Thu Episode #2078: Inflation Lies: Food + Power Costs Exploding

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:45):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's the twenty first of August.
If our Lord twenty twenty five, they were going to
take a look at a mixed bag of good and
bad news about the climate. Mcguffin. Yes, they are still
our grid apart like grimlins on a plane, but there's

(01:06):
a couple of positive moves that are happening with it.
We're going to take a look also at more politics.

Speaker 3 (01:12):
It is now.

Speaker 2 (01:14):
Rumored that there is a rampant hypocrisy about the LGBT
within the GOP. Who would have thought that the party
that protects pedophiles, whether it's Jeffrey Epstein or whether it's
Israeli cybersecurity guy, who would have thought that they would
be closeted. So we're going to be right back, stay

(01:34):
with us. Well, I want to wish Travis happy birthday.

(02:12):
Yet today is his birthday and he's working.

Speaker 3 (02:14):
On his birthday. Thank you, Travis. Where would you like
to start here? I'll give you the choice. Make a wish.

Speaker 4 (02:21):
Let's go with the green agenda stuff.

Speaker 3 (02:22):
That's all same, Okay, that's why I started. I guess, yeah,
we have.

Speaker 2 (02:26):
The USDA Secretary, Brooke Rawlins was in Tennessee for the
State Fair and she made an announcement that they're going
to stop funding solar panels all over fertile farmland. Did
you know they were doing that? The USDA was actually
subsidizing solar panels to destroy farmland. Yeah, feed the AI,

(02:52):
but don't feed the humans. That's really what this is
all about. Who knew they were doing this? And I
talked about this in the UK and we showed pictures
of the massive numbers of solar panels there that are
just covering everything. It's truly amazing. So the USA will
no longer subsidize that putting solar panels on productive farmland

(03:17):
to destroy it, or allow solar panels manufactured by foreign
adversaries to be used in department projects. They're still going
to be subsidizing it, but they'll be subsidizing it with
taxpayer money for American crony capitalism.

Speaker 3 (03:32):
That's what they'll be doing. So that's the good news
from Broke.

Speaker 2 (03:35):
Rawlin, noting how solar panels on farmland nationwide have increased
nearly fifty percent since twenty twelve.

Speaker 3 (03:42):
Let's see who the president has been since twenty twelve.

Speaker 2 (03:45):
Trump was one of them, and he didn't do anything
to stop the solar farms replacing food farms.

Speaker 4 (03:54):
I mentioned this for but my wife and I go
back to Texas to visit her family fairly frequently, and
along the side out of the road a lot of
the time, there's just these giant farm fields and I've
seen so many solar panels in them.

Speaker 3 (04:07):
Now, Yeah, you know.

Speaker 4 (04:08):
Things I never used to se when we were a kid.
We took quite a few cross country trips when we
were younger, and just something you didn't see. You'd occasionally
see those giant windmills because they've been around a long time.

Speaker 2 (04:17):
And that really does create the strange illusion when you're dry,
because they're so large, it creates a strange per sey.

Speaker 4 (04:23):
Am I getting any closer to this at all? Don
Quixote's mind would have boggled at them.

Speaker 3 (04:29):
Yeah, this is when you look at it.

Speaker 2 (04:32):
It's yet another cost that people have not really factored
into it, solar panels, in the fact that they are
getting rid of farmland, getting rid of trees, forests and
things like that, cutting them down in order to put
solar panels up. It's another one of these things that
really hasn't gotten sufficient exposure.

Speaker 5 (04:52):
And that's the cost everyone has to pay, the increase
in food costs as they replace these fields.

Speaker 2 (05:00):
Food costs are exploding. The thing is that when you
look at all these different things, even the fact that
the wind and solar does not have the kind of
inertia that power generators did, and that's created a whole
new level of problems. If they're concerned about warming, getting

(05:21):
rid of trees is the wrong thing to do, but
of course that's now starting to become the new fashion.
We have to cut down the trees and bury them.
I wonder why they made that switch. Could it be
because they want to support putting solar panels out in various.

Speaker 4 (05:35):
Places having funerals for trees.

Speaker 2 (05:38):
Now, well, Bill Lee made a statement the governor Tennessee
saying yeah, we're going to stop doing this. But what
he really needs to do is he really needs to
tell the TVA, the Tennessee Valley Authority to stop going
down this renewable These are people who the upper echelon
of the TVA are getting paid literally millions of dollars.

(06:00):
The CEO got paid like eight or nine million dollar salary.
It's seen the kind of money that this power company
that is part government and part private. It's this weird thing,
kind of like the Federal Reserve and the CDC. But
they're moving very quickly to put in battery energy storage

(06:21):
sites best. This is what Elon Musk is selling. And
these are massive conglomerations of batteries which, guess what, they
can spontaneously combust and burn all of our homes and
forest land and farms down all at the same time.
But they're taking a victory lamp for the USDA, saying

(06:44):
it's a testament to Department's determination and taxpayer support for unaffordable,
unreliable green energy sources and ensure that this pie chain
consists of American products and manufacturing. Well, we'll see if
they can still manufacture them with a tariffs in place.
But just like the UK, the US is imposing renewable
energy and charges consumers for creating unreliable and costly energy supply.

(07:11):
And the largest regional transmission organization in the United States
is one that involves Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland Interconnection. It
began with just those three states, but now it provides
the power for thirteen states. All are part of the
power for thirteen different states. They call it PJM as

(07:34):
in Pennsylvania, Jersey, and Maryland. And now what is happening
with it part is seems kind of like, you know
the tariff issues that Trump had, where there's this additional
layer of problems that are brought on by the indecision
as to whether or not he's going to move forward
to the tariffs of what level it's going to be.

(07:55):
That's what they're coming up with with the renewables, they said,
it's a reliance on renewables. It's created a juggling act
with a backlog or projects waiting for transmission lines, waiting
for grid storage to that wonderful battery energy storage system
that must wants to do, and higher costs and reduced
reliability for consumers. See one of the things is when

(08:17):
you start building these remote power generation areas like the
solar farms or the windmill farms, you got to run
the power lines out to it. And when they did
that in Texas to make the grid unreliable there, it
costs billions of dollars that were paid for by the
state to subsidize these formerly oil rich billionaires who then

(08:40):
jumped over into the quote unquote renewable. They wanted to
run the power lines out to them so they could
sell power and make profits.

Speaker 3 (08:48):
So it's an amazing grift.

Speaker 4 (08:50):
Labor green scam is what caused the massive Texas freeze.
Well not the freeze itself, but the problems with it.
There are these windmills up and relying on them for power. Yeah,
and they play these word games like, oh, well, technically
the windmill didn't freeze. It was the pro pane that
would defrost the windmill that froze.

Speaker 2 (09:07):
Or we didn't pay for the option that would have
defrosted it because we didn't think we'd need it, you
know that type of thing.

Speaker 4 (09:14):
Yeah, either way, it's an issue with the windmills themselves.
You don't have these issues with the power plants.

Speaker 3 (09:20):
Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (09:21):
When we first moved to Texas, they were real busy
shutting down power plants that were fully functional, had a
lot of life left in them. But they were using
coal and oil, which Texas has in abundance of the oil.
But this is something This is an article from the
UK and they point out that as much as they've
seen this in the UK. It's also happening in the US.

(09:44):
It's happening everywhere. They said, a similar plans being followed
on both sides Atlantic. Are we seeing the rollout of
a global plan or is it just a coincidence? I
think it's a conspiracy. Frankly, the media has been taking
extensive talking extensively about New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy's energy plan,
saying it will do little, if anything, to quote unquote

(10:04):
save the planet, and it's a bad idea and will
in fact unnecessarily raise electricity prices for millions. Here's a
headline example, a green new headache. Democrats flee Governor's green
energy master plan as election approaches. Insane energy policies are
set to burn Democrats in New Jersey and New York. Also,

(10:27):
what makes Jersey run Your growing energy bill is a
growing issue in the governor's race. The question is when
are people going to push back against this. PHAM doesn't
generate power. It's actually a regional transmission organization. It doesn't
have any power lines, it doesn't have any power plants,

(10:49):
it has no substations. It's kind of like an air
traffic controller of the grid, coordinating the flow of electricity
across eighty eight thousand miles of high voltage transmission, managing
more than fourteen hundred power generators, and pulling the levers
of gigantic energy marketplaces where you're told he is buy
the electricity delivered to your living room. And part of

(11:11):
why this is exploding so quickly in cost, and it
has exploded. It's gone from twenty nine to ninety two
per megawat per day to three hundred and twenty nine
megawatts per day at three hundred twenty nine dollars megawatts
per megawat day for twenty twenty six, so it's gone
from twenty nine dollars to three hundred and twenty nine dollars. That, folks,

(11:35):
is an elevenfold increase. And what is causing that is
not that the cost of electricity has gone up, but
it's a lot of uncertainty costs. As I said before,
it's very much like the tariffs that are out there.
We have a government that's going to operate by FIAT
and tell people do this, make this happen, and do
it now whether or not it can happen, and it's

(11:57):
created chaos and confusion throughout our economy from the tariffs
to the power generation. They said, suddenly one fifth of
your bill is just capacity, meaning a backup for things
that don't work when it's cloudy, when it's calm, or
when it's dark. Right, so if the wind is not
blowing or the sun is not shining, you've got to

(12:18):
have backup. And that's where Musk comes in. He's going
to make tremendous amounts of money for his backup capacity.
So New Jersey, like every other Green leader, is retiring
gas plants and nuclear units as a matter of policy.
I thought they had just given their new seal of

(12:38):
approval to nukes so that they could have AI power,
but that's still not they haven't gotten the memo in Jersey.
I guess they're pinning their hopes on renewables that still
don't have transmission lines or grid storage. There is one
hundred and forty three gigawatt backlog, like.

Speaker 3 (12:56):
The professor would say, jigawats Marty.

Speaker 2 (13:00):
That's huge, and their project queue, most of it wind
and solar, waiting for approval and to even get started
building it. And so there's lawsuits, there's bureaucrats, there's regulatory
things that have to be done before they can get
this stuff moved, and that's that kind of indecision, that expense.
And even without that stuff there, they have jumped the

(13:21):
electricity prices by eleven times higher. Now tell us in
the wildcard the AI Data Center gold Rush, what used
to be a footnote on the demand page now accounts
for four percent of total load with a straight trajectory
to twelve percent by twenty thirty. In other words, it's
going to triple as well. And so you've got to

(13:44):
pull out all the stops and rush this stuff through,
grease it with extra money so that we can have
a sufficient capacity for AI to grow. That's only going
to increase the cost as you try to do it
faster and faster.

Speaker 4 (13:57):
It's truly just amazing, because it'd be bad enough it
was simply going to be sucking up all the energy
for non nefarious purposes. But these things are going to
be used to track us and control us at all times.
So not only are they going to deny you air conditioning,
but what they're going to deny you for is also
going to restrict your freedoms. They're going to crush you
in multiple ways. The AI Data centers are going to

(14:17):
be such a burden and a blight on the American people.

Speaker 2 (14:21):
Yeah, the average bill there in that area that's served
by PJAM is now twenty percent higher than the national average.

Speaker 3 (14:30):
It's going to soar even more.

Speaker 2 (14:32):
And business owners are seeing twenty eight hundred dollars monthly
charges for mid size operations. All the while billions and
clean energy projects, offshore wind storage farms, hydrogen pilots are
being canceled nationwide. Fourteen to twenty two billion dollars and
twenty twenty five alone were canceled due to political uncertainty

(14:55):
and people looking hard at the real cost of these renewables,
as well as the vanishing tax credits and the politics.

Speaker 3 (15:04):
Involved in it.

Speaker 2 (15:05):
These things would never exist if it was market driven,
if it was driven by efficiency and competition, they would
never exist. And it is all based on a phony crisis.

Speaker 3 (15:16):
That's the worst thing.

Speaker 2 (15:18):
What is the worst thing about this The fact that
they're going to use the AI stuff. It's going to
really ramp us up to surveil us in the fact
that this is all just a phony mcguffin.

Speaker 4 (15:29):
The energy is used to spy on us, and in
such small portions too.

Speaker 2 (15:33):
Yeah, that's the joke about the two old ladies came
out of the restaurant and one said the food was
horrible and the other one said yes, and then such
small portions as yeah, the electricity is unreliable and yes,
and it's so expensive as well. So this is the
state of where we are right now. We see that

(15:54):
they're bragging about pulling back the green mcguffin, and yet
not all of that is under the troll the federal government.
Much of it is happening because the federal government has
subsidized and pushed that, and so just pulling back some
of the subsidies as the Trump administration is doing is
a positive thing because if he subsidizes the stuff, as

(16:14):
he did with the COVID so called pandemic, that is
what really makes it happen. And it was these subsidies
from Biden and from Congress with their you know what
was their acronym. It wasn't the big beautiful bill.

Speaker 4 (16:29):
It was build back Better.

Speaker 3 (16:32):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (16:32):
Anyway, it was like IRS or something like that. Anyway,
these these bills that they put in there, if they
subsidize it, it will be built one way or the other,
even if it never gets finished. They will pour that
money into it and they will do a lot of damage.

(16:53):
In the UK, people are starting to get concerned about
Tesla's battery energy storage sites as well. Thousands are objecting
to Tesla's bid to supply energy to UK homes. Now
they're not so much worried about the true issues, which
are an astronomical cost and a massive fire rist there.

(17:17):
They are just opposing it because they don't like Elon
Musk anymore. The company applied for a license last month
to the Energy Regulator to start supplying power to homes
and businesses in England, Scotland, Wales as in as next year,
and they have online polls where people are pushing back

(17:37):
demanding that do not be built. Well, we're going to
take a quick break and when we come back, we're
going to talk about how much energy does do these
AI programs actually use. You'll be surprised actually, and it
turns out that they're not getting more efficient, they're getting
more power hungry.

Speaker 3 (17:56):
So it's going to be even worse with the later generations. Comments.

Speaker 4 (18:00):
If you want to get to the most, sure, we've
got North American house hip. But thank you very much,
that is very generously appreciate it, he says. There's an
electric bus fire at the Universal Bus yard last month.
Fortunately it happened in the middle of the day, so
other than the diesel bus next to it, all other
buses were on the road. Because there were no nearby
buses for the fire to spread to. It never got

(18:20):
to the be the best out buildings. It would have
been unfortunate. Nevertheless, the fire was spectacular. That was a
near miss right there.

Speaker 2 (18:29):
Yeah, that's there have been so many of these entire
bus stations that have burned down in Germany and France
that they pulled back on that stuff. And by the way,
you know you're talking about having a fire there, there
was a fire of a tractor trailer that was pulling
several electric vehicles to the marketplace. And that was a

(18:51):
big mass. I mean not as big a mass as
the massive transport ships. We have hundreds of millions of
dollars worth of luxury car to go down the drain
literally because they can't put the fire out electric fire.
Some of the electric cars caught fire. But this was
a tractor trailer eighting wheeler towing a lot of electric

(19:12):
cars and one of them caught fire and they all
caught fire, and we'll see that over and over again.

Speaker 4 (19:17):
It keeps happening. It's one of those things where anyone
that's actually paying attention knows about it, but you don't
really hear about it on the news. It seems like
they don't mention it. Well, it's something that at least
not connect the dots. It is a tremendous flaw in
the technology. And if they're going to have battery driven cars,
they need to wait until.

Speaker 2 (19:38):
They got a reliable, safe battery to put it in there.
And the problem is these battery energy storage sites that
they're attaching to the grid are even worse than the
cars because they're much much much larger. I mean, even
just the little electric scooters in New York are burning
down buildings.

Speaker 4 (19:55):
Yeah, electric bikes as well. That's the thinking. You know,
if everything else to do with an electric car, you
can turn off autopilot, you can avoid the other issues
with it. But this is simply just it's a grenade.
You don't know when it's going to go off or
if it's going to go off. You might get one
and it's perfectly fine and it never has any issues,
or maybe you get one and it burns your house
down the first night you bring it home. It's whatever

(20:17):
the flaw is, they haven't figured it out and they
don't know.

Speaker 2 (20:19):
And it can be a slight injury. You can have
like a small little fender bender and that might compromise
the battery. And this is why the insurance rates are
going sky high now have to replace all that stuff
because if there's some small flaw introduced because of that
fender bender, that's when you get the kind of spontaneous
combustion that you see.

Speaker 4 (20:39):
Yeah, and then you have to actually trust that they
were able to figure out where the flaw was, to
trust that your mechanic knows exactly what to look for
in all of these spots. It's you know, you have
a minor issue with a gasoline car and chances are
you'll be fine. You know, maybe you need to take
it back in get some more work done. Maybe it's
leaking oil or something like that, but it's not going
to explode in the middle of an and burn your

(21:00):
house down.

Speaker 2 (21:01):
Yeah, well, you know, and that's the other thing too.
A lot of these flaws in this new technology, like
range issues and the high cost, those are things that
the person wants to buy it can make that decision
whether they want that or not, because there are some
advantages to the electric cars. Yeah, and so they can
make that trade off. That's where they want to do it.

(21:22):
But this whole thing about spontaneous combustion and the uncontrollable
fires that affects everybody, and it also, by the way,
affects the environment.

Speaker 4 (21:31):
And dumping all those chemical gases into the air and
then the liquids into the top soil.

Speaker 3 (21:36):
But they don't care about that.

Speaker 2 (21:37):
They don't care about the rockets, and they just do
the lockets go up, the lockets come down.

Speaker 4 (21:43):
They got to escape to Mars because they're you know,
we're poisoning the planet. We're going to Mars though, don't worry.

Speaker 2 (21:47):
Yeah, well, the Trump administration just relaxed the rules for
rockets going up in terms of you know, whatever emission
rules that they had with it. I guess some more.

Speaker 4 (21:59):
KWD sixty eight says, save the Earth. We'll have a
silent spring, another ice age, or the ozone layer will fail,
or we will have acid rain, or we will have
global warming. It goes on and on and on.

Speaker 3 (22:11):
Yeah, they'll come up. I got one mcguffin after the other.

Speaker 5 (22:14):
So.

Speaker 4 (22:14):
She also says parts of Kentucky set up for wildfires.
No rain in weeks. Later day could be rough day,
Labor Day, my apologies. Then we have some happy birthday wishes. Well,
it's very kind. Denver Adaway says, happy birthday, Bil Houghton,
be my Valentine, KWD sixty eight. Brandon Bennett Mama c.
Nineteen ninety six. Maluten Milankovic OCCULTI sim mister palm and

(22:41):
for the love of the Road says anniversary or the
first show too? A happy eight years? Was it really?
I didn't realize it was on my birthday?

