Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, and joining us now is Gerald Clinty. Always
a pleasure to have him on to see what he thinks.
He's has a great track record as a discerner of
trends and it's pretty hard to tell. As he said
last time, Trump is a wildcard. He is absolutely wild
It's chaotic. It's back and forth and back and forth,
(00:20):
you know, just on the tariff issues and things like that,
and what's going on with Panama. Always great to have
Gerald on again. You can find his publication. It's a
weekly publication, Trends Journal. You can save ten percent off
with a code night. And he has a wealth of information.
It's not fluff. It's not you know, entertainment to news
(00:41):
about what's happening in Hollywood or whatever. This is real
news about what's happening in financial markets as well. It's
what is happening geopolitically. It's always great to have you on, Gerald,
Thanks for coming on, well.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
Thanks for having me, thank you, and yeah, they go ahead,
trudge Journald.
Speaker 3 (00:57):
By the way, it's two dollars and when you get
it from night, two dollars and fifty cents a week
nothing and this week's was two hundred and nineteen pages.
People say, I can't read two hundred and nineteen pages.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
You read what you want.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
It's a magazine geopolitics, economics, socioeconomics, high tech, science, AI technocracy.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
We cover the world and what we do.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
For example, like the Israel war going on, we subscribe
to Haha, that's the Israeli newspaper. We pay to go
on to it. We also go to Jerusalem Post, Times
of Israel. What do you what they have to say?
We go to Irnaisna, PRESTV, Tehran Times. Want to hear
(01:43):
what the Iranians have to say. Go to Al Jazeera,
go to Arab News, Middle East Monitor. We want to
hear what the Arabs have to say. We go to
d W. We go to euro News. Want to hear
what the Europeans have to say. We go to the
media and then we say, this is what they're saying,
(02:04):
this is our analysis, this is where we see it going.
Other than people with little minds the size of a p.
I like Fox because Fox likes Trump. Yeah, I hate Fox.
I go to MSNBC. I want to listen to their crap.
(02:26):
How could people call themselves Republicans, democrats, conservatives, liberals? How
about having an open mind and calling yourself a political
atheist and just looking at facts to what they are.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
That's right, that's right, That's that's what I hated. You know,
Time and Newsweek. I've said this many times. Oh well,
they're supposedly objectives.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
They know they're not.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
I'd much rather go to an opinion piece like National
Review and the Nation find out what they're saying. They're
diametrically opposed to each other. I hear their arguments about
what they're saying, and then make up my mind. And
that's what you do with a trends journal, exactly, so exactly.
Speaker 3 (03:08):
And I have to tell you that, you know, the
more subscribers we get, the more positive the prospects for change.
Never I've been at this, you know, you know my books,
best selling books, Trends two thousand, trend tracking, on and on.
Speaker 2 (03:25):
I've been at this forty five years.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Never before in my life have I seen such a
volatile presidential.
Speaker 4 (03:34):
Time.
Speaker 3 (03:35):
Never ever, and never a better time for a new
third party. I wasted two hours of my life watching
that drum do. By the way, we own the trademark
presidential reality.
Speaker 5 (03:52):
SHOWY actually watched two hours of his spewing out crap
and bringing it out all these people to show the
great things he did and the stupid, little, gutless little
Democrats over there another.
Speaker 4 (04:09):
Rhymes yeah not bro.
Speaker 3 (04:14):
I know it never been a better time because if
there wasn't Trump, there'd be no Republic again. As I'm
watching this thing, I'm seeing that little jerk Mike Johnson
with Advance next to him, standing behind him.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
It's a freak show, a little clown.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Show with Trump in front of him, a freak show
in front of everybody's eyes. So the slime ball not
one word in the two hours about the genocide being
committed by the United States, stealing our money, another four
(04:55):
billion dollars to keep slaughtering the Palestinians, bombing God into ruin. Oh,
Israel bombing Syria, taking control of more of their land.
We can't have terrorists our territory.
Speaker 2 (05:09):
Hey, it's not your territory, it's stolen land.
Speaker 3 (05:14):
Oh, violation of Geneva Convention an Article two four two
the United Nations. Oh no, no, who are settlers, No,
you're not your colonists, driving out forty thousand. I'm in Kingston.
You've been up here twenty three thousand people. I'm thinking
to myself, they just they just threw forty thousand Palestinians
(05:35):
out of their homes in the West Bank that Israel
has illegally invaded since nineteen sixty seven. Hardly a word
in the major media. Nothing nothing, Oh yeah, not a people.
Oh and now how tough Trump is. Hey, if you
don't bring back them hostages, you're gonna.
Speaker 2 (05:56):
Pay for this. Hey, how about how.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
Oh you don't call the hostages, the thousands, the tens
of thousands of Palestinians that you put into prison for nothing. Oh,
they're not hostages, they're prisoners. Oh and that little that
little jerk, that little jerk, a little clown of nothing,
a little more on.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Of a scum rubio.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
Oh yeah, it goes with with the with the with
the cross on his the the.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
Ashes on his thing telling. Oh, how upset Trumps.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
He's on Fox about Oh, every time he sees these
pictures of the hostages.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
Oh, how terrible.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
Hey, how about the Palestinians whose homes have been bombed
to ruin? How about them? How about all these little
kids that got their arms blown off, heads blown off dead?
How about the hundreds of thousands, according to the numbers
that have been killed. How about the two million people
that have nowhere to live anymore? Hell with them, we
(06:58):
don't care about them.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
Well, you get these no dueling atrocities. You know, people
will say, well look at the mob cut the heads
off of these. Whether that happen or not, you know,
you have a fog of war. Yeah, you got the
fog of war, but you also got this back and forth.
And the issue is that they don't want to stop it.
You know, I talked about what a just war is.
Ajust war is when you're attacked. Okay, well did they
(07:21):
invite the attack and that type of thing. But if
you if you come after civilians and you do it relentlessly,
you get to the point I talked this last week about.
