Wed Episode #2156: The Drug War Is Becoming World War

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:35):
It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Wednesday, the tenth of
December of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. There are so
many different issues. That is a poly crisis that is
happening everywhere. We see the rise of new financial systems
and competition, see the rise of new wars, pharmaceutical issues.

Speaker 2 (01:03):
We're going to talk about all about today.

Speaker 3 (01:04):
But the key issue here, folks, that we can see
that is happening now is what is happening with the
consolidation of power and the concentration of it through artificial intelligence.
And we see both the administration's order on this as
well as what is being done in the state of Alaska.

(01:26):
This is not just something that is Trump doing this.
This aligns with the global agenda that is happening everywhere
in every country, all at once. This is the global governance.
They don't have to erect a capital somewhere. It'll be
distributed with artificial intelligence in each country. We're going to
talk about that. Stay with us, we'll be right back. Well,

(02:10):
we have it is kind of interesting. I played the
clip for you the other day, and I'll play it
again here. Pete Hegseth in twenty sixteen repeatedly warning of
Trump issuing unlawful military orders. And as a matter of fact,
I don't know if we've got that or not, but
I don't think I do have that in the deck today.

(02:30):
I think we had to move that out anyway. You
heard the clip, and what was the context for that? Well,
the context for it was a question that was asked
in the presidential debates. In March of twenty sixteen, as
Trump was consolidating his lead, he was asked in a
debate by Brit Hume about unlawful orders, and Trump's response

(02:57):
to that was Brett Bahr said, so, what would you
do as commander in chief if the US military refused
to carry out those orders? And he said, they won't
refuse me. They're not going to refuse me, believe me.
And so he was pressed about warnings from former military
leaders at US forces are legally obligated to reject unlawful orders.

(03:22):
In twenty sixteen, and at that time, Pete haig Seth,
who was working at Fox News when I was with
Fox and Friends and said that all the people in
the military knew that they had to follow, not follow,
but to refuse illegal orders.

Speaker 2 (03:40):
So I guess instead of the seditious.

Speaker 3 (03:42):
Six, we could now say there's the seditious seven and
include Pete hegg Seth in that, because he was saying
at the time that you know, they have a higher
authority that they have to obey. Trump later walked that back,
but Hegseth said at the time, what happens when people
follow those orders, they don't follow them. It's not clear

(04:02):
that Trump will have their back. Donald Trump is oftentimes
about Donald Trump, and so you can't if you're not
changing the law, and if you're just saying it, you
create even more ambiguity. In other words, it subordinate's going
to be left to twist in the wind. Trump later
walked back his comments, saying in a statement the day

(04:23):
after the debate, I will not order a military officer
to disobey the law. And so here's yet another broken
promise that we have seen. So that was the context
of the clip that we played the other day. But
you've got people like Representative Don Bacon saying about heg Seth,
I don't I think I've seen enough to make a

(04:45):
judgment about where this guy is coming from. And of
course he has criticized Trump as well, which is why
he's not running again for Congress. However, what is really
interesting is that Laura Lumer has pushed back against the
lies and the Pentagon member. She is now part of
the Pentagon Press along people like Jack Pasoviet, and it

(05:08):
is now something of a joke. But she said fentanyl
isn't being manufactured in Venezuela. How about that? Why would
you say that, Well, of course it isn't. Everybody has
said that it isn't, and you even had the Navy
seal former Navy seal admiral who ordered the second strike
said it was all about cocaine. Nobody mentioned any fentanyl.

(05:31):
With this, they can't keep their lies straight. So the
Pentagon's new press corps, which includes her, Matt Gates, Jack Pisoviet,
and others, is really kind of a joke. It really
is a clown circus. Remember pa Soviet was a guy
who was pushing that finanel was coming from Canada. It's

(05:54):
coming from Mexico. That he was pushing that it was
coming from Canada and even went up to the border
of a small town and says look at this. You
know there's no guards, there's no you know, there's no
fence or anything. People just walk across this area. We
can't have freedom like that. You know, we're the guard towers,
we're the police dogs, We're the men with automatic weapons.

Speaker 2 (06:16):
What a joke.

Speaker 3 (06:17):
He is and a sycophant, As this article points out,
Lumor Pasoviec and so many others make their living entirely
off of keeping a pro Trump audience.

Speaker 2 (06:28):
That's what this is about, folks.

Speaker 3 (06:30):
Keep your pro Trump audience happy, keep them in the dark,
give them a reason to believe that they didn't make
a mistake, that they weren't deceived. They are financially incentivized
to toe the line, to attack the left and to
never spark the ire of Trump or their viewers. And
that's why they tiptoe around like this. That's why occasionally
see Alex Jones step over the line then quickly step back. No, No,

(06:53):
I'm still on Trump's side here.

Speaker 2 (06:55):
Well.

Speaker 3 (06:56):
Galen Carpenter Dead Galen Carpenter brother at any war dot
com points out that NATO is a menace, not a
benefit to America, and this is coming as there's increasing
tension between Trump and Europe in terms of pushing for
peace in Ukraine. Zelenski and the EU don't want to

(07:18):
have peace of any sort. And as he said, NATO
is a menace, not a benefit to America. I would
say this is true of all foreign alliances, including Israel.
George Washington said that was true of all foreign alliances, and.

Speaker 2 (07:31):
He was right.

Speaker 3 (07:33):
He said, since World War Two, we have embraced two
key assumptions and continue to do so. One that NATO
is essential to the peace and security of the entire
Transatlantic region and will remain so for the indefinite future.
The other sacred assumption is that the alliance is highly
beneficial to America's own core security and economic interests. The

(07:56):
toxic militaristic views towards Russia too many European leaders are
adopting have made NATO into a snare that could entangle
the United States in a large scale war with ominous
nuclear implications. Yeah, they should listen to Washington. Anyway. We
see this as well with Israeli. You have the IDF

(08:17):
chief there says the yellow line in Gaza is now
the new border. This is the IDF chief of Staff.
Lieutenant General told that to the troops. The so called
yellow line is the vague boundary that separates the Israeli
occupied side of Gaza from the rest of the strip.
It is the quote unquote new border, as he said,

(08:40):
suggesting that Israel is planning a permanent occupation. Was there
ever any question about that? I mean, you get censored
for saying that. They'd be called racist if you said that.
It isn't anything at all about race. If it is
about race, is on the Israeli government's side. Israeli troops
currently occupy more than fifty percent of Gaza. The IDEF

(09:00):
has continued to launch attacks across Gaza, killing more than
three hundred and seventy Palestinians as the truce is supposed
to go into effect. The Idea of regularly claims to
kill Palestinians who cross the yellow line, but it is
not clearly marked on the ground, and Gaza residents have
reported people being killed well beyond the boundary before they
reach it.

Speaker 2 (09:21):
This is the.

Speaker 3 (09:22):
Kind of actions that get us drawn into these unjust wars.
But we don't need any help. I mean, we can
do our own Venezuelas, can't we in our Vietnams. But
it's just another issue. So in terms of national security,
Trump is now threatening and saying that the Supreme Court

(09:43):
is a big threat to the US. If they overturn
the tariffs, they've better watch their back. They can get
a drone strike or something. Right now, his tariffs have
been a total failure, and people are looking at the
metrics now we can see that it hasn't brought manufacturing back.
It hasn't made manufacturing stronger. Manufacturing has declined. Why because

(10:05):
of the chaos that he's brought. I don't care what
his tax policies are. If they're constantly shifting. You can't
run a business, you can't run a farm if you
don't know what the products are. That's why they have
the Chicago border trade and that's why he has basically
reversed all of that and cast it to the wind. So,
whether you're manufacturing, whether you're a retailer who is importing goods,

(10:27):
or whether you're a farmer who's trying to grow crops,
Trump's chaos has destroyed everything. And of course the stated
goal to beat our Chinese competition. Here's a newsflash. We
don't compete as nations. We compete as corporations. And if
you want your nation to succeed, you have to get

(10:48):
your reins off of the corporations and the businesses and
let them be able to compete. They have tied everybody
down with regulations to the extent that you can't do
manufacturing in the United States or pretty much anything else
as well. The biggest enemy of production and innovation in
the US is the federal government itself. It's not foreign governments,

(11:12):
not foreign corporations. So, as I pointed out yesterday, if
you go back and you look at the numbers that
are now in the Chinese have had their exports go
up by five percent over a year ago. The US
has had their exports go down by thirty percent versus
a year ago. And that's the reality of this. And

(11:32):
the fact is the prices are going up because they
have to be passed on or the businesses will go
out of business. There's only so much that they can
absorb and only for so long. So the tariffs are
an absolute failure. Unless raising taxes, killing small business, destroying manufacturing,
unless those are the real goals that Trump had, which

(11:55):
I wouldn't put it past them, because when you look
at the policies that he's doing this is obviously the
tool of the UN, the World Economic Forum, Musk and
all the rest of these techno bros that are out there.
Trump on Tuesday, so that national security could be at
risk if the Supreme Court rules against his tariffs under
emergency law, arguing that it could pose the biggest threat

(12:17):
to the US.

Speaker 2 (12:17):
So there you go.

Speaker 3 (12:19):
They better get some air defenses over the Supreme Court building.
If he tells Pete to do it, Pete will do it.
He doesn't care whether the orders are illegal or not.
So yeah, national security, the emergency threat, all these things.
People haven't caught on to this huckster yet. Everything is
this is national security. It's an emergency, it's a threat.

(12:42):
He says that about everything when he is really the
biggest threat that we have. So he said the biggest
threat in history of the US national security would be
a negative decision on teriffs by the US Supreme Court.
We would be financially defenseless. How did we survive? How

(13:03):
did we get to this point? What were the things
that America had that made America great? It was a
lack of federal smothering of everything that we do. The
federal government was very small. That's how America got great.
It got great because of that, and everything that he
has done under his benevolent dictatorship is not going to

(13:24):
restore that greatness because he doesn't understand what made America
great in the first place. So let me just say this.
If the Supreme Court approves of Trump acting as this
bogus bogus dictator where he can declare an emergency and
do whatever he wants about anything, he can declare a

(13:44):
threat when a threat doesn't exist, everything is an emergency.
Everything is the threat. Now he has the power to
do whatever he wishes. If they allow that. The next
Democrat president, and there will be a next Democrat president,
we'll do whatever he wishes. You need to think about that.
The people who are cheering this on because they like

(14:05):
the particular policy that he's got, It's not about the policy,
it's about the principle. This year, so he goes on
to say, talking about Emmanuel Macron, he said, the Trump
administration imposed duties on Chinese imports starting earlier this year.
That has failed. He said, now Europe is going to
use tariffs against China. We would not be allowed to

(14:27):
do what others are already doing. Well, there you go.
There's the argument, well what about France. You know, can't
make the argument, well what about the Democrats? They did that? Well,
you know, we could have a situation in the future
where the French are doing something we can't do. Yeah,
the French have always tried to centrally plan and control
their economy. That was what Alexis de Tokville was amazed

(14:48):
at how poorly that worked in comparison to the freedom
that we had in the United States. So yeah, just
do like the French. You know, what about the French?
They want to follow Trump's fail to strategy and go ahead.
During last week's oral arguments on the tariff case, some
Supreme Court justices appear to cast out on Trump's authority

(15:08):
to impose a broad range of tariffs under the nineteen
seventy seven International Emergency Economic Powers Act i EPO because
this is a total fraud. Anybody who looks at this
with a cursory glance understands us you don't need to
have detailed arguments about this and just trying to weigh
the consequences of what they do in terms of opposing him.

(15:30):
Justice Cony Barrett argued that it could be a mess
for the courts to administer refunds to US importers who
paid tariffs that were declared illegal. How does that have
anything to do with the principle whether or not this
is allowed on the Constitution. You see what Trump is doing.
He's making lie, telling people lies about it being an emergency,
being a threat, being a national security threat. Then he

(15:53):
acts as a dictator. Now that he has declared that
it is a phony emergent, he will use that phony
declaration to essentially enact martial law. And she's going to say,
that's okay, because of practical issues, how do we refund
the money that we've taken. Well, that's the other part

(16:14):
of his strategy. He comes out with fraudulent lies and
then he moves very very quickly to make the mess
that he has created difficult to unwind. And they will
fall for that evidently. So the question is it's unclear
where the companies will be entitled to refunds of more
than one hundred billion dollars and i EPA Terris that

(16:37):
paid so far, if the immunis, if the administration loses
his case. And that's why Costco followed that lawsuit. You know,
think about it. The American government comes in and does
things that are completely illegal, completely unconstitutional, based on a
foundation of lies, as even more apparent than the weapons
of mass destruction lies that got us into the Iraq war.

(16:59):
I mean that was plausible. This is not even plausible.
So they do that, and then the government's going to
take the position that they can't get their money back,
that it's collected illegally, so you have to sue them.
This is like civil asset forfeiture, isn't it. Will the
police come in, they don't even charge you with the crime.
They steal your car, they steal your home, they steal

(17:20):
your cash or whatever, and they keep it and you've
got to sue them in order to get it back.
This is what happens when you were governed by bureaucrats
making rules or presidents making rules and not doing it
with Congress. And Congress they say, well, that's a law,
we have to follow due process. But if it's a
rule that is just imposed by a dictatorial bureaucracy or

(17:44):
a dictatorial president, sorry you're out of luck. You'll have
to sue us to undo that. So the president said
last month there would be economic disaster, a national security
disaster if we've lost the case in the Supreme Court. No,
it is his issues, and it's put out the big

(18:04):
lie and then move real fast to put its tentacles
throughout society so that rips everything apart if you and
do it. Meanwhile, Trump and Treasury Secretary Thesaurus soy Boy
Bessant have said that there are many other ways to
impose the government's tariffs if the Supreme Court case fails.

(18:25):
Although the President has stress that the current tariff's regime
is more direct and less cumbersome than other methods, he
will still find a way to get around the law,
to lie about it. That's what he's saying. He says,
I have ended eight wars in ten months. Total lie,
total lie. Because of the rights clearly given to the

(18:47):
president of the United States. The president doesn't have rights,
he has powers. States don't have rights, they have powers,
and he doesn't have these powers under the Constitution. Another
good example of this is how he is working very
hard to completely destroy the Tenth Amendment on one of

(19:09):
the most foundational changes that we've had in America ever,
and that is putting AI and its ability to monitor
and to manipulate the population in a police surveillance state.
He is prohibiting any regulation of that at the state
and local level. Now that is in direct defiance of

(19:31):
the Tenth Amendment. He is not the president, he's not
the commander in chief. He is the usurper in chief.
Trump has also used tariffs as part of a separate
negotiations of other countries, including illegal immigration and drug trafficking.
There you go, hey, it works. Look, we don't have
fentanel coming in from Canada anymore. It wasn't coming in

(19:53):
in the first place. But he's on a point. I
did that great. You know, fentinel is bad, but things
go better with coke. Just ask Alex Karp have a
clip of him and actually his own company, Pallanteer kind
of snarkily as everybody was saying, he looks like he
is strung out on cocaine. They kind of made a

(20:16):
snarky joke about it, kind of more or less admitting it.
I wouldn't be surprised. China's manufacturing is booming despite Trump's tariffs,
says the Wall Street Journal. And that was what we
pointed out yesterday. They have had an all time record
high exports of over trillion dollars Meanwhile, what do we
do we spend You know, they make a trillion dollars

(20:40):
in profits. We spend a trillion dollars with the military,
with the NDAA which is coming up. They always do that.
That is the Christmas gift to themselves. They always pass
the NDAA funding the defense businesses. It's such a given
that you have them rushing to put all kinds of

(21:01):
bills in that they think they might have a problem
passing otherwise they tack them on to the NDAA. US
pressure has only cemented China's status as the world's indispensable
factory floor, sending its trade surplus above a trillion dollars.
Trump took the White House almost a year ago promising
a manufacturing boom, and he got one in China. All

(21:25):
of these policies have backfired. Why would anybody think that
it's a good idea to have the economy centrally managed
by a guy, especially by a guy who bankrupted six casinos,
where you basically have a license to print money. Western carmakers,
as we look at the de industrialization of the West,

(21:46):
of course, that is a key part of it. They're
in a fight for their lives against their Chinese rivals,
says the boss of Ford. This is a joint appearance
that he made with Renault. They announced a deal to
make two small electric cars. They're going to go down
to the golf cart business. I guess is where we're going.

(22:06):
But look, the technological advantage that we had has been banned.
You can't have internal combustion engines. That was a big
technological advantage that Western industry had over everybody else. I
had a lot of experience making these very complicated things.
They banned that. They also banned energy that you need
in order to be able to compete in manufacturing. If

(22:28):
your energy costs is much higher than China, and it
is because of the pair's climate accord and other things
like that. If that's the case, then the industrialization is
a given. And we've been saying this for over a decade.
That's when they did the Paris Climate Accord. Now we're
seeing the chickens come home to roost. Western carmakers are

(22:50):
going to five our lives against Chinese competition, said the
boss of Ford. Along with the boss of Francis Renault.
The two companies said yesterday they would work together. They
are on two smaller electric cars. The first, we'll go
and sale as soon as twenty twenty eight, they'll also
look at producing vans together. We're in a five far
lives in this industry. There's no better example than here.

(23:11):
In Europe, manufacturers like Byd and Cherry have gained market
share by producing well reviewed electric cars. It's much lower
cost than Western manufacturers. Again, they can bring the Chinese
price to bear and it has just been put on steroids.
It's no longer simply about intellectual property, theft, currency, manipulation

(23:35):
and slave labor. Now you can add to it a
huge cost advantage in terms of energy.

Speaker 2 (23:42):
Well.

Speaker 3 (23:42):
As all this is happening, Australia has launched their youth
social media ban, saying that it will be the world's
first domino to fall, and they expect that this is
going to be their ability to shut down free speech
and anonymity on the Internet to.

Speaker 2 (23:59):
Push a global ID.

Speaker 4 (24:02):
I just have to say we have to look at all.

Speaker 3 (24:06):
These different things and understand that there's a difference between
the intended or stated purpose and what is really going
to come out of this. If parents are going to
abdicate their responsibility to their children, so we want the
government to do it well, guess what you're going to
wind up with a nanny government. And the other aspect

(24:29):
of this is that if we have kicked God out
of our society, guess what's going to go into that vacuum. Government.
So government needs to solve all of our problems. And
they've just got a new toy that they tell us
can do it, which is artificial intelligence. That's the way
Trump has put this out. It's going to solve all
the problems that we have in the twenty first century. Now,

(24:52):
it is going to be the seminal problem of the
twenty first century. So they're going to have government enter
the vacuum. There you have god verment.

Speaker 5 (25:02):
Yes, yes, Personally, I think this is partially to do
with the fact that there is a lot of right
wing content online which ends up resonating with a lot
of young guys. Naturally, young men tend to be more
right wing, and so they gravitate towards those sorts of
ideals and policies, and it's the one space where the
government brainwashing isn't totally ubiquitous from every.

Speaker 2 (25:26):
Angle that's right.

Speaker 5 (25:27):
So if you can kick these kids off the internet,
they're not going to get exposed to any sort of
right wing talking points at all.

