline, well they'll turn them into
housing. No, you won't.The buildings built in the last fifty years.
You can't convert them. It's tooexpensive. Can't do it. You're
ugly, stupid things just steel andglass. You know you don't have windows.
You know, you can't do it. It doesn't work. So now

(02:33:16):
the commercial office building is going tobring down the banks as well, and
they are about five point six trilliondollars worth of commercial real estate loans.
Now you have less tenants, you'vegot a mortgage to pay. Oh,

(02:33:41):
they're floating rates most of these mortgages. So now interest rates went up.
They got to pay more on theirmortgage as they have way less income coming
in. Yeah, yeah, thisis going to be like we've never seen
before. We warn this when theybe again the COVID war. People are

(02:34:01):
staying now at home when they saidyou can't go to work, stay home,
and people are gonna, they're sayingthemselves as they're stay at home day
after day, week after week,month after month, waking up and saying,
oh, I've been getting up atfive o'clock in the morning to drive
an hour and a half to work. I'm not going to do that anymore.

(02:34:22):
I'm not doing it anymore. Andso now I'm I'm the employer.
I said, okay, stay hometwo days a week, because I you
know, I have employees worked forme. I don't want to. I'm
lucky if I see one or twoa day. I don't. I got
other things on my mind. Idon't care if he's just doing your job.

(02:34:43):
I don't care where you do itfrom now, I could save rent
on the office. I don't needall the space anymore. The big tenant.
So there's subleasing and they're not renewingtheir lease again. There's over five
trillion dollars worth of loans coming again, and interest rates have gone up there

(02:35:03):
to pay more on their on theirmortgages on their loans. So they're going
to say to the banks, here, you keep the building, man,
I don't want it. And again, the bigs that own these they don't
lose any money. The rich don'tlose it. It's the people that invest
in it, so they don't care. So what I'm saying to you is
the banking crisis has just begun.And it's not only in the United States,

(02:35:30):
it's global. People aren't going backto work like they used to owe
and I forgot. Oh. Iwas just down the city on Wednesday,
down in New York City in Midtown. Fifties for rent, police, for
rent, rent, rent, rent, rent, all over the place,

(02:35:52):
all over the place. So isbecause once upon a time you had commuters
coming in. Yeah, you don'thave them anymore. So all the businesses
that we're serving them a lunch andall the rest of the stuff, they're
going out of business. Let meask you this, while we're talking about
the banking industry and knock on effectsof some of these things that are happening

(02:36:13):
in potential failures. When we lookat Silicon Valley Bank in the Cayman Islands,
I think it was they had abranch and there was a lot of
money that was at that branch,mostly from Asian investors, most of them
from China, and they were told, you know, we'll wait. We're

(02:36:37):
not really sure what's going to happen. The Wall Street Journal said this last
weekend that they got word that theFDIC is not going to cover any of
that stuff. They said, theFDIC is there to cover only domestic stuff.
And so if they've got their moneyin an American bank and that American
bank goes belly up, then there'sno FDIC coverage. And of course they
went well beyond the FDIC coverage.They extended coverage, you know, for

(02:37:01):
billions and tens of billions of dollarsfor some of these people, when it's
only covered for two hundred thousand dollars. These people thought they were going to
get it because it was a SiliconValley bank that said, nope, there's
a foreign branch, so we're goingto do that. Now, here's the
other part of it. Gerald.They said that you have JP Morgan and
City Bank. Between the two ofthem, City Banks got six hundred billion

(02:37:22):
dollars in that kind of a situationof deposits that are in City Bank branches
that are in foreign countries, youknow, like Cayman Islands or wherever.
Right, and JP Morgan has gotfour hundred over four hundred billion there So
between the two of them, justthose two banks over a trillion dollars,
like one point one trillion dollars thatis not going to be FDIC protected for

(02:37:46):
these depositors. And as they're lookingat that, they're saying, was this
going to create a massive run oneven big banks like JP Morgan as people
want to get their money out ofthat and put it into something else.
I do know, what do youthink? I think to some extent,
but the the money is really pouringout of the small and medium sized banks

(02:38:07):
and going into the bigger banks,you know, so they don't like you
know what you just said. Mostpeople have no idea about that. If
sin apheign country, you don't getany coverage. I think it's two hundred
and fifty thousand. I'm not sureof the fdi C. And like you
said, they bailed out the bigsthat had money in there. That again
our money to give back to thosewho who would should have lost it.

