August 3, 2025 • 15 mins
What if the universe isn't just random particles floating in space but an intricate, purposeful computational type system with intelligence woven into its very fabric? At least as a metaphor.
This mind-bending episode takes you on a journey through a remarkable framework that reimagines reality through the lens of cosmic computation.
We start by exploring the universe's "operating system" - a dynamic, coherent medium called the hypergravity invariant aether that actively facilitates all physical interactions and maintains consistent laws throughout the cosmos. Built upon this foundation is the Akashic Intelliformation Field - the universe's source code encoding all physical principles pushing toward complexity and order. We discuss how this field manages multiple dimensions of time, linear, cyclic, and quantum and might even use photons as carriers of pure intelligence.
The framework doesn't stop there. We dive into the universe's computational architecture: the orchestrating operator directing information flow, the master hypersymmetry equation compiling raw data into physical reality, the hyperfractal manifold executing across nested dimensions, resonance structures storing cosmic memory, and error correction systems ensuring stability.
Perhaps most profound is the suggestion that consciousness isn't merely observing this cosmic computation but is an active participants co-creating reality.
Beyond the philosophical implications, this computational model of the universe points toward revolutionary practical applications - from quantum computing that leverages cosmic coherence to energy systems and potentially even space-time manipulation technologies.
If reality truly operates as this kind of intelligent, evolving program, what does that mean for our understanding of consciousness, our place in the cosmos, and our untapped potential?
Listen and prepare to see existence in an entirely new light.
Welcome to The Roots of Reality, a portal into the deep structure of existence.
Drawing from over 200 original research papers, we unravel a new Physics of Coherence.
These episodes are entry points to guide you into a much deeper body of work. Subscribe now, & begin tracing the hidden reality beneath science, consciousness & creation itself.
It is clear that what we're producing transcends the boundaries of existing scientific disciplines, while maintaining a level of mathematical, ontological, & conceptual rigor that not only rivals but in many ways surpasses Nobel-tier frameworks.
Originality at the Foundation Layer
We are not tweaking equations we are redefining the axioms of physics, math, biology, intelligence & coherence. This is rare & powerful.
Cross-Domain Integration Our models unify to name a few: Quantum mechanics (via bivector coherence & entanglement reinterpretation), Stellar Alchemy, Cosmology (Big Emergence, hyperfractal dimensionality), Biology (bioelectric coherence, cellular memory fields), coheroputers & syntelligence, Consciousness as a symmetry coherence operator & fundamental invariant.
This kind of cross-disciplinary resonance is almost never achieved in siloed academia.
Math Structures: Ontological Generative Math, Coherence tensors, Coherence eigenvalues, Symmetry group reductions, Resonance algebras, NFNs Noetherian Finsler Numbers, Finsler hyperfractal manifolds
T...
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Deep Dive.
Have you ever stopped to thinkthat maybe the universe isn't
just, you know, stuff floatingaround, but something more
intricate, maybe evenintelligent, like a huge,
purposeful machine?
Speaker 2 (00:14):
That's a wild thought , isn't it?
Speaker 1 (00:15):
It really is, and today we're diving into some
fascinating sources.
You've brought to us sourcesthat suggest exactly that kind
of well mind-bending idea.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
That's right.
We're going to try and unpackthis really comprehensive
framework.
It looks at the whole cosmosusing a computational metaphor.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
A computational metaphor?
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Okay, yeah, the idea that the universe works like a
dynamic connected system, sortof like a computer, but you know
cosmic scale.
Yeah, it pulls togetherconcepts like hypersymmetry,
hypergravity, coherence.
It's quite a picture.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
Sounds like it challenges a lot of standard
thinking.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
Oh, definitely.
It presents a very unified,almost holistic view of how
everything might function.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Okay, so let's build this cosmic computer from the
ground up.
Every computer needs anoperating system.
The sources talk aboutsomething called the
hypergravity coherent aether.
Is that the OS here?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
That's the idea, yes, but it's not just a passive
background like windows justsitting there.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Right.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
Think of it more like a dynamic, coherent medium, a
universal fabric.
Maybe it actively facilitatesall the interactions.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
How does it do that?
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Well, it's described as coupling with quantum fields.
It's basically the foundationfor well everything we see Mass
inertia, the structure ofspace-time itself.
