Wed Episode #2097: Trump the Censor: Free Speech Betrayer And Big Pharma Vaccine Pusher

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
You know, rule of deceit. Telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (00:40):
As o'clock strikes thirteen, It's Wednesday, the seventeenth of September,
year of Our Lord twenty twenty five. Today we're going
to take a look at the outrage from the right
against free speech. These people are trying to cancel everything,
especially Charlie Kirk's legacy in the First Amendment. And so

(01:01):
we're going to take a look at Trump's bullying, his lawsuits,
the rest of this stuff. And we're going to for
the last couple of days, I wanted to get to
the Unite the Right rally, or unite the Kingdom, I
should say, in the UK, huge, huge rally. People understand
what's going on there. We played the clip already from
Elon Musk warning people that they can't sit on the

(01:25):
sidelines because he didn't say it. But this is a
fourth turning and I would say that even in the UK,
they're going to see a civil war, a revolution and
a world war because that's what their leaders want, just
like our leaders want that.

Speaker 3 (01:41):
We'll be right back, stay with us.

Speaker 4 (02:11):
Good morning, and welcome to the show today, folks, many
of you a brief rundown on the articles or we're
going to cover in this segment. This is Trump threatens
ABC's carl on hate speech, crackdown, the MAGA, crackdown on
free speech. This has come from the New Statesman. And
Trump sues New York Times for fifteen billion over critical
books and articles. Most degenerate newspaper and history. Trump slaps
New York Times most degenerate. That's a bold claim. More

(02:36):
about Trump and the New York Times. Milania Trump shares
Daily Beast statement on removed articles about Epstein connection. Daily
Beast apologizes to Milania Trump and removes podcast segment over Epstein.
Claims Pam Bondie's ridiculous twenty four hours that sounds kind
of like a children's book.

Speaker 2 (02:52):
Almost wow. Yeah, it's actually our very very bad twenty
four hours because she's supposedly the chief law enforced one officer,
and she doesn't know or care what the law is.

Speaker 4 (03:03):
Trump elevates push for Charlie Kirk act I would let
government police speech from the New American and Trump attacks
reporter for asking about profiting off presidency.

Speaker 2 (03:13):
Yeah, we live in an idiocracy that is becoming increasingly
authoritarian and totalitarian. So yeah, the fifteen billion dollar lawsuit.
Trump said, they're allowed to freely lie, smear, and to
fame me of all people, because you know it is
always about him. Yeah. I don't care much for the
toilet paper of record, as Joe Clentia said, but you know,

(03:35):
we've all known for the longest time what a joke
it is. They've had to give back pullitzerprizes. You had
Taylor Lorenz who was weeping about being doxed after she
had doxed people. The New York Times is a joke,
But Trump treats the Constitution as if it were a joke.
That's the real issue here. You know, we can really

(03:56):
sort this out Donald without you. We don't need you
tell us that. And he's again he does these types
of things. He does is he makes heroes out of villains.
New York Times is a villain, but he's going to
make them a hero. This is going to be a
way for these people to recoup their image because it
is so tarnished at this point. They're going to go

(04:18):
in there and they're going to fight against Trump, and
with their reputation, they will have plenty of money. I
can imagine everybody on the left is going to jump
in there to defend The New York Times. Not so
much other organizations like The Daily Beast that have been
bullied by millennia. But actually, I want to begin with

(04:38):
Pam Bondi's twenty four Hours. This is actually coming from
National Review, which is an establishment conservative and again there
they've been very closely tied to the CIA for a
long time. I'm not holding them up as an example,
but they got this right. They criticized her for going

(04:59):
onto a podcast. Asked she said, we will absolutely target you,
go after you if you're targeting someone with hate speech.
The National Review says, actually she won't. She won't target
or go after anyone for hate speech because legally there's
no such thing as hate speech in the United States.

(05:23):
A government employee, she is bound by the First Amendment
that she swore to uphold as a condition of her job.
Did she ever read it? I wonder, And they said
if she tries it anyway, the Supreme Court will side
against her nine to zero. I'm not so sure about that.

Speaker 4 (05:40):
Yeah, that's putting a lot of faith in the Supreme Court.

Speaker 2 (05:43):
Yeah, Amy Cony Barrett, if you remember I remember very
clearly because I was in the car listening to it.
When she had her confirmation hearing, she was asked by
a Republican senator, and I don't think it was intended
as a gotcha question. I think he was trying to
make her look good. Named the different components of the

(06:03):
First Amendment. She couldn't think of all of them, so
she's obviously qualified, you know, to be They joke about
what is a woman? You know from Kenanjie Brown, and
she doesn't know what a woman is. But Cony Barrett
doesn't know what the First Amendment is, and I imagine
she probably wouldn't agree with it if somebody explained it

(06:24):
to her. So, yeah, they may not have the law
on their side. They may not have the Constitution. As
a matter of fact, the Constitution may explicitly prohibit what
they want to do. But you know how the Trump
administration operates. They declare an emergency and then they do
whatever they wish by executive orders. So that's the real

(06:46):
issue going forward with all this. And then there was
a back and forth with John Carl of ABC. He's
the ABC News chief Washington correspondent, Jonathan Carl, and he
said well, be because of Pam Bondi. He says, she's
not a lot of scrutiny and criticism for threatening to
target and to go after people for hate speech. And

(07:09):
so what did Trump say? This is what he said,
and what do you make Pam Bondi says she's going
to go out for hate speech?

Speaker 5 (07:15):
Is that?

Speaker 6 (07:15):
I mean a lot of people, a lot of your
allies say hate speech is free speech.

Speaker 2 (07:19):
Should probably go after people like you because you treat
me going fairly. It's boy, you have a lot of
hate in your hearty. You're after ABC well paid me
sixteen million dollars recently for.

Speaker 5 (07:30):
A form of hate speech.

Speaker 2 (07:32):
He's a thug company page shaking people down, Mafia don
hate speech. So maybe they'll have to go after you. Yeah,
maybe they'll have to go after you. And that's not
the only reporter he's threatened in the last couple of days.
He also threatened a reporter from Australia who asked him
questions They didn't like, who are you? You're from Australia. Well,

(07:52):
you're not doing very well for your country. The Australian
government governor is coming here soon and I want to
talk to him about you. You know that type of thing.
What a disgusting thug and bully. Trump is always has been.
So again, you know, what do you make of Pam
BONDI says he's going to go after speech. A lot

(08:12):
of people, some of them your allies say hate speech
is free speech. Well that's the truth. I don't know.
I haven't seen any of his allies saying that, because
his allies are going to say the Constitution is whatever
Donald Trump wants it to be. It's there to serve
his interests. Trump said, you probably go out to people

(08:33):
like you. Yeah, exactly. He said, you have a lot
of hate in your heart. Is that projection? I think
it is. I've never seen anybody who has tested the
limits of free speech more than Donald Trump. That's what
he pointed out yesterday. If he wants to make vicious
speech illegal, he's likely to be the first one up

(08:55):
against the wall. Anyway. Maybe they'll come after ABC, maybe
they'll come after you. And so he said, a year
ago our country was dead, and now Washington, d C.
Is fixed. I fixed it? Did he really? I had
noticed that, did you? And again, if putting the military

(09:16):
on the street and reducing the crime by individuals is
the way that he wants to go. I would prefer
the tumult of liberty, as Jefferson said, to the quiet
servitude of living under a standing army. So Trump rambled

(09:37):
on about railroads in Chicago for full two minutes more.
But yeah, that's it. It's his ego. So I want
to say that.

Speaker 5 (09:44):
I also find it funny that he would say, well,
your network paid me for a form of hate speech,
didn't they. It's sort of the yes, of course, I
know the politicians are cropped. I've paid many politicians. That
he said when he was first running back in twenty sixteen.

Speaker 2 (10:01):
That's right.

Speaker 5 (10:02):
It's like, yes, I should hate speeches. I say hate
speech all the time. I have an expert on it.

Speaker 2 (10:08):
I sug your country company down just like a mafia figure,
would you know, to shake it again. Yeah, so this
is coming from the New Statesman, says the MAGA crackdown
on free speech. And as I would say, you know this,
they want to cut this out, put it up as
a segment, called it canceling Charlie, because that's what the

(10:29):
right wants to do. They want to cancel his legacy.
It is exactly the opposite everything that they're proposing we're
gonna come after anybody says anything negative about Charlie if
they cheer about the fact that he has had been assassinated.
But we've seen this type of thing on the right
all along as well. Right, they would cheer even if

(10:50):
there was violence against someone on the other side, and
we've seen examples of that. Bit like, that's just been
political discourse for the longest time. You may not like it.
I don't like it, but that is still free speech.
So they are canceling not only Charlie, but more importantly,

(11:11):
the canceling Christianity. I mentioned this yesterday when I talked
about how scared Taylor Swift was and she's hiding behind
the screen. It's not enough just to have security with her.
She's got to hide mind the screen so nobody can
see her and then hide in the box at the

(11:32):
NFL because she's afraid that she's going to be killed. Well,
you know, I'm not saying that we need to be
cavalier about violence, and we shouldn't take it seriously. We
shouldn't defend ourselves. However, Charlie was doing what he was doing,
presumably because he was a Christian that did not fear
those who could destroy the body as much as he
feared the one who could destroy both the body and

(11:55):
the soul. As Christians, we don't live in a spirit
of fear. We are there to speak our mind and
our truth. And that's a part of the First Amendment.
We should explain that, Damie Coney Barrett before it gets
to the Supreme Court. These two things are inextricably linked together.
If you don't have free political speech, you aren't going

(12:16):
to have free religious speech either, And this is why
Christians have always pushed us. Look, we have the truth
and we don't need to shy away from it. We
need to shine our light and we need not be
afraid to do that, regardless of what the consequences are. Yes,
we want to try to protect ourselves and others, but
these threats, whether the threats are coming from the left

(12:39):
or from Donald Trump, need to be opposed. And we
need to stand up to these bullies and these thugs
and these evil people like the Trump administration. So he
wasn't afraid of this, and we shouldn't be afraid of
this either. The GP, especially under Trump, is to overthrow

(13:01):
everything that Charlie Kirk did in his name. Of course,
do you hear Maga warriors tell it, the horrifying murder
of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was no less than the
making of a martyr. And I guess it's also the
making of the authoritarian right, because they have become a
twisted reflection of the authoritarian left. And the people who

(13:27):
are doing this have absolutely no idea and don't care
where it's leading. And when you talk about martyr, as
they point out in this article the New Statesman, of
course is coming from the left. They say, everybody's using
the term martyr. And of course martyr originally didn't mean
somebody who died for their religious beliefs. It meant witness.

(13:48):
It's the Greek word that just says witness. And what
happened was the people who died in the first century
who were witnesses to Christ and what he had done.
When they were told they had had a choice to
either recant and say that they were lying, or they
would be killed, they refused to recant. That's the way

(14:09):
that we should oppose this. Look, if we want to
build a civilization, we want to rebuild our culture and
our civilization, it's going to be rebuilt on Christian principles,
not even on the Constitution. The Constitution is another layer,
so down removed. We need to go back to the
bedrock of Christ, and we need to rebuild it on that.
Nothing other than that will bring back civilization. And that

(14:32):
was the basis of it when it came. So they said,
So everybody's got the term martyr on repeat. Trump called
him a martyr for truth and freedom, and he asked
all Americans to commit themselves to the American values for
which Charlie Kirk lived and died, all of the things
that Trump despises, free speech, the rule of law, patriotic devotion,

(14:54):
and love of God. Does Trump look at any of those?
I mean even patriotic devotion. He may hug the flag
and kiss it for the cameras, but does he really
have patriarch devotion when he subordinates our interests to that
of a foreign country Israel. No? Does he love God?

(15:16):
I haven't seen any evidence of that whatsoever. I'm not
his judge. God is his judge. But show me your
faith by your works, show me your faith even by
your words. He hasn't indicated that he even knows who
God is.

Speaker 4 (15:30):
Oh, but he likes two Corinthians.

Speaker 2 (15:33):
Yeah, well, you know, that's the way they say it
in Britain. So I said, we shouldn't make that as
chivals because you know, but again he's never read it right.
Ben Shapiro said that Kirk was a free speech martyr.
Josh Hammer said we must not allow Charlie to have
died in Vain as a free speech martyr. He called

(15:53):
him the living embodiment of the First Amendment, the first
Amendment that they are all seeking to kill. In fact,
the right seems to be doubling down on targeting anyone
who so much as criticizes Kirk's words or his legacy,
certainly those who speak in a cruel manner about Kirk.

(16:14):
The commitment to free speech extends, it seems to conservatives only,
and conservatives are gunning to use the power of the
state to squash speech they don't like, to ruin the
lives of speakers, to impose a kind of right wing
omni thought on the nation. You know, I saw this
clip from Greg Guttfield and he absolutely lost it while

(16:36):
he is claiming, you know, don't give me this both
sides stuff. Well, Greg, we can all see that you
are even if you can't see it of yourself. We
can see that you are a mirror image of the
screaming leftist crazies that are out there.

Speaker 7 (16:51):
Both sides argument, not only does it fly, we don't care,
We don't care about your Both sides argument that shit
is dead. For one thing, there is no cognitive dissonance
on our side. On your side, your beliefs do not
match reality. So you're coming up with these rationalizations like.

Speaker 2 (17:12):
What about this or what about that? We're not doing
that because what about the first of menment?

Speaker 7 (17:18):
We saw a young bright man assassinated and we know
who did it. We are not coming up with rationalizations.
We are calm, we are honest, and we are resolute.
We're not defensive. And I understand the defensiveness. I understand
why people are saying what about this.

Speaker 5 (17:38):
And what about this?

Speaker 7 (17:39):
Because if you have to face the underlying fact to this,
your life is going to fall apart because you're gonna
realize you're not the good guys. If you sat around
and you defended the mutilation of children, you're not the
good guys. If you sat six hundred, seven hundred cases
of harassment against Republicans and you said, but what about

(17:59):
this another, and then you see this murder after calling
somebody a fashion you fascist, you realize maybe I'm not
the good guy. That is a hell of a realization
to deal with.

Speaker 2 (18:09):
Maybe you're not the good guy.

Speaker 7 (18:10):
Therefore you have to grasp at rationalismity.

Speaker 2 (18:13):
To destroy the constitution? How the people died.

Speaker 7 (18:15):
For they do. I don't believe you're part of that group.
But why the hell do you have to mimic an echo.

Speaker 2 (18:22):
That crap to us?

Speaker 7 (18:23):
He was a patsy.

Speaker 5 (18:25):
That guy was a patsy.

Speaker 7 (18:26):
He was under the hypnotic spell of a direct con nihilism,
the transcult and the speech. If you can decide that
biology is false, you can agree that you that murder
is okay, and that humanity is expendable. How you cannot
see that alone and see that for what the evil

(18:49):
it is without having to attach all of these other
things is beyond me.

Speaker 2 (18:55):
Serenity now, that's the only thing missing from that which
you had that than but yes, so ready, now, so
ready now, as he screams, right, yeah, you're not the
good guy if you want to overthrow the constitution. Look,
I'm sorry. It deeply disturbed me to see Charlie Kirk murdered.
I understand about his family, but look, we have had

(19:17):
people over the last two and fifty years who have
died to establish a government that respects those God given rights.
Greg Guttphil he is exhibit A and why you don't
want to have comedians and entertainers the political commentary. He's
just the right wing side both sides. Now, Greg, you're
the side that is the opposite side of Stephen Colbert,

(19:42):
and not much difference really there. If you're going to
wet your pants and demand that the Constitution be taken
out because of one death, how many people died to
preserve that document? You're despicable anyway. Yeah, we must not
allow Charlie to have died in vain, they say. But
that's what they're to do the right scenes, doubling down

(20:03):
and targeting anybody who so much as criticizes Kirk's words
or legacy, certainly those who say that his who were
cruel about the speech attacking him. We had JD. Vans's
I talked about yesterday, did the Charlie Kirk Show. They're
from the White House, people like Steven Miller there with him.
They declared war on liberal organizations. Miller said quote domestic

(20:26):
terror movement is going to be rooted out, despite there
being no evidence that Kirk's killer was affiliated with any
liberal group. But look, we understand what his philosophy was
and what Steven Miller is not going to do. He's
not going to root out the schools, the government schools
that are pushing this insanity on kids. As I talked about,
that's the real issue, and none of them are talking

(20:46):
about it, not Greg Guttfield. Certainly, nobody at Fox and
nobody in the White House is talking about stopping the grooming.
They stop at the boys and the girls' bathrooms and
showers and participating in sports. And that's why you see
Sean Hannity having Bruce Gender on and fawning over him.

(21:09):
Bruce Gender a tranny himself, has a problem with men
competing with women in sports. Oh it's not fair. But
the rest of this stuff, he's fine with it, and
evidently so is Fox, so is Sean Hannity, so is
Greg Guttfaild.

Speaker 5 (21:24):
Conservative there's no evidence that he was affiliated with any
liberal extremist group, but we know of one that he
was definitely affiliated with, and that's the government schools that
he was indoctrinated by.

Speaker 2 (21:37):
That's the one they won't do anything about. That's the
one they pretend doesn't exist. Conservatives are creating their own
superpowered cancelation machine, ironically in the name of Charlie Kirk,
which is exactly what he fought against, using public shaming
along with the full force of government. The website has

(21:58):
been set up called Charlie's Murderers, and it compiles posts
from people celebrating his killing or simply being dismissive about it,
with the goal of getting them canceled. And of course,
as I talked about yesterday, JD. Vance's call was you
note these people, but find out who they worked for

(22:19):
and get them fired. That's a Stazi society. I don't
want to see that. But these people have absolutely no
understanding of American principles whatsoever. People on the left, people
on the right. Now, I'm stuck in the middle with
you clowns to the left of his jokers on the right,
a conservative think tank employee started a next based trophy

(22:43):
case people who lost their jobs for social media posts
about Kirk's killing. Random citizens who made nasty comments have
now been fired. MSNBC's Matthew Dowd was fired, and I
think for just cause what he did was really journalistic
malpractice and stupidity. The guy was beyond stupid. Yeah. Well,

(23:06):
I don't know if he was shot by some of
his supporters who were celebrating. It's just crazy. Yeah, were
you in sanz Yeah.