Speaker 3 (25:34):
But it's also about whenever they go to war with us.
When they went to war with us over COVID boy,
they wanted to shut down anybody that opposed the agenda.
If you say there's any alternative to lock down until
we get the genetic vaccination. If you said that, you're out.
If you push back against their pandemic, you're out. You're
shut down. We saw this over and over again. And

(25:54):
if you push back against their wars, they want to
censor you as well. A million social media accounts held
by users under sixteen are set to be deactivated in
Australia in a devisive world first ban that's been closely
watched elsewhere. This happens, folks, This is the end of
liberty and anonymity on the Internet. All of course, in

(26:16):
the name of protecting the children. They will always put
that out there. And again, I want to protect children,
but this is not the way you do it. This
is just like the drug war. I'd like for people
not to do drugs, but the way the drug war
is being done is not the way to do It
is destroyed law enforcement, It has created these massive cartels,

(26:37):
It has destroyed our justice and prison system as well,
and now they're using it for justification for a real
war because they don't want to call it prohbition. Because
it realized that probition was tried, it had to be
done legally with a constitucial amendment, and it also failed.
And this has failed now for fifty one years. So
the next step is, let's make the drug war a

(26:58):
real hot war. Children and teenagers be forced off of
social media and mass well, they're about to find out.
I don't think they can. How difficult is it for
you to spoof the system? How difficult is it for
them to get VPNs? They can outlaw them, but there's
a way that people will be able to get that out.
You want to prohibit anything, there's going to be a

(27:20):
way around it if there's demand for it. We should
have known that after fifty one. It's now fifty four years,
nineteen seventy one, fifty four years of the war on drugs,
and the United Nations, with its little puppets like Richard
Nixon who did that for the UN, they haven't been
able to prohibit drugs, not that they really want to.

(27:43):
You know, they're some of the biggest traffickers out there.
More than a million social media accounts held by users
under sixteen are set to be deactivated in Australia today.
And again, how they identify these people when you look
at YouTubers are started doing this. As a matter of fact,
we kind of ran against it. With the one computer.

(28:03):
We just pull up like failed videos and stuff like that,
watch about ten minutes or something at night and you know,
talk about as we just relax or something, you know,
nothing important. And so I started putting this thing up
saying that we need to identify who we were.

Speaker 2 (28:18):
I guess it.

Speaker 3 (28:18):
Thought it might be teenagers because they're watching really stupid
content and total lance. I said, I guess we're going
to have to watch some music from the listen to
some music from the forties and fifties, make them think
we're a little bit older, and I mean maybe eighteen
forties and eighteen fifties. Listen to some classical music. Because
it's just looking at what you're watching and figured out, well,

(28:40):
if they're watching a bunch of car crashes and failed videos,
probably a bunch of teenagers out there, so they need
to verify their age. So I guess we need to
get our YouTube tastes elevated.

Speaker 2 (28:52):
Here a little bit, a little bit too low brow.

Speaker 3 (28:55):
So they're going to be sucked into purgatory by predatory algorithms,
said one person who designed this. But they're not talking
about the ID, they're talking about what is going on
with the Internet. They call it behavioral cocaine. So what's
the answer to behavioral cocaine? The same answer we have

(29:15):
the regular cocaine. We prohibit it and then it stops. Right,
we don't have cocaine anymore. I mean, we outlawed that
fifty four years ago. It's not around anymore.

Speaker 2 (29:25):
Is it.

Speaker 3 (29:28):
Two fifteen year olds have brought a legal challenge against
this to the nation's highest court. In Australia, supporters say
the rest of the world will soon find will soon
follow the example set by the Australian ban, which faced
fierce resistance from social media companies, because they're the ones
who are going to pay the fine. They're going to
be the ones who are going to do all the work,
all the expense, all the investigation and all of the purging,

(29:51):
and if they don't do it, then the government can
hit them with massive fines. Social media companies will be
responsible for enforcing the ban, paying up to thirty t
two million dollars for serious or repeated breaches. Children and
parents will not be punished for any infringements. Okay, well
there you go. I should make it easy. You know,
that's actually the way that the war on drugs actually began.

(30:15):
At the very beginning, it was only the dealers who
were being punished. The users weren't punished. And then Reagan
decided that they would go after the end users along
with Biden. Might have been Biden's idea, and then we
know where that wound up. We filled up all the prisons,
the private prisons. They were fine with that because you
can get some stock in those private prisons. Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook,

(30:38):
ex Snapchat, Reddit all set to be aged restricted under
the law. Some have taken action before the band even
takes effect. So he had met us saying that they
would be closing Instagram and Facebook accounts on December fourth.
I don't know if that happened not. I don't play
in that space. According to a national study the Australian

(31:02):
government commissioned this year, ninety six percent of children ages
ten to fifteen use social media and they're saying seventy
percent of them have been exposed to harmful content and behavior. Well,
there's no doubt in my mind that it is harmful
for kids, and there's no doubt in my mind that
it's the parents' responsibility. And yet who's not going to

(31:23):
be held responsible the parents. They want the social media
companies to parent you. They want to be the nannies themselves. Actually,
they just want to have some substitute nannies that are
doing this for them. Well, we're going to take a
quick break, folks, and we come back. I'm not finished
with war. We've got more to say about war, but

(31:45):
just to let you know what's going on. Travis is
not done the seed over here today, and that's because
we've got Lance working on a special project and so
Travis will be kicking in with comments and things like that. Back, Yes, yes,
you want to read the comments, or you don't mean
to read them.

Speaker 2 (32:04):
I can read them. Okay, go for it, Bo.

Speaker 5 (32:07):
Says warmonger working for Fox. Huh, don't forget sen, say Hannity.

Speaker 2 (32:11):
That's right, he's the guy out there. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (32:15):
Isn't it amazing how these guys who are never in
the military are such warmongers. Maybe they've never had a friend.
They saw it blown apart. That's the reality of it,
and they're attached from that reality.

Speaker 5 (32:27):
They mostly come from rich families that never had to
worry about their son being sent off. They make sure
that they got placed in positions if they were in
the military that ensured they wouldn't see combat. Whackjaws. As
I saw that ridiculous speech last night. Trump is a
pure liar and very evil. This clown supposedly went to
the Wharton School of Business and he can't even keep

(32:48):
a casino open.

Speaker 4 (32:50):
A casino for God's sake.

Speaker 2 (32:53):
Yeah, that is It's crazy. You know.

Speaker 3 (32:55):
I guess he loves to set rules and things for people,
but you know, when you have a casino, so typically
they set the rules up so the house always wins.

Speaker 2 (33:03):
It wasn't smart enough to do that.

Speaker 5 (33:06):
I have heard some people say he specifically tanked them
for tax reasons, but who knows.

Speaker 3 (33:10):
Oh, come on, he wouldn't do that for tax read
it's his ego, you know. That was the thing. When
the roths Childs came to him with Wilbur Ross and
well Barross got up there, big crowd around Trump and goes, hey,
I think we can use this guy. You know, he's
a real snake drummer, right, pied piper, And so you know,

(33:32):
they they he basically let them do anything that they wanted.
He just wanted his name on the building. He doesn't
if he wants his name on the building, he's not
letting it fail for tax purposes.

Speaker 5 (33:44):
Remember in the original Batman movie where Jack Nicholson says,
you know, I want my face on the one dollar bill.
That's all I can picture.

Speaker 4 (33:53):
Mm hmmm.

Speaker 5 (33:55):
Defy Tyrants seventy to seventy six says, wasn't Pasobic the
guy who said there was watermarked ballots? No, No, that's
a totally different charlatan.

Speaker 3 (34:03):
Yeah, that's another guy who worked for the intelligence agencies,
another controlled opposition mouthpiece that's out there. Yeah, people, they
didn't realize just how Operation Mockingbird works in the twenty
first century, you know, back when when Walter Kroncott was
doing it. They give them, basically give them the script.
What they do now is they establish these people in
alternative media like Alex Jones's Info Wars. They put in

(34:27):
Steve Pichennik, they put in Soviet and these are intelligence
assets who oh they're retired now, well, no, probably not right,
And they feed people all these lies about January sixth
and fentchannel coming across the Canadian Board and all the
rest of this stuff.

Speaker 5 (34:45):
Somehow I feel like it might be the mafia. There's
no such thing as retirement. You're always at their beck.

Speaker 2 (34:51):
That's right.

Speaker 5 (34:52):
We have so bogus saying if I don't have the
right to murder someone because they are possessing drugs, how
do I delegate the right to murder that persons of
government representatives?

Speaker 3 (35:01):
That's right, And that's exactly Rampall is making some of
those statements, just like I did you know? I said,
so you know, they've got very strict protocols, as Marketing
Mark and New Jersey point out, they have certain people
ask they're specialty coastguard people and everything. They have to
do it by the book. When they interdict drugs at
sea port of the time they're wrong when they think

(35:23):
somebody's got drugs, so you don't just blow them out
of the water. And then when you go there, you
have certain protocols that you must follow because this is
going to go through courts and do processing. You don't
want to get these if you're going to come after
these people for your illegal warn drugs, you don't want
to have a legal loophole that they can get out
of it with it. So it's a very precise protocol.

(35:45):
And as I said from the very beginning, So you
interdict these people, and they're still doing that everywhere else.
The Coast Guard is still doing that in all other waters.
But you stop these people, you search, you find the drugs.

Speaker 2 (35:57):
What do you do.

Speaker 3 (35:57):
You line them up on the side of the boat
and machine on them like the nazis dead with the
Great Escape Prisoners. That's why I played that clip and
basically Rampaul made that statement, very powerful statement that he
made yesterday. So we're going to talk about that coming
up as well.

Speaker 5 (36:16):
And we have let's see the real Octo spook. We
do have real nation security threats and Trump's tariffs addressing
none of them.

Speaker 2 (36:23):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 3 (36:24):
Yeah, you want to talk about the real national security threat?
Why is he focused on the trade deficit and he
doesn't care anything about the government spending deficit. See, it's
all about misdirection. And you know, when we look at
all these other things, and these are important issues that
are happening. This is war and peace and things like that.

(36:46):
But he's got all these other issues that are out there.
All of them really are important to some level or
the other. But as this is being done, he is
completely restructuring our society to have all power concentrated into
the hands of the government and the techno broligarchy as
some people called it, right his brother oligarchs, and they're

(37:10):
going to do that with artificial intelligence. And he's laying
the legal quote unquote legal foundation because he's putting out
pronouncements from the White House and that's what passes now
for a legal process. They are laying the foundation for
all of this stuff is reported the other day, and
putting in a global id system so that you won't

(37:30):
be able to buy sell a trade. I mean, this
is mark of the beast stuff. People need to wake
up and pay attention to this. But that's what's going
on while everybody's looking at all this other noise and
disturbance that he's doing everywhere else on these other issues.
And it's not to say those other issues are not important.
You know, he's setting fires everywhere, you know, and while
that's happening, he's laying a whole string of bombs that

(37:55):
he can detonate remote control. It's just insane. What's happening
right now? Go ahead, Travis, that's right.

Speaker 5 (38:01):
We have DeFi Tyrant seventeen seventy six. Again, says DK.
The Constitution is what created this cancerous leviathan. We govern
ourselves just fine, are the articles in Confederation. But they
needed to take control over the states, and that's what
the Constitution has done.

Speaker 3 (38:15):
Well, I agree that the Articles of Confederation were much better,
but the how did we get the Constitution? You know,
the argument for that was we need to have a
common defense, and so we got backed into this thing
really with a national security argument. And the Constitution is
really not that good of a document if you don't
have the Bill of Rights. And the Bill of Rights

(38:36):
is there because James Madison and others recognized that with
some of these clauses like the general Welfare thing that
they proposed to do, and the commerce clause and things
like that, that if it wasn't directly opposed with a
tenth Amendment, that could be very dangerous. Well, they put
the tenth AMENDM and M, but it's just ignored, and

(38:56):
so we have the War on drugs is not they
don't have a constitutional MENI meant to let them ban
all these different drugs. They just say, wait, well, we
can do it under the Commerce clause. And so they're
ignoring the Tenth Amendment amended the Constitution. So if you
want to make an argument that the drug PROHIBITIONI can

(39:17):
be done under the Commerce clause, well, if you look
at the Constitution, I don't think you can make that case.
But let's say that you did. Well, the tenth Amendment
just shut that down. It shut down and the General
Welfare Clause the same thing. If you want to make
that case, it doesn't really matter because if the Tenth
Amendment applies, and it does, it shut down those loopholes

(39:41):
that were put in there.

Speaker 4 (39:43):
Go ahead, Treves, all right, we have the real.

Speaker 5 (39:48):
Hold on there.

Speaker 2 (39:49):
We go.

Speaker 5 (39:50):
High boost is what is David drinking? And inquiring minds
want to know.

Speaker 3 (39:54):
Oh, I'm drinking coffee. I need to clear my throat
more frequently since of stroke, and so I used to
wait until I take a break, but I have to
do it more frequently.

Speaker 5 (40:05):
Now coffee keeps the show running. That's right, Coffee and egos,
Sonita says, now aj has Patrick byrne On pushing the
war propaganda.

Speaker 3 (40:14):
Yes, multiple times, multiple and even put up that he's
an intelligence asset. Alex isn't trying to hide any more
that he's being controlled by the CIA shills.

Speaker 2 (40:24):
I mean it was.

Speaker 3 (40:26):
It was getting pretty obvious so already before when we
were there. And again when you look at Alex and
lick at Tucker, how many people do you know that
have a lot of family in the CIA. I never
knew anybody that had been even tangentially involved in the
CIA until I got there, And seems like he's full
of it.

Speaker 2 (40:46):
He really is full of it.

Speaker 5 (40:47):
Go ahead, Travis, that's right, Guard Gold says. Madison said
the letter, the Commerce Clause was remedial after state on
state conflict over trade policies, tariffs.

Speaker 2 (40:58):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (40:59):
Yeah, they were enacting terraces between different states, and that's
really the point of the Commerce Clause. It was to
keep trade going instead what they have done with war
on drugs. It's just shut trade down if you don't
look at it that way, and to assert control over
everything commercial. And so they took something just like that.
They do that with everything. They did it with the

(41:21):
Pisa Act. Okay, so the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They said,
you're not going to spy on people without a search
warrant if they're in America. Even if it's a foreign
citizen in America, you're not going to spy on them.
You can only spy on foreign citizens in foreign countries.
And so they used the PISI Court then to turn
that upside down and to get a to say, well,

(41:43):
now the PISA Court has given us a search warrant
for mister and missus Verizon. They told us we could
search everybody's phone. So now see, we complied with the law.
So they used the thing that was supposed to stop
them from doing what they were doing. At the very beginning.

Speaker 2 (41:56):
They were.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
They were only people through phone issues from the very
inception of the NSA and the CIA, and that's why
they had these hearings, and so they redirect it to
their illegal coups and assassinations. And then when they get
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, you know, there was anything
that came out of the Church Committee hearing or the
Pike Committee hearings to stop them from doing any coups,

(42:22):
assassinations or anything like that. So that wasn't the issue.
It wasn't about the heart attack, gun and things like that.
It was about them spying on Americans without a search
warm And the thing that came out of it was
the Faiza Act. And so then they used that to
give themselves legal cover to do exactly what they were
trying to stop. And that's what they did with the

(42:43):
Commerce clause. The commerce clause, you're right, guard liberty conspiracy.
It was because they were enacting terifs are enacting being
enacted by one state against another state. And they said,
we want to have a free trade zone, and so
that was a part of it. Now, all what they
do is they say, well, we're going to use the
commerce clause to prohibit drugs, and we're also going to

(43:05):
use it to control all commerce. And we're going to
prohibit commerce, and we're going to come into your come
into your state and regulate you, because I regulate the
businesses that are there that are sending products across state lines.
So they use it in exactly the opposite way that
it was intended. Everything in the Constitution is being twisted, perverted,

(43:31):
turned upside down, turned inside out by these crooks that
we have in government. Now, well, we're going to take
a quick break and we're going to we will be
right back. Let me see if I can find something
here that I haven't played for a while.

Speaker 2 (45:00):
You are listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (45:04):
Elvis the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown.

Speaker 6 (45:09):
Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 3 (45:15):
By the way, that reminds me, I played Art the
Healt Angels sing. I changed the audio on that a
little bit, as well as on the Charlie Brown Christmas
Time Christmas Time is here. I updated those if you
got the link if you bought the album last year,
I made some minor changes in it. I was changing
the visuals on these things, and I thought, well, yeah,

(45:36):
I think I could make that a little bit better.
And so it made some minor changes. You may or
may not even hear them, but it mattered to me.
As they say, art is never finished, it's only abandoned.
I had abandoned it a couple of years ago, but
the album out, but I went back and I may
wind up doing more of this stuff. But anyway, if
you want the updated versions, it's been updated on the

(45:58):
link there. On Mega We've got a folder there and
we give you a link to Mega that's how you
can download the album if you bought that, and if
you bought it already, and even if you've lost the link,
we'll just do it on the Honor system. Just let
us know, we'll give you the link and you can
download it again. Trump is pushing Ukraine to accept the
peace deal, saying that Ukraine is losing. Well, he's absolutely

(46:20):
right about this, And it's not that Trump is a peacemaker.
It's just an amazing thing to make his obsession and
his desire to have the Nobel Peace Prize and the
lies that he's put about out about how many wars
he has ended as a total nonsense. And you can
see that he's not a peacemaker. He's not a peacemaker

(46:43):
when it comes to politics, when it comes to domestic policy,
he's not a peacemaker when it comes to a foreign
policy either. He's out there with his dirty little war
in Venezuela, and it is a dirty little war. So
he's not blessed as a peacemaker. I think he's going
to be cursed as a war But he dialed up
the pressure there in Ukraine. I think he just wants

(47:05):
to have a war that he can win. He can
win the war easily with Venezuela. He doesn't want to
go to war with Russia, which is a smart thing,
surprisingly smart for Trump. We don't want to have a
war with Russia. We don't want to have a nuclear war.
Zelensky wants us to have one. The British, French and

(47:25):
German leaders want us to have one. They have absolutely
no regard for their own people, quite obviously, and that
includes a nuclear war. They're making preparations for that, and
they're very angry with anybody who will pull back from
their world war, their world nuclear war. Trump wants to
have war, but he wants it in places where there's

(47:46):
an asymmetric dynamic going on. You know, let's bomb civilians
in Gaza, Let's bomb civilians and Venezuela. Let's blow up
unarmed ships. Trump dialed up the pressure Ukraine to swiftly
accept a US design peace plan. European backers insist that
the US security guarantees are vital to a peace deal,

(48:10):
exacerbating intentions between Europe and Washington. Trump land bastard European
leaders is weak, and said that Russia holds the cards
and any peace negotiations with Ukraine. So point out they
are rapidly taking land, rapidly advancing in Ukraine. It looks
like Ukraine is collapsing.

Speaker 2 (48:29):
And this is.

Speaker 3 (48:30):
Always the way this is going to turn out. And
Trump even says that, he says, you know, they're too
tiny to be able to beat Russia. Trump says Zelensky
has until Christmas to accept the peace deal or else
what you know, what is the or else? I don't know,
but anyway, maybe they get a lump of coal and

(48:50):
they're stocking.