I said, you know, look at robberty Lee for example, right,
he could have continued that war indefinitely. But when you
get to a point where you don't have any object,
you don't have any possible way that you're going to
(07:43):
win something other than you're just extending this because you
know you're gonna you're gonna wind up just killing people
for no purpose at all. And if what Israel is
saying is that well, we got to keep attacking because
we haven't gotten to Hamasha. Well, if the then that
says that your strategy isn't work and that you can
keep doing this forever, and if that's really what you
(08:04):
want to do is to get harmas, then you're just
going to keep killing civilians. So it's not justified from
that standpoint. But I think we're all seeing what they
really want is to get everybody out as. Trump made
it very clear. We want to you know, we want
to set up a resort here. So it really is
about the money. It's not even about getting Hamas. But
even if it was about getting Hamas, it still wouldn't
be justified because they're not able to get Hamas. They're
(08:26):
just killing civilians and so it's not justified.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
No, And look what they're doing in the West Bank.
They have no right being there. It's in violation of
the Geneva Convention and you an article two for two.
They are colonists, invaders.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
And I'm tired of hearing this crap that God said
to Abraham three five hundred years ago that this land
is your Landy was God have locked your since three thousand,
five hundred years ago?
Speaker 2 (08:58):
Come on, Hey, God, come on down.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
And say this land belongs to them. I don't want
to hear this fairy tale. And these are all Eastern Europeans.
They're Ashkenazis as h.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
K e.
Speaker 3 (09:14):
N a z I ashkar Nazis that did not convert
to Judaism into what about eleven hundred a d They're
not Semites. The Palestinians are Semites. Mesopotamia region, those are Semites.
(09:36):
So Korean anti Semite. Oh what's Netnahu's real name? O? Milakowski?
I forgot?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Oh what was Bengoria's real name? Oh? Green? These are invaders?
Speaker 3 (09:51):
Yeah, they are Eastern European invaders from Russia, from Ukraine. Asha,
these Kazars, and they're making up this fairy tale. I've
had it. I've had it. Oh and how about that
jerk again? These are all daddy's boys. I can't stand
(10:16):
the crap spewing out of R. F. K. Junior's mouth
last week. Yeah, did you hear about that or this week?
Speaker 2 (10:24):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (10:24):
Oh yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (10:25):
It's a health issue if your Chris I is a
foreign government's policies, Yeah yeah, it's a healthy.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
Yeah yeah, yeah, how terrible it is. And you're an
anti summite if you can. Oh, you talk a little
daddy's boy, a little drugged out daddy's boy. You don't
mean nobody, man, if your name wasn't Kennedy, just like
that little George Bush, a little boy with a para
(10:52):
cohone smaller than a morth ball. My daddy was George Bush.
My grandpa is Prescott Bush. Or you're the guy that
did the year with the Nazis. Oh, the Kennedys that
used to do the dirty deals, bring in boos from
Canada during it.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Oh that got crime syndicate.
Speaker 4 (11:09):
Yeah, oh yeah, yeah oh oh.
Speaker 3 (11:11):
In Trump, you know, I had lunch with his brother
rob It back in two thousand and seventeen at a
restaurant over here in Wassaak across the river. He goes
on to tell me that when the father died, I
think the father died in two thousand and two, he
left the family over a half a billion dollars worth
(11:33):
of real estate. That was beck what twenty years ago?
How much is that real estate worth now? Trump is
nothing more than a little spoiled daddy's boy. All these
people are a little spoiled daddy's boy. And it's one
(11:53):
big Club. Oh, you're talking about Black Rock. Oh what's
the guy that runs Think think a.
Speaker 4 (12:03):
Think right Think Yeah, he's yep.
Speaker 3 (12:08):
And again, when you and I were young men, there
were no venture capitalists. There were no hedge funds doing,
no private equity groups that now own everything Blackbrock, Vanguard,
and State Street of eighty eight percent of the S
and P five hundred three companies eighty eight percent, it's
(12:28):
a crime syndicate. Look at the billionaires and the Trump Club.
If you're not a rich person, shut your damn mouth.
You have no right in this country.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
And that's all he wants now, I mean he's got this.
If you've got five million dollars to pay me, you
get the Gold Card and you get to come in.
And he's going to give them special benefits too that
don't even that American citizens don't have. I mean, they
won't have to pay taxes on income that they earn
outside of the United States. Well, Americans have to pay
taxes on income that they earn't outside of the US.
But these people will come in and buy this favor
(13:00):
with Trump won't have to do that. Yeah, they're looking to,
you know, bring in more super elites to hang around
with them. Maybe they get a discount off of mar
Lago membership or something, right, but.
Speaker 4 (13:12):
That really is truly the case.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
What do you think about this Bitcoin Reserve thing that
they're going to announce today. You know, when we looked
at bitcoin in the past, you know that he surprised
everybody again so unpredictable. As you point out, he's a wildcard.
He comes out with these three different cryptocurrencies that are
really about processing transactions. They're highly centralized, they're not at
(13:35):
all like Bitcoin, and everybody said, well, wait a minute,
what happened about bitcoin? Oh yeah, Bitcoin will be the
heart of it, you know, along with ethereum. But these
other three that are out there, these are mostly owned,
you know, highly centralized and owned by these companies. They're
for doing transactions and anything. What is your read on this?
Is this just crony capitalism and corruption or is there
something that he's planning with the Bitcoin Reserve?
Speaker 4 (13:57):
What do you think?
Speaker 3 (13:59):
I don't know what they're planning, but it's definitely crony
capitalism and corruption.
Speaker 4 (14:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (14:04):
Every time that they do something, you think the team's
betting on what they're going to do, and they know
what they're going to be doing next, and they're going
to make up something.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
They're going to make up something to do way with it.
Speaker 3 (14:15):
Look at the look at the equity markets. The NASDAK
is in correction territory. It's down over ten percent from
its high.
Speaker 4 (14:24):
Mm hmm.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
They're going to do everything they can to jack it
up and make as much money as they can in
any way that they can.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
Look at this little again.
Speaker 1 (14:33):
Yeah, and you know when you talk about the whiplash stuff,
you know where the tariffs are on tarifs are offering it.
Speaker 4 (14:38):
All.
Speaker 1 (14:38):
These guys like lut Nick, they know that the way
they make money is by making the market go way
up and go way down, way up, and they make
money off of that volatility. And so when if you
look at this administration as really just being kind of
a uh, you know, a robber barons, Okay, then then
the chaos and everything really kind of makes sense from
a corruption standpoint. It is how Trump is all is
(15:00):
operated of course as a as a personality as well,
but it also makes sense from a corruption standpoint.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
I'm telling you, they know what they're going to be doing,
and they play the markets on it. They play the
game on it. Yeah, they may come up with bigcoin
of something. They're going to do everything they can to
try to get rid of the debt level that they have. MM,
they're gonna do it and they'll make up something. This bigcoin
is worth this. We've got all this money we did
away with the debt. As I said, Oh, how about
(15:26):
the bs that we're going to go into Fort Knox?
Speaker 4 (15:30):
Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
I wonder what they're trying to pull in terms of
public opinion and you know, public fear and everything with that,
you know, I mean, and it is just a show.
I've compared it to HAROLDO. Rivera going into al Capone's vault.
You know it's going to be a show going to
come out of it.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
A piece of jerk look at that? How about how
about a piece of stupid, arrogant crap. Look at the
jerks out there that they call them media. So going
back to to Fort Knox, Yeah, we're gonna go win there.
Speaker 2 (16:05):
They know exactly what's it. They know exactly what's.
Speaker 1 (16:11):
It, and we wouldn't know anyway if they went in.
I mean, we're going to see some pictures of some
shiny gold and stuff'.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Not they're making a it's a show.
Speaker 3 (16:21):
So here's one of the things that I suggest might happen.
I don't did I tell if I tell your story?
Speaker 2 (16:30):
It cut me off.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
When I was a young kid, I about seventeen years old,
and my father May rest in peace, tells me the story.
I don't know where you know when your grandfather said,
I was dating your mother nineteen thirty three.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
They got married in thirty four.
Speaker 3 (16:46):
They go to your grandfather's house and he's wrapping up
all his gold coins.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
He had a little of gold coins.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
Oh yeah, you did tell the story, Yeah you did. Yeah,
And so.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
It's pretty amazing. As a matter of fact, I talked
to Tony yesterday and he said, somebody, I think it
was Rickards, went back and looked at it, and he said,
they saw that.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
They wrote that.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
They claimed that there was way more gold that they
had at the time than they actually did. So fdr
the certificates that he's putting there for the money that
he was dealing for people, they were inflating that even then,
you know, I.
Speaker 3 (17:19):
Mean heflated it by seventy percent. Yeah, they turned it
in my grandfather and the people that gave it back
they got like twenty dollars in something CeNSE an ounce.
Speaker 4 (17:31):
Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
The next year they passed.
Speaker 3 (17:33):
The Gold Reserve Act nineteen thirty four, and they raised
the price to thirty five dollars an.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
Ounce, and they changed the number of ounces that they had.
In addition, I mean, if that wasn't bad enough, they
changed the number of assets our ounces that they had.
They lie about everything, don't they. I just saw that
Lutnik is talking about how they're going to come up
with a different calculation for GDP. I think that's pretty dominous.
Speaker 4 (18:00):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
I think that's pretty ominous because that means that he
expects that GDP is going to be going in the
wrong direction, doesn't it.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
That's right.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
Yeah, we talked about that yesterday in my podcast. So
going back, they're going to say that they got more
gold than they have. They're going to raise the price
of gold. They did it before, and they're going to
do it again.
Speaker 2 (18:20):
That's my bet.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
Let me ask you about the Sovereign Wealth Fund, because
that's another thing that's been thrown out there, and you've
had both Lutnick and Bessent and the thing with Trump
talking about the fact they wanted to put the US's
assets to work. A lot of people believe that that's
going to be a public land that the federal government
claims that they own, but they don't constitutionally really have
(18:43):
a legal right to own land except for forts and ports.
But the bottom line is that there's a lot of
public land, and I think that's something else that they'd
like to sell to foreigners or whatever that they would
like to liquidate. You had Doug Bergham, the former governor
of North Dakota who's now the Interior Starry I said
in confirmation hearings. He said, Yeah, we got like two
(19:03):
hundred trillion dollars worth of land in this country. We're
gonna put those assets to work type of stuff. Same thing,
is that what you think they're gonna do with this
Sovereign Wealth fund? What do you that's because that's a
little bit different thing than the bitcoin thing. They're gonna
try to do a land grab or or auction off
the land to foreign investors. What do you think it's
up with that?
Speaker 2 (19:20):
I don't know. I don't know they're gonna come up
with anything.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
It's a wild card again, look at who can get
away with this. When I get elected, my first day
in office, I'm gonna put a twenty five percent tarifund
Mexico and Canada. First day in office, I'm gonna wait
till February first. February first comes, put the tariffs on.
(19:45):
February third comes, I'm taking them off. I'm gonna put
them on on March fourth. March fourth comes, he puts
them on.
Speaker 4 (19:54):
Mm hmmm.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
We're gonna, We're gonna, We're gonna change the tariff. We're gonna.
Speaker 3 (19:57):
I'm not gonna do it as much as I said
we would. I mean, this is a who could get
away with this crap? And I'll tell you who could
get away with it? A guy that lies right in
front of your face. Again, I wasted two hours of
my life watching that BS thing that he did to
Congress the other day. And here's one of the things
(20:19):
that he said that when he was president, quote, we
had the most successful economy you ready in the history
of the country.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Yeah, that's why I don't watch these things, not a
what yeh.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
Because I'm a trend forecast. I need the facts.
Speaker 3 (20:42):
Yeah, lying in front of everybody's eyes, not one person,
none of the media.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
No. So I looked up the numbers.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
Right, the GDP grew two point eight percent from two
thousand and seventeen to twenty twenty one when he was president.
You know how much it grew on the Biden three
point two percent, under Jerry Ford five point four percent,
(21:17):
the JFK five point two percent. It keeps going on. Yeah,
you're not even close yet.
Speaker 1 (21:23):
No, And of course I'm saying, well, it was it
was you know, COVID that did. But he was the
one who came up with the lockdown stuff and everything,
you know, And of course we know, no, COVID wasn't real,
but you know that that really was his responsibility. Wasn't
something that China did to him. I'm sorry, go ahead
with the next metric.
Speaker 4 (21:42):
That's there. No.
Speaker 3 (21:43):
The other one was the stock markets did go up.
It went pretty good during his thing.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
Oh you remember that.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
December twenty eighteen was the worst dow since the Great
Depression nineteen thirty one.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
And what did he do?
Speaker 3 (22:00):
He forced Powell to lower interest rates and he did
in January artificially propping up the markets. Remember the repo
crisis that you and I talked about as it was
going on. That's right, Yeah, and again it wasn't the
best one. That was much higher under Bill Clinton. The
equity markets. But he throws out the lie, one lie
(22:21):
after another, and the people swallow it. And that thing
was nothing more than a promo of all he talked about.
Speaker 2 (22:32):
Was the all of the illegal aliens coming in.
Speaker 3 (22:34):
That's great. I'm totally supportive of that. Great, But you
got to go on for how long?
Speaker 4 (22:40):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (22:41):
Yeah, how long I got to hear about this?
Speaker 4 (22:43):
Yeah? I agree, I agree. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:46):
When I look at those things, I try not to
watch them live and I try to get it after
the fact so I can just get a transcript and
then do word searches for what did he say about
this or that or that even mentioned this type of thing?
You know, it is It is always just excruciatingly slow,
especially when you're watching it live. You can't even make
him go like at two times.
Speaker 4 (23:07):
Spared you know, it was.
Speaker 2 (23:12):
Again it's a reality show.
Speaker 4 (23:14):
Yeah, it is, it is. That's what it is.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
All it was. He's still doing his show.
Speaker 4 (23:18):
Well.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
You know the thing that surprises me, Gerald is is
that you know, he put in the USMCA, which I'm
not a fan of. I don't like NAFTA, I didn't
like USMCA, which is a rebranded He rebranded it just
like he renamed the Gulf of Mexico, he renamed NAFTA
and called it his own. But you know, this this
latest pullback. You know, first of all, it was the
(23:38):
auto companies coming in and lobbying loot Nick and so
he said, okay, okay, we'll pull back, you know, for you,
and give you another thirty days. But then the other
stuff that they did was they pulled back and you know,
they got thirty eight percent of the goods going into
Canada and fifty percent of the goods going into Mexico
are protected by this trade agreement that Trump put together
(23:59):
and signed and was so proud of. And he didn't
remember this, of course, but nobody in his administration, all
these supposedly great financial minds like Bessentt and loot Nicking anything,
they were completely unaware that there was this treaty and
that if they violate this treaty, they get drug before
an arbitration court and they get that thrown out. And
(24:22):
so that's why they're pulling this stuff back. And in
thirty days, none of that stuff is going to change.
It's still lying about all that stuff.
Speaker 2 (24:29):
And again, what's making up this thirty days crap?
Speaker 1 (24:32):
I know, I know it's just because he wants chaos.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
I guess it's strange, arrogant people. They got Besset.
Speaker 1 (24:39):
What's his name, Bessett, Scott Bessint, Yeah, sous body.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
Yeah, all right, yeah, right form of saurus. Are you ready?
President Donald Trump?
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Sanctions against Iran are designed to shut down the country's
oil industry quote and collapse. It's already buckl Economy Treasury
Secretary Scott Besant said yesterday the US is deploying this
(25:11):
is the NBC sanctions against Iran aggressively quote for immediate
maximum impact. Bessett told the Economic Club of New York.
You mean the Crime Syndicate of New York, the Economic
Club anyway?
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Are they a sister branch of the World Economic Forum?
I mean it sounds like that.
Speaker 3 (25:36):
We are going to shut down Iran's oil sector and
drone manufacturing capabilities end quote. Okay, what has Iran done
to the United States?
Speaker 1 (25:51):
Better question is what is the United States done to Iran?
As we've talked about that going back to the fifties.
It's incredible what's happening with that?
Speaker 3 (25:59):
Yeah, have no idea, people have no idea of that.
Little another again, as George Collins said, it's one big
club and you ain't in it. What was his name,
Kermit Roosevelt. Oh, don't you don't mind? Grant good Theodore Roosevelt.
I'm not with the grandson of son of Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
Oh, and Winston Churchill, a murderous piece of scum crap
who people look up to. Again.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
The only newspaper that reported this in twenty seventeen was
The Financial Times when they finally released the CIA data
from nineteen fifty three twenty and seventeen. How the CIA
and the MI six overthrew the democratically elected government of
(26:43):
Mozadeg Mohammed Mosadeg in Iran in nineteen fifty three because
he had the nerve to say no, no, that oil
belongs to the Iranian people, not Anglo Iranian oil better
known today BP or standard oil better known today as
(27:03):
Exon Nobile.
Speaker 4 (27:05):
No, so he was Iran first. How dare him be
Iran first? You know?
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (27:13):
Today all but through the government they brought in the Savak,
the secret police that murdered hundreds of thousands of Iranians.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
It made the SS look good.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
So yeah, I've said many times, I know students and
from Iran when I was in engineering. They were scared
to death of the Savak. They protested what the Shaw
was doing, but they had, you know, the masks on
and all the rest of this stuff, you know. And
that's why I asked him about it. I said, what's
going on? I've got a comment here from Cecilia fourteen.
(27:44):
She said, David, can you ask Gerald what the name
of his book he showed last time about his Italian
family would like to get it?
Speaker 2 (27:50):
Oh? My favorite? Yeah, they don't have a copy of
it here.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
They just gave it to someone. What Zizzi gave Honey Boys,
z I z I. What Sizzy gave honeyboy a true
story about love, wisdom and the soul of America.
Speaker 2 (28:04):
And you could go to Trends Journal.
Speaker 3 (28:06):
You see the about and as you get it from there,
everything I've written that's my favorite.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Good Yeah, and get it there instead of Amazon. Go
to Trends Journal.
Speaker 4 (28:14):
Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
And unfortunately it came out like the week before nine
to eleven, so we didn't get any coverage on it.
And again my other one and talking about the Iranian conflict,
my book trend tracking far better than Mega trends Time Magazine.
That's how I became a trend forecaster when little Jimmy
(28:35):
Kata came back from Iran spending New Year's Eve with
the Shah and his wife and said, the Shaw is
the island of stability.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
In the Middle East.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
Yeah, the Bronx used to bullshit has its own sound,
you know.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
Yeah, I became a trend forecaster.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
Jimmy Carter, you know, that guy that everybody holds up
as a moral standard. And he was standing there behind
the Shaw and Savak as all that stuff was happening.
That's the way this stuff always goes out. Let's talk
a little bit about Ukraine. You know, what do you
think I mean since we last talked the Oval Office
fight back and forth that was happening there, and now
(29:14):
the Trump administration has cut off the intelligence that you know. Basically,
what it showed was that what Putin was saying was true,
that these long range missile programs everything said that has
to be operated by American people and its leave satellites
and all the rest of that stuff. And so now
Trump has cut that off. And you know, so what's
(29:38):
your take on all this stuff? You know, you got
the saber rattling of Macron and all the rest of
these people. What's your take as to what's going to.
Speaker 4 (29:43):
Happen with that?
Speaker 3 (29:45):
First of all, I believe if Trump was president, the
Ukraine War would long be over because you would not
have sent all the money in that Joe Biden sent in.
And as much as I can stand Trump, if the
Biden administration she came back, it would just keep going
more of the same and worse. This is just a
different freak show, I agree, But I totally believe that
(30:08):
Trump would not have sent that money, that the hundreds
of billions that Biden sent, and the war would have
been over, and I think he's going to do everything
he can to end it. On the other side, again,
the hypocrisy of sending more and more weapons to Israel
to keep slaughtering the Palestinians, and Israel's stealing more and
more land from Syria in violation of ceasefire agreement with Lebanon.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
They're in five different areas.
Speaker 3 (30:35):
In Lebanon, bombing the hell out of destroying entire neighborhoods,
bombing people's homes to ruin, and sending more money for that.
Speaker 1 (30:43):
Yeah, So he cuts off the funding for arms to
Ukraine and then they send four billion to Israel, and
Israel immediately cuts off food to the people that are there.
I mean, you know, it is this back and forth,
and it's pretty clear who's controlling him. But you know,
also they're getting involved in trying to get Zelensky out
of there. They're they're talking to the different opposition people
(31:07):
that are there. I thought it was amazing. Gerald Wall
Street Journal took the side of Zelensky in that little
spat in the Oval office, and they ended their little
puff piece with a quote from Zelensky where he said, well,
you know, they they want me to leave anything, but
the Ukrainian people have something to say about that. We
have elections here and all this, and they.
Speaker 4 (31:28):
Left it there.
Speaker 1 (31:29):
They didn't say the fact that, you know, Zelensky has
shut down the elections, Zelensky, Zelensky, rest his opponents. They
leave this there as democracy. I'm so sick and tired
of democracy being their excuse to these people. Don't believe
in democracy at all, neither, you know, none of the
people throwing it out there.
Speaker 3 (31:45):
Yeah, yeah, there's the Trench Journal in twenty fourteen. We've
talked about this a dozen times. It's the United States,
so would throw the democratically elected government Depictinganakovich in Ukraine. Yeah,
people have no idea about it here whoever, the article
was written by doctor Paul Craig Roberts. Washington is driving
(32:08):
the world to the final war? How the United States
gave five billion dollars to non governmental organizations in Ukraine?
With Victoria Newland boasting about it in twenty thirteen.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
You could look it up.
Speaker 3 (32:22):
She's at the National Press Club doing the whole act.
Speaker 2 (32:26):
People have no idea of the overthrow, none at all.
Speaker 4 (32:29):
Oh yeah, But.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Going back to the Ukraine, Now, look at the stupidity
spewing out of the mouth of a little got sewn
like Macrone who you mentioned with a guy with a
pecker probably about the size of this thing, if he
has one at all.
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Was fake little hair. And the other clown a Blackrock guy.
Speaker 3 (32:47):
Oh they bought another Blackrock guy that's going to be
the chancellor of Germany.
Speaker 4 (32:52):
Oh really, Oh, oh, I tried.
Speaker 1 (32:54):
He was with Blackrock, one of these technocrat bankers, you know,
like they throw out.
Speaker 2 (32:59):
The election up the bigs on the world.
Speaker 4 (33:02):
Yeah, yeah, they don't care about the elections, you know.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
Greece would just throw that out and we'll put in
Mario Draghi and then they put him in over the
Greek election. They put him in twice in Italy, and
so now they got a black rock guy that's there
in Germany.
Speaker 2 (33:16):
In Germany, yeah, yeah, that's great.
Speaker 3 (33:20):
So anyway, now look at how they're gonna they want
to expand their defense budget Germany. Oh you mean the
Nazis want to defend that Germany?
Speaker 2 (33:30):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (33:30):
Oh, and Matt Crohne, they're going to all increase their
defense budgets. How stupid can you be? How stupid you're
going to increase your defense budget so you could fight Russia.
Get to in your head, if you go to war
with Russia, it's the end of life on Earth. Yeah,
it'll be nuclear war, in nuclear annihilation. Nobody talks about this, nobody.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
And even if you didn't, even if you take the
nuclear thing off, which they can't take that off, but
even if you did, it's absurd. I talked about the
saber rattling from Kure Starma and the UK, and I said, okay,
look at this. You know, Russia out numbers them like
fifty to one on most of.
Speaker 4 (34:12):
These metrics that are out there.
Speaker 1 (34:13):
You know, they go down you know what kind of
in terms of jets, in terms of ships, in terms
of submarines, not even talking about nuclear weapons. And it's
absolutely amazing. The hubris of these people. I think probably
just want to get some kind of a military industrial
complex going on there for the money and for the politicians,
you know, is what I'm guessing with this.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
Well, you should see how the stocks have gone up
in Europe on the defense stocks now skyrock.
Speaker 1 (34:38):
Yeah, they need a European military industrial complex so they
can make money the same way that the people in
the US do. But of course, yeah, it's also when
you have that military guy Stama.
Speaker 3 (34:49):
Look at them, Yeah, look at these little, gutless little boys.
Oh and how about the arrogant jerk that we have
overre or Secretary of Defense Hegson. Yeah yeah, could you
get a more arrogant piece of scum?
Speaker 4 (35:03):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (35:04):
Oh oh, and we're going to fight China. Yeah, it
got sown. You haven't won a war since World War Two. Yeah,
and you wouldn't have won that one without the Russians. Oh,
don't say that. Oh yeah, the Russians were the first
to beat the Germans after the Germans Operation Barbara Rossa.
Speaker 2 (35:21):
Killed over twenty million of them.
Speaker 3 (35:23):
M Oh, you remember Eisenhower made the deal the whole
they held back so that we could get in there.
Speaker 2 (35:30):
Right, Yah, you forgot that one. You haven't won a war.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
You lost the Vietnam War, you lost, you lost the
Iraq War. You couldn't beat the Afghans. You're going to
beat the Chinese at one point four billion people and
the largest naval fleet in the world.
Speaker 1 (35:47):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, a lot of hubris. But of course
the problem is is that you know, they create this
build up a European version of the military industrial complex
so the politicians can make a lot of money craft
and corruption that type. Then you know, it does come
along these these the military industrial complex then wants a
war because they want to sell even more of these
weapons and they want to test their weapons. And so
(36:08):
you know, when you look at Europe and the history
that has had, you know, one of the reasons why
Washington said no foreign entanglements, because they're at the constant
state of war. That's been the situation for centuries and
here they are. They're still at it again, and now
they're going to rearm. And it's Trump who's been pushing
them to rearm. He pushed him in his first term, saying,
if you don't increase your spending, we might leave NATO
(36:31):
and all.
Speaker 4 (36:31):
Those other guys.
Speaker 1 (36:32):
But the net result was that he got them to
increase their spending. And now he's going to do it again.
Perhaps that's his role why they put him in place,
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (36:41):
Yep. And again, how stupid can you be?
Speaker 4 (36:44):
Yep?
Speaker 2 (36:45):
Berlin seeks long term EU exemption for defense Financial Times
Mertz on Tuesday.
Speaker 3 (36:55):
This is the guy who's the blackrock guy, Friedrich Mertz.
Speaker 1 (36:59):
I know, I was laughing about that. They got fred Mertz.
I wonder if Ethel is going to be there as.
Speaker 4 (37:04):
Well, that.
Speaker 3 (37:10):
The country would do whatever it takes to defend European
peace and security. Oh and if only women were in charge.
How about that clown lady that that that that vandal
von Dolian, What do you pronounce your name? The one
that's the head of the NATO.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
Yep.
Speaker 4 (37:32):
Yeah, we've also got Ursula who's fond of lying, you know,
she's yea.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
European leaders a recent day have accelerated plans to increase
the continent's quote rearmament. Has von delay and put it
lion lying on the line.
Speaker 4 (37:51):
YEPA who's fond of lying? Yep, that's right.
Speaker 3 (37:57):
Well, I Whyon encouraged the US twenty six capitals to
use the four year exemption from fiscal rules for their
military budget.
Speaker 2 (38:06):
You're ready.
Speaker 3 (38:07):
Quote, a new era is upon us. Europe faces a
clear and present danger on a scale that none of
us have never seen in our adult lifetime. She said, adult,
you're still a kid.
Speaker 2 (38:27):
What are you talking about? Adult? Oh?
Speaker 3 (38:30):
Oh, Russia hasn't They haven't threatened Europe.
Speaker 2 (38:36):
Why are you saying? Is you liar again?
Speaker 3 (38:38):
I'm tired of hearing this crap that they don't say
that if only women were in shies, they it be peace.
Oh yeah, about Hilary Clinton, we came, we saw he
died when he found out Gaddafi was dead.
Speaker 1 (38:52):
Oh, we just had this last week. They had the
Danish prime minister. Her name is Frederickson. She said peace
in Ukraine is more dangerous and the ongoing war does
this sound like orwell? War is peace? Ignorance of strength?
You know, I mean, it's it's absolutely.
Speaker 4 (39:08):
Insane what they're doing. Next, he's gonna be.
Speaker 3 (39:11):
Telling Amanda Powell you forgot about how about Samantha Power?
How about how about Susan Rice condolesa Rice. Oh and
they're when they're black, you mean black women. Again, I'm
tired of hearing about this race creed and color crap.
One bed comes in everyone saving God. I don't want
(39:31):
to hear this garbage anymore.
Speaker 1 (39:33):
Yeah, yeah, well that's how they control us. And of course,
you know it's also part of that is how Trump
can get away with so much of the stuff that
he's doing because everybody just trusts him. Oh well, I
know it looks like it's bad. It's just forty chest right,
and so you know, they get these people and when
you buy into that identity politics, whether it's like, oh well,
if it's a woman, it's good, if it's a black
person it's good, if it's Trump, it's good. You know,
(39:55):
they just buy into that and they're not actually looking
at the policies, and that's what it's really dangerous about this.
But yeah, Macron is trying to set himself up. I
think as a Russian fore minister called him a little Napoleon.
Speaker 3 (40:08):
A little jerk of nothing again, a little clown. But
it's again you mentioned that guy's starmer, A little jerk
of nothing, what little jerk? Again little as I said,
you look at that little uh Mike Johnson, then you
look it's a clown show. Yeah, it's a freak show
in everybody's eyes. You gotta be def dumb and blind
(40:29):
not to say it.
Speaker 4 (40:31):
Well.
Speaker 2 (40:31):
By the way, on to another issue before I forget Yeah.
Speaker 3 (40:35):
A month ago March fourth cover of Vould trans Journal
magazine dot Com Bust two point zero, I mentioned to
you before the Nasadak now is in correction territory. There's
going to be a dot com bust. You go again.
(40:59):
We only go by Ada. Before scumbag Clinton brought China
into the World Trade Organization In two thousand, ten percent
of the eighteen year olds in China went to college.
Now nearly seventy percent are I'm going back to AI,
young people. Everybody's AI addicted, totally addicted. It's a tech world.
(41:28):
China is going to be the advanced nation in AI.