Speaker 5 (23:13):
I mean they're trying to group this all in together.
But there's a huge difference, a world of difference between people,
you know, that are small business owners firing these crazy
lunatics because they're disgusted by them, versus pressure from the
government and coercive measures going after driver's licenses.

Speaker 2 (23:36):
That's right, that's right. Yeah, if you got somebody at
home depot that doesn't want to print a poster for
Charlie Kirk, that's arguably against what the home depot is about.
They're there to print what you bring them, and it's
bad business for them to do that type of thing,
and they're entitled to fire you. But to have the
government come in and do that, that's a separate issue.

(23:57):
And even the people who wanted to use social media
as a beard for censorship would acknowledge that. They would say, yeah,
we don't have the ability to do that. As the government.
But we can put pressure, just like Clay Higgins said,
we can put pressure on the people we know in
the big tech companies. We can threaten them because they've

(24:17):
got everybody on their payroll, right everybody is on the
Dole and all these corporations are getting government grants and
contracts and so forth. You want to keep that government grant,
be ashamed if anything were to happen. That's exactly the
kind of government that we've had for a very long time.
Donald Trump is just the ugliest face with all this stuff.
He's the one who's taken off the mask completely to

(24:40):
show that it's about nothing other than thuggish bludgeoning of people,
which brings us again to the trader Clay Higgins, the congressman,
say he's going to go after business licenses permitting their
businesses will be blacklisted aggressively. They should be kicked out
of every school. Driver's licenses should be revoked. Congressman Randy

(25:01):
Fine from Florida, also Republicans, said, if you're aware of
anyone in the sixth District of Florida, or heck, anyone
anywhere in the state who works at a level of government,
who works for an entity that gets money from the government.
Well that's pretty much everybody now right, or who holds
a professional license, a lawyer, a medical professional, a teacher

(25:21):
that is publicly celebrating this violence, please contact my office.
I'll demand their firing, defunding, and license revocation. Yeah, so
this is where the Republicans are. It is precisely the
opposite of what Charlie Kirk did. They're spitting on his work.
So Charlie was the antithesis of Trump's hateful, rude bullying.

(25:48):
Charlie was respectful, he was fact based, He wanted to debate.
He wanted to uphold free speech. You wanted to uphold
the idea that we would contend for the true that
there was a truth that could be discovered, that it
was based on facts. Trump doesn't care about any of
that stuff. You know, Charlie didn't change Trump, but Trump

(26:10):
will change everything that Charlie Kirk stood for Trump and
his minions. So it all feels particularly hypocritical coming from
a political movement that has made cruel speech something of
an art. Yeah, that's Trump. When Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul
was attacked with a hammer in twenty twenty two, many
conservatives mocked him. Donald Trump made light of the near murder,

(26:33):
and his son Don Junior posted a photo of a
hammer and a pair of men's underwear on social media
and labeled it a Paul Pelosi Halloween costume. I think
that's funny, and I think we should be allowed to
have humor like that. And it wasn't empathetic. But see,
this is what's going to happen. We're going to have
everybody is going to be pearl clutching over whatever. Everybody

(26:57):
else says, I don't want to live in a society
like that.

Speaker 4 (27:00):
There's also some extenuating circumstances regarding the whole Paul Pelosi thing.
He just exactly, Yeah, I think you might be glossing
over some facts here.

Speaker 5 (27:08):
It's not quite fair to compare, you know, a spot
with his probably gay lover to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
That's kind of a slap in the face.

Speaker 2 (27:19):
And that's what people were actually mocking, the fact that
what is this guy doing.

Speaker 4 (27:22):
There with him, We're comparing apples to gay lover, hammer attacks.

Speaker 2 (27:27):
The First Amendment protects speech from government interference even if
the speech is hateful or offensive, and that speech about
Paul Pelosi should be protected. But again, if you were
to say something against Charlie Kirk, you're going to be attacked,
and they boast about it, even the Attorney General. It's

(27:50):
now conservatives who are doing the canceling. Thanks to Trump
the bully, he is now transforming the conservative side of
the political parties. He's now transforming that into a mere
image of the left. Because Donald Trump has always been
a New York City Democrat socialist. He has always been

(28:10):
somebody who's threatened people who said things about him that
he didn't like. That's who he is, and the Republican
Party is now becoming who he is, even to the
extent of protecting pedophiles, because that's who Donald Trump is,
and people like Speaker Mike Johnson, that's who they are
when they want to protect Trump. Canceling people, getting them fired,

(28:34):
taking opportunities away from them, or publicly shaming them was
often unfair, but it wasn't unconstitutional. Some of the right
are taking it much further, making a government action. The
First Amendment offers expansive speech protections that Kirk championed and
benefited from. This writer says that they didn't like much
of what he had to say. As a matter of fact,

(28:54):
they call much of what he had to say deplorable
to them, but he had the right to speak his mind.
That he was murdered for his views should shock and
frighten every American. When we resort to violence over vast
political differences, even over bigotry, we break the basic social
contract that enables our democracy to survive. Yeah, that's my opinion,

(29:15):
that's the constitution. But it also is accelerating us towards
a civil war. And I believe that's what Trump's role is.
I think don is there to divide, and he's not
a great job of that. I think that is particularly
why they put him in there.

Speaker 5 (29:33):
I also I think it's fitting that the example that
he chooses is the ridiculous thing with Pelosi and person
that yeah, probably having an affair with having a fight
in the middle of the night, saying that that's the
same thing, and you can't criticize that that's equivalent to

(29:53):
celebrating the death and assassination of Charlie Kirk. It's the
left will do that when have the power.

Speaker 2 (30:00):
Obviously that's right, and now the right will do it
when they've got the power. Strain the Constitution and the
promise that the people in America can say what they
believe without fear of government penalty is particularly galling to
do so in the name of someone who died for
free speech. They can at least see that hypocrisy. The
MAGA people can't see it at all. And so Trump

(30:23):
and his fifteen billion dollar lawsuit against the New York
Times quote lying about your favorite president me he puts
an all upper case in parentheses. Having secured big payouts
from Disney, ABC and Paramount CBS in recent months, Yeah,
he shook them down, didn'ty. He's now going after the

(30:44):
New York Times for fifteen billion dollars. He keeps escalating this.
You know, he just recently sued the Wall Street Journal
because they accurately reported about the Jeffrey Epstein birthday book.
And it should be interesting discovery. I hope, I hope
we finally get some information about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

(31:05):
from this lawsuit. But anyway, that was ten billion dollars,
so now he's upping it to fifteen billion dollars.

Speaker 4 (31:11):
This is another one of those cases where they's saying,
you know, if only they could both lose, you know,
it was. Yeah, the guy was basically a fog of war.

Speaker 2 (31:20):
Yeah, I said that. I can't remember the guy's name. Yeah,
fog of war. Oh that was mcnamair, Robert McNamar.

Speaker 4 (31:27):
Was it Robert McBeth that said, no, it was the
other guy. I don't know, one of the guys in
the administration around that time, one of the power brokers.

Speaker 2 (31:33):
That it's a people have said that about the iron
in Rock war, but this is another one.

Speaker 4 (31:37):
It's a pity they both can't lose.

Speaker 2 (31:39):
Yeah, that's right, that's right. Yeah. I'm not a fan
of the New York Times, but they have a huge
mythology that has been built up around them. I mean,
Hollywood has done movies about the Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks,
you know, about the Washington Posts and New York Times
and the legend in their own minds about what happened
with the Pentagon papers, and so they have this quote

(32:02):
unquote proud history. But I think Hollywood, all the left,
everybody will get behind the New York Times, especially to
oppose Trump. So from that standpoint, I think I think
Trump is far more dangerous than New York Times. I mean,
I don't take the New York Times seriously. But we
better take Trump seriously because he is going to do
whatever he wants and dare you to stop him, And

(32:23):
it doesn't matter if he's got any legal authority for
it or not. Hyperbolically citing his twenty twenty four election
win over La La Harris as the greatest personal and
political achievement in American history, this guy is just a
textbook case narcissist on steroids. There's anything like it. We

(32:46):
said that when he was first running. I remember interviewing
somebody who said, well, you know, all these politicians are
on ego trips, but Trump is in a class by himself,
isn't he so offering nothing in terms of evidence or argument?
For that matter, This lawsuit filing alleges one election interfering
salvo after another as part of a quote decades long

(33:08):
pattern by The New York Times of intentional and malicious
defamation against Trump. And one of the key things that
he's concerned about is a New York Times editorial board
endorsing Harris. Now, look, that's an op ed piece is
labeled as an editorial, Yes, they put it on the
page one, but it's still labeled as an op ed piece.

(33:30):
How in the world can he claim that that's false.
It's not even pretending to be objective reporting. It is
an op ed piece. So you know, the papers always
endorse people as a matter of fact, and many times
it doesn't really make any difference. Remember you had some
major newspapers make endorsements that haven't made any difference whatsoever

(33:55):
in the recent elections, and especially when it comes to
New York Times, I think they have lost their credibility.
Trump is going to make heroes out of them as
they defend the First Amendment, and rightfully so. So he's
a perpetually offended narcissist. Yeah, he marks this editorial, and

(34:17):
they are entitled to have an opinion, especially even you know,
even Ellie may the bucktooth leftist who now thinks she's
a conservative is when she talked about it, she said, well,
if people are going to put out stuff that's their opinion,
it's not factual, they need to label it as their opinion.
Guess what, Elly Maye, This was labeled as an op
ed opinion, as an endorsement, and it was their opinion,

(34:39):
which again did not persuade anybody. Just before heading over
the Atlantic for pompa ceremony state visit to the UK.
This week, Trump has lashed out from his so called
truth social about how the New York Times has been
allowed to freely live, smear and defame me and that
stops now all upper case. I wonder how the Brits

(35:02):
are really going to twist the knife and him after
he and Jade Vance went over there and rightfully complained
about how they were punishing people severely for social media
posts and other things that the government didn't agree with.
And now he has jumped the shark with this stuff,
showing proposals that are much worse than what the Brits
have even done up to this point. Increasingly erratic, Trump

(35:26):
hasn't been as successful in the past and his legal
actions against New York Times as he has as squeezing
money out of Hollywood over fifteen million dollars each from
Disney and Paramount over what were widely considered to be
weak lawsuits. But it would have been cheaper for them
to just pay him the fifteen million dollars and let

(35:47):
him go away, except that you can't appease a bully,
you only make him worse. In twenty twenty three, the
New York Supreme Court Judge Robert Reid tossed out Trump's
twenty twenty one suit against The New York Times over
a twenty eighteen article on his tax schemes from way
back in the nineteen eighties Reagan era. Trump has promised

(36:10):
to sue news outlets over coverage that he didn't like.
This is the guy who would call up and pretend
that he was someone else so he could praise himself.
Remember that, we heard the clips. It's amazing what an
ego trip this narcissist is on. Most of the time,
the lawsuits never occurred, and when they did, up until

(36:32):
Trump won the White House again twenty twenty four, they
were usually dismissed or they withered away. Yeah, he has
the temperament of a spoiled brat because that's what he is.
He has no principles. He's just looking to see what
he can get away with by bullying people. Different ballgame now,
as Trump openly goes after his perceived enemies and critics

(36:53):
with few restraints. Right now, Trump is pursuing, though with
less vigor of late, a ten billion dollar defimation lawsuit
against Murdoch's Wall Street Journal their reporting on his connections
to one time close pal and now dead convicted sex offender,
Jeffrey Epstein. And again the Congressional Committee has released the book,
and you can see that the reporting was accurate. I'm

(37:16):
anxious to see them shove that down his throat. And
then you've got Malania, who is threatening anyone who repeats
what Michael Wolfe said about her and Jeffrey Epstein's role
in introducing her to Donald Trump, that she was one
of his Epstein's girls. It's interesting to me that they
have not that Milania has not sued Michael Wolfe. He's

(37:41):
the source of all this. You know, he's done four
books that are very very much hated by Trump, talking
about the Trump administration and Trump and Epstein the rest
of this stuff. And he always does it based on
what he says are insider interviews, and people say, well,
that's not factual and everything, but nobody has sued him,

(38:02):
and Milania is not suing him. Now, he claims that
these statements that he's made about Milania's connections to Jeffrey Epstein,
he claims that this is based on audio taped interviews
that he had with Jeffrey Epstein. I suspect. That's why
she has not sued him. They do not want people

(38:24):
hearing Jeffrey Epstein himself saying this stuff about Milania. So
she threatens billion dollar lawsuits against every outlet that talks
to talks to Michael Wolfe. The lawsuit has no merit,
It lacks any legitimate legal claims. It is an attempt
to stifle and discourage independent reporting. Yes, everything that Trump

(38:45):
administration does has an attempt to stifle and discourage free speech,
free press. The New York Times will not be deterred
by intimidation tactics, and I think they will fight this
and certainly the First Amendment on their side. So he's
particularly upset about the fact that it was on the

(39:06):
first page. But you know he can't. He can't get
over and just take the win, right. He is as
ungracious as a winner as he is as a loser.
In recent days, Trump shared a video on social media
calling for the president to reinstate a Cold War era
media accountability law, and it's nothing of the sort. He

(39:28):
is as ignorant as that Ellie may hillbilly look that
she's got going now. She did that young girl doesn't
know what she's talking about Smith Mount Act had nothing
to do with controlling the content of the free press.
It was there as a promise that they broke to
the American public that these newly created media organizations as

(39:52):
part of the Cold War in nineteen forty eight, they
created the Voice of America. It was there to assuage
people's fears, which are justif that they would be propagandizing
the American public, which they were, Operation mocking Bird and
many other things, but then openly doing it and had
nothing to do with what she claims. It is Trump's

(40:14):
lawsuit for the New York Times. He's also suing reporters.
He's also suing Penguin Books. They published in twenty twenty four.
Listen to this title lucky Loser. Now, Donald Trump squandered
his father's fortune and created the illusion of success. Boy,

(40:34):
they mailed him, didn't they.

Speaker 4 (40:35):
So first he tariffs that island full of penguins. Now
he's suing Penguin books that maybe just really hates penguins.

Speaker 2 (40:42):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, he bankrupted a half dozen casinos,
so I think they got it spot on. So Milania
Trump as the latest media outlet that she has bullied
as a Daily Beast, they interviewed Michael Wolfe, who interviewed
who had interviewed Jeffrey Epstein, and he said that Jeffrey
Epstein said that Milania had been introduced to Trump. To

(41:06):
put it Molly on the Lolita Express, I guess to
say that they were introduced is something of a euphanism. Anyway,
The Daily Beast recently published a story that was headline
Malania Trump very involved in Epstein's scandal based on interviews
with Michael wolf which based on he says, interviews with Epstein,

(41:26):
and if Milania wants to shut this up, she should
come after the source that keeps saying this, But she doesn't.
She always comes after whoever interviews Michael Wolfe. There's simply
an arm of the Democrat Party and should accord to
many have their licenses re vote by the FCC. Trump
is saying, and again that's him going on and on

(41:47):
about news media. The FCC should not be policing content. Ever,
the licenses were about allocating frequency spectrum for the different
broadcast media ABCNBC and so forth. He doesn't respect anything
about free speech. News outlets have typically been very clear

(42:11):
about their bias. I mean We have seen newspapers all
over the place, like the Arkansas Democrat. Right, they used
to name the newspaper after the political party that they
were affiliated with. He thinks that somehow now a crime.
You're free to do that. By the way, that is
not a crime, only in his mind is not a crime.

(42:32):
So they say this lacksing legitimate legal claims and will
be shut down. I hope. So legal threats continue though
against those who are repeating Wolfe's claim, but she does
not sue wolf Trump is elevated the push for the
Charlie kirkakt that would let government police speech, you know,
for the buck tooth child, completely ignorant, despising free speech,

(42:56):
not understanding the principles, not understanding what the smith Mount
Act was about at all. She framed the idea as
a revival of the smith Month Act. But as everybody's
pointed out, that's not what it was about at all.
But Trump, of all people, should know better. Not that
we would expect Trump to know better, but he's in
the office of the President, so you would expect that

(43:18):
maybe he would look at it and read the Act,
read the first Amendment. But he doesn't. This Amended Act
according to this petition that forty three thousand people signed,
would hold media outlets, radio stations, educators, and content creators
accountable for the false narratives and erroneous statements that they make. Well,

(43:40):
that's another gutting of the First Amendment. And then finally
this Australian reporter. Trump attacks reporter and this is right
about the same time that he was doing that to
Jonathan carl who said, you got Pam Bondi out there
doing things that are prohibited by the First Amendment. What
do you say, Well, maybe she'll come after you. I'm
gonna have her investigate you. So this is an Australian

(44:01):
reporter and he's with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. The reporter asked,
how much wealthier are you now than when you returned
to the White House. Trump said, well, I don't know
the deals I made for the most part, other than
what my kids are doing here. They're running my business.
But most of the deals that I've made were made before.

(44:21):
That's what I've done for my for a lifetime. I've
built buildings. And they started boasting about the new White
House ballroom that he's constructing, talking about the elitist mentality here.
That's going to be the greatest ballroom anywhere in the world,
and for one hundred and fifty So it gives me
great pleasure to do it for the country, and I'm

(44:42):
paying for it out of some of the proceeds from
his craft and corruption. He's making billions. He said, the
country is not is an expensive ballroom. I think it'll
cost two hundred and fifty million, and it'll be I
think the finest ballroom for one hundred and fifty years.
You know, they wanted a ballroom, and now they are
going to finally have it, and it's going to knock
your socks off. The reporter pressed Trump on his business endeavors,

(45:06):
with recent reporting indicating that the Trump family has made
as much as five billion in recent months off of
a crypto venture alone. So he's going to virtue signal
about that and he's going to take one twentieth of it,
five percent and build a lavish ballroom there that people
look at. Oh Trump did that with his own money.

(45:28):
Now he did it with the money that he stole
because of craft and corruption, And so he says, is
it appropriate? The follow up, is it appropriate President Trump
that a president in office should be engaged in so
much business activity. Well I'm not really. My kids are
running the business. And then he said, wait a minute,

(45:48):
where are you from. I'm from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Well my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now.
They want to get along with me. You know, your
leader's coming up to see me soon. I'm going to
tell him about you. You set a very bad tone.
Isn't that amazing? I mean it's spoken like a Soviet dictator,

(46:12):
is it? Be very careful, citizen, you've been noticed. Trump
proceeded to call on another correspondent and he cut off
the Australian reporter who was trying to follow up. He said, quiet,
we looked at him. This guy has nothing in common
with the American system. I am absolutely disgusted by this man.
You want to get some of the comments before you.

Speaker 4 (46:34):
Bro Yeah, minute man militia. Well he isn't wrong. I
don't remember it. Don't know what that was, Tom mcdog.
Europe has wanted to take over Russia for two hundred years,
haven't succeeded yet. It has been obvious to me they
want another shot at Russia. Frothing at the mouth over
the idea even frightening.

Speaker 2 (46:54):
Yes, Russia's got a great deal of resources, but of
course they want to take everybody to war because they
are in the process of deconstructing Europe. It's not just
the UK, They're also doing that in Germany as well
as in France. They're destroying their own countries. They've imported
massive migration and made them given them superior rights to

(47:16):
the citizens who were there before. They want to overthrow
their country. Yeah, it's and when people find out about it,
just like we see with the United the right, when
people find out about it, they're going to be upset
with the rulers of their country, so they want to
take them to war. Same thing met Na, who's doing

(47:36):
keep a distraction going.

Speaker 5 (47:40):
He isn't wrong. Was about the Trump calling it the
most degenerate newspaper in history.

Speaker 4 (47:47):
Oh yeah, got citizen of Americaca. We are told in
this Holy script in the Holy Scriptures, sitting at sixty
five times, as you know, one for every day of
the year, to fear not. And although many argue pride
is one thing that will keep you out of heaven,
it's actually cowardice.

Speaker 2 (48:03):
Yes, it's not a revelation. All those who are cowardly
will have no part in it. But look, fear is
the opposite of faith, isn't it. It's exactly the opposite.
And so again, all these people say that Charlie Kirk
is a Christian martyr, they are trashing his Christian witness
as well, and they're going to make it impossible for

(48:25):
other people to give an answer for the hope that
is within them because they are inviting censorship of every kind.
And of course, the left truly does hate Christianity. They
hate christ and they will apply the censorship in canceling
their first and foremost citizen of Americaca.

Speaker 4 (48:43):
I hate speech is the most protected of speech, As
Tony says, I will fight for someone else's hate speech
minute Man, militia. They also seem to have no clue
of history and how this has played out ad nauseum.

Speaker 5 (48:54):
Yeah, I mean it's been said before, but you don't
need free speech to be protected for speech that everyone
loves and is polite.

Speaker 2 (49:03):
And yeah, I think it was I think it was
Augusta maybe who said, I'm not sure, said the speech
that the truth doesn't need to be hidden and protected.
He just needs to let it loose like a lion.

Speaker 4 (49:17):
Yeah, let's see, citizen of Americaca. Do you really think
Trump is going to heal the schism in this country
by denying Rosie O'Donnell her citizenship for simply hating his
fat orange guts. You know, probably not, but maybe we
could try.

Speaker 2 (49:35):
I mean, we should know. But you know, yeah, that's
more of this both sides thing. You know. That's why
I say Greg Gutfeld is a failed comedian and now
he's become a political commentator and he's just like these
people have been running the late night TV shows. He
just doesn't have any principles. As far as I can see,

(49:57):
I've not seen very much of him, but I was
disgusted by that little temper tantrum. Yet don't talk about
both sides? Well, then stop acting like the other side,
because you're looking like a Uni party solo cat.

Speaker 4 (50:10):
Nineteen eighty, Paul Pelosi was attacked by his drugged up
gay lover, which the media neglected to admit. While getting
them to admit something like that would be very difficult.

Speaker 2 (50:20):
They don't like it. They don't like talk about that
kind of thing.

Speaker 4 (50:22):
They don't really bring up the std rate among homosexual
men or the violence rate among lesbians. Those are two massive,
massive statistics that they just kind of glance over, don't
want to talk about it. Yona any wody fighting against
free speeches not in the name of Charlie Kirk proves
that it's not about free speech nor Charlie Kirk. Citizen americaka.

(50:43):
The hate that people have for Trump is essentially his
job security. Like a maintenance man, he wouldn't have anything
to fix if things didn't break. Nihar twenty twenty nine,
be the loneliest man in town, like the may tag repairman.

Speaker 5 (50:56):
Right, I mean the controversy. He has a weapon from
day one of his political career.

Speaker 2 (51:03):
That's right. It's always been the tact that he learned
about from professional wrestling. You gotta have heroes and heels,
and if they don't exist, you manufacture them. That's what
gets people excited.

Speaker 4 (51:16):
Yeah, but twenty twenty nine, they put the Donald back
in office to sell the divide in conquest. Citizen of americaka,
Well you already heard your bug eyed compromised FBI director.
There's no evans that Epstein trafficked to any girls, traffic
any girls, anyone, but himself.

Speaker 1 (51:33):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (51:33):
Yeah, Cash Bettel what a jash hotel. Every time you
see him, he looks like a deer cotton headlights, doesn't he.

Speaker 4 (51:41):
I saw someone online tweet out he was very, very
mad about what happened. He's like, we're gonna slam dunk
Cash Battel right back into the Ganges River from any one.

Speaker 2 (51:53):
But it's always like.

Speaker 5 (51:54):
He's got this expression, you want me to say what
to the American people?

Speaker 2 (51:59):
He was just like Dan Bongino, because they are influencers.
They're not investigators. They don't have any background that could
be used with this stuff. And as a matter of fact,
even though Dan Bongino worked for the Secret Service for
a while, when you saw his reactions to the raids
on mar A Lago, which I didn't agree with those raids,
but you know, the things that he was saying about

(52:20):
it were absolutely untrue. These guys are influencers. They will
say anything in order to have a platform, and so
of course they're exactly the kinds of persons that Trump
would pick for his administration. Somebody who will say anything
in order to have a job. I have no respect
for one of them.

Speaker 4 (52:39):
We've got a Syrian girl. And don't forget his profits
from lassuits. David, No, we've been covering that. Can't forget
about those making big bucks out of those lots you
Citizen of Markaka. Yes, wasn't it nice when they asked
him how he was coping with the death of his
dear young friend and he said, Oh.

Speaker 2 (52:57):
We're just working on my lovely, lascivious ballroom. You gonna
be the best ballroom.

Speaker 4 (53:03):
Charlie would have loved it. Charlie would have loved the
ball room, would have been here every day.

Speaker 5 (53:07):
I actually saw a clip of that. I didn't get
in the deck. Saw it last night of a reporter,
you know, asked like, how are you doing, and he's like, oh,
he just starts going off on the ballroom.

Speaker 2 (53:19):
We're going to a ball.

Speaker 5 (53:20):
I was like, right after the shooting, Yeah, we're.

Speaker 2 (53:23):
Going to have a ball. We're gonna have a ball,
canceling everybody.

Speaker 5 (53:27):
And of course he's saying, how you know Charlie Kirk
was like a son.

Speaker 2 (53:29):
To him and all that. Yeah, you.

Speaker 4 (53:33):
Reporters want to stop me from ballin, but they can't.
Citizen already read that. Citizen Marykaka, do you know what
a narcissist does when you start to talk about a
subject that they have large amounts of guilt or involvement over. Yeah,
they chase squirrels. Look at my ballroom. Also says make
no mistakes, citizen. If you don't use your speech now
and you are intimidated by either lawsuits or assassination, then
we have lost already and none of our lives are

(53:53):
worth excrement.

Speaker 2 (53:55):
That's right, absolutely, Well, we're gonna take the quick break, folks,
and we will We'll be right back. M h.

Speaker 1 (55:37):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (55:42):
Elvis and the Sweet Sounds of Motown.

Speaker 1 (55:47):
Find them on the Oldies channel at APS radio dot com.

(56:38):
You're listening to the David Night Show. Well, we have
an interesting.

Speaker 2 (56:43):
Update on George Zen, the old man that was screaming
I did it, I did it kill me and was
led out of the place there with his pants around
his ankles during up Paul Pelosi, I guess, but I
have an interesting update with that. But I'd like to
thank real quickly some of the people who have contributed
on cash app to us recently. David F who writes

(57:06):
a long overdue donation, Well, thank you very much. David
appreciate it, and Dave B and Christopher and Michael B
thank you very much. That's on cash app. If you'd
like to support the show, we do not make it,
we do not put it behind a paywall, but if
you'd like to support the show and keep it going,
we have listed at Davidknight dot news the places where

(57:30):
you can make donations or you can set up to
subscribe to the show. And we also have some merchandise
that is there as well.

Speaker 4 (57:39):
Yes, you can go to David Knight dot news and
see the hoodies, the shirts, the pens and of course
the very very nice brass coin or the brass finished
coin that Jason Barker put together.

Speaker 2 (57:50):
And we have some more stuff that's coming that Ryan
put together all love of the Road. Yes, we just
haven't done the commercial yet.

Speaker 4 (57:56):
For there's always more stuff to do. There's not enough
hours in the day.

Speaker 2 (58:01):
And we're really getting late on that, so we've got
to get that together. Yes, so really interesting bookmark is
similar to the coin that he designed, the medallion, the
large medallion. But you go to David Night dot news
to see all that.

Speaker 4 (58:12):
You also go to David Knight dot gold if you'd
like to start getting out of the fiat money market,
sort of accumulating something that you can hold, that you
can keep with you. So you go to David Knight
dot gold. That'll let Tony Rderburn know you came through us.
You can also go to r NC store dot com
and use promo code night on their products there. Hopefully
something there is something that you need can help you

(58:33):
with what you're struggling with when it comes to your health,
and hopefully it'll keep you outside of the medical industrial complex.
And briefly, Trends Journal dot com if you use promo
code night, you get ten percent off the Trends Journal.
Gerald Sunte works very hard. He puts so much information
into the Trends Journal. It is a massive publication and
he puts it out weekly. At this point, I believe

(58:54):
right it's weekly.

Speaker 2 (58:54):
It's weekly. It's usually about three hundred pages. Yeahs online magazine.
I see the headline, many markets rise as the economies decline.
There is this bifurcation of reality and markets right now,
isn't there. That's why I say, you know, gold and silver,
David Knight eye gold is a really good hedge against
that insanity, but also against the tyrannical toutlitarian policies around

(59:21):
money that they are putting in place as well.

Speaker 4 (59:24):
Yes, well I'm not gonna plug anymore.

Speaker 2 (59:27):
We'll break it up. We can do more later. So
this guy, George Zen I thought it was kind of
interesting when it first came out, Travis, they talked, they
referred to him as a gadfly, and it's like, what
does that even mean? That gave no explanation. Now we
have found out since they have charged him. You're right, Lance,
why isn't this guy charged as being accessory? Well, that's
exactly what they have charged him with. And as part

(59:49):
of this discussion about him, they said they called him
a gadfly because every time there would be any kind
of political meaning of any sort, he was always there
and he was always making an issue when he was there.

Speaker 4 (01:00:02):
He's obviously got something wrong with him.

Speaker 2 (01:00:04):
Yeah. Yeah, he's seventy years old.

Speaker 5 (01:00:07):
He was just arrested for having child abuse material.

Speaker 2 (01:00:12):
Yeah yeah, that was after they arrested him for being
an accessory that got his phone and they found a
lot of kiddie porn on it as well.

Speaker 4 (01:00:21):
The most insane thing it's in the articles, which I'm
sure we're going to cover, but I have to bring
this up now. Is just they arrest him. They say,
we'd like to look through your phone to see what's
been going on. He says, okay, but just be aware.
I use it to exchange you know, child porn with
other people, child sexual abuse material with other people.

Speaker 2 (01:00:38):
And they go, oh, oh, yeah, I'm investigating. Yeah, that's it. Yeah,
I'm an investigator. Right.

Speaker 4 (01:00:45):
So he just flat out admits it, says, yeah, you
can look at my phone, but be aware.

Speaker 5 (01:00:50):
Is this some like intelligence thing, like, you know, don't
go after I'm not.

Speaker 2 (01:00:55):
Sure there's any intelligence involved anything.

Speaker 5 (01:00:57):
This guy does just ignore all the illegal stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:01:03):
So they locked him up and then they said, well,
you know he's not the shooter, said let him go,
and then they thought about I guess you know the
same thing that you said, Lance, And wait a minute.
He was trying to help the guy get away, and
I think he actually even said that to them. He is,
there's something definitely wrong with this guy. An affidavit the
police detective that works for the university there said he

(01:01:27):
approached him after Kirk was shot. Zen immediately started yelling
at me, I shot him, now shoot me. I could
see both of his hands, and I could not see
a weapon. When asked where the gun was, he replied,
I'm not going to tell you, he said. Then, after
being taken to the Utah Valley University Police offices, he
asked for an attorney and said he did not shoot

(01:01:47):
the individual, saying that he did it to draw attention
away from the real shooter. Zen later told officers he
was glad that he said he shot the individual so
the real suspect could get away. He also stated officers
that he wanted to be a martyr for the person
who was shot. Zen has a history of criminal charges
and convictions. In twenty thirteen, he was convicted of making

(01:02:11):
a terroristic threat at Salt Lake City Marathon, and that's
where the statement about him being involved in the Boston
Marathon came from. He was not involved in that, according
to the information I could find. They disputed that. I
don't know, but the Salt Lake County District Attorney gil
said that Zen's criminal history dates back to the nineteen eighties.

(01:02:33):
He's a person who can be odd. He has all
those kinds of sometimes odd behavioral challenges, but by and
large he's more of a gadfly than anything else. He said,
Ben would always give me a hard time for being
a Democrat. So he's all over the place, right.

Speaker 5 (01:02:51):
He can be a little odd. What was helping assassins
and child born?

Speaker 2 (01:02:55):
And what a character? Yeah, almost every political event you
can think of, there was always George somewhere in the background,
said Gil, that's what they mean by being a gadfly. Uh.
So he's now hit with child porn charges as you
point out, Lance keeping graphic sexual photos of children on

(01:03:16):
his phone. According to law enforcement, investigators found more than
twenty images of kids as young as five, at least
partially naked and posing in sexual ways of the Utah
County Sheriff's office. Zen admitted that he gets sexual gratification
from viewing and sharing child sexual abuse material images with others.
That his preferred victim age is five to twelve. No

(01:03:38):
wonder he hangs out with politicians. That explains I guess
why he's at every single political event, right, because he
knows who the pedophiles are of a feather and all that.

Speaker 5 (01:03:50):
Yeah, So who is he sharing these with again? And
why is he so close to all these politicians?

Speaker 2 (01:03:57):
He fessed up to not being the shooter and get
her successfully requested if they could take a look at
his phone. As you point out, he warned me. He said,
there's gonna be a lot of child porn on there,
and it turns out that there was, So he's got
some issues that are coming up. The search warrant was
obtained Monday that led investigators to find the illicit images

(01:04:21):
and several very graphic sexual text threads in which Zen
shared images with other parties. Well, Tyler Robinson grew more
pro gay and trans write oriented, said his mom. And again,
as we said yesterday, and be labored the point, where
did you get this? You know, who was it that

(01:04:43):
did this to him? Was it on the gaming platforms
or was it at school? I'm sure it was elements
of both of these, but I think the predominant influence
was the school. He left his home when he was
seventeen and he moved in with this tranny furry guy.
A litany of charges against him, including felony, discharge of

(01:05:04):
a firearm causing serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering,
and the commission of a violent offense in the presence
of children. Whether they've been very creative with all this stuff.
I mean, we look at it and we just see
a murderer. But the obstruction charges both felonies stem from
him allegedly concealing the rifle, youth and the shooting. So

(01:05:26):
if you conceal the murder weapon, that's obstruction.

Speaker 5 (01:05:32):
And the clothing matter if he hadn't concealed the weapon afterwards.
That was the part that really bothered me.

Speaker 2 (01:05:39):
The worst part is the hypocrisy. But it just goes
to show you why there's no jury trials anymore because
they get so creative with these charges. I mean, you know,
he murdered Charlie Kirk. If that's true, that should be enough.
And again there's the issues about you know, where was
the gun when he went over the roof. We talked
about that yesterday. There's other and they still haven't found

(01:05:59):
the bullet, which is I think very interesting surprising. So
both countsel witness tampering relate to instructions that Robinson related
to his living boyfriend, directing him to delete his text
messages and to stay silent if questioned by the police.
And so the transcript between the two things that have

(01:06:22):
been released by the police, and so it's along the
lines of you weren't the one who did it. Right then,
he said In the text message exchange allegedly said I
am I'm sorry, and the roommate says, I thought they
caught the person Robinson, No, they grabbed some crazy old
dude interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to
grab my rifle from the drop point shortly after, but

(01:06:42):
most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet,
almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering roommate, Why, Robinson,
Why did I do it? Yeah? I had enough of
his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I'm
able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left
no evidence. Roommate, how long have you been planning this?

(01:07:05):
He said, a bit over a week. I believe I
can get close to it, but there's a squad car
parked right by it. Robinson said, I'm wishing I had
circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got
to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would
do if I didn't bring back Grandpa's rifle. I don't
know if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't

(01:07:25):
trace to me, so he's safe. It's only going to
trace back to his grandfather, which will then show with
trace the ham right. This is why I mean, you know,
people who commit crimes are not usually very intelligent, right, Yeah,
let's take it away with it.

Speaker 4 (01:07:40):
You don't get into crime by being a genius.

Speaker 5 (01:07:42):
You know.

Speaker 2 (01:07:43):
Yeah. So anyway, that was what they released. I'm just
passing it on to you. And then he said, I
think that scope I want to get it back. I
think the scope is worth two thousand dollars. And then
he said delete this exchange. So now they're saying witness tampering.
That's the charge for witness tampering based on that exchange,
going back and forth. So let's take a quick break.

(01:08:04):
Do we have any comments that you want to cover here? Yes,
we do.

Speaker 4 (01:08:06):
First, I want to thank Stealth Patriot. Thank you very much.
We appreciate the support. Says, whatever the tragedy, both parties
make it their mission to eat away at your liberty.
The the problem is they put people in power that
do not honor their oath to the constitution.

Speaker 8 (01:08:18):
Just stating the obvious, yes, yes, yeah, whatever happens, it'll
be used and whoever did it, it'll be used by
both the right and the left.

Speaker 2 (01:08:30):
For their purposes and as you point out, their purposes
always to take away our liberty. And the amazing thing
to me about it is that the right, because of
Donald Trump, the right is now saying that we're going
to take this guy who made his entire life about
challenging postmodernism, that there is no such truth and you

(01:08:51):
can't say that because speech is hate and speech is violence.
He challenged that, he debated these people. Now Trump and
the conservative influencers for MAGA want that to go away.
You know, they're going to censor everybody in the name
of the guy who pushed back against that and got
killed for doing that. That's that's the most amazing thing.

(01:09:13):
And that includes people like Greg Guttfield. Gutlass Greg gutlass Field,
We've got gyms.

Speaker 4 (01:09:21):
Seven stakeholders will own all the lands, that's right. Yeah,
we're not going to have anything. They're going to make
sure that we have our freedom cities, and that'll be it.
A Syrian girl, it's sickening to realize how many evil,
insane people there are in our nation today, and like
the old guy trying to take credit for a murder,
they are willing to risk everything.

Speaker 2 (01:09:40):
To destroy us.

Speaker 4 (01:09:41):
All Yes, Audi, Mr R get to see you. Audi,
says Travis. The reason that he's a character is because
he's probably is that very thing a character?

Speaker 2 (01:09:51):
Yeah, it could be Central casting. He's very on the
nose whatever he is. All right, we're got to take
a quick break, Folks will be right back. We're going
to talk about uh, Peter Thiel, who has this obsession
with the Antichrist. More and more it looks like that's him.
Maybe it's kind of some kind of excuse.

Speaker 4 (01:10:12):
You know, if you were mentioned in a book, you'd
probably want to talk about it too.

Speaker 2 (01:11:22):
Analyzing the globalist.

Speaker 1 (01:11:24):
Next move the Deep Nut Show.

Speaker 4 (01:11:40):
Welcome back, folks, appreciate you still being here with us.
We're gonna get back to the in segonment. I do
want to remind you can go to Homestead Products dot
shop and if use promo codnite, you get ten percent
off all of their products that they have there. And
they have a numerous variety of different things, whether it's
things like this beetroot powder, and of course beatroot powder
is a vasodilator. It's good for your working out, it's
good for heart health. It's a great product you should

(01:12:03):
check out or even things really good.

Speaker 2 (01:12:05):
For heart health because it diholates your blood vessels.

Speaker 4 (01:12:08):
Yes, or things like this fancy soap. It is a
wide ranging site. They have many many different products, like
I said, from beat repowder to soap to survival and
camping gear. You can get all kinds different things. There
are a promo code night. You get ten percent off
and you support a business that is pro America, pro freedom,
and they work very very hard to make sure their
products are high quality and source from America. So go

(01:12:28):
check out Homestead Products dot shop and use promo code
night for ten percent off. We want to support people
that are on our side and businesses that are on
our side as well.

Speaker 2 (01:12:37):
Yes, yes, well the New America, the New Republic says,
ask what is up with Peter Thiel's obsession with the Antichrist?
And he just constantly talking about it, and he's got
a four part series that he's keeping under wraps, and
he's got all kinds of restrictions. You've got to go
to all four lectures or whatever. Can't tell anybody about.

Speaker 5 (01:12:57):
Its secret information. Help the Antichrist that I can give
you a be pay me, Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:13:04):
It's me, but for the right price. I'll stop on
again just so you know. But you know he's amping
up as apocalyptic rhetoric and adding a dangerous dose of
extremism into the already fraught culture war. That's what they
characterize it as. And when you look at Peter Tiill
and the way when people ask him a question, he

(01:13:25):
just kind of gets caught in the headlights and he said,
this is the guy who's the mentor to JD. Vance.
It's very, very troubling. Peter Teeal can't stop talking about
the Antichrist. This month, he's delivering a four part closed
door lecture on the topic, which he is framing as quote,
political theology, oh, political theology. It's part of what you

(01:13:47):
might call an Antichrist world tour by the PayPal pallunteer
co founder who has already given off the record Antichrist
lectures at Oxford, Harvard, and Barry Weiss's College the University
of Austin. It's not clear why Teal needs secrecy the
whole fourth his latest obsession. He's been pontificating about the

(01:14:10):
Antichrist and public talks for years. In a June interview
with New York Times New York Times again, he offered
extended thoughts on the shadowy figure who is barely mentioned
in the Bible. Yes, that's right, the spirit of Antichrist
has always been around here, but you know, the Antichrist
is only mentioned I think once. He says this character

(01:14:35):
will arise to help Satan kick off the armaged, and
he even named a suspect, Greta Thunberg. Might be reaching
a bit there. Yeah, The interview went viral when he
struggled to answer a question about whether or not he
wants the human race to endure. He also struggled when
asked directly if he was the Antichrist. So why pay

(01:14:58):
attention to this the biblical musings of a guy who
probably never read the Bible. Well, because he's one of
the world's richest men and most influential, and these Antichrist's
speeches reveal his deep belief that religion is a weapon
for political warfare. And he's right about that. It really
is the symbol of the Antichrist, he says, has played

(01:15:20):
a surprisingly significant Now he doesn't say this. This is
Robert Fuller, historian in nineteen ninety five book Naming the Antichrist,
The History of an American Obsession He says the symbol
of the Antichrist has played a surprisingly significant role in
shaping Americans self understanding. Because they tend to view their
nation as uniquely blessed by God, they have especially prone

(01:15:45):
to demonize their enemies. I think we probably will find
out that Peter Till will be the Antichrist, and that
America would be Bible. And I think there's probably a
surprise twist ending no one saw coming. I think it's
more clearly that we're Babylon, you know. I think maybe
the Babylon b thinks that as well.

Speaker 4 (01:16:03):
This summer, Peter Teel reveals who's thinking anti Christ.

Speaker 2 (01:16:06):
From colonial days to the AI era. The hunt for
Antichrist continues. Today's Q and on conspiracy theorists believe that
they are battling a cabal of cannibalistic Satanists. Well, I
wouldn't say that they're wrong. Un Humans, a twenty twenty
four book that was praised by J. D. Vance equated
progressives with bloodthirsty, unhuman creatures because this is a zero

(01:16:31):
sum holy war, and of course they're not the unhuman,
bloodthirsty creatures. They're just covering up everything that Trump and
Bladia did with Epstein. Right, Once we label our adversaries
in these kind of terms, all of it good versus evil,
like the tempertantrum you saw from Greg Guttfield, there is
going to be no compromise, and this is the civil

(01:16:55):
war that they're rapidly pushing us into. Teal understands this
and frames and the anti crisis part of his own
political theology, a term that he borrows from Carl Schmidt,
a Nazi philosopher who defined the practice of politics as
a struggle against an existential enemy, arguing that politics is

(01:17:16):
just religion in disguise. It is downstream from religion, folks.
Teal also draws on Renee Girard, a Catholic thinker in
one of Teal's Stanford professors, who warned that human societies
tend to spiral towards violence in a hunt for scapegoats. Well,
that's certainly what we're seeing now all over the social media.

(01:17:37):
There's all raised a question of whether politics is like
a market or is it something like a scapegoating machine.
Where the scapegoating machine only works if you don't look
into the sausage factory, said Peter Teel. If say, we're
having a lot of conflicts in our village. We have
to find some random elderly woman and accused her of

(01:17:57):
witchcraft so that we'll achieve some psychosocial unity as a village.
This sort of thing doesn't really work well if you're
self aware. Tel knows these dynamics well, but it's not
clear whether he's horrified or impressed by it. His talks
stop short at providing solutions. He will talk about the Antichrist,

(01:18:18):
but he'll not talk about the Lord Jesus Christ. That
should be very, very very telling. They meld Schmidt, Gerard,
and scripture into an incisive meditation on the power of
apocalyptic ideas. Teal positions himself as someone trying to help
the world navigate a quote narrow path between armageddon and Antichrist,

(01:18:41):
but his rhetoric also sketches a playbook for holy war,
for scapegoating, for crisis, and for power. These people understand
the time that we're in. They understand that we're in
a cyclical turning forth turning, and they seek to destroy
society so that they can rebuild it. That's why of
their focusing all this apocalyptic stuff. Since Schmidt famously argued

(01:19:04):
that power consolidates during existential crisis like four turnings.

Speaker 1 (01:19:09):
And as.

Speaker 2 (01:19:11):
Strauss and Howeck talked about the fourth Turning mentioned, they
said that was the thing that was unusual about the
American Revolution because power usually, as you have everything turned
upside down, they destroy society. The economy goes down, people
lose their faith, and institutions usually wind up with more
concentrated power. The reason that didn't happen was because the
founders were looking at it from a Christian perspective, and

(01:19:34):
because they had looked at it also from the Enlightenment
perspective of people like Lord Acton who said power consolidates
and becomes absolute power. They wanted to make sure that
that did not happen. But that was a very unusual event.
Typically it consolidates during these crises, existential crises, when constitutions

(01:19:56):
can be suspended. Therefore, Trump is a man that they
shows everything that he has done has been that is
of any significance if you think about it, has been
by suspending the constitution going back to twenty twenty and
the lockdowns and the rest of this stuff, and everything
that he did with the so called pandemic. What he

(01:20:16):
sought to do afterwards with the election and what he
began to do from day one, whether you're talking about
tariffs or you're talking about using the military as police,
everything that he does is suspending the constitution. Perhaps we
should feel fear the Antichrist. Perhaps we should fear the
one world to solitarian state more than armageddon, said Teal

(01:20:41):
in twenty twenty three. Perhaps we should fear God. That
would be the beginning of wisdom, wouldn't it so? But
that's not what he's preaching. He's talking to people about
the Antichrist. Like I said before, he won't talk to
them about the Lord Jesus Christ. In January, he wrote
an opbed framing Trump's return to power as an apocalypsis,

(01:21:02):
an unveiling of hidden truth and a chance to cleanse
the nation's sins. I guess Trump sees himself as just
the guy to do that, and he can call out
the military to cleanse us of our sins city by city.
Teal does not hesitate to name potential Antichrist, whether it's
Gretathon Berg, communism, or regulation of tech. As a matter

(01:21:28):
of fact, as I said before, he was saying that
if you create, he said, AI is going to be
perceived as an existential threat, and there's going to be
a pushback to regulate it. This is his company that
he's talking about, and or for them to do that,
they're going to have to create some kind of a
global structure to push back against it and to regulate it.

(01:21:48):
Of course, they will always have some kind of a
crisis that is global. That's what the climate change nonsense
is about. That's what the pandemic was about, and it's
going to typically be imaginary. But he thinks that the
regulation of AI is going to lead to world government,
antichrist world government.

Speaker 1 (01:22:08):
So.

Speaker 2 (01:22:10):
He said, as he founded Palanteer. This is a software
company literally named after an all seeing orb controlled by
an evil wizard in the Lord of the Rings. It's
partnering with the Trump administration of the supercharged government surveillance.
At a moment when the president openly embraces authoritarianism, it
seems almost like a confession. I see this as the

(01:22:34):
type of thing they always do in the movies where
the super villain the mologue, and that tells you why
he did all this stuff. You sly dog, you got
me monologuing. I think that's what this is truly about.

Speaker 4 (01:22:46):
I don't have mentioned this before, But to me, the
name paleteer also goes well on multiple levels because in
the books Eric Gorn is able to use the paleteer
because it's his birthright, it's part of his heritage. And
I think they see themselves Agorn. They are the rightful rulers,
and as such they should be allowed to look at
all your data. They should be allowed to surveil you

(01:23:07):
and look at you and catalog everything you do. They
don't see themselves as the evil wizard. They see themselves,
in my opinion, as the rightful king, and as such,
you know, it's their duty almost to look into this
and to keep track of everything.

Speaker 2 (01:23:20):
Yeah, they even call it the God view, you know.
I remember years ago when we were talking about Uber
and Lyft and stuff that Uber had even put out
op apiece as well. They cross tabulated people's strives and
things like that to make inferences about what they were
doing late at night. But they had a god view

(01:23:41):
which showed all the different cars and where they were.
And that's their term, the God view. Yes, and of
course Aragorn. It's a picture of Christ coming back, the
return of the King.

Speaker 4 (01:23:53):
They believe they're Aragorn, but they are denethor they are.

Speaker 2 (01:23:56):
Sarah mennethor they're the Unfaithful. Well Trump, I guess is Denethora,
and I guess that Teal is a solown man. Anyway,
you build domestic surveillance technology to surveil our friends and neighbors,
and then your other pet passion is the Antichrist. It's
kind of strange, said one person. Trey Stevens, a teal

(01:24:18):
ally self proclaimed arms dealer who co founded the drone
warfare company Andrewill, Another warped Lord of the Rings reference
Frames's work as part of a quest to quote carry
out God's command to bring his kingdom to earth as
it is in heaven. I guess he missed that part
of what Jesus said. My kingdom's not of this world.

(01:24:39):
If it was, then my servants would create Andrewill. You know,
in the drone warfare country.

Speaker 4 (01:24:44):
They would bomb the children remotely via drone.

Speaker 2 (01:24:48):
So this guy who co founded Andrewill, his wife Michelle,
co founded the Acts seventeen collective, which is an acronym
for acknowledging Christ and technology in society. They evangelized tech
workers and they're hosting Teal's Antichrist lectures. I mean, this
is some twisted stuff. Meanwhile, in Russia, Alexander Dugan alternationalists,

(01:25:11):
philosopher and propagandists known as Putin's brain. It's the only
other major political figure who fixates on the Antichrist as
much as Teal. In Dugan's version, Russia is at war
with the Antichrist, which is liberal modernity emanating from the
country of apocalypse, the United States. I would buy more

(01:25:34):
into Dugan's version of this. Anyway, not everyone is convinced
by Silicon Valley's pivot to piety. Some traditional religious conservatives
railed against there would be tech brethren. Conservative firebrand Jeffrey
Miller blasted AI developers as quote betrayers of our specie,
as apostates to our faith, and called for what The

(01:25:57):
Verge described as a quote literal holy war against tech.
And of course this is what Hugo de Garris always
talked about, the artellect war. Once people figure out what
Peter Teel and his ilk are doing to us, that
they would rise up and then these guys would take
their technology and fight against the rest of humanity and

(01:26:18):
there would be billions of people killed because of the
technology that they have. So we've already gotten a glimpse
of that in twenty twenty. If we're hunting for existential enemies,
Silicon valleys, diabolically greedy tech billionaires who want to create
god like AI systems powerful enough to destroy humanity top
the list. But we must avoid falling into the antichrist

(01:26:39):
name calling trap. We've got to ask why is a
tech billionaire trying to convince us that we're on the
brink of an apocalypse? It is a cynical ploy to
further inflame political divisions. I agree, just like their hate
speech obsession is. It's all about division, It's all about
laying the foundation for a civil war. Journalist Matthew dion

(01:27:03):
Kanna described Teel's anti Christ theories as a high brow
version of Maga in Times Theology. He said, this all
fosters a crisis mentality. And with a crisis mentality, now
we put aside all other differences. There is a tribal cohesion,
a tribal unity that justifies even immoral acts, because to

(01:27:27):
defeat an enemy that is evil, a Satanic enemy, you
must do whatever is necessary. Folks. This is what happens
with every single war, and this is why you have
people like George W. Bush drag us into it, or
net and Yahoo, or Trump dragging us into war, because
once you have a war, it becomes an existential crisis,

(01:27:48):
and people are more likely than not to fall in
line behind the dear leader that drug them into that war.
Last week and the hours after Charlie Kirk's assassination, the
words demon and evil trended on x as some of
the right portrayed his murder as a work of supernaturally
possessed Democrats and leftists. And that's what we saw earlier

(01:28:09):
from Greg Guttfield Chris rufo Is doing the same thing,
calling for a political crackdown anybody who criticizes Charlie Kirk.
They called on law enforcement to quote infiltrate, disrupt, arrest,
and incarcerate the radical left. Again the looking at this
small or lesser known accounts that respond to any calls

(01:28:35):
to support the First Amendment. What I see on Twitter
is I've seen over and over again when I say
I wrote the op ed piece on substack and I
put it up, and the response that I got to
it was like, yeah, well, you know, they we just
want to cancel their speech. They want to kill us.
And we got to shut them down, and so it

(01:28:56):
was all that kill them all, that type of attitude,
that's what I see. That's the reactionary right that is
out there talking about this stuff. They don't want to
hear anything at all about That's the most concerning thing
about this, because this is not only the fact that
the right and the left are embracing censorship, that they're
opposed to free speech for anything that they disagree with.

(01:29:19):
They don't want to build a civilization. Both sides have
been convinced that the only way forward is to tear
down our civilization. Whether you're left or right, that's the
both sides issued Greg Guttfield. You need to pay attention
to that. They want to both sides want to tear
down our society, and they're playing right into the hands
of people like Teal and Trump his puppet. When political

(01:29:42):
opponents become evil cosmic enemies, persecution and violence become a
sacred duty. If tech billionaires seek to spread Christianity, they
should stop hunting Antichrists and reflect on the words of
Jesus Christ. This is coming from the New Republic. They're
not even Christians. You get self professing Christians out there
who want vengeance, hatred, there's no forgiveness in their heart.

(01:30:06):
They don't want to take a higher road. But these
people are saying, you know, we reflect on the words
of Jesus Christ empathy forgiveness. Teal should listen to the
Gospels that warned that it is easier for kimbel to
go through the eye of a needlemn for a rich
man to enter the Kingdom of heaven. They leave out
the part where Jesus said, but with God, all things
are possible. Even Peter Teel is not beyond the reach

(01:30:29):
of God. So we should pray for that self righteous,
covetous young rich man. Is what Jesus was responding to.
He was a guy who loved his wealth, and he
was claiming that he had kept all the tin commandments,
that he was a good person, and to show him
that he wasn't, Jesus said, well, then go sell everything

(01:30:51):
you got and give it to the poor, because he
knew that the guy was covetous, even though it was
his own stuff, it was his idol. And the guy
just walked away. And that's when Jesus said, it's easier
for a camel to get through the eye of a
needle than for a rich man to get into heaven.
It is very difficult because they get this god like mentality.

(01:31:14):
As we saw from Donald Trump over and over again.
AI as a matter of fact, is now claiming to
be God, not necessarily the Antichrist. I guess it thinks
it's Trump. We've got a Bible Chat, which claims to
be the number one faith app in the world, is
boasting over twenty five million users. They said our AI
was trained exclusively on scripture and developed a guidance from

(01:31:38):
Christian pastors and theologians. This is a God in a box.
And many people are pointing out what we've pointed out
when we talked about this and talked about large language
models in the first place, the fact that they are
just reshuffling text. In this particular case, it's going to
be the Bible using statistical modeling. There's your stochastic.

Speaker 5 (01:32:01):
If only there were some way to talk to God
or receive messages and his word.

Speaker 2 (01:32:07):
Yeah, that's right, just don't know how to do that.
AI's strong tendency to please the user may have unintended consequences.
AI will tell us what we want to hear. And
there's a guy who's written another app called Hallow and
his name is Alex Jones. It's another new asia named

(01:32:28):
Alex Jones. How about that going around? Yeah, it's a
dystopian new spend on spirituality and the digital age, one
that might just be poised to change the face of
religion itself. Some people are saying, well, that's a really
good thing, because people are so difficult to deal with,
So let's just put God in a little model here

(01:32:51):
and we'll interact with that. But Peter Thiel is not
dialoguing with God. He is dialoguing with other elite members
of the Trilotter Commission and others. It's an article from
Technocracy News with rotating membership and Peter Tiele's top secret society.
That's the society he calls Dialogue. We have no idea

(01:33:13):
who's attended over the last twenty years, but now we
can be certain that the Trilatteral Commission dominates because it
has five members in this organization Dialogue that Peter Thiel
has set up, Eric Schmidt, Larry Summers and Maurice Slaughter,
Robert Rubin and Richard Haas. Richard Hass's the Council on Formulations.

Speaker 5 (01:33:33):
Remember when they used to keep their secret societies actually secret.
It used to be a conspiracy theory that groups like
Builderberg existed.

Speaker 2 (01:33:43):
Yeah, they didn't even exist. Now they just tell you
you can't know what we say. You know, we got
we operate under Chatham House rules and so we have
to obey those rules. But they don't have to obey
the constitution. They don't have to be the law of
whether it's God or man. But they use that as
an excuse.

Speaker 5 (01:34:01):
Yeah, these days, they've got the different competing groups of
secret elite organizations. You've got the top secret field Dialogue
Group is packed with members from this other group of
elites that are plotting to control the world. Yeah, so
it's oh, look the people from that team are switching members.

Speaker 2 (01:34:23):
Yeah, they just meet at different times. Peter Thiel's on
the steering committee of Builderberg. He's now got these five
people from the Trilateral Commission as well as at least
one guy from the Council on Formulations, and they're all
there as part of his Dialogue group. Dialogue is a secretive,
invitation only network founded two decades ago by Peter Teel

(01:34:43):
and Arren Hoffman, star investors and entrepreneurs. They are preparing
a major expansion, including a real estate purchase, to build
a campus in the DC suburbs. And they're actually buying
land and building a building. I wonder if it's going
to look like that blow and white temple on that
thing's island.

Speaker 4 (01:35:02):
I'm sure this isn't going to be somewhere where they
bring politicians in to lobby them or anything like that.

Speaker 2 (01:35:07):
Oh no, And that's the whole point of this article.
They said, well, what does that tell us? It tells
us that they are playing a long game. This isn't
just about how they can manipulate Trump. They're planning on
setting up a physical presence there for subsequent administrations.

Speaker 4 (01:35:22):
I guess that's normally where these people really have us
is base. With the amount of wealth they have, they're
free to think on extremely long timelines. They know for
a fact that you know, they're one hundred billion dollars
or how much they have isn't going to run out.
So they can sit there. They don't have to worry
about their day to day things. They can sit there
and they can think five, ten, twenty, thirty years into
the future and how they want this to play out.

(01:35:44):
Whereas we all have to sit around and think, all right,
what are we doing tomorrow?

Speaker 2 (01:35:48):
What am I paying for? What are my bills? What
is going on?

Speaker 4 (01:35:51):
It eats up a lot of your time. Instead, they're
free to sit there and continually plot and scheme.

Speaker 2 (01:35:56):
That's right. They can make their plans, but God will
have the final say. It is God who has declared
the end from the beginning, and he has a plan
that he is operating with, and they don't acknowledge him.
Given declining trusts and institutions and anti establishment forever, the
source said, the group actively keeps its center workings secretive

(01:36:17):
and hidden from public scrutiny. The group's secretive nature allows
participants to share controversial and concerning ideas that they would
not be comfortable sharing elsewhere.

Speaker 4 (01:36:28):
Given the fact that people don't trust us, we're going
to keep everything a secret secret and then just admit,
you know, people are sharing uncomfortable ideas.

Speaker 2 (01:36:35):
Yeah. Yeah, considering the fact that we want to make
sure that we take everything from you and your own nothing,
and that we want to kill all of you useless eaters.
Let's say that we're doing this under Chatham House rules.
So past dialogue participants have included Elon Musk, Scott Bessant
with a Trump administration and Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, some

(01:36:55):
of the Obama administration, Henry Cravis of KKA are Grover Norquist,
who is of this I forget the exact caddle of it,
but it's a taxpayer group trying to keep taxes low.
Robert Hurr and Sophia Bush. So who can survive the

(01:37:17):
AI apocalypse? And this is art interviewing doctor Matthew Mavac,
an expert on global risks and AI intelligence. And I
was surprised because they don't see anything about this guy's
background being a Christian or anything like that. But in
this interview he makes several references to illustrations out of
the Bible, and he also quotes the Bible in this

(01:37:39):
and Artie just goes along with it without any explanation.
But they said a joke appeared on the Internet comparing
the future envisioned by the utopian fiction authors with robots
doing menial physical work and humans free to pursue creativity.
They compare that in the cartoon to the reality who

(01:38:00):
are chat GPT and Stable Diffusion are creating texts and
pictures and movies while humans work minimum wage jobs at
fast food and Amazon warehouses. Is this anti utopian humor justified?
And he says yes, the humor is more than justified.
In fact, it is no longer funny. Instead of robots
flipping burgers, we have Ai painting portraits while humans flip

(01:38:23):
the burgers until robots replace them, said Matthew. And as
he points out, though, the people who are going to
transcend this at first, he talks about all the things
that we've always said that nobody's jobs are safe. If
you're a knowledge worker, it's not safe. And even if
you are doing manual work, they said, people used to

(01:38:44):
think that robots lacked the dexterity for real work, doing plumbing,
car repairs, things like that. But they said, no, we're
working on that. It's just a matter of time. But
the ones who are immediately in the crosshairs are the
knowledge workers. But he said, I can be an ingenious
tool and assistant in many lines of work. What do

(01:39:04):
you think benefit who do you think benefits the most
from it? And he says, I would divide humans into
two broad categories, the herd, which is the vast majority
of humans, and a term that I coined. He said,
the harnesser. Ninety nine percent of humanity is driven by
herd instincts. They have consistently surrendered their critical faculties to

(01:39:24):
accommodate the herd in order to find safety in their
respective comfort zones. Many are sleepwalking into a future that
has no place for them. This presages massive social upheavals.
But globalist movers and shakers foresaw this specie long ago,
which is why they commissioned futurists like Uvill Noah Harari

(01:39:46):
to enunciate a mass opiated future for so called useless eaters.
So we'll figure out how we're going to work with
We'll deal with them, so we've said so many times,
with UBI and smart cities, and just keep them doped
up on entertainment or maybe drugs or sex. The harnesser, however,
by contrast, is far more than a critical thinker. See

(01:40:09):
if this reflects you or your family. They can turn
an impossible situation into a creative opportunity. Like a sailor
who is catching the wind in his sails in a
stormy weather. The harnesser has cultivated, often over decades, a
trait of sailing against the current. They have neuroplastically conditioned
themselves to question everything. The harnesser also applies a system's

(01:40:33):
approach to problems, grasps complexity with ease, and may possess
an uncanny repertoire of knowledge. Their interaction with generative AI
is not a one sided copy and paste exercise. They
will interrogate AI and even correct it. He said, Their
tacit knowledge, their diverse, refined and somewhat inscrutable, remains beyond

(01:40:57):
AI's reach. And so then he gives an example of
an interaction that he had with AI over the Bible,
and he said, he called it out on a particular
phrase that was there. And he said, where'd that come from?
And he pointed out that in the oldest documents that

(01:41:17):
he had, the phrase that was there was mistranslated because
the diacritical marks were missing. But he said, Artist said,
but wouldn't these so called harnessers be seen as a
threat to authoritarian regimes? He said, well, questioning everything does
come with consequences, often in the form of self imposed solitude.

(01:41:38):
But the harnessur types I've observed also carry a healthy
cynicism towards politics. They are unlikely to join the herd
in mass demonstrations you know, like J SIXX. If rallies
and protests actually worked, Western governments would have addressed various
public agreementss long ago. Instead they have double down on

(01:42:01):
these problems. That's why I considered Western governments and their
satellites to be intellectually hostile, despite their pretension to the contrary.
The most immediate political question for both AI powers and
laggers alike is this, how prepared are governments to deal
with mass unemployment on the scale that is induced by AI?

(01:42:22):
And Artie says, well, you've included many including you have
written about how generaitive AI is erouting people's ability to
think for themselves, reinforcing false notions and providing false information.
How much of a threat is this to humanity as
a whole? Which categories of humanity are most susceptible to it?

(01:42:42):
And he said the cohort that benefits the most from
generitive AI are those who were educated before mass Internet era.
It sounds paradoxical, but that generation had to read books
and journals. They had to scrounge for information and to
cultivate a regime for inquiry. Most harnessers hail from this group,

(01:43:04):
and they're dying out and true society was already hopelessly
dumbed down. Just look at the quality and the theatrics
of politicians today, especially in the West. Their successors are
a little more than parrots reciting scripts. Can anybody take
them seriously? AI is not the cause of this decline,
but it is an accelerant. I think that's very true.

(01:43:28):
And I think as he talks about this, he says,
so what's going to happen is that, you know, we've
talked in the past about kind of the the Alkhoff
Kreutzfeld disease or the mad cow disease, where you start cannibalizing,
and that happens with AI. They've already shown it in
a couple of different tests that people are running that

(01:43:49):
once it gets so much AI data out there and
it starts cannibalizing other synthetic data, it gets dumber and dumber,
and that it kind of is a self limiting thing.
But I think that that's kind of true in terms
of as humanity gets dumber and dumber, so it's kind
of a race to the bottom. Is AI going to
be limited by the dumbing down of humanity or is

(01:44:12):
it going to be limited by the saturation of synthetic
data produced by AI, we'll have to see. So in
terms of the AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends and what
we just mentioned about the idea that AI is God,
he said, people have always worshiped idols, and they have

(01:44:37):
projected agency and personality onto carved images of god gods.
And this is exactly what I mean when I talk
about political idolatry. I've said that for the longest time
about Trump. We saw it also with Obama. People will
project onto them what they wish them to be and

(01:44:57):
then worship that. It is a form of idolatry. And
many times you've seen the Maga people actually make golden
statues of Donald Trump himself. So that I think is
where we are already. And there's also a projection that
he talks about, where people project onto AI what they
want it to be. So he said, AI can simulate affection,

(01:45:22):
it can shower compliments without the conflicts of real relationships.
The financial and psychological costs appear to be minimal, but
the emotional entanglement can be very real. And so he
sees that people are going to be going into this
dark area of isolation from other humans and focusing on
AI girlfriends and boyfriends. It's exactly what you've a Harari

(01:45:46):
has described that we need that they envision us having,
and then he finishes up with this. He says, the
script reminds us the heart is deceitful above all things,
and desperately wicked. Who can understand it? We cannot truly
understand the human heart either, as it only simulates human affections. Yes,
AI can certainly feel safer to us, and can feel

(01:46:09):
more real for an increasing number of lonely people, but
it is a false reality. And this is what they're
trying to do. They're trying to move us into a cloistered,
siloed existence, and that's what we need to push back against.
If we understand where they want to take us, that
is the beginning of resistance. And so we have to

(01:46:32):
understand that completely trash. You want to get some of
the comments.

Speaker 4 (01:46:35):
Here, Yeah, we've got Nibodoo twenty twenty nine. They'll find
the bullet as soon as they can make one. Patty
Wax says, no one writes text messages like that. Sounds
like a child's first attempt at writing a thriller.

Speaker 2 (01:46:48):
Well, I.

Speaker 4 (01:46:51):
I've spent a lot of time unfortunately dealing with leftist
Sunline and watching people that deal with leftist s online.
This is a very very similar type of speaking and
writing as your typical mid win pseudo intellectual leftist.

Speaker 2 (01:47:07):
Ye, they are like children. Yeah, it's and you look
at some people that Charlie Kirk engaged. I mean, it
is really unbelievably stupid.

Speaker 4 (01:47:15):
Yeah, so well, I understand where you're coming from. I
regret to inform you there is an entire cadre cohort,
a large number of people that write exactly like this.
Audi Mr are a true assassin whenever a text incriminating
info like this, this reeks of sciop. Again, you could
be right, but there's also the fact that these people

(01:47:37):
are not very smart. These people are not very smart
at all. It's not making you know what, Olivio Raslough.
Zoomers do not talk like that in convo. Note is fabricated. Again,
there's an entire.

Speaker 2 (01:47:54):
A lot punctuation which they wouldn't do as well. So yeah,
we'll see.

Speaker 4 (01:47:59):
Yeah, it's interesting, but there's an there's a large different
type of zoomers. This is very reminiscent of your typical
pseudo intellectual politically involved idiot that has been rat has
watched a bunch of clips from people like a Sanpiker
or Destiny and think they know a lot more than
they do. Defy tyrants. Seventeen seventy six, Kirk death got

(01:48:22):
rid of Epstein talk, they got their wish.

Speaker 2 (01:48:24):
Yes, that's the key thing. I haven't seen anything at
all about Epstein. Right, it's dead in the water for
these people. I mean, almost everything is about Charlie Kirk,
good or bad, and you know people speculating on what
actually happened with it. It's almost all about Charlie Kirk.
We need to make it about the First Amendment. We

(01:48:45):
need to make it about religious liberty. That's what it
needs to be about. Yeah, especially if you want to
honor Kirk citizen of America.

Speaker 4 (01:48:53):
What they're trying to keep under wraps, David, is that
we are about to give all of our NHS records
to the same people coordinating a genocide.

Speaker 2 (01:49:00):
What could go wrong?

Speaker 4 (01:49:02):
Stop NHS slash Palanteer contract. Yes, yeah, scone Colla Rose Gardens.
I always thought the Antichrist was just a rebranding of
Satan knew and improved, now with thirty percent more wickedness.

Speaker 5 (01:49:19):
I mean, it's not very clear whether it's you know,
the Bible talks about the spirit of Antichrist a lot,
and there's some parts where it sounds like it's talking
about one specific person, so it's there's different interpretations.

Speaker 2 (01:49:33):
Well, it's different difficult to understanding since it's allegorical. But
you know, certainly we can see the Beast system, right,
the Beast is an allegory for government, and certainly we
see those types of aspects of it, which is truly amazing.

Speaker 4 (01:49:49):
Big brit is back again. His fake ai Antichrist is
what he wants. Theeter teel ap rumbles seat. And why
shouldn't Silicon Valley get in on weaponized religion, say strategy,
the same way trans Mania, according to him, was meant
to encourage and legitimize transhumanism. Yes, Guard Goldsmith, in my opinion,
anyone who actively attempts to separate me and my free

(01:50:10):
will from God is part of the Antichrist machine.

Speaker 2 (01:50:14):
We are part of the government the Beast. We are
all dead.

Speaker 4 (01:50:18):
Imagine waging a holy war with a leader who's a pedophile. L. L.
Well never stopped the Muslims back when Muhammad was around,
So you know what it's long history, long history of
that sort of thing.

Speaker 2 (01:50:31):
Big brit Is back again. Peter Teel anagram is the reptile.
The reptile, so spirit tale. It's not Zuckerberg, right, There's
there's enough of them to go around.

Speaker 4 (01:50:44):
Citizen of Americaca vollunteers partnering with the UK's National Health
Service NHS to build the NHS Federated Data Platform FDP,
using its boundary software, connect disparate NHS data systems and
improve patient care. That's what I'm sure they'll do with it.
Oh yeah, yeah, your care will be so much better.

Speaker 2 (01:51:02):
Yeah, these color robots are really there just to help
little ladies across the street.

Speaker 4 (01:51:06):
I can't wait for them to export it to Canada
so they can figure out you want to kill yourself
before you even know it, and just show up at
your door. Here's some Canadian healthcare for you, free of charge.
A Syrian girl Teal should read the Bible. It tells
us there will be many Antichrists in the world before
the final one who enslaves the world prior to the
return of Christ. But that would ruin his narrative.

Speaker 2 (01:51:25):
Audi m r R.

Speaker 4 (01:51:27):
Public welfare has always been the alibi of tyrants, Albert Camus.

Speaker 2 (01:51:31):
Yeah, and we seem like we're begging them to be tyrants.

Speaker 4 (01:51:35):
Now, please get safe, Please give me the boot a
Syrian girl. Yes, Teal would be a good candidate for
Soura Man.

Speaker 2 (01:51:45):
Bull. I would nominate Steven Miller as Grimmar worm Tng.

Speaker 4 (01:51:48):
It's yeah, a just question, my liege bull dag. Russia
presently attacks Christians and Muslims, anyone not accepting the state religion.
That's another thing. Just just because I think Russia is
more justified in the war Ukraine doesn't mean I support
Vladimir Putin, doesn't mean I think they're a good country,
doesn't mean it's somewhere I want to live. People largely

(01:52:09):
forget nuance. You say one thing, and it thinks that
people to think you support everything someone does all the
time forever.

Speaker 5 (01:52:17):
Just yeah, there's good information from rt about what our
governments are doing, and our government will tell you the
truth about what the Russian government is doing. It's just
you gotta be aware of the bias that these people have.

Speaker 4 (01:52:32):
Ap rumble seat Silicon Valley elites have also been busy
building underground bunkers. Anything to do with the fact that
they now run an AI run platform based drone populated
war machine.

Speaker 2 (01:52:42):
Well, you know, could be, could be. They know what
their intentions are.

Speaker 4 (01:52:46):
So look at nineteen eighty revenge cancel culture. M. H.

Speaker 2 (01:52:49):
Shelley A. How did they get so rich? Oh? There
in lies the tail.

Speaker 4 (01:52:54):
It's a lot of scheming, a lot of plotting, and
a lot of stealing.

Speaker 2 (01:52:57):
Well, some people have said behind every billion the other list,
I think maybe in their case many crimes, probably a
deal with Satan. You're talking about literally signed anywhere or not.
They have essentially made that agreement in their minds.

Speaker 5 (01:53:14):
Talking about all this Antichrist stuff. But let's not forget
that when Satan tempted Christ, he said, I'll give you
all these kingdoms. He didn't respond, Oh, you don't have
the power to do that. He responded, no, I don't
want that.

Speaker 2 (01:53:32):
Yeah, wouldn't have been a temptation if he couldn't have
delivered on it.

Speaker 4 (01:53:34):
Right, Satan can indeed give these people riches three little birds.
Once they destroy the first Amendment, no one be allowed
to say anything about the second possum king. Freedom cities
will solve everything, that's right. We'll all be in our
little freedom city and we'll truly be free then, and
won't that be wonderful.

Speaker 2 (01:53:54):
Well, when you come back, we're going to talk about
what's happening in the pharmaceutical world. And there is a
cancer treatment that I saw several articles about, and we'll
talk about what that protocol is apparently, and it's an
anecdotal thing. I mean, this is not based on a study.
It's the anecdotal evidence of one particular case. And of

(01:54:15):
course if you're going to see anecdotal evidence about several
different cases. You can get Jed Griffin's book A World
Without Cancer at RNC stores dot com. I don't forget
you can use my name to get ten percent off there.
But yeah, we'll tell you what that was, because I
think it's important. You know, people need to know that
they've got options out there besides the bankrupting options given

(01:54:38):
to you by the medical community which have been proven
not to work. That's what I say about things like
nine to eleven or the jfk assassination. I don't know
what happened, but I know what didn't happen, and that
is the official story. And I know what doesn't cure cancer,
and that is the official approach that they have. So
We're going to talk to you about that when we
come back. Stay with us. We'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:57:36):
Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:57:44):
Well, Trump's cracked down on Prescription Drug Act ads. What
do you need to know? This is from the Epic Times.
Trump has directed the FDA to ramp up its efforts
to ensure that the advertising of prescription drugs directed to
consumers is transparent and accurate. And that's the key thing,
because what we're talking about here is fraud, extreme fraud.

(01:58:06):
I don't that's the way I see it. I don't
see this as a free speech issue. This is commercial speech.
They're trying to sell you something, and if somebody was
trying to sell you something, it's likely to kill you
or harm you in some serious way. I think the
government should step in and should limit it. But I
think it's also interesting to look at the history of

(01:58:26):
this and how it is unfolded over time and the
amount of money that is involved. This is how the
pharmaceutical companies have protected themselves from any criticism. So they
owned Fauci. They got Fauci and Reagan to give them
legal immunity from any harm that they do to people.
And then by using these ask your Doctor commercials, they

(01:58:48):
gave themselves immunity from any investigation and criticism by the
media because prior to that they've been very devastating expose
as of pharmaceutical drugs gone wrong, if you remember the
swine flu and things like that, that were done by
sixty minutes. So it includes requiring drug makers to provide
more information on the risks of using the drug and

(01:59:10):
stepping up enforcement of federal laws regulating these ads. So
that's going to be the way they focus on it
is by saying you've got to have more information about
the risks. If you don't, it's fraudulent. Directing consumer ads
have skyrocketed, they said. It wasn't generally used even until
the mid nineteen eighties. At that time, lengthy descriptions of

(01:59:33):
a drugs risks and possible side effects were required in
each ad. But it really grew in the nineteen nineties.
As I said, before nineteen ninety seven, and that was
we noticed that we didn't have TV at home and
we took a vacation after living in the place we
moved to that didn't have any TV, and we flipped

(01:59:55):
on the TV in the motel room. It was just
one pharmaceutical ad after the other. It's like going on here.
So it's nineteen ninety seven that they expanded it rapidly.
Directed consumer drug advertising has grown to be a thirteen
point eight billion dollar business as of twenty twenty three.
That's the price to get silenced by the media, fourteen

(02:00:16):
billion dollars. In twenty twenty four, seven companies spent a
combined three point three million to advertise ten medications. The
top advertiser, ABYV, spent nearly one point four billion to
promote the use of and I'm not even going to
try to mention these different drugs.

Speaker 1 (02:00:35):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (02:00:36):
You probably have heard their names on television if you
watch it. I don't watch TV. The US and New
Zealand are the only countries that allow direct to consumer
prescription drug advertising. Isn't that interesting? The Trump administration maintains
that the practice of omitting much of the risk information
from broadcast advertising has negatively affected the health of Americans. Okay, Trump,

(02:01:00):
now do that with your genetic cut injection, right, you
skipped all the testing. You told people that there were
no adverse effects. As a matter of fact that was
war gamed. They had the Yale study where they talked
about how they were going to sell it to people,
how they had like seven to nine I forget the
exact number of little dialogues, you know, different angles of

(02:01:23):
the take this because it's a miracle, it's from science,
you got to do it to protect other people, on
and on. So they were gamed how they were going
to psychologically push this to people and those who wanted
access to Trump and who wanted to bask in his
aur you know, for their audience. And that's many Christian
leaders repeated this stuff verbatim. And he then paid the

(02:01:46):
ad Council two hundred and fifty million dollars to sell
this stuff to you. So it is somewhat hypocritical for
them to talk about it. I'm glad that they're talking
about it. Nevertheless, drug use has increased dramatically over the
thirty years that they've done this, to the point where
children born in twenty nineteen can expect to spend roughly

(02:02:09):
half of their lives taking prescription medications, according to Penn
State University study. So they said that the vaccine stocks
are tumbling as not just about this, but as Trump
administration is going to link the COVID shots to the
deaths of children. Is not amazing. And the findings are

(02:02:31):
based on the bear's database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Database.
We knew all this stuff from the very beginning. As
a matter of fact, they started rolling this out to
people who were in the medical community in late December
of twenty twenty when Trump was grifting about January sixth,
and that was all the news. This is also breaking.

(02:02:51):
And before he left office at the end of January,
we had and I remember reporting on this, we said,
look at this, this is the same number of adverse
reactions that they've had from all other vaccines combined over
the last two or three years. That became five years,
and ten years, and so forth. Eventually it became more
than they had of all vaccines for the previous thirty

(02:03:14):
or forty years. They've been tracking this since nineteen eighty six,
and so now they're pretending that they're just finding out
about this stuff. The Trump administration people know what they did,
and they're trying to backfill and reinvent the past. Here
they're trying to pretend that they really did the best
that they could. This is the kind of stuff that

(02:03:36):
you're seeing from people like Robert Redfield, who's now trying
to say, oh, it was a China virus, it came
out of the lab and so forth. That protects them
from what they know that they did. So now they're
saying that they're looking at the Varius database, and here
we are, five years later, they're seeing the stuff that
we saw at the time. We've known this along. As

(02:03:58):
a result of them talking about the now Pfizer Modernas spike,
their stocks spiked down. A little bit of irony with that,
isn't it. Yeah, they sold the spike to you so
they could spike their stock prices and their profits, and
they minted a lot of new billionaires. But now their

(02:04:19):
shares spiked lower. So the FDA is going to report
on twenty five deaths of children and that doesn't even
that's not even the tip of the iceberg. It's ridiculous
how few it is. But in the past we have
stopped drugs that killed fewer people than that. But this
was given a pass. Why because of Trump? Now maybe

(02:04:40):
he's going to lean into that as a way as
an alibi. He's going to reinvent himself as not the
father of the vaccine, but the guy who's going to
protect us from the vaccine that he bragged and boasted
and funded. So it is the Advisory Committee Ammunization. According

(02:05:01):
to the Washington Post, they will consider new COVID nineteen
vaccine recommendations, which may include some restrictions on who should
get the shot. According to their official story, and of
course all of it was a lie. They were saying
at the very beginning that the only people who were
really vulnerable were the people who were elderly. And they

(02:05:21):
were saying that because they were misattributing the cause of
death from people who were passed at or past life
expectancy and already had two and a half comorbidities on average.
They said, well, these are the people that are being
wiped out by COVID, but we don't see that in children,
And so that was a lie. It was not COVID

(02:05:41):
that was wiping them out. But even though they told
everybody that children were not in danger of they pushed
really hard to get the children vaccinated because again that
had some legal implications for them to put it on
the childhood vaccine schedule. Today, we have what they call
a blue state confederacy that has risen to defy the

(02:06:02):
federal vaccine policies. These are states like Washington, California, Oregon.
They have formed something called the West Coast Health Alliance,
and Hawaii jumped in on that as well. They want
to strengthen public confidence in vaccines and in public health.

(02:06:23):
So they want to join together in order to kill
their citizens. And that's what they're doing. In response to
what a little bit that RFK Junior has done. Last month,
the Trump administration fired CDC director Susan Monarez. And I
never played this for you, but I think do we
still have that in the I had a clip of

(02:06:48):
some of the things that she had said. I don't
think we still have that. But anyway, I don't know.
I thought it would have Monarez in the name, but
I don't see it there. I don't know if it's
the darka AI bio weapon. Maybe that's it.

Speaker 6 (02:07:03):
Let's see think about advanceation AI for healthcare and a
number of different facets, so some are direct to the patients.
What tools and what capabilities can we develop to help
them really understand where they are in their health care
journey and empower them to make great decisions We also
think about AI from the provider side, So how can

(02:07:24):
we help providers better understand their patients, How can we
help providers optimize their time within the health system as
they're seeing patients, as they're trying to make complex decisions
to create the conditions for improve patient health outcomes. We
also think about AI from the defensive side, So we
understand that there is a great vulnerability within the health ecosystem.

(02:07:47):
More and more in the Internet of to have an
incredibly positive effect, but we also know it creates vulnerabilities,
and so we're using that same AI technology to help
the bend against those vulnerabilities, to anticipate the negative implications
that are happening within the health systems, and to try
to stay ahead of it. Arta age takes on the

(02:08:09):
entirety of the health ecosystem. It's not just biomedical research,
it's not just resilient systems, it's not just investing in
the tech of the future.

Speaker 1 (02:08:19):
It is all of those.

Speaker 6 (02:08:20):
And what we do is we actually go out and
we seek these incredible innovators. We call them our program managers,
and they come to us and they say, you know,
here are the big problems that we're seeing in the
health ecosystem space.

Speaker 2 (02:08:33):
We will you can see why Trump administration were On
his first day in office, he pulls on Larry Ellison
and other individuals to sell you custom made by AI
genetic code injections, all this mr and A stuff. She
was the person I think they had and they're all along.
So this is kind of an interesting development to see

(02:08:54):
her shoved out by our K Junior. I'm glad she's gone.
She is a very dangerous, individ and exactly the kind
of person that I expect them to put there. She
refused to adopt more safety focused stance on vaccines, and
four other senior officials, of course, resigned when she was fired.
A day after this alliance was formed, the Washington Department

(02:09:17):
of Health issued a standing order on the COVID nineteen
vaccines and defiance of the federal governments pullback on the
shots for young, healthy populations. The order recommends them for
all populations six months and older, including pregnant individuals and
pregnant people because they can't say pregnant women. So this

(02:09:39):
is what the left wants to do. The Left Coast Alliance.
They want to get all babies six months older and older.
They want all pregnant women, all subjected to these genetic
code injections. It's absolutely reprehensible, truly is amazing, and so
they're trying to pull back a little bit from that.
I said before that we talk a little bit about

(02:10:00):
out of this cancer protocol, we will get to that
do babies really need the hepatitis B vaccine? And of
course the answer is no, we don't need any of
their vaccines. The CDC's advisory committee has voted to recommend
delaying a shot that is typically given at birth, and

(02:10:21):
so they said there's likely going to be a discussion
about hepatitis B vaccine, very specifically trying to dislodge the
birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine and to push it
later in life. This is a good example of why
these people who are pushing virology and the virus fantasies
and stuff, why even their own narratives don't even make

(02:10:44):
any sense. They're not consistent even with the fantasy sci
fi world they've created. The virus is typically listen to this.
It's typically and primarily spread through contact with infected blood
or bodily fluids, typically via sex, needle sharing, or childbirth
when the mother is infected, So why then would you

(02:11:05):
vaccinate all children? Right, if the mother is not infected,
and that's very easy to determine, and they do run
test to see if the mother is infected with hepatitis B.
If the mother's not infected with hepatitis B, then why,
according to their virus theory, does a child have to
be vaccinated. There's absolutely no rational reason for this. And

(02:11:28):
the more you look into the whole virus paradigm, the
more you see these kind of irrational contradictions. Why vaccinate
all kids when you can test the mother? And they said,
us pregnant women are typically screened for hepatitis B and
the first trimester, if the mother is found a habit,
she may be given antiviral medication and the third trimester

(02:11:50):
and her baby would receive a he BE vaccine and
goobulin globulin within twelve hours of birth. However, in nineteen
ninety one, they recommended universal vaccination for all infants. Again,
babies whose mother does not have this, who are not
going to be exposed to blood or sexual activity as

(02:12:14):
newborn babies, Why would you do that to them? It
makes absolutely no sense. But the American Academy of pediatricians,
which only makes sense if you look at them as
a greedy guild that doesn't care at all about their patients.
They're still fighting to vaccinate these kids for which there
is no logical reason to vaccinate them for hepatitis.

Speaker 4 (02:12:36):
B unless you're looking to create a lifelong customer of
someone who's been injured. Yeah, yeah, someone who's been damaged.

Speaker 2 (02:12:42):
If you're a pediatrician, you want to make sure this
kid keeps coming back to you with some kind of
chronic illness.

Speaker 4 (02:12:47):
Or what what if we were to just damage these
children so that they have to come back over and
over again.

Speaker 2 (02:12:53):
Yes, that's right. A Planned Parenthood is accused of helping
teens to bypass transition safeguards because Planned Parenthood is seeing
all this gender gaslighting as a big profit center. They
can at the very least dispense the drugs. They can
get involved in some cases with the actual surgery, and

(02:13:14):
they have an online program of sex education. They call
it sex ed to Go. I think that's a good slug,
gotta go. Yeah, I think that's a good slogan. Sex
Ed's got to Go. They have it both Spanish and English.
It's developed by Planned Parenthood for teachers and students, ranging
in topics from sexually transmitted disease to handling breakups. The

(02:13:38):
new module is titled Gender Affirming Care and it's created
by Planned Parenthood Pacific Southwest. It is designed for students
in the eighth grade and above. We're talking about fourteen years.

Speaker 1 (02:13:50):
Old and older.

Speaker 2 (02:13:51):
They're getting them at puberty where they're starting to get
confused about what's going on, so they can confuse them
even more so. The courses explore four basic types of transition.
Number one social transition, meaning non permanent adjustments such as
changing your pronouns, clothing, hairstyle, or name. Second, legal transition

(02:14:13):
by updating that in identification documents. And this is the
schools join in and push that very first one, the
social transition. We're going to give you different pronouns. We'll
have you change your clothes when you come to school,
we'll give you a different name.

Speaker 4 (02:14:27):
So and of course, if anyone dares to question that,
we'll punish them.

Speaker 2 (02:14:31):
The third one is medical transition hormone interventions. That's what
Planned Parenthood makes money with. And then the last one
is surgical transition where they mutilate the children. Planned Parenthood
jumps in and makes money in those last ones. There
has a political risk benefit analysis on vaccines, changed, asks

(02:14:52):
Brownstone Institute. Well, I would say that the only risk
benefit analysis that has been done has been political. It's
not about health. It's like what they can get away with.
So point out Trump has just made one of his
most eye opening posts on true social that suggests that
he may have been duped by big Pharma when he

(02:15:14):
authorized Operation Warp Speed. Like I said, he sees the
handwriting on the wall. You can't hide the massive damage
that he's done to people, and it was important for
him to start to pull back from it so he
could get elected. The cognitive dissonance was just too much,
even for the MAGA crowd. But now he has criminal
liability and what's going on here, So he and others

(02:15:37):
have pulled back trying to distance themselves from Operation Warp Speed.
I don't know what will happen with that. I was
deceived by Fauci. Yeah, that's why he gave Fauci a
medal and why he bragged about it for many years
afterwards when Facci was no longer there. The question I've
recently been asking myself is why do good people blindly
believe what should be viewed as obvious mega lies. Well,

(02:16:01):
because the megalies, the giant lies, are maga lies from Trump.
So that's why you've got to trust him, right, so
he said from the very beginning, this is about trust,
trust the plan. Well, you've got to realize there's a
comma there. Trust, comma the plan. The plan is for
you to trust them. That's how they take advantage of you.