Speaker 2 (48:51):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (48:51):
I was going to say he's going on the naughty list.

Speaker 3 (48:55):
Yeah, the Lensky's around on the naughty list for a
very very long time. There's a very long list of
naughty that he's involved in. Were you gonna say, Travis.

Speaker 5 (49:05):
He's going on the naughty list?

Speaker 2 (49:07):
More bombs? They put him on the no fly list.

Speaker 3 (49:12):
Trump has told Zelenski that he has until Christmas to
accept the deal to end the war with Russia. The
President's envoys, Jerry Kushner and Steve Witkoff, I mean, what
could go wrong with those two guys? Right, delivered the
warning in a two hour long phone call with the
Ukrainian leader after their recent talks with Putin and Moscow.
And again I reported yesterday Trump was saying with the

(49:32):
weekend he was very upset. Apparently Zelenski didn't even care
enough about peace to look at the plan. He says
he read it. Of course he hasn't read it. He
doesn't want peace, he wants war. This has been a
parent from the very beginning, so does Europe. He is
their cat's paw for these European leaders who want to
have a war. Why did they want to have a
war for the same reason that all these people want

(49:54):
to have a wars. It's a wag the dog things,
the same reason that Clinton got us involved in and
that were in Yugoslavia and Serbian things like that, because
it's to distract people from what the bad things that
are happening around him or the bad things that are
happening to them in their own country. Netnya who had
big issues in Israel and Israel and so therefore we

(50:15):
get a war. Clinton has big issues, so we have
a war. And they have created huge issues throughout Britain, Germany,
France in terms of immigration. Their industry is collapsing because
that's what they've been working on. And when people see
the result, people realize that it was their policy, it
wasn't something that happened accidentally. Then they're going to get

(50:40):
the pigs and the shovels and the torches and come
after them. So the way that you stop that is
you take people to war. In a separate wide ranging interview,
Trump said the Ukraine would eventually succumb to Russia if
a deal was not signed. He also condemned European leaders
as weak for failing to end the war and accuse
them of presiding over a decaying continent diminished by illegal

(51:01):
migration and political correctness. Trump is one hundred percent correct
about this. Again, you still have to watch what he does.
Writing on social media on Tuesday night, Zelensky said that
he was working very actively with European allies to formulate
a proposal to end the war. I don't believe that
for a minute. He told reporters that he'd asked officials

(51:22):
to draw plans to hold elections within sixty to ninety
days under martial law.

Speaker 2 (51:28):
He declared martial.

Speaker 3 (51:29):
Law because under their law, there are no elections under
marshal law. So he is trying to appease these people.
The guy is a petty little dictator and a kruk.
He and his wife have skimmed so much money to corruption,
and the Zelenski administration is off the charts. And with
Ukraine just in general. Ukrainian law forbids elections being held

(51:53):
during martial law, but Zelensky said they could take place
as long as the US and Europe provide security guarantees
relating to the vote. And then this is thrown in
by the UK Telegraph. Russia has been known to interfere
in European elections.

Speaker 2 (52:09):
Prove it.

Speaker 3 (52:10):
But so what I mean we interfere in elections. We
overthrew Ukraine with a coup. I mean, give me a break.
What true or not? What difference does it make. All
the elections everywhere are rigged and crooked, and that's especially
true of Ukraine, so Trump told Politico. He said in

(52:32):
the interview, he said, Russia has the upper hand. They
always did. They're much bigger, they're much stronger in that sense,
and at some point size will win generally. This is
a massive size. When you take a look at the numbers,
I mean, the numbers are just crazy. So this is
what everybody was saying from the very beginning. And you
had some a few military analysts in the US, but

(52:54):
you also had people speaking out in India, which is
really not involved one way or the other. They weren't
on Russia side or NATO's side or whatever. They said, Yeah,
this is there's some way they're going to win this,
and they're going to fight them to the last Ukrainian,
which is really what the plan appears to be. We're
going to keep fighting until we've got no more Ukrainians
because what we want to do is we can Russia

(53:18):
and they're their puppets for doing that. And so you
know what Trump is saying here, the size disparity is
is so amazing, and this he realizes that about Venezuela.
That's why he's doing what he's doing in Venezuela. And
we talk about what Putin did in terms of invading Ukraine.
It's a lot easier to make a justification for that
than there is to make a justification for Trump's war

(53:39):
in Venezuela. After all, Ukraine was an area that was
part of Russia for four hundred years, and it was
split off after the Soviet Dish Union, and then it
has been a NATO cat's paw ever since.

Speaker 2 (53:57):
For all of that.

Speaker 3 (53:59):
Asked what would happen if Zelensky rejected the latest show's proposal,
the President said, well, he's going to have to get
on the ball and start accepting things, you know when
you're losing, because he is losing. So since the call
with President's envoys, Lensky has visited London, Brussels, and Rome
to shore up support from European allies for his little war.

(54:20):
The White House previously endorsed a twenty eight point plan
that demanded Ukraine unilaterally withdraw from his eastern don Bass
region of Dnsk and Leuhensk as the price end the war.
They don't have to withdraw, they're being thrown out, Ukrainian
negotiators warned this would be unacceptable, but they have not

(54:40):
ruled out seating territory as long as Russia is willing
to make a quote unquote reciprocal concession.

Speaker 2 (54:47):
What would that be.

Speaker 3 (54:49):
They think that they're going to get Russia to give
up land. This is beyond delusional. As a matter of fact,
the only guy who's really such an interesting character, he
never gets any exposure here in the United States, and
that's Alexey Arrestovich, the guy who was you know, when
Zelenski came to power in twenty nineteen, the civil war

(55:13):
had been going on the aftermath of the Cia coup.

Speaker 2 (55:16):
The civil war had.

Speaker 3 (55:17):
Been going on for five years, and they had been
shelling these cities that they're now so upset about the
fact that Russia is shelling these cities. And it doesn't
excuse Russia doing it. It was wrong for Russia to
do it is also wrong for Ukraine to do it.
But that been going on for five years.

Speaker 2 (55:34):
And so.

Speaker 3 (55:37):
Alexey Arrostovich, as the Zolensky government came in in twenty nineteen,
was part of a peace commission that was trying to
shut this thing down. He was the representative and he
comes back and was interviewed on Ukrainian television and the
reporter asked him, said, what's the chances of peace?

Speaker 2 (55:55):
He said none.

Speaker 3 (55:56):
She goes, oh, that's terrible. He goes, it gets worse.
He said, in three years, we're going to be at
war with Russia. And guess what Russia attacked in three years.
That's interesting, how do you know that exact timing? And
then she said that's horrible and he goes, yes, Ukraine
will be happocked in other words, it's going to be decimated.

(56:18):
But he goes the good news as we get into NATO.
Obviously she didn't care. Who would care about that except
a politician, And so he's just right out there.

Speaker 2 (56:25):
He tells everybody what's he's.

Speaker 3 (56:27):
Like Donald Trump, right, and then he goes ahead and
does these horrible things. And when they had at one
point in the war, if you recall, there were some
cruise missiles that are being sent in by Russia. They
were fired upon by Ukrainian defense forces and hit them
and one of them went creaning into an apartment building,
and they tried to make that about the Russians attacking civilians,

(56:51):
which the Ukrainian government had been doing for five years
before Lensky even got into office, and they continued to
do that. Ar Restovich went on television and said it
wasn't intentional. This thing went off course because we hit it,
and that got Selensky so upset that he fired him
because he was telling the truth in a very candid way. Well,

(57:16):
I mentioned all of this again because Restovich, it's said
about three or four months ago, if you recall, and I
talked about it briefly. He said there isn't any resolution
out of this. We're going to lose, so you need
to get out in front of this and cut the
best deal. And so he's been telling him the truth
all along. It may be evil what he is pushing.

(57:38):
You know, we just got to get into NATO, but
that is the reality. You know, they're losing and they
need to cut the best deal that they can while
they can. The longer they wait, the worst of the deal.
Ukrainian negotiators feel like they've not been offered sufficient details
about potential security guarantees from Washington in order to make
a decision over the territory keV has asked for that

(58:00):
would resemble NATO's Article five. In other words, they want
to guarantee that we will be dragged into a nuclear
war with Russia over some territorial dispute with them in Russia.
So Keir Starmer and Macron and Fred Mertz, maybe Ricky

(58:20):
Ricardo two, who knows. They get them all in there.
The Coalition of the Willing, that's what they call it. Yeah,
they're willing for what They're willing for a nuclear war.
And so these guys are pushing back against Trump and
they are supporting Zelensky and all of this last week
and a national security strategy document the US claimed that
Europe was facing civilizational erasure. And I read you excerpts

(58:45):
from that last week, and I was really surprised. It
has not really been reported on here in the United States.
They don't consider that to be newsworthy. I thought it
was very newsworthy, you know, laid everything out there, some
of that Trump is saying now. Whether or not they
will do it, I don't know. But it made the
case that Europe was weak, that it was committing suicide,

(59:08):
you know, attacking its own citizens in multiple ways, that
it couldn't stand, and that we didn't want to be
drugged down with it. It was reported. The only people
that I saw report that was Russia today. I mean
I looked, I didn't see anybody else with that out there.
Of course, Russia put that in there because it showed
a division between the US and Europe, and it was

(59:30):
a division that was, you know, big enough you could
you could drive an aircraft carrier through it.

Speaker 2 (59:37):
They're miles apart.

Speaker 3 (59:38):
Thirty three page document also blamed her for standing in
the way of Trump's efforts to end the Ukrainian Russian
War and called for renewed US relations with Moscow. During
the interview, Trump suggested European leaders would continue their support
for Ukraine's armed resistance aimlessly until they quote unquote, until

(59:58):
they drop unquote, or until they suffer a military defeat.
Trump said, European leaders quote talk, but they don't produce unquote.
He asked whether he thought the Europeans were doing the
right thing. He said, well, they can't be doing too
right because look at what's happened. The US President added.

(01:00:19):
The Europe's immigration policies had made the continent a different place,
he said, and if he keeps going that way, it's
going that Europe will not be in my opinion, many
of those countries will not be viable countries anymore. Their
immigration policy is a disaster, he said, and then he
singled out London and the leadership of Sadiq Khan. Well, absolutely,

(01:00:40):
but you know what these people are doing is deliberate.
They're bringing the barbarians into the gate to attack their
own people, and it's why they need to have war
in order to stay in power. A US national security strategy,
but rating Europe has triggered a wave of acrimony across
the Atlantic and in dismaying European officials who say the

(01:01:01):
document has turned the Trump administration's vitriol against European democracies
into formal policy. Well, the interesting thing is they're all
reporting about the reaction of the European leaders to this.
Guess what they're not doing. They're not showing you the document.
I mean, the document is something that you would see
from somebody like the French Nationalist Party or Tommy Robinson,

(01:01:25):
or it's criticized in the European government so strongly that
the mainstream media here and there don't.

Speaker 2 (01:01:32):
Want to report it. What's in the actual document.

Speaker 3 (01:01:35):
And this is a document that is drawn up by
the White House, the National Security Statement, So they will
talk about the reactions to it, but they won't show
you the document. It's a good document, right, so good
that I said, I don't think the Trump will follow
through on it, that he was just using this as
a negotiating tactic, strongly criticizing Europe and so forth to

(01:01:57):
make his case for thisotiation at Tensions erupted after the
US strategy painted the EU as a bigger threat than
Russia or China and said that Europe risks civilizational erasure
because of the immigrants and the progressive social policies. All
that is true, it really is a political suicide that's

(01:02:18):
being done there after that. Also, reacting to this document,
Macron has warned that the US could betray Ukraine in
a leaked call between the leaders. So they leaked this
out to Deshpiegel. Europe rallied around Zelensky and sharply criticized Washington. Well,

(01:02:39):
they demand war at any cost. Trump, however, is not
a peacemaker. He just wants to have a situation where
he's much bigger than the people he's attacking. He doesn't
want to have a war with Russia.

Speaker 2 (01:02:51):
Good.

Speaker 3 (01:02:52):
I hope that that is a reality. But he is
certainly not noble and he doesn't deserve a peace. He
is not a peacemaker. He is a warmonger if you
look at what it's going on with Venezuela. And of
course he made comments yesterday. I think it was in
this Politico interview that came out yesterday, also talking about well,

(01:03:13):
you know, Mexico and Colombia have got some drug problems too,
maybe we'll use the military against them. I mean, if
you want to actually make this about the war on
drugs to make it an actual war, those would be
the countries that you would be attacking, not Canada, not Venezuela.

Speaker 2 (01:03:29):
The question is.

Speaker 3 (01:03:32):
When will he use the drug war excuse in order
to use federal police to attack the cities, the cities that.

Speaker 2 (01:03:41):
He doesn't like.

Speaker 3 (01:03:43):
And that's the key, you know, That's why when I
did that Trump Apocalypse, that was really what it was about.

Speaker 7 (01:03:55):
This is the.

Speaker 8 (01:03:58):
Beautiful from this is the.

Speaker 1 (01:04:06):
H my only friend, the h.

Speaker 5 (01:04:12):
Oh love blos.

Speaker 4 (01:04:16):
The uh.

Speaker 1 (01:04:18):
Oh, the things, the uh.

Speaker 4 (01:04:24):
No sense no rouse, the end.

Speaker 1 (01:04:30):
I'll never look get to your Okay, sorry, I said crisis.
And we're going to straighten that one by what it's.

Speaker 8 (01:04:42):
There saying you're trying to take over the republic and
this is going to be a major part for some
of the people in this room.

Speaker 2 (01:04:47):
That's a war too, it's a war from within.

Speaker 7 (01:04:49):
I told Pete, we should use some of these dangerous
cities as training grounds for our military.

Speaker 4 (01:04:59):
Can you pitt you what?

Speaker 2 (01:05:04):
So sadly?

Speaker 9 (01:05:09):
Just really rely, also.

Speaker 5 (01:05:15):
Stranger, bitter, just real.

Speaker 3 (01:05:45):
Yeah, that's right, And you know that's my concern about
it is that all of this talk, and that's why
I put that in from the very beginning, I said,
this is, you know, this guy doesn't care what the
constitution says. And at the same time he you know,
he's doing this stuff with the cities he starts up Venezuela.
When I did that, that was in response to him

(01:06:07):
putting up his apocalypse now Maime, and I animated that,
and then I said, I think that where this he
wants to go with all this stuff is using his
federal police army of robots against people. And I really
do believe that now because if you look at the
justification for going against Venezuela, it's saying that the drug

(01:06:28):
war is going to really be a real war.

Speaker 4 (01:06:31):
Now.

Speaker 3 (01:06:32):
We've got to go after Mexico, We've got to go
after Columbia, we got to go after other countries that
don't have any drug trafficking. We'll go after them when
they say they're doing fenterral when they're not doing ventral.
And so we thought, PROJECTS says, so does America first
mean bombing Venezuela first? The neo cons are duping gullible

(01:06:53):
Americans again, and I think the drug war is one
of the biggest dupes that they have ever done. And
I think that they will use that they'll use it
for conflict in the different cities. And he will use
this as an excuse to federalize, to militarize, to use
artificial intelligence, surveillance, and police state. He will use the

(01:07:15):
drug war. This has been the favorite hobby horse of
government encroachment and destruction of the constitution since its inception
by Richard Nixon, and it will continue to be used
that way as US crumbles from within, the government is
using recycled propaganda to drag a gullible public into another

(01:07:35):
census war in order to protect their crumbling power. It's
the same thing's happening in Europe, same thing.

Speaker 2 (01:07:41):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:07:42):
They're crumbling from within, so they use a war to
distract people. So Washington is always busy cooking up the
next distraction, even though you've got a thirty eight trillion
dollar deficit. They call this one the Operations Southern Sphere.
They tell you it'ssary to save your children from fentanyl.

(01:08:02):
They tell you it's about freedom. But if you've been
paying attention for the last twenty years of American foreign policy,
you know exactly what it is. It's a smash and
grab robbery of the US Treasury disguised as a moral crusade.
The war drums beating in Venezuela are not new. They
were beating in twenty nineteen when Trump first threatened a
naval blockade under the twisted legal logic provided by the administration.

(01:08:27):
Secretary of War quote unquote Pete Hegseth recently proclaimed, we
have only just begun to kill narco terrorists or anybody
that they went to label as a terrorist. And of
course they're now saying that dealing drugs is the same
as violence. You know, the left said speech was violence,

(01:08:48):
the right saying drugs are violence. And they're both lying
to you for their own purposes. When a boat is
destroyed and men are left lobbying in the Caribbean, strafing
them as they beg for their lives is not defense.
It is an atrocity. But the facts do matter to

(01:09:09):
the war don't matter to the war machine. As many
freethinkers will recall, in two thousand and three, they told
us that Iraq had yellow cake uranium, remember that, and
aluminum tubes for nuclear weapons. It was all a lie.
In twenty eleven, US investor Susan Rice stood before the
world and claimed that Kaddafi was supplying his troops with

(01:09:31):
viagra to encourage mass rape. It was a sensationalist fabrication
used to manufacture consent for bombing campaign that turned Libya
into an open air slave market. I know, by the way,
the Sarcozzi guy out of France who just went to prison,
he had a lot to do with starting that, and
it was because of corruption. He was corrupt and getting

(01:09:52):
money from Gaddafi. They cut him off and he threatened him,
and he made good on his threat. So again goes
to jail. But they're gonna let him out, if they
haven't already. I think they're already talking about pardoning him
as soon as they put him in. While some Democrats
feign outrage at Trump's escalation, they're ignoring the uncomfortable truth.

(01:10:13):
Trump and heg Seth are cashing a blank check for
carnage that was written years earlier by Obama. As Jim
Bovard previously detailed, Obama laid the foundation for the very
extra judicial killings that were witnessing today. In twenty seventeen
farewell address, he boasted, Obama, did we've taken out tens
of thousands of terrorists. This is the same man who

(01:10:34):
has a candidate in two thousand and seven said we
will again set an example for the world that the
law is not the sub is not subject to the
whims of stubborn rulers unless it's him. Once in power, however,
the whims of the rulers became law. One question about
the killings on American teenager, Obama's former Press secretary Robert

(01:10:55):
Gibbs callously remarked, well, I would suggest that you should
have that he should have a far more responsible father.
Obama loaded the gun. Now Trump is firing off the rounds,
just like Trump loaded the syringe and Biden mandated the injections.
You see how it works left right, left right, and

(01:11:16):
it is bipartisan. They get everybody fighting over which tribe
and which color they are. Is so pathetic to look
at politics, it really is. Perhaps the most disappointing aspect
of this recycled war propaganda is a silence from those
who once claim to oppose it. In twenty nineteen, when
the first wave of regime changed rhetoric was aimed at Venezuela,

(01:11:39):
Taul C. Gabbard was one of the few voices of reason.
She correctly identified that US intervention would only lead to
quote death and destruction unquote. Today, as Director of National Intelligence,
Gabbard's silence is deafening and folks, she joins Pam Bondy,

(01:12:00):
Cash Betel, and Dan Bongino as a bunch of spineless careerists.
They're there just to feather their nests and to do
whatever the man in charge wants them to do. The
woman who famously destroyed La La Harris on a debate
stage where her prosecutorial overreach is now overseeing the very
intelligence apparatus that is feeding those lies to the American public.

