Thu Episode #2098: Unite the Kingdom: Millions Rise Against Immigration & Globalism

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
You know, a world of deceit. Telling the truth is
a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the eighteenth of September.
You have of our Lord twenty twenty five, and today
we're going to tell you the truth about the revolution
that they are trying to create. They've already done it
quite a bit of a revolution. But we're going to
be again with Trump's trip to England and the pomp

(01:05):
and circumstance that the circumstances surrounding it. He got away
from the because of the assassination of Charlie Kirky, is
able to get away from Epstein, but Epstein is being
used to haunt him in the UK. They've even got
a program that is going to be One channel is
running Trump programs all day analyzing his lies.

Speaker 3 (01:30):
So we're going to begin with that.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
We're also going to take a look at some tech issues,
some war issues. We'll be right back. Yes, we have

(02:10):
Britain as well. Travis tell us a littleit about it
gives the headlines here before we get started.

Speaker 4 (02:15):
That's right, it's good to be the king and Britain
indulges King Trump fantasy with historic ceremony. That's from the
News and how the British flag became a flashpoint in
a new culture war. From the Wall Street Journal Tommy Robinson,
Unite the Kingdom protest proved the Establishment has lost its
power to silence the majority. From the expose, when Trump's

(02:35):
Epstein scandal back in the news stream with historic trip
to London this week, vaccine impact for arrested after images
of Trump and Epstein projected onto Windsor Castle. That's from RT.
What an industrious group before there must have been. You're
the freaking FBI, Democrat Slamsptel over why FBI doesn't have
Epstein docs.

Speaker 2 (02:57):
Yeah, so all of this has been shoved off the
front page, but it is front and center in the UK.
And as they're pointing out, he got the kind of
ceremonial extravagance that Britain has not seen since the funeral
of Elizabeth I, and the people in the UK are

(03:17):
not very happy about it. As a matter of fact,
Trump demanded the spectacle and Britain provides it. He wants
to be the king for a day and Britain is
letting him. The UK will silence descent empty out its
traditions and rent out its monarch like a sex worker,
deployed to flatter the ego of a man who has
spent his political life suggesting that he should be treated

(03:38):
like one a monarch that is not a sex worker.

Speaker 5 (03:43):
Fair.

Speaker 4 (03:43):
I think that's about the level of respect Charles probably deserves.

Speaker 3 (03:47):
Yeah, that's right. I think we got some video of it.

Speaker 2 (03:50):
Lance, if you want to play the royal procession, you
can see some of the treatment that they got for him.
There you go to everybody, look at that long wine
of grendier guardsman and that is uh because we've animated
some of these films. Actually this is AI, but there's
a real picture of that, and they're they're having a

(04:11):
big time, the two of them. I wonder it's almost
reminiscent of that picture with Jeffrey Epstein that Donald Trump had.

Speaker 3 (04:19):
I wonder what they were talking about. But they're having
a big time.

Speaker 2 (04:24):
Yeah, we got them to laugh in the carriage thanks
to AI on those piquent things. And then we got
another one here. I think he's going to come back
with a bruised hand. Lance, show the handshake that he's
got here. You know, Trump likes to do handshakes with
people and show that he's stronger than they are. Let's
keep think on a grenadeer guard there. That's just a

(04:45):
either We'll let you know if it's AI. We're not
going to show fake stuff and tell you that it's true.
But yeah, he may come back with a big bruise
on his hand from that handshake. Is a Macron style
right speculator. As the stage props go, the monarchy is unbeatable.
But if this is what the special relationship between the

(05:06):
US and the UK now means, it looks to many
in Britain less like a partnership, more like a groveling,
feudal servitude. Nothing about the welcome was subtle. From the
moment Marine Won touched down the grounds of Windsor Castle, Trump,
Trump and Millennia were greeted not with a minister or
a courtier, but by the Prince and Princess of Wales,

(05:29):
William and Kate, who walked them up to Charles and
Camilla as a forty one gun salute thundered across Windsor. Simultaneously,
a second salute shook the air from the Tower of London.
The choreography spoke volumes every cannon, every plume, every flashing braid,
every polished boot, time to inflate and flatter Trump's sense

(05:50):
of himself. Then came the pageantry proper, a carriage procession
through Windsor's great parks, long avenues. Lania asconced with King
Charles and Queen Camilla dutifully present, dutifully present brother despite
having Sini, Sidis, William and Kate followed in another coach

(06:11):
with the US ambassador. It was a grotesque parody of
a coronation parade. Yeah, that's like I said, it's the
kind of pomp and circumstance that they typically only have
during a coronation or a funeral.

Speaker 3 (06:26):
I wonder which we're talking about here.

Speaker 4 (06:30):
The thing is, if they would just leave us alone,
I would let them have all this, you know, if
they could be trusted. You know, Okay, you can have
your little parades, you can have your play dates and
your time with the king. Just leave us alone. You
can spend millions upon millions of dollars on it, just
keep out of our lives.

Speaker 2 (06:46):
And that's one of the things that they have done
with the monarchy in the UK. You know, it's like
they're there as the figureheads, and I think somebody gets
upset with the and rightfully so, with the heads of
Parliament and the political parties. But here we combine it
all into trump banks, including the powers of Congress, because
they've just become a rubber stamp under Speaker Johnson. Ranks

(07:10):
of soldiers and scarlet and gold plumed helmets catching the rain,
polished breastplates gleaming in the gray light, the clang of armor,
the rhythmic clip of one hundred and twenty horses, the
rolling of drums, the blast of brass bands, the star
spangled banner, ringing off of Windsor's medieval stone. Well that
was the only thing that was on Windsor's medieval stone

(07:32):
will show you that in a moment. A royal ceremony
in theater. But this was theater that revealed far more
than a sovereign nation should about its craven need to
please a foreign leader who's done absolutely nothing to help
the foreign the sovereign nation in question, and has done
plenty to harm it. Well, the household cavalry mounted regiment

(07:55):
provided what was formally described as a sovereign's escort. The sovereign,
it seemed, was not Charles at the castle's quadrangle. The
massive guard of honor was another extraordinary attempt by desperate
Britain to run Trump's favor. They had the Grenadier Guards,
Coldstream Guards, the Scots Guards all praded their colors for

(08:16):
the first time on such an occasion to pretend this
was normal diplomacy as ludicrous. It was carefully chosen, excess
intended to impress one man. Meanwhile, what is happening in
the country itself? You have, as we showed the other day,
we had the London protests, where they had crowds that

(08:36):
were far bigger than the mainstream media would admit. As
a matter of fact, they would only say that it
was one hundred and ten thousand, and the Guardian had
the low assessment. I said, tens of thousands. Yeah, you
bet to start with the people who were there organizing.
Hommy Robinson said he thought it was one to two

(08:57):
millions there on the ground.

Speaker 4 (08:59):
That looks a lot more like a million than it does.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
Yeah, and you could see that there were a million
people that were watching it, more than a million people
who were watching it live on social media as well.
And so I guess the question is, you know what
should we do about all of this stuff? And I
have too many clips here to see this stuff.

Speaker 6 (09:18):
There we go, your majesty, I must have a word
with you. Ah, count the money, count the money?

Speaker 1 (09:26):
No, correct me?

Speaker 6 (09:28):
What of course, your majesty, I have come on the
most urgent of business. It has said that the people
are revolting?

Speaker 7 (09:35):
Who said that they stink on? I?

Speaker 6 (09:38):
No, your majesty, this is a very serious problem. The
peasants feel you have no regard for them.

Speaker 7 (09:43):
What I have no regard for the peasants.

Speaker 6 (09:46):
They are my people.

Speaker 7 (09:47):
I am the sovereign.

Speaker 6 (09:49):
I love them.

Speaker 7 (09:56):
Drifting to the left, got to be.

Speaker 2 (10:00):
A king, oh, the Prime minister, if it's whoever's ruling them?
And so, just as an example how much the rulers
in London hate their own people. Stuart Field raised its
first flags in July, the English red cross of Saint George,

(10:21):
also smattering of the British Red, white and blue, hanging
them from the hometown's street lights. His daughter had just
been sent home from her high school's annual cultural celebration
day for wearing a sparkly dress designed around the Union jack,
and he was infuriated. A flyer from the school had

(10:41):
described the event as a way to recognize the diverse
cultures represented among students. Wear your traditional cultural dress to
school instead of your usual school uniform. It said, your
attire must reflect your nationality or your family heritage. That is,
as long as your family haird is not British and

(11:01):
your nationality is not represented by the flag anything but that.
And so you know when these people talking about diversity,
that's just it. They don't want diversity. They despise on
people again.

Speaker 4 (11:17):
I mean by that is less white people as a
general rule.

Speaker 8 (11:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (11:20):
Tommy Robinson, as I said before, in terms of the
people that were there, he disputed the estimates from the
mainstream media. He said, we had millions of Brits, millions
on the street, we had two million people watching live
on x and we had millions that attended live. Everyone there,

(11:41):
anyone watching the videos can see it wasn't one hundred
and ten thousand. So they've just exposed themselves time and
time again as liars. He said, this is the biggest
protest in British history ever. For twenty years, the establishment
instilled fear into the population and had them whispering about
the replace of the British people and culture using mass immigration,

(12:04):
he said, But the massive turned out on Saturday proved
that the power that they had over the population was gone.
We're not being replaced and we're not staying silent anymore.
You're not having uncontrolled mass immigration endangering our daughters, endangering
our wives, whilst then beating us down with your racist labels,

(12:25):
your fascist labels or islamophobic labels. It doesn't wash anymore,
said Robinson. Every move they make has just backfired. It's
literally like a fire's burning and they just keep pouring
gasoline on it. Even their response to Saturday, they're just
blowing the fire up even more. They're giving us more
supporters every move they make. I just sit there and

(12:46):
think there's nothing they can actually do here. So again
it's heating down a path of confrontation just like we are.
Isn't interesting that, just like the pandemic pandemic that they engineered,
that they're very busy engineering a revolution in civil war

(13:07):
in every country as well. It doesn't matter what political party.
You've got labor rabid socialists and Marxists in the UK
who are engineering it there, and you've got conservatives who
are engineering it along with the left here in this country.
They all want to push us into a civil war
at this juncture. And it's the same in every single country.

(13:30):
As a matter of fact, Lance, you showed me clips
of how the Japanese had taken to the street because
of the great replacement there.

Speaker 3 (13:38):
They're bringing in.

Speaker 2 (13:38):
Massive amounts of people from Africa into Japan. You talk
about a culture clash, that is, you know, the Japanese
have been very xenophobic, even to the extent that they
are so homogeneous. Everybody looks alike, everybody is to act alike.

Speaker 3 (13:57):
There's a lot of pressure.

Speaker 2 (13:58):
With all that that mix. You bring in people that
have that are as polar opposite from and culture and
appearance everything as you can to try to mix things
up and to get people angry. And they're getting them
angry in Japan, aren't they.

Speaker 1 (14:14):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (14:15):
I believe they had just voted to import you know,
five hundred thousand Indians or something like that.

Speaker 3 (14:20):
Yeah, or a workforce.

Speaker 4 (14:22):
And again you want to talk about cultural polar opposites.
The Japanese are a hyper conscientious, hyper cleanly society. India
is not, to put it mildly, it's just the clash
that would happen.

Speaker 2 (14:38):
Yes, Well, Trump wanting to get away from Epstein. He's
been able to do that with the assassination of Charlie
Kirk and his attacks on free speech, but it is
there to haunt him when he gets to the UK,
and he had some people who were projecting onto It's
kind of funny here in the US, MAGA projects Trump

(15:00):
onto Trump, and there in the UK they projected Trump
and Epstein onto Windsor Castle. Here's what it looked like,
actually live pictures that they projected there. And we've all
seen these videos before, but it was kind of interesting
to see it projected up there while Trump is in town.

Speaker 4 (15:16):
Should have projected on the Tower of London.

Speaker 2 (15:19):
Yeah. The arrest of four men after these images of
Trump alongside Epstein were projected onto Windsor Castle on Tuesday was,
as one person said, or well in and ridiculous. The
political campaign was led by a group called Led by Donkeys.

(15:39):
We've been led by donkeys as well the Democrats. I
guess we should guess implication here is that they are asses,
but that probably would have been a better titling. We
confirmed that it was behind the stunt which saw several
images of Trump and Epstein projected onto a Tower, while
a soundtrack questioning the relationship between the two men was

(16:01):
played on a speaker. The police said in a statement
that four adults were arrested on suspicion listen.

Speaker 3 (16:08):
To this of malicious communication.

Speaker 5 (16:12):
Thanks, so we finally have an arrest related to Epstein.

Speaker 2 (16:15):
Yeah, that's right, finally, good point lance And it was
malicious communication of his relationship.

Speaker 4 (16:21):
I think that means we're not allowed to go to
the UK anymore.

Speaker 2 (16:24):
Yeah, malicious communications and unauthorized projection at Windsor Castle.

Speaker 4 (16:31):
And are we not a license for that projective?

Speaker 2 (16:36):
The organization came back and said it was the first
time anyone from the group had been arrested. We've done
I reckon twenty five or thirty projections since we've been going.
Often the police come along and we have to chat
to them, but they even have a laugh with us
and occasionally tell us not to do it. They said,
but no one has ever been arrested before. So it's

(16:58):
ridiculous that four of our guys been arrested for malicious communications.
Forgive the cliche, but it is rather or well in
for a group of journalists for piece of journalism, which
raises questions about our guest relationship with America's most notorious
child sex trafficker to lead to arrests. As a matter

(17:20):
of fact, there's a new documentary coming out about Orwell.

Speaker 3 (17:23):
Called two plus two equals.

Speaker 2 (17:24):
Five In a time of deceit, Telling the truth as
a revolutionary act.

Speaker 7 (17:31):
So Orwell.

Speaker 9 (17:35):
When I sit down to write a book, I write
it because there is some lie that I want to expose.

Speaker 3 (17:43):
Again how many pingos?

Speaker 9 (17:45):
My starting point is always a feeling of injustice.

Speaker 3 (17:51):
I feel the same way about the broadcast.

Speaker 9 (17:54):
The very concept of objective truth is fading out of
this world.

Speaker 7 (17:58):
I'm going to set down and I cannot say aloud
to anyone.

Speaker 9 (18:04):
This prospect frightens me much more than bombs. Freedom is slavery,
war is peace, Ignorance is strength. Totalitarianism, if not fought against,
could triumph anywhere. Do you begin to see them? What

(18:36):
kind of world we are creating?

Speaker 3 (18:45):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (18:45):
I would say that the same starting point, not writing
a book. But when we do the broadcast, it's because
there's some lie that I want to expose.

Speaker 4 (18:56):
It looks like it'll be an interesting documentary. I do think.
Most likely from just a couple of little things there,
there's probably gonna be a left.

Speaker 3 (19:03):
Wing Oh yeah, definitely, based on.

Speaker 4 (19:06):
The fact they had the black lady with that I
can't breathe over her mouth. Yeah, So I'm sure it'll
have some good points in it, but I would also
imagine this is going to end up.

Speaker 3 (19:16):
A bit far on the left.

Speaker 4 (19:18):
Yes, a lot of most documentary filmmakers tend to be
left wing to start with. So while I'd be interested
in watching it, I wouldn't put it's not gonna be
my favorite movie. I guarantee you that, I'm sure he'll
make some good points, but there's also probably going to
be some points where I'm just rolling my eyes, like, okay, buddy, Okay,
you're right.

Speaker 2 (19:37):
That was even with that there. I didn't cut that out.
But there were some parts of that that we've more
left wing obviously, and we're constantly told, you know that
we need to see peaceful protests, said the guy with
led by Donkeys. Well here's a peaceful protest. We projected
a piece of journalism onto the wall, and now people

(19:59):
have been arrested for malicious communications. I think that, frankly,
that says a lot more about the policing of Trump's
visit than it does about what we did. Yeah, these
are police state tactics. That's the thing that's really done.
And Trump's on our right. This is the last the
pomp and circumstances and being king for a day, but
it's the police state fist in your face if you

(20:23):
talk about him or Epstein.

Speaker 4 (20:25):
You know, I've always wanted to see some people beheaded.
Maybe you could be added them for me. Be great,
we could be ad them right in the public square well.

Speaker 2 (20:30):
As Brian Shaw, Hobby of Vaccine Impact says, Trump has
been enjoying a short reprieve on the Epstein scandal story
due to the Charlie Kirk assassination, but all that changes
as he lands in London for.

Speaker 3 (20:44):
A historic visit.

Speaker 2 (20:46):
The British press will undoubtedly make the Epstein scandal the
focus of his trip, as they're already doing ahead of
his visit. Prince Andrew needs to be fully investigated, says
the Guthrie family. This is the BBC reporting on this.
The family of Virginia Guthrie has told the BBC that
the Duke of York needs to be fully investigated over

(21:06):
allegations that he sexually abused her. Guphrey was one of
the most prominent victims of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. She
said at the age of seventeen, She said Epstein introduced
her to Prince Andrew, who she said sexually abused her
three times. Andrew, who has been approached for a comment,

(21:28):
stepped back from the royal duties in twenty nineteen because
of the Epstein scandal and after growing backlash from a
BBC Newsnight interview about his friendship with a convicted pedophile.
Roberts told the BBC it doesn't matter if it's a
royal family member or a president or a prince. Every

(21:49):
single person deserves to be held to the fullest extent
of the law. He said, this is her relative. It's
time to put every single person, whether you're a royal
Prince Andrew, you need to be fully investigated and if
it's found that you had any participation, you need to
be put behind bars for the rest of your life. Yeah,

(22:10):
it was supposedly just the punishment to remove him, the
man who's formerly.

Speaker 3 (22:14):
Known his prince. That's aeveral of these people now a
mer kay.

Speaker 4 (22:19):
Could there be a greater punishment than not being to
indulge in the spotlight in the spectacle for these people.
I mean, really, hasn't he suffered enough? I mean, sure,
he's got his massive castles and his estates and his money.
But you know what, the camera hasn't been on him,
so surely.

Speaker 3 (22:34):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you give him the royal treatment in
a prison. We have punished him severely.

Speaker 2 (22:41):
Meanwhile, back here in the US things are heating up
as well. So far, Thomas Massey is the only man
in the GOP House to support his bill to force
the Trump administration to release all the Epstein files. The
other three Republicans, of course, are all women.

Speaker 3 (22:56):
Now.

Speaker 2 (22:56):
The survivors and victims of Epstein's sexual abuse, who all
met in DC a few weeks ago, made the corporate
media rounds. Now they are putting pressure on the remaining
women in the House to support their cause. Isn't that interesting?
You know that the GOP is so concerned about protecting
Trump that they're willing to be seen as having total

(23:22):
animosity and different disinterest to the women who were abused
by Jeffrey Epstein. GOP has become guarding our pedophiles. Only
the women got upset enough that they would move away
from protecting Trump. A group of Jeffrey Epstein's survivors is
urging members of the Republican Women's Caucus to stand up

(23:42):
against the abuse of power, to take action to end
the silence and the speculation surrounding the sex offender. The
letter says, remind us that America is the country that
we thought it was when little girls, when we were
little girls, before we were let down repeatedly by our
own government. More than twenty Epstein's survivors signed the letter,

(24:05):
including several who were part of a high profile visit
to the nation's capital earlier this month, which included public
events and private meetings with lawmakers. But again, the GOP
is just guarding our pedophile. We have sought justice for
decades to no avail. We have been denied the basic

(24:26):
rights it should be afforded to every American citizen time
and time again. The fact that it took the song
for anyone to care about us is a true American tragedy.
This is not some he said, she said, cancel culture
type of thing that really exploded after you had some
real sexual harassment that was there. This is very different.

