Tue Episode #2164: Debt-Fueled Militarism Sold as Strength

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:35):
It's the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen,
it's Tuesday, the third of December, you're of our lord
twenty five. Well, Donald Trump has announced a new group

(00:56):
of ships to be built, and we're going to talk
about that. He calls it his Golden Fleet of battleships.
And so there's not too many details about what the
ship is. Certainly no details about costs, because we don't
care about that anymore. The last thing on the mind
of Donald Trump, the King of debt, is the deficit.

(01:19):
He doesn't care about any of that. So we're going
to take a look at what that entails. And also today,
being December the twenty third, that's a very special date.
We're going to talk about the significance of that as well,
and why that is significant. Something that happened one hundred
and twelve years ago. Will be right back. I want

(02:11):
to say to all of you who support us, yesterday
it was a tremendous We didn't see a lot of
tips on Rumble as we typically do, but we had
a lot of other tips and several people gave a
tremendous amount. Of course, Marty was matching it yesterday and
we really do appreciate that it was one of our
most successful ones. Thank you, Marty, appreciate that in all

(02:34):
of you. It's a very nice Christmas gift. It got
us over seven eights. I don't know the gas gage
has been updated this morning or not, but got us
over seven eighths and really close to being right there,
even with a little bit of next week involved as well.
So thank you all so much. And I just want

(02:54):
to thank some of the people who contributed yesterday on
cash app. Dave Bank, thank you very much. That was
a very generous match. Philip Creswell, Daniel let me just
use a last initial. I'm sorry, Daniel F. And Robert M.
Thank you all for these contributions and apologize for using

(03:17):
last names there. I know that people would like to
keep that quiet many cases. And on Zel we had
William R. Lisa Kay, Julie W. Scott, el, Bobby P,
Daniel C, William W. Ryan Forrest because we've talked about Ryan.
Thank you so much, Ryan, and he had a very

(03:38):
nice comment. He said, glad to hear Marty is matching funds.
He's pulled so much of the weight this year, and
he really has. And Ryan is another one. Thank you
so much, both of you and Michael P. Gregory C.
Thank you all of you who contributed on Zell and
everyone who's contributed this. I want to begin with, we're

(04:04):
going to get into battleships. But you've got all these
big MAGA influencers, for whatever reason, have arranged themselves into
the circular firing squad. And it's actually I'm kind of
amused to see it. It's amazing to me how whenever
I would talk about the things that I actually saw

(04:25):
that involve policy and what was being told, whether it
was a truth or lie, the issues about lockdowns, the
issues about vaccines, issues about January sixth, When I would
talk about that, people had always come after me and
still do. You shouldn't be saying things like that about
Alex Jones. You know, I don't hear it any more
about Trump. Those people have moved on, I guess, but

(04:47):
I still get people who will criticize me because I
say negative things about the lies that Alex Jones told
then and continues to tell. And I'm going to call
people out on that, and I'm not going to apologize
for it, you know, quite frankly, if you don't want
to support me that that was not the first thing
on my mind when I called out Alex on the

(05:08):
lies over stopped to steal in January the sixth, and
the lies about the vaccines. I knew that I was
warned not to do that, and I chose to do
that rather than to get the money just get a payroll.
I'm not interested in that. I mean, how shortsighted is that?
So you know, we look at this and you have

(05:33):
the people who were completely silent about all the lockdown
and the vacs unless they cheered it, you know. And
I'm looking at people like Tucker Carlson silent. You know,
he might do eye rolls about all you can get
from it, and then later on he said, you can't
criticize the stuff or they'll fire you. Right. He did
it for the money. Yeah, Dan Bongino, who did it

(05:55):
for the job. You had Ben Shapiro who told you
and berated as being stupid and foolish if you didn't
do it. Of course, his wife is a doctor, Okay,
so he's completely bought into that paradigm. You had people
like Candice on and I don't remember her pushing back
against January the sixth stop to steal stuff. I don't

(06:16):
remember her pushing back against the shots either. As a
matter of fact, I remember her when she had a
one on one with Trump. She started to go there
and Trump started to brag about encountered by bragging about
had saved millions of lives, and she let him say
that she has a limited hangout. She is not going
to tell you the truth. I had somebody who was
very angry with us because we were saying she was crazy,

(06:38):
and she is crazy. I mean Alex Jones called her crazy.
When Alex Jones calls her crazy, he's really embraced that moniker.
There was a guy that did a song going to
be Crazy like Alex Jones, which I thought was kind
of funny. But Alex called her crazy, and I say
that she's crazy like a fox, just like Alex is.

(07:01):
They know what they can do that's going to get
people's attention, and they don't care if it's true or not.
Just take a look at all this Macron's wife stuff
that she's doing. So what if it's even true. We
already know the woman is a pedophile. We know that
that's an open thing. Why does think she criticized her
about that? And why isn't she criticized the policies of

(07:22):
Macron and war and all the rest of this. No,
she's going to focus on whether or not Macron's wife
is a secret trainee. Give me a break. Yeah, that's
not crazy. But that is grifting, folks, And that's what
this is all really about. They're going to avoid the
big issues. But Ben Shapiro made a couple of appearances,

(07:44):
came out shooting, and he was cheered by both the
right and the left, both National Review as well as
this Medea mediaite, which is left wing anti Trump. They
both thought he was greatful what he had to say.
You first went by the Heritage Foundation, and as this

(08:05):
is reported by Mediaite, he delivered a stunning takedown of
Tucker Carlson in which he called him quote an opponent
of conservatism, an outsider masquerading as an insider, and destroying
the character of the conservative movement in the process. Wait
a minute, was that Tucker? Was that Trump? You know

(08:27):
when he says an outsider masquading as an insider, well,
you know, Trump is an insider masquerading as an outsider.
So I guess it was about Tucker and destroying the
character of the conservative movement. Well, that's definitely Trump destroying
character just in general, but especially of the conservative movement

(08:49):
as he embraces what Reason calls republican socialism. I call
it fascism. It's economic fascism. Trump is literally a fact
in terms of economics, and that is the merger of
business and government. And he has really stepped this up

(09:10):
very quietly over a dozen companies in the last month.
He has bought an active partnership into for the government
and I think it's going to pay dividends for his family.
His family is also getting heavily involved in one company
after the other. They just took their media company, which
is I think it's the company that does true social

(09:33):
and they just bought a big steak in nuclear fusion company.
This sounds kind of like Hunter Biden and his expertise
in oil with the Ukrainian oil company Barisma. Well, these
guys are buying into a fusion company. What does Trump
know about fusion zero zip? Maybe he wants to identify

(09:58):
as being mister Fusion other than being Biff from Back
to the Future. Is that's what they had in mind
when they did the character of Beff was Donald Trump.
Then Ben Shapiro showed up right for a fight at
turning point, USA is America Fest. Well, you know the
thing is, I don't trust Tucker, and you know that
I don't trust him, even though he's mostly saying the

(10:19):
right things for now, we'll see what he does. I
think he's a limited hangout. I think he's very dangerous.
And I saw this the longest time about Glenn Beck.
Remember Rolling Stone used to they did a long expose
and Alex used to talk about that quite a bit,
talking about how Glenn Beck would echo Alex Jones, and

(10:41):
it wasn't just for audience, because what he was doing
was building up his credibility with people. And then when
the Bundy Ranch came along, he stuck the knife in
Cliven Bundy's back, trying to get him to say that
he's a sovereign citizen, because that basically puts a bullseye
on you for the police. And in the midst of

(11:02):
that standoff, to say that he's a sovereign citizen was
to completely miss what was happening there, and I think
to endanger them as well. And he doesn't know or
doesn't care about things like the Fusion Center. And he
came on and somebody mentioned the Fusion Center and he's like, oh,
let me look that up, and they're reading off he
and his co host are reading off of Wikipedia what

(11:25):
a fusion center was. Now, Fusion centers kind of got
on everybody's radar back in two thousand and nine because
these fusion centers from Homeland Security, an abomination, if ever
there was one. Was telling people out to the two
thousand and eight election, if you see somebody with a
rom Paul bumper sticker or a Chuck Baldwin bumper sticker

(11:47):
on their car, these people are likely sovereign citizens, so
be ready to shoot them because they may the threat
to your life. And so that's that's what you know.
He followed. Actually, then Alex followed him in terms of
being a limited hangout, in terms of being controlled opposition.

(12:09):
But Ben Shapiro took on Candice Owen about the assassination
of Charlie Kirk and then came after Tucker Carlson and
Meghan Kelly and on and on and on again. These
people are doing what they're doing not because they want
to warn you about something, not because they want to
inform you they're going to be a limited hangout. Megan

(12:32):
Kelly will use four letter words now to be a
bad girl. That's her new persona. Tucker Carlson's got a
new persona as well after he left Fox News. You
can listen to him if you want. I wouldn't trust him,
that's my advice to you. I've not had any interaction
with Tucker Carlson. I have with Megan Kelly anyway. So

(12:55):
a National Review did a headline three cheers for Ben Shapiro.
They said Shapiro's critics accused him of wanting to cancel
his adversaries, but having standards standards standers like Israel verst
that kind of standard, or speaking truthfully about lies? Did
he speak truthfully about the USS Liberty? I'm going to

(13:18):
play for you a clip of Ben Shapiro talking about
USS liberty and a survivor of the USS Liberty responding
to what he had to say.

Speaker 3 (13:30):
Liberty incident is very fruquently used by anti Semites who
suggest that Israel deliberately targets American ships and then has
no penalty.

Speaker 4 (13:38):
So murdered thirty four of my shipmates in cold blood
wid one hundred said before others includ myself and almost
sunk our ship in a concept barage of nothing but
hell on earth.

Speaker 3 (13:48):
And there have been multiple legal investigations of the USS
Liberty incident.

Speaker 4 (13:52):
It says there's been five official investigations into the USS Liberty,
there's never been one. They're all liars, would you write,
com prepared to be liked to. In fact, I called
my congress or senator. But guess what they're all taking
money from apac Apak has got him under the thumb.

Speaker 3 (14:08):
And there was a case of mistaking identity wherein USS
Liberty was in the Mediterranean in a place that were
not supposed to be.

Speaker 5 (14:14):
Israel thought that it was.

Speaker 4 (14:15):
An Egyptian ship and shot the USS Liberty was never
a mistaken identity. Was a pre planned murderers slavvage attack
on innocent Americans doing their job for their country and
our country put an eyep on our back and paid
them billions for it. For murdering American sailors and marines
on the high seas. They got billions and they're still
getting billions from the United States of America because of it.

Speaker 2 (14:38):
Now, the question is why can't we talk about that?
Why is that anti semitic? That has nothing to do
with racism. Give me a break. I'm so sick and
tired of the left screaming racist, racist, racist. Whenever they
disagree with you about anything, they want to discredit you
with an ad hominem attack that you're a racist. And
now Israeli lobby design this lobby is doing the same thing.

(15:02):
It's not going to work, Ben, We're onto your game.
When are you going to be called racist and andy
semitic if we talk about Jonathan Pollard that you supported,
that Israeli supported, that betrayed us, Just like with the
USS Liberty, this is a foreign government. We're talking about it.
Just Christians need to get over that, need to understand

(15:24):
what is happening with it. But they go on to
say Ben Shapiro has put down an important marker. Anyone
invested in the health of the conservative movement should be grateful. Well,
I don't know what kind of conservatism Ben Shapiro represents.
Actually I do. It's big government, big business conservatism. It's

(15:48):
one of the reasons why Ben Shapiro said, you know,
mister Potter, not Harry Potter. I guess that Warlock was
his son grandson. Anyway, mister Potter from It's a Wonderful Life,
he said, was the hero of the story. How do
you get to that? We'll talk about that after you

(16:08):
hear what Ben Shapiro says about his review of It's
a Wonderful Life.

Speaker 3 (16:12):
Alrighty, It's a Wonderful Life, which isn't just the best
Christmas film, It may be the best film. It's a
Wonderful Life. It's an amazing, amazing movie. Obviously it requires
very little introduction. You got Jimmy stew He got Lionel
Barrymore in a cast of thousands, and the entire film
is a play on a Christmas Carol. The first half
of the film is really really dark, and people forget
how dark. The performance that Jimmy Stewart gives in this

(16:33):
film is so Jimmy Stewart was famous for being sort
of slapsticky and.

Speaker 1 (16:37):
Very Jimmy Stewart.

Speaker 3 (16:38):
In this film, he gets angry and when he plays
angry it actually works. Jimmy Stewart underrated actor. And Jimmy
Stewart is this guy who feels hemmed in by life
and he's started this bank and now he's lost all
the money because his dumb uncle, who's a drunk idiot,
has lost all the cash, and Lionel Barrymore is taking
advantage of him, and he thinks about killing himself, and
he's convinced not to by being shown what the world

(16:58):
would be like had he not been born. And then
of course the community comes around to save him. It
is the ultimate Christmas movie. It's about forgiveness, it is
about community. It's about the unseen contributions that we all
make to the lives of the people around us now. Also,
Lionel Barrymore is correct, so on a financial level, the
villain of this piece is actually the hero, because if
Jimmy Stewart actually gets his way, all of Bedford Falls

(17:19):
collapses in the subrime mortgage crisis. Basically, Jimmy Stewart keeps
giving out loans without proper checking into the credit history
of the people he's giving loans to, based on his
sort of assessment of their own personal viability Financially, Lionel
Barrymore is much more by the numbers. Linel Barrymore is
a better banker, and that local bank probably goes under.
So the movie was supposed to be sort of a
quasi socialistic FDR parable. But the reality is that the

(17:41):
real estate policies followed by bankrupt Bedford falls and everybody
ends up homeless.

Speaker 2 (17:47):
Yeah, that's the conservatism of Ben Chapiro, big bankers, heartless,
big corporations. That was what the movie was about. It
was not about your subprime mortgage all the rest of
this stuff, let me tell you, you know. It was
about a situation where the community knows each other. He
did say that. He did say it was about community,

(18:10):
but he said that's really what Christmas is about. It's
about giving and this and that. No Christmas, Ben is
about christ That's what it's really about. You missed that,
the ultimate gift. Sorry that you missed that. But the
reality is is that this is not about subprime. This
is about knowing these people personally on a basis, not

(18:30):
at a distance. It's not like you've got some office
in Wall Street and you're making subprime loans and those
are not bad business decisions. The people who did that
got away with it. They knew exactly what they were doing.
There were crooks, there were criminals. Mister Potter was an
example of JP Morgan himself, the guy who engineered banking runs,

(18:55):
the guy who engineered us into the Federal Reserve, and
today is the anniversary of that. They waited until most
people had gone home, and they passed the Federal Reserve Act,
even though there's been some discussion about it. They passed
it kind of on the cusp of the Christmas break
as a lot of people had left, and rushed this

(19:17):
thing through. So it was really about a difference between
big banks that don't know you. Jimmy Stewart, George Bailey
didn't make a bad loan when he made these loans
of these working people. He knew them, he knew their character. Now,
this is an example of why we don't want to

(19:37):
do welfare with the federal government, and if possible, we
wouldn't want to deal with the JP Morgan banks, or
the Bank of America banks or all these other banks
that do business at a distance. They don't know you.
You're nothing but numbers to them, and you're nothing but
numbers to Pin Shapiro as well. As a matter of fact,

(19:58):
let's just go ahead, yeahiculous.

Speaker 6 (20:00):
That he would try to equate that to the subprime
mortgage thing, when that's sort of the opposite of it.
It was you know, large amounts of these things getting
shuffled into some bland, nameless frightened that then got shuffled
into a larger fund that then people started betting on
in an absurd gambling pyramid strategy.

Speaker 2 (20:22):
Yeah, this whole subprime thing that collapsed. It was not
really about bad loans as much as it was about
bad bankers and the people who are putting that stuff
together deceptively, you know, packaging these things together and selling
you derivatives of the mortgages. And they were hiding bad

(20:43):
mortgages from investors who bought into it. And so it
was about the madness of crowds. It was about dishonesty
on Wall Street. It was about deliberate deception. And that's
really what we see, mister Potter, as well for the
people for whom numbers and money mean everything. Over the
last one hundred years, the Federal Reserve has created bubbles

(21:05):
and burst them, enslaved us with debt, and destroyed our
purchasing power through inflation. Yes, it's been a wonderful lie
for the bankers. There are striking parallels and Frank Capra's
it's a wonderful life to the lies and tricks that
real bankers used to create the Federal Reserve. Human nature
doesn't change, and the greedy elite of nineteen thirteen in

(21:26):
twenty thirteen look and act a lot like Potter the
banker in the movie. And many Americans are left like
George Bailey, staring into the abyss as their dreams collapse
and they face financial room. Do we live in a
country that looks a lot more like Pottersville than Bedford Falls?
What does Frank Capra's film show us about how we
got here and how we can get out? When the

(21:47):
Federal Reserve was created two days before Christmas one hundred
years ago, it was a culmination of six years of
fraud and fear and manipulation.

Speaker 7 (21:55):
I've never really seen one, but that's got all the
air marks.

Speaker 2 (21:58):
Of being a run. The Panic of nineteen oh seven
was used to shape public support for the FED. The
panic was triggered by rumors that two major banks were
about to become insolvent, just as we see in the
movie George.

