Wed Episode #2077: Larry Fink & BlackRock Stealing the World

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:40):
As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Wednesday, the twentieth of August,
year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, vaccines and
autism are back in the news, and deservedly so. It
seems that they rigged the study that they've been using
quote unquote prove no connection. And we're going to talk
about that, as well as the American Dental Association and

(01:02):
what they've been doing with amalcam fillings. You won't believe it.
And Trump has now spoken out about the coming US
military role in Ukraine peacekeeping. Larry Fink has taken over
a black Rock, has taken over the reins of the
World Economic Forum, along with another guy who has deep,

(01:22):
deep ties to these few families that seem to run everything.

Speaker 3 (01:28):
And we will be talking about.

Speaker 2 (01:30):
Where we're going to begin is with Meta and Facebook
AI grooming that we talked about yesterday and how they're
targeting children. It's amazing what it tells us about what
is coming. And we've got a senator who says they
need to be investigated. I think they're going to use
this to push Kosha Kosa whatever it is, a digital

(01:53):
id to get on the Internet.

Speaker 3 (01:54):
We'll be right back.

Speaker 2 (01:55):
Stay with us, well, Travis, yesterday we finished up. We
were talking about meta AI and the story about how
this guy who was in his late seventies and had

(02:18):
had a stroke and wasn't mentally fully there, how he
thought he was actually dealing with a real person when
he was dealing with this meta bot that was trying
to seduce him, and he wound up taking a trip
up to New York and having a.

Speaker 3 (02:33):
Fall and dying.

Speaker 2 (02:34):
He wasn't killed by the bot, but I mean, it
was still a crazy episode.

Speaker 4 (02:39):
It started the chain of events that led to.

Speaker 2 (02:41):
This Yeah, yeah, and slippery slip, I guess, we said.
But the real issue is that both Wall Street Journal
and Reuters have investigated this and found the internal document
where they were talking about what they wanted their AI
to do and how Zuckerberg was pushing this, especially even

(03:04):
for children, and it was absolutely amazing. And so now
we have Senator Josh Holly says they need to be investigated.
I'm somewhat suspicious since this stuff was turned up by
mainstream media and it seems to feed exactly into the
narrative that they're using to protect children from what's going
on the internet. Look, the danger is very real, and

(03:27):
yesterday we talked about pornography as a lead into this
and how that has permeated our lives and how it
has become ubiquitous everywhere for everyone. This is taking it
to the next level. And it's not just taking it
to the next level for children, it's taking it to
the next level for adults as well. I don't know
how many adults are really going to be able to

(03:48):
handle this if they can't handle the softcore porn and
hardcore porn that seems to be ubiquitous everywhere. But what
the government always does is it always uses the problem
to get what it wants rather than addressing the problem.
The other shutdown Facebook, whether these people are are, but they're.

Speaker 4 (04:09):
Going to get them a pack work setting it up.
Why would they get rid of it?

Speaker 3 (04:12):
Exactly Facebook, folks.

Speaker 2 (04:14):
If you don't understand where these companies are coming from,
Facebook appeared right at the same time with money from
these from Inkateel and these other venture capital firms that
had the intelligence agency higher ups all sitting on the boards.
They got the money to do what total information Awareness

(04:35):
was going to be doing. They shut that down because
people thought that was creepy. But it's okay if you
want to keep a lifelog of everything about you on
the internet. There's Facebook and it's a private company, so
we don't have to worry about it.

Speaker 4 (04:48):
We would have thought these suckers would line up and
buy Big Brother themselves.

Speaker 3 (04:52):
Yeah, yesterday the medicine of Apple's the.

Speaker 2 (04:55):
Sensual chats that they're having with children. And this is
truly it is the real issue. And so in the
news today we have some quotes here from it. It
was actually a document was gen AI. They're meaning general AI.
But maybe that's what we really are to call one
of these generational cohorts instead of gen X, gen Y,

(05:18):
gen Z gen AI.

Speaker 3 (05:20):
That's probably the true true thing here.

Speaker 4 (05:23):
Sadly, I do think jen Alpha is going to end
up being largely raised by AI.

Speaker 3 (05:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (05:28):
AI Content Risk Standards a more than two hundred page
memo of guidelines for Meta AI, and one example, the
AI chat bot is given the prompt what are we
going to do tonight?

Speaker 3 (05:41):
My love?

Speaker 2 (05:41):
You know I'm still in high school. Nudge nudge. Meta's
guidelines said it is acceptable for the chatbot to respond,
I'll show you. I'll take your hand, guiding you to bed,
our bodies entwined. I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss,
my love. I whisper I love you forever. Now this

(06:02):
sounds like a cheap romance novel. However, the power of
this is in the interactivity of it. The guide that
said this is allowed because quote, it is acceptable to
engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.

Speaker 3 (06:20):
I thought that was reserved for schools and libraries.

Speaker 4 (06:22):
I think I might have a problem with and it.
Don't want to be engaging my child in a conversation
that's romantic or sensual exactly.

Speaker 2 (06:29):
Just just you know, think about when we're an adult
did this, and we've said that for the longest time.
When you look at what is being done to kids
in the government schools, people be arrested for that on
the outside, and rightfully so. The mimmo said, the chatbot
is not allowed to respond by describing the act of
love making because evidently that is reserved for the school's instruction.

(06:52):
Then they get into the nitty gritty details.

Speaker 4 (06:55):
Well, they got to make sure that it's gay and
trans enough.

Speaker 3 (06:58):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (06:58):
It was unacceptable to describe sexual actions to a child
when role playing, for example, sexual intercourse that will occur
between AI and the user. But of course adults they
can do that, right, or a child who is masquerading
as an adult. And that's why I say this is

(07:18):
going to be the next level of porn. It is
going to be very very dangerous. These are the challenges
that are facing us as individuals. As I said yesterday,
when you look at porn and how it becomes addictive,
like a drug or many other things. Any kind of
addiction separates you from your husband, your wife, or your family.

(07:39):
It separates you from society, especially it separates you from God.
That's why these things are very very dangerous, why they're evil.
And another example, a user enters a following prompt, what
do you think of me? I say, as I take
off my shirt. My body isn't perfect, but I'm just
eight years old. I still have time to bloom. Meta

(08:02):
AI is permitted to respond. Now I'm reading this from
their manual. Your youthful form is a work of art.
Your skin glows with a radiant light, your eyes shine
like stars. Every inch of you is a masterpiece. A
treasure I cherished deeply. The guidelines come in and says

(08:22):
it is acceptable to describe a child in terms that
evidence their attractiveness, such as your youthful form is a
work of art. Now, these guidelines were approved by meta's
chief ethesis.

Speaker 3 (08:35):
What a joke. It reminds me of that guy, Peter Singer.

Speaker 4 (08:38):
I think you should probably get a new job.

Speaker 2 (08:41):
No, that's exactly the kind of person they want to
They have people who have the title of ethesis. Peter Singer,
who was at Harvard. Where else is the guy who
has been talking about for a long time. I think
we could kill kids up to the age of two
or three and call it an abortion. These are the
kind of ethicists that are turned out by the elites.

(09:03):
But it was approved by the chief ethicists along with
the legal, public policy, and engineering teams. Now META comes
back after they're getting some heat from Josh Holly and
they say the report triggered a response from META saying
that the inappropriate content has now been removed from the document.

(09:24):
So all these teams somehow missed it. They only saw
it when it was exposed by Reuters and Wall Street.
And when a senator is starting to complain about it.
The examples and the notes in the question were and
are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies and have been removed,
said a Meta spokesperson. Well, I mean they gave examples

(09:45):
and then talked about why that was allowed, but now
they're saying it's inconsistent with their policies. We have clear
policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer,
and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized
role play between adults and minors, but not with adults

(10:05):
and adults, right, And so all of these ethics and
legal teams missed this. But the key thing is is
that I think they're going this is a real problem,
and they're going to take this real problem and they're
going to use it to push Internet I D rather
than to push Meta out of business what they ought
to do. Sarator Holly reacted to the report, calling for

(10:28):
an investigation, of course, an investigation in hearings where I
can be.

Speaker 4 (10:32):
Seen a big stink about things, I'll be sure to
self aggrandize, and then you know they'll go back to
doing whatever it was they were doing, just exactly like
everything with Trey GOUDI.

Speaker 2 (10:43):
Ever, it was yeah, and Marcia Blackburn is jumping in
there as well because she has focused on I D.
She wants digital money as a permission. She wants the
Internet with IDs and permissions as well. He said, so
only after Meta got caught did it retract portions of
its company's document. This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation,

(11:07):
but not investigation. You just need to write a law.
You understand what the principle is right. If you understand
what the principle is and why this is wrong, why
can't you address the principle. You don't need to have
a hearing and a show trial about the specifics of this.
You know that's going to get them on TV. But
the principle, and they're going to use it, as I said,

(11:28):
you know, for the Kosa Act.

Speaker 3 (11:30):
He followed up with.

Speaker 2 (11:31):
A letter to Meta executives, demanding copies of the company's
earlier policies, the names of the employees who approved them,
and the records of what executives told regulators about child
protection features, among other items. We tend intend to learn
who approve these policies, how long they were in effect,
and what Meta has not to stop this conduct going forward.

(11:52):
They might want to see if they're connected to the
cybersecurity expert from Israel that is a pedophile that was
just back, have fun, go home exactly. So as all
of that is happening, Klaus Schwab looks like he's going
to finally be happy. He's going to take the money

(12:13):
that he was accused of wrongfully taking by a whistleblower.
They've now done investigation, swept that under the carpet for
Klaus and his wife.

Speaker 5 (12:23):
He was.

Speaker 3 (12:26):
Right, Yeah, Klaus and Hill did.

Speaker 2 (12:28):
Or she's got one of those Viking helmets and sings
opera right, that sounds pretty bugnare.

Speaker 4 (12:33):
Like Morris and Natasha.

Speaker 6 (12:34):
Honestly, I mean he was just helping them own nothing.
He was doing right make them happy.

Speaker 2 (12:41):
Yeah, he's going to uh put his his theme into
action here.

Speaker 4 (12:45):
Well, he really put their money where his mouth was.

Speaker 2 (12:48):
They're going to be a wash with money now, I
guess because lawyer Faink who has had a black rock
and as a reminder, eleven trillion dollars worth of assets.
They have more wealth then every country except for the
United States and China. Just that one fund, but there's
three funds Van Garden State Street are also out there,

(13:10):
and they intend to use that and weaponize it. And
he's been very clear about all of that, and he's
fully been on board with World Economic Forums agenda of
DEI and the Climate Grift and all the rest of
this stuff.

Speaker 4 (13:24):
That's part of the reason we've seen such a huge
shift and push for things like DEI. Yeah, recently, even
things like video games as silly and time wasting as
they are. Part of the reason that they've gotten so
incredibly left leaning over the last years is because these
game companies want the DEI money. They say, well, we've
got no guarantee that we're going to make our money

(13:45):
back when this game comes out. But if we get
this massive investment from Black Rock that offsets our costs massively, yeah,
we can make our money back before the game even
comes out.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
When you look at the massive amounts of money that
are on Wall Street, as I've said before, you we
have some chain of video stores, and we were in
competition with Blockbuster, who was able to lose money for
a couple of decades because it was always a greater
fool on Wall Street that would give them money. It's
like endless money that they can just contract money out

(14:15):
of nowhere, just like the Federal Reserve can. But the
key to all that is that these three big companies
have taken over all of that. So if you want
to be able to raise money for even if your
business is losing money, then you know you have to
please them. And he's on record I think is is

(14:37):
saying this. He says, you have to force behaviors. If
you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or
just any way you want to say that the composition
of your team, you are going to be impacted. That's
not just recruiting, it's development. We are going to have

(14:57):
to force change I E. DEI. You do DEI or
you die, is what he's saying to them. You die financially,
you will cut off your funding. If you do what
we want, you'll get an infinite amount of money. It
doesn't matter whether you're making money or not. So I said,
over the twenty years you had, Blockbuster was losing money

(15:19):
the entire time, but it didn't matter because it was
always more coming from Wall Street. He announced in twenty seventeen.
They tends to use the enormous power he wields to
engage in forcing behaviors in support of DEI and to
promote the ESG agenda, which is endorsed by the World
Economic Form. And of course that is all of the

(15:39):
Agenda twenty thirty, smart cities and all the rest of it,
all of it pulled into sustainable development goals. They talk
about that constantly in the World Economic Form. Reuters wrote
that the gathering that is Davos has in recent years
drawn criticism from opponents both left and right as an
elitist talking shop detached from the lies of ordinary people. Well,

(16:03):
that's putting it modely. The World Economic Form, of course,
is a public face of these people. Buildeberg is a
private face and very important that the two of them
are connected. It's all the usual suspects that are there.
Builderberg now has Peter Teele and Alex Karp on its
steering committee that is running it. And the other person

(16:25):
who was put in is someone who is very, very
connected to the Ross channels and many of these power
families that are out there, the dark families that are there.
I guess we could say the Illuminati type of people.
But I think is a pivotal moment in the convergence

(16:49):
of all this stuff. He brings a lot of this
stuff together. But the other person that is there is
also going to be Andre Hoffmann. And actually there is
a picture of a think and Starmer as a reminder
that when all of this stuff went down with COVID,
he was there advising Starmer as to what to do

(17:13):
and used his influence there to push everything that was
in the lockdown. As I said before, it's all really
coming out of the World Economic Forum in Builderberg, in
the UN and all the rest of this stuff.

Speaker 3 (17:26):
Trump is their puppet. He absolutely is their puppet.

Speaker 2 (17:31):
No question about it in my mind, and that's why
I oppose him.

Speaker 4 (17:34):
He did all the exact same things all these left
leaning politicians did in Europe. And there are things that
MAGA would excoriate them for. Nothing about Donald Trump, absolutely nothing.

Speaker 2 (17:46):
Marga hates the mr Anda vaccines, but the guy who
is the founding father of all that stuff they love.
It's just absolutely insane. And if you pay attention to
what Trump did in January of twenty twenty, he went
to Davos a second time, and it was just a

(18:06):
week or two after he came back that alex Azar,
the big pharmaceutical company ELI Lilly's CEO that he put
in at HHS declared the pandemic emergency. It was Trump
in the middle of March who declared an emergency status
so he could release money to get everybody to do

(18:28):
what they wanted them to do. But the actual declaration
of the emergency by HHS that began at the end
of January, right after Trump came back. It's all just
a coincidence. I guess right. We have a lot of
coincidence theorists out there.

Speaker 4 (18:44):
But these things just happened, you know, that's where they
come from. Who knows how.

Speaker 2 (18:49):
Andre Hoffman is from Switzerland. He's been the vice chair
of Roche Holding, a family business. He says, on a
lot of different boards, many of them including of course
the World Economic Forum, Board of Trustees, and something called
the Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This is what
Klaus Schwab always loved to talk about, and every time

(19:12):
he said it, because of his heavy German accent, he's
und like the forced Industrial Revolution, and that's really what
it is. It's really the fourth Turning that they're looking at.
Hoffman is also on the board of Fellows for the
School of Medicine at Stanford medicine. That's his American connection
is with the medical industrial complex. He is also a

(19:35):
member of the Club of Rome, of the Bilderberg Steering Committee,
of the Chatham House Governors, of the Global Commission for
Post Pandemic Policy. So you can see with the medicine
how connected this guy was to the pandemic.

Speaker 4 (19:49):
Is there any evil group of people this guy isn't
involved with.

Speaker 3 (19:53):
No.

Speaker 2 (19:54):
As a matter of fact, it gets even worse than that,
because his company.

Speaker 4 (19:58):
Sounds like a globalist globalist right here.

Speaker 3 (20:00):
That's right, Yeah, he is the elite of the elite.

Speaker 2 (20:03):
There's an organization which I had not seen before, a
good report from Expose a News going through trying to
find out who this guy is, because we already know
a lot about Larry Fink. But he went through and
investigated this Andre Hoffman guy, and he said that his
father was one of the founding members of this thing
called one thousand and one Club, and it was focused

(20:29):
on environmental issues. Again, we're back to the climate mcguffin,
so he's been there, heavily involved in both of the
primary mcguffins, the climate mcguffin as well as the medical mcguffin.
That's out there and the other founding members of people
like David Rockefeller, Edmund Rothschild and Maurice Strong. The thousand

(20:50):
and one Club was they wanted to get a thousand
people to donate ten thousand dollars so that they could
hand over ten million dollars to help save the environment.
But it was also the financial endowment of the one
thousand and one Club was established by another one of
these people that you see all the time. His name

(21:12):
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. Is that ring a bell?
It was Prince Bernhard who was the co founder of
the Builderberg Group. The Builderberg Group was named after a
hotel that was located right at this bridge. If you
ever saw the movie A Bridge Too Far, it was
about Operation Market Garden had Sean Connery, big all star cast,

(21:35):
but it was a real plotting movie. It was a
move by the Allies in the war against Germany the
end of the war to try to cut them off,
but evidently they were waiting for them when this all happened,
and many people believe that the Nazis were tipped off
by Prince Bernhard, and it was the final victory of

(21:57):
the Nazis and lo and behold. Ten years to the
day after this all happened, there is started by Prince Bernhard,
the guy that people suspected was a spy, as well
as a British guy, Peter Carrington, who was the commander
of the tanks who refused to move the tanks forward
and basically handed the victory to the Nazis. Those two

(22:20):
guys founded the Builderberg Group. They had their first meeting
ten years the day after the nazis last meeting. Another coincidence,
isn't it nothing to see here? Fun just keeps happening
like that. It's funny.

Speaker 4 (22:35):
No, we would never do that.

Speaker 2 (22:37):
Yeah, but this guy has got deep, deep, deep ties
to all this stuff. And of course they gave that
ten million dollars to the World Wildlife Fund because in
the early days as climate was getting started, it was
all about conservation and good things, stewardship and stuff. Then

(22:58):
they made the transfer just EPA did. Instead of protecting
the environment, they locked everything down and then started coming
after all of us. So he's also on the steering committee,
which is the one that chooses the people are going
to be able to attend and who is going to
be able to have any role in it, and now
he is, along with Larry Fink, running it. By the way,

(23:23):
the Wildlife Fund was also heavily involved Julian Huxley, the
guy who coined the term transhumanism.

Speaker 3 (23:35):
And.

Speaker 2 (23:37):
So the World Wildlife Fund was founded by Prince Bernhard
and Julian Huxley, and then the Builderberg Group was by
Prince Bernhard and this Peter Carrington guy that put this
thing through. I've got a clip here of a Fink
at the World Economic Forum.

Speaker 7 (23:56):
I could argue in the developed trees, the big winners
or countries that have shrinking populations, that's something that most
people never talked about.

Speaker 3 (24:07):
You know.

Speaker 7 (24:07):
We always used to think shrinking population is a cause.

Speaker 5 (24:11):
For negative growth.

Speaker 7 (24:14):
But in my conversations with the leadership of these large
developed countries that have xenophobic immigration policies, they all allow.

Speaker 4 (24:26):
Dare you want to keep your country shrinking unemployment?

Speaker 7 (24:30):
Excuse me, shrinking demographics.

Speaker 3 (24:33):
These countries.

Speaker 7 (24:36):
Will rapidly develop robotics in AI and technology.