(24:49):
But the GOP is just trying to cover this up shamelessly,
and it really is apparent to everyone what they're doing.
I don't know why they think that people don't see this.

Speaker 4 (25:01):
I suppose it's one of those things where it's just
they know what's in the Epstein file, so if they
release it, it's confirmed. Whereas any level of deniability, even
when it's so obvious, is better than none at all.

Speaker 3 (25:14):
Well, I don't know.

Speaker 2 (25:15):
As far as I'm concerned, they're committing public suicide. I mean,
and I think that if Trump told them to kill themselves,
they would, because these people love their careers more than
they do life. And so it tells you that they
believe that Trump is so powerful that really doesn't matter
what the American people think. It tells you that the GOP,

(25:36):
except for these four people, don't really care about the
people who voted for them. They care about Trump. They
serve one man. They do not represent you whatsoever.

Speaker 10 (25:47):
I think it shows that it's pretty widespread because the
people that are going to sacrifice their career to make
sure this doesn't get out are the people that would
have an even worse time but did get out, The
people that, under no circumstances can allow this file to
be released.

Speaker 4 (26:06):
Yeah, this is the better option imagine how bad it
must be.

Speaker 2 (26:09):
Yeah, well they've all they've all got something on each other.
I guess this is like Jaggar Hoover.

Speaker 3 (26:15):
Right.

Speaker 2 (26:16):
They weren't all connected to Jeffrey Epstein, but the ones
who were are probably threatening the other guys to blackmail
them over some other thing, whether it's financial or something
else that they.

Speaker 4 (26:27):
Were Whatever happened with that page boy that used to
come to your office, right?

Speaker 2 (26:30):
The page scandals have been rampant throughout the GOP in
the past.

Speaker 4 (26:35):
You just have to imagine the kind of skeletons that
Lindsey Graham has in his closet. Maybe you shouldn't imagine
the type of skeletons Lindsay Graham has in his close
He doesn't.

Speaker 2 (26:43):
Keep them in his closet. He creates skeletons all over
the world with his wars that he pushes. Prior to
this current Epstein scandal of Trump calling it a hoax
and infuriating the victims, these kinds of articles were not
in the corporate media because the pedo billionaires like Trump
had control of the met but not anymore. The Guardian
is talking about Marine Maureen Comy, who is the daughter

(27:08):
of the FBI's Comy. She alleges that the firings were
in retaliation against her father, James Comey, former FBI director.
Marine Comy, a federal prosecutor involved in cases against Jeffrey
Epstein and his accomplice Glene Maxwell, and who led a
recent case against Sean Diddy. Combs filed a lawsuit on

(27:29):
Monday challenging her abrupt termination on politically motivated retaliation against
her father, former FBI Director James Comey. According to the
court documents, the Justice Department fired Comy without cause or
explanation sixteenth of July, citing only Article two of the
US Constitution and the Law of the United States. In

(27:50):
a brief email, when she asked for a reason, the
interim US attorney, Jay Clayton, told her all I can
say is it came from Washington. I can't tell you
anything else. Just three months before her termination, the thirty
five year old prosecutor had received a glowing review from
the same attorney who would later deliver news of her firing.

(28:11):
The lawsuit seeks her reinstatement, bank pay, and decoration. The
determination violated the Constitution. Her removal came after sustained pressure
campaign by Laura Lumer. Lumer posted to her one point
seven million X followers calling for the firing of James
Comey's liberal daughter, But of course she had prosecuted some

(28:33):
of these pedophiles and been involved in that. You don't
want to have any loose ends. You don't want to
have anybody who doesn't particularly like Trump and who has
been involved in these prosecutions. You don't want them snooping around,
licking in the files that they claim don't exist. And
so as all that was happening, you had Cash Betel

(28:54):
yesterday going before the House Judiciary Committee and facing a
lot of questions from Democrats because the GOP is fully
on board with this. You're the freaking FBI, said a
Democrat to Patel, asking why the FBI doesn't have all
the Epstein documents. Ted Lou asked simply whether he had

(29:16):
seen all of the images included in the investigation files
around Jeffrey Epstein. He began by questioning the discovery of
a safe when rating the Epstein mansion. I don't have
the catalog of evidence in front of me, sir, said Patel,
refusing to answer. Lou said, are their photos showing Trump

(29:36):
with girls of uncertain age, Patel said, no, how do
you know that, Lou questioned, because the information would have
been brought to light by multiple administrations, said Patel. Well,
that's not true, said Lou.

Speaker 3 (29:50):
Rhymes.

Speaker 2 (29:52):
Nobody knew about the creepy birthday message that Trump wrote
to Epstein until the Wall Street Journal disclosed it, and
then of a sudden the Epstein the state provides it
to Congress, pointed out Lou. And again, this doesn't bode
well for the lawsuit that the Trump administration brought against
Wall Street Journal and has defiantly said they're going to

(30:13):
move forward with it. Well, I think we're going to
have to have some more discovery.

Speaker 3 (30:17):
I think.

Speaker 2 (30:18):
I mean, this is even after the actual book was released,
he still claims that it was made up by.

Speaker 3 (30:24):
The Wall Street Journal. Good luck with that. I think
the Wall Street journals should hit him with a slap lawsuit,
which is the counter lawsuit when you do a frivolous
charge against somebody.

Speaker 4 (30:34):
Yeah, that's one of the that's where you just say
this is ridiculous, dismiss the case.

Speaker 3 (30:38):
Yeah. Well, I'm sure they'll get dismissal, but I think
they should then proceed to sue him back for doing that.
Lou said it's possible that the Epstein estate still has
evidence not obtained by the FBI, which Patel noted was
a good point. I never thought of that. I never
thought of it.

Speaker 2 (30:56):
I can just imagine what his expression looked like. It's
probably caught in the head light thing that you always
say him did so. Lou asked why Patel wouldn't go
get that information, which Patel said he couldn't, and that's
when he said, you are the freaking FBI. You can
subpoena information from the estate. Patel said, the estate doesn't
have to provide anything even with a subpoena. He went

(31:18):
on to ask whether Prince Andrew was named on the
list of Epstein clients, and Patel refused to say. He
noted only that it was publicly available information. Lou pointed
out the significance of Patel refusing to answer, which is
because Trump is in the UK right now and the
press is all over this story.

Speaker 4 (31:40):
That might be bad for diplomatic relations.

Speaker 2 (31:43):
Senator Dick Durban released information from an FBI whistleblower in July,
saying that agents were working twenty four hours a day
searching through all the documents for Trump's name, to find
any reference of him, and then to get rid of it.
So Patel has gone from being outraged at concealing Epstein
files and vowing to release them to Epstein never did it.

(32:06):
That's a comment from Bin Shaw hobby and he's absolutely right.
This is what Patel said. He said there's nothing concealed.
I'm sorry.

Speaker 3 (32:13):
This is not Patel. This is Jesus that said this.

Speaker 2 (32:17):
There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed or
hidden that will not be made known. What I tell
you in the dark, speaking of the daylight, what is
whispered in your ear? Proclaim it from the rooftops. Do
not be afraid of those who kill the body but
cannot kill the soul. Rather be afraid of the one
who can destroy both soul and body and hell. So

(32:39):
clearly there is no fear of God in them. And meanwhile,
the UK is doing an around the clock broadcast on
the lies of Donald Trump, you know, playing them and
then showing.

Speaker 3 (32:55):
How each of them are lies.

Speaker 2 (32:56):
It reminds me of that meme I had a couple
of weeks ago, Travis work. You got a guy asking
Donald Trump, what's your favorite lie? That you've told, and
Trump says, I don't lie. He goes, yeah, that's my
favorite one too. So we've had some comments here.

Speaker 4 (33:11):
Yes we do, a Syrian girl. I hope the size
of the demonstration the UK indicates that people are ready
to pull down that government. But the UK government has
always been populated by elites who protect other elites. Yeah,
that's North American house hippo. Trump wants to be treated
like a king. No visit to London is complete without
stopping by the Tower of London Epstein Island, So I

(33:34):
guess gotta scroll that up. The Epstein files won't be
released in our lifetime. No, No, probably not. I would
be surprised if the Epstein files still exist. Again, I
don't understand why they would even keep them. If they're
so radioactive, you would think they would just destroy them
and have a dummy somewhere. Steve Evs Stead Evs. Do

(33:56):
we get Tony Rdburn today?

Speaker 3 (33:57):
We do, Yes, we do.

Speaker 2 (33:58):
We're very excited to have him one. Yeah, we're gonna
be talking about what's happening with gold. A lot is
happening with gold is amazing.

Speaker 4 (34:05):
Speaking of gold, it's guard Goldsmith. Gee, if only Jimmy
Saville had been there to meet Trump, the royal experience
for him would have been complete.

Speaker 3 (34:13):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (34:13):
They're the premier pedophile of the United Kingdom. Jimmy Saville
is no longer with us.

Speaker 2 (34:20):
Yeah, it's amazing. Yeah, he is now facing the consequences
of that.

Speaker 3 (34:28):
Is he's facing, and of course very connected to the
Royal family. I mean they would have given him the
royal treatment as well. He would have been there times.

Speaker 4 (34:36):
Yeah, if he was still alive, he would have been
there most likely original babe.

Speaker 3 (34:40):
Lol.

Speaker 4 (34:41):
That was a great idea of projecting it on the building.

Speaker 3 (34:43):
Yeah, right, the building where he is protect all that
stuff up there.

Speaker 4 (34:48):
His solo cat nineteen eighty malicious communication.

Speaker 3 (34:51):
Lol.

Speaker 4 (34:51):
I think they're the ones projecting.

Speaker 3 (34:54):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (34:55):
Nibaru twenty twenty nine arrested for hate projection, assault with
a deadly projector guard Goldsmith. Why wasn't Zelensky invited? He
must have been upset. Well, you know, I'm sure he
had some military cause play to do somewhere.

Speaker 2 (35:11):
You don't have enough formal wear, you know, he doesn't
have all those David Knight t shirts exactly.

Speaker 4 (35:16):
He's only got his as dread Sealante calls it his
military drag.

Speaker 10 (35:20):
They had that big fancy pageant and he didn't have
the costume for it.

Speaker 4 (35:26):
Well, it's a fancy dress ball. I cannot go Patty
wax women with a me too message or frightening Epstein
survivors or whatever. A person could say anything and it
doesn't make it true. And that is true. But I
believe there's enough evidence to say that with this, that
Trump is involved in this, and there's enough evidence surrounding

(35:47):
Epstein to say that he was definitely trafficking women. I mean,
that's what Gilainne Maxwell was arrested for.

Speaker 2 (35:52):
Yeah, the absurdity of all this is that supposedly all
the women were raped only by Jeffrey Epstein. We're not
worry about that because he's dead now, right and the
manic you know, you look at again, the real thing
to look at is how much how many political hits
Trump and the GOP are willing to take.

Speaker 3 (36:12):
To cover this stuff up.

Speaker 2 (36:13):
They could easily just release everything, but they don't want
to do that. And again, just as we talked about,
mentioned again the fact they had people at the FBI
working twenty four hours a day trying to find Trump
and remove any reference to Trump out of the document,
so if they do release them, they will be sanitized
and redacted.

Speaker 4 (36:34):
Yeah, that's right. But I do understand where you're coming from.
The Me Too movement caused many, many issues and has
led to a rash of false accusations, which is, you know,
it's ruined lives. It's ruined lives.

Speaker 10 (36:49):
They'll probably have some people interjected into this to you know,
create confusion and throw questions onto the real victims. It
would make sense for them to have fake victims with
fake accusations mixed in amongst them. Yeah, a complicated issue.

(37:10):
But I remember a friend that there is a large
pedophile group and we can't ignore that just because of
you know, the possibility of that. We can't ignore the
possibility either.

Speaker 2 (37:25):
Yeah. Yeah, this didn't just begin with Harvey Weinstein. This
actually began with Clarence Thomas. That was their tactic, And
I remember the big thing back and forth. I believe Anita,
you know, I had coffee cups printed up. I believe
Anita and all the rest of this. And that's one
of the reasons why they got so upset with Biden,
because it didn't really matter to Biden even if that

(37:47):
had been true.

Speaker 3 (37:47):
What mattered to him.

Speaker 2 (37:48):
The big offense that Biden took with with Clarence Thomas
was that Clarence Thomas believed in natural, God given rights,
and as we see, the Democrats don't, and they publicly
rail against the idea of the fact that our rights
come from God, that they are human rights because we're
in the image of God.

Speaker 3 (38:08):
They hate that.

Speaker 2 (38:09):
We just had Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton's running mate, come
out and say that and take a lot of hits
for saying that. But they genuinely believe it, and it
is a core belief of them that you have no rights,
You only have government granted privileges that they can remove
at any time for any reason. And that's why I

(38:29):
say Trump shows his Democrat roots all the time.

Speaker 4 (38:34):
Donal Lord one three three seven. It might not be
that they are afraid of Trump. I think it shows
that they are all connected in some way. They're all
connected by a little island in the Caribbean.

Speaker 2 (38:47):
Yeah, it's not even six degrees of separation. It's just
a couple of degrees a separation there. It's not like
the Kevin Bacon thing.

Speaker 4 (38:54):
Yeah, this kind of thing is apparently a lot more
common than we want to believe. Look at they've got
people in different areas too. You've got people like you know,
Sean Diddy, Combs in the music industry and the entertainment industry,
and you've got people like Epstein when it comes to politics.
So apparently this sort of thing goes on all.

Speaker 3 (39:11):
Over the place.

Speaker 4 (39:13):
Shield your eyes. Tell Joe Biden to release the file.
He didn't say nothing when he was in DIRP.

Speaker 3 (39:19):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (39:19):
That's what you always hear from people when they say, well,
why are.

Speaker 3 (39:22):
You attacking Trump? You didn't ask for well, Joe, because
Trump ran on the platform that he was going to
release this information, and that's something that mattered a great
deal to his base. It didn't matter to Biden's base.
Biden had.

Speaker 2 (39:36):
Biden wanted to come after Trump, but he wanted to
come after Trump with things that were nonsense, and that
was to inoculate Trump against real crimes that he committed.
That's I say, if you want to try to impeach
Trump now for the things that he's doing to attack
the First saying he wants to do for the First Amendment,
putting troops and cities and all the rest of this stuff,

(39:57):
Oh no, we're not going to let's not play that
game anymore. You're a Democrat if you want to impeach
Trump anymore, because the Republicans would never stand.

Speaker 3 (40:06):
For the Constitution. They absolutely especially not against Trump. Adi, Mr.

Speaker 4 (40:14):
The only thing on Pam Bondi's desk is a pile
of nothing burgers.

Speaker 3 (40:17):
Delicious, delicious.

Speaker 10 (40:20):
I was just gonna talk about that comment from tunnel
Lord that or rather from shield your Eyes that it
is kind of, I won't say annoying, but just a
little okay, funny that these Democrats are, you know, so

(40:40):
eager to gleefully talk about this, like Moskowitz has, you know,
actually pretty funny things to say about it. He said
basically the same things I was saying. You put it
in a pretty good way, like, okay, so you've got
this thing that he's an FBI informant, and then the
guy says, I misspoke, Oh what so is he an.

Speaker 5 (41:01):
Agent or what?

Speaker 10 (41:03):
It's funny he can point all these things and rub
it in. But then let's not forget that they were
completely silent when they were in a position where they
could have had a little bit more impact on it,
when you know they had someone from their own party
in charge.

Speaker 7 (41:18):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (41:19):
They don't really want this stuff release and when he
uses as a club against Trump, they know that he
won't release it. And you know, for whatever reason, Okay,
he and the Republicans have decided they're going to guard
the pedophiles. So let's really beat them with this whole idea.

Speaker 4 (41:37):
Or they're free to bludge in it because it's as
I keep saying, I'm pretty sure it's so radioactive that
it just cannot see the light of day. They cannot
allow it to come out, so everyone else is free
to come out and as you said, bludgeon him with it,
beam over the head with it. Biel Hoten, Why won't
Trump and bite the Epstein victims of the White House
as they requested? Yeah, interesting question. Interesting you never liked

(42:01):
have your specter taken with them? They were victims either
bad for business?

Speaker 3 (42:06):
Yeah, the real.

Speaker 5 (42:07):
Show off is a nice new ballroom.

Speaker 4 (42:09):
That's right, the real Octo Spook Epstein game American Americans
the greatest gift ever exposing the worst of the worst
to broad daylight.

Speaker 3 (42:19):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (42:19):
Patty Wax says, all you have to do to ruin,
particularly a male's life, is to make an accusation that
terrifies me on behalf of males. Yeah, we've seen that
where all it takes is a single accusation. There doesn't
have to be any evidence. In fact, the evidence can
be pointing the other way. But you know, people will
run with it because if you don't, if you don't
immediately take up sides that you're condoning rape and that

(42:42):
sort of thing. Yes, so you do have to be
very careful, you know.

Speaker 2 (42:46):
That's that's one of the things. I remember having a
conversation with Alex about Pence. He said, that guy is
so uptight he won't even get in an elevator with
a woman unless there's somebody else in there. And I said, well,
I think, you know, I know why he's doing that,
and there was I'm not as sure of his name now,
but he's one of these people with the right, the

(43:09):
moral majority and things like that. And he was running
for political office after having done that, and he would
meet alone in his office with a woman that was
there with the door closed, and there were allegations, not
even she wasn't alleging that he had done anything, I think,
but people were saying that maybe they thought something was

(43:29):
going on behind the closed door. And it tanked his
thank his presidential campaign, and damage the organization. And so
a lot of people have taken the attack that they
men have taken the attack that they're not going to
be alone with a woman in a particular room. That's probably,
especially in today's environment, that's probably a wise policy from

(43:53):
a number of issues. But to protect yourself against wild
accusations as well, it's not just that you're afraid of
women or something. I can't control yourself. Best to protect
yourself against rumor mills or against false accusations.

Speaker 4 (44:08):
Yeah, we've got Epstein Island. If the files were released,
Trump would be immediately removed from the White House to
fight tyrant seventeen seventy six. Sad thing is that if
they release the Epstein files and Trump was number one
on the list, the supporters would vote for him again.

Speaker 2 (44:22):
They would they would. Yeah, as a matter of fact, Yeah,
I mean he was. He was Epstein's number one friend
for fifteen years, and he was likely the guy who
turned him in. That's what all this stuff about him
being an FBI informant was, And that's why Moscow has said,
oh okay, so he informed on Jeffrey Epstein turned the

(44:42):
guy in We're now told right at the time that
the two of them were having a fight over property,
and then now he calls it a hoax, So he
was an informant on a hoax.

Speaker 10 (44:54):
I actually still have that on the board. We played
the one about him talking about the birthday book. I
don't think we played the one where he was talking about.

Speaker 3 (45:01):
Go ahead and play that.

Speaker 10 (45:02):
Yeah, yeah, give me just a second up to find
it all right?

Speaker 4 (45:07):
Until then, Wally Wallrice, the blackmail list will never be
completely released. They need to keep blackmailing. Point got to
maintain your leverage. Sosa box os Biden could come after
Trump with Epstein because he would be incriminating himself in Friends.

