22May23 At Hiroshima G7 Nudges Nuclear War; Whose Fault is Default and Why It Doesn't Matter

None

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Yeah, using free speech to freeminds. You're listening to the David Night

(00:35):
Show. As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the twenty second of
May. There of our Lord twothousand twenty three. Today we're gonna take

(00:58):
a look at they're rapidly escalating war, pushing us towards nuclear war. Of
course they would do it in hiroshimup right? Are they trying to send
us a message escalating that desperate attemptseven as their war is failing in Ukraine
and they don't care about the bloodshed. But we're also going to take a

(01:19):
look at the fourteenth Amendment. Ittruly ish and the debt ceiling. It
truly is a reality TV show andthere's nothing that you need to worry about
except for the politicians who are alignedto everybody. We'll talk about the pistol
brace, as well as the factthat we finally have people calling out the

(01:42):
medical martial law at very high levels, which is very important. We have
to understand that this is not over. The legal foundation is there and has
to be address. We'll be rightback. I like this article from Zero

(02:13):
Hedge. This year's Emmy for OutstandingReality Series goes to and it shows a
picture of Biden McCarthy. This isfrom Academy Securities actually covered by zero Hedge,
and that's exactly what this is.This is a reality TV show.
As I say, well, highlyunusual to give an award for a series
that hasn't been finished. It juststood out as deserving in this recognition.

(02:38):
Critics claim that it was manufactured,unbelievable, with one dimensional characters constrained by
an unbelievable script, But the audienceloves it, not they, and of
course it's something for mainstream media totalk about. How can this move markets,
he says, when the people believethat the default cannot happen, and

(02:59):
even those who think that it couldhappen don't believe it is likely to happen.
Yet markets moved on a series ofheadlines, including they were popular,
the meeting ended abruptly and disagreement followedthen by they're heading back to the table.
Now, of course you have alot of people who will manipulate the

(03:19):
markets with headlines like that, anda lot of people got really wealthy manipulating
markets, people like Pelosi, DianeFeinstein doing insider trading, and of course
it's good a bit of that happeningwith us as well. But I also
want to take a look at whythis isn't going to happen and why the
fourteenth Amendment is a non starter ifwords mean anything, if the Constitution has

(03:43):
any authority. I think it's interestingthat after trying his best and doing a
pretty good job or destroying the FirstAmendment, second Amendment, with the Amendment,
the Eighth Amendment, tenth Amendment,pretty much all of the villa rights,
Biden is now expanding his administration toattack amendments to the Constitution outside of
the Bill of Rights. He's goingfor number fourteen and Bripebart had an AFP

(04:09):
story. Now they post it upwithout any correction. Pretty amazing the bias
in this story from AFP. I'msurprised that they would do something like that.
Speaking out a press conference just beforeleaving to return to Washington from the
G seven summit and Hiroshima, Bidensaid Republican's latest demands for spending cuts as
a condition for raising the US government'sborrowing authority were quote frankly unacceptable. Biden

(04:33):
said he was looking into an obscureconstitutional clause and the fourteenth Amendment, which
states that the validity of public debtshall not be questioned. Is that questioning
the debt to do that? No, I'll tell you why, in just
a moment, it doesn't even apply. That doesn't even apply. I think
we have the authority, he said. The question is could it be done?

(04:54):
Could it be invoked in time?Noting the likelihood of legal challenges.
This is something that we've seen overand over again by the left. They
come up with something like the commerceclause, they turn it upside down inside
out, pervert it for exactly theopposite use of what it was meant.
But they say, look, it'sgot the word commerce in it. It's
got the word commerce, so wecan use it for all things commerce,

(05:17):
just like oh it says something inthe fourteenth Amendment about the public debt.
Well, there's got to be someway that we can twist the rest of
that to suit our purposes to dowhatever we want to with a public debt.
This is what is happening. Yougo back to the commerce clause.
What was a commerce clause? Aboutcommerce clause was saying we're not going to
have internal trade barriers erected at theborders of various states in the Lords of

(05:42):
the United States is going to bea free trade zone. Instead. What
they do they then invert pervert that, turn it upside down inside out,
and they say, well, we'regoing to This gives us the authority to
ban drugs, even though that wasn'tthe opinion that people had when they decided
they needed to ban alcohol. Theyhad to pass a constitutional amendment. But

(06:04):
they say, no, we'll dothat in the name of controlling commerce commerce.
Well, it's not about controlling commerce. The whole purpose of that clause
was that government would not control commerce, the states would not control it.
And so then the federal government sayswe will control everything. And we saw

(06:25):
that happening in the first bit withFDR when he started enacting price controls on
farmers and he had a farmer saidI don't want to get into that program.
He was adamant that it didn't wantto be a part of that program.
And they said, well we haveto, and he said, well,
I'm growing my product and I forgetwhat it was, corn or something

(06:46):
for internal use inside the state.I'm never shipping it across state lines.
Oh well, if you are doinganything in the state that is affecting globally,
this and so it affects globally allof our commerce, and we can
regulate that. They've expanded that nonsense, That was nonsense, but they've expanded
that to give them presumed authority todo the war on drugs. Are always

(07:12):
doing that type of thing. SoBiden says, I think we have the
authority. He thinks he has theauthority to do anything and everything that he
wishes. That's why he rules likea dictator, with executive orders more than
anybody else has, and in muchgreater severity, not just the number of
executive orders, but the impact ofexecutive orders. The Treasury Department says the

(07:33):
government could run out of money anddefault on it's thirty one trillion dollar debt
as early as June first. Bidenhad planned to travel from Japan to New
Guinea and Australia, but he cutthe ship the trip short. Is he
trying to save money? No,No, they don't care about cutting corners

(07:54):
anywhere. This is all just aboutvirtue signaling. And then again, like
I said, Brightbart just lifted thisstory from AFP without any corrections, and
AFP says, I looked at thisand it's like this is on Brightbart looked
at it, and it's like,oh, it's a FP story. The
debt ceiling raise is usually an uncontroversialannual procedure, but this year the increasingly

(08:20):
hard right Republican Party has turned thethreat of default into a powerful lover.
The increasingly hard right Republican Party.You know what is increasing the deficit.
Anybody want to think about how wegot to thirty one trillion dollars so quickly
with Trump and Biden, and howquickly is it going to be before we

(08:43):
get to forty trillion dollars and withrising interest rates or even at the rate
that they are now. Is Ireported last week that's going to be fifty
percent of what the government takes inin terms of revenue just to pay for
the interest on that debt. It'snot sustainable. And anybody who pretends that
it is missed their math classes becausethey thought they were white supremacists or something.

(09:09):
It's just basic math. This isnot rocket science or calculus or anything
like that. It's just basic math. It doesn't add up more borrowings as
AFP is required eminently by the USgovernment just to meet expenditures already agreed to
in the current budget. Well there'snothing that in the fourteenth Amendment about the

(09:33):
current budget being sacrosanct, and that'sthe key. So just cut those things
that you've already agreed to if youdon't have the money to pay for them.
Better start learning how to deal withthis right now, because they're destroying
the US dollars reserve status and thereisn't going to be any floating of this
stuff. Once they cut the reservestatus. They can't just continue to print

(09:56):
money without consequences. So you needto start thinking about life after the petro
dollar, because that's where it's goingto go. They said this will trigger
an array of economic shockwaves worldwide,including the White House says a US recession.
We're already in a recession, butthey're just looking at how they can

(10:18):
blame this on the Republicans in Congresswho don't want to spend money, who
don't want to print money that theydon't have as a federal reserve has been
doing so soon it'll be fifty percentof the government's revenue just to pay the
interest in just a couple of years. Yelling and I says the fourteenth Amendment
cannot be appropriately used to raise thedebt ceiling. Why does she say that

(10:41):
yesterday on Meet the Press, Well, she said it because a you know,
from a pragmatic standpoint, we justdon't have the time to do it.
We know that we're going to havelegal challenges because we're stretching the Constitution
beyond any reasonable interpretation, stretching itso far we're going to break it in
multiple places, and that's going tobe challenged. And we've only got a

(11:01):
couple of weeks to do this.So she said, well, there hasn't
been much discussion on the fourteenth Amendment. She's the Treasury Secretary now used to
be Federal Reserve Chairman for a while. Biden said, I believe this morning
that doesn't seem like something that couldappropriately be used in these circumstances, given
the legal uncertainty around it, andgiven the tight time frame that we're on.

(11:26):
She said, if the debt ceilingisn't raised, there would be hard
choices to make about which bills willnot be paid. Well, that's exactly
right. It's not about repudiating thedebt. It's about you spending more money.
Which bills are you going to pay? And of course we know what's
going to happen. Any billionaires andmultinational corporations that get paid before the people

(11:48):
working in the military, the militaryindustrial complex, we'll get paid. Ukraine
will get more weapons as they're alreadyfound a way to do that, and
the surveillance state will continue to getfunded. They'll shut down things like the
National Park. Because this isn't somethingthat hasn't happened before. I've seen it
happen before. I've seen that.They go out and they take probably the

(12:13):
only thing that anybody wants from thefederal government because we're not getting any defense
of our borders, which is whatthe federal government is supposed to be.
They have set up trip wires toget us caught up in World War three.
They have involved us in every singleentanglement of every single war everywhere in
the world. So we don't wantthat. You know, the parks are

(12:35):
nice, so they close them first, that type of thing, and that's
what they have done in the past. So why can't Biden use the fourteenth
Amendment? This is from rod RobNadolson at the Epic Times. He says
some Senate Democrats are urging Biden touse the fourteenth Amendment. Elizabeth Warren especially

(12:56):
because she plays fast and loose withall the facts, including her own history.
So she plays fast and loose withthe Constitution and the history of the
Constitution. She said, if KevinMcCarthy is going to push United States over
a cliff, then it becomes apresent's responsibility to find an alternative path.
Well, Rob Nicholson says, asa former law professor senator for more than

(13:20):
ten years, and presuming that shecan read, so what I would say,
Warren almost certainly knows that keeping thecurrent debt ceiling doesn't cause default.
Right, it merely forces a governmentto run a balance budget, something the
government should be doing anyway. Inother words, they don't have to spend

(13:43):
this money. They can still servicethe debt. You know, they're not
repudiating the public debt. It givesthe president the fourteenth Amendment gives the president
no power to use it to createmore debt. See, it's really key
to be able to read and think. It says you're not going to repudiate
the public death. What was thepurpose of that. Well, that was

(14:05):
right after the Constitution. They wereworried that there was going to be a
you know, you might have peoplefrom the Southern states that were still angry
about the Northern aggression said we're notgoing to pay those bills. So I
said, well, fourteenth Amendment,it addressed things after the Civil War.
So well, we got the slavesare free, so let's understand that they

(14:28):
have full rights as citizens. Andlet's understand that you know, this public
debt that we ran up because youknow, they were printing fiat currency the
North. Wise, it wasn't justthe worthless Confederate paper money, but it
was also the worthless greenbanks. Youknow, Lincoln had created a draft,
he'd created an income tax. Itwas just printing money, all these different

(14:50):
things. So they put through thefourteenth Amendment to make sure that wasn't going
to be thrown out. The debtlimit is a law restricting how the federal
may borrow. The current law saysthirty four point four trillion dollars, and
if Congress refuses to change the law, it will remain at thirty four point
four trillion dollars. But that's notenough for these people. Yeah, the

(15:15):
world is not enough for these people. Where are we more than that is
illegal? So the government will haveto pay its debt obligations out of its
current revenue. Could the federal governmentdo that? Sure, current revenue is
about eight times what the current interestpayments are, so right now it's about
twelve and a half percent. Goingat the rate that they're going, however,

(15:35):
and with interest rates rising, it'lljust be a few years before it
goes from twelve and a half percentof their receipts to fifty percent of their
receipts. We have reached earlier debtlimits on many occasions, but there's been
no default. Mostly what happens isa few federal facilities closed. When that
happened the last time, the Fedsclosed Rocky Mountain National Park see, but

(15:56):
the Colorado state government took over thejob and kept it open. We don't
need the federal government to do thingsthat we want to have happen. If
we really want it, we reallyneed it, we can do it on
our own. And that was thething from Alexis to Pokefall when he came
to America. He said, youknow, France and socialist France, whenever
we see a problem, we wantthe central government to do it. But
here in America, when people seea problem, they address it at the

(16:18):
local level, the community level,not even at the state level. Were
they taking care of it? Still, every time we approach a new debt
limit, unscrupulous politicians and their mediapropagandists claim that we're at risk of default.
This is so patently false, saysRob Nielsen, that we can only
conclude that what concerns them isn't default, but it's something else. So what

(16:42):
is that something else? Well,they don't want to have any limits on
federal spending, and as I saidbefore, I'm convinced that that's going to
be imposed on them one way orthe other. Again, he says,
the fourteenth was ratified in eighteen sixtyeight to ensure the Congress, even if

(17:03):
dominated by members of the former ConfederateStates, would honor the Union's Civil War
debt. And here's what it says. The pertinent thanks sections four, Section
five. Section four, the validityof the public debt of the US authorized
by law shall not be questioned.And number five, the Congress shall have
the power to enforce by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. Well,

(17:26):
nobody's questioning the debt, that's there. They're questioning raising the debt limit,
increasing the debt, he says.Notice what the language says the validity
of the US public debt shall notbe questioned. This means that the federal
government may not use any pretext forrefusing to pay off debt instruments such as
savings bonds and treasury bills. Theamendment grants Congress the power to pass laws

(17:51):
to ensure that the debt obligations aremet. But what does the language not
say. It does not say thatthe government must borrow more to pay off
existing debt. Congress may meet itsobligations from its existing revenue. It also
does not say that Congress must changelegal limits on borrowing. And although it

(18:14):
grants power to Congress, it grantsnone to the president who wants to use
it again. Yeah, be Congressthat would be initiating this, not the
President. But Biden and Elizabeth Warrendon't care, and the media assists them
in a false narrative because that's whatthe media does. It's always about creating

(18:36):
issues in terms of getting people panickedand fearful. Tune in tomorrow, same
bad time, same back channel.As we see the puppet shark knowing Batman
and Robin hanging by a thin ropeover the tank. Right, Biden and
McCarthy are doing, and so youwill tune in same battime, same BAT

(18:59):
channel for the same bat nonsense.Four and five, sorry, four and
ten people say the Congress should beginimpeachment proceedings on Biden? Is that all?
What's the matter with the other sixpeople? Where are they? So?
You know a lot of them aregoing to be Democrats. But still,

(19:19):
survey found forty two percent of likelyvoters said Congress should begin impeachment proceedings
against Biden, while forty five percentsaid lawmakers should not. So slightly more
said no. Republicans, it wasseventy percent. Again, what's the matter
with those other thirty percent? Thirdof the Republicans don't think the Biden should
be impeached. Maybe they think heshould be jailed for political corruption tens of

(19:44):
millions of dollars in shell corporations allover the world. Forty percent of independence
do not believe that Congress should beginimpeaching, but thirty nine percent think they
should. So it's pretty evenly divided. And every one of these Democrats,
You've got a large number of peoplewho are undecided. Especially amongst the Independence
there seemed to be always undecided,and that can be a good thing,

(20:04):
right we don't want to march andlock step to this partisanship. Fifty three
percent across the board believe that itis at least somewhat likely that Biden has
committed high crimes and misdemeanors that wouldjustify Congress impeaching him. Actually he did
a lot of that even before hebecame president, but certainly since as well.
Thirty eight percent said it is verylikely. One third of Democrats also

(20:26):
believe that it is somewhat likely,as do forty eight percent of Independence.
But of course we know that theCongresses all talk and no action. Atrocious
in every way. Biden is rippedfor punishing folks with good credits, but
will they stop what he wants todo? And I've talked about this,
I think two weeks ago, begantalking about it, the fact that Biden

(20:52):
administration wants to penalize people who havea good credit rating. And I believe
it's also they ar you will chargeyou more higher interest rate if you buy
a house if you have a goodcredit rating, and they would also charge
you more if you have saved ahigher percentage of the down payment. Again,

(21:14):
not only is a Biden contemptuous ofbalancing the federal budget, but he
hates people who balance their own budget. It's the tariff. These people just
want to tear everything to the ground. It's absolutely amazing. Punish Americans with
good credit scores, that is thenext thing that they want to do,

(21:34):
you know, because it's got tobe some kind of white supremacists conspiracy against
them, Right, if you've gota good credit score, I don't know,
it's got to be racist. Ithink. McCarthy slams Biden on the
debt negotiations, said Biden rather wouldbe the first president to default than to

(21:55):
cut radical left spending. See thisis why I say it's it's a phony
thing. McCarthy's phony as well.Doesn't have to be a default. Why
would you push the idea that there'sgoing to be a default? And so
he's feeding this fear narrative as wellfor political purposes. McCarthy knows that there's
no reason that they have to default. They can still pay what they have