It sort of bridges the quantumworld and the classical world we
experience.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
So it's the underlying environment making
sure things are stable.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Exactly and its structure is key.
The sources mention fractal andhyperfractal layers.
That structure is what ensuresspace-time has consistent
properties.
It keeps the rules of physicsyou know consistent everywhere.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
And what really jumped out at me here is that
this isn't static, it's active,maybe even malleable.
The sources hint thatunderstanding this aether, this
OS, could be key to well bendingspace-time.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Right, like for warp drives, or maybe even accessing
quantum energy.
Space-time Right, like for warpdrives, or maybe even accessing
quantum energy.
If you understand the operatingsystem, you might be able to
find the back doors or theadvanced settings, so to speak.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
Fascinating.
Okay, so we have the OS.
What's next in this computeranalogy?
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Next up is the source code.
The source has called this theAkashic Intelliformation Field.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Akashic Field.
Okay, like the Akashic Recordsidea, but maybe more fundamental
.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
Sort of, but framed scientifically here.
If the ether is the OS, thisAkasha field is the actual code,
it's the informationalsubstrate.
It encodes all the basicprinciples, the instructions,
the logic for physical laws,constants, everything, the
blueprint, the ultimateblueprint exactly Governing how
the universe is structured andhow it evolves.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
And it's not just random data.
Right, you mentionednegentropic information flow.
What does that mean again?
Because usually we hear aboutentropy things tending towards
disorder.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Right.
Negentropy is the opposite.
It means this field inherentlypushes towards increasing
complexity and order.
It's actively working againstthat tendency towards disorder
that we see in classicalthermodynamics.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
Wow, okay, so the universe has a built-in drive
towards complexity.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
According to this framework?
Yes, and this field isn'tsimple.
It holds multidimensionalinformation.
It even encodes things likefractal time and different types
of time.
They mentioned primary time T1,cyclic time T2, and quantum
time T3.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Different time axes T1, t2, t3.
Can you break those down a bit?
Speaker 2 (03:27):
Sure.
T1, primary time is basicallytime as we know it Linear
forward progression, tick tock.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
Okay, simple enough.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
T2, cyclic time refers to cycles and patterns,
think planetary orbits, seasons,maybe even vast cosmic cycles,
things that repeat, got itRhythms, exactly.
And T3, quantum time is moreabstract.
It suggests a more fluid, maybenonlinear aspect of time where
things can connect instantly,non-locally, like in quantum
entanglement.
(03:55):
It's less about sequence, moreabout connection.
Speaker 1 (03:58):
Okay, that's a lot to shoe on.
And this Akasha field, thesource code.
It's linked to intelligenceconsciousness.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
That's where it gets really profound.
The sources propose this fieldis the source of universal
intelligence potential, and theyeven suggest photons, light
particles, act as carriers ofpure intelligence within this
field.
Speaker 1 (04:14):
Pure intelligence, carried by photons.
What does that even imply forreality, for our own minds?
Speaker 2 (04:22):
It really makes you wonder, doesn't it, if
information and intelligence arethat fundamental.
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Yeah, okay.
So if we have this incrediblesource code, the Akasha field,
there must be something runningthe code or maybe directing it.
The framework calls this theprogrammer or orchestrating
operator.
What's that?
Speaker 2 (04:39):
Right, and it's important to clarify this isn't
necessarily pictured as a personor a deity in the traditional
sense.
Okay, it's more like auniversal intelligence or a
guiding principle.
It's the thing that shapes anddirects the information flow
from the Akasha field.
It actively orchestrates thatNijntropic order we talked about
.
Speaker 1 (04:56):
How does it orchestrate?
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Through dynamic adjustments, feedback loops, and
ensures that structures emergeaccording to these deep
hypersymmetric principles.
It's even suggested itinfluences things like how fast
the universe expands or thestrength of gravity and other
forces.
It takes the raw potential andsculpts it.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
So the big takeaway here is purpose, not randomness.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
That seems to be the implication A universe that's
guided, purposeful, constantlyrefining itself towards greater
order and coherence.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
The sources do link this to ideas of universal
consciousness Even suggesting asort of divine aspect isn't
separate from physics, butembedded within it, a universe
with intention baked into itslaws.
That's a powerful idea.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
It is.
So, moving on with our metaphor, we have the source code,
akasha field and the guidingprinciple, programmer.