(02:38:33):
Yeah, and again the whole gameis rigged, right, and so but
I I, you know, Idon't. I don't think. Yeah,
I don't think that's gonna be apredominant effect. That the fear that people
had that the two big defailed banksare going to be supported, so I
got to get my money out ofthis regional bank. I think that's going
to be a bigger factor, justone. And maybe there'll be so much

(02:38:54):
of that happening because JP Morgan wason the big winners, JP Morgan and
Bank of America where they're recipient ofso much of the deposits that were shifting
out of small regional banks, midsized banks, that maybe that'll offset foreign
investors who decided they want to pulltheir money out and put it in something
else. Right, And yeah,and again we have to look at who
made this happen. You mentioned Bankof America and JP Morgan Chase. Once

(02:39:18):
upon a time not too long ago, banks who are only interstate banks.
They weren't intro internal intrust, statenot interstate. Bank of America was only
on California, and then he hadJimmy Kata and Reagan are the ones that
started changing that and allowed them togo across the country and they put all

(02:39:41):
the small banks out of business ormost of them. So again, when
this thing hits, when I saidthat the commercial real estate business sector,
it's in mostly small and medium sizedbanks that have those loans, So they're
the ones that are going to gethit the hottest. So the bigs are

(02:40:01):
just gonna get bigger. Oh yeah, and again, look at it.
We got we what do we have? A interest rate between five and five
point two five percent? You putyour money in JP Morgan Chase Back of
America. What do you get?How much did they give you to for
depositing it there? Basically nothing?Basically nothing. Yeah, yeah, nothing,

(02:40:22):
tiny fraction of one percent typically exactly. Yeah. I remember going back
and looking, you know, whenthey were saying, well, you know,
interest rates when they got up athome mortgage rates got up around five
percent, they said, oh look, you know, it's got back up
to where it was like in thesixties. And I wonder what they paid
people who put money in savings accountsin the sixties. And I went back
and when it was like five percentat the banks, you know, to

(02:40:43):
borrow a home loan, they wouldpay you four percent. So then you
know, you but today, youknow, five percent, when it was
five percent to get a home mortgage. It was like zero point zero one
percent that they would pay you.I mean it's less the way, yeah,
almost negative interest rates. Again.You know, it's um one of
the covers of the Trends Journal.I find it here. Yeah, here

(02:41:07):
it is. Yeah, yeah,chasing the money changers out of the temple.
But it's a modern bank that Jesusis that's it. That's right,
nothing's changed. Yeah, it's acrime synical, Yeah, ranking front of
our eye. So anyway, weare headed. The recession has already begun.

(02:41:31):
People are feeling it again. Italked to, you know a lot
of people. One guy I knowthat has a he supplies the top restaurants
in New York from New York Citynorth of where I am and into Connecticut
and Jersey, a huge firm andhe high end restaurants. He provides a

(02:41:52):
produce for I estimate, said,how how's business going. He's just slowing
down. M it's slowing. Soit's slowing down at the top. You
know how bad it is below that? Yeah? It was. Was the
numbers, some seventy four percent ofthe people living paycheck to paycheck. Yeah
that's right. And yeah, theprices of things are coming down, but

(02:42:16):
they're still very high. Yeah,right, and was of course the house
was what almost four hundred thousand dollars. That was a mansion when I was
a kid, Like there were twentyeight acres in Rhinebeck of the town of
Miland right off right next to Rhinebeckin nineteen eighty four three parcels sixteen acre,