Speaker 2 (22:48):
Actually I wasn't sure, but Karen had said the other
day when I said we're getting close to the eight
year anniversary of the show, she said it began on
Travis's birthday.

Speaker 3 (22:57):
I said, yeah, I remember, I thought it was to it.
But yeah, Ryan would know. He keeps up with that.

Speaker 4 (23:04):
Better than y'all are better at keeping track of this
stuff than we are.

Speaker 2 (23:07):
But yeah, here we are. It's pretty close to having
an eight year anniversary. When we went to two people
in the show.

Speaker 4 (23:14):
It's almost a show is going to be ten years
old soon.

Speaker 2 (23:17):
Yeah, yeah, Well we're going to take a quick break, folks.

Speaker 3 (23:21):
And we will be right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 6 (23:25):
Oh to look all round at the patch of round
the illness, mother Najersey.

Speaker 1 (23:33):
Oh, it's all.

Speaker 4 (23:35):
All to be busy.

Speaker 6 (23:38):
It's a miserable place to live.

Speaker 1 (24:28):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (24:32):
Just alm Travis. His son really likes that song there Pladio.
Whenever that comes on, he sets up and takes notice.
It might be because uh, he I kind of I've
played a lot of string orchestras for him. I got
Mozart's in a klina, not music. I thought it's funny.
I thought, let me get this is a little night.

(24:53):
Let me give him some little light music.

Speaker 4 (24:55):
He's getting, he's getting cultured here, making sure that he's
well better taste than I do.

Speaker 2 (25:02):
It does grab his attention, especially if he's got a
video that shows that people actually playing it.

Speaker 3 (25:08):
You know, he really likes that.

Speaker 4 (25:09):
So I also want to apologize. Apparently I misspoke and
I called KDBD sixty eight a she sorry, my apologies.
I got not much sleep last night. The little guy
has been going through some sleep regression. He's been making
it kind of difficult. So he's got my apologies, he's.

Speaker 3 (25:27):
Got mozart playing in his mind.

Speaker 2 (25:28):
Okay, so how much energy does a chat GPT consume
when it's doing processing a prompt. It turns out the
energy consumption for the newest version of chat GPT is
significantly higher than previous models. It could be up to
twenty times more energy intensive than the first version.

Speaker 3 (25:47):
Here we go.

Speaker 2 (25:48):
I mean, we're seeing stuff growing by leaps and bounds.
Electricity rates are going up by a factor of eleven,
the energy requirements for the chats are going up by
a factor of twenty. It's amazing. Prices of things are
going up, but our salaries are not. There is a
severe lack of transparency regarding energy use and environmental impact
that the AI models. Isn't that amazing because these are

(26:09):
the people who are so freaked out about it all,
but they want to keep that hidden. That should tell
you something as well. So we can have the government
have energy standards for everything from cars to air conditioning,
but they're not going to have any energy standards for AI.
They don't even want you to know what these things use.

(26:30):
So it's not going to have that little sticker on
it legacy for your refrigerator or your washing machine or something.

Speaker 3 (26:37):
How much energy does it use?

Speaker 2 (26:38):
The answer is, well, a whole lot is about the
closest they can go, they said. Academics are trying to
quantify the energy use or queries, but it is considerably
higher than it was for previous models. There are no
mandates coming from the Department of Energy or the EPA
that would force AI companies to disclose their energy use

(26:59):
or their environment impact. No, it's all just going to
be swept under the carpet for their purposes, because understand,
the government wants what AI brings to the tables, surveillance
and control. It blows my mind that you can buy
a car and know how many miles per gallant consumes.
Yet we use all these AI tools every day and

(27:20):
we have absolutely no efficiency metrics, no emission factors, nothing,
said one person. It's not mandated, it's not regulated. Given
where we are with the climate crisis, said one of them,
it should be the top agenda the regulators everywhere. This
is a person who hasn't clim under the fact that
the climate crisis is not real, and that's one of

(27:42):
the things I think really.

Speaker 3 (27:43):
Sticks out about this.

Speaker 2 (27:45):
Clearly, the government is not worried about this. Clearly, the
government doesn't see this as an existential crisis, the climate
part of it is. But you should see AI as
an existential crisis because it is.

Speaker 5 (27:57):
It shows that the government doesn't believe it, and it
shows that these people that are pushing for more regulation
about it don't believe it. And what does that tell you.
It's kind of like how so many billionaires are socialists.
Clearly they don't think socialism is going to be bad
for them. And clearly these billionaires don't think the green
agenda is going to hurt them.

Speaker 3 (28:18):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (28:19):
And it's not just electricity, it's the water that uses
as well. And we said this the longest time about
NSA when they built their bluffed deal Utah facility to
store all this information until they were able to come
around with data mining to be able to make sense
of it. You know, for the longest time, the federal
government has been saving everything that you do, the lifelog

(28:40):
if you will, project or Facebook or whatever. But they're
saving everything on the Internet so they can at some
point in the future, when the computers are fast enough
and the software is smart enough, they can go back
and collate all that data, mine it and tag you.
Experts moutside the open AI fold have estimated that chat
GPT five may use as much as twenty times more

(29:01):
energy as the first version of chat GPT. At the
very least, it would be several times more, they've said.
And while all that is happening, and electricity prices are soaring,
vegetables are up nearly forty percent, coffee is up twenty
five percent, and electricity prices arising twice as fast as inflation,

(29:23):
the question is why, And there's a lot of different
theories about this. Some of this is due to the tariffs,
some of it in terms of vegetables. Many people are saying, well,
we're having fewer vegetables come in because we don't have
the people to harvest them because of the immigration enforcement.
So there's a lot of different things that are happening here.

(29:43):
But the reality is is that as we all know,
prices are going up, well not the government will admit it,
with its phony numbers or not. They're trying to hide that,
just like chat GPT is trying to hide its energy usage.
And in the face of all of that, Trump is
manically trying to get the Federal Reserve to drop interest rates.
I think it's kind of interesting to see his latest

(30:07):
his latest move to try to get rid of a
FED governor that was put in by Biden, who has
turned out to be a real hawk, which is probably
more political than it is from an economic standpoint. I mean,
this person is probably so it's they're pointed.

Speaker 3 (30:23):
By by Biden.

Speaker 2 (30:26):
They're probably a modern monetary theorist that doesn't which is
Keynesianism on steroids. But they will set there very carefully
say no, no, no, we can't lower interest rates because
it would politically be what Trump points now, it's not
going to help us if they lower the interest rates.
It's going to kick inflation into higher gear. And it's

(30:48):
going to not lower the interest rates on things like
homes and cars because those are going to be put
out there by people who have to make a profit.
They can do fiat interest rates and the federal reserve
that they charge to banks, They can do that by
fiat and just raise it or lower it. But the
other people are looking at what they think inflation is

(31:10):
going to be, and they're going to offer you rates
on homes and cars and other things like that based
on their perception of the inflation rate, so the real
figure is thirty eight point nine percent. Trump's stats are lying.
They don't include electricity because electricity is only weighed in
as three percent of the costs I pointed out the

(31:32):
other day. So they have all these different tricks that
they've put in to manipulate the price of are the
costs they should say various things and manipulate the overall
inflation rate. Coffee exports from Brazil were already were hit
with a fifty percent tariff, even though they were already
up by twenty five percent. They just hit them with

(31:53):
a fifty percent tariff and that has not kicked in
yet because they have contracts that are there, so that
tariff rate has not kicked in, and the tiff this
teophone coffee is simply to protect Trump's friend Bolsonario. And look,
I disagree with the idea that you're going to lock
up your opponents if you win the election, and that's

(32:14):
what's going on there in Brazil. But nevertheless, when you
look at the way these things are being set up,
they don't help the American consumer. Coffee prices rose sharply
twenty five percent of the past three months, about two
thirds of US adults drink coffee, one of the most
basic things that Americans buy. And then when you look

(32:35):
at electricity, like I said before, you look at Pennsylvania,
New Jersey, Maryland, down into d C where there's massive
amount of data centers that are there outside of Washington, DC.
But in another area down in Florida, people are complaining
because they've got power bills that are going up to

(32:56):
five hundred dollars a month. And when you start looking
at what the median family income is, it turns out
that that's a pretty big part of the budget. If
you take a look at the medium family income and
I think it's still around fifty thousand roughly, somebody's paying
five hundred dollars a month. That's twelve percent of their budget.

(33:18):
That's not three percent, which is what the government uses
to calculate that. But the thing is when we look
at the cost of food skyrocketing and cost of electricity skyrocking,
as I said before, the only thing that they're interested
in feeding is AI. They're interested in feeding their power
and their tyranny, and they're not interested in feeding people.

(33:39):
This is all set up to come after people, and
so MSN News is saying, well, after AI replaces most
humans jobs, then what do we do. Well, of course
the answer is universal basic aygom, that's where these people
have been for the longest time. Elon Musk as well
as Bloomberg talking about that. You know, it sounds like Marxism,

(34:02):
and the technocracy is not Marxism, but it shares many
of the same components as a matter of fact, so
much so that George Gilder in his book said that
he called the people in Silicon Valley, he called them
neo Marxists because he said they have the same fundamental
flaw that Carl Marx did, which was to imagine that

(34:28):
because of the Industrial Revolution, Karl Marx said, well, we
have infinite capacity.

Speaker 4 (34:32):
We're post scarcity.

Speaker 2 (34:33):
Yeah, exactly, no more scarcely. All we have to do
is justly allocate these resources. I'm going to let government
allocate these resources. That's the basic premise of communism. And
George Gilder said, that's the same thing that these idiots
in Silicon Valley think. They think that they have infinite
capacity to produce material goods, and all they have to

(34:56):
do is just allocate that to you with universal basic income.
It's a very arrogant and arrogantly dangerous and stupid idea truly,
as we have a clip actually while we're talking about
Karl Marx, Karl Marx and Satan, the connection between the
two of them. This is an interview that was connected

(35:16):
by Jordan Peterson. And I want you to hear just
how satanic the person Carl Marks was. And we have
seen this over and over again from people who have
dedicated their book. Solensky dedicated his book to Satan, The
Original Rebel. Another communist authoritarian.

Speaker 7 (35:38):
Poems that he wrote that were pans to Mephistopheles, is
that after he becomes an atheist, no, he's writing so
the first one was eighteen thirty seven, wrote another in
eighteen forty one. He wrote a bunch of them.

Speaker 3 (35:51):
He did.

Speaker 7 (35:52):
He did a just a chilling play called Ulanem ou l.

Speaker 8 (35:58):
A n E M.

Speaker 7 (36:00):
And people that are watching this, if they now type
into their computer Ulanem even in Google, it'll pop up
play by Karl Marx even has a Wikipedia entry. And
let me warn people, you might not want to do this,
but if you click the images button, you will see
I mean you will, I mean there's some satanic stuff
up there. From like not heavy.

Speaker 1 (36:21):
Metal, but like black metal groups.

Speaker 7 (36:24):
So Ulanem is an anagram for a manual or Manuelo.
So Marx takes a Manuel, which is the name given
to Christ, or Manuelo, and he flips it into this
anagram called ulinem. And it's this chilling play. The main
character is Lucindo, Lucindo, l uci nd O, and you

(36:47):
just can't believe what you're reading with with with this play.
So that that was written later in the eighteen forties.
So really the prime of his writing, including the decade
when he wrote the Communist Manifesto, is also the same
decade when he was writing these these these these poems
and pa and place and place, and throughout his life

(37:08):
his kids and others would say, uh yeah, he had
a favorite line always from Mephistop Everything that exists deserves
to perish, So that remains a part of him through
throughout his life. Edgar has a letter where.

Speaker 4 (37:22):
You or at least be tracked and trace continually.

Speaker 3 (37:25):
Which I don't know.

Speaker 7 (37:27):
Maybe it's playful, I don't know, although I would never
you know, call my dad my dear devil. His wife
called him, uh my wicked knave. I quote Henry Heinesen,
referring to him as a goblin to try to get
take me under under his spell. Other cases, of of where,

(37:47):
of where he's using that kind of language. When Ingles
first met him, he describes him as this dark man
from Trier who hops and leaps and springs on his heels,
the monster of ten thousand devils, he describes him. And

(38:08):
the letter from his father is which was written in
eighteen thirty seven, a year before before his before his
father died. So his father writes to him March second,
eighteen thirty seven, Karl, at times my heart delights in
thinking of you and your fortune, and yet at times
they cannot rid myself of ideas which arouse in me

(38:32):
sad forebodings and fear when I am struck as if
by lightning by the thought. Is your heart in accord
with your head your talents has a room for the earthly,
begentler sentiments, which, in this veil of sorrow it's a
beautiful letter in any ways, are essentially consoling for a
man of feeling. And then this question from the father

(38:53):
of Karl Marx to his at this point eighteen year
old son. And since that heart Carl is obviously animated
and governed by a demon not granted to all men.
Is that demon heavenly or Faustian?

Speaker 3 (39:14):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (39:15):
Have you sold your soul? That's very amazing. Yeah, such
darkness there, and that philosophy. You know, these philosophies really
do matter. That's how they take captive our mind. And
that really is where the war is. The secularists called
it a mind war. Christians call it a spiritual war.

(39:37):
It's a fight for your mind and what you think.
And we know which side Karl marx As followers have embraced.
The interesting thing is as we look at this and
people are seeing something that is kind of a hybrid
of a lot of these different aspects, and that is technocracy. Now,
so a lot of people look at it and say,

(39:58):
is technocracy fascism? Is it communism? And many others have
been calling themselves now saying it's communitarianism. You know, in
the same way this is a These labels are used
to confuse people. I mean, the communists will call themselves
socialists or progressive, and yet you know, you can't really
see any difference that is there.

Speaker 5 (40:18):
Isn't it.

Speaker 4 (40:19):
Vladimir Lenin that said, the end goal of socialism is communism,
you know, it's a stepping stone. That's how you get there.
You sell them on this light version of it, Yeah,
and then you work your way towards the full deal.

Speaker 2 (40:29):
Well, it's authoritarianism that culminates into tolitarianism. And that's why,
you know, you can talk about fascism versus communism. The
difference is the path that you take to get to tolitarianism.

Speaker 4 (40:42):
An order of operations sort of deal, you know.

Speaker 2 (40:44):
Yeah, exactly, So you have technocracy. News has an article
about the difference in this new label. But they're using
to try to confuse people, is what we're talking about.

Speaker 3 (40:57):
He says.

Speaker 2 (40:58):
When technocrafts want a shield their technocratic policies, they intentionally
do so in the language of communitarianism. So yeah, we're
not communists, we're socialists, or we are progressives.

Speaker 3 (41:11):
He says.

Speaker 2 (41:12):
One example of this is smart cities. The technocratic policy,
of course, is urban planners who lock you into a small,
controlled area, restricting your movements and that type of thing. Surveillance,
digital id algorithmic resource allocation made by unlikeed, unaccountable technical
experts and private sector consultants. That's the reality. So how

(41:34):
did they frame this to say, this is about communitarianism,
because you know, we like communities, we want to have communities. Well,
policy makers will frequently describe these initiatives as advancing inclusive
urban communities. Yes, inclusive, it's like inclusive, like a you're
going to be included in a prison or open their prison,
or something as empowering local groups, or as in building

(41:59):
public trust through collective digital transformation. The emphasis is on
community driven sustainability, shared public spaces, and strengthening community ties.
And going back to the very beginning of this, when
they were going around when it was still Agenda twenty one,
they would use a tactic that was developed by the

(42:21):
Rand Corporation, and they would go into a community tell people,
come in, we want to have your input on the
things that we want to do. It's going to help
the community. So they gave it kind of this. They
didn't call it specifically communitarianism, but they would come in,
they already had their agenda set and they would have
the facilitators would be the people who are actually in control.

(42:43):
They would ask you for your input, but they already
had the conclusion was pre written, and so it was
just a beard, a facade to try to get people
think that even if they didn't agree with the conclusion,
that was what was agreed to by the rest of
the g is called the Delphi principle. And so they've
been doing this communitarianism for quite some time. Another issue,

(43:07):
another example of this.

Speaker 3 (43:08):
Of course, is public health.

Speaker 2 (43:10):
We're going to do this all to you to help
the community, right, and we know exactly how that worked
in the twenty twenties.

Speaker 4 (43:17):
Help you ride into your cell, yeah.

Speaker 3 (43:19):
He said.

Speaker 2 (43:19):
If you've ever read Walden two by B. F. Skinner,
you know everything about communitarianism that you need to know.
The story, by the way, ended very horribly. Communitarianism is
a political and social philosophy that places primary emphasis on
the importance of the community. Just as we saw with
the public health scam. Right, you have to take the

(43:42):
inject the kool aid poison for the good of the community,
the common good. Social relationships all shape individual identity, values,
and moral judgments. It asserts that people's identities are molded
by their social environment and their community ties, rather than
by individualism. Forget about individuality, your personhood, even your soul.

(44:05):
Communitarianism sees the community as an end of itself, and
so the reality is is they don't care about consensus,
they don't care about the common good or about social
adhesion adhesion, they have their own agenda. And again probably
you know, the best way that we can understand this

(44:27):
is by what was rolled out on us under Trump
in twenty twenty with a fake pandemic and so Volunteer
Peter Tiel, co founder of Pollunteer and Alex carp as
he points out, Volunteer is the master of these tactics
on the battlefield and in civilian life.

Speaker 3 (44:48):
And so the.

Speaker 2 (44:50):
If you say that technocracy, if you talk about it
in a negative way, they will turn it towards communitarianism.
But it's not the same thing technocracy. It is not
even in his reality, is not even concerned with the
good of the community. It's only concerned with the good
of a few oligarchs who are running this whole thing.

(45:11):
So they will always come up with their labels in
order to see people, and they will hide it as well.
One of the examples we have is Doge and this
AI tool is now going to take a buzz saw
to federal regulations. Now I would have always cheered any
buzz saw being taken to federal regulations. Remember when we
did that video that had a congressional candidate who was

(45:38):
going to he did a stunt and basically want to
take the income tax Code and feed it through a
wood chipper. And he contacted the IRS and they couldn't
tell him how many pages it was, and they couldn't
send him as many pages as it was their best
estimate that was at the time of something like seventy
thousand pages of regulations.

Speaker 4 (45:59):
It's great to know that even the people there don't
know what's on the books.

Speaker 2 (46:04):
And so way did was he He took the approximate
number that they could come up with, and he got
the equivalent in phone books, and he fed it through
a wood chipper.