It's perfect for the Chinese. It's more control over the
people and all through technology. They've over invested in the
first companies that AI trends are born, they grow mature,
rich old agent Die Ai.
Speaker 2 (41:48):
Was only born in twenty twenty two. It's only three
years old.
Speaker 3 (41:53):
You don't invest everything in the biggest companies first, and
that's what they did. They've overinvested in all of these
companies and China came out deep seekers out of the news.
Now it's the most gone to AI site in the world.
Speaker 2 (42:10):
In the world, they do it for a fraction.
Speaker 3 (42:13):
Of the cost with smaller chips. Is going to be
a dot com bust. And I say, when all those fails,
they take you to war. They're ramping up war with Venezuela.
You're seeing it when that, guys, I just read to.
Speaker 2 (42:31):
You and now again in another article about Venezuela.
Speaker 3 (42:39):
I just had it here. Venezeuela's repression forces hit from
Trump oil curb and they're going through a tough time.
We have no right doing this to Venezuela. They didn't
do anything to us. Trump is the guy that tried
(43:02):
to put in this little crown. We wrote about it
while it was happening in trans Journal Guido Juan Guido,
remember that, and.
Speaker 2 (43:12):
He totally failed, totally failed.
Speaker 3 (43:16):
They're doing everything they dan to cut off oil to
keep bringing up the oil prices in America to where
America sells more oil. They're trying to cut it off
from Venezuela, and they're cutting it off from Iran so
United States oil companies can make more money.
Speaker 2 (43:33):
They're ramping up war.
Speaker 3 (43:37):
And Israel and the United States are going to ramp
up the war against Iran. And again Trump led his
way into offices being a peace candidate. He just did
this to Venezuela cutting off their oil. We're renaming the
golf of Mexico the Golf of America. We're going to
take over the Panama Canal. We want Greenland and Canada
(43:58):
U two.
Speaker 4 (43:59):
Yeah, that's right, the most amazing Hubris right there.
Speaker 2 (44:02):
Why, yeah, as he always does.
Speaker 1 (44:05):
Yes, yes, I agree. Yeah, And now we've become you know,
the national anthem is being booed everywhere at sporting events
now because of this Canadian nonsense that he's doing. But
you know, I thought it was also interesting that it
came out that there was secret negotiations with this Rick
Grenell guy, who was his temporary d and I first term,
(44:27):
that he's in Switzerland talking to Russia about doing a
partnership with the gas pipeline stuff, right, reopening some of
these pipelines that were blown up and having a partnership
there with it. Not that they would actually run it,
but that they would have some of his investor buddies.
Again we're always back to this crony capitalism and the
(44:48):
robber barons, except this time he spells baron with two rs.
Speaker 4 (44:51):
Right.
Speaker 1 (44:52):
So you know, as all these people who are going
to be making money like the old railroad guys in
the late eighteen hundreds, and so he's got some money
men who w to be a part of this. And
that appears to be maybe something the deal that they're
putting in on the side, because it seem like every
deal that he's going to do they got to make
some money for him and his friends.
Speaker 2 (45:09):
Yep, yeah, look at this happening.
Speaker 3 (45:12):
All the billionaires, the Billionaires Club. Yeah, they said, if
you're not a billionaire, shut in your mouth, you have
no right in this country. They could Perfore, by the
way you were talking about Amtrak, I call it am crap.
Speaker 2 (45:24):
It's it's ridiculous. Go to Europe.
Speaker 3 (45:26):
Oh China has trains how many miles an hour? I
believe again, they destroyed this country when they did away
with the rail system and trolleys and all that and
put railroad. They destroyed whole neighborhoods. You go to New
aven Connecticut. What a mess all over roads going through
the middle of the cities. I believe that the transportation system.
(45:48):
I'm totally in favor of having a national transportation system,
totally in favor of it.
Speaker 1 (45:55):
Y I'm all about individual private cars, and it seems
like they're hell bent on making sure that that doesn't happen.
I don't want them controlling my I remember, Jery, I'll
tell you the story my audience has started. When I
was in Raleigh, Little Raleigh. They had a woman who
had just gone to Russia, and she said, I could
go all over Moscow and only pay a nickel. And
I said, no, it cost you all your freedom, you know,
(46:17):
to have something like that. I don't want the government
running my transportation system.
Speaker 3 (46:21):
I do because because the transportation system stinks in this country.
And rather than putting the money into the industrial military
industrial complex, imagine if we put that money into a
high speed rail.
Speaker 1 (46:34):
They won't even maintain the roads. But they won't even
maintain that. They won't even maintain the roads. You know
this whole thing about congestion pricing up there in New
York City, when Trump shut that down or whatever. You
know that fight that's going on there. So their response is, okay,
so we're going to widen the bike lanes and you know,
do it put a road diet because they're doing everything
they can to get rid of the they're trying to
(46:54):
create congestion. They want to get rid of of cars.
So they won't fix the road. They make the roads narrower,
you know. And if they won't fix the roads, what
are they going to do with the railroads. I mean,
they're they're not going to maintain the railroad.
Speaker 2 (47:08):
Yeah, the whole countries, the whole countries.
Speaker 4 (47:11):
Yeah, they don't care. They don't care about any of
that stuff.
Speaker 2 (47:13):
Well, I care about is making money.
Speaker 4 (47:15):
I agree. I agree.
Speaker 1 (47:17):
Let's talk a little bit about China because I saw
an interesting take about the Belton Road initiative, and it
reminded me very much of the International Monetary Fund when
it was under Robert mcnamaray, you know, the whiz kid
that got that did the Vietnam debacle, And so he
goes from Vietnam to the International Monetary Fund and he
would encourage all these countries to borrow money from the
(47:38):
IMF and build up their infrastructure, except that they didn't
build up their infrastructure, they built up their welfare state
and basically put them in debt to the IMF. Now
what China's doing is a little bit different. They go
in and with this Belton Road initiative and they say,
you know, we're going to finance this for you. We're
going to build a lot of infrastructure for you. And
(47:58):
then they overbuilt, like in the case of Pakistan, this
is what this article was about. They overbuilt the infrastructure
there and it is costing a fortune. For it's like
half of what these Pakistanis get on average on a
monthly basis. If they just run a couple of lights
in an oven, it costs them like sixty bucks a month,
and they've got one hundred and twenty dollars a month
that they're doing there. And so they put these countries
(48:20):
into debt to China building infrastructure that is more than
they need. In many cases it's not functional, but they
still owe the money to China. And so the question is,
you know, we look at China and how they overbuilt internally,
they're overbuilding externally as we move forward, and everybody's you know,
pushing in trade wars and tariffs and all the rest
(48:40):
of this stuff again, give us an update on where
you see China and their internal economy and what kind
of a risk that presents to the international financial system
in peace.