(02:42:37):
ten acre and eight point five acresand an old house on one of
them. Had to take redo thewhole old house, but it was a
beautiful old house. Twenty eight thousanddollars. Wow, twenty eight thousand dollars.
Yeah, when I was a kid, when we moved from the Bronx
to Ancres, my father may restin peace bot this big old house.
Thirteen thousand dollars. That's right,Yeah, it's absolutely amazing. Now now,

(02:43:03):
of course your car, of courseyou watch fifty thousand dollars, yes,
yep, right, average price ofnew cars right there. The funny
thing about it is the used carsare not that much less used cars now
are just what what you know,I remember talking to Eric Peters the EP
Auto as we talk about cars lotand uh, you know, just a

(02:43:24):
few years ago we're saying, lookat this. The average price of a
new car is like thirty thousand dollars. Can you believe this? And now
it's gone up to fifty thousand,and the used cars or thirty thousand.
And then when you look at theinterest rates that they charge being more for
used car, the used car paymentsare almost as bad as the new car
payments. It's it's crazy what ishappening. And this is what people stretching

(02:43:45):
this out for, you know,eight years to pay it back seven eight
years. That type of thing peoplecan't afford to get. They're pricing us
out of housing, they're pricing usout of cars everything. That's that's the
plan, I think. And let'slet's talk a little bit about I want
to get your take on what ishappening with fed now and fed coin and

(02:44:05):
CBDC and things like that. Course, there's no question they're all going to
do it. They're going to goto digital coins. It was one of
the covers of our magazine back inMarch of twenty twenty, from dirty cash
to digital trash, right, andwhat they're going to do, you know,
it'll be something like the Russians hackedout a banking system. But don't
worry about it. You know,we got a new coin for you.

(02:44:26):
They're going to come up with it. They want to know every print you
spent, what you spent it on, where you spent it, have more
control over you. But most ofall they could get their tax money.
That's all they're interested in is politiciansnever work a day in their life,
so they got to get your moneycoming in. And so they they're all
going to go digital. And they'regoing to go digital. I really believe
when, especially when the dollar crashes, because the dollars at its end,

(02:44:52):
the most of the world, themajority of the world has had enough of
America's a geminy being it local withthe awards and what they do in countries
and economics, they had enough ofAmerica, right, So we're going to
see the dollar go down. Whenthat happens, you're going to go digital.
They're all going to go digital,There's no question about. And so

(02:45:13):
when you look at what is happening. The same guy who held court with
a Senate and had them eating outof his hand, Sam Altman, He's
only like thirty eight years old,very much like Sam Bankman, just a
little bit different. Right, He'sthe alternative to Sam Bankman. But he's
put together a coalition. He's abig venture capital guy. He's put together
a coalition with some of the biggestventure capital firms out there. As a

(02:45:35):
matter of fact, I think it'slike and Teres and Horowitz has taken the
lead in this venture capital thing forworld Coin. They say they're going to
go out with that in about sixweeks. But a key part of that
is having a biometric ID. Andthe justification for putting this thing out is
that they want to have universal basicincome because after they take everything away from

(02:45:56):
us, as you know, they'regoing to put us all on a uniform
universal allowance to try to keep usfrom coming after them. Bloomberg said that
when he was running for president,he said, Hey, we're gonna We
had the agricultural society, we replacedit with the industrial revolution. Now the
smart ones of us are looking howto get everybody out of their job,

(02:46:18):
and the only thing we have toworry about is how we're going to keep
them from coming after us with guillotines. That's what Bloomberg said when he's running
for president. So it's always beenabout universal basic income. You see Elon
Musk pushing this. You see SamAltman pushing it, because that's what Andrew
Yang was running on four years ago, you know, when he started his
campaign. And so this push tohave an ID and to have a universal

(02:46:41):
basic income as well as a digitalcoin, that seems to be what they're
pushing, and it seems like thatit's coming pretty quickly. Do you think
this is going to happen? Whendo you think this whole thing is going
to collapse? You know, hecan't tell when the collapse is going to
come because they keep rigging the markets. Yeah, that's true, that's true.
You know again, you know,I never heard when economics one on
one. They never taught me aboutzero and negative interest rate policy or think