(22:19):
borrowed. They just won't be ableto pay some of the new things that
they wanted to buy. Yeah,this is the way it works. Isn't
it should work that way? Shouldn'tit? On Rumbull Steve Swan, thank
you for the tip, he says, and he's now a monthly supported on
rumbull, I appreciate that. Hesays, you can pledge five dollars per
month of the David Night Show duringlive chat. I appreciate that, Thank

(22:40):
you very much. And on RockFinn carrieus Rex, thank you for the
tip. And I've got another commentcoming in here from Angus Mustang. I'll
read that in just a moment.But anyway, McCarthy accused the president of
preferring the US default on its debtsrather than cut federal spending. They're not

(23:02):
going to default on debts, thedefault on their promises to spend more in
some other areas. He said,President Biden doesn't think that there's a single
dollar of savings to be found inthe federal government's But well, that's true,
that's true. As a matter offact, they Biden Pentagon just says
they found another three billion dollars forUkrainian weapons, So we're gonna send a

(23:26):
whole bunch more to them, andit's an accounting trick. And I'll talk
about what they came up with.A Biden's decision to take a foreign trip
less than two weeks from a potentialdefault may have harmed his reputation with the
American public. They're trying very hardto turn this into a crisis, and
they know it's not a crisis.And Biden, if he knows anything,

(23:47):
I mean, he may not knowwhat's going on. He may think it's
a crisis and he's just doing whathis handlers tell them too. But the
Biden administration told this guy who can'tfind his way off of a stage,
he said, yeah, you gotto go to Hiroshima because we've got to
give some more weapons to Ukraine orHiroshima Part two. And so he has

(24:10):
and his administration has been pretending it'sa crisis. But then they didn't go
follow through with all of this onthe crisis. So let's talk about this
three billion dollars that they found justthree days after Politico reported that the latest
authorization the military aid to Ukraine wason pace to run out this summer,
the Pentagon on Thursday to close thatit had made an accounting error and they

(24:33):
had overvalued the weapons that they hadsent by three billion dollars. I'll convenient.
You know, you go back andyou look at nine eleven and the
Pentagon, my personal story involved inall that. I have told this a
couple of times. I'll say itagain because it just always amazes me.
Karen and I went down to oneweekend. We drove down to little tourist

(25:00):
area that was south of where welived in Texas, and we're going through
the shops there and this shop hada lot of mostly Christmas type stuff,
and it was the middle of summer. Wasn't really interested in anything. Most
people were not interested in looking atstuff. Karen was. So I stood
there and waited, and there wereno other customers in the store, and

(25:23):
the lady was bored out of hermind, and she starts monologuing with me
about how she and her husband hadretired from the Pentagon, the military,
and they'd set this thing up andhe made these things and so forth and
so on and and so she keepsgoing and she starts telling me, you
know, I was working with aPentagon and they had trillions of dollars that

(25:47):
were unaccounted for and we were findingit. And she said to her congressmen
that were not running for reelection becausethey did not want to face an investigation.
And we had people retire from themilitary. She said, it was
huge. And she said, butI did get a chance to finish this
because her husband had retired and andyou know, so she quit at that

(26:14):
point in time so they could betogether and go to Texas. And she
said, but you know, theoffice where I was working was right where
that plane landed in the Pentagon,and that ended that entire investigation. I'm
like, whoa. She could notput two and two together. I said,
where do you get your news?Of all the usual places right Fox

(26:34):
News, where Tucker Carlson was saying, yeah, none of this nine eleven
stuff is true. She got hernews from Fox and places like that,
just amazing, and sometimes CNN.She said she had. She could not
put those things together. And sonow we got three billion dollars in an
accounting error, not trillions of dollarsat the Pentagon. Just like that,

(26:57):
the Pentagon says it's now free tohand over another three billion dollars in weapons.
Do you believe that you believe thatwas a plane that flew on the
pedagone you believed that it You lookat the hole that's there, and you
look at the report from that guywho was on the scene from I think
it was ABC News. So there'sno debris here from a plane. It's
really strange. And they never airedthat again. But we grabbed it.

(27:19):
Some people did. I didn't grabit. Didn't even have television at the
time. I was listening to allthis stuff and say, that's really strange.
Well, that's really strange. Andthen when I saw what I saw
the pictures a few years later,it's like, okay, saying I was
my take on it was okay.So the plane just felt that the buildings
in New York just fell on theirown fingerprint, a footprint like wow,

(27:44):
wow, oh the world could thathappen? I saw the pictures and it's
like no. But I was concernedabout the Patriot Act and how they're doing.
So I looked at it, andI'm not looking at the For years,
I didn't see anything, honestly,and so I was concerned that the

(28:04):
Patriot Act isn't going to solve this, just like you know, the lockdown
and all these other measures were notthe appropriate response, even if it was
a real bioengineered weapon deliberately released thatwas a threat to us. Well,
I knew the same thing about thePatriotact. But anyway, getting back to
this, Pentagon now says, wehave discovered inconsistencies and how we value the

(28:26):
equipment that we have given to Ukraine. It's possible the three billion dollar discrepancy
could grow even larger, and I'msure that it will if Congress tries to
restrain this pending, they will doit with accounting trick. So what is
the accounting trick that they claim theySo the Pentagon used replacement cost for these

(28:48):
things, but they should have usedthe Pentagon's net book value, which would
have been what the Pentagon had originallybought them for minus depreciation. Did you
know that? Did you know thatnuclear weapons depreciate? We're gonna adjust the
book value the nuclear weapons or thewhatever. You know that we got depleted

(29:08):
uranium? Well, you know whatthey say, the second you fire it,
it loses like fifty percent of itsvalue at least it loses the other
fifty percent when it winds. Rightthere you go, That's that makes perfectly
good sense, Thank you, Travis. Yeah, so you understand, of

(29:29):
course, why would they do itthat way. Why would they use replacement
cost? Well, because they're goingto replace it. You know, they're
going to replace They've already talked abouthow they're trying to replace these things and
guess what the replacement cost will behigher, and what they paid for these
things in the past. Why isthat, Well, because the Federal Reserve
has been printing money. Have youheard that? And it caused inflation and

(29:52):
all these other things. Of coursethey're gonna you know, the price of
everything else is going up. Theprice of missiles and munitions and weapons are
going to go up as well.I mean, it's all nonsense. And
so the GOOP immediately call them outon this. Well no, actually,
now they didn't. You know whatthe GOP didn't Instead of calling BS on

(30:15):
all this stuff, they scolded themfor not realizing this quote unquote error sooner.
You know, people like Mike McCall, these neocons, Mike McCall with
the House Armed Services he's the chair, I'm sorry, he's the Foreign Affairs
chair, Mike McCall is, Andthe House Armed Services Chair is Mike Rogers.

(30:38):
And so these two neocons put outa statement saying these funds could have
been used for extra supplies and weaponsfor the upcoming counter offensive instead of rationing
funds to last for the remainder ofthe fiscal year. We could have given
him the three billion dollars worth ofstuff sooner. What's the matter with you
people? You'll find some more ofthese things so we can send them even

(30:59):
more weapons. The revelation of athree billion dollars accounting here, discovered two
months ago and only today shared withCongress, it's extremely problematic. It's extremely
unbelievable, totally unbelievable. I hadto get that Wallace Sean or whatever his
name is, that from Francis Bride. Unbelievable. Yeah, that's what it
is. But again that the Republicanswant this war even more badly than the

(31:26):
Democrats. Apparently Jop's response to this, you should have given him the money
sooner. Not We're in the middleof a budget crisis here, and you
guys are pushing the panic button sayingthere's going to be a default and you're
gonna send another three billion dollars.What's the matter with you? No,
Instead they say, oh great,oh, we got extra three billion.

(31:48):
Oh we should have sent this moneysooner. They reiterated previous calls for Biding
to make up for this precious losttime quote unquote by starting to provide Ukraine
would dual purpose improved conventional munitions.Yeah. Thus far, the US government
has given Ukraine almost thirty seven billiondollars in military aid over the course of

(32:10):
the fifteen month war. However,Dave DeCamp at antiwar dot Com notes that
when tallying military aid, direct budgetaryaid, training, the cost of troops
deployed to Eastern Europe, and otheraid, the real tally exceeds one hundred
and thirteen billion dollars. But hey, that doesn't really matter. You know,
a billion here and a billion there. It takes a long time before

(32:34):
you're talking about real money, right, They're going to have thousands of billions
before you get to a trillion.Or put it the other way, you
got to have a million millions beforeyou get to a trillion. And they
don't really care about that because we'vegot thirty million millions in debt already that
they've spent that they don't even havethe money for. And yet look at
what is happening. Our tax revenuesgoing down for them, No, they're

(32:57):
going up. Do they index ratesfor inflation, No they don't. They'll
make periodically adjustments, they say,for inflation, but of course they're always
lagging just like what they pay peoplewho are on Social Security because they were
taxed throughout their working life. Well, occasionally we'll go back. I'll make
an adjustment which is always a tinyfraction of what the actual inflation and inflation

(33:22):
wise, and it is retroactive,and it doesn't reflect the current situation,
and it takes them a year todo that. And for all these reasons,
it is absolutely insane what they're doing. Neither side is serious about ending
the spinning, and both sides arepushing the panic button over to fall.

(33:42):
But the real concern is how they'repushing the war button. And so they
said, Questions already abounded about whathappened to the weapons once they're in the
hands of the notoriously corrupt Ukrainian government, which everybody agrees is perhaps one of
the most corrupt governments on Earth.Bill Gates even set it corrupt. Bill
Gates a kettle calling the pot blackright. With American support for US involvements,

(34:08):
softening, congressional hawks will become we'llwelcome the opportunity to give Ukraine another
three billion dollars without taking a vote. In April, the Brookings Institute took
a poll found that only twenty sixpercent of Americans think that America's goal should
be returning Ukraine to the status quobefore the Russian invasion. Yeah, would

(34:34):
it be worth it for them tolose a little bit of territory so they
don't devastate yet another city and killwho knows how many people and poison the
land with the pleated uranium? Wouldpeace be worth anything at all to these
people, Well, not to peoplelike McCall and Rogers other GOP warmongers.

(34:54):
And we talk about the corruption Ukraine. The head of Ukraine's Supreme Court has
just been a arrested for large scalecorruption, a two point seven million dollar
bribe so that he could put hisfinger on the scales of justice for some
corporation that was there. Yeah,God really hates dishonest judges like that.

(35:19):
Called him out specifically several times,didn't he Yet another large scale corruption scandal
has come out of Ukraine. Theyhave documented that the head of the Supreme
Court received two point seven million dollarbribe. He's been arrested on suspicion of
accepting bribes. It was seized andarrayed on the top judges home. This

(35:42):
would be like John Roberts, right, it's the chief justice of their Supreme
Court. But again, two pointseven million dollars is that it? That's
small potatos compared to Biden, isn'tit. We got Biden down for at
least ten million, way more thanthat. Frankly, At this time,
the head to the Supreme Court hasbeen detained and measures are being taken to
check other individuals from involvement in criminalactivities to the statement. Reports in Ukrainian

(36:07):
media suggests that additional judges may berated because we're talking about Ukraine here,
right, We're talking about Ukrainian administration. It was put in place by a
coup that was run by Obama andthe CIA. Oh, I'm sure there's
no corruption there, right eight yearsago, nine years ago now, I

(36:29):
guess. Reports and Ukrainium media suggeststhat additional judges will be rated and arrested
amid this probe. The case couldjust be the tip of the iceberg.
Contacts involved an agreement regarding unlawful benefitsin favor of high ranking court officials for

(36:49):
quote rendering the necessary decision quote unquotein favor of the businessman. The past
months have seen Ukraine, which consistentlyranks among the most corrupt countries and the
world take public steps to root outits notorious corruption problem. Well, we're
gonna take a quick break and whenwe come back, we're going to talk
about Hiroshima. So stay with us. We will be right back as soon

(37:15):
as I can find the button here. The common man, they created common
Core and dumbed down our children.They created common Past to track and control

(37:36):
us, their Commons project to makesure the commoners own nothing and the communist
future. They see the common manas simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each
of us has worth and dignity createdin the image of God. That is
what we have in common. Thatis what they want to take away.

(38:00):
The most powerful weapons are isolation,deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hideeverything from us. It's time to turn
that around and expose what they wantto hide. Please share the information and
links you'll find at the David Knightshowdot com. Thank you for listening,

(38:22):
Thank you for sharing. If youcan't support us financially, please keep us
in your prayers. Thee David Knightshowdot Comget three file, Jared Freemile,

(38:57):
target and Tighten Why how Major Kong? Hey, what about Major Kohn.
Is that Major counter or is thatMike McCall I can't talk. Yeah,

(39:21):
Doctor Strange love and so Zelinski Ryasand Hiroshima to Lot BG seven nations for
more military aid. Were they tryingto tell us something? Why would they
go to Hiroshima at this point intime? They are trying to tell us
something. Yeah, you know,we'll meet again, maybe not in their

(39:45):
underground bunkers or something like that thatthey've set up for themselves. Would they
let the rest of us die?That's the plan? Continuity of government?
Yeah, be one way for themto get rid of the excess population.
As a matter of fact, thatwas of the things Paul Erlich was famous
for saying. He made several speecheswhere he said, well, you know,
there's a lot of different ways thatwe could reduce some population. You

(40:07):
know, there could be a plaguethat would be good. But the way,
the best way that we can reducethe population the fastest is with the
war. And of course these peopleare all about depopulation, aren't they.
So Zelenski arrived Saturday in Japan atHiroshima for talks to the leaders of the
world's most powerful democracies. Yeah,let's do this doctor Strangelove thing, shall

(40:29):
we. Bolstering international support is akey priority as Ukraine prepares were quite as
seen as a major push to takeback territory seas by Russia. Well,
now they got more to push backon, because now they've lost a lot
more territory. Over the weekend asthey were meeting, they lost yet another

(40:51):
large area which has been totally devastated. And admitting the defeat the way Zelenski
put it, the actor, theprofane, rude, degenerate comedian quote unquote
actor said bach Mut is only inour hearts. Hours after, Russia's Defense

(41:14):
ministry reported that forces of the WagnerPrivate Army with the support of Russian troops,
had seized the city in eastern Ukraine. Or time I see that,
I wonder do they play the Rightof the Valkyrie like Apocalypse now Robert Duval
character the Wagnerian Private Army. Andit ain't over because a fat lady hasn't

(41:37):
sung yet. She hasn't pushed thebutton yet either. Zelinski said the Russians
had destroyed everything. He said,you have to understand that there is nothing.
Well, we understand that was aplan. Actually, I've played it
many times for you. Rostovich isa chief lieutenant. They know. Zelenski

(42:01):
and his regime took power in twentynineteen on a platform of peace, said
we're going to stop this civil warthat's been going on for the last five
years. And I guess people thoughtthat, you know, a degenerate comedian
would actually do that. This isn'ta guy who wants to have war,

(42:22):
right, Well, yeah, hesent a Restovich to peace talks and Arstovich
came back and was interviewed by Ukrainiantelevision and they said, so, what
are the chances of peace? Hesaid nine nine, it says matter.
She said, there isn't anything thatcould be done. Yeah, no,
it's going to get worse, hesaid. In twenty nineteen, he said,

(42:44):
in three years, meaning twenty twentytwo, there'll be direct war between
US US and Russia. And shesaid that's horrible and goes and he said,
and Ukraine will be havoced. Thisis the way he put it,
in other words, completely destroyed,just like bach moot. Ukraine will exist
only on our hearts, supposedly right. But he said no, no,

(43:07):
he said. The good news ishe says it's not bad it's good because
then we get to get into NATO. See, I get my membership card,
you know, all the free passesto go all these different places and
everything, my Swiss bank accounts,all that stuff. Well, you know,
he was very unrestrained in what hehad to say, which led to

(43:30):
his being kicked out recently when headmitted frankly that the Russians had not targeted
a civilian structure, but it wasa cruise missile that they shot down and
then veered off course and then crashedinto the well. When he said that,
they got rid of him. Buthe was a guy who just didn't
have a filter. Yeah, justtell people what it is. But these

(43:53):
people get to join the club whiletheir own countrymen have nothing left. There's
nothing. So I guess you knowthat that part of the Great Wesset has
been accomplished in bach Moot. Theeight month battle for bach Moot has been
the longest and probably the most bloodyof the conflict in Ukraine. Zelenski's comments

(44:14):
came as Biden announced three hundred andseventy five million dollars more in aid for
Ukraine. Was he getting this moneyat the same time he's got this charade
going on about the faulting on thedebt and all the rest of the stuff.
But here here's another three hundred andseventy five million more ammunition, more
artillery, and more vehicles. AndI think maybe that's not even the three

(44:37):
billion dollars that they magically found somewherein the accounting trick. The city was
known for its sparkling wine production andunderground caves. It's broad tree lined avenues,
it's lush parks, and it's statelydowntown with imposing late nineteenth century mansions.