Speaker 2 (48:49):
What do you think China overbuilt?
Speaker 3 (48:52):
As you said, they have like ninety million vacant apartments,
sixty ninety million, and with every boom there's a bust.
And they made a bad situation worse by three years
of zero COVID policy that destroyed the lives and lively
as one hundreds of millions of people in the country.
So when they're getting back, because what they're doing is
they're buying less and less foreign products and becoming more
(49:13):
self sustaining and self sufficient, just like what happened with
Russia when they put sanctions on Russia. We said, no,
it's not Putin's not going to pay the price. They
have the human and natural resources to be more and
more self sufficient. And that's what's going on with China,
and this whole AI thing is now changing the whole
scheme just like that. Just like that, you're looking at
(49:35):
how the stocks are going up all of a sudden,
and they Hangsang and others because of the AI thing,
And that's the future. So it may balance out to
a little bit, but their debt level is still going
to increase. They have a debt to GDP level of
about over three hundred percent. So they way over built,
way overspent. But they're going to become more and more
(49:55):
self sufficient.
Speaker 1 (49:57):
They need to change the way they calculate GDP AM solved. Right,
Let's talk a little bit about gold because another thing
that I thought was interesting was the fact that you know,
with all this Trump tearff stuff and everything, everybody's not
we'll get this stuff in here now. You know, the
car companies are bringing in the engines and the parts
before the deadline is supposedly going to hit. And a
lot of that happened with gold. They said, it's not
(50:18):
just the gold that's coming in through London, but the
massive amounts of gold and out of Switzerland everything then
to the extent the zero hedge that it actually it
was a significant part of the of the trade deficit,
you know, buying form gold and bringing it in. We'll
tell us a little bit about what's going on with
gold again.
Speaker 2 (50:37):
You know, we've been positive on gold.
Speaker 3 (50:39):
One of your top trends for twenty twenty four was
a golden year for gold. Gold prices went up last
year twenty seven percent, were up over twelve percent.
Speaker 2 (50:47):
Now the central banks are buying it up.
Speaker 3 (50:49):
There is all of this uncertainty going on in the world,
and so we're very bullish on gold.
Speaker 4 (50:55):
Again.
Speaker 3 (50:55):
We don't give financial advice, but we see gold breaking
all with three thousand, five hundred dollars an ounce, and
it could go much again. It's the wild card that
they're going to say again that we have more gold.
This is our goal, are raising the price of gold.
I agree, and I think they're going to do it.
They're going to make gold the gold standard again. And
(51:17):
by the way, before I forget about Iran, it's very
important because of Israel and the United States go to
war against Iran, you're going to see oil prices spike,
markets crash, and again the dot com bust. When that happens,
gold prices are going to skyrocket. So we're very bullish
on gold for those two reasons. And again it was
(51:38):
Trump that kills Solomoni. Everybody figures that, Oh yeah, not
Rannie Commander.
Speaker 4 (51:43):
Yeah, and he threatens them. You know, don't you try
that against me. I just thought about that before you
did that.
Speaker 1 (51:50):
Yeah, it's you know, when things get really chaotic and
volatile like they are now, people are going to run
to gold even if some of these other things don't happen.
And so it's do you think that is going to
be the case? A couple of people here real quickly.
Dustin Helm, thank you very much for the tip and
high boost, he says, Health Impact News use use a
source yesterday. First time I've seen David us as a
(52:10):
source for making ways. Thank you so much for letting
me know that. I didn't know that. But yeah, I
like the research that he's done on the turn that
RFK Junior has done with these vaccines and everything else,
as well as speech and the anti semitism stuff. So
it's always pleasure having you on Gerald And again, I
just want to mind everybody if you go to Trends
(52:30):
Journal dot com and you can use the code night
and you can save ten percent off of the subscription
that's there. And it's a great magazine, as you point out.
You know, he's got two or three hundred pages that
you're doing each week, and you know, people, it's an
online magazine so that you can quickly hop around from
(52:51):
topic to topic. It's very nice to format that you
can read online. It's not like a regular website. It's
an online book that you can flip through. So it's
a really great format and great information that you've got there.
Speaker 2 (53:04):
Thank you so.
Speaker 1 (53:05):
Again, thank you so much for that. And I'll just
read one more quote here before we go away. Denver
Adaway says, Children's Health Defense and RFK Junior I call
them now, I call them RFKJAB.
Speaker 4 (53:16):
I've been calling them RKJ.
Speaker 1 (53:17):
I call them r K JAB have adopted very different
messages on MMR. Children's Health Defense blames the measles on
a new vas RFK JAB. I ain't talking about any
of that. Yeah, that's right, it truly isn't me. Well again,
that's the end of the show. Everybody, have a great weekend. Again, Gerald,
it's great having you on. Don't forget folks. The code
(53:39):
night and that's going to get you an entire week's
worth of information at Trends Journal for just a little
bit over two dollars. Thank you so much, Jeryl, thank.
Speaker 2 (53:47):
You, thank you for what you doing. Thank you for Hello.
Speaker 6 (53:49):
It's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing these
same t shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with all
the billions I've skimmed off, America could dress better, and
I could if only David Knight would send me one
of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new black
T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But he
(54:12):
told me to get lost. Maybe one of you American
suckers can buy me some at the Davidknightshow dot com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred. Those
amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful, I'd wear
something other than green military cosplay to my various.
Speaker 2 (54:30):
Gallas and social events.
Speaker 6 (54:32):
If you want to save on shipping, just put it
in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
the USA.