(02:47:07):
quote quantitative easing. But they're buyingup corporate bonds, your repro markets,
you know, all of this stuff. So they're going to do anything they
can. A plunge protection team,I mean, it's a plunge protection What
are you talking about. Oh,we're going to read the markets when they
go down too low, but don'tworry about it. The biggs when the
prices go up, they'll sell atthe top and then it'll go down again

(02:47:31):
and the little people who lose.See, you can't forecast this stuff.
It's impossible, but it's going tohappen, and it's all going to go
digital, there's no question about it. Again, we began talking about the
chat GPT. It's all artificial,artificial currencies, artificial intelligence, artificial flavors,

(02:47:56):
artificial coloring. It's all artificial.And look at the damage it's done.
Yeah, that's right. You know. Oh, by the way,
I want to remind everybody again,I think we sent you the poster.
Yes, the rally coming up andpull that up, Travis. Yeah,
we got that poster. Yeah,that's is that next week that's going to

(02:48:16):
be happening. Yeah, yeah,May twenty seven, and you've been here
up in Kingston. Yeah. Andit's peace and free. It's it's make
America healthy again, spiritually, emotionally, patriotically. And we're coming at it
from very many different directions because Ikeep telling people, you're in the fight
for your life, and what youhave to do is get in the best

(02:48:37):
shape you can physically, emotionally andspiritually. And we need to fight for
as I see it, peace onearth, goodwill to all. Like I
say, they have a thing calledthe pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance
to the flag of the United Statesof America and to the Republic for which
it stands, One nation under God? Stop what God you're talking about?

(02:49:01):
What God? Did you see thenew study that came out from Brown University
this week? God would have lovedthis. Eight trillion dollars of our money
was spend since nine to eleven tofight wars. Yeah, and America killed
wat between I'm not sure the numberfour point three million or four point five

(02:49:24):
million. What God you're talking about? Mars, the god of war.
I guess one nation under Mars isyeah? What makes you under Satan?
Yeah that's right. Yeah, that'sright. So I'm tired of this killing
machine and I'm doing and again Iwant to everybody listening, it's not about

(02:49:46):
me that you're coming to the rallyfor or donating to occupy peace for.
You're not helping me. This coursedme. Have you been here? Oh
yeah, that's me. A lotof money to put on. Yes,
takes a lot of energy from me. I'm not a kid. Yeah,
And I'm doing it for the spiritof America. As I say, my

(02:50:13):
blood is Italian, my heart's American. I was born in Altavillaiapino, Vico
Quentz. That wouldn't be me.I'm only me because the Monopolitano born in
the Bronx, born to be free. So I do everything I can to
fight for the freedom that was givento me and allowed to have by our
founding fathers, that these little freakynothing boys and girls have stolen from us.

(02:50:39):
So what you're doing, you're nothelping me, You're helping yourself.
So if you don't want to doanything, don't do anything. But don't
complain when all your freedom is stolenfrom you or we're being annihilated in a
nuclear war because you shut your mouthand you didn't put your money with your
heart, mind and soul are right. So and again I also want to

(02:51:03):
thank all the people that had beendonating and because this costs a lot of
money to put on, So goto occupied peace dot com, Occupied peace
dot com and do what you can. We'll do nothing. It's up to
you. M Yeah, it's agreat crowd. It was a great event.
And this year you've got Dennis Cascinich, You've got John Whitehead, who

(02:51:24):
I have I put forward his articlesall the time. He's a great writer
for liberty and for the constitution,great speaker. I'm glad you're going to
have John Whitehead there. And bythe way, Dennis Cascinich is RFK Juniors
campaign manage. Yeah, and helet off. He introduced RFK, I

(02:51:45):
called him RFKJ. He introduced himwhen he had his kickoff speech. I
was Dennis Cascentrich up there. Yeah, And so he's going to be talking
on behalf of RFKN. Because hecouldn't make it here. We're gonna try
to get him up here again,though, probably in September. I'm gonna
do another one. And again Ido I agree with everything, though I