Speaker 3 (46:13):
And actually we filmed it for him.

Speaker 2 (46:15):
It was at a candidate's meeting, and it truly was amazing.
And I would be all in favor of taking a
bus saw. All these regulations are growing by leaps and
bounds every year and have been for many many Republican
and Democrat administrations, including Trumps. But the problem is what
they're going to replace it with. DOGE actually has a

(46:38):
successor called RAGE, which stands for Replace All Government Employees,
and that's what I said, this was about from the
very beginning. I've never seen this acronym before, but you
could tell from what Musk wanted to do. He wanted
to fire government employees and replace them with what when
to replace them with AI? And so I said, he's

(47:01):
going to minimize government employees, and he is going to
maximize government. AI is going to be able to glean
the details of your life far more comprehensively than any
group of people could do. And so I don't see
this as an improvement. I see this as a trumping

(47:23):
out of the frying pan and end of the fire.

Speaker 4 (47:25):
Quite frankly, Yeah, As I said before, my biggest concern
is the fact that when you get rid of the
human element, there's no longer a single there's no longer
a chance for mercy at all.

Speaker 9 (47:33):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (47:34):
Sure, the people who work in the government are generally
not going to give it to you, but there's a
small chance. There's always the potential that you'll come across
somebody that may empathize with you and be able to
look at you and say, okay, Well.

Speaker 2 (47:45):
Joe Banister's case is a good example of that. He
worked for the IRS as a criminal investigator and he
started asking some questions as he was investigating some of
these people, but they were coming after as criminals because
they looked at the IRS code and said, but wait
a minute, you haven't done this legally. He came across
some arguments they thought were pretty valid, and so he

(48:05):
asked his supervisor. Supervisors, is, don't talk about that, you know,
shut him down. So that got his curiosity even more.
As he looked at it more and more, he got
to ask him more questions. But you know, he eventually
left and they eventually attacked him. But before that happened,
there was an IRS agent and again this is the
human element. The guy didn't like Joe Banister because as

(48:27):
a criminal investigator, he got to carry a gun, he
got paid more, he got to get out of the
office and you know dry outsides that are being bound
into a cubicle or whatever and so and every year
the criminal investigators had to be audited. When this guy
audited him, he came up with a big number of
under payment that he said Joe needed to pay plus

(48:50):
penalties plus interest in all the rest of the stuff.
And he knew he didn't know that, so he appealed
it and he got some other people who didn't have
an issue with him and looked at it objectively. And
yet you know, when we look at it, you would
think they're going to sell to you. Oh, well, this
is AI. It's going to be objective. It's not going
to have vendetta to come after you. No, I don't

(49:11):
have a vendetta that is that is built in there
based on your political or religious background.

Speaker 4 (49:16):
Whoever is in control of the AI at that moment
can make it do whatever it wants. Whatever data they
put in is whatever data it will come out if
they tell it. We believe this guy is a threat
to our security, make sure that he is punished in
an acceptable way. However they phrase it. They'll be able
to get whatever kind of output they want. And the
AI won't give you its training data. It's you're not

(49:36):
gonna be able to audit it.

Speaker 3 (49:39):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (49:40):
Well, they have a new AI program. The guy who
led this is his name is Sweet, and he is
someone who just got out of college. Actually I don't
know if you even graduated until recently. He was a
third year student at the University of Chicago, so he
may have left early. And but very young guy and

(50:01):
Christopher Sweet has put this project together and it's going
to be an AI review. They call it the DAIP,
the Suite Rex DAIP, which stands for Deregulation AI Plan Builder. Again,
as I said, we would all support deregulation. It is

(50:22):
like a bulk instrictor and it's choking everything. Except when
you look at what the long term goal of these
people are. They said they're likely to use this tool
to eliminate up to fifty percent of federal regulations by
January the twenty sixth. So again, we should feed these
regulations in the wood chipper. But I'm afraid they're going

(50:43):
to feed us into the wood chipper if we get
rid of humans in the process and move to a
ruthless AI. That's that's the kind of terminator I'm worried about.
The terminator's got built in biases from our human masters.

Speaker 4 (50:59):
And one of the things is also part of the
reason one of the only arguments for AI is the
sheer number of laws and the complexity of them. If
you're able to pair these down, if you're able to
send fifty percent of them to the woodchipper, and then
maybe another fifty percent and pare it down to a
reasonable level, then you can actually have a reasonable state
where a human being can look through these things and
make judgments on them. If we've got two hundred thousand

(51:22):
federal regulations, no, there's no way any amount of human
beings can actually know what's on the books and give
you a fair reasoning on any of it. So, yeah,
the AI would be better at scanning through these and
actually cataloging what's there. But if you pare it down again,
you could actually have a reasonable bureaucracy that.

Speaker 2 (51:40):
You've got a government created problem, Okay, that they're then
going to exacerbate with their quote unquote solution rather than
fixing reaction problem. Yeah, we didn't have that, you know,
when we had Jefferson others. That's a government that was
small enough to actually be legitimate and fit in the constitution.
We have a massive, illegitimate government that resembles a byzantine empire.

Speaker 3 (52:03):
With it's bureaucracy.

Speaker 4 (52:05):
I coletally wonder, I wonder what Jefferson or Washingt would
say if you were telling them we had two hundred
thousand regulations.

Speaker 3 (52:11):
They would say we're slaves, And they would be right,
wouldn't they.

Speaker 2 (52:14):
Well, before we take a break, we've got some comments
here if you want to read them.

Speaker 4 (52:18):
Sure. Sam Miller one two three, thank you. That is
very very generous. Really really do appreciate it. Great day
to celebrate. Welcome back David, Happy anniversary, Happy birthday, Travis. Well,
thank you, blessings to all. My big reveal. I'm a
she Well.

Speaker 3 (52:32):
It's not Sam Miller, it's I think, yeah.

Speaker 4 (52:36):
Or maybe it's short for Samantha. Oh okay, maybe I
don't know, but skun callo Rose Gardens two dollars one
hundred awesome. Yes, thank you very much. Sprumford, Thank you
very much. Strumford. We appreciate it. I've been away from
the show for a while. It's so great to see
you back. Mister night love the new setup make Christ

(52:56):
continue to bless you and your family. Well, thank you, nice,
thank you.

Speaker 3 (53:01):
And Guard.

Speaker 4 (53:02):
Good to see you.

Speaker 3 (53:03):
Guard.

Speaker 4 (53:03):
I hope you're doing well. The book The Devil and
Karl Marx is excellent. That sounds like an interesting read.

Speaker 3 (53:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (53:09):
Karen Carpenter twk abtably probably kind of like The Devil
and Daniel Webster, right, or maybe.

Speaker 4 (53:14):
Even they seem like they were the best of friends.
Karen Carpenter twenty seven says also cameras for surveillance don't
like trees. That's true. Trees get in the way of things.
A Syrian girl. Another thing about the electric cars, a
lot of mechanics around here won't touch them. They bring
in specialized teams to service those babies. I imagine. It's

(53:36):
a completely different system than what you have in a
combustion engine, and as such you probably need specific tool
sets and specific skill sets.

Speaker 2 (53:46):
Well, I've been going in that direction for a very
long time, complicating it so that you can't be a
shade tree mechanic.

Speaker 3 (53:51):
You know.

Speaker 2 (53:51):
They long ago left the world where everything was mechanical,
and now there's so much electronics and everything that you've
got to have special equipment to diagnose it. Even if
you've got an internal combustion engine, so.

Speaker 4 (54:04):
You have to have one of those things you plug in,
you know.

Speaker 3 (54:06):
That's one of the interesting things with Miatas. There's four
different generations.

Speaker 2 (54:12):
Of Miatas, and they had a company that called Flying Miata,
and what they would do is they would say they
would squeeze in an eight cylinder engine.

Speaker 3 (54:22):
Into these things, usually like a Corvette engine. The first
generation it was a piece of cake.

Speaker 2 (54:26):
Second generation was still fine. Third generation, they started having
some issues because now there was a lot of electronics
in it, and now the fourth generation. They struggled with
that for more than a year. They had to bring
in special people to help them to do that. Because
everything was connected. They said, you know, we would, we
would put this in, and we thought we had all connected.
Now all of a sudden, the winchil wipers are running

(54:47):
all the time. Everything was interconnected to the electronics.

Speaker 4 (54:51):
And whenever I shipped into fourth my hornhawks. For some reason,
I don't get it. Coal three sixty forms are so
last century. That's why we need lab grown meat and
produce from AI bought farms, running new quarter to feed
the plants and production. That's right, we need all these things.
We can't live without them. Tunnel Lord one three three seven.
Communism is just a cover for central control that is

(55:13):
indistinguishable from monarchical rule. Both have central controllers telling everyone
how else to live. Sprumford, I think communism is at
the end. It's the means sa Miller. We're going to
assume essay now one two three. Communitarianism says slash socialism
was practiced in biblical times. A big difference was that
people were filled with the Holy Spirit and volunteered, not forced,

(55:36):
and that's a huge distinction. If people want to form
their own community and voluntarily work together towards their own
common goals and engage in these sorts of practices, that's
absolutely fine. I have no issue with that. It becomes
an issue when you send in the men with guns
and say you're giving us this and we're going to redistribute.

Speaker 3 (55:52):
It, and it's a it's a heavy left for Christians
even to do. Sorry, lance, I.

Speaker 5 (55:57):
See people conflate the who, and it's just a false
equivalence because it's just the difference between theft and charity.
It's the force of government taking it from people versus
giving freely.

Speaker 2 (56:14):
Yes, it makes all the difference in the world. And
it's a difficult thing to do. It was done in
the early Church and they were filled with the Holy Spirit,
and it is something that is very, very difficult for
humans to be able to execute. And we have seen
this over and over again. Through the eighteen hundreds, you
had a lot of utopian communities that were based on

(56:35):
what sounded like Christian principles and things like that. As
a matter of fact, I remember somebody did a survey
and they asked a lot of people, you know, men
on the street, type of thing you know about, from
each according disability and to each according disney, and ask
them where that was from. Large number of people thought
that was from the Bible. And you're right, that does

(56:56):
fit if it is voluntary, right, But if you got
a gun to your head, that's not what we're talking about.
And that's one of the things that we need to
always keep in mind when we look at keeping separate
state and church, and I say that I know that's
not in the constitution, but I don't want to merge

(57:19):
the two. Whenever we do that, it always harms Christian life.
Whenever you merge it with politics, what happens is you
wind up with politics. It kills the Christian side of it.
And that's what happens with a forced welfare state. It
kills the Christian side of the voluntary giving and the
joy of doing that is now compulsory, and the people

(57:40):
who are getting the stuff demand it because they say
they're entitled to it. They don't want to see it
as charity. They find that to be an offense.

Speaker 4 (57:47):
It robs both parties. One of the party of being
able to experience the joy of giving, as you said,
the other of the joy of thankfulness for that of being.
You know, entitlement is such a nasty, grasping emotion. You know,
you feel that you deserve this and you should be
allowed to take it, whereas being thankful, being able to
really sit down and be thankful for what you have

(58:08):
been given, is such it's if you can do that,
it's a wonderful, wonderful blessing to be able to see
that people have given that to you, and that God
is the one that inspired them to do that. It
can be a very very wonderful thing for both parties.

Speaker 2 (58:20):
That was really driven home to me, Like I said,
when I got up and spoke against Hillary Care and
boy did they get up. So I talked about charity,
you know, and there is there was I don't know
why it is today with the corporation's taking over the
medical profession, but back in the day, there were doctors
would donate a lot of their time to help people
who were poor, and you know, various things like that,

(58:43):
and we had a society that was built around that.
That's what Alexis to Tokyo talked about. When it came
to America and we talked about democracy in America. The
central difference between that and the socialism that he left
in France was the fact that the Americans would voluntarily
come together and build what was needed.

Speaker 4 (59:02):
So sorry, I was just looking for that book. It's
in this room somewhere. I saw it just the other day.

Speaker 3 (59:08):
Maybe it's fine.

Speaker 4 (59:10):
I don't know, I know I saw it. Democracy in
America is somewhere in here. It exists.

Speaker 3 (59:15):
Yeah, yeah, it is. Well, we're going to take a
quick break.

Speaker 2 (59:19):
We're not going to look for the book, but we're
gonna take a quick break and we will be right back.

Speaker 3 (59:23):
Stay with us.

Speaker 5 (59:25):
It's on one of the shelves right behind dad.

Speaker 2 (59:26):
Oh yeah, okay, Well, we'll see if we can find
it there. When we come back, we're going to talk
about Trump's move again to the Federal Reserve and why
he's doing these things. But this is not an illegitimate
move that he's talking about with this Fed governor. There
really is fraud, corruption, and illegal activities. We'll talk about

(59:46):
that when we come back.

Speaker 10 (01:00:39):
You're listening to the David Night Show. You're listening to

(01:02:19):
the David Knight Show.

Speaker 11 (01:02:21):
Wait a minute, where am I?

Speaker 3 (01:02:24):
Sorry? Jefferson.

Speaker 8 (01:02:25):
The scoundrels who put America on Central bank fiat currency
used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.

Speaker 11 (01:02:33):
This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.

Speaker 8 (01:02:47):
Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the FED.

Speaker 3 (01:02:51):
Up the All.

Speaker 8 (01:02:52):
New David Night Show Commemorative coin. Now patriots can support
a show that won't sell out with a limited edition
coin that's sure to sell out quickly.

Speaker 12 (01:03:02):
They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation only support.

Speaker 2 (01:03:18):
Well, Tony's going to be joining us at the bottom
of the hour and we're going to be talking about
the Fed and monetary policy. But it's kind of interesting
to watch the moves that Trump is making against the
Federal Reserve people. He would like to get rid of
the FED chair Jerome Powell, but he cannot remove him
at will. In other words, he can't just fire him

(01:03:39):
because he doesn't want him there anymore. He has to
have a reason, and so we saw this back and forth,
and the Trump surrogates were also complaining about statements that
Powell had made to Congress about their exorbitant remodeling that's
going on. That is yet another example of the kind

(01:03:59):
of corruption and a luxury that we see out of Washington.
They have this incredibly expensive guilding that's going on with
their building, and they said, he reported that incorrectly, so
we need to come after him for perjury. And some people,
I think actually one member actually recommended him for charges,
you know, coming at perjury. And I looked at them

(01:04:21):
as I said, you know, James Clapper lied to the
American people under oath when he was talking to Congress,
and they never filed charges for him. The whole thing
ended after five years with statute limitations. Nobody ever came
after him about that. But they want to because they said, well,
there's some differences and the reality and the way that

(01:04:42):
you portrayed this remodeling, and so we want to come
after you with that. They would like to be able
to remove him. They can do that for cause. So
if they can come up with some criminal charges, they
could remove Powell. But he can't just do it because
he wants to get rid of him. The same thing
is true of the Federal Reserve boarding governors, and so

(01:05:02):
it is kind of interesting. I think they're setting up
to remove this federal governor, Lisa Cook, and it turns
out that she actually has committed a crime. It was
a mortgage fraud, and she has responded after Trump tweeted
this out and said she needs to resign, she tweeted

(01:05:25):
this out said I have no intention of being bullied
to step down from my position because of some questions
raised in a tweet. I do intend to take any
questions about my financial history seriously as a member of
the Federal Reserve, and so I am gathering the accurate
information to answer a legitimate questions and provide the facts.

(01:05:46):
So zero Head says, well, here's one quick question, did
you break the law or not? Because she did, and
there is a paper trail.

Speaker 3 (01:05:55):
That shows that she did.

Speaker 2 (01:05:56):
They've produced the documents that she signed basically what she did,
which she f also high bank documents and property records
to get more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud
under a criminal statute. So here's your cause. He can't
get rid of a lot of these people. But this
is one person who, as I said at the beginning

(01:06:17):
of the program, was appointed by Joe Biden. You could
look at her as a DEI pick, first black woman
to be put in the reserve, and that's where the
people are going to draw the line to defend her.
But what she did was actually indefensible because it was
a criminal fraud that she committed. With this, she has
now become a hawk against interest rates, and so Trump

(01:06:41):
would like to get her removed. So she took out
two loans almost at the same time, one of them
in Michigan, another one in Atlanta on a condo. On
both of these she said they were going to be
her primary residence. You can only have one primary residence
to start with. And then two weeks after she got
the property in Atlanta, she sorry two weeks apart with

(01:07:05):
these two mortgages, and then she put the property in
Georgia up for rental, showing that it was not going
to be her residence. But by making the declaration that
it was going to be her primary residence, of course
that gets her better terms on her loan than she
would if it was going to be an investment property.

Speaker 3 (01:07:24):
So they have a clear record for her.

Speaker 2 (01:07:27):
The letter that was sent out as part of the
criminal referral letter includes copies of mortgage documents in her name,
as well as an apparent rental listing a little over
a year after she bought the Georgia property. So she
buys these two properties two weeks apart, two different states,
and then after one year she starts renting the Georgia property.

(01:07:49):
So she was nominated to the Fed by Biden, as
I said before, and her term does not expire until
twenty thirty eight. But she wants to stay there, she
better be ready to fight some criminal charges. I think
it is they want somebody that they can They want
to remove some of these people, and so they are

(01:08:11):
going through their lives so they find tooth Comb. This
is what it's like now in Washington. You know, you
get into office and both the Democrats and the Republicans
will look over your life and find tooth Comb and
try to put you in jail. Musk has had pledged this.
This came out yesterday. We talked about this said, whatever
happened to a third party that Musk was talking about.

(01:08:33):
Now he's telling people that he wants to get behind
JD Vance. Well, of course he does. Because JD. Vance
is a technocracy dude that they put in there. He's
going to be more compliant probably than Trump is for
the technocracy.

Speaker 4 (01:08:47):
Yeah, he's Peter Tiel's boy.

Speaker 1 (01:08:49):
He's this guy.

Speaker 2 (01:08:51):
Yeah, he's part of the Peter Till mafia. TiAl made JD.

Speaker 3 (01:08:55):
Vance.

Speaker 2 (01:08:56):
So this is what we're saying. Yesterday there's been crickets
about third parties. Well, now you know later that day
they spoke about it. Musk has told allies that he
wants to focus his attention on his companies and he's
reluctant to alienate powerful Republicans by starting a third party
that could siphon off GOP votes. So now he's going

(01:09:16):
to play nice and he's going to get behind JD.

Speaker 9 (01:09:18):
Vans.