Speaker 2 (45:23):
Yeah, most likely. I don't know if he knew. I mean,
it's not to say that Biden wouldn't be capable of
doing that or something similar to that, but he has
some different crimes. I think I think he focused more
on money corruption and uh it was Hunter. Biden would
definitely have been there zero, But I don't think Hunter knew.

Speaker 3 (45:43):
Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 4 (45:44):
Yeah, he was a crackhead, crack fiend.

Speaker 2 (45:48):
But you know, that's another example of why you know
the blackmail files and they're all out there. They could
blackmail Biden over something else if he exposed some of
these other people who had been around there. But so
that's the issue, you know, it's not just the loyalty
to Trump.

Speaker 5 (46:05):
I think here's the.

Speaker 11 (46:06):
Video, gentlemen's recognized.

Speaker 12 (46:10):
Thank you, mister chairman.

Speaker 13 (46:12):
You know, just following up on a little bit of
what the ranking member was discussing, there was a significant
event this week in which this committee has jurisdiction over
the Speaker of the House, the third highest ranking US official,
third in line to be the president, looked into the

(46:34):
TV cameras and told us that the current president of
the United States was an FBI informant. I consider that
to be gigantic news, and I'm just curious. Have we
reached out to the FBI, to Cash Betel to confirm
whether the president was at any time an FBI informant.

(46:55):
I only say it because the Speaker of the House
obviously gets significant briefings. He gets things that we do
not get as regular members, and so I think this
is something that we need to hear definitively before cash
Bettel comes.

Speaker 12 (47:09):
We should clear up.

Speaker 13 (47:10):
Maybe we should send a letter to him to find
out if the President was an informant, and if he
was an informant, is that because he was working with
the FBI after he was hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein?

Speaker 12 (47:24):
Did he turn because he.

Speaker 13 (47:26):
Got caught with Jeffrey Epstein? You know, when you're an
FBI informant, there are lots of questions about how you
became an FBI informant.

Speaker 12 (47:33):
And then how long was he an FBI informant? When
did his.

Speaker 13 (47:36):
Service to the FBI stop, you know, being a member
of the deep state, when did he stop doing that?
I mean, look, any if a regular member had said this,
I would discount it. But the Speaker of the House
is the one who said it. And then he said afterwards, well,
I may have misspoke.

Speaker 12 (47:54):
What was his misspeak instead of informant? Did he mean agent?
I mean, what is the miss speak for informant? I mean,
I don't know.

Speaker 13 (48:02):
Another word that we use when we're describing an FBI
agent or FBI informant or undercover. I mean, what what
was the misspeaking?

Speaker 12 (48:13):
Then? Is he lying?

Speaker 13 (48:15):
Now?

Speaker 12 (48:15):
I'm just confused.

Speaker 13 (48:17):
Perhaps maybe the Speaker should come to our committee and
tell us what he meant when when he said that
it's just in order it I'm still speaking to I'm
still speaking on.

Speaker 12 (48:30):
Is there a bill? Or in a moment on the floor,
I strike the last word. I'm allowed to finish.

Speaker 11 (48:34):
Gentlemen's, gentlemen, gentlemen's. Gentleman from Florida has the time he's
speaking us. I think he's speaking about the bill while
he's not really speaking about the bill, but he's recognized
to speak about the bill.

Speaker 2 (48:43):
Well, he's just been uh interrupted for about thirty seconds.

Speaker 3 (48:48):
He added back on robbery when we.

Speaker 8 (48:50):
Moved to restore his time. That was.

Speaker 11 (48:53):
The will maybe plenty of time. I'm usually good about that.

Speaker 13 (48:56):
Well, tell you, mister Chairman, I appreciate your indulgence.

Speaker 12 (48:58):
And I'm only bringing it up.

Speaker 13 (49:00):
Again because this committee is the committee of jurisdiction over
the FBI. And I don't think in the history of
this country we've had a Speaker of the House say
the President was an FBI informant.

Speaker 12 (49:13):
I mean that is I mean, that's a dual role
of I ever heard one.

Speaker 13 (49:17):
And so I just think we have we have questions,
mister Chairman, and on a bipartisan basis, maybe the answer
is no, he wasn't an FBI informant, and that's fine
if the answer is no. I just think we need
to hear from the FBI. The Speaker has confused the
American people whether Trump was working with the FBI against
Jeffrey Epstein because he had information about Jeffrey Epstein because

(49:39):
he was there for a long period of time and
then and then got turned maybe by the FBI. I mean,
did Trump ever go under cover? I mean, these are
questions that the Speaker has raised. By the way, President
going undercover would be interesting, you know, but these are.

Speaker 12 (49:56):
Questions that he's raised. That is not a misspeak. There
is not another.

Speaker 13 (50:00):
Adjective or verb for FBI informant, right, I understand the
President kicked him out of his club. That doesn't make
you an FBI informant. So I think we need to
get to the bottom of that.

Speaker 3 (50:16):
Well, the Druman I will Yeah, yeah, it was hand
their neck.

Speaker 2 (50:24):
But yeah, he was an informant because he was on
the inside, because he partied with him for fifteen years
and knew everything the guy was doing and did it
with him as well.

Speaker 4 (50:33):
So yeah, they just need to get rid of all
the rules of decorum and let these people shout and
scream at each other.

Speaker 3 (50:39):
It's about time.

Speaker 4 (50:40):
There's no he's got thirty mores, l be quiet. Let
them all just scream at each other over top of
each other. A person of the loudest voice wins. We'll
decide it that way. Be as good as anything else
we're gonna get.

Speaker 3 (50:51):
That's kind of the way they do it in the
UK Parliament.

Speaker 4 (50:54):
They don't really at least more entertaining.

Speaker 2 (50:57):
Yeah, they don't really follow up parliamentary rules. Shell and
scream with each other. We should only loosely follow them.

Speaker 4 (51:04):
You should allow bullying on the House floor. Wally Wallrice
the blackmail list, we already read that Christian Conservative Why
can't these women who call themselves survives as Epstein Island
name the names? I never get an answer on that,
can't think, replies to him and says, because they will
be charged with slander.

Speaker 3 (51:22):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (51:22):
I think it's one of the reasons why Marjorie Taylor
Green said, you put that list together. The lawyers said,
we know the names, right, Why don't the lawyers release it? Well,
because the court has forbidden them from doing that. The
court is keeping it under seal as well. Even though
the trial is over and the rest of the stuff
so Je Marjorie Taylor Green said, you give me that
list and I'll read it on the house floor. Now,

(51:43):
you're right, we haven't heard anything about that, so I
don't know what's going on with that. But she can
read it on the house floor and they can't do
anything to her in terms of slander or anything else
like that, or false accusations, and the judge can't come
after her for you know, releasing these records.

Speaker 4 (52:02):
Con think, thank you very much, says The American justice
system only works for those that can afford to pay
for it. It's a very very much pay to play system.

Speaker 3 (52:12):
And it works to hide information as well from the public.

Speaker 4 (52:16):
Soaksaw Boxhaw as those women said they were going to
come out with their own list, and I heard nothing
about it since, probably being threatened and paid off. We'll
have to wait and see. That is something that makes
me wonder.

Speaker 2 (52:27):
Sometimes these things work slowly. But yeah, you would think
that we would have that They might be waiting for
the assassination of Charlie Kirk to die down a little
bit because it's going to be swamped by that. They
know that that's taking over the entire news cycle. It's
really hard to find anything that isn't about the assassination
or the reactions to the assassination about Charlie Kirk. I

(52:51):
think what is important about all this is not that,
certainly it's horrific, but the most important thing about it
is how it's going to be used against all of
us to shut down the First Amendment and this whole
idea that we are not going to try to have
a rule of law or the constitution. We're going to

(53:13):
just throw that out so that we can get vengeance.
That is an incredibly dangerous idea.

Speaker 10 (53:19):
It's also a complicated issue. The only time that I've
heard of someone coming forward with naming a name of
an abuser, one of the Epstein victims came forward and
said that she was abused by Dershowitz, and then Dershowitz
suit her for defamation or some other things. I'm not

(53:40):
sure it was definition and yeah, then she recanted it
said it might have been someone that just looked like.

Speaker 5 (53:48):
Dershowitz, who was also a friend of Jeffrey Epstein's.

Speaker 3 (53:51):
That also is could have been the two of them
are doppelgangers.

Speaker 4 (53:57):
I think it's a it's a phenotype that's out there.
Stealth Patriot Biden isn't an upscale enough pedo to be
hanging with Jeffreyskin. I have to up his game and well,
and Jeffrey Epsy to look at his crackhead son like
get out of here.

Speaker 3 (54:09):
Yeah. Yeah. He didn't have enough money at that time
for Jeffrey Epstein and.

Speaker 4 (54:13):
The milk Ukraine for it out e mr R. The
best thing parents can do is to keep their kids
the hell away from government, politicians and even law enforcement
slash military. Government runs child trafficking.

Speaker 3 (54:24):
That's right, they run the schools as well.

Speaker 2 (54:26):
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll
be right back. When we come back, we're going to
talk about the civil war that is coming up that
they're pushing us towards and all these different countries, just
like they're pushing us towards the pandemic, all these different
groups at the same time. You know, like I said before,
it's kind of interesting, isn't it that in all the
European countries what he talking about, France or Germany, especially

(54:47):
in the UK, these different people who are completely opposite
in what they profess in terms of their political ideology
from Trump, and yet they are all pushing us pushing
all the buttons they can in order to push us
into a civil war.

Speaker 14 (55:02):
We'll be right back, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, Laois,
your annual Global Risk Report makes for a stunning and
sobering read for the global business community. The top concern

(55:25):
for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within
our societies.

Speaker 1 (55:50):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 8 (55:56):
You are listening to the David Knight Show. You're listening

(56:49):
to the David Night Show.

Speaker 15 (56:52):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I.

Speaker 7 (57:02):
Could dress better.

Speaker 15 (57:04):
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some. At the Davidknightshow dot com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred those

(57:24):
amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear
something other than green military cosplay to my various gallas
and social events. If you want to save on shipping,
just put it in the next package of bombs and
missiles coming from the USA.

Speaker 6 (58:15):
In one.

Speaker 8 (59:19):
You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 2 (59:26):
So you want a civil war, Well, let's remember what
the first one looked like. This is an article from
a New Republic. Yesterday was the one hundred and sixty
third anniversary of Antietam, and that was the single bloodiest
day in that bloody civil war as a matter of fact,
in terms of and there's a picture that Matthew Brady took.

(59:50):
It was famous for documentary documenting it. And now we
have some people have taken those black and white pictures,
fed them into AI that has colorized them and brought
them to life with little bits of movement for people
as they move around. But you know, there was an
interesting alternative history novel from Harry Turtledove called How Few

(01:00:13):
Remain and it began with the Battle of Antietam. And
what is interesting about this, certainly it was a horrific,
bloody war, as I said, bloody battle that day, twenty
three thousand people casualties. But one of the reasons that

(01:00:34):
it was interesting to a lot of people, besides the
fact that it was the bloodiest, single bloodiest day, was
the fact that Lee's orders to showing the outline of
where the different armies were because he'd split his forces.
It was wrapped around three cigars, handed to this courier
who was supposed to take it, and he dropped it.

(01:00:55):
So the beginning of how Few remain the officer who's said, oh,
wait a minute, you dropped this thing, and the guy
comes back and gets it and goes imagine what would happen
if that fell into enemy hands, because in reality it
did fall into enemy hans. But McClellan, even with the
I'm showing where Lee's troops were still getting beat Lee

(01:01:18):
he reacted quickly enough, and so it kind of came
out as a stalemate, but an incredibly bloody battle. And
in the novel what happens is you can imagine that
if it was such a stalemate, even when the guys
got the other guy's battle plans, that it would have
been a tremendous loss. They would have continued to go

(01:01:38):
north and it would have been an early into the
war perhaps, so that was what he based his alternative
history on.

Speaker 3 (01:01:49):
So he picks it up a couple of decades.

Speaker 2 (01:01:51):
Down the road from that, and all the major figures,
many of whom were killed during the war in the aftermath,
back and they've got different positions, and it's a second
civil war that happens. You've got Jeb Stewart out in
the American West and his cavalry is using camels because

(01:02:11):
that was something that had been proposed by Jefferson Davis
when he was with the War Department. And you've got
Stonewall Jackson has just been made President of the Confederacy
after Roberty Lee.

Speaker 3 (01:02:25):
And you've got.

Speaker 2 (01:02:26):
Abraham Lincoln who was driven out of public life in
disgrace because of the loss of his war, and he
comes back as a leader of the Socialist Party, which
really fit because that's really where the guy was coming from.
But anyway, it's very interesting novel. But he focuses on
this bloody battle to say, really, don't want to have

(01:02:48):
a civil war. And of course in the New Republic,
the article is filled with their political propaganda, I guess,
but just trying to take it out and look at
the description of the battle that was there. And you know,
the Trump administration, of course, is exploiting the assassination of

(01:03:10):
Charlie Kirk for constant partisan revitalization and the sharpening of
conceptions of the fact that the enemy, whoever that is,
must be destroyed. And I would agree with him on that.
And so in September seventh, eighteen sixty two, in a
tetam near Sharpsburg, the two armies clashed in what some

(01:03:33):
still call the most deadly fighting on any battlefield in
that entire war. McClellan versus Lee, mccollin had said, by
the way, that when he got those when he got
the plans of robbery, Lee said, if I can't defeat him,
I need to go home. And I think Lincoln thought
the same thing as well. Afterwards, you know he did

(01:03:55):
go home, Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:03:56):
Right after.

Speaker 2 (01:03:58):
The photographer Matthew Brady went to the ghastly landscape immediately
after the battle and took on forgettable images of the
mingled dead near the Dunker Church, the sunken road that
you just saw their stern lawn fences hard by the
Haggerstown Pike. Americans have forever been able to see the
results of unrestrained civil war. They can see, but they

(01:04:20):
can't really hear, feel, taste, or smell so much death
and unimaginable suffering in one concentrated place, most probably these
soldiers who were their only thought of survival or endurance
or home. On that terrible day, they witnessed the bodies
of their comrades and their foes blown to pieces by
short range artillery. They saw bullets smash apart bones and

(01:04:43):
blow off heads. They feared most being shot in the
torso that often meant no recovery. A shattered arm or
leg might be survivable with an amputation. They had approximately
sixty thousand amputations throughout the Civil War. They faced and
penetrable smoke and the terrifying noise of thousands of muskets

(01:05:04):
and dozens of cannon all firing at once. They saw
blood everywhere as it dried on bodies on the ground
or on abandoned weapons, and the blood turned black. A
Pennsylvania soldier said, no tongue can tell, no mind, conceive,
no pen portray the horrible sites I have witnessed this morning.

(01:05:27):
Dead bodies everywhere, hideously swollen and blackened. Many, he said,
were so covered with dust, torn, crushed, trampled, though they
looked like clods of earth, and you were obliged to
look twice before recognizing them as human beings. Sometimes the
deads swoll up and exploded fluids all around, even bursting

(01:05:48):
inside makeshift coffins. So you say you want a civil
war because you hate liberals or because you want a
national divorce. By the way, you know, I always agree
with this. I think we should have a right of
self government. But you need to understand that if you
want a divorce, as Marjorie Tayler Green has been saying,
you need to understand that you are married to an

(01:06:11):
abusive husband who, when he finds out about your divorce papers,
will seek you out.

Speaker 3 (01:06:16):
He will beat, rape and kill you and.

Speaker 2 (01:06:19):
Cut you to pieces just to show people how tough
he is. That's what we're talking about in the divorce.
That's what the American government has done and will do.
We have to find ways to fiercely disagree about ideas,
and I would say we also have to not destroy
the First Amendment so we can have revenge against people.

(01:06:41):
That is truly the issue in front of us. So
now the US is at war with Venezuela. Are you
going to inflict that on them? And of course, with
the weapons of modern warfare, it is we can do
it to civilian It's not just the soldiers that are

(01:07:01):
facing this as well. And Trump is so proud of
his second Venezuelan ship that he's blown up that one
with three people. That adds to his eleven that he
killed before that he's so proud of as well. That's
fourteen people that he's killed in two weeks, whether they
are criminals or not. As I have said, I don't

(01:07:22):
know that smuggling drugs is a capital offense. But he's
not even giving them due process, and he's boasting about
the fact that he's not giving them due process. Does
that cause you concern? It causes me concern because I
see in Trump a boasting, bragging fascist, just like Dutarte,

(01:07:44):
who did the same thing in the Philippines. Dutarte killed
twelve thousand people with his police. He told him to
shoot on site anybody that they suspected of doing drugs,
which is exactly what Trump is doing now. A lot
of people say, well, perhaps he is just trying to
push his way into a regime change. With him, is

(01:08:06):
that any better. Is that an excuse? I mean, I
look at the everything about the drug war has been
so destructive to the rule of law, so destructive to
our institutions, corrupting the police, corrupting the courts, corrupting Congress.
They have thrown away all the ideas about due process.

(01:08:27):
That's why we have swat team raids everywhere all the
time in America. So you know, yes, drugs are horrible,
and they've taken the wrong approach to this and it
just keeps metastasizing. Trump assures us, but as assurance says,
have done little to assuage concerns from some that the

(01:08:49):
US is headed towards are already engaged in an unauthorized
war with Venezuela, of course, never with any decoration of war.
Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, said last month the US
government had seized up to seven hundred million dollars worth
of assets allegedly linked to Maduro. Trump also issued penalty

(01:09:09):
tariffs on countries that purchase oil from Venezuela in March. Again,
why would you think that would be any different when
they have instituted theft against American citizens without finding a
conviction without even charging anybody with a crime. They have
confiscated houses, cars, cash, planes, you name it. And in

(01:09:33):
the name of the war on drugs, they call it
civil asset forfeiture. Civil because you have to sue them
in civil court to get your property back that they
stole by force. Civil asset forfeiture is a moving down
the road from the Rico statute that also came into
existence because of drug war. But I got to say

(01:09:57):
that that whole approach of I'm just going to take
what you what you have, and you're going to have
to try to stop me in court, that has become
the rationale for everything that Trump does. And it's one
of the reasons why I dislike him so much, because
as much as I dislike civil asset forfeiture, stealing somebody's

(01:10:17):
car and you have any you don't charge them with
the crime. You charge the car with a crime, and
then saying, Okay, if you want to get it back,
you got tossue me. That's what Trump has done with
the rule of law. He takes the rule of law
and he says, if you want to stop me, you
got to take me to court.

Speaker 3 (01:10:32):
And maybe even that won't stop him. At some point
in time.

Speaker 2 (01:10:36):
What needs to start happening is that some of these
boats they need to get blown up, said Marco Rubio. Well,
it seems to be what's happening when that's on Sunday.
If the US would start doing strikes on mainland Venezuela,
Trump said, well, we'll see what happens, right, I will decide.
It's just going to be on my whim, my capricious
and arbitrary whim. We're not going to have a debate

(01:10:56):
about this. Did they ask you about this?

Speaker 16 (01:11:00):
No?

Speaker 3 (01:11:00):
Did they ask Congress about it?