(02:52:05):
don't agree who agrees with everything ofanybody? Yeah, but or you want
Biden or you want shrunk, Well, he's got some very important things to
say that need to be heard.And that's the key thing, you know,
And that's the thing about the elections. It's kind to the point now
where you know, I don't haveany confidence in the integrity of the system.
However, I do believe that thediscussion part of it is very important

(02:52:26):
because it guess it's an idea ofhow they're going to be coming at us.
And lets us talk about these typesof things and talk about what the
problems are. And rfk J hasdone a great job of identifying a lot
of existential problems that other people don'treally want to talk about. It's it's
a key thing. He is almosthe's almost repeating word for word the platform

(02:52:48):
of occupied peace. And one ofthem is close all those eight hundred bases
overseas in over seventy countries and bringthe troops hold, to secure the homeland,
to protect America. Yes, yes, absolutely, And and he's come
out against the biggest taking over ourlives. He is against all of these

(02:53:16):
refugees coming into America. You know, there's a lot of things that this
guy. I'm on the same sideof it. You know, I've had
enough of this. I don't wantit. Yeah, I've had enough.
Well, he's stroke against the CBDCstuff as well, you know. Yeah,
and he came out against digital coinsas and it was good to see
that because you know, we don'twant to only there's been a few high

(02:53:37):
profile Republicans who've talked about it.There's been some people in Congress, and
of course they can't do anything aboutit because Biden's gonna be to it.
They don't have the votes to overridethat. Desantist talked about it. I
think Ramaswami talked about it. Butwe don't want that to just be a
Republican issue. So it's really importantthat our FKJ is talking about this on
the Democrat side so it doesn't justbecome oh well, Republicans are for that,

(02:53:58):
so I'm against it type of thing, which we see over and over
again. Yeah yeah, yeah,So again, this guy's talking about a
lot of stuff that I'm on thesame page with. And again you look
at the data. The people don'twant either Trump or Biden. That's right,
that's right. And even the Democratsdon't want Biden's right, and particularly

(02:54:18):
the younger people. I mean,it's this is like a great grandfather,
you know, and they don't wantthem. So this guy could win.
And of course they're they're playing itdown. You know, they always say,
you know, long shot, youknow, yeah, call a long
shot. What are you look atit? Again, the people, to
me have had enough of Trump andthey and they've had and they don't want

(02:54:39):
Biden. Oh yeah, oh yeahabsolutely. And you know when we talking
about Trump talking about having enough ofTrump, do you see this lawsuit about
Rudy Giuliani that was there and whatcame out as part of that. You
know, he's got some assistant.Then she's got out a lot of allegations
about sexual misconduct and everything. Butshe says she's got recordings of him talking
about pardon for two million dollars.And I interviewed John Kiryaku a few years

(02:55:03):
ago, and he said, youknow, he served his time because he
exposed the torture program, and hejust wanted to clear his name and to
get his pension that was there,which wasn't anywhere close to two million.
I think it's like seven hundred thousanddollars. And he said he had a
meeting with Rudy and his friends andRudy gets up to go to the bathroom
and the two guys say, Okay, it's gonna be two million dollars.
Guys, are you crazy. I'mnot gonna spend that two million dollars.
Even if I wasn't opposed to thaton principle, I wouldn't give that to

(02:55:26):
you for seven hundred thousand dollars.But she says she's got recordings of this.
I mean that I think that couldblow up bigger than any of this
other stuff they're throwing at Trump,and people are just it discussed sick of
him. Look at that little arrogantjerk. You just talked about it,
Yeah, Rudy, look at thatarrogant, little stupid piece of crap.
And that Oh isn't Diane not soFinestein doing great? She's dying fine Stein.