(45:00):
All of this is now reduced tosmoldering waste land, but it had
made it a popular tourist destination.Don't think for a minute that this can't
happen to us. The Russians andthe Chinese that we're picking fights with incessantly

(45:21):
have the capacity to bring war toAmerica's homeland that we have not seen in
many, many generations. So whenyou look at how the Ape portrays the
Obama coup, they said, whena separatist rebellion engulfed eastern Ukraine in twenty

(45:43):
fourteen, a separatist rebellion weeks afterMoscow's illegal annexation of Ukraine's Crimean peninsula.
The rebels quickly won control of thecity, only to lose it a few
months later. I said it fromthe very beginning. I said, look,
Crimea was part of Russia longer thanAmerica has been America. And you

(46:05):
had the head of British Defense said, we've beaten the Russians in Crimea once
before, and we'll beat them again. Well, what were they doing fighting
Russians in Crimea and the Crimean War. Well, it's because that was Russian
territory, and so these are peoplewho said we would prefer to stay with
Russia. I always support the rightof self governance of any people. I

(46:31):
think we were right in the AmericanRevolution. I think the South was right
to say we're going to have regardlessof what you think the issue was,
even if you think the issue withslavery, they had the right to secede.
Just as I've said, I disagreewith what Andrew Jackson did to the
Cherokee in North Carolina. It washorrible, but the Supreme Court even agreed

(46:53):
that he could do it, andthen when they saw the results of the
policy, they changed their mind withinone year. And then Andrew Jackson said
well, you've made your you've issuedyour opinion. Let's see you enforce it
owards He had the power, unfortunatelyto do what he did. And you

(47:13):
know, Mike does not make right. But we created this country based on
the idea of self determination, andso I agree with the right a secession.
We're gonna talk about this more whenwe get to a story here on
Oregon. In a moment, whatis happening in Oregon. I think people
should have the right of self governance, and they should be able to create

(47:37):
a government of their own. Andof course we have seen that secession does
not have to be accompanied by war. It usually is because people in power
want to hang on to that.The only place where that has not been
the case is in the Scandinavian countries. They have broken apart and come together
in various combinations those five countries manytimes over several centuries and never had a

(48:00):
war over it. And you hadCzechoslovakia peacefully split instead of having a war
like Yugoslavia. But anyway, afterRussia switched its focus to don Bath following
a botched attempt to seize Kiev earlyin February twenty twenty two, invasion Moscow's
troops tried to take bak Mood inAugust, but were pushed back. Mercenaries

(48:22):
from Wagner spearheaded the Russian offensive.Progozan, the leader, tried to use
the battle for the city to expandhis clout amid the tensions with the top
Russian military leaders, whom he harshlycriticized. He said, we fought not
only with Ukrainian armed forces in bakMoot, but we also had to fight

(48:43):
the Russian bureaucracy, which through sandin the wheels, he said, probably
meaning in the gears right, whichis what you would expect a bureaucracy to
do, and it's why you knowthey're getting results from a private mercenary organization.
Biden, however, has agreed andHiroshima to step this up to strange

(49:07):
Love level. He's going to greenlight the transference of F sixteens to Ukraine.
Of course, we knew that wasgoing to happen for months. Britain
was saying, well, we're goingto train Ukrainian pilots on F sixteens and
then we'll think about whether or notwe really want to give them the F
sixteens. Well, they couldn't saythat they were going to give the F
sixteens, because when the US sellsweapons, there's always a string attached saying

(49:31):
we have to approve the transfer thisstuff. And so now Biden is saying,
we're going to approve the transfer ofthis stuff, so they can do
it openly. Western leaders are developinga plan to develop American made fighter jets
to Kiev. The US will allowits European partners SEE to transfer F sixteens
to Kiev, according to The WashingtonPost. Earlier this week, the UK

(49:52):
and Netherlands began forming a coalition tosend the F sixteens to Ukraine otherlands.
They want to starve the people there, shut down the farms and confiscate them.
They're on the verge of a civilwar because a lot of the farmers,
they're said, we're not going topeacefully just walk away from our lives

(50:12):
and let you take everything from us, and so they would love to have
a bigger war. That's why Isaid this third turning, fourth turning rather,
and I say third because I'm thinkingof three different aspects. You've had
three fourth turnings in America before theRevolutionary War, the Civil War, and

(50:34):
World War two, and the GreatDepression, as Strauss and how always pointed
out, they're always accompanied by economicunrest by the overturning of all the corrupt
institutions, because it only takes seventyyears and the institutions are hopelessly corrupt.
But usually when you overturn those institutions, the people in power want to have

(50:54):
a war, try to make surethey come out on top. And I
said, I think that this isgoing to be around the world. We're
going to see civil wars most countries. We're going to see a world war
as well. This time man,maybe it'll be a revolutionary war to one

(51:15):
degree or the other. Where there'sgoing to be a Bolshevik revolution or an
American revolution remains to be seen.So the White House informed its allies that
it would not block their plans toprovide keV with F sixteens. And when
Washington sells F sixteens, the buyermust agree that the US government can block
the planes from being transferred to eightthird country. And that's why they're playing

(51:36):
this cat and mouse game in theUK where Rishi Rich, little rich kid
who's the PM there now, saidwell, you know, just start training
people. We're not giving them anyplanes. We'll have to think about that.
I'm not really sure if we're goingto do that at a hunt had
to get the US permission. Theplan would include training on fourth generation fighter
aircraft, including the F sixteens,to further strengthen and improve the capabilities of

(51:59):
the Ukrainian An Air Force. Officialshave previously estimated Ukrainian pilots could learn how
to fly the F sixteen and aslittle as six to nine months about the
time they deployed. Then, Zelenskihas pledged not to use the weapons to
attack Russian territory. Scout's honor,Yeah, you believe anything that little liar

(52:20):
says. However, that pledge doesnot extend to the Crimean peninsula annexed by
Moscow in twenty fourteen. So Moscowhas said in these previous declarations that these
areas and don Bass in other places, they said, this is now Russian

(52:40):
territory. And so if Zelinski usesthese weapons to attack that territory, Russia
has already said that's an attack onus. It might as well attack Russia.
And we have already had documents released. They were included in discordly the

(53:01):
ones that that guy, that youngkid put up with his gaming group.
It showed that Zelenski was plotting toattack Russia anyway, notwithstanding his many promises.
So if he were to attack Crimea, Russia has said that is now
going to be considered to be anattack on us. But he wasn't going
to just stop there. He wasplanning, as we see from these discord

(53:23):
documents, he was planning to attackRussia anyway. So we got six to
nine months? Is that what itis before this thing actually glates to a
new level there? You want toget this done before the election. Maybe
if they get a war started,there won't be an election. Wouldn't that
be convenient for Biden administration? Zelenskihas demanded f sixteens. Biden appears to

(53:45):
have changed his mind and the runup to the G seven summit in Hiroshima,
The Guardian reported the Washington sudden reversalshocked some allies. Quote things are
moving really fast in Japan, fastereven than we dared hope, said one
European diplomat. So I would havesaid faster than we had feared. But

(54:08):
these people hope for war, Theyhope for it. It marks another significant
escalation in Western support for keV.When London began training Ukrainian pilots on fighter
jets back in February, the Kremlinissued a stern warning. They said Russia

(54:28):
will find a way to respond tounfriendly steps taken by the British side.
The next round of escalation, saidRussia in February, will cause bloodshed for
the European continent and the entire world. Yeah. So they have a summit
in Hiroshima, and when they goto Hiroshima, it's not enough to push

(54:51):
for war with Russia. They're alsofocusing on China. The G seven leaders
respond to China's economic bullying at theHiroshima summit, and they weren't to quote
consequences for China. They're bullying peopleeconomically. No really, I mean,

(55:12):
we would never do anything like that, right, We would never use our
reserve currency status to bully people economically, to create sanctions and do all the
rest of stuff. Now we're doingthat, and that's why we're losing our
reserve currency status. Very rapidly.Leaders outlined actions to counter Beijing's economic coercion,

(55:32):
quote unquote economic coercion and non marketpractices. Well, they've never had
market practices that They were always justfine with that. That was the way
they would make more money. TheChina price based on slave labor, based
on intellectual property, theft, basedon currency manipulation. It was never about

(55:55):
markets. And of course you wantto talk about economic coersion, talk about
Biden's economic corsion, not just thesanctions abroad, but his domestic economic coersion
of no job, no job,that type of stuff against the military,
against people who worked for him inthe federal government, and using his multinational

(56:19):
corporate partners, you know, thisprivate public partnership for global governance, to
use all those dictates on US.So the G seven countries are the US,
the UK, Japan, Canada,Germany, France, and Italy.
They announced on May twentieth their plannedto address the disturbing rise, they said,
in incidence of economic coercion, butnot with the United States, only

(56:45):
with China. It's not to saythat China has blameless in it. And
it's not to say, well,the me tooism, right, this me
tooism, Well, well China doesit, you know, so we could
do it too, or or you'regonna blame China because you do it.
No, it's just the hypocrisy.See of these people, the utter hypocrisy.
Listen to this G seven leaders statement. We'll work together to ensure that

(57:07):
attempts to weaponize economic dependencies by forcingG seven members and our partners, including
small economies, to comply and conform, will fail and face consequences. We
express serious concern over economic coersion andcall on all countries to refrain from its
use. And you understand, theeconomic coersion isn't just what they did with

(57:30):
COVID, and it isn't just whatthey're doing with Ukraine. Internationally, all
of these countries, the US,UK, Canada, Germany, France,
Italy, they are all desperately coercingus on the Green Agenda. Everybody at
the Green Agenda is about coersion.We're gonna tell you what you can eat,

(57:51):
We're gonna tell you what you candrive, I'm gonna tell you where
you can live. We're going totell you that you can't have roads,
you can't have buildings even and we'regoing to tear down the existing buildings,
and we're going to tear down youridea. Shut up if you don't like
it. And they're going to runthis on us economically, how is it
being run in the US strictly byeconomic coercion. They're not really out there

(58:12):
pushing edicts like they do in theUK. Now they're rewarding and punishing people.
They're coming up with regulations and finesand things like that to take away
our cars by default. That's whatthese people are doing. Unbelievable hypocrisy.
But what they want it's war withChina. They want to finish Russia before
they go to war with China.But they want a world war. Looks

(58:37):
like they're going to get it.We'll be right back. You're listening to

(59:30):
the David Night Show. By theway, are we talking about Warren Peace?
This weekend? I'll plug this forUM for Gerald Occupy Peace is going
to be having a rally and againit's a good cause and you'll be having
it in Kingston, New York.And if you want to support them on

(59:50):
that, they're gonna have it onlineif you want to see it, but
if you want to support with themwith some of the costs, and I
know it does cost him a greatdeal of money. By the way,
Also, UM, you can getten percent off if you subs gribe to
Trends Journal use a promo code atnight. Always appreciate general support. And
while we're talking about people who haveassisted US, big sponsor of US is

(01:00:10):
Tony Ardaman at wise Wolf Gold.He even set up a website, David
Knight dot gold to take you tohis website and there you can get gold,
silver, even bitcoin. We'll getto RFK Junior on bitcoin. I
know that General Clinty loves RFK Junior. I'm not so fond of him quite

(01:00:30):
frankly, I would not vote forhim, but he does have some really
good points on some really good issues, and I'm glad to see that he's
there saying these things. RFK Juniorwent to a bitcoin convention and he said,
I got my first bitcoin after Isaw what happened in Canada to the
protesters who had their money stolen fromthat, and he said, we're going

(01:00:53):
to keep that avenue open, hesaid if he becomes president, so anyway,
a goodition on that. I'm gladto see that he took a strong
position on that. Not that I'minterested in bitcoin or any the other cryptocurrencies
personally, because I think it isthanks too easy for fraud to happen.
They had a big trusted source ofwallets that was selling wallets that came loaded

(01:01:20):
with software to steal your money.I mean, it's just it's that kind
of complication that I just don't wantto keep up with. I like having
something that is, you know,real money and that is disconnected from the
Internet from everything and money that youhold, real money that you hold,
and that's a gold and that's whatyou can find at David Night not gold.

(01:01:42):
With Tony Ardaman, let's talk alittle bit about the election. This
is something that is unfolding in Oregonand I saw this and I was going
to report on it. I didn'trealize that this had been going on now
for three weeks. I saw thatRepublicans had walked out of the Oregon State

(01:02:04):
Legislature so that they would not havea quorum and could not pass any laws.
I saw they walked out, andI saw that it was reported it
was over a new abortion and guncontrol laws. It turns out it's also
some new stuff about child mutilation thatthey call gender affirming healthcare. That is
one of the most disgusting euphanisms I'veever seen These people come up with,

(01:02:25):
and everything that they talk about,they always come up with a euphanism.
It's how they control it. You'reagainst care for kids, gender affirming healthcare?
Oh, what's the matter with you? And what's the matter with you?
You pedophiles? And it's you know, and we'll get to that.

(01:02:45):
We'll get to that in a momenthere. But I want to talk a
little bit about the elections and thefact that some politicians but principle over their
so called careers. You know,I just don't. I can't warm up
to people who see politics as acareer. You've got a lot of state

(01:03:06):
legislators who you know Tennessee and inTexas they have short legislative terms. These
people have a real life. Theydon't make that much money out of being
a legislator that they can just affordto do that and that only. And
so they typically have a real lifeand they live in the communities with people,
and that's the way that ought tobe. That's why I have a
lot more confidence in state government thanI do in the federal government. These

(01:03:28):
people who get elected to Congress,they can live off of that. They
stay there all the time, andthey get a big salary that they can
live off of. And as amatter of fact, they James Bovard pointed
out they just gave themselves a secretraise of thirty four thirty five thousand dollars,
didn't tell anybody about it. Yeah, Republicans as well as Democrats and
so. But you know, welook at the state legislatures. These people

(01:03:53):
are again connected more to us,more to the community. And so you
have these politicians who because they havestayed away from the legislature, if you
stay away ten days or more,then even if you get reelected, they
have a state law and organ thatyou cannot be recognized and become a member

(01:04:16):
of the legislature. So that's goingto recreate a real issue because what these
people are doing is real popular withtheir constituents and so, but these people
are putting it out there and say, well, I don't care if I
get reelected or not. I'm notgoing to allow these laws to go through.
Now. The way the Associated Pressspends this, they said, is

(01:04:41):
this the end of an era.GOP walkout shows political chasm where the quote
the Oregon Way quote unquote once meantbipartisan trust. Well, I think it
is the end of an error.R R O R. And I think
the Republicans realize what this error hasbeen. It has been an error of

(01:05:02):
compromise on principles. Well, okay, we can at a death by a
thousand cuts. And now they getto the point where these people have rapidly
escalated their demands and they don't wantto go along with this anymore. But
the Associated press puts it all onthe Republicans, they say. Oregon has

(01:05:25):
long been seen as a quirky statewhose main city was satirized in a TV
comedy where rugged country folk and urbanhipsters could get along and political differences could
be settled over a pint or twoof craft beer, but with a Republican
walk out and the Democrat controlled Oregansin it and its third week. Oregonians
these days are wistfully recalling the quoteOregon way when politicians of different stripes forged

(01:05:51):
agreements for the common good. Famousexamples include establishing the nation's first recycling program,
ensuring beach access for the entire coastline, and limiting urban sprawl, and
a pioneering land use program. Well, there you go. It seems like
those are things that conservatives and Democratswould agree with. Recycling programs, limiting

(01:06:16):
urban sprawl, and a pioneering landuse No, that sounds like GFP caved
to Democrats, doesn't it do you? A quarter of a century ago,
former Republican US Senator Gordon Smith andcurrent Democrat Senator Ron Widen championed legislation together
in Congress and even jointly appeared attown halls across the state. There were

(01:06:38):
quote unquote moderate Republicans and the legislatorlegislature who represented suburban Portland. Well maybe
they were moderate by Portland standards.I gotta say, one of the most
Marxist, woke, racist LGB thingsI have ever seen in my life.
Do you remember when we were inPortland and we went to see this historical

(01:07:00):
building and its hotel or something toremember that Travis and went in there and
it was my jaw dropped when Isaw that. And what was that of
five? Six years ago? Atleast five or six probably longer than that
because we didn't take trips really onceI started my show with them for Wars.
Yeah, so it's been at leastseven, I would say, yeah.
Yeah, we walked in and Imean, it's all the stuff that
you see that you see it allthe time now, but the first time

(01:07:24):
I had seen it, and asa big meeting in Portland and they had
this one room and we stopped buyinga listen to that. It's like whoa,
and and it was full. Imean it was it was a big
deal. So anyway, yeah,that was our experience in Portland a quarter
of a century ago. They wouldall get together with the Portland Away.
They had moderate Republicans and so forth. Now there are no Democrats in rural

(01:07:47):
districts and there's no more moderate Republicans. Well maybe it's all that land use
and urban planning and all that kindof stuff. Maybe that's set these people
apart from each other. Maybe theDemocrats have decided they want to get rid
of the arms and things like that. I remember when we loved Oregon.
The countryside didn't like Portland, butwe loved Oregon. We were driving around
there and we'd stop at farms andget fresh blueberries and fresh I think it's

(01:08:15):
peaches. They had at the times, a lot of fresh produce. It
was great. It's great not tohave to eat fast food, you know,
McDonald's and all the rest of theMcDonald's. But still, you know,
you never know what you're gonna getif you avoid the fast food places,
and you know, the restaurants.You still don't know what you're gonna
get, but it's nice to beable to get food right off of the
farm and drive around there and seebeautiful countryside. The gridlock in the state

(01:08:36):
capital in Salem comes as Oregon grappleswith homelessness, mental health issues, and
a fitted open air drug market inPortland, and gun violence in the state's
main city, where some businesses arefleeing, including outdoor gear retailer ARII.
Well, it sounds to me likethe Democrat policies have come home to roost.

