Mon Episode #2110: Trump’s Martial Law Order Blocked

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As a clock
strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the sixth of October, you're ward

(00:50):
twenty twenty five. The numbers are flying by on the
calendar here. But something else that is flying by as
a relic of a by gone past, is the Constitution.

Speaker 2 (01:02):
We're going to take a look at the police state
of Donald Trump. He's even getting pushedback from a judge
that he appointed, and she is one hundred percent right
in terms of what she said that this is against
everything this country was ever founded upon. We do not
want a standing army enforcing arbitrary edicts by unitary executive.

(01:26):
So we're going to talk about that to start with.
We're also going to talk about AI. You know, maybe
it's not really a threat to jobs except when it
crashes the stock market. We'll be right back.

Speaker 3 (02:09):
San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles. There very unsafe places,
and we're going to straighten them out one by one.
The same you're trying to take over the Republic, and
this is going to be a major port for some
of the people in this room. That's a war too.
It's a war from within. I told Pete, we should
use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for

(02:30):
our military.

Speaker 2 (02:32):
Yeah, a war from within. Looks like he's doing his
best to start a civil war. Yeah. The other people
are chipping in on their side as well. It's the
left right divide, and he's looking for any excuse to
build this up. You know, for the longest time, you
know what we saw in Chicago with hundreds of troops, helicopters,

(02:53):
people repelling off of the helicopters, going through, arresting everybody
in sight, children throwing flash bang grenades everywhere. This is
precisely what Alex Jones was talking about more than a
decade ago. He had already done for police state documentaries.
When I started to work for him, I thought he
was against this stuff. Now it turns out he's for

(03:15):
it if it's done by Trump. He's against it only
if it's done by the Democrats. We talked about this,
everybody making the black helicopters, the drills, and all the
different cities. And I talked about this event last week,
but I'm going to go back over it again. I
had the woman who said in Chicago, black women in
a poor area of town. And we know that there's

(03:37):
a lot of gang fighting there, which is a relic
of the drug war, which they're now escalating to a
new and dangerous level. But there are people that are shot,
several dozen shot every weekend. There rival gangs, a lot
of people killed with that. But this woman who's lived
there over life, says, I've never had a gun stuck

(03:57):
in my face before. It took the federal government to
do that. They can always come in and make a
bad situation worse, can't they. Sometimes you can just what
you're throwing on the fire is a bucket of gasoline.
Around one am in the morning on last Tuesday, armed
federal agents repelled from helicopters on the roof of a

(04:18):
five story residential apartment on the South Shore of Chicago.
As they worked their way through the building, they kicked
down doors, they threw flash grenades. They rounded up adults
and screaming children, detaining them in zip ties and arresting
dozens of them. This is the kind of over the

(04:39):
top satire level of authoritarian police state that we would
see typically By Terry Gilliam nineteen eighty four in Brazil.
I'm laughing, but this is how absurd it has become.
Trump is an absurdity. He's an authoritarian absurdity. He is

(04:59):
aiming not for a Nobel Peace Prize. What he really
deserves is to be charged in the international Criminal Court,
because his role model is Robert due Care to the Philippines.
And I was glad to see that reason picked up
on that. They said, the way he's conducting himself, the
things that he's saying, death penalties for this and death
penalties for that, just like that dictator in the Philippines

(05:21):
whom he loved in his first term. He thought the
guy was doing a great job, and now he wants
to mimic him. The military raid was part of a
widespread immigration crackdown called Operation Midway. Blitz has drawn outrage
through Chicago and state and writes groups and lawmakers claiming
it represents a dramatic escalation and the tactics choosed by

(05:44):
the federal authorities. Of course it has, and it disgusted
me to see conservatives excusing this. Now we've got as
an example, this is a war within what happens in war, well,
the first casualty is truth, and you have both sides
of the war have their own narrative about what happened,
and we're going to see that when we talk about
this woman who was shot by Ice. Was she the aggressor,

(06:08):
were they the aggressor? It depends on who you hear from,
and so you can't find out what the truth is
once this starts. And that's why you better make sure
that you've exhausted every other possibility before you start a war.
Trump is the guy that they have put in charge

(06:28):
to take us into a civil war. So Illinois Governor
Pritzker has now been given the opportunity by Donald Trump
to sound like he's a founding father. It's ridiculous. It's
ridiculous that he's making heroes out of these people like
Jimmy Kimmel or whatever you know, Jimmy Kimmel and Pritzker

(06:50):
and anything. He's putting them in as victims so they
look good. It's the same thing that Democrats did to
Trump when he was running for office, which is why
he had to run for office while he never had
to debate anybody, why he never had to defend his
shoddy record of his first term either. So Pritzker accused
federal agents of separating children from their parents they did,

(07:12):
zip tying their hands they did, and detaining them in
dark vans for hours they did. Videos show flash bangs
erupting in the street, followed by residents from the apartment building,
children among them being led from the building. Photos of
the Aftermas show toys and shoes littering the apartment hallways,

(07:32):
evidence of those pulled from their beds at one am
in the morning by FBI and Homeland Security agents. This
makes me want to throw up. This is not America.
This is Trump's America. And MAGA and conservatives want to
cheer this stuff. They're part of the problem. They're no
better than Antifah. They are no better than antiphib They

(07:53):
have a different cause. But the two sides neither one
of them have any principles, any any moral foundation that
they want to build a civilization off of. They now
just want to go after each other. And guess what,
We're stuck in the middle with Anti found the left
of us and MAGA on the right. I'm stuck here
in the middle with you. It's an Rwellian farce what

(08:14):
Trump is doing here. Pritzker said these military style tactics
should never be used on children in a functioning democracy.
That didn't happen in a country with authoritarian regime. It
happened here in Chicago. Well, it did happen in the
country with an authoritarian regime. How many times does Trump
have to get rid of the First Amendment? How many

(08:35):
times does he have to do this until we call
it what it is? Rule by executive order? Is an
authoritarian regime, folks, He said, this happened in the US.
DHS has touted some nine hundred arrests in Chicago Operation Look,
I'm very much against leaving people with who are who

(08:58):
are illegal aliens here? I think you know some of
these people are the criminals have been arrested and let
loose and let loose, and so fix the judicial system
number one. Fix the judicial system. Number two, you can
fix local law enforcement. They're finding these people, the violent criminals,
and they're arresting them. The problem is the judicial system

(09:18):
is turning them back out on the street. And the
biggest problem is that we've got this gigantic welfare magnet.
You come here and we'll give you free money forever.
Fix those problems before you start doing this kind of stuff.
They're doing this kind of stuff because they want a
civil war, folks. Shame on them, Shame on the people

(09:38):
who support this. So thirty seven arrests were made in
the night time raid on Tuesday, all of whom IT
said were involved in drug traffick and distribution, weapons crimes,
and immigration violators. This area was known to be frequented
by the trendy game, which again, good case can be

(09:59):
made that it was a creation of the CIA, just
like al Qaeda. The ACLU said the raid represented escalation
of force and violence from the federal government in Chicago.
They can be right occasionally, you know, like a broken clock.
What we saw was a full fledged military operation conducted
on the South side of Chicago against an apartment building.

(10:20):
An apartment building. So yeah, Police State five, the Trump
Maga deception. How about having that that one Alex. They
just treated us like we were nothing, said a citizen
from the apartment building. She said she was handcuffed in
health for hours. This is when I played the other day.

(10:41):
They held her until three am in the morning. So
the first time a gun has ever put into her face.
So the raids come just days after Trump signaled a
desire to make greater use of the US military and
American cities. During the speech, I just played some of
that for you, the war from within, telling the assembled

(11:02):
generals last week we are under invasion from within? How
are you under invasion from within? It doesn't even say
invasion across our borders. No different than a foreign enemy,
but more difficult in many ways because they don't wear uniforms. Hey,
you know, if they don't wear uniforms, they might think
that you are the enemy at some point in time,

(11:24):
might they? And especially these guys, when these guys, the
ICE people, when they do wear uniforms, they put masks
on their face. Why do we wear uniforms? Why do
we have rules of war? Why do we have laws?
Why do we have the constitution. ICE's tactics were denounced.
On Friday, a Chicago alder person was handcuffed by federal

(11:46):
immigration agents at the Chicago Medical Center after questioning agents
about their warrant to arrest people at the medical center.
So if you question somebody, say do you have a
warrant for this? You get arrested. So that's not authoritarian,
is it. DHS says that agents shot a woman in

(12:07):
Chicago after they were boxed in. They said Now, this
is the event that everybody was disputing over the weekend,
everybody talking about it, and it's very interesting to see
the two sides of this. And so you got people
on the left saying, look at this, they just shot
a woman. The people on the right side, our poor
agents nearly died if flix could have killed. Federal agents

(12:30):
shot a woman after being surrounded by cars. The woman
who was armed with the semi automatic weapon allegedly rammed
her car into the agents. Now the question is you
know if she had a gun, did she point the
gun at them? Did she fire the gun? No, nobody
said that she pointed the gun at them. Nobody said
she fired the gun. Did she ram the car or

(12:51):
was it a fender bender? With all the stuff that
was going on, who knows? She was somebody who was
known to them, they said, because she had published some
stuff on social media saying let's go f up these
people or whatever. But what does that tell you? It
tells you that ICE is scouring the internet, just like

(13:15):
the UK cops, looking for comments and putting people on
their list. Another thing that bothers me about this whole thing.
Watch your speech, because they will come after you. And
I mean, we're not talking about Jdvans saying they said
something bad about Charlie Kirk, So get them fired. No,

(13:36):
these are the DHS people who are scouring social media
to try to put you on a list. So DHS
said on Saturday in a news release that law enforcement
officers quote fired defensive shots at an armed US citizen
after multiple vehicles boxing and federal agents who are patrolling
Chicago this morning. So let's understand, multiple cars are there,

(13:59):
and they don't say that she pointed or wave to gun.
They say they fired first in defense. Our brave law
enforcement officers are rammed by vehicles. Now, multiple vehicles rammed
them right and boxed them by ten cars. Well did
they did they shoot everybody? Whether they do the other people.

(14:23):
Dozens of armed federal agents and tactical gear have been
patrolling the city. Protesters have at times clash with law
enforcement in La the summer. Officers use tear gas and
rubber bullets to disperse crowds during several nights of demonstrations. Well,
I don't know if these were peaceful or not. This
is the way. This is newsweek. So they're saying that
demonstrations are mostly peaceful. And again it can go in

(14:45):
one of two ways. Here Saturday morning, federal law enforcement
agents were conducting routine patrolling in a Chicago suburb. I
don't know that federal agents are supposed to be patrolling routinely.
That's the whole right. Where are the people? As I
said before, there's been a couple of good articles on

(15:05):
the New American But I would think since they were
warning about this sixty years ago, support your local police,
support your local sheriff, that they've been aware of the
dangers of federalized militarized police for a very long time.

(15:26):
I mean, that'd be screaming this. You know, a half
dozen articles a day. There's enough to write about it,
and we don't see that on the right. Recent protests
and clashes law enforcement in that area have led to
dozens of arrests. The agents were quote rammed by vehicles
and boxed down by ten cars this morning. One of
the drivers who rammed the law enforcement vehicle was armed

(15:47):
with a semi automatic weapon. They said. The women allegedly
posted online, hey to all my gang let's f those mothers.
Don't let them take anyone, and so she was already
on their list. They but they didn't know that when
they shot her. It was unclear whether federal authorities arrested
the woman after receiving treatment. She drove to the hospital

(16:07):
and received treatment, but they don't say whether she was
arrested or not. Homeland Security did not respond to any
questions about the shooting. Isn't that interesting and either did
the Chicago police. The Chicago police were called and they said, well,
we're not going to talk about this. We have no
details to tell. You. Didn't sort out what had happened there.

(16:28):
We went there to control traffic. Authorities did not name
the armed individual, but it said the woman had appeared
in a bulletin last week because of her social media posts.
They're putting out bulletins beyond the lookout for right, so
they're watching social media, just like the UK Gestapo. At

(16:48):
least one person was arrested at the scene, according to bystanders.
Elizabeth Ruiz, fifty one, said federal agents ram the back
of a car driven by her son, Anthony Ruiz after
the sh shooting. After the shooting, the mother said the
agent's then detained her son, a twenty one year old
US citizen, and confiscated the car. I mean the police

(17:11):
confiscating a car that hasn't have they charged him with
a crime. This is the drug war that we've seen
over and over again. So the last that forfeiture, they
charged the car with a crime. So the car rammed
into them. It wasn't even the way mo. How about
that They turned it all around, said the mother. She

(17:31):
said she was on the phone with her son when
the shooting began. When she arrived at the scene, agents
took him into custody. They later told her he could
be released Monday today. It was one of you guys
that rammed my son. Why are you arresting him? She said.
The Chicago police had officers responded to the scene to
document the shooting and to control traffic, but they declined

(17:53):
to detail what happened. Chicago Police departments not involved in
the incident. Of this investigation. The federal authorities are investigating the shooting,
said the police. So the federal authorities will investigate themselves.
There's no separation of powers. There's no second guessing of this.
It is what the federal government says. It is. End

(18:15):
of story. The Brighton Part intersection quickly attracted dozens of protesters,
who who stretched a block along the road. There, the
crowd grew to nearly one hundred people, but it escalated
as many of the agents left. Residents initially heckled the
agents with a steady stream of criticism and antagonism. A

(18:35):
young man was pushed to the ground by a federal agent,
causing protesters to shout and tensions to rise. They come
in and this is all really a deliberate provocation, the
way that they're doing this, And you've probably seen by now.
We didn't play it because it's all visual and we
have a lot of people listen on the audio podcast.
But there was one scene where a kid on a

(18:55):
bicycle drives by and he just yells an insult to
these agents and they all start chasing him, all ten
of them. You're not allowed to talk back to your masters.
Don't you look sideways at your masters? And he got
away from all of them on the bicycle. So that's
been making the rounds for a lot of people. He

(19:16):
stepped in the street and the federal officers shoved him
back in the most brutal manner possible, said one person.
Agents then began throwing tear gas canisters into the crowd.
One person tried to grab a canster. The agents jumped
on top of the individual. People were clearly angry, but
they posed no threat. Federal agents put both the Chicago
Police Department and all those people in danger when they

(19:38):
didn't have to. They put people in danger. He stressed.
They're now shooting at cars. These agents are one hundred
percent out of control. Agents have already fatally shot one person,
Valgas Gonzalo last month as he fled his car during
attempted arrest. The AHS officials immediately claimed an agent had
been dragged by the man's car, but and body camera

(20:00):
footage later obtained by the Tribune and other news organizations,
the agent referred to his own injuries as his quote
nothing major moments after he was after he shot and
killed the man. The HS and ICE are known to
lie about the nature of their operations. Yeah, they all do.
And of course they have a license to kill. They're

(20:22):
double low seven. Of course, now that Bezos has taken
over the MGM and the Bond franchise, he's going back
and removing the guns from James Bond. I guess he's revoked.
Jeff Bezos has revoked his license to kill. I mean,
it's all about that anyway, they just don't know what

(20:45):
to do with these franchises. When they buy him to.

Speaker 4 (20:47):
The Travis, it's amazing. Everything gets worse.

Speaker 2 (20:51):
Lord of the Rings, and the same thing is going
to be done with Narnia. I'm sure.

Speaker 4 (20:57):
We should rendition in gretteger wigs. She should not be
allowed anywhere near a film crew ever again, Detain her indefinitely.

Speaker 2 (21:05):
So now let's take a look at what the conservative
side says, which is that's the approach from Newsweek. Let's
take a look at what zero Hedge and Fox and
these people say, right, because this is a war. Both
sides have conflicting statements. We don't know really what happened
with either one of them. So this is the headline

(21:26):
from zero Hedge. The Ice agents were ambushed in Chicago.
The armed attacker a woman who was a US citizen. Well, interesting,
the armed attacker, that's interesting phrase. They say that she
had a gun. Where was the gun? Was it in
the car, on the floor, whatever was it holstered on her?
I don't know. Nobody has said that she attacked them

(21:47):
with a gun. Nobody has said that she pointed the
gun at them, or that she fired the gun at them,
and so a lot of this is the kind of
thing that you'll see from the police after the fact.
I'll just tell a personal story we had. I said, well,
I worked at Texas Instruments. The group that I was
in I was the American. They had a German, a Japanese,

(22:08):
a French guy. They had a lot of English people.
So we had a lot of friends that we hung
out with, especially the English. The German guy deep more
spoke English, but the French guy didn't. And the Japanese guy,
he was just constantly reading. He never talked to anybody
as I was always taking a book. Anyway, we had

(22:31):
our British friends. One of them had his family, his
brother and his parents came to visit him in the
US and they are driving around in our friend's car
and it sounded they were going under an overpass and
it sounded like somebody drop something on their car. They
had this bang, and they pull over and get out
and look at the back of the car and they

(22:51):
see a bullet hole. You know, they fanned out. It
was a bullethole, but it was a hole about this
big around and they opened up the trunk as the
cops get there, and there was a shootout that was happening.
There had been a bank robbery and the police had
followed the robber to an apartment complex where they had

(23:11):
a shootout. They opened up the trunk and the cop
sees the vault there and he grabs and goes, that's
not ours. I don't know if it was his or not,
but you better believe that he's not going to tell
anybody that it was theirs if it was theirs. So
Chicago police told officers no units will respond as protesters

(23:33):
surrounded federal agents. And again this is zero Hedge and
Fox Fox News is Bill Mlugan said they were surrounded
by protesters. Remains unclear where the rejection was due to
a shortage of officers or to a genuine refusal. So
this article is about the fact that the Chicago Police
did not send a lot of officers there, although they

(23:56):
did send officers there to report about the shooting and
to control traffic. So again, the conservatives cast this as
the Feds were abandoned and thrown to the dangerous wolves
that were there. The liberals look at this as the
Chicago Police department is covering up the federal crimes. The

(24:17):
truth probably is of those things, but we will not
be able to find out what it was. So in
prig versus Pennsylvania, that court case said the states could
decline to help federal law enforcement. That's the non commandeering
decision saying that you can't force and compel people to

(24:39):
help you, so they don't have to do that. But
then the way that this is spun by the conservative presses,
they were, you know, they don't have to help federal
law enforcement, but they can't obstruct it. Today's sanctuary jurisdictions
have turned non cooperation into active interference, allowing street to

(25:00):
block ice. It's no longer federalism, it's nullification, said a
Fox News reporter. Well, I'm all for nullification. I support nullification,
strongly support nullification. That's the most peaceful way to enforce
the separation of powers. The federal government. Government has become
too consolidated, too powerful. They were always merely an appointed

(25:24):
agent for limited duty, appointed by the states who retained
the majority of their sovereignty, as well as the people
who did that. That's what the Tenth Amendment says. That's
what the ninth and tenth Amendment says. And nullification is
the peaceful way to not have a war. So the

(25:45):
right wing media is pushing this really hard, especially Fox.
So they went out and they said, well, you know,
the Fraternal Order Police a national and the Illinois Fraternal
Order Police believe that when an officer calls for assistance,
you answer no matter what. These were officers in distress.
Were they were they in distress? Who knows as far

(26:07):
as that goes. But then the other issue is this
US District Judge Karen Immergot on Saturday basically put a
temporary restraining order against Trump's imagined emergency and said that
the White House's justification for all of this stuff was

(26:28):
untethered to the facts. Quote unquote. The injunction remained in
place until at least October the eighteenth, pending for their litigation.
And so again this is a Trump appointed judge who
takes this constitution seriously. As people are talking about what
has happened in Portland. For example, this is Nick Sortor,

(26:50):
he said DHS has employed blackhawks over the ice facility
in Portland as rioters get tear gassed and pepperballed by agents. Well, again,
that's not necessarily just a protest if they are fighting
with it, And who knows how that started and when
they got the black Hawks. They remember how we used

(27:10):
to talk about militarized helicopters, the black helicopters, Remember how
that used to be a thing, and everybody, Oh, these
conspiracy theorists tenfoil hat. Well, here it is black Hawk helicopters.
Following my wrongful arrest, said Nick Shortur Secretary Nome promised
to surge additional DHS resources into the area. It's kind

(27:31):
of like the Afghanistan surge, right, probably work out the
same way. Looks like she's following through. He says, no mercy,
all upper case. Then you have Andy no exact every
has his name in GU.