(01:12:22):
It is a stark reminder that the problem isn't just
the people in charge, it is the machine itself. When
you step into the halls of power, you either grease
the gears of the war machine or you are crushed
by them. There is no middle ground, and the real threat,
if we want to look at it, is domestic. Just
like the EU. Trump wants a war that he can win.

(01:12:45):
The only difference is is that the EU doesn't really
care if they win the war. That's how suicidal they are.
So why Venezuela, Why now? Just look around you? The
US is collapsing from within. They have lied to us
about every major conflict since Vietnam. If your guy is
dropping bombs on innocent people based on a lie, your

(01:13:06):
guy is a tyrant. I don't care if he's a
donkey or an ephone, if he's red or blue or whatever.
Spread the truth. When your family or coworkers repeat the
Venezuela fentanyl narrative, show them the data, show them the history.
The war machine relies on your fear and your ignorance.
Deny them both of those things. I agree. Well, ram

(01:13:30):
Paul talking about this, he said, would you also shoot
them in the head? And this is what I've said
from the very first day. You know, when we interdict
drugs using the Coastguard, we have very specific procedures and
if they find the drugs, they take the drugs, and
they take the people, and they put them on trial

(01:13:51):
and they send them to jail. Well, what they're doing
now is not even determining if there's any drugs on
board and just executing everybody. So what if we had
a middle position where you actually go through the procedure
to make sure that this is not as they point out,
twenty five percent of the time, it's not innocent people.
So all, they really got drugs. So now we line

(01:14:12):
them up and shoot them in the head. Well, that
would still be wrong. And so they try to make
it into a war. They try to pretend that the
drugs are actually violence. There are a lot of things,
but they're not violenced directly like that. The President has
said earlier, about a week earlier, that he would have
no problem with a second video coming out. So this

(01:14:34):
was ram Paul being interviewed on Fox News. They said,
do you believe that it should be released? Senator He
says yes, without questions, said Rampaul, I think if people
were to see the images of people clinging to the wreckage,
there wouldn't be much sympathy for Secretary heaset to order
the killing of people who are shipwrecked. It is clearly
illegal according to military justice, according to our own military laws.

(01:14:58):
Excuse me, and he he said, And you know, I
have members of my staff who were high ranking in
the military. They tell me that this is done for
the protection of our soldiers. If our pilots have to
eject from a plane, we show that we don't shoot people.
We don't shoot pilots that are descending by parachute. If
we blow up a boat and they are survivors. We

(01:15:19):
don't shoot those people. We don't sidle up in a
boat and take a nine millimeters pistol out and shoot
them in the head. This is why folks I played
the Great Escape. I said, this is what's going on.
The people who are prisoners there in those Nazi Nazi
prisoner of war camps. They were pilots that had bailed

(01:15:40):
out and survived, and then after they escaped enough times
it became a pain in the behind to the Nazis.
They just said, okay, we've had enough of this. Take
them out of a field machine gun, he said, So
you're going to put a gun to their head and
shoot them. Nobody would do that. But just because the
missiles come from a long distance doesn't make it anymore right.

(01:16:02):
We're in the middle of a war with unarmed people.
Why don't they present evidence that they are even armed.
Why don't they present evidence that these boats are even
coming to the United States, Because the evidence is that
they're not. They're not capable of making that trip. And
what we have found, and as I said, it's so
reprehensible that some of these partisan cheerleaders are saying, you know,

(01:16:23):
just like Kelly, I want more of this. I want
them to suffer. And then you got people saying, well,
what if you know, they we went to rescue them,
and what if they pulled out a pistol and they
shot our brave Navy seals. Seriously, you don't think the
Navy seals can handle that. But they pull out a pistol.

(01:16:44):
These guys who are struggling to not drown for forty
one minutes, they can't even get this the flotsam that
they're in the midst of. They can't even get the
boat righted, so they have a chance to get back
to shore, and they're way at the plane that's coming in.
It took them out. It was murder, premeditated murder. They

(01:17:07):
talked about it for forty one minutes. He said, to
make a crime into a war is to stretch credibility
to the point that I think a lot of common
sense people are not going to buy this. And I
think that's why, you know, they didn't call it prohibition.
They called it drug war. He said, if the admiral
were there on the scene and he came in a
follow up boat, would he take out his nine millimeters

(01:17:29):
pistol and put it against the head of the survivors
and shoot them in the head. Paul said, it's easy
to sit here and say, oh, I just push a button.
I'm in an air conditioned room ten thousand miles away,
and I antiseptically blow these people up. But you know
a month later that they didn't do that because I
think somebody finally said, oh, you know what, we just

(01:17:52):
read the military justice law of justice, and we're not
supposed to kill survivors.

Speaker 2 (01:17:59):
And you know what they did.

Speaker 3 (01:18:00):
A month later they picked up two people who were
not from Venezuela. They did not prosecute them for drugs.
They collected no drugs, they collected no weapons. They just said, oh,
you can go back home. One out of four boats
that the Coastguard boarded before we came up with this
blow them out to Smithereen's policy, one out of four

(01:18:22):
did not have any drugs. So are we willing to
accept an air rate of one in four and to
kill people on these boats when they might be wrong
one in four times? I think that's a tragedy. So
that would mean that about if that ratio were to
hold up, that mean about five of the boats were
not doing drugs, And I see all over social media

(01:18:44):
people showing the black and white video that was taken
evidently by the Reaper drones or whatever it is that
they're using, and said, look they're going really fast, and
look they're throwing stuff out of the water. So I
guess they're throwing out lobster cages and all the rest
of stuff. Making fun of the fact that they're fishermen. Folks,
it doesn't matter really if they were fishermen or if
they were doing drugs. It's still murder. If they were

(01:19:07):
doing drugs, that crime does not carry the death penalty.
Let's imagine that no make up a crime. Let's say
you're doing shoplifting, okay, which is no longer even a
misdemeanor in California. But let's say that they treat it
for what it is, that it really is a crime,
and these people are not armed, but they have committed

(01:19:28):
a crime, and in every jurisdiction except California, for example,
they should be arrested and tried and jailed for shoplifting.
But let's say that your policy is then that you
just shoot them in the back. That's not justified, and
that's what they're doing. There is no law that says
there's a death penalty for moving cocaine in boats. And

(01:19:51):
while all that's happening, you most likely had the guy
running Pallanteer going to a presentation sky high on cocaine
and they do it. They get away with it. Hunter
Biden gets away with it. Nobody's going to execute Hunter
Biden with that stuff, right, He's got Secret Service protecting him.
But anyway, senator claims that Trump is sleepwalking US into

(01:20:13):
a war with Venezuela for oil. Well, that's what it
is all about. Chris Coon's Democrat Delaware, said, Trump and
heg Seth are sleepwalking the US into a war of
Venezuela just to get the country's oil. Yeah, this is
We're back to war as a racket. Smedley Butler. Coon's
call for more transparency on Trump's form boat strikes as

(01:20:35):
he fears the real motivation is to sparkle war between
venezuel and the US. Trump and others have accused the
Venezuelan president Maduro of heading an operation sending drugs in
the US. Well, it's just as absurd as a lie
that Canada was doing fentanyl. And if you want to
get at the people really behind the drug trade. Go
to the CIA, start arresting those people. You see the

(01:21:00):
strike that kills two individuals standing on top of a
floating piece of wreckage, waving at something, presumably the plane
that is closing in on them to kill them, and
the larger frame Coons saw the video. He said, the
larger frame here that matters is whether this entire undertaking
is a good use of the exquisite and expensive resources

(01:21:20):
of our special forces, whether these drugs were on their
way to the US at all, There's been no proof
of that, and whether this is the most effective way
to actually interrupt the cartels that are poisoning Americans with drugs.
I'm afraid that Hegseth and Trump are sleepwalking us into
Venezuela because they want the oil and gas of Venezuela.

(01:21:40):
That's right, they don't have Funchanel. They just happen to
have the world's largest known reserves of oil, bigger than
Saudi Arabia. And this is a twenty first century colonialism,
but it sets up a very very dangerous precedent, I think.
And that's the thing that really concerns me is how
he's he going to use this. Are we going to
have the the police taking the war on drugs and

(01:22:04):
making it a literal war. We've gotten pretty close to
that already. So Trump is sending shockwaves through Mexico and Colombia,
insinuating that they are also in his sites for the
quote unquote drug war. So he didn't rule out expanding
US military operations beyond Venezuela to the places where they're

(01:22:24):
actually doing the drugs. Mexico and Colombia president said an
interview tape this week that he would consider using military
force in those two countries. He cited Mexico and Colombia's
drug trade in the US as he continues threatening to
overthrow the Venezuelan government. Mexico is the primary country for
trafficking a variety of narcotics, including heroin, fentanyl, and cocaine

(01:22:48):
in the US. Colombia is the largest producer of cocaine,
Surewood said Trump when asked by Politico if he'd consider
using force against targets and other Latin American countries with
active drug trade. I don't rule it enter out. I
don't want to talk about it. I don't want to
talk to you about military strategy. Oh okay, so here

(01:23:09):
we pull the veil of unwarranted national security over this.
I can't talk to you about this. I'd have to
kill you two. Right, Is he planned to do this
as a sneak attack or is this simply going to
war against Mexico and Colombia as well? Is that going
to be another sneak attack against the Constitution as well
as the countries? He wants to do this to sneak

(01:23:30):
past Congress, the Constitution and we the people for his
dirty little wars. Trump recently pardoned former Honduran President Orlando Hernandez,
who had been convicted on multiple counts involving drug traffick,
and a lot of people called him out on the
stupidity of this. So how's this guy who really is
a drug trafficker?

Speaker 2 (01:23:50):
How is it that you.

Speaker 3 (01:23:51):
Pardoned him when you are coming after Maduro and you've
even got to make up a non existent organization, the
Cartel of the Sons or whatever. The Honduran president was
actually doing this, and so you pardon him, but you're
killing people that you say are part of a drug
organization that doesn't really exist. The president said he knew

(01:24:12):
very little regarding Hernandez's case, but he had been told
by very good people that Hernandez was targeted unfairly. Who
were the very good people? It turns out it was
Roger Stone working in there and lobbying on behalf of
this drug lord and from Honduras, and he had Trump's ear,

(01:24:35):
you know, the one that wasn't shot.

Speaker 2 (01:24:36):
I guess, and.

Speaker 3 (01:24:39):
Says, well, the pardon was seen as contradictory for a
president who's ostensibly fighting the drug war. Stone ran an
aggressive campaign for Hernandez, framing him as a casualty of
politically motivated legal attacks by the Honduran left and the
Biden administration. Well, you know, if Biden wants to put
him in jail, he must be a good guy.

Speaker 2 (01:24:57):
There you go. That kind of thinking works even Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:25:00):
I guess, as Roger Stone did that Rogerstone wants to
and I don't. I've made it pretty clear I don't
really have any respect for what Steve Mannon does at all.
And of course Steve Mannon testified against Roger Stone, and
Roger Stone is still not very happy about that, to
say the least. He just did like a WWE type

(01:25:23):
of thing, because all this politics is really like WWE.
But he was in the ring with an announcer, and
he was saying, yeah, I want to have a bare
knuckles cage fight with this guy, and only one of
us is going to be walking out Rogerstone. And it's like,
I don't know. It really is professional wrestling in so
many different ways, isn't it. But Trump administration is quietly

(01:25:47):
building plans for what would happen if Maduro were ousted
out of Venezuela. As they point out in this article
from CNN, you know, we went into a rocket collapse
so quickly. They didn't have a plan. It's like, Okay,
we won, Now what do we do two thousand and three? Oh,
I don't know. We'll just stick around for a while,
I guess. So what do they do then? If they win?

(01:26:08):
Do they then march on to Colombia? Do they march
on to Mexico? What do they do? Or do they
just stop when Exon gets all the oil? I'm not
really sure what the endgame is here, right. So the
options for what the US action could look like to
fill a power vacuum stabilize the country if Maduro voluntarily
leaves a part of the negotiated departure or is forced

(01:26:29):
in leaving after the US strikes on targets inside Venezuela
or the direct action. Well, here's what's going to happen.
It's going to be a long war, asymmetric war, guerrilla
war that's going to be happening there. They will get
some people there in Venezuela that were on their side,
and then you'll have a massive number of them as
they're running death squads for the CIA against their enemies

(01:26:49):
and things. Same thing will happen that happened in Afghanistan,
and we'll wind up being flooded with Venezuelan immigrants and
some of these people who have been trained as by
the CIA dust squads will wind up being just like
this guy that killed a couple of National Guard people
in Washington called a week or two ago. That's why

(01:27:09):
this is all going to happen. We've seen this movie before,
you know it. It's pretty amazing when you look at Hollywood,
they've lost the ability to come up with anything original.
It's all just remakes one way or the other. And
that's the way it is a politics. But one of
the reasons they do it for politics is that it
works and they can keep doing the same lies over

(01:27:31):
and over again. So Marchie Tayler Green says that she's
going to vote no on the NDAA because of the
foreign aid spending that is in it, arguing that the
legislation directs US taxpayer dollars towards foreign age. She said,
and so that is, you know, she points out the

(01:27:52):
deficit that Trump doesn't want to talk about, the deficit
over what the government is spending and what it takes
in the thirty eight two point thirty nine trillion, And
so she says, I worry spending too much money.

Speaker 2 (01:28:05):
We got.

Speaker 3 (01:28:06):
The NDAA is filled with America's hard earned tax dollars
being used to fund foreign aid and foreign countries' wars.
These American people are thirty eight trillion dollars in debt,
suffering from a affordability crisis, on the verge of a
healthcare crisis, a credit card debt crisis, at all time high.

(01:28:26):
Funding foreign aid and foreign wars in America last and
is beyond excuse anymore. I would love to fund our military,
but I refuse to support foreign aid and foreign militaries
and foreign wars. I'm here and will be voting no.
Nobody ever votes no for the NDAA. They throw the
kitchen sink in there to get this thing through. Such

(01:28:47):
a sure thing. So I'm glad she's doing that because
we look at it. We got money for Taiwan. They're
offering authorizing up to a billion dollars for Taiwan Security
Cooperation Initiative for next year. For Israel, they have put
in five hundred million for Israeli missile defense, eighty million
for US Israel Anti tunnel cooperation, fifty million for US

(01:29:10):
Israel Anti drone cooperation. And I don't know why they
put this in here by this particular production, because there's
a lot more that is going to Israel. It's going
several billion dollars going there, Baltic Security Initiative, millions of
dollars as a matter of fact, one hundred and seventy
five million dollars of security assistance for Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia,

(01:29:31):
overseas humanitarian disaster and civic aids. Authorizing one hundred and
three million dollars for the Department of Defense Humanitarian Assistance
Program for next year. All this stuff is there, and
she has had to go to war against, of course,
Mike Johnson, who wants to rubber stamp all this as
all of these speakers in the House do just an

(01:29:52):
example of the stuff. It's not just the foreign stuff,
it's what's happening here in America as well. Technocracy dot com.
You know, we look at DARPA, what is that that's
attached to the Pentagon, to the defense stuff, and what
are the things that they're doing. Like we talked about yesterday,
the horrific projects about mind control that now are no

(01:30:14):
longer simply about drugs and electromagnetic frequencies. It's now about
brain computer interfaces and things like that. So the brain
weapons that target perception, memory, and behavior, where are those
coming from. It's coming from DARPA and the funding that's
in the NDAA. This is not national security. This does

(01:30:34):
not make our country safer. It is a threat to
our country. This is the state of the art science
of social engineering developed through technocracy, says Patrick Wood. And
actually this is an article from Daily Mail that he
picked up that he prefaced it. He said, I've been
warning about this for twenty years. Convergence science like the

(01:30:58):
NBIC two thousand and Obama as Brain Initiative, he says
that was twenty thirteen. He said these were pitched as
cures for disease. In reality, the military and the spook
organizations were working in the shadows to scoop up mind
altering technologies that could be used to control entire populations.

(01:31:19):
And that is true not just to the brain projects
and brain computer interfaces. That's true of the Internet, and
it is especially true of artificial intelligence. We've got some
comments here, Travis. You want to read.

Speaker 5 (01:31:32):
Those absolutely, Let's see B T Tailor two four six.
Because if the Constitution could be twisted and perverted like
it is now, isn't that just proof it is a
worthless document. Well, everything can be twisted in perverse.

Speaker 2 (01:31:47):
That's right. It is.

Speaker 3 (01:31:49):
As Russell Means said, he worked with the American Indians
movement and he had a book called Where White Men
to Tread, and it began it by saying, the federal
government has broken every treaty that they ever made with
the Indians. He said, white man, the Constitution is a

(01:32:13):
federal government's treaty with you. They've broken every aspect of it.
What are you going to do about it? That's the
reality of it. And I think it's important to talk
about the Constitution because we have to show people need
to understand what this government is and how criminal it is.
Every person in government, and doesn't matter if it's the

(01:32:33):
federal government, state government, or local government, they all swear
to pull the constitution. When they violate the constitution, when
they oppose the constitution, when they act and utter disregard
of it, they have lost their authority. That's the key thing.
And so you've got a lot of situations where that
comes up, and we need to refuse to.

Speaker 2 (01:32:58):
Obey that.

Speaker 3 (01:32:59):
We understand that they have a lot of power, but
they don't have authority. So we pick our battles. But
we need to understand what crooks they are. That's why
we talk about the constitution because these people are oath
breaking crooks. That's the bottom line.

Speaker 5 (01:33:16):
We have Marquee Mark and New Jersey says speedboats are
used to either take drugs to or from a ship
or drop point. They're used for the first or final
leg of transporting the drugs. A ship or plane takes
the drugs most of the way.

Speaker 2 (01:33:28):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:33:29):
And they said in these hearings when the admiral was
talking about it, he said, I think what was it.
I can't remember the country that he said it was
going to, but he said no, it wasn't going to
the US. It was going to this particular in.

Speaker 5 (01:33:40):
Europe, I believe, I think maybe France.

Speaker 3 (01:33:42):
Well that was going to be the ultimate destination, but
there was there was a country there in the Caribbean
that it was headed for, and then from there it
would be sent to France. And so they even admit, A,
it's not fentanyl. B it's not coming to America. Those
ships were not coming to America. We've known that all long,
and you'll still see these cheerleaders out there writing stuff

(01:34:03):
about that and saying, oh, they're going to kill Americans
with all that stuff. It's crazy, It really is.

Speaker 5 (01:34:08):
Cleatis five five five says, can we send you guys
Christmas gifts to the peel box that you have listed?

Speaker 2 (01:34:15):
Oh, that's really nice.

Speaker 3 (01:34:16):
As a matter of fact, somebody we've got on Travis's chair,
since Travis was going to be doing the the producing today,
we've got on the chair here, very nice blanket here.
They came from the We have a listener who is
a supporter on Subscribe Star and every year, I think

(01:34:38):
he's close by where the Jimmy Stewart Museum is, and
every year he would send us a it's wonderful life
ornament and we really do appreciate those. It's really nice.
And so we draped the carpet over here and not
the carpet the rug. I'm sorry, and he can't quite
see it, but it's the iconic picture that's kind of

(01:35:00):
on the cover of the movie. Can you pull that in, Travis,
Do you have that where you can show people a
little bit of that? But anyway, he sent that, I
want to thank him. That was really nice and we
do appreciate that. We've had several people sent to us
Christmas gifts. We try to acknowledge them.