(01:08:59):
And when you describe all of thisstuff, maybe the gridlock is because
of the homelessness and the mental healthissues and the open air drug markets that
are characteristic of Democrat run cities.And people are saying an Oregon, Yeah,
we don't want the rest of thisplace to turn into Portland, and
we don't want to be governed bythe people who would create something like what

(01:09:21):
Portland has become. We're in itfor the long haul, said Republican Senator
Daniel Bonham. Oregon is in aleadership crisis, he said, of the
UOPE boycott, Republicans have walked outin twenty nineteen twenty twenty one. This
is evidently something that's new because ithas gone on for so long. A

(01:09:44):
p says, neither side seems willingto give an inch over a bill on
abortion rights and transgender health care andanother measure on guns. So the question
is, as they're trying to makethe Associated Press the whole spin of this
article is to try to show justhow radical and intolerant Republicans have become,

(01:10:09):
and yet what has changed and whatis proposed to change. The Republicans aren't
proposing a radical agenda. They're walkingout in opposition to a new radical agenda.
It is the Democrats who have failedto abide by the previous compromises.
It's the Democrats who continue to movethe goal post on all of these issues.

(01:10:33):
On abortion, on child mutilation,on gun control. They continue to
move the goal posts, and thenthe Associated Press covers for them, saying,
look at these radical Republicans. Canyou imagine these always go along with
whatever we want to do. Well, now they see that Portland is melting
down, They see the fruit ofthese bad decisions that they should not have

(01:10:57):
gone along with in the first place. After ten or more unexcused absence as
a lawmaker cannot take office in thelegislature even if the Secretary of State's election
division allows them on the ballot andthey win. And so they said,
the system that is already shaken bythe resignation of the Secretary of State Fagan

(01:11:19):
this month for a secret for secretlymoonlighting as a highly paid consultant to a
marijuana business. Republican lawmakers appointed toFagan's actions as a sign of corruption among
Democrat politicians. No, really,he's Fagan. Is just it's a woman.

(01:11:40):
I think, shimmy a Fagan.But she is just reviewing the situation,
right like Oliver Fagan is reviewing thesituation. There's no real corruption here,
nothing to worry about, and there'sno reason for you guys not to
allow us to mutilate children, tokill children, and to take your guns.
Republicans accused Democrats of ignoring a longforgotten nineteen seventy nine law that says

(01:12:04):
summaries of bills need to be writtenat an eighth grade level, a law
resurrected this month by the GOP.They didn't resurrect it, it was on
the books. AP has become propaganda. It's not the Associated Press, it's
the associated propagandists, and you knowwhich side they're associated with if you read

(01:12:27):
any of their articles. Unbelievably biased. The boycotters also say they won't return
unless and they put the word extremein quotes. Yeah, extreme bills like
the ones on abortion, gender affirmingcare, and gun safety or scrap.
Do you see how they do thatAssociated press. Well, if you were
opposed to murdering babies, you're extreme. If you're opposed to what they call

(01:12:54):
gender affirming care, mutilating young children, minors, you're extreme. And if
you don't want to give up yourguns, you're extreme. So the Democrat
Senate President Wagner, another Wagner,he probably pronounces that Wagner American way.

(01:13:15):
I said, the House build twothousand and two on abortion, gender affirming
care and all. This is nonnegotiable. Republicans object to a provision that
would allow doctors to provide an abortionto anyone, regardless of age, and
bar them in certain cases from disclosingthat two parents. So it would allow
them, but it would bar them. This is what's radical, you see,

(01:13:38):
this is what's non negotiable. No, no, no, you're gonna
do abortion the kids of any age. You know, you got a child
who's it does happen. You know, kids who are even under ten get
pregnant. We don't want to tellthe parents, and we don't want to

(01:13:59):
tell the police. Let's just dothe abortion and we'll make the money.
That's long been planned parenthoods. Butnow they're going to honor this in law.
Always in the past, planned parenthooddid it. And you could argue
that there was some legal jeopardy andit if somebody was going to actually try
to enforce the laws on the books. But now they're going to take that

(01:14:21):
away. And you know, allof this is non negotiable. Killing kids,
mutilating kids, that's non negotiable forthe Democrats. But it's the Republicans
who are radical. It's the Republicanswho have new ideas and are extreme,
and it's the Republicans who are tearingup this good government where people would get
together and you agree. The questionis do principles matter to these people?

(01:14:47):
Does the law matter to them?Or do they just get to do whatever
they want because they say that theygot the most number of votes. Whether
they did or not, trust them, they're experts. Trust them. Yeah,
there is no way that election couldbe rigged, right, But you
have to understand when we're talking aboutthe election. I wanted to talk about

(01:15:08):
this first before we get to thepresidential politics, because the state stuff is
far more important than the presidential politics. The presidential politics, we don't even
have anybody that I would trust.We have some people who have said some
good things, we have some peoplewho have done some good things, and
then we have Trump, who hasbetrayed everything that he said. Trump is

(01:15:30):
no different from these people. Heis simply the flip side of the same
coin that Biden is on. Butyou know, this is a republic,
This is not a democracy, andthese politicians need to be subject to the
law, even if it is somethingas simple as you've got to write the
bills so the n eighth grader canunderstand it. And I guess with the

(01:15:53):
government running the educational system, thatstandard has continued to decline, especially in
liberal run areas. Right, Solet's talk about the Republican parade that's going
to start this week. Should getthe baby elephant walk from anyway. Tim
Scott has dropped six million dollars anda hint that he's running for president.

(01:16:18):
I think that's more than a hint. As a matter of fact's a lot
of money, especially the stage formost of these people. By the way,
I don't see him as anybody who'sgot any conservative credentials. I think
he's in the vice presidential sweepstakes justlike Nicky Haley, and I would fully
expect that these people, especially NickyHaley has already indicated that she's going to

(01:16:41):
come after the Santis. These peoplewant to you know, not offend Trump.
They are positioning themselves to be hisvice presidential pick. So anyway,
he will launch a TV ad campaignand with a five and a half million
dollars ad buy, it will beginon Wednesday. This week, he spent

(01:17:03):
five and a half million dollars onads in Iowa and New Hampshire. Scott
as a senator from South Carolina,of course, the younger senator, the
junior senator to Lindsey Graham, wellthey can really pick him in South Carolina.
Canty Scott's ad by marks the largestof the twenty twenty four GOP candidates,

(01:17:29):
thus far, costing more than whatsome might raise during their campaign's entirety.
According to a senior Scott official,they're bragging about that, you know,
some of these people aren't going toget six million dollars in their entire
campaign before they drop out. We'regoing to drop that in our very first
ad. Bye. And they said, he's going to enter the field with
twenty two million dollars in cash onhand, and we'll make a major announcement

(01:17:51):
in North Charleston today and we'll headto Iowa and New Hampshire in the following
days. I guess he's not tooabout all this default stuff either, right,
I don't care. I see youlater. I've metten out on a
presidential campaign trail. Scott's campaign ExploratoryCommittee announcement video touched on his Judeo Christian

(01:18:15):
values as well as issues that hemight run on in twenty twenty four,
like parental rights and education, solvingthe border crisis, tackling crime, and
protecting the right to life. AndI haven't seen any credibility on any of
these issues. That's one of thereasons why it's usually difficult for a senator
to win. A governor like DeSantiscan get involved in all these issues,

(01:18:35):
and he has, and he's he'snot perfect. He's been late, he's
been limited on his responses to manyof these problems, but he's done far
more than any of the other governorshave. So there's that, Yeah,
there's a half full or half empty. Well, it's up to you.
But the bottom line, as agovernor he can deliver on these issues.

(01:18:57):
Senator can't really do anything about this, so it's gonna be difficult for Scott
to have any credentials on these issues. But it looks like the social conservatives
in the Maga cult don't really careabout the fact that Trump is a socialist
liberal on all of these things,calling anybody who pushes back against them sanctimonious.

(01:19:19):
Right, So to double down onall this, de Santis mock the
Biden administration of the Navy's drag queenrecruiter. He said, their recruiting is
in the toilet. Well, soare there morals frankly in their position?
He said, Under Biden the militaryhas quote lost its way unte by using

(01:19:43):
a drag queen to help in recruitingefforts. He said, when I see
them focusing on things like drag queensfor recruiting, this really has lost its
way. And is it any wonderthat recruiting is in the toilet right now?
He said, So, I thinkyou need to restore a sense of
mission, and it's all about beingable to fight and win wars. And
when you have that sense of missionand nothing is going to detract you from

(01:20:04):
it, morale goes through the roofbecause people like to feel like they are
part of something that matters. Andwhat he was responding to when you've seen
the pictures they featured this guy whodresses up like a woman and their profile

(01:20:24):
for Pride Month in twenty twenty andyeah, so again he is in spite
of the positions that he's taken andinspite of pushing back against the corporation of
the conservatives all say they hate becausethe way they're grooming kids, Disney,
you know, pushing out CRT Marxism, the angry proud family trying to groom

(01:20:47):
our kids and all the rest ofstuff, and then demanding that they are
entitled to special corporate privileges. AndI think that de santists, whether he
wins or not in court, Ithink he's got a very strong case to
say, and that's the case thathe's been making. Since when does a
corporation like Disney gets some kind ofspecial privileges? As he said, Universal

(01:21:12):
doesn't have that SeaWorld doesn't have that. Disney doesn't think that their park should
compete on a level playing bass withthe other ones. No, they don't,
and they're pretty upfront about that,and so were their establishment billionaire donors
that the GOP. They don't likeDe Santis's position on abortion, on CRT,

(01:21:35):
on the grooming and the schools andthe rest of this stuff, and
the Republican voters don't like that either. And yet the Republican voters are increasingly
moving towards Trump, who doesn't havea problem with any of those things.
He not only doesn't push back againstthem, but he has celebrations for the
LGBT movement in mar Lago. I'vetalked about it. Life site News has

(01:21:59):
talked about it. Yeah, goingback a couple of years, what he's
doing. And of course in twentytwenty he had Milannia cutting a commercial bragging
about how much he had done forLGBT, how he had embraced same sex
mirage and all the rest of thisstuff. He is a New York Liberal,
is a New York Liberal who supportsgun control. He's a New York

(01:22:23):
Liberal who doesn't care about the Constitution. And yet the conservative base loves this
guy. Survey shows that survey showsit's like family feude. De Santis's favorability
is slipping. Trump remains the mostfavorable candidate, even though his base disagrees
with him on gun control by executiveorder, His base disagrees with him with

(01:22:45):
a population control vaccines that he continuedto cheer. His base disagreed with him
on lockdown, and on the trillionsof dollars that he spent, record level
that he spent is based, disagreedwith him on the lockdowns that he was
financing with these bad governors. Andnow he is obviously not pro life.

(01:23:11):
He's pushing back against the pro lifepeople. And yet Trump remains the most
favorable GOP contender, as seventy eightpercent view him favorably compared with twenty percent
who do not. And I thinkthat this is all by design. I
think that the Democrats very cleverly arecoming after Trump with trump up charges to

(01:23:36):
turn him into a martyr in theeyes of the MAGA people. They want
to make sure that he gets thenomination because they know that he cannot win
the general election. You know,Neil Gorsich has now spoken out against the
lockdowns. And a statement made onMay eighteenth, in a case concerning Title
forty two. Neil Gorsich breaks thepainful silence. It's on the topic of

(01:24:00):
lockdowns and mandates, says the DailySkeptic, and he presents the truth with
startling clarity, so much so thateven this UK organization reprinted the bulk of
it. He said, since Marchtwenty twenty, this is Neil Corsage.
Yeah, I remember when they stillhad the executive order there. I did

(01:24:24):
the daily countdown. But the realityis is that the legal structure that's there.
I could continue to do the countdown. I wanted to, but because
the legal structure has not really beenremoved, it has changed in the Supreme
Court, as Darth Vader Ginsburg wasturn limited out by God and replaced.

(01:24:45):
But the Supreme Court, including Roberts, was all about allowing these lockdowns and
had ruled that way at the beginningof Trump's lockdowns. I called it medical
martial law, and I stand bythat it is medical martial law still because
we have not ripped out the usurpationthat these people have presumed to put into

(01:25:10):
state law, the usurpation that theyhave established by example and by precedent,
we have not rooted that out,and so I was glad to see that.
Neil Gorsich addressed this. He said, since March twenty twenty, we
may have experienced the greatest intrusions oncivil liberties in the peacetime history of this
country. Exactly, Executive officials acrossthe country issued emergency decrees on a breathtaking

(01:25:36):
scale. Governors and local leaders imposedlockdown orders, forcing people to remain in
their homes. That's right, butTrump paid them to do it, and
he continued paying them to do it. And he does get to that eventually
as well in his comments. I'mnot going to get into all them right
now, but just wanted to pointthat out as we look at the amazing

(01:26:00):
Trump derangement syndrome within manga. There'sa guy who the biggest peace time infringement
of civil liberties in the Constitution ever. He presided over that, he produced
it, he funded it, justas he funded the vaccine. So an
ex Trump White House lawyer, theone that I liked that quote that he
had about Trump being a deeply offendednarcissist and capable of acting except out of

(01:26:25):
his own perceived self interest or revenge. Ty Cobb says he believes the Feds
are coming fast for Donald Trump.Cobb, a former US assistant attorney and
member of the Trump legal team fromJuly twenty seventeen through to May of twenty
eighteen, said that there is aplethora of evidence that exists to convict the

(01:26:46):
former president. But the problem isthis is only going to cause his popularity
to soar. The Democrats know that, and that's why they're doing this,
And so whether or not this islegitimate is beside the point. You see,
and we have seen how many timeshave we seen our government forego prosecuting

(01:27:08):
somebody over crimes, certainly because ofpartisanship, but also because they understand what
the implications are going to be ifthe person's found guilty. I talked earlier
about how they allowed so many ofthese congressional figures, Pentagon figures who are
skimming money out of the Pentagon priorto nine to eleven. They let them

(01:27:30):
walk. Why they didn't want tohave a big scandal because they knew what
it would do to the government.These people know what this is going to
do the government. They know thatif they can get Trump in as an
nominee, that win or lose,it's going to move us towards the civil
war because one side or the otheris not going to accept the results.
And they know that if they cancome up with case after case after case

(01:27:53):
with this guy with an it isguilty of the stuff or not. You
know, I certainly believe the allegationsthat he and Rudy were selling pardons for
two million dollars. But whether ornot, you know, if he's convicted,
whether or not he's guilty of anyof this stuff, it's only going

(01:28:14):
to continue to move the needle inhis favor because they know that they can
beat him, They know that hewill lose a general election, and they
know that they can push everything towardsthe civil war. Michael Goodwin put it
this way writing for The New YorkPost. He said, Republicans are damned
if they do and damned if theydon't. And Trump's twenty twenty four candidacy,

(01:28:35):
and you know it's going to bethey're going to lose in the Senate
and the House as well again becauseTrump again, he said, nearly all
candidates for president start with the sametwo challenges. First, you got to
win the nomination. Then you gotto unite your party have a shot at
winning the general election. Then thereare those unlucky candidates and this year's Republican

(01:28:58):
field who face a third challenge.By the end of this week, there'll
be at least seven contestants in arace to see who gets to go head
to head with Trump. But there'sanother obstacle for whoever the lucky survivor is.
If he or she manages to defeatTrump for the nomination, there's a
good chance that Trump will take manyof his supporters and run as a third

(01:29:20):
party candidate or tell them to stayhome, dooming the GOP nominee to defeat
in the general See is this guya fifth column or not? And I
said that about the twenty twenty election. I said, he's getting all of
this money, And he got twohundred fifty million dollars. He split almost

(01:29:41):
all of it with the RNC,and they spent very little of it on
any actual legal investigation or challenges.And of course they did absolutely nothing to
change these new rules about mail inballots and ballot harvesting and all the rest
of this stuff that had been imposedby Trump the Trump administration over the lockdown
the new lockdown election rules. Theydid nothing to change any of that for

(01:30:04):
the runoff in Georgia, and theylost both of those Senate seats on January
the fifth. And then you stillhad the MAGA people on January the sixth
showing up to do what what wasthe plan? What were they supposed to
do? Were they supposed to takeover the floor of the House of the

(01:30:28):
Senate or whatever? What was theplan? I still don't know what they
They all say, well, wedidn't plan for that to happen. Well,
what did you plan for? Whatwas the purpose to stop this deal?
Right? What was the purpose ofthat? And of course you know
he's going to do it again thistime. He cost Republicans the election in

(01:30:48):
mid terms in twenty eighteen, butthat frequently happens, is the president who
is the incumbent, usually his partyretrenches bank. But they lost it then
as usual. But he was abig red wave because of economics, and
yet still because of Trump, ormaybe it's because the new rules that he
helped to establish. They lost intwenty twenty as well, and lost in

(01:31:14):
lost in twenty twenty, lost intwenty twenty two, I should say,
and now twenty twenty four. Sohe says everything says Michael Goodwin. Everything
in twenty twenty three is still aboutTrump, and just as it was then,
it's damned if you do, damnedif you don't. For Republicans and
for people in my situation like this, this is why I see people like
Alex He's on, he's off,he's on. It's like a daisy.