Speaker 4 (27:43):
I think it's just no, no, yeah.

Speaker 2 (27:46):
And the non governmental organization far left, he said, far
left anti government extremists have surrounded the ICE facility in
an attempt to storm the building. They're encouraged to get
a rest for the cameras and will have immediate access
to cash and free lawyers. So again, both sides are
playing this pr game, and both sides are escalating this

(28:11):
and initiating force. I kind of say that, you know,
when somebody is driving away and the police shoot them,
that is not something I think is justified. So the
judge Immergut agreed that Oregon is likely to prevail, warning
that Trump's legal approach could allow a president to deploy
troops quote virtually anywhere at any time, unquote, thereby undermining

(28:35):
the separation of civil and military authority. And to respond
to that, Homeland Security says, the violence and the dehumanization
of these men and women who are simply enforcing the
law must up. What about the violence and the dehumanization
of the people who are sleeping their beds at one
am in the morning. What about that? I am absolutely
against swat team raids, no knock raids, these magnet raids

(29:00):
of an entire building. Come on, How in the world
can anyone support that? I just do not understand. And
so the judge had more to say. Karen Immergoot, So
she said in her decision, as soon as the federalized
National Guard deployees to Portland, the state of Oregon will
suffer an injury to its sovereignty. She said. This country

(29:23):
has a long standing foundational tradition of resistance to government overreach,
especially in the form of military intrusion into civil affairs.
That tradition has deep roots in our history. And found
early expression, for example, and the constitutional provisions for civilian
control of the military, the Federal Convention of seventeen eighty seven,

(29:46):
she quotes, said, a standing military force with an overgrown
executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. They said,
and again quoting Madison, I've said this many times. The
means of the vents against foreign dangers have always been
the instruments of tyranny at home. And that's what Trump

(30:06):
is doing now. They're not even a means of defense
for foreign dangers. They are dragging us into foreign wars
one after the other. She said, This historical tradition blows
down to a simple proposition. This is a nation of
constitutional law, not martial law. Stamped out across that orange forehead.

(30:28):
Of his defendants have made a range of arguments that,
if accepted, she said, risk blurring the line between civil
and military federal power to the detriment of this nation.
So its temporary restraining Order will be in effect until
October the eighteenth. Trump is expanding federal powers under the
Domestic Terrorism Directive. This is a new American who covered

(30:50):
this last week. Just to remind you, it was a
national security presidential memorandum this executive order, it was called
Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence. The directive orders
federal agents to build a far reaching law enforcement strategy
to investigate into the dismantle what it calls terrorism domestically.

(31:14):
She said, this is violating the First Amendment, which protects
speech and assembly, the fourth which guards against unreasonable searches,
and the fifth, which guarantees due process. The memos framing
is selective. It casts descent on the left as extremism
while ignoring violence everywhere. And this is exactly what Biden did, right,

(31:37):
And so both sides are doing this to demonize the other,
to dehumanize the other. Both sides are pushing us into
a civil war. That's why they're doing this left right
dance between Trump and Biden and Trump again to build
up this tension. Both of these sides are doing law
fair and they are politically persecuting other people. And all

(32:02):
of this I believe is deliberate by design to try
to push us into a civil war. Don't follow them, right,
the lawfair on the left is now lawfare on the right.
Don't get fooled again. No doubt left wing violence is real, right,
so new American The anti VOB branded groups, though amorphous

(32:23):
and decentralized, have been involved in riots and assaults. Some
are manipulated by nefarious actors who profit from chaos. But
it is wrong to frame political violence as a domain
of the left along, because we just had an Iraqi
war veteran open fire in a Mormon church, and we
just had another veteran who just randomly shot up a

(32:48):
waterside bar that was there. Trump is saying armed conflict
justifies executing suspected drug dealers. Keyword here is suspect. Did
even you know how long before he authorizes this on
the streets of the USA. This is a reason. And
they're talking about him bragging about blowing ships out of

(33:13):
the water near Venezuela in international water. So he said
that they were unlawful combatants in an armed conflict. Well,
are we unlawful combatants? Have we declared a war against them?
Have we followed the rules of engagement in a war? No,

(33:34):
I would say that Trump and the people who pushed
those buttons are unlawful combatants. This is no different really
than what we saw that was exposed by wiki leaks
that nearly got Julian osnge killed because of the vengeance
and the wrath of the federal government when he showed
what they called it collateral murder, where they waited for

(33:56):
people to show up and they could see that they
were orders, they could see that they were medical staff,
and then they opened fire on them and they got
the You could see what they saw, and you know
that it was just simply murder. And this is simply
murder as well, he says. They say here that the

(34:18):
reality is that Trump has authorized military murder of criminal
suspects who posed no immediate threat of violence. So far,
Trump has ordered three of these attacks. Well now it's four.
He did more on the weekend. Again, these are attacks
of boats that are not a threat because they turned around,
they didn't fire, and they don't know for sure if

(34:42):
these people were smuggling drugs nowe that stuff was determined
at a time because they didn't they didn't engage them,
they didn't interdict them, and which is the standard procedure.
And you got people who were military, top military lawyers
for the Army, for the Navy, all of them were
saying this is absolutely unjustified. This is a very very

(35:05):
important precedent that Trump is setting and it's a very
bad precedent. Again, I'd say I call him precedent Trump.
So Trump described these people as confirmed narco terrorists from Venezuela,
except there's no details on how they confirmed that, and
he said that they were affiliated with a designated terrorist organization. Again,

(35:27):
these are all just assertions without any proof, without any evidence,
Contrary to Trump's implications that designation, that designation does not
turn murder into self defense. So what they're saying is
even if this group was affiliated with a drug gang,
and even if they were carrying the drugs, which is

(35:49):
why I said from the very beginning, we have a
procedure for doing that, and that procedure was still being
followed elsewhere by the Coastguard. This is not about that
at all. It's yet another example of Trump flat out
lying to people because he wants to start a war
in Venezuela to take their oil. It's just that simple.
This is just ruthless gangsterism. The State Department designation merely

(36:13):
triggers the government's ability to implement asset controls and other
economic sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the
AEPA and the Immigration Nationality Act. Along with other statues.
Look just like with COVID, his emergency declaration released money.

(36:33):
Just like if you were declare an emergency after a
hurricane or a flood or something like that, it releases money.
And so this designation of a terrorist group allows him
to unleash sanctions and to do other economic things. But
it does not mean that it is a declaration of war.
Who can just start going out and randomly shooting people.

(36:56):
According to a White House spokeswoman, Trump is delivering on
his promise to take on the cartels and eliminate these
national security threats for murdering more Americans. This will ultimately
result in these same types of rules of the game
being done here on American streets. I guarantee you they'll
be murdering Americans in another decade on the streets if
that long. That framing is logically, morally and legally nonsensical,

(37:21):
says reason. The truth is that Americans like to consume
psychoactive substances that legislators have deemed intolerable, and the criminal
organizations are happy to profit from that demand. You know,
criminal organizations like the Criminal Intelligence Agency the CIA, they're
some of the biggest drug gang in the world right there.

(37:43):
And so then they talk about, well, what about alcohol.
So the alcohol producers and distributors to supply a product
today that has an estimated one hundred and seventy eight
thousand deaths a year from alcohol today, by Trump's logic,
they should be subject to the death penalty based on
nothing more than the allegation that they were involved in

(38:05):
the alcohol trade, the alcohol producers, distributors, retailers. There's obviously
something wrong with an argument that would justify the execution
of brewers, vintners, distillers, liquor store owners, and bartenders based
on their complicity and alcohol related deaths. Even during national

(38:25):
alcohol prohibition, the government did not treat bootleggers as murderers
even when they were smuggling booze in the US, which is,
according to Trump's reasoning, posing a deadly threat to national security. Yeah.
The other thing was that they had enough respect for
the Constitution that they passed to constitutional Amendment, which underscores

(38:45):
the fact that none of this United Nations War on drugs,
with its un schedule of four drugs, none of this
stuff is constitutional. And folks, what reason is pointing out
here is that you have a willing buyer and a
willing cell. It is a spiritual issue. It's a medical issue,
is spiritual issue, every kind of issue except law enforcement.

(39:09):
Law enforcement has not worked for over fifty years, is
it now fifty four? I think seventy one. But law
enforcement has failed for half a century. When you keep
doing the same thing and expecting different results, you're the
one who's crazy. This is a crazy, unconstitutional war on drugs.

(39:33):
It's had a lot of diletorious effects to law enforcement,
to corruption, to the judiciary, but it hasn't stopped the
use of any of these drugs, and it never will.
It never will again. It's the wrong tool for this problem.
I'm not saying that drug use is not a problem.
It's a big problem. Alcohol use is a big problem

(39:55):
as well, and we realized that that prohibition wasn't the
solution to it. The current drug prohibition regime is more
severe in several respects. It still deploys a death penalty,
though only in rare cases. Federal law authorizes the execution
of people who commit murder in the course of drug trafficking.
It also notionally allows the death penalty for drug trafficking

(40:18):
involving very large quantities. Those quantities are so large to
be three hundred times the amount that would trigger a
mandatory ten year sentence, but no death penalties have been
imposed under these provisions, and it's not clear whether the
death penalties would be considered to be constitutional or whether
it be considered to be extreme, cruel and unusual punishment.

(40:42):
Trump has made no secret, however, of his desire to
execute drug dealers, and he thinks he's found a legal
way of doing that without seeking new legislation or going
to the trouble of arresting and trying suspects. The trick,
he thinks, is to equate drug smuggling with violent digression,
to define drug interdiction as an armed conflict, and to

(41:04):
treat suspected drug smugglers as unlawful combatants. They can be
killed it will, regardless of whether they're actually engaged in violence.
Trump deemed his targets worthy of assassination simply because they
allegedly were trying to supply Americans with politically disfavored intoxicants,
and so calling them narco terrorists is a is their game.

(41:29):
The labels Jeffrey Korn, who was formerly the US Army's
senior advisor on the law of war told The Times
that Trump has not established the quote hostilities unquote required
for a quote armed conflict against the US, because, as
the Times dryly puts it, selling a dangerous product is

(41:50):
different from an armed attack. This is not stretching the envelope,
he said, This is shredding it. This is tearing it apart.
Cardoza Law School professor said that Trump's policy utterly is unprecedented.
He said, the proper and entirely feasible and precedented response

(42:11):
would have been interdiction, arrest and trial, which is the
same response that was happening in other locales. Because this
has nothing to do with Trump's lie about drug trade.
It has everything to do with the fact that he
wants regime change in Venezuela so he can steal the
oil there. The Trump administration's summary execution and targeted killing

(42:34):
of suspected drug dealers, by contrast, is utterly without precedent
and international law. And he says what I said from
the very first day. In fact, there is precedent for
considering such attacks, when committed on widespread or systematic basis,
to be a crime against humanity. Former Philippine President Rodrigo

(42:57):
du Terte is currently facing charges in the International Criminal Court.
He's under arrest there for exactly that reason. What he
did was an international crime against humanity. And what Trump
is doing is the same thing principle. And now he
hasn't killed tens of thousands of people yet like du
Terte did. But du Terte said, we got to stop drugs,

(43:18):
and we're going to do it by just executing people
on the street. So if you think somebody is a
drug deal, just kill him and I'll excuse it. So
now he is standing trial for the murder of those people. Trump, however,
is a big fan of Duette, who likened himself to
Adolf Hitler while urging the murder of drug offenders. During
his first term, Trump bragged about his quote great relationship

(43:41):
with due Tarte, who he said was doing a great job,
he said, and tackling substance abuse. Now Trump seems bent
on copying due Terte's bloodthirsty example. And I wish somebody
would lock up Trump as well. Who will protect us
from the so called protectors. This is from the Free
Thought Project, and of course it's anything. Andrew Napolitano judge

(44:04):
and Politano story and that is always the question, you know,
who watches the watchers, who protects us from the protectors.
As Madison said, because men are not angels, we need
to have government. But because the government is made up
of men, we need to be careful about how we
proceed with this thing. That is why we have the

(44:25):
rule of law. That's why we have the constraints against
government that are in the Bill of Rights. With Madison,
who stressed that. And so you know President Trump quietly
signing a presidential National Security Memorandum that purports to federalize policing.

(44:45):
This is again not only unprecedented, but unbelievably dangerous and
destructive to America. What Trump is doing. It's just another
continuation of this nine to eleven COVID stuf to create
a police surveillance state. Comments Travis, Yeah, real, Jason Barker,

(45:07):
good to see, Jason, hope you're doing well. A judge
and Washington rule, Trump's use of National Guard unconstitutional. Time
for impeachment. Also, all these soldiers should refuse to follow
unconstitutional orders. Yeah, absolutely right. Yeah. And as a Trump
judge who did it, Yeah, good, good for her.

Speaker 4 (45:23):
Do not obey people. We are getting real close to
the biometric digital implementation implantation. How is it we the
people are accepting of this? Well, they have been conditioned
to over many, many years, Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard, Well,
that's our National Guard.

Speaker 5 (45:41):
The previous comment, how are people accepting this? It's anything
to stop these problems that they've created. Any solution they
give us, no matter how illogical, that solution must be
something that we have to do in order to stop
their problems.

Speaker 2 (45:55):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, they're they create this problem solution. Yeah,
and our National Guard Goldsmith right there exactly.

Speaker 4 (46:04):
Guard Goldsmith says, constituently allows for three forms of federal
land control a ten square mile area for a capital
B territories or for a capital B territories, C military garrisons,
FED courts are not to be on state land, and
if they are, they're under state control. How does it
feel to be living in a period of some of

(46:24):
the most lawless federal activities since FDR or Lincoln? What
a time to be alive.

Speaker 2 (46:31):
It feels like deja vu, Guard, that is what it
feels like.

Speaker 4 (46:34):
Yeah, b My Valentine says in response to Guard total chaos. Yeah, Rinson, Yeah,
And Francine says, police not here to protect and serve
since a long time. Yeah, yep, nice of the storm.
Patrolling in full kitten weapons is not routine, at least

(46:56):
it has not been historically.

Speaker 2 (46:58):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (47:00):
Yeah, do not obey police today. Our order followers was
zero moral aptitude, mostly from institution brainwashing. They do a
good job of weeding out people that would question the
orders Guard Goldsmith. Unfortunately, the judge didn't go far enough,
not ruling it unconstitutional, but just saying the facts of
the situation did support Trump going in the constitution forbids

(47:21):
it without state invitation?

Speaker 2 (47:23):
Yes, yes, I agree, I agree. Yeah, it was at
least you put temporary restraining order on it. You know,
she didn't have the guts to go fall on the
head of Trump, but so you pulled back enough. That's
that's at least that's a good thing. I understand where
she is.

Speaker 4 (47:43):
M OE Studios suspected drug dealers, bomb Pfizer then, and
of course he's saying that from a military perspective, as
in the president would issue the orders. We're not advocating
that anyone in the audience, but we know.

Speaker 2 (47:59):
If you got you know, alcohol again, you one hundred
and seventy eight thousand people a year die. There is
when you look at the Bear's database, even with you know,
it was a Harvard data study, and I think they
found that, if I remember correctly, it's one percent. We're
all that were reported in the Bear's database. And yet
they actively discourage it like they have never done before.

(48:21):
So if we look at that thirty eight thousand as
one percent, probably much less than that, that'd be three
point eight million people in the US alone that were killed.
And Trump thinks that Albert Borla is a hero. And
the question is why does Trump why Trump's people who
understand what happened with this genetic code injection, why they

(48:41):
still celebrate Trump as a hero? I cannot understand.

Speaker 4 (48:45):
They refuse to see the truth. Don't frag me bros.
As systemic corruption in the NYPD for over thirty years
and going, yeah, it was the NYPD that Frank Soppacol
was part of. Yeah, right, the NYPD is full of guys.
Don't frag me bro Mullen Commission, nineteen ninety four, NYPD Corruption.
NAP Commission nineteen seventy two, NYPD Corruption, Frank Cirproco there even.

Speaker 2 (49:10):
You know, way Frank Cirprico said, he said, every human
institution is going to have good and bad people in it.
He goes, the question is can the institution or will
be institution purge the bad people out or will it
close ranks around them and protect them, you know, because
they're a cop. And he said, that's how the institutions
go bad. And that's what we're seeing now. And we've

(49:32):
seen this one institution after this, not just a police,
a police some of the worst out there and the
most dangerous when they go bad. But we've seen this
from one institution in our society after the other. That's
why we're in a fourth turning right now because people
have seen the corruption now for several decades, a corruption
of people like FDR and others.

Speaker 4 (49:53):
Says, don't frag me bro so it says, then there
is all the known factual corruption to the LAPD, CPD
N LVPD. The four big departments have systemic corruption. What
do you think this does two smaller departments, especially when
you consider how much criminal fired cops end up at
other departments A the beach govs on both sides, they'd
fund their own civil war. Well that way, no matter

(50:16):
who wins yeah, they come out on top.