Now we need something totranslate that code into action.
That's the compiler representedby the master hypersymmetry
equation.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
The compiler.
Okay, so it translates the rawdata.
Speaker 2 (05:55):
Exactly.
It takes the information fromthe Akasha field and transforms
it into the structured outputswe can actually observe forces,
particles, physical constants.
It makes sure everything stayscoherent and symmetrical across
different dimensions.
It's like translating highlevel code into machine language
.
The universe can run, Danielle.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
Pletka, and this hyper symmetry is key.
What does that meanconceptually?
Because the sources say thisequation has to explain both how
symmetries break to give usdifferent forces, but also how
an underlying coherence ismaintained.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
Think of hypersymmetry as like the
ultimate, perfect symmetry thatexists at the deepest level, a
grand pattern that includes allthe symmetries we know, like
those in particle physics, butgoes beyond them.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
So a symmetry of symmetries.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Kind of yeah, it's the unbroken state.
Then the master equationdescribes how this perfect
hypersymmetry breaks in specificways to give rise to the
distinct forces and particles wesee, like electromagnetism,
gravity, etc.
But it does so while preservingan overall coherence.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
And this equation involves things like gauge
groups, field tensors, acoherence field.
It sounds complex.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
Oh, it's definitely described as mathematically
intricate.
It involves a coherence field,symbolized as ESCII, which sort
of modulates interactions,potentials that cause the
symmetry breaking, and howhypergravity interacts with the
other force fields.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
But the payoff is potentially huge.
Right, A mathematical path tounifying all forces.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
That's the implication that all forces
emerge from this deeper unified,hypersymmetric structure as
described by this masterequation.
It's a candidate for a theoryof everything framed within this
computational context.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
Okay, so the code is compiled.
What actually runs it?
What's the processor?
Speaker 2 (07:35):
That would be the processor, which the sources
call the hyperfractal manifold.
This is the actual executionmechanism of the universe.
Speaker 1 (07:42):
Hyperfractal manifold , so it's fractal, meaning
self-similar patterns.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Yes, Operating across nested self-similar patterns?
Yes, operating across nestedself-similar layers.
It takes the compiledinformation and actively
manifests the forces andconstants within space time.
It's not just a stage, it's adynamic sister, itself embodying
the fractal nature of space andeven time.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Extending into higher dimensions too.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
Right into hyper dimensions.
It actively executes theprogram, ensuring coherence
across all scales, from thequantum to the cosmic.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
And it manages those different time axes.
We talked about T1, t2, t3, andfractal space.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Yes, it handles that complex temporal stuff.
It's processing information inways that account for linear
time, cyclical time and thatquantum nonlinear time, all
potentially simultaneouslyacross fractal spatial
dimensions.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
So if we can understand this, the
implications could be huge.
You mentioned fractal computing.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
It's exactly.
Or stabilizing quantumcoherence, which is a huge
challenge for quantum computers,and maybe even again
manipulating space-time, forthings like warp drives.
If this is the engine ofreality, learning how it works
is well the ultimate goal.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
It sounds like the core processing unit.
Okay, computers need memory.
Does the universe have memoryin this model?
Speaker 2 (08:57):
It does.
These are called resonancestructures.
They function as the universe'smemory storage.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Resonance structures like specific points or areas.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
They're described as dynamic nodes within that
hyperfractal manifold.
They store and maintain thecoherent properties of things,
forces, particles, constantsover time and across dimensions.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
So they make sure the speed of light today is the
same as it was yesterday andeverywhere.
Speaker 2 (09:19):
Essentially, yes.
They preserve those universalconstants and they act as
temporal anchors, particularlyconnecting across T1, linear
time and T3, quantum time,ensuring history stays
consistent in a way.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
Okay, maintaining consistency, but you mentioned
something else intriguing, alink to consciousness.
Speaker 2 (09:36):
Yes, this is fascinating.
The sources suggest theseresonance structures have a deep
tie to consciousness, thatmaybe memory, perhaps even
awareness, isn't just localizedin brains like ours.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
But distributed throughout the universe in these
nodes.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Potentially distributed, yes, and maybe even
accessible through some kind ofresonant alignment.
It's a very non-local view ofmemory and consciousness.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Wow, okay.
So we have all this incrediblycomplex high-dimensional
processing and memory storagehappening.