(01:31:36):
He loves me, he loves heloves Trump, he loves Trump. Not
he loves Trump, he loves Trumpnot. Depending on what's going on,
He's trying to what do I do? You know, what does the audience
want me to say? I'll sayit. Just tell me now, you
don't want to oppose Trump if youwant to have an audience and you want
to make money. Even with Trumpbeing in dited in New York, losing

(01:31:56):
a federal civil trial on sexual assaultand def and facing three more criminal probes
and other civil cases, the parametersof this race are about the same as
they were a year ago. Hissupporters don't care. And this is the
other damning thing about the MAGA people. They don't care any more than Bill
Clinton's base cared about what he wasdoing, raping brutally, violently sexually assaulting

(01:32:21):
women, all of the corruption theywas involved in domestic and international as well.
They didn't care about any of thatstuff. And of course Trump's base
doesn't care about any of that stuffeither. If anything, the odds of
Trump becoming the nominee for the thirdtime have improved. Trump's gains have come
despite or perhaps because of relentless attacksby Democrats. You see, everybody knows

(01:32:41):
this. Everybody knows this. Themore they can tort the law to try
to bankrupt him and lock him up, the larger his support becomes. Do
you think the Democrats don't know that? Of course they do. That's the
point of all this stuff. Still, even with the corrupt Joe Biden as
the Democrats nominee, Michael Goodwin atNew York Post says, I believe the

(01:33:05):
GOP has no more than a tenpercent chance of capturing the White House regardless
of whether Trump or another Republican ison the ballot, and a losing presidential
candidate generally spells doom for party congressionalcandidates and swing states and districts. You

(01:33:25):
think about the fact that Trump isgoing to be at the top of the
ballot, He's going to go around, and he's going to want to have
events with the people who are runningfor Senate or are running for Congress.
And if they say I don't wantto have aythinged it, well, then
now the MAGA base hates these peopleright, and Trump will attack them.

(01:33:46):
But if they embrace him, thenthe Independence and the Democrats hate that candidate.
It's a no win situation at thispoint, says Michael Goodwin. I
assume Democrats will control all power inWashington as of January of twenty twenty five.
To be prepared for that, beprepared for them to turn over the
House that they're narrowly hanging on toonarrow narrow majority. They will not take

(01:34:13):
the Senate, they will probably nottake the presidency. Does that scare you?
Does that concern you? Shouldn't right, Our hope is not in Washington.
We are not looking for a saviorin Washington. We're not looking for
Washington the federal government to solve anyproblems. The federal government is the problem,
Republican and Democrat. We need tostart making these solutions at the local

(01:34:34):
level. We need to set upparallel structures to get away from the federal
reserve. That's why we talk aboutthe state banking systems and things like that.
That's why we talk about having goldand silver. Whatever you can do
on a personal, local, andeven state level to get away from Washington.
That's what you need to be focusedon, not on the presidential politics.

(01:34:56):
And that's why we talk about thepresidential politics, because he's going to
talk about that. Try to getyou focus on it, just like they
try to get you focused on theceiling, the debt ceiling. Oh,
look, what's going to happen ifwe default, and who's responsible for the
default? And it's going to bethe end of the world if we default.
Don't. No, they won't,and even if they did, it
wouldn't be a big deal. Hesaid. Of course, to santists,

(01:35:18):
looks like the strongest alternative to Trump, and a speech he gave Friday in
New Hampshire reflected the basis of hisappeal. His record of cutting taxes,
creating jobs, expanding school choice,taking on the culture issues pushed by the
far left demonstrate his conservative bona fidesand his political skill. And that's the
key thing. He's taken. Theculture war they'd like to call it,

(01:35:39):
I think it's a spiritual war.He's taking the spiritual war issues far more
seriously and effectively than anybody else has. He said to Sant said, if
you look at what we have beenable to accomplish, there's something in there
for anybody in terms of the issuesthat we tackled. But of course the
Trump replies not by saying I gota better idea, I've got a better

(01:36:00):
policy than this, and I cando this better than him. No,
he just labels him as the sanctimonious, as Michael Goodwin said. That's been
going on for months. He saysit's silly, but you asked what it
works. It works, It workswith Trump's silly bass. He says,
I don't think Ron de Santis saidTrump is a concert. I'm sorry,

(01:36:23):
not Trump. This is Chris Christie. Chris Christie who's going to be throwing
his hat in the ry. Says, I don't think the Santis is a
conservative. I reported this before basedon his actions towards what Disney Disney say,
a real conservative does chrony capitalism,right, that's the Chris Christie brand

(01:36:45):
of conservatism. We don't offend abig corporation. And of course Nicki Haley
said, oh, come to SouthCarolina. Yeah, we'd love to sacrifice
our children on the altar of Molochat a Disney World. You know,
Hailey says welcome to Santis and therace with a dig quote We've been waiting

(01:37:06):
for you. Oh yeah, evil, which she is. Again. She's
part of the VP sweepstakes, andas part of that, you can expect
NICKI Haley to attack de Santis,not Trump. She is betting as well
as everybody else that Trump is goingto win. Thomas Massey the only congressman

(01:37:30):
that I have any respect for inWashington, the real successor to Ron Paul
said, DeSantis is more likely todouble down than to pivot as he enters
a presidential race. Thomas Massey hadbeen in Congress less than a year when
a colleague approached him with a controversialplan. DeSantis of Florida was also a
freshman, urging Republican lawmakers on theHouse floor to rail against a proposed internet

(01:37:57):
sales tax that had the strong supportof Tell giants and only muted GOP opposition.
Desantist's effort drew Faris pushback. Lawmakerswere surprised to receive calls from irate
lobbyists before the floor debate even endeddemanding that they back off. He said,
the big internet companies, big retailers, especially the big retailers, wanted

(01:38:20):
this internet sales tax from the federalgovernment. Of course, we do have
sales tax at the state levels,but they wanted at the federal level as
well. Yet Desantists did not waivera demonstration. Massey says of how Desantist
response to critics when his plans comeunder fire, Massey said, I just
thought, make sure he's right beforeyou follow him, because he's not going

(01:38:43):
to back down and it could becontroversial. And so as all these people
tried to make a big deal onthis Walt Disney Corporation feud, and it's
all over Friday and Saturday. Itwas all over the Drudge Report. Disney
was I think going to build spenta billion dollars or maybe it was two
billion dollars or whatever, but theywere going to get a half a billion,

(01:39:04):
more than a half a billion dollarsworth of government subsidies from the state
of Florida, and they were kickingin. That's why I said it was
a little over a billion dollars,I believe because it was going to be
something like an eight hundred plus millionfrom Disney and five hundred plus million from
Florida taxpayers. I hate that kindof stuff. You ought to hate it

(01:39:26):
too, if you call yourself aconservative. I've talked about I've spoken against
that for sports stadiums. Why woulda why would a why would Disney be
any different with that? Right?We give billions of dollars to the billionaires
who owned these sports teams, andthey pay these millionaires multimillionaires, all this
money to play a child's game,and the taxpayers have to foot the bill.

(01:39:49):
Oh, but it's good for economicactivity. Well, so is the
economic activity of small businesses and independentbusinesses, and yet they are taxed and
burdened with that as well. Idon't like chrony capitalism, and I think
he's in a much stronger point thanthe position the liberals believe in the mainstream

(01:40:10):
media believes. But a pivot,according to long time Desanti's watchers like Massey,
isn't going to come anytime soon.Instead, the Florida Republican plans to
double down in his past positions,say allies and insiders, confident that recent
history proves that he and his politicaloperation are better attuned to the values and
the desires of the average Republican voterthan their critics and downs and I believe

(01:40:32):
that he is. However, thatdoesn't matter because this is all about personality.
This is all about Trump's personality.It's another episode of the Apprentice.
It isn't about anything. They don'thave any principles anymore. They have an
idol that they follow, weathering attacksin the belt weight chattering class to deliver

(01:40:54):
on campaign promises. May be aconcept that is alien to stale establishment Republicans.
So a spokes person for DeSantis ispolitical team. But DeSantis has a
long record of tuning out critics anddoing what he said he would do,
and this includes some of the thingsthat he's done that are wrong as well.
Look, nobody is perfect. Countingof these things, it is a

(01:41:15):
mixed bag. My take on DeSantis, though, is that he appears to
be appears, he does what heappears to do. What he appears to
be should say, so you knowwhat you're what you're choosing, whether you
like it or not, and thatis different from most of the other politicians.

(01:41:38):
And as speeches around the country,he often says he receives advice to
govern as a moderate in Florida,but he said his decision where it usually
they have very narrow margins, Buthe said his decisions were politically vindicated in
the election in twenty twenty two,where he did not govern as a moderate
who's just slightly different than the Democrat, but he governed from conservative principles.

(01:42:02):
So you have this crazy thing happeningwith the naacp issuing a travel advisory to
people against visiting Florida to black people. I guess, by the way,
they still have not taken the coloredpeople out of their I don't know why
that they're not harangued over that,because they harangue other people for using that

(01:42:25):
term. Now that there's anything wrongwith any of it. But I just
anyway, they said de Santis ishostile, hostile to black people. He
han't do anything hostile to black people. No, he's hostile to LGBT people.
Therefore he's hostile to civil rights,and we're about civil rights. You
see the equation. It's just likeit is with the ADL. Yeah,

(01:42:46):
they have a political agenda. Theyhave a leftist Marxist political agenda, and
that's what they care about. Theydon't care about their stated agenda of fighting
anti Semitism or fighting racism. It'sall about the politics and has sustained blatant,
relentless systemic attacks on civil rights.And he clarifies that to meaning LGBT.

(01:43:14):
That's what they're talking about. Sowith that happening on the Biden side,
the Biden administration is very concerned aboutthe fact that people have been winning
in the Supreme Court in terms ofprayers and schools and that type of thing,
because the Supreme Court understands the differencebetween establishment and the free exercise of

(01:43:35):
religion. But a new plan fromthe Biden administration to update guidance regarding prayer
in public schools means they crackdown onthat activity. In fact, lawyer for
the ADF, which has fought multiplecourt cases regarding student speech in schools,
that's the Alliance Defending Freedom the adthey said, this suggests that schools have

(01:43:58):
to purge religious messages is from anystudent's speech if the school in any way
controls the student's speech. So ifyou let them speak, you're controlling their
speech. You should be controlling theirspeech all speeches by permission. And so
in this kind of authoritarian society whereyou have to get permission from the government

(01:44:18):
to speak because it's no longer aright but a privilege. You also have
to get a permission from them tospeak about religious issues, because again the
exercise of religious freedom is not aright, it's now a privilege. But
again, the exercise individuals exercising theirreligious beliefs is not the establishment of a

(01:44:42):
religion. What did the establishment mean? It meant that you had you did
have established state religions in every singlestate when they put the Constitution Bill Rights
together, and they wanted to makesure because they were all different religions,
Congregationalist, Baptist, Catholic, youname it. They wanted to make sure
that there wasn't going that one ofthose is not going to be picked and

(01:45:02):
used to shut down whatever the statereligion was. And so they said that
the federal government would not established religion. What did that look like? That
meant that in some states you wererequired to attend that state church. If
as a Congregationalist church, you hadto attend it, and you had to
give them money. And some ofthe states they were more liberal and you

(01:45:25):
did not have to attend, butyou still had to pay money to that
established state church, and that continuedin Massachusetts and one other I think it
was in Connecticut, but Massachusetts continuedthe longest after the Bill of Rights is
put in Massachusetts up into the eighteenforties still had an established state church.
So it doesn't do anything about thestate establishing a church. And so clearly

(01:45:49):
somebody freely exercising their religion in school, it's not establishment either. But the
reality is this is something that wehave established, is that Biden, like
any authoritarian dictator, hates any God, hates every god, hates every religion

(01:46:13):
because he sees himself as God.So I come back, We're gonna take
a look at the LGBT. Ithink we've got a new acronym for them,
which I'll defend when I come back, luciferian grooming bigoted trannies. We'll
be right back only listening to theDavid Night Show. By the way,

(01:47:26):
thank you on Rumble Way cool Snoopy, thank you very much for the tip.
That's very kind and generous. Iappreciate that, and it's now a
monthly supporter. Travis says, thatis something that you can do on Rumble.
You can sign up for that.You can sign up for that inside
the chat there, and they havevery generous terms for the rest of twenty
twenty three. They take no cutout of that. So anything that you

(01:47:49):
contribute as part of that monthly support. I don't know if that applies to
the tips, but I certainly doesto the monthly supporter thing. So I
really appreciate that. And uh way, cool snoopy, But the term limited
by God was a funny. Iput that in quotes. And by the

(01:48:10):
way, UM got a message fromTravis. This is on the on the
stream there. Harps, one ofour listeners in Australia, has been very
active in the comments. So pleasekeep Harps in your prayers. Still in
a great deal of pain as heheals. You had some injuries, ribs
and what was what there was something? Was there? Something else besides the

(01:48:32):
ribs. He said that his anklesare really swollen in hurting as well.
All right, so keep Harps inyour prayer. Appreciate that. In Australia,
so I said, we'll talk aboutLGBT, which is really now Luciferian
grooming bigoted trainees. And I'm notthe only one saying that you've got gays

(01:48:56):
against groomers. You've got a conservative commentator who is homosexual saying the same
thing. So the queers have takenover from the homosexuals. I'll talk about
that in a moment, but let'sfocus first on the luciferian aspect of it.
Target, as part of Pride Month, has got a partner who boasts

(01:49:17):
about Satanism quote Satan respects pronouns.Ab Prelan, a brand that's out of
the UK headed by a self proclaimedgay transgender man known as Eric, has
had a collaboration of the works withTarget for roughly a year. The collection
includes a sweatshirt that reads, quotecure transphobia, not trans people. He's

(01:49:41):
got a tote bag that reads tooqueer for here and a messenger pack that
reads we belong everywhere. Now thereyou go. Sounds really clever, doesn't
it. It's just munch of propaganda. Among ab Prelan's other apparel are images
of pentagrams, horned skulls, andreferences to devils. One previous design said

(01:50:06):
Satan respects pronouns, and it wasfeatured on t shirts and pins. These
items have been known to be soldat London's Satanic Flea Market during December,
which the brand promoted on its socialmedia. He said that being called a
demon is something I can cope with, and the idea of a trans demon
is pretty damn cool. Most ofmy work focuses on gothic or dark and

(01:50:29):
satanic imagery juxtaposed with bright colors andLGBT plus positive images, you know,
rainbows and stuff. You know,since when do we let the rainbow be
captured by darkness? I don't know. Anyway, The bottom line is whether
you believe this or not. Hebelieves it. The designer claims that the
brand was approached by Target for collaboration. Hall so acknowledging that the designs have

(01:50:53):
already made transphobes infuriated with me,he says, And of course we'll get
to this in a moment. Butyou know, Target also has the swimwear
for young boys, tucking swimwear tohide the fact that they're boys and things
like. I mean, it's justfor Pride month. Target is always in

(01:51:14):
the lead with this stuff. Always. But before we get to that,
remember when Mom and I went toTarget, this has to be almost two
decades ago, there was some guywho was he had long hair, he
was balding on top. Really gross. Goblin features and he's in a sun
dress, just one of the mostThis was twenty years ago and Target was

(01:51:35):
on this. He was working theircustomer service desk. Yeah, the place
where he's going to have the mostinteraction with customers. Yeah. Yeah.
I remember Karen talking about that.She was absolutely freaked out about it.
And at the time, you know, we needed to save money, and
we had friends like she was atone of friend. I'm not ever going
back there again if that's what they'regonna do. Friends said, oh,
you need you need to go,you need to save some money. They

(01:51:58):
have some great deal. I'm notgoing to go there to shop, And
that's what we need to do.A lot of people talking about the fact,
why are we with this cucking swimwearand stuff like that they're pushing out
for the kids. Why is everybodygonna boycott beer? But you're not going
to boycott Target for this kind ofstuff. We're coming after the kids anyway.
Andrew Sullivan says, we're in anew era and the erasure of gay

(01:52:21):
men and lesbians is intensifying. Yousee, it's a civil war. For
the longest time, you had theteas fighting the elves, you know,
the trainees fighting the lesbians. Nowthey're also fighting the g's. I don't
know they're going to come for thebees. Which side of the bees going
to join? I don't know killerbees. But his title is Queers Versus

(01:52:45):
Homosexuals. The ANDREWS. Sullivan isa conservative writer and not socially conservative.
But you know, from that perspective, I guess and some way question is,
you know, what is he tryingto preserve? But here's what he
has to say. From his perspective, he said it was a most speedily

(01:53:08):
successful civil rights story and memory fromhis perspective, including us in existing institutions,
did not need to change anything inheterosexual life. Live and let live
and equality and dignity was the idea, you see, And that's how this
is all changed. You know,that was the way that it was sold.