Speaker 8 (22:10):
There is a room around town that you close your doors?

Speaker 1 (22:13):
Is that true?

Speaker 8 (22:15):
I am going all out to help in this crisis.
I have just guaranteed the bank sufficient funds to meet
their needs. They will close up for a week and
then reopen.

Speaker 7 (22:28):
Just took over the bank.

Speaker 8 (22:30):
I may lose a fortune, but I am willing to
guarantee your people too. Just tell them to bring their
shares over here and I will pay fifty cents on
the dollar.

Speaker 7 (22:41):
Are you never miss a trek?

Speaker 6 (22:42):
Do your part.

Speaker 2 (22:43):
Unfortunately, JP Morgan got away with the deception and was
able to shut down competitors and snapped up assets at
fire cell prices.

Speaker 8 (22:51):
Take during the depression, for instance, you and I were
the only ones that kept our heads. You saved the
building long I saved all the rest.

Speaker 2 (23:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (23:02):
Well, most people say you have stole all the rest,
leading as ones say that Jeorge the size.

Speaker 2 (23:07):
Charles Lindberg Senior warned people at the time of the
creation of the Federal Reserve that it would not stop
boom and bus cycles, but would actually create them in
order to benefit its private owners. Here's what he said.
To cause high prices, all the Federal Reserve Board will
do will be to lower the rediscount rate, producing an
expansion of credit and a rising stock market. Then, when
businessmen are adjusted to these conditions, it can check prosperity

(23:30):
in mid career. By arbitrarily raising the rate of interest,
it can cause a pendulum of rising and falling market
to swing gently back and forth, or cause violent fluctuations
by a greater rate variation, and in either case it
will possess inside information as to the financial conditions and
advance knowledge of the coming change, either up or down.
This is the strangest, most dangerous advantage ever placed in

(23:52):
the hands of a special privileged class by any government
that ever existed. The system is private, conducted for the
sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the
use of other people's money. They know in advance when
to create panics to their advantage, and they know when
to stop panic. Inflation and deflation work equally well for
them when they control the finance. As we see in

(24:14):
the movie, not all lending institutions have the same motivations.

Speaker 8 (24:19):
Now you take this loan. Here is any bishop, you know,
the fella that sits around all day on his brains
and his taxi. You know, I happen to know the
bank turned down this loan. But he comes here and
we're building him a house worth five thousand dollars.

Speaker 9 (24:39):
What well I handled that?

Speaker 2 (24:41):
Mister Potter.

Speaker 7 (24:42):
You have all the papers, there is salary insurance. I
can personally vouch for his character.

Speaker 8 (24:46):
Friends of you, Yes, you see, if you shoot pool
with some employee here, you can come and borrow money.
What does that get us? A discontented, lazy rab instead
of a thrifty working class.

Speaker 2 (25:02):
As a former FDIC chair said, all too often the
large banks shoes their models and their algorithms, and if
you don't fit in their boxes, you don't get the
loan and Dodd Frank legislation is tying the hands of
small lenders, shutting out buyers and shutting down lenders. Today
there are fewer lenders than at any time the government
has kept records. Ten thousand banks disappeared between nineteen eighty
four and twenty eleven.

Speaker 7 (25:23):
This town needs this measly one horse institution, if only
to have someplace where people can come without crawling the Potter.

Speaker 2 (25:30):
Tomorrow in the movie, George gets to see what happens
to the small town if Potter didn't have competition from
credit unions and smaller lenders.

Speaker 7 (25:38):
If it hadn't been for you, Yeah, if it hadn't
been for me, everybody would be a lot better off.
My wife and my kids and my friends are look
low following Why you go out and haunt somebody else?

Speaker 8 (25:48):
Yeah, so you still think killing yourself would make everyone
feel happier?

Speaker 7 (25:52):
Right?

Speaker 5 (25:54):
Oh, I don't know.

Speaker 2 (25:55):
I guess you're right. Suppose better born Pottersville. The only
businesses thriving are vice. People are angry. The town is
filled with signs like keep moving, keep off the grass.
Bert the cop actually shoots at George when he's running
away and is no threat to anyone.

Speaker 5 (26:14):
Stay.

Speaker 2 (26:20):
Everyone is a renter. No one has a steak.

Speaker 7 (26:23):
Now you're only bishop and you live in Bailey Park
with your wife and kid.

Speaker 10 (26:26):
Look, Bud, what's the idea?

Speaker 8 (26:28):
I live in a shack and Pottersville my wife ran
away three years ago and took the kid, and I
had never seen you before in my life.

Speaker 2 (26:33):
See private property and everyone having a steak is the
antidote to Pottersville.

Speaker 7 (26:38):
Here, you're all business man here, go to make them
better citizen. Doesn't make them better customers.

Speaker 2 (26:43):
But whether it's the Trans Pacific Partnership or a global
carbon tax, the global elite don't see you as a stakeholder.
They want to turn us all into serfs and treat
us like cattle.

Speaker 7 (26:53):
Just remember this, mister Potter, that the rabble you're talking about,
they do most of the working and paying and living
and dying this community. Well, is it too much to
have them working, pay, and live and die in a
couple of decent rooms on a bath. Anyway, My father
didn't think so. People were human beings to him. But
to you, a warp frustrated old man, their cattle. Well,

(27:14):
in my book he died a much richer.

Speaker 8 (27:15):
Man than you, or I'm not interested in your book.
I'm talking about the building and loan. I know very
well what you were talking about. You were talking about
something you can't get your fingers on.

Speaker 2 (27:25):
Speaking of riches, do you find the salary amounts amusing?
When Potter tries to buy George.

Speaker 8 (27:29):
Off, look at your side, young man twenty seven, twenty
eight married, making me say forty a week, forty five,
forty five, forty five, George, I'll start you out at
twenty thousand dollars a year.

Speaker 7 (27:52):
Twenty thousand dollars a year.

Speaker 8 (27:55):
You wouldn't mind living in the nicest house in town,
buying your wife a lot of fine clothes, a couple
of business scripts in New York year maybe once in
a while Europe. You wouldn't mind that, would you?

Speaker 11 (28:07):
Jones?

Speaker 2 (28:07):
Would I? Even if George had saved a lot of
his twenty thousand dollars salary, would it have bought much
A couple of decades later, By even the government's very
conservative estimate of inflation, the dollar has lost ninety percent
of its value since nineteen forty seven, when the movie
was made. The Fed's deliberate inflation is devastating to anyone
trying to accumulate wealth through hard work and saving. So

(28:30):
what is the answer to all the George Bailey's out there?
One hundred years after the government gave control of our
money supply to private bankers like Potter? Well, Potter had
more money than he could spend. But would any of
you want to be Potter?

Speaker 7 (28:43):
You sit around here and you spend your little webs,
and you think the whole world revolved around you and
your money. Well it doesn't, mister Potter. They in the
whole vast configuration of things. I'd say you were nothing
but a scurvy little spider.

Speaker 2 (28:56):
George Bailey finally sees how rich his own life is
as he sees the fruit a relationship, honesty and compassion.

Speaker 5 (29:07):
May you here to you in jail going home.

Speaker 2 (29:11):
I'm waiting for you. And if the public can awaken
to the lives of the Federal Reserve, if it could
even be audited, it would be a huge step to
breaking the change that enslave all of us. But ultimately
it is God that change his minds and change his hearts.
God hates oppression and we can and should confidently pray

(29:32):
that He will stop it.

Speaker 12 (29:34):
I owe everything to George Bailey.

Speaker 2 (29:37):
Help him, Dear.

Speaker 12 (29:38):
Father, Joseph, Jesus and Mary, help my friend mister Bailey,
Help my son George tonight.

Speaker 2 (29:49):
He never thinks about himself. God, that's why he's in trouble.

Speaker 8 (29:53):
George is a good guy.

Speaker 13 (29:55):
Give him a break.

Speaker 5 (29:56):
God, I love him.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
Dear Lord, what please God, somethings from now with Daddy?

Speaker 8 (30:05):
Please be gay bad.

Speaker 2 (30:08):
There's father than him.

Speaker 12 (30:13):
I'm not a grand man.

Speaker 7 (30:15):
But if you're up there and you didn't.

Speaker 1 (30:18):
Hear me, you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 14 (32:16):
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (32:33):
Well, welcome back, and we have a very special guest
who's going to read the comments for us today. We have.
The first one we have is from Jerry Alatalo. Go ahead, Lance.

Speaker 15 (32:45):
Jerry Elatalo says, there's one person on earth who watches
It's a wonderful life and take sides with banker Potter.

Speaker 5 (32:52):
Ben Shapiro.

Speaker 2 (32:56):
Very good. So Trump is our special guest. Today's rigged
this thing out for so we can do it in
real time. But the Yeah, it's one of the things
I said in that piece. I said, would any of
you want to be Harry? Would any of you want
to be Potter? Keep saying Harry, would any of you
want to be mister Potter? Ben Shapiro raises, that's the
only person on earth who wants to be Potter? Again,

(33:19):
I guess uh. Instead of a warped, frustrated old man,
as George Bailly describes Potter, we got a warped, frustrated
young man. I would not want to be Potter. I
would not want to be Ben Shapiro either. We've got
another comment here.

Speaker 15 (33:37):
You're right, but when the baron and k One says,
speaking of It's a Wonderful Life. I prefer the SNL
alternative ending, the one where George Bailey rips Potter's arm
off and beats him to death with it.

Speaker 2 (33:50):
I haven't seen that. I haven't seen that one, but yeah,
I guess so it's uh, that would be that would
be good. Yeah. Then again, when you look at this,
I guess maybe if Trump can build his freedom cities,
maybe we can call them Trumpville. That's what I probably

(34:11):
name it after himself in some way shape or for him.
Go ahead, Lance or said Donald, Yeah, go ahead, Donald, Yeah,
give us the next one.

Speaker 15 (34:20):
So Star Barkley says, there's a clip of La Crecenta, California,
as the development where Potter's renters were buying with loans
from the Bailey's. The home my parents owned there now
goes one point five million dollars a one story house.

Speaker 2 (34:37):
There's inflation for you, right, Yeah, you can have the
finest house in the area only one and a half million dollars.

Speaker 6 (34:45):
He said that they're building a home that costs five
thousand dollars that's now apparently a one point five million
dollar home.

Speaker 2 (34:54):
Yeah, yeah, and the big numbers guys that Benjapara thinks
are so great. Have made sure that we are homeless.
You know, the the mister potters have won. We look
a lot more like Pottersville than anything else. So yeah,
thank you Lance, that's a great job. Thank you for
getting that together. We're gonna have a other guests. Oh

(35:15):
we do.

Speaker 15 (35:15):
Okay, go ahead, h is always it exists, ricklo and
Ci Lannigan understand.

Speaker 6 (35:21):
Okay, so it's not perfect. That one is just gibberish
like real thing.

Speaker 2 (35:28):
Trump just at a senior moment. Okay, Well, let's talk
about the uh, the buggy whip ships that he's talking about.
He's gonna build a lot of new battleships and I
saw that and I kind of almost fell out of
my chairs, Like battleships, these are this is not state
the art stuff. It's got to be something else. It

(35:49):
turns out it is. He just doesn't know what he's
talking about. I think he and war Pete we're playing
a board game of battleship just before the thing out there.
But again, nothing about what it's going to cost. And
he doesn't really have any specks on the ships either.
The Trump class, well, of course, it's just about spending money.

(36:11):
That's all it's about. And they're really fast, and they've
got all kinds of things. And I mean, I can
just envision Trump getting a pitch on this from General
Bucky Turgen's and remember that from doctor Strange luff. Oh,
we see one of those babies come in, those be
fifty twos, you know, real close to the ground, flying
chickens to the barnyard. You know, these babies are unbelievable.

(36:33):
And so he's got people that are pitching him these things,
and of course he's going to put the bill on you,
mister deficit, mister debt Trump. And so when you look
at a battleship, it's not a battleship at all. As
a matter of fact, the battleships were known for being
really large, heavy ships that had a lot of armor

(36:54):
and had really big guns and they could, you know,
fire long distances into in the land. Of course, you
don't need that anymore with cruise missiles and with other
missiles like that. That was a way that they could
deliver munitions to various places. Of gunboat diplomacy was what
that was about. And today having this kind of centralization

(37:15):
of firepower, just like the centralization of political power. You know,
this is what these guys always want in their life.
They want all power in the presidency, all power in Washington,
and all the Washington power and the presidency. So they
want to make centralized, complicated systems that they control. And
that has always been the weakness of authoritarian governments and

(37:39):
tyrannical governments and Marxist governments. It's the weakness of the
American government now complicated centralized dinosaurs. And so is that
what we're talking about here. You know, they actually recommissioned
some of these battleships back in the nineteen eighties, and
they were very expensive to do that. They recommissioned them
so that they could fight some missiles and that type

(38:01):
of thing. But the I mean, and again I'm not
a military expert by any means, certainly not naval stuff.
But even I know the story about World War two
and how the Japanese thought they had delivered a big
blow when they sunk the battleships, But the real issue

(38:24):
was that the aircraft carriers were out to sea and
just as it you know, it was aircraft carriers that
allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. It was aircraft
carriers that were going to be the key asset of
that war. And so he's not looking even at another
aircraft carrier. He's looking at what he calls battleships. But

(38:45):
they're not really battleships. They're more like the large versions
of the Arly class destroyers that are out there. They
have a wide variety of armaments on them. The they're
going to have the ability to launch drones and perhaps
hopefully to be able to defend against drone swarms. They're

(39:07):
gonna have some laser weapons on them and things like that.
And so Trump talks about a golden fleet, it's really
more like a golden fleece. He's going to fleece all
of us in America to pay for these luxury assets
of the military industrial complex. They're going to make a

(39:29):
lot of money out of this. Whether or not it's
going to be useful in a real war or not,
who knows. Hopefully we won't find out, but I'm afraid
with Trump we may. He keeps pushing this really hard.
Everybody is pushing towards war. These things are not going
to be ready for another couple of years. They're talking
about twenty to twenty five of them. We don't still
don't know the cost because who cares. This is the Pentagon,

(39:52):
this is Washington. Nobody cares about the cost. So Trump
made the announcement at marl Lago with warpet. No detail
been released about the substance of the announcement, but it's
going to be his focus on shipbuilding. You know, we
don't build many ships at all. The Chinese are building
a lot of ships, you know what. They use them
for commerce, not war. They're actually making money from their ships.

(40:19):
Ours are just a sunken cost and let's hope they're
not a sunken cost. Literally. Maybe he's looking at South
American gumboat dipomacy that he's going to run with this thing.
But here's his announcement that he made about the hopefully
these aren't buggy whips that they're building.

Speaker 15 (40:38):
As Commander in Chief, is my great honor to announce
that I have approved a plan for the Navy to
begin the construction of two brand new, very large, the
largest we've ever built battleships. You know, you used to
build the Iowa, the Missouri, the Wisconsin, the Alabama, and
man the others we had big battleships. These are bigger,

(41:02):
but they will have one hundred times the There'll be
one hundred times the force, the power, and there's never
been anything like these ships. These have been under design
consideration for.

Speaker 2 (41:17):
A long time. All I got was a Bucky charges.

Speaker 15 (41:20):
Sun in my first because they said, why aren't we
doing battleships like we used to? And the these are
the best in the world, will be the fastest, the biggest,
and by far one hundred times more powerful than any
battleship ever built. So if you look at the Iowa,
the Missouri, Wisconsin, Alabama, and others, but they were similar

(41:44):
in size. I'm a little bit bigger than the others,
but if you take the biggest one, it's one hundred
times more powerful. They're longer by a little.

Speaker 5 (41:55):
Bit, but the and they bigger. They're bigger ships, but
they hold a bunch. They use the word lethality battleships.

Speaker 2 (42:04):
He's been talking to higgsth hasn't a lethality vessel. You
noticed there was. He keeps mentioning the Iowa and some
of the others. The one that he didn't mention was
the Arizona, which is at the bottom of Pearl Harbor, unfortunately,
because it was a relic of World War One and

(42:25):
it was antiquated at the beginning of World War Two.
But that's Trump's mindset. He really doesn't understand what he's
just being told. They're lethal and all the rest of
this stuff, and you know when he says, it's one
hundred times faster. One of the interesting things was there
was an artcle where they went back and they had
about a dozen different times where Trump was bragging about
something or boasting about something that was an absolute lie,

(42:48):
and they said, he's got to tell we lies like this.
Many times he'll say ninety two bigger, ninety two percent
off or whatever. You know, it's he loves to use
the term nine when he's just making stuff up. And
so we look at this and we hope that it's
something that isn't going to bankrupt us. It's not going
to get a lot of people killed, because he is

(43:11):
adamantly determined as his warpeat to get us involved in
more and more wars. Well, the so called Trump class
ships are not really battleships. It's really more like a destroyer.
But it's really big. So that's why he's calling it
a battleship. I guess they have advanced capabilities like hypersonic missiles, railguns,

(43:33):
high powered lasers, nuclear armed sea launched cruise missiles. Now,
the problem is is that we don't have hypersonic missiles.
You got a ship to put them on, but they
have yet to get them working. The Russians have them,
the Chinese have them. We're picking fights with them, but
we don't have any hypersonic missiles and we don't have

(43:55):
any defenses against them either. And so as far as
railguns go to my and high powered lasers, there have
been some tests of some of those things. I don't
know if they've deployed any of them, if they've gone
them working. I know they don't have hypersonic missiles yet,
so there's a lot of fantasy here. They're designed to
be thirty or four thousand plus tons larger than current destroyers,

(44:19):
will incorporate modern weapon systems such as vertical launch system
cells for hypersonic and CPS missiles, as well as rail
gun like gun. So they're throwing the kitchen sink into
all of this. It's going to be very expensive, it's
going to be a lot of complexity and a lot

(44:40):
of concentration of firepower into one thing, and in an
environment where people have drone swarms and hypersonic missiles, I
don't know that that makes much sense. It makes sense
for the military and dust so complex to make money
off of it. I don't know if it makes much
sense in a war situation. The term battleship is the

(45:02):
US has not built such vessels since the nineteen nineties.
Actually earlier than that, I guess the nineteen nineties are
talking about the refitting of some of those older battleships.
The role of the large gun armed ships has diminished
with the rise of aircraft carriers and long range missiles.
You don't really need them, but we'll see what happens

(45:25):
with it. Again, it's going to be two and a
half years before they get these things on board. How
many wars will we have in two and a half
years before they get these things on board. Well, we're
going to take a quick break and we're going to
be right back. Folks, stay with us.

Speaker 1 (46:42):
You're listening to the David Night Show. You're listening to

(48:31):
the David Knight Show.

Speaker 14 (48:35):
Here News now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (48:44):
Come back, and we have some comments about that that
we'll have Donald Trump himself read it to us. Go ahead, Trump, all.

Speaker 5 (48:51):
Real.

Speaker 15 (48:52):
Jason Barker says, drone carriers will be the new.

Speaker 2 (48:55):
Thing, absolutely right. Yeah, that's uh, it's amazing to me.
How stuck in the past these people are, you know,
go back and his whole mindset is to build a battleship.
Fortunately it's not quite that bad, but still large, complex,
incredibly expensive things are It's this calcified, antiquated empire. Thinking

(49:23):
that Trump embodies it truly is amazing. You're right, Jason,
And again Jason Knights of the Storm check him out.
And we got another comment here.

Speaker 15 (49:37):
Wally Wallers says, my three hundred dollars drone sunk your battleship.

Speaker 2 (49:44):
Yeah, that wasn't in the game. I guess that heg
Seth and Trump are playing at mar Lago on that
board game. They don't have drones. I guess. I don't know,
but that's that's really what's going to happen pretty much. Yeah,
Alien poop Evolution has got a good comment a.

Speaker 15 (49:57):
And poop Evolution says, drones, CA barriers, tractor trailers like
I robot open up and a swarm flies out.

Speaker 2 (50:05):
Yeah, we've actually seen that. Do you remember the big
attack on Russia that took out so many of their
very large, expensive planes as they were parked of the airport.
How'd they do that? Well, they smuggled in a tractor trailer.
The top part of the trailer opened up and these
drones come out and blow up about five or six

(50:26):
of these very very expensive planes. That is, you know,
this kind of warfare. They still haven't figured this out,
even though they've been watching what's going on. Have they
been watching what's going on with Ukraine and Russia. It's
pretty amazing, But yeah, it really is outdated, this whole
mindset of this stuff, and we don't want to have

(50:46):
an empire anyway. Maybe it'll be taken away that way,
Go ahead, Lance, we got something else from Trump here.

Speaker 15 (50:54):
Assyrian girl says Trump's big, beautiful battleships remind me of
the biggest ship ever, both host of the Titanic. So
will he have written on the side even God can't
sink these ships.

Speaker 2 (51:06):
Yeah that's a good comment. I like that. But we
should call these Titanic class. This is the biggest ever.
They're unsinkable. They're impervious to anything. It's that kind of
arrogance and stupidity, And it's that kind of arrogance and
stupidity that gets us under one war after the other.

Speaker 6 (51:23):
And I've still got the previous comment from before.

Speaker 5 (51:26):
Yeah, go ahead, Shellye says they love Pottersville.

Speaker 2 (51:31):
That's right, Yeah, yeah, the National Review, Ben Shapiro, they
love that. That's where they hang out. Well, major signs
of another coming Dark Age collapsing the West could make
history repeat itself. The problem is this is from Victor
Davis Hanson, and he really doesn't have a clue about
the Fourth Turning. He doesn't look at this as a

(51:55):
generational thing. He sees the corruption, he sees all the
signs there. But he goes back and he looks at
a couple of major collapses, or we went into the
Dark Ages and when Greek civilization collapsed eighth century BC.
And then he talks about when we went into the
Dark Ages after the collapse of the Roman Empire. But

(52:18):
that's not what we're looking at here. This cycle is
an eighty year cycle. Yeah, maybe it'll be a very
big cycle, a very big collapse. I've been saying for
the longest time. I think this fourth turning that we're
right at the tail end of. And I guess who's
going to be at the helm as we go into
this storm. Donald Trump. Yeah, you talk about a Titanic

(52:38):
It is a Titanic type of problem. And he's rearranging
the deck chairs. He and the Republican Party very busy
rearranging the deck chairs. Aren't they on this Titanic voyage?
We're on there with them. But yeah, the cycle is
about every eighty years. And as I said, you know,
when we look at the previous ones prior to this,
we had the Great Depression of World War two, that

(52:59):
we had Civil War. Before that, we had the American
Revolutionary War. And I've said for the longest time, I
think this is going to be a combination of the three,
and it will be global. So it'll be a depression,
it'll be World war, it'll be civil war, it'll be
a revolutionary war. We're going to see this in a
lot of different ways, and we're having a lot of

(53:19):
people talking about this. At European Outlet, a guy by
the name of Ralph Schulhammer said the EU could be
gone in four years. A revolutionary eruption is coming. A
lot of people are seeing this interesting. And as I said,
for the longest time, everybody uses a generational perspective. They

(53:43):
even use the terms that Strauss and How came up
with millennials and so forth, but they will not talk
about the Fourth turning. Way is that they know precisely
what is happening. They even talk about it in terms
of the timing. Here's this guy saying, well, four years,
so when is that nine? Twenty thirty. This has been
what they've been talking about now for quite some time.

(54:05):
For over ten years, they've been talking about this deadline,
which coincides with what Strauss and House said about the
Fourth turning back in early nineties when they were talking
about this generational view of history. So yeah, twenty twenty nine,
twenty thirty, the fourth turning, he says, in nineteen eighty eight,
if you'd told anyone that the Soviet Union would cease
to exist just four years later, you would have been

(54:28):
dismissed as a crank. The institutions looked solid, the bureaucracy
was entrenched, and the power was absolute. Yet by nineteen
ninety two it was history. Well, he sees this in
the EU where he lives. I see it in the
American Empire. You know, whenever you look at these institutions,

(54:48):
they may look solid. It might be like the two
hundred year old tree that you see and you've been
used to seeing it. It looks gigantic, it looks very solid,
and yet it's all hollow it out and dead on
the inside, chewed out by insects, and the first time
a stiff breeze comes along, it just collapses. That's what

(55:08):
we're going to see. I think with both America and
with the EU, European politicians and Brussels, Berlin and Paris
suffer from the same dangerous optimism. They believe they're so
safely ensconced in their institutional frameworks that public anger can
never truly throw them out of the saddle. But looking
at the trajectory of the European Union, I believe we're
close to a revolutionary moment, closer to it than the

(55:31):
elites dare to imagine. We often hear comparisons to the
nineteen thirties, to Munich to nineteen thirty eight, but this
is the wrong history. If you want to understand Europe's
current predicament, look instead to France in seventeen eighty eight,
or Russia in nineteen seventeen. And again understand that at
this point in time, you know, all these different countries

(55:54):
had their their own cycle and so forth. So you
look at russiaeen seventeen, and then it collapsed seventy two
years later nineteen eighty nine, and so it does follow
like four generational cycles. But now what has happened is
that everybody is kind of on the same cycle. Consider

(56:17):
the French Revolution one of the primary drivers. It's monarchies
fiscal collapse accelerated by the financing of the American Revolutionary War. Morally,
supporting American independence was a justifiable cause, but from a
pragmatic standpoint, it bankrupted the state, It failed to bring
the expected economic benefits, and it created the conditions for

(56:38):
the monarchy's overthrow. Europe is walking the same path. In Ukraine.
We see leaders like former Finnish Prime Minister Sana Myron
or Ursula fond of lying, making great moral statements insisting
that Russia must be entirely pushed out of Ukrainian territory.
But there is a massive gap between this rhetoric and

(57:01):
political reality. You can write any twenty eight point piece
plan that you like, But the reality is Russia, China
and Iran are out producing NATO in a war of attrition, steel, drones, ammunition.
In international politics, power is the main currency, and right
now Moscow has the leverage. The idea that aggressive powers

(57:24):
are never rewarded is a nice bedtime story, but history,
whether you're talking about Frederic the Great or the Prussian
invasion of France in eighteen seventy one, tells us otherwise.
By overextending ourselves financially and military for militarily for a
conflict that we cannot sustain, European governments are delegitimizing themselves

(57:45):
at home. You can't demand that your citizens sacrifice their
living standards for war in the don Bass when they're
worried about the cost of heeding their homes. This brings
us to the second pillar of Europe's decline, style prioritization
of ideology over economic reality. Nowhere is this clearer than

(58:06):
in our energy policy in Europe. We were promised that
the green transition would trigger a new economic miracle, and
of course we all know that it would have taken
a miracle in order to actually do that. To do
something about this mcguffin lie that they had put out there.
We all know it was a grift. Instead, we have

(58:27):
stagnation and contraction. We are shutting down blast furnaces, shutting
down aluminum smelters, and the name is saving the planet.
While our geopolitical rivals expand theirs, and while China builds
more and more coal powered plants, and America is so
rich in coal, we don't need to go abroad having

(58:49):
wars for oil. We could power most of the things
that we need with coal our grid, and we could
be able to buy if we weren't belligerent, we could
still get access to the oil. We have a lot
of oil ourselves. To put it cynically, you can go
green or you can go to war, but you can't
do both. You can't fight a war of attrition if

(59:12):
you have de industrialized your economy in order to satisfy
an environmentalist religion. Because that's exactly what it is. It's
a religion that treats empirical evidence and data as heresy. Yeah,
we don't want to show you our data. We're going
to be the high priests of science. I am science,

(59:34):
obey me. It is complete madness. We have created a
regulatory regime. We're saving a single salmon or protecting a
nesting site takes precedence over national security and economic viability.
Then there is the cultural dimission dimension. There's a fantasy
in Washington, in London that Germany can simply flick a

(59:55):
switch and become a military power again. But you can't
spend in forty years teaching your youth that nationalism is evil,
that patriotism is suspect, that the military is bad, and
then expect them to suddenly rush to the recruitment office.
Young German men are asking a very logical question. You

(01:00:16):
want us to pay high taxes to support a migration
policy that imports young men from Syria to live on welfare,
and then you want to conscript us to fight a
Russian tank in Eastern Europe. The social contract is broken.
The Green Party, which was once a pacifist party, are
now the loudest militarists. That's right. It's absolutely amazing when

(01:00:42):
you look at these different groups. Do we saw have
that clip of the Christmas market here? I don't think
we do. Yeah we do.

Speaker 6 (01:00:51):
Yeah, it's low on.

Speaker 2 (01:00:53):
The here it is. Yeah. If the problem is islamophobia,
why do we need security barriers outside of Christmas market
shet not outside of mosques. The mosques are not being
attacked by people, but the Christmas markets are. That should
tell you everything this time of year. Absolutely so they
feel it when they visit a Christmas market and they

(01:01:15):
see armed military guards next to the wine stand. If
these grievances are not addressed, the system will break. A
revolution doesn't always mean pitchforks in the streets. It can
happen at the ballot box. But if the establishment tries
to ban parties, which they're doing in Germany and in
France and other places, since their speech with quote unquote

(01:01:36):
democracy shields and prevent political chains, they only make the
eventual eruption more violent. And so here's an example of
what the elites are focused on. In the UK. They've
got a problem. They need to have more women as policemen.
They say, yeah, that's their problem, and they need to

(01:01:59):
not only have more women, they need to have more
Muslim women. Problem is the Muslim women wear these head
scarves and things like that to cover up their hair,
and it makes them vulnerable. You know, you can grab
those scarves and you can jerk their neck around, you
can choke them. You can throw them to the ground
with those scarves. So they've been working for a while

(01:02:19):
to try to figure out how to By the way,
we don't have that club anymore. We played it a
couple of months ago. It was a pub and there
were these two women police officers and there was this
one guy that was unruly, and he wasn't even really
making an effort. I mean, just like, get off of me,
you know, the type of thing. They could not subdue

(01:02:40):
this guy. Finally, a big guy goes over and throws
them to the ground.

Speaker 6 (01:02:43):
I don't think tactical jobs are really going to fix
the problem the female cops face of being not all
that intimidating in a fight.

Speaker 2 (01:02:51):
That's right, that's right. So here we are the solution
to all this. We've got to have more Muslim women
as police officers, so let's give them magnetic jobs. Okay.
The blue light jjab is designed to prevent strangulation and
to protect the modesty of female officers who wear the
religious headwear. The hijab has already been given to every

(01:03:13):
eligible officer in Leicestershire Police Force, and other forces are
now placing orders, as well as other emergency service workers
such as paramedics and NHS employees. The jjab consists of
two pieces of fabric attached by a magnetized quick release
class and is designed to detach from the head easily

(01:03:33):
during a confrontation. And so they may actually find another
market in this for women who are not police officers
but are Muslim and they have a abuse of husbands
and other men. They're kind of known for abuse of
their women.

Speaker 6 (01:03:48):
Just what the modern Muslim woman needs.

Speaker 2 (01:03:51):
A breakaway j jab. There you go. They aim to
protect Muslim women from assault and having their headwear pulled
over their eyes as a distraction. So yeah, I think
this is a They've got a large market for this.
It was actually designed by a detective sergeant who was
the first one to come up with the idea. He
himself is Muslim. He was the founder of the Leicestershire

(01:04:13):
Police Association of Muslim Police. He said, it's actually taken
years to develop it properly. We completed the combat trials
at Enderby with female officers wearing it and it held up.
The bottom part was able to detach and the officer
is able to keep her dignity well, keep your keeper,

(01:04:35):
be able to win the battle.

Speaker 6 (01:04:37):
It took them years to develop a cloth that is
magnetic that goes around their hair.

Speaker 2 (01:04:42):
Yeah, I know. Yeah, we're doomed, aren't we. It's amazing.
Uh So, the first time ever we have set up
manufacturing in the UK for this. So they may have
shut their steel plants down and there they're coal fired
energy plants, but they're going to be able to make
magnetic careway jobs.

Speaker 6 (01:05:00):
They're leading the world in the manufacture of tactical jobs.

Speaker 2 (01:05:04):
That's right. Maybe they want find an export market forward
or something. Right, It's amazing to think that after three
years of research and development, we have got the design
of this right and we're taking it forward together. It's
a great product, is safe, and it protects Muslim women's dignity.

(01:05:25):
Well maybe you might want to protect their dignity and
by not putting them in a job that they really
can't do, but this is their priority.

Speaker 6 (01:05:32):
It protects their dignity by you know, allowing us to
keep them.

Speaker 2 (01:05:36):
Yeah in this. You know. The one thing is that
we can thank the trainees for, and that is putting
a lie to the idea that women are going to
be able to compete with men in some kind of
a physical activity like this. What they need is they
need to train these women if they're going to put

(01:05:57):
them in that situation. I would never put a woman
in physical situation because we don't want am using lethal
force as a first resort. And that really is the
key here. I remember years ago they had a couple
of young, very fit guys who were Scandinavian police officers.
I don't remember which country it was with, Sweden or Orway,

(01:06:17):
Finland or whatever. They were in New York City. Something
happened on a subway and these guys basically unarmed because
they're traveling as tourists. They didn't have to use weapons
or anything. They didn't have to shoot anybody, didn't have
to taze or anybody. They didn't have to handcuff anybody.
What these two guys did was they broke up these
thugs and basically toinament a pretzel on the floor of

(01:06:42):
the subway train and waited until the police got there
to arrest them. And they didn't even break a sweat
doing it. I mean, they were almost kind of laughing
when the cops got there because it wasn't difficult for them.
That's what you want to be able to do. With
the police. You want to be able to get a
violent situation on control without escalating it, without killing somebody.

(01:07:04):
You know, firearms are something that elderly people and women
need to really think about because it may not save you,
but it does level the playing field in a way
that just trying to come in and you know, fight
by hand is not going to do. As a matter
of fact, as we look at the way that they
are committing suicide. A study shows coal's importance to electric affordability.

(01:07:28):
Who knew? The group I was working with about twelve
years ago knew and talking about it all the time.
We always knew this. So they got a new study
estimate the cost of repair replacing coal plants with renewable
power sources. We should have paid attention to this thing
decades ago because we already knew all this. We didn't

(01:07:51):
need the study. But what they did in the study
was they looked at the annual cost of replacing coal
power plants. They well, if we replace them with for example,
renewable sources of electricity is solar alone, or if we
add in the very expensive battery energy storage systems b

(01:08:12):
EESS BESS or natural gas, or we use wind alone,
or we use wind that is backed up by BESS
or backed up by natural gas. So I looked at
all those and they still found that the by far
and away the best solution economically and for reliability was coal.

(01:08:35):
So ask Santa for a lump of colon your stocking
this year. That's really what you want. Electricity prices for residential, commercial, industrial,
and transportation sectors averaged just under seven percent increase year
to year. But this is about to go vertical because

(01:08:55):
of the AI data centers they are going to. AI
is going to affect us. Like I said before, this
is the threat to electricity availability and affordability. This is
the threat coming from the technocracy coming from the right,
if you will, as opposed to the green attack that

(01:09:16):
was coming from the left. They're both going to have
the same end result here. So it varies from state
to state. But the thing that's going to be driving
us is the data centers and AI, as well as
government taxes, state and local taxes and that type of thing.
They said almost forty two gigawatts of coal fired generation,

(01:09:38):
that's forty six plants. Seventy nine generating units have retired
or have announced plans to retire throughout twenty twenty five
and twenty twenty eight. So they are building more power
plants than this and China on a regular basis because

(01:09:59):
they're going to be all the manufacturing. It's just a given.
This is the biggest part of the China price, and
it used to not even be the part of the
China price. So West Virginia alone really is not closing
because they have a lot of coal. And you know,
when I went to Texas back in twenty twelve, they

(01:10:22):
were closing coal powered plants left and right, and oil
powered plants, and they were building this big boondoggle of
wind power that took us all down in twenty twenty
one when they froze up. The study estimates that continuing
to operate retiring coal plants rather than building new renewable

(01:10:43):
power sources could save at least three billion dollars and
as much as four billion dollars per year. Yeah, but
who cares. That's chump change? Is that it's.

Speaker 6 (01:10:54):
Trump's changed fifty four billion dollars per year?

Speaker 2 (01:10:56):
Oh yeah, I'm sorry, fifty four billion per year. Anywhere
from three to fifty four billion, I wrote over that,
So thank you for correcting me, the huge cost savings
do not even quantify the loss of reliability attributes that
coal provides and renewables do not. See renewables that's a
good name for them, because they don't last forever. You've

(01:11:17):
got to constantly renew these things as well. You know,
the solar panels as well as the windmills themselves, they
wear out, they have to be replaced, so you constantly
have to renew them. Policymakers need to understand that an
energy strategy that includes coal as an irreplaceable part of
our electricity mix is crucial to maintaining affordable and electricity

(01:11:42):
prices and reliability on our grid. And the fact that
they want to put these things down tells you what
their religenda is. Well, there's a lot of concern that
as they roll out these robots that again it's the
fear mongering coming from the UK, coming from a tabloid

(01:12:02):
in the UK. The sun Ai robot, Chinese humanoid robots
could be a trojan horse inside the West could be
turned against their masters by shi jing Ping. Again, instead
of Ming the Merciless, we have shujing Ping the Merciless.
And there's a video that you're looking at right there.

(01:12:22):
That comes from China. They're showing their army of robots
all moving together.

Speaker 6 (01:12:27):
Terra cotta army, except a lot more intimidating because these
ones actually do move.

Speaker 2 (01:12:33):
That's right. Yeah, they've been doing this kind of thing
for a while, except now they can they're not made
of clay.

Speaker 6 (01:12:39):
The Chinese have the most experience in creating artificial.

Speaker 2 (01:12:43):
Armies, and instead of ming the Merciless from Flash Gordon,
we have Shijing ping the Merciless because flip a switch
and make this army of robots start to attack people. Well,
the reality is is that you know that can be
the case. They had some researchers, some white hat hackers
who flipped one robot and then he's communicating with other

(01:13:06):
robots and flipped a whole bunch of them and started
doing destructive things, dangerous things, but they don't mention anywhere
in this article. Autonomous cars. Autonomous cars are much more
dangerous than the robots because they're much larger. They can
block intersections, as we saw in San Francisco when they

(01:13:27):
freak out. If somebody were to weaponize these things and
a robopocalypse, that was a Michael Crichton thing. Wasn't robo
Apocalypse or was that somebody else?

Speaker 6 (01:13:37):
I don't think it doesn't sound familiar.

Speaker 2 (01:13:40):
Okay, well maybe somebody else. Somebody wrote a book called
robo Apocalypse and it was that whole type of sci
fi scenario. So it's nothing new. But if you're going
to make some of these autonomous moving things into a weapon,
that would be the thing that you'd want to do
it with with a car because they have so much capability.

(01:14:02):
As a matter of fact, we just had another report
of a Tesla cyber truck and it was some young
kids who were driving it. They had an accident. They
got it wedged between a retaining wall and a tree,
and when it compromised the battery, it burst into flames.
People ran over and they couldn't get the door open,

(01:14:24):
right because the door is under electronic control, and so
people rushed over trying to get them out, but with
the extra armoring and everything they have on the cyber truck,
they couldn't get them out. Watched them burn to death
inside the truck. So, yeah, you take these electric cars,
they're much more liable to burst into flames. I remember
when Michael Hastings was assassinated and I am absolutely convinced

(01:14:48):
that he was assassinated. I looked at that situation. He
goes flying by like one hundred and ten miles an
hour in the middle of the night. You know, some
cameras caught him, and they didn't see the explosion. But
what happened was the engine blew up and went down
the road in the direction that he was going, and
then his car veered off to the side and had

(01:15:10):
a frontal collision with a tree. And yet it burst
into flames. And I said, I have questions about that
because I went back and I looked at a lot
of car crashes, you know, Nascar crashes and things like
that at high speed, and one of the ones that
I played when I was talking to people about, I said,

(01:15:31):
look at this over and over again. This is a
car race. Wasn't Nascar, I think it was. It was
a Formula one or something. They go around this curve
and there was something slick there, and one car after
the other goes around the curve, loses control and goes
spinning out and crashes into a wall. And you know,

(01:15:51):
several of them do that, and then another one comes along.
It spins out and it's the wall back in first
where the gas tank is, and then it burst into
flames immediately, And I said, it seems to me like,
you know, this thing blew up all it was going
down the road, Because I don't see how if they're
going to tell us that this thing caught fire and
ejected the engine when it hit that tree. An engine's

(01:16:14):
not going to get ejected like that from a frontal collision.
It's going to be pushed into the car. It's certainly
not going to be ejected. There's certainly not going to
be ejected at a right angle to the collision by
any of that at all. But when you look at
the electric cars, the reason I bring this up, You
look at the electric cars and they've got batteries underneath

(01:16:36):
the entire floor platform. It can get compromised in any
of those areas and burst into flames and then it
becomes a runaway fire. So yeah, it's the robot cars
that you need to worry about that are going to
be doing this. So exploiting the flaw within the robots
ai system, Beijing could hijack hundreds of these household robots

(01:16:58):
to launch an attack on the US. It is feared, well, again,
I just put this in the category of complex infrastructure vulnerability,
just another one of those. But I think the real
issue is the cars. They're trying to make an issue
by saying, well, once they deploy them into medical and
elderly care, I just don't think that that is the

(01:17:22):
orientation of the Chinese right now, to say, well, let's
go kill all the people in the old homes. That's
something that Quoma looks at. That's not something that Shijiping
looks at. That's something that they're trying to do in
order to save on their pension plans. That's what's really
happening in twenty twenty. But they're looking at something where
they want to take down the entire infrastructure. And that

(01:17:45):
kind of asymmetric warfare is something that we could expect
to see much more so than the direct frontal assaults.
Of course, the same thing. Both those things happen. And
when you look at what is happening with Russia and
you how can anybody miss the drone attacks that each
of them are doing on each other's infrastructure, very vulnerable

(01:18:08):
targets like oil refineries. I mean, he doesn't take much
in terms of a drone explosion to blow up an
oil refinery. The report also claims that the emphatic capabilities
of social robots might in the future be abused by
criminal and terrorist actors for a variety of malicious activities. Again,

(01:18:29):
cars are even more dangerous and also hackable. Meanwhile, HHS
is going to prohibit hospitals from performing sex change surgery
on kids. This is long overdue and I'm glad that
RFK Junior is doing this, and kudos to him for
doing that if he actually gets this through. So they're

(01:18:51):
going to stop them from mutilating and sterilizing children. And
that's why we're talking about the other day not consent
to sex. Even if these kids were lying about their
age and wanted to do this, that they don't have
the judgment to do that. There's other things that are happening,

(01:19:11):
and that's why we oppose the mutilation the sterilization of children.
That's why we oppose abortions for children, which Planned Parenthood
has done for a very long time. You would have
kids who would come in that would be under age,
that would be pregnant obviously the result of statutory rape,
who are not there was a physical rape against their

(01:19:31):
will or not, it was still statutory rape because they
don't have the maturity to make those kinds of decisions.
And so this is something that should have been done
a very long time ago, and now they're going to
have some ethical penalties with this try to stop it.
But it really is something that should have been stopped
and could have been stopped a long time ago at

(01:19:53):
the state level. And yet you know this type of
action that's coming. Hoefully it'll happen. But it's interesting to
see that mammet oz doctor oz He was now head
of CMS. I remember CMS is where they write the checks. Basically,
CMS was what Trump used to reward hospitals. They point

(01:20:17):
the finger at somebody and say you got COVID, they
get a nine thousand dollars bonus. They put them on
a ventilator, you get what was it? They get thirteen
thousand dollars. They put him on a ventilator, you get
thirty nine thousand. So just those two things fifty two
thousand dollars and a ventilator only cost fifty thousand dollars.
Then they would also get a twenty percent bonus on

(01:20:38):
everything they did to the patient while they were there.
So that was all being run through CMS. During the
Trump administration. So now you got doctor Oz there, and
doctor Oz has got comments about how he's fully on
board with stopping the gender mutilation and sterilization of children.
And yet doctor Oz was one of these people who

(01:21:00):
was pushing it from the very beginning, you know, like
Trump was pushing it for his for his beauty contests.
He wanted to have a trainee guy for his beauty contests.
He had Michael Flynn who was pushing a transgender seal
holding him up as an example to everybody else on
the second Pride Month celebration of the Pentagon back in

(01:21:22):
what was it, twenty fourteen or fifteen that Flynn was
doing that. And so all these guys who were some
of the early adopters and the pushers of this stuff
are now starting to back against it. Well, I hope
that it's sincere. I just don't see them coming up
with the rationale for why they have changed or any

(01:21:44):
regret for what they pushed on people. Candy told his audience,
which included Congress members and several attorneys general, that he
signed a declaration stating that healthcare practitioners who perform sex
rejecting procedures on minors would be deemed out of compliance
with professionally recognize standards of healthcare. So what does that mean?

(01:22:05):
Is that an attack on their license? I mean they
came after people who gave people hydroxy corquin or I
remectin in twenty twenty. Well, they do that for these
people who are doing it. I don't know that there's
really a penalty for this. I'm glad they're talking about this,
but I don't really know what difference it's going to make. Well,

(01:22:25):
let's get some more comments here from Trump Lance.

Speaker 6 (01:22:28):
Yeah, having little bit of technical difficulties getting new comments,
but I've got a few queued up.

Speaker 16 (01:22:34):
Oh okay, can we just scroll through these to find
where we left off.

Speaker 2 (01:22:40):
Yeah, that's good. I can read them. If you don't have.

Speaker 6 (01:22:44):
Them, I'll have it in just one sec.

Speaker 2 (01:22:47):
Sorry, Okay, that's right.

Speaker 6 (01:22:51):
Let's see what's the first one octave?

Speaker 2 (01:22:57):
Well, how do we take a break and we'll come
back in and we'll get those comments read by Donald
Trump and we'll get this together. This is a very
complicated things. Do he's got money? Okay, go ahead.

Speaker 5 (01:23:13):
Gov.

Speaker 15 (01:23:13):
Is not there to see you into stable homes. It
is to see you lose your home.

Speaker 5 (01:23:18):
And become a forever debtor.

Speaker 2 (01:23:20):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, and he's making sure that we're
going to be forever debtors with his is a thirty
eight trillion now or thirty nine trillion, we're going to
quickly get to forty trillion. Maybe we'll get to forty
five trillion. Then everybody can give new meaning to all
their forty five hats that they've got. Yeah.

Speaker 15 (01:23:37):
Go Ahead says we haven't even started with fifty ir
mortgages and hyperinflation yet.

Speaker 2 (01:23:45):
That's year Donald, fifty year mortgages and hyper inflation. That's right,
that's on the way. That's on the way.

Speaker 15 (01:23:54):
A Syrian girl says the Pentagon should see these huge
ships is real big target for missiles and drones, not
protection for America.

Speaker 2 (01:24:03):
I agree, I agree. Yeah. The way you protect America
is you stop these wars of aggression, stop dragging us
into every conflict on the planet, and stop creating conflicts
where there is none.

Speaker 15 (01:24:14):
Go Ahead, Wackjaw says, no worries, robots will build the
big boats.

Speaker 5 (01:24:19):
No more shipyards.

Speaker 2 (01:24:21):
That's right. Yeah, we're not really building many ships at all.
It's the Chinese are doing it because they can make money.
We just lose money when we build these things. Go ahead.

Speaker 15 (01:24:32):
KWD sixty eight says, whatever the ships will be, they
will be the best.

Speaker 2 (01:24:39):
They'll be the best. That's right, Donald, You got that right.
They're gonna be huge. They're gonna be ninety two percent
better than anything else that's out there as well. Yeah.

Speaker 15 (01:24:46):
WUD sixty eight says Trump class will he unsinkable?

Speaker 5 (01:24:50):
Too too much hot air?

Speaker 2 (01:24:52):
That's right, it's a combination.

Speaker 15 (01:24:56):
Blamdybrew twenty twenty nine says how many illegals will it
take to build a Trump destroyer?

Speaker 2 (01:25:05):
Well, you know, they brought the cattle with him, so
they'll have plenty to eat. According to Bessett, that's what's
the problem with the cattle industry. All these illego We're
going to brought their cattle across the border with them. Yeah,
go ahead.

Speaker 15 (01:25:17):
Radis bro says, yes, drone carriers China already building them.

Speaker 2 (01:25:23):
Mm hmmm, yep. Real.

Speaker 15 (01:25:27):
Jason Jason Barker says that was creepy hearing my name
read by dj T lol.

Speaker 2 (01:25:35):
If he called you out? How about that? Yeah, that's
now you know what it feels like for all the
people who work for him. That he then turns against
and he calls out their name after lavishing them, flattering
them over the top, then he comes after them with
every kind of petty criticism that he can imagine. That's
not true.

Speaker 6 (01:25:53):
Go ahead, that was it for the ones that I've got.

Speaker 2 (01:25:56):
Okay, Radis bro says, Yes, drone carriers already built and
China real. Jason Barker also says, my concern is they're
going to sink a carrier as a false flag to
fast track the new fleet. I've been saying this for
quite a while now. Well, but it's amazing when you
look at carriers because even before the hypersonic missiles, they
were again a high value target. You create these massive, complex,

(01:26:23):
centralized systems, and a carrier group is a good example
of that. So you have the carrier in the center
of it, and you have all these different layers of
defense all around, and all these other ships that are
around it to protect it. Truly is amazing and again
a hallmark of an aging empire, aging and its perspective

(01:26:45):
of many things. Yeah, m Sellar's Trump voice reading my
truth bombs is confusing my brain. Real, Jason Barker says,
the Army of twenty thirty plans to have autonomous drone swarms.
So imagine the Navy is looking at the same thing,
one of the things, and you know, Lance turned me
onto this Daniel Swures book. Was it killed decision? Was

(01:27:08):
that the one yeah swarm? That is a really interesting book.
First of all, it came out quite some time ago,
so he wore games all this stuff out and so
to give them the spoiler alert, that's their spoiler alert.
The whole thing was they start having all these attacks
by drones and the drone swarms. They had a conflation

(01:27:32):
of people who are making the drones as well as
some entomologists, and so they're working in terms of kind
of creating a way of how they could communicate with
each other. And they went with kind of an insect
model where there was this kind of scent signal that
they would use, and they the people who were doing this,
and they started doing a lot of attacks on their

(01:27:53):
own people that were false flag attacks like you're saying, Jason,
And finally they make out you know, carriers all these
other things. And the whole point was that it was
a military industrial complex to start with. They wanted to
make all of these expensive, centralized complex systems obsolete, so

(01:28:15):
they could sell the new drone stuff and so that
was where the entire threat came from in the book,
but still a very interesting book, and it's still you.
Daniel Suarez does a great job with all this stuff.
We're gonna take a quick break, folks, and we will
be right back.

Speaker 11 (01:28:37):
Contous stern love religious remain processor us for remb processive,

(01:30:34):
My Christmas fos, the rent all of the world, Jesuss came.

Speaker 17 (01:30:49):
We're even take a photo on a phone. There is
machine learning in the background.

Speaker 10 (01:30:53):
Highest quality video capture ever in a smartphone.

Speaker 17 (01:30:56):
In the metaverse, we're going to need a I that
is builder on health and people navigate virtual worlds as
well as our physical world with augmented reality.

Speaker 18 (01:31:05):
Augmented reality is a profound technology.

Speaker 17 (01:31:08):
Includes like your position in three D space, your your
body language, facial gestures.

Speaker 18 (01:31:13):
And we invented new intimate ways to connect and communicate
directly from your risk.

Speaker 17 (01:31:21):
Everything from virtual reality to designing our own data centers.

Speaker 13 (01:31:25):
Describing what's coming even it's just so different in you.
I've been in this infrastructure business for three decades.

Speaker 5 (01:31:31):
No one has ever seen industry.

Speaker 17 (01:31:33):
Yeah, and now I expect that these trends will only
increase in the future.

Speaker 19 (01:31:38):
And in the last few months we launched voice and
vision capabilities so that chat GPT can now see here
and speak courts up to one hundred and twenty eight
thousand tokens of contexts. That's three hundred pages of a
standard book.

Speaker 17 (01:31:55):
That's all AI generated. Actually, let's add some alto do
us fuss.

Speaker 2 (01:32:04):
All right, break free of the technocratic night mayor this
Christmas and go back to basics where the David Knight
Show bookmark and notebook. This high quality and boss metal
bookmark with a full color design on the back is
guaranteed to be cross compatible with all physical books, and
the beautiful foul leather notebook is one hundred percent hacking proof.

(01:32:24):
An ideal gift for fans of The David Knight Show
or anyone looking to start a journaling or prayer journal habit.
No bells, no whistles, just pen and paper. Available at
Davidnight dot News. Merry Christmas, and again we're getting so

(01:32:45):
close to Christmas. You might be able to get this.
I don't know, maybe if you don't live too far
from Tennessee, might be able to get this by Christmas.
But Nevertheless, it's a great gift anyway. And I just
also remind you of Homestead Products Dot shop. They have
a all purpose seasoning blend that they had on sale
and they get is still on sale there, but now

(01:33:08):
it's the season to get some seasonings. I guess, always
a great place to shop. We recommend them highly. They
have very innovative products or I like that. But again,
if you want to excuse me, if you want to
get the bookmark and you want to get the journal,
that's there. We have them all set up and ready

(01:33:29):
to go. If you want to get them, we can
get them out today if you place the order today.

Speaker 6 (01:33:36):
I have a couple more comments.

Speaker 2 (01:33:38):
Okay, we got some more comments from the don go ahead,
let it lose Trump.

Speaker 6 (01:33:41):
Yeah, I've been a bit behind on the comments. So
here's one about the job.

Speaker 15 (01:33:47):
Payin mac says they hire many Muslims as police in MN.

Speaker 5 (01:33:52):
Are they using them to take over?

Speaker 15 (01:33:55):
Which makes the massive fraud in MN even more sickening?

Speaker 2 (01:33:59):
Yeah? Him as Trump speak for Minneapolis, Minnesota'm sorry, but
it's also Minneapolis and there. Yeah, that's true. Absolutely.

Speaker 15 (01:34:08):
The Jews says, now we've stolen three tankers of Venezuelan
oil to power the data banks.

Speaker 2 (01:34:16):
We're gonna take it. We gotta steal the will. A
lot of people pressed him, well, what are you going
to do with they will? We're going to keep it, yeah, yeah,
but what are you gonna do? Well, we're going to
keep it. Maybe you'll put it at mar Lago or something.
But no. They even said you're gonna put in the
strategic cruiser. Yeah, we might do that. He doesn't know
what he's going to do with it. It's just the
use of forces there. You know, we have the migrants

(01:34:39):
who are brought in as cheap labor. That's what the
Republicans were getting out of this. And I said all along,
they're going to continue to do this until the excuse me,
until the robots come in, and then these people are
going to be here without a job either. So not
just going to be Americans that are losing their jobs.

(01:35:01):
This is going to be the laborers that they're replacing
with us. But I guess they'll put them on welfare
and keep them here right so, at home depot, at
home depot they have deployed. This is the headline, Havana
style sonic weapons against day laborers I never believed that

(01:35:22):
that was a sonic weapon. I did believe it was
a targeted EMF weapon, And I believe that because the
only research that the government has done that they've told
us about in terms of EMF being weaponized against people
was work that was done by Alan Frye, and he

(01:35:42):
discovered by accident that you would hear like clicking noises
and things like that for certain frequencies, and they could
also produce a course of physical effects. And since that
was very similar to what people reporting with this Havana thing,
I never thought that that was a conspiracy theory. This
is the way mainstream media has portrayed it because the

(01:36:03):
government wants to portray that way. They don't want people
to be aware of the fact that the government is
using MF weapons against targeted individuals. They don't even want
you to think that's the thing with other governments. In
terms of the Havana weapon, it's really the freight effect.
And so now you have a situation where ice and
border patrol are running up on immigrants and home depot

(01:36:28):
parking lots or hanging out to get a day labor job.
And it's not just that. Now home depot in LA
has started using high pitched noise machines meant to show
away the day labors. And again that is something that
has been weaponized and they point that out here in
this article. It's been weaponized for crowd control for some time.

(01:36:51):
It's a very different thing than the Havanah situation. But
they're upset about it. And so you have a Hispanic
city councilwomen whose last name is Hernandez said, devices like
these are used as torture against our people. Again, the
tribalism that is a part of this mass migration movement

(01:37:15):
that they're putting it here. It's always about our people.
In the same way that when you had complaints about
police brutality or excessive use of police force, it was
always Black Lives Matter, right. They didn't want to bring
people together to push back against the use of these
different things. It was always about our people. Just tribalism,

(01:37:37):
which keeps anything from being done. That's why I said,
from the very beginning, I thought that the Black Lives
Matter was a way to try to shut down any
real reform of this. And if you look at it,
of course from a percentage standpoint, it was affecting black
people more but in terms of absolute numbers, it was
affecting white people more. So, why wouldn't you try to

(01:37:57):
bring the black people and the white people pulled together
to stop this thing. Instead, they choose to divide people
by tribalism, which is what this councilwoman is doing her
nand is our people, because that's how she gets her
votes and how she gets in office. So one guy
says he has to wear ear plugs to block the
excruciating noise, saying it penetrates your bones. Caltrans has begun

(01:38:21):
using the devices on this property as well, and they said, well,
this is public lan, Why is Caltrans doing this? This
is not even private property. And you know when I
saw this is before we saw the news about Barry
Manilow having cancer. I think it's lung cancer or something.
He's eighty two now, and they said he may not

(01:38:42):
sing again because of the lung cancer. But you know,
they still have his records and it's been used for
a very long time in some locations of private property
if they have a lot of young people who are
hanging out and loitering around property, and one way to
have them off they found was to start playing Berry

(01:39:03):
mental of music. I wonder if home Depot has tried
that it would it might work for hispanics as well.
Who knows, it might not just be a thing that
young people don't like. And actually, I'm not putting down
Berry Mental. I think he's a really good songwriter in
terms of jingles that he did. You know, he did
the like a good neighbor, state farm is there and

(01:39:25):
things like that. He had a lot. He's very successful
musically in terms of writing really catchy tunes that were
used for advertising. But yeah, not so much. You know,
if you talk about the Havana effect, you could do
that with Copa Cabana, right, just have those old records
of Barry. The noise machine evokes tales of a mythic

(01:39:47):
weapon supposedly used Havanah syndrome. Again, it's not a mythic
weapon at all. They want you to think that they
don't do that, but they do so. Asked for comments
about the sonic warfare, home Depot said the machines are
quote a safety initiative intended to deter and prevent illegal

(01:40:09):
overnight parking in the area. It has no connection to
any immigration enforcement. Well, you want to talk about weapons,
and you want to talk about things. They love to
tell us that certain weapons are mythic, so they're not
really weapons yet. Michael Jaden has told us for the
longest time. And again, he used to be a very
high ranking position and Peiser. He left Pfeiser, and he's

(01:40:33):
telling people the truth about these vaccines. And he was
doing it from the very beginning. You know, when you
had all these MAGA influencers like Megan Kelly and Tucker
Carlson and Ben Shapiro and Candice Owned when they were
not telling people, Michael Jaden was, and he is now
very adamant that these vaccines were designed as a weapon. Yeah,

(01:40:58):
the real monster. What's the jam folks.

Speaker 12 (01:41:01):
So now I'm going to turn to something that probably
of all the contributors, only I can tell you, and
that's the design of these molecular structures in the vaccine
injections has no other purpose but to injure and kill.
It's a huge claim. I've worked over thirty years with

(01:41:23):
colleagues in what's called rational drug design. Every synthetic medicine
that is something not purified from nature. It consists of
a series of atoms and molecules and formulations. Every single
component in that vial, as it turns out, has to
be chosen by a person. They're not there randomly. They're

(01:41:46):
not there as a natural product. Someone decided to put
them in there, and you put them in there because
you have particular objectives for the drug to be absorbed
quickly or slowly, for it to last a long time
or not, for it to go everywhere versus a certain
area of the body, and so on. When I looked
at these I declare them toxic by design. They are

(01:42:12):
intentionally harmful. Now, I think that fits perfectly with the
lie you've been told about a pandemic. There isn't one.
The purpose of the pandemic, I think, was to damage
the economy, to get us used to doing what we're
told under a mock emergency, and to roll up our
sleeves to receive these dangerous materials. And I believe in

(01:42:33):
in short, if you do nothing and don't speak up
and do what you're told, if you will lose your
freedom and then your life. I think some self appointed
group of very rich people have decided they don't like
eight billion people being on the planet and want it
to be a much smaller lumber. I don't have a
copy of the script, but I can deduce what they're doing.

(01:42:57):
So given the warning to you, I suggest that you
get weaving and start talking to anyone and everyone, and
do so relentlessly, because this is not going away. And
if we do not protest, if we do not refuse
and fight back, and we will lose freedom first and

(01:43:19):
then our lives.

Speaker 2 (01:43:22):
I agree with that, as some of these peopers A
half thousand percent. Now, I agree with that as much
as you possibly could. Michael Yaden was early and has
been right and consistent all along. He's telling you the truth.
They deliberately designed and put in this mRNA. They deliberately
use lipid nanoparticles. They deliberately pagolated this stuff knowing that

(01:43:45):
it would cause an allergic reaction with a lot of people.
And it did. And this is why it's so important.
And why when somebody tells you that it is sugar water,
who would that be? When they tell it was sugar
water and it's okay, Trump's there, It's all right, don't
worry about it. When they refused to confront Trump, when

(01:44:08):
they refused to connect his jab to the real issue,
when they say, well, COVID did this to us, No,
it was Trump's lockdown policies that did it to us,
and these are all part of the technocracy, is all
about population control. Yeah, we have really seen the script.
It's the Georgia guidestones. And even though Alex knew that,
he still pushed this lie on people. And now they're

(01:44:30):
pushing another lie to you, which is why I did
that Halloween report. The whole idea that's being pushed by
many people now, the lab leak idea is being pushed
by most of the people in the conservative MAGA talking
you know groups, these influencers. The same people who were

(01:44:52):
silent or lied to you about the vaccine are the
ones who are now pushing this lab leak stuff. Folks,
that's a cover up. There was never a pandemic that
came out of a lab. It was deliberately put in there.
It was bioengineered, it was a bioweapon, but it was
the vaccine that was the weapon. And as Michael Jayden said,
we need to tell everybody this far and why, because

(01:45:15):
it is all part of the plot to take away
everything from you. And as I've said, it is the
other shoe to drop from nine to eleven. They did
their first war game dark Winter two months before nine
to eleven and put all that stuff in in conjunction
with it. So it is really key and you should
listen to Michael Jaden. Please listen to him. We have

(01:45:36):
the acting director of SISA has failed a polygraph and
the career staff are now under investigation for giving it
to him. Isn't that interesting? This is again SISA is
one of these dark agencies. It has many different uses
that it can be put to. It's another one of

(01:45:58):
these massive expands bureaucracies, and people fought against it for
a very long time for good reason. When it first
came out, SISO was CISPA, and they took the pee out.
The pe was for protection. What it was there for
was to protect corporations from being sued when they turned
this information over to the government, and it was all

(01:46:21):
part of the government corporate partnership for censorship. And so
they tried SISPA several times in Europe. They had ACTA, PIPPA,
all these different ones, and Aaron Schwartz took the lead
of that and pushed very hard against that, and then
he was attacked by this woman who was her last

(01:46:44):
name was Orties. And while he was in prison awaiting trial.
The guy was a fighter. He supposedly committed suicide. I
don't believe that at all. As soon as he was
out of the way, and he had fought them over
and over again on these things, as soon as he
was out of the they were able to get SISSA through.
Now SISSA and this director, his name is mod who

(01:47:09):
got to Ookula. Sounds like a Christmas song from being
Crosby that I heard the other day. Anyway, that's how
they say, that's right, Merry Christmas to you and Hawaiian.
But this is Matt Who. Will just call him mad
Who because I can't tackle that last name there anyway.

(01:47:30):
He is now head of SISSA, and it's because of
Christine nom She had brought him in to run this
statewide it cyber security thing and South Dakota. His expertise
was he was just running it for a big insurance company,
and then she brought him in as kind of a
cyber security expert and then brought him along with her.

(01:47:53):
She became director of Homeland Security, put him in charge
of SISSA. His first a deputy there. Now he is
the acting director there and acting like he knows what's
going on. He's got a three billion dollar budget there.
Instead of taking ownership and saying, hey, I screwed up,
he's blaming other people and he's trying to get them fired.

(01:48:16):
And so what why was he taking a light detector test? Well,
it turns out that there were certain secure documents that
this Indian wanted to get to for some reason. He
was adamant that he needed to see these documents. And
in order to be cleared for getting these documents, the

(01:48:36):
procedure was that he had to take a polygraph. Now,
his predecessors, as the deputy directors and directors and stuff,
had chosen to forego all that stuff and there wasn't
they didn't feel that there was a need to review
these top secret documents. But Matt who was absolutely mad
about getting to these things, and he was determined that
he was going to see these things. And so he

(01:48:58):
decides that he's going to take the polygraph test. And
so he took the polygraph test and he failed the
polygraph test. And so now he is blaming the people
who gave him a polygraph test. And he's got people
who have been there for quite some time. He wants
to fire them. They said that he did not fail

(01:49:20):
a sanctioned polygraph test. What is the difference between a
sanctioned and an unsanctioned polygraph test? An unsanctioned polygraph test
was coordinated by the staff, and these people have now
been placed on administrative leave. Well, a sanctioned one would
be one that basically he would sign off on, except
that he set for this. It wasn't like they grabbed

(01:49:42):
this guy, man handled him into a chair, strapped him
down like he was Alex from Clockwork Orange and a
polygraph test. He wanted it, He set for it, he
volunteered for it. And now they're saying, what wasn't official?
You didn't have somebody sign off on this to it? It
was on sanctioned and he failed it. So he said,

(01:50:03):
we expect and require the highest standards of performance from
our employees. We hold them directly accountable to uphold all
policies and procedures. Got to muklah Madhu, let's just call him,
has the complete and full support of Secretary g. Nome
and has laser focused on returning the agency to its
statutory mission. When asked for clarification, is what is considered

(01:50:26):
to be an unsanctioned polygraph they said, Well, random bureaucrats
can't just order a polygraph. Polygraph orders have to come
from the leadership who have the authority to order them.
If this guy wanted it in order to get documents,
if he sat for it, wouldn't you say that that
is coming from leadership? And yet that's their excuse. Again

(01:50:47):
the Trump administration coming up with the most absurd lies,
nine lies all the time. So anyway, nearly a third
of its staff have left the agency since January. Some
were recently given an ultimatum to either move into immigration
related roles at Homeland Security or leave the agency altogether. Again,

(01:51:13):
I don't know when this guy came to the US
If I think he came as a college student, that's
how they come and take the jobs. And so anyway,
polygraphs are used widely across the Pentagon and the USPI
community to ferret out those whose foreign connections or personal
liabilities could threaten the government's most sensitive information. Karen worked

(01:51:37):
as a district personnel manager for convenience store chain. Their
policy was that anytime there was some kind of an
issue with a shortage or some kind of monetary shortage
or something like that, they would give the employees a
polygraph test. It was absolute and utter nonsense. The only
value of polygraph test is the intimidation. You can really

(01:52:02):
intimidate people and you can make them very nervous, and
so you can kind of read that, but they can't
tell if you're lying. It is a Ouiji board type
of thing that is going on here. I'm gonna say
it just gives me all new disrespect for the Pentagon
and the spy community that they would depend on polygraphs
to attest people. They've also been used over the last year.

(01:52:23):
They become increasingly common tool under Christy Gnome to root
out those who are suspected of breaking information to the media. Again,
she's now been hoisted by her own petard to her
own absurd little gimmick that is there using it to
see if people have leaked information. Senior staff raised questions

(01:52:46):
about whether mad Who needed to review the intelligence materials
on at least two occasions, but he continued to push
for access, even if it meant taking a polygraph. According
to four current officials, in early June, a senior agency
official did not approve an initial request signed by mid
level CIS staff to grant him access to the program

(01:53:08):
on the basis that there was not an urgent need
to know, So you don't need to get information, You
don't need to have access to this stuff. Oh I
got to have it. I'll take the polygraph. The request
was not approved because only a set number of agency
staff are allowed to review the program, and it is
traditionally the agency's senate confirmed director who chooses who those

(01:53:30):
people should be. It really goes to kind of bring
up a question as to why this guy is so
that set on getting that information. A separate senior official
advised mad Who that some former senior leaders at SIS
adopted not to take the polygraph because access to the
most sensative programs was not considered essential to their job.

(01:53:51):
Less classified versions of the request that intelligence materials would
have been available without him taking a polygraph, but still
he persisted. They told him that it wouldn't be a
problem for him to pass the polygraph. He asked to
see the intelligence and only later started claiming that he
was just doing what career staff told him to do,

(01:54:12):
said a fourth current official. The allegation from DHS that
the polygraph was unsanctioned is comical, since someone in his
position would eventually have to sign off on his own
polygraph request. He demanded it, he sat for it. But again,
this is very much like Trump boasting about all the

(01:54:32):
money that he's going to give himself because he sued
over the mar Lago raid. You know, I how to
look at this, and it's like, Okay, that was wrong.
But how many times have we seen swat teams come
in and harm or kill or destroy property and it's
even the wrong people. Are they able to get any compensation? No,

(01:54:53):
ordinary people don't get compensation for that. But Trump not
only thinks that he should get compensation for it, he
was talking a couple of weeks ago about well, I'm
going to sign this off two hundred and thirty million dollars.
I can I can do that. You know, funny thing
how this works. I file the suit and now I'm
the guy that has to file sign off on the amount,

(01:55:14):
and I can do that. I'm going to write myself
a check for two hundred and thirty million dollars. He
just had a rally in North Carolina said all the
same stuff, except now he's saying a billion dollars he's
going to write for himself. Oh, I'll just give it
to charity or whatever. Again, he doesn't care that this
is taxpayer money. He wants to have control of that

(01:55:35):
one way or the other and put his name on it.
People may fail polygraphs for innocuous reasons like anxiety or
a technical error. Polygraph results are not reliable enough to
be admitted as evidence in most US courts. Again, it
is a bluff. That is a bluff. But on August

(01:55:55):
the first, not long after Matt who took the polygraph,
at least six careers staff who are involved in scheduling
and improving the test were informed in letters from then
Acting Chief Security Officer of DHS that their access to
classified national security information was being temporarily suspended for potentially
misleading him into taking the light detector test. This is

(01:56:22):
so Trumpish, isn't it. It's absolutely is a comedy show
that we have here. Well, I think we've got some
comments from Trump, don't we.

Speaker 6 (01:56:30):
Lets, yes, give me just one secon.

Speaker 2 (01:56:39):
Should give you a little bit of a heads up
before this happens.

Speaker 6 (01:56:41):
But yeah, sorry, Well let's do.

Speaker 2 (01:56:44):
It when we come back. We can still do it
when we come back. Let's take a quick break, folks,
and we will be right back, stay with us.

Speaker 17 (01:56:52):
Even take a photo on a phone, there is machine
learning in the background.

Speaker 10 (01:56:56):

Speaker 17 (01:56:59):
In the metaverse, we're going to need AI that is
build around helping people navigate virtual worlds as well as
our physical world with augmented reality.

Speaker 18 (01:57:08):

Speaker 17 (01:57:11):
That includes like your position in three D space, your
your body language, facial gestures.

Speaker 18 (01:57:16):
We invented new intimate ways to connect and communicate directly from.

Speaker 17 (01:57:23):
Your rest everything from virtual reality to designing our own
data centers.

Speaker 13 (01:57:28):
I've been in this infrastructure business for three decades. No
one has ever seen industry.

Speaker 17 (01:57:36):

Speaker 19 (01:57:41):
And in the last few months, we launched voice and
vision capabilities so that CHATJPT can now see here and
speak courts up to one hundred and twenty eight thousand
tokens of contexts.

Speaker 6 (01:57:56):
That's three hundred pages of a standard book.

Speaker 17 (01:57:58):
That's all AI generator. Actually, let's add some alto cumulus bucks.

Speaker 2 (01:58:07):
All right, break free of the technocratic night mayor this
Christmas and go back to basics for the David Night
Show bookmark and notebook. This high quality emboss metal bookmark
with a full color design on the back is guaranteed
to be cross compatible with all physical books, and the
beautiful foul leather notebook is one per hacking proof. An

(01:58:28):
ideal gift for fans of the David Knight Show or
anyone looking to start a journaling or prayer journal habit.
No bells, no whistles, just pen and paper. Available at
Davidnight dot news.

Speaker 1 (01:58:38):
Merry Christmas, you're listening to the David Night Show. This

(02:00:59):
is the David Night Show, all right, and we're backing.
I think we've got some comments from gonna be read
to us by the man himself, Donald.

Speaker 15 (02:01:11):
Trump defive tyrants won seven seven, six, says the Trump
class ships will be the big liest, bestiest, the most
fantastical and spectabular ships ever.

Speaker 5 (02:01:22):
And yes they will sink the fastiest.

Speaker 2 (02:01:28):
A great job to fight tyrants. I like that sounded
really good having him read that.

Speaker 15 (02:01:32):
Yes, five tyrants won seven seven, seven or six, says
Trump's voice makes me sick.

Speaker 5 (02:01:39):
That ego and narcissism.

Speaker 2 (02:01:41):
That's right. The big leiest and most spectabular that's right. Absolutely,
we got some more here as well, right.

Speaker 16 (02:01:51):
Real, Jason Barker says, has anyone considered the impact of
keeping these robots charged if we were to have one
in every household like Elon?

Speaker 2 (02:02:01):
Of course, that's muscle and waste, that's there. That's a yeah, yeah,
what about that. Well, we're going to have the data centers,
you know, that's that's fine. Maybe if you've got a robot,
maybe you'll get an extra allowance of juice, right what
it's for. But if you don't have a robot, if
you don't have electric car, maybe they cut down on

(02:02:23):
your ration of electricity because that's what they're going to
wind up doing.

Speaker 5 (02:02:28):
We got one more, WD sixty eight says.

Speaker 15 (02:02:30):
Basic impact is AI data centers and evs and robots
will need all the power.

Speaker 5 (02:02:34):
We can all die.

Speaker 2 (02:02:37):
You can all die, that's right. And thank you ratus Bro.
Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate Thank.

Speaker 5 (02:02:42):
You radus Bro. Thank you radus Bro the tip.

Speaker 2 (02:02:47):
That's good. You got that actually in there so you
actually have it programmed for.

Speaker 15 (02:02:51):
The radus Bro for the tip, he says, bean Busters.
In two thousand and three, we designed and illegal scaring
device configured as a ice agent using sonic technology.

Speaker 5 (02:03:06):
After a conditioning.

Speaker 15 (02:03:07):
Period, all illegals will avoid the area seeking safer grounds.

Speaker 2 (02:03:12):
There you go. You have like a scarecrow ice thing
and letting out this shrill, high pitched sound or something.
Well more Republican socialism again the Trump administration.

Speaker 6 (02:03:23):
Well, before we move on, marky Jung says, I think
these AI Trump and marts might might start to make
the truth sound more unbelievable. This isn't going to be
for everything. This is just we just got this working.

Speaker 2 (02:03:37):
So yeah, just a new toy. Yeah. I thought it
was a great idea that Lance had and he implemented
all this stuff and he's got it. It's working over
the Wi Fi network even from another remote computer that
he's got set up to do AI.

Speaker 6 (02:03:48):
So yeah, the idea of that we would have Trump
read out the Trump tweets in his own voice. But yeah,
we are also using it for this in the meantime
since we've got it set up.

Speaker 2 (02:03:57):
Yeah, that's the key thing. We want Trump reading his
own tweets.

Speaker 6 (02:04:00):
Try to normally read the comments that don't want to
give data a chance to rest his voice.

Speaker 2 (02:04:04):
Yeah, I was choking up a little bit here as well. Anyway,
we have more republican socialism. The trumpetministration has not made
a convincing case for why it is buying stakes in
these companies and why these companies in particular instead of others. Right,
how do you choose which businesses, which industries you're going
to support, which ones you're not. Well, that's where the

(02:04:25):
corruption comes in. That's where the donors get their leverage.
Once you set up a system where government can pick
the winners and losers, you're inviting corruption. And that's what
Trump is. They've left this wide open door and he
is walking right through it. The Trumpetminstration has now bought
pieces of more than a dozen private companies. Well began

(02:04:49):
as an apparent effort to prop up stumbling giants like
US Steel and Intel. It's quickly morphed into a recurring,
even routine behavior. And it's all happening that even an
attempt at getting congressional authorization. I remember when they bailed
out christ that was a big deal. There was a
lot of debate about that. Congress isn't involved in that.

(02:05:10):
But now Trump gets to pick the winners and losers
and he goes into business with them. This pivot towards
a more aggressive form of state capitalism is a risky
experiment that involves more central planning, invites more corruption. It's
an open display, folks, and it risks both taxpayer dollars
and vital sectors of the economy because when the government

(02:05:32):
gets in and picks the winners and losers, even within
a sector, it's going to pick the wrong ones and
it's going to stop the competitive aspects of a free market.
Administrations one of the administration's many intrusions into the private
economic sphere. Tariffs are another one. The attacks on independent

(02:05:54):
media outlets is another one, and so on. The rapid
acquisition of shares and so many private companies has been astonishing.
In just the past few weeks, there has been a
world win of additional acquisitions. You have Vulcan Elements, a
North Carolina based company and makes advanced magnets, and of
course how you got the Trump family involved in that

(02:06:17):
as well. Re Element Technologies, which also is involved in
the supply chain for rare earth minerals, was announced at
the same time. This month, the White House announced that
it was taking a ten percent steak in Korea Zinc,
which is building a new plant in Tennessee. The Trump
administration is also taking an undisclosed equity stake and x Light,

(02:06:39):
a Silicon Valley startup that will receive one hundred and
fifty million dollars from taxpayers via the Chips and Science Act.
The company is attempting to compete with a Dutch firm,
which is currently the only manufacturer in the world producing
ultraviolet lithography machines capable of making high end semiconductor chips. Meanwhile,
the Trump administration has also granted permission to Nvidia to

(02:07:03):
sell US most advanced chips to buyers in China, but
only after they agreed to pay twenty five percent of
profits from these sales to the federal government. And so,
as Reason points out, this ought to raise a lot
of questions. If Trump is going to block the sale
because it represents some kind of a national security threat

(02:07:24):
to the US, then why does that national security threat
go away if we get twenty five percent of the profits.
It's utter nonsense and mostly.

Speaker 6 (02:07:34):
To see the government investing in good American companies like
Nvidia and Korea Zinc.

Speaker 2 (02:07:41):
That's right.

Speaker 6 (02:07:41):
I'm sure they're classic American company.

Speaker 2 (02:07:46):
That's right. Now. The dollar has no nationality to Trump,
and it's how can he and his family feather their nest.
That's what's really going on here. There's certainly a long
history of federal government propping up, subsidizing, and protecting businesses
for political reasons, even though there is no constitutional authority
to do that. But what is happening now is fundamentally different.

(02:08:08):
Previous subsidies and other forms of protectionism were offered broadly,
They were provided at arms length, and they were authorized
by law by Congress after a debate, even though they
weren't authorized by the Constitution. At least you go through
the debate process in Congress. Washington doesn't interest interest itself
in a firm's public share price or it's day to

(02:08:30):
day business sales, purchases and that type of thing, besides
giving them a subsidy agreement. But Trump's state corporatism, Trump's
economic fascism fundamentally differs from these policies, and that it
empowers the government to be involved in a specific company's
routine operations and to care deeply about the firm's ultimate

(02:08:53):
success or failure. Folks, this is just Chinese fascism and
it is corruption. When you look at these Chinese leaders,
for example, the mentor and the I guess it's not
so much a mentor as a patron giving Steve Mannon money.
You know, Steve Mannon when he was arrested for his
border fraud, was arrested off of the yacht of a

(02:09:13):
Chinese billionaire who was on the Lamb from China after
he got a lot of money in China because of
this model, if you're connected politically, you can shake people
down for permission to be the favored business, to operate,
or to be the favored business. And this Guo Guy
I got a lot of money that way. All these

(02:09:34):
things are set up that way. You know, we look
at Maduro, this socialism that's there, you know, nationalizing the
oil properties and everything that's making his people and Chavez's
family rich. Trump is doing the same thing. He's like
a third world dictator. He's like a Chinese communist dictator.
It's corruption, folks, and it is something that is a

(02:09:58):
cancer on on our industries because they don't have to compete,
they just have to please the government. Unless Congress demands this,
It's unlikely to be much resistance to Trump's new state capitalism,
as Reason calls it, because the companies involved in these
deals are eager to go along and they make a
lot of money. And he's just getting started. Let me

(02:10:19):
tell you, he's going to do a lot of stuff
with AI and he's already started. Just after this was written,
his company, his family company, got deeply involved. Again is
Trump Media got involved with a fusion power company, right,
because that's tied end with AI, and he's also going
to get involved. I think in stable coins already are

(02:10:41):
to a large degree. Eric has said. Eric Trump has
said they're going to replace all the banks within ten years.
So the Trump family is repositioning itself into an industry
they think is going to replace all banking. They're positioning
themselves into AI, data centers, all the rest of the stuff, which, again,
if they weren't in government, that'd be smart moves, even

(02:11:04):
if I don't agree with those dirty businesses, but it
would be smart from an economic standpoint alone. But the
problem is that it's corruption, it's a conflict of interest,
and we know exactly what is happening here. State capitalism
doesn't just serve the interest of the state, it serves
the interest of favored capitalists. How do they get that

(02:11:26):
favor They get that favor by donating to Trump and
his causes. That's why a politician is the best investment
you can make. You spend one thousand dollars, you get
a million. Spend a million, you get a billion. We've
seen this happen over and over again. Asked recently about
the logic behind these acquisitions, Trump said, we should take

(02:11:46):
stakes in companies when people need something. Well, that's an
answer that lacks any limiting principle. You know you need something, well,
we just do it right. The powerful executive branch that
is unrestrained by Congress, by precedent or by principle, I
would say, by constitution, we'll only keep growing. Even vague

(02:12:08):
claims of national security are enough to establish a new
and dangerous norm that allows presidents to insert themselves into
the management of private companies. And so again, you can
say that it's an emergency, you can say it's national security.
These are the magic wands that Trump waves to give him.

(02:12:29):
You know, we waives these ones. He gets the little
crown on his head, just like he took a bite
of margin or something. Small man, big ego. Adding Trump's
name to the Kennedy Center only shows his weakness and
his shallowness editorial from the Daily News, and again it
is not important in the sphere of things, but it

(02:12:52):
does show us the man's character or lack of the
fact that he has taken over the Kennedy Center and
now he is going to call it the Kennedy Trump Center,
adding his name to it. And he had done the
same thing with the Institute of Peace. He's now called
the Trump Institute of Peace. As he's starting wars everywhere

(02:13:16):
and funding them, which is odd because Trump wanted to
shut down the Institute of Peace. He kept it then
put his name in front of it, just like he's
wanting to rename the Department of Defense the Department of War,
except they haven't gone through the formalities to do that
or spent the money to do that, as he renamed
the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. Trump is

(02:13:38):
very much active in putting his mark everywhere, and that's
a big part of why he's building this palace next
to the White House. There, Joe Biden's likeness was hung
up on a gold frame with an auto pen. It's
funny if you're in grade school, and that's the thing.
It really is stupid. So when you look at the

(02:14:01):
amount of money they spend out this ballroom, rapidly going
from two hundred million to three hundred million to four
hundred million, going going gone. I mean, it's like some
kind of an auction keeps going up. Trump has been
tearing down norms and laws and customs and traditions since
January the twentieth. Why not historical structures as well. Trump
only cares about Trump, not about public service, not about

(02:14:22):
the Constitution, not about the people. Being loyal to Trump
will get you nothing. To Trump, everyone is disposable as
a matter of fact. You know when he shut everybody down,
he called all the main street mom and pop businesses,
he said they were non essential. Yet there is a
steady stream of new allies who are lining up to

(02:14:42):
please him and to kiss the ring. A lifelong con man,
Trump knows that there will always be new suckers, and
there's a new one born every minute. Trump still has
three years in a month remaining. Don't be surprised should
he try to add his own bust to mount more
or put dishonest Don in a chair at the Lincoln

(02:15:05):
Memorial next to honest Abe. He's photo bombing all these
different things, and again the amazing thing where he keeps
boasting about, yeah, I can write a check to myself.
You know, first it's two hundred thirty million. And now
at this North Carolina rally he said, yeah, a billion dollars.
He goes funny thing speaking of Rocky Mount, North Carolina.