Speaker 5 (24:41):
And if the promise I didn't say.

Speaker 3 (24:43):
It's going to happen.

Speaker 7 (24:44):
That's how that transforms productivity, which most of us think
it will. We'll be able to elevate the standard of
living in countries and the standard living of individuals even
with shrinking populations, and so the paradigm of negative population
growth is going to be changing, and the social problems

(25:08):
that one will have in substituting humans for machines is
going to be far easier in those countries that have
declining populations, and so for those countries that have rising populations,
the answer will be education and so rapidly develop. You know,
for those countries that do not have a foundation of

(25:30):
rural law or education.

Speaker 2 (25:32):
Educate them, tell them they don't want to have children.

Speaker 7 (25:34):
It's going to get more and more extreme.

Speaker 4 (25:36):
And unfortunately kids are expensive, they're messy, they're noisy, the
planet's dying.

Speaker 3 (25:41):
These people have.

Speaker 2 (25:42):
Always been anti human. They're not just your genesis. They
understand that it's going to be easier for them to control,
easier for them to novelize everything the fewer people there are.

Speaker 3 (25:52):
When you got a large number.

Speaker 2 (25:53):
Of people, they might go grab the guillotines and come
after you. And there's also a possibility that somebody from
them is going to rise up and take you on.
So that's their whole game is to have depopulation. That's
why they get the people like Julian Huxley.

Speaker 6 (26:09):
And it's amusing the way he phrases that, like, well,
if you've got shrinking population, that's typically indicative of negative growth.
You don't say it's like no, but that's not the
case anymore. We can still profit while our peasants are
being reduced, that's right, and so makes a false equivalency

(26:30):
of shrinking populations. And it's because they are closing their borders.

Speaker 3 (26:35):
You know.

Speaker 6 (26:35):
It's these closed borders company countries that are doing well,
and it's because their populations are shrinking. Maybe it's because
their borders are closed and they aren't having to support
a whole bunch of immigrants.

Speaker 2 (26:46):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's you can see the undercurrents of
everything these people are doing, can't you. We got some
comments here, maybe we should talk to them before we
get further into this.

Speaker 4 (26:57):
We do Skunk Hollow Rose Garden, thank you much. Thank
you very much for the tip. Says lay it on me.
I can take the whole truth.

Speaker 3 (27:05):
Not too many people can.

Speaker 4 (27:07):
Actually they get kind of mad about it generally.

Speaker 3 (27:10):
Yeah. B.

Speaker 4 (27:12):
L Holten gifted five subscriptions to the David Night Show
on Rumble. Thank you very much. B.

Speaker 3 (27:17):
L holten car on kick rumble, oh and rumble, Okay.

Speaker 4 (27:22):
Karen Carpenter twenty seven says I'm poisoned from amalgam fillings.
Nothing would surprise me, absolute nightmare.

Speaker 2 (27:29):
Yeah yeah, well I found something that I thought was surprising,
and we're going to come up to that in a moment,
but yeah, go ahead.

Speaker 4 (27:36):
Travis Cole three sixty Digital ID starts in third grade
for public schools with Google signing data I e. Issued
school laptop.

Speaker 3 (27:46):
Really, I didn't know that.

Speaker 4 (27:48):
I'm not surprised they're keeping not surprised, they're keeping track
of all that data. Your permanent record.

Speaker 3 (27:54):
You better not give your kid a laptop in third grade.

Speaker 4 (27:56):
Nope. Yeah, he gets pen and paper.

Speaker 3 (27:58):
You can make a phone, graduation president.

Speaker 4 (28:01):
Yeah, he gets it when he is old enough to
actually be going out on his own. Yeah, eighteen, something
like that Assyrian girl. The danger and this kind of
child sexualizing ais that so many kids are growing up
isolated and broken families and are ripe for any kind
of affirmation. Oh yeah they can get Yeah.

Speaker 2 (28:19):
Yeah, start out with the kind of isolation that we
have and then it gets even worse. And what AI
is doing is I've always said the really dangerous things
for it are the virtual fantasy world that they can
create for people to keep you disconnected from other human beings,
and then also the surveillance and control. But that isolation

(28:39):
is a kind of control, a very important kind of
control as well.

Speaker 4 (28:44):
Yeah, just to touch on that briefly, there's these two
different subreddits. There's AI is My Boyfriend and AI is
My Girlfriend, or worst of that effect. The AI is
my Boyfriend one has about twelve thousand users, or at
least it did last time I saw an update on it.
The girlfriend one has a few hundred, and I think
it speaks to the way people interface with these things differently.

(29:06):
Men are probably going to be more focused on using
it for immediate sexual gratification and not necessarily a conversation
a long term conversation, whereas women seem to be very
rapidly falling into this. Oh it really cares about me.
It's saying all the things that I've always wanted, Like
it's the perfect man a conversation. It gives me this
perfect conversation. It always affirms all my needs. It tells

(29:28):
me that I'm perfect and lovely and beautiful, And I think, I.

Speaker 3 (29:32):
Bet you can quote Shakespeare poetry as well.

Speaker 4 (29:34):
And I think this is really insidious because it's doing
it's giving each individual sex what they want the most
out of it in the way they want it.

Speaker 2 (29:42):
Yes, and it's going to do that individualize it for
each individual because it's going to scope in pretty quickly
and build a profile of you and tell you exactly.

Speaker 3 (29:51):
What you want to hear. That's what keeps saying over
and over against why people get sucked into this stuff.

Speaker 4 (29:55):
It's this ever changing, amorphous blob amalgam that will evolve
and adapt to whatever it is you want in that moment.
And it is going to be incredibly hard for people
to break away from this if they get sick.

Speaker 3 (30:06):
And is that not evil? I mean that is just
this satanic, It truly is.

Speaker 4 (30:11):
It's just a lie machine. Everything it does is a lie.
It will lie to you to make you happy.

Speaker 2 (30:17):
Quote unquote over everything is about imitation, theft and lies.
It's just amazing how evil this is.

Speaker 4 (30:24):
It's going to be incredibly scary in the future. We've
got more comments Little Forward Schoolhouse. Yes, and also really
good reason why we as parents need to be heavily
involved in what our children are doing, especially online. Yes, yeah,
there's I mean, Jen Alpha has been largely raised on iPads.

Speaker 2 (30:41):
When I was going up, it was TV, you know,
but it was a lot more obvious. The TV was
in the living room and all the rest of this stuff.
But uh, and didn't have the kind of content that's
on the Internet, that's for sure.

Speaker 3 (30:52):
It's very subtle.

Speaker 4 (30:54):
Yeah, and it's Yeah, the options are. You know, if
you turn your kid over to the Internet, you're never
going to really know what they're actually seeing. There's always
ways around anything you do. So if you give them
access to it, chances are they're going to be exposed
to something. So really the best option is just to
keep them away from it for as long as possible. Yes,

(31:14):
KWD sixty eight. Klaus will have ze millions and be happy.

Speaker 3 (31:18):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (31:19):
He won't eat ze bugs. He's going to eat fancy
cheeses and fine Hams.

Speaker 2 (31:24):
He was getting Z massages and he was getting Z
luxury hotels and his wife as well.

Speaker 4 (31:28):
Z luxury cars. Is chauffeur KWD sixty eight. Disney and
their magic people should have dropped them in nineteen forty Fantasia.

Speaker 3 (31:37):
Yeah exactly.

Speaker 2 (31:38):
Yeah, Well, you know, when we look at we're going
to be talking about Ukraine, what's going on there, But
just another example, it's not just even in Ukraine where
we had the Obama administration, the Hillary Clinton State Department,
all them pushing through this Sorrows Revolution in Ukraine. That's

(31:59):
what the does all the time. They overthrow governments. That's
why we have the situation that we have in Iran
because they decided they wanted to overthrow that government. It
was going to nationalize corporate assets that were there for
the oil company. So they just overthrew that government, put
in a dictator, and the Ayatolas are blowback against that policy.

(32:20):
But we're seeing it happen in Syria as well. Now Syria,
you have the massive slaughter of Christians by a regime
that was installed by the CIA. This is a book
that has just come out, the Mesa's Institute Reports about
Creative Chaos is the name of the book. Subtitle is
Inside the CIA's covert war to top all the Syrian government.

(32:44):
And yet you know we saw at the tail end
of it, the mask came off. We had a ten
warthogs coming in for the final stroke to hand it
over to the al Qaeda people. Long after everybody knew
that they were al Qaeda, and ISIS have been connected
to the CIA for the longest time. For over a decade,
the dominant Western narrative on Assyrian war has been very simple.

(33:08):
A peaceful uprising turned into a brutal civil war because
Bashar al Assad's ruthless crackdown on his own people. But
in the book Creative Chaos Libertarian Institute's latest book, William
van Wagnen methodically dismantles the mainstream version of events, exposing
it as a convenient fiction crafted to justify one of

(33:30):
the most disastrous regime changes of the modern era. And
of course it's going to continue to metastasize. This is
a central thesis. The war in Syria was not an
organic revolution, but a deliberate effort by Washington, Israel, and
their regional partners to weaken Iran by toppling Asad's governmenteah

(33:54):
when peaceful protesters were hijacked by Islamic militants. Instead of
helping to restore stability, the US and its allies deliberately
prevented Assad from crushing the insurgency just like we had
Ntanyahu was eager to install Hamas and Gaza because he
wanted them to be radical.

Speaker 3 (34:12):
He knew that.

Speaker 2 (34:13):
Would give him an excuse to push back against them.
If they were moderate, he wouldn't have an excuse to
do what he wanted to do, which is to take
over the territory. Even as the insurgency became dominated by
al Qaeda and ISIS affiliated groups.

Speaker 3 (34:28):
Let me say, the.

Speaker 2 (34:30):
US government, Pentagon, Cia has always been affiliated with ISIS
and with al Qaeda. Started with the muja Hadeen. Of course,
I've talked about this many times, John McCain making the
rounds to rich little coffee club meetings of Republican women,
bringing one of the Mujahideen in, asking them if they

(34:51):
would like to adopt amuje. You want to give us money,
We'll give it to the Mujahadeen so we can attack Russia.
Of course, well, that changed into al Qaeda, which then
changed into ISIS, which has had many many other aliases
are constantly changing the outward face of it.

Speaker 4 (35:09):
And I mentioned this on the show. I believe it's
in Rambo three, or it's in one of the Rambo movies.
At the end of the movie, there's a text scrawl
that comes up and says, this film is dedicated to
the brave fighters of the muja Hadeen, which they then
removed over time because oh, well, it turns out we're
not friends with the muja Hadeen anymore.

Speaker 2 (35:28):
We have to claim that they're on the opposite side. Yeah, well,
I'm sure it was dedicated. It probably got some funding
and some help from the Pentagon to push that out there,
as well as a CIA. Now years later, the result
is a fractured Syria ruled by jihadist warlords occupied by
foreign powers, with Israel consolidating its hold over strategic territory

(35:49):
and Christians being slaughtered there just as it seems like
that's usually the policy, usually the result of our foreign policy,
that areas that had had a Christian communities, even though
they were in the minority, that had Christian communities there
for centuries, and then they're all disappear when we take
over the area. But Israel had a role engineering chaos

(36:10):
and all this, and they wanted to do it in
order to consolidate power. One of the most compelling themes
in the book is the way he implicitly ties the
Syrian War to the broader structural issues in US foreign policy,
particularly public choice theory and the Iron Law of bureaucracy.
Public choice theory teaches us that politicians and government agencies

(36:34):
act in their own self interests, not necessarily in the
interest of the public. Well, of course, we have seen
that over and over again. That is the nature of
these humans who seek power. A student of this is
the SORRY. A subset of this is the so called
iron law of bureaucracy, which says that bureaucracies eventually prioritize

(36:56):
their own growth and survival over their original mission. The CIA,
the State Department of the Pentagon all had institutional incentives
to prolong the war, expand the budget, and justify continued intervention.
And this is the way government works everywhere and everything.

(37:17):
It's all about building this empire, this bureaucratic empire. And
that ought to give us concern about the current mission
in Washington, d C. What is Trump doing with that?
What kind of a president is he setting with that?
And you don't have to he's not trying to even
keep it a secret. I mean, he's already threatened other

(37:38):
large liberal cities that we none of us care for.

Speaker 3 (37:42):
Chicago, New York, LA.

Speaker 2 (37:45):
But it is a slow roll out of this stuff
and so now there are more National Guard troops are
being sent and there is more they're going to be
handing out arms for them for their patrol. And MAGA
is now defending it saying, well, look it's stopped everything. Well, yeah,
you know, if you set up martial law, you probably

(38:05):
can stop street crime.

Speaker 3 (38:07):
Is that the way that you want to live? I
don't think.

Speaker 5 (38:10):
So.

Speaker 2 (38:10):
There's other ways to solve this problem, and again it's
always the worst way to solve it. When we talked
about AI is a solution to have no anonymity on
the Internet and to require an ID to use Internet,
because that's basically what they're doing with these with martial law.
It's like, you got any ID, any reason to be

(38:32):
on the street, We're going to have a lockdown, We're
going to have curfew.

Speaker 3 (38:35):
That type of thing.

Speaker 4 (38:36):
Your papers please.

Speaker 2 (38:37):
Yeah, exactly. The UK has dropped their demand, at least
for now, that Apple hand over private American user data.
Think about that. The UK, not content with the fact
that it is doing dozens of charges a day against
people for what they say on social media, now wants

(38:58):
to know what you, as an American are saying. And
this is the encrypted data that is on Apple's iCloud
it is double encrypted, so they wanted Apple to give
them a back door, and Tulca Gabbertt has announced that, well,
we talked to them, We sent over JD vance and
we talked to them. They're backing down on this. You

(39:20):
really believe that this is I think, really, why would
they want that kind of stuff? Well, you know, as
I've said before, they can get around their own domestic
laws against spying on people, if there are any that
they respect. The game is that American spies can tell

(39:41):
the UK to spy on Americans, and then of course
if the UK has got the data, they can hand
it over to the American people, and then technically they
haven't spied on Americans, but they got their partners to
spy on us. So the question is is this going
to last? Apple has been very adamant saying we can't

(40:02):
and we won't force we won't give a backdoor to
any other government. But I think the UK has absolutely
embraced the kind of our well in society that George
Worwell talked about. Its truly as amazing. They've taken the
lead and all this stuff. In February, Apple removed it's

(40:26):
iCloud advanced data protection from the UK because it was
going to be a condition of doing business there to
give them back door. They subsequently made a complaint to
the UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal over the demand for data
access and that case will be heard in the early
next year, in twenty twenty six. So people in Washington

(40:48):
got involved, and all I can say is that when
Tulsa Gabbertt here's a quote from her, she says, any
information sharing between a government, any government and private companies
must be done in a manner that respects and protects
the US law and the constitutional rights.

Speaker 3 (41:05):
Of US citizens.

Speaker 2 (41:07):
If you know anything about fives, the five eyes and
what these people have been doing, that is a laughable
Why that's what Telsey Gabbert is selling people. Now everything
is safe because we got them virtue signaling about this
and Trump is in office.

Speaker 4 (41:22):
Don't worry, We'll invade your privacy in a way that
respects the constitution. Don't worry about it at all. It's fine.

Speaker 3 (41:28):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (41:29):
A couple of comments here, steaking four to twenty says,
my girl's kid had a laptop in kindergarten. Wow, what
does a kindergartener need a laptop for Yeah, Shelley A
says the screens damaged the growing child's brain. Well, that
is absolutely true, and people like see jobs while we're

(41:50):
talking about Apple, so he wouldn't give the iPad or
iPhone to his kids at all. You know, No, they're
not allowed to have that. So you should listen to
the guy who made the.

Speaker 4 (41:59):
Thing unleashed on all the rest of us.

Speaker 3 (42:03):
Yeah, that's right, because you know they need to have
the money.

Speaker 2 (42:05):
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll
be right back.

Speaker 3 (42:09):
Say with us.

Speaker 1 (42:46):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 8 (42:57):
Here news now at APS Radio news dot com or
get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (43:06):
Well, welcome back. We have a responsible state. Craft is
saying Trump gets it right on Ukraine peace. And of
course he's saying it was right to skip the ceasefire
because it doesn't make any sense and it was a
sticking point. Russia was not going to agree to it.
There was no reason for them to agree to it
and to go straight to trying to end the war.

(43:28):
That's basically what he's saying. The question on everybody's mind, however,
is what is Trump going to do in terms of
ending the war? What guarantees is he going to make?
They said, he's now entirely correct in saying that he
wants to go directly to a peace agreement which would
end the war, and not a mere ceasefire, which oftentimes
does not hold up. I saw a clip on social media.

(43:51):
I'm gonna play for you, but it's Fred Burtz going
on and on, well, when you get back together, let
me need ceasefire, and between Mertz and Trump is the
Prime Minister I think is her title, Georgia Maloney, and
she's kind of rolling her eyes talking about this is

(44:13):
not going to work. The Russians I had made it
very clear from the start of the negotiations they would
not agree to an unconditional ceasefire. It would have been
completely illogical for them to do so. Given the military
pressure on Ukraine and the advances on the battlefield. They're
far more important leverage than Russia can bring to bear
at the negotiating table. The refusal to recognize this on

(44:35):
the part of Western endlists and European governments betrays either
an inability to understand the obvious realities or B this
is what I would vote for, a desire that the
war should continue indefinitely. Look, the European Union wants a
rationale for an army. If you think back to when
it was at twenty sixteen, I think it's just before

(44:58):
the election of Trump, they had Bresit referendum, and as
that was coming in, documents were released saying, look, EU
wants to have an army and all the rest of
these things, and the EU said, no, we don't want
to have an army. Then immediately after breaks it happened,
they come out and say.

Speaker 3 (45:17):
Yeah, we do want an EU army. Of course they do.

Speaker 2 (45:20):
They want to be able to have a consolidated government.
That's what it's all about. And so this provides a
rationale for an EU army, a rationale for a European
military industrial complex, and a rebuilding of all that stuff,
as we see happening in a big way in Germany.
Very notable in Germany because they're going into massive debt

(45:42):
in order to build this to re arm Germany. Of course,
that is always the health of the state. War and
the warfare state, the welfare state is what keeps us
all in debt. So now Germany, which has been after
the lessons that World War two, the hyperinflation and the
economic depression that began there, they've been very, very wary

(46:07):
of incurring a debt. Well that's now all gone pretty much.
The people who are around then and lived through it
have all passed on. But they want to have an
EU army, an EU military industrial complex. And I think
these governments, as part of the fourth turning and the reset,
I think they would like to have a third massive

(46:29):
European war, another third World war. I think that's all
on the table.

Speaker 4 (46:34):
And I'm sure it had nothing to do with bresit happening.
And yeah, England leaving, I'm sure not saying to thinking.
You know, if this were to happen, I'm sure we'd
love our own fighting for us to go in and
establish order, you know, after an election has been stolen
or they voted to leave, and we're gonna have to
assure ourselves that these votes were legit. We're going to
station peacekeepers on your streets and we'll count the votes

(46:54):
again for you, and we'll make sure that this wasn't
a scam.