(01:53:30):
That's why so many people accepted it. And again it was about adults
at the time. You know,now everything has changed, and he talks
about this. He may not haveany discernment about what is happening here spiritually,
but he does have discernment about whatis going on in the political minds
of the people that are part ofLGBT and that's why it's important to hear

(01:53:53):
what he has to say. Ithink he has a very important insight and
to the mindset of these people andwhat they're trying to get at. I've
said for the longest time. Ohso, all this time, we were
told that there's a gay Jane andso forth, and I never believed that
that was deterministic. I thought itwas a choice. Nevertheless, I said,

(01:54:14):
notice what is happening now with thetrends, you know, the trans
are saying that there is no fixedbiology. And that's what he addresses here.
And so it's not just this liveand let live. What changed about
that is really the kids, andhe doesn't really necessarily address that. But
anyway, he goes on to say, America discovered what I discovered the first

(01:54:34):
time I went into a gay bar. These people were not the stereotypes I
was told about. They were notsome strange alien tribe. Well they are
now. They are now, Andthe stereotypes existed for a reason, and
now we see these pedophile stereotypes thatare exploding. Yeah. I'm not sure

(01:54:56):
what gay people he's met, butmost of the gay people I've met in
my entire life have and just stereotypesand nothing but that. Yeah, yeah,
but you know it is it issomething that has always been uh you
know, been there. I hadwhen I was a young child. My
dad was not one to openly talkabout such things, and he just left

(01:55:18):
it vaguely saying, Um, ifyou're in a restroom by yourself and it
comes out, don't engage him,runaway, why dad, Just do what
I said and don't ask any questions. But now they want to put the
people not in just in the samesex bathrooms, they want to put them
in the women's bathrooms as well.Now, these stereotypes existed for reason,

(01:55:43):
and perhaps Andrew Sullivan was deceived acrossthe board. You know, just like
many other people. It was notsimply about what consenting adults want to do.
That's not the agenda here. Whybecause there this whole thing is being
driven from a spiritual perspective, andso he may not have understood what his
role was in it. And I'veplayed clips from somebody who could who identified

(01:56:08):
themselves as a conservative drag queen.He said, moms, get your kids
away from this. This is ahorrendous culture for kids. Lots of sex,
lots of drugs. That is likea stripper culture. They have no
business around kids. I've played foryou. I think it was gays against
groomers. A woman who said,I'm a lesbian. I worked so hard

(01:56:29):
for this. And if I'd seenwhat this is going to become in terms
of targeting kids. Target, yeah, target if it's going to be.
If I'd seen what it's going tobe common terms of targeting kids, I
would have never done any of thisstuff. And I don't want to have
anything to do with it. Andso you've got a lot of people like
Andrew Sullivan and these other people whoare pulling back from this because they're not
pedophiles. But you want to understandthat this was the thrust of this This

(01:56:50):
is the satanic direction that it wasgoing. And from the transgender pedophilia,
the next step is a transhumanist that'sthe next step. You can see that
progression already. Andrew Sullivan says,if you read mainstream media, you'll be
told that this war is back becausethe GOP has, for cynical reasons,

(01:57:12):
become even more unhinged hate machine targetingthe freedom and dignity of queer people.
As one New York columnist put ittoday, he said, but when you
examine the other issues at stake,public schools teaching the concepts of queer and
gender theory to kindergarteners on up,or sex changes for children before puberty,

(01:57:36):
or the housing of biological males withwomen in prisons and rape shelters, and
biological males competing with women in sports, you realize that we are far beyond
what the gay rights movement once stoodfor. You see, yeah, he
may have been genuinely believing this stuff. I think he was, but he

(01:58:00):
was deceived. He still doesn't becausehe doesn't have any spiritual discernment about this.
You could have seen where this isheaded, and now many of them
see it and they're trying to pullback from it. He says. These
initiatives from the far left are new, that's right. Yeah, they want
to make this about Oh look atthe Republicans are back to their old tricks,
and every time they talk about howthey're being attacked, the issues that

(01:58:26):
they focus on are how they areattacking children. So he said, these
initiatives from the far left are new. It is the capture, he said,
of the gay rights movement by queersocial justice activists. You know,

(01:58:47):
somebody like this. This is actuallya Nebraska state senator Democratic course, I
think we get the idea. Shejust goes on that this goes on for

(01:59:15):
more than a man, and Iwant subject to anywhere that. But now
you had a good laugh at that. Just understand these people don't have an
argument to make. That's probably themost cogent and intelligent thing that woman has
ever said. I mean, they'rethe type of people who just show up
and say racist, racist, racist, you know what what about it is?
What what are you talking about?No, not gonna I'm not gonna
explain any of that stuff. Soum, he said. The core belief

(01:59:40):
and here's the key, this isthe core part of this article. I
think to give you an insight intothe mind of these people that are now
lesbians and gays are saying, wedon't want to have anything to do with
these queers and trannees, right,he said, The core belief of critical
queer theorists is that homosexuality is nota part of human nature, because there

(02:00:05):
is no such thing as human nature. You see when I said before that,
you know, there was all thistalk back in the day when we
were talking about adults. They weresaying, well, there's a gay gene.
Well, the queers and the radicalcritical queer theorists are saying there is
no biology. There is no biology. What do they think there is,

(02:00:28):
Well, he says, they thinkthat there is no such thing as human
nature, because there is no suchthing as it's not a part of human
nature. Because there's no such thingas human nature. They think that everything
is socially constructed, even the body. And because heterosexuality is the overwhelming norm,
the homosexuality the exception, and becausesociety is nothing but a complex of

(02:00:53):
oppression, homosexuals are defined by theirrejection of heteronormity. You see, they've
got to rebel against everything. Theybelieve that everything is. And this is
why I've said for the longest time, this is all rooted and postmodernism.
What is postmodernism. Postmodernism says thatthere is no absolute truth, except that

(02:01:15):
that is the absolute truth for thepostmodernist, and they don't see the contradiction
there. Right, we have anabsolute truth, and that is that there
is no absolute truth. Modernism reallygoes back to higher criticism of the Bible
and of society in the eighteen hundreds, and it was when people would debate
you know, they would talk about, well, you know, is there

(02:01:39):
a God and has he spoken throughthe Bible? And this and that,
you know, and the evolution versuscreation and all these different things. So
they would argue, they would debatethat was modernism. Then they got to
postmodernism. They said, I don'tcare because there is no such thing as
truth, like pilot. What istruth? I don't know conscious pilot.
And so these people don't believe thatthere is any such thing as truth.

(02:02:01):
And as he said, they don'tbelieve that there is any such thing as
human nature. They believe that everythingis a social construct, everything is fluid.
They're not grounded in any reality,they're not grounded in any moral principles,
any cultural norms. As a matterof fact, they despise all cultural
norms because they see any and allcultural norms as a means of oppression.

(02:02:25):
And so they set themselves in defianceto everything. And you see, this
is one of the reasons why yousee the LGBT and the Green movement and
the Marxist movement. They're all alignedin the sense that they want to tear
down everything that is established. Butthis is their idea from the critical queer

(02:02:45):
theorists because heterosexuality is the norm,homosexuality is the exception. Therefore heterosexuality must
be oppression. And this is whythey can just if the racist things that
they do. They say, well, because there's more white people than there
are black people. The white peopleare by are obviously all racist, even

(02:03:10):
if they harbor no ill will tosomebody else, they're the racist simply because
they're the majority. And no matterhow much I hate white people, I
can't be racist because I'm in theminority. That's their mindset. So it's
important understand where their mindset is.It's totally build nonsense. It's important to
understand where these people are coming from. That's so I think Andrew Sullivan does

(02:03:31):
as a service there saying they says, to be queer is to be dedicated
to subversion. See that's why Isay it's a luciferian grooming bigoted trainees.
That's what they've become. They've takenover the LGBT. That's what it is
now, luciferian bigoted grooming, bigotedtrainees. So to be queers to be

(02:03:59):
dedicated to version, to mock conventions, to deconstruct language, to dismantle the
human body. And he doesn't writethis, but I would say dismantling the
human body even means mutilating it right, even for kids, especially for kids,
and to defy nature and above all, to liberate humankind from the prison

(02:04:21):
of gender. Do you see howluciferian this is? Some gays or queers,
he said, but most aren't.And queers now run what was once
the gay rights movement, and theyhave taken it over and run it into
the ground. And so that bringsus to parental rights. And we're going

(02:04:42):
to talk about that when we comeback. We'll be right back analyzing the

(02:05:54):
globalist next move show. A pastorhas a brutal five word comeback after a

(02:06:15):
school board stops him from reading adisgusting book. The story from Western Journal,
A North Carolina pastor gave the perfectresponse when members of an Asheville school
board tried to stop him from readingthe sexual explicit text and one of the
LGBT books that the board has refusedto take off from them from the curriculum,

(02:06:41):
and the minister said he wanted toread out loud from a book called
It's Perfectly Normal. It's not perfectlynormal, by the way. Spoiler alert
which can be found on school bookshelvesand it says it's for ages ten and
up. This pastor is John Amanchuck Wu. I don't really know how

(02:07:08):
to pronounce his name, so I'mnot sure. But anyway, he read
sir, we'll be sexually explicit materialsand the book. But he only got
seconds into his reading before the membersof the school board tried to stop him
from voicing the explicit material. I'mgonna play this for you because you're not
a school board. You don't needto hear this. I agree with him
reading this to the school board,but we don't. We don't find it

(02:07:34):
necessary to show you what is inthe book or let you hear it.
If you're curious, I'm sure you'llbe able to find it somewhere. But
it was something and we've seen thishappen over and over again, but this
pastor does it really well. Manytimes they've shut down people who are reading
from these books. They said,what's the problem. What's the problem.
You've got this there for kids.Why don't you want me to read this

(02:07:58):
to you. I'm an adult,you're an adult. You don't want me
to read this to you. Here'swhat he had well happened, Sarah,
I'm sorry? Was it something Isaid? If you don't want to hear
it in a school board meeting,why should children be able to check it
out of the school system. Wehave perverts that are perverting our kids and

(02:08:18):
you won't step back smug in yourchairs. But you don't want me to
read us Why does it bother you? Yes or no? You can't answer
that question. You want to knowwhy because politically speaking, you can't say
that is wrong. And you don'twant me to read the filth because it
exposes the truth? How dare youtell me to stop reading it? If

(02:08:39):
you don't want to hear it,why should the children have to see it?
Pastor your time? Is the timeis up? Thank you? That
makes two of us. That makestwo of us. Yeah, we should
have some righteous indignation about this stuff. He is absolutely right. And in
addition to that, he had aninterview and he said, this book is

(02:09:01):
used as a tool to create whatI call mental rape in the hearts and
the minds of the children. Weare robbing kids of their innocence in America
as we allow diversity, inclusion andequity to dominate our schools and so many
of our librarians are bringing this kindof material into the public school system because

(02:09:22):
they believe children need to see themselveson the shof Now you are creating a
role model for them. You aregrooming them. That's what this is.
He says. I don't believe thatthis is perfectly normal. That's the title
of the book, right. Ibelieve that this is perfectly perverted and it
needs to stop, he said.He said, if a parent wants to

(02:09:43):
talk about these things and be explicitwith their children and show them pornographic images,
I don't advise that. I don'tthink it's something that they should do,
but that should be something that takesplace at home. But when we
rob our kids of their innocence,we're leading in a sense down a supriest
Well, that's where I disagree withhim. I don't think that we look
the other way if parents are sexuallyabusing their kids. He just said,

(02:10:07):
it's mental rape. Let's stick withthat. If it's mental rapists, mental
rape, if it's being done bythe parents. I don't want to get
government overly involved and what happens athome, but we don't need to normalize
this either. Anyway. The keything to understand is that sexual grooming and

(02:10:31):
showing pornographic images can only be doneby teachers. That's the important thing.
They got a free pass to dothis to kids that they only slightly know.
He says. You can't let yourguard down for a second. He
says, there are sexually evil andcorrupt and deviant, perverted people who believe

(02:10:56):
that this is okay. No,I don't think they believe it's okay.
I think they know it's wrong.I think they know it's wrong and they
don't care. I think they knowit's wrong and they want to wallow in
it. I think they know thatit's wrong, and that gives them a
special kick. You see. That'swhat happens with a perversion. Yeah,
that's the excitement, the forbidden fruitaspect of it. They know that it's

(02:11:18):
wrong what they're doing, and that'swhy we should give them no quarter.
Let's not have anymore. That's well, they meant well, or they just
don't understand what No, they dounderstand what they're doing. They do understand.
They bring these gender theory and theybring in these gender theory and queer
books, and the parents don't knowthat it's there, he said. He

(02:11:41):
slammed the school districts. We're forcingparents to go through a ten step process
in order to remove some books likethis. So he says, you can't
let your guard down for a second. No, and what you do is
you don't give your kids over tothese institutions for a second. He said,
what's going on to the schools asinister, it's criminal, and it

(02:12:05):
is child abuse, it is grooming, it is Luciferian grooming bigoted trainees.
And at the Biden White House theylove that you have. The White House
Press Secretary Queen Jean Pierre this weekspoke before a LGBT media event and again,

(02:12:28):
how many times are you going tosay this? Kids don't belong to
you, They belonged to all ofus. It takes a village to raise
a child. We had Melissa HarrisPerry about a decade ago public service announcement
that was being run by MSNBC allthe time. We got to get over
this idea that your children belonged tothe parents. They belonged to all of
us. You know, the villageowns them. Well, only thing that

(02:12:50):
is owned by the village is somethingthat nobody owns. And so she said,
as she was this LGBT group.She said, the children of America
belong to all of us. Inthe course of defending surgical and chemical quote
gender transitioning of children, she wastalking about articulating a view of state prerogatives

(02:13:13):
versus parental rights that fuels much ofwhat the Biden administration's stances on the issue.
And of course that is what thisis all about. She said,
these are kids, these are ourkids. They belong to all of us.
Some more statements, says Life SiteNews have been made by of course

(02:13:35):
Biden and La La Harris and manyother Democrats. As I said, Melissa
Harris, Perry, Hillary Clinton,for example, here's what one teacher said
in terms of parental rights. AndJenny, you've said you feel that this
is a targeted attack. What doyou mean when you say that that same
school board member is currently going aroundright now trying to well along with you

(02:13:56):
know, the whole what DeSantis isdoing, trying to get rid of all
basic diversity elements out of schools completely, like they're trying to strip individuality and
diversity to fit one common agenda,and it's ruining everything. It's not what
America stands for. I think Let'slet our viewers listen to what that parents
said that complained about you doing thisin a recent school board meeting. Here

(02:14:20):
it is it is not a teacher'sjob to impose their beliefs upon a child,
religious, sexual orientation, gender identity, any of the above. But
allowing movies such as this assist teachersin opening a door, and please hear
me, they assist teachers in openinga door for conversations that have no place

(02:14:45):
in our classrooms. We had playedthat for the viewers in the introduction,
but I just want to give youa chance to respond. Yeah. So
that's what she's missing, and whatthese parents are missing is they're not in
the school system. That just showsme that she's ignorant and has not come
and volunteered at all. Because arethese conversations, these doors they're open,
These students have one to one devices, the amount of things that they're able

(02:15:07):
to pull up that we have toshut down these conversations, these doors that
she's talking about telling you, I'mstripping her rights as a parent. Those
rights are gone when you're child's inthe public school system. Because there are
students talking about these things. It'swhere they get ninety percent of their socialization
for the day, and we can'tshut down every conversation every child has.