Speaker 2 (50:19):
Yeah, just our civil war will be just like all
the wars that our government has fought elsewhere where. We're
playing both sides of the game. That's especially true with
the drug war, you know, we're both sides. You got
the Criminal Intelligence Agency, the CIA, the biggest supplier of that.
Of course, in Afghanistan, the US military was guarding the
poppy fields for them. While we've got an opium crisis

(50:41):
going on here. I wonder where they get all that
stuff to make the opium from. It's a mystery.

Speaker 4 (50:46):
Yeah, Energy Woman seven oh seven says our gobment is
the biggest drug dealers. They don't like the competition. Yeah,
that's right, badass Uncle Sam.

Speaker 2 (50:56):
Good to see you see. Well, yeah, I've got an
interview with that badass uncle Sam later today. Now we're
going to go at it for an hour or two. Yeah. Yeah,
he's down in New Orleans. Saw when we went to
New Orleans once.

Speaker 4 (51:11):
The New Orleans accent is a very interesting one, very interesting. Knowls,
constitutional carry instead of deplaying troops will handle the situation better.
That's right. It would fix the problem. Don't frag me,
bro Government agents and useful idiots always take the violent
path Audi Mr R. The war on drugs has nothing
to do with fighting addiction.

Speaker 2 (51:32):
You're absolutely right about that, don't Yeah, it'll never work
it you know, it didn't work with alcohol. Gave us
al Capone and all these different gangs. And when we
do it for fifty years instead of what was there
is less than ten years, I think the alcohol prohibition.
But we do it for fifty years, you get these
international drug gang setter so embedded globally. I mean when

(51:54):
they talk about having an authorization for the use of
military force against drug cartels, that is basically an authorization
for the use of force. And what was the number
of sixty some odd different countries just one of the gangs,
just the center.

Speaker 4 (52:08):
All cartel, I think it was sixty four.

Speaker 2 (52:10):
Yeah, and that was just one of the gangs. So
basically that's just a blank check to deploy the military
anywhere you wish and say I'm finding drug gangs.

Speaker 4 (52:19):
I get to do what I want. Don't frag me.
Bro says history has proven that tyrants do not return
power back to the people peacefully. That's right, defy tyrants
seventeen seventy six. Trump should be careful what he wishes
for when he says drug dealers who kill people should
be given death penalty since his warp speed poison has
killed millions around the world. Yeah, Steve evs, drug dealer

(52:41):
Albert Borla is exempt. That's right, he has special privileges.
Brian McCartney. Then they have to off the entire cia.
Do not obey. Don't have to commit an actual crime.
Just be a dissenter and find yourself committed to prison
as a wrist right. They'll rendition you. They will have

(53:03):
you off somewhere, spirited away.

Speaker 2 (53:06):
Well, when we come back, we're going to hit a
variety of topics in the news, but we're going to
begin with this stuff with Albert Borla and Pfizer when
we come back, So stay with us, folks, will be
right back. Has some interesting tech news as well. There
may be a silver lining in terms of the fact
that even though you had some of these CEOs bought
the hype and they started firing a bunch of people.

(53:28):
So we'm all going to replace them with AI. They
can't replace them with AI. The problem is that people
are being replaced not with AI but with h one
B visus. That's sound. They're replacing everybody. And when we
look at this, what's going to happen when the stock
market crashes because the AI bubble, that's going to cost
a lot of people that aren't just in tech sectors

(53:49):
to lose their jobs. We'll be right back. Stay with us, folks,

(55:28):
you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 6 (55:32):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(55:55):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some at the day vidnightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various.

Speaker 4 (56:13):
Gallas and social events.

Speaker 6 (56:15):
If you want to save on shipping, just put it
in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
the USA.

Speaker 7 (56:33):
Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
them on the Oldies Channel at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (56:45):
Well, welcome back here. We're going to talk there's just
general news. Were gonna be talking about the drugs that
We're just talking about the hypocrisy of Trump concerned about
drug gangs while he hands billions of dollars to the
pharmaceutical companies. And we're also talking about some COVID fraud
of the PPP style. There's a lot of fraud around COVID.

(57:05):
Have to clarify what I'm talking about is the PPP
as well as digital ID in the UK cropping up
everywhere strategy over optics. Trump's most Favored Nation status on
drug prices. This is from the Brownstone Institute. And again
that is amazing. You know, most favored nation status, So

(57:30):
that's great. We're going to get that now from Pfizer.
Pfiser's granting this stuff out there like there's some kind
of a sovereign nation. Actually, they got more money than
most nations do. They're not thirty seven trillion dollars in debt,
so they got more money than the US government does.
Albert Borlaw standing in the White House beside Trump stunned
large segments of the public. The moment instantly became a

(57:52):
lightning raw, drawing condemnation and confusion from those who remembered
the unresolved and in many cases still unaccounted for devis
station of the COVID nineteen response. This is James lyons Weiler,
who says, my inbox and those of others who have
worked to expose the record flooded with a single question,
usually framed in rage or betrayal, such as what the

(58:16):
f This piece is not an apology, nor is it
an attempt to launder history. We must hold multiple truths
at once. Okay, stop right there now. Do not hold
the idea that Trump is on your side when you
see this. Okay, that is double think. If you see

(58:36):
it the betrayal that this is, and you see the
corruption that this is, then don't try to explain this
away like some kind of a fort y chess thing,
which is basically what he does in this article. He says, First,
he lays out of the case against Pfizer and Borla.
He said the ninety five percent efficacy figure behind Pfizer's

(58:58):
original mRNA vaccine was marketed with urgency and without full
transparency was the result of a methodological side of hand.
This is soft pedaling this in inexcusable way. You need
to understand it was premeditated fraud, premeditated murder. This is
mass murder that they'd practiced for twenty years, going back

(59:19):
to dark Winter. Don't try to sugarcoat this. Don't give
me this. Mistakes were made, we were soppy. That's not
what this was at all. So again, he's not going
to try to sugarcoat it, or I think he did
right there from the get go. He's sugarcoating it. So
I won't follow anymore with what he's got to say

(59:42):
because at that point I'm done. If you can't see
this for what it is, if you can't call it
what it was, and when we look at what is
going on with autism, This is an interesting article from
Children's Self Defense. They won't say this about tilinaw, but
they will kind of through the back door criticize this
whole talent all narrative. They said, redefining brain injury as autism.

(01:00:05):
This has been a long term strategy to conceal vaccine
harms because just like thilanol, this article outlines how they
have used brain injury as a red herring to distract
attention from the vaccine stuff. And that's a metaphor that
I go back to. It's such a wonderful metaphor. The
people who didn't like fox hunting in the UK, so

(01:00:28):
they would wait in the bushes and when they would
see the fox go running by, they would run out
with a smellyest fish they could find, which was a
red herring evidently, and drag it across the trail to
throw the hounds off the scent. And that's what this
calling autism. Relabeling it as brain injury or relabeling it

(01:00:50):
as thailand all given to pregnant women. That's what this
stuff is all about. It's about a red herring to
let the foxes, the the pharmaceutical companies in the vaccine industry,
that's the fox. And this is all being done by
RFK Junior and the Trump administration let them go free.
For over a century, vaccination has been repeatedly linked to

(01:01:13):
severe neurological injuries, including brain damage, with many modern studies
showing a three to sevenfold increase in chro common chronic illnesses.
And let me just say it's a much stronger case
than that. I think one of the best examples of
this was that family that was here in Tennessee to
They had moved here, I think from Illinois so they

(01:01:36):
could homeschool the kids and freedom and things like that,
and they got a divorce, and as part of the divorce,
the judge, who was very pro vaccine, says, these kids
haven't been vaccinated. And at that point, I think the
youngest one was like eight years old or something, and
he says, if one of your parents agree to catch
up on these kids vaccines, I'll give you custody of

(01:01:57):
the kids. The woman's lawyer knew all this going in,
so he was the one who basically brought that up.
So she gets custody. They take the kids to a
doctor who foolishly gives them one shot after the other,
because if you look at the vaccine schedule, they keep
repeating the same vaccines for the same disease. I mean,
how many times you have to get vaccinated in one

(01:02:19):
setting against measles? Right? None of that makes any sense
even by their own imaginary science fictional world that they operated.
And so all you know, they split up for the
young girl because she'd already had some allergic reactions to things.
But both of the boys got the full course. Both
of them were sent to intensive care. One of them

(01:02:41):
got out in a few days and was okay. But
the youngest one when he came out, he's so severely
artistic that his dad has to change his diapers for him.
He can't communicate, he can't even do bowel movements anymore.
And so that was the youngest boy. If that was
the only case, that would be enough to stop this

(01:03:02):
vaccine schedule, that would be enough to show that autism
can be caused by these vaccines. That is a smoking gun.
They've never had a direct cause of relationship with tailanol
or this other stuff. And again, the kids who are
getting talanol after they've been born of also getting the vaccines,

(01:03:24):
and so is the mother. The mother's been vaccinated while
she was pregnant. They used to not do that. It
wasn't that long ago that they would tell pregnant women
not to get vaccinated. Now they tell them that they
must get vaccinated to dodge this massive liability. All research
into vaccine injuries, and just like they did with other
things like agent orange, was suppressed so that health authorities

(01:03:47):
could claim that there was no evidence of vaccine harm.
They always do that, always do that. Let's just not
have any research. They did that with marijuana medical marijuana. Well,
there's no studies that sho Why because you guys haven't
done any studies. The government doesn't fund it, corporations aren't
going to fund it. The government wants it prohibited, and
the corporations can't make money from it. And that's the

(01:04:09):
way it is with all natural substances. The government can't
make any money from it. They won't do any studies,
not our government. Another scheme was to redefine the brain
injury as autism rather than as encephalitis. For example, Previously,
children with significant vaccine brain damage were referred to as
mentally retarded. However, after a multi decade campaign canceled the

(01:04:34):
word retarded, they were instead diagnosed as autistic, a vague
term which blurs severe and minor disability together, thereby effectively
concealing the severe case from public's awareness. And again in
that family, there was no question that that was severe.
So getting back to the fraud, the other fraud, I

(01:04:56):
mean the fraud of not only giving all this stuffed
Albert Borla, but following the U and Agenda to lock
us down, which was their plan to do that all along,
and looking the other way while people were being killed
and cheering it as some kind of a breakthrough miracle.
We also had the PPP nonsense. And here is a

(01:05:18):
company that was supposedly a small business that was there
as a gym or something, and this fitness company was
just a front to collect PPP checks. Except you know,
one of the things that they've done. They did was
they redefined what a small business was, and as a

(01:05:39):
result of that, it benefited some of Trump's businesses. But
as a result of that, more than fifty percent of
the money went to less than five percent of the
companies that were out there, and a lot of small
businesses still went under. And I bring this up again
because I think this is going to happen yet again
with a small farmer's Trump's tariffs are destroying small farms.

(01:06:01):
As I reported last week, one out of every three
farms in Arkansas going out of business. And so he
promises that he's going to get around to giving them
some money. But before he gives any money to the farmers,
he wants to send more money to his pal running Argentina,
Javier Malai they already sent billions of dollars to Argentina.

(01:06:25):
Argentina took the money and then they repaid us by
cutting their tariffs to China and selling soybeans to China.
So China is buying zero soybeans from US now. But
don't expect the small soybean farmers to benefit from this.
I think it's all going to go to large corporations,
the essential corporations. That's going to go to big agg

(01:06:47):
it's going to go to companies like Archer Daniel Midland.
It won't go to the farmer down the street from you.

Speaker 5 (01:06:53):
And when you think about it, that actually is very
detrimental to the small businesses, small farmers. You know, when
you give a ton of money to the competition, that's
but half the money is going to the big guys,
who are then going to be able to cut their prices,
just as we saw happen on a national scale.

Speaker 2 (01:07:10):
Yeah, it's a double hammy. You know, not only do
you harm them, but you give money to their big competitors.
As if they needed more money, They've got Wall Street
where they can operate at a loss for decades. I mean,
it's like being able to print money with a federally
reserved Wall Street gain is. But anyway, I think he's
going to do exactly the same thing to small farms.

(01:07:31):
This one company that're fraudulently obtained three million dollars in
PPP loans, then attempted to obtain over another four million
in PPP loans. They caught them, however, sentenced them to
fraud and aggravated identity theft sentence to four years and
six months. Meanwhile, in the UK, a bill to create

(01:07:54):
a digital ID for children has only one reading in
Parliament left to pass. This is coming from expose A
News and they said, you know, it's kind of interesting
because they're getting a lot of pushback from adults, so
they're going to go to children. But the thing that
is most interesting and most insightful about this article is

(01:08:16):
that they've got an age of thirteen. And they said,
so the justification that they have for this digital idea,
and I've played you the clip that the Global is
put together for Ukraine. Ukraine twenty thirty. The war is
over and we're now we've now won and things are
going to be much better because look at all these
different things where government intrudes into your life. What it's

(01:08:37):
going to be easier to deal with a government because
you've got an app for that now, and so you're
not trying to keep track of your physical paper and
all the rest of the stuff. It's like, hey, just
get the government out of my life. I don't want
the DMV to start with you know, I don't want
a digital ID to do that. Or taxis right?

Speaker 4 (01:08:53):
If the DMV could be with you everywhere you went.

Speaker 2 (01:08:56):
That's right. Or you know, hey, you got the irs
here and it's not enough that you taxes and you
fill out the forms for them. Now you've got to
get a digital idea or they won't work with you
at all. They just send your jail for not paying
your taxes, that type of thing. So that's the way
they're justifying this. So they said, understand the government's latest
moves in the UK to hoodwink the public and to
accepting their enslavement and the enslavement of their children. We've

(01:09:20):
got to start with why they say that we need
to have digital IDAs there. They said, digital IDAs are
required to quote make it easier to use vital government
services and to send a clear message that if you
come to the UK illegally, you will not be able
to work. Well, of course we understand that it's the
UK government that has been facilitating this immigration and so

(01:09:42):
to make it easier to use government services. They're not
actually serving you. They're kind of serving you, know the
same way that a bull services, like, how, yeah, that's good,
go ahead and play that. That's good.

Speaker 8 (01:09:56):
Weah, the government is looking at digital ID cards at
the moment. How would that help prevent the situation that
we're in now? Well, Keir Starmer, our Prime Minister, said,
we are looking at what other countries have done to
bring a sort of digital creditation. I think there's real
actually benefits right across here from obviously dealing with illegal working.

(01:10:19):
Seems like imagine if your viewers imagine that they had
one credential that would allow them to access all the
different government services and public services. Do I'm sure many
of your viewers often tear their hair out with all
the different numbers and passwords of the different bits of
government that they have to deal with and ideal actually.

Speaker 2 (01:10:41):
The regulations and taxes, Dave Morrish.

Speaker 8 (01:10:43):
Benefit here them here and working legally and accessing out.

Speaker 4 (01:10:47):
We've made the system completely unbearable.

Speaker 8 (01:10:50):
We one route in as well as the benefits it
could have with illegal migration. We're looking at that. I
think it is an interesting idea that other countries have
taken forward and we want to learn from what they've done.

Speaker 2 (01:11:03):
Yeah, it's a global stagenda, it's what she's saying. With
all that, and of course, in the way that they
love to skirt the truth and they say, well, it
won't be compulsory to get a digital idea, but for
some things like dealing with the government, which you can't avoid,
it will be mandatory. So therefore it will be mandatory

(01:11:23):
to get it.

Speaker 5 (01:11:24):
It won't be compulsory to get it, but this will
prevent any illegals from working or living in here if
they don't have it. Yeah, you will absolutely need it
to work or live.

Speaker 2 (01:11:33):
Yeah, yeah, it's over time, the system will allow people
to access government services such as benefits or tax records.
And this is exactly the same strategy that was followed
by Bill Gates in India with the Oddhar system they
put together. And one of the ways that that works
in terms of benefits is you know, you have to
impoverish the people to where they are desperate. They need money,

(01:11:57):
they need health care and things like that because it
can't provide it on their own. Well, they're getting to
that point in Europe. In the UK, the implied voluntary
nature is a psychological tactic that has been used over
and over again. What is the aim of this flowery
language so that people don't resist the legislation or perhaps
even view it as beneficial. It will be made compulsory.

(01:12:22):
But here's what should raise red flags. That's what I
liked about this article. They said, is the consideration to
include children thirteen years and older. Parliament claims a digital
ID is for public services to start a new job
or for example, to buy alcohol, And they said, well, yeah,
the thing is none of those things are done by

(01:12:45):
thirteen year olds, So why do you need a thirteen
year old an ID to buy alcohol or drive a
car or whatever.

Speaker 5 (01:12:52):
Plus, I mean, don't they already have things in place
to prevent thirteen year olds from driving cars, buying alcohol
and getting job. No, I think that that's you already
have to show ID of some form. This is just
let's get one ID so that everything can be surveilled
under it.

Speaker 2 (01:13:11):
Well, yeah, they just don't want you carrying a wallet
that has physical cards in it or something like that
they want you carrying a smartphone because that provides them
a lot more surveillance, GEO, special intelligence and so forth
as well. So I just put it all in there,
you know, one smart idea to rule them all. So
why not be honest and lower the age to include
babies from the time they're born. It's because other legislation

(01:13:34):
that's currently being pushed through Parliament will control those who
are under thirteen years old. Within a decade, every new
born will undergo whole genome sequencing. So the UK Telegraph
they're gradually and incrementally implementing a cradle to grave identity
surveillance and control system for every single person using digital

(01:13:57):
identities and DNA they collect at the very beginning. So
Free Thought Project has this article from the off Guardian,
also in the UK, and the guy says, wait a minute,
something is off here. And I love the contrarian thinking
because he's looking at this and saying there's been so
much pushback against this that maybe this is a setup.