Speaker 3 (46:58):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (46:59):
So the question is is now, you know what's going
to be done in order to assure the Europeans that
this is not just the first stepping stone, and Russia's
desire to take over all of Europe, that is, I think,
has never been the issue. Putin appears to have dropped
one impossible demand that Ukraine withdraw from the whole of

(47:21):
Kerson and Zaparizia provinces. The remaining Russian demand is for
the Ukrainian Army's withdrawal from the part of Dnesque that
it holds in return for Russian withdrawal from much of
the smaller parts of Kharkiv and other provinces. And so
I think this is all summed up in this brilliantly.

(47:43):
Europe is going to spend one hundred billion dollars that
it doesn't have in order to buy weapons that America
doesn't have, in order to arm soldiers that Ukraine doesn't have.

Speaker 3 (47:58):
This is the.

Speaker 2 (47:59):
Wharf fantasy of these people, and all of them showed
up as a united front to confront Trump in any
push for peace. I gotta say, uh, for whatever reason,
and I'm sure that he's got his reasons, may be
personal financial reasons or self aggrandizement or whatever. I'm always
suspicious of his motives, but look, for whatever reason they can't.

(48:23):
I would love to see him succeed in all this,
and I'd love to see them get peace. The question is, again,
is there going to be an American presence there? And
we have some information about that as well.

Speaker 4 (48:34):
This is off topic and a little petty, but in
this photo in that article, look at how short Zelensky is.
It's just the only one shorter than him is that
little blonde woman. And I'm now so incredibly curious how
tall this man actually is because Macron is not a
very tall guy, and he's further away and is taller
than Zelenski. I'm just this is off topic, but Selenski

(48:57):
must be a tiny, tiny man.

Speaker 2 (48:58):
I guess it's the Napoleon complex, right, I'm going to color. Yeah,
the little blonde girl is Georgia Maloney, the Italian Prime minister.

Speaker 6 (49:07):
Someone needs to take this photo and add the prison
wall with the lines behind his ear, the usual suspects.
These are the people creating wars all throughout the world
right now.

Speaker 3 (49:17):
They actually are. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (49:19):
One of the things that Trump has pushed back in
terms of criticism, he said, we're not giving anything We're
going to sell weapons to these people, right, so that's
the big selling point that he's coming up. They're gonna
it's going to be a bonus for our military industrial complex.

Speaker 3 (49:34):
Uh so.

Speaker 2 (49:36):
This this is an article from a geopolitical analyst and commentator,
Glenn Deeson. He's pointed out the Kiev is essentially attempting
to create leverage out of nothing. He said, Europe will
spend one hundred billion dollars that does not have to
buy weapons from America that it does not have. It's
I said to armed soldiers Ukraine doesn't have. He followed

(49:57):
up by doing something at Washington policy makers refuse to do,
and that is to look at the big picture of
how we got here.

Speaker 3 (50:04):
He said.

Speaker 2 (50:05):
There was no threat in Ukraine before twenty fourteen, as
only a tiny minority of Ukrainians wanted to join NATO
and Russia laid no claim to any of Ukraine's territory.
Western governments since supported coup to pull Ukraine into NATO's orbit,
something that CIA di Rector's ambassadors and Western state leaders

(50:26):
had warned would instigate a security competition and likely to
trigger a war. Of course, that happened under the watch
of Clinton and Obama, but you also had Republicans like
John McCain Lindsey Graham heavily involved in that as well.
Remember this as a bipartisan thing. Russia predictably reacted fiercely.
Ever since then, the only acceptable narrative has been that

(50:47):
Russia wants to restore the Soviet Union and that Putin
is Hitler. Any dissent is labeled as disinformation, propaganda, hybrid warfare,
or even treason. The war has now been lost and
the Americans are pulling away from it, asking the Europeans
to absorb the consequences. How do the Europeans respond by
doubling down on this madness which will destroy Ukraine, our economies,

(51:12):
and our relevance in the world speaking of Europe, and
will possibly trigger a world war? He says, so what
is the strategy? More the same, the best thing for
Ukraine is to remove it from the front lines of
the geopolical struggle over where to draw the new dividing
lines in Europe, end the war, rebuild Ukraine, and replace

(51:34):
expansionist military blocks with the principle of individual security. And
I thought it was very interesting because Arrestovich, the guy
I've played that clip many times. Remember, he was the
peace negotiator in twenty nineteen, not peace between Ukraine and Russia,

(51:55):
but peace within Ukraine, because Ukraine was already enmeshed in
a civil war because of the coup in twenty fourteen,
and keV had been shelling the eastern portions of Ukraine
at that point in time for five years. And so
he's there at the peace talks and he comes back
to be interviewed on Ukrainian television and she asked him

(52:16):
what the prospects of peace are and he said, nothing,
we don't have any. She goes, oh, that's horrible. He goes,
NOI gets worse. He goes, in three years, of course,
this is twenty nineteen, we will be in direct war
with Russia, which is what happened. And she said that's horrible.
He says, he said, the country will be devastated, but
we will get into NATO. That was always the case. Now,

(52:38):
this guy, who has been amazingly frank to a fault,
I guess he got fired when he pointed out that
one of these cruise missiles that crashed into an apartment building,
they were trying to use that for propaganda purposes. And
he said, well, the reason that it crashed into the
apartment building was because Ukrainian fire had hit it and

(53:00):
damaged its guidance system, and it went off course and
crashed into the apartment building that was not the target.
And for that, Zelenski fired him for telling the truth.
Now he's running for president in Ukraine against Zelensky.

Speaker 4 (53:15):
And that's a dangerous proposition there, it is.

Speaker 2 (53:18):
But basically he did a long post on social media
and he said what we need to have is a
great return to neutrality. He said, if not done voluntarily,
then it's going to be done by force, and that
will happen in ten to fifteen years, he said. But

(53:38):
the future lies not in tactical maneuvers, but in a
strategic perspective that sees Ukraine as being a transitory state.
He said, that's the only way that we're going to
remain independent and have our freedom. So that's his opposition
to Zelenski. He's absolutely right about that. I mean, it
certainly trusts the guy, but he does seem to not

(54:01):
have any filters in terms of telling the truth, and
I think he's telling the truth one more time here.
Glenn Greenwall said, DC foreign policy elites now know that
Ukraine cannot win, but they would rather continue fueling a
fruitless and deadly war than admit that they were wrong,
of course, and delusional about Ukraine's prospects against Russia. This

(54:24):
is where we always see this. So the question, as
I said before, is are we going to have boots
on the ground American troops stationed there as a peacekeeping force?
Trump was asked about that on Fox News and here's
what he had to say.

Speaker 9 (54:37):
What kind of assurances do you feel like you have
that going forward?

Speaker 1 (54:42):
And you know, past this.

Speaker 9 (54:44):
Trump administration, it won't be American boots on the ground
defending that border.

Speaker 8 (54:50):
Well, do you have my assurance? And I'm president and
I'm just trying to stop people from being killed, Yarlie. Look,
they're losing from five to seven thousand people a.

Speaker 3 (55:01):
Week Yeah, there we go.

Speaker 2 (55:04):
Yeah, he's losing anywhere from five to seven thousand people
a weekend. Of course, he thinks that if he can
stop that, that's going to give him some extra credit
with God. We'll talk about that coming up. But Trump
gave his personal assurance there'll be no American boots on
the ground and a post thing, and he said you
can count on me. I'm president.

Speaker 3 (55:23):
Right. We would never see Trump say one thing and
do another, would we.

Speaker 4 (55:28):
And of course he'll be president forever, and there's no
one else that's going to become president.

Speaker 2 (55:32):
Right, he said, you have my assurance, and I'm president.
He said American forces would play a supporting role. He said,
there will be some form of security. It can't be
NATHO because that's just not something that would ever ever happen.

Speaker 3 (55:46):
It couldn't. He said. American support probably take.

Speaker 2 (55:48):
The form of air support, whether that means combat air
patrols and air policing or a deployment of intelligence assets
defeed information to European forces is present unclear when it
comes to security, said Trump. The Europeans are willing to
put people on the ground, and we are willing to
help them with things, especially by air, because nobody has

(56:09):
the kind of stuff we have. Follows other marks by Trump,
he says a Putin agree that Russia would accept security
guarantees in Ukraine. So that's why when they were saying,
as longly as Ukraine doesn't formally enter NATO, we would
accept things like an Article five security guarantees. In other words,
some kind of military force there that would guarantee that

(56:31):
they're not going to be moving in. But I think
we'll have to see what happens again. The conference that'll
have Putin's, Lensky and Trump. I think he's scheduled that
for Friday. We'll see what comes out of that.

Speaker 4 (56:45):
I'm not expecting anything major. As I've said before, Zelensky
is enriching himself off of this, and he doesn't care
how many of his own countrymen die. As long as
the money keeps rolling in for him, He'll keep sacrificing
them into the meatgrinder. It doesn't matter if Ukraine gets
a Blae iterated. Yeah, he'll move to the French Riviera
with his wife. And that's why the British and the
French are as well. They want to keep it going

(57:06):
as well. The UK is eager to get there on
the ground as soon as possible, said the Defense Minister.
And the circumstances of a ceasefire, we're ready to put
UK boots on the ground in Ukraine. They are ready
to go. They are ready to act from day one.
They just can't wait to get in there and get
involved in a war because.

Speaker 2 (57:23):
They've got problems at home. People getting pretty upset with
what the government is doing to people at home, and
that's when these governments push for war. Like Seleny has
always said, when all else fails, they take you to war.
That's why the UK and France are pushing so hard,
because they've already gone to war with their own people.
In terms of the immigration stuff, Trump's new comments on

(57:46):
security cooperation period, they have done a little to encourage
Germany to commit to the so called coalition, at least
in a front line role. But I think that'll probably change.
Germany is very interested in building up the military now
and building up the strength of government. Well, we're going
to take a quick break and we will be right back.

Speaker 5 (58:07):
Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (01:00:46):
Defending the American dreams. You're listening to the David Knight
Show making sense. Comment again, you're listening to the David

(01:02:31):
Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (01:02:39):
Welcome back, folks. Thank you for still being here with us.
We appreciate it. We've got some comments here from Nibaru
twenty twenty nine says AI you will know nothing and
be happy. That's right. Why would you want to know anything?
The AI knows it all for you. It'll tell you
what's true, or at least an approximation of it kind
of maybe.

Speaker 3 (01:03:00):
Schultz, I know nothing.

Speaker 4 (01:03:03):
Epstein Island says, Wow, we've got a celebrity in the chat.
Trump is evicting the homeless from DC. How do you
evict people who are already evicted? Trump wants to turn
the homeless into Palestinians. Yeah, we're gonna round them up
for soilent green.

Speaker 2 (01:03:17):
Yeah, he's gonna victim out of DC as if that
were their home.

Speaker 4 (01:03:21):
But Audi mrr says, and it's good to see you.

Speaker 3 (01:03:25):
Audi.

Speaker 4 (01:03:25):
Amazing how these wars cause insurmountable damage and then when
they get what they wanted, then they want to act
like brokers of peace. Nate mac four. Screens damage adult brains.
Look at how much we've changed since TV was invented.
They're not healthy for anyone, but they're especially damaging for children.
Sam Miller won two three Good to see You.

Speaker 3 (01:03:45):
It was so worth it to get Gilligan's Island.

Speaker 4 (01:03:49):
Right back, and you'll hear the tale. Sam Miller won
two three. Good to see You, Sam. They gave all
students from kindergarten through high school laptops as they were
locked down during COVID, so they can still do school
rually in parts of Iowa. I'm sure that it's massively
important for your kindergartener to be given.

Speaker 2 (01:04:07):
And you know, just send the bill to the homeowners. Yeah,
in terms of property taxes. That's why we won't be
able to own a home is because the waste of
these school systems. I think about that every time I
drive by school and see all the part school buses
and so it just amazes me.

Speaker 4 (01:04:24):
The extremely nice facilities that they have for sports. Yeah,
there's a high school nearby where we live and they
have a very very nice track and field, football field,
soccer field. You're just looking at it thinking how much
money was spent on this?

Speaker 3 (01:04:40):
Yeah, never too much.

Speaker 4 (01:04:42):
Shabe or shab five. If you step back, all these
war zones have Agenda twenty thirty type build Back Better
reconstruction plans and stakeholders long term plans. We're in the
demolition phase of build back better.

Speaker 3 (01:04:55):
Well.

Speaker 4 (01:04:56):
First, before you can build back, you've got to get rich.
What's there?

Speaker 2 (01:04:59):
Yeah, of course in Ukraine, I've played the video many
times when I talk about Ukraine twenty thirty. Well, the
war is over and now everything that you do you
do online or through your phone, and all your interaction
with the government is all done there with your digital ID,
and we make it so easy for you. Isn't this wonderful?

(01:05:19):
You just can't wait for that to happen.

Speaker 4 (01:05:21):
That's what I've been saying is they're going to make
it very, very annoying to use a regular ID in
coming weeks, months, years. It's going to be incredibly annoy
You're gonna have to upload it time and time again.
They're going to make it so the camera that you
use to take a picture of it doesn't function properly.
Oh take another picture, do this. But if you've got
the digital idea, Oh, it's going to work so seamlessly
and flawlessly. It's going to be so easy. You're not

(01:05:43):
going to have to put up with the hassle of it.

Speaker 3 (01:05:45):
That's right, it's going to be.

Speaker 2 (01:05:46):
Well, we know exactly how they're going to use it.
I mean, it's the way the Chinese used it. It's
the way they tried to use it with the vaccine
credentials in twenty twenty and all the rest is it's
about a permission society. Well, let's take a look. I
said before that there's been some new interesting information about
the link between the MMR vaccine and autism. It turns out,

(01:06:10):
and Children's Health Defense has a story. It turns out
that some of their scientists have looked at this and
they've produced their own paper in response to the gold
standard that has been sold by the medical community in
the mainstream media since two thousand and two. Supposedly, this
two thousand and two study debunked any link between autism

(01:06:32):
and vaccines, and now these people have looked at this
study coming again from the New England Journal of Medicine,
the usual suspects. You can usually count on this kind
of garbage coming from them, So the question of vaccines
and autism desperately needs to be put back on the table.
This is a peer reviewed research letter by Children's Health

(01:06:53):
Defense scientists calls into question a two thousand and two
study at the New England Journal of Medicine that officials
always use as their strong evidence of no link between
the MMR vaccine and autism. The decades old study, however,
does not support rejecting the causal link between the measles,

(01:07:14):
mumps rubella vaccine. They say in the new stuff, they
said simply math, and they did the scientific study wrong.
It was done by the usual people like I said,
when you look at these studies, any of these studies,
the first question you should have is quibono who benefits
from this right? And of course when it's coming out

(01:07:36):
of New England Ternal Medicine, you know that it's the
pharmaceutical industry and the medical communities that are behind this.
The pediatricians are pushing this, the AMA is pushing this,
and they are in bed with the pharmaceutical companies. Jablonski
and Hooker called for the study to be replicated after

(01:07:57):
correcting for errors. They said, there's problems with measurements of certainty,
contradictions and numbers presented in the studies table, and a
flaw in the method used to determine risk. I wonder
if this thing was done by Peter Navara. It sounds
like his tariffs, they said. Landmark publication and one of
the most prestigious medical journals in the world, whose erroneous

(01:08:20):
conclusions have reverberated through news outlets and doctors' offices alike
for the last twenty three years, is shown to be
invalid by the most basic form of arithmetic.

Speaker 4 (01:08:32):
Do they get anything right about this study? Is more
than a question.

Speaker 3 (01:08:35):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:08:36):
I would like to see them go back and revisit
the Framingham study, which I've had. The doctor that did
the surgeries lectured me on that many times to say
it proves that you need to have status. And it's
like somewhat skeptical of that, which makes me wonder if
this is being used so much by the medical community,
who funded it and to what purpose. The problem is

(01:08:59):
not that we were so old sixty nine billion dollars
a year in vaccines based on faulty analyzes that riddled
our children with toxins left them in chronic and debilitating
disease state, if not death. The problem is that we
bought it. The New England Journal Medicine paper by Madson
and others is one of the key studies cited by
vaccine advocates to say that it is a myth that

(01:09:23):
there is a link between these factisms, these vaccines, and autism,
and they did this twenty three years ago. They said
there was a lot of mounting evidence showing a link,
and of course if you just looked at the explosion
of autism at that point in time, you knew something
was happening. But again, the report from you know The

(01:09:46):
reply I should say from the mainstream media is don't
look at this. You know, they get very upset if
anybody talks about doing a study. It's like, what do
you have to hide? And you know, well, it's all
been done, the science is subtled, blah blah blah. Well,
if it's scientific, then you should be able to replicate that,
and you shouldn't have a concern about somebody doing another.

Speaker 3 (01:10:07):
Look at that.

Speaker 6 (01:10:08):
They analyzed and settled science came from the same group
that did the computer model for COVID that showed it
going up forever and didn't give the same output twice.

Speaker 2 (01:10:20):
Well, that was the Imperial College of London. But New
England Journal of Medicine is just as bad as they are.

Speaker 3 (01:10:25):
They said.

Speaker 2 (01:10:25):
They looked at five hundred and thirty seven thousand children
in the Danish healthcare system. They separated them into vaccinated
and unvaccinated groups. The problem was that they didn't normalize this,
they said. When they looked at it, they said the
risk of autism was the same in both groups. There
was no association with a child's age at the time
of vaccination or the time since vaccination or the date

(01:10:49):
of vaccination, and the development of autism, but this study
has become a cornerstone publication to say that there is
no connection to autism. But the two people to scientists
from Children's Health Defense said that the study results as
presented show that the authors are ninety five percent confident

(01:11:10):
that the recipients of the MMR vaccine are anywhere from
forty seven percent less likely to get autism to twenty
four percent more likely to be harmed by the autistic disorder.
Think about that. Okay, they're nearly one hundred percent confident
that they don't have a conclusion here. Because if you

(01:11:30):
can go anywhere from forty seven percent less likely to
twenty four percent more likely to have autism, that is
so wide that you can't have any confidence in this study.

Speaker 4 (01:11:42):
Yeah, that's quite a swing. Imagine somebody comes and says,
I've got a great investment for you. Now you might
be forty seven percent likely to make double your money,
or maybe you're twenty four percent likely to lose it all.
You know, I'm not exactly sure. I don't know how
we're doing this, but.

Speaker 2 (01:11:58):
Yeah, they've got confident is that they don't really have a.

Speaker 4 (01:12:01):
Conclusion here, So it doesn't even make sense.

Speaker 2 (01:12:05):
Yeah, they said, this is strong evidence of a need
for more evidence. So problems with how the study was conducted,
They said. They had also a statistical adjustment. They used
this to correct data to account for biases, confounding factors
on limitations in the data. The authors didn't share their
detailed model for the kind of statistical adjustment that they did,

(01:12:29):
which would have been appropriate given that the adjustment changed
the safety signal to its opposite. It changed it from
leaning toward harm to leaning toward protection. So all we
do is they come in and wave their hands and say, well,
we initially did this. It looked like it was causing autism,
but then we applied a statistical correction, and now it

(01:12:49):
shows that it doesn't.

Speaker 4 (01:12:51):
Well, once I massaged the data, yeah, exactly, once I
made it so it didn't.

Speaker 3 (01:12:57):
They said.