(02:15:30):
Okay, so when your kid isin the public school system, you don't
have any parental rights and you don'tknow what's going on. So what she
said, and she's right about that. We've heard that over and over again
when you take your kid and dropthem off at school. So are the
judge in one of these cases thatI phoned, you have abandoned your child
to the state, and we willoperate in place of the parents and loco
parentheses the Latin term for that.And of course the socialization which everybody was

(02:15:56):
so big on. When we've homeschooledour kids decades ago. Are they going
to be socialized? I said,They'll be socialized with adults and people of
all ages. They won't be rigidlysegregated. But I don't want my kids
being raised by their peers. Theydon't know what to tell them. That's
exactly what she's saying. She says, well, this tells me that the

(02:16:16):
mom has never been in school,because it's the peers that are instilling these
values in them. All she wasdoing, which is showing people a Disney
movie that featured homosexual characters to pushthe grooming aspect disgay disgay movies. So
the mother objected to that. Shesaid, I'm just showing them a Disney

(02:16:37):
movie. It's a lot worse.What's happening with their cell phones the parents
give them without restriction. And whateven if you don't give your kid a
cell phone, the other kids whohave cell phones and no restrictions from their
parents are going to be raising andpushing your kid in the other direction.
Do you think you ought to behomeschooling your kids? Seriously, this is

(02:17:01):
a serious job. God has givenyou a child and put you in responsible
position for this, and you willanswer for that. We all will to
what we have done with our kids. And it's not going to be sufficient
to stand before God and say,well, I wanted them to do the
right thing, but it was atschool that did it to them, or
there are classmates that did it tothem. Well, why'd you put them

(02:17:24):
in the school? Why did youlet the classmates raise them? Studies find
that more than eighty percent of childrenexperiencing gender dysphoria outgrow it on their own
by late adolescence. Gender dysphoria wasnever a thing. We never had.
Gender dysphoria. Didn't have it inmy generation, my parents' generation generation.
It came after me or in mykids generation. Either that. Full reassignment

(02:17:46):
surgery often fails to resolve gender confusedindividuals heightened tendency to engage in self harm
and suicide, and may even exacerbateJust like a pharmaceutical drug. Yeah,
take this drug for X. Theyhear the adverse effects, and oh,
it increases the incidents of X inmany cases, and then all these other

(02:18:09):
things that happened as well. Soto confuse these kids who were confused for
because of their peers or whatever,to confuse them even more heightens the tendency
for them to engage in self harmand suicide, may even exacerbate it,
including by reinforcing their confusion and neglectingthe actual root cause of their mental strife.

(02:18:31):
The issue is grimly illustrated in thestory of Yaale Martinez, a nineteen
year old to whom gender transitioning wastouted as a possible cure for her depression
in high school. Supported by ahigh school counselor who withheld what she was
going through from her mother, thetroubled girl killed herself after trying to live

(02:18:54):
as a man for three years.We're seeing these stories over and over again.
And yet it is not just inAmerica. Even in China. They're
now talking about the last generation youngChinese people who are vowing not to have
children. You understand that this iscoming up people in many different ways.

(02:19:16):
And what the Chinese are now experiencingis the wave of lies that we've been
dealing with here in America for atleast fifty years. It was the line
that was always used by planned parenthood. It just costs too much to have
a kid, That's what they're parentingnow. It costs too much to give
kids a decent life. And theyeven say, well, I don't want

(02:19:39):
them raised in a communist Chinese school, so I'd have to send them to
a good school in the Western Ijust don't have the money to do that.
Say. It's got a little bitof a variation on it from what
we're told now. I just can'tafford it, says a twenty six year
old researcher who swears that she willnever have children. The China, his

(02:20:00):
government announced that the country has nowentered an era of negative population growth,
where they're not having enough people kidsper capita to maintain the current population.
Since in nineteen nineties, couldn't theyjust say the population is declining negative population
growth. That's just such a backwardsway of phrasing that. That's stupid.

(02:20:20):
Sorry, I had to comment onthat. It's coming from academia, right,
so, yeah, it sounds theonly people that can make something this
stupid is academy. You have tobe real smart to make something this stupid.
Yeah. Yeah, negative population growth, it's negative growth. Yeah,
there you go. Since in nineteennineties, are total fertility rate has declined
below the replacement level of two pointone. In twenty twenty one, it

(02:20:46):
was one point one five. Ayear before that it was one point three,
so it's still dropping. The Guardianleftist organization is writing this saying the
last generation, and they're happy aboutthat because you know, they don't like
people. The Guardian says a solutionto this would be more welfare. For
years, studies have found the risingcost of bringing up children in the lack

(02:21:09):
of welfare provisions to be the mainreasons behind China's low fertility rate. Now,
no, they're much wealthier now thanthey were when they had explosive growth.
That's not it at all. Itis a spiritual sickness. The way
that they sell this, right,Greed, lust, the love of money,

(02:21:31):
all of this. And then ofcourse there's the other aspects of physical
sterilization via the food, via thevaccines and medications and other things like that
that are environmental causes. So there'sphysical aspects of it, there's psychological aspects
of it, there's spiritual aspects ofthis. Again, they have not yet

(02:21:54):
in China run into the lust aspectof it, you know, the LGBT
aspect of it. But I say, well, I don't want to have
kids because I want a homosexual relationship. They're just dealing right now with the
greed and the love of money aspectof this. But all of these things
are involved as we see this rollingout globally. And so that brings us

(02:22:18):
back to Target selling what they calltuck friendly children's bathing suits. I point
out how they've got a designer,they're having their Pride month, and they've
got all these you know, thespecial pronouns and things like that they're pushing
on the kids. The signs allover Target, and Target is selling a

(02:22:41):
tuck friendly bathing suit is part ofits massive Pride collection as they are marketing
this to children. The far leftuses the artificial designation of Pride month.
The further the radical gender theology,and I'd call it an ideology. It
is a theology. And who dothey see as God? Themselves? Each

(02:23:03):
and every one of them are God, they stand above God. So it's
a radical gender theology. The Pridesection, routinely placed towards the front of
the department stores, features items thatare not just for adults, but children
as well. And this year Targetis rolling out a tuck friendly bathing suit
designed to help biological men tuck theirgenitals away to look more feminine and pushing

(02:23:24):
this to kids. And so Ilike what some of the comments on the
internet are saying. One person saysTarget has a new Pride collection with What
this corporation is doing is far worsethan anything that bud Light did. They're
targeting children and selling chest binders andtuck friendly bathing suits for children. The

(02:23:48):
nation can come together for beer,but not for children, said another person.
Now we cannot boycott all stories thatencourage and promote or celebrate this stuff,
or rather now we can, andthat should be a very easy thing
to do. Like I said before, you know, Travis has talking about
it for twenty years. We boycottedTarget because we knew that at the very

(02:24:09):
forefront of this, and it wasn'tjust what they were doing in that one
particular store. We were validated withthat as we saw them then doing away
with any gender based labeling of toys. They were pushing men into women's restrooms
before it became cool for the Democratsto try to do that from Washington.
And then there's this story from VigilantCitizen. Why is Miriam Kahn's art that

(02:24:35):
depicts child abuse? Why is thatbeing shown in museums in France and in
a very prestigious contemporary arts center inParis. And then when people complained about
this, as a matter of fact, several organizations, one of them six
major associations, one of them Lawyersfor Childhood, sought to have these paintings

(02:24:58):
removed on the grounds at the Frenchlaw forbids the exhibition of pornographic representations of
miners and that's what it does.But the court's ruled against the association,
and the French president defended this socalled artwork, but of course his wife
is a pedophile. She was afterhim when he was a miner, and

(02:25:20):
she was quite a bit older thanhe is. That's why, as I've
said before, I think it wasso odd that, you know, there's
a big profile case in France becausesomebody had accused Macrone's wife of being a
tranny. But I said, whythey care about that, she's obviously a
pedophile. They don't make any bonesabout that. They don't have any problems

(02:25:43):
with that whatsoever. And so hedefended this pornographic children image publicly displayed,
including children. As he said,attacking a work of art is attacking our
values. See that's what he values. These are their core values. That
how many times they have to tellus that pedophilia is a core value for

(02:26:05):
them, certainly is a core valuein the Macron family home. Right,
the only time these people say freespeech, said the Vigilant citizen, is
to defend pedophilic movies such as Cuties, or to say free speech if they
want school library books that have pornographicmaterial, or if they got art that

(02:26:26):
literally depicts a pedophile raping a child, well that's not a surprise, right,
because the only time they talk aboutchoice is when they want to kill
a baby, or when they wantchildren to be mutilated. That's when they
talk about choice. The only timethey talk about free speeches when they want
to push pornography and kids. It'snot banning books, it's banning mental rape

(02:26:48):
and pornography of kids. Here's thedark truth about this situation. Paintings by
Miriam Kahn depict the occult elites' obsessionwith control, torture, and the systematic
abuse of children. Her style ofpainting is early similar to artists such as
Kim Noble, who is a victimof monarch mind control. Associated with MK

(02:27:11):
Ultra Right also depicts horrific abuse ina distinctive style that is childish yet deeply
disturbing. Miriam Khan is a Swisspainter who describes herself as a feminist.
Her paintings are said to incorporate feminism, child endangering themes, and female rituals

(02:27:33):
featuring violence and shocking representation of sexualorgans. That's how she describes her own
work. Going through her body ofwork is like entering the mind of a
sick, sadistic person who takes pleasureand watching other people suffer. It is
difficult to pendpoint the exact message behindthese paintings. However, there are some
clear recurrent themes that are horrific andthat is the reality where we find ourselves

(02:27:58):
now in our society. In Ontario, students stay home in mass on a
day when the Ontario schools are goingto be flying their pride flags. Why
would you send your child back toa school like this is what I don't
understand. Over four hundred students,including about a third of the student body,
at an elementary school in London,Ontario, were absent as a school

(02:28:24):
raised pride flags to mark the InternationalDay against Homophobia, buy Phobia and transphobia.
Many of the students were from Muslimfamilies. In response, the president
of the school district's teachers union,Craig Smith, encouraged the school board to

(02:28:45):
engage unquote courageous conversations with the Muslimcommunity. So they wouldn't take this kind
of easy approach I think with Christians. But they still think that they they've
got an in to the Muslim families. Why well, because you know,
you're in the minority. So therefore, going back to what Andrew Sullivan was

(02:29:05):
saying, you know, because they'rein the minority, they should all be
united against whatever the majority opinion is, and they need to deconstruct that oppression
because the majority is always oppressive andthere is no absolute truth, no absolute
values. Is all just an arbitrarysocial construct that they need to set themselves
an opposition to an overthrow. Sothe president of the umbrella group, Oxford

(02:29:28):
County Pride, said she was leftspeechless, quote unquote by the idea of
parents keeping children home to avoid theLGBT celebration. I guess it's the parents
choice, but it is very unfortunate. Of course, she would be very
excited if the parents had chosen toabort these kids or to mutilate these kids.

(02:29:50):
Oh, that would be a goodchoice. In a time where the
same group, the Muslims, havebeen quite marginalized, you would think that
minorities and marginalized groups would unite andsupport each other. Say, that's where
this is coming from. Everybody mustjoin together to overthrow and destroy the culture
that is here. The culture it'sbased on Christian values. That's the one

(02:30:15):
thing that they can all agree uponand unite against. We're going to be
right back, show we've got aproblem. Who who are you? It's
the new mug fare selling at theDavid Knightshow dot com. Right, So
basically a mug is something that holdsliquid, right, because basically you can't
hold coffee with your hands. Right. I'm scaton nay. But anyone tries

(02:30:41):
to mug me, I'm be readyfor it, you dog faced pony soldier.
They say the monk can help patriotstrink coffee. Then saved the world
and this could be bad for us. Saved the world, but we owe
the world. These people, they'resupporting free speech. I every month they

(02:31:03):
buy Come on these people, Itell you. Well, anyway, you're
listening to the David Night Show,welcome back. And as one of the
listeners on Rumble pointed out, andwe had another listener send this to me,

(02:31:26):
it was sent to me by MJ. Thank you very much. M
J said, I was one ofthe I was the one that originally mentioned
Rumble's twenty twenty three promotion to giveone percent of contributions to the creators during
your question answer with Nights of theStorm a couple of weeks back. Please
see the link below for more clarification. I apologize for not following up sooner
with my source. Well, thankyou very much for pointing that out to

(02:31:50):
me, something that I had notseen. He said, I think it
requires a subscription badge, so I'llmake sure to subscribe there as well as
my subscribe Star accounts. So thankyou very much free support him. Really
do appreciate that, and again itis what we see here is Rumble will
provide a one creator revenue share forsubscription badges till the end of twenty twenty

(02:32:13):
three, So that is a ifyou'd like to support the program, that's
a good way to do it.So really do appreciate your support, and
we really appreciate the voluntary support ofpeople. The only place that we've really
got it monetized is on the podcast, and you know the commercials that are
there. But you know, ifyou listened to every show all the way

(02:32:37):
through and listen to every single commercial, the monetization that we would get there
would be a tiny fraction of it'sless than a dollar that we would get
so for the entire month. Sowe really do appreciate it when people voluntarily
contribute something like five dollars is abig, big deal to us. Thank
you. Thirty ton shipment of explosionof chemicals has just disappeared between California,

(02:33:01):
Wyoming. Yeah, nothing to seehere, right, just move along,
and they're explaining this away. Youknow, Gotree sent me some texts about
this. He goes says, lookat this railroads again, the infrastructor.
A thirty ton shipment of ammonium nitrate, which can be used both as a

(02:33:22):
fertilizer and as a component in explosives, has gone missing during a rail shipment
between Wyoming and California. A sixtythousand pounds just disappeared. Has anyone seen
Timothy McVay recently, Yeah, exactly. Yeah, that's what they use for
the Oklahoma City bombing, right,for the Oklahoma City false flag. And

(02:33:46):
I say it was a false flagbecause what Hope Heidelberg did. I could
do an entire program on that.Happie Heidelberg was a citizen here there who
was part of the grand jury.He started asking questions, Well, this
could not have just been done byone or two people, right, couldn't
have been done just by McVeigh andNichols. There had to be other people
involved. You had, going backto the New American that I talked about

(02:34:09):
in the John Bird Society, theyhad a retired Brigadier general whose specialty was
demolition, and he said, ifyou look at the blast pattern there at
Oklahoma City Building, he said,it's not a point explosion. You know,
it would have if it was onetruck that blew up, it would
have had a very different thing.But he said, the entire going all
the way across the front of thebuilding, it was taken out in a

(02:34:31):
linear fashion going across, not ina radial point explosion. So he said
that tells you that whatever else happened, we know that this was multiple explosives
that were planted all across the frontof the building. And it was a
very large building. So between thattype of stuff and everything, it was

(02:34:54):
very suspicious. And now this isvery suspicious. That same ammonium nitrate,
sixty thousand pounds of it, leftApril twelve from Cheyenne, Wyoming. It
was found to be empty two weekslater at a rail stop in the Mojave
Desert. Huh, they said.Ammonium nitrates commonly used as a fertilizer,

(02:35:15):
it's also ingredient and high explosives,was used as the homemade bomb detonated in
the nineteen ninety five attack on theMurrah Federal Building in Oklahoma. Now,
according to the company that was puttingthis through, a company called Dino Nobel,
kind of like it sounds like dynamiteand the Nobel Rise, the guy
who invented dynamite, Dino Nobel.The ammonium transferred in pellet form and a

(02:35:41):
covered hopper car similar to those usedto ship coal must have just fallen from
the car on the way to therail sidings. As they they lose sixty
thousand pounds of this stuff all thetime. I don't know how these people
even stay in business. Frankly,I don't know what the value of sixty
thousand pounds of ammonium nitrate or sixtythousand pounds of anything. They said the
rail car was sealed when it leftthe Cheyenne facility, and the seals were

(02:36:01):
still intact when it arrived in Saltdown. Now that's really evaporated, right.
It was sealed, still sealed,and yet there's nothing in it. This
is a hardy boys mystery and chippingand what was a guy's name, skipping
whatever? You know. The initialassessment is a leak through the bottom gate

(02:36:24):
on the rail car that may havedeveloped in transit. So I guess this
happens all the time, right GOAtree was laughing about it. He said,
I guess there's a lot of wellfertilized scrub brushes along the way in
the desert. It should be prettyeasy to follow that trail of breadcrumbs back
to the origin if they want tolook at it. But you know,

(02:36:46):
they still apparently have not inspected thecar. This is still a theory because
the rail car is being transported backto Wyoming for inspection. Well, they
ought to be able to see allof a sixty thousand pounds of stuff that
fell out of it along the way, don't you think. Meanwhile, representative
for the Federal Railroad Administration says theinvestigation points to an improperly closed hopper car

(02:37:09):
gate or it could point to anupcoming false flag attack. We'll have to
wait and see. Drug dealer releasedby Obama charged with attempted murder. A
convicted crack dealer, Alton Mills,who had his life sentence commuted by Barack
Obama in twenty sixteen, was arrestedand charged with three counts of attempted murder

(02:37:30):
on Tuesday. It had been sentencedto life in prison without parole in nineteen
ninety four on federal crack cocaine conspiracycharges having acted as a street level courier
in a drug deal. And ofcourse at the time they don't mention this
in the article, but it wasBiden's three strikes in your outmandatory minimum sentencing

(02:37:52):
that was there. But as myguests last week pointed out, many times,
these lesser charges are something they knewsomebody was involved in something, so
they take it down. But again, I don't support the drug war in
any way, shape or form.It's led to all kinds of abuse and
corruption from people like Joe Biden,along with ninety four other non violent federal

(02:38:13):
prisoners. Mills sentence was commuted intwenty sixteen. He had spent twenty two
years in prison. He entered thesystem at age twenty three. They got
him out and he has now killedpeople as a result of that. New
York Mayor has got a plan tostop shoplifting. Oh, this is really

(02:38:35):
good. As a matter of fact, this is what the plan looks like,
and people are having a lot offun with this. It's going to
crack down on shoplifting in New YorkCity. First Gift, First time Offenders
Intervention programs instead of prosecution intervention programs. Yeah, I know that you really
didn't want to steal this stuff,and I feel guilty because they're just not

(02:38:58):
giving you enough, you know,enough welfare, enough opportunities, enough of
this or enough of that. Right, then they're going to have de escalation
training for retail employees. Don't getin the way of these people. Just
let them steal stuff. Third oneestablished neighborhood retail watch groups to share theft
information. Share it with who shugtell the New York Police Department about it,

(02:39:22):
or the district attorney, the souristdistric attorney. What are they going
to do about it? Nothing?They don't care. You know, the
police catch them, the district Attorney'sgoing to release them. What's the point?
Right? Finally, install kiosks andstores to connect the would be thieves
with social service programs. You see, they don't understand what human nature is.