(02:15:26):
He suddenly spoke about a billion dollar someth They claimed
that he could give to himself. He said, maybe I'll
give to charity, maybe I won't. I don't know. So again,
suddenly it's four times as much as it was. Of course,
he's the guy who determines that is he going to
write himself a check for two hundred thirty million dollars,
which is an absurdity. I said before, where's the compensation for

(02:15:47):
the people who had children maimed because a swat team
had the wrong house and threw a grenade into the
crib of a baby, or the police who shoot up
a house at a as they were in the middle
of a pursuit, or any of the other things that
happen all the time with the government. Everybody else is

(02:16:08):
subject to the stuff, and we're subject to civilizet for
for church, just like the nonsense that he's doing with
the oil tinkers. It's just piracy and theft. Nobody else
gets any compensation. But he was going to pay himself
two hundred thirty million dollars. Now he's quadrupled that just overnight, arbitrarily,
because why because he can do it unchecked power. And

(02:16:31):
I got to say my contempt for the Republican Party,
people like Mike Johnson that just rubber stamp. This tyranny
grows every day. I just discuss me to see how
passive they are, how they have betrayed this country for
loyalty to a man, loyalty to Trump who's disloyal to

(02:16:53):
everyone around him, including his wives. So when will he
ever stop? Will he ever give any complace station to
anybody else? No? Never, There's never been a case like this.
This is Trump talking. Donald Trump suits the United States
of America. Donald Trump becomes president, and now Donald Trump
has to settle the suit. It's another weird thing about himself.

(02:17:15):
And he always talks about himself in a third person.
I hereby give myself one billion dollars. Actually maybe I
shouldn't give it to charity. Maybe I should just keep
the money. No, well, a lot of people have said
do it. Yeah, we'll see what happens with this. Yeah,
he has absolutely besides the injustice and the absurdity of

(02:17:38):
this again, he has absolutely no concerns about the budget deficit,
the tens of trillions of dollars that he has run up.

Speaker 6 (02:17:47):
Yeah. I mean, even if he does give it to charity,
it's oh, because you guys, because injustice has been committed
to me. I'm going to take money from the taxpayers
and give it to charity.

Speaker 11 (02:17:57):
M h.

Speaker 2 (02:17:58):
It's not it's absurd, that's right. And when we look
at the fallout from his tariffs that's happening, we're seeing
that this is hitting Kentucky bourbon industry again. Their foreign
cells are just evaporated, especially in Canada after he made

(02:18:19):
America odious to Canadians with his taunting and his lies
about fentanyl and all the rest of this stuff and
threatening to make it the fifty verse. All of it
just absolute nonsense. It's professional wrestling trash talk. So all
this guy does, and so he says up the tariffs,
and now Jim Beaan Jim Beam is shuddering their Kentucky

(02:18:41):
distillery un halting production for twenty twenty six and this
is their campus. They got several different places, so this
is just one of them, but it's the one that
is in Happy Hollow. They said that production statewide of
bourbon is down twenty eight and in Kentucky that is

(02:19:02):
a nine billion dollar industry and they've lost about a
third of it all, a quarter of it through, a
third of it. So we're talking about, you know, maybe
two and a half to three billion dollars has disappeared
because of Trump's tariffs. That's the effect lost level. Since
twenty eighteen, exports have fallen. Sales to Canada are down

(02:19:23):
more than sixty percent through October due to a boycott
that is tied to They say trade tensions is tied
to Trump's tensions. Trump is the one has created the war,
the tension, and with all that happening, and he's coming
after Marjorie Teylergreen. He calls her now a stone cold liberal. Really,

(02:19:47):
he says that she is a stone cold liberal, highly neurotic.
Another reality is is that it's Trump who's the liberal.
It's Trump who was pushing tranny stuff, every kind of
depravity and hanging around with Jeffrey Epstein. It is Trump
who is a tax and spenned Democrat, not Marjorie Taylor Green.

(02:20:08):
Are these other people he's attacking like Thomas Massey. He
is a Republican. He is the Manchurian candidate for the
globalist You know what is republican if about economic fascism,
in corporate cronyism. So again, Trump, at that speech in
Rocky Mount slammed Green as a stone cold liberal and

(02:20:30):
highly neurotic. And and yet look at his neurotic well
we could say, you know, he was neurotic or erratic
about his tariffs, constantly changing them all the time. He
gets upset with some leader of a country, then he
tacks a tariff on everything that they do all of

(02:20:51):
a sudden jumps up to one percent. It's ridiculous. Trump
hit Marjorie Tayler Green with his nickname Marjorie Trader Brown.
I guess if you're an eight year old, this is
really funny. And I guess maybe that's kind of the
level of people who are following this guy around at
this point. They still haven't caught on as to what

(02:21:13):
is happening here. So he goes then he said, well,
she knows that I would have gotten behind somebody who
would quote kill her in the polls, and then they
talk about how brave she is. No brave would be
to stay in the race, And you know it's one
of those things, he said. So I guess by that logic, Trump,
are you calling Thomas Massey brave because you're not running

(02:21:34):
him off? With all your Zionist money and donors coming
after him and all your personal attacks against him, he
is still in the race. So again, we're going to
take a quick break, and when we come back, we're
going to have some comments here. We'll be right back, folks.

Speaker 6 (02:21:53):
Well, I've got one comment ready, Okay, go ahead.

Speaker 15 (02:21:57):
Thank you DG eight for the tip he said, is
the Trump cult celebrates Trump rhetoric as real action. Words
are cheap. Who in the deep state has been arrested?
I personally would like to see the first deep state
arrest as Pambondi for Epstein.

Speaker 2 (02:22:14):
Let's start, let's understand the deep state or people like
Cash Metel and Pambondi who are feasting at the pig troth. Now,
Cash Mattel, I'm talking about you. You have become what
you always criticized, and the hypocrisy is just evident for
everybody to see, We'll be right back.

Speaker 7 (02:22:35):
I wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot Com
for just thirteen ninety nine. There was right in the
second flour there. See what'd you waste? You well, not
just one wish, a whole hat for first, I'm going
to the Davidnightshow dot Com and purchase the Christmas Night Album.

(02:22:58):
Then I'm going to listen to Christmas classics like are
you gonna throw it on?

Speaker 16 (02:23:02):
I want the Christmas Night Album too.

Speaker 8 (02:23:06):
Hey, that's pretty good.

Speaker 7 (02:23:11):
Hello, girls, can't you come out to me?

Speaker 10 (02:23:14):
Can't you come?

Speaker 7 (02:23:17):
David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
all new I'll be home for Christmas.

Speaker 12 (02:23:27):
What do you want?

Speaker 5 (02:23:29):
You want the moon?

Speaker 7 (02:23:30):
Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
pull it down.

Speaker 9 (02:23:33):
I'll take it and what and then I'll buy you
your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night Album.

Speaker 1 (02:24:42):
You're listening to The David Night Show and now The

(02:25:37):
David Knight Show.

Speaker 14 (02:25:44):
Elvis, a Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 2 (02:25:55):
Okay, so we got to comment here. I'll take this
on instead of giving it to Don James. Faithways says, Hey,
David iView or your crew or any of your guests.
Done research into methylene blue. It seems to be pushed
by everyone, including those who really only believe in natural remedies. Well,
you know, I've seen pictures of RFK Junior taking it.
It was recommended to me by somebody who looked at

(02:26:19):
natural remedies as a doctor that we talked to when
I had the stroke, and as part of the operation,
my sub what do they call it, hypolingual nerve was
damaged with it, and they damaged my vocal cords and
I'm thankful that that's now recovered now. But as part

(02:26:39):
of that, and it seemed to make a big difference
when I did it, I took some methylene blue and
used red light therapy on my mouth and my tongue
and things like that. That seemed to help a lot.
And so I could just say it from an anecdotal standpoint,
I'll also tell you anecdotally, it was some of the
worst tasting stuff I've ever had. It was horrible, but

(02:27:00):
you know, it was in a liquid format, and so
it's not something that I would take as a regular supplement.
I don't I didn't look into any long term effects
of it. It is, after all, a die that was there.
I don't know why somebody started started drinking it or

(02:27:22):
you know, using it. I really don't know how that
came about.

Speaker 6 (02:27:26):
Well, the dyes are color coded for your convenience. The
red ones are bad and the blue ones are good.

Speaker 2 (02:27:31):
That's right, Take the blue pill or the blue dye. Right,
take the red pill, but take the blue dye instead. Yeah,
one of those.

Speaker 6 (02:27:39):
Things up when you asked about that, because you were
still recovering from the stroke and all that, And there
was a lot of studies that show it is very
good for stroke recovery. But that's kind of an obscure use. Yeah,
it's not really good for what ails you. It's specifically
if you're recovering from a stroke. Methylene blue is a
very good thing.

Speaker 2 (02:27:59):
To Yes, it would have been better if I started
taking it even earlier. Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 6 (02:28:04):
Yeah, there are questions about side effects, so I wouldn't
take it unless you have a reason to take it.

Speaker 2 (02:28:09):
Yeah, but if you had a stroke. I would recommend it.
I could definitely tell the difference with it when I
took it, And so you know, it's one of these things. Again,
why did somebody start taking that? Why did somebody think
that they would ingest a dye? I remember when someone
as were talking about the is it Girsham treatment or whatever?
It was juicing a lot of stuff, doing hypernutrients and everything.

(02:28:34):
It's a cancer treatment, and also doing coffee enemas. And
I I had a friend I told that about it.
He went to stare go laughing and goes, why would
anybody ever think of doing a coffee anema? I said
one of these things, like, why would you ever think
about ingesting blue dye? I don't know, but hey, if
it works, people do strange stuff, drugs and other things

(02:28:59):
like that. So, as we were saying before, the Trump
media is going to merge with a nuclear fusion company
to power AI more merger, more grift, more corruption. Trump
is merging corporations with government, as I said before, and
now he's getting in the fusion power through a six
billion dollar merger of his social media firm and a

(02:29:21):
Google backed technology company. Just days after the industry representatives
urged for federal funding. Let me guess he's going to
get rid of regulations for them, and he'll also find
some way to give this company federal funding. As I
said before, maybe he envisions himself. You know, he's the
father of the vaccine. Maybe he can be mister Fusion

(02:29:42):
as well instead of Biff from Back to the Future Again.
I expect the safety regulations for these nuclear power plants
to be swept aside. You know, isn't it funny nuclear radiation.
They don't even care about the issues of nuclear way store,
the potential of some kind of a Chernobyl meltdown. None

(02:30:04):
of that stuff is even on the radar of these people.
As long as it doesn't put out CO two, it's fine, right.
But if it put out CO two like all animals do,
or if it put out CO two that is necessary
for plants, oh we'd have to shut that down. That's
a deadly threat. But if it's radiation or the threat

(02:30:24):
of a meltdown, nothing to worry about. Let's just go
straight ahead with this. So the company is founded in
nineteen ninety eight. It is now in the energy storage business.
One of these battery energy storage sites which by the way,
you know, Ford canceled their Lightning f one to fifty truck,
And isn't that interesting. You take the most popular vehicle,

(02:30:47):
the Ford f one fifty and by far and away
the most popular, and then you take away the engine
and put in a battery and nobody wants it. What
does that tell you about consumer demand? This is all
being pushed by government, by government subsidies, by people like
Biden and so forth. They lost five billion last year,

(02:31:07):
they lost nineteen and a half billion this year, so
they're getting out of that. Where are they going. Well,
Ford's going to go into the battery energy storage, so
I think that's going to be the next big, major ripoff.
And even worse than the money is the fire hazard
that that presents. Imagine a gigantic array of batteries. It's

(02:31:29):
like a tinder box anyway, it's going to burn through
a lot of money, even if it doesn't burn through
our neighborhoods. Trump Media shares jumped thirty three percent. As
one person said an analyst, well, this company will clearly
have major political support from Trump in our view, that's right.
He's going to clear the way for regulations and he's
going to shower them with cash. This, folks, is corruption.

(02:31:54):
This is a guy who has handed a fortune and
blew it, bankrupting six casins, and now he wants to
pick the winners and losers based on the criteria whether
or not they make money for him. That's what's really
happening here. So He's got this company that's social media

(02:32:15):
company that's now getting a fusion, is being run by
former Congressman Devin Nunez is a CEO. So obviously geniuses
at work here. So what does Trump's ai zar really want?
A good example of this again is David Sachs. David
Sachs is the guy that he put in for both Crypto.

(02:32:36):
He was the cryptos are now he's going to be
the ai Zar, and he's been there for both the
Genius Act for Crypto and as well as the Genesis
Act for ai David Sachs is somebody who is part
of the technocracy, part of the PayPal mafia, very early
connections to Peter Tiele. That's how he got wealthy. Peter.

(02:33:00):
I guess we could call him the Trump whisperer, right,
anything Teal wants he gets from Trump, he became part
of the Teal and Elon Musk PayPal mafia David Sachs did,
and when the company was sold Microsoft fort one point
two billion, and then he founded a venture capital firm
like most of these PayPal mafia guys did. They took

(02:33:21):
all this money and they started investing it into other
startups and he invested in two SpaceX and Xai. And
now he is there at the White House as the
tech guy. So he's got a podcast called All In,
and this is Vox. They say he's a conservative, and

(02:33:44):
yet he was politically involved in giving money in previous
election cycles to Hillary Clinton. Only Vox could call somebody
like that conservative, and only Trump could put somebody like
that enter Republican administration and get away with it. He
mostly gives to Republicans now. He was against the January sixth,

(02:34:06):
quote unquote insurrection. He was actually backing Ron DeSantis, and
he asked his buddy Elon to host Twitter spaces with
DeSantis back when they were still calling it Twitter. I
remember that it was an audio disaster. He also hosted
a fundraiser for Vivate the snake rama Slimy. So he's

(02:34:31):
all the usual suspects as friends and supporters He hosted
then a fundraiser for Trump in June of twenty twenty
four and his home in San Francisco, and that turned
everything around. This guy who had been on the opposite side,
who had been giving money to Democrats and Hillary Clinton,
all of a sudden reinvents himself in order to get access.
He's one of these Silicon Valley billionaires and venture capitalists

(02:34:54):
who all flocked around Trump. You know that. We saw
most of them doing it in the summer and flocking
around him in the inauguration. It really turned things around.
The fake assassination attempt. I think they saw that and
they saw how everybody fell for it. They go, this
is this is who's gonna win, and they all shifted

(02:35:17):
to that point, Zuckerberg, a whole lot of them did so. Anyway,
Trump is very impressed with it. And so that was
his end into the Trump administration. He goes from outside
of the Washington d c. Establishment into a role in
the Trump White House. And what is he doing for
Trump now? And how serious is the job? Well, his

(02:35:38):
title is White House AI and crypto tzar as I said,
I don't think we need a czar, We don't need
a caesar. We don't need a king. How is that
a thing? Why do they keep using that term? It's disgusting.
He's playing an extremely pivotal role in these two technologies

(02:36:01):
that he's been put in charge of. Yeah, he's in
a very very important situation. David Sachs's. So, states want
to regulate AI. Governors want laws on the book screening
protecting people from AI. You know, except for Marcia Blackburn,
the Republican who is running for governor here in Tennessee.
She is pushing very hard to take away tenth Amendment

(02:36:22):
powers from herself if she wins the governorship, and she
is by far and away the front runner, and so
she doesn't want the power to regulate AI. She doesn't
want to do anything with it. Talk about a red flag.
I'm done with Marcia. Marcia, Marcia, Marcia. I think you're
part of the Brady bunch here, but not governor material. Now,

(02:36:43):
they tried to make it clear, we're not trying to
stop you from protecting teens in your district or what
you have. We just want laws that are not onerous,
that won't slow us down. You know what would slow
them down, as if we regulated these AI data centers
and that's what they don't want. So they want your electricity,
they want to ration it to you economically, they want

(02:37:04):
to ration it to you from an availability standpoint. That's
what they want. We want no hindrance for AI. They
make it clear this executive order definitively reflects their interest
in making sure that there is not a quote unquote
patchwork of laws. This is what they always say when
they want to consolidate power in Washington. Unconstitutionally, they say,

(02:37:26):
we can't have a patchwork of regulations around the states.
Why not, That's what the constitution calls for. David Sachs
is a rich man who is powerfully connected in the
White House. He does not want there to be any
AI regulation. But you have Americans who are concerned about AI.
So which side of this do you think is going
to end up winning? They asked as a play around

(02:37:47):
with this on box, and they said, well, increasingly there's
concerns from parents who read stories about chatbots, you know,
doing things with kids. And at the same time you
got people who are pushing back in organized way against
having more data centers in their neighborhood. Let me say
one thing I don't care about Marsha Blackburn's Genesis Act.

(02:38:09):
And I don't care about Trump's executive orders. We have
the Constitution on our side, and if we got anybody
at the state level that's got a backbone and a spine,
they could stand up to this nonsense and say no,
I'm going to regulate it and you can't stop me. Now.
Of course, what would happen in response to that would
be a lot of economic blackmail and bribery. But that's

(02:38:31):
why I said, they're going to have a spine to
stand up to that kind of thing. The thing that
will really shape how to take industry has to behave
is any checks on its ability to grow. And so again,
these people are after political power, they're after electrical power.
That's going to be the basis of it. And it's

(02:38:52):
going to be very difficult to stop them. But that's
where the fight is right now, folks, you need to
understand that. Well, the White House is very confused about
how a random YouTuber's stream got featured on its website.
Maybe they should ask these tech geniuses like David Sachs
and others. Right, they're so smart. I was just trying
to stream with my buddies, he said, so it said.