Speaker 2 (01:09:19):
That's probably gonna hurt Jdvance Trump. But yeah, so as
we look at this robot as we moved to our
robot world in the factories and everything. In China, they
just had a robot arm that nearly decapitated a man

(01:09:39):
and they said it's probably the surgeons who did up
patting themselves on the back. It sounds like it was
a horrific thing and essentially internally did decapitate him. The
only thing that was still connected with some soft tissue.
It severed his spinal cord and his.

Speaker 3 (01:09:58):
Neck.

Speaker 2 (01:09:58):
There his cervical vertebrae completely severed. Critical arteries were damaged.
Only soft tissue held his head to his body, and
so he came in That also caused him to have
a heart attack. Came in an unbelievably bad condition. They
talked about how complicated it was for the human surgeons
to be able to fix him, and this article was

(01:10:21):
kind of interesting. On zero head they immediately go from
the dangers of a robotic arm to the dangers of
arming robots, and they started talking kind of using militarized robots.

Speaker 3 (01:10:32):
That was kind of an interesting cycultar.

Speaker 2 (01:10:34):
I think robot nearly decapitates man and grewsome surgery fail
and it actually wasn't. The headline is not accurate. It
was when I first looked at that, I thought they
had robotic surgery that was going.

Speaker 4 (01:10:47):
I thought the same thing too until I read the article.

Speaker 2 (01:10:49):
But it was actually it was an amazing success in
terms of surgery, and it was not robotic surgery. It
was a guy who was injured in in the factory there.

Speaker 4 (01:11:01):
If you are online at all the factory conditions in China,
there's tons of videos of people being mangled and killed,
and just the conditions they work in are horrific. There
is no safety standard at all, and people are continually
being grievously harmed or just as I said, killed.

Speaker 3 (01:11:20):
They have no regard for people in China.

Speaker 4 (01:11:23):
They have people a massive population base. So if one
of them falls into the you know whatever it is
and gets absolutely torn to pieces, well, there's another guy
that's waiting for the job right well.

Speaker 2 (01:11:33):
And there's a long history of the Chinese elite being
ruthless and brutally cruel in terms of the people that
they govern, and it's only become worse when they mix
it in with communism.

Speaker 4 (01:11:45):
It's also amazing China has always had, or seems to
have always had a massive, massive population base. You'll read
about these small battles that they'll say are small battles
that barely have a footnote in history, and it'll be like, oh, yeah,
one hundred thousand people died, and it's just what one
hundred thousand dead, ten thousand cannibalized. What are you guys
doing there? Yeah, it's part of it's baked into their culture,

(01:12:08):
this disregard for human life, disregard for life in general.
You can just kind of see it through. It permeates
everything they have. This just kind of apathy towards existence.
You know, someone dies, well whatever.

Speaker 2 (01:12:22):
Yeah, yeah, So it's been there for a very long time.
And just real quickly, while we're talking about politics, the
Trump administration has announced who the new number two the
FBI is going to be. And the question is what
happened to Bongino, And there's actually no word about Bonginos.

(01:12:43):
They have announced his successor before they have announced that
he is going to be leaving. I thought that was
kind of funny, but that's the way it is in
Washington right now. This I thought was incredibly interesting. The
lawsuit between Smart Mattic and Fox Corporation. Now, you know,

(01:13:04):
Fox already paid a massive settlement of like three quarters
of a billion dollars to the other voting machine company,
Dominion that Fox was talking about. And now the lawsuit
between Smart Mattic and Fox has started up, and as
part of discovery, they're getting documents, and some of the

(01:13:25):
documents that were internal conversations and Fox News have been
released to the public, and I think it gives us
an interesting insight. These are memos from Janine Pirot, Jesse Waters,
Maria Bartiromo. They all seem to have different motivations but
the same goal. They all wanted to help President Trump.
As a matter of fact, this one I thought was

(01:13:46):
very interesting. This is a memo from Jesse Waters sent
to Greg Guttfield, and he said, think about how incredible
our ratings would be if Fox went all in on
stop the steel. Stop the steal was Alex Jones's thing,
you know, it was basically it was kind of interesting

(01:14:07):
to see that Fox News was so much.

Speaker 1 (01:14:09):
Like, think about how hard we could grift.

Speaker 3 (01:14:12):
Yeah, it's so much like Info Wars.

Speaker 2 (01:14:14):
It's all about the audience, and it's about the money,
and it's about their ratings, and so you know they're
going to this is what Jesse Waters was saying. You know, hey,
we could our ratings would soar if we jumped in
on this stop the Steel stuff. And that was exactly
the calculates that was going on with Alex Jones and
the rest of this stuff. And Janine Pierrot, who has

(01:14:36):
now been put in as the attorney for the district
of Columbia said, I worked so hard for the president
and party. And she was also mentioned her husband who
had been convicted of tax fraud and some other things,
and she did get a pardon for him, and she
got a position, as you know, federal attorney there in

(01:14:59):
DC from Nowlex Jones, but from Donald Trump. Hundreds of
pages of documents, largely newly unredacted versions of previously released ones,
filed on Tuesday in the New York State Supreme Court.
Smart Mattic has accused Fox News of knowingly implicating the
company and false claims of vote rigging in between twenty

(01:15:20):
elections for ratings, and these comments going back and forth
seem to support that. But of course, on the other side,
Fox News is getting records of the history of Smartmatic,
and as I said before, Smartmatic has a long history

(01:15:41):
of helping Hugo Chavez. They've been questioned and there's been
hearings and massive controversy in other countries like the Philippines
and in Brazil where they were accused of fraud in
those areas. That's all a matter of fact and history,
and Fox could have portrayed it that way, but they
decided they were going to make this about just you know,
sucking up to Trump. Another thing that has come out

(01:16:05):
is the fact that even in the Biden Department of Justice,
they were going to indict Smartmatic for bribery of elected
officials to put their machines in at a higher price.
So there's not any good guys in any of this stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:16:21):
You give us a premium and well maybe we make
sure the votes flip a certain sort of way here
for you.

Speaker 3 (01:16:26):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
Now, the way that smart Matic is portraying this is
they're saying that after the MAGA people got mad with
Fox for calling Arizona for Biden, they started passing these
memos around saying things like, hey, if we got on
Trump's side, we could be number one in ratings and
all the rest of the stuff. And they have a
memo from Murdoch to the Fox News chief executive at

(01:16:49):
the time, Suzanne Scott, in the days after the election.
He said, we're getting creamed by CNN. Guess our viewers
don't want to watch it, meaning the election returns. And
you know, there is evidence that that was what was
going on. But last August, when Biden was an office,
the Biden Department of Justice charged three current and former

(01:17:12):
executives at Smartmatic with bribing an election official from the
Philippines so the company could win a contract providing voting
machines for the country's twenty sixteen elections.

Speaker 3 (01:17:23):
So this is a company that.

Speaker 2 (01:17:25):
Has a very very storied past of corruption and reaking
elections and bribery and all the rest of this stuff.
It's going to be an interesting trial as the dirty
laundry comes out against both sides. I think we're going
to see just how corupt this all. Maybe the good
news is the solution, of course, is paper ballots, and
maybe that will be something that will come out of this.

(01:17:45):
People just have had it with the voting machine stuff, and.

Speaker 4 (01:17:49):
I'm incredibly surprised they actually went ahead with the lawsuit,
just given what both parties have to lose in discovery,
the amount of dirty info that has to be out
there on these Well.

Speaker 2 (01:18:00):
That's what people said about Trump. You know, if Trump
wants to sue people because what they reported about him
and Jeffrey Epstein, it's like, do you realize what discovery
is going to look like for you?

Speaker 4 (01:18:11):
You got to turn over everything.

Speaker 2 (01:18:13):
Yeah, same thing with Milania and her threats of billion
dollar lawsuits against these Democrats, from Hunter Biden to James Carvill.
You know they want to threaten them with these large lawsuits.
Guess what Discovery's going to look like. But of course,
if you take the attack that Alex did, you just
don't comply with discovery. And that's what he did. And
then they found the the evidence that he said he

(01:18:36):
didn't have was sent by his lawyer to the opposing counsel,
and yet everybody seemed to ignore that. I thought that
was a pretty big issue. It was kind of, as
Alex said at Perry Mason moment, you.

Speaker 3 (01:18:48):
Usually get those in real life. Fact check this crap. Said.

Speaker 2 (01:18:53):
One of the emails that was there, in addition to
the ones I've talked about where they were going back
and forth talking about how they could be number one
and ratings, you had an email from Brett bar He
urged Fox News executive Jay Wallace to express dismay at
the election coverage provided by Maria Bartiromo. He said, none
of that is true as far as we can tell.

(01:19:15):
He said, we need to fact check this crap. Well,
that would have gotten them fired at Info Wars, but
evidently that's the difference of Fox News. They did not
fire Brett Baar.

Speaker 4 (01:19:30):
But who knows why that guy is dull and uninteresting.

Speaker 2 (01:19:35):
Well, at least he was focused on what was true.
He was on the right side of that issue. That
was there, I gotta say. And then finally we have this.
We have this is from the Daily Mail. A secret
gay sex scandal has exploded in the Republican Party. It's
kind of interesting when you look at the Republican Party

(01:19:55):
and how they close ranks around the pedophiles. As I
said before, GOP stands for guarding our pedophiles. And they said,
this is a guy who has gone to the press.
He is a male prostitute in DC. And he wouldn't
name any names, but he said, you wouldn't believe how

(01:20:17):
many Republican officials there are here that are closeted and
living this secret double life.

Speaker 4 (01:20:25):
I believe it.

Speaker 3 (01:20:26):
Yeah, I mean you go back and look jaygar Hoover.
We have.

Speaker 2 (01:20:32):
Roy Cohen, who was allied with Joe McCarthy and allied again.
He was a mentor of Donald Trump, people like Dennis Aster.
They got a long history of that. What I thought
was interesting is they said when the Republicans had their
convention in Minnesota last year, the big Republican convention that

(01:20:53):
was there, Grinder, which is a homosexual hookup app as
traffic one and sixty percent, that's kind of all.

Speaker 3 (01:21:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:21:06):
So, as they pointed out, the twenty twenty four platform
from the GOP last year dropped their concerns about homosexual marriage,
or as many of us call it, same sex mirage,
that was done at the behest of Don and Milania
because they have embraced that very heavily. As we pointed

(01:21:27):
out before when he ran in twenty twenty his merchant
that he was selling a lot of rainbow merchandise. I
think it's amazing. You know, when you have corporations do that,
you have people organized the same maga people organize a
boycott against them. But when Trump and Milania do it,
there's silence about that. And when they use mar Lago

(01:21:49):
as an award ceremony for log Cavin Republicans, there's no
talk about that at all, And there is no memory
of the fact that Trump was at the very forefront
of pushing male transgenders. He wanted one of them in
his beauty contest that he owned Miss Universe. House speaker
Mike Johnson has called same sex mirage the dark harbinger

(01:22:14):
of chaos and sexual anarchy, and he once described homosexuality
as quote inherently unnatural and a dangerous lifestyle.

Speaker 3 (01:22:24):
I finally agree with Mike Johnson on something. I don't
know that he would do anything about it.

Speaker 2 (01:22:30):
Trump himself is widely considered personally tolerant, even welcoming towards
gay people, and they welcome him and Milania as well.
As I said, with the Pride merchandise and the awards
that are held in mar Lago. Life site news is
about the only site that I saw report what was
happening with that. Everybody else pretty much ignored it. Trump

(01:22:51):
is also a megafan of the Village People, the gay
disco group. They say the homosexual hookup ad as I said,
had a hundred than sixty percent increased Grinder did and
they say this is coming from Daily Mail. And they
talk about some state representatives that have been caught in

(01:23:13):
massive hypocrisy, but you know, interestingly, they do not talk
about the big cases and national cases. Dennis Hastert, who
was Speaker of the House for a very long time,
Mark Foley, who he also covered for, who had the
page scandal, the congressional pages these were people who were

(01:23:33):
in both these cases, Dennis Aster and Mark Foley were pedophiles,
and I'm assuming that that's the reason why the left
here in this publication did not want to talk about that,
because they didn't want to draw any connection between pedophilia
and homosexuality except that was there in both of their cases.
And these guys are both living this secret life that

(01:23:54):
is in contradiction not only to the law, but to
what they publicly say.

Speaker 9 (01:23:59):
And so.

Speaker 2 (01:24:02):
They then preceding this thing to pat Democrats on the
back because they're not hypocrites.

Speaker 4 (01:24:08):
For once, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:24:09):
Yeah, well anyway, yeah, they cheer this kind of stuff.
They have a quote from George Santos, of course, who
said you can be gay and conservative, and of course
George Santos and Charlie Kirk agree on that. Yeah, that's
that's the problem I have with Charlie Kirk. This guy
can go around and he can suck up to Trump
and Trump Junior and all the rest of them as

(01:24:30):
much as he wants. That's politics, right, But when he
goes around and presents himself as a Christian apologist and
he's going to tell people about God and about Christ,
and then he does that at his conventions, he appears
and defends a homosexual guy that's there. Oh, you can

(01:24:50):
be conservative and be gay.

Speaker 9 (01:24:51):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:24:52):
I have a big problem with that.

Speaker 4 (01:24:53):
And this is a problem that has been infesting the
GOP for decades at some point.

Speaker 2 (01:24:59):
Recidal problem. And if Charlie Kirk wants to embrace Christ
publicly for these types of things, he needs to not
be a hypocrite about some of these issues.

Speaker 4 (01:25:10):
I mentioned before, but Shady five brought it up in
chat as well, about the Franklin savings and loans scandal. Yes,
and this is something that has largely disappeared from the internet.
If you google it, you're not going to find much
info on And that.

Speaker 2 (01:25:22):
Was largely the Bush administration and Republicans around him as well.

Speaker 4 (01:25:25):
The guy who was largely involved at Larry King, he's
still alive, lives somewhere around DC.

Speaker 3 (01:25:30):
Now.

Speaker 4 (01:25:31):
They got him on some kind of you know, fraud
when it comes to banking or whatever. Never charged for
any of this. But he's saying at the RNC the
National Anthem twice, you know, four years you know later
after the first time. Yeah, this is the type of people.
The GOP is filled up with. This is the guy
that was supplying you know, young boys to people that

(01:25:52):
were in the White House.

Speaker 3 (01:25:53):
Yeah, yeah, that's true.

Speaker 2 (01:25:56):
Well, I pointed out I did not know this. In
the late nineteen Seventieslifornia conservatives pushed what they called the
Briggs Initiative that would bargay and lesbian teachers from government schools,
and they said Ronald Reagan opposed that as governor.

Speaker 3 (01:26:12):
So this goes for a very long time.

Speaker 2 (01:26:14):
You are not going to get any real reform of this,
of this cancer on our society. You're going to have
to take your kids out of school. There is no
Republican saviors that are going to be there. There's nobody
that really stands for Christian principles, that includes Charlie Kirk
and these people who are on the side. And it

(01:26:35):
was during that period log Camn Republicans formed and now
they are closely connected to the to the Trump family.

Speaker 3 (01:26:43):
There was.

Speaker 2 (01:26:45):
Also just the same same issue here you have in
the Utah state legislature. You have the guy who was
head of the Utah Senate. Let's see, let me see
if I can find this thing here. He was head
of the Utah Senate and he suggested this is kind

(01:27:09):
of interesting. The Senate President J. Stewart Adams inspired a
change in state law that reduced the penalty for cases
in which an eighteen year old who was still enrolled
in high school has consensual sex with a thirteen year
old and they put consensual and air quotes.

Speaker 3 (01:27:26):
Because it should be there. That's the whole point.

Speaker 2 (01:27:29):
The reason that we have these laws is because when
you're that young, you can't consent to it, which means
that you also can't consent to having your body mutilated
with chemicals or surgery and that type of thing. You
just don't have the judgment to be able to consent.
And so this is a situation again, an eighteen year
old high school boy and a thirteen year old girl.

(01:27:49):
Turns out that this Senate President J. Stuart Adams had
a relative who was the eighteen year old boy who
had been charged with coming after a thirteen year old girl,
which is kind of interesting.

Speaker 3 (01:28:03):
And they noticed that and the local papers at the.

Speaker 2 (01:28:06):
Time the law was changed, he reportedly had an eighteen
year old relative who was facing charges of child rape
for having sex with a thirteen year old, they said.
The Salt Lake Tribune published an article said Utah's Senate
President prompted law change that helped eighteen who was charged
with child rape. The law was not retroactive, meaning that

(01:28:28):
his relative still faced the original charges of child rape
and not a reduced charge. However, the judge, the prosecutor,
and the defense attorney and Adams's relative's case reportedly all
agreed that the legislative change did impact how the charges
were resolved in the relatives plea deal. So here we
have some legislation that just happens to look exactly like

(01:28:51):
his eighteen year old relative who's in a lot of trouble.
It lessened the penalty, but the age of consent was
not changed by this law. That's the kind of corruption
that we see in politics, whether we're looking at the
state level or whether we are looking at the federal level.

Speaker 3 (01:29:10):
We're going to take a quick break and we will
be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:29:13):
Stay with us, Liberty, it's your move, and now the

(01:30:55):
David Night Show.

Speaker 10 (01:31:00):
If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis
and the news, they say.

Speaker 7 (01:31:09):
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 4 (01:31:18):
Welcome back. We've got a lot of comments.

Speaker 2 (01:31:20):
Here.

Speaker 4 (01:31:20):
We're currently waiting on Tony Rderburn and we'll be joined
by him shortly. But ratisbro thank you very much for
the tip. It's very generous and very kind, says. Most
people don't know Waters and Owen Shroyer are good friends,
and so that push was from Alex Jones to get
mainstream to stop get in on Stop the Steal.

Speaker 2 (01:31:36):
Didn't know that, Yeah, I didn't know they were knew
each other either, but of course to me, Stop the Seal.
The interesting thing about Stop the Steal, and you know,
Roger Stone came up with that name from the twenty
sixteen campaign because there was going to be a move
to try to stop Trump at the Republican Convention, if

(01:31:56):
you remember, and so that's why he started calling it
Stop and Steal. Brought that back up, and he had
some people were following him around at the time in
twenty twenty who were doing a documentary and they got
it on a camera that he said.

Speaker 3 (01:32:09):
This is going to be we're going to raise money
on this so easily.

Speaker 2 (01:32:13):
It's going to be like falling off a log, and
that was what it was all about, folks. And to me,
it's amazing that the people who organize this thing, the
people who promoted it so heavily that even fox Knews
everybody was talking about stop the steal. The dog that
did not bark is the fact that there was no
indictment for them when there was an indictment for all

(01:32:34):
these other J sixers. It's pretty clear they wanted to
protect certain people and that the system wanted those people
to continue to mislead their followers.

Speaker 4 (01:32:45):
But yeah, s A Miller one two three. Trump is
a very confused individual, doesn't know what religion he is
and is trying to negotiate peace talks to get him
into heaven.

Speaker 2 (01:32:56):
Shaking my head, that's yeah, that's I saw. Franklin Graham
responded to that and he said, yeah, Trump is right.
We are saved by works. It's not our work, so
it's Christ's works. And that's the difference between Christianity and
every other religion. Every other religion, they come up with
a series of things for you to do. Sometimes it's

(01:33:18):
kind of vague and ill defined. Sometimes it's incredibly specifically detailed.
That's the way it is with the rabbis and the
laws that they rules that they come up with. They're
incredibly detailed about what you're allowed to do or not
do on Sabbath and things like that. But the Christian
religion is about the free gift of grace coming from

(01:33:38):
the Lord Jesus Christ, what he did on our behalf
and what he gave to us. That's the big difference
with it. And we have people even within the Christian
religion that have difficulty accepting and understanding that as well.

Speaker 4 (01:33:51):
I just got a text from Tony says he's going
to have to reschedule. They're doing construction in front of
his house and it is just so loud that the
audio would not be acceptable.

Speaker 2 (01:34:01):
Okay, that's fine. Well, we'll continue on with what we had.
We had some interesting things one of them.

Speaker 4 (01:34:08):
But we do have one more comment though, if you
don't mind sure, As Syrian Girls says, I was reading
a book on Chinese history and had to stop. The
viciousness of the Chinese governments to their people has always
been way beyond all the evils perpetrated by Western governments.
Chinese history versus Western history shows the value of Christianity
when it is only half heartedly adhered to.

Speaker 3 (01:34:28):
We may have a situation where christian we're trying to
maybe a more Christian nation than the United States and
not too distant future, they are building really strong people
in their house churches and they are you know, whenever
you have.

Speaker 2 (01:34:43):
Christianity suffering and a persecution like that, it builds some
really you get the dead wood. That is, typically they
are under soft circumstances like we have, and you only
have people who are truly committed, people who are true believers.
And that's really what's happening in China. You may have
already had more christ in China than you do in
the US in terms of sheer quantity, yeah, but in

(01:35:06):
terms of quality, you probably have much stronger Christians in
China than you do in the US.

Speaker 4 (01:35:10):
Yes, it's a It is a value Christianity and shows
the softening effect it can have on people. I also
think it has to do with a lot of Western
philosophy and the fact that a lot of other countries
have never even sat down and considered you know, rights
at all. It is simply you exist, and whoever has
more power than you is in control. They don't give

(01:35:32):
any thought to what your duty is to your fellow
man and what it.

Speaker 3 (01:35:36):
Is might makes right.

Speaker 4 (01:35:37):
M Do you see that very very much in Eastern philosophy.

Speaker 2 (01:35:41):
And I'm afraid you're seeing that in the West now.
They don't really care about principles. Nobody on either side
of this thing cares about free speech. They just want
to get the other side, you know. That's that's the
thing we keep coming back to.

Speaker 4 (01:35:53):
We got one more here, Skunk Collo Rose Garden, thank
you for the tip, says best chat this side of Marl.
I'll go, well's is that high praise? I don't know,
bt Taylor two four six. The fact that pedos get
off with such light sentences, it's proof our government is

(01:36:14):
run by pedos, I would agree.

Speaker 2 (01:36:17):
Well, this is kind of an interesting story. This is
the Women's NBA. The w NBA players have turned down
a pay boost that would have raised a minimum salary
for players in the league from sixty six thousand to
two hundred and fifty thousand.

Speaker 3 (01:36:33):
And the thing that makes.

Speaker 2 (01:36:35):
Us interesting is the fact that the league has never
made money and they're losing money at a bigger rate.

Speaker 4 (01:36:40):
They're subsidized by the NBA. This is again, they.

Speaker 2 (01:36:43):
Want to be paid what they're worth. I think probably
they would be paid nothing because.

Speaker 4 (01:36:47):
I truly do not I don't follow sports in general,
but at least with the NBA, you can kind of
make a case for it, like, oh, they're at the
top of their skill level. These guys are the best
at what they do. You know, they're very cool, they're
very fast, it's very fast paced.

Speaker 3 (01:37:02):
Calls people. Yeah, yeah, they get points for.

Speaker 4 (01:37:04):
That, and so you know, there's there's something to be
said for that. The WNBA has none of that. Being
the best, you know, female basketball player, you're probably gonna
get outdone by some you know, varsity maybe junior varsity team,
and you might get outdone just you know, by a
standard high school team.

Speaker 2 (01:37:24):
Well, they considered this offer to be a quote, slap
in the face, I said, even though the proposed numbers
would have represented the largest salary leap in league history.
I said, for context, the WNBA has never turned a
profit it's twenty nine year history. Annual losses hovered around

(01:37:45):
ten million dollars before Caitlin Clark, but now they have
ballooned to nearly fifty million dollars in twenty twenty four,
even as revenues grew past two hundred million. So they
got revenues of two hundred million, and yet they have
lots losses of fifty million. I mean, that's a tremendous
per you know, that's like twenty five percent of their

(01:38:06):
net gross is their loss That is that is a
pretty poorly run But evidently they're giving Caitlin and some
other celebrities really really big salaries that have run up
the red ink. The league survives because the NBA owns
roughly sixty percent of it and has consistently subsidized operations
since nineteen ninety.

Speaker 4 (01:38:26):
Seven, so they very generous.

Speaker 2 (01:38:29):
Yeah, they've done that, I think to avoid criticism of
sexism and things like that. But it's not paying its
way now. The players said this is a slap in
the face because they said, it's not the money. We
want a percentage of the profits, like the NBA players
do you have to generate profits first?

Speaker 3 (01:38:47):
Yeah, exactly, that's my thing.

Speaker 2 (01:38:48):
What is the percentage of profits if you've got negative
profits to pay? Yeah, exactly, that would pay us. Yeah,
the wn BA players need to pay to play.

Speaker 3 (01:39:02):
And that would be the reality of it.

Speaker 2 (01:39:04):
I guess you could say that their profit sharing is
net and zero because you gotta have some bads to
point out profits before they can do it. Critics say
that point out that the WNBA has a shorter schedule
than the NBAA.

Speaker 3 (01:39:19):
They have forty four.

Speaker 2 (01:39:20):
Games, and they only have ten minute quarters instead of
fifteen minute quarters. They have limited playoff rounds, and they
say that's one of the reasons why their salaries shouldn't
scale anywhere near NBA levels. But of course it's amazing
to me to see that this anything you can do,
I can do better attitude is still there in the
era that we have seen what happens when you have

(01:39:41):
just mediocre men pretend that they're women and compete in
a sport.

Speaker 4 (01:39:46):
And blow out the records.

Speaker 2 (01:39:48):
Yeah, I mean when I was growing up, they did
everything they can to try to deceive people. And I remember,
you know Billy Jean King, and you have Bobby Riggs
that staged match, and people that time who knew Bobby
Riggs said that he threw that for the money because
he had already had matches with other he was retired.

(01:40:08):
He was an older male guy who again was not
at the top of the league when he was at
his prime, and now he's retired.

Speaker 3 (01:40:16):
And older, but he was still able to beat some
of these.

Speaker 2 (01:40:20):
Current women's professionals, and they staged that and made a
big deal out of the fact that he threw the
game to her, because Jimmy Carner also did one after that,
and he skunked another tennis pro, female tennis pro, who
was again at the top of her game at the time,

(01:40:40):
and there have been others that were out there. So
they took this one match and they focused on that
almost exclusively, ignoring all the rest of the stuff. But
now that we've had this outrage from women about women
being women in sports being skunked by men trainees, you know,

(01:41:00):
it's amazing that we still have this type of thing happening. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:41:04):
I really thought that was going to be the one
good thing to come. But no, I underestimate the power
of their double think. They can simultaneously hold that, you know,
tranies are destroying them in sports, which they were, of
course and are to some extent still. Uh, and also

(01:41:25):
that women are just as good as men.

Speaker 3 (01:41:27):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:41:27):
Yeah, it's like the MAGA people who hate the m RNA,
they hate the lockdowns, they hate the mask, but they
can't connect the dots and will not connect the dots
to Trump.

Speaker 4 (01:41:37):
So real clearly also see able sort of thing with
feminists and the fact that they want to portray and
have all men viewed as you know, potential rapists and threats,
and they're evil and violent, you have to be continually
scared of them. But also women are just as strong
and powerful. And you can't have it both ways. If
you need to be afraid and you need to be
fearful of men, that means that what men are bigger, faster,

(01:41:58):
stronger and a danger to you. You can't have it
both ways. You have to pick one at least, which
again I don't think the average man is out there
trying to be heinous to women.

Speaker 2 (01:42:10):
I think Orwell was onto something when he came up
with a term double think, don't you truly? We see
it everywhere. And Nova Scotia, the government there has approved
glyphaset spraying on three five and seventy seven acres of
drought stricken, fire prone forest. Now, glyfasset is sprayed under

(01:42:31):
these forests and it kills deciduous trees, and it kills
pretty much everything except the pine trees that are there,
and so it doesn't create. It kills the forest essentially,
and you wind up with just one specie of tree
that grows there. But it also creates a fire hazard
even for those trees. And so you've got the press

(01:42:54):
there that found out about this and engage the premiere
of Nova Scotia and asked them some questions about it,
and he just com pleaded ignorance about it. Premier Tim
Houston had in exchange with the Halifax Examiner. They asked him,
they said, herbicide spraying has been ended, but because the

(01:43:16):
concern is that obviously the herbicides kill growth and add
to the fuel burden potential fireburden. Is it spraying on
now or has that been stopped? And he says, well,
I don't know if there's any spring that's going on
at the moment. Certainly not banned for all time, not
in our province. If it's been temporarily ceased, I'm not

(01:43:36):
sure really what's going on. So he doesn't know. And
the interesting thing about this was that they were doing
this in the forests previously, and they would report and
tell people the areas where they were doing this, so
people could stay out and not be sprayed themselves and
not come into direct contact with it. As I've said before,
we had a dog that died in particular type of

(01:44:00):
leukemia that is associated strongly with Glycassett, and I believe
that it was from one of these chemical lawn spraying
companies that our neighbors use. They would come out and
spray their lawn and then put signs up keep pets
and dogs off of it. And our particular dog was
a master of escape who was able to get out,

(01:44:22):
and he did get out, and he got into that grass.
He liked to roll into it and to eat it
more than any other dog I've ever seen, and so
he got the same kind of cancer that you saw
farm workers getting from using roundup. But they have taken
the approach to not ban the spring, but to ban
citizens from the forests. It looks like robin Hood yet again.

(01:44:46):
They even call it the Crown's forests, and I say,
you're not allowed into these forests period. So you've got people.
I think it's in the article Lands you could show
the pictures of people putting large signs on the ground
saying do not spray us, don't spray. They've got it
down on the ground, really large signs, and they're very

(01:45:07):
concerned about They said there is no consumptions to be
no consumption of berries and fruit within the spray sites.
Remainder of the growing season. And as I said before,
what was interesting about this was that prior to the
last couple of years, going back to twenty twenty three,
prior to that, they would always list the areas that

(01:45:29):
they were going to be spraying with They had it online.
But the people of the industry group that is selling
the glyphis at spray asked that that be taken down
and so they deep sixed it. They memory hold so
that people can't see the areas that they're going to
be spraying or no when they are going to be
spraying it there. Aerial spraying on private land would not

(01:45:50):
fall under the wildfire travel restrictions as they now stand,
but it's not clear whether herbicide spraying would be allowed
on crown land as industrial forestry uses it as a
form of Sylvie culture, which I don't know what that is.
They say it is permitted at night.

Speaker 3 (01:46:09):
So there you go.

Speaker 2 (01:46:10):
Where we are going back into a feudal system, aren't
we You know you're not allowed to go onto the
Crown's land.

Speaker 4 (01:46:16):
No, this is our forus.

Speaker 3 (01:46:18):
You may not nsweries.

Speaker 4 (01:46:19):
That's right, these are the Kings Dea.

Speaker 2 (01:46:21):
Well, we know that it is going into a kind
of a feudal system and a system of tyranny. The
EU has got a so called media freedom law that
it is about to take effect. And this European Media
Freedom Law which take effect last Friday, they said, it's

(01:46:41):
a debate over which media is going to get the safeguards,
and they openly came out Reuters and others said, we're
very concerned about the fact that you have a very
large online platforms, and so they create an acronym out
of that called velops vlops such as YouTube, face book, Instagram, TikTok,
those types of things. They said, people are getting their

(01:47:03):
news from that, and so you need to make sure
that you punish YouTube if they don't promote mainstream media.
That was the mainstream media approach, and so what they
what they did was they said that they had to
not put any restrictions algorithmic or otherwise to downgrade the

(01:47:25):
reports coming from mainstream media. So in order to avoid
the appearance of that, of course YouTube and Facebook and
others will make sure that they promote mainstream media if
they didn't before, under penalty of financial penalty. And so
the quote from Reuters was that it has contributed to

(01:47:46):
a fragmented alternative media environment that is filled with podcasters,
YouTubers and ticcongers.

Speaker 3 (01:47:53):
Don't worry. They've done their best to exclude me, so you.

Speaker 4 (01:47:58):
Know, we're only one out of those three.

Speaker 2 (01:48:00):
It's right, and it's not just making sure that you're
getting the mainstream mockingbird press promoted to you. The EU
is going to be scanning your chats by this October. Again,
the paranoia of the tyrants that is there now. They
say that they're doing this because they want to cut

(01:48:21):
down on child sexual abuse, so they want to scan
all the chats. This is all happening the same week
that the Trump administration sent this Israeli cybersecurity guide back
to Israel, who was doing exactly this. So they always
use this stuff and they talk about it as being
chat control. Big push coming out of Denmark to do this.

(01:48:45):
Some of the European countries are not fully on board
with this, but they will be. And when we look
at the pedophilia that is rampant in all of these
different governments, you know that they're just using that as
a figly to do the kind of surveillance that they
always wanted to do.

Speaker 3 (01:49:05):
That's what this is ultimately about it's just another mcguffin.

Speaker 4 (01:49:09):
It's always the same end gold matter which tack they're
coming at it from. Is it for the kids, is
it for to save the environment. Either way, you're losing freedom.
As you're losing your liberty. Is they're going to lock
you down the fifteen minute city agenda.

Speaker 2 (01:49:24):
Well, they're not locking down their borders. And you see
the massive numbers of people that are being brought into
the UK, Germany and France that type of thing. Show
the video of how some of these farmers have handled
the massive number of migrants that have come in and
squatted on their land. They gave them some of They

(01:49:46):
call it the honey truck.

Speaker 4 (01:49:48):
Oh no, yeah, look at this.

Speaker 2 (01:49:52):
They got all these people just moved onto their land
and decide they're going to live on the land of
the farmers.

Speaker 3 (01:49:56):
So the farmers go.

Speaker 2 (01:49:57):
Out and get the the trucks that spray manure.

Speaker 3 (01:50:03):
They use that to great effect there in the Netherlands too.

Speaker 2 (01:50:06):
I think when you had Mark ru to try to
shut down the farms, they brought out Winnie the Pooh
and the honey tree, I guess. But this is the
fight that's going on between farmers and squatters. And this
is in France. They really do want to shut down
our farms, don't they. That's truly amazing. Well, we're going

(01:50:26):
to take a quick break, folks, and we will be
right back. And when we come back, we're going to
talk about some financial issues, so stay with.

Speaker 1 (01:50:33):
Us analyzing the globalists. Next move now the David Nutshell.

Speaker 3 (01:51:57):
Well, welcome back.

Speaker 2 (01:51:58):
We're gonna talk about the fact that Trump has snapped
up more than one hundred million dollars in bonds since
taking office. We'll talk about what that means and maybe
perhaps why he is doing that, as well as what
is happening with stable coins. But before we do, I
want to thank the people who support this program. These

(01:52:18):
are some of the August checks that we just got in.
Let me read off their first names and their last
initial Scott C. HD from n C North Carolina, David
and Anne, Marie N.

Speaker 3 (01:52:32):
Aaron W.

Speaker 2 (01:52:33):
John R. Monica, s Helen T. Minor Mike and I
have a letter from Minor Mike. I want to talk
about here.

Speaker 3 (01:52:41):
Peter G.

Speaker 2 (01:52:43):
Charles, Larry P. Charles with APS Radio and Z, Timothy W. Margaret,
Mary T. Marty of I'm Marty T. K from Ohio,
Sylvia D James F. William G. David and Deborah W.
Thank you so much for your support. And these are

(01:53:04):
mostly people who have supported us continuously. I want to
give you this information from Minor Mike because he's asked
for prayers as well as Audi Modernature Radio. They're both
facing issues with their businesses. Here, he says, I apologize
not sending more money sooner, but my small mining company
has been sued in federal court by an organized crime group.

(01:53:28):
They're trying to steal my property and equipment with the
help of a complicit federal judge. These criminals have been
running a fraudulent stock selling mining scam since two thousand
and nine. They want me gone because I have shined
light on their sixty plus million dollar scheme. There are
many servants of the dark side in this world. I'm

(01:53:50):
confident that in the end the truth will prevail and
God will win over evil, and so please keep Minor
mic in your prayers. He has been someone who has
been very generous and kind and his support of us.
But we're going to see more and more issues. Of course,
this is not about the economy in general, but I
think we're going to see more and more issues of

(01:54:11):
people that are going to be having issues because of
the economy. We certainly saw that back in twenty and
twenty and twenty one, so many people that were faced
with losing their job because they didn't want to take
the job. And so please keep them in your prayers.
Audi Mrir Modern retro radio and minor.

Speaker 9 (01:54:35):
Mic as well.