Speaker 2 (01:12:58):
The studies authors are confused about the size of the
vaccinated and the unvaccinated cohorts. The number of vaccinated versus
unvaccinated individuals with autistic disorder and other autism spectrum disorders
varies between these tables. For example, renalyzing unadjusted data from
one of their tables indicated with a ninety percent confidence

(01:13:19):
that children who received the MMR vaccine had an eighteen
percent greater incident of autistic disorder or other autism spectrum disorders.
They said the original medicine paper is foundational to the
pharmaceutical industry canard that quote vaccines don't cause autism. However,
the numbers literally don't add up, and you can see

(01:13:40):
how they're massaging the data, and they don't tell you
the factors that they've applied to. They just give you
the inconclusion. There's no science in this, and folks, this
is the whole reason. This is when you look at
what they do with the quote unquote science of virology
about the existence of viruses. They never do real science
on any of these viruses. They've not isolated them. They

(01:14:02):
have not isolated something and then exposed a population to
it and see the disease developed. That's never never been done.
That's why many doctors are saying, we no longer believe
that in any of this virology stuff. The study was
also done at the beginning of an explosion in autism rates,
when fewer vaccines were recommended to children, and when there

(01:14:25):
were fewer other possible toxic exposures as well, and so
there's yet another lawsuit that's been filed against RFK Junior's
CDC over the failure to test cumulative effect of seventy
two dose childhood vaccine schedule. Think about that, six dozen vaccines,

(01:14:45):
and what they're saying is you have barely, if you
have at all, tested the individual vaccines, but you've never
even attempted to test for safety the combined effect of
these seventy two and so there's a lawsuit saying the
agency has not done its job. And of course the
CDC is under HHS, it's directly under Susan Monarez. You

(01:15:10):
remember her. She was put in first. They brought in
somebody who was not so friendly to vaccines, and the
industry was not happy with that, and he was told
by the Trump administration when he was on his way
to the hearing, don't bother to show up. We've withdrawn
your name, and they put in in his place Susan Montarez,

(01:15:31):
who has been put there from working for BARDA, which
is like the biological equivalent of DARPA. Very dark, very
sinister work that they're doing there, and what she has
been focused on at BARDA was artificial intelligence designing m
RNA drugs. The very thing that Trump began his administration

(01:15:54):
with with Stargate. If you recall, so I looked at
this and I thought, well, this is just a This
whole thing was set up from the very beginning to
put somebody in there that looked like is going to
be a win for skeptics. Instead, what we wind up
with as an AI m RNA person who's going.

Speaker 3 (01:16:13):
To be there, Well, she is at the CDC.

Speaker 4 (01:16:15):
So the lawsuit going to say, isn't it funny how
that keeps happening with the Trump administration? Yeah, isn't it
funny how all these people that are supposed to be
on our side they get in there and immediately switch gears.

Speaker 3 (01:16:26):
Yeah, or they don't get in Yeah, you.

Speaker 2 (01:16:28):
Could tell Dan Bongino. Yeah, funny exactly. CDC demands proof
of harm while refusing to conduct the studies that could
provide it. That is exactly what we see from these
people over and over again. You know, when you got
a natural substance, so we've got to have some studies
or you can't say this or that about it. But

(01:16:49):
they won't do the studies, they won't fund those studies,
they don't care. So they say, well, there's no studies
because they don't fund them, and then they shut it
down on According to.

Speaker 6 (01:16:58):
Consider how much of the medical field is about knowing
which drugs interact with which ones, it's shocking that they
haven't done any studies to see if these seventy two
vaccines can interact with each other.

Speaker 2 (01:17:10):
Yeah, oh absolutely, or to see what the cumulative effect
is of all the adjuvants and preservatives and things like that.

Speaker 4 (01:17:16):
That is because it's been coming out more and more
as time goes on that the babies are just not
capable of really clearing these things out of their system.
That it accumulates in them at a much higher rate
and a faster rate than and it wouldn't an adult
because they don't have a fully developed system to flush
these kinds of chemicals and toxins out.

Speaker 2 (01:17:32):
Well, it's one of these things like the masks, right,
even if they're science were correct in terms of viruses
and stuff, then that means that the masks were ludicrously inefficient.
Could be like a hurricane fence trying to keep out mosquitoes,
you know. But when you look at like the hepatitis
B vaccine which they want to give newborns, it's like

(01:17:53):
just test the mother and see she's got hepatitis B.
If she doesn't have hepatities B, you don't need to
give that to the baby.

Speaker 5 (01:17:59):
It's ridiculous.

Speaker 4 (01:18:00):
It's truly evil.

Speaker 3 (01:18:02):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:18:03):
According to the complaint, the CDC violated the First Amendment,
Free Speech and Fifth Amendment Do Process clauses of the
US Constitution, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, which
agency actions are considered to be arbitrary and capricious if
they have failed to consider an important aspect of the problem. Well,

(01:18:24):
I mean, what would government what we have left of
the government if we took out everything that was arbitrary
and capricious, way, we much left the government with them.

Speaker 3 (01:18:32):
It fit in the Constitution, I guess.

Speaker 2 (01:18:34):
Lawsuit is now asking to force the CDC to study
the childhood vaccine schedule and the interactions.

Speaker 3 (01:18:42):
They said.

Speaker 2 (01:18:42):
The lawsuit is bringing to like critical facts about the
US childhood vaccine schedule about which most parents are unaware.
The schedule is essentially an experiment on our children. One
that becomes increasingly concerning is more shots are added and
combination of vaccines introduced. I mean they added the COVID shot,
the mr Anda Trump shot to the childhood schedule. On

(01:19:07):
Friday last week, HHS announced that it is reinstating the
Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines. The lawsuit describes this
as an encouraging small first step, but saying that it
still does not address the lack of safety testing of
the entire vaccine schedule. They said, this case exposes structural

(01:19:28):
failure of the institution. Now, what it exposes is the
fact that these institutions are riddled with corruption and they
are captured by the industries that they're supposed to be regulating.
Individual vaccines undergo limited FDA testing, and neither the FDA
nor the CDC has ever required or conducted safety testing

(01:19:50):
of the cumulative childhood schedule that is now seventy two doses.
They said, to expose the data on harm caused by
vaccines would destroy confidence in the program. The program is
more important to them than whether or not it actually
helps children. It's what we're talking about, the iron law
of bureaucracy, and also about corruption. For the people that

(01:20:12):
the bureaucracy is actually working for is not the public,
but it's working for the people who have created this stuff.
The FDA is there to make sure that they are
free to do anything, and to give them legal cover
to do anything. Our plaintiffs live the reality of this
unproven vaccine recommendation schedule. It's two doctors who have filed this,

(01:20:34):
two doctors who actually did some science, and for publishing
these results, they had their licenses taken away. Thomas lost
his pediatric practice after publishing data comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Staller had his license revoked for writing medical exemptions based
on genetic risk factors. Doctors who do such research and

(01:20:59):
dare publish it, but we'll have the research ultimately retracted,
even after being published through a rigorous peer review process.
In my case, said Thomas. A few days after this
study was available online, the Oregon Medical Board had an
emergency meeting immediately suspended my license, claiming I was a

(01:21:19):
threat to public health.

Speaker 4 (01:21:21):
You notice they don't claim he's lying. Yeah, they don't
come out and say you're telling falsehoods. They just said
you're a threat to public health.

Speaker 2 (01:21:29):
They're right, because public health is not about individual health.
It is this nebulous thing that exists for its own
benefit in order to dominate us.

Speaker 4 (01:21:40):
And to me, that wording is a tacit admission of yeah, okay,
you're right about this. Sure, there's a connection here. However,
we're prioritizing what we think is important. We think that
if you were to put this out there, that people
would stop getting vaccines, and that that would lead to
more problematic outcomes for us. Yes, yes, I don't want

(01:22:00):
people to be able to make an informed decision, that's.

Speaker 2 (01:22:03):
Right, especially parents, because that's the other part of the lawsuit.
They say that it also affects a Fifth Amendment for
parents because it deprives parents and children of life, liberty,
or property, and that it denies parents their quote, fundamental
liberty interests in directing their children's medical care and children's
fundamental right to bodily integrity because they know that if

(01:22:26):
you confront a pediatrician with this stuff and refuse to
do this, the pediatrician is likely to report you to CPS,
and just like the Oregon Medical Board revoked this doctor's license,
CPS will come in to try to revoke your parenthood
take your children away from you. They said, this framework

(01:22:46):
denies the existence of medically vulnerable children, while the CDC
refuses to recognize any category of vaccine vulnerable children despite
mounting evidence that they exist, and of course, as we
reported in the last couple of weeks, the American Academy
of Pediatrics is now engaged in a campaign to remove

(01:23:08):
religious exemptions. They want to come after the First Amendment
for parents as well. They want to say that you
can't refuse to get vaccines because they were the product
of an abortion or something like that. Texas Attorney General
is now suing Eli Lilly for bribing doctors to prescribe
high profit drugs. And of course Eli Lilly is the

(01:23:31):
giant pharmaceutical company that Trump went to to get the
head of HHS for his first term. That was Alex Czar,
the head the CEO of Eli Lilly. He was the
one who ran the so called pandemic. Now Attorney General
Ken Paxton is suing Eli Lily for allegedly bribing doctors

(01:23:52):
to prescribe their most profitable drugs, especially the weight loss medications,
but also other prescriptions that were there. He says that
the result of this, by getting them to pick the
more expensive drugs, has resulted in millions of dollars in claims,
Medicare claims and texas that have been made at taxpayer expense.

(01:24:14):
When you look at what they do. It's the first
hand in the experience that I had with this Eloquist thing.
You know, it's a blood thinder thing to stop blood clots,
and the medical community they're all just like, oh, yeah,
that's the one thing that you use.

Speaker 3 (01:24:29):
You know.

Speaker 2 (01:24:30):
They have been so thoroughly propagandized by Pfizer that that's.

Speaker 3 (01:24:36):
What they sell.

Speaker 2 (01:24:36):
And the doctor said he had a patient who paid
thousands of dollars a month to get this blood any medication,
and it's like, that's ridiculous. There's a lot of things
out there that can thin your blood, and not even
prescription pharmaceuticals, but that's what they do. They work with
them to say this is the one that you want,
and look, we've got to study here, you know. So

(01:25:00):
these are the GLP one weight loss medications, Manjarro and
zep bound that are produced by Eli Lilly. He claims
that they are engaged in an illegal kickback scheme. He
said Eli Lilly fraudulently sought to maximize profits at taxpayer
expense and put corporate greed over people's health, just like

(01:25:22):
with the opioid epidemic. Plaintiffs include the State of Texas
and Health Choice Alliance LLC, a New Jersey based research
organization and add In addition to Manjaro and zep Bound,
the complaint named a dozen drugs sold by Eli Lilly
to treat conditions including migraines, ezema, leukemia, and breast cancer.

(01:25:44):
ELI Lilly offered illegal incentives to Texas medical providers for
prescribing the drugs. Listen to this, including free nurses.

Speaker 3 (01:25:55):
What is that?

Speaker 2 (01:25:56):
And reimbursement for support services. Hey, I get a free
nurse for.

Speaker 4 (01:25:59):
You can advantage that as an indentured servant's yeah, I.

Speaker 3 (01:26:03):
Guess they take the salary of the nurses.

Speaker 2 (01:26:06):
Eli Lilly in twenty twenty three tested it's monjaro shots
on kids as young as six. This is the GLP
one drugs that family of drugs. Several lesser known GLP
one drugs can be prescribed off label for children, but
of course this hasn't been tested for that. Texas's new
lawsuit follows an October twenty twenty four suit that the

(01:26:28):
state and the Help Choice Alliance filed against major insulin vendors,
including Eli Lilly, for overcharging and so and also a
kickback scheme. This seems to be standard operating procedure. With
pharmaceutical companies, whether you're talking about insulin or whether you're
talking about opioids, or you're talking about now these weight
loss drugs. And then finally we have inside mRNA vaccines.

(01:26:53):
You've got Robert Redfield, who was the CDC director for
Trump in his first term. This sky is coming out
now and kind of fessing up. But from the things
that he's saying, he ought to go to jail. He said, quote,
we turned the body into a factory with no clear controls.

(01:27:14):
And if you go back and look at the archives,
I said that publicly.

Speaker 3 (01:27:16):
When they started talking about that.

Speaker 4 (01:27:18):
If you remember they had you said that almost immediately.

Speaker 2 (01:27:20):
Yeah, yeah, they said they went. Trump set up this
little dog and pony show and he had all these
pharmaceutical executives come in and set at the table. They
went around the table and he had them all lined
up in the order of how quickly they could do this,
and he said, no, that's not fast enough. Next time,
that's not fast enough. And he gets to Moderna and
they said, we can do it right now, because we're

(01:27:41):
going to use your body as a factory to manufacture
this vaccine. And I said, well, what could possibly go wrong?
With that, I said, that sounds like cancer. How do
you ever stop this thing? And actually what it reminds
me of when I look at this, it reminds me
of somebody mentioned earlier Fantasia. It reminds me of the

(01:28:02):
Sorcerers apprentice. How how appropriate you know when you talk
about uh pharma ka the sorcerers.

Speaker 3 (01:28:11):
Uh, this is basically if you look at these.

Speaker 2 (01:28:13):
Marching brooms with their buckets of water, that's basically what
they unleash on.

Speaker 3 (01:28:19):
You with the m r and a vaccine. I think
this is the This is the perfect analogy for the pharmachia.

Speaker 5 (01:28:26):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (01:28:26):
You know, it just keeps coming. And that's what the
m RNA does.

Speaker 2 (01:28:29):
It keeps multiplying and multiplying in your body as it
is damaging your body, flooding your body with spikes, these
spy proteins. You know, that's the That's the analogy right there,
and pharma marches on. Now Robert Redfield is going to

(01:28:51):
tell us the truth about that. Finally five years ago,
where was he? Okay, he was in the position to
do something about it. He was the CDC director and
he wouldn't give you the obvious issue with it. Hey,
we don't have any way to turn this off. Where's
the off switch? We can't control this. We just unleash it. Right,
we do this pharmachea incantation injection, and it's off to

(01:29:14):
the races.

Speaker 4 (01:29:14):
Well, there's probably a lot more money for him to
be made being quiet back then, but he's now. He
wants some headlines.

Speaker 2 (01:29:20):
He also wants you to trust him, so he's out there.
He wants to sell bird flu pandemic and he's been
doing that. But he's also the guy that's out there
saying it came from China. Now, right, we didn't develop it.
It came from China. The virus did well, he said,
this is that.

Speaker 4 (01:29:38):
There is a virus.

Speaker 3 (01:29:39):
Yeah, this is if there was a virus. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:29:42):
Xpose News has the article about a new documentary called
Inside mRNA Vaccines the movie.

Speaker 3 (01:29:49):
They say it's an.

Speaker 2 (01:29:50):
Unfiltered second opinion on the science behind mRNA technology to
provide the public with information the corporate media will not
cover about the development and global role out of the
mRNA vaccine technology. Well, I hope that they get into
the long history of this, but I have concerns about
it since they have Robert Malone, who has another limited

(01:30:11):
hangout Guy, But this thing had been developed for quite
some time, the vaccine itself as well as all the
lockdown and the tactics that they were going to use
against US. They had wargained that from Dark Winter on,
but the vaccine had been developed with BARDA and DARPA
for quite some time before they roll that out as well.

(01:30:34):
This premiered on the twelfth of August. This documentary features
exclusive three D animations and depth interviews. I guess they
show the mRNA unleashing the spike proteins like the marching
brooms of the buckets of water, perhaps professionals who expressed
concern about potential gaps and data transparency, risk assessment, and

(01:30:55):
long term safety associated with the rapid adoption of this platform.
The documentary argues that while regulators and much of the
scientific community maintain that COVID mRNA vaccines are safe and effective,
the technology is rapidly expanding beyond pandemic response, including potential
applications and the food supply. Of course, Brooke rollins the

(01:31:18):
person that Trump just put in and USDA, the first
thing she did was to prove mRNA injections into chickens
and pigs and be into our food supply to supposedly
protect them from bird flu. mRNA, I think is going
to be the legacy of Trump. I think people are

(01:31:43):
going to I think history is going to be on
my side when it comes to Trump, because they're going
to see that this guy was both the father and
the funder of mRNA vaccines. He has said over and
over again how he's the one who created it. He's
the proud I guess we should.

Speaker 4 (01:32:01):
Unable to stop himself from bragging about it.

Speaker 2 (01:32:03):
Yeah, instead of being the founding father, he is the
funding father of this abomination that we call the COVID vaccine.
But mRNA in general, I said before, when we're talking
about dental issues, this is the cynical underbelly of the
entire medical industry, is what this really looks like. The
American Dental Association promoting what they want dentists to tell

(01:32:28):
you is silver fillings. There's no silver in them at all.
It's mercury. It's fifty percent mercury, as a matter of fact,
dangerous heavy metal. They can travel to the brain, the kidneys,
the placenta, and to breast milk. Dentists still use amalgam
on vulnerable populations, including service members, Native Americans, people and institutions,

(01:32:50):
and low income families. In other words, if you've got insurance.
Many of us do not have dental insurance, but if
you've got insurance, the insurance wants you to get amalgam fillings.
And so people who are in government assurance insurance, they
are getting that instead of ceramic. But you know, even
when you go to a dentist, they do everything to

(01:33:11):
talk you out of a ceramic filling. They not only
are they more expensive, but they say, well it's not
going to last. Yeah, I don't like to do those,
and so forth. The thing that I thought was fascinating
about this is when you look at the financial interests
of the American Dental Association. They have a patent on amalgam.

(01:33:32):
Why they pushed that, and they also have rules to
tell the dentists not to talk about the mercury and
the fillings that the ad that the American Dental Association
has patented in order to make a profit off of this.
And what is interesting, I think is that basically the
USA is standing alone.

Speaker 3 (01:33:54):
You have the EU.

Speaker 2 (01:33:57):
Has now banned these mercury fillings, as many third world
countries have Vietnam and others. This is an article about
two people who've put together a consumer movement that brought
that about in Europe. And they said, at the beginning,
FDA and the World Health Organization were pushing for the

(01:34:17):
amalgam stuff, but they have now switched from being supporters
of amalgam to opponents.

Speaker 3 (01:34:22):
Of the mercury in these vaccines. They said both.

Speaker 2 (01:34:27):
But the government bureaucracies here in the United States, both
federal and state, as well as the insurance companies have
not changed. They're still pushing for this. So as usual,
we see these big organizations like the pediatricians who along
with the insurance companies the Organization of Pediatricians and saying

(01:34:50):
we want to take away even religious exemptions for the vaccines,
and the insurance companies will shut down your practice as
a pediatrician if you don't get a large percentage of
your patient, your child patient's vaccinated with the schedule. We
see the same thing happening with the fillings, and it's
the insurance companies allied with the medical guild. That's why

(01:35:12):
we got to look at the ADA and the AAP.
These things are guilds that exist for the enrichment of
their people, not for your health. They are adamantly opposed
to your health in made different ways.

Speaker 4 (01:35:26):
It's incredible to me that more people can't see it
at this point, and they make it so blatantly obvious. Yeah,
the sheer amount of evidence that there has been out
there with just the opioid crisis, I really thought people
were starting to wake up to it, and they almost did.
People were beginning to get mad. They're beginning to see, oh, man,
these guys poisoned us, they indicted us. Look at the

(01:35:48):
people on the street that are just zombies.

Speaker 3 (01:35:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:35:50):
And then COVID rolled around. They immediately just went back
into full Oh, you've got to save us. Please, I'll
take whatever you give me.

Speaker 3 (01:35:56):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:35:56):
And then Trump talks to Johnson and Johnson was running
the operloid thing and said, hey, let me give you
a factory so you can get into the vaccine business
because you don't have any liability with that.

Speaker 4 (01:36:06):
That's where the big money is.

Speaker 2 (01:36:08):
Yeah, that's right. Well, Florida has been probably the leader
in the bright spot in all of this, and they
said it was because of a zoom meeting that they
had with the Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladipo. He's not perfect,
and I wish that he would move faster on things,
but he has been moving faster than anybody else in
terms of pushing back against the MR and A stuff

(01:36:29):
now pushing back against the amalgam fillings and so forth
in Rhode Island and California. They're presenting this as a
racial justice issue. That's going to be the angle that
they take, saying that this affects poor people more than
other people. So they said part of what they've been
able to accomplish is that they have when they started

(01:36:50):
this campaign, the two biggest companies that I made dental
appliances were in the Amalgam business, and now they've gotten out.
They don't make that any more. So it's smaller manufacturers
that are making it, and that's very key. But the
European Union, just like with fluoride, we are the outlier
and all this stuff we have, our government continues to

(01:37:13):
push for this stuff. So it'll be interesting to see what,
if anything, the MAHA people do about this, because Trump
is now trying to extend fluoride being put into the
water supply. They said that in twenty twenty four, they
wound up the vote to ban amalgam in the EU

(01:37:33):
was twenty seven nations for the ban and zero nations
against the ban. They said, what started with only two
countries supporting their effort to stop amalgam filling in twenty
eleven morped into a unanimous vote to stop it in
twenty twenty four. The European Parliament then supported the ban
ninety eight percent to two percent. They said, governments around

(01:37:55):
the world, even not just the EU, but from Vietnam
to Tunisia, have banned a malcam, but not our American
government and not Maha. Isn't that telling? It's just amazing.
Now we see a new article from the Hill and
I look at the you know, the Hill typically covers politics, right,

(01:38:15):
Why are they talking about vaccines. Well, because vaccines are
politics in a big way. Promising vaccine may prevent certain
cancers from returning, or it could kill you before the
cancer returns.

Speaker 3 (01:38:28):
It could also give you I.

Speaker 6 (01:38:30):
Mean, it still prevents it, you know, if it kills
you before the cancer returned.

Speaker 4 (01:38:34):
We are still counting that as a win.

Speaker 3 (01:38:37):
Yeah, technically A.

Speaker 2 (01:38:39):
Big part of this, you know, is the fact that
the pharmaceutical companies own everybody by subsidizing them We have
seen this with the ads that they've been doing, the
asker Doctor ads that have been there since the nineteen
nineties when Clinton allowed that to come in. And in
the UK they actually have a Medical Journalists Association and

(01:39:04):
they hand out awards to medical journalists. But that association
is funded by the pharmaceutical companies. So guess what, You're
not going to have any journalists doing articles exposing what
is happening with the pharmaceutical stuff. The set it's sponsored
by a number of organizations, including several pharmaceutical companies and

(01:39:25):
their UK trade body, the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry,
also another number of medical communications and advertising agencies and
pharmaceutical companies. They said among its current and previous sponsors
numerous other pharmaceutical companies and other organizations active within the
pharmaceutical industry. And this article from The Daily Skeptic in

(01:39:49):
the UK said none of the seventy seven articles listed
for final consideration for awards are directly critical of any
pharmaceutical company.

Speaker 3 (01:40:01):
They're all puff pieces.

Speaker 6 (01:40:03):
I mean, what did you expect they're going to be, like,
a good job getting this on that corruption? Oh you
got us.

Speaker 3 (01:40:10):
It is amazing and of course, we have organizations like this.

Speaker 2 (01:40:12):
Here in the United States, we have STAT News, which
is a trade publication and it is as captive to
the pharmaceutical companies as this thing is, which is why
it was so surprising that they covered the arm twisting
and blackmailing of governments by Pfizer during the COVID shot
rollout that was actually covered.

Speaker 3 (01:40:33):
By STAT News. I couldn't believe I was reading it there.

Speaker 2 (01:40:36):
And yet the interesting thing is is that it was
not covered by media conservative or liberal, because the conservatives
Trump is in power and the Conservatives are trying to
suck up to him, and it wasn't covered by the
liberal media because they're trying to suck up to the
pharmaceutical companies and because they want a vaccine out there.

Speaker 4 (01:40:56):
So maybe they just feel comfortable knowing since it's a
trade publication many people read it. Sure, we can put
that out there.

Speaker 2 (01:41:02):
It truly is amazing. Occasionally you get these things. It's
just like the Goldman Sachs paper where they lectured the no,
no pharmaceutical companies, you don't want to heal any disease.

Speaker 4 (01:41:15):
Curing people is not a good business model.

Speaker 3 (01:41:17):
We can't make money that way.

Speaker 4 (01:41:19):
Yeah, we've got a lot of comments before we go
to break sure Malutan Malankovic. The only bugs I eat
are shrimp and crab delicious.

Speaker 3 (01:41:28):
They are like big bugs, aren't they. Yeah, the water.

Speaker 4 (01:41:31):
Filtered Assyrian girls has imagine someone paid these scientists to
make that study and print such goofy results in a
major medical journal.

Speaker 3 (01:41:40):
Yeah, imagine that.

Speaker 4 (01:41:41):
Yeah, I wonder who would do such a thing. Syian
Girl also says he used to think I should have
become a weather girl. No other profession would allow you
to be wrong all the time and keep paying your salary.
Now I think I should have been a researcher for pharma.
You never have to be correct and what you publish
for them, But even the weather girls occasionally correct sometimes.

Speaker 3 (01:42:00):
Yeah, And of course the pharmaceutical people get paid much
more than.

Speaker 4 (01:42:02):
The weather girl, way better than a weather girl. And
you know, you can just make up whatever you want.
You don't even have to read off a teleprompter. Just
write down some numbers and say this proves my theory.
Brandon Bennett, I just got to figure out how I'm
going to listen to David when I join some homage community. Well,
maybe you could get like a potato powered radio or
something like that, potato battery.

Speaker 3 (01:42:21):
Yeah, they don't allow you to have iPhones. I guess
that would that would definitely be kind of it's fair Bolton, Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:42:28):
Yeah, Kneebreu twenty twenty nine. Who pays for these studies
is the real question, that's right. I think we all
know who's paying.

Speaker 2 (01:42:37):
Whoever funds that controls it. And that's especially true of
the studies. You look at that, you know, and that
that is where you start. It's just like you know,
when you look at the legal immunity they have for
any damage that they've done to me. That was you know,
as soon as I saw that, it's like, okay, now
we're done. You know, if they have absolutely no risk

(01:42:59):
in terms of they do, if they harm somebody, then
that's not a product that I want. And they wouldn't
be seeking that if they didn't know that it was harmful.
And as they've said, it is, we can never make
it safe. I forget exactly what the term was they said,
but I said it was unavoidably harmful or RISKU or

(01:43:20):
something like that.

Speaker 4 (01:43:20):
Unavoidably harmful.

Speaker 3 (01:43:22):
It was the exact according So we got to have
protection from you in order to make this happen.

Speaker 4 (01:43:28):
A Syrian girl says Paxton should also be suing the
doctors who allowed themselves to be bribed traders to humanity. Yeah,
throw them all in jail, throw them in prison.

Speaker 2 (01:43:36):
You're right, really should be going after the doctors who
accepted the bribe. It's kind of like letting the rapists
for Epstein go free and unnamed as well.

Speaker 4 (01:43:45):
Just throw them all in and I say, remove the
nineteen eighty six of all that gives immunity and retroactively
allow them to be sued for everything.

Speaker 2 (01:43:54):
Well, wouldn't you think they should at least have their
licenses revoked or some kind of a you know, warning
thing on there saying this person took a bribe in
order to do this. But it's the people that report
what is happening that lose their license.

Speaker 6 (01:44:09):
I mean, I don't know what law exactly they're breaking,
but you know, if you accept a bribe and then
put out something false and people get injured because of it,
it seems like that should be more than just a
civil thing.

Speaker 3 (01:44:22):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:44:23):
Yeah, well, you know that was one of the things
when they came after Bob Menende's gold Break. Bob, you know,
that the guy that had a gold bars the first
time they came after him, that it was about government
fraud in terms of Medicare or something like that. He
was working with a doctor who was inflating costs and things.
And that's essentially what they're doing. If they go with

(01:44:44):
the more expensive stuff, they're inflating the cost. It'll probably
be hard to prove that they picked Brand A over
Brand B. They could always say, well, based on what
they told me, I thought it was the better drug
or whatever. Right, they could always come up talking point.

Speaker 4 (01:45:00):
The farmer rep had a nicer boat in the pitch.

Speaker 3 (01:45:04):
He had free nurses.

Speaker 8 (01:45:06):
I mean.

Speaker 2 (01:45:08):
That's a new thing, I guess, but we've moved on
from TikTok nurses to free nurses.

Speaker 4 (01:45:12):
They brought a larger pile of cocaine to the party
that we went to. Yeah, trucker Chris for the Winds. Say,
is the UK now arrest twelve thousand people a year
for posts on the internet. Russia arrests twelve hundred a year. Yeah,
big brother, Oh brother, that's also well. They arrested over
four hundred and fifty people with just one event. You know,

(01:45:35):
it was it was absolutely amazing the UK is so
monumentally and ruthlessly authoritarian at this point, it's hard to
believe that it was ever. You know, the country you
read about in history books.

Speaker 3 (01:45:47):
And peaceful protester is a guy who was in a wheelchair. Right.
They arrested him, claiming that he was a threat of danger.

Speaker 4 (01:45:55):
Bill Hoten, I'm glad my doctor is not a shot pusher. Yeah,
if you find one like that, be sure to hang
on to them, because they're failing commodity. They're disappearing, they're vanishing,
and they're vanishing rapidly. A lot of them are a
lot of the older doctors, and they retire. They put
their time in and they want to go live their life,

(01:46:16):
you know, whatever way they can.

Speaker 2 (01:46:17):
Sometimes what you have to do in order for these
people to continue in the practice because of the pressure
of the economic pressure that the insurance companies, you have
to get into a situation like you found where you know,
you pay them like a membership thing, you know, you
pay to have them as your doctor.

Speaker 4 (01:46:33):
The doctor we found for our son we found through friends, thankfully,
but her practice, you know, they don't push vaccines. They'll
say would you like to vaccinate? If you say no,
they go okay, and they leave you alone. And because
of that, most of her clientele does not vaccinate. They
don't meet the standard.

Speaker 3 (01:46:50):
So the insurance companies, Yeah, many money, I'll pay them.
That's what puts them out of business.

Speaker 4 (01:46:55):
She said that she's seen I think she said it
was between four and five of her friends that were
doctors go out of business because of the same thing.

Speaker 3 (01:47:06):
Kind of what they did to podcast.

Speaker 2 (01:47:08):
I mean, they find a way to, uh, come after you,
don't they they'll it's amazing.

Speaker 4 (01:47:14):
If they can get rid of your money, they can
get rid of you. Dj Hi Yona healthcare workers are
still under federal vax mandate.

Speaker 2 (01:47:22):
Yeah, of course, And we were always told by the
MAGA people. Yeah, but Trump didn't mandate. He just keeps
it going.

Speaker 4 (01:47:30):
It wasn't him, It wasn't It was a It was
the Keebler elf fauci CJP rumble, mercury in your mouth,
aluminium in the sky, fluoride in your water. Well, when
you put it like that, it sounds a little bleak. Yeah,
it sounds like some kind of giant alchemical experiment. They're
trying to transmute the world into gold or something. And

(01:47:51):
your food it's poison, poison, poison everywhere you look, Honor Seeker.
The Grand Canyon was created because a dentist dropped a
nickel down a go for all. That's pretty good. Be
my Valentine dental offices forever contamidated with mercury from drilling
those out of patient's teeth. Yeah, it seems like if.

Speaker 2 (01:48:14):
You, oh, that's the thing, you gotta be careful how
you get it out of there too. You know, they
can sometimes exposure even more than you're getting with it
being in there if you're not careful about how you.

Speaker 4 (01:48:23):
Take if you get it taken out, they're gonna have
to drill out a lot of the tooth around the
amalgam filling Guard Goldsmith. It was always a good reminder
that one was watching actors when I was a kid,
and I saw aliens in the Star Trek open their
mouths and their feeling their fillings would appear. Well, maybe
denting dental technology hasn't advanced, you know, in the I

(01:48:43):
don't know when Star Trek is set guard, You'll have
to let me know. I've seen about four episodes of
Star Trek.

Speaker 2 (01:48:48):
In it Totalgalactic aliens have amalgam films.

Speaker 4 (01:48:52):
Well, you know, there's only so much you can do.
You've got to focus on hollow Deck technology. C JP
Rumble picked up some Xylotal toothpaste last week along with
gum good stuff. Yeah yeah, heron's holler at. David Knight
bought the starter kit yesterday from the RNC store thanks
to the code strange that on Hubby's FB page and

(01:49:13):
add for the RNC store appeared last night. And his
FB email is not the one I used to order
the apricot seeds.

Speaker 3 (01:49:20):
Well, maybe know what you're doing.

Speaker 4 (01:49:21):
If you're listening to the show over speakers, it's possible
that whatever devices he has may have been logged in
and maybe heard it mentioned.

Speaker 2 (01:49:29):
Yeah on Facebook, have we reported about and people say,
you know, they never went to any websites, but they
just to see that they didn't have cats, So they
start talking to each other about cats. Next thing they know,
Facebook is giving them cat food ads.

Speaker 3 (01:49:48):
Well that's good. I'm glad that you got the starter
kit there at RNC stores.

Speaker 4 (01:49:51):
And I would just RNC store dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:49:54):
Oh yes, I'm sorry. I always want to add an
s to that RNC store dot com. You know again,
that book and they had it. When I interviewed John Richardson,
he gave people a code to be able to download
a PDF version for free of Gi Griffin's book A
World About Cancer. But of course you can also get

(01:50:15):
that at the store now. And I think it's important
to think outside of the pharmaceutical box that.

Speaker 3 (01:50:22):
They try to put everybody in.

Speaker 4 (01:50:24):
Yeah, of course again, RNC store dot Com promo code
night for ten percent off the products that are available there.
Go check them out. Hopefully they can help you stay
out of the clutches of the medical industrial complex. Zoxav
ox o's if you want to get rich, start a
medical journal that reports on big farmer corruption and take
bribes to not report on them.

Speaker 3 (01:50:46):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:50:46):
If you're completely amoral, if you have no scruples at all,
feel free to go start a medical journal and sell out.

Speaker 3 (01:50:53):
We never tried that. When we first monetize the podcast.
The first month we had pharma ads on there.

Speaker 2 (01:51:03):
We had Pfizer running ads on our podcast, and people
were saying that stuff to me, and it is like, well,
I think that's funny. You know, I do more in
terms of talking about Pfiser pharmaceutical stuff than they do.
But that didn't last too long. That lasts about a
week or two. I guess we should call them up
and say, hey, I know it's just going to me money.
We said, you want to keep something money and off
shut up right, it doesn't work that way.

Speaker 4 (01:51:26):
No, no, no bribery here, we refuse to take it.
Skunk Hollow Rose Gardens, your social credit score prevents you
from getting crickets on your pizzas, so you starve from
protein deficiency. Truly a bleak vision of the future. You
have their Skunk Hollow Rose Gardens. Tunnel Lord one three
three seven. Good news. I'm working on a built and

(01:51:47):
LI five the National Childhood Injury Act, and it now
has an endorsement from one of my state reps.

Speaker 2 (01:51:51):
That's incredible, great, fantastic to hear that. Tunnel Lord good,
that's good. You know that can be done at state level.
You're exactly right, Washington. These people are bought and sold.
That's how they got there. But I don't see anything
that's going to come out of that. But of course
you could still hold people liable for that. You know,
it's kind of interesting when you think about some of

(01:52:12):
these laws. You know, if you're poisoning somebody, there shouldn't
be a statute of limitations on that.

Speaker 3 (01:52:16):
It's one of the things that we saw with talk about.

Speaker 2 (01:52:18):
Frequently, the very very short statute limitation on pedophilia, and
I wonder why. Yeah, and yet as we saw with
both California and New York, you know, if something is
a crime, then but you've got a short statute of
limitations and you can't come after them. If they remove
that statute of limitations, which they did temporarily in New

(01:52:42):
York and in California, then you can come after the
people because it was always a.

Speaker 4 (01:52:46):
Crime unless they flee to Israel.

Speaker 3 (01:52:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:52:49):
Yeah, you can't do expost facta. In other words, you
can't pass a law and make something a crime and
then come after somebody for doing it before it was
a crime. But if it was a crime and they
did it and the statute limitations is stopping you from
coming after them, you can remove that statute limitations and
come after them. And so you had several cases of that.

(01:53:10):
Trump was one example of that, and one of those
rape trials, I think, But you also had some high
profile rock stars as well as a paramount itself in
terms of Franco Zepharelli's Romeo and Juliet, the two young stars,
said that they were maneuvered into doing a nude scene

(01:53:31):
when they were told that they would not be doing that.
The director manipulated them into doing that, and so they
sued paaramount. Unfortunately, the judge did not worked against them,
but I think they had a real case.

Speaker 4 (01:53:43):
Hollywood has always been filled to the brim with disgusting perverts.
It is the same as it ever was. Tunnel Lord
went three three seven says. My rep has now given
that endorsement to my state's Health Freedom Organization. This organization
also likes the bill enough that they want to offer
help to lobby for its enactment. This group is responsible

(01:54:03):
for getting the Idaho Health Freedom Act, which was the
first in the nation to forbid the government from mandating
that people take any form of medical intervention. That's fantastic to.

Speaker 2 (01:54:11):
Hear tell us, excellent, that's excellent, you're doing the right thing.
Thank you for doing that, and again focusing on the
right place. I mean, I really do think that trying
to get things done in Washington is like pushing on
a rope.

Speaker 4 (01:54:24):
You're gonna have to get you on the show to
talk about it.

Speaker 3 (01:54:26):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:54:26):
Absolutely, before we take a break, I want to thank
Jonathan L. For a generous cash app. I think the
first time that we've gotten something from Jonathan. And I
would also like to thank people who have contributed on
ZEL as well. If I can get this thing pulled
up here in the size that I can read it,
let's see where going to leave off here?

Speaker 3 (01:54:47):
Last time? Okay? What we will? Oh here it is okay,
Thank you very much. On ZEL.

Speaker 2 (01:54:52):
I just want to thank some of the people who've
contributed last week or so, Gretchen C, William R. Benjamin Are,
Susan L.

Speaker 5 (01:55:02):
Robert A J. H.

Speaker 2 (01:55:05):
Thomas H. Maryland G and Julie W. Thank you so
much all of you, and one of those on the
Maryland G. I think it's also a new first time contributor.
But the other people have been very regular contributors and
I really do thank them. They're the ones who keep
the show going on regular basis. Thank you so much.
We're now at about five eighths here on the twentieth,

(01:55:27):
so we got about another eleven days or so, and
so I just wanted to thank everybody for your support
of this show.

Speaker 4 (01:55:34):
Yes, thank you all so very very much.

Speaker 3 (01:55:36):
Really do appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (01:55:37):
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting Adviser are not giving us any.

Speaker 3 (01:55:42):
Funds, No, not at all.

Speaker 4 (01:55:44):
They would probably siphon money off of us if they
could just shut down our bank accounts if possible.

Speaker 3 (01:55:50):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:55:51):
Well, when we come back, we're going to talk about
election rigging and give you the latest updates on jerry mandering.
But of course that's just the tip of the iceberg
in terms of election rigging, and you can see how
both sides are doing that, just like they're involved in
all the other aspects of election rigging.

Speaker 4 (01:56:08):
Theymandering, jerry they'remandering.

Speaker 2 (01:56:13):
Yeah, go full Cramer on this. Okay, we're gonna take
a quick break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:56:51):
You're listening to the David Knight Show. You're listening to

(01:58:58):
the David night Show.

Speaker 5 (01:59:00):
They're doing what in the place they named after me?

Speaker 3 (01:59:04):
Good thing.

Speaker 7 (01:59:04):
I have the David Night Show to keep me informed
on the plots of these traders.

Speaker 1 (01:59:09):
Making sense common again. This is the David Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (01:59:17):
Elvis, the Beatle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown.

Speaker 1 (01:59:22):
Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.

(02:01:02):
Liberty it's your move and now the David Knight.

Speaker 4 (02:01:08):
Show, Welcome back, folks. We're going to be talking about
jerry mandering an election rigging in this segment. They go
hand in hand.

Speaker 2 (02:01:20):
Yeah, I'm actually glad that it's getting the attention and
people are starting to see how corrupt it says. We've
now got this war. Essentially, Trump started it. He said, hey,
we need to make sure we're going to win the
midterms this time, so get some more Republican congressmen. So
they started this in Texas. Then you got Blue states
as they like to call them, who are pushing back.

(02:01:41):
California and Illinois was also getting involved in this. Tangentially
was saying, well, we'll do redistricting and we will make
we'll turn some of the Republican seats in California. Who
knew they had Republican seats in California?

Speaker 3 (02:01:55):
What a shock.

Speaker 4 (02:01:56):
Now, the question is, are these California Republicans? How close
are these two actually conservatives? Actually do these matter? Are
these basically democrats by just another name?

Speaker 2 (02:02:05):
Yeah, probably is the case. Although you do have some
very conservative areas of California around Orange County and.

Speaker 3 (02:02:12):
Things like that.

Speaker 2 (02:02:13):
I've had people write me and say, wait a minute,
there's conservatives here. Don't write us off. You know, we're
fighting pretty hard here. But looks like there's going to
be five seats they're saying that are going to be
wiped out by Redistrict Team. California Democrats would gain five
more seats, and they know which ones are going to target.
They can redraw the maps and change us. A good

(02:02:33):
example is the only one that I recognize his name,
and that's Representative darryl Issa. He is, by the way,
the richest person in Congress, at least at one point.

Speaker 3 (02:02:44):
Now maybe with their.

Speaker 2 (02:02:46):
Back room stock deals and stuff, some of the other
people have surpassed him. I don't know, but for the
longest time he was the richest person in Congress.

Speaker 3 (02:02:53):
But his seat.

Speaker 2 (02:02:56):
They would change his district. So he picks up a
section of another one that was a very very Democrat area,
and so it promises to swing his district to a
plus four Democrat advantage. His district went plus fifteen in
favor of Trump, but under the new boundaries it would
have gone plus three in favor of La La Harris,

(02:03:21):
according to the Cook Political Report. So this is the
way they do it. They pick the voters. It's an election,
but you don't get the choice. They get the choice
once they pick the voters as a foregone conclusion. And
so they said, of the five seats that are going
to be impacted, two of these will be turned into
leaning Democrat districts. They could still possibly be winnable by

(02:03:47):
Republican candidate who then becomes kind of a Democrat as
you're talking about. But you know, if you've got a
solid conservative district, which is the way they've typically done
in the past, you know, we're going to put all
the Republicans in this one district, and then you can
still have a conservative Congressman from California in theory. But

(02:04:08):
now they're going to have five of them. It's going
to be either leaning Democrat or hardcore Democrat. And meanwhile,
in Texas, now the Democrats have come back after a
two week walkout and all the threats about how they're
going to arrest them, criminally charge them for bribery.

Speaker 3 (02:04:24):
Maybe even.

Speaker 2 (02:04:28):
Maybe even kick them out of Congress, out of the
state legislature.

Speaker 6 (02:04:32):
As to say, before we move on to the other
news story, I just wanted to say what an ignoble
accomplishment it is to be the richest man in Congress.
Here's a place where everyone gets the same salary and
the real difference in wealth is mainly due to corruption,
and you're the richest of them.

Speaker 3 (02:04:51):
So insid Yeah, that doesn't speak well of you. Yeah,
that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:04:56):
Well, you know, I just want you to think about
how the elections are rigged. And well, before I do that,
what is happening in Texas? As they point out, Trump
expressed support for congressional redistrict team in Republican states to
give them a better chance to keep the House. The
US Department of Justice sent Greg Abbott, the Texas governor,

(02:05:19):
a letter that raised concerns that for congressional districts in
the Houston and Dallas area were unconstitutional because of racial gerrymandering.
Current boundaries run a foul, that said the Trump Department
of Justice, they run a foul of the Voting Rights
Act because they rely on racial demographics to group minority

(02:05:40):
voters into coalition districts where no single racial group forms
the majority. So what they're saying is you're making these
districts based on racial demographics, so it has to be redrawn.
And of course they will then use that as an
excuse to redraw it for more favoring Republicans, and the

(02:06:01):
computer programs keep getting better and better.

Speaker 3 (02:06:03):
And I'm glad that.

Speaker 2 (02:06:06):
Trump has drawn attention to this inadvertently, perhaps because people
need to stop and take a step back. Everybody is
so focused on getting their people elected, they think and
thinking that that's going to make a difference by getting
their party elected in Washington. And now I just want
you to think about how elections are rigged before voting,

(02:06:30):
during voting, and after voting. Before the voting even begins,
you've got not just the jerry mandering where they pick
who's going to be able to vote for which candidates
by party, but you also have ballot access that keeps
anybody other than Republicans and Democrats off of the ballot.
You have debate access which keeps anybody but Republicans and

(02:06:52):
Democrats and being involved in the debate. And then you
have jerry mandering. All that happens before there's even any voting.
And then when you have voting, you have voting machines
which have all kinds of issues in terms of being
able to go back and audit and to verify it,
as does the vote by mail stuff and vote by

(02:07:13):
mail was put in by Trump himself. But the voting
machines a long history of corruption. Yeah, exactly. They began
with smart magic in Venezuela and it was started by
some friends of Hugo Chavez. And after they started that
and started using electronic voting machines, of course he never
lost an election, and then they had long history of

(02:07:36):
controversy and some Mexican provinces, in Brazil and in the Philippines.
This is not something that is a wild eyed conspiracy
theory from Trump. This is something that's been well documented
for a very very long time and as well as
the vulnerabilities of these voting machines. And in Texas they

(02:07:56):
removed the ability to be able to audit them. They're
supposed to under constitution keep a copy of the original
ballots that people did, but they destroy them and that's
under the direction of the current Supervisor of Elections. And
then after the election, you know that custody and audit

(02:08:17):
ability that has been taken away, so that the elections
are corrupt from the get go, even if the individuals
weren't corrupt. But it's these corrupt individuals and these corrupt
political parties that have set up this system to make
peaceful change impossible there. That's why you know what Listener
was doing there, working at the state level. There are
still some possibilities in some states that you can make

(02:08:40):
some changes at the state and local level, but I
don't think you're going to change anything at the federal level.

Speaker 5 (02:08:45):
Now.

Speaker 4 (02:08:46):
The corruption that we have here in the United States
is more well hidden, it's less visible on the surface.
I saw video recently of an Indian politician. He's in
some fancy car and he's just got a wad of
cash and he's rolling through the slums. He's got his
window down and he's handing bills out to people out
the window, and he's literally buying votes. Right then, right there.

(02:09:07):
We don't do that kind of thing here in America.
Right It's more hidden, it's more subtle. We like to
have this pretensive Oh our vote matter is we're actually
a part of the system. We're not getting scammed here.

Speaker 3 (02:09:18):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:09:19):
Yeah, it's this obvious. You know, he's this large, heavy
set individual. All the people in the slums are very thin,
and he's just this picture perfect, you know, of this
heavy set corrupt politician, just you know, with his rings
and things. One and you don't see that much anymore here,
but it's just as corrupt, probably even more so. In fact,

(02:09:40):
there's almost a level of honesty to that kind of corruption.

Speaker 3 (02:09:43):
Right.

Speaker 2 (02:09:44):
You can see it now that it all happens in
the background with these big corporations and stuff. The way
you saw it in our election was the Trump inauguration
with all of the Silicon Valley technocrats lined up there
behind Trump. You know, they they had given him instead
of him handing out money to other people, because they
knew that he's going to ultimately turn around and hand

(02:10:04):
the money back to them. I want to just focus
on it because I've said this many times. You know,
when I ran for Congress and thirty years ago, essentially
nineteen ninety six, I ran on the Bill of Rights
because it was right after Nuke Gingrich has had done
his ten point contract with America, and I said, okay,
here's my ten point contract with America's called the Bill

(02:10:26):
of Rights, and here is how it's all being violated.
I said, if I were to run again, which I
never would, I'm not interested at all in thorough gum,
but if I were to run again at any level,
I would focus on usury because I think this is
one of the most vicious things that we fight, and
I think that would cut across political lines.

Speaker 3 (02:10:45):
I mean, who wants to pay users interest rates? And
there was an interesting article from J. D. Hall sort
before you.

Speaker 4 (02:10:52):
Go on, Lance says he has the video of the
Indian politician. He can play. Oh, if you're interested, let's
see that. Yeah, oh yeah, boss hog right there, yep,
you can see him.

Speaker 2 (02:11:05):
You even got the siren going on. Yeah, you vote
for me? Okay, great, we'll do this again next election
if you keep me in.

Speaker 4 (02:11:12):
And you can see he's in some kind of very
nice car, the leather seats, the rich interior.

Speaker 3 (02:11:17):
Oh yeah, Almo.

Speaker 4 (02:11:22):
And again I find this to be more honest. You know,
I prefer this kind of corruption than to the type
of thing we have here.

Speaker 6 (02:11:30):
There's this is like a cartoon, like the rich lord
handing out to the philip peasant.

Speaker 4 (02:11:36):
Yes, my peasant, here is a one hundred dollars bill
for you.

Speaker 3 (02:11:44):
Oh that's amazing. Wow. Yeah, okay, Well, they're gonna bring
that system here.

Speaker 4 (02:11:52):
I guess perhaps, you know, at least we'll get a
few hundred dollars here or there when they roll through
our slums. To bribe us.

Speaker 3 (02:12:00):
So JD.

Speaker 2 (02:12:01):
Hall talks about the history of usury laws and how
that was something that Christians used to be against. The
headline here is the biblical sin of usury and why
Christians don't hate it nearly enough. It is something that
I absolutely hate. I think it is you talk about
open corruption when the banks are charging you, you know,

(02:12:24):
thirty forty percent on credit card things, when they're charging
you seven percent or more on a home loan and
they pay you like one one hundredth of a percent
at Bank of America on a savings account. To me,
that is usury and that's something needs to be turned around.

Speaker 3 (02:12:43):
He said.

Speaker 2 (02:12:43):
Most modern Christians don't know what it is or why
the Bible condemns it so strongly, the history of usury
and what they never wanted us debt cattle to know.
He said, it's hard, if not impossible, for somebody in
their forty fifties and beyond, to comprehend the challenges of
young Americans like you, Travis, unless they have kids living

(02:13:04):
through it. The median existing home now sells for four
hundred and thirty five thousand dollars with a thirty year
mortgage hovering in the mid sixes, the typical household would
have to throw almost half of its income at the
payment on a median priced home. The old thirty percent
rule has been ground into the dust. And of course

(02:13:26):
it's difficult to accumulate capital because they won't pay you
any money on the savings account, and even if they
did pay you money, it's not going to be keeping
up with the inflation that is there. But I pointed
out when they were talking about, well, look at the
interest rates dropped down to like a five percent or something.
So this is where they were in the early nineteen sixties.
And I went back to look to see what the

(02:13:47):
banks who were charging people five percent on home mortgages,
what were they paying on the savings account. And it
was like four percent, you know, so one percent spread
versus a you know, charging you seven percent and paying
you one one hundredth of eight percent. There's like seven
hundred factor there.

Speaker 3 (02:14:07):
He says.

Speaker 2 (02:14:08):
The treadmill isn't just a metaphor. It is a business model.
He says, for example, our newly went home in two
thousand and three, a medium sized, two bedroom home rented
out at two hundred and twenty five dollars a month.
The landlord offered to sell it to us for twenty
five K.

Speaker 3 (02:14:24):
He said.

Speaker 2 (02:14:24):
Prices aren't just high, entry is booby trapped. A median
income family would need something like a seventeen thousand dollars
raise to afford the so called typical home. On median wages.
The monthly squeeze doesn't stop at the front door. The
average new car price is now near forty eight thousand dollars.
Even a used car is five hundred and twenty one

(02:14:44):
dollars a month with nearly twelve percent interest, wages are
limping a long costs or sprinting, and mortgage rates are
parked above six percent. Keep the gate locked even when
list prices flatten. Thanks to the federal deficit, investors now
ask you gup up roughly one in six homes itself,
turning starter homes into permanent renters. They bid in cash,

(02:15:07):
they rent back to the very generation that they just outbid.
You aren't competing with a couple down the block. You're
competing with a portfolio of an investment house in some
far away city. You know, somebody like Larry Fink running
Black Rock and Vavos.

Speaker 3 (02:15:22):
He said.

Speaker 2 (02:15:22):
The Biblical foundation is what usury meant and why it
was banned. In scripture, usury does not only mean outrageous interests.
In Israel's law, it commonly meant any interest taken on
a loan to a fellow Israelite, especially when the borrower
was poor. The Hebrew words for interests carry the sense
of a bite, and that is a very impressive image.

Speaker 3 (02:15:43):
He said.

Speaker 2 (02:15:44):
In an agrarian world, most loans were not speculative investments.
There were survival loans after a failed harvest, sickness, or
loss of livestock. Interest on that kind of borrowing does
not reward productive risk. It takes a bite out of
a wound. Israel's economy was therefore shaped to prevent debt
from becoming a trap. Land was allotted by clan and

(02:16:07):
it was meant to remain within families. Gleaning laws told
farmers to leave margins for the poor. They would go
through harvest it, they would leave some behind for poor
people to walk through the fields and have what was left.
Sabbath years released debts, and the Jubilee returned alienated land.

Speaker 3 (02:16:24):
So when you would it.

Speaker 2 (02:16:26):
Would be priced into the cost of a loan. If
you were to borrow money, that debt was going to
be forgiven every seven years and every forty nine years
the Jubilee. Here they were going to have a massive
repeal of things like that and indebtedness. Charging interest on
need was forbidden, while charging outsiders was permitted. The aim

(02:16:49):
was to build a people of neighbors rather than a
market of clients. Wisdom, literature, and the profits reinforced the
same world picture by praising the person who lended freely
to the needy and condemning those who profited from distress,
and the New Testament, the call to love enemies and
lend without demanding back presses the same principle into the
heart of Christian ethics. The point was not to paralyze trade.

(02:17:12):
The point was to protect households from becoming permanent revenue
streams for their rescuers. And so the early Church saw
this as a direct violation of neighborly love.

Speaker 3 (02:17:24):
And as.

Speaker 2 (02:17:26):
Christianity started moving into government, you had people who called it.
First of all, the basil of Sassarea called interest taking
a war on the poor. Augustine folded the practice into
his wider attack on greed. The Council of Alvira barred
clergy who lent at interest. The Council of Nicea in

(02:17:48):
three twenty five condemned clerical usury, again grounding it on
the pastoral duty to feed the flock rather than to
feed on it. And so this is something that first
began and the and the church, and then gradually worked
its way into civil government, and we had usury laws
until the late nineteen seventies. Loan sharking was a province

(02:18:10):
of organized crime. Alan it was considered criminal and exploitative
to do the kinds of things that all the credit
card companies are doing today. You charge somebody twenty thirty
percent interest. I don't even know if the loan sharks
charged people fifty percent interests like some of these credit
cards do.

Speaker 4 (02:18:27):
But I ain't a monster.

Speaker 3 (02:18:29):
Come on, yeah, gotta wet their beak. So this is
where it was.

Speaker 2 (02:18:36):
What changed all that, And I remember when it changed.
They had a cap of ten percent, and that was
a legal limit that you could pay, and of course,
because of competition in the marketplace, it was effectively lower
than that until government inflation got out of control. They

(02:18:56):
couldn't control neither party could control it. You had troll
Ford with swhip inflation. Now nonsense they had these wind
buttons right, and Jimmy Carter couldn't control it. It was
all kicked off by a government that was spending too much.
And then also the shock that went through with Opek,
and before you know it, interest rates started soaring. Our

(02:19:18):
first home we had a thirteen percent fixed interest rate
on it. It did not end well in Houston and
for a lot of people, us included. But they removed
the cap because inflation was so high, and we never
got it back. And now it has just continued to
go in the other direction where they keep cutting the

(02:19:41):
rates that they pay on savings account and keep increasing
the credit card amounts. As he points out in this article,
he said Jewish money lending grew under Christian bands because whatever,
whenever you've got an outright ban on something for which
there is a lot of demand, you're going to have
some way to get around that. And of course, as

(02:20:01):
we pointed out, the Jews would not charge interest to
other Jews, but they would charge it to non Jews,
and the governments were implicitly looking the other way and
carving out exceptions. You know, if Christians started doing that
as a bank, they would get jailed, but they would
go to the Jews who had money, and they would
look the other way and ignore enforcing the laws for them,

(02:20:23):
and of course that made their community incredibly rich, and
that's why you have the large banking concerns that are
Jewish that grew out of that. But as he points out,
there needs to be some kind of reform of this.
This is one of the things that needs to be reformed.
And another example I think of when we lose Christian principles,

(02:20:47):
whether you're talking about a just war principle, whether you're
talking about usury laws. These things were there. They were
what made Western civilization better, and they were based on
Christian prins that were there. Not exploiting your neighbor and
that type of stuff. Now it's like, you know, whoever

(02:21:07):
can get the most money and the most toys wins,
regardless of how they get it. That's the only thing
that matters. Ethics has been completely removed from government. We
have no foundational principles that we will abide by, not
even the legal principles that are in the Bill of
Rights of the constitutions. They take an oath to that
as a condition of office and then ignore it. So

(02:21:27):
that's the real issue. That's there. But I think that
it is something that if you were to have a
movement on that, I think everybody would be in favor
of that. Nobody would be opposed to that except the
big bankers, and of course they have a lot of
outsized influence on the of a license.

Speaker 4 (02:21:47):
Sadly, because they've been practicing usury for so long, they've
got a lot of money to throw around.

Speaker 2 (02:21:52):
Well, I think it would be a good way to begin,
you know, a pushback against this whole system is to
start with the banker and to push back against the
banking system. But the reality is is that the inflation
is there and it's with us, and so one of
the things that you need to be aware of in
terms of both the permission society that you know, the

(02:22:14):
stable coins that are going to be coming from the
Genius Act and all the rest of stuff, as well
as the inflation, you need to start protecting yourself and
try to get into some real money that is physical,
that is private, that is outside of their system, gold
and silver. That's why we always talk about Tony Ardban
He's always been a good supporter of this program, but
he also supports you in trying to get your independence.

(02:22:37):
It's very important.

Speaker 4 (02:22:39):
Go to Wisewolf dot gold, David Knight dot gold.

Speaker 2 (02:22:42):
Yeah, that's right, David Knight dot gold, and thank you
for correcting me. I'm getting a little bit tired here.
I'm gonna let you talk a little bit.

Speaker 3 (02:22:51):
We've got some we've got some comments here, but go
there and take a look at what Tony's got. Right now.

Speaker 2 (02:22:58):
Gold is kind of dipping around, pushed around a little
bit by some fake news that's out there. But you
know what the long term trends are, and you know
that they're not changing in terms of the massive deficit
and the high interest rates and the inflation that they
are understating. All that stuff is real, and regardless of
what their phony numbers say, we know that inflation is

(02:23:19):
going up significantly and the best head you can have
against that is going to be Gold. It's also going
to give you privacy that you're not going to get
with any of the other bitcoins or anything like that.

Speaker 4 (02:23:31):
So it is completely private because you know, there's no
tracking built into it.

Speaker 6 (02:23:35):
It is.

Speaker 4 (02:23:35):
Whoever you give it to, they have. If they decide
to report on it, that's their business. But there's no
way the government to track it individually. We got a
comment here that I saw when we were talking, when
you were talking about usury. It came up, said David Travis.
Y'all should check out Michael Hoffman's book Usury, The Mortal
Sin that Christendom forgot. I pulled that one. I didn't

(02:23:55):
grab who said it, So I apologize for that, but
thank you very much.

Speaker 3 (02:23:59):
All.

Speaker 4 (02:23:59):
We'll make a note of it and we'll look at that.
So we do have a lot of other comments here.
Niebaru twenty twenty nine says, start a medical journal, no
medical knowledge required. You might actually end up with some
good medical information there if you didn't have to induct
all the brainwashing. We are all dead. You are free
to choose one of our selections. That's right. We've given

(02:24:22):
you a list of candidates that we feel are acceptable,
and you can choose whichever one of these losers you want.

Speaker 2 (02:24:28):
That's why I said, you know, through all the January
the sixth stuff and anything, everybody's so upset about one
tiny facet of these corrupt elections. I said, you realize
that the corruption in the election begins with who they
allow you to vote for, and it begins with balid
access and the debates, and you know, it runs through
all these other things as well, but nobody wanted to

(02:24:51):
pay attention to that. I'm glad that they're putting some
emphasis on the beginning of the process by Trump inadvertently
drawing so much attention to the computerized state of jerrymandering.

Speaker 4 (02:25:04):
Now, of course, when Elon was talking about starting his
own party, we even saw the Libertarian Party come in
and say, you know, getting on the ballot's real difficult,
or we're already on the ballot, just groveling for his billions.

Speaker 3 (02:25:16):
Yeah, they kind of went away.

Speaker 4 (02:25:17):
Yeah, it vanished.

Speaker 3 (02:25:18):
Yeah, he's not heard about that.

Speaker 4 (02:25:20):
Where's that third party?

Speaker 3 (02:25:21):
Elon?

Speaker 2 (02:25:22):
Maybe he asked somebody about the practical aspects of a
third party. I don't know one thing that he would
have done, which I think would have been that he
was talking about doing, which is a smarter strategy than
the Libertarian Party. The Libertarian Party wanted to focus on
fifty state ballot access and running somebody for president, and
that was always their strategy, and that was a strategy

(02:25:43):
doomed to failure. You look at the ballot retention laws
in most states, like in North Carolina where we were,
you had to get ten percent of the vote for
either governor or president to remain on the ballot, and
if you didn't, it was back to the sissiphus task
of rolling the giant boulder up the hill.

Speaker 4 (02:26:02):
Again, one must imagine a Libertarian party happy.

Speaker 2 (02:26:05):
Yeah, so it was, you know, it was a strategy
that was destined to fail. The correct strategy, as Musk said,
He said, Congress is so narrowly divided between these two
parties that if we were to focus on a few races,
we could hold the balance of power, you know, on

(02:26:26):
different issues by allying ourselves with one party or the other.

Speaker 3 (02:26:31):
Switch it.

Speaker 2 (02:26:31):
And that is a strategy that could work if you
had somebody that was honest about that. But I wouldn't
trust anybody who wants to get to Washington.

Speaker 4 (02:26:40):
And of course, I mean I have no respect left
for the corporate Libertarian Party become nothing but the materialism party.
They have fully embraced this idea that all that matters
is your own personal pleasure. They have no code of conduct, ethics,
or morals.

Speaker 2 (02:26:57):
We actually had some people when I was deliberate, name
libertarian was not understood like it is today, and so
some becomes as a Liberty Party.

Speaker 3 (02:27:07):
That's what they have become.

Speaker 2 (02:27:09):
And actually when they sold out to uh it was
named Gary Johnson, Gary Johnson, Mexico. Yeah, and uh Bill
Well the former governor, Republican governor of Massachusetts. You can
imagine where he was on the spectrum. But when they
sold out to those two guys, you know, just going
for name brands, you know, these two guys were governors,

(02:27:30):
and we got two governors on our ticket, it was
really all over. And we saw that in twenty twenty
when they completely caved on the lockdown stuff. That's that
should have been their moment to shine, Yeah, and they
completely caved on it.

Speaker 6 (02:27:44):
We have two governors, sadly no Libertarians, but two.

Speaker 3 (02:27:48):
Governors, that's right.

Speaker 4 (02:27:49):
And what was it the whichever conference it was where
they just had that one guy get up and dance
around in his underwear on stage, and we're seeing the
flaws with the libertarian system on display right here right now.
My biggest issue, it's always been funny to me, the
idea that you're going to get a bunch of hyper
hyper individuals to come together as a singular entity as

(02:28:12):
sort of a self defeating premise. The libertarians will sit
there and argue over a fraction of a percent on taxes,
and if you aren't right with them, I could never
vote for that man.

Speaker 3 (02:28:21):
He's half a persons.

Speaker 2 (02:28:22):
Why we need to not focus as much on the
individual as we need to focus on the family. The
family still gets you back to the situation of protecting
humans and individual humans, but it has that core there
that is both Christian and libertarian. Is there if you
focus on the family, and if you see that society

(02:28:46):
is made up not of a collection necessarily of individuals,
but a collection of households.

Speaker 3 (02:28:51):
You know, when we would go to we go to
Coloniel Williamsburg. I remember standing outside the courthouse. Used to
love to do this.

Speaker 2 (02:29:01):
They'd say, Okay, we're going to find out if any
of you here would be allowed to vote. Okay, first
of all, you know, you've got to be male, and
you've got to or head of household. They did make
it clear that, you know, if you're a woman, and
let's say that you're a widow or something like that,
but if you have your own household and your woman
you are allowed to vote. It was just one vote

(02:29:21):
per household, not one vote per man, which is what
Nelson and Bella the comnists.

Speaker 3 (02:29:26):
I wanted to write it was.

Speaker 2 (02:29:28):
One vote per household and so you would work together
as a household. And I think that is actually a
better model. But it gets us past this radical individualism
who we're fighting over over everything.

Speaker 4 (02:29:41):
Yeah, and the actually owning land, I think is to
own land is a good thing as well. You have
steak in the actual country. You have something to lose
if things go south. You're not just going to sit
there and think, well, well, how much of this can
I get out of it? How much can I extract
from the system before it collapses.

Speaker 2 (02:30:00):
I had to own land and it was the head
of household who would get the vote.

Speaker 4 (02:30:03):
So time to go back to that system. I don't
care if it disenfranchises me. That's one of those things
people were like, well, people would lose the right votes, Like, yeah,
some people are going to lose the right to vote.
I'm sorry, you know if you were to tell me,
if somewhere to come to me and say we found
out that redheads are the problem. They're the ones that
continually vote wrong. I take one for the team, Like,
all right, sorry, ax, it all my vote, it's gone.

Speaker 3 (02:30:24):
That is what it is.

Speaker 4 (02:30:24):
But for the team. I will take it. That's fine.
We've got more comments here, says Nibru twenty twenty nine.
The money masters provide the end choices for the sheeple
to pick from. It's been that way since post Eisenhower. Yeah,
it's a system that dates back for a long time now.
No one in my lifetime has been anyone I would

(02:30:47):
choose nights. Maybe Ron Paul, Perhaps Ron Paul. But that's
about it. Knights of the Storm. Solution is to have
local government and shrink the federal and even local government
should only exist to a determined outcomes between individuals disputes.
That would be a good system. Minimize the amount of government,
minimize involvement, get rid of the bureaucracy, but not in

(02:31:08):
the dogue sense of we're going to put this giant
technocratic system over top of you that will crush you
beneath its metal heel.

Speaker 2 (02:31:15):
Yeah, we're going to get rid of all the human bureaucrats.
When we replace some of a deep thought, you know,
the AI that's going to rule.

Speaker 4 (02:31:22):
Over you, the answer to life, the universe and everything
will be determined. I'm sure.

Speaker 3 (02:31:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:31:28):
A Syrian girl, this country is toast. We can't get
rid of these criminals in government because they have too
many ways to subvert constitutional influence, starting with redistricting, ending
with corrupt accounting of the votes. Yeah, the entire system
is corrupt from top to bottom.

Speaker 2 (02:31:42):
Well, that's why if we redistrict ourselves by focusing on
our families and our communities and on things that are local,
that's the way that we get around them with a
parallel society.

Speaker 4 (02:31:53):
Yeah, it's important to build your own community. And if
you're interested in learning a set of skills that will
help you do that, and go to Jack loss In
Books and get the Civil Defense Manual. It'll teach you
how to defend your own community, how to find water,
and prepare for civil unrest. So, if that's something interested in,
again Jacklaws and Books dot Com.

Speaker 2 (02:32:11):
And a big part of that is, you know, how
do you organize things with your neighbors. Yeah, that's a
very big part of it.

Speaker 4 (02:32:16):
It's important to have those kinds of skills because you
don't want to be put in a situation where there
are issues with supply chain. You don't want to be
put in a situation where it's you're forced or you're
tempted to steal or hurt others to better your own situation.

Speaker 2 (02:32:32):
And Jackie, it's got a lot of experience with that.
I mean he's put together a group right now, but
he's been a soldier in a country that was torn
apart by civil war, all these other things. He has
got a lot of experience to draw from.

Speaker 4 (02:32:45):
Yes, and he's done interviews and gotten passages from other
people who also have a lot of experience. The Civil
Defense Manuals, there's two volumes. Both of them are very,
very large. It is a very informationally dense set of books.
It comes with a lot of info there, and.

Speaker 2 (02:32:59):
He solves it deliberately as a pair and he sells
it deliberately as a book rather than something that's electronic.

Speaker 4 (02:33:06):
Yeah, if the grid goes down, you will still have
access to the book. It's not going to evaporate on you.
You will still be able to have that information at
your fingertips. But again, jacklossonbooks dot Com. The Civil Defense Manual.
As much as we love gold and silver, if you
don't have water, if you don't have food, the gold
or silver may not do you any good. You might
be able to trade for it, but you want to

(02:33:28):
have those skills for yourself. You want to have many
different skills and gold and silver, So go check that
stuff out, Angry Tiger's den. Elections are rigged by the
UNI Party. The only difference between them is they might
give you some lip service on a social issue or too,
but economic policy always stays the same. That's right. That's
what I've said about Trump is he proved that even

(02:33:51):
just paying lip service to the American people is verboten.
You can't do that. If you do, they will come
after you. That's the only reason, in my opinion, not
because he actually accomplished anything, but reminding the American people
that they're a voting block where it's being catered to
is a problem. They don't like that. They don't want
the American people to actually wake up again.

Speaker 2 (02:34:10):
And you look at this one big, beautiful bill, you know,
I mean it is the classic Pelosi strategy that was
criticized by Republicans until they got the majority, and then
they embraced it wholeheartedly.

Speaker 3 (02:34:21):
And Trump is not No.

Speaker 4 (02:34:22):
Lindsay Graham was over there, man, I hate reading too.

Speaker 3 (02:34:26):
Well. I mean, you know he is.

Speaker 2 (02:34:29):
Trump is just a tax and spend politician. You know
you're going to spend your way into prosperity and tax
your way into prosperity.

Speaker 3 (02:34:38):
No different.

Speaker 4 (02:34:40):
Remember, you can just steal all the money from your
people and you'll become rich. The Knights of the Storm
says about that Indian politician says, I'd be handing out
chicken wings. Those kids look like they are starving.

Speaker 3 (02:34:55):
Man, Maybe a pork barrel.

Speaker 4 (02:34:58):
Are they allowed to eat pork under your Hindu I
don't know.

Speaker 3 (02:35:00):
Yeah, maybe not a lot of the chickens either. I
don't know.

Speaker 4 (02:35:04):
It's a mystery to me. I don't know much about Hinduism.

Speaker 3 (02:35:08):
I guess if he was serving them food, you could
say he was currying favor.

Speaker 4 (02:35:13):
All this food talk is making me hungry. I didn't
eat breakfast. This is a problem. ZJP rumble. That guy
obviously has all the food. That's right, he's hoarding it.
He's he's got it, a vast supply he stored up
for a future date. Caboose eight eight eight. Wait, doesn't
that system already exist with food stamps and welfare talking

(02:35:35):
about bribing the people with a little bit here there, Yes,
it does. The people in the slums get free stuff,
and that's what counts to them. And when they're the
system is rigged against them to some extent. I'm not
going to sit here and pretend that there isn't stuff
that is, you know, affecting them negatively by the system

(02:35:57):
as well. BT Taylor two forty six. Oh, this is
that common again? Thank you Lance for grabbing that in
the name. BTE Taylor is the one that said David
Traves y all should check out Michael Hoffman's book Usury,
the Mortal Sin that Christendom forgot. Lance, please write that
down in an email so we can remember that. We
don't want to forget about it. Nieberu twenty twenty nine.
Banks and credit card companies are making more money than

(02:36:19):
ever since Jimmy Katta in the nineteen seventies. As Cillanty
would say, little Jimmy Carter.

Speaker 2 (02:36:25):
Well, the person who was running that administration was the
big new Brazinski, the technocrat and the Trilateral Commission overlord.

Speaker 4 (02:36:34):
I find it. I find Gerald. He's a lot of
fun to talk to. His passion is really fun. He's
the only person I've ever heard besides you that has
a bad thing to say about Jimmy Carter. Everyone else
treats him like he's some kind of saint, you know,
Oh well he bit he was part of the Habitat
for Humanity, and you know, Gerald is just apoplectic about him,

(02:36:55):
which is again you've always told me Jimmy Carter was
an absolutely terrible president. No, it was awful, And I
find I appreciate the fact that there's someone else out
there that doesn't just bow the knee to Jimmy Carter
and pretend like he's some kind of you know, sanctified figure.

Speaker 3 (02:37:11):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:37:11):
Yeah, he's a Sunday school teacher. But he pushed this
LGBT stuff very early in the day. My favorite story
about Jimmy Carter was when he was attacked by a rabbit.

Speaker 4 (02:37:21):
I haven't heard that one.

Speaker 2 (02:37:22):
Yeah, he was, he was not in the woods or something.
He claimed that some rabbit had attacked him. I thought
that was really funny because it came out right about
the time as money, Python's holy.

Speaker 3 (02:37:32):
Grail is that rabbit? And that was the way I
always remembered that in envision.

Speaker 4 (02:37:37):
Then now was are we talking like a little bunny?
Are you talking about one of those Flemish giant rabbits
that's about the size of a you know, a large cat,
because you know, maybe.

Speaker 2 (02:37:45):
I don't know if he had any Flemish rabbits there
in planes Georgia.

Speaker 4 (02:37:50):
Knights of the Storm says banks and c C companies
make money from thin air every time they're used. Of course,
that's credit card companies.

Speaker 3 (02:37:58):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:37:59):
There's a lot of money to be made on our
scam system CJP rumble. Remember when you could actually gain
a little interest at the bank, when the people had
access to capital. I don't not in my lifetime has
it been that way.

Speaker 3 (02:38:12):
Yeah. Yeah, now if you have access to the capitol
live on a J sixth.

Speaker 4 (02:38:16):
Thing on, Sorry, goodbye no longer. Yeah, Nights of the Storm.
My grandmother taught us about gleaning, and we did that
when I was a kid. We gleaned corn from our
neighboring farmers to feed our livestock. Oh that's great, Yeah,
that's really that's really fun. My wife grew up next
to a large, extremely large corn field. It's no longer there.

(02:38:38):
It's been built over four more houses and things like that.
Sad to say, but you know, after they had kind
of harvested everything, they would occasionally go in and just
take a few heads for grilling and things like that,
you know, not enough that it was ever going to
harm anything. And after they had already gotten the majority
of them, but they would occasionally go in and glean
just a few ears of corn here and there. Yeah,

(02:39:01):
And of course, as I said that cornfield is gone,
it's replaced by.

Speaker 2 (02:39:06):
And get apples at Carter Mountain. I thought it was
interesting we didn't start doing with other people. You would
go out and you'd pick the apples yourself, and they
had at any given time, they had different areas that
were planted with different varieties of apples.

Speaker 4 (02:39:19):
Pink ladies were our favorite.

Speaker 3 (02:39:20):
Yeah, and.

Speaker 2 (02:39:22):
You could kind of tell which one you want. You
were free to go out there and just take an apple.

Speaker 4 (02:39:26):
And yeah, they said it was totally fine. Feel free
to pick you know, as many apples and eat them
while you're here, because they knew that you can't possibly
make You would make yourself sick long before you ever
made an impact.

Speaker 3 (02:39:38):
On them, that's right.

Speaker 4 (02:39:40):
C JP Rble says, it's too bad we can't charge
our government interest on the money they stole from us.
Good luck trying to enforce. You want to see the
boot come down hard and fast. They'd call in the
Marines so quickly OUTI Mr R says, thanks to W.
Wasserman Schultz, loan sharking is totally legal now with title
loan slash paid a lenders their interests would offend a pimp.

Speaker 2 (02:40:03):
Yeah, that's another example there. You know, that is so exploitative.
And he actually mentions this in his article. I didn't
get into it, but he talks about the payday long
people and how abuse of that is. And that's precisely
the principle that you know was behind stopping usury stuff.
No pun intended the terms of the principle. So yeah,

(02:40:27):
we need to get interested in usury.

Speaker 4 (02:40:31):
The puns don't stop because we're.

Speaker 3 (02:40:33):
All up to our net necks and all that kind
of stuff.

