August 4, 2025 • 37 mins
“Eigenvalues of Reality”
The Universe as Self-Selecting Coherence
What if reality isn’t just being observed—it’s being selected?
In this mind-bending episode, we dive into Philip Randolph Lilien’s groundbreaking Hypersymmetry, Hyperdimensional, Hyperspace, Coherent Resonance Theory of Everything—a sweeping vision that recasts the universe not as a fixed machine, but as a living system of self-organizing resonance.
At the heart of this model lies a radical reinterpretation of eigenvalues