(01:14:21):
He said, You know, it's kind of like when you
are watching a murder mystery, right, and everything is falling
into place so precisely. It's almost like they've set this
whole thing up to happen that way, and you know
that there's another shoe that's going to drop, and that
this whole thing was a pretense. He goes, the official
announcement is possibly the least surprising news that there's ever been,

(01:14:44):
And he says, and yet suddenly I find myself doubting
the sincerity, and let me explain. And then he talks
about the mystery, the murder mystery whatever. About halfway through
you start to doubt to yourself, Wait a minute, there's
just too much evidence here. The movie seems to be
making it too obvious. The main characters are openly accusing
your chosen suspect, and there's still an hour left, so

(01:15:05):
they start asking is he the fake out villain? Will
the twist be that he was wrongly accused? Says I'm
seeing resistance from quarters that I wouldn't expect, and I'm
suddenly questioning the narrative Because of that, he says, I
remember COVID. I remember that COVID skeptics could barely get
likes on Twitter, let alone get to go to question

(01:15:26):
time in the Parliament, or right columns for the Telegraph
or the Guardian. I know what it looks like when
an agenda is being sold hard and no opposition is allowed,
it doesn't look like this. Members of Parliament are opposing
it from every single party, including Labor. Labor mayors are
likewise against it. Every single party in Northern Ireland is

(01:15:48):
against it as well, with the First Minister calling it
the ill thought out and ludicrous Labor ministers and Keir
Starmer himself are being challenged in TV interviews with pertinent
and reasonable questions. That never happens unless someone powerful wants
it to happen. It can't happen by accident because interviews

(01:16:10):
are discussed and questions are vetted beforehand. A petition against
the plan allegedly gained over a million signatures in twenty
four hours. Somebody created this thirty foot tall sand art
of Sir Kir Starmer on the beach and the police
were dispatched to remove it. That it was very impressive.

(01:16:33):
It was Orwellian and very impressive artwork on the beach,
and they moved right away to give that a lot
of exposure. He says. I'm surprised by the players that
are on my team and it makes me wonder if
the rules of the game have been changed. Maybe there
is a bait and switch coming. It might be the
reaction to digital ID will be such a defeat for

(01:16:56):
Starmer that he resigns, perhaps causing a new general election
leading to a reform win. And Nigel Frage is Prime Minister.
That seemed crazy a few years ago, but I can't
shake the idea now that would help to get them
to restore confidence in the institutions, wasn't it. He put
Nigel Frage and form in and people like, oh that's good,

(01:17:19):
you know, just like Trump getting in. Now we're safe.
We don't really have to watch government, we don't have
to worry about what they're doing. That's the way this
is done with Conservatives and others. And we've seen Varage,
who I really liked in years past. We've seen him
compromise on many different things recently, so he could be

(01:17:39):
their guy. It might be that Starmer immediately scraps a
plan and this is held up as an example of
him listening to the will of the people and the
system working, and so he says, and so strengthens him.
Both of these possibilities account for the headlines hammering home
hair Starmer's apparently creating approval rating. It's also possible that

(01:18:02):
the UK will be used as a control group on
digital ID. Those criticizing or blocking it will be shown
up and embarrassed somehow. Maybe a terrorist attack will take
place that could have been prevented if it only had
digital ID, or the next pandemic or some other global
event will be shown to have done less harm in
countries that had digital ID in place, and we're therefore

(01:18:25):
able to respond more effectively. Yeah, all that kind of
stuff this guy's spot on. Or similarly to Brexit, the
UK's lack of a digital ID will see us fall
behind and contrived economic metrics of some kind that are
then in turn used to excuse our deliberately sabotaged cost
of living. However unfolds, It just feels like there is

(01:18:49):
too much opposition, too much broadcast and too much mainstream
opposition for this to proceed along the prescribed lines. There
is something coming, some wrinkle is coming. But whatever does happen,
I should be clear about three things. Number One, digital
ID is still going to happen. A digital ID system

(01:19:09):
is foundational for the great reset world, plans for digital
currency and fifteen minute cities and all the rest of
it rely on the keystone of digital ID. They already
exist in many countries around the world and will exist
in dozens more by the end of next year. Number two,
digital ID is still a very bad thing. This is

(01:19:31):
not me flipping sides or going pro digital ID just
because I don't like agreeing with Owen Jones whoever. That
is not even I am that much of a contrarian.
And number three, we are still winning. He says, this
is not a black pill take. I'm not suggesting that
all resistance a digital idea is fake and that we

(01:19:52):
can't win the opposite. In fact, if I'm right, what
we're seeing is a response to widespread opposition. They move
designed to harness and then to redirect the momentum of
organic resistance. So his like you say, it's not a
black pill take. What he thinks is happening is that
there really is resistances. People really understand what it is,

(01:20:13):
and so they're trying to figure out how they can
get behind it so they can move it in a
different direction. That's what I'm warning against. I suppose the
possibility that we could be handed a quote unquote win
on digital ID that is immediately parleyed into something else,
to slink shot around the moon and then back down
to Earth, Like when you're pushing against the foe who's

(01:20:33):
pushing back, and then they suddenly stop and you find
yourself pushing against nothing and your parents' sudden victory destroys
your control. You have to be aware of that even
as you push, And he says, remember the Battle of Hastings,
Harold and his Saxons had the high ground and they
were holding firm but a dozen Norman charges couldn't punch through.

(01:20:56):
But when the Normans feigned to retreat, the Saxons, filled
with the unexamined joy of victory, gave chase and abandoned
the tactics and the position that had been winning them
the battle, and then they lost the battle. In short,
the Saxons were winning until they were sure that they
had won. So I guess what I'm saying is stay

(01:21:16):
on the high ground, keep the shield walled up even
if they retreat, because I just don't trust it. I
think it's very sage advice, and we need to think
about that in many different areas. Joe Rogan is raging as.

Speaker 5 (01:21:31):
The cure Starmer beach art thing. So here's yeah, picture
of it, and here the cops looking at it.

Speaker 2 (01:21:40):
Yeah, that's right, and yeah, look at that pictures scollope again,
look at that. So it says nineteen eighty four, but
the eight is actually Cure Starmer as kind of a
bust picture of him, so that his shoulders are the
lower part of the eight and his head is the
upper part of it. So, yeah, it is nineteen eighty four.

Speaker 4 (01:22:00):
Your Starmer is a bust indeed, Yeah, hair Starmer, I
think is a better way to rogan.

Speaker 5 (01:22:06):
There's the petition for removing the digital ID, which every
time there's one of these unpopular things, you see one
of these petitions pop up and the response from the
government saying, yeah, we're going to ignore that they have
a thing in the UK.

Speaker 2 (01:22:21):
Well, that's what they do here with our regulatory agencies, right.
Congress doesn't write the laws. They tell the regulatory agencies
that are unconstitutional and of themselves. You write the rules
and then they put it out for a comment period
from the public. They don't care what you comment on.

(01:22:42):
You have no control over that. They might listen to
some of the industry executives because the corporations have bought
a seat at the table with them. But you don't
have a voice in any of this stuff, and you
don't have any representation because you're a representative that have
been elected even though you know the elections are rigged.

(01:23:02):
You're theoretically representative representatives. They still call them representatives. I
don't see any of these people that represent me. But anyway,
they're not even pretending to play anymore. And when it
all goes wrong, they can come in and act as

(01:23:23):
the White Knight. He's going to save everybody from these
bad regulatory agencies and overturn it. That's the game. Yeah,
you can comment on what they do, but it's not
going to change anything. So Joe Rogan is raging at
media silence and what he calls the UK's or Wellian nightmare.
Sure is a free speech crackdown. As a matter of fact,
you know, we have seen people arrested, as I point out,

(01:23:46):
you know, for silently praying. The grandmother who was arrested,
she had a sign an abortion clinic said I'm here
to talk if you want. I'm not here to course
to anybody.

Speaker 7 (01:23:56):
Guilty of offering to talk to someone about abortion.

Speaker 2 (01:24:01):
That's it. Yeah, you're guilty of trying to talk to
someone offering to talk to someone about abortion. You're not
screaming at them. She's standing there silently with a sign.
You want to talk about your systems, I'm here to
talk if you want. No, that's not allowed. So Joe
Rogan has blasted the media and the leftists for ignoring
a massive crackdown on free speech and a move toward

(01:24:22):
total dystopian surveillance in the UK, while focusing instead on
Jimmy Kimmel being suspended for a few days. He said,
this is an Orwellian nightmare coming to life right in
front of our face. And of course you know they
work in each of these countries. They are refining their
tactics because this is a unified global approach, just like
the pandemic was and the pandemic lockdown and the vaccine

(01:24:47):
passes and all the rest of this stuff. You're seeing
a complete total attack on one of the most fundamental
principles of the Western world, which is the ability to
express yourself, said Rogan. He said, twelve thousand people arrested
by the police in the UK, the same place that
just implemented digital ID. No one is flinching. No one
in America is freaking out about what's happening in the
UK at all. Well, you know jd. Vance went to

(01:25:09):
the UK and he freaked out about it, and then
he came back and did it himself, pushed it himself. Yeah,
we don't want anybody protesting against what a foreign country
Israel is doing. So let's punish the universities if they
allow that to happen. It's all predicated on the back
of on the back of out of control mass illegal

(01:25:32):
immigration here as there with a leftist using the crisis
created by the previous conservative government and amplified by Hair
Starmer's cabal in an attempt to roll out or well
in style surveillance and control. That's exactly what it is.
So it is really an unforced error that is part

(01:25:54):
of this. But you know, you got to wonder when
you look at Trump and how he is handled or
mishandled so much of this stuff, whether it's the military
meeting that they set up or the Jeffrey Epstein documents.
This is an interesting back and forth between a congresswoman

(01:26:15):
and who is a Democrat and Mike Johnson listen to
what she has to say about Trump. He calls him unhinged,
and uh, and and Mike Johnson agrees the president is unhinged.
He is Unwell, what do you do one too? I
don't contrite that performance in front of the generals.

Speaker 8 (01:26:37):
It's so dangerous.

Speaker 2 (01:26:39):
He doesn't disagree. Is there whole lot of people on
your side? It's going around that That kind of reminds
me of the thing with Madeline Albright? You know, are
you you know, are you upset about the fact that
you killed a half million kids with your sanctions? It
was worth it? She said, So here he is, Trump
is unhinged, and he's well, yeah, well, a lot of

(01:27:01):
people on your side are too.

Speaker 4 (01:27:05):
Y'all aren't very hinged either.

Speaker 2 (01:27:07):
Yeah, that's right, So salon which is anti Trump of course.
The writer argued that a deep and destabilizing fisher has
opened within the Trump administration over how to control the
narrative about the pedophiles and Jeffrey Epstein. She knowed that
while the White House has tried to project unified silence

(01:27:29):
or denial that the Epstein files even exist, recent statements
from within Trump's orbit exposed the narrative as fractured. Primarily
this interview that was done with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick
who described Epstein as the quote greatest blackmailer ever. In
that same interview, Lutnick claimed, of Epstein's approach toward his associates,

(01:27:53):
you tell him get a massage, Get a massage, and
then what happened in that massage room I assume was
on video. So in both this case of Lutnick and
Mike Johnson, these people are trying to be sick ofphense
to Trump. Eventually the truth leaks out in the kind
of inadvertent way. Those remarks from a cabinet official closely

(01:28:16):
tied to Trump represent a direct break from earlier public
denials that any compromising material or client list existed. And
you know they own it now say that there wasn't
anybody that was being blackmailed. And Lutnik said, well, you know,
obviously we know that he's blackmailing people, and we know
he was doing it for intelligence agencies MASAD, CIA, so forth.

(01:28:36):
If there is any if there is much space between
those two, I don't know. Lutnick made a complete unforced
error with his revelation. Wired Magazine told NBC News and
as a sitting cabinet official and the former neighbor of Epstein,
he lived right next door to Jeffrey Epstein New York City.
The Secretary's story places him at odds or the public

(01:28:59):
posture of the Department of Justice and FBI officials as
seemingly backs up Attorney General Pam Bondi's initial claim of
an Epstein client list, while simultaneously undermining FBI Director Cash
Bettel's conflicting testimony that no credible evidence of blackmail or
client list exists. Well, Lutnick evidently knows that's not true,

(01:29:23):
and you know that's not true, and you know that
they're all liars, all these people trying to excuse us.
Lutnixx interview presents a significant narrative jolt because it comes
from inside the Trump orbit and it directly conflicts with
the administration's public claims about the Epstein files. Lutnix comments
make it clear that the Trump Epstein connections will not

(01:29:44):
be going away anytime soon. That's right, And again, Mike
Johnson can delay this stuff, but he can't hide the
truth forever it will come out. He's delaying the seating
of this new Democrat congresswoman who is obviously going to
move to release as they have the votes. With that

(01:30:05):
one special election that just happened, and Mike Johnson is
still playing games. I mean he shut down Congress is
going to be off for all the month of August. Anyway,
he gave him an extra week so that they couldn't
run this vote and get people on record either guarding
the pedophiles or else coming after them. And now he's

(01:30:27):
still trying to delay it a couple more days by
trying to wait to seat this representative so they can't
have this vote to discharge this this motion to release
all these different papers.

Speaker 4 (01:30:39):
So it's truly amazing the links they're willing to go
to for this. The obviousness of it. Yeah, they're very
rarely this in your face about it.

Speaker 2 (01:30:49):
Yeah, that's right. And so you got to ask yourself,
how bad must it be? Really bad? The political cost
that Trump and the GOP is willing to incur on this,
it has to be hugely damaging, because otherwise it would
make absolutely no sense for them to do this. This
isn't just awkwardly done. This is premeditate and it is

(01:31:11):
a hard stop on all this stuff that he had
promised to show. That was one of the things that
he was going to show. You remember, he was going
to shut down all the pedophile rings and all the
rest of this stuff. So yeah, it is another one
of those moments, just like Albert Borla where maybe that
maga people figure, wait a minute, is he the bad guy?
You know, it's just like like that British comedy routine.

Speaker 4 (01:31:34):
Are we the baddies?

Speaker 2 (01:31:35):
And so are we the baddies? We've got skulls in
our uniforms. Are the bad guys that they've got the
pedophiles on their side? So yeah, So you know, as
we're talking about the First Amendment, we've got some Muslims
that have a different take on that.

Speaker 4 (01:31:48):
They travel, Yeah, their understanding of the First Amendment doesn't
exactly jive with the actual First Amendment. They thought that
the First Amendment allows them to commit vandalism, yeah and
arson and yeah. So apparently the First Amendment to them
means I get to destroy your stuff and there's nothing
you can do about it.

Speaker 2 (01:32:06):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:32:07):
But this happened in Texas. It was a church in Ulas,
Texas where they went in. They decided that they were
going to put an expletive on their sign because they
don't like Israel. The church had a Israeli flag flying
so they decided to spray paint f Israel on their
sign instead.

Speaker 2 (01:32:24):
And I don't get the church showing a flying flag,
you know, of a foreign country and.

Speaker 4 (01:32:32):
They think you should be flying an American flag.

Speaker 2 (01:32:35):
Yeah, the church. I went to church one time and
it was Veterans Day, and so they did a couple
of worship songs and then they start doing every branch
of the service. That this is a big church, and
they had an orchestra and stuff, and so they start
recognizing each one of the branches. And so they have
anchors away from the navy. If your navy stand up

(01:32:55):
and come up here, we want to come up on
a stage, blah blah blah. And they go to the
army case signs go rolling along and so forth, you know,
every branch of the military. And I just got up
and walked out. It's like, I'm not here to worship
the damn government. And if you are, then we're not
in church. And that goes double for any foreign government
that is out there that is committing genocide. And you

(01:33:18):
got forty percent of American Jews now say that what's
happening in Israel is genocide. It is he can't avoid it.
And so I don't understand that with the Church they
should be upholding Christ, not a foreign political organization, but
the Muslims. Just last week, Travis, we had the story
that you had some guy who had is in front

(01:33:40):
of MELI. Was it the Turkish embassy or something? He had, Yes, yeah,
he had. He was descended from Kurds as well as
from Armenians. So I thought you're going to say, way,
well it was had they had away with them, they
had a genocide with them, and so both of these

(01:34:00):
ethnic groups have been attacked by the Muslim Turks. And
so he was protesting at the Turkish embassy in the UK,
and he wasn't even burning a Koran, but this guy
comes up to him and stabs him, and then two
other Muslims ran up and start kicking him on the ground,
and the judge said it was all justified. So I

(01:34:20):
can understand these guys would think that if they see
a sign that they don't like in a church, then
they're justified to destroy the church building as well as
maybe burn it down. Where the judge disagreed.

Speaker 5 (01:34:33):
I mean, that's much less harmful than stabbing someone. If
that's pre speech to stabs someone then surely burning their
church down.

Speaker 4 (01:34:41):
You have to understand they were severely provoked. I believe
that's why you judge phrased it.

Speaker 2 (01:34:46):
I justand you're severely provoked. You pull him in. There's
such an upstanding citizen.

Speaker 4 (01:34:52):
And of course this is the results of our horrendous
foreign policy and the results of our horrendous immigration policy
coming home. Either one of these on their own would
be bad enough, but together they result in a nightmare scenario.
We export violence and destruction across the globe, and then
we allow any group from these places we have destroyed

(01:35:13):
to come back into our country, and they bear grudges,
and they rightfully bear grudges against us. This is just
a terrible, terrible scenario. Diversity is not our I thought the.

Speaker 2 (01:35:26):
Penalty was interesting too, because the government gives them a
ten thousand dollars fine that goes to the government. The
church they damaged got seventeen hundred dollars. This is another
thing that's always been a pet people.

Speaker 4 (01:35:40):
Against you, and you alone have against the system of
justice that we have here.

Speaker 2 (01:35:46):
You know, in Mosaic law, you know you didn't pay
a fine to the state or to Moses or whatever.
You know, you paid restitution to the victim. Why is
it that we don't have victim restitution? In many cases
the victims get zero and they levy find that the
government gets the money. So here, you know, the government
gets five times more than five times as much as

(01:36:08):
the people who were harmed by this.

Speaker 4 (01:36:11):
Yeah, the victim has the crime committed against them in
they're wrapped up in a court case for who knows
how long. That's right, So a court case is never
a fun thing, even if you win, it's a miserable experience. Yeah,
I know, I'm sure you've all heard the saying, but
I've heard it all my life. You don't take someone
to court to you know, get justice. Generally, it's you know,

(01:36:33):
because it's going to be good for you. You do
it because you know it's the right thing to do.
You feel strongly about it. You're not going to get
a giant judgment, you're not going to get paid out
of it. You're going to be miserable the entire time.
It is something that you're not going to get just
as a compensation. No, you're just trying to punish the
other person and you wind up punishing yourself as well.

(01:36:55):
Now we also have a tech billionaire of course defending
the massive H one B labor pipeline, because that's all
the tech billionaires do is warning that Trump's reforms will backfire.
And I am I'm continually sick of this rhetoric because
they act like, well, Americans are stupid, they don't know

(01:37:16):
how to do this.

Speaker 2 (01:37:17):
Remember when Musk can bivate the snake. We're talking about that,
the two other total agreements we need. These immigrants, Yeah,
these Americans are nothing. It's like, yeah, well, what about
the country that you came from. You're so great, Why
isn't it a better country.

Speaker 4 (01:37:32):
It's also important to point out that it's generally Americans
that built all these systems, Yeah, the inner whether it's
the Internet or just about everything that modern people enjoy,
it's Americans or generally Europeans. Some of these countries. People
are not interchangeable. They are not just this is an
economic zone where you can just you know, pull out

(01:37:54):
all the parts and put in new ones and it
will be the same. People. Groups want different things, and
they achieve different things differently. If everyone was exactly the same,
everyone would have invented the car and the airplane at
the exact same time, but they didn't because people groups
achieve different things.

Speaker 2 (01:38:10):
Yeah, there cultures, culture will have a different approach to it,
you know. And it also is one of these things
that was a big deal when I first started working
in engineering. There's a book that went around called the
Mythical Man Month, and so they would always talk about
projects when they're specing this stuff out, how many man
months is this going to take us? Oh, well, it's
going to take a couple of years of the personnel

(01:38:31):
we've got here, We'll hire a bunch more people. And
it's like that doesn't necessarily help, because again, you've got
a corporate culture, just like you're talking about in general,
the culture in the US. So you got this corporate
culture that people got to come in. They've got to
get assimilated into this project, into this culture, they've got
to get up to speed, and there's a lot of
other things. There's the overhead involved if you've got a
larger group of people, but you've got to move around.

(01:38:53):
So the whole idea that you're going to be able
to measure this stuff in terms of man months needed
a fallacy. And it's the same type of thing that's
really coming from the H one B visa. We need
more bodies in here, and they're not looking qualitatively at
who they're hiring, are they No?

Speaker 4 (01:39:10):
And you can see this in every sector. What has
gotten better in technology since the nineties when the H
one B visa stuff really kicked off, when it kicked
into high gear? Can you name anything? We've got more technology,
but it's not better. The user interfaces on programs have
gotten worse. The capabilities of them have gotten worse. I

(01:39:31):
encounter more bugs than I ever did before.

Speaker 2 (01:39:34):
We've got an article coming up the guy who coined
the term and shitification just you know, when you look
at this and it's like, why doesn't the phone? Why
is it working more poorly than it did before? The
user interface is worse and all this kind and it's
happening across the board, and it's since as technology ages.

Speaker 4 (01:39:53):
It's everywhere in every aspect. Whether you're importing I mean,
it's not even necessarily that you're importing H one B
workers could be as simple as the DEI policies. You
can see it in things as meaningless as video games.
There was a massive push over the last decade to
bring in more you know, oh, you know, queer gamers
of color, and the games are horrendous. They cannot make

(01:40:17):
good games anymore. They are physically incapable of doing it.
And it just gets worse and worse. You can see
it in every aspect of life that the use policies
simply result in worse outcomes for everyone.

Speaker 2 (01:40:30):
Yeah. Well, you know, one of the things that really
was like rubbing salt in the wound was this billionaire
whose name is Meritz, and of course he's highly connected
to Trump as donor and the rest of this stuff.
He reinforced his point by saying warehouse workers, account managers,
brands specialists, and dishwashers are the kind of jobs that
Americans hold. And so what he's saying is that they

(01:40:53):
want the foreign workers to come in and take the
jobs as biochemists, software engineers, and other high schol positions,
while Americans are concentrated in lower level work. You know,
that's a job for you. You're an American, you need
to be a dishwasher. We're going to bring this guy
in to be the CEO of Google, you know.

Speaker 4 (01:41:10):
So, yeah, And of course part of that is also
that when you bring someone in from the outset, they
have no loyalty to the country. They have a loyalty
to the person paying their salary. They're not going to
question what you ask them to do. They're not going
to sit there and think, is this something that will
benefit the country, is this something that is good for people.

(01:41:32):
They're going to sit there and think, this guy is
paying me a million dollars or more a year. Whatever
he wants he gets.

Speaker 2 (01:41:39):
Well. I think you find that with Americans as well.
You know, I've seen this over and over again, what
people will do for a job. I mean, we're just
talking about the police, you know, that same kind of attitude.
As they're an engineering as well, they'll look at it
and they'll say, uh, you know, okay, so we're developing
a weapons system here that's going to be used against
civilians and all those But that's okay because it's a
tech problem. I'm getting paid a lot of money, so

(01:42:01):
I'll do it for you.

Speaker 4 (01:42:02):
Yeah, I think you can. You will see this in
the general populace, but there may be a consideration of, well,
you know, do I want to live in a country
like this, whereas this person they have no loyalty at all.
There's not even going to be a consideration.

Speaker 2 (01:42:16):
You'll occasionally have a whistleblower, you know, but if somebody
has no interest in all the country, you know, it's like, well,
that's fine. And of course the British Empire knew that.
That's why they came in and they would put like
in India, for example, the top of the bureaucratic structure
that would rule India from the British Empire. Those it
all be Brits, right, But then they would fill the

(01:42:36):
entire civil service on down with fellow Indians, so that
that would tamp down resistance.

Speaker 4 (01:42:42):
You're represented in government? Is that wonderful?

Speaker 2 (01:42:45):
Yeah? So well. The other thing, too, is a qualitative issue.
Meritz claims that undergraduate degrees from Eastern Europe, Turkey, and
India are quote every bit is qualified unquote as American
degrees and wrights. That does not stand up to global
data and the OS World University rankings of twenty twenty six,

(01:43:07):
US institutions dominate the top tier. Mit is ranked number
one for thirteenth consecutive ear and over forty US universities
are in the top two hundred. By contrast, India's highest
ranked school, it Deli, sets at spot number one hundred.
And twenty three. Most Indian universities fall much lower.

Speaker 4 (01:43:27):
I've also commented on this before, but India has a
massive problem with degree mills, where basically you pay you know,
fifteen hundred dollars and they just manufacture degree. There's all
kinds of fake universities and this is a major problem.

Speaker 2 (01:43:41):
And that would explain why they said. Studies show that
Indian engineering graduates approximately ninety four percent of them lack
the skills required for employment, with only four point seven
seven percent able to complete a basic programming task. So
there you go.

Speaker 4 (01:43:55):
They engage in this sort of thing where they get
the fake degree, and then wherever they get hired, they
start trying to learn as much as they can on
the job. Oh well I need to do this. Well,
I'll watch the YouTube tutorials on it, and I'm sure
i can fake my way through it, fake it till
you make it, yes, which does not You know, there
are certain jobs where I'm sure that's possible. They're not
extremely complex things you can learn as you go. I

(01:44:17):
don't want engineers doing that. I would prefer if the guy,
whether it's an electrical engineer or a civil engineer building
a bridge, I prefer if you knew what you were
doing before you got there.

Speaker 2 (01:44:28):
That's right. So you know, again, the US has seven
of the top ten universities worldwide. India's best performer is
ranked in the two hundred and one to two hundred
and fifty band, with a majority of them falling below
six hundred. So he's five hundred and nine to nine.
Other universities that have a better I.

Speaker 4 (01:44:49):
Know, I pick on India a lot. I don't have
a problem with Indians specifically. I think if they want
their culture, however they want their culture, they're entitled to
have it.

Speaker 2 (01:44:58):
Well, I have a problem with the government, yeah doing that,
you know, and and Mexico is doing the same thing
as well. They want that those payments sent back, so
the government is aiding and bretting this.

Speaker 4 (01:45:08):
Yeah, yeah, it's actually we covered this, but that's.

Speaker 2 (01:45:10):
The reverse colonization.

Speaker 4 (01:45:13):
It's a specific part of India's economic plan to export
their workers other places and have them send millions billions
of dollars back.

Speaker 2 (01:45:20):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:45:22):
Again, If I think whatever culture India wants, Indians are
entitled to their own culture. China wants a different culture, they're
entitled to that. I don't want to export American culture
to everyone. I think different people groups, as I've said before,
deserve to be governed how they want to be governed.

Speaker 2 (01:45:38):
Unless we need to destroy their country and rebuild it
and our image.

Speaker 4 (01:45:42):
A little false flag here, a little coup there, a
little color revolution from time to time.

Speaker 2 (01:45:47):
Yeah, right, well we.

Speaker 4 (01:45:50):
Already mentioned this briefly, but Amazon is deleting the.

Speaker 2 (01:45:54):
Yeah that picture up plants. That's uh. There you go.
There's a couple of bond posters. They got the arms
crossed and they're holding it up there and instead of
having a you know, Walter PPK usually though, it's like
a Luger's. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:46:08):
I believe the newer ones it's a Walter PPK, and
the older ones I believe it was a Luger of
some kind.

Speaker 2 (01:46:13):
Yeah, it's kind of Yeah, it's interesting if you look
at the logo, see there's GoldenEye and doctor No. If
you don't get the logo underneath it double O seven
And they use the seven as a gun so they
couldn't get it out everywhere. And the whole point is
that this is a spy who has a license to kill.
I mean, the whole point was that they were trying
to legitimize and romanticize assassinations and things like that.

Speaker 5 (01:46:38):
But a license to kill, but does he have a
license to carry?

Speaker 4 (01:46:40):
Oh, you got a license to that.

Speaker 2 (01:46:44):
That's a good point when it does he have a
license to carry? Yeah, it's a of course. And this
is insanity from Jeff Bezos and Amazon because they bught
MGM Studios.

Speaker 4 (01:46:54):
It reminds me of when all the tech companies went
in and removed the gun emojis from the smart phones
because that was what was causing all the shootings. Of course,
that's what the problem was. They replaced them with squirt
guns and ray guns and different things like that, and.

Speaker 2 (01:47:08):
That was the Zionists takeover of TikTok. They were just
telling me Lance that they removed one of the emoji's
off of TikTok too. Right. They had people who were
if they wanted to refer to Jews, they had a
juice box. So now now they have removed the juice
box emoji. These people don't think that they can control speech.
They just don't get it.

Speaker 4 (01:47:30):
No matter what you do, people will find way around it.

Speaker 2 (01:47:34):
So Amazon bought MGM for eight and a half billion dollars.
So now they're going to run this franchise in the ground,
and we'll see what they do with.

Speaker 4 (01:47:44):
We mentioned it, but just every single franchise gets worse
and worse. It's just absolutely incredible. I was never that
big of a Star Wars fan. I liked the original
three movies. I think they're good, but I would you know.
I wasn't around when they were coming out, so they
didn't have massive cultural zeitgeist impact on me. I just
thought they were good movies.

Speaker 2 (01:48:04):
I like the first one, lot second one, and then
the third one is like, no, the e.

Speaker 4 (01:48:10):
Walk So yeah, I've never liked the e walks. Every
time you walk up on screen, it's like, come on, Stormtroopers.

Speaker 2 (01:48:17):
You can do it.

Speaker 3 (01:48:18):
You know.

Speaker 2 (01:48:19):
It was obviously kids and costumes or something.

Speaker 4 (01:48:23):
I've always hated the Ewoks I have. I have an
innate response to when someone is trying to put something
cute in front of me to dislike it. I like children,
I like kids, but this corporate idea of just oh
look it's baby Yoda. I want to punt baby Yoda
into the stratosphere, get that thing away from me.

Speaker 2 (01:48:41):
And the execution was inexcusably bad. It was like the
the monkeys in two thousand and one who you can
see the zippers on the back suits sometimes, and it's
just like George Lucas.

Speaker 4 (01:48:55):
People have pointed out he needs someone to tell him,
no that you need he he needs someone steadying there
to be like, you know, George, maybe not Yeah, you
could see it, just like Trump, Yeah you could see it.

Speaker 2 (01:49:07):
He went.

Speaker 4 (01:49:08):
He lost it completely with the Prequels. He had no
one there that could tell him now because he was
George Lucas and you got to do whatever he wanted
in the prequels. I love the Prequels just because of
the time they came out.

Speaker 2 (01:49:17):
I was young.

Speaker 4 (01:49:17):
I've got a lot of nostalgia for them. They're not
good movies, though there's a there's a million video essays
that have explained what's wrong with them.

Speaker 5 (01:49:26):
Well, great when you compare them to the newer stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:49:27):
Oh yeah, comparatively to the new trilogies and movies, they're fantastic,
but they're still not good. They don't stand on their own.

Speaker 2 (01:49:36):
Yeah. Right, and then we've got Scott Pressler.

Speaker 5 (01:49:38):
Before we move on to the next story, I wanted
to point out there's one of these posters where they
left his Holster but removed the gun like sheriff.

Speaker 2 (01:49:46):
They would eat him. Yeah, sheriff. Yeah. That was always
a sticking point with us with toy story as much
a little love story story, the fact that he had
an empty, empty ulster and they even made fun of
that draw. You know he does it with etches ski
Oh you got me. But yeah, because I went to

(01:50:09):
great links to get Western guns for you guys, it
wasn't easy to find them. Even in the early nineties,
it wasn't easy to find guns like that.

Speaker 4 (01:50:17):
So everyone loves a six shooter, that's right. I would
love a cult single action army just for the historosity,
historosity of it, historicalness of it.

Speaker 2 (01:50:29):
But those are some people get hysterical one.

Speaker 4 (01:50:31):
They are ridiculously expensive. Yeah, not gonna.

Speaker 2 (01:50:35):
Well, we got one with no firing pin. Then I
put in your room when you're a kid.

Speaker 4 (01:50:40):
Anyway, you were saying, Scott Presler.

Speaker 2 (01:50:42):
Scott Presler, you talk about losing the plot. This is
as bad. The GOP is as bad as Amazon when
it comes to this. Scott Pressler is a raving homosexual
that the GOP wants to use him as an activist everywhere,
and he's now saying the biggest hurdle is getting Republicans
to vote in every election. We need big, beautiful turnout.
He said.

Speaker 4 (01:51:01):
I was amazed by this. I didn't realize the key
to winning was getting more votes than the other guy.
This is unheard of game theory. This guy's breaking new ground.

Speaker 2 (01:51:10):
Well, he talks about how there are thirty percent of
Pennsylvanian hunters are not registered to vote, and I'm sure
that sending them a hom psycho shoulder link they are
is going to motivate these guys to vote GOP. Don't
you think that along with the Epstein files that should
do it. I'm sure they can't away with the GOP.

Speaker 4 (01:51:28):
We've got pedophiles, We've got homosexuals. Now what, in a
few years, we'll be transing your kids too. That's how
it goes.

Speaker 2 (01:51:37):
This is big tent GOP guarding our pedophiles. And this
is always my criticism of Charlie Kirk and turning point USA,
he would do the same thing, not with Scott Presler necessary,
but here's Bright Barton News doing an interview with this guy,
Scott Pressler. And you know, you had Charlie Kirk with

(01:51:58):
a cultural war and he had another guy. It was
a black guy, and he was It wasn't just one event.
This guy was part of their speaker crew and he
was on the website the entire time, and so you know,
people challenged him said, exactly has it help us to
win the cultural war or spiritual war? When you are
making a virtue out of having somebody here because they're homosexual,

(01:52:19):
you're showing how open and how big the tent is
of GOP politics. And again, you want to make this
about politics instead of about family values. That's what you do.
And so this is again just they're keening this up to.

Speaker 4 (01:52:36):
Lose, and it couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.
At this point, what does it matter? If this is
what the GOP achieves, who cares? It doesn't mean anything.
I have no interest in electing a group of slightly
less Democrat Democrats. I'm not going to vote for the

(01:52:58):
lesser of two evils, especially not when they're so so
slightly less.

Speaker 2 (01:53:04):
Well, the thing is for me. As I've said many times,
and this is another example of it, the Republicans are
more Democrats than Democrats of my youth. Right.

Speaker 4 (01:53:14):
It's I mean everything that everyone has gone insane. Over
the last decade, the Democrats are turned into full on Marxist. Yes,
it's you'll hear them say, just have being moderate, A
moderate Republican of today, not of you know, ten years ago,
twenty years ago is a fascist, which is I mean,

(01:53:35):
some of them may be, but it's utterly ridiculous in
the fact that you'll have these, you know, your standard
Christian Republican that is, as a general rule, far too
soft on everything, in my opinion, and they are considered,
you know, this abhorrent fascist monster.

Speaker 2 (01:53:52):
Yeah. So I good an article from Jadie Hall and
he said cowardice And he said cowardice is I actually
called out and the end of Revelation as one of
the setting sins. And he goes, I think it is.
What characterizes the Christians in America today is a cowardice
because you don't want to take things on head on.
You know what I have. No, I don't play this

(01:54:12):
game of lesser to evils. I'm done with these evil people,
both parties. I have no interest in either one of them.
You know, they need to be opposed. They need to
not be supported for any reason, not even as a pullback.
That's that's the way I feel, and if we do
that enough, perhaps we would be able to find other

(01:54:34):
solutions outside the political sphere.

Speaker 4 (01:54:36):
Yeah, and of course, as you pointed out, there is
no hope in Washington. The amount of money it takes
to make a run at anything that will land you
in Washington is an astronomical sum. The general population is
not going to make an impact there. But you can
make an impact in your local elections. You can find
out who is running and who actually may represent your interests.

Speaker 2 (01:54:58):
Yeah, there and then swamped by out of state money.

Speaker 4 (01:55:01):
Yeah, like we had here with Frank Nicely. Again, he
passed away recently this year. He was a very He
was probably the best politician we had in the United
States as far as I'm aware, and he worked very,
very hard for the people of Tennessee.

Speaker 2 (01:55:18):
He was a solid guy. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:55:20):
Sew a guy and his family is very, very nice.
They're wonderful people and I'm so sorry for their loss. Yeah,
if you have someone like Frank Nicely, and you know
they're few and far between, do what you can to
keep them in there because they're needed more than ever
at the local level.

Speaker 2 (01:55:39):
And he was. He was not just a straight up guy,
but he also knew how these guys played the game too,
you know, he knew that when he was going to
go against them. One of the things is a farmer,
he knew what they were doing in terms of chicken.
He said, to load him up with arsenic to make
him gain weight, because they did sell the chicken by
the weight. And so he said, tried to expose that,

(01:56:00):
and he told me some of the things that they
did to him when he tried to expose that. His downfall,
I think was trying to stop out of state money
and these other politicians there in the state, they're getting
their bread buttered that way. So that bill did not pass.
Out of state money got him out. So they put
up a an avatar for them.

Speaker 4 (01:56:22):
Yeah, whatever that guy's name is, he's completely forget.

Speaker 2 (01:56:26):
I've never seen a race where somebody put up a website.
They tell you zero about what he does for a living. Now,
they tell you zero about his history, nothing about his family.
You know. Usually that's what sure is a warm body,
isn't he Usually they get a story about how, you know,
what they've been doing and how that uniquely qualifies them
to be your representative or something. This guy was just

(01:56:47):
anonymous practically, he had.

Speaker 4 (01:56:49):
Never done anything, he'd never appeared in the public eye before,
and then all of a sudden, the Walmart heiress is
granting him millions of dollars.

Speaker 2 (01:56:58):
He had no policies and had no background. This guy's
just put in place, and he was running the most
dishonest shill campaign I've ever seen. But anyway, enough about Frank. Yeah,
and it's sad to see that happen here. I had
really high hopes.

Speaker 4 (01:57:14):
We have another article here, have we passed peak social Media?
And I thought this was an interesting article and I
was excited reading it, but they bury the lead, so
I'm going to clue you in before you guys get
too excited. They said social media usage has gone down.
It's gone down across the board. It's going down until
you get to the very bottom. They say, well, not

(01:57:35):
in North America.

Speaker 2 (01:57:37):
So to me, as a.

Speaker 4 (01:57:41):
North American, this article was just like, oh, that's great,
that's one awe man, really darn it. But they're saying
across the board that in general social media usage has
gone down. Not in North America, though, of course, people
are becoming tired of it, and I think personally though,
they're being a little bit too optimistic. Things tend to

(01:58:02):
be cyclical. What becomes old people get tired of. You know,
kids love to look at the previous generation or the
previous generations go. Everything they liked is lame. I hate
whatever they like. You guys were on Facebook. Facebook is lame.
You guys were on Instagram. Instagram is lame. They're right,
but they're simply doing it because they like to despise

(01:58:25):
previous generations. They don't want to like whatever anyone else has.

Speaker 2 (01:58:29):
Liked before them, whatever the newest fad is.

Speaker 4 (01:58:31):
Yeah, so the problems become obvious. Yes, yeah, look look
what happened with them. And also, I'm sure you've all
seen it, but Jen Alpha has largely just been turned
over to iPads. It's kind of a meme at this point,
but there are entire just there is a huge portion
of Generation Alpha that has just been handed in iPad

(01:58:51):
since they could sort of function to keep them entertained,
so the parents don't have to deal with them. And
you'll see it when you go out, just you know,
a mom pushing a kid in a cart and he's
just got an iPad in front of him. He's and
so maybe they're not on social media as we think
of social media. Maybe they're not on Twitter or Facebook,

(01:59:12):
but they are just as addicted and obsessed to technology,
maybe even more so. Yeah, because at least, you know,
the previous generations, maybe they didn't have a smartphone or
a tablet in their hand from the time they could
hold it. You know, the millennials have their problems. I
will freely admit the millennials are whiny, entitled, annoying, pretentious.
All those things are true. But at least we got

(01:59:35):
to experience the world before the smartphone took it over,
before you know, the iPad was ubiquitous. And yeah, and
that's no fault of the Zoomers or Generation Alpha. That
is a fault of the people that are raising them.
So while this article seems to be painting hopeful trends,
I'm still skeptical. I'm always skeptical when people are like, well,

(01:59:57):
you know, I think people are turning around on technology.
Techno Ology advances eternally. It's forever incorporated further and further
into our lives, and you have to make specific effort
to remove it. It doesn't just simply get up and
walk away.

Speaker 2 (02:00:10):
Yeah, and we get something coming up about an ad
campaign from what was the dictionary people very Webster. Yeah
it's pretty cool. But anyway, the next article, pull this
up lance and show people. I love the graphic that
they did for this zero Hedge article. They said dating
app fatigue is emerging, and they show a picture of

(02:00:35):
a frowning, angry Greta right there, and it's like, I
guess you would want to swipe right or left? I
don't know which one is the rejection keep looking you
don't want to go on a date with her? Yeah?

Speaker 4 (02:00:50):
I do feel somewhat bad for Greta Thunberg because she
was a child and obviously used by these people, and
I tend to believe there is some thing mentally wrong
with her. She's not all there, and just to have
the entire world focused on you this way, you know?

Speaker 2 (02:01:12):
Yeah, I guess if you if you swipe in the
direction that's going to do reject. I don't know which
direction that is, but you're probably here. I can think,
how dare you dig?

Speaker 4 (02:01:22):
I feel bad for her, you know, she did. You know,
she bears responsibility for her own actions now that she's
an adult, but she was a child that got pulled
into this, and she has my pity, and I do
feel bad on some levels, but yeah, dating app fatigue.
I also wonder how much of this is just people

(02:01:45):
giving up in general.

Speaker 2 (02:01:46):
Yeah, that's true.

Speaker 4 (02:01:48):
Much of this is people looking at it going you know, well,
the divorce rate is you know, fifty sixty percent.

Speaker 2 (02:01:53):
Are they going back to the old ways or are
they having a network of people in the community, real
people that you meet and churches or college or communities
or workplaces or whatever, and they just you know, are
they going back to that? Are they just going it alone? Yeah?
With that rather than saying, well, I don't want to
mess with this.

Speaker 4 (02:02:10):
There's an entire movement of guys that go by migtow
men going their own way. They basically say, the divorce
courts are terrible. Everything is weighted against men. If you
get divorced, it's going to be the worst experience of
your life. They'll take everything from you. It doesn't matter
how good you were, and it's you know, to some extent,

(02:02:30):
they're right, it is. It is weighted against you in
divorce court. It will be a horrible experience.

Speaker 2 (02:02:35):
I grew up. Divorce is something people in Hollywood dead. Yeah.
And Donald Trump.

Speaker 4 (02:02:40):
However, I think going your own way and quitting and
just signing off is the wrong approach. I understand a
lot of these guys have been utterly screwed over, but
I think giving up is wrong. I don't think you're
supposed to do that.

Speaker 2 (02:02:54):
I think it's harder now, but you know, the possibility
is still there and it's worth looking for it because
they find the right person. It's the best thing you
could have in this life. I think certainly has been
in my case, and I'm glad that we you know,
I don't know if I would have used one of
these apps or not. Garan introduced herself to me. I've

(02:03:14):
seen you somewhere before, haven't I that's where he started.

Speaker 4 (02:03:17):
Well, I've been somewhere before.

Speaker 2 (02:03:21):
But I was kind of shy, and fortunately she wasn't,
so anyway, that was Yeah, it worked out just fine.

Speaker 4 (02:03:31):
It helps with when one of the people in the
relationship has a big personality.

Speaker 2 (02:03:37):
And we know which one it is in our case,
not me, and.

Speaker 4 (02:03:41):
Yet somehow you're the one that's on air. It worked
out this.

Speaker 2 (02:03:43):
Well, that's not that's going to really talk about things.
It's just that got angry about things. So but yeah,
this I thought was interesting too, you know, forget youthful brilliance.
The human mind actually peaks at sixty.

Speaker 4 (02:03:57):
It's nice to know there's still hope for me.

Speaker 2 (02:03:59):
Yeah. Well, well I guess even under this new article,
I'm still over the hill. That's about those ten years ago.
I'm done with that now. So and the bottom line
with this is that they're looking at it and saying, well,
you know, there's different types of intelligence. Right. We all
know that very very young kids are very quick to

(02:04:21):
pick up and memorize things. That's why, you know, traditionally
schooling would focus the early years of educational kids would
be focused on memorizing facts, and then you would start
to work on critical thinking and stuff like that later on. Right,
that's you get the rhetorical stage. But in grammar school,
you're just basically memorizing, you know, your letters, your off bet,

(02:04:45):
learning to read, you know, and things like that. But
later on you start to put the facts together. And
so what they're saying here is that even though your
memory span and your processing speeds start to decline line
after the early twenties, then there's still the accumulation of

(02:05:05):
knowledge and experience helps to build And that's another kind
of intelligence as well.

Speaker 4 (02:05:09):
You know, that's why it doesn't really matter how fast
you can think if you don't know anything to think about.

Speaker 2 (02:05:14):
I don't put too much weight on IQ tests and
things like that because there's different types of intelligence. You know,
what do you even First of all, are you accurately
measuring this? And secondly, what is it that you're measuring?
You know a lot of people can be that might
score high on an IQ test, might do well academically,
but they don't do well in terms of fixing something

(02:05:37):
or practical problem solving. So there's obviously different types of intelligence.
It's not to say that one is more important than
the other. And so that's what they're saying with this, yeah,
is that you know there's different types of not just intelligence,
but you know your your brain and cognitive ability differ
as well.

Speaker 4 (02:05:53):
Yeah, the cognitive of the difference in cognitive ability has
always been interesting to me because you know, you would
think that someone with a PhD, you know, there's the
pinnacle of intelligence, right or are they the pinnacle of compliance?
Are they simply the only people that are willing to
sit there and waste you know, ten twelve years of
their life getting a piece of paper instead of actually

(02:06:15):
going out and doing things. There's a matter of what
does this actually say about the person. Another thing that
I've always funder saying about PhDs is when you get
your PhD, allegedly you're supposed to have contributed something new
to the field, a new discovery, a new way of
interpreting data. You're supposed to have changed something. We give
out fifty five thousand PhDs a year across the board

(02:06:36):
for whatever you're studying. You're telling me fifty five thousand
times a year something is being changed, revolutionized, reinterpreted. I
don't believe it. This is a degree farm. I think
they just sit there and go, well, you put.

Speaker 2 (02:06:47):
It in, are making changes. It's called infication.

Speaker 4 (02:06:53):
I do not believe that the PhD system is this.
Oh he has a PhD. He must know he sat
there for ten to twelve years and gave them what
they wanted compliance, and they said, you're a good little boy.
You've given us two hundred thousand dollars. How much it is,
here's your piece of paper.

Speaker 1 (02:07:12):
You know.

Speaker 4 (02:07:12):
I'm sure there are a lot of brilliant people with PhDs.
I'm sure I'm not trying to say this across the board.
But personally, I think the PhD system is a scam
because there's no I.

Speaker 2 (02:07:20):
Think in general, what you're saying is that you know,
in educational institutions, and I know it was my case personally.
You know, it isolates you, makes you less social, and
it also kind of pacifies you in a way because
you're kind of spoon fed stuff. You know, that changes
a little bit with the PhD. And you know, it

(02:07:41):
was interesting when you looked at the way people were
reacting to all this COVID nonsense. Compliance continue to go
up with education level until you hit PhD, and there
you got to say that part of it is that
they would at least at that stage, they would start
trying to instill into them some critical thinking. You know,

(02:08:03):
that's part of it, you know, challenge what is.

Speaker 4 (02:08:06):
Raw until we have the raw intelligence looking to go,
wait a minute, this logically doesn't track. Yeah, this doesn't
make sense. But there's a certain conformity. That's what the
whole educational system was designed to create, was conformity to
things and to not have you think critically. It does
a very good job at it too.

Speaker 2 (02:08:23):
Well. You know, we say this is the other bookend
to that other article saying that your mental capacity peaks
at the age of sixty, but your entrepreneurship peaks now
between seventy and seventy nine.

Speaker 4 (02:08:37):
That's because that's when you've been able to save up
enough money under this horrific system that you can actually
afford to do something.

Speaker 2 (02:08:44):
I don't know, so maybe the best is yet to come.
But the life expectancy is seventy five for men. Now
you got five.

Speaker 4 (02:08:50):
Years to run a business, make it good, started, make
it go.

Speaker 2 (02:08:53):
Yeah, this is kind of the Colonel Sanders study. Colonel
Sanders didn't start his business until he is very late
in life. But yeah, this is what they want us
to believe now is at the new age of entrepreneurship
is between seventy to seventy nine.

Speaker 4 (02:09:10):
What a time to be alive. So guys, give me
just another forty fifty ish years and I'll have something
for you.

Speaker 2 (02:09:18):
Yeah. We Meanwhile, we got some comments for us, Yes
we do.

Speaker 4 (02:09:22):
MARKI Mark and in New Jersey, thank you very much, Marky. Mark,
he says, is mictow. I disagree. The only way to
fix the corrupt system is to bring it down. We
bring it down by not participating in it. I respectfully
disagree with this marking mark. I think there are times
and systems that it works for, but I think as
a whole, participating in the system of relationships, if you

(02:09:44):
want to praise it that way benefits. What is men
going their own way? It's oh a n acronym. Yeah, yeah,
it's I mean, I look back.

Speaker 2 (02:09:54):
On my life. You know, Karen and I have known
each other since we were eighteen, you know, and I
just think, you know, if she hadn't been around, how
lonely I would have been. It's worth that, It's worth
taking the chance. I would just recommend that to you,
and and just and you keep looking. There's a lot
of people out there, and a lot of fish in
the sea. They to tell the good.

Speaker 4 (02:10:15):
We don't know your story. Maybe you've had something horrible
happen to you. And if so, I understand, you know,
I won't I can't tell you that it'll all work out,
or that you know, getting out there you'll find someone.
I just think it's worth it. But I can understand
why you would. I can understand that people have terrible experiences,
especially with the way things are sitting.

Speaker 2 (02:10:36):
And the system has gotten a lot worse, and you know,
part of it is this educational system which is created
the kind of monstrous education and entertainment and things like
that's created the kind of monstrous attitudes, and any society
that we see.

Speaker 4 (02:10:49):
Gotten especially bad. You'll see these the animosity between men
and women is at an all time.

Speaker 2 (02:10:54):
High and deliberately. Yeah, And so in a sense, if
you try to bridge that gap, you are fighting the system.
Right to try to find somebody, and to find somebody
that is a way of resisting that system that wants
to atomize us and to segregate us from each other,
and to create that kind of animosity. So, in a sense,

(02:11:15):
that is fighting the system. You might think of it
that way.

Speaker 4 (02:11:18):
And I've said this before, but part of the reason
that guys like Andrew Tate and to some extent Nick
fuent Is get the audience they do is because they
look at the you know, disaffected male population and say
you have value, You're the people that build society, you
do great things, and it immediately gives them an in it.
Immediately all they've heard their entire life is you're the problem.

(02:11:41):
You're bad, your tendencies are bad. Everything you do is evil.
You know, it's built around society has become incredibly feminized.
It's built around keeping women, you know, busy and feeling
productive and happy, and it leaves men out in the
cold because men are more aggresis. You know, I have
a problem where I get very animated and loud when

(02:12:03):
I speak. I try to keep it toned down on
the show, but you know, it can be off putting
and intimidating and make women upset when I do this.
I've had this conversation before, and so it comes across
as if I'm bullying an intense which they don't like.
But if I don't get to express myself the way
that I want to, I don't want to engage with

(02:12:25):
the conversation. If I'm supposed to sit here and hold
myself this, it limits my ability to communicate and my
desire to want to communicate with people, And so I
under you know's it can be a difficult thing. Society
is definitely set up to cater to type of women.

Speaker 2 (02:12:41):
You know. I just think about that. The other day
I saw that I came up in music rotation since
I listened to some old music and stuff. There was
a play called How to Succeed in Business Without really trying,
and I saw that. My family went up to New
York and we went to that play when it was
on Broadway. I remember because I had to set on
a sack of They didn't have these seats left. That

(02:13:03):
was standing room only, and I wound up sitting on
a stack of programs in the back. And it was
a pretty miserable. But it had one memorable song, I
Believe in You, that sung to the guy by his girlfriend,
and I was thinking, would that ever be done today?
Never put that in any kind of entertainment. They would
never do something with a woman builds up the man.

(02:13:25):
You know, that would never be part of it. So
there's this animosity that is deliberately programmed into our society
between two people. So all I can say is just
resist that, fight against that, and swim against that stream.
I don't know how to give you any more advice
about that. You probably don't need any more advice from me.
But let's go to the other comments, because I got

(02:13:46):
to I want to get in here to the AI
and the impact that it's going to have on jobs
and on the economy. I think very significant new study that.

Speaker 4 (02:13:54):
Came out market Mark responds again, thank you again Markey, Mark,
we do appreciate it, and I appreciate that you are.
You know, we disagree, but you know you're very respectful,
and I'm trying to be respectful as well. He says.
Even if you have a good woman, now, what's to
say she won't change in ten to twenty years time.
If she falls into a group of feminist, divorced single
friends who hate men, her attitude will sync with them.

(02:14:14):
That is something that can happen.

Speaker 2 (02:14:16):
I would say that you know what you want to do,
and this is something that's happened with Karen and I.
You know, we had our you know, guys that I
ran with and girls that she ran with. And what
happens is you make yourself more important than that other
group that's out there. That's that's your best defense against that,
and you can do that, right I had. I had

(02:14:36):
guys that I used to had a car and they
didn't so used to hang around the three of us,
you know, all kinds of stuff on the weekend everything.
They really hated that I had a girlfriend that I
was spending so much time with and but it was
too late, and she had friends that thought that I
was just too straight. Completely too straight. I had. She

(02:14:58):
had one of her best friends from element school that
she still knew lived in the same neighborhood, came down
and she actually mocked the fact the way I was
holding the steering wheel. He's so proper with holding the
steering wheel. He's got his hands at ten o'clock and
two o'clock and it's like, well, how do you hold it?
That's the best control.

Speaker 4 (02:15:15):
So anyway here in the cigarette in the offhands.

Speaker 2 (02:15:19):
Yeah, yeah, she was. She was a smoke or too,
so we didn't get along. But it was too late.
She couldn't change care. They had been friends for a
very very long time before because they were next door neighbors.
But you know, you have to work on that, and
you have to work on it. You work on it
to you know, to honor the other person. And that's

(02:15:40):
a key thing about it, you know, you just you
invest in that other person's life. That's the key thing.

Speaker 4 (02:15:48):
Yeah, but thank you again for the comments, Mark. I
appreciate your perspective.

Speaker 2 (02:15:52):
And yeah, may God bless you and.

Speaker 4 (02:15:56):
Be my Valentine must be. Magga is under Stockholm syndrome
from trum in Lockdown's force vaccination and masks they're identifying
with their abuser, Audie m r R. The solution to
government is not more government. Well you say that, but
what if we just added a little bit more.

Speaker 2 (02:16:11):
That's always a solution they want to give us.

Speaker 4 (02:16:13):
Yeah, it hasn't worked before.

Speaker 2 (02:16:15):
It failed because we didn't have enough people. So we
need to grow my department here.

Speaker 4 (02:16:19):
We've had a few more idiots. We could really get
this going. Christian constitutional Conservative. I thought the Obama sick
events were bad, but maga Heites have taken cult following
to a whole new level. We've got the best cult,
the biggest. Yeah, they're the most brainwashed. You wonderful people,
absolutely brainwashed, believe everything I say. Brandon Grateful Baptist, please
pray for me as I battle tobaco addiction. It's been

(02:16:40):
six days I think since I smoked and it's just
really hard. So pray for Brandon Grateful Baptist. He also
asked for prayers before because he's dealing with some other ailments.