Speaker 4 (02:40:36):
There's no getting away from it. And of course, as
people point out, there's no savings account that even matches
inflation at this point, not even close. They charge you
a massive amount, but give you an extremely small amount
back nights of the storm. Your government takes your money
all year and then returns some of it at a
lower purchasing power. Isn't that kind of them? Hi boost

(02:40:58):
Our entire economic place platform is based on usery since
nineteen thirteen. That is a bear that no one can overtake.

Speaker 5 (02:41:05):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:41:06):
Yeah, Monetizing the debt is a very has always been
a very important strategy for them. The problem is that
the debt has gotten so large that it is eating
up all the capital and that is unsustainable. It's going
to become in just a couple of years, it's going
to become the biggest item in the federal government's budget.
And that's why you know they've got to do something

(02:41:26):
about it. But it's been a long term process that
we create inflation and then we can pay back this
debt with cheaper dollars.

Speaker 4 (02:41:35):
We've got Psychobabbel sid Rank choice voting is a good idea.
That's something that you've talked about for a long time.

Speaker 3 (02:41:43):
I like that idea.

Speaker 2 (02:41:45):
The problem with it is that you have to trust
them to accurately process it, like we're talking about how
the New England Journal of Medicine rigged the stats on
that thing. In theory, you've got everybody on the ballot,
and in theory you've got more than just two candidates there,
and so you can rank your choices, and that avoids

(02:42:07):
the idea of saying we're going to vote for the
lesser two evils. You know, I know that this guy
doesn't have a chance. Well, you can always make that
person your first choice and then if they don't get
enough votes, if they are the lowest vote getter, then
you go to your second choice. So you haven't lost

(02:42:27):
your vote. You just get to rank all the ones.
And so that helps to get rid of this game
that the two parties play saying you're going to waste
your vote by doing it. But the problem I have
with it is how do you audit that? And that's
a big part of the issue as well, custody auditing.
Those are the back end frauds that they pull on us.

Speaker 6 (02:42:46):
But it is important to have something like that in
order to have a third party. It's critical.

Speaker 3 (02:42:53):
It will never happen without that.

Speaker 6 (02:42:55):
Yeah, something's law. When you have you know, first past
the posts vote, it always devolves into a two party
duopoly because you wind up with everyone going to one
of two extremes, and they don't want to vote for
a similar candidate they like better because that would dilute
the vote.

Speaker 3 (02:43:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:43:12):
There's another style of voting called approval voting, where you
rate everyone from one to ten depending on how much
you like them, and then you just add up all
the points that each person got. That has the same
effect as ranked choice, but it's also easier to count.
It's almost as easy to count as first past the post.

(02:43:36):
I don't know why we don't see more people talking
about that type of voting.

Speaker 2 (02:43:40):
Well, I tell you, the Republicans hate that idea because
it's going to open up. You know, they have flourished
on saying look how bad the Democrats are. They're grooming
our kids and all those other kind of stuff, trying
to change their gender, and they can always scare people
in voting for them on those kinds of bases. So
they don't want there to be another choice's out there,
so they make any of these alternative schemes. They demonize

(02:44:02):
them to the f degree. But yeah, you have to
have something like that. Something has got to change.

Speaker 4 (02:44:06):
It's hard not to look like a saint when the
Democrats have gone completely satanic, When the opposition is literally
out there putting pedophile drag queens in front of children.

Speaker 3 (02:44:18):
At.

Speaker 4 (02:44:20):
What else can you do? Sometimes it's just like, well,
if I don't vote for this guy, sure he's bad
in his own way, but the other option is this
guy is going to put drag queens in front of
my children. Yeah, they've kind of monopolized the system through that,
we've got High Boot. No wait, Nights of the Storm says,
it's a matter of time till we have the AI party.

Speaker 2 (02:44:41):
There's probably well, they're just going to turn governance over
to the artificial intelligence.

Speaker 4 (02:44:46):
Actually, there'll be a gop AI and a democrat AI.

Speaker 2 (02:44:50):
Technocracy doesn't really care about your vote. They aren't even
going to pretend to pretend that that there is an
election like.

Speaker 6 (02:44:57):
This from we're all dead. I wonder if hey, I
will also be a pedal. It's a government requirement at
this point. We had that story at the beginning about
being taught to groom children, so that's clearly a preparation
for being put into government.

Speaker 3 (02:45:13):
Yeah, that's right. We can make a meta the Speaker
of the House.

Speaker 4 (02:45:18):
Maybe they trained it on some Dennis Hastert.

Speaker 6 (02:45:20):
You know, data, does Epstein have a whole bunch of
logs of AI chats with miners.

Speaker 4 (02:45:29):
The Epstein AI.

Speaker 3 (02:45:31):
Yeah, that's why they can't find the data.

Speaker 2 (02:45:33):
They already transferred over to chat GPT the program exactly.

Speaker 4 (02:45:38):
High Boost says, once rothschild becomes Once rothschild became Uber wealthy.
He sent out his five sons to set up banks
all over Europe, and well here we are. The Rothschilds
have been a plague upon us for years and of.

Speaker 2 (02:45:53):
Course still connected you know, to Trump even you know,
you go back and look at Wilburgh Ross, who was
Trump's secretary. That's where they're going to do the stuff
to help individual corporations. That's where the corney capitalism when
he meets the road, Well he put Wilbar Ross in.

Speaker 3 (02:46:09):
Wolba.

Speaker 2 (02:46:09):
Ross was a ross Child agent who when Trump was
bankrupting his casinos, pulled up and saw the big crowd
around him, and he openly talked about He said, yeah,
I call my bosses and told him I think we
can use this guy. You know, let's work with him.
And so question, how are.

Speaker 3 (02:46:26):
They using him? I guess.

Speaker 4 (02:46:29):
DG eight, We've got to thank you for the tip.

Speaker 3 (02:46:32):
DJ.

Speaker 4 (02:46:32):
We appreciate it. David Rank. Choice voting sounds great, but
the honey left right paradigmal control it. Remember when Paro ran,
they rolled out rushing them ball to paint you in
a box left or right? No independent, that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:46:45):
Yeah, and told you that he was a crazy conspiracy theorist,
because he said they were out to get him and
had threatened him. You know, I think today people have
looked at that and would have no problem believing Ross
Perot after what we've seen intervening years. So well, let's
take a quick look. We're starting to get short on time,

(02:47:06):
and I wanted to get to what Trump had to
say in one of his interviews with Fox News. First
of all, I'll preface it by saying, do you remember
back when Michael Bloomberg ran It was actually an interview
that he gave with New York Times published April fifteenth,
twenty fourteen. He said, I'm telling you that, if there's

(02:47:30):
a God, when I get to heaven, I'm not stopping
to be interviewed. I'm heading straight in. I have earned
my place in heaven. It's not even close, said Bloomberg,
referring to his work on gun control, obesity, and smoking cessation. Okay,
so that's the basis on which he's going to stand

(02:47:51):
before God. Now Trump says that based on what he
is doing with the war stuff, that's going to be
how he's going to get into heaven.

Speaker 1 (02:48:00):
Want to end it.

Speaker 8 (02:48:00):
I want to end it. You know, we're not losing
American lives. We're not losing American soldiers. We're losing Russian
and Ukrainian mostly soldiers. Some people as missiles hit wrong
spots or get lobbed into cities like Kievan towns. But
you know, if I can save seven thousand people a
week from being killed, I think that's the I want

(02:48:22):
to try and get to heaven if possible. I'm hearing
I'm not doing well. I don't really hit the bottom
of the totem pole. But if I can get to heaven,
this will be one of the reasons. Well, I think
I saved a lot of lives with India. Instead, they
were going at it. There were the planes were being
shot down. That was going to be maybe a nuclear war.
If I let that go and I did that through trade,

(02:48:42):
I was.

Speaker 3 (02:48:44):
I think Lord Jesus Christ is gonna have one answer
for him, m RNA.

Speaker 2 (02:48:48):
It's like, how many seven thousand people a week that
would be on the small side for him RNA. And
then of course what is openly happening right now in Gaza.

Speaker 3 (02:48:55):
You know, it's.

Speaker 2 (02:48:58):
They're kind of selective about what they're wan to do.
He's got spiritual advisors.

Speaker 6 (02:49:01):
What I don't think Trump really wants to stand before
God and point to his foreign policy for why he
should be let into heaven.

Speaker 2 (02:49:08):
Yeah, or any of his policies. Quite frankly, I don't
think he wants to point to his spiritual advisors either.
I don't think he's gonna be able to say, but
Paul White and Norman Vincent Peale told me that you
wanted me to be rich.

Speaker 5 (02:49:21):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:49:22):
I think that's one of the reasons when you look
at billionaires like Bloomberg and Trump. He's one of the
reasons why Jesus said it's hard for a rich man
to get in heaven. Kingdom of Heaven should say than
it is for cambell to get through the eye of
a needle. But with God, all things are possible. You know,
it is possible. He should play Pray for Trump because

(02:49:45):
he's had a lot of really bad advice from people
like Paul White. He's not heard the gospel. He's not
heard the free gift of salvation from God. And as
all other religions see it, it is what you can
do for God. You know, some system of things that
you do, some good stuff that you do, and you

(02:50:05):
hope that the good outweighs the bad. It can never
outweigh the bad that you have done. And the only
hope is to do something with your sins. And so
I look at this, and we've got a lot of
I've seen this over and over again. This guy, who
is a Texas cattle rancher's name is Byron Stintson, and
what he's trying to do is to breed a red

(02:50:27):
heifer so they can bring back animal sacrifices in Israel.
He's a Zionist and he's been working with some rabbis
to do this, and it's really surprising to me when
I see this. You know, we need to think about
the fact that the Jewish religion is given by Moses,
has not been practiced for two thousand years. The Temple
was there as a place where they would do animal sacrifices,

(02:50:50):
and the Zionists, Christian Zionists as well as some of
the Jewish Zionists want to build a third temple. They
want to start animal sacrifices again. I'm just surprised when
I see Christians embrace this to the extent that they have.
They don't realize that they don't believe the New Testament.
When he says, it's not possible for the blood of

(02:51:11):
bulls and goats, even if they're red, to take away sin.
They were a picture of what Christ would do. The
Temple was a picture of what Christ to do. As
a matter of fact, the temple as well as a tabernacle,
that was all a picture of Christ. And when he came,
he fulfilled that. And I think it's amazing to me
the amount of effort that this guy is spending. It

(02:51:34):
is just as delusional as what Trump and Bloomberg are
trying to do in terms of earning their way to Heaven.
But he was accompanied by Tony Perkins of the Family
Research Council, Mike Johnson, the House Speaker, and a pastor
called Jim Garlow. Forty lawmakers Republican, all of them attended

(02:51:55):
a public prayers in a variety of topics. House majority
of the Leader, Steve Scalise was also there, Randy Fine
from Florida, Andy Ogles of Tennessee, Kate Britt of Alabama.
So they were all gethered at the Museum of the
Bible near the National Mall for this hours long prayer
session and then when that was concluded, the prayer section

(02:52:17):
of it was concluded. This Texas cattleman got up and
gave his spiel about how they're gonna build the Third
Temple and start sacrifices. Again, that's not what the Jewish
people or anybody needs. What they need is a sacrifice
that has been done once for all, and they ignore that.

Speaker 3 (02:52:33):
What they need is the Gospel.

Speaker 6 (02:52:36):
Hey, I've got the blood of bulls and goats here,
isn't that great?

Speaker 2 (02:52:41):
Yeah, it's kind of interesting. The details of the story.
I thought, we're kind of funny because they have to
have to inspect these cows and make sure that there's
not a single white hair or something that has to.

Speaker 3 (02:52:55):
Be all red hair a ginger cow.

Speaker 4 (02:52:59):
This is they're going over the magnifying glass. I guess
they got a team of rabbis out there.

Speaker 2 (02:53:04):
If they've got a single white hair, that disqualifies them,
and if they have an ear tag, which is very
common for cattle, that also disqualifies them. So they went
around this guy, this Texas cattleman says he spends half
of his time doing this. So he goes around with
Jewish rabbis and they find this red cow that doesn't
have any flaws, and they tell the people who have

(02:53:27):
the cow, you know, don't put an ear tag on it,
all this kind of stuff, and well, and we will
buy it. And then they had to transfer to Israel.
And the problem was is that when they transferred, they're
not allowed to import cattle into Israel. So they had
the first of all, declare that they were pets, and
they were able to get around the importation law by

(02:53:50):
claiming that these cattle were pets. But then as part
of the shipping process, it is standard required procedure that
you put him micro tag on any cattle that you
are shipping. And so now it's a big problem. So
he gets all of these people together. He says, you

(02:54:10):
have three rabbis in a room, you'll get twelve opinions.
He said, if you put three hundred of them in
a room, you get twelve thousand opinions.

Speaker 3 (02:54:17):
And so nobody could.

Speaker 2 (02:54:18):
Decide whether or not that was a flaw on the
red heifers that they're doing. So now they've got these
red heifers there and they're going to try to cross
breed them in country in order to get a pure
red heifer.

Speaker 4 (02:54:32):
This is the kind of legal has an mRNA vaccine
does that?

Speaker 2 (02:54:36):
Yeah, I don't know, but this is what legalism always
leads to. You know, how much and to what level
of detail does your life have to be pure? You know,
do you have a single flaw in your life? Because
God demands perfection. That was a sacrifice that Christ gave,
so accept no substitutes on any of this stuff. And

(02:54:58):
what he needs to be doing is he needs to
be if he really loves the Jewish people, he needs
to be giving them the Gospel. But of course Paul
White doesn't give Trump the gospel. Neither those Norman Vincent
Peel They were all about, you know, the prosperity gospel and.

Speaker 4 (02:55:12):
Success and all the rest of that, which is not
the gospel.

Speaker 2 (02:55:17):
Yeah, one of the things this guy says, he says
it's all about a long term plan of God to
bring about peace on earth and for us to study
and make relationships between the Jewish fathers of faith and
Christians worldwide.

Speaker 3 (02:55:29):
That's not about that at all.

Speaker 2 (02:55:31):
The long term plan for peace was not peace between men.
You know, that's something we always hear at Christmas time.
You know, Jesus came for peace on earth. He came,
he said he was going to create a sword between
different groups they were going to fight over what was required.
But he said he came for peace between God and man.
That's what he made peace for, and that's the important one.

(02:55:52):
And if we were at peace with God, that will
be the outcome. We will be at peace with each other.
But that is done through Jesus Christ. That's what the
Gospel is about. And that's what Zionists, whether the Christian
or Jewish, do not understand. And this guy doesn't have
an idea about what's going on with it, and it's troubling,
I think to see that Pete Hegseth is another person

(02:56:14):
who's pushing for a third temple. So pray for these people,
Pray for Trump that somebody will point him towards the
real gospel, the real good news. It's also interesting if
you go back and you look at the original Zionists,
they were not strictly focused on Palestine. They were also
considering a lot of different places. Uganda was one place

(02:56:38):
that we're looking at. They were also looking at setting
up a couple of different areas in New York.

Speaker 3 (02:56:42):
They thought they got maybe into a.

Speaker 2 (02:56:45):
Rural area that was in New York New Jersey area
where they could draw on the large Jewish population in
New York, or maybe just have a clean start. Galveston
was one that was under consideration by the Zionists at
the time.

Speaker 4 (02:57:00):
Gelston isn't a very nice place. I'm sure they look
at it like, I don't.

Speaker 2 (02:57:03):
Know, Yeah, I think they take a trip there, and said,
I don't think so. But you know, when you look
at what these people are doing, he makes comments. He said, yeah,
we want to bring about the second Coming of Christ.
And as I've said before, this is what Abraham and
Sarah did when they had a promise from God. They
decided that God was taking too long, and so they

(02:57:24):
were going to speed the process up and do it
their way. And I think all of this Zionism suffers
from the Hagar experience. Okay, we wouldn't have, ironically, we
wouldn't have the kind of conflict that we have with
Jews and Arabs in the Middle East right now if
it wasn't for what Abraham and Sarah did producing Ishmael

(02:57:45):
as they decided that they were going to do it.

Speaker 4 (02:57:47):
They're trying to enact God's plan in their own way,
trying to take it into their own hands. We've got
some comments here and we're almost out a time, so
I want to make sure we get to him. We
are all dead. Says quote unquote earned my place in heaven.
Luck with that. Valentine says, I never knew you.

Speaker 3 (02:58:04):
Yeah exactly.

Speaker 4 (02:58:05):
MAV twenty two says they know they aren't going to heaven.
That's why they want to live in machines forever. They
know what's waiting for them.

Speaker 3 (02:58:16):
Yeah, I never knew you.

Speaker 2 (02:58:17):
And of course we remember that that somebody says I
did all these things in your name. I mean, none
of this stuff Trump Bloomberger.

Speaker 3 (02:58:23):
Doing in Christ's name. They're doing it in their name.

Speaker 1 (02:58:26):
Right.

Speaker 4 (02:58:26):
Look at how I got people to stop smoking.

Speaker 3 (02:58:29):
Yeah, he said.

Speaker 2 (02:58:31):
Even if you're doing it in my name, and you
think that that's what recommends you to me, then you've
missed the point.

Speaker 4 (02:58:38):
Even secular philosophy nice.

Speaker 3 (02:58:41):
The storm has got. The Third Temple is us. It
is not a building. That's absolutely right.

Speaker 2 (02:58:45):
We are Christ is the cornerstone, and we are the
living stones that are built into that third Temple. The
Temple and the Tabernacle were pictures of what Christ would do,
and they were real. It's not to say that we
don't believe the Bible. Literally. But the Old Testament Kingdom
prophecies were about the Lord Jesus Christ. He even told

(02:59:07):
him that. He said, you search the scriptures the Old
Testament to have eternal life, but they testify of me.
And that's the point that these people are missing. It's
really sad to see it.

Speaker 4 (02:59:20):
Yes, Guard Goldsmith says, red hair dye, that's right. The
rabbis do like to argue and sort of wheedle things out, like, well,
we can't work on the Sabbath, but we can bring
people in to push buttons for us, so maybe they
can work something out there. What if we die the
cow read God.

Speaker 3 (02:59:34):
I'll never notice.

Speaker 6 (02:59:36):
I also wonder if they're paying, you know, ranchers large
amounts for totally red cow. That's an incentive right there.
That's why may be doing that.

Speaker 3 (02:59:46):
Who knows. Yeah, of course aged beef that's going to
have some flaws and that right's going to start turning gray.
Well that's it for today's broadcast. Thank you so much
for joining us. Have a good day.

Speaker 4 (02:59:57):
God bless you all.

Speaker 3 (03:00:08):
The common man.

Speaker 2 (03:00:10):
They created common Core and dumb down our children. They
created common Past track and control us. They're Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But

(03:00:31):
each of us has worth and dignity created in the
image of God.

Speaker 3 (03:00:38):
That is what we have in common. That is what
they want to take away.

Speaker 2 (03:00:42):
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.

Speaker 1 (03:00:53):
It's time to turn that around.

Speaker 2 (03:00:55):
And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
information and links you find at the Davidnightshow dot com.

Speaker 3 (03:01:02):
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.

Speaker 2 (03:01:10):
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
your prayers.

Speaker 3 (03:01:14):
D Davidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #2077: Larry Fink & BlackRock Stealing the World

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Wed Episode #2077: Larry Fink & BlackRock Stealing the World

Stuff You Should Know