Speaker 2 (01:11:01):
Now? I'm not going to have a public debate. He's
just going to do whatever he wishes, and the Congress
under Speaker Johnson, Squeaker Johnson the mouse, will do nothing
about it. Venezuela has responded to the first strike, where
loven were killed by flying two F sixteen fighter jets
over US Navy destroyer on September fourth, to which Trump

(01:11:24):
warned that the US would shoot them down if they
did it again. He said, it puts US in a
dangerous situation. Yeah, you know, would they be flying their
planes over American ships if the American ships weren't close
to their waters? The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry said whoever ordered
the action was looking for an incident to justify escalating

(01:11:44):
war in the Caribbean with the aim of regime change. Well,
we all know that it was Trump who did that,
and we all know that is what Trump wants. Most cocaine,
by the way, in Latin America is produced in Columbia, Peru, Bolivia,
not Venezuela. In twenty nineteen, seventy four percent of cocaine
shipments to the US came through the Pacific, which Venezuela

(01:12:07):
does not border. Seventy four percent came through the Caribbean. Sorry,
twenty four percent came through the Caribbean, according to the DEA.
So that's what the DEA is telling us. All of
this raises legal concerns that Trump would think that he's
entitled to kill people without any proof. And again, as

(01:12:28):
I said, if this were a capital offense, they should
still get due process. But it's not even a capital offense.
If you stopped the boat and you found drugs there,
should you then be allowed Would you want the military
then to execute everybody on board, especially when it's not
a capital offense. Countries are prohibited from using force unless

(01:12:49):
under attack per the UN Charter. After designating the Trendy
Gang as a terrorist organization, Trump accused the cartel of invasion,
invoked the seventeen ninety eight Alien Enemies Act, and said
the gang was conducting irregular warfare against the US at
the direction of Maduro. There's one lie after the other,

(01:13:10):
and that he's tax the liizes so hard it's difficult
to get down to which one was actually the foundational lie.
It's here, But the fact that US officials described the
individuals killed by the US strike as narco terrorist does
not transform them into lawful military targets. It doesn't matter

(01:13:30):
if the victims are criminals. These are murderers, said one
lawyer who was posting on this. Intentional killing outside of
armed conflict hostilities is unlawful unless it is to save
life immediately. You see, when we look at this, when
I've talked about a just war, these are rules in

(01:13:53):
Western civilization that have been adopted even by the UN
and by international law, and that is that you are
not allowed to just kill people. You're not allowed to
begin wars. We still understand that that is unjust to
do primptive strikes, and we still understand that if you
are not being directly threatened, you are not allowed to

(01:14:16):
use deadly force the same rules that apply in your household. Yes,
you are allowed to protect yourself, but if somebody is
not directly threatening you, even if they broke into your house,
presumably you still have to make the case that your
life was in danger. If they broke into your house
and they're running away with a TV set, you can't

(01:14:37):
shoot them in the back. And so these Trump is
working to shred any last remnant of the just war
based on Christian principles, just like he's working very hard
to shred any last remnants of the Constitution and the
Bill of Rights. He wants to do this, I think

(01:14:58):
partially to wag the Epstein, but I think he really
wants the oil this. They they have more oil than
Saudi Arabia, And as Gerald Centi always points out, we're
not doing this to any of these other Caribbean nations,
and we're not doing it to the ones that are
actually manufacturing most of the drugs because they don't have oil.
Venezuela does.

Speaker 5 (01:15:17):
Maybe it has nothing to do with the oil.

Speaker 10 (01:15:18):
He's just really concerned about the fentanyl coming from Canada. Specifically,
and the cocaine coming from Venezuela's.

Speaker 3 (01:15:27):
Yeactly, that's right, which isn't it.

Speaker 2 (01:15:29):
But you know, people don't you know, it is absurd
to say that there's fentanyl coming from Canada, but people
can believe that somewhere down there, I don't know my geography,
but somewhere down there, down south, they're making this stuff
up and they're sending it up to us. So he
can maybe get away with that lie better than with
the Canadian one. The fact that Congress has just been

(01:15:49):
completely left out of the loop suggest that Trump administration
doesn't feel that it has to follow the rules of
the game, said a professor of international law. Well, of
course they don't believe that they got to follow the
rules in any sphere, foreign or domestic. Rampaul, of course,
expressed concern when JD. Vance said killing cartel members who

(01:16:11):
poison our fellow citizens is the highest and the best
use of our military. Yeah, that's as I said. I'm
getting more and more concerned as we go along with JD.

Speaker 3 (01:16:23):
Vance. Just kill him.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
You know, at least he's just saying arrest people who
are haters, but he wants the people who are that
he says, are involved in the drug war without any
proof or due process. Ram Paul said, did he ever
read to Kill a Mockingbird? Did you ever wonder what
might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial

(01:16:51):
or representation? And so, yeah, what do we know about this?
I think it was interesting that the Atlantic Council, which
has always pushed war and is involved with NATO, they
love this. They love old wars, the like Lindsay Graham
in terms of an institution, and so they wrote an
op ed piece and want to know about Trump's war

(01:17:12):
on drug trafficking from Venezuela. What they want you to know,
this is the gist of the article, that these actions
that he's taking against Venezuela are long overdue. According to them,
it's not amazing. We should take Trump at his word
when he hints that the US is evaluating the possibility
of striking targets inside Venezuela. One big challenge for the

(01:17:35):
US military planners, however, is that Venezuela has a functional
air defense system, which it's kept running with the help
of Russian advisors. And he strikes in Venezuelan territory, may
have to first take out air defenses, which could further
complicate US relations with Moscow at an already tense moment. Well,

(01:17:55):
it's not just Russian advisors running their air defenses. Also,
the Chinese are deeply embedded there. So if he goes
in with a big stick to bash Venezuela and take
their oil, he's going to find that Russians and Chinese
are there as well. This is possibly another tripwire into
World War three, which I think would suit him just fine.

(01:18:18):
That would be the ultimate wag the Epstein move. So
for now, he said, I think we'll see continued saber
rattling that appears aimed at signaling to disaffected elements the
Venezuelan armed forces that now is the time to rise
up against Maduro. The problem with this approach is that
the US backed operations have failed to produce such cracks

(01:18:41):
inside the Venezuelan government over the past twenty years. So
this is why this writer wants us to start it
in earnest And he said this is long overdue. Since
we couldn't overthrow them from the inside, let's overthrow them
from the outside. But one thing is certain, we have
to overthrow them, he said. But Trump is sending mixed signals,
just like he does with the terraffs you had. As

(01:19:03):
recently as July, Washington eased restrictions on Venezuela and oil
exports after negotiating a prisoner release. Even now, in spite
of the tensions, the US and Venezuela are cooperating on
the president's immigration agenda. The US government is funding twice
weekly immigration deportation flights that take off directly from US

(01:19:26):
military installations and land in Venezuela's largest airport. So this
is going to work against his deportation agenda. But the
guy in the Atlantic Council, Jeff Ramsey, doesn't really care.

Speaker 3 (01:19:41):
Let's do it.

Speaker 2 (01:19:41):
Now is the time, Let's let loose the dogs of war. Well,
whenever you have a war, you have not only massive carnage,
but now, as I said in the twenty first century,
the war is focused against civilians. An Israeli sniper has
detailed killing Palestinian including children who are waiting for aid

(01:20:03):
and in line for food. As an Israeli sniper from
the IDFs Nahal brigade detailed in comments to Haaretz the
killing of unarmed Palestinians, including children who are attempting to
get aid in Gaza. He said it started about two
months ago. The soldier goes by the pseudonym Benni. Every

(01:20:23):
day we had the same mission to secure the humanitarian
aid in northern Gaza strip. When they say secure it,
what they mean is to make sure that doesn't get distributed.
The report said that Benni and his fellow soldiers began
o their day at three thirty am, when they set
up sniper positions near where the AID trucks arrived to
unload their contents. He said the Gaza residents try to

(01:20:46):
move forward to get a good spot in line, but
they often cross an invisible line that was set by
the IDF, a line that if they cross it, I
can shoot them. It's like a game of cat and mount.
They try to come from different directions every time, and
I'm there with a sniper rifle and the officers are
yelling at me, take him down, take him down. I

(01:21:08):
fire fifty sixty bullets every day. I've stopped counting the kills.
I have no idea how many I have killed, a
lot children, he said. He said Aurettes previously reported that
idea of soldiers were ordered to fire on Palestinians attempting
to reach the GHF distribution sites to drive them away

(01:21:30):
or disperse them, even though they posed no threat. And
then what they tell the international press is that the
food is just rotting. They can't get it to them.
It's like it's writing, because when you're killing people to
keep them from taking the food. Benny told Harettes that
if he didn't want to shoot Palestinian civilians waiting for aid,
he was forced to by commanders and sometimes threatened. The

(01:21:54):
battalion commander would yell over the radio, why aren't you
taking them down? They're heading your way. This is dangerous,
he said. The sense is that we're being positioned in
an impossible situation and no one has prepared us for this.
The officers do not care if children die. They also
do not care what it does to my soul. To them,

(01:22:18):
I am just another tool, and this is why they
want autonomous or remote controlled robots and drones to kill. Essentially,
this is what they're telling this guy. But he's, you know,
he's got problems with this. So we've had medical doctors
who have talked about snipers killing people children especially, and

(01:22:40):
taking two shots, one to the chest to kill them
and then one to the head to be sure. And
now you've got the snipers who are going public with it.

Speaker 4 (01:22:50):
Yeah, like you said, it's one reason they want drones. Yeah,
the child mangle or nine thousand isn't going to grow
a conscience and decide I should report on this to
ha Aretz.

Speaker 3 (01:22:58):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:23:00):
Another soldier who went by the name Yani, shared a
story about killing two children and bite Lahaya, northern Gaza.
After one soldiers shouted terrorists approaching. We got into a
frenzy and I get on the Negev a machine gun
right away and I start spraying, firing hundreds of bullets.
We then charged forward, and I realized that it was

(01:23:21):
a mistake. I saw the bodies of two children, maybe
eight or ten years old.

Speaker 3 (01:23:26):
I have no idea.

Speaker 2 (01:23:28):
There was blood everywhere, lots of signs of gunfire. I
knew it was all on me that I had done this.
I wanted to throw up. After a few minutes, the
company commander arrived and said, coldly, if he wasn't as
if he wasn't a human being, they entered an extermination zone.
It's their fault. This is what war is like. He added, Well,

(01:23:52):
that is absolutely true. That is what it's like. So
other Israeli soldiers have detailed killing unarmed policine civilians without
expressing any remorse. Israeli media outlets have reported extensively on
the existence of kill zones in Gaza, where any Palestinian
who crosses the line set up by the IDEF as

(01:24:12):
deemed a terrorists. This reminds me of the stories that
came out of Panama when they had the Panama invasion,
and after the fact documentary that I saw, the people
that were there said, we had this loud speaker said
get out of the area. We are going to attack
this area. Anybody who's in this area will be killed.

(01:24:34):
And they're like, what is the area? Am I in
the area? I am out of the area. They had
no idea. It's this big loud speaker saying if you're
still in the area and they don't define it, we
will kill you. So meanwhile, you had about two hundred
and fifty members of Congress or in Israel to get
their orders. And the thing that I thought was interesting

(01:24:57):
about this was the and of course this is a
tweet about it. They call this fifty states one Israel,
and so it's all to serve Israel's interest, not our
fifty states they have.

Speaker 3 (01:25:15):
They're not just taking over God, so they're taking over America.

Speaker 4 (01:25:18):
It's truly amazing how subservient and groveling these politicians are.
Whatever you want, whatever you need.

Speaker 2 (01:25:26):
Well, we can rejoice on one thing. This was their entertainment.
That's a guy singing fly spirts flo and then we

(01:25:51):
can see our congressmen setting.

Speaker 3 (01:25:58):
Is that sufficient punishment for them?

Speaker 10 (01:26:00):
No actions of the idea extend even to our congressmen.

Speaker 4 (01:26:06):
Is that a demo of what they're going to unleash
on the Palestinians? Next is we're going to be pumping
this over loud speaker into gaza.

Speaker 3 (01:26:13):
Somewhere over the rainbow.

Speaker 2 (01:26:14):
They don't have the rainbow flags there for some reason,
I don't know.

Speaker 4 (01:26:17):
It really makes you wonder, well, you know in Tel
Aviv there's many many rainbow flags. Tel Aviv is actually
one of the gayest cities on earth.

Speaker 3 (01:26:23):
That's right, that's where the rainbow flag stuff began. Really
is I wonder?

Speaker 7 (01:26:27):
I wonder why?

Speaker 3 (01:26:29):
Curious or and curious?

Speaker 4 (01:26:30):
Here we got comments Shelley A. I don't understand that
civil war talk. Who's going to fight the military the trannies.

Speaker 3 (01:26:38):
They mostly fight themselves. They have a habit of.

Speaker 4 (01:26:43):
Removing themselves from the equation.

Speaker 10 (01:26:45):
The thing is, any crazy person with a gun can
be dangerous, as we have just seen in the recent.

Speaker 2 (01:26:51):
CRUs Well, you know, I used to when I was
with the Libertarian Party and we would do interviews.

Speaker 3 (01:26:57):
They would interview us and we would.

Speaker 2 (01:26:59):
Talk about how essential the Second Amendment was, and we
were talking about the fact that, hey, it's not about hunting,
it's not even about self defense, it's about keeping the
government in check. And I had every time we would
have reporters talk to us, they would scoff at that idea.
What do you think you're going to do with the military,
And I said, well, it's called asymmetric warfare, and we

(01:27:20):
haven't won any of these yet, and since that time,
we've now lost two more asymmetric wards because of that
type of thing. But you know, it is horrific, and
it will be horrific an asymmetric war here. I mean,
take a look at what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.
You really want to have that happen here. No sane

(01:27:41):
person would want to see that. It is mutually assured
destruction that's the point of the Second Amendment. We have
nuclear weapons because the other people had nuclear weapons, and
we just hope and pray that somebody doesn't use them
against us. And the same thing is true of the
guns and the government. We hope that they don't use

(01:28:01):
their guns against us, and you know, the kickoff of
civil war like that.

Speaker 4 (01:28:06):
But yea, and I want to say thank you to
bl Hoten on Rumble. He has gifted ten subs to
the community there on Rumble, So thank you, thank you
very much, really.

Speaker 3 (01:28:16):
Do appreciate it.

Speaker 4 (01:28:18):
And now we've got defied hire at seventeen seventy six,
I would Speaker of the House say in public that
President was FBI informant.

Speaker 3 (01:28:26):
More distractions. Yeah, that's right. I just throw this out
here and that let them debate that now for a
couple of years. That'll keep them busy for a while.

Speaker 4 (01:28:33):
Yeah, Christian constitutional conservative. When Team Blue takes over eventually,
they will, they will ramp up the censorship even more.
Censorship begets censorship, That's right.

Speaker 2 (01:28:43):
People will forget. I mean, it's just January six. Look
at what Biden was doing with the outrageous claims about
insurrection and revolution. All the rest of this stuff and
how they were coming after people simply on the basis
of their speech. In many cases because the very few
people at the fifteen hundred people they were not violent,

(01:29:06):
not all of them. I mean, as I said, from
the very beginning, you got pictures of somebody being violent,
you know, come after them. But Joe Biggs, for example,
they featured him. He was one of the people that
they wanted to give decades in prison to. And Enrico Terio,
who was head of the Priud Boys, wasn't even there,
so there wasn't any violence from those guys, and yet

(01:29:27):
they wanted to send them to jail forever. I mean,
Joe Biggs is just walking around peacefully and the report
Sam who was at INFO Worth walking peacefully between the
velvet ropes filming it, working as a journalist, and Biden
didn't care. He didn't care about free press, he didn't
care about free speech, he didn't care about the peaceful

(01:29:48):
redress of grievances, all of those things protected in the
First Amendment. So you don't have to imagine what if
people have seen this and it was done against the
very people, the Maga cult that are out there demanding
that the First Amendment be removed now for their enemies,
it's just mindless revenge. If we don't get the principles

(01:30:09):
of Christ about forgiveness, if we don't understand the importance
of the rule of law, it will take us into
this civil war barbarism. That's why Christianity is the answer,
not the Republican Party, not Trump. If we don't follow
Christ and his example and we don't start looking at
forgiveness and figure out how we're going to build a

(01:30:31):
civilization rather than focusing on how we're going to tear
down civilization. That's the problem I have with the GOP
and the Democrats. Everything they do is designed to tear
down our civilization and not to rebuild it.

Speaker 4 (01:30:45):
We've got so Bogus says our family never thought much
of mister Lincoln. As the best line the Kenburtons documentary.

Speaker 3 (01:30:52):
I think that was Shelby Foote who said that.

Speaker 2 (01:30:56):
By the way, I think he has got the by
far and away the best history of the Civil War,
and I've read a lot of them. He is an
excellent writer, and he spent almost all of his life
researching and writing about the Civil War.

Speaker 4 (01:31:12):
We've got soaksa Voxha says, now that is what AI
is great for. Just wow, talking about the civil war
pictures that they animated, Yeah, that was very interesting.

Speaker 3 (01:31:23):
So bogus.

Speaker 4 (01:31:24):
All wars are schemes that he populate young males, especially
World War One. Yeah, the World Wars really just destroyed
the young male population of Europe. It fed them into
a meat grinder. It really really probably more than decimated.
Decimating is taking one in ten. I'd be surprised if
the World Wars didn't take more than that. Oh yeah,

(01:31:48):
we've got Shelley A. They have poison and dumbed everyone down.
There will not be a civil war. I hope there
isn't a civil war, and I hope it's not just
because everyone is too dumb and weak to fight tire
at seventeen seventy six, Americans who are yearning for a
civil war, in my opinion, are fools. They have no
clue what they're yearning for. Most can't handle being with
that electricity for one day. They are very disconnected from reality.

Speaker 2 (01:32:09):
And of course that's one of the things that some
people have said is that if you have a war
with China or something like Taiwan or something, they will
most likely do attacks against the infrastructure because they can
have a plausible deniability that it came from them. But
of course the same thing is true of Venezuela, right
that would be even more obvious approach for them. In

(01:32:33):
terms of asymmetric war. They are no match against our forces,
so the only hope that they would have would be
to create chaos against the infrastructure.

Speaker 4 (01:32:44):
I want to say thank you again to Bielahotney's gifted
another five subs. Fifteen subs now gifted by b L
hot And I know we've got a lot of comments,
but our guest is ready. We'll have to get to
those comments afterwards. And I know you said someone sent
in a question about a book.

Speaker 3 (01:33:00):
We'll talk about that.

Speaker 2 (01:33:00):
Yeah, And I'm sorry the listener who said that, I
have not replied yet. I'll give you you said that
Travis had some said something about alternative history. We'll talk
about that after we get Tony on. We're going to
take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.

Speaker 8 (01:34:52):
You're listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 2 (01:34:58):
Yeah, well, welcome back, folks. We have Tony Ordabin on
the line, and again Wisewolf gold and you can get
there with David Knight dye gold. That'll take you Tony's site.
A lot is happening with gold, and we've just had
the Fed's cut the rates by a quarter of a point,
and Bank of America says that gold always rallies Tony

(01:35:20):
when the FED cuts rates in an inflationary environment that
has been difficult to get under control.

Speaker 3 (01:35:27):
They think that.

Speaker 2 (01:35:30):
They said that goal prices have seen average gains of
around thirteen percent within twelve months after the FED has
cut interest rates in a stubborn inflationary environment. However, that
looks like a fairly muted response, as goal prices are
already up nearly forty percent so far this year.

Speaker 3 (01:35:47):
What do you say about that?

Speaker 7 (01:35:49):
Well, who knew? When you create inflation, gold tends to
go up and furness is denominated by dollars. Who knew? Yeah,
Bank of America, I think that's a good call. But
it's a good charge to look back because there are
some analysts that were saying, don't move interest rates, you know,
because the dollar is already weak. We already see inflation
is still out of control and deed allarization is continuing

(01:36:11):
to eat away at the purchasing power of the dollars,
So holding steady was actually a much wiser move if
you see, like the quote from Jerome Pally said, we
see where we are now, and we took the appropriate
action today on that's coming off of the FOMC meeting
where he cut interest rates by twenty five basis points,

(01:36:33):
and that was I think it was like a ninety
nine percent bet on the markets that he would make
that move. And there's a lot of pressure from the
White House and the Trump administration and putting pressure on
these Fed governors and everything else that really it's not
something that's happened in American history, this outright conflict directly
with the Fed and trying to get monetary policies shifted

(01:36:56):
towards further inflation. But that's where we're headed. Interesting enough,
gold went down. It's down about forty three dollars or
so from the opening bell and now I mean it's
still reaching all time highs. I mean, we broke thirty
seven hundred dollars last week. But you know, the economy

(01:37:18):
and the they perceived value that will be pumped into there.
I think that that took a little bit of a
hit on gold. But as you see the Bank of
England didn't do anything, and gold just keeps going less
and less. Do these decisions really affect the price of
precious metals, David, And that's because this has become global

(01:37:39):
and systemic, the deed dollarization process, in my opinion, And
there's another story that's out today I'd like to talk
about it. I think this really struck me as probably
one of the most important moves and precious metals in
a long time, and that's the move for the Hong
Kong Gold Exchange to come online and start trading. They're

(01:38:00):
in physical gold and building gold storage facilities that can
house up to two thousand tons outside of the airport. Wow,
because you understand the history of Hong Kong and of
course now completely controlled by the communist regime of China
and since nineteen ninety seven, I think that is I
think that's a big story that's not getting a lot

(01:38:22):
of play right now as we see deed allarization continue
to happen and gold really taking the helm as the
world's reserve currency.

Speaker 3 (01:38:30):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:38:30):
We spent a couple of days in Hong Kong when
we adopted my daughter about twenty years ago. And one
of the things that really fascinated me about it was
first of all, very nice.

Speaker 3 (01:38:40):
City.

Speaker 2 (01:38:40):
People were incredibly nice. One of the nicest big cities
I've ever visited. Very friendly people. They all spoke English,
and we'd be puzzling over a map or something and
people walk up, Hey, can I help you find something?
You know, it was very nice. But the money that
we had was all different because it was issued by
private banks, which is what used to be done in America.

(01:39:03):
I remember pulling out some of these notes, the same
denomination and it was completely different, different design, different color,
different size, and it is this, how can we have
Hong Kong dollars? This many Hong Kong dollars? And then
here's another bill that's the same denomination, totally different And
I saw they were issued by different banks that were there.

(01:39:26):
It wasn't done by a Hong Kong Central Bank. So
this is kind of interesting. I wonder if this is
something that the Chinese communists are involved in, because part
of this, we've had the Shanghai Gold Exchange, and that's
really one of the things that has caused me concern
about the ETFs that are out there. GLED and then
SLV for silver. Do you really own that do they

(01:39:49):
really have the gold in the Shanghai exchange or are
they Shanghai knew as far as your money goes, you know,
so it'll be interesting to see what happens with Hong Kong.

Speaker 7 (01:39:59):
Well, I think this is an indirect conflict and a
shot across the bow at London and the West currency exchanges.
Right now. This is I didn't expect to see this.
I mean, you mentioned the Shanghai gold exchange and that's
been pretty much the norm. But I go back to well,
I watched that live in nineteen ninety seven when the

(01:40:19):
Chinese warships rolled into and you remember the handoff from
the what the British had a ninety nine year lease,
wasn't that right? Yeah, yeah, that's right on Hong Kong
and everybody was wondering what they would do. But they
didn't do much. I mean, they've put down this was
something at the end of twenty nineteen, you remember was
going on with the Hong Kongers and some of the upright.

Speaker 2 (01:40:42):
And they've been tightening the news very very slowly. They're
very patient with this stuff. They don't come in just
start shooting everybody, but they will hang you a little
bit at a time, like Boel constrictors or something.

Speaker 7 (01:40:54):
Well, I think this is something that's a very important
strategic move that this is being done pushed by Beijing
in order to reallocate and repurpose the world's commodity markets
through Hong Kong, which would be a smart play getting
it away from the West because it lends like you
mentioned that decentralized legitimacy, it lends that to the world

(01:41:17):
and shows oh no, it's and it completely controlled by
the communist Chinese at the same time. Interesting play, and
I think that this may be one of the most
important stories on precious metals in the monetary system since
we talked about Russia making silver a strategic reserve asset.
I think that the price of silver is directly correlated
right now with that one move in my opinion. I mean,

(01:41:38):
all the other market conditions are about the same as
they were in accordance with silver in the last couple
of years, but that one move by Russia really has
made a difference in my opinion, on the price of silver.
So this is another move I think that will set
the stage for the resetting of the monetary system worldwide.

Speaker 2 (01:42:00):
And I think, you know by doing it in Hong Kong.
You know, the Chinese really do control Hong Kong. They
control it from the top down. They've gradually exercised their control,
using it through the schools and doing it through the
politicians at the top, and the people are pushing back
against that quite a bit until COVID and then, as
Jeryl Clenty points out, that just ended at all. That

(01:42:22):
was the end of the pushback, and so they've now
consolidated all of their control over this stuff. But there's
still this idea in the West that Hong Kong is
somehow this still a separate autonomous region, which it's not anymore,
and that it's a bastion of freedom. I remember the
series that was done by Milton Friedman called Free to Choose,

(01:42:44):
and he used Hong Kong as an example of freedom
and thriving because of that. And that was largely possible
because the British had taken kind of hands off approach.
They didn't really want to run the place, and they
were kind of stuck with it until the lease ran out,
and so they kind of left these people alone. And

(01:43:05):
so it was a good laboratory to show how effective
freedom can be, but not anymore. There's still that illusion,
I think in the West, and I think that'll serve
the Chinese communists very well.

Speaker 7 (01:43:16):
You're watching a report years ago, and I'm I'm not
sure you could do this today. But John Stossel went
over to Hong Kong just to show how easy it
was to start a business as compared to starting it
in New York City and just did the you know,
the diametrically opposed idea, all the forums and everything and
all the red tape, probably the bribes and everything in
New York City as opposed to Hong Kong, where you

(01:43:36):
just go in. I think you just get a you
just get a slip and you fill it out and
then just hand it back and say, I'm going to
be over here. I'm going to start this business. And
that's pretty much it.

Speaker 3 (01:43:44):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (01:43:44):
I don't know if that's the case anymore. This was
a long time ago, but there's.

Speaker 2 (01:43:48):
A probably there probably gott to find somebody in the
Chinese Communist Party that you're going to pay off and
make a partner.

Speaker 3 (01:43:53):
That's probably the way it.

Speaker 7 (01:43:54):
Works, I would assume, So I would assume. Yeah, but
that's still that lasting impression. Yeah, I thought when I
watched that. I was seventeen years old in ninety seven.
I watched those warships roll in. I thought, I wonder
what they'll do. You know, as they leave it alone
and let it stand, that'll say a lot about the Chinese.
They're the communists, you know, government in Beijing. That'll say

(01:44:15):
a lot about them if they just leave it alone.
And they for the most part have but right.

Speaker 3 (01:44:20):
They moved slowly.

Speaker 2 (01:44:21):
You know, they're very patient. They've got their goal of
where they want to go, and they're constantly moving toward it.
But they are doing it with very small steps so
that you don't notice. That's the key thing. And they
can get what they want that way very easily. I mean,
you talk about making small steps towards getting what they want.
There's an interesting article from I think is the Corbett Report.

(01:44:43):
I forget what his first name is. It Jim Corbett,
and he was talking about the fact that he went
to Malaysia and it was some conference that he was doing,
and he was talking about how difficult it was for
him to even try to get something to eat because
everybody had gone to electronic forms of payment. His cell
phone didn't work there, and he couldn't get into the

(01:45:04):
app that everybody wanted to take, and so in his
hotel he had cash and they still have cash in Malaysia,
but the hotel didn't want to take it. It wound
up and then letting him go the second time that
he did it. First time, they went through this long process.
They got the manager, they opened up the safe and
they got a little bit of cash line and pay.
Second time, there wasn't a manager around, so they just

(01:45:26):
let him walk. But then after that he tried to
get food outside of the hotel and there's absolutely no
way that he could do it because he didn't have
the cell phone connection. And he said, this is a
taste of what life is going to be like once
we moved to a cashless society. You won't even be
able to eat in the system unless you adopt this

(01:45:49):
system that they want to have out there. And that's
why I look at gold, because I think, again, you know,
people may not take gold, but then I'm sure that
you'll be able to find people who will take it.

Speaker 3 (01:46:00):
It's going to be an.

Speaker 2 (01:46:01):
Underground black market economy if they get this thing through.
And I imagine you saw what's going on with Visa
teaming up with a large biometric company where they will
look at your face, they'll look at your fingerprints, and
then Visa will handle the processing of it. So it's
a merger between a biometric company and Visa in order

(01:46:23):
to set up this market the beast system that's coming
down the road very quickly.

Speaker 7 (01:46:28):
Well, it's interesting you mentioned and I've been thinking a
lot about the moves to a cash society via stable
coin and what that would look like. And you know,
this war that's maybe it could be a pageant, could
be scripted, most likely is in some way, but there's
a controlled demolition going on of the Federal Reserve itself,
so the creature from Jackal Island is maybe being put

(01:46:51):
down or repurposed or something. If you mentioned cash, so
all over the world, all the cash that it's out there,
and again it's like I think it's eighty percent of
all the one hundred dollars bills that are printed and
not in the continental United States, and sixty five percent
of all the paper currency that's ever been printed it's
not in the continental United States. But those are Federal

(01:47:11):
Reserve notes, every single one of them. The only this
is a little bit of history but John F. Kennedy
made notes direct from the Treasury, and so did Lincoln,
and as Jim Marsh said, they were both shot in
the head in public. So the only two presidents that
made notes directly from the treasury.

Speaker 3 (01:47:28):
But I so, do you think that.

Speaker 2 (01:47:30):
If they get rid of the Federal Reserve then that
invalidates the notes as well?

Speaker 7 (01:47:35):
That's an open question, right, David. I mean, if you're
talking about going getting away from a getting away from cash,
you're and you're looking at the link between the treasury
and stable coin. See, the Treasury has close ties to
stable coin, and it's based off of the right based
it's based off treasuries. Yeah, so that's an interest. So

(01:47:57):
I'm looking at this and I'm just kind of war
gaming out there. This is what I think about all
the time. I'm probably exhausting to be around because I
always pose these questions even talking to myself. But that's
something to think about. You mentioned the cash of society,
and it made me think about that. Is the Fed
doesn't move policy, it doesn't move the economy the way
it used to, and especially doesn't move gold. So it's

(01:48:20):
a weakening position. And you see, you know with the
Trump administration going after these FED governors. I mean, you've
been causing the one FED governor of mortgage fraud and
she's not moving. And did you notice that.

Speaker 2 (01:48:31):
They just found out that Scott Bessant did the same thing.
He bought multiple homes. I think it's like twenty one
million dollars worth of homes that he bought and said
there were his primary residents. So you know, as I
said before, yeah it was fraud. But you know why
they were doing it. Trump is trying to insinuate to

(01:48:53):
the FED governors that if they don't do what he wants,
he's going to come after them personally. You know, that's
the gangs or move that he does. But now you
see the same thing happened with Scott Bessant. Somebody found
out take them a little bit longer because Polti was
using AI. He bragged about using AI to investigate mortgage fraud,

(01:49:14):
and so he's been using AI to find crimes of
Trump's political enemies. That should concern us as well. But
it's kind of interesting to see that happen. Now you
mentioned the stable coin stuff. When you go back and
look at the petro dollar, how did Saudi Arabia prop
up the US dollar. They did it by buying the

(01:49:36):
Fed reserve notes, right, And so if you got the
stable if that's now that that's falling apart, stable coin
is there because the stable coin people will buy up
the bonds from the government and it will be at
a retail level rather than trying to sell it to
the central banks of various countries. That's it really is

(01:49:58):
a way for them to sustain the fiat nature of
the dollar, isn't it.

Speaker 7 (01:50:03):
Well, it was about exclusivity, you know, not just not
just buying the dollars, but the exclusivity of everything has
to be denominated in dollars to purchase energy. So that
was the petro dollars from nineteen seventy four to twenty
twenty four, and we lost the end of it. Was
there was a weird occurrence, wasn't it, where we watched

(01:50:25):
them just not do anything, and I wonder, you just
gonna lose the petro dollar. Yeah, And you had Biden's advisors,
you know writing was it Bernstein that wrote about losing
the petro dollar or losing the world's reserve currency would
be good writing in the New York Times would be good.
For America, and I thought, this is this is insane.
But if you look at the on ramps of stable coins,

(01:50:46):
that changes the game because if you have to denominate
something in something in a stable coin that's backed by
the dollar or that follows a dollar like tether to
enter these markets where if things go digital then you can.
Then you give new life. It's a birth of the
dollar itself. And especially if you were to repatriate cash
and get rid of Federal reserve notes and go direct

(01:51:08):
to this, you know, public private partnership of label coin.
It's interesting to watch. It's an interesting thought experiment because
they have they're doing something. There's the moves being made
right now. Yeah, that are but the traditional this isn't
the traditional financial news that we're watching, especially with the
push so hard to lower interest rates.

Speaker 3 (01:51:29):
That's right. Yeah, And they told us where they want
to go.

Speaker 2 (01:51:32):
They called it CBDC, and everybody said, no, no, no, we
don't want cb Okay, we won't give you CBDC. Don't worry,
that's dead. Instead, we'll give you stable coin. And it
has all the functionality in terms of surveillance and control.
Being able to deny transactions to people has all of
that that CBDC does. But you know, people are again
it's the way they labeled this stuff. You know, we

(01:51:54):
we don't want the Democrats because who know what they're
going to do. So think give the Republican who does
the same thing but calls it something different. And that's
what's really going on with the CBDC versus a stable
coin and this thing with Visa. The company is called
tech five. They've got a seven year global agreement to
accelerate the rollout of digital identity and payment systems as

(01:52:17):
part of the larger framework of Digital Public Infrastructure.

Speaker 3 (01:52:20):
That's what they call it.

Speaker 2 (01:52:22):
At the UN and the World Economic Form DPI. It's
not dots per inch, but it's now the digital public infrastructure,
and that's the infrastructure of control that they're putting on
everybody coming in all of these different groups. You've got
the World Economic Forum, the UN, the European Union, they're
all pushing that.

Speaker 3 (01:52:42):
Of course Bill Gates is in favor of it as
well in his organization.

Speaker 7 (01:52:47):
That's the future, YEA, in the future according to the
oligarchs and the overlord class, that's what they want, and
they want surveillance disguised as money and that's why I
look at.

Speaker 2 (01:52:58):
Gold and silver is a hedge not only against the
Fiat dollar and how they're manipulating it and its value
and inflation is a hedge against all that, but it's
also a hedge against this thing as well. It's the
only hedge that's really available to us of any sort.
It's not a perfect heage, but it's the only one
that we've got.

Speaker 7 (01:53:15):
I agree, and you have all of recorded history, human
beings have used gold and silver as a form of money.
That's not going away. If you read the history of
metals like I do, and they're linked to our story,
the human story, then you understand these aren't going to
be decoupled, so they'll be around. So that's going to

(01:53:37):
be the challenge for them to completely control every aspect
of our lives using these centralized public private partnerships that
they will use. And it is the whole thing is
laughable when you think about it at the it's just repurpose,
rebranded the same thing with censorship. Look look at the
pendulum swung the other way. Now now we're have Pam

(01:54:00):
Bondi in the same breast saying that she said, well,
we need to support people that want to know anybody
that's being employed, and if you can't support Charlie Kirk
or put up any sort of memorial for him, then
we want to stand by you. But if you speak
ill of Charlie Kirk and you get fired, we don't
want to stand with your employer. She said that in

(01:54:21):
the same two sentences. And that's the that's where the
pendulum is wung as far as censorship. So it's the
same thing with CBDC and a centralized control controlled be
out currency.

Speaker 3 (01:54:33):
Yeah, somebody pointed out, and it is. It is.

Speaker 2 (01:54:36):
I thought the same analogy that you know, if she
says that she's going to go after Home Depot because
they had an employee who they've now fired, who refused
to print a poster that.

Speaker 3 (01:54:46):
Was going to honor Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 2 (01:54:48):
So she says, yeah, we're going to find out, we're
going to go after that business that is that's not
been shut down twice at the Supreme Court. And conservatives
were outraged and rightfully so, that the state of Colorado
would continue to come after these bakers who they were
trying to get them to, trying to force them to
make a training cake and things like that. And yet

(01:55:09):
now the conservatives are cheering this because Lukhu's doing it.
You know, it's why they can they have the two parties.
They can keep switching these two factors back and forth
and have the guy do it that can get away
with it.

Speaker 7 (01:55:26):
The move towards that authoritarian censorship willingly, I think was
always the goal is to whip people up in an
emotional frenzy. And that is the issue. That's the danger
that we're in right now. And that's why at least
what's the left. You know what you're getting. They tell
you exactly what they're doing, pretty much out front. This

(01:55:48):
is who we are, it's what we want to change.
They signal that, and then it's your job to oppose them.
The right is more insidious or with the so called right, Yeah,
there's a lot more insidious. It's being it's being shown
to you right now just how dangerous they have become
with the language that they use, and that the diametrically

(01:56:10):
opposed ideas being fused together like Pam Bondi has done.

Speaker 3 (01:56:14):
I agree.

Speaker 2 (01:56:15):
Yeah, And the people that I see on social media,
you know, I did a substack piece about cancel Culture
is now owned by the Conservatives and all these people
are like, you know, well, good, I'm glad that that's
the case. You know, these are the people who hated
it when it was done against them. The people who
can't understand that these powers that the Republicans are setting

(01:56:36):
up will be used by the Democrats against them, just
like they used warfare against them on January the sixth.
They don't see that coming back at all. They are
naive enough to not think that power will ever switch
back to the other side because and they are always
switching it back and forth, because that's how they the

(01:56:59):
march I Tyrnany remember that Ben Garrison poster of the
Marching Tyranny left right, left right. He's got the two
boots that are marching and the left wing and the
right wing. They got to keep doing it, alternating and
back and forth or they can't move forward. And these
people just don't get it. They're cheering the stuff that
they absolutely hated because it's now for their guys, right,

(01:57:20):
it's revenge for Charlie Kirk, and it's coming from Trump,
so it's got to be okay.

Speaker 7 (01:57:26):
I think what you're alluding to is something that David
Ike called the totalitarian tiptoe. That reminded me of that,
just using both sides just to get to that control grid,
a new world order that they want to build. And
it's sad to watch and a lot of these things.
You know, we can get bogged down in the politics.

(01:57:46):
You certainly can. And I'm not saying don't be an
activist or don't speak out and don't do things, but
it seems like a lot of that's just going to
take care of itself. And I'm over here looking at
the big macro picture, especially the economic picture, and what
you can do to prepare for the fallout that I
think is inevitable at this point. I mean, the culture
that we have here in this country, unfortunately in the West,

(01:58:07):
is disintegrating, and now it is going to go full
you know, China syndrome, melt down to nothing. No it won't,
but we're definitely going to have to experience some major
shifts and culturally, socially, economically in the next five years
as we're on this timeline of Agenda twenty thirty in
the Great Reset and everything else. So that's what I

(01:58:27):
look at. I mean, a lot of this stuff is
already set into motion and there's big question marks that
hangover how much of this is manufactured. I mean, we
could talk about the fight between supposed you know, hostility
between the FED and the Trump administration. You know, I
see that it's happening. I don't know how much of
it's real. It's kind of like there's a desert warrant

(01:58:48):
war soldier, desert storm soldier that well in the first
go for named Doyle Shanley. He was the right hand
man for Bill Cooper and he was very well read,
so he was part of the cave unit and they
would go and blow up these Iraqi tanks that were
Soviet made, and he'd go and pull the data plate off,
because every tank has a data plate where it shows

(01:59:09):
like how it has made it where with factory and
it was all in English, so at beause, a lot
of the you know, the same factories that made the
Soviet tanks in World War Two and were propped up
by the banking houses and the and the Rockefellers and
the industrialists and everything still making you know, Soviet made
weapons that killed our soldiers in Vietnam and Korea, and

(01:59:32):
a lot of this is you know, staged, for lack
of a better term, it doesn't mean that the Cold
War wasn't real or there wasn't real threats of nuclear war.

Speaker 2 (01:59:42):
Well, had all the companies, the American corporations that worked
with the Nazis, IBM and the rest of them, you know,
at the same time, they always did that there their
flag is the dollar sign or whatever they can exchange.
I've got a lot of questions here from people in comment.
It's a nicest storm. So when I got into the metals,
gold was at eighteen hundred, silver at twenty.

Speaker 3 (02:00:01):
That's just a couple of years ago.

Speaker 2 (02:00:03):
Overall trend will be upward as a dollar declines.

Speaker 3 (02:00:06):
But then.

Speaker 2 (02:00:08):
Jason says, question for you, Tony, if we move into
CBDC or let's say stable coin, how will this affect
the price of metals since it'll be valued in a
different system.

Speaker 3 (02:00:21):
What do you think that's interesting?

Speaker 7 (02:00:23):
Well, well, gold and silver retain their purchasing power. It
may it may denominate differently if there's a monetary reset,
but you're still going to have the same amount of
purchasing power via other commodities. And I think you will
see that shift eventually where we you know, the same
thing with like the price of bitcoin or the gold
silver ratio, or you know, you might start looking at

(02:00:45):
commodities versus the ratio of other commodities instead of dollars.
Perhaps you'll always be denominated in some currency, but that's
a good question of like what actually happens. You shouldn't
worry about it too much, though, because the historical purchasing
power of gold stays pretty constant.

Speaker 2 (02:01:04):
You could you could denominate it in as we've talked
about in the past, a custom.

Speaker 3 (02:01:09):
Suit, you know, custom suit, customs, zoo a century ago,
how much gold did it take about the same amount
that does today.

Speaker 7 (02:01:17):
And crude oil, you know, groceries, food, there, these are
things that you can look and it's gold's been pretty
stable that way, and it's outpaced you know, the S
and P five hundred and so many areas. There's there's
other metrics that that gold has done better than. But
go back to nineteen seventy one, gold was thirty five
dollars an ounce, and now we're at close to thirty

(02:01:40):
seven hundred dollars an ounce, and so you know, that's
the that's the move that's been made. And there's one
hundred thousand more tons of gold since nineteen ninety than
there there was at the time in nineteen seventy one.
So gold is gold has still retained a massive amount
of purchasing power.

Speaker 2 (02:01:55):
Yes, yes, uh for the level the road has a
question for you, Tony, will goldbacks be in the lone
Wolf packages anymore? As he looked into silverbacks at all cetera.
Word tipped on the rumbles, he said, word tipped on rumble.
But for some reason Chat isn't working for me there,
so he's on kick. Just if anybody's having problems with rumble,

(02:02:16):
you can get.

Speaker 3 (02:02:17):
On to kick. So what about that? What about gold
backs and silver backs?

Speaker 7 (02:02:21):
The silverbacks are only made by a couple of different companies.
We are looking at that. I'd love to make them myself.
That's one thing I'd love to do silverbacks, And that's
maybe with the new bank location that we've got. With
a little bit more extra the room that we've got
in Dennis, and they've got some pabability, we can do
some refining and other things. We may do that or
have them custom mates. I like the silverback idea. Goldbacks

(02:02:43):
and lone Wolves are generally the staple, that's what we do,
but sometimes supply gets a little short and we still
got to send the packages out, so if we've had delays,
we don't like to keep somebody's package, so we'll just
use something else in place of it. But normally goldbacks
are put into the lone Wolves and the Warrior Wolves
with the one twenty five. Because we can't give you

(02:03:05):
any gold bullion at that at those prices, we put
goldbacks in. It's generally the rule, but uh uh, I
try to keep it from that from happening. But sometimes
it's just shipping delays and cash flow delays with with
gold back.

Speaker 2 (02:03:19):
Well, I think silver backs would be a great combination
with your banking building.

Speaker 3 (02:03:22):
This thing you.

Speaker 4 (02:03:23):
Should I just don't understand how you'd get an entire
gorilla in one of those packages. That seems a little reasonable.

Speaker 2 (02:03:30):
That's what shamage. That's what your image should be, a
gorilla on there.

Speaker 7 (02:03:35):
So that would be that would be a good silver back. Yeah,
that would be a good one. We need our or
wolf backs, you know where I make my you know,
wise wolf stuff, but something like that, that's a great idea.
Anything that is you know back by the metal, you
know that that you can weigh and verify the gold

(02:03:56):
backs and anything like silverbacks are really good.

Speaker 2 (02:03:59):
Yeah, all Holden says. You can't buy friends, but you
can buy memberships. I guess a wolf pack. That's great.
Let's see star Barkley says. Silver is doubled. Says I
bought it in twenty eleven, all in this year. Yeah,
that's interesting. You know, watch out for what's going to
happen in the future because none of the fundamentals have changed.

Speaker 3 (02:04:20):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:04:20):
I think you see gold stabilize after big runs. Like
we said, we had a big run a year ago,
and we just had another one. That's happened right now.
I don't know if it's finished or not, who knows,
but it'll kind of because of the psychology in the market,
it'll kind of level off and then pick up again
because the fundamentals have not changed. Nice of Storm says, Yeah.

(02:04:40):
One of the stocks I still own is a silver
mining company, and it is also doubled in value. I
tried that years ago. Some of the mining companies and
most of the stocks were like in Canadian exchange and
the fees for buying these these stocks, uh, as well

(02:05:01):
as the exchange going into a foreign currency and then
coming back out of it. By the time you added
up all that and the higher fees of dealing with
these brokerage firms in Canada. Couldn't make any profit off
of it. You know, it looked looked really good on paper,
but I couldn't make any profit off of it. So
guard Goldsmith said, I watched silver rise sixty eight percent

(02:05:23):
since I started with the wolf Pack. That's a pretty
good return on investment, isn't it. That's good. Yeah, I'm
glad to see that. Let's see trying to find one here.
I was looking at you move the comment where do
where do we leave off?

Speaker 7 (02:05:38):
There?

Speaker 4 (02:05:40):
I think that was all the comments starting wolf Pack?

Speaker 3 (02:05:43):
Is that it? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (02:05:44):
Okay, yeah, I think that's all the comments that we
had there. Tell us what's going on with wolf Pack
besides the new building and the idea which I think
would be a really interesting one for you to do
your own wolf Pack silver backs.

Speaker 7 (02:06:00):
I thought about, you know, eventually getting some refining equipment
and anything that I buy, like the sterling silver or
the scrap or the scrap gold, and just purifying, melting
it down and getting my own stamp and doing some
bullion that may be eventually on the table on a
limited basis. So we'll see that's the future. I mean,
we're just kind of preparing for that. Every story is

(02:06:22):
just reminding me every day that I read that there's
deed aullorization, the monetary system is being reset. The future
is commodities. The future is decentralized in some way. The
future again for us, is decentralized. But the push you know,
for the stable coins and other things, and we'll have
to keep an eye on that, on that push for

(02:06:43):
centralization and control. So I'm just building an infrastructure and
day by day, just keep it, keep it running, keep
it steady. I would say I've got some some deals
just for David Knight listeners. I might talk about it
on my show. So if you're hearing my voice and
you're interested in silver at the price of spot, I've

(02:07:04):
got some constitutional silver. I will that's first come first,
or we're just buying so much right now and wolf
pack can only handle so much. I don't need any
more for wolf packs. So text has picked up a
considerable amount of ninety percent yesterday, and we'll be selling
that as long as you pay shipping. I'll sell it
at melt. So nobody does that. I don't there's nobody

(02:07:26):
selling the silver at Melt right now, So that's like
you know, premium free as long as you pay pay shipping.
It'd be a mix of and I'll even throw in
some silver dollars in there. I've got silver dollars, half dollars,
orders and dimes. So that's a good way to get
just some silver. And it's you know, we charge a
low premium and wolf pack anyway or constitutional silver. But

(02:07:49):
that's a good way to get some some silver in
your hands today. And we can if you just give
us a call, go to Davidnight dot gold Messages, or
give us a call and talk to myself or yekka.
And it's just sober out today at Melt and sober
is down. It's interesting too. Silver and gold are down,
and it's funny to the psychology of markets. That always
makes me smile because you know, they lower interest rates,

(02:08:12):
which you know signals the economy is alive again. There's
gonna be let lending and not as much money is
going to be held up in bonds or treasuries, and
so because the interest rates lower, so they put it
into the market and there's currency creation, which creates inflation,
and that means that the dollar will weakend, but gold
went down because there's the perception of value out there.
You know that you can get into you know, leverage,

(02:08:36):
whatever is happening because of the easier dollars, it'll be created.
So gold and sober go down, even though that's the
safe haven for what just happened. And so fun fun times. Yeh,
markets are crazy.

Speaker 2 (02:08:49):
It's almost like you know the old adage, buy on rumors,
sell on what you know, sell when it happens. And
so I guess that's why they're looking at We bought
into gold because they thought they're going to lower the
interest rates. They did lowder that, so that's sell it.

Speaker 7 (02:09:03):
Is it by their room or sell the news.

Speaker 3 (02:09:05):
Or something like something like that.

Speaker 2 (02:09:07):
I remember it wasn't that long ago, and you were
talking about it how it was really strange that it
was only institutions that were buying silver, you know, all
the people saying that they've had tremendous increase in value
since they bought into silver. And I saw right around
that time, I saw a YouTube video where they went

(02:09:27):
to a metals show and they were this one guy
was going around interviewing all the people that all the
vendors that were there and they said, yeah, for some reason,
nobody wants to buy silver. We're just accumulating it here, right,
And that was about the time that Guard and all
the other people said they were buying into it. Nobody
else really wanted to buy into it except for the institutions.

(02:09:49):
And now look at what has happened. Everybody agreed.

Speaker 7 (02:09:51):
Institutions are continuing to buy. That's the reason the price,
I mean, silver's at are fourteen year high, golds at
all time highs, continues to break all time highs, and
that's central bank buying governments and in institutions themselves. So
that's a that's a quandary. And I know that a
lot of people are strapped for cash and other things.
But it's funny. I was going through with my accountants

(02:10:13):
what happened in twenty twenty two, like you were, just
these direct sales are completely where did they go? And
I'm like, that's a great question. Where did my where
did my big direct sales go? We fortunately built wolf Pack,
which is regular everyday people, and that keeps the ship
afloat because I did like the reverse of these other
but the big purchases, you just don't see them as

(02:10:34):
often or even the state. We should have a steady
pace of people just buying you know, chunks of silver
and gold, which we're just getting started. I mean literally,
the prices of where we're at going, especially where silver's going,
we're just really getting started these There's not going to
be another time where're like, well, you know, gold to
two thousand and I'm going to buy and it's never
coming back. It's not ever going to come back like that.

(02:10:56):
And I think silver, as we mentioned earlier in the broadcast,
you know the governments are picking up and putting silver
on the balance sheet, like Russia. That's going to change
the game because those governments are going to ensure that
the prices that they're going to see, that those exchange
prices reflect the actual value when the governments get involved,

(02:11:16):
as opposed to what's happened to us that's held silver
for so long and wondering why this is so skewed.
I think that's why you're seeing it keep up. It's
keeping pace with gold on the gold silver ratio right now,
and I think that will only continued.

Speaker 2 (02:11:30):
Yes, yes, as a matter of fact, when we started
this and we talked about that Bank of America analyst
the article about that, they were saying at the very
beginning of the article that gold is within striking distance
of thirty seven hundred dollars an hour. So it's just
like a day or two ago, it's already gone back
over that and then dropped down a little bit. But
that's how quickly things are moving. And they're saying, oh, yeah,

(02:11:52):
I might see second quarter of next year, might see
four thousand dollars. So, I mean, these are very conservative
estimates that they're putting out there. You've got a program
that's going to be following this one today, right.

Speaker 3 (02:12:03):
Is that correct?

Speaker 7 (02:12:04):
That's true? Yes, sir, Ill Arnerburn Radio Transmission. We were
broadcast on Rumble on the America Unplug channel at my
ex at Tony Arderburn and my YouTube. If I believe
I still have a YouTube, that's so weird they have
found me yet, so at Tony Arterburn on YouTube. I
just did it for fun to see if I could
get it. But yeah, we're streaming over there on YouTube

(02:12:24):
as well, and we'll go over some of these same stories,
a little bit of pair of politics and precious metals.

Speaker 3 (02:12:30):
Good.

Speaker 2 (02:12:30):
I've got one more question that just came in here.
This is from Doug seven. I understand that purchasing gold
and silver is a good store of wealth. One of
my concerns is that bartering will be difficult, especially with
larger pieces of gold and silver. Curious as to what
you think, Tony.

Speaker 7 (02:12:47):
That's why that pre nineteen sixty five silver is just perfect.
It's US currency, it's ninety percent silver, it's recognizable. You
even might get a little bit of coin value. We
do so much of that stuff that I pat I
know that there's packages I send out, especially for the
Lone Wolves, and I hope you guys will go give
us a good review. I put silver dollars in there
sometimes in the Lone Wolves. I know that are worth

(02:13:08):
more than the Lone Wolf package. I know that they
are if I if I spend more time on them,
and I just marketed them and put them out. But
I try to get speed and whatever I know pass
on a good value to my customers. I'll do that.
So the great bartering capability of that Constitutional Silver, and
we even have Constitutional Wolf. We go to Davidknight dot Gold.

(02:13:28):
You can see on the list of memberships there's just
a ninety percent one that's a great way to have
for bartering like a silver dime. You know, that's that's
over three dollars in purchasing power right now just in
the multiple silver alone. Not to mention the fact that
there's a finite amount of it. It's never coming back.
You can't go back and get a time machine and

(02:13:50):
make you know.

Speaker 3 (02:13:50):
More times at space value.

Speaker 7 (02:13:53):
Now that's funny, that's funny.

Speaker 2 (02:13:56):
Yeah, you know, And I would just say this in
general too. If you are somebody wants to stay out
of the system, there's going to be people who also
want to stay out of the system. So you know,
as the news closes in on us, it's people are
going to gradually be understanding that they want to be outside.

Speaker 3 (02:14:15):
Of the system. So I think there will be a market.

Speaker 2 (02:14:17):
It'll be a black market perhaps, but there'll be a market,
just like there is for drugs. You know, if we say, well,
what happens if they outlawed drugs, we see what happened
for over fifty years now we're getting close to fifty
five years that's been going on. They're not going to
stop a market that people want. So the question is
they're going to be demand. I think there will be
demand because I think a lot of people are not

(02:14:39):
going to want to have to have their transactions scrutinized
and canceled before they can happen. I think there will
be demand for that out there. Well, Tony, thank you
is always great talking to you. Appreciate that, and it's
been a great deal for our listeners getting into it.
Always feel good about recommending gold and silver. And I
think the fundamental are still there. This is not something

(02:15:02):
that has run its course. Everybody is looking at it
and saying it's going to continue from here because all
the things that have pushed it, nothing has changed with
any of the fundamental situations with the central banks, or
the inflation or the borrowing of the debt, none of
that has changed. It's only looking like it's going to
get worse if you look at all these different fundamentals.
So I feel good about recommending that to people, and

(02:15:23):
I feel good about recommending you, Tony, because I've known
you for years. Thank you for coming on, Appreciate your
support of this program. Thank you very much.

Speaker 7 (02:15:32):
It's an allarser. Thank you for having me.

Speaker 3 (02:15:33):
Thank you. All right, folks, we're going to take a
quick break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 8 (02:17:59):
To defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David

(02:18:20):
Knight Show.

Speaker 16 (02:18:22):
Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS Radio
has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels
on our app at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 4 (02:18:37):
Welcome back, folks. We got a lot of comments. I'm
gonna try to get through them. Heresa oxas as you
can still buy a Civil War bones saws on eBay
says add a real Civil War bone saw to your
bugout bag. Yeah, that's a that's a terrifying piece of gear.

Speaker 2 (02:18:54):
Yeah, yeah, probably. They said there were sixty thousand amputations
during the Civil War. That's seems kind of low. But
I wonder just how many of those people die of infection?

Speaker 4 (02:19:04):
Yeah, you know it was a lot.

Speaker 3 (02:19:07):
Yeah. Stonewall Jackson was one of them.

Speaker 4 (02:19:09):
Yeah, I remember that quote. You know, when God decreed
that the South would lose the Civil War, he also
had a decree that Stonewall Jackson would die. That's right, Yeah,
Patty wax Yona Annuodi sure felt like war was declared
on the people with the lockdowns and mandates.

Speaker 3 (02:19:25):
I felt that way.

Speaker 2 (02:19:26):
I said, you know, if you look at the lockdown
shutting down businesses. I said that is essentially sanctions, and
sanctions have always been a prelude to war or part
of it an act of war. Really, we're trying to
starve people to death. That's what I said in twenty twenty.

Speaker 3 (02:19:44):
Got Patty Wax.

Speaker 4 (02:19:45):
Plenty of people who would be called MAGA aren't calling
for civil war. We group people too easily. I've seen
a lot of people on the right still saying, you know,
we don't want violence, we don't want this, you know,
don't attack people, just continue to engage with rhetoric.

Speaker 3 (02:20:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:20:01):
I think if you don't want civil war and you
don't want to just blindly follow Trump, I don't think
you qualify as MAGA. That's what I look at MAGA
as a cult. And if you're not calling for the
cultish things like shutting down free speech, then you're not
real MAGA. They'd kick you out. Laura Lumer would get
you fired. If she knew that you were doing night,

(02:20:23):
she would make sure she'd cancel you.

Speaker 4 (02:20:26):
Laura Lumer OUTI mrr Tennessee. You got rid of no
knock rades about five years ago. Violates due process, violates
the Fourth Amendment, and many innocent people have been traumatized
and killed by these badged thugs.

Speaker 3 (02:20:37):
Well, that's good to know. I didn't know that they
gotten rid of it.

Speaker 1 (02:20:40):
Here.

Speaker 2 (02:20:40):
As a matter of fact, I saw a doormat that's said,
come back with a warrant, and I thought that'd be
kind of funny for us to have that for our house.
But I said, I don't think that would stop the
swat teams. I'm glad to know that they stopped it
five years ago.

Speaker 4 (02:20:54):
One of my favorite doormats that I've ever seen. It's
from this guy that does comic strips, and he's just
got a little sock puppy character on. They're holding a
shotgun that says, this is my house and it's my
god given right to make it a tomb for federal
agents and thieves. We've got Christian constitutional conservative. I will
never call that civil asset forfeiture. It is government seizure

(02:21:14):
of private property.

Speaker 2 (02:21:16):
Yeah yeah, they's nothing's ctivil about it. And you're not
forfeiting it. They're stealing it. It really is true, but
they come up with their little interesting euphanisms. I wonder
what they'll call the war in Venezuela. You know, he
had desert storm when it was on a rock. And
I wonder what the little cute little name they'll come
up with for the war with Venezuela.

Speaker 3 (02:21:37):
Oh, it'll probably be something really good.

Speaker 4 (02:21:38):
They'll probably put AI on it, and they'll have it
generate a list of ten thousand different names and they'll
pick the best one.

Speaker 3 (02:21:44):
Got Livia Roslo.

Speaker 4 (02:21:46):
Forgive me for asking, David, but why do non citizens
deserve the same rights afforded to Americans?

Speaker 2 (02:21:51):
Because we don't want the government to ever be able
to do things without due process. They used to understand
that they had when they created the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
they said, you're not going to surveil anyone who is
in America without a search warrant, including foreign citizens. You
will only do that to foreign citizens and foreign countries

(02:22:13):
because in America we're going to be ruled by the
rule of law and by the Bill of Rights that
demand do process. That used to be the mindset, and
I think that's the mindset we have to have now.
Of course, they didn't do that with FISA. They used
FAIZA as an excuse, as a beard to do whatever
they wished. Basically, they used that PISA Court, which is
just one judge. They used him to rubber stamp this

(02:22:34):
and to clear them of violating the law and allowed
them to do whatever they wish. So they used that
as control. But the mindset that was the public that
they put out to the public saying that yes, we
will obey the Bill of Rights for all people who
are here in America because those rights are human rights.

(02:22:55):
Those rights are there because you are created in the
image of God, and the government needs to respect all
human beings who are here. You violate the law, that's fine,
there can be punishments for that, but let's do it
with a due process, and let's not allow the government
to do things that we would not want them to
do to American citizens, because if you allow them to

(02:23:16):
do it to foreign citizens in America, it is guaranteed
that they will do it to American citizens in America.
That's just history has shown that. But we know that's
just a progression, and so you have to say that
nowhere in America are you going to do this to
a human being. As my belief, and I think that's
why it's very important to recognize due process, even when

(02:23:40):
somebody is clearly violating the law, as an illegal immigrant
would be doing.

Speaker 5 (02:23:44):
It's also kind of not quite accurate to you phrase.

Speaker 10 (02:23:49):
It is. American rights is not like the First Amendment
and we're trying to protect someone's free speech. This is
a matter of the US government going out and murdering
a bunch of random people without any trial or stopping
to see if they are in fact drug dealers.

Speaker 2 (02:24:06):
That's right, that's right, And that again it's not like,
you know, the American government can We haven't declared war,
and it's one of the reasons why we don't want to.
Just you know, when you give the ability as Trump
is claiming he has, if you allow him to have
the ability to just instrumentally kill anybody he wishes because

(02:24:27):
they're foreigners, because he labels them a terrorists or whatever,
there's no end to that. That's why you have these
international agreements. And once you start moving away from that,
and we've always seen way too much of that from
World War Two on the targeting of civilians for their purpose.
Both sides engaged in that in World War Two. It's

(02:24:47):
become standard operating procedure. But we want to go back
to the Christian idea of a just war. A justified
war that means that you somebody has invaded you, and
you're fighting to stop that. Wary, you're fighting to drive
them out of your territory. And as soon as you
drive them out of your territory and you have been

(02:25:08):
able to stop that, you don't continue in terms of
punishing them for what they did. You stop it at
that point. The same rules that you have when somebody
invade your home, and the goal of the war is peace,
it is not absolute, total war and total destruction of
your enemy. That's the difference in the mindset between a

(02:25:30):
Christian definition of war, which says it's going to be
to defend innocent life and the objective is to return
us to a state of peace, versus this all out
total war against civilians that have sustained and never ending
because you just want to rack up a body count.
And that's basically the mindset that we've adopted now.

Speaker 4 (02:25:51):
Also, if rights come from God, then the government has
no right to abridge your rights, no matter who you are,
no matter where you're from. And you know the government
can potentially grant extra privileges that they would be doled
out to the American citizens, and therefore, as a non citizen,
you would not be afforded those And so you know,
rights come from God. Privileges can be granted by the.

Speaker 2 (02:26:12):
State, they're not American rights and the American government. The
Bill of Rights is about telling the American government that
there are human rights that come from God, as Travis said,
and you are not going to violate those. And so
the Bill of Rights, correctly understood, is a restriction on
the American government and that would apply to the actions

(02:26:34):
that they take within this country and outside of this country.
If we throw that away, we wind up giving the
CIA and people that ilk a blank check to do
as they wish forever. And that is not in our
interests as American citizens.

Speaker 4 (02:26:50):
Yeah, so you know, you have a right to life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness. You don't have a right
to live in America. You know that is a It
is a privilege to live in a America. If you're
born here, you know you're automatically granted that privilege. Basically
at this point, you know, we should not extend it
to if you make it over the border. But you know,
just you're not free to come here whenever you want,

(02:27:11):
from wherever you want, at all times forever. You know
that you know, emigrating to America is a privilege. Not
getting bombed and murdered by the American military is a right.

Speaker 2 (02:27:22):
That's right, and you just have to worry because if
the government is going to do this to other people,
that's a very dangerous precedent, and they will use that
precedent against you. That's the creeping issue of government.

Speaker 10 (02:27:37):
Yes, this wasn't a matter of the government not protecting
the rights of foreign citizens, but rather the government going
out and murdering a foreign citizen. It's a direct action
of the government to violate someone's right to life.

Speaker 2 (02:27:51):
And Trump actually violated our laws because there is no
law that I'm aware of that has a capital punishment
for drug dealers. Some people have suggested that, I don't
think they never put that on the books. So even
under American law, he would not be authorized to execute
these people. If he had stopped and done an investigation

(02:28:13):
and they had shown the evidence that these people are
dealing drugs, he still would not have the legal authority
that summarily execute them. But he did it without even
verifying that, and then he boasted about it. Do we
want to let him have that kind of power? I
think Trump is the exhibit A of the slippery slope
and what we have to be concerned about.

Speaker 3 (02:28:33):
Let's see the next one. Here, we got Epstein Island.

Speaker 4 (02:28:35):
Epstein Island, Trump said in twenty twenty four, then had
he won in twenty twenty he'd have stolen Venezuela's oil.

Speaker 3 (02:28:40):
Well, at least he's honest. I guess you got to
take the oil. Mary said that about what Syria or
something like that, Star Barkley.

Speaker 4 (02:28:49):
IDF soldiers are suffering PTSD and are protesting not getting
adequate medical treatment.

Speaker 2 (02:28:54):
Well, that's another thing that happens when we have these wars.
That's another part of wars that are really not justified.
You know, if you have it's bad enough. If you're
in a battle and your friends around you are getting
blown to bits, and you know maybe you've been shot
or injured or whatever. That's enough in and of itself,

(02:29:16):
but it only compounds it when you believe that your
cause is not justified.

Speaker 3 (02:29:22):
That is correct.

Speaker 4 (02:29:24):
I also want to say, just yeah, I'm sorry. Murdering
children has weighed heavy on your conscience, but they can't
compel you to pull the trigger.

Speaker 3 (02:29:33):
That's right. You could choose not to. You could say
I refuse to do this anymore. I refuse to serve.

Speaker 4 (02:29:38):
There are members, you know, there are Jews in Israel
who say, I'll take the prison sentence. I don't care.

Speaker 3 (02:29:43):
I'm not going to do this for you.

Speaker 2 (02:29:45):
Some who have done it, and then you know, they
had a short tour and now they're not there and
they don't want to go back.

Speaker 3 (02:29:51):
They said, I'll take jail before I go back.

Speaker 4 (02:29:53):
Yeah, and you know, maybe he didn't realize what he
was getting into when he signed up. Maybe there's propaganda
surrounding it. They don't show you what you're going to
be doing, but once you're there and you've seen it,
you have the obligation to say no, I will.

Speaker 3 (02:30:06):
Not do that.

Speaker 4 (02:30:07):
So if you continue to do that, I'm sorry. I
don't have any sympathy. Boohoo, I'm you know.

Speaker 5 (02:30:12):
Yeah, it was kind of shocking.

Speaker 10 (02:30:14):
There's that story of the idea of soldier talking about
his experiences saying I had to shoot, you know, fifty
sixty times a day, killed a lot of children, and
the officers are just saying more and more, kill them more.
It's like, okay, well, at some point it you kind
of are responsible. I mean, you're responsible every time you

(02:30:36):
pulled the trigger. Obviously, it's at what point are you
going to push back on that? When you're having to
kill children every day?

Speaker 5 (02:30:44):
It's shock.

Speaker 2 (02:30:45):
There was a commercial that ran when I was in
high school about the Vietnam War and was, you know
what if they had a war, nobody came, was that today.

Speaker 3 (02:30:56):
Show up to fight it for them? Right?

Speaker 2 (02:30:58):
Because war is when the government told you with the ende,
me is revolutions when you figure.

Speaker 4 (02:31:02):
Out for yourself, Francine, who will be able to live
in Gaza after it's all done up?

Speaker 3 (02:31:10):
Trump and Cushioner, it's like that newburger. Ai think.

Speaker 2 (02:31:13):
We were talking about his new golf course there and
the Trump towers way more than eighteen holes.

Speaker 3 (02:31:18):
He said, you're going to be the biggest, the best
golf course.

Speaker 4 (02:31:22):
We've got Christian const soitcial conservative. Nuclear weapons were used
once by the USA. Why because the USA was the
only one who had them, That's right. They were only
let off the chain when we were the only ones
that hadn't when there was nobody that could retaliate. As
soon as people were able to, We're like, we need
to stop this proliferation. Fellows, don't you think it's gone
far enough.

Speaker 2 (02:31:42):
Yeah, of course it was Truman, the same guy who
gave us a national security state, the NSA, the CIA,
all this stuff propaganda.

Speaker 10 (02:31:49):
That comment was posted when you were saying that the
Second Amendment is essentially a sort of mutually assured destruction
with the government.

Speaker 3 (02:31:58):
Yes, if you take away that, Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:32:01):
Firearms keep the peace, and they are a deterrent to evil,
said the Founders.

Speaker 3 (02:32:05):
Right.

Speaker 4 (02:32:05):
Yeah, you can see that, as I pointed out, just
with how gleeful these leftists are about the murder of
Charlie Kirk. If the Second Amendment was not in place,
you can only imagine what they would be getting up to.
So it's a restraint on the federal government, and it's
a restraint on the lunatics that you fill up the left.

(02:32:27):
So it's a restraining force on all of these things.
So it is truly what defends all the other rights.
Knights of the storm. Alex will get his audience to
push a civil war. Then he will tuck tail and
hide when the bullets start flying, he tucks tail. On
January sixth.

Speaker 2 (02:32:41):
Yeah, he went across the town to the Supreme Court.
He scuttled up, but Sam got caught. Yeah, Sam was
doing the only one doing anything reporting.

Speaker 4 (02:32:50):
Yeah, he was doing real journalism him and Biggs where
Yeah Sam?

Speaker 3 (02:32:54):
Then Alex fired Sam. Anyway, b L we.

Speaker 4 (02:33:00):
Read that one says, you know, Patty Wax, if you
have a Rumble membership, do you stop getting the ads?
I don't know. I don't have a Rumble membership, so
I can't tell you it works.

Speaker 3 (02:33:10):
Yeah, I think.

Speaker 10 (02:33:11):
I think it's talking about subscriptions, and yeah, I believe
that's the point of them, is that you give someone
a subscription and they don't get ads anymore.

Speaker 4 (02:33:20):
Okay, well that would be good. That's an answer for you.
I we don't not able to confirm that, but that
seems likely. That is what getting a you know, YouTube
premium membership does considered ads.

Speaker 3 (02:33:32):
And we don't. We don't have anything to do with
the ads. That's uh.

Speaker 2 (02:33:35):
I think they just use automatic pay. They use that
to pay to fund the Rumble platform that they don't
pay us for that.

Speaker 4 (02:33:42):
Yeah, video hosting, and it's just it's remarkably expensive. Yeah,
so they have to generate revenue somehow. I understand that
it's really annoying. Ads on Rumble aggravate me as well,
But video hosting is monumentally expensive. YouTube was unprofitable for
years up on your spun years and the only reason
they survived is because they had the backing of Google,

(02:34:03):
an infinite you know, pocketbook.

Speaker 2 (02:34:05):
They had the backing of the government as well. But yeah,
it's it's just remember back to the days of TV.
It's not quite as bad as that. I think TV
was a lot worse. I remember TV. If you're watch
a movie, right, they would take you know, they would
they would cut parts of the movie out so they
could get to fit evenly in their two hour segment

(02:34:25):
with their commercials, and they would they would run it
for like the way the clock was set up. They
would maybe you wouldn't have a first commercial for like
thirty minutes, you know, the beginning of the movie.

Speaker 3 (02:34:36):
They would go for long stretches to get you involved
and get you hooked.

Speaker 2 (02:34:39):
Yeah, And then now that you're getting towards the end
of the movie and you're really involved in it, you
want to see how this thing is going to end.
Then the commercials start coming fast and furious, every five
You got to stick through them in order to find
out how the movie ends.

Speaker 4 (02:34:53):
You're not going to bail at the last minute. Are
you Christian Constitution.

Speaker 10 (02:34:57):
Before we move on, Just to clarify, I was saying that,
you know, Bill Holton was gifting subs earlier. If you
gift a sub the person that receives it will no
longer have ads without any ad block or anything.

Speaker 4 (02:35:07):
Yeah, Christian constitutional Conservative. It's a pincer attack. Team blue
from the left, team red from the right. Yeah, well
that's how you remember it, you know, red for right
and blue for left. Epstein Island blue to the left,
red to the right, and we're all stuck in the middle,
and I don't know what it is we should do.
Nights of the Storm. I looked into refine equipment to
recycle all my old electronics I've been hoarding. But the

(02:35:29):
chemicals are really nasty to deal with and to.

Speaker 3 (02:35:31):
Get rid of.

Speaker 4 (02:35:33):
They put all kinds of nasty stuff in these things.

Speaker 3 (02:35:36):
And we used to watch what Blend Yeah, I'll breathe this. Yeah,
that was this.

Speaker 2 (02:35:41):
Guy to sell his blender, which was really you know,
industrial strength or whatever. We had a it was a
series I think on YouTube or something we used to
watch when the kids were young, and he would throw
all kinds of stuff in the lend tech.

Speaker 3 (02:35:53):
Yeah, we're going to go to the movies.

Speaker 2 (02:35:55):
So let's throw in some popcorn, and let's throw in
a hot dog, and let's go in some coke, and
we'll just keep it in the can, you know, we'll
put it in there. He blends the can and all
the rest of stuff. And when a new model of
the iPhone came out, he said, let's see if the
iPhone blends, and.

Speaker 4 (02:36:11):
He basically atomized it.

Speaker 3 (02:36:13):
Yeah, and he had some really he said, ooh, that's
nasty smelling iPhone. Don't smoke. Don't breathe that iPhone smoke.
That's there. Yeah, there's a lot of nasty stuff in
the electronics when we blend it.

Speaker 4 (02:36:24):
Yeah, and then we've got dug do doubo seven. I
understand that purchasing gold and silver's good for the store
a bit of wealth. When of my concerns that bartering.
Oh already read that one, Steve Steve Ebbs yesterday's wolf
pack shipping values fifty seven and the cost was fifty dollars.
So yeah, you're getting extra value there.

Speaker 3 (02:36:40):
Yeah, that's what Tony was saying. He just kind of
rounds it up, you know.

Speaker 4 (02:36:44):
Yeah, the real Octo Spook cut large coins into pieces
like pieces of eight. That's right, you can be a pirate.

Speaker 3 (02:36:51):
Nights of the storm.

Speaker 4 (02:36:52):
When people understand that metals are not an investment but
a storage medium, then they finally figured.

Speaker 3 (02:36:55):
Out the monetary system. That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:36:57):
Metals go up because the dollar goes down. That's their
store of value. As Jason points out Epstein Island Shelley
A is responding, Shelley A, the vaccine passports were like
a prequel to.

Speaker 3 (02:37:08):
The Mark of the Beast, exactly what they were, the
real octosepook.

Speaker 4 (02:37:12):
We need to create laws preventing government from owning robots automatons,
and only we the people, own them and use them
to provide our government and goods products, food, et cetera,
which we need. If government owns them, they will just
be robots of our enslavement. Epstein Island says Operation Steel
the Oil. That's a catchy name, maybe a little on
the nose, but it gets to the heart of it all.

Speaker 2 (02:37:32):
It should be something that spells out oops, oh, opis
or something, or you say, Lance, I was just saying.

Speaker 10 (02:37:39):
You're saying it had desert storm. We need a new one,
so operate jungle Storm.

Speaker 3 (02:37:44):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:37:45):
Yeah, going back to the vaccine passports being a prequel
to the Mark is a prequel to all digital passports
and Permission Society, And of course the stimulus check that
might love so much, that was a prequel to universal
Basic income. Nicee check all a dry run rehearsal. I mean,
they've practiced this stuff, folks for twenty years, beginning three

(02:38:07):
months before nine to eleven, and the twenty twenty stuff
was just.

Speaker 3 (02:38:13):
The next level. It's a beta test, if you will.
Real quickly.

Speaker 4 (02:38:18):
We had someone email and ask about a book I
had talked about. I've compiled the list of all the
books I remember talking about on the show. I don't
know exactly which one it was, but you know, you
can go in and check these out for yourself see
if one of them was it. We don't have the
email in front of us about who it was, so
apologize for that. But if you're listening, the books I've
talked about are Doctor Universalis. It's a very short novella.

(02:38:39):
It's by Gaston Norval. It's a sort of medieval crusade
sort of thing guy's going to questify and a holy relic. Again,
I don't believe in holy relics, but it's an interesting premise,
you know, it's a good premise for a story. That's
a really nice ending. Doctor Universalis by Gaston Norval. There's
the Franklin Savings and Loan Scandal by John W.

Speaker 3 (02:38:57):
Camp.

Speaker 4 (02:38:58):
Again, it goes into the Franklin Savings and Loan Scandal,
as one might expect, where these guys were caught again
providing drugs and children to powerful people. There's Aberrations in
the Heartland of the Reel by Windys Painting, which is
about the life of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVay and
the weird things that went on with him. It's like
seven hundred pages long. It is a massive book. I
haven't gotten very far into it because I just don't

(02:39:19):
have time, and you know, it catalogs his life all
it's probably the definitive tome on Timothy McVay.

Speaker 3 (02:39:29):
I don't think there's warm peace.

Speaker 4 (02:39:30):
Yeah, I don't think there's anything that even comes close
to detailing his life. So if you're looking for something
that's interesting, it's a very interesting read, but it is
very very large. Again, that's Aberrations in the Heartland of
the Reel by Windy S Painting. Then I've also talked
about The Storm of Steel by Ernstunger. It's about it's
the diary of ern Shunger and he was in World
War One and it talks about his experience during the

(02:39:52):
war and what he saw and you know, how he
felt about it. And it's very interesting because he's a
very very military minded guy, and there's almost, you know,
when he's commenting on it later in life, there's almost
a sort of wistfulness for the horrors of the wars.
He's a very interesting guy. And then there's Chaos by
Tom O'Neill, which is a book about Charles Manson and
the potential involvement with you know, MK Ultra and the

(02:40:15):
CIA and doctor Jolly West. But it also you know,
that's a smaller portion of the book. It's largely just
about the very strange things that happened around that investigation.

Speaker 2 (02:40:26):
You mentioned that World War One book. That reminds me
of a quote from Roberty Lee. He said, it's good
that war is so horrible, or we would grow too.

Speaker 3 (02:40:35):
Fond of it.

Speaker 4 (02:40:36):
ERNs Younger was fond of it anyway.

Speaker 2 (02:40:37):
Yeah, yeah, I mean, you know, you can look at
the Civil War and it is it is fascinating from
the standpoint of the battles and what was happening with it.

Speaker 3 (02:40:48):
But again when you.

Speaker 2 (02:40:50):
Get up close to it, and like we were talking
about in this article earlier today, and the horror of it,
and to imagine what it was actually like, it is
truly horror.

Speaker 3 (02:41:01):
But yeah, it especially a civil war. It's very very interesting.

Speaker 2 (02:41:06):
I mean, even to the extent that the war began
and ended on the same farmer's property. Even though it
began and first began in Manassas, and there was a
second Manassas.

Speaker 3 (02:41:20):
That was there.

Speaker 2 (02:41:21):
The Union called it the Battle of bull Run. So
both of those were on this guy's farm. And he said,
that's it. I'm getting out of here, because in that
war the two capitals of Richmond and d c were
only one hundred miles apart, and so unfortunately he was
in the middle of it. So he moved bought a
farm out at Appomatics, and they wound up ending the
war and having Lee surrender to Grant there at Appomatics.

Speaker 3 (02:41:43):
So it all began and ended on this one guy's farm.

Speaker 2 (02:41:46):
It's very much like the characters keep coming back over
and over again. You see that Stonewall Jackson as well
as robberty Lee were there at Harper's Ferry arresting John Brown,
one of the seminal events of the Civil War. And
so it is like a I look at it, it's
kind of like a real version of a Dickens novel
where everybody is related to everybody else in some way

(02:42:08):
to keep popping back, characters keep coming back. But it's
also interesting in terms of the actual warfare aspect of
But it truly was a horrific thing.

Speaker 3 (02:42:17):
We do not want to repeat that.

Speaker 4 (02:42:20):
Well, that is all of the books that I have
covered on the show. Got a couple comments, and then
we're going to start talking about meta Defy Tyrant seventeen
seventy six says Trump's warp speed poison has killed millions.
Biggest drug dealer in America.

Speaker 2 (02:42:36):
Yeah, we're not suggesting that we're not, but when we
look at drugs, I mean it's the CIA that the
biggest drug dealer. But you know, if you include things
like the pharmaceutical poisons like that, it, yeah, it truly is.

Speaker 3 (02:42:53):
We don't want to.

Speaker 2 (02:42:53):
Go down the route of Mario Orgigi.

Speaker 3 (02:42:57):
That's a.

Speaker 4 (02:43:00):
High boost says the two A is holding the entire
world together. By a string at this point, very realistically.

Speaker 3 (02:43:06):
Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:43:07):
Brian de McCartney says we should start a book club. Yeah,
I enjoy a lot of books. I do really enjoy reading.
And Owen sixty one I see her says, don't let
Jolly West give your LSD.

Speaker 3 (02:43:21):
You shouldn't.

Speaker 2 (02:43:22):
Well, let's take a look at there's a new generation
of metaglasses that's being hawked by Zuckerberg.

Speaker 3 (02:43:31):
And you know, when you look at this, it's like.

Speaker 2 (02:43:33):
When you see him putting these guyses on, it instantly
reminded me of somebody else that's been in the news recently.
That's right, these people licking. Why would Why is it
that the left likes these large, dark corn room glasses?
Do they like the Michael Caine ip Chris files.

Speaker 4 (02:43:52):
I think it has to do with, you know, glasses
make me look smart. Big glasses, big smart.

Speaker 2 (02:43:58):
Except when you superimposed the chart of what happened to
Cracker Barrel's stock over those glasses. But here is Zuckerberg
talking about his.

Speaker 17 (02:44:09):
I start putting together a team the best people in
the world.

Speaker 3 (02:44:14):
Yeah, the best people in the world.

Speaker 5 (02:44:16):
To build these glasses.

Speaker 3 (02:44:17):
You really want these things.

Speaker 17 (02:44:19):
The requirements are actually pretty simple, but the technical challenges
to make them are insane. They need to be glasses,
they're not a headset, no wires, less than one hundred grams.
They need wide field of view, holographic displays sharp enough

(02:44:42):
to pick up details.

Speaker 2 (02:44:44):
And you've got to have those really heavy frames.

Speaker 17 (02:44:46):
Right enough to see in different lighting conditions, large enough
to display a cinema screen or multiple monitors for working
wherever you go, whether you're in a coffee shop or
on a plane, or or wherever you are, and you
need to be able to see through them, and people

(02:45:06):
need to be able to see that through them too
and make eye contact with you.

Speaker 3 (02:45:08):
You always need to be able to see through the technology.

Speaker 17 (02:45:12):
This is the physical world with holograms overlaid on it.
So if someone messages you, you will see that and
instead of having to pull out your phone, there will
just be a little hologram and with a few subtle
gestures so you can reply without getting pulled away from them.

Speaker 3 (02:45:33):
All less enthusiastic.

Speaker 17 (02:45:34):
This is if you want to be with someone who
is far away, they're going to be able to teleport
as a hologram into your living room as if they're
right there with you. You're gonna be able to tap
your fingers and bring up a game of cards or
chests or holographic ping pong or whatever it is that
you want to do together.

Speaker 5 (02:45:52):
You can work, play or whatever.

Speaker 3 (02:45:55):
Boy, I gotta have this, build it, and.

Speaker 4 (02:45:58):
All it will cost you is the twenty four to
seven surveillance of you and everyone you love, your house,
your floor plan, you know, your entire life.

Speaker 7 (02:46:06):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:46:06):
As he's laying out all these technical challenges that he's
doing and how they overcame them, evidently what came to
mind is that quote from Jurassic Park. Just because you
could do something doesn't necessarily mean that you should do it.
You know, again, the cracker barrel ceo effect.

Speaker 3 (02:46:23):
So I don't know.

Speaker 2 (02:46:24):
Now he's trying to make it a little bit cooler.
They're adding Oakley sunglasses and stuff, so it's not simply
the dark heavy frames that are there. But yeah, the
smart glasses. He says, it's going to be a pathway
to superintelligence in your life. It's like, yeah, that's exactly
why I would avoid these things like the plague and

(02:46:46):
avoid anybody who has them on their head.

Speaker 3 (02:46:49):
Like the plague.

Speaker 2 (02:46:50):
He sees the glasses as the main way that we're
going to integrate superintelligence meaning AI into our day to
day lives. Smart glasses are a nascent market with a
potential to become, if not the then at least one
computing platform of reference for the coming decades. And that

(02:47:12):
was an attributed to a bullish HSBC analyst. I think
they must spell that word bullish. They left out the
tea and they got the.

Speaker 4 (02:47:24):
H They've probably done something else.

Speaker 3 (02:47:27):
Yeah, I think that is a BS analysis.

Speaker 2 (02:47:29):
There more technological progress may be required before the glasses
can compete where the functionalities are currently offered by smartphones.
Even as people are starting to wake up the smartphones
and realize they don't want them in their life. Well,
they say it's going to be somewhere around eight hundred dollars,
so you know, grab your wallet before they run out

(02:47:51):
of them, I guess. And there was also the story, yeah.

Speaker 10 (02:47:56):
Me of a mapew looked up at six twenty three.
It's saying, it's twenty two. Is the eyes on a
lamp of the body, And if your eyes are healthy,
your whole body will be full of light. But if
the light you think you have is actually darkness, then
how great is that darkness?

Speaker 3 (02:48:15):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:48:16):
Well, there was a story that came up on Wired
one vigilante that torched twenty two cell towers. And the
interesting thing about this article is how they use it
as a cautionary tale that you shouldn't that this guy
was weaponized. So this is Wired magazine, which really has

(02:48:38):
a I guess you could say that they're part of
the establishment media. They do push the agendas that the
government once pushed. So this whole story about this guy
who basically was it was somebody who was never successful.

Speaker 6 (02:48:53):
He had.

Speaker 2 (02:48:55):
Been to prison several times, and he started to get
his life back together again with a girlfriend and a
job and things like that, and then twenty twenty hit
with a lockdown and he lost all that and he
had a lot of spare time in his hands. So
this is a story from Wired magazine where they're portraying

(02:49:16):
this as somebody who was weaponized by conspiracy theories online.
Because don't forget that it's not just the Republicans who
are pushing saying that we've got to shut down speech
that is dangerous. This has always been the agenda of
the left, and they're not getting rid of that agenda.
They are just being joined in it now by the

(02:49:39):
GOP as well. They say Smith's actions highlight the dangers
of misinformation and the importance of critical thinking and fact
checking information before sharing it. But of course they want
you to believe if we were to go through this
whole article, I won't bore you with all the details,
but they want you to believe all the official story

(02:49:59):
about five G and about COVID and all the rest
of this stuff inside the mind of the most prolific
anti five g arsonists in the world and the incoherent,
very online political violence.

Speaker 3 (02:50:15):
Of our era.

Speaker 2 (02:50:16):
Again, this writer for Wired magazine, this leftist writer, wants
to tell you that speech is violence, and that the
Internet is violence. It's not censorship really is hate. They're
not getting rid of hate speech. What they're doing is
they're acting in hatred against speech, and they're making peaceful

(02:50:40):
change impossible, which will result in violence. But in this
article they call out David Ike, Joe Rogan, Alex Jones,
Eddie Bravo because of things that they were saying about
five G. But I think that five G really is
a health issue. It really is a privacy issue. When

(02:51:01):
before the pandemic was thrust upon us, remember Trump was saying,
we can't have Chinese electronics companies supplying the electronics that
run our five G system. We've got to have five G.
Well why do we have to have five G? Well,
we need the bandwidth. What are you going to do
with the bandwidth? They're going to use it for real
time analysis of you, real time biometric analysis of you,

(02:51:26):
real time data tracking of you, geospatial intelligence, and all
the rest of this stuff. And he the question. I
mentioned this when he was pushing it so hard in
twenty nineteen. It's like, okay, so you don't want the
Chinese doing this, I said, they want to tell us
that it's a conspiracy theory that they're going to use
five G to surveil us and to learn everything about us,

(02:51:49):
because we don't want the Chinese seeing that. But at
the same time, they're admitting that that's not a conspiracy theory,
and they're telling you that they want to be the
one who are going to be doing all this stuff
that is so bad you just don't want the Chinese
government doing it. I feel less threatened, frankly, by the
Chinese government than I do by my own government. The

(02:52:09):
Chinese government is much, much, much further away from US
than Washington is. So anyway, did you want to read
some of the comments before?

Speaker 4 (02:52:17):
We got plenty of comments here, we got little time
to do it. In Knights of the Storm, we're playing
to c JP Rumbles says it was the I was
the first cycle to go through basic training when they
forced all the soldiers to get an account for direct
deposit CBDC will be the same. We'll start with the
government and work its way out. Also, probably things like
EBT and that sort of thing. Yeah, people that rely

(02:52:40):
on the government in any sort of capacity for their livelihood,
they're just going to force you.

Speaker 3 (02:52:44):
Well, that's the way they've already done it in India.
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:52:47):
Bill Gates went over there to help them set up
their ide system they called the oddhar system. And what
they did was they went in with poor people who
were on welfare and getting medical care. They said, you're
not going to get any money from the government that
you're depending on, and you're not going to get any
healthcare unless you take the number and unless you get
into our Oddharst system. That was Bill Gates who set

(02:53:09):
it up with the Indian government. Same system. They will
use the people who are getting the money from them,
and of course they will put the pressure just as
we saw with the vaccine mandate, so put the pressure
on private employers who are getting government money. And so
when you look at all the people who are getting
paid by the government, who are getting welfare, or who
work for the government, or corporations who are dependent on

(02:53:32):
government contracts in order to stay in business, that's pretty
much almost everybody.

Speaker 4 (02:53:36):
Yeah, they're going to roll it out that way. Yeah,
And of course, you know companies are going to want
to be able to accept these things because they do
a lot of business through EBT places like grocery stores,
gas stations. They are going to be accepting it for sure.
Knights of the Storm CBDC will be forced on government
employees than onto anyone on government assistant today, Like I
was saying, yeah, then on the rest of us, Yeah,
it's going to roll that through there. Remember when people

(02:53:57):
on food stamps got actual stamps. Now it's a snap card,
all digital on the same page there. Epstein Island. Why
does Zuckerberg sound like Bill Gates because he's from the
same type of person. They're both these ruthless, wretched nerds
that never should have been given power, but somehow wheeled it.

(02:54:19):
Truly the condemnation of our times and of our people.
Our people perhaps Epstein Island White is suck. I already
read that one Doug did w seven his shirt is
one size too big.

Speaker 3 (02:54:31):
Well that's fashion. Maybe maybe his body is one size
too small.

Speaker 4 (02:54:35):
Oversized shirts are in tunnel Lord one three three seven.
They're just trying to make the surveillance State equipment look fashionable.

Speaker 3 (02:54:42):
Well, boy, have they failed. They got to give it
to somebody drawing board.

Speaker 2 (02:54:46):
Yeah, that reminds me of you know, when Dean came
and rolled out the Segway and he had a lot
of Silicon Valley CEOs like Steve Jobs, Larry Alison and others.
He wanted to show it to them before he made
it public and get their feedback. Steve Jobs told him,
he says, first of all, this looks stupid. It's an
amazing piece of equipment, but you need to make it

(02:55:07):
look cool. And the second thing he said was, and
you're going to have if you roll this thing out
instead of in a controlled way, if you do it
all at once, you're going to have some high profile
idiot have a crash on it. And it's gonna make
it a laughing stock. Turned out that that that actually happened,
and the idiot was George W.

Speaker 3 (02:55:27):
Bush who crashed on this segue. Of course they fixed
it after that.

Speaker 2 (02:55:31):
That was before Karen and I road segues all over
Chicago and a tour that when we were up there.
But they changed it, so that was when I first
did it. You know, it was some kind of a
different control with the handlebars. By the time we did it,
you just leaned in one direction or the other and
it would pick that up.

Speaker 3 (02:55:51):
And they're very easy to use.

Speaker 4 (02:55:52):
It basically just thought based because your body sort of goes.

Speaker 3 (02:55:55):
In the way. You're thinking, yeah, we got a tunnel lord.

Speaker 4 (02:55:58):
Nope, Brian de McCartney, we had May Mobility driverless cars
in our small town. They're everywhere with their cameras. Is
like Google cars on the streets eternally. That's a nightmare.

Speaker 3 (02:56:10):
May Mobility. I've never heard of that.

Speaker 4 (02:56:12):
Or maybe it was Many Mobility.

Speaker 3 (02:56:14):
Maybe I'll have to look it up. Yeah, I'll have to. Okay,
we'll have.

Speaker 4 (02:56:19):
To google that.

Speaker 3 (02:56:21):
Tony TYE six.

Speaker 4 (02:56:22):
The only smart thing I like is that smart car
that had a V eight swap.

Speaker 3 (02:56:27):
It's basically like a.

Speaker 4 (02:56:30):
It's like putting a V eight in a hot wheels
car at that point, Basically, Shelley A, a bunch of
guys in London are cutting down phased array cameras and
five G towers. The British can get a little rowdy
sometimes when they need to.

Speaker 10 (02:56:44):
Good for them, stuffed up the blade runner protests that
they have over there of people cutting down those cameras
is seeming.

Speaker 5 (02:56:53):
To really work for them.

Speaker 10 (02:56:54):
They are doing it so widespread, I think it's slowed
down or stop the rollout of them. I'm not shut
out to look that up. It might have just been
people optimistic, but there's a pretty widespread resistance against that
with people attacking and destroying these cameras.

Speaker 2 (02:57:11):
Yeah, there's a lot of resistance too on these limited
You know, when they started closing off roads and putting
up barriers so that people had to drive in circles
and stuff around Oxford, they started removing those barriers as well.
They will push back on things more than Americans do.

Speaker 4 (02:57:28):
It's also hopeful because it shows that once you get
a large enough coalition, if you have enough people involved
in it, the government is almost forced to back off.
They cannot arrest you all its people too upset. Yeah,
you get enough people together, the government is forced to
bow down.

Speaker 10 (02:57:43):
I think a lot of the people that would be
the types to protest and do that sort of thing
have been pacified by the MAGA movement and just trust
the plan and hope that Trump has it all taken
care of.

Speaker 3 (02:57:55):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah. In the UK they have absolutely
no hope with.

Speaker 2 (02:58:00):
The local parties out of there, and I would say
that includes even the Reform Party. If you look at
the moves that Nigel Faraj has been making lately, I
don't see any hope coming from that sector either. But
certainly the Conservatives have been fully on board of the
the industrialization and subversion through massive migration of the UK,
no doubt about it.

Speaker 4 (02:58:20):
Which I mean we've said this before, but you know,
the UK, Canada, those countries tend to be about ten
to fifteen, maybe twenty years ahead of the United States
in some areas. But as they go, eventually so goes
the United States.

Speaker 2 (02:58:33):
Well, you know, in terms of asymmetric warfare. I remember
when we were investigating the militarization of policing and things
like that, what Obama was doing in terms of these
m wraps and small communities, and Biggs and I went
to that Asymmetric Warfare Center at ap Hill, and when

(02:58:53):
I started looking at it and found the meetings and
they had them posted on YouTube, it's just nobody ever
watched them, you know, had been up there for like
ten years and they'd had three hundred views or something
like that. But these I set through these dry presentations
and these military leaders, US military leaders are saying, you know,
when you hear them say people are not radicalized by

(02:59:17):
their religion, you know, usually you just kind of dismissed
that as well. They're trying to be apologists for Islam
as the Islamification, and yet what they were saying was
what radicalized people they see over and over again. Typically
these are people who were in the mid thirties. They
were successful, they might have had technical background and a

(02:59:37):
wealthy family, upper middle class, but what got them was
they had a situation where they realized that they had
absolutely no control over their future. And that was when
they started becoming terrorists. And after they got become terrorists,
then they started looking for religious backup. But that's not
what we do as Christians. We understand that and if

(03:00:00):
we don't have any power in our future. God holds
the future, and we don't need to get desperate like that.
Thank you so much for joining us. Have a great weekend.
The common Man. They created common Core and dumb down

(03:00:26):
our children. They created common past, track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we

(03:00:50):
have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

Speaker 3 (03:01:04):
It's time to turn that around.

Speaker 2 (03:01:06):
And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Thu Episode #2098: Unite the Kingdom: Millions Rise Against Immigration & Globalism

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Thu Episode #2098: Unite the Kingdom: Millions Rise Against Immigration & Globalism

Stuff You Should Know