(02:39:14):
On a Friday, the White House that it was launching
an investigation after some bearded dudes YouTube stream suddenly showed
up on its official website. The live stream was hosted
by a guy, Real Matt Money, who is seen on
the Bloomberg screenshot. He was also seen on the White
House's Live News section sitting at a typical streaming setup

(02:39:36):
and wearing gaming headphones and dark gray T shirt and
overlay shows his stream chat where viewers praises analysis. Beneath
the video window of the stream's title displayed an elegant
White House font promising that there will be no midstream ads,
plus a little descriptor offering a ten dollars discount if
you click a link for stream yard. It was available

(02:39:57):
on the Live News section of the official White House
website shortly before midnight. Real Matt Money says he has
no idea how any of this happened. He says, there's
no way this is real, right, he said on Friday.
After that happened on Thursday night, I was just trying
to stream with my buddies. The strange incident is bound

(02:40:17):
to raise eyebrows, give them. The Trump administration's track record
of cybersecurity gaffes. Maybe they need to ask mad who
got a macaro or whatever. The guy's name is, the
guy who failed the light detector tests. Maybe they need
to give him a light detector test and ask him
how cybersecurity missed this. You know that's his department, Sissa,

(02:40:39):
How did they miss this? How did this happen? Does
this guy have any clue? So you've got Secretary of
Defense hag Seth accidentally leaking secret bombing plans in non
secure group chat, many other things. So this guy real
Matt Money. He gives investor advice to his audience. He

(02:41:00):
works as a petroleum engineer in Texas, and he's a
fan of Trump. He said, had I known I would
be on the White House page, I would have probably
dressed a little differently. He said, well, yeah, dress it up.
But meanwhile, Twitter users have uncovered a secret link to
bizarre CDC text files. This is the thing, you know,

(02:41:20):
this guy gets on the White House website. They have
no idea how this happens. Then there's another file from
the CDC that leaks out onto Twitter. I can't wait
until you get the skinny on all of this vaccine stuff.
When they get the secret documents get leaked out mistakenly
about that. So the odd file was discovered by a

(02:41:45):
Twitter user who goes by the name Charlie. Does anyone
want to see some scary CDC web page I accidentally
stumbled on just now. It's basically just a long list
of single words that seems to have been there since
two thousand and nine. The first word was damnatory? Is

(02:42:07):
that even a thing? Then it talks about counter revolutionaries,
sword play, necromancy, love making, all the rest of this stuff.
This is on the CDC side. It seems related to
the CDC's Mortality Medical Data System, a program first developed
in nineteen sixty seven to automate entry, classification, and retrieval

(02:42:29):
of cause of death information from death certificates. Maybe we
should start calling this whole plandemic the damnatory attack. These
people getting into it. By the way, I didn't have
this in the stream deck lands, but it saw my
Twitter feed and a little bit down there's a thing.

(02:42:49):
When I first saw this, I thought it was pretty clever,
and it was a guy who was doing a selfie.
So he's there at an a kind of at an
iconic movie set like the Ones that are pictured here
in the stills. He's there with the Pirates of the Caribbean,
or he's there with Gladiator, you know, and he goes
from one to the other. So he takes a picture

(02:43:11):
with one of these characters and then he runs to
another one. If you got it, we could show people
what I'm talking about. And I thought it was.

Speaker 6 (02:43:18):
It keeps disconnecting from the Internet. I'm pulling it up.

Speaker 2 (02:43:20):
Okay, all right, that's fine. It's not necessary if you
pull it up. But it's kind of interesting. I thought
it was really well. It just, you know, he takes
a selfie with a character in a particular set of
a very famous movie, and then he runs to another one.
So it's it's continuous. He runs to you know, off
to the side, and on another set he's doing it again.
I thought, well, that's a good use of AI. I

(02:43:41):
thought that was really clever.

Speaker 15 (02:43:43):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (02:43:43):
They don't like this, they said, now people with the
powers of AI, annoying dorks can now pretend that they're
friends with cool and famous people. That wasn't my take
on it. I thought it was a clever use of this.
But that is something that came out of Nano Banana
pro that Google just released and so that's showing some

(02:44:05):
of the capabilities. And I thought it was very realistic.
I mean, all the faces looked very real and is
able to set up these different sites. I liked enough
that I retweeted, And now everybody is doing it. It's like,
oh gosh, this is really it's really being overdone. When
somebody found the prompt to it or something like that,

(02:44:27):
start redoing it with all these different movies. Elon says
his new rocket is as important as the origin of
life itself. These people are filled with their own self importance,
aren't they. And he had an interview where he was
speaking Katie Miller, the wife of Steven Miller, Trump's deputy

(02:44:50):
chief of staff, and he said there's a lot that's
coming down the pipeline. She said, like what he said. Well, Starship,
the degree to which Starship is polutionary technology is not
well understood in the world. It's the first time there's
been any rocket design where a full rapid reusability is possible, well,
full reusability at all is possible, or full reusability at

(02:45:12):
all as possible. He said, this is the first design
where a reusable rocket is one of the pop is
one of the possible with success is one of the
possible outcomes. He said. If there are historians in the
future that will look back at Starship and say it's
one of the most profound things that ever happened. You
can think of historic events as where would they fit

(02:45:35):
in the evolutionary Hall of fame. You got things like
single cell life, multi cellular life, capturing a mitochondria, and
then also on that scale, probably in the top ten,
is life becoming multiplanetary. These guys are scary in their
lack of discernment and their obsession with what they do

(02:46:00):
like egos. Keep in mind this is all about SpaceX Starship,
which has struggled to launch and subsequently land without exploding.
Failure is so profound that NASA is now shopping around
for alternate vendor for its moon landing, and I would
say for its first moon landing, I don't believe they

(02:46:20):
ever got this thing off the ground. Especially you know
when you look at one of those test fires of
the rockets that he had down in South Texas and
it blew up the concrete landing pad and chunks of
concrete flying. You know, unbelievable distances of that stuff. Why
did that never happen with the Saturn five rockets that

(02:46:41):
supposedly took us to the moon, and you know, how
did they anyway, It's just so many questions about that.
He says. There just aren't very many things that are
in the top ten of the evolution of life where
you can basically say where you can evaluate any given
civilization or any given life form, as you know, on
that scale, he said, So life becoming multiplanetory, that's in

(02:47:04):
the top ten. That's what he thinks is really going
on here. Meanwhile, so I pointed out before cyber truck
is having a lot of issues. We just had the
death of people got locked inside. I've got a friend
who's got a Tesla and we were talking about He says, Yeah,
I got locked inside this thing once for a couple
of hours, and fortunately I had my phone and I

(02:47:25):
could call tech support get them to unlock my doors.
You know, it's a fun car to drive. I got
to say, it's a very different car. It's totally different
than the Miata. The amount is a kind of a
momentum car. You know, you keep the speed going, and
you keep speed through the curves and all the rest
of the stuff, whereas the Tessa is very much like

(02:47:48):
being inside of a electric slot car they used to
play with when I was a kid. You know, the
slot cars. You put your thumb on the gas and
all the thing takes off as soon as you ease off.
It's not right away, and that's the way it is
with Tesla's. It's a different experience. It's kind of fun
to drive, it's got a low center of gravity. It's good,
But all of the other stuff that's on it, I

(02:48:11):
really don't like on it. So despite a pessimistic sales forecast,
Tesla's sales I'm sorry Tesla shares have skyrocketed and are
almost fifty percent in the last six months, showing yet
again how the company is one and a half trillion
dollar market cap is largely untethered from the success or

(02:48:33):
the reality of its core business. But that hasn't stopped
Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, from seemingly putting his thumb on
the scales. In addition to that, he's got SpaceX has
bought more than one thousand cyber trucks from Tesla. This
is very much like what Jenson Wayne did and is
doing with Nvidia you know where he is the circular investing,

(02:48:57):
loaning money to his customer so that they can buy
his Nvidia chips. And so Trump's Trump Musk has got
SpaceX buying cyber trucks from Tesla and a large amount
as well, more than one hundred million dollars of cyber trucks.

(02:49:18):
According to registration data. The company sold only three and
eighty five cyber trucks in the US in the third quarter,
a drop of sixty two percent compared to the same
period last year. These are teeny tiny numbers for a
car company. This is a niche product. And again when

(02:49:38):
you look at things like you know, Ford F one fifty,
I think they sell you know, a couple hundred thousand
of those a year. And I'm talking about the real ones,
not the electric ones, which nobody wants those things either.
Cyber truck has been recalled eight times in addition to
the other issues that just recently happened. And then here's
some positive news after high school has banned cell phones.

(02:50:04):
Actual human interaction is flourishing. They're talking about oh, look
they're doing this and they're doing that, and it's like, yeah,
this is kind of stuff that happened when we were
in high school. People my age when they didn't have phones,
They said. That New York Magazine report that while the
bell to bell ban on cell phones was intended to

(02:50:24):
foster a distraction free learning environment, it is allowing old
fashioned human socializing to flourish. All of a sudden. Kids
are playing cards at lunch, even board games. They're trying
their hand at sports. They're discovering the joys of old
school analog tech and even a little no stakes gambling.

(02:50:45):
In general, the vibes are way way up, they said.
A senior said they preferred the phone free pastime, and
one of the things that they really liked was playing dominoes.
So dominoes is a really staple Dominican game. So that's
one person. People get passionate. You have to slam that
first piece down on the table. Kids are playing volleyball

(02:51:07):
during lunch, and it's an equal number of boys and girls.
They're socializing. They're socializing boys versus and girls are socializing,
they said. When the phones were first banned, there was
a lot of grumbling and it was cumbersome to cram
a lot of homework or last minute quiz prep between classes. Now,
she says, she prints out her study guides and finds

(02:51:30):
that the paper is much more effective for learning. She said,
I don't get distracted by notifications. That's what this is about.
This is the electronic paper thing. We were to the
point where're printing out three or four hundred pages a
day of articles, and this is a lot easier to
manage it. And unlike using it on, this does practically nothing.

(02:51:54):
It just pulls up PDFs and lets me annotate it.
But there's no distractions, there's no alarms going off, there's
no ability to connect to the internet any of that stuff.
When I start working with this, that's what I'm working on.
And that's what this person was saying about paper. So
they said, honestly, half the people are playing board games
and I didn't know at all about this before. It's

(02:52:17):
made us a lot closer, said one person. You know,
that was a nice thing last year we had. That
was last year that we had with Keith played board games,
and it was a board game that we had that
was a conspiracy board game. The person who was the

(02:52:40):
best of that was not me, It was Lance. All
these conspiracies inside and out. We're gonna take a break up.
We'll be right back. Folks in.

Speaker 1 (02:53:58):
S you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:55:25):
Welcome back, and I think once we have some Trump
comments reading some comments for us, Yes we do. Okay,
here we go.

Speaker 5 (02:55:33):
Thank you EG eight for the tip.

Speaker 15 (02:55:35):
He says, the Trump cult celebrates Trump rhetoric as real action.
Words are cheap. Who in the Deep State has been arrested?
I personally would like to see the first deep state
arrest as Pam BONDI for Epstein.

Speaker 2 (02:55:48):
Yeah, that's right. Ye, we had that one before, but
I hardly agree with that sentiment. Thank you very much.
You got any others?

Speaker 15 (02:55:55):
Surian Girl says sugar water, Trump's got your back. He
also has a big beautiful knife.

Speaker 2 (02:56:04):
That's right, the biggest, the biggest, the longest knife. Let's
stick in your back. Any others?

Speaker 15 (02:56:09):
Solo Cat nineteen eighty says sugar water and a big
beautiful syringe.

Speaker 1 (02:56:14):
It's huge.

Speaker 2 (02:56:18):
Nobody could read that like Trump. It truly is amazing.
I like the inflection that's there. That's that's great. You
got another one.

Speaker 5 (02:56:24):
Thank you.

Speaker 15 (02:56:24):
Tall Man nine sixteen for the tip. He says, David
and Lance, this is President Trump. I expect immediate royalty
payments for the usage of my strong, beautiful voice on
your show. It's the best comment reading voice ever.

Speaker 2 (02:56:40):
Yeah, I would like to see you try. Go ahead.
This is political parody. I know you don't like that,
but yeah, it's you know, we got by the way,
we're going to put up the It's Wonderful eye. We're
going to put it up as a test on YouTube
and so later on today I'm going to give it
to Travis and get him to create a channel and

(02:57:02):
we'll put up So I don't know what channel, I'll
tell you, but you can look for it by the title.
And that was the very first thing that ever got
censored at info Wars. They claimed it was a copyright
violation and the copyright that they have on Its Wonderful
Life expired and they got it back under very dubious circumstances.
But it was never about that. That was on a
shutdown political comment and by doing that same thing they

(02:57:25):
did with the Hitchcock mcguffin for the climate thing. They
don't like satire. It's very damaging, said Slowinsky. It's the
most damaging of anything is satire. So they don't like
that those things are covered under fair use, and so
is this Do you have any others or can I?

Speaker 16 (02:57:42):
Mister non PC says electric cars are useless even worse
than the winter, the battery gets drained to nothing in
the cold weather.

Speaker 2 (02:57:51):
I figured that's something you're not gonna hear Elon Musk
say on a regular basis. But it absolutely is true,
Absolutely is true. Well real, quick, one more, okay, real.

Speaker 16 (02:58:02):
Jason Barker says, the devastation to the Earth to produce
those batteries is massive. There is also child labor involved
in horrible conditions for the minerals fifty that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:58:14):
And isn't it the height of hypocrisy that a guy
who became the world's richest man by grifting the whole
green movement, its electric vehicles and things like that. Isn't
it amazing that he's now launching these satellites. Total disregard
for any of the so called greenhouse gases that they're

(02:58:35):
telling everybody we're going to die from truly is insane. Well,
we don't have much time left, but I just want
to say, you know, last year I did the the
ad that you all know, the Silver and Gold ad
about yukonn and Cornelius telling everybody there was a lot
of Trump euphoria about crypto and everything, but the fundamentals
were the same last year, and we could see what
was what was set up for gold, and you know,

(02:58:58):
we have for I guess the new year of predictions.
When you look at this, people are saying, well, what's
going to happen gold and silver next year? The way
I look at it, the same factors that we're driving
gold and silver this year are still there. As a
matter of fact, many of them are going to get worse.
For example, Trump's not going to do anything at all
about the deficit or about inflation except to feed them

(02:59:20):
and make them worse. And one of the ways he's
going to do that is he's going to put his
own guy in at the FED this next year. That's
going to be a big plus for gold and silver.
And then, of course, the financial result is still going on.
The dollars getting weaker, central banks are stocking up on gold,
and everybody's trying to accumulate gold for the next financial system.

(02:59:44):
And then next year, that's something that we've been having
going on that's going to continue. Then next year we're
going to have a lot more institutional buyers we're going
to have stable coins are trying to make their coins stable,
so they're collecting gold, and you also have the paper
old people are rushing around to get it. So go
to Tony Ardban's Wise Wolf Gold. You can get there

(03:00:05):
through David Knight dot gold and that lets Tony know
that you're coming through us. Thank you so much for listening.
Have a merry Christmas, because we're going to take off tomorrow.
We're going to do a rebroadcast and so for Christmas Eve,
Christmas and the day after we're going to have rebroadcasts,
so we will still be broadcasting, but it won't be live.
So thank you all for your support. Thank you for

(03:00:27):
the many gifts that you gave us yesterday. And may
you have a blessed a merry Christmas and a blessed
New Year as well. Thank you.

Speaker 17 (03:00:37):
Even take a photo on a phone, there is machine
learning in the background.

Speaker 10 (03:00:40):

Speaker 17 (03:00:43):
In the metaverse, we're going to need AI that is
builder on helping people navigate virtual worlds as well as
our physical world with augmented reality.

Speaker 18 (03:00:52):

Speaker 17 (03:00:56):
Include It's like your position in three D space, your
your body language, facial gestures.

Speaker 18 (03:01:01):
We invented new intimate ways to connect and communicate.

Speaker 17 (03:01:07):
Directly from your risk, everything from virtual reality to designing
our own data centers.

Speaker 13 (03:01:13):
I've been in this infrastructure business for three decades.

Speaker 2 (03:01:19):
No one has ever seen industry.

Speaker 17 (03:01:20):

Speaker 19 (03:01:25):
And in the last few months we launched voice and
vision capabilities so that chat ept can now see here
and speak courts up to one hundred and twenty eight
thousand tokens of contexts.

Speaker 17 (03:01:40):
That's three hundred pages of a standard book. That's all
AI generated. And actually let's add some alto Cumulus clothes.

Speaker 2 (03:01:51):
All right, break free the technocratic Night mayor this Christmas
and go back to basics. Whether David Night showed bookmark
and notebook. This high quality embossmental bookmark with a full
color design on the back is guaranteed to be cross
compatible with all physical books, and the beautiful foul leather
notebook is one hundred percent hacking proof. An ideal gift

(03:02:13):
for fans of The David Knight Show or anyone looking
to start a journaling or prayer journal habit. No bells,
no whistles, just pen and paper. Available at Davidnight dot news.
Merry Christmas,

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

The Bobby Bones Show

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2164: Debt-Fueled Militarism Sold as Strength

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

The Bobby Bones Show

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2164: Debt-Fueled Militarism Sold as Strength

Dateline NBC