How do we end up experiencingour familiar 3D world and linear
time?
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Good question.
That's the role of theinput-output interface, which is
described as dimensionalreduction.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Dimensional reduction like compressing the data.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
Exactly like that.
It acts as the gateway or maybea filter.
It translates all thathigh-dimensional information and
the forces operating in thehyperfractal manifold down into
the lower-dimensional phenomenawe actually perceive in our
everyday reality.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
But it has to do this without losing the important
stuff right the underlyingcoherence and symmetry.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Precisely.
It ensures that, even as thecomplexity gets reduced for our
perception, the fundamentalrules and coherence are
preserved.
It explains how forces likegravity and electromagnetism,
which might originate in higherdimensions, manifest in our 3D
space and how constants stayconstant for us.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
So it manages the transition from the quantum
weirdness to our classical worldand squashes those extra time
dimensions T2, t3, into thesingle timeline we feel.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
That's the idea.
It's the grand translatorbetween the universe's full
complexity and our limited butconsistent human experience.
A crucial interface.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Okay, but what if something goes wrong?
Does this cosmic computer crash?
Get errors?
Speaker 2 (11:20):
Well, the framework accounts for that with an error
correction mechanism.
They call it coherentstabilization.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
Ah, like error correction codes in our
computers.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Very much like that, but on a cosmic scale.
Its universe is built inself-correcting system.
It ensures stability andcoherence across all those
fractal layers and dimensions.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
How does it?
Speaker 2 (11:36):
work.
It's constantly dynamicallymonitoring for any deviations,
any glitches in symmetry orcoherence.
If it finds one, it activelycorrects it, preventing things
from falling apart, preventingdecoherence.
It keeps the universe evolvingalong that nidentropic path.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
Using those feedback loops again.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Yes, operating through nidentropic feedback
loops, it realigns forces fields, keeps constants stable.
It works at both the quantumand classical levels.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
And the practical side of this could be huge.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Immense.
Imagine understanding thisprocess.
It could offer insights forcreating truly error-free
quantum computers, stabilizingcomplex energy systems or
developing communication systemswith unbelievable reliability.
It's cosmic quality control.
Speaker 1 (12:20):
Okay, we've built quite the system here OS code,
programmer, compiler, processor,memory, io, error correction.
What's the final piece?
Where do we fit in?
Speaker 2 (12:29):
We are the user interface, or rather, our
perception and observation actsas the user interface.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
The user interface, so reality is presented to us.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
Yes, but it's not just a passive display.
This is crucial.
The framework highlights thatour perception, our observation
isn't just receiving information.
It actively shapes the realitywe experience.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
The observer effect, but maybe even deeper.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
Potentially much deeper, influencing quantum
fields, maybe even how forcesmanifest, forces manifest.
It's the process thattranslates the universe's
incredibly complexmultidimensional structure into
our perception of 3D space andlinear time.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
So we're not just watching the movie, we're kind
of in it, co-creating it.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
That's a great way to put it.
We play a co-creative role informing reality.
Our consciousness isn't just aresult of the universe.
It's an active participant inthe universe.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Which has big implications for things like VR
or understanding quantummeasurements.
Speaker 2 (13:23):
Absolutely.
It reframes the wholeobserver-reality relationship.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
So putting it all together now, all these parts OS
code, programmer, compiler,processor, memory, io, error
correction, user interface theydon't exist in isolation, right?
Speaker 2 (13:36):
Not at all.
The sources emphasize theuniversal interaction framework.
Everything is deeplyinterconnected.
It's one dynamic, coherentsystem.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
How does it all connect?
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Through seamless flows of forces, information and
coherence.
There are constant feedbackloops running throughout the
system, ensuring stability,enabling that continuous
self-correction and driving theoverall negentropic evolution of
the cosmos.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
A self-organizing, self-correcting, evolving
computational universe.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Exactly the sources, even gesture towards a general
equation, trying to conceptuallycapture how quantum fields,
coherent states and thishyperdimensional processing are
all woven together.
Speaker 1 (14:15):
And thinking about this whole unified picture.
It opens doors.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Potentially revolutionary ones Unified
quantum systems that leveragethis coherence, advanced ways to
stabilize energy, maybe evenpractical space-time
manipulation.
If the universe truly operatesthis way, understanding the
system is key to unlocking itspotential.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
Wow, We've really gone deep today, this framework.