(02:39:43):
I think this is all happening becausethese people have been victimized by the
system. They don't think there shouldbe any punishment and no restitution, and
so Adams is getting a lot ofmockery and criticism. The Democrat Mayor's plan
eight out in bullet point format Ijust showed you included providing de escalation training

(02:40:05):
for retail employees and kiosks in thestores, and people were laughing about it.
Communications advisor for Ted Cruz in termsof installing kiosks and stores to connect
thieves with social services programs, well, Cruzes communications advisors said, these kiosks
will be the first thing stolen.I don't think anybody's got any use for

(02:40:30):
kiosks though, but it certainly isn'tgoing to make any difference. Notice,
the very first part of this Democratmayor's response to storing shoplifting losses in New
York City is to lessen the punishmentfor first time shoplifters. You might as
well provide first time shoplifters with bagsthey can use to carry the stolen merchandise

(02:40:50):
out. Yeah, that's about right. A reporter Jonas Campbell said, why
don't they put a time out cornerin the store. Well, maybe that's
what the kiosk is all about.So meanwhile, we talk about things being
stolen, do you realize your identityis being stolen by the bank? Know
your customer, you know, Bankof America. Well maybe we should know

(02:41:13):
what our bank is right. Theyknow you pretty well, do you know
your bank? Bank of America gaveFBI access to January the six bank records
without the customer's knowledge, and sowhistleblowers have testified that the FBI had become
enveloped in politicization. And among theabuses they said was a Bank of America

(02:41:35):
had transferred information to the FBI onany transactions that took place in or around
Washington, DC on January six,twenty twenty one. Customers were not informed
of this data transfer. And ofcourse, you know when you look at
what is happening all the time onsocial media, that is the big issue

(02:41:56):
there as well. And that's oneof the reasons why they passed which they
call SISSA, was to give legalprotection to the companies. They are going
to act as the deputized state,these multinational corporations that are the stazi,
the eyes and the ears of theof the deep state. Bank of America,

(02:42:18):
with no directive from the FBI,data mined its customer base. They
targeted transactions made in Washington or innearby counties in Maryland and Virginia. So
investigators asked the whistle blower FBI SupervisoryIntelligence analyst George Hill, who made the

(02:42:39):
allegations. They asked Hill. Theysaid, it's anyone who used a Bank
of America, either a debit orcredit card to conduct a transaction, right,
said Hill. Any transaction to buya hot dog, doesn't matter.
Hill then confirmed that those who hadpurchased a gun at some point at any

(02:43:00):
time, we're bumped to the topof the list given to the FBI.
I remember this story. I've talkedabout this several months ago, but now
you know, we have these hearingsand it's being made publicly available again,
and we should all be reminded ofthis. The list was provided without any
legal process to the FBI, He'llsaid, correct. So it's my understanding

(02:43:22):
that the FBI and amateur assessment basedon law is that if a citizen sees
a crime and commission see something,say something taken to the level, that
Bank of America can do it.Right, if you see a crime in
commission, there's nothing wrong with injectingthat and opening up a case. But
anyway, he said, there isno legal process asked for the information,

(02:43:45):
so they acted entirely on their ownaccord. You will really believe that,
I really believe that these too bigto fail banks who have been given preferential
treatment. And you understand, Bankof America was there at the very beginning
when they began the consolidation where wewound up with a half dozen banks that
were too big to fill. Thevery first one of those was during the
Clinton administration Erskine Bowles from North Carolinaat a high ranking position. I forget

(02:44:11):
what his position was. I don'tknow if he was chief of staff at
the Clinton White House, but itis a very high position like that.
If it wasn't it, Erskine Bowleshad been in North Carolina. I knew
of him there, and Nation's Bankwas headquartered in North Carolina in Charlotte.
Bank of America was a California bank, as we pointed out many times when

(02:44:33):
I talked to General Clinty. Youknow, I used to have they took
down the restrictions for banks going acrossstate lines. And so then after they
took that down, then the nextstep was for this California bank, in
the North Carolina Bank, to saywe want to merge. And people said,
if you do that, you're goingto set off a wave of mergers
and you're going to wind up atjust a half dozen banks, it would

(02:44:54):
be monopolistic, an oligarchy. Butthey approved it again because of the North
Carolina connections inside the Clinton White House. And within ten years you not only
had a handful of banks, butthey'd also come up with their derivatives schemes
created the big collapse that had happened, and all that only took ten years.

(02:45:20):
So House Republicans were on it onthis. You don't worry. They're
going to protect everybody on this.They had some very strong words about this
and their committee hearings, which isall you can expect the Republicans to do
about anything. They're not going topass any laws to restrain any corporations or
any bureaucracy. Now they're part ofthis kabuki theater that is happening with the

(02:45:45):
default debt and debt default and allthis other stuff in the ceiling. They
called this testimony highly alarming, andthey said it is highly concerning. But
you can bet your bottom dollar they'renot going to do a thing. They're
going to talk, They're going tograndstand for the cameras. Jim Jordan is
the best one at this right now. Trey Goudy has already done his apprenticeship

(02:46:09):
so he can move on to FoxNews, and Jim Jordan is working on
the same thing. Oh, hecan really give these people a great tongue
lashing whether Republicans won't do a thingabout any of this stuff. Meanwhile,
in New Jersey, we have thegovernor there, Murphy, saying, we
will defy the Supreme Court to quote, save lives if they rule against the

(02:46:31):
abortion pill. Now, when westop and think about this, what has
happened with the abortion pill. We'vehad the abortion pill for decades, right,
what has changed with it? Well, it used to be that you
had to have a prescription, andyou used to have to have a prescription
after an examination, and that wasto protect the life of the mother,

(02:46:54):
not the life of the baby.That's the purpose is to kill the baby.
But it was to protect the lifeof the mother. That's why they
required a physical examination to make surethat the baby wasn't large enough that it
would present a health problem for themother killing the baby. If it was
too large, it would be difficultfor them to cause all kinds of health

(02:47:18):
complications from it. They just sweptall this stuff away. So when you
see this happening here, this isnot about saving lives. This is about
creating a health situation for pregnant womenthat is far, far more dangerous than
anything that was ever there. Andwhen I talk about this mephopristone, I
prefer to call it Mephistopheles because itis satanic. As actually look up the

(02:47:43):
meaning of Mephistopheles. It means destroyer. So this is about destroyer also liar,
sometimes destroyer liar, That's what itmeans. These people are lying in
order destroy women they can get withtheir abortion, with their Mephistopheles, they
can not only kill a baby,but perhaps kill a mother as well at

(02:48:05):
the same time. So he wenton with MSNBC Katie Tour. She asked
him, is there anything you cando as governor if Mephistopheles gets struck down
by the Supreme Court? Murphy says, oh, my Lord, which lord
would that be? What lord doeshe serve? Right? He said,

(02:48:28):
I listened to your reporters talk aboutsome of the positions these judges in New
Orleans are taking. We've gone tothe CEOs of both Walgreens and CVS to
make sure we have unencumbered access.We have considered a bulk acquisition. We
have clearly joined in legal action asan amicust matter. Everything is on the
table, and please God, itdoesn't come to that, but we will

(02:48:54):
continue to fight it, like heck, does that please God? Who is
his Lord? And does his moveto give an abortion pill to women who
have not had a physical exam don'tknow the condition of the size of the
baby put their life in jeopardy?Is that something that pleases God to kill
the mother as well as the baby? So then Katie Tour said, so

(02:49:18):
if you get a ball code orof Mephistopheles, would you then be prescribing
it in defiance of the Supreme Court? And he says, well, that's
to be determined. But when Isay everything is on the table, yeah,
everything is on the table. Everything'son the abortion table. Isn't it
a double one tender? I guessby the way he says at six weeks,
my wife and I don't think thatwe knew we were pregnant in any

(02:49:41):
of our four kids at six weeks. So why is he saying that?
Is he sad that he missed theopportunity to kill those four kids? That
was certainly I think the situation withKaren, I think she didn't know that
she was pregnant. We had didTravis, and she was throwing up all
the time whenever she tried to changehis diapers. What's going on? But

(02:50:07):
I think it was probably six weeksthat that happened, the two of them
pretty close in age together. Butlet me just finish up this section here.
I'll get some more that I wantto talk about with gun control coming
up here. But you know,over the weekend we had a pastor,
Tim Keller, who died. AndI don't I don't really know Tim Keller

(02:50:28):
or any of his books, soI'm not gonna, you know, don't
write me about his theology at thispoint, it doesn't matter. He stands
before God at this point. Hehad some good things to say. He
had some good quotes that I thought. Here Again, you know, he
was he had a very large churchin Manhattan, five thousand people. Joe
Scarborough went to his church, SoI guess he wasn't too hard on people,

(02:50:54):
not too demanding on people. Buthe did have some very encouraging things
to say I thought that I thoughtwere interesting in these quotes. One of
them he said, if we thinkthat we are not all that bad,
the idea of grace will never changeus. Change comes by seeing a need
for a savior and getting one.Well, that's just a rephrase of what

(02:51:16):
the apostle Paul said. The lawwas a teacher. Think comments as a
teacher to show you your position beforeGod, because if you don't know your
true position before God, you don'tknow that. As a preacher who is
far more successful than any of ourcontemporary preachers, Jonathan Edwards, you know,
he talked about sinners in the handof an angry God and said,

(02:51:39):
your foot is standing on the precipiceand it's about to slip, and at
some point you are going to descendinto that. You better understand what awaits
you and see yourself in the eyesof God. But anyway, he wanted
to say, when people say Iknow God forgives me, but I can't
forgive myself, that's something we heara lot from people about abortion right,

(02:52:03):
people who regret that decision that they'vehad. And that's why I wanted to
pull this up, because I thinkwe all need to understand that if God
forgives you, if you understand whatthis is and you're repented of that sin,
you ask God to forgive you,and you say you can't forgive yourself.

(02:52:24):
This is what he had to say, and I thought it was good.
He says, that means that theyhave failed an idol themselves. Right,
they have failed an idol whose approvalis more important than God's. That's
one way to look at it.And finally, this when he talks about
faith and about doubts that people mayhave, I think it's very important for

(02:52:46):
us too. And I've said thismany times. I said, you know,
if you don't believe that there's aGod, and if you don't believe
that God has spoken, test it. There's many, many, many times
that people have set out smart people, intellectual people, investigators, homicide detectives,

(02:53:07):
legal experts, decided they were goingto disprove this because perhaps somebody in
their family had become a Christian.They hated that stuff. They We're going
to disprove it to them. Theywound up proving it to themselves. And
so if it's true, we don'thave to run from it. That's why
we don't have to run from theabortion stuff. We have to show it

(02:53:28):
because it is true what is happeningto kids, and the truth can withstand
scrutiny, and the truth becomes strongerwhen you do scrutinize it. So he
says, a faith without some doubts, it's like a human body without any
antibodies. And people who blithely gothrough life too busy or too indifferent to

(02:53:48):
ask hard questions about why they believeas they do, we'll find themselves defenseless
against either the experience of a tragicMany people, everything is fine until something
tragic happens in their life, andthen they don't understand why, and they

(02:54:09):
an anger turn from God. Sothey'll be left defenseless against either or the
experience of a tragedy or the probingquestions of a smart skeptic. A person's
faith can collapse almost overnight if she'sfailed over the years to listen patiently to
her own doubts, which should onlybe discarded after long reflection. Believers should

(02:54:31):
acknowledge and wrestle with doubts, notonly their own, but their friends doubts
and their neighbors doubts. It isno longer sufficient to whole beliefs just because
you inherited them. Only if youstruggle long and hard with objections to your
faith, will you be able toprovide the grounds for your beliefs to skeptics,

(02:54:52):
including yourself, grounds for this thatare plausible rather than ridiculous or even
offensive. And finally, he says, the Christian gospel is that I am
so flawed that Jesus had to diefor me. Yet I am so loved

(02:55:13):
and valued that Jesus was glad todie for me. And so he did
understand what the gospel is. Andagain, don't write me letters about his
theology. I think it's important aswe talk about society and other things.
I've said this many times. Youknow, we got these statues that are
put up to people. We don'tput them up to engage in idolatry.

(02:55:35):
We put them up to honor somegreat achievement that they had done. And
that's the way civilization advances, andthat's the way Christianity will advance. If
we look at the important things thatsomebody says, without going through their life
with a fine tooth common saying yeah, but he did this, and he
did that, and he said this, and I disagree them on that.
Let's find, especially at a timewhen somebody has just passed away, we

(02:55:58):
look at the good things in theirlife and that's what the statues in our
society is about. Civilization grows whenyou look at the good stuff in somebody's
life, and certainly you don't haveto be blind or you know, pollyanna
ish about the other aspects. Youcan take a look at Jefferson. You
look at the hypocrisy about slavery andthings like that, explaining it away really

(02:56:22):
and a kind of paternalism. Andwe see that kind of paternalism with many
liberals today. So we don't haveto excuse his slavery, but we can
take a look at his declaration ofindependence. We can look at the original
Declaration of Independence where he talks aboutslavery and other issues. So there's blind
spots, there's you know, failingsand everybody's life. And with a civilization,

(02:56:48):
we move forward by elevating what isright and not completely forgetting what is
wrong, but not trying to findsomething wrong about each and every person or
and everything so that we can tearit down. There was a in the
UK some person, I'm sorry Italy, somebody came out and said we need

(02:57:11):
to start tearing down these classic buildingsto protect the environment. Well, that
had already gone through in the UK, and people had already said the obvious.
Well, if you go through awrecking crew and you tear this thing
down, even if you don't buildanother building in its place, you know
you're you're creating. I guess theysaid, you're going to release all kinds
of unicorn farts into the atmosphere.But that's but it's not really about the

(02:57:37):
gas It's not about the green gaslighting. These people simply want to tear
things down because they want to teardown in our society. And so it
gets to the point where you gota beautiful classic building, Oh, let's
tear it down in the same waythat they want to tear down classical music.
And this is happening as well.And some of the liberals that I

(02:58:03):
had to laugh when I saw that, because when I was in college WSF,
where I went to school at Universityof South Florida, they played almost
classical music around the clock, andthen they would gradually started putting some news
broadcasts in from MPR, and thenthey got to be more and more news
and less and less classical music andeverything. Now they want to just get

(02:58:24):
rid of all the classical music altogetherbecause it is too white and European and
that's the way they rope people inand then move the goalposts, isn't it.
Well, we don't have time todayto talk about the pistol brace or
about the medical martial law. I'mgoing to get to that tomorrow. I
just want to point out for thoseof you who listened to Sons of Liberty

(02:58:50):
on GCN, I'll be hosting thattoday for Bradley Dean, And also today
I will be on with Lionel's wifehas now got a radio show, and
so I'm going to be on withher for a short period of time this
afternoon as well. So it's goingto be a busy day for me.
But tomorrow when we come back,we're going to talk about the pistol brace
issue, because that is ramping upto be a major confiscation in legal jeopardy

(02:59:16):
for millions of people. Even theATF thinks that it's somewhere between three and
five million people. And for thislittle piece of plastic, they're going to
charge people with the felony. Isn'tBiden awful? Yeah? But you know
what, Trump had a pistol bracein the works as well, and they

(02:59:37):
stopped it in December of twenty twenty. The gun groups were livid with him
after he banned bumpstocks with executive order. He was planning to do the same
thing, is in the process ofdoing it the pistol braces, and then
in the middle of all of thiselection protesting and everything. I guess he
decided he didn't need to completely alienatethe gun owners until his second term.

(03:00:03):
Thank you for joining us. Letme tell you the David Night Show you
can listen to with your ears.You can even watch it by using your
eyes. In fact, if youcan hear me, that means you're listening

(03:00:24):
to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you
want to know something else, Youcan find all the links to everywhere to
watch or listen to the show atthe David Nightshow dot com. That's a website.