(02:55:56):
I think it's what she is,right. Oh, and and and
Mitch McConnell, Yeah, and ChuckySchuma and Lindsey Graham. Look at the
clown so peters ship, one littleclown after one jerk after Adam what is
it Pete, Adam Schiff, Peter, Yeah, he's a good guy,

(02:56:18):
Peter Schiff, Adam the little clownguy up in California. And look at
the jerks telling us what to do. Yeah, they're circling the drain.
And I think they're kind of apicture. They're they're kind of like the
portrait of Dorian Gray, right there, a picture of the American Empire.
All of these politicians I show,they're real quick one second, yeah,

(02:56:39):
yeah, yeah, it is right, It is amazing, you know.
And as I said earlier, uh, you know, Pelosi is right there
with Diane Feinstein. They both figuredout how to make hundreds of millions of
dollars on the stock market. Andof the course they're going to manipulate this
thing. He's the shirts that aregoing to be available and our site later
today at politicians. Yeah, that'sgood, that's good. What's on the

(02:57:05):
back? Oh there you go.Oh that should get some responses, especially
if people wear them around Kingston,New York. Yeah, they're gonna that's
gonna win friends and influence people.Oh yeah, yeah, I'm so adored.
Remember when we locked when everything waslocked down and I had I had

(02:57:26):
rallies when everything was locked down andpeople were afraid to go out. Yeah,
we all died. There were fouror five hundred people. Everybody died
from the COVID we killed us.My son says, you're the toast of
the town there. They really dohate freedom there. They want a mask
on my face, save me.You know, they're they're so afraid of

(02:57:48):
living life. It's truly amazing.So sad well. Peace and Freedom Rally
that's gonna be coming up next weekMay the twenty seventh. Again, a
lot of very good speakers there.Dennis cacentich On Whitehead that you hear me
covering his I don't know Frank Moranoor Gary Noll, tell us at a
bit about them. Gerald, FrankMoranos has a big thing on WABC radio

(02:58:09):
and Gary know, Gary knows oneof the pioneers in natural healing. Okay,
and again this is about yeah,Progressive Radio Network is his channels.
He's used to be on everybody backin the day. He's a real great
guy. And so and other speakerstoo. We're going to have a number
of people here, so uh,it starts at one o'clock. It will

(02:58:31):
be live streamed as well Unoccupied Pieceand in the General's Celente channels. So
anybody please do what you can withfighting for peace and freedom because World War
three's already begun. Yes, yes, yeah, yeah, just like a
look at what happened this last week. I thought it was kind of interesting,
these dueling narratives about, you know, we destroyed your Patriot battery,

(02:58:54):
and then the Patriot side they say, well, we destroyed your hypersonic missile.
This is what this has become.What that back and forth exchange I
think was pretty typical. This lookslike this is the military industrial complex is
uh, you know, dueling weapons. Um, let's let's see our weapons
system is better than yours. Let'ssell more of these things. I mean,
that's what this has come down toit. But it's very dangerous because

(02:59:16):
they keep increasing this and increasing thedirect involvement and in direct engagement to Russia,
don't they. Yep. Yeah,it's not a proxy where we're at
war again with one hundred and thirtybillion dollars of our money has gone to
Ukraine. You saw the numbers thatcame out about how much money there is

(02:59:37):
stealing out of it as well.Yes, it's it's again as this country's
infrastructure has rotted as people can't affordto live paycheck to paycheck. One hundred
and thirty billion dollars. Yeah,no problem at all, No problem at
all. Well, it's always greatto talk to you, Gerald, Thank
you so much. Trends Journal dotcom and don't forget Occupy East dot com

(03:00:00):
next week, and of course youcan also donate. Make you drom show.
We've got a problem. Who whoare you? It's the new mugfare
selling at the David Nitshow dot com. Right, So basically a mug is
something that holds liquid, right becausebasically you can't hold coffee

All Episodes

19May23 ADL: Defamation, Lies, Provocateurs; GOP Ignores Important Pro-Life Free Speech Case — Will SCOTUS?

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}19May23 ADL: Defamation, Lies, Provocateurs; GOP Ignores Important Pro-Life Free Speech Case — Will SCOTUS?