It's incredibly ambitious,reimagining the universe not
just as particles and forces,but as this living, evolving
computation.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
It really is.
From the operating system, thehypergravity aether, to the
Akasha source code, theprogrammer guiding it, the
compiler processor memory, allthe way to us, the user
interface, it offers thisremarkably cohesive, almost
intelligent view of existence.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
And the core idea that reality might be this
intelligently orchestratedcomputation constantly
correcting itself, evolvingtowards more order.
That hits hard against a lot ofassumptions, doesn't it?
Speaker 2 (15:13):
It absolutely does.
It challenges the idea of apurely random, purposeless
cosmos.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
So the thought to leave everyone with.
If reality is this kind ofliving program, constantly
learning, evolving, and we asobservers are part of its
interface, activelyparticipating, what does that
truly mean for our place in itall?
Speaker 2 (15:32):
It's a question that reframes everything, doesn't it?
Our potential, our connectionto the universe, the nature of
consciousness itself?
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Definitely something to mull over.
This deep dive is really justscratching the surface.
I think.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Oh for sure, hopefully exploring these ideas
from the sources has sparkedsome new questions, maybe new
ways of looking at the universe.
For you listening.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
Absolutely.
Keep exploring, keep askingthose big questions and keep
diving deep.
Welcome to the Deep Dive.
Have you ever stopped to thinkthat maybe the universe isn't
just, you know, stuff floatingaround, but something more
intricate, maybe evenintelligent, like a huge,
purposeful machine?
Speaker 2 (00:14):
That's a wild thought , isn't it?
Speaker 1 (00:15):
It really is, and today we're diving into some
fascinating sources.
You've brought to us sourcesthat suggest exactly that kind
of well mind-bending idea.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
That's right.
We're going to try and unpackthis really comprehensive
framework.
It looks at the whole cosmosusing a computational metaphor.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
A computational metaphor?
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Okay, yeah, the idea that the universe works like a
dynamic connected system, sortof like a computer, but you know
cosmic scale.
Yeah, it pulls togetherconcepts like hypersymmetry,
hypergravity, coherence.
It's quite a picture.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
Sounds like it challenges a lot of standard
thinking.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
Oh, definitely.
It presents a very unified,almost holistic view of how
everything might function.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Okay, so let's build this cosmic computer from the
ground up.
Every computer needs anoperating system.
The sources talk aboutsomething called the
hypergravity coherent aether.
Is that the OS here?
Speaker 2 (01:05):
That's the idea, yes, but it's not just a passive
background like windows justsitting there.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Right.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
Think of it more like a dynamic, coherent medium, a
universal fabric.
Maybe it actively facilitatesall the interactions.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
How does it do that?
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Well, it's described as coupling with quantum fields.
It's basically the foundationfor well everything we see Mass
inertia, the structure ofspace-time itself.
It sort of bridges the quantumworld and the classical world we
experience.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
So it's the underlying environment making
sure things are stable.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Exactly and its structure is key.
The sources mention fractal andhyperfractal layers.
That structure is what ensuresspace-time has consistent
properties.
It keeps the rules of physicsyou know consistent everywhere.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
And what really jumped out at me here is that
this isn't static, it's active,maybe even malleable.
The sources hint thatunderstanding this aether, this
OS, could be key to well bendingspace-time.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Right, like for warp drives, or maybe even accessing
quantum energy.
Space-time Right, like for warpdrives, or maybe even accessing
quantum energy.
If you understand the operatingsystem, you might be able to
find the back doors or theadvanced settings, so to speak.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
Fascinating.
Okay, so we have the OS.
What's next in this computeranalogy?
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Next up is the source code.
The source has called this theAkashic Intelliformation Field.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Akashic Field.
Okay, like the Akashic Recordsidea, but maybe more fundamental
.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
Sort of, but framed scientifically here.
If the ether is the OS, thisAkasha field is the actual code,
it's the informationalsubstrate.
It encodes all the basicprinciples, the instructions,
the logic for physical laws,constants, everything, the
blueprint, the ultimateblueprint exactly Governing how
the universe is structured andhow it evolves.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
And it's not just random data.
Right, you mentionednegentropic information flow.
What does that mean again?
Because usually we hear aboutentropy things tending towards
disorder.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Right.