Speaker 5 (01:35:15):
Go ahead, Yes, thank you very much.

Speaker 4 (01:35:17):
And I want to make sure.

Speaker 5 (01:35:18):
I don't know if I said it, but thank you
Marky Mark. We appreciate the tip as well. Yes, And
Jerry Altalo says, I always wait until the last moment
for Christmas shopping so I can get into fistfights with
very large women over the last items on the shelves. Well,
you know, however you spend your holidays, I suppose tis
the season to give rights, rights and lefts. So yeah, Zanovonte,

(01:35:42):
seventeen seventy six. The founder's admitition to avoid entangling alliances
stems primarily from George washington seventy ninety six Farewell address,
in which he stated, it is our true policy to
steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the
foreign world. Thomas Jefferson echoed this sentiment is eighteen oh
one inaugural address declaring peace, commerce, and honest friendship with

(01:36:04):
all nations, entangling alliances with none.

Speaker 2 (01:36:08):
That's right.

Speaker 5 (01:36:08):
That's right, and don't frag me. Bro says, regardless of
the evidence that the US government may or may not have,
is not an excuse or reason to be judge, jury,
an executioner period.

Speaker 2 (01:36:18):
That's right. That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:36:20):
Everything about this It's like, you know, so what if
you weren't lying to us, which you know you're lying
to you still don't have the authority to kill these
people without any due process. Even if you pretend that
you have legal justification for your drug work, which you
don't have. Even if you pretend that these people are
bringing this stuff to the US, which they're not. Even
if you pretend it's fentanyl, which now they've admitted it
was not, you still don't have the authority to just

(01:36:42):
shoot and kill them. And you don't have a war
going and you don't have a conflict going, and you
don't have a threat that is going. All of it
is a lie. As Audi would say with his podcast,
that's the title of his podcast, It's all a lie.

Speaker 5 (01:36:57):
Everything is a lie.

Speaker 2 (01:36:58):
Damn.

Speaker 5 (01:36:58):
It is the end of the podcast. To find that
on Rumble as well. Yeah, we haven't seen Audi for
a few days. He's probably very busy with everything, so
hope he's doing all right.

Speaker 2 (01:37:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:37:07):
Yeah, and now we have defy tyrants seventeen seventy six.
Christians love Gabbard and she's a Hindu communist loll.

Speaker 2 (01:37:19):
Go figure.

Speaker 3 (01:37:20):
Yeah, people just don't seem to be able to suss
this stuff out. It's amazing to me.

Speaker 5 (01:37:24):
We live in strange times. Yeah, real, Jason Barker says,
Venezuela is about sending the message to Mexico that they
still need to pay for the wall.

Speaker 2 (01:37:34):
You know.

Speaker 3 (01:37:35):
Going back to the Tulsa Gabbard thing, it's not just
that she's a Hindu. She's a part of that radical
Hindu party that Modi, the Prime Minister or president whatever
his title is. They are engaged in a lot of
religious murder against Christians, against Sikhs, you name it. And

(01:37:57):
so and she is very connected politically to Modi and
DO political party in India. So yeah, it gets even
worse than that.

Speaker 4 (01:38:07):
Very much.

Speaker 5 (01:38:07):
So it seems that Christians generally are the only ones
that are interested in providing religious liberty to other groups.
And when you have the truth on your side, you
can freely say, you can believe what you want if
the truth always wins. If you don't have the truth,
it takes a lot of enforcement, a lot of crushing

(01:38:28):
of dissenting ideas.

Speaker 3 (01:38:30):
Yeah, if you know that you're lying to people, that's
when you get into the censorship stuff. Right, you don't
want to have that debate if you feel like the
truth is on your side. I think it was Augustine
they said the truth doesn't need to be defended, it
needs to be unleashed.

Speaker 5 (01:38:42):
Yeah, the truth is like a lion that need to
be defended. It just needs to be unchained.

Speaker 3 (01:38:47):
That's right, that's right, And that's why I feel the
way that I do so strongly about free speech. We
just need to let that lion loose because other people
are liars and they're not lions.

Speaker 2 (01:38:59):
They're liars, So big difference.

Speaker 5 (01:39:01):
Yeah, Mark Young twelve says, when you blame the constitution
instead of those violating it. You're barking up the wrong tree.

Speaker 2 (01:39:08):
That's right.

Speaker 5 (01:39:08):
And I've said this many times before. I'm I'm sure
I'm paraphrasing someone else, but the law of the land
is always effectively whatever the people will tolerate. It does
not matter what's on paper. Governments immediately and always start
working towards their own end goals. They don't really care
what the law is, just what they can get away with.

Speaker 2 (01:39:27):
That's right.

Speaker 1 (01:39:28):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:39:29):
Well, we're going to take a quick break and when
we come back, we're talking about a very important Supreme
Court win. It's a win for those of us who
want to have freedom of religion. And this is something
that the Amish were fighting. This fight.

Speaker 2 (01:39:45):
I'm talking about this when we come back, won't be
right back.

Speaker 9 (01:39:47):
That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sail
on silver and goal.

Speaker 5 (01:39:54):
Trump euphoria has caused a zip and shelver and goal.

Speaker 9 (01:39:59):
It's time to some medals with vat dolls before they
come to there. Since is go to David Knight dot
Gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself,
Tony Harterburn. He knows where to look to find Silver
and Gold.

Speaker 2 (01:40:27):
Yug beat.

Speaker 10 (01:40:31):
I wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot com
for just thirteen ninety nine.

Speaker 4 (01:40:41):
There's right in the.

Speaker 8 (01:40:41):
Second four o there say would you wish George? Well,
not just one wish a little hat flog.

Speaker 10 (01:40:50):
First, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase
the Christmas Night Album.

Speaker 4 (01:40:54):
Then I'm gonna listen.

Speaker 8 (01:40:55):
To Christmas classics like are you gonna throw it on?
I want the Christmas Night Album.

Speaker 3 (01:41:00):
Two.

Speaker 2 (01:41:02):
Hey, that's pretty good.

Speaker 8 (01:41:08):
Hello, girls, can't you come.

Speaker 4 (01:41:10):
Out to me?

Speaker 5 (01:41:10):
Can't you come come?

Speaker 10 (01:41:13):
David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
like God Rest You Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
all new, I'll be home for Christmas.

Speaker 5 (01:41:24):
What do you want?

Speaker 4 (01:41:25):
You want the moon?

Speaker 8 (01:41:27):
Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
pug down, I'll take it and what and then I'll
buy you your own download of David Knight's Christmas Night
Album to.

Speaker 1 (01:42:09):
The you're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:43:09):
You know that Silver and.

Speaker 3 (01:43:09):
Gold commercial has early aged pretty well? It really was
on sale a year ago. We could see that. And
there's a lot of people talking about how they're picking
and making their justification for why gold should go to
five thousand or even ten thousand. Several different articles about
people making the case for a ten thousand dollars gold
looking at historical evaluation. And I think it is still

(01:43:34):
not a bubble, but it is a response to bubbles
that are out there. But yeah, people got it last year,
they got it on sale, they got the silver says
it's that one hundred percent game this year.

Speaker 2 (01:43:48):
You got your silver. If you got it last year,
you got it that fifty.

Speaker 3 (01:43:50):
Percent off, and nearly that good on the on the gold,
which is up like sixty percent or something. Silver just hit.
I'm high going over sixty. But let's talk about what
happened in the Supreme Court. This is still very important
to a lot of us. A group of Amish parents
challenged the state of New York's vaccine mandates for schools,

(01:44:14):
ruling that the Appeals Court must reconsider the case. Today's
ruling could have implications for other states that don't allow
religious exemptions. Set attorneys. I almost want to call up
Elan Derschwitz and say hey read this. He was the
one who was saying, yeah, we could have vaccine mandates.
We could force you to take this stuff. And I

(01:44:34):
mean mandates, you know, not just saying you're going to
lose your job. That's send the police out, drag you
out of your house, and force that into your arm.

Speaker 2 (01:44:41):
And he goes.

Speaker 3 (01:44:42):
And you want to fight me in the Supreme Court.
I'd take you to the Supreme Court and I'd win.
Don't think so, Dershowitz. The US Supreme Court today yesterday
reversed a lower court decision against a group of Amish
parents and school leaders who challenged the state of New
York's vaccine mandates for schools. Appeals court must reconsider the case.

(01:45:03):
Today's ruling could have implications for other states that don't
allow religious exemptions. So again, vers this lower court case.
They said, they asked the Supreme Court. The people who
were finding this asked the Supreme Court to hear the
case Miller versus McDonald. After the US Court of Appeals

(01:45:23):
for the Second Circuit dismissed the lawsuit in March, they said,
we're not even going to listen to it. And so
typically what would happen is, you know, they would make
a ruling and somebody might appeal it from there to
the Supreme Court. But they said, we're not even going
to consider it. We're going to let the lower court
decisions stand. And so these people appealed directly to the
Supreme Court. Supreme Court said, no, you're going to hear
the case, which is kind of strong because it might

(01:45:47):
mean should mean that they're going to rule in the
favor of religious freedom. This is huge, said one of
the lawyers, because another case, Mamod versus Taylor, the Supreme
Court decision released in June, negated the Second Circuit's legal
arguments for denying the Miller plaintiffs the right to a

(01:46:08):
religious exemption. All the reasons basically that the Second Circuit
cited to say they weren't giving relief were overturned in
that case my Mood versus Tailor, so I don't see
any way the Second Circuit could uphold the dismissals. By
vacating the dismissal, the Supreme Court signaled that the Mood
precedent applies to vaccine cases. My mood provides incredibly broad

(01:46:33):
protection to parental religious rights infringed by school policies. For decades.
A problem with religious protection has been a case called Smith,
where the Supreme Court said, you don't actually get First
Amendment protection for the exercise religion until you can prove
that the law is burdening your religion, that that law

(01:46:53):
is either not neutral in other words, it's targeted just
to your particular religion, or it's not generally applic Since
vaccine mandates applied everyone and aren't issued against a specific religion,
it's been challenging for those seeking religious exemptions to obtain protection.
Lawyers have had to argue that there are certain exceptions

(01:47:13):
to that rule. Well, you and I know that if
you are forcing somebody to do something violates their conscience,
I don't care if it's a general rule out there
for everybody or not. That to me, these kinds of
legal distinctions are like arguing how many angels fit on
the head of a pen. It doesn't make any difference,
and you're missing the bigger picture here. So in another

(01:47:35):
case Wisconsin versus Yoda, Amish families didn't send their kids
to high school because it violated their religious beliefs. They said,
even though the high school requirement is also neutral and
generally applicable, the parents are still able to get strict
scrutiny of that and get constitutional protection, So they cited

(01:47:56):
the Wisconsin versus Yoda cases as justification for the Second
Circuit to grant the New York Amish parents and school
leader's relief from the state's vaccine mandate for school entry.
The Second Circuit disagreed, arguing the Ooder exception applied only
to the exact situation detailed in that case. The Mamod

(01:48:19):
versus Taylor case was about parents being able to opt
out out of LGBT themed elementary school books elementary school
due to their religious beliefs. The Yoder exception basically applies
anytime parents have religious objection to a school policy, even
if that school policy is neutral and generally applicable. That

(01:48:41):
means that the Yoder case can be used as a
potent legal argument in vaccination contexts. That's what the Supreme
Court did today by vacating by nullifying the Second Circuit's
decision in Miller and ruling that the Second Circuit has
to undo its decision and light of these other cases.
Decision comes amid a litany of lawsuits seeking to restore

(01:49:04):
religious exemption rights. So HHS announced last week that it
is investigating a complaint that a Midwestern school disregarded a
valid religious exemption and failed to get parental consent and
vaccinated a student against the wishes of the parents. Today,

(01:49:24):
we're putting pediatric medical professionals on notice that you cannot
sideline parents, said rfk jor HHS secretary. When providers ignore
parental consent, violate exemptions to vaccine mandates, or keep parents
in the dark about their children's care, we will act decisively.

(01:49:45):
We will use every tool in our disposal to protect
families and restore accountabilities. So that's all good news. That's
really good news. Meanwhile, as we heard Alex Newman talk
about the COP thirty conference, they call that COP is
called Conference of the Parties. It's the UN's climate nonsense.

(01:50:07):
And they had the thirtieth one there in Brazil.

Speaker 2 (01:50:10):
Alex K.

Speaker 3 (01:50:11):
Newman was there and one of the things that he
was talking about was how much pagan religion and phony
Christianity was on display there as they worshiped the environment.
And this article is from American Greatness, said the god
spend on Climate Change, inspired by the UN's thirtieth conference.

(01:50:34):
The COP thirty wrapped up last month with an offering
of the usual suspect socialist solutions for the acolytes to advocate.
But it wasn't just that it was, and it wasn't
just the fact that you know, California is there, Newsom
is there in Brazil telling everybody we're still in with

(01:50:55):
all this stuff. But unfortunately, they said, there's also a
substantial Christian presence of the Climate Conference through organizations like
Christian Climate Observer's Program CCOP. They should have come up
with a different acronym, call them kooks or something. They said,

(01:51:15):
we report back to our constituencies, to our church's denomination, schools, network, etc.
About what we observe in an attempt to more effectively
mobilize everyone for climate action. Well have they done?

Speaker 2 (01:51:28):
They have.

Speaker 3 (01:51:29):
This is a church organization that you know, just like
the Pope blessing a block of ice and things like that.
They have elevated this climate stuff to their own pagan
religion and they have replaced Christ with their climate religion.
A climate observer who is a follower of Jesus or
is observing on behalf of a Christian denomination or an
NGO has additional responsibilities. They said, we believe, namely that

(01:51:54):
we have to interpret what they observe through a biblical framework,
and we have to act prophetically and priestly. They said,
this person says, Heaven help us Christian's witnessing for climate
salvation to more effectively mobilize everybody for climate action. Compromising
with the world for Christ by putting a Jesus spend

(01:52:15):
on highly dubious eminent collapse of God's bountiful creation is
nowhere near preaching the truth of the Gospel. That's right,
Christian enthusiasm for secular, disputable solutions. This is all about
politics and money, folks, has nothing to do with religion.
I know that they're religious about it, but it has
nothing to do with Christ. And even performative exercises like

(01:52:38):
the Pope's blessing of a trunk of ice do not
advance the good news of Christ. It's just more idolatry.
This time is done for climate change. Other people do
it for other issues. Which brings us to this strange
thing that we saw happening with Mike Huckabee in Israel.

(01:52:58):
This organization called Friends of Zion, and they flew in
one thousand pastors into Israel. But as we pointed out
this Friends of Zion organism. It's an organism, not an organization.
It's like a parasite. It is a part of the

(01:53:18):
Israeli government, and it works with the idea if it
works with the tourist ministry, it works with various organizations
to promote Israel, and that is its sole purpose. And
yet how do they do it. They do it by
coming to getting Christians to get to get them to

(01:53:39):
support the Israeli government, the political organization, and making them
think that they are somehow supporting an entity that is
a following God. That's not the issue at all. It
is a secular government that is involved in an unjust war.

Speaker 2 (01:53:58):
That's it.

Speaker 3 (01:53:59):
And they're getting a lot of money and a lot
of support from people like Mike Cookabee. So the title
of the sop ed piece here from JD. Hall is
Mike Cookabee's thirty shekel summit. He said, as a joke,
he said, well, Judas got thirty pieces of silver, all
these guys gets a fruit basket and air.

Speaker 2 (01:54:20):
An airline ticket to go back and forth. So again.

Speaker 3 (01:54:27):
It's pandering to people and politicians so they can make
their career. That is the religion of Mike Cookabee, the
state of Israel was an act of worship, a kind
of political tithe paid in the currency of silence, and
that spell is breaking. The desperate spectacle in Jerusalem where
a thousand pastors are flown in to a government managed

(01:54:48):
narrative chamber and instructed by Ambassador Huckabee to ignite their
pulpits on behalf of a foreign state. Expose the machinery
behind the myth. This is not a ministry. This was
an influence operation. There was a culmination of decades of
pressure campaigns, propaganda pipelines, curated tours, paid influencers, and the

(01:55:09):
Friends of Zion network that disguises political lobbying as Christian devotion.

Speaker 2 (01:55:16):
And so.

Speaker 3 (01:55:18):
It is a propaganda apparatus that's been built by this
guy whose last name is Evans. As a matter of fact,
this is what happened with this situation, and I'm trying
to find it looks like, oh, I know it's right here.

Speaker 2 (01:55:37):
Here we go.

Speaker 6 (01:55:38):
Israeli leaders encourage the pastors to be bold and express
gratitude for their support.

Speaker 1 (01:55:44):
Stand up and be counted, Tell the truth, Speak to
young people, speak up and be counted.

Speaker 2 (01:55:50):
I'm counting on you. Tell them about Christ. No, that's
not what I want some time, that's what our destined.

Speaker 3 (01:55:55):
Tell them about my government and my war.

Speaker 11 (01:55:58):
This is a fight for civilization. We're facing very much
a civilizational struggle like we saw in the thirties between
Nazism and the free world. Today that Nazism is Islamism
in coordination with Communism, which today's expression is called woke,
but it's the same thing.

Speaker 2 (01:56:16):
Behind the scenes.

Speaker 6 (01:56:17):
Sierra Mills of the Friends of Zion Museum help make
the summit possible.

Speaker 2 (01:56:22):
Never been done before.

Speaker 8 (01:56:24):
This is something very unique, very difficult, but here we are.

Speaker 4 (01:56:30):
From my point of view.

Speaker 3 (01:56:31):
It's miraculous division going forward recruiting ten thousand more pastors
in the next thirty six months.

Speaker 11 (01:56:39):
Because there's a lot of misinformation out there.

Speaker 12 (01:56:42):
A lot of young people that are not for Israel,
and they're just getting the wrong information.

Speaker 2 (01:56:49):
So our whole.

Speaker 12 (01:56:50):
Idea here is to reach the youth.

Speaker 8 (01:56:53):
Of America and around the world and just show the truth.

Speaker 12 (01:56:56):
With a thousand pastors gathered at such a critical moment
for the nation of Israel, when anti Semitism is rising
in our nation and class.

Speaker 3 (01:57:06):
It's not anti Semitism, it's anti Israeli government, Anti Nettan,
Yahoo is them. We're sick and tired of the unjust
wars and the murder, and we're sick and tired of
you trying to co opt people who say that they
are pastors. These people are not pastors, they're impostors. They're impastors.
I guess we could call them. But you know this

(01:57:28):
is they want to have ten thousand of them, That's
the amazing thing, not just a thousands.

Speaker 7 (01:57:33):
Stop.

Speaker 2 (01:57:34):
This is the guy and I want evans something.