Speaker 2 (01:54:36):
When we look at Trump, he has been accumulating bonds extensively.
They don't know exactly how much of this is an
estimate that it is one hundred million dollars in bonds.
It's been six hundred and ninety transactions that had taken
place since he took office, about seven hundred transactions in
about six months. That's several a day. The documents were

(01:55:00):
made public on Tuesday. According to CNBC calculations, the purchases
had a total value of at least one hundred million dollars.
By law, the US president, vice president, and some other
select officials must periodically declare reportable transactions. The precise value
of these dealings does not, however, have to be reported.
But what is Trump buying? We can see the kinds

(01:55:23):
of things that he is buying. They said that for
big purchases between five hundred thousand dollars and a million
dollars worth, or things like T Mobile, United Health, Home Depot,
and others. Meta he put in somewhere between two hundred
and fifty thousand and five hundred thousand, So he's buying
commercial paper. I wouldn't read too much into what these

(01:55:45):
companies do, but I think when you look at the
fact that he is buying bonds and commercial paper, I
think that means that he's pretty confident that he's going
to be able to get interest rates lowered. Because if
interest rates go down, those bonds that he got at
a higher interest rate are going to become even more valuable.
So it's going to be yet another incentive for him

(01:56:06):
to pull out all the stops and to go for
lowering interest rates. How will that affect us, Well, it
will affect us because inflation is going to make things
like gold go up. I'm not so sure what's going
to happen with bitcoin. It's not necessarily as we saw.

Speaker 4 (01:56:25):
It doesn't retract exactly like gold does.

Speaker 2 (01:56:28):
Yeah, I mean, gold is definitely the contrary trade to
the dollar. Bitcoin it's kind of a mixed bag. It's
kind of its own thing, So not really clear about
what that's going to do, but that certainly does give
us an insight. And as I said before, we see
that he is eager to replace as many people as

(01:56:48):
he can in the federal Reserve and he has to
find some crimes to charge them with.

Speaker 3 (01:56:54):
It looks like he's found at least one person.

Speaker 4 (01:56:56):
Actually have a comment here from Angie Tiger about the bonds.
Just invested a hundred million in government bonds. Doesn't surprise
mean while he's pushing lower interest rates to a weaker dollar,
he will make out like a bandit insider trading at
his finest.

Speaker 3 (01:57:09):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:57:09):
Yeah, the richie get richer.

Speaker 2 (01:57:11):
This makes Nancy Pelosi like like a small change when
he goes out and buys one hundred million dollars worth
of bonds. And again, the value is going to soar
on those things because they don't have a higher yield.
Nervous banking lobby is now fighting to change the Genius Act,
and of course it's another area where the Trump family

(01:57:33):
has made a very big investment. We've had Eric Trump
talk about the fact that he thinks and this was
before they got the Genius Act put through, he thought
that banks as we know them were going to be
extinct within ten years. Why is that Well, because they're
going to be replaced with stable coins, and so the
banking industry was kind of caught by surprise. Here you

(01:57:57):
got even people like JP Morgan CEO, Jamie Diamond or
Demon I think is perhaps maybe the better pronunciation of
his name. Even they are upset about what happened because
they wanted to make sure that stable coains could not
pay interest. But the question is what difference does it

(01:58:20):
make when the banks aren't paying any interest. I mean,
when you got Bank of America paying you like zero
point zero zero one percent interest on your savings accounts,
They're not paying any interest.

Speaker 4 (01:58:32):
They're disinterested in giving you a return on your money.

Speaker 2 (01:58:35):
Yeah, catching that's right. But anyway, this is the route
that this is going to take. I don't like that
idea because I like to have not that I'm a
big fan of banks, but smaller local banks are very important,
especially if you want to be able to buy things

(01:58:55):
with cash. You're not going to be able to have
any cash transactions if the banks go away, killed by
stable coins. That's going to accelerate the move to digital
ID and trackable permission financial statements. So banks are really
kind of local. Banks are going to be essential, I
think for you to be able to be able to

(01:59:17):
have cash transactions. You know, if a business is going
to take a cash they need to be able to
take it back physically to a bank that's going to
be nearby. That's the downside I see from this. Prominent
members in the crypto industry have long argued that stable
coin issuers should be allowed to offer users interests. So
this is the big fight going back and forth. But

(01:59:39):
like I said the other day, when you look at
the user's interest rates that they charge you when you
borrow versus the essentially zero interest rate that they pay
you when you put money in the bank, I really
don't understand what the fight is over this, But it
is the banks that have the target get put on

(02:00:01):
them stable coin issuers. They wanted to prohibit them from
paying any form of interest or yield in connection with
the holding, use, or attention of such payment stable coin.
And again when you look at the model for tether,
they buy Federal reserve notes which pay interest, and then
they doll these you know, the stable coins. The users

(02:00:26):
have their stuff, their funds, backed up supposedly by the
Federal Reserve notes. However, the users would not get that interest.
That's one of the things that made the stable coins
so profitable was that tether would keep all that interest
on the Federal Reserve notes. And by buying the Federal
Reserve notes, they were creating an international market for the

(02:00:47):
federal bonds that the other countries central banks don't want
to buy because they understand how we're gaming this, but
individuals in other countries would want to buy these stable coins,
so that's one way they back up their worthless fiat currency.
So they said, the ability for firms like exchanges to

(02:01:10):
allow interest on stable coins is based on factors other
than holding, use or retention, as mentioned in the Genius Act.
The word solely used in the Genius Act is quote
a powerful legal limitter. And it really does mean that
if there is any other basis for the deals, they
probably don't qualify, said one person. As things stand, customer

(02:01:33):
deposits allow banks to create a significant portion of the
money supply through loans and through lines of credit, incentivizing
a shift from bank deposits and money market funds to
stable coins would end up increasing lending costs and reducing
loans to businesses and consumer households.

Speaker 3 (02:01:52):
That's the way the banking industry is fighting back on this.

Speaker 2 (02:01:56):
They say, well, you know, it's just going to mean
that we're going to charge you more on loan and
make the loans more difficult for you to get them.
I'm seeing a lot of potential downside on this stuff
in every different direction. I mean, it looks like they're
setting us up for some really difficult times, and it's
how they're going to make sure that we own nothing.

(02:02:16):
This is a part of the real big takedown that's coming.

Speaker 3 (02:02:21):
Again.

Speaker 4 (02:02:21):
We've talked about the fact that this is going to
use for tracking and tracing, and they can immediately turn
your wallet off, but there's so many other different things
that like this are much more hidden and harder to consider.
How this interplays with the system that's already there and
the ways they're going to utilize it.

Speaker 2 (02:02:37):
Well, it's this argument from zero H says, it's very
unlikely that the crypto industry will accept any amendments to the
Genius Act, the law that's probably been passed. And I
think that is true, and I don't think that you're
don't find anybody in the Trump administration that's going to
want to have that happen either, because this is all
about this oligarchy that Trump has around him and the

(02:03:00):
money that they're going to make off of these stable coins.
You know, this is going to be the new financial
system that they're pivoting in. You know, Tony did a
great job last Friday talking about Bretton Wood's too, that
announcement that was made on August the fifteenth, nineteen seventy one.
We're going to come up to I don't know if

(02:03:20):
there'll be an announcement or if they'll just kind of
de facto move into this new system that's going to
be there, but I would expect that it's going to
happen pretty quickly whether or not there is an announcement.
I think even if it is something that just kind
of gradually evolves as a de facto move, I think
it is still going to be pretty sudden when it happens.

(02:03:41):
And I think all this stuff is going to be
They're going to make out like thieves that they are,
and we're going to be left holding the bag.

Speaker 4 (02:03:49):
They do these things solely at first, and once they
have a large enough portion of the population on board
to where once they flip the switch, you're kind of
forced to go along with them.

Speaker 3 (02:04:00):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:04:00):
Yeah, once they get a you know, they have some
number in mind. Probably someone does. Once we've got it
established here, here and here, then immediately we can hammer it.

Speaker 3 (02:04:09):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:04:11):
One of the people talking about this that's on the
crypto side said people never wanted to use banks to
make payments.

Speaker 3 (02:04:18):
They just had to. Now they don't have to, just
like digital music.

Speaker 2 (02:04:22):
Files were better than CDs. Well that's a matter of opinion.
I don't think so. They said, dis intermediated finance is
better and easier than traditional banking. Well, you know, and
I say that not because we're talking about necessarily whether
the digital music that you download has the same quality

(02:04:42):
or resolution as the CD that you had. But there
is something very important about having a physical media, and
that's what we're ultimately talking about with the banking thing here.
What makes them important is the connection to cash. If
the law local banks go away, there's not going to
really be any way to manage this cash.

Speaker 4 (02:05:04):
This is an issue that's pervasive. If you do not
have a physical copy of whatever it is, you don't
actually own it. This has been shown time and time again.
Even I bring them up because they're an exemplar. But
even something is silly as video games, something like the
Steam Store, you're technically kind of renting access to all
the games you purchase on steams.

Speaker 2 (02:05:23):
If you don't have it physically, you're going to wind
up renting it, right, That's exactly.

Speaker 4 (02:05:26):
They make it clear that, you know, if you were
to die and say it, will your Steam Library to
your kids? No, No, they don't get it. That's in
their terms of service. They are the holders of it.
You're simply renting access from them, and if they choose
to take that away from you, you have no recourse.

Speaker 2 (02:05:43):
Yes, does that sound familiar everybody? You'll own nothing, right,
You'll rent everything. You rent your home, you rent your music.
You know, everything will be rented. That's the way they
keep ultimate control of it. And that's why it is
important to have something that is physical. It gives us
some control and they want to divorce us from the
physical in every regard. Well as gold Ready to explode,

(02:06:05):
The Fear Trade says, yes, this is an article from
zero Hedg. Just region the headline. But that is the
key thing. You know, when you look at this and
what happened was stock market. We have a little bit
of an up and down this week. The stock market
right now is been doing well. It's been inflated, mainly
doing well because of just a handful of stocks like Nvidia,

(02:06:28):
and these are stocks that are connected with the AI bubble.
And now you've got even people like Sam Altman talking
about how the AI bubble is like the dot com bubble.
I said, from the very beginning, the dot com bubble
happened because everybody got so they rushed into this thing
and their minds ran away with all the things that

(02:06:50):
were going to happen immediately with the Internet. Now, those
things did eventually happen, but they didn't happen right away.
And because you had this massive mob got all hyped
up about it, they were the ones who ran in
and bid the price up. And that same type of
person will look at it and when it's not paying
off and it's not happening because it's going to be

(02:07:12):
down the road, that same type of person will then
run out the exit. And when they all start running out,
that's when it's going to happen. So it will first
happened with the AI stocks that will take down the
stock market in general, and that's when you're going to
see gold and silver rally. We already saw just a
little bit of that as the US stock indices sold
office last week. Gold and silver prices solidly higher went

(02:07:37):
near midday yesterday. And the question is, you know, when
is that needle going to pop?

Speaker 3 (02:07:43):
The AI bubble?

Speaker 2 (02:07:44):
Everybody is talking about it now, even the people who
are profiting from the AI bubble. UBS has raised the
second quarter twenty twenty six gold price target to thirty
six hundred dollars an ounce. They say they see the
strongest gold demand since two thousand and eleven. So stop
and thinking about that. If they're right, and we don't
know if they're right, but if they're right, if it

(02:08:05):
goes up from about thirty three hundred right now to
thirty six hundred in about four to seven months, you're
talking about a nine percent gain over those four to
seven months. That's a pretty large annualized gain for something
that is a very conservative investment. I still say that

(02:08:26):
gold and silver is a great investment. Go to David
night goldbe I'll take you to Tony Ardiman and he can.

Speaker 3 (02:08:32):
Help you to.

Speaker 2 (02:08:34):
Acquire physical goal physical silver he can also help you
if you want to put gold and silver into your
IRA as well. Gold prices posted steady gains and overnight
trading hit a session high of thirty three fifty. So
it's been solidly around the thirty three hundred level. And
one person is saying, yeah it can. Gold can float

(02:08:56):
to thirty six hundred, but it will not outperform silver
and plan and people are still expecting a big move
from silver. Goal prices are holding their gains even as
the Federal Open Market Committee minutes show that the federally
Serve remains very hesitant to cut rates. What they do
is they meet in places like Jackson Hole, Wyoming and

(02:09:18):
beautiful area. Yeah but yeah, and very very very wealthy
there as well.

Speaker 3 (02:09:25):
But anyway, you know, we went there.

Speaker 2 (02:09:29):
They had these real estate offices that were like Sethaby's.
You know, they're selling real estate as if it was
like fine art or something in that area.

Speaker 4 (02:09:36):
Luxury real estate.

Speaker 3 (02:09:37):
Oh yeah, very luxurious.

Speaker 2 (02:09:38):
Anyway, they have their meetings there and then they decide
what they're going to do about interest rates, and then
a month or two later, what they do is they
released the minutes of that meeting so people can see
what the various governors are saying. This is one of
the reasons why the Trump administration is going over the
history of these federal Reserve governors will fine tooth com

(02:10:00):
to say if they can get any dirt on them,
any crimes, so that they can remove them and put
them in replace them. When people are going to be
compliant with Trump and supportive of whatever he wants to do,
and we know what he.

Speaker 3 (02:10:12):
Wants to do. He wants to lower interest rates.

Speaker 2 (02:10:14):
So markets are seeing an eighty two percent chance of
a rate cut in September. So that's one of the
reasons why gold is staying steady at this point. So
that's you know, who knows what's going to happen in
the future with it. I just know that we want
to have some honest money. We want to have physical

(02:10:34):
money that is outside of their rig system that they
are creating. It's going to be a very bad system
for the rest of us, and we need to think
about how we're going to try to get outside of
it as much as possible.

Speaker 4 (02:10:46):
It was I think about this every once in a
while when it was one of the times when I
think you were sick, back when we're still working Force.
Tony hosted the show, and some guy called in and asked, like, well,
you know, the government can just come in and take
your gold and silver. That's not really could technically come
in and do that to anything. They can come in
and just kill you, So why do anything at all?
Just again, golden silver is a good store of value,

(02:11:08):
and it's something you can have on hand, and it's
something you can bury in a chest out back if
necessary and dig up later. The government can.

Speaker 2 (02:11:17):
You can hide it better than you can any of
the stuff that is electronic ansecryptocurrencies, except for some of
the ones like Manero or Zano or which.

Speaker 4 (02:11:27):
You're specifically built to be completely private.

Speaker 2 (02:11:30):
But they have a pretty steep learning curve, and if
you don't know what you're doing, you can have somebody
steal that from me. That's not even the government. That's
my concern about all this stuff that's electronic. I've exposed
myself then to all of these clever thieves worldwide, and
there's some pretty smart people who spend all their time
following this stuff, and you know the ins and outs

(02:11:51):
and how they can hack into it. And we're constantly
seeing systems being hacked into the CIA has been hacked
into the NSA's been hacked in.

Speaker 4 (02:12:00):
Such thing psyographically secure system. If it's attached to the Internet,
someone can find a way in and give them. It's
just a matter of time. Even if it's something as
simple as just a confidence attack where you send someone
an email and say, oh, I need this from you
or that from you. If they're not trying to break
an encryption, you know, all they need is someone's log in.
All they need is one person who has a lapse

(02:12:21):
in judgment and they can gain entrance to assystem.

Speaker 2 (02:12:24):
Yeah, and it's going to be increasingly easy for them
to use AI privately to to see people as well. Well,
we're got to take a quick break and we're going
to come right back.

Speaker 9 (02:12:33):
Stay with us.

Speaker 13 (02:13:34):
Who listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 1 (02:16:45):
Defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 4 (02:16:53):
Welcome back, folks. We've got some comments. Big Britt is
back again. When we're talking about the w NBA, Assume
says most of them are men, so they want men's money.
I don't know about that. Sprumford says, go to the
Nova Scotia forest, come back with a little cancer. That's right.
Just a little cancer. At least it won't be turbo cancer, right, yeah,

(02:17:15):
Tonal Lord one three three seven. Their desperation to watch
us as an indication that they know they're on thin ice.
They're scared, yes, hopefully.

Speaker 2 (02:17:24):
And we're gonna talk in this segment here about sort
of things that you can do to get away from
their virtual control.

Speaker 4 (02:17:29):
Here, yes, Alien poop evolution, EU will scan America, will
buy the info, and Lance says, just trade our info
for it. The five Eyes.

Speaker 2 (02:17:41):
Yeah, that's been one of their longest scams. Say, oh,
we're not allowed to collect that information on our own citizens.
How about you our partner over their collected on them
and then just voluntarily turn it over to us. That's
been the scam from the very beginning. Right after World
War Two. We had AT and T was basically the
phone company everywhere. They use them for surveillance. That's one

(02:18:04):
of the reasons why they had the Church Committee hearing
because from their inceptions, CIA and the NSA were spying
on Americans without a warrant. And what they said was
it's our data. These customers have willingly turned this over
to us, so we own it. The customers don't own
this information about themselves, and since we own it, we
can do with it whatever we want, and if the

(02:18:25):
government wants us to turn it over to them, we'll
do that voluntarily because we like the fact they put
us on in a monopoly situation.

Speaker 4 (02:18:32):
I can't wait for them to start minting our data
packets onto the blockchain as NFTs. Imagine George Soros pulling
a double sided holographic David Knight data n FT and
being very excited about it. I'll trade you this, I'll
trade it to Mark Zuckerberg or something. Knights of the Storm.
Coffee and tobacco will be a tradable item someday, that's right.

(02:18:52):
Maybe you need to start learning how to grow your
own tobacco.

Speaker 2 (02:18:55):
Yeah, pretty much anything is going to be a tradable item,
especially your skills. You know, get some real skills, not
just real material stuff, but real skills in terms of,
like you said, growing this or growing that.

Speaker 4 (02:19:07):
Now, I'm curious as to what kind of laws there
are about growing tobacco. I imagine they were strict that
they can't just be as simple as you're allowed to
grow your own tobacco.

Speaker 2 (02:19:14):
It's big business, really is. And you know, tobacco has
been one of the things that they have done more
genetic modification two than anything else for whatever reason. It's
so there's really really big money in big tobacco, as
we've seen their control over government and media.

Speaker 5 (02:19:30):
Yeah, I remember looking that up a few years back.
It's heavily, heavily regulated, and you're going to have the
government all in your business if you're trying to grow tobacco.

Speaker 3 (02:19:42):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:19:42):
So I googled it right now and it says you're
generally allowed to grow up for your own personal use.
But if you're gonna, you know, distribute it or sell
it at all, you're going, I'm assuming you're gonna get
involved with the ATF.

Speaker 2 (02:19:53):
Yeah, that's get Proto would get his house rated in
the shire.

Speaker 4 (02:20:00):
No long bottom leaf to distribute, sour man, We're coming
for you, Cecilia fourteen David. Most concerning in the Genius
To Act is it gives government power to punish vax
mandate refusers by freezing bank accounts.

Speaker 2 (02:20:12):
That's right, all of these stable coins do. That's why
I call them a trojan coin. That's what they really
ought to be called instead of a stable coin.

Speaker 10 (02:20:20):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (02:20:21):
Yeah, the horses come out of the stable it's a trojan.

Speaker 4 (02:20:23):
Horse, I say, nay sa Miller one two three. The
terriffs are now kicking in and threatening the existence of
so many small businesses. So said, Trump has been the
most devastating presidents for small businesses in that lifetime.

Speaker 2 (02:20:37):
Yeah, no one can lock down now. This all always
coming after a supply supply chain and always impacting the
small businesses the most.

Speaker 9 (02:20:47):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:20:48):
Again, the big businesses can afford to eat the teriffs
for a while. They can keep their prices low and
keep you coming to them. You look at you know,
your local markets. Prices go up. They have to raise
prices immediately because they offer right on such razor thin margins. Yeah, like,
oh look, Walmart's still cheap. Yeah, not for long. Once
the small businesses are gone, then they'll raise it. Nights

(02:21:09):
of the storm. Digital money is going to shut out
a lot of banks that are all insolvent. They can't
make it from nothing. This will centralize the banking to
one entity. That's always how they operate. It's always a consolidation.
I remember when we were young, and you know Bank
of America and what was that one of the other
ones they merged consolidated under Bill Clinton, I believe it was.

(02:21:30):
And you talked about that.

Speaker 2 (02:21:31):
And we were, oh, yeah, that was. That was Bank
of America. Bank of America was a California bank, and
Nations Bank was Questions Bank and Charlotte and we had
a bank account or a business bank account with Nations Bank.
And it was a guy from North Carolina. Trying to
remember his name, but he was in the Clinton administration

(02:21:55):
and he ran this whole thing through and then he
wound up running for Senate, although he didn't make it
through the primaries. But that's when they approved that merger.
And when they approved that merger, everybody said we're going
to wind you know, throughout the industry, and other people
were posing it and they said, we're going to wind
up with just a handful of gigantic banks, and lo

(02:22:17):
and behold, that's exactly what we had about a decade later,
and we saw how that too big to fail thing
worked out. They were the ones who were bailed out,
and the small banks started collapsing, hundreds of them collapsing
a year every year at that point in time. Drudge
would put that kind of stuff up and you could
see how several hundred and fifty one year one hundred

(02:22:39):
and sixty another year, they were going out of business
because the big banks were protected, but they were not,
And the new regulations that they put in with the
Consumer of Financial Protection Board only made things worse for
the small banks and protected the big banks and some
of the other things. Elizabeth Warren wants to pretend that
she's on the side of the little guy, but she

(02:23:00):
everything that she has done helps the big banks. That's
why she's on their payroll.

Speaker 4 (02:23:06):
They get what they want out of these politicians. Yeah,
Night of the Storm. Oh read that one tunnel lord
win three three seven. He says, I had no idea
Steam did that with inheritance. Holy smoke. Yeah, it was
a fairly big deal. I remember reading about it a
few years ago. They may have changed their policy since then,
but I haven't heard anything about that. But I do
know at the time quite a few people were up
in arms about it, the fact that wait, I mean,

(02:23:27):
I can't will my game library to my children in
case they want to play. You know, you know, what
if we played these games together since they were young,
and maybe we've got memories, you know, and what if
we've got like a shared server or something.

Speaker 3 (02:23:39):
Like Sorry, Travison Leias. I don't have a library, will you.

Speaker 4 (02:23:43):
I've taken all the records.

Speaker 5 (02:23:45):
I remember seeing that. Well it's kind of a you
can laugh at that particular situation. It shows that you
don't own the games if you can't do whatever you want,
including bequeathing them to your children.

Speaker 3 (02:23:58):
Yeah, it's because no matter what area of life, they
want you to be a renter.

Speaker 4 (02:24:01):
Right, even something down to the silly escapisms we enjoy
Skunk Collo Rose Gardens. Silver is the most reasonable value
of anything in the whole world right now. As Tony
points out, it's continually undervalue. Knights of the Storm has
been in chat talking about it as well.

Speaker 3 (02:24:18):
As a ratio to the price of gold and everything else.

Speaker 4 (02:24:22):
Yeah, they've been playing games that keeping it low. Knights
of the Storm, keep your eye on silver. It is
below the cost to mine and refined because of ETFs.
They played that game too long. Silver. ETFs had to
have put the price down so low that silver is
on sale. Eventually the bubble will pop and silver prices
will go more than four times up.

Speaker 2 (02:24:42):
See, that's the whole thing. That's the kind of games
that these people play. ETFs are a good example of
that when they do these derivatives. It's very much like
the securitized mortgages that created the mortgage bubble. It took
me a while to catch on to the ETFs.

Speaker 3 (02:24:56):
At first.

Speaker 2 (02:24:57):
I looked at it and I thought, well, i'll accumulate.
You know, GLD and SLV. These are a couple of
ETFs that come out of supposedly there is gold and
silver that is being held by these companies on the
Shanghai Gold Exchange.

Speaker 3 (02:25:11):
Show me the money, yeah, exactly.

Speaker 2 (02:25:14):
What got my suspicion was that it was not tracking
the price of physical gold, the spot price of physical gold.
I thought, why is that? And then I realized that,
you know, they're running a scam. They are not really
backing it up with their purchases what they're selling you.
So when they can divorce the actual whether it's real

(02:25:34):
estate or whether it's gold and silver, they can divorce
that and give you some kind of a token, then
we lose everything. And that's the way that they're going
to rob us of everything for sure, And that's this
tokenization and stable coins are just another part of that
as far as I'm concerned.

Speaker 4 (02:25:50):
One of the things that always talking to funny about
sable coins they own. It's stable because it's tied to
something like the US dollar. We have very different definitions
of stable. Nothing tied to the US dollar is stable
by definition.

Speaker 3 (02:26:01):
Yeah, it's a token that's derived from the US dollar.

Speaker 4 (02:26:05):
How stable can it be? Then we have a comment
here from Marquie, Mark and Jay that just popped up says,
aren't we de facto renters now with property taxes?

Speaker 3 (02:26:14):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (02:26:15):
True, as long as we have property tax you don't
ever own your land. I've told this story before, fairly recently, even,
but I remember you were doing taxes. I was probably
about seven years old, and I wandered into your office
because I was bored, and she's like, what are you
doing taxes? You know what's that? And you explained taxing
me and just what tax are we going to know?
Property taxes? I pay the government for the lands. But

(02:26:37):
I thought you bought the house. I thought you paid
for the house already. I have to pay them every year,
and it just blew my seven year old mind. I
had to sit down and think about that for a while.
I was like, wait a minute, that means you can't
really own it.

Speaker 2 (02:26:47):
That's right, And you know why we have these property taxes.
Almost all of it goes to supporting these schools and
the harm that they do to our children. It's such
a racket. So I can't understand why people are so
wedded to the school system. And that's across the political spectrum.
We got to get rid of this. You need to
shut it down.

Speaker 4 (02:27:06):
If they're wasting our money to brainwash and propagandize our
children with.

Speaker 3 (02:27:10):
Arms that they do not just financially.

Speaker 4 (02:27:13):
Yeah, which I mean if they were to say, we're
going to keep taking your money, but we'll do absolutely nothing.
But if you get rid of the money, we're going
to keep doing it, I'd say, fine, we'll pay you
to go away. I'll keep paying the taxes if it
means you guys leave, I would take that trade. Karen
Carpenter twenty seven. The first time we went to Jackson
Hole in the seventies, there were mud streets when it
snowed in places. Jackson Hole is a very different place now.

Speaker 3 (02:27:35):
Yeah. Yeah, it's still not like New York City. It's
still very rustic in that. But you know these people
have massive estates.

Speaker 4 (02:27:41):
Oh yeah, it's you can tell. It's a cultivated rusticness.
The original people that made it the way it was
are no longer there. It's a bunch of people that
moved there because they liked the aesthetic, who have priced
the original owners far out of anything they could have
ever afforded. Knights of the Storm. Copper is going to
be a thing as well.

Speaker 3 (02:28:00):
Soon.

Speaker 4 (02:28:00):
They are trying to build a large collider in Texas
and that will consume all the copper we have on hand.
They will artificially suppress the price of copper to get
the collider built. Then when it's done, the price will explode.
I have to look at that too. Are they talking
about a large hadron collider like they've got going on
in Cern. Are they gonna be doing weird at cultic
rituals like that in Texas too? That'll be fun MAV

(02:28:22):
twenty twenty two. Copper has been messed with for a while.
They need copper for this AI crap too. They need
copper for a lot of different things. It's a metal
that's heavily used in all kinds of different industries. Knights
of the Storm. This is why crackheads are ripping wires
and pipes out of walls. Before they did it with
the CERN large collider before Tony hinted to copper being

(02:28:43):
a medal to watch in the future a while back.
He's right, Yeah, if they build a collider here in
the United States, they're gonna have to worry about crackheads.
Those people are industrious, they have a lot of energy.
You're gonna have to have guards twenty four to seven.
It's not as friendly and nice as it is in
Switzerland here, Cecilia, Are pennies valuable for copper?

Speaker 3 (02:29:02):
Good question? Was there any copper left and pennies?

Speaker 4 (02:29:06):
That's what I was about to ask. Is there actually
any copper in pennies or is this some you know,
weird amalgam metal. Now they seem to have gotten rid
of all the value in all of our metals, because
I know for a fact that pennies cost more to
manufacture than they're worth. Yeah, aren't they phasing out pennies next?

Speaker 3 (02:29:21):
Oh yeah, Trump shut it down.

Speaker 2 (02:29:23):
And as I said, I have real concern about that
because that impacts the utility of cash to some degree.
But you know, when you look at coins, it's not
all that meaningful to talk about the cost to mint
coins because they last for a very long time, unlike
the paper money.

Speaker 4 (02:29:42):
Yeah, Knights of the Storm and Chat says pre eighty
two pennies are pure copper. So if you find a
penny from before nineteen eighty two, then you've got a
pure copper penny. Might be worth holding on to. That.

Speaker 2 (02:29:54):
That's interesting, Well, I was talking about stable coins, and
it's kind of interesting that you've got a guy that
was part of the Trump administration earlier this year. Remember
the Trump administration is only what like six or seven
months old. You've already got Beau Hines leaving the White
House as the White House Crypto Director and now going

(02:30:15):
to Tether, which is Lucky Lutnix company that he's heavily involved,
and of course you know it's a company that is
linked to Tether. And his company has got a great
deal of steak and Tether and they acquire the Federal
Reserve notes and sell them to Tether. Heinz will work
to help Tether enter the US market and cultivate relationships

(02:30:37):
with policymakers and industry stakeholders. They give me a break.
They've already got a rotating door here between policy makers
and industry stakeholders. That's why we got the Genius Act
in the first place, and it's just another example of
this kind of you know, regulatory revolving door that pharmaceuticals

(02:30:57):
are filled with. And of course that's what they're building
right now, that with their crypto stuff. This is an
article from Brownstone. It says, from Fiat everything to real everything,
and he lays out some of the problems with the
fiat society that they're trying to build with tokens and
Larissa's stuff, and then talk us a little bit about

(02:31:17):
some of the solutions that we should be focused on
in each of our personal lives. Here the infrastructure is
now visible to anybody who is willing to see it.
The systematic replacement of natural systems with artificial ones has
reached into every domain money, food, health, education, information. What
began as isolated changes has revealed itself as a coordinated operation,

(02:31:42):
the complete substitution of reality with decree ownership and access,
competents with credentials, everything for a permission society. The mathematical
engineering of ownership out of reach becomes clear. From fifty
two percent of thirty year olds owning homes and nineteen
fifty to a projected thirteen percent by twenty twenty five.

(02:32:05):
Extraction was rebranded as liberation, the subscription economy that converts
your three thousand dollars monthly into someone else's equity while
you build nothing. These aren't separate trends, but components of
what I documented in feat Everything. He said, they didn't
just lude us financially and culturally, but they rewired our

(02:32:28):
psychology to make resistance impossible. That's the key thing, you know.
They want to make it so that you accept all
of this rental stuff rather than taking control of it yourself.
And he talks about how Catherine Austin Fitz is very
focused on this, and she is she worked very hard
to try to make sure that there was going to

(02:32:48):
be a kind of a Tennessee reserve system here in
this state, so that we would not be completely reliant
on stable coins. She sees the connection course between stable
coins and the great pump and dump, and that's the
way she sees that her article was a plunder financing
the pan Opticon, and that just recently came out. He said,

(02:33:11):
that was last week. It connects the dots that reveal
the full scope of the operation. The surveillance infrastructure isn't
just watching us, it is actively conditioning us. For compliance.
She calls it the pan optagon because she said it
creates the psychological substrate that makes extraction possible. Her work

(02:33:32):
has long explored themes of sovereignty and financial freedom, but
this latest analysis shows the endgame. We're not just being robbed,
we're being participating, programmed to participate in our own robbery. Yeah,
you will own nothing, and you'll be happy about that.
This is the villain's masterpiece. The system is so sophisticated
that it harvests not just our wealth but our very

(02:33:53):
capacity for resistance. And of course a key part of
that is going to be the universal basic income. Get
how quickly everybody got used to a stimulus check in
staying home and not working with Donald Trump, As I
said before, he's an accelerationist and always said that people
would get ruined by the welfare state, because we've already

(02:34:13):
seen that happen in the past. But the extent of
doing it universally and the extent to which people became
so compliant and so dependent on this stuff really surprised
me at how quickly it happened.

Speaker 4 (02:34:26):
Almost overnight. And I know we have this article in
the stack. You might get to later about the sheer
number of Britons that now just take permanent disability and
never into the workforce.

Speaker 3 (02:34:34):
Yes, when you get people to the US as well, Yeah,
when you.

Speaker 4 (02:34:38):
Get people that option, there's a large number of people
that will simply take it. They look at their options
and think, well, I can work, you know, I can
work you know, one hundred hours a week and barely
straight by, or I can do nothing and get almost
as much from the government. I think I'll take it
from the government.

Speaker 2 (02:34:54):
And that article they were talking about how so many
young people went straight from college or whatever straight onto
saying that they were disabled. And one of the things
they would say is, oh, I've got PTSD.

Speaker 4 (02:35:04):
Or i'm you know, I'm stressed, I'm depressed.

Speaker 3 (02:35:07):
ADHD or whatever.

Speaker 2 (02:35:09):
I got some kind of mental issue, And so I
can get on one hundred percent disability and just live
off of the government. And it's very easy for people
to do that. It's engineered compliance, as they say here.
The recent certification of class action lawsuit for children who
were MK Ultra victims demonstrates that these were not just

(02:35:30):
isolated experiments. They were the prototype for mass psychological conditioning.
The same techniques that once tested on unwitting subjects now
reach billions of people through the devices that they carry,
willingly impulsive, debt prone, and dependent on external validation, and
capable of long term planning. This is what we're seeing

(02:35:52):
in citizens today. The same systems that price you out
of ownership simultaneously condition you to prefer access over assets,
subscriptions over purchases, digital relationships over physical community. It's the
own nothing, be happy idea. So Jeffrey Tucker has talked

(02:36:13):
about a practical way of living with the founding father's
principles in a world of smartphones and surveillance capitalism. He's
not advocating retreat, but showing how to navigate this system
without surrendering the character traits that made America's founders ungovernable.
And of course, a key part of that is local agriculture.

(02:36:34):
Jefferson said that the whole system of government that had
been designed was dependent on an agrarian society, and he
thought that once we moved into industrialization that we would
lose it. He should see what's going on with the
technocracy in a world that is drownding and manufactured complexity.
This one hundred and twenty page work from Jeffrey Tucker

(02:36:56):
is as efficient as it is inspiring, cutting through the
noise to reach cential truth, he says. Tucker has identified
specific practices that make.

Speaker 3 (02:37:08):
What is it? Oh?

Speaker 2 (02:37:08):
Okay, yeah, I don't know what that was. That was like, yeah,
it makes fiat. Is there an acho in here? It
changed my voice to it made FIAT systems powerless, though
not through retreat from modernity, but through applied philosophy for
maintaining sovereignty from within. And so he's got three or
four things here. The first thing is to try to

(02:37:31):
cultivate in your life a long time preference over instant gratification.
So they're constantly wanting us to want it now. But
he says, the mentality that you will have delayed gratification,
that you can wait so that you don't have to borrow,
So you save so you don't have to borrow this thing.

(02:37:52):
He says, when you can plan decades ahead, you will
not be manipulated by quarterly thinking. Then also, craftsmanship over
disposable consumption. Real skill building creates anti fragility. The person
who can fix, build, grow, or repair something valuable becomes
harder to control. Craftsmanship builds the patience and the attention

(02:38:16):
span that surveillance capitalism deliberately erodes. It creates real value
instead of renting access to other people. And then generational knowledge,
he said, over credentialed expertise, wisdom that has been passed
down through families and communities doesn't require institutional validation. It

(02:38:37):
cannot be revoked by authorities, It cannot be updated by algorithm.
Your grandmother's knowledge of food preservation doesn't come with subscription
fees or terms of service. This knowledge exists outside of
their systems, making it both valuable and dangerous to those
who profit from dependency. And this is one of the

(02:38:58):
reasons why, you know, we talk about out a civil
defense manual. That's not going to be online. It's not
going to be something that can be taken away. It's
in a book. And you know, that's the importance of
either having a book or if you put something on
a device, making sure that that device is air gapped
and not on the internet where anybody can mess with

(02:39:20):
that device, and to make sure that it is protected
against something like an EMP. But even better than that
is a book. Books are protected from EMPs.

Speaker 4 (02:39:30):
The electricity can go out and you can still read it.
You can light yourself up a candle and read the
Civil Defense Manual by candlelight.

Speaker 3 (02:39:36):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:39:37):
Yeah, and it's kind of interesting, you know when we
look at this.

Speaker 3 (02:39:40):
This is an article.

Speaker 2 (02:39:41):
I'm not going to go into detail on it, but
basically they say that goal performs more like luxury real estate,
and he is an example of Manhattan, and they say,
you know, there's people who want to live in Manhattan
and they can afford it.

Speaker 4 (02:39:54):
But then there's a lot of suckers.

Speaker 2 (02:39:57):
There's a lot of people who can't and they wait
on the outset skirts and they're waiting to see if
they can find a deal or something like that, but
they're not making more real estate there in Manhattan. He said,
that's basically what you see with gold. That's that same
kind of market dynamic that you see with luxury real
estate in a highly competitive market like that. And so

(02:40:18):
we're going to leave the financial stuff because there's some
other things that I want to talk about when we
come back. We're going to talk about surveillance, and so
we're gonna take.