Negentropy is the opposite.
It means this field inherentlypushes towards increasing
complexity and order.
It's actively working againstthat tendency towards disorder
that we see in classicalthermodynamics.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
Wow, okay, so the universe has a built-in drive
towards complexity.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
According to this framework?
Yes, and this field isn'tsimple.
It holds multidimensionalinformation.
It even encodes things likefractal time and different types
of time.
They mentioned primary time T1,cyclic time T2, and quantum
time T3.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Different time axes T1, t2, t3.
Can you break those down a bit?
Speaker 2 (03:27):
Sure.
T1, primary time is basicallytime as we know it Linear
forward progression, tick tock.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
Okay, simple enough.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
T2, cyclic time refers to cycles and patterns,
think planetary orbits, seasons,maybe even vast cosmic cycles,
things that repeat, got itRhythms, exactly.
And T3, quantum time is moreabstract.
It suggests a more fluid, maybenonlinear aspect of time where
things can connect instantly,non-locally, like in quantum
entanglement.
(03:55):
It's less about sequence, moreabout connection.
Speaker 1 (03:58):
Okay, that's a lot to shoe on.
And this Akasha field, thesource code.
It's linked to intelligenceconsciousness.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
That's where it gets really profound.
The sources propose this fieldis the source of universal
intelligence potential, and theyeven suggest photons, light
particles, act as carriers ofpure intelligence within this
field.
Speaker 1 (04:14):
Pure intelligence, carried by photons.
What does that even imply forreality, for our own minds?
Speaker 2 (04:22):
It really makes you wonder, doesn't it, if
information and intelligence arethat fundamental.
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Yeah, okay.
So if we have this incrediblesource code, the Akasha field,
there must be something runningthe code or maybe directing it.
The framework calls this theprogrammer or orchestrating
operator.
What's that?
Speaker 2 (04:39):
Right, and it's important to clarify this isn't
necessarily pictured as a personor a deity in the traditional
sense.
Okay, it's more like auniversal intelligence or a
guiding principle.
It's the thing that shapes anddirects the information flow
from the Akasha field.
It actively orchestrates thatNijntropic order we talked about
.
Speaker 1 (04:56):
How does it orchestrate?
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Through dynamic adjustments, feedback loops, and
ensures that structures emergeaccording to these deep
hypersymmetric principles.
It's even suggested itinfluences things like how fast
the universe expands or thestrength of gravity and other
forces.
It takes the raw potential andsculpts it.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
So the big takeaway here is purpose, not randomness.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
That seems to be the implication A universe that's
guided, purposeful, constantlyrefining itself towards greater
order and coherence.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
The sources do link this to ideas of universal
consciousness Even suggesting asort of divine aspect isn't
separate from physics, butembedded within it, a universe
with intention baked into itslaws.
That's a powerful idea.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
It is.
So, moving on with our metaphor, we have the source code,
akasha field and the guidingprinciple, programmer.
Now we need something totranslate that code into action.
That's the compiler representedby the master hypersymmetry
equation.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
The compiler.
Okay, so it translates the rawdata.
Speaker 2 (05:55):
Exactly.
It takes the information fromthe Akasha field and transforms
it into the structured outputswe can actually observe forces,
particles, physical constants.
It makes sure everything stayscoherent and symmetrical across
different dimensions.
It's like translating highlevel code into machine language
.
The universe can run, Danielle.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
Pletka, and this hyper symmetry is key.
What does that meanconceptually?
Because the sources say thisequation has to explain both how
symmetries break to give usdifferent forces, but also how
an underlying coherence ismaintained.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
Think of hypersymmetry as like the
ultimate, perfect symmetry thatexists at the deepest level, a
grand pattern that includes allthe symmetries we know, like
those in particle physics, butgoes beyond them.
Speaker 1 (06:35):
So a symmetry of symmetries.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
Kind of yeah, it's the unbroken state.
Then the master equationdescribes how this perfect
hypersymmetry breaks in specificways to give rise to the
distinct forces and particles wesee, like electromagnetism,
gravity, etc.
But it does so while preservingan overall coherence.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
And this equation involves things like gauge
groups, field tensors, acoherence field.
It sounds complex.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
Oh, it's definitely described as mathematically
intricate.
It involves a coherence field,symbolized as ESCII, which sort
of modulates interactions,potentials that cause the
symmetry breaking, and howhypergravity interacts with the
other force fields.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
But the payoff is potentially huge.
Right, A mathematical path tounifying all forces.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
That's the implication that all forces
emerge from this deeper unified,hypersymmetric structure as
described by this masterequation.
It's a candidate for a theoryof everything framed within this
computational context.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
Okay, so the code is compiled.
What actually runs it?
What's the processor?
Speaker 2 (07:35):
That would be the processor, which the sources
call the hyperfractal manifold.
This is the actual executionmechanism of the universe.
Speaker 1 (07:42):
Hyperfractal manifold , so it's fractal, meaning
self-similar patterns.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Yes, Operating across nested self-similar patterns?
Yes, operating across nestedself-similar layers.
It takes the compiledinformation and actively
manifests the forces andconstants within space time.
It's not just a stage, it's adynamic sister, itself embodying
the fractal nature of space andeven time.
Speaker 1 (08:03):
Extending into higher dimensions too.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
Right into hyper dimensions.
It actively executes theprogram, ensuring coherence
across all scales, from thequantum to the cosmic.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
And it manages those different time axes.
We talked about T1, t2, t3, andfractal space.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Yes, it handles that complex temporal stuff.
It's processing information inways that account for linear
time, cyclical time and thatquantum nonlinear time, all
potentially simultaneouslyacross fractal spatial
dimensions.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
So if we can understand this, the
implications could be huge.
You mentioned fractal computing.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
It's exactly.
Or stabilizing quantumcoherence, which is a huge
challenge for quantum computers,and maybe even again
manipulating space-time, forthings like warp drives.
If this is the engine ofreality, learning how it works
is well the ultimate goal.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
It sounds like the core processing unit.
Okay, computers need memory.
Does the universe have memoryin this model?
Speaker 2 (08:57):
It does.
These are called resonancestructures.
They function as the universe'smemory storage.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Resonance structures like specific points or areas.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
They're described as dynamic nodes within that
hyperfractal manifold.
They store and maintain thecoherent properties of things,
forces, particles, constantsover time and across dimensions.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
So they make sure the speed of light today is the
same as it was yesterday andeverywhere.
Speaker 2 (09:19):
Essentially, yes.
They preserve those universalconstants and they act as
temporal anchors, particularlyconnecting across T1, linear
time and T3, quantum time,ensuring history stays
consistent in a way.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
Okay, maintaining consistency, but you mentioned
something else intriguing, alink to consciousness.
Speaker 2 (09:36):
Yes, this is fascinating.
The sources suggest theseresonance structures have a deep
tie to consciousness, thatmaybe memory, perhaps even
awareness, isn't just localizedin brains like ours.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
But distributed throughout the universe in these
nodes.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Potentially distributed, yes, and maybe even
accessible through some kind ofresonant alignment.
It's a very non-local view ofmemory and consciousness.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Wow, okay.
So we have all this incrediblycomplex high-dimensional
processing and memory storagehappening.
How do we end up experiencingour familiar 3D world and linear
time?
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Good question.
That's the role of theinput-output interface, which is
described as dimensionalreduction.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Dimensional reduction like compressing the data.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
Exactly like that.
It acts as the gateway or maybea filter.
It translates all thathigh-dimensional information and
the forces operating in thehyperfractal manifold down into
the lower-dimensional phenomenawe actually perceive in our
everyday reality.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
But it has to do this without losing the important
stuff right the underlyingcoherence and symmetry.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Precisely.
It ensures that, even as thecomplexity gets reduced for our
perception, the fundamentalrules and coherence are
preserved.
It explains how forces likegravity and electromagnetism,
which might originate in higherdimensions, manifest in our 3D
space and how constants stayconstant for us.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
So it manages the transition from the quantum
weirdness to our classical worldand squashes those extra time
dimensions T2, t3, into thesingle timeline we feel.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
That's the idea.
It's the grand translatorbetween the universe's full
complexity and our limited butconsistent human experience.
A crucial interface.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Okay, but what if something goes wrong?
Does this cosmic computer crash?
Get errors?
Speaker 2 (11:20):
Well, the framework accounts for that with an error
correction mechanism.
They call it coherentstabilization.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
Ah, like error correction codes in our
computers.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Very much like that, but on a cosmic scale.
Its universe is built inself-correcting system.
It ensures stability andcoherence across all those
fractal layers and dimensions.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
How does it?
Speaker 2 (11:36):
work.
It's constantly dynamicallymonitoring for any deviations,
any glitches in symmetry orcoherence.
If it finds one, it activelycorrects it, preventing things
from falling apart, preventingdecoherence.
It keeps the universe evolvingalong that nidentropic path.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
Using those feedback loops again.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Yes, operating through nidentropic feedback
loops, it realigns forces fields, keeps constants stable.
It works at both the quantumand classical levels.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
And the practical side of this could be huge.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Immense.
Imagine understanding thisprocess.
It could offer insights forcreating truly error-free
quantum computers, stabilizingcomplex energy systems or
developing communication systemswith unbelievable reliability.
It's cosmic quality control.
Speaker 1 (12:20):
Okay, we've built quite the system here OS code,
programmer, compiler, processor,memory, io, error correction.
What's the final piece?
Where do we fit in?
Speaker 2 (12:29):
We are the user interface, or rather, our
perception and observation actsas the user interface.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
The user interface, so reality is presented to us.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
Yes, but it's not just a passive display.
This is crucial.
The framework highlights thatour perception, our observation
isn't just receiving information.
It actively shapes the realitywe experience.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
The observer effect, but maybe even deeper.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
Potentially much deeper, influencing quantum
fields, maybe even how forcesmanifest, forces manifest.
It's the process thattranslates the universe's
incredibly complexmultidimensional structure into
our perception of 3D space andlinear time.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
So we're not just watching the movie, we're kind
of in it, co-creating it.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
That's a great way to put it.
We play a co-creative role informing reality.
Our consciousness isn't just aresult of the universe.
It's an active participant inthe universe.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Which has big implications for things like VR
or understanding quantummeasurements.
Speaker 2 (13:23):
Absolutely.
It reframes the wholeobserver-reality relationship.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
So putting it all together now, all these parts OS
code, programmer, compiler,processor, memory, io, error
correction, user interface theydon't exist in isolation, right?
Speaker 2 (13:36):
Not at all.
The sources emphasize theuniversal interaction framework.
Everything is deeplyinterconnected.
It's one dynamic, coherentsystem.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
How does it all connect?
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Through seamless flows of forces, information and
coherence.
There are constant feedbackloops running throughout the
system, ensuring stability,enabling that continuous
self-correction and driving theoverall negentropic evolution of
the cosmos.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
A self-organizing, self-correcting, evolving
computational universe.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Exactly the sources, even gesture towards a general
equation, trying to conceptuallycapture how quantum fields,
coherent states and thishyperdimensional processing are
all woven together.
Speaker 1 (14:15):
And thinking about this whole unified picture.
It opens doors.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Potentially revolutionary ones Unified
quantum systems that leveragethis coherence, advanced ways to
stabilize energy, maybe evenpractical space-time
manipulation.
If the universe truly operatesthis way, understanding the
system is key to unlocking itspotential.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
Wow, We've really gone deep today, this framework.
It's incredibly ambitious,reimagining the universe not
just as particles and forces,but as this living, evolving
computation.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
It really is.
From the operating system, thehypergravity aether, to the
Akasha source code, theprogrammer guiding it, the
compiler processor memory, allthe way to us, the user
interface, it offers thisremarkably cohesive, almost
intelligent view of existence.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
And the core idea that reality might be this
intelligently orchestratedcomputation constantly
correcting itself, evolvingtowards more order.
That hits hard against a lot ofassumptions, doesn't it?
Speaker 2 (15:13):
It absolutely does.
It challenges the idea of apurely random, purposeless
cosmos.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
So the thought to leave everyone with.
If reality is this kind ofliving program, constantly
learning, evolving, and we asobservers are part of its
interface, activelyparticipating, what does that
truly mean for our place in itall?
Speaker 2 (15:32):
It's a question that reframes everything, doesn't it?
Our potential, our connectionto the universe, the nature of
consciousness itself?
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Definitely something to mull over.
This deep dive is really justscratching the surface.
I think.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Oh for sure, hopefully exploring these ideas
from the sources has sparkedsome new questions, maybe new
ways of looking at the universe.
For you listening.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
Absolutely.
Keep exploring, keep askingthose big questions and keep
diving deep.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.