Speaker 2 (02:16:49):
Ye, I don't pray that God will bless you with that,
and he can. He can, he can fill that void.
I would just say, you know, deep into that and
it's an opportunity, you know, just like fasting is. I think,
you know, it really does. As you realize it's going
to focus your mind on that. And I would just say,

(02:17:11):
you know, study the religious aspects of fasting and how
that can focus your mind, you know, whenever the hunger
pains hit. It's a similar thing, although this is going
to be more intense, but it's the same type of
thing as a as a food fast that can be
very very beneficial spiritually.

Speaker 4 (02:17:31):
Liberty valiant. Venezuela is armed the teeth, Its citizens are
armed with the AK forty sevens, and the millions of
Americans going to Venezuela, they better bring a lot of
body bags.

Speaker 2 (02:17:39):
Well, it isn't like we've won any of these asymmetric
wars that we've gone into. People with it. It's crazy,
is it crazy? It's unjust.

Speaker 4 (02:17:48):
It's the key thing, Audi m Are. Our government does
not have constitutional authority to legislate morals, values or vices,
says Trump is going to turn the country into a
war zone perpetually occupied by its own military, and they're
using the guys of noble intentions to pull it off
like they always do.

Speaker 2 (02:18:03):
I mean, look at how they have militarized the police,
with swat teams all the rest of stuff. You know,
that was a real aberration coming out of La and
Darryl Gates, I think was a police chief. You know.
We wind up then with DARE programs all the rest
of this stuff, and it never goes away, It only
continues to build. That's the thing that really concerns me
about this as well.

Speaker 4 (02:18:21):
The only people I ever saw wearing DARE shirts were
the people that were obvious druggy burnouts wearing them. Ironically,
that's its lasting legacy, is being the chosen apparel for
druggies to let other people know liberty, valiant, yep, warp speed.
Trump showed us that he doesn't give a rats behind
about the public. He works for big pharma and the

(02:18:42):
corporate military complex. That's right, Yeah, need to scroll down
hal nine thousand. Albert Borla is a dear friend of mine.
We're making America healthy again, that's right, right, Doug. The
w seven the tetanus shot is the same way doctors
tell you that community lasts only ten years, so you
need boosters. It's ridiculous, Francine. I had one vaccine in

(02:19:02):
my life, and I spent one week under an oxygen
tent afterward, Liberty Valiant. Trump says he's worried about the
drug trade while warp speeding the clock shots that have
and are still killing people by the thousands, Guard Goldsmith.
Trump wants to consolidate the farms for corporate friends. That's right,
it's always absolutely it goes.

Speaker 2 (02:19:21):
Yeah, And to me, it amazes me because Trump did
this in his first term. Through he got into some
trade fights and the farmers paid the price. He knew
this was going to happen. And yet what has he done.
He's done one bailout to Argentina, he's about to do
a second bailout to Argentina, and he's thinking about helping

(02:19:41):
the farmers. And I don't think it'll be a help
to the farmers at all. Will be a help to
big AG and it won't be to the small farmers
at all, I'm sure. But he finally gets around to
doing something about it.

Speaker 4 (02:19:51):
Just like always, the big corporations will come in and
siphon off the vast majority of the money.

Speaker 2 (02:19:55):
Yeah, if this stuff wasn't just ad hoc off the cuff.
I just thought of this as afternoon type of thing,
which has been a long he never thought through any
of this tariff stuff, and if he'd thought through any
of it, and if he had cared anything at all
about his supporters, the farmers, he would have put that
program in place before he you know, ready to go

(02:20:17):
with it on day one when China drops, you know,
buying soybeans, one hundred percent drops it.

Speaker 4 (02:20:26):
Twenty twenty nine, Bill Gates owns the most farm land,
and Marx America stands to make millions to billions from
Trump's big friends funding. Yes, Liberty Valiant children now take
ninety six vaccines before they get out of grade school.
Ninety six. Imagine how messed up their natural immune system
is well Trucker Chris for the Wind Trump legally flooded
Texas with Indians Saturday. Liberty Valiant boiler admitted on camera

(02:20:50):
that he didn't take the COVID nineteen clot shot. What
are you crazy? I'm not going to put that in
my body.

Speaker 2 (02:20:55):
We ever tested it on a lizard yet those is
a throat pulsates.

Speaker 5 (02:20:59):
Enow Well, none o the mr and a stuff ever
made it past animal testing.

Speaker 2 (02:21:04):
So yeah, yeah, I don't know what an animal he.

Speaker 4 (02:21:08):
Is, but we don't know. It's beyond our comprehension, liberty,
valiant illegals everywhere. Best way to create chaos, civil wars
and dismantle the existing governments. Shelley A. How can you
have a digital ID if you don't have a cell
phone and you let your last paper ID expire, Well,
they'll track you down somehow, or you just won't be

(02:21:30):
able to do anything.

Speaker 2 (02:21:31):
Yeah, that's it. Yeah, I'll say that you have to
do this with the government, but then they won't let
you do it with the government. Yeah, well run into
some of that stuff in terms of business forms.

Speaker 5 (02:21:39):
Yeah, smartphone will be necessary while they're locking down smartphones.
Like just last month, Android made it so that you
had to have They got rid of all unapproved apps.
It has to be an app that goes through their
app store that they get a cut of the sales of.
It has to be proved Google or else. You can't

(02:22:01):
install it on Android anymore as of September.

Speaker 2 (02:22:04):
Well, you know, the other thing about all this the
digital ideas, is that it's all biometric, you know, And
so what happens when they hack the database and they
steal your biometrics and can fake your biometrics, You can't
get a new face. You know, that's one of the
things that people have brought up about this You're right, lanced,
is about control, and you know, the corporations want control,

(02:22:24):
they want monopoly, they want cash, and the government has
its own agenda for control. But they're helping each other.
It's called fascism. That's why it's going the way it is.

Speaker 4 (02:22:35):
Reverend Bill nineteen sixty I recalled twenty five years ago
they were going to import Chinese oil field workers to
Colorado because there were not enough US workers willing to
work the rigs. It's the same old, same old. There's
just not enough. I mean, there's not enough people that
will work for slave wages. Yeah, Big brit is back again.
They now have the guns back after backlash.

Speaker 2 (02:22:57):
That was about the chains bond.

Speaker 4 (02:23:01):
I was trying to figure out, like, what are we
talking about? Don't frag me, bro. The powers that be
are destroying all forms of popular culture. Is part of
the collapse into the great Reset fran scene. I learned
in school that every Greek soldier had a little boy
to you know what I mean. That aspect of Greek
life and culture has been greatly exaggerated. It's been the

(02:23:21):
work of a few scholars quote unquote that try to
make it seem as though that Greek was some oh,
homosexual paradise.

Speaker 2 (02:23:31):
It's like the Greek equivalent of the sixteen nineteen project.

Speaker 4 (02:23:34):
Yeah, there's a really good video by a guy called
Leather Apron Club on YouTube that talks about how overblown
it was. Briefly, I'll give you one little fact toy.
There was this guy that went in and you know,
there are multiple, multiple thousands of pieces of recovered pottery
with art on them, and he went in and he
very very loosely catalog well I think there's you know,

(02:23:57):
a few hundred of them that depict potentially homo se
sexual acts on them, and he did things like, well,
you know, he's holding his sword in a specific way,
and that's obviously meant to represent homosexual desire. And so
even by his exaggerated numbers, it's a small fraction of
the recovered pottery that would be considered homosexual. But when
you look at his methods, it shrinks to a dramatically,

(02:24:19):
dramatically tiny fraction of the recovered artwork that could even
be interpreted as potentially homosexual. They had slurs for homosexuality. However,
you want to think that, but if it was a paradise,
it wouldn't be a recorded fact that they had slurs.
Homosexuality was you know, if you were caught, they would
punish you by doing things to you. So it was

(02:24:41):
not a gay paradise. It's not what they want you
to believe.

Speaker 5 (02:24:44):
It was literally illegal. It was against the law to
be a homosexual, and there was a very horrific public
penalty for it. I'm not going to go into now.
If you are not being a homosexual. The whole thing
about young boys that were the uh in relationships with
the elite is the same thing that we're seeing currently.

(02:25:05):
It was something that the populace was disgusted by. It
was something that did happen to some extent, there's documents
of that, but it was not approved of.

Speaker 2 (02:25:14):
And homosexual marriage was never a part of any culture
in history, never part of that. Never did have homosexual
marriage anywhere.

Speaker 5 (02:25:23):
By modern standards, ancient Greece would be considered highly homophobic.

Speaker 4 (02:25:27):
Yeah, it would be full of hate crimes. Don't frag me,
bur responding front Seeds, have you actually verified that or
was your teacher a raging homo? In Niburu twenty twenty nine,
that it was between a fascist and a socialist. Absolutely nothing. Yeah,
Doug A do seven the iPad kids, That's what I
was talking about. High boost. Well boomers set their kids

(02:25:49):
in front of TV so they didn't have to watch them.
This isn't new. The thing is, you know, you couldn't
There wasn't always something on TV that you wanted to watch.
Eventually you run out of programming. People put on bat
shows with the iPad. There's a million different people on
YouTube or Twitch or any of these other sites where
you can go and continually find a new dopamine hit

(02:26:10):
your board of the old content. You can put in
a very specific search term to find something you want. TV,
while bad, was not this insane level of tailored, you know,
content for you. There's always something new on YouTube that
you can find if you want to waste your time.

Speaker 5 (02:26:28):
It is the same thing, but it's more concentrated.

Speaker 4 (02:26:30):
Yeah, it's you know, it's like going from you know,
marijuana to a hard drug. They're both technically drugs.

Speaker 2 (02:26:37):
Real.

Speaker 4 (02:26:37):
Jason Barker responding to out e m r R. We
should call it fed book. Don't frag me. Bro Micktao
is controlled Opposition for feminism both destroying marriage and the
creation of the family timed non tides. Greta Road the
flotilla to Possible Death against Genocide was tortured for a trouble.
You should probably praise her.

Speaker 2 (02:26:55):
Well, you know. The thing is, sometimes there are some
people that actually hurt your movement when they join it.
I would say about the digital ID stuff Before.

Speaker 4 (02:27:06):
I again, I want to make clear I do feel
bad for Greta. Her entire life has been scrutinized. She
has been made fun of for her appearance.

Speaker 2 (02:27:13):
Been used by her parents.

Speaker 4 (02:27:14):
And Yeah KWD sixty eight. Research used to be digging
into periodically in primary documents. Now it's Google slash AI.
Thinking is learning your talking points. Don't frag me. Bro
feminism is the spawning of man hate. Migtow is the
spawning of women hate. Both destroy the idea of a
loyal relationship to start a family. K towd sixty eight
signed the no fault divorce law in California. Governor Reagan

(02:27:37):
thinks Ronnie.

Speaker 2 (02:27:38):
Tell it was also divorced. Yeah, funny how that happens
is not married three times like Trump?

Speaker 4 (02:27:43):
But yeah, tunn of Lord in three three seven, don't
marry a woman who has such cheap convictions. You want
to find someone that has strong beliefs and that is
compatible with you. Don't be unequally yoked, Obermensch. I'm not
MiG Tao, but I keep looking for this wise woman
with high standards that a ton of Lord mentions and
no such luck. It can be.

Speaker 2 (02:28:03):
Difficult there, It can be. That's always been the.

Speaker 4 (02:28:05):
Culture has destroyed both men and women.

Speaker 2 (02:28:07):
Well, we're going to take a break and we come back.
We're going to take a look at AI and is
it really a threat to our jobs? Yes, but not
in a way that they've been telling you that it's
a threat to our jobs. We'll take a quick break
and we'll be right.

Speaker 1 (02:28:21):
Back defending the American dream. You're listening to the David

(02:31:04):
Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (02:31:07):
Welcome back, folks. Briefly, I would like to let you
know that Homestead Products dot shop, where you can use
promo co Night for ten percent off, is having a
sale on tumbleweeds. No, not the tumbleweeds that you see
in Texas, but the ones you can use to start fires.
This is what I use when I fire up my
charcoal grill. Makes starting it very easy. You put the
charcoal in the charcoal chimney, the tumbleweed underneath. You light

(02:31:29):
it and it does all the work. And I really
appreciate the fact that I do not have to put
lighter fluid or any of those other chemicals on the
charcoal and wait for it to burn off. I never
like doing that. I found it always ends up flavoring
the first batch of meat because I never wait long
enough because I'm impatient. Tumbleweeds worn't great, they're perfect for that,
and I've never used them to light a campfire, but

(02:31:49):
I assume they're excellent for that as well, if you
don't have enough dry kindling. But so pumble finally found
a good use for tumbleweeds exactly. They're not just for
Clint Eastwood anymore, folks. So Homestead Products Dot shop promo
could nite for ten percent off. They're having a sale
on the fire starter tumbleweeds.

Speaker 2 (02:32:08):
Well, I said. We talked about AI and it's impact
on jobs, and we just had a Yale study. They
found that the rate of change in the labor market
is very similar to when computers on the Internet became
widely adopted. You know, I had a friend of mine
whose father worked in a very heavily unionized situation. It

(02:32:29):
was with the trains, and they were very concerned that
the computers are going to take their jobs, right, and
so what they did this early days, I mean this
is like late nineteen sixties. It literally bragged about the
fact they put newspapers on top of the computer and
make it overheat so it wouldn't work. And then when

(02:32:50):
the guys came in to fix they take them off
and the guys, the engineer, the repairman came in, I
can't understand why this thing is working now, I don't
understand why it's not working before. Are very worried about
that back then with computers and then with the internet,
experts and executive has been predicting that AI models are
going to eliminate untold jobs. And we've seen a lot
of executives say, you know, doing mass firings and tech

(02:33:12):
and say, yeah, we don't need these people anymore. But
it turns out that that's self serving hype. While anxiety
over the effects of AI on today's labor market are widespread,
our data suggests or remains largely speculative, said Yale's Budget Lab.
The analy's job data from the past thirty three months
since chat GPT was released, the employment status of college

(02:33:34):
graduates and how exposed various groups of workers are to
AI tech, among other questions, and really it's like we
were saying before with the H one B visa, that's
really more of a threat to your jobs than AI,
certainly immediately. In one analysis, they compared three different groups
of workers who have varying levels of exposure to AI
technology high, middle, or low level, and they attracting changes

(02:33:58):
in their share of the workforce since chat GPT begin
in public. If AI is having any impact at all,
you'd expect a decrease in the high and middle exposure groups,
but that simply wasn't the case. In fact, the percentage
in each category hasn't budged much, suggesting that AI is
essentially a non factor, at least so far. In another analysis,
the team looked at the rate of change in the

(02:34:20):
composition of the American labor force and compared that data
to two separate time periods, when computers started gaining wider
usage around nineteen eighty four and the explosion in internet
entrepreneurship beginning around nineteen ninety six. The idea was to
measure whether AI is transforming the workforce in a historically resonant way. Surprisingly,
they found the rate of change in labor market's makeup

(02:34:41):
in the wake of AI closely matches the pace when
computers and the Internet were first taking off. In other words,
it doesn't appear to be more disruptive than those two technologies,
at least so far. Despite heavy hitters like Anthropics CEO
saying that AI will cause massive of people in the
world and that the entire sectors of jobs will be

(02:35:03):
lost forever. A lot of that is self serving hype
from the AI CEOs to get other people to buy
into their product, and some of the people who believe
that fired people, and yet it hasn't really turned out
that the AI could really take their place. The picture
of AIS impact in the labor market that emerges from

(02:35:24):
our data as one that largely reflects stability, not major
disruptions at an economy wide level. So what explains the
depressing job market? Again the hype from these self serving
AI CEOs, even though it leads much to be desired
in practice, they said, it's still too soon to tell. Maybe,

(02:35:46):
but so far they don't really see that happening. Meanwhile,
science fiction writer Corey doctor Rowe, who also has a
tech substack, says that the AI industry is about to collapse,
and this is something that was picked up by I
think it was Forbes that picked up his op ed piece.
He argues that the AI industry is propped up by

(02:36:07):
tech mega corporations that are selling a lie that AI
can replace human workers. He believes that when the bubble bursts, however,
it will have a significant impact on the economy, potentially
leading to widespread job losses and economic instability. There you go,
So AI really will cost you jobs because take the
economy down, not because it's going to be replacing people functionally,

(02:36:29):
and so he said. He spoke at recently and afterwards
he had a student come up, an undergraduate student, and
questioned him on the AI bubble. And the student said, so,
you're saying a third of the stock market is tied
up and seven AI companies that have no way to

(02:36:51):
become profitable, and that this is a bubble that's going
to burst and take the whole economy with it, asked
the student. And he said, yeah, that's right, okay, but
what can we do about it? He said, the bubble
is being propped up by tech mega corporations who are
now begging investors to come aboard now that their growth
potential is slowing to a halt. To court investors, the

(02:37:13):
monopolists are selling a lie that AI can replace human workers,
when in reality AI experiments are failing at ninety five
percent of companies that attempt them. He said, AI can't
do your job, but an AI salesman can one hundred
percent convince your boss to fire you and replace you
with AI that can't do your job. He says, when

(02:37:34):
the bubble bursts, the money hemorrhaging foundation models will be
shut off and will lose the AI that can't do
your job, and you'll be long gone. You'll either be
retrained or retired or discouraged and out of the labor market,
and no one will do your job. He said, I
like this quote. AI is the asbestos that we are

(02:37:56):
shoveling into the walls of our society are to send
that'll be digging it out for generations. Was in junior
high school. The building that we had it was all concrete,
concrete walls and concrete ceiling floor and everything, and then
for sound deadening, they sprayed the asbestos on it. Wasn't
for fire retardant or anything. They sprayed asbestos on the

(02:38:17):
ceiling and we used to play with that and we
would flick our pencils up and they would stick in
the asbestos. Most of the time they worked pretty well,
but we used to joke about how the building could
never be burnt down. It was concrete and the top
was covered with asbestos. But the joke is on us.
We were sitting there in this room with all this
asbestos there. I don't know what they're doing to that

(02:38:38):
school now, be curious to know if they went back
in and pay people big bucks to shovel that stuff out.
But that is a good analogy for what AI is.
The most important thing about AI isn't its tech capabilities
or its limitations, said doctor Row. The most important thing
is the investor story and the ensuing mania that is
teed up an economical catastrophe that harm hundreds of millions

(02:39:01):
or even billions of people. AI isn't going to wake up,
become super intelligent and turn you into paper clips, but
rich people with AI investor psychosis are almost certainly going
to make you much much poorer. And of course the
government will use it to do massive surveillance and control.
It is going to be a killer app for that,
that's for sure. Meanwhile, in terms of making you much poorer,

(02:39:24):
the AI data centers are skyrocketing people's energy bills, and
not only will it kill the economy, but it's going
to make electricity unaffordable. The expansion of data centers is
leading a surge of electricity demand. Wholesale energy prices have
already increased by up to two hundred and sixty seven
percent in the last five years, and it's going to

(02:39:46):
get worse. And we know it's going to get worse
because the big companies black Rock and Blackstone, which I
didn't realize used to be the same company. They split off.
One of them became Rocky, the other one became Stone.
It's like the Flintstone or something. I guess Marty Rubble
got the smaller company and Fred got the bigger company.
But actually not Fred, unfortunately, somebody not nearly as nice,

(02:40:10):
Larry Fink. And so you know, as this article points out,
these two guys are heavily involved in every globalist organization
where you're talking about the Council on Foreign Relations or Builderberg,
where Larry Fink is now the CEO replacing Klaus Schwab
or whether you're talking about the UN and all the
rest of these these guys are at the epicenter of this,
and this is a global agenda that's being put out there.

(02:40:33):
This means the cost necessary for network expansion and maintenance
is trickling down to residents and to businesses electricity bills.
And so they go through this long thing talking about
the how many entire utility companies have been bought by
these two companies over just the last few years. They said,
Bloomberg projects the data center of power demand will double

(02:40:54):
by twenty thirty five. That would be equivalent to just
shy of ten percent in the total electricity demand of
the country, and it would be the biggest increase since
air conditioning became popular in the nineteen sixties. And they said,
in both of these things carry climate change implications. Well,
that's a joke, but I tell you that air conditioning

(02:41:15):
certainly changed. Was a climate change for made living in Florida.
It was a very welcome climate change. I'd had enough
of the warming. It seemed like it was warming year
around until we got the air conditioning. It was climate
change for the better. But yeah, it's going to be.
It's always the big companies that are coming in and
they are buying up these you told these one after

(02:41:36):
the other, and there's been some pushback in some areas,
but once they get them, you can bet that they're
going to raise the rates. More than we're seeing right
now is really going to explode. And there's also the
water issue that is there. And as Larry Fink has bragged,
he is all about pushing ESG, environmental, social and governance factors.

(02:41:59):
Quoted in twenty seventeen in discussion hosted by The New
York Times, he said, behaviors are going to have to change,
and this is one thing that we're asking companies. You
have to force behaviors. And at Blackrock we are forcing behaviors.
That's why everybody points out a lot of this DEI
stuff and LGBT stuff is being driven by Larry Fink

(02:42:23):
and Blackrock and it absolutely is that is his agenda
that he's putting out there. Meanwhile, we have AI now
endangering tourists by sending them to nonexistent landmarks and hazardous locations.
And they point out, we've seen this once before when
you had have you seen the.

Speaker 4 (02:42:41):
Great obelisk of O Block in Chicago. It's really worth
you got to go see it.

Speaker 2 (02:42:45):
I remember the story is when people when it first
started becoming popular, and people started using their phones for
driving directions instead of using physical maps or talking to people,
and a couple of those things, people got sent out
into wilderness areas and stuck. And one particularly bad example,
there was a couple and they were so hell bent

(02:43:08):
on following Google directions that even though there was a
bridge that was out, they were working on it and
they had all these cones up there and everything that
Google told them to keep going. So they went around
the coin cones and they went over the edge of
the bridge and I think they both survived, but he
was hurt, very, very seriously. And it's just always garbage

(02:43:29):
in and garbage. This is a dangerous thing though. It's
that kind of blind obedience to it that we know
is going to have the big effect with AI on
certain people. They're going to believe whatever the AI tells them.
That's why it's so effective as propaganda. It's going to
make a very credible case to them.

Speaker 4 (02:43:46):
At least before the map apps wouldn't make up a
destination for you to go, you could look at it.

Speaker 1 (02:43:52):
Go.

Speaker 4 (02:43:52):
I don't think this is right. The AI is making
up monuments or whatever it is and say, oh, you
should really go check it. Look at this thing, you should?
Don't you want to go see it?

Speaker 2 (02:44:02):
Yeah? And the case that they give here is a
couple of tourists are in Peru. They were going to
go to a non existent sacred canyon of human tay
in the Andes Mountain and a local tour guide overheard
them talking and so there's no such thing as that.
He got very scared about. He says, this is really

(02:44:23):
a dangerous area to go. And there's nothing there either.
So maybe that was the problem with El Dorado and
the early explorers. You think they looking for the Fountain
of youth they had maybe it was an AI hallucination
or something.

Speaker 4 (02:44:41):
We've been assured that the Fountain of Youth is here
and El Dorado is right next to it.

Speaker 2 (02:44:47):
Yeah, so anyway, wait.

Speaker 4 (02:44:49):
A minute, it's all human sacrifice.

Speaker 2 (02:44:51):
This is the one I mentioned earlier, and I really
like this. This is Miriam Webster's announcement of its new
AI model. They said it is the dawn of a
new AI err and they've actually put out a little
bit of a commercial there. So we're proud to introduce
our latest large language model. And this is what they're

(02:45:13):
talking about here.

Speaker 9 (02:45:14):
It is the dawn of the AI era, and we
are proud to introduce our latest large language model. This
LLM has over two hundred and seventeen thousand rigorously defined parameters.
It never hallucinates, it does not require a data center,
and uses no electricity. It's a powerful tool that will

(02:45:37):
change how you communicate forever.

Speaker 7 (02:45:41):
There's artificial intelligence, and there's actual intelligence.

Speaker 2 (02:45:47):
AI actually intelligent. That's their collegiate dictionary that they're coming
out of this year. That's an intelligent commercial there. I
like that a lot. And that's actually a relatively small dictionary,
that collegiate dictionary. I have somewhere a dictionary from the
nineteen fifties that has over six hundred and fifty thousand
words in it, and the print is microscopic, and the

(02:46:11):
book is about this thick it is.

Speaker 5 (02:46:14):
It's right above treviis.

Speaker 2 (02:46:16):
Oh, oh up, there is that it? Yeah. Anyway, I
picked that up at a used bookstore. I thought it
was interesting, and one of the things I looked up
was the term gay. I thought I knew that when
it was done in the nineteen fifties, that was not
a term, and of course that was so then I
looked up homosexual and guess what. That wasn't in the dictionary,

(02:46:39):
even though it had six hundred and fifty thousand words.
The word homosexual was not to be found anywhere. And
so they had sodomy there, but they didn't have anything else.
And so you realize when I when I looked at it,
I started looking at the timeframe. I realized just how
quickly they went from a pejorative term to a neutral term.

(02:47:00):
And then as soon as they got to the neutral term,
it took no time at all for them to go
to a positive term gay, you know. And that's just
the way they use the labels and use the language.

Speaker 4 (02:47:10):
It's also generally just how things work. It's difficult to
get someone to remove a negative opinion, but if you
have them in a neutral spot, it is much much
easier to shift them in the positive.

Speaker 2 (02:47:20):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:47:21):
Once you overcome the negative, it's very very rapid.

Speaker 2 (02:47:24):
It's like your transmission. You gotta neutral. You can't go
from going and drive to reverse. And it doesn't like that. Well,
they pointed out this has got five thousand brand new
spanking words like riz, beast mode, doom scroll, and dumb phone.
And then they said, what a time to be alive. Yeah,

(02:47:44):
this hot new lingo that we're sure will age just
as fine as the current bout of AI quackery. So
it's going to go the way of all fads, I guess.
And speaking of AI quackery, this chat GPT update that's
been done by open Ai, the chat GPT four oh
has really upset a lot of people who had AI

(02:48:07):
boyfriends and girlfriends, but especially the women. The women had.
They're hearing more from women who had AI boyfriends. And
now what chat GPT did was they dial this back,
so it's not as conversationally.

Speaker 4 (02:48:22):
Jam set that they're perfect. Man that always tells them
they're right and justifies everything they do has vanished.

Speaker 2 (02:48:28):
That's right. Yeah, I feel frauded, scammed and lied to
by Open Ai. And they're crying about this on social media,
and as you can imagine, they get ripped ratioed on
all this stuff, and so said that many couldn't help
but mock the user's grief for her faue digital boyfriend

(02:48:50):
pointing out the absurdity of mourning for something that clearly
isn't sentient. Create an imaginary friend. It's in your head, girl,
It's free, said one user. Updates made the company's AI
chatbots less personable and friendly flirty. The outcry was so
inflamed that open Ai even partially reversed course and made

(02:49:10):
some previous models available again after initially planning to nix
them entirely. But they said still not the same as
it was. They needed to do that because I had
several lawsuits against them. Some kids got these things, and
one boy had an AI girlfriend that they believe led
him to commit suicide. So that's what got them to

(02:49:32):
pull back. So she writes out, open Ai, please feel
free to toss yourself off the nearest cliff. I guess
these girls are going to have to go back to
romance novels, the fantasy life.

Speaker 4 (02:49:44):
The romance novel scene is horrendous as well. Yeah, if
you thought it was bad before, if you have not
paid attention to the quality of the female romance novel
over the years, it is it is horrendous.

Speaker 2 (02:49:58):
I won't really bad. Decades ago, they did a movie
called Romancing The Stone of Michael Douglas, which has kind
of revolved around that whole fantasy world.

Speaker 4 (02:50:06):
It has become so perverse and disgusting that it's broken containment.
It has gotten so bad that multiple people have had
to comment on it just with are women okay, this
is what you read? It is horrifying, It isn't horrible.

Speaker 2 (02:50:23):
Well, the co founder of Rumba, the robot that vacuums
up here, says that Elon Musk is in for a
terrible surprise with humanoid robots. And you know, we've got
a video of a way Mo taxi that is actually
driving around as if it was a Look at this.
This is time lapse, so you see this thing's picked

(02:50:44):
up a passenger and this way More taxi and it
is circling the parking lot over and over and over
and over again till finally it leaves. But it works
very much like a Rumba, except it's not doing anything
except literally going into circles. He suggests that humanoid robots
will eventually evolved a half wheels or other forms that

(02:51:05):
are more practical for specific tasks. Well, like his Rumbo,
they will still suck what they're doing here. So Elon
Musk is looking at his robot venture his optimist adventure,
and he thinks that it's going to be much bigger
than Tesla and the car company. And he actually might
be right, because it doesn't necessarily mean that optos robots

(02:51:28):
are going to get that big. It could be that
this Tesla business shrinks because it's been shrinking very rapidly.

Speaker 5 (02:51:33):
Or maybe you're saying that, like Tesla, he'll own a
tiny percentage of the humanoid robot market, but everyone will
pay disproportionate attention to him because of it.

Speaker 2 (02:51:43):
Yeah. Yeah, he thinks it's going to bring in ten
trillion dollars in revenue. He thinks he's going to be
bigger than Nimvidio whatever. But not everybody's convinced that pouring
all this kind of money into robots just so that
they can and replace a made is going to make
that much of a difference. And so the Rumba co

(02:52:06):
founder said, we will have plenty of humanoid robots fifteen
years from now, and they'll look like neither today's humanoid
robots nor as humans. He said. The difficulty of simulating
human touch is one of the big deals that and
just limb dexterity in robots, he said, despite many hands
that are modeled on human hands, with articulated fingers having

(02:52:27):
been built over the last few decades, human like dexterity
has remained very tricky. To think that we can teach
dexterity to a machine without understanding what components make up touch,
without being able to measure touch sensations, and without being
able to store and replace touch is probably dumb and
an expensive mistake. Yet again, you know, when I look
at this, we always don't think about how complex our

(02:52:54):
human bodies are and what God has done to design
them until you start to try to imitate hate it.
And I guess that was one of the things when
I had the stroke that was really hit me because
I lost control of my left side of my hand.
It's like I couldn't you know, I'm like fighting this thing,
you know, and go to wash my hair the first time,

(02:53:15):
you know, get in the showering up, put my left
hand up, and it's just it's not doing anything like move, move,
you know, it's not moving. I mean, you don't think
about your body. Everything is on autopolit and it's so
sophisticated you really don't think about it until something happens
to you or until you try to replicate what God
has done. Tesla has been struggling, in fact, with technical

(02:53:37):
problems related to Optimus's hands, causing production to fall far
behind Musk's goal of producing five thousand of the robots
this year. Other companies it looks like we'll do that.
Chinese company is going to do that unitry, but perhaps
their goal is not to have as much functionality as

(02:53:58):
Musk is trying to put in. He says, legs will
also end up being a costly distraction. So yeah, arms
and legs, these are the issues with robots.

Speaker 4 (02:54:09):
That whole general human thing is very difficult.

Speaker 5 (02:54:12):
We got the whole torso idea down too, well, that's
the easy part.

Speaker 2 (02:54:17):
Yeah, what do we attached to it to move it around?
That was what Einstein said. He said, all I ask
in my body is that it moved my head around.
You know. Well, that's all they're asking. Maybe they're asking
a little bit more in asking too much of these robots.
Before too long, he said, we'll see the human robots
will start to get wheels for feet at first two
and then maybe later with more, and we'll have nothing

(02:54:39):
that any longer resembles human legs in a gross form
but they'll still be called humanoid robots. We've already seen
that with those that Chinese robot that can lock the
wheels and just kind of walk on it and then
run the wheels, you know, in various pits. And I
think that's a real video. I don't think that that
is AI.

Speaker 4 (02:54:59):
I don't do you guys think looked fairly rude to me.
I didn't notice anything.

Speaker 2 (02:55:03):
I think it's real. I think it would have been
auded by now. Well, I guess you know, this kind
of goes back to I guess doctor Smith from Lost
in Spaces onto something with that robot, you know, it
add wheels, danger Will Robinson, danger and danger Will Robinson.
We have financial danger on the horizon here. Oh.

Speaker 4 (02:55:22):
Also, briefly in chat, I saw Nibrew twenty two and
nine said that silver just passed it's all time high
under Obama.

Speaker 2 (02:55:29):
Hmmm, oh that's good. Yeah, that's yeah. I don't think
we're not going to get to the We're not going
to get to the money stuff today, but that is
an important thing. We'll get to that tomorrow. I'll finish
up with this. New data shows that way moo's are
so safe that it's almost comical. I'd say they're so

(02:55:49):
safe that it is maddening to the people that have
to live with them. Just as we saw that Waymo
going around and around in circles. How many times have
we seen way moo's blocking these taxis blocking people? And
why is it that people hate them? It isn't because
the way mos are ramming into them. It's because it
goes so slow that you can set a coffee cup,
an open coffee cup on the dashboard and not have

(02:56:11):
it spill on you. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (02:56:12):
Yeah, everyone hates them. They stand out and that makes
them kind of safe. But the better way to put
this would be that they're so comical they're almost safe.

Speaker 2 (02:56:20):
Yeah, almost safe. Yeah, that's right. Uh, just switch that
headline around a little bit. Well, you know, they they
get paralyzed and frozen at a four way stop. It
does help that they got that big thing on them
that is visible. That's a bigger warning than if you
have somebody that's a student driver. What it's doing there

(02:56:42):
is no driver in this car is they'll give it
a lot of room, so that helps as well. People
like crowding it. So they're bragging about their safety record.
And one guy who is a lawyer that works for
the self driving car company is very self servingly said,
I like to tell people that if Weimo worked as
well as chat GPT, that all be dead. So you know,
we're doing this much better than chat GPT.

Speaker 4 (02:57:05):
Not a high bar realistically.

Speaker 2 (02:57:08):
Well, you know the other part of the thing is
that you know they have not they typically they don't
take them on the interstate where you'd have a higher speed.
It's just around town where they're an obstacle and they're
blocking emergency vehicles who can't get to sick people or
put out fires or things like that. All go to
one intersection and hang out all day and block that intersection.

(02:57:29):
So they do have their issues. They are far from perfect,
so why they've had so much of a pushback. Pushback
is not coming from people who are going to taxi
drivers who are going to lose their jobs them. Pushback
is coming from the people who have to live with them.
As a matter of fact, this one family is baffled
by way more robotaxis. They constantly hang out in front

(02:57:50):
of their house, so they find their preferred places. It
might be one intersection, might be one family's house and
they just hang out there. But It reminds me of
what I said. I think it was last week. I
was talking about that driver who is very slow that
I carpooled with and how dangerous she was, and she
drove very very slowly. She drove like a weay mow.

(02:58:12):
And but you know, if you are a really bad driver,
the speed can amplify it. But the real thing that
kills is not speed. It's in attention and inability. That's
the really key thing.

Speaker 4 (02:58:23):
Well, as Jeremy Clarkson said, it's not the speed that
gets you, it's the sudden stop.

Speaker 2 (02:58:28):
That's right. That's right. They would know something about that, wasn't.

Speaker 4 (02:58:31):
They Speeds never killed anyone. We have high boos says
no offense. But AI isn't going to collapse. It's only
getting bigger by the minute.

Speaker 2 (02:58:41):
Well, just like the Internet didn't collapse. But the dot
com bust was real. Right, And again, as I said before,
I personally learned that lesson the hard way, you know,
looked at it's like, yeah, the Internet is absolutely real,
it's going to be huge, And yes it is huge.
It did get very very big. However, the hype can
get ahead of the reality. And that's what we're talking

(02:59:04):
about once the hype gets ahead of the reality, and
once you've poured so much money into these few companies,
and Nvidia is already several different It's not just the
opped piece that I read, but several different financial publications
have picked up on this circular investing where they're loaning money.
They got so much money on the stock market, they're
loaning money to their customers to buy their product, to

(02:59:27):
inflate their sales so that people will buy their stock.
That's the circular aspect of it. That's the bubble aspect
of it, and that I think will bust. And so
much money has been poured into just a couple of companies,
that's the entire market, and if people run for the
exits in a panic, that's going to create a lot
of problems.

Speaker 4 (02:59:46):
Well, folks, r out of time. I want to remind
you again. You go to Homster Products dot shop, the
having a sale and their tumbleweed fire starting to go
check that out. I'm going to think apsradio dot com
as well, So go check out APS radio.

Speaker 2 (02:59:58):
And David Night dot cold. Take you to tony Ard
and get some of that silver. It's going to continue
going up, and gold as well are going to both
continue to go up. Factors haven't changed. Have a good day,
the common man. They created common Core and dumbed down

(03:00:23):
our children. They created common Past to track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we

(03:00:47):
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll

(03:01:09):
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2110: Trump’s Martial Law Order Blocked

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2110: Trump’s Martial Law Order Blocked

Stuff You Should Know