Speaker 13 (01:57:39):
A decade ago, when I started this, I had a
vision of establishing an ambassador program to commission impostors to
become ambassadors impostors. Israel I wrote the curriculum, and just
in the last month, the Prime Minister of Israel has
approved the program. He's going to sign the diplomas, he's
going to speak of their graduation, graderation, and the Chief

(01:58:03):
of staff here is going to be flying the pastors
to Israel for this ceremonies. So he's our partner in
this new initiative, this ambassador program.

Speaker 3 (01:58:15):
Senagogue of Satan, the people who say that they're Jews
and they're not. And course he also had this to say,
that he was so he was born to defend the Jews,
he said.

Speaker 7 (01:58:26):
I'm born to defend all the Jews. Now, you wrote
in your newspaper yesterday that this guy converts Jews. That's
complete bs. Somebody did.

Speaker 3 (01:58:39):
He doesn't want tell anybody about Christ. I he rejects Christ.

Speaker 7 (01:58:43):
My life to defend the Jewish people, and.

Speaker 3 (01:58:47):
He won't defend Christ to Christians.

Speaker 2 (01:58:49):
That's all I do.

Speaker 4 (01:58:50):
I do it full time.

Speaker 7 (01:58:51):
And I've got twenty two death threats on me right
now from crazies for doing it. And my son has
them on him too. And I'll tell you why why
is this going on? Well, wait a second before I
get into my thing, I've got to make an apology.
I want to personally apologize to not Tally Bennett because

(01:59:17):
I used some very harsh statements and some very rude
language and that wasn't right.

Speaker 3 (01:59:23):
Gravel to him, that's right. The pastors were whined and welcomed,
shepherded from a site to site. They were ushered into
auditoriums where every camera angle, every applause line had been
choreographed long before their charter planes ever lifted off of
American soil. It was not a pilgrimage. It was a
state engineered influence operation. The scent of propaganda clung to

(01:59:45):
the proceedings like incense burning in the wrong temple. That's
who this guy is. Then came Mike Huckabee, who carries
himself less like an emissary of America and more like
a press secretary hired to read the cue cards from
the cannet steps. He attacked critics, He chastised those who
dared to question Israeli military actions. He rebuked those who

(02:00:07):
refused to treat the foreign policy of an unbelieving nation
as a sacrament. And these pastors, I'll call them impostors, cheered.

Speaker 2 (02:00:18):
They swallowed a.

Speaker 3 (02:00:19):
Narrative that's been prepared for them with the same meticulous
care that goes into polishing state propaganda for foreign consumption.
What actually occurred in Jerusalem was the culmination of a
coordinated state to church influence pipeline that has been quietly
expanding for years. They've got a thousand of them this time,
they want to get ten thousand the next time. The

(02:00:40):
Friends of Zion complex sits at the center of that pipeline,
built in partnership with the Ministry of Jerusalem and heritage
promoted by the Ministry of Tourism and working in cooperation
with the Israeli Defense Forces. The Israeli government describes the
Friends of Zion as a quote strategic asset for public diplomacy,
also known as state propaganda. Friends of Zion serve as

(02:01:04):
the go between between Yahou's government and the Little Old
Ladies and the Bible Belt, whose both tax and tith
dollars support Israel's war. Huckabee's speech was only visible was
the only visible surface of the deep state operation which
Israel used an American funded Christian institution as a turnkey

(02:01:27):
propaganda platform for shaping the perceptions of America's evangelical voting block.
The fingerprints of state coordination and visible everywhere. Israeli officials
control the itinerary, the messaging, the emotional pacing, even the
storyboards of suffering that were presented to the visitors. The pastors,
after getting generous gift passkets resembling those given at a

(02:01:49):
Hollywood Awards show, were escorted through Southern communities, shown military
vetted presentations, and fed testimonies selected by government liaisons trained
in information warfare. Meanwhile, the realities that contradict the propaganda
were systematically hidden. No one showed them the charred remains
of the Baptist and Orthodox churches in Gaza. No one

(02:02:12):
explained that Israel continues to deny the right of return
to ethnic Jews who believe in Jesus. That's how much
they hate Christ. No one disclosed the missionary visas are
routinely denied, and that evangelistic literature is confiscated at the border,
or that arrest for prosetizing spike whenever political pressure mounts.

(02:02:37):
What they received is not revelation but choreography. It was
not a pilgrimage, but it was a simulation. It was
crafted by a state apparatus that has learned how to
turn Christian goodwill into geopolitical leverage. Anyone with eyes to
see understood the message that Israel is losing its grip
on evangelical imagination. Polls inside in the US have tracked

(02:03:00):
a steep decline in automatic evangelical support for Israel, especially
among younger believers. You have to look at the fundamental issues.
The moral issues are very clear. That's what we use
to formulate the ideas of an unjust war. And don't
overturn that with your ideas about what you think prophecy

(02:03:23):
should look like. It is a completely backwards way of
understanding the Bible. This public diplomacy has been weaponized against
the conscience of the Church, and I think their desperation
to censored descent, their desperation to censor even ethnic Jews

(02:03:44):
who've accepted Christ as Messiah. I think that speaks more
loudly than anything that could be said. At the center
of their weapons sits their Friends of Zion. And that
guy Evans, who obviously is a disbeliever, believed Christ, he
would want to and if he really liked Jews, and

(02:04:05):
if you believed Christ, he would not have said what
he had to say. Friends of Zion is the branding
arm of the Israeli government. So then Huckabee I didn't
realize this. I didn't know Huckabee's background. But during the
last during the nineteen eighties, writes J. D. Hall, when

(02:04:28):
the Southern Baptist Convention was locked and its defining struggle
over the inerrancy of scripture, Huckabee did not stand with
the conservatives who fought to reclaim the seminaries and the
institutions from theological drift. Huckabee was elected in Arkansas as
the preferred candidate of the Moderates, the faction that sought
compromise rather than confrontation and resisted the efforts to restore

(02:04:53):
biblical authority within the denomination. While others spent years battling
for doctor fidelity, battling for what the Bible actually says,
against administrators and professors who denied the very foundations of
the faith, Huckabee made his name as a conciliator, as
a conciliator who avoided the hard fights. A politician, he

(02:05:16):
never mustered the kind of ferocity when the Bible itself
was on trial. Yet in Jerusalem he roared like a
zealot on behalf of a foreign government. The man who
once declined to risk capital for scripture now spent his
capital defending a modern state that rejects the Messiah, rejects

(02:05:37):
Christian evangelism, and treats belief in Jesus's grounds for legal exclusion.

Speaker 6 (02:05:42):
I often say to people here in Israel, and I
say it to people in the US. The partnership we
have is an important one for Israel, but it is
equally important for the United States. Yes, and it is
part of the message that I bring as an ambassador
from the US but also an ambassador of the truth

(02:06:06):
back to the US that every partnership relationship we have
with Israel is beneficial many times over to the people
of America. And it's something most Americans do not understand. Yes,
but medical technology.

Speaker 3 (02:06:23):
Yeah, you're right, I don't understand it. And you don't
understand the Bible either. This guy begins again with a
misquoting of Genesis. No wonder that he didn't care about
biblical inerrancy. Just like Ted Cruz, they say God blesses
those who blesses, and curses, curses those who bless curses
those who curses Reel. It doesn't say that. It doesn't

(02:06:45):
say that. It says those who bless and curse you
the right talking to Abraham. And when it says that
through you, all nations will be blessed, it's talking about Christ.
It's not talking about a political and it's not talking
about an ethnic group. And Paul made that abundantly clear.

(02:07:05):
He said, when it's talking about Seed, he says it's singular,
not plural. It's not talking about an ethnic group of people.
It's talking about the Messiah, who would be a blessing
to all nations, and they skip over that there's absolutely
no surprise that Huckabee would not be in the fight
for biblical inerrancy because people like him and Ted Cruz,

(02:07:28):
who are nothing but grifting politicians who are trying to
use people who are Christians for their own purposes, they
constantly misquote that. So there's absolutely no surprise that he
would do that. Well, we are out of time and
we have our guests. Doctor Shiva is ready to come on,
and we want to talk to him about his latest
political campaign, because there's other things involved in his political campaigns.

(02:07:52):
He uses those to organize people and to start redirecting
them into things that they can do productively and trying
to push on a rope. So we're going to take
a quick break and we're going to connect with doctor
Shiva and uh, and I'm going to get something drink
here because I'm getting uh. Anyway, we're going to do that.

(02:08:13):
Will be right back, folks, stay with us. Let's see,
let me grab some here. I haven't plate.

Speaker 1 (02:09:17):
You're listening to the David Night Show. A. You're listening

(02:11:55):
to the David Night Show, all.

Speaker 3 (02:12:00):
Right, and joining us now is doctor Shiva. And Doctor
Shiva and he is running for Senate as an independent. Right,
that's that's a good thing. The website is Shiva for
Senate dot com. Thank you for joining us, doctor Shiva Good.

Speaker 4 (02:12:16):
How are you doing, David doing good?

Speaker 2 (02:12:17):
Tell us a bit about what you're doing here, what
your goals are.

Speaker 12 (02:12:20):
Yeah, so I think David. People know that fundamentally, those
in power give people essentially only two options on their
battleground and how to participate in politics.

Speaker 4 (02:12:36):
Right, these are the two.

Speaker 12 (02:12:40):
Promoted options, which is, you run for office in either
the Republican or Democratic party, take a left or right position,
or you file a lawsuits, you become a lawyer. So
if you think about it, if you wake up some
point in your life and you say, you know what
I see injustice in the world and I want to
change it, they give you these to vehicles legalism, become

(02:13:02):
a lawyer, file lawsuits, or.

Speaker 4 (02:13:06):
Electoralism. Right, run for office.

Speaker 12 (02:13:10):
Now the realities if you just take those two positions,
you invariably get either demoralized or you get co opted.

Speaker 4 (02:13:19):
Or you compromise.

Speaker 12 (02:13:21):
And they know this because the judges of courts, the
legal systems, the electoral process is all controlled by what
I call the swarm, and if people want to understand
what that is in go to shatter the swarm dot
com and I describe that in a very scientific way
the structures of power. Okay, so, but what they do
not teach David anymore, they rarely even talk about it

(02:13:47):
is that actual changes come through bottoms of political movements,
of everyday people organizing locally and building self organizing systems,
massive movements.

Speaker 2 (02:13:58):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 12 (02:14:00):
This is the fundamental weight any changes come. So that's
at the core. So if you have a movement at
the core, and then you go participate in the electoralism
or the legalism process as a vehicle for a at minimum
building the movement and a potential you may actually win
some legal cases and participate much more robustly in the

(02:14:22):
electoral process. So a priori, you have to have a movement.
Without that, you're going to get compromised.

Speaker 3 (02:14:28):
Who is so I think it's somebody anthropologist I can't
remember the name, said something like a small, dedicated group
of people is the only thing that's ever changed the world.
On paraphrasing, maybe you know that quote, but.

Speaker 12 (02:14:39):
Well, yeah, well it's a dedicated it's a dedicated group
of people who have in any field, politics, science, medicine,
who have really taken the time to apply the scientific
method to understand how nature operates. And then once with
that understanding, then you go do innovation. Then you bring

(02:14:59):
some thing to humanity. So example, for since the time
of Memorial, people thought human beings could not fly, right, right,
then you had people understand Bernoulli's principle, and then you
had the creation of airplanes which came from that understanding.
Or people never thought we would have lights, you know,
we'd always live in darkness. You had Maxwell's laws, these principles,

(02:15:24):
then people created all these gadgets that you.

Speaker 4 (02:15:27):
Know, we have light, we don't have darkness.

Speaker 12 (02:15:29):
So when it comes to politics, there's been a a
view that there will always be the oligarchs and the
rest of us have to suffer, right, There'll always be
the point one percent, and just like there will be darkness,
only birds can fly, you know.

Speaker 4 (02:15:49):
Just deal with It's okay.

Speaker 12 (02:15:51):
And then as a part of that, you were just
talking earlier about christian You know, the fake Christians in
every religion, be it Hindu, his own, Islam, Christianity. The
corrupt owners of these religions take these religions, and they
create a political ideologies to support the suppression of the

(02:16:13):
masses of people by the few. In hindusm they called
it karma the Brahmins. Right now, Christian evangelism now supports
another political ideology called Zionism right, not season, but the
notion of rationalizing that there's no way out of this,
that you simply have to accept the way things are,
and if you do want to change it, run for politics,

(02:16:36):
you know, raise money, you.

Speaker 4 (02:16:37):
Know, be Republican or Democrat.

Speaker 12 (02:16:39):
You're going to have to compromise or become a lawyer
where you're doing deal making.

Speaker 4 (02:16:43):
You never really present in corporate anymore.

Speaker 12 (02:16:46):
So we have sort of shattered both of those, David,
And it's been a long arc of a lot of
hard work, you know, my personal journey, but also we
built a global movement and it's a lot of hard work.
It's something that should have been done several generations ago.
But those in power brainwash people to think Bernie Sanders

(02:17:12):
was going to take care of it, or Donald Trump
was going to take care of it on the right,
or Tucker Carlson, who griffs all day long as it
was a CIA agent, right, or Nick Fuentes, two FEDS,
by the way, having interviews each other saying they're not Feds, right,
the biggest syop.

Speaker 4 (02:17:31):
Right, So quite fascinating.

Speaker 12 (02:17:32):
So everything they do, and I want people to really,
if there's one thing you get from this conversation that
I want to share is that everything that the swarm
does elites to is to disempower you from the even
the thought an iota of the thought that we must
build bottoms up movements.

Speaker 4 (02:17:52):
That's right, That's it.

Speaker 12 (02:17:53):
And if you understand that, you will understand what we're doing,
what my life has been about, what our movements about.
Our movement is truth, Freedom, Health. You can go to
truthfromhealth dot com. And we educate people on history. We
educate people on engineering system science. So just like Bernoulli's
principle or Maxwell's laws, I've uncovered these natural laws, David,

(02:18:17):
that come from engineering science that show the dynamics of
nine principles how every system in the universe operates.

Speaker 4 (02:18:25):
And the cool thing is I can teach this to anyone.
You don't have to go to MIT.

Speaker 12 (02:18:28):
Okay, but with that understanding, you get this very deep
view of the dynamics of all systems, and you can
apply to political systems. So truth, freedom, health. There's no
and there or dashes or emphasizing one or the other.
They are three principles. The movement of information and matter
and energy freely that's freedom. The conversion of ideas to

(02:18:53):
find what is real. That's truth, the conversion process, and
the vessel, the structural process which contains truth and freedom.
That's your health, economic health or physical health, etc. Now
the principles of movement, conversion, and structure appear in everything.

Speaker 4 (02:19:10):
I could do a whole lecture.

Speaker 12 (02:19:11):
I don't want to bore you guys on that, but
we have founded a movement on scientific principles. So you
can't just do science. You can't just be an activist
fighting for freedom. You can't just take care of your health.
You have to do all of it.

Speaker 4 (02:19:25):
So you have seen during.

Speaker 12 (02:19:26):
COVID you had all these yoga people and wellness people
who talked about health, but they were all supporting masks
and getting vaccinated complete dysfunction. Then you have people who
talked about freedom, but the same people who talked about
freedom were supporting lockdowns. You say, yeah, And those people
who talked about science truth were making claims that the

(02:19:47):
only way to get out of this was you had
to take the mRNA vaccine and you had to put
people on respirators. I was the only first one, the
early one who said, gave a protocol as a scientist
that the focus the immune system. So when you take
the systems approach, you see things as they are. This
is why our movement in my work was always at
the forefront. In twenty twenty, we were the first ones

(02:20:09):
to call out, you know, COVID. We were the first
ones to expose the depths of election integrity. You know,
it was like PhD level stuff we did. And we
were the first ones, in our historic lawsuit to expose
the fact that government has an unholy alliance in social
media companies. We want our preliminary in junction our lawsuit.
We exposed the hypocrisy of people like Elon Musk. You

(02:20:31):
know where government ends and where Elon Musk begins. Nobody knows.
So our movement has grown now because we have leaders
all over the world. We ran in twenty seventeen eighteen
and we had a great meme if you remember, I
may have it up here, which says only the real
Indian can defeat the fake Indian.

Speaker 4 (02:20:53):
And it was a picture of me and Elizabeth Warren.
Even though it was only.

Speaker 12 (02:20:56):
Seven or ten of us, we ended up gett about
one hundred and fifty thousand votes in the Masachusetts and
we were the ones who forced Elizabeth Warren to take
the DNA test.

Speaker 4 (02:21:06):
Not Trump, not Donald Trump Junior.

Speaker 12 (02:21:07):
But it was we had these signs, David, that when viral,
we had magnet signs. I think thousands of them. I
think I can show you a picture of them. That's okay,
just to remind people of sort of the you know,
there is a creativity to politics, and it's really an
opportunity where real art can thrive, you know, you know where.

(02:21:33):
So if I can share my screen, I think I can.
I think I need to send a request. But anyway,
the hatred against Elizabeth Warren was not a hatred against
her individually, David. It was the fact that she represented
a fake Indian. All these fake politicians who say one
thing and do another. In Elizabeth Warren's case, it was

(02:21:55):
very much more direct because she said she was a
Native American and was not. And because of that she
got jobs a cozy tenured professorship at Harvard and mind you,
a professor at Harvard is like the Brahmin of ancient India.
They're the ones who control ideas. They make three to
five million dollars a year, they get the best healthcare,

(02:22:17):
they get free gym memberships, their kids get to go
to school for free, and so it's quite hypocritical. So
but our slogan with my picture with Elizabeth Warren in
a head dress. By the way, you could put Donald
Trump in the same headdress. You could put Elon Muskin
a same headdress Bernie Sanders. But at the depth of
the subconscious, we were hitting something deep that these people

(02:22:40):
don't work.

Speaker 2 (02:22:41):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:22:42):
And you know that wrote when she took that test,
that really did hit home. I remember bablin Bee had
a joke about it. They said, well, you know, Hollard
Clinton did a test and she found out she had
more lizard alien lizard DNA than Elizabeth Warren did. I
repeated that joke, and because of that I had The
Daily Beast tried to get me thrown off of Twitter

(02:23:03):
because there are people joke about that. They absolutely are humorless.
It's funny how humorless they are.

Speaker 12 (02:23:09):
When these came out, David, they tried to tell me
to take the signs off my bus. It went into
a federal law suit and ended up winning it, Okay,
the city of Cambridge. But the reason I bring this
up so that was twenty seventeen and eighteen. That was
our first foray into our electoral politics. And I spent

(02:23:30):
forty years of my life building movements. But the reason
we decided to do that was we obviously knew that
we had a very low chance of winning because the
Democrats and a Republicans control it. But we injected ourselves
and it was a very successful work because we forced
her to take the DNA test. We got on all
these social media and platforms that we built this broad understanding,

(02:23:52):
whether people knew it or not, about the hypocrisy of
all these guys.

Speaker 4 (02:23:56):
So that was first phase.

Speaker 12 (02:23:58):
Phase two was we ran in twenty twenty as a
Republican as everyone said, oh, you were against Polcahontas, why
didn't you run as a Republican because they thought I
must be a Republican, So we did.

Speaker 4 (02:24:09):
We gave the Republican Party.