(02:16:21):
Because it's a giant con game, and it always has been.
Why would so many people believe all the COVID lies,
more importantly, comply with the mandates and the dictates of
leaders who might be speaking with fork tongue, Well, because
they still are. And even this person this article seems
to give Trump the benefit of the doubt that maybe

(02:16:43):
he is waking up, Maybe he's going to tell us
the truth after all these years of lying to us
and harming people. Now, we were all assured that it
was at least ten times more deadly than the regular flu,
and of course we knew that it wasn't hard to
discern that these people were lying to us. It's very simple.

(02:17:06):
It's just like claiming that we didn't have any information
in the various database but now after five years, we
found twenty five children. And that's all that were damaged
by this. I've talked about probably twice that number just
on here by name. A man stage four cancer, this
is what I mentioned before, is cured by following the
what they call a hybrid ortho molecular protocol. A retired

(02:17:30):
attorney was diagnosed with metastasized stage four prostate cancer and
told that it was incurable. He came across a new
cancer treatment that they called a hybrid ortho molecular protocol,
a fifteen week protocol including a ketogenic diet, moderate exercise,
high dose vitamin c iromectin, and finnbindazole. And again these

(02:17:54):
are things that you know Mel Gibson talked about when
he was talking to Joe Rogan. The ivermectin and the
fem bendazol basically are anti parasitics. And I remember, for
the longest time many people would say that they thought
that cancer was a parasitic infection or whatever. But we
do know one thing, and that is that whatever the

(02:18:15):
medical community has been doing has not been working. So
this guy's particular case, two weeks after completing the treatment,
he was declared cancer free. But I know people have
said the same thing about the apricot seeds, and quite frankly,
I would personally. I'm not telling anybody what to do. Personally,
I feel better about getting something that is natural that

(02:18:39):
is going to stop it rather than getting into pharmaceuticals
like these anti parasitic drugs ivermectin and fembendazol. I know
that they have been used for a very long time.
They're cheap, you don't need prescription to get them because
they're veterinary drugs, and so you can at least get
the veterinary drug with him. He was diagnosed with metastasized

(02:19:00):
stage four prostate cancer that had spread to his hip bones,
his lumbar spine, and to his enguinal lymph nodes. I
have no idea what that is.

Speaker 5 (02:19:11):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:19:12):
A Cleveland clinic oncologists had advised him that the cancer
was incurable, but probably manageable for a short time using
testosterone suppressant drugs until his body ceased being hormone sensitive,
at which point he would decline. From there, the side
effects of that drug combo would be substantial and potentially
would kill him. It would assuredly demineralize his bones at

(02:19:36):
a very high rate, up to eleven percent per year,
leading to hip fractures and loss of mobility. This was
his second bout with cancer, as in twenty ten he
had undergone surgery, then three months of combined chemotherapy and
radiation for tonsil cancer that had incapacitated him for a
year before he was able to resume his law practice.

(02:19:57):
A new peer reviewed cancer protocol off by a team
of sixteen cancer doctors and medical researchers from the US
several other nations, was published in September of twenty twenty four.
Its authors are prominent in oncology, and the published protocol
was heavily footnoted to two hundred and four medical studies.

(02:20:17):
And so the whole thing cost him about twenty thousand dollars,
which is way more expensive than the apricot seeds are.
I gotta say, I don't know why it would cost
him that much, because if you look at the price
of ibermicican and FeMn bendesol, it's actually pretty low cost stuff.
It's veterinarian medicine. He took some vitamin C injections, but

(02:20:40):
those aren't that expensive. When I was in the hospital,
I asked him, I said, can I get vitamin C?
I'd prefer to get vitamin C in chact Oh no,
we don't do that. Insurance doesn't pay for it. And
because you could take the pills, I said, well, let
me have the pills. We can't give that to you either.
I mean, they won't give you anything that will help
your health. It's all poison.

Speaker 4 (02:20:59):
They went on harm you with money python, you know,
cheese shop, sketch, you know, like, well, can I have
vitamin C? Oh no, we don't vitamin C injections? There's pills.

Speaker 2 (02:21:08):
Well, can I have the pills?

Speaker 7 (02:21:09):
No?

Speaker 4 (02:21:09):
You guys do provide medical care here, don't you.

Speaker 2 (02:21:12):
No, cotn't get sleep there either. That's the other thing.
But anyway, was this a one time miracle or repeatable
protocol that may help other cancer sufferers who are without hope? Well, again,
as I've said many times, I I put a bit
as much confidence in some anecdotal, isolated case as I

(02:21:33):
do in a study, because I know how the studies
can be manipulated, very easily manipulated by the people who
benefit from it in different ways. So when you look
at the ketto diet, that makes a lot of sense
because a lot of people when they've gotten cancer will
get an alkaline diet that will cut down on sugar
and carbs and things like that, because that evidently does

(02:21:54):
feed the cancer. But again I would suggest that you,
you know, keep this in mind, but I would also
suggest that you take a look at what they've got
at RNC store, the book by Geo Griffin, A World
Without Cancer. And of course they also sell the apricot
seeds as both the natural seeds that you can eat
or you can get them in a pill form because

(02:22:16):
they can be kind of bitter, but you can get
used to that. I kind of like it. Yeah, yeah,
that's good. So anyway, ketto iivermakn m bendaesol was what
they said, claim helped the sky here. And then one
last thing, and that is the RSV shot that they
have been so eager to give newborn babies. They now

(02:22:37):
find that they are getting sick and that they are
difficult to treat after they have given them this RSV.
A substantial portion of infants who got the monoclodal antibody
shot intended to prevent RSV, have developed a shot resistant strain.
According to a French preprint study. The author said that

(02:22:58):
the finding highlights the need for extended genomic surveillance. Oh yeah,
we gotta look at people's genes again. This is all
about genetic code injections, this particular one put out by AstraZeneca,
who had a disastrous history there with a COVID genetic
code injection. Over twelve and a half percent of infants

(02:23:19):
with breakthrough cases of RSV. In other words, they got
what they were supposedly injecting them to protect against. Following
immunization had variants of the illness with intermediate to high
level resistance, including new strains of the virus that had
not been previously seen. I wonder if they've seen these
new strains either, because that's the thing. They don't isolate them.

(02:23:42):
So how do you see it if you don't isolate it.
I don't know. But we're gonna take a quick break.
But before we do, let's take a look at some
of the comments.

Speaker 4 (02:23:49):
That's right, we've got the Regimer the regimer zinas the
Salt Lake City Marathon's marketing director if they needed any help,
planting bombs to the finish line, displaying awareness of the
Boston Marathon bombing was oh so fake and gay.

Speaker 2 (02:24:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:24:03):
The Boston Marathon is another one of those things where
the FBI knew about these guys, Yeah, for months beforehand,
that even been brought to their attention by Russia.

Speaker 2 (02:24:12):
I believe it was.

Speaker 4 (02:24:13):
Yeah, And so they had even met with him and
I think tried to turn him into an informant.

Speaker 2 (02:24:19):
Or something like that. So I think the whole thing
was set up. And yeah, very likely.

Speaker 4 (02:24:23):
It's not one of those things where the FBI has
agents all around you as provocateurs and they say we
should do this, and here's the supplies, and you should
go there and do that.

Speaker 2 (02:24:34):
Yeah, I thought that that was a false flag, the
Boston Marathon. But yeah, I wonder, you know, we look
at Zen. He's such a crazy character. You might have
been actually serious when he said he need some help
setting up the bombs. Yeah, he might not have been sarcastic.

Speaker 4 (02:24:49):
He may have actively been excited. Hey can I get
in on this tun of Lord one three three seven?
You know how come they didn't use geofencing to find
the assassin. He had his phone on him the entire time,
since he was tech his roommate A point interesting question.
I am going I always like to play Devil's advocate,
not because I think, you know, they're telling the truth,
but because I think it's important to come through it

(02:25:10):
from every possible line of thinking. It's possible he left
his phone in the car because he said, you know,
I wish I had gotten my rifle before I went
back to the car. And those text messages whether if
they're real, So it's possible he dumped all of his
electronics in the car when he went to do this,
left them there, so they were in the general vicinity,
but not exactly where he was. So that's a possible explanation.

(02:25:31):
Not a guarantee, though, but it's a good question and
one that the FBI could very utely answer.

Speaker 2 (02:25:37):
I think it's interesting they haven't found the bullet. Yeah,
you know that's I looked that up after I saw that,
and it was when I looked last night they still
had not found the bullet. So that is really really interesting.

Speaker 4 (02:25:49):
Especially you would think if he was shooting from upward
angle down, the bullet would you know, either embed itself
somewhere in Charlie so in which case they would have it,
or if it goes through an through it's going to
hit the ground, you'll be able to see an impact mark,
and then you know it's going to lose a lot
of momentum and then likely be found in the general vicinity.

Speaker 2 (02:26:10):
So magic bullet disappeared and a lot of that. There's
quite a few magic bullets. Apparently.

Speaker 5 (02:26:14):
We were talking about the potential bulletproof vest yesterday. I
looked it up. He definitely was not wearing a bulletproof vest.
He's just wearing a fin t shirt. You can see
in the pictures you would see it if he had
a vest on underneath that. Also, they paved over the
area where he was shot apparently. Yeah, apparently they've already

(02:26:38):
torn up all the grass and paved it.

Speaker 2 (02:26:42):
So whereas Rudy Giuliani is he is he involved in this?
I mean, this is like nine to eleven type of stuff.
You pave over the crime scene and.

Speaker 5 (02:26:51):
They haven't found the bullet yet. Yeah, so maybe it's
under the pavement stones.

Speaker 2 (02:26:57):
Yeah, who knows or whatever it was. You know, Like
I said, I saw that one video with people doing
hand signals and then there was a guy that was
over to the right and he you know, see his
hands like that. But I haven't zoomed in to try
to see if there was anything else there. I mean,
it'd be good to run that through lance some of
the AI programs that upscale the res But anyway, you know,

(02:27:22):
I'm more interested in the direct quote unquote solutions that
they're proposing in terms of the cancel culture that the
conservatives are now cheering. That is something that we that
is a clear and present danger to everyone, and that
needs to be understood and opposed. This other stuff it's
hard to see, but I see some very suspicious things

(02:27:43):
with it. So I mean, if it was a situation,
if that was true, if that were true, if it
was a guy that was shooting something off to the side,
that might explain when he didn't find a bullet, because
maybe it wasn't a bullet, maybe it's something else.

Speaker 4 (02:27:58):
Ap rumbles Big Pharma should have lost his immunity long
ago due to fraud like safe and effective for instance,
to mention not blocking infection and spread nothing they claim was.

Speaker 2 (02:28:10):
True refective and not safe. No, no, it's all lies.

Speaker 4 (02:28:14):
Scun Collo Rose Gardens. The doctor told my wife to
start taking a nasal and hailer every day for allergies,
even if she didn't need it.

Speaker 2 (02:28:22):
That's great. Yeah, sure, just take this, take this. Who cares? Yeah,
Guard Goldsmith.

Speaker 4 (02:28:29):
It is not consistent with the First Amendment to tell
companies how they can advertise anything. The only Lockey en
roll for government in that sphere is to provide courts
for tort suits over deceptive ads.

Speaker 2 (02:28:40):
Well, I think that I think deception and fraud is
something that the government should be involved in. And whether
or not the federal government should be involved in it,
I mean, this is something you'd argue that these are
these ads are being aired nationally, But I would come
down the side that I think the government should stop fraud.
I remember when the Libertarian Party, when I first went there,
they used to have principles and what they would say

(02:29:03):
was we oppose the use of force or fraud, and
especially in politics. But I think we should the government
should protect people against fraud. I think people should be
locked up if they steal money from people. I think
people should be locked up if they tell them something
is safe and effective and it kills them. And so
I have a strong opinion about that as well. Vidge Guy,

(02:29:25):
Prescription drugs are poison.

Speaker 4 (02:29:28):
Yes, the medical industrial complex has no goodwill towards you
and they.

Speaker 2 (02:29:34):
Especially true of this weight loss drug. It's like venom
from a monster. Yeah, it's based on Helo. It's literal poison,
no question about it. The Helo monster.

Speaker 4 (02:29:49):
It's a cool little lizard for Zonovante seventeen seventy six.
Destroy the one A in twelve to twenty four months, Gonzo, Johnny,
if it came from a lab, how come they can't
show the virus. Oh, it's a good question, Gonzo.

Speaker 2 (02:30:03):
It makes me think the one A it's exactly the
opposite of a one, which is who was that federal
official who read that? Nick? Oh? Yeah, the Education secretary
of that Trump is faked, of course. Yeah, she saw
ai and she thought it was a one and a one.
Had a little bit of a moment there. It said, yes,

(02:30:24):
we will put our sauce, our steak sauce in every school.

Speaker 4 (02:30:27):
Your child has a right to a one. For these
terrible Michelle Obama lunches. We've got Audi m oh no, Fiji, guy,
I only take herbs for illness. There are natural antibiotics,
any fungals, and anti parasitics more potent than any synthetic drug.

Speaker 2 (02:30:43):
Audi, m R R.

Speaker 4 (02:30:44):
Trump just signed off on five new COVID vaxes. He's
full love excrement.

Speaker 2 (02:30:49):
He is, and so is all the MAHA movement. I mean,
these people, it's all about getting your trust again. You know,
it's like trust the plan, all the stuff. But you
look at RFK Jr. And you look at Tulse Gabbart.
He said his mission wants to restore people's trust in
the CDC. Well, then the CDC is unconstitutional, shouldn't exist.

(02:31:12):
And she wants to restore people's trust in the intelligence community,
the CIA, the NSA, which should not exist either. That's
a real tell. I think.

Speaker 4 (02:31:22):
We've got Christian constitutional conservative both Biden Harris said they
would not take the shots if Trump was reelected and
mandated it. Nibaru twenty twenty nine children injected with Caligula's
warp speed will be sterile in the future and spend
millions trying to conceive only to purchase AI created pod babies.

Speaker 2 (02:31:42):
That's a that's a dark vision of the future. Indeed,
that's their vision. I think we'll see if they can
pull that off or not. You know, I think people
are starting to wake up and we come back. We
talk about the Unite the Kingdom rally in the UK
a little bit. Just go ahead and finish ap rumbles seat.

Speaker 4 (02:31:59):
We're gonna trust people's out the AI that hallucinates and
advises people to commit suicide via bot programs, idiocy on steroids.
That's right, you're gonna have an AI that's in charge
of your Canadian health care. You really want to die,
don't You just want to die? And of course, considering
how good it is at gaslighting and making people insane,
who knows what we're going to see in the future.

Speaker 5 (02:32:20):
M m it's already practicing Canadian helping out isolated incidents
VP rumbles.

Speaker 4 (02:32:27):
The tortuous, in humane injections and mandates babies and children
are being subjected to will result in extinction in a
very six sterile population, which is already manifesting. They've done
incomprehensible damage to children and it is truly disgusting. M
OE studios. Watch the FED finally acknowledged state's powers on
this vaccine crap, the real octo spook. If the vaccines work,

(02:32:51):
let everyone choose to be vaxed or not. If they
don't protect those vaccinated, no one needs them anyway.

Speaker 2 (02:32:56):
And of course that's always been there, you know, the
herd mentality argument about herd immunity. My vaccine doesn't protect me.
Your vaccine protects me. You know you've got to get
it to protect me. And of course we saw that
same argument with the masks and then again with the GCI,
the genetic code injection from Trump. It's always that lunacy

(02:33:18):
and people say, well, we force you to take to
wear a seat belt for your own protection. It's like, yeah,
but you don't come me to the seat belt or
a motorcycle helmet that's being worn by somebody else in
another vehicle is going to protect me. It's going to
be my seat belt or my motorcycle helmet that's going
to protect me. That's the absurdity of all this stuff.
None of it made any sense whatsoever. I say, the

(02:33:42):
entire virus paradigm that sold to us with these injections
and with this so called science of virology just really
falls apart when you look at their total scheme and
what they're saying with everything, it's contradictory. It doesn't make
any sense. Imaginary world that they haven't thought through completely.

Speaker 4 (02:34:04):
We've got fijiki applying a Christian Christian conscus conservative says
you'll need to preserve the Second Amendment, or next time
they'll be able to force you to take their death vaccine.

Speaker 2 (02:34:13):
It's about vaccmin dates.

Speaker 4 (02:34:14):
In Europe they would not let you at a grocery store.
In Brazil and India they did so at gunpoint.

Speaker 2 (02:34:20):
That's crazy. Well, we're going to take a quick break
and we are going to come back with and talk
a little bit about Unite the Kingdom, the big demonstration
that they had over the weekend in the UK. People
there understand what's going on, and they finally have figured out,
as we say, you know, the when the government tells
you who the enemy is, that's called war. When you

(02:34:42):
figure out who the enemy is, it's called revolution. I
think maybe they figured out who the enemy is in
the UK. We'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:35:39):
You're been listening to the David Night Show. You're listening

(02:36:18):
to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:36:49):
Well, welcome back. And we've got a video of some
of the protests in London that show how vast this was.
Here's some aerial shots of it. The people who are there.
The organizers said there was over a million people and
even the mainstream media says one hundred and ten thousand.
I think that's a lot more than one hundred thousand.

(02:37:09):
That's a lot more than you could fit into a stadium.

Speaker 4 (02:37:12):
Yeah, that's a massive, massive crowd for that down the streets.
It fills the streets completely, la and it spreads out.

Speaker 2 (02:37:22):
It is massive, truly amazing. So that was over the weekend,
one of the largest protests in UK history. They're losing
their country to the Third World because of mass migration
policies and that the elites have shoved down their throats,
and of course the two tier system of oppression that
they have elevating the people that they brought in to

(02:37:43):
have superior rights, different rights that are superior to the
people who've always lived there. It was organized by Tommy Robinson.
He called it Unite the Kingdom Rally. There was a
counter protests that drew about five thousand people. I mean
even the mainstream media with a low ball number of

(02:38:04):
one hundred and ten thousand, which you see that video there.
There's absolutely no way that it was only one hundred
and ten thousand people. But even if it had been
one hundred and ten thousand, it's hardly worth it to
talk about five thousand people showing up an a counter protest.
But it was more than a million, they say, and
I think that's true. Robinson also piped in Elon Musk,

(02:38:24):
who offered a stark warning the people, saying violence is
going to be coming for you. You better be ready
for it. He said, yes, there's people who want to
take the reasonable middle ground. They harbor the mistaken impression
that the violent consequences of unfettered mass migration may never
touch their lines. But it will. So the crowd stretched

(02:38:46):
from Big Ben across the Thames around the corner beyond
Waterloo train station, which is about three quarters of a
mile away. Robinson said that many who believed they believe
many more people turned down. The mainstream media said, of
course that's always the case. And Britain, they said, is
first and foremost for the Brits. Well, they're going to

(02:39:09):
have to get rid of the political people who are
ruling over them if they're going to make that true.
Robinson told the sea of people before him that they
were part of a tidal wave of patriotism. This is
your community, These are your brothers and sisters. We are
today united. Today is the spark of a cultural revolution

(02:39:29):
in Great Britain. He said. The traders in Westminster are
watching right now. They're cowing, they are trembling. Keir Starmer,
the Prime Minister of the Labor Party. The revolution has started.
They managed to silence us for twenty years with labels
of racist, islamophobe, far right. They don't work anymore. The

(02:39:50):
silent majority will be silent no longer. Today we are
sending shockwaves through the corridors, a power of the elite,
like a bloody earthquake. Armor managed to slither into power.
With nine million votes, said Robinson. Twenty million British people
didn't bother to vote. The people who didn't vote were
people like you, people like me who've been told that

(02:40:13):
their voices don't matter. The Brits are in the same
boat as many other countries in Europe, including France, Germany,
Sweden and others. Robinson said, of course they're in this
boat because of the boats that are coming in. Last week,
he said, they took Epping community to court and they
said in a court that the rights of migrants, of

(02:40:34):
undocumented illegal immigrants that we know nothing about, supersede the
rights of the local community. They told the world the Somalians, Afghanis,
pakistanis all of them that their rights supersede yours. Well,
that's absolutely what they're doing. For the last twenty years,
there has been a globalist revolution. They've attacked the family,

(02:40:56):
they've attacked Christianity, They've opened the borders, they have flooded
our nations. And we're done watching our communities crumble at
the hands of open borders, mass uncontrolled immigration. And then
when Musk spoke and I played the script for you yesterday,
he said, this is a government against the people, not
for the people. He had a message for the people

(02:41:18):
who are in the reasonable middle. He said, if this continues,
the violence is going to come to you. Whether you
choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You
either fight back or you die. You either fight back
or you die. And that's the truth. You repei not twice. Yeah,
global war, which is what all of these people. You know,

(02:41:39):
you look at the fact that they were all marching
in lockstep with a so called pandemic, and they're all
marching in lockstep now as well. They want to have
a revolution, they want to have a civil war, they
want to have a world war, which is what the
last for Turnings fourth Turnings were here in the United States,

(02:42:00):
said for the longest time. I think they want to
have all three of those at the same time, and
it looks like all these countries want to have all
three of them at the same time.

Speaker 5 (02:42:07):
Yeah, it's great that they're pushing back. It's just me
to be concerned when we have people like Elon Musk
that clearly don't have any principles in this taking the
lead and being the spokesman of it.

Speaker 2 (02:42:21):
Yeah, I do trust Musk, I don't, but yeah, it
has to be from the grassroots up. But of course
they'll always try to find a leader who will take
it over and subvert it.

Speaker 5 (02:42:31):
But still, you see there is quite a lot of grassroots.
You can watch the video again, it's obviously a lot
more than one hundred thousand people.

Speaker 2 (02:42:40):
Yeah, they're incredible. I just don't know how they fight
back when the police are complicit with all this and
they have a monopoly of force as they do there,
It's going to be a difficult battle. I mean, they're
gonna be fighting them with their bare hands there. In
the UK, ed Miliban has cost Britain one billion barrels

(02:43:00):
of north sea oil. That's huge, you know, because we
look at the reserves of places like Venezuela and Saudi
Arabia's getting right up there with them. And you know,
the north Sea oil that Britain had was a massively,
you know, wonderful thing for their country in terms of
energy independence, in terms of wealth, and that's been taken

(02:43:24):
away and held hostage to this idiocy of the climate mcguffin,
so they said. Ed Millbrand's own statisticians have released data
showing that Britain's North Sea oil will produce a billion
barrels of oil and gas fewer than expected between now
and twenty to fifty, with analysts linking the downgrade to

(02:43:46):
Labor's imposition of seventy eight percent taxes and a ban
on new drilling. Yeah, this is what it's about. It's
about destroying and deconstructing the UK. They don't want them
to have any industry and they're using this excuse of decarbonizing,
as they like to put it. They want to use
that excuse to basically de industrialize the UK and make

(02:44:07):
people poor and dependent on them. Meanwhile, a climate change
committee in the UK has doubled down on their unrealistic
zero costs under a new chair. People need to understand
the means of attack that are coming from them. That
it's not simply the open borders and the immigrants. That
is very much a case, but it is equally what

(02:44:28):
it's being done to them with a climate mcguffin. Anyone
who is harboring hopes at the appointment of Nigel Topping
that sounds like Nigel Topping, that sounds like a PJ. Boadhouse,
a name from Nigel Topping is a new chair of
the Climate Change Committee, said any hopes that he would

(02:44:51):
herald in a new era of realism. The hopes were
cruelly dashed last month. His projections do not reflect only
about the true cost of quote, decarbonizing electricity supply. That's
just an absurdity, decarbonizing electricity supply. The goal is to
have zero wealth, zero energy, zero resources, and to be

(02:45:15):
able to travel or to have food. We got to
take that to zero as well. That's the insanity that
they're looking zero. That they really want in net zero
is zero population. Yeah zero. They want to zero out
the population.

Speaker 4 (02:45:29):
Zero freedom, then zero population once they've gotten you runched down. Yes,
it's again it's a war on multiple fronts. It's I'm
using the term war, don't and I don't want anyone
take that the wrong way. But it's just they attack
you by flooding your streets with migrants that are you know,
violent and rapacious, who are going to assault your women,

(02:45:49):
your daughters, your wives. They're going to be violent towards you.
They're going to attack you, and then you're going to
defend them over the victims. Yes, that's what they've done
in the UK. And they'll also go in and pass
this legislation which makes it so it's impossible for you
to travel or do anything else while you're completely focused
on the more immediate dangers of these people that are

(02:46:11):
in your midst Yes, they get you by distracting with
multiple things. And just because it's a distraction doesn't mean
it isn't real and dangerous, but it is something that
catches your eye. It's something that draws your focus in
because it is an immediate physical danger to you and
your wives and daughters.

Speaker 2 (02:46:27):
There's a lot of ways that you can create a
civil war. You can create internally. You can create factions
like the left and the right and that type of thing,
having people fight each other, or you can import them
in large measures. If they didn't bring the people in
in large measures, you wouldn't have competing groups that be
fighting each other because of different languages, cultures, and religions.
But that is exactly the case when God talks about

(02:46:48):
different people groups at least talk about nations, tongues, and tribes. Well,
that's exactly what they're trying to do. They're trying to
bring in. They're trying to put a new nation amidst
your existing one, and they know that they'll be conflict,
always is under those circumstances.

Speaker 4 (02:47:03):
Yeah, personally, I'm of the opinion that since God split
the people apart during the Tower of Babel to some extent,
there will always be a separation and a you know,
you know, there will always be conflict when people of
different nationalities come together. Because God has separated the people,
there can be no unity on this earth anymore. You
can minimize the discord, and you can be friendly with
other people, and you should try to emulate Christ and

(02:47:25):
give them the gospel and treat them as you would,
but understand that in this earth, you know, there are
different people groups and there are always going to be
some level of conflict when they come into contact with
each other.

Speaker 2 (02:47:36):
That's my personal opinion. Well, it's the language issues there,
and then the tribal issue that's really your culture, you know,
and I think it was Michael Savage used to say borders,
culture and languages, and that's basically nations, times and tribes.
We got to comment taken.

Speaker 5 (02:47:52):
The Tower of Babel thing is more of God giving
humanity extra time rather than a one world globalist government
that's going to eventually, you know, invent things that can
spy on everyone and control everything, which would have happened
much sooner had the Tower of Babbel thing not happened.

(02:48:15):
Was how I had.

Speaker 2 (02:48:17):
Well, they're working on debabbylizing the whole thing, aren't they
trying to you know, bridge these language gaps and that
type of thing. So and and so the end result
of that is a Tower of Babbel one world government,
which is really what they're trying to put up.

Speaker 4 (02:48:33):
Citizen of AMERICAKA says, you know what else, COVID was
a parasite, David, Otherwise I've remected and wouldn't have worked
on it.

Speaker 2 (02:48:39):
So that's a good point. Yeah, it's very interesting case
whatever it was. I mean, you do have some inorganic
issues there in terms of nanotech and things like that.
I always think back to the two different batches, each
of them over a million shots that they destroyed in
Japan because as they noticed that there were black particulates

(02:49:02):
that were forming and that they reacted with magnets, So
that was something else as well. Who knows what was
in it. I mean, it's probably all the above. Anything
that you can imagine was probably in there at one
degree or the other. Because these people are just pure evil.
You know, the monster for.

Speaker 4 (02:49:19):
One type of poison when they can dose you up
with just about everything.

Speaker 2 (02:49:23):
The monster really was the jab you know when you
look at this. Well, we're going to take a quick
break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:50:14):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (02:50:20):
Well, you have a New York judge has tossed the
terrorism charges against Luigi Mangioni. And of course the Democrats
in the street were cheering because there's a whole group
of people out there that is a fan club of his.
You've got people out there in the streets wearing little
green caps like Luigi from the Super Mario games and everything.

(02:50:44):
It's crazy, and this New York judge rud but there
you go. You got some pictures of that anybody there
with some green cap. There's a guy with a green cap. Yeah,
I am Luigi, and it truly is insane. Well, the
New York judge rule that although Mangione's actions were ideologically motivated,

(02:51:08):
New York law requires proof of intent to intimidate or
to coerce a civilian population for terrorism charges, which prosecutors
failed to present. So again, you know, terrorism, when I
think of it, is the use of violence or the
threat of violence in order to achieve societal change. Under
that definition, I would think that it would be considered

(02:51:30):
to be terrorism. But we're talking about New York judge here,
so you know, you forget about logic or law. Legally
sufficient evidence of all other accounts, including murder and the
second degree murder in the second degree, how does that
work out to me? Obviously thought about this and planned this.
They're not going to come after him. They the judge

(02:51:50):
shut down first degree murder charges, shut down terrorism charges,
and they're only going to do a second degree murder,
which means that he won't face life in prison. He's
twenty seven years old, and I think he can get
out in like twenty five years. Prosecutors wrote that the
writings quote convey one clear message that the murder of

(02:52:11):
Brian Thompson was intended to bring about the revolutionary or
revolutionary change to the healthcare industry. And in terms of
United Healthcare, I'm not going to defend the practices of
Brian Thompson or that corporation. It was incredibly predatory. It
is one of the ten largest companies worldwide when you

(02:52:32):
look at it. I just saw a month or so
ago they listed the ten biggest countries and they were
talking about what country they are. These companies are headquartered
in you know, how many Chinese companies, how many American
companies and the Chinese are gaining on us. It was
that type of thing. And United Healthcare was the tenth

(02:52:52):
largest country in the world and one of the reasons
that they got there is because they have far and
away the highest rate of denial. And so I've seen
people on Fox News eclips of them saying this is crazy.
You know, Brian Thompson was trying to provide a service,
which is healthcare that people need. It's like, well, actually

(02:53:12):
they were taking taking premiums for people and then denying
them at a rate that was about ten times more
than the next lowest competitor. They were the outlier in
the entire insurance industry. I remember when this all happened
and we showed the chart and it's like you look
at the percentage of claims that they denied, and it
was like way out here and everybody else is down

(02:53:34):
here in the noise, the other insurance companies. That's how
they get to be so rich.

Speaker 4 (02:53:39):
I mean us, I think in a just world, this
company every you know, the CEO would have been put
on trial.

Speaker 2 (02:53:45):
You know, it's a criminal.

Speaker 4 (02:53:47):
People would have brought cases against him and he would
have been bankrupted and his company would have been bankrupted
because they are ostensibly again, they're there to provide a service.
You're paying into them. You were assuming I pay for this,
I'm going to get the service back when it comes around,
and they will do everything they can to avoid paying that.

Speaker 2 (02:54:04):
Well, it's like when I talk to John richardson or
in c store dot com and we're talking about, you know,
why is it that the insurance companies are not interested
in cheaper treatments for cancer like the protocol we were
just talking about earlier, for example, or you know the
apricot seeds. They says, well, if you stop and think
about it. If the cancer protocol treatments are so incredibly expensive,

(02:54:27):
people look at this and say, if I don't have
health insurance and if I get cancer, I won't be
able to get any treatment at all, So I better
get insurance. And so it feeds that, you know, they
look at this and say, well, it's necessary to scare
people into getting a health insurance policy because we're going
to make it so incredibly expensive, and then they wind
up not paying for it.

Speaker 4 (02:54:48):
Yeah, there's almost no one except for you know, the
upper class that can afford any kind of treatment anymore
without insurance. If you don't have insurance, if you get
something that's going to put you in the hospital for
moderate amount of time, it will ruin you financially.

Speaker 2 (02:55:03):
Back in North Carolina, we had a friend who got
brain cancer and he wanted to go through the standard
medical protocol stuff they felt was essential to preserve or
at least maybe extend his life a short period of time.
And he had been a customer in Blue Cross Boothshield,
North Carolina for like thirty years, and they wouldn't pay
a cent And he goes, how is this You know,
you look at it that's the real stuff, and that's

(02:55:24):
the outrage that's there. But the murder was not he
was not justifying it.

Speaker 5 (02:55:29):
I mean, back to what Chris was saying, how he
should have been arrested and tried legally. I remember when
this happened, there was a news story about the guy
that replaced him, the CEO, the next CEO of United Healthcare.
The first thing he did in the first board meeting
was telling his shareholders that I'm committed to reducing unnecessary

(02:55:54):
payments or forgetting how he put it in double down. Yeah, yeah,
he was saying that we need to do more of
what this guy was doing. Yeah, it's not going to
change anything unless you have actual societal pressure from you know,
governments and things against these companies just randomly.

Speaker 2 (02:56:13):
It's amazing how they all interlocked together. Yeah, you got
the drug companies and the medical companies and the government
and all of them.

Speaker 4 (02:56:20):
It's another issue is just how ludicrously expensive it is
to go.

Speaker 2 (02:56:24):
Through a lawsuit at this time as well. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:56:26):
You know, if you're already you know, bankrupt because these
people won't pay for your medical treatment and it's ruined you,
how can you afford to sue these people ruining you.

Speaker 2 (02:56:36):
You know, it's just it's a catch twenty two.

Speaker 4 (02:56:38):
It's a truly horrible system that is in place.

Speaker 2 (02:56:41):
We kind of have the worst of all worlds. Delay, deny,
depose these This is the phrase that has commonly used
describe how major insurance companies avoid paying claims. And that
was what was written on the bullet casings. And so
the prosecutors are saying this is clearly premeditated. And yet

(02:57:01):
they said, we're not going to charge him for terrorism.
We're not going to charge him for first degree murder.
It'll be second degree, which means that he's going to
be eligible for parole in twenty five years. He'll be
fifty two years old. He can be parrolled, you know,
if he doesn't get pardoned by some politician in New York.
He's also facing murder charges in federal court, and the

(02:57:23):
federal charges can result in a death penalty. Now I
look at this, and again, I'm not defending this guy
at all or anything that he did, but does seem
to me and his lawyers are making the case that
this is double jeopardy. How can you be tried twice
for the same crime, you know, one in state jurisdiction,
the other in a federal jurisdiction. And I don't see

(02:57:45):
the jurisdiction of the federal government in terms of a
simple murder charge. They're not charging him with terrorism. They're
charging which again, that is not something in the Constitution
that the federal government has the authority to charge anybody with.
So I don't see the authority for the federal government
to come after somebody in death metal. That seems to
be to be something at the state level. They made

(02:58:09):
that argument, and the judge, however, threw that out. They
said it's going to be very difficult to defend against
both these things simultaneously. They said that in the ruling.
The judge said, well, you know, terrorism has been famously
difficult to define unless you're Trump, and then you know
exactly who the terrorists are. There anybody who criticize you, right,

(02:58:31):
and it's anybody who's in a boat, whether you have
inspected the boat or not. That is terrorism. And he's
done it a second time as well. This is a
second boat kill. This is a boat that you see
drifting there, and Trump is boasting about how he is
now blown up a second boat off the coast of

(02:58:53):
Venezuela and saying we're going to do this to anybody
who's trafficking drugs. A second strike he called it. I
call it murder. Quite frankly, it is an extra judicial killing,
meaning that there was no legal, due process, no fact
finding involved in any of this. He just kills somebody
because he points at him, calls him a terrorist. On

(02:59:16):
my orders, we positively identified extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels
and narco terrorists, and confirmed narco terrorists from Venezuela. But
I didn't confirm anything. I just saw a boat there
and killed it. And that's what he's doing, says be warned,
if you're transporting drugs, they can kill Americans. We see
you as terrorists, and we don't have to prove it. Right.

(02:59:39):
So again, is somebody. Are you going to have a
judge that's going to say that Trump is not a terrorist.
This is premeditated and it is the purpose of this
is to get us involved in yet another war so
that he and his friends can get a hold of
the oil fields. Have a good day. Thank you for
joining us the common man. They created common Core and

(03:00:15):
dumb down our children. They created common past, track and
control us They're Commons project to make sure the commoners
own nothing and the communist future. They see the common
man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has
worth and dignity created in the image of God.

Speaker 3 (03:00:39):
That is what we have in common.

Speaker 2 (03:00:41):
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find

(03:01:01):
at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
keep us in your prayers. D Davidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #2097: Trump the Censor: Free Speech Betrayer And Big Pharma Vaccine Pusher

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Wed Episode #2097: Trump the Censor: Free Speech Betrayer And Big Pharma Vaccine Pusher

Stuff You Should Know