Speaker 3 (02:40:28):
A quick break.

Speaker 4 (02:40:29):
Let's roll the beach boys.

Speaker 2 (02:40:31):
Yeah, you got that, Liss. We had a request from
Karen to play that, so We're going to play that
if you can find it, but if you can't, I'll
play something else.

Speaker 1 (02:41:25):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:41:29):
All right, welcome back. I want to talk about targeted individuals.
It's not something that I've talked about before. I've had
many people who have said, you need to interview so
and so, and they've had experience with it. I know
that William Benny has talked extensively about it. He believes
that he is a target of the government. When we
mean that, we don't mean he's been targeted with audience

(02:41:50):
or something like that, but really targeted with the electronically,
with some of the same types of tactics that have
been used with the you know, so with the label
of the Havana syndrome, and if you remember when they
came out about ten years or so ago, I talked
at the time about Alan Frye, who worked for the Navy.

(02:42:13):
He's the only scientists that's ever been funded by the
government to look at biological effects of electromagnetic radiation and
very similar to what they found with microwave radiation, the
fact that you could cook food with it. He found
that different frequencies than the microwave would have effects that

(02:42:33):
could be they could affect your mind. And he had,
you know, with a microwave for example, they had some
of the microwave technicians who were working on radar and
found that if they left their coffee cup on top
of the thing that wasn't shielded very well, but it
would get hot. And that's why one of the very

(02:42:53):
first microwave ovens was called a radar range from a
man if you remember that. And because it came from radar, well,
Alan Fry's assistant realized they were working on something else.
It was different frequency, and he started hearing these clicking
noises like crickets and things like that, and those EMFs
were actually manipulating his nerve, his auditory nerves in a

(02:43:17):
way that it was making him hear things. And so
Alan Fry started doing research on that, and a lot
of people have picked up his research and talked about
it in light of five G or six G or
some of these other things. So when they started talking
about the Havanah effect, that was people who worked for

(02:43:38):
the US Embassy and Havana and they were getting nausea, dizzeyness,
and hearing clicking sounds, and I thought, I wonder if
that's anything like the Fry effect, and I always believed
that it was. They wound up having hearings. He had
so many people who'd been affected by it, and they
basically kind of poop pooed it and said, no, nothing exists,

(02:44:00):
even though they're own people being hurt by it. And
I think one of the reasons that they did that
is they don't want you to realize that they are
doing it. Our own government is doing it to people
they considered to be their enemies in the same way
that the communists in China were doing it. A targeted
individual is a short name for a victim of government weaponization,
said Puerto Rican attorney Anna Toledo.

Speaker 3 (02:44:23):
From Targeted Justice. She said.

Speaker 2 (02:44:26):
In twenty twenty three, Cash Patel, who at that time
was a former top official at the White House, Department
of Fence and the Intelligence Community and the Department of Justice,
published his memoir Government Gangsters, the Deep State, The Truth
and the Battle for Our Democracy. Well, the problem is
is that he's joined the mob now, I think, and
I don't think it's going to get any more truth

(02:44:47):
out of him.

Speaker 3 (02:44:49):
He's gone to the other side.

Speaker 2 (02:44:51):
He discussed at that time two hundred and seventy eight
thousand Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications against Americans two hundred
and seventy eight thousand. Fiser reports, Right, so this is
the star chamber where you're not allowed to know that
they're coming after you. He said that. She said, that

(02:45:12):
is who the targeted individuals are. These are people who
were often average Americans who have been wrongly classified as
domestic extremists or violent extremists. The very first report that
I did when I came, when I went to info Wars,
was about a guy who was the victim of this

(02:45:32):
type of approach. They put him on a no fly list,
and he didn't know that he was on the no
fly list, and he was on his way from the
continental of the United States to see his wife who
was in the military in Japan, and he was flying,
actually on a military plane. They stopped in Hawaii to
change planes, and when he got on the second plane
to take off, agents came on board and drug him

(02:45:54):
off and said, you're on no fly list. It's like,
I didn't know that. How'd they let me get this
far to Hawaii? And he was stuck. He was stuck
in Hawaii, because if you can't fly out of Hawaii,
what are you gonna do.

Speaker 3 (02:46:04):
You're gonna take a slow boat out of there, and
he couldn't find one. Anyway.

Speaker 2 (02:46:09):
We publicized it and he had some other people who
helped him with it, and they eventually got him back
to the United States. But they could not find out
why he had ever been put on that list.

Speaker 3 (02:46:18):
He had been.

Speaker 2 (02:46:19):
Vetted by the FBI for concealed carry and he had
also been vetted by the TSA because he worked at
an airport, and so they had done extensive vetting of
him and nobody had found anything whatsoever. But somebody didn't
like him and put him on a bad list. And
this is what they can do with the Pisa Court.

(02:46:40):
It's amazing to me to see this, you know, the
Pisa Court and the Pisa Act. PISA came out of
the hearings that they had because the Church Committee hearings
in the Senate and the Pike Committee hearings in the House.
Those were held to monitor what the CIA and the

(02:47:01):
NSA were doing because from their inception, they've been spying
on Americans without warrants, and so they created this oversight thing,
said Okay, we need to be able to spy on people,
but we're going to say that they can't do it,
except they're going to have to have a warrant, unless
it is a foreign citizen in a foreign country. Even

(02:47:22):
if it is a foreign citizen in America, you've got
to get a warrant. But then they wound up using
this FISA court as a star chamber process to give
them legal cover to spy on anybody that they wanted
to without a warrant. That's how the government operates now.
They take these structures that are there to restrain them

(02:47:43):
and to keep them within a system of rules and
within the constitution. They take those very systems and they
use them as legal cover to enable them to do
what they are legally prohibited from doing. They said, they've
been placed there under secret criteria. Of course, you don't
have of any right to confront your accusers. You don't

(02:48:04):
even know that you're accused. You're never supposed to find
out that they're on this database because it's a blacklist
for enemies of the state, Toledo said.

Speaker 3 (02:48:13):
Tulca.

Speaker 2 (02:48:13):
Gabbard declassified about two months ago. A December twenty twenty one,
memorandum by the Biden administration that classified as violent extremists
anybody who opposed the COVID mandates and the vaccines and
the lockdowns. So you can bet that I'm on one
of these lists.

Speaker 4 (02:48:32):
It's probably why they probably on all of the lists.

Speaker 2 (02:48:35):
Yeah, that's probably why they sent to PayPal. They said,
we can't find things that we got this message. I
don't know who it's from, said take this account off immediately.
You are subjected to government surveillance, harassment, even potentially torture
with directed energy weapons referring to the Havana Syndrome hearing
that was held May of twenty twenty four by the
Committee on Homeland Security. And whenever they have these committees,

(02:48:58):
whenever they do these things, they have an inquiry into
the jfk assassination, or in the UK they had an
inquiry into how they handled the so called pandemic. Whenever
they do that, these things are set up to be
a whitewash. They're not ever going to expose anything.

Speaker 3 (02:49:12):
She said.

Speaker 2 (02:49:13):
These directed energy weapons can cause a range of symptoms,
from feeling unwell to experiencing horrific burns and attacks. They
can be used to make a person believe that they
are going crazy. The symptoms of Avana syndrome, such as
severe headaches, dizziness, nausea, cognitive problems, and a sensation of
pressure on the face was exposure to directed radio frequency energy,

(02:49:39):
with psychological factors considered as a secondary contributor. I have
to say that that is one thing that I've not experienced.
I've not experienced any of that kind of stuff. She
noted that it not only affects diplomatic, military and intelligence officials.
Doctor Michael Hoffer, who said that he had been prohibited

(02:49:59):
from Diagon noticing any more civilians with Havana syndrome, suggesting
that there was a cover up of civilians that were
being targeted. She believes that Havana syndrome is a silent
epidemic in America. Neuroscientists and neuroethicist doctor James Giardano has
admitted in a Catherine Herriage interview that directed energy weapon

(02:50:21):
attacks are occurring in America, and he co authored a
paper published in April this year stating that these weapons
are likely the cause of Havana syndrome. Again, Bill Benny,
who was an NSA whistleblower and he was the formerly
he was the global technical head of the NSA, has
gone on record in interviews saying that he believes that

(02:50:42):
he is a target of a directed energy weapons. Toledo
explained how to identify a weaponized cell tower. This is
something you may want to know if you think you're
in this category. Cell towers with a level featuring four
panels facing the same direction contain a microchip, she said,
patented by Ericsson company, is a beam forming chip that

(02:51:05):
can fire microwave beams. She suggests that one way to
stop the Hamana syndrome epidemic is to de weaponize these
timers by removing or disabling the chip. Well, I don't
know if this is true. All I know is that
this is one of the things that concerned me about
five G when I look at it. Five G can
target you individually. Now, whether or not the government is

(02:51:26):
doing this because of your political beliefs. I believe that
if something has potential to create damage, it can be
made more intense. They like to say, well, five G
it's a very different frequency, which of course they've not
done any safety studies to see what the biological effects
of that frequency are. But what it does is that
multiplex is the targeting of people who are in a

(02:51:50):
given area. It can focus on one phone at a time,
and you can get signals from several different antennas focused
on the one and that moves to another one that
does it's very rapidly to everybody in the area. Now
I looked at that and I thought, just you know,
that looks like that is ripe for being weaponized against people.

Speaker 3 (02:52:11):
I don't know if that's how they're doing it or not.

Speaker 2 (02:52:13):
You know, it may be that rather than the celt
towers they said it began before twenty sixteen, when the
Havana sentdrome became public after Canadian and US employees and
diplomats and their families that were assigned to the US
Embassy and Havana began experiencing similar symptoms. Mini mass shooters
have also had a common thread of hearing voices due

(02:52:35):
to the microwave auditory effect that Alan Frye had developed,
the so Caull fry Effect the Voice to Skull technology.
Toledo briefly shared her personal experience as a victim of
government weaponization for twenty years and believes that she was
given an implant without her knowledge or consent during a
surgery that she underwent. Anyway, it's it's a very interesting

(02:53:02):
thing certainly. You know, the mistakes that we make when
we look at what our government is doing is to
underestimate their depravity, their lack of ethics or lack of morals,
and to underestimate their We overestimate those things. I should say,
we don't think anybody can be that evil, and we
underestimate the technology that they're capable of. I think when

(02:53:24):
we look at these.

Speaker 4 (02:53:25):
Things, yeah, we want to ascribe to them some level
of humanity. You know, Well, they're still humans, so obviously
they share something with us, but they really don't. They
have no compunction about killing anyone everyone, and that's how
they managed to get away with it so frequently, because
we can't believe that they would engage in evil on
this kind of scale.

Speaker 2 (02:53:46):
Yes, that's absolutely right. Well, we have some interesting comments
that were sent to us. Actually, I guess you pick
these up off of the show the other day, and
I thought it would go through some of these. One
of them was I just love this hang on a second.
One of them says Travis will need his own show,
and I'd love to see them. I mean, we're very

(02:54:08):
very busy, and Travis is very busy trying to get
the show up after we do it, as well as
preparing for the show before we do it. So I
should do that. I don't know what's going on with
your game show.

Speaker 4 (02:54:19):
I haven't had time recently. Things have just been so busy.
Maybe now that we're doing this, I'll be able to
do it, see if it can. It was fun. It
was enjoyable just to relax and chat with you guys
and still get some cool information from you. Lots of
very interesting people in chat with a lot of great information.

Speaker 2 (02:54:38):
Yes, and we had a couple of things. This is
sent to me. I think either you or Lance sent.

Speaker 3 (02:54:44):
This to me. I think Lance that were yesterday.

Speaker 2 (02:54:47):
This is don't Fragen me Bro said two days before
Epstein's asserted death, over five hundred million dollars was transferred
to an Epstein trust fund. Well, that's the key thing,
you know, when they look at this. The game that
they're playing now is the Trump administration is saying that
we want some particular documents that were part of the
deposition in the court, and the court is reluctant to

(02:55:08):
ever release those kinds of documents. But that's not going
to tell people what the money trail would tell them,
and so Trump can play the game and say, well,
we've asked for this information, but the judge is keeping
it from being released. But the reality is is that
what people really need to see is the money trail
that would show who is being blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 4 (02:55:32):
Never get to see that. Never.

Speaker 2 (02:55:34):
Yeah, nice and the Storm said Angry Tiger's interview with Gregory.

Speaker 3 (02:55:38):
Marinaro was fire.

Speaker 2 (02:55:40):
Well, I haven't seen that, but I'll just pass it
on to all of you if you want to see that.
I'm not even sure who Gregory Marinaro was.

Speaker 4 (02:55:48):
It sounds like.

Speaker 3 (02:55:52):
Mannarino, I guess is how it is.

Speaker 5 (02:55:54):
I just saved a few comments. If it was up
like a guest recommendation or someone that you might want
to interview, I save them and then send them at
the end of the week.

Speaker 2 (02:56:05):
That's what Okay, good, Yeah and Nicest. Storm also said
the moon landing was mathematically impossible if you do the
fuel calculations. There was also not enough physical space for
the people for the equipment the lunar lander. I've always
thought about that as well. I had a guy with
a masters in advanced math. Try to convince me, and

(02:56:27):
he was blown away when he looked at all the
numbers and the specs from NASA's own website.

Speaker 4 (02:56:32):
Yeah, wait a minute, Wait a minute.

Speaker 5 (02:56:36):
Also save things that might be like a story lead
sometimes if.

Speaker 2 (02:56:40):
Yeah, I think, yeah, the more I look at it,
the less I am, the more convinced that I am
that that did actually not happen. You know, now the
Chinese are saying they're going to go to the moon.

Speaker 3 (02:56:54):
Have at it. But so yeah, we'll see, we'll see
what happens with that today.

Speaker 4 (02:56:59):
Yeah, I've got Marky, Mark and j thank you for
the tip, says with fifteen minute cities being a thing,
do you think bicycle repair is a good skill to have.
You might be onto something there.

Speaker 3 (02:57:08):
That's right, you know, just like the Wright brothers.

Speaker 2 (02:57:09):
If you learn how to repair bicycles, pretty soon you
might be able to do a flying machine exactly.

Speaker 4 (02:57:14):
Brandon Bennett, thank you very much for the tip, says
Happy birthday, Travis. Well, thank you, Brandon, I really do
appreciate it. BT Taylor two four to six. In the
Civil War, the South was not able to get coffee,
so they made coffee like drinks out of soup, potatoes
and stuff like that. Interesting, but that was good. I
try it. Yeah, I'm not overly skeptical. I'll try a
lot of different things, not bugs, but when it comes

(02:57:35):
to food, I'm pretty open minded.

Speaker 5 (02:57:37):
I wonder if that's where, like the tradition of southern
super sweet tea came from.

Speaker 4 (02:57:44):
Interesting. Could be paleo armory. They tried to build the
largest collider in Texas before it failed miserably. Well, that's good,
I'm glad to hear that. Knights of the Storm. Fun fact,
the South Korean mafia made millions making fake Nichols with
a cheaper material. Wow. Industrious and genius.

Speaker 3 (02:58:01):
Yeah, and now we have our own governments doing that. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:58:05):
Counterfeiting used to be an act of award like sanctions,
and now our own government does. The sanctions and the counterfeiting.

Speaker 4 (02:58:12):
Were beset on all sides. Ratus bro I foiled my
m I failed my MK ultra courses as a child.
What are the only interesting things? One of the only
things I've actually done with AI is I just fed
in some of the some random things I've written and asked, like,
based on the psychological evaluation you'd give this person, how

(02:58:33):
difficult do you think they'd beat an mk ultra And
they said it'd be very difficult and very unstable, likely
to lead to adverse outcomes. So there you go. I'm
not likely to be mk ultred.

Speaker 3 (02:58:43):
If the chat program is correct.

Speaker 4 (02:58:45):
Yeah, who knows, angry tigers. Then one year I went
to the airport with a friend of mine and put
up posters about the body scanners. That year I flew
to Florida. They knew who I was before I pulled
out my ID. I said, welcome, mister mattee. They promptly
questioned me in separate rooms and let me go on
my way. Yeah, it's about intimidation. Yeah, we know who
you are. You're on our radar.

Speaker 2 (02:59:05):
You've been noticed, citizen, and not always that line always
stuck with me seeing you. Yeah, but that line we've
noticed you, citizen, that came from doctor Shibago. You know,
he comes back to his home, has been commandeered by
the local communist official and everything, and the guy's watching him,
you know, just waiting for him to get angry about
what they've done to his family and to his possessions

(02:59:28):
and everything. He keeps his cool and everything. So finally
the guy just kind of gives up and looks at him, says,
you've been noticed, citizen. You know that's one we're ever watched.

Speaker 4 (02:59:38):
Yeah, you've mentioned it my entire life, but we've never
actually watched it.

Speaker 3 (02:59:42):
I don't like that movie. I live in a worldwide.

Speaker 4 (02:59:46):
But already kind of there. Why would we watch the movie?

Speaker 3 (02:59:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:59:49):
The other thing about it my parents mentioned and they
didn't like it because it was the fundamental plot was
about adultery, you know. And the whole thing is that
doctor Shivago leaves his wife and and uh, you know
that's but I that completely went over my head when
I was a child.

Speaker 3 (03:00:07):
The thing that stuck with me was the communism. I
completely missed the adultery staff.

Speaker 4 (03:00:12):
I don't know what's going on there, but man, these
communists are awful.

Speaker 3 (03:00:16):
I don't remember this man and woman's stuff.

Speaker 1 (03:00:18):
I was just a king.

Speaker 2 (03:00:20):
Well, thank you for joining us. That's it for today,
and now we're gonna do something for Travis for his birthday.

Speaker 3 (03:00:25):
But thank you all. Have a good day.

Speaker 4 (03:00:28):
Thank you very much for the birthday wishes.

Speaker 3 (03:00:29):
God bless you all.

Speaker 2 (03:00:42):
The common man. They created common core and dumbed down
our children. They created common past track and control us
their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

(03:01:02):
unsophisticated ordinary.

Speaker 3 (03:01:05):
But each of us has worth and dignity created in
the image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.

Speaker 2 (03:01:16):
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,

(03:01:38):
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. The Davidknightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Thu Episode #2078: Inflation Lies: Food + Power Costs Exploding

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Thu Episode #2078: Inflation Lies: Food + Power Costs Exploding

Stuff You Should Know