Speaker 12 (02:24:13):
In Massachusetts said an opportunity to have someone like me
four degrees from mit accomplished seven companies who came from
a bottom built myself up, but the established and Republican
Party in Massachusetts, which always works with the Democrats, had
no interest in supporting me.

Speaker 2 (02:24:30):
Okay.

Speaker 12 (02:24:30):
Nonetheless, we raised closes to two million dollars in twenty twenty,
all one dollar, five dollars twenty dollars, predominantly donations, and
we had three thousand volunteers. We had twenty five thousand
lawn signs up, ten thousand bumperstickers.

Speaker 4 (02:24:44):
It was quite extraordinary.

Speaker 12 (02:24:45):
Every part of Massachusetts, you could not leave Massachusetts without
receiving a doctor Shiva billboard on the major highways, et cetera.

Speaker 3 (02:24:52):
You know, here in Tennessee when you ran for president,
there were Shiva signs around here. We saw at a
few of them.

Speaker 12 (02:24:59):
You know that that shows, David, not only the strength
of people's affection towards our ideas, but the fact that
we have people.

Speaker 4 (02:25:08):
On the ground all over the country that matter, all
over the world.

Speaker 3 (02:25:11):
That's right, okay, And I like that what you've done
to empower people and to get them to understand that
it really is from the bottom up. And you know
Trump understands that, then the establishment understands. That's one of
the reasons why Trump is so adamant that they're going
to shut down any state or local regulation of AI.
It's only going to be in one rule to rule us,

(02:25:33):
all right, and that's going to come from him, and
it's going to come from Washington. They're very afraid that
when people see a problem, and they do see a problem,
you know, they think most people don't buy into the
climate change thing, but they do buy into the changes
that AI could bring upon us, and they don't like it.
They don't like the police state surveillance. Trump does, and

(02:25:54):
so he wants to shut that down anybody pushing back
against it, because that's where the real power is. The
real power is from the bottom up.

Speaker 12 (02:26:02):
Yeah, And so if you look at the movements of
the late eighteen hundreds early nineteen hundreds in the United States,
there was these very bottoms up organic workers movements, which
they try to relabel as red scare communists. You say,
so that's what McCarthyism did, right. These weren't movements controlled
by Russia. They were organic American working class movements, and

(02:26:27):
they're the reason America actually did become great during nineteen
seventy two, I'm sorry, nineteen hundreds to nineteen seventy as
GDP grew, everyone's wages grew because the leeches were afraid
that working class Americans would take to the streets. In fact,
during that period, David, there were eleven thousand strikes, close
to two hundred million people. Ordinary people wouldn't take bs right,

(02:26:52):
they would organize.

Speaker 4 (02:26:53):
And these were organic movie.

Speaker 2 (02:26:54):
We need to reclaim that.

Speaker 3 (02:26:55):
We got to reclaim that because they're going to do
it to us, right, So what's going on now is incredible.

Speaker 12 (02:27:02):
So the right wing McCarthyite branded those movements as communists,
hijacked the fact that four American workers were hanged in
the eighteen hundreds fighting for the eight hour work day,
and that's why the international working class labeled that May Day.
It wasn't a communist holiday. So they essentially created this

(02:27:22):
false narrative. So between nineteen fifty to seventy, the Democrats
like Bernie Sanders and other left trade union top down
people took over the unions and Wall Street was given
to the right wing. So by nineteen seventy there is
really no more fight anymore. They destroyed these bottoms up
workers' movements, and between nineteen seventy till today, if you.

Speaker 4 (02:27:44):
Read the Ram Report, they came out a couple of
years ago.

Speaker 12 (02:27:47):
As GDP has grown, the wages of the first and
second income quartile of hard working Americans has gone down.
And if you add it all up, if you do
the calculus on it, between nineteen seventy till today, okay,
it adds up to forty seven trillion dollars of wealth
has moved to Trump and Jared Kushner and Elon Musks,
et cetera.

Speaker 4 (02:28:07):
So, but here's the interesting thing, David.

Speaker 12 (02:28:09):
The left will do half troops against the right, and
the right will do half troops against the left.

Speaker 2 (02:28:18):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:28:19):
Or they'll say, what about the fact that these guys
did what you're accusing me of doing, you know, and
so I get a path to do it.

Speaker 2 (02:28:24):
Now.

Speaker 3 (02:28:25):
They set precedents for each other, right, It's like, but
what about him, he did this crime because I get
to do the same crime, you know.

Speaker 12 (02:28:32):
Right, So they have and so anything that they do
that seems truthful is not truthful. It's basically to split
the middle, which the middle works, which means working the
middle class, working people actually work. Bernie Sanders has never worked,
Donald Trump has never really worked. Fucker, excuse me, Tucker,

(02:28:55):
Carlson has never really worked. Okay, and if you look
at these characters, Robert Kennedy Junior, as I call him
Booby Kennedy has never worked, AOC has never worked. So
on the left and the right, you have these leaders
who essentially had the birth lottery given to them. Even
this guy, I'm Donnie. His mother is a very very
famous Hollywood director. A lot of people don't know this.

(02:29:17):
Mira and I are, and she directed her son. This
was not something he organically came.

Speaker 4 (02:29:24):
Up central casting.

Speaker 2 (02:29:25):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (02:29:26):
Right, So the left and the right.

Speaker 12 (02:29:29):
Have spent a lot of effort in manipulating people to
think that they are actually in some fight. So this
image that I recently developed, I don't know if you know,
I have a degree in graphic designing, David say if
I were, so, this image sort of captures our meme
for twenty twenty six on my US Senate race.

Speaker 4 (02:29:48):
I don't know if you can see it.

Speaker 2 (02:29:48):
Yeah, yeah, that's the middle works.

Speaker 12 (02:29:51):
So yeah, even the fist, which was a left wing
quote unquote theme, Trump started using the fist, if you notice.
So we're saying let's give the middle, and what do
we mean by this? And you know this came to
me actually in a dream on how to structure this.
But it takes an effort to work on these kinds
of graphics, you know. But we say the middle works,

(02:30:13):
which means we work for a living, and we must
the middle must rise. So we have all these workers
rising up through the middle finger on the left of
the donkey, fearing people rising aoc Mamdannie and Bernie, which
are sort of the characters, the cast of characters who
represent the left, and ohe you have. I'd like to

(02:30:36):
call them Efer Carlson, but I know in respect to
your so I won't do that. And you have a
Booby Kennedy, and you have Trump and the elephant. Both
the donkey and the elephant are fearful if someone like me, David,
who actually comes from below right, that actually has built
a movement, a brand, even I mean, no one gave

(02:30:58):
me Doctor Shiva as a brand.

Speaker 4 (02:31:00):
See, this is the other thing.

Speaker 12 (02:31:01):
They don't want independent people getting limelight or getting fame
because they have to own even that.

Speaker 4 (02:31:09):
So when I exposed all this stuff in twenty twenty,
the backdoor.

Speaker 12 (02:31:12):
Portal to Twitter, the COVID stuff, the election integrity, they
created their own cast of characters two years later to
literally plagiarize my material, and they still do it today
because they cannot give independence the limelight because they represent
the people. So our view is the middle is rising,
we must shatter the swarm. And what we are doing, David,

(02:31:35):
is this meme is a very powerful meme because it
goes to working people and saying, look, do you want
to get over your own dysfunction? That's what our campaign's
going to do. It's not about forget them. We know
what they're doing. But when you have someone like me running,
why aren't you getting off your butt and go to

(02:31:56):
your neighbors and saying you got to vote for doctor
Shiva Because it's not like they don't have a candidate anymore.
So our campaign, I'm going to run, David, but I'm
not going to run meaning the emphasis I'm going to
do someone. And we have a lot of people say, oh,
doctor Sheeva, you were great, thank you so much for
doing those videos.

Speaker 4 (02:32:14):
Great. Now what are you going to do? It's right,
don't just say you like my videos.

Speaker 12 (02:32:19):
There's four thousand of them, But are you going to
go tell your neighbors to pledge their vote for me?

Speaker 4 (02:32:25):
Right now?

Speaker 12 (02:32:26):
So people go to Shiva Numeral four Senate dot com.
You'll see what we've done.

Speaker 2 (02:32:30):
David.

Speaker 12 (02:32:30):
People can go right now and pledge their vote for me.
Now we're not waiting to next year. So if you're
listening and you have friends in Massachusetts, tell them to
go pledge their vote. But not only that, tell them
to go talk to their neighbors and their family and
their friends. Everyone needs to be a microactivist. The old

(02:32:52):
even me going out running. I mean, we did this right.
We drove all around Massachusetts and our bus, we put
up all these signs.

Speaker 4 (02:32:58):
It still was a set of us.

Speaker 12 (02:33:01):
The only way we working people can win is if
it's a self organizing system, which is the principle of
system science. If individuals on the node all say, hey,
I like this guy, doctor Shiva. I know he's proven
he it's not my resume speaks for itself. David, you
look at all these politicians. Let's look at if they
have ever in their life solved a problem.

Speaker 3 (02:33:25):
We had had Trump who bankrupted six casinos, exactly like
this ultimate low achiever. He's even sued the people who
wrote a book about him, who said that lucky loser.
They got a slot machine.

Speaker 2 (02:33:38):
On the Couverry.

Speaker 4 (02:33:38):
I think one of his professors that.

Speaker 12 (02:33:41):
One of his professor's word and said he was a
dumbest student he ever had. So what you're looking at
is and boobf and Kennedy. By the way, the way
he applied to Harvard was just put his name the Hubris. Yeah,
and he gets in his thesis is completely written by
his roommate who couldn't get girls. So the trade was
he would get him girls and he wrote his thesis.

(02:34:01):
So these people do not work, and you have to
have a significant amount of hatred, trade and anger at them.
But the more important thing, David, is what we want
to educate people is why are you in this?

Speaker 4 (02:34:16):
Why are you letting the left and the right divide us?

Speaker 12 (02:34:19):
And this is a personal dysfunction people need to do
reflection on. And so my job as an educator, as
a you know, I think a penultimate candidate for Senate
because I've.

Speaker 4 (02:34:31):
Worked my work to get here.

Speaker 12 (02:34:33):
So people now working people need to say, wait a minute,
this is one of us.

Speaker 4 (02:34:37):
Why do I vote for the left or right?

Speaker 12 (02:34:39):
They need to do their own reflection and it's a
one degree shift that needs to take place.

Speaker 3 (02:34:45):
And these people, you have these people who the double
thing that they're able to engage in is just amazing
to absolutely hate X or Y. Let's say they hate
the vaccine, right, but they love the father of the vaccine.

Speaker 2 (02:34:58):
It's like, how can you not see this?

Speaker 3 (02:35:00):
I understand when it is sould to them by the
people who make money by you know, peasing these people
and by telling the group what they want to hear.
But the group think is absolutely killing us.

Speaker 12 (02:35:11):
Well, the reason it's occurring, that's why this graphic is nice, David,
because they have it down to a science. It's a
psychological operation science. So Bernie Sanders or Mumdannie or AOC
will attack these people as quote unquote zionis okay. Or
they will attack them and tell you guys are NEPO babies.

Speaker 4 (02:35:30):
Right, which is true.

Speaker 12 (02:35:33):
And these guys on the right, you know, Trump will
say Bernie and all these people just want.

Speaker 4 (02:35:40):
Free stuff, which is also true. Yeah, okay. So the
reality is, Ma'm Donnie is.

Speaker 12 (02:35:45):
Not talking about like a worker's state, we're working people
sees a means of power. He's talking about top down socialism,
state capitalism, no different than what Trump wants. What he's
doing with then video Okay, that's why Trump and Mamdani meeting.
I did a little blog posts on this and being

(02:36:05):
chums in some sense, each supporting each other, reveals the
fact that the economic conditions in the United States were
working people have been devastated. So what the elites are
doing is that entire scene in the White House was
telling working people on the left and the right, don't worry,
we have it under control. Trump and Mamdani are meeting together.

(02:36:25):
They're all on the same team. You don't have to
do anything, They'll take care of it. And this is
why the middle is so important. The middle must rise
up and from a philosophical, spiritual, whatever you want to
talk about it. Our twenty twenty six campaign for you
a Senate is going to be a very different campaign.
We're going to ask the individual, oh, you support me,

(02:36:47):
but what are you going to do?

Speaker 4 (02:36:50):
What are you going to do?

Speaker 12 (02:36:52):
And we're going to go to all these working people
and say, look, you work for a living.

Speaker 4 (02:36:55):
They don't. Why do you give all your self respect
to them?

Speaker 12 (02:37:00):
And I think this is if you study the psychology
of abusive relationships, this is what happens. The abuser somehow
brainwashes the abuse victim to keep coming back to them,
you see, in all sorts of and so it's basically
a mass abuser abuse victim relationship. Yes, that's what we're

(02:37:23):
fundamentally dealing with. And the way they're able to get
away with it, David, as this meme reflects, is one
group says half truths against the other and the other
group says half truths against the other.

Speaker 4 (02:37:33):
So people are literally split.

Speaker 12 (02:37:36):
So Trump, the elites, the swarm, created Trump because they
needed the white working class to have hope. Because the
same white working class, at least sixty percent of them
who voted for Trump and voted for Obama, and his
thing was hope. Right, So they have this down to
a theatrical physics.

Speaker 2 (02:37:55):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (02:37:56):
Yeah, we're supposed to believe.

Speaker 3 (02:37:57):
We're supposed to believe that Trump is a a blue
collar billionaire.

Speaker 2 (02:38:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 12 (02:38:03):
Or Carlson who wanted to be in the CIA is
somehow come to some you know, holy revelation that he's
fighting demons, as he says in his sleep, and now
he wants to reveal truth. Well, the revelation of truth
is not sufficient to change because now every grifter is.

Speaker 4 (02:38:22):
Exposing truth quote unquote truth. But None of.

Speaker 12 (02:38:26):
Them will ever when it comes to talking about election
integrity when I did all the you know, breakthrough work,
will ever mention my name when we were the one
to expose a backdoor portal to Twitter and accept a
few people like yourself, and maybe Clayton Morris will say,
wait a minute, he's the one who did the work.
But they literally steal our truth that we expose because

(02:38:48):
they don't want the limelight coming to working people like
myself who do the hard work. And this is what
people need to understand. They do this consistently credit. They'll
diminish you for saying, hey, I did that work. Oh
why do you want credit?

Speaker 2 (02:39:01):
David?

Speaker 12 (02:39:02):
Why do you want But everything they do is about
getting credit. The Trump is a brand. The Kennedys are
a brand, and they spend billions of dollars creating their
brand equity. Well, I created the doctor Shiva or truth
for them, health brand bottoms up and that really pisses
them off, David, because we understood their dynamics.

Speaker 4 (02:39:22):
And that's why in twenty twenty six our.

Speaker 12 (02:39:27):
Campaign in Massachusetts and I we're going to win this
campaign because we're going to win it because the previous
campaigns we're about exposing truth.

Speaker 4 (02:39:37):
But this time we're going to win this campaign. You know,
ninety six.

Speaker 12 (02:39:41):
Percent of the youth under the age of twenty six
in Massachusetts or independence now. Sixty five percent of people
under the age of fifty five are independence now Massachusetts.
The work that we did a lot of people moved
to becoming independent. There's only nine percent Republicans and thirty
five percent Democrats, so the.

Speaker 4 (02:39:59):
Majority is in. Yeah, they don't have a voice.

Speaker 12 (02:40:02):
So that's why the left and right create this fake
dialectic to split the middle. And so I think the
great thing with our campaign is we're going down to
the heart the root cause of the issue. It's not them,
it's us, David. Yeah, Why is it we remain abusive victims?
Why do we listen to Tucker Carlson the idiot got

(02:40:24):
twenty five million dollars working for Fox and suddenly he's
become a truth teller. He didn't know anything about Israel
for four to fifty years of his life.

Speaker 4 (02:40:33):
Suddenly, you know.

Speaker 3 (02:40:35):
Or nine to eleven, you know, he shut down people
when they wanted to show videos or what was happening
nine eleven, you know, And now I hear he's going
to do some kind of a nine to eleven documentary
and reinvent himself.

Speaker 4 (02:40:45):
But right well, never came out.

Speaker 3 (02:40:46):
All he said was, Hey, if you talk about Building seven,
they'll fire you, so I won't talk about it.

Speaker 2 (02:40:51):
So who's controlled Marco?

Speaker 12 (02:40:52):
The age of disclosure of this movie about the UFOs
right with Marco Rubio? I mean anything Mark or Rubio
is involved with is it Joe? Okay, the guy.

Speaker 4 (02:41:02):
Is a joke.

Speaker 12 (02:41:02):
But anyway, they have gotten very clever with these cast
of characters. And that is why our campaign is going
to take all the learnings, all the work we've done
and focus on the singular point. Do you want to
save yourself period to the individual? And why do you
give up your self respect to these fools who say
one thing and do another. They're all fake Indians?

Speaker 2 (02:41:24):
That's right, Right, Well.

Speaker 3 (02:41:26):
I think it's really coming there is coming to a
head now because I don't know if you are familiar
with the work of Strauss and how in the Fourth Turning,
but I really do believe the research they had has
a lot of validity in it that we have the
cyclical thing and you can see the institutions and the
corruption that is there. You see the economic issues and
the fact that all these different countries are trying to

(02:41:47):
find or wherever they can get it to distract the
people at home because they know that they're at war
with the people at home. So let's get them focused
on something over here where we can all unite and
they can cheer and get behind us. But you know,
they're they're talking about how there was an MIT study
saying they could replace and I don't know if it's

(02:42:08):
true or not, they could replace a little over twelve
percent of the workforce right now with AI. If they
do yeah, yeah, if they do that, that's going to
be instant depression. You know, that was most of the depression.
We had about a fourteen to fifteen percent unemployment rate.
They could do that just like you know, the drop
of a hat if they wanted to, and it doesn't

(02:42:28):
matter if the AI really works all that well, they
could still fire you.

Speaker 2 (02:42:32):
You know.

Speaker 3 (02:42:32):
So people are looking at this, and when Huang in
video went to went to d C, people were talking
to him. He says, yeah, everybody says it's going to
take your job. No, you're going to work harder, You're
going to have a job, and you're going to work harder,
so we can go back forget about the eight hour day, right,
that's what these guys would like to do.

Speaker 2 (02:42:51):
I guess it's take us back. That' says, well, I think.

Speaker 4 (02:42:54):
What's going to happen? Well, what's going to happen? David?
I don't know, if you know.

Speaker 12 (02:42:58):
I have the three earliest patents in tech spased AI
from nineteen ninety three that I use for a company.
And it's interesting, right when those patents expired a few
months later is when chat shept came. Okay, but anyway,
so I know a little bit. I was in this
field for twenty years. So when you look at AI,

(02:43:18):
you know, as a senator for example, one of the
laws that people should think about is this, you have
private companies over here creating technologies to suck human knowledge
and instantiate it into a machine.

Speaker 4 (02:43:32):
Okay.

Speaker 12 (02:43:35):
Most of the AI requires what's called supervised learning, so
you have to give it information. So they have people
in Africa watching images and deciding what kind of image
it is, and eventually those people don't be needed.

Speaker 4 (02:43:47):
Okay, So yeah, it's called a training set. Okay.

Speaker 12 (02:43:51):
So the interesting question, and I think only someone like
me could even bring this up because I understand the
bridge of team technology, politics and engineering is so, if
you are a worker doing some task, Okay, let's say
a radiologist and a machine which is a private company's

(02:44:11):
watching your diagnosis. It's getting all that information and it's
going into this private company's database.

Speaker 4 (02:44:18):
Eventually the radiologists will not be needed.

Speaker 12 (02:44:20):
Okay, the radiologists was hired you know x salary for
a per hour. It was not given any He will
never be given any royalty or ip for his knowledge
that was taken from his brain. So I, for example,
first of all, educate people like I'm doing right now.

(02:44:40):
But more importantly, if knowledge is taken from a human
being and put into a private company, no compensation is made.
You could argue that private company owns a royalty stream
to those individuals, for that matter, to all of us. Yeah,
you know, when Google is looking at all of our searches,
because there are a few of them are monopolies, we

(02:45:03):
are not, as humans being compensated for the knowledge that
they're taking from us.

Speaker 4 (02:45:07):
Now, you could say to Google, if you.

Speaker 12 (02:45:09):
Have a web page, I don't want my web web
page index, which means you'll never show up, so they
force you to give your knowledge to them, and there's
no consideration given to you for exchange of this value.
So there's a fundamental issue here, and this is happening
in the arts right. Most of these, you know, besides

(02:45:31):
the A list actors who're also selling their rights by them,
and they'll get compensated. The majority of us who are
working today, there is no fundamental structure to compensate you
for the fact that random private companies funded by Silicon
Valley are vacuuing up your brain and you are not
going to be compensated for that. So this is there

(02:45:54):
has to be some compensatory relief for that, because it
was your knowledge that trained these systems. I created a
technology years ago for automatically reading an email, separate from
the invention of email, analyzing it, and routing it. So
we were actually used to watch the call center reps
how they treated an email. Our systems would learn, so
instead of doing six emails per hour or call center

(02:46:16):
representative could do forty emails.

Speaker 4 (02:46:19):
Okay, So AI.

Speaker 12 (02:46:22):
Can be used as a significant adjunct to obviously creating
more productivity. But the elites don't care about that. They're
not going to say, okay, we have one hundred workers.
We're going to put in AI what they're and then
we're going to basically the ideal model would be you
compensate people fairly, but maybe they don't have to work
four days a week.

Speaker 4 (02:46:43):
May I have a five days a week.

Speaker 12 (02:46:44):
Maybe they work three days a week because their knowledge
was used to train those systems. Instead, what they'll do
is fire eighty percent of the workforce and have the
remaining twenty percent working three times more.

Speaker 3 (02:46:56):
That's right, you're saying, Yeah, so it's one kind of
what Disney did when they in the h one visa people.
They said, well, you know, we'll give you a little
bit more severance pay if you train and replacement, you know.
And that's really what it was happening across the board
with artificial intelligence. As you point out, Yeah.

Speaker 12 (02:47:14):
Yeah, I did a podcast years and years ago explain, Look,
AI is not machine AI. AI existed the instant that
Henry Ford created the manufacturing line.

Speaker 4 (02:47:25):
Okay, that was AI. He took a very complex.

Speaker 12 (02:47:28):
Process of creating a car, he made it into a
you know, individual task based process, and then he put
these carbon based beings along that manufacturer. Some of them
just screwed on a bolt others put on the windshield wiper.
That was AI because you took human creative intelligence and

(02:47:48):
localized it into doing one task. Now, if you remove
the carbon based being and you put a silicon based being,
that's still AI.

Speaker 4 (02:47:56):
You see what I'm saying. So people need to understand
that from the aspect.

Speaker 12 (02:47:59):
Of productivity, which has been explosively growing, capitalism has done
that as a goal of capitalism is to maximize profit.
Labor is the biggest expense in that formula, so you're
trying to reduce labor, which you're trying to increase productivity.
But the promise of that was not that you would
lay off everyone. Right as productivity increased, the massive human

(02:48:24):
workers should be able to work less hours.

Speaker 2 (02:48:27):
Right.

Speaker 12 (02:48:28):
Instead, the model that came from crony capitalism was you
lay off eighty percent of the people and then twenty
percent are working harder.

Speaker 4 (02:48:38):
And that's what's going to happen with AI.

Speaker 12 (02:48:39):
So if you can learn how to use AI, well
you don't need a certain set of low level workers.
But whenever new technologies come David, the legislators in Congress
were basically dumb as doorknobs will always get manipulated in
this case by Silicon Valley.

Speaker 4 (02:49:00):
So for example, I know this personally.

Speaker 12 (02:49:02):
You know, when I invented email back in seventy eight,
there were no laws to patent software because the idiots
in Congress thought software was a movie script.

Speaker 4 (02:49:11):
You were writing something, right.

Speaker 12 (02:49:14):
So the problem is when you have idiots who don't create,
who are in the political process, they can get manipulated
by others.

Speaker 4 (02:49:22):
Who was only nineteen ninety four? Could you patent software?

Speaker 12 (02:49:25):
In nineteen eighty the Computer Software Act allowed you to
use copyright law to protect software, which is what I did.
But the point is when you have morons who have
never created anything right, very different than the founders. You know,
they actually architects. So when you are with your hands

(02:49:46):
doing something, you were much more fair in the laws
that you want to create, and you're thinking into the future.
I mean the founders were thinking two hundred, three hundred
years ahead because they were creators. But if you look
at the resume of eighty nine percent of the people
in Congress or Senate, and everyone should do this. This
is to working people listening, Why are you electing these idiots?

(02:50:08):
Ask yourself when they say I will solve this problem, Well,
have you ever solved a problem. Show me one problem
you solve, I will fix this. Have they ever fixed anything?

Speaker 4 (02:50:19):
I will create this?

Speaker 12 (02:50:20):
Have they ever created anything? And I think it's time
people take this approach. And the fact that people don't
take that approach David again, it comes down to a
dysfunction among the broad mass of people who have been
manipulated to think Tucker Crosson making his grimaces and faces

(02:50:40):
has some authority to talk about anything. Yeah, I mean
he hasn't earned that, right, I'm sorry you didn't put
into freaking time. Or Bernie Sanders talking about how he
cares about working people.

Speaker 4 (02:50:52):
You've never worked a day in your life.

Speaker 12 (02:50:54):
So I think it's really important that working people derives
some self respect for themselves.

Speaker 4 (02:51:02):
And it's like the.

Speaker 12 (02:51:03):
Slaves have forgotten they're the ones who are doing all
the work. That's right, right, So the slaves need to
wake up and want to save themselves, want to have
leaders come from there will be leaders. But why are
you electing leaders who have nothing to do with you,
who don't even want to be with you, who have
great disdain for you?

Speaker 4 (02:51:24):
Why are you doing that?

Speaker 12 (02:51:25):
And that's because you're in an abusive relationship, right, And
this is I think, very very deeply a fundamental issue
that people need to reflect on. And that's why in
twenty twenty sixth David, I'm not going to run around.
I'm not going to do all the work. Yeah, so
people want me. You're going to have to do to
the work.

Speaker 2 (02:51:45):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:51:46):
So yeah, And that's a message of people really need
to hear because the plan and they keep telling us
this is a plan. They want to pacify us. You know, well, hey,
you know, you can have a job if you want to,
but you don't really need to. Well, give you everything
that you need and a it's just kind of like
having a garden, right, you don't really need to have
a garden. You can go down and buy all the
food you want at the grocery store. But if you
won't have a garden, because that's some people want to do,

(02:52:07):
that's fine. It's a hobby. So you can have some hobbies.
But we're going to put you on universal basic welfare
and all the money is going to be made by us.
And at the same time he's doing that, Musk is
saying at the same time he wants to have all
the money in the world that belongs to him, He's saying, well,
money's not going to mean anything, right, Well.

Speaker 4 (02:52:26):
Where from where did Must come from? David?

Speaker 12 (02:52:29):
He came from apartheid South Africa, where they had three
percent of the population, having ninety seven percent do all
the mining for emeralds, diamonds, jewels.

Speaker 4 (02:52:38):
Et cetera.

Speaker 2 (02:52:39):
Right, that's right.

Speaker 12 (02:52:40):
So that's where Must comes from, and he needs to
justify his own legacy of exploitation. Right, It's not like
he's concerned for humanity. The reality is when you look
at the aspect of you know, AI and what can happen,
he has no you know when he says everyone's gonna

(02:53:03):
doesn't have to work. Let me put it to you
this way. This is what the quote unquote white man
did the Native Americans.

Speaker 4 (02:53:10):
You don't have to work. We're going to put you
on reservations.

Speaker 12 (02:53:12):
What's now happened is that we have a decentralized reservation.

Speaker 2 (02:53:18):
Yeah, that's exactly the model average.

Speaker 3 (02:53:19):
Yeah.

Speaker 12 (02:53:20):
Yeah, So seventy percent of people are basically living hand
to mouth, right. I think eighty percent of Americans may
have one thousand dollars in savings for rainy day. They
are all exposed to some type of substance abuse cannabis,
which is by the way, not a harmless drug, and
we do a whole discussion on that, Okay, I agree,

(02:53:43):
or alcohol or smoking.

Speaker 3 (02:53:45):
Right, So I don't supporting that. I just I'm against
the drug war. But you know, when you go back
to the Indian reservation, I think that really is the
model that they've got. That's a model day in that
particular case, it is people who supported themselves by hunting
and gathering or whatever it was that they were doing,
and they they took that away from them by force
to put them into this container with us. For the

(02:54:05):
most part, they're doing it with a program of pacification,
you know, like you would domesticate a wild woolf or something.
You feed them until they become dependent on you. And
yet they will go to the next level. That's only
going to get a certain percentage of people. As you
point out, it's decentralized. It's everywhere the control is centralized.

(02:54:27):
But yeah, and so they'll be able to have a
situation where if you don't toe the line, we're going
to cut you off from everything, and if you do
toe the line, we'll give you all the free stuff.
I mean, that's what Bill Gates is doing in India
with the oddhar system. You know, if you're poor and
you're reliant on a handout from the government, that's fine.

(02:54:47):
We'll give it to as long as you take the number.
If you need healthcare, we'll give it to as long
as you take the number. But that allows us to
control you, to inventory you, and to know everything that
you're doing. We'll let you walk around freely, but you
won't be able to do anything if you don't take
a system that we're imposing on you.

Speaker 2 (02:55:05):
And so that's kind of the model. Yeah.

Speaker 12 (02:55:07):
Yeah, So in the United States now, it was interesting.
There's a butcher over here that I went to a
young guy and he said that, you know, he said, oh,
I've got a lot of bitcoin. This is like several
years ago. And I saw him a couple of weeks
ago and he said, oh, I sold all my bitcoin?
And I said, how many did you have? He goes, oh,
I had two hundred and eighty. I go, but how

(02:55:28):
many did you sell? Oh twenty? I go, what happened
to your other two undred and sixty? He goes, Oh,
I got into on these online gambling crypto sites and
I lost two nur in sixty Wow. Okay, so basically
lost twenty million dollars.

Speaker 2 (02:55:40):
Yeah, okay.

Speaker 12 (02:55:41):
So they have the slaves gambling on drugs, right and
encouraging them not to work.

Speaker 4 (02:55:51):
That's a reservation, that's right, And this is happening.

Speaker 12 (02:55:53):
So you talked about the audar system in India, which
was actually implemented by another scumbag call non than Nila Khane.

Speaker 4 (02:56:00):
He's the one who actually developed it.

Speaker 12 (02:56:02):
Okay, originally he was brought in by the former Prime
minister to do it. But they have China being the
Petrie Dish for aveillance, right, and they have India being
the Petrie dish for getting everyone on a card. And
how you incentivize people not to work. Look thirty years

(02:56:23):
ago in India.

Speaker 3 (02:56:24):
The kind of the beta test sites, you know, their.

Speaker 4 (02:56:26):
Beta test sites, right, mass populations.

Speaker 12 (02:56:30):
So you know, if you it's very hard to get
laborers to do anything in India now because this of
our system gives everyone a free TV, free laptops, free food,
so people are working, like, why the hell do I
need to work?

Speaker 3 (02:56:49):
That's what's scared me so much about the lockdowns. I
saw that as a Overton window normalization of this very
type of thing, and I was surprised, you know, when
they locked everybody down, everybody's going to take the hand
out and then they get used to it just like that,
you know, I mean it was it just took a
hold of them. They didn't push back at all.

Speaker 12 (02:57:11):
What's really interesting, David, I don't know if you've ever
gone on safari in Africa. Have you done that?

Speaker 5 (02:57:15):
No?

Speaker 4 (02:57:15):
Well, it's an interesting thing. I went once.

Speaker 12 (02:57:19):
And you're sitting there and you're seeing all these animals, right, lions, right,
and you see these monkeys, right, and they're living among
each other and they're scratching, you know, whatever fleas off them.

Speaker 4 (02:57:31):
But they're living in this environment.

Speaker 12 (02:57:32):
And you think about the fact that we as humans
at one time lived in very basic conditions, right, living
off the land, you know, very simple stuff. And I
think the swarm knows this that they could keep diminishing
the infrastructure and people live with less and less and less,

(02:57:53):
so right, like, you could theoretically just live in the woods, right,
you know, learn how to kill it.

Speaker 4 (02:58:00):
You could go to that.

Speaker 12 (02:58:00):
Level of you could say I'm living off the land,
but you could go to that level. So I think
the elites have done their calculus and they know that
the bottom is pretty low. So you see in San
Francisco people are shitting on the streets. Yeah right, So
I think a lot of very dumb activists and this

(02:58:22):
is the demortalization that's taken place to not build the
bottoms of the movement. They'll say, oh, doctor Shiva, your
movement won't be success of you. You have to wait
until there's a cataclysm, then people rise them.

Speaker 4 (02:58:33):
It's actually not true.

Speaker 12 (02:58:35):
When a cataclysm occurs, people go to a new state
of oppression and a newer state and a newer state.

Speaker 4 (02:58:40):
So if you ever go.

Speaker 12 (02:58:41):
To Indo, you'll see on a highway ride down Delhi
guy taking a shower and pooping on the streets. And
you'll see a guy like Thembani's and Bombay right, who
live in a billion dollar skyscraper. So the elites know
that the human mind can be manipulated. So putting people
on UBI is going to be the squeeze. So I

(02:59:04):
think it's going to be a slow squeeze. They're not
just going to go kill people. You're going to get
twenty million jobs off AI. Put them on reservations, let
them get drunk, let them eat crappy food, and they're
just slowly going.

Speaker 4 (02:59:16):
To die off.

Speaker 2 (02:59:17):
Yeah right, that's right, And.

Speaker 12 (02:59:18):
That's what they did with the Native Americans, right right,
So that model, I think has been mapped out in
some wonderful spreadsheet created by you know whoever.

Speaker 2 (02:59:32):
Right.

Speaker 12 (02:59:33):
So, I think these guys are very clever and the
only way out of this is us building a bottom
of up movement now intellectuals like.

Speaker 3 (02:59:43):
And if we wait for a crisis like you're talking about.
That was what surprised me about the lockdowns and stuff
in twenty twenty. I thought, Okay, they're going to change
things rapidly enough, and they're changing them very rapidly. It's
going to wake people up, you know, the whole bowlt
boiling frogs thing. And yet when they sped up the change,
it didn't wake people up. And I thought, wow, no, no,
because this is this erroneous theory. Yeah, forward, oppression will

(03:00:08):
somehow give a rise. Oppression oppresses, that's right. Oppression doesn't
lead to liberation.

Speaker 12 (03:00:14):
So they have a set of fake activists telling people
that's why they do all the doomsday stuff. Oh, Wall
Street's going to crash tomorrow, well and then people will
rise up. It's nonsense. You have to build. Change is
not something spontaneous. Change must be organized, It must be
built bottoms up. You have to have the right theory,

(03:00:35):
you have to write have like anything. I mean, this
iphon didn't just pop out of it nowhere, right, right.
Someone had to think about it, apply the physics, the chemistry,
the material science to make it. So this is what
they don't want intellectuals. So intellectuals are interesting, David. You
could say I'm an intellectual, right, You're an intellectual.

Speaker 1 (03:00:56):
Now.

Speaker 12 (03:00:56):
Intellectuals are interesting in the sense they're not a class.

Speaker 4 (03:01:00):
You know, the swarm.

Speaker 12 (03:01:02):
Gave me the opportunity to go to Mit to learn
this shit, right, But I could easily have taken my
weaponry of the intellectual knowledge I got and been on
Wall Street working at a hedge fund doing nonlineary dynamic equations.
Or I could say, you know what, I don't really
want to do that. I actually want to learn how
to shatter the swarm the system's dynamics. So there was

(03:01:24):
a time at the time of let's say there were
a revolution of the Renaissance, where intellectuals make conscious decisions
who do they want to serve the majority of intellectuals
in academia are practice the oldest profession of the world
right now, that's right, right, So there's not so we
have to actually go among working people and give them

(03:01:46):
the knowledge, and that's what we're doing with our movement.
So we trained them on the same advanced system science
that you would learn as a PhD.

Speaker 3 (03:01:53):
Because I really that's what I really like about your
movements and about your campaigns. Your campaigns are way to
pull people around, organize them and give them the real
tools and the perspective that they need to actually activate them.
And that's what that's really about. That is so much
more important than the elections. But again, when people are

(03:02:14):
paying attention to what's going on at least a little bit,
that you can grab those people who are at least
looking around and seeing the things that are out there
and then focus them on getting actively involved themselves. And
that's why that is so important. Well, we're out of time,
but thank you so much for coming on, doctor Shiva,
and we'll talk to you more about this. Shiva the
number four and Senate dot Com again.

Speaker 2 (03:02:36):
Go there.

Speaker 3 (03:02:37):
That'll show people how they can get involved and they
can learn about the swarm and how they can start
to take control of this process instead of being controlled
by it.

Speaker 2 (03:02:48):
We need to be histories actors.

Speaker 3 (03:02:49):
That's what Carl Rovius to Maccus and saying, well, you're
just watching what we're doing, where the people are actually
doing it, you can.

Speaker 2 (03:02:55):
Be the people who are actually doing it. That's the
message from doctor Shiva.

Speaker 3 (03:02:59):
Thank you so much, appreciated, Thank you yeah, and sounds
like the clown car is there for you and thank you,
Bye bye, Thanks everybody, thanks for joining us, have a
good day. The common man. They created common Core that

(03:03:27):
dumbed down our children. They created common past track and
control us their Commons project to make sure the commoners
own nothing and the communist future. They see the common
man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has
worth and dignity created in the image of God. That

(03:03:51):
is what we have in common. That is what they
want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide
everything from us.

Speaker 2 (03:04:06):
It's time to turn that around.

Speaker 3 (03:04:07):
And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially. Please keep us in your prayers.
Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Crime Junkie

The Brothers Ortiz

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #2156: The Drug War Is Becoming World War

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

Crime Junkie

The Brothers Ortiz

All Episodes

Wed Episode #2156: The Drug War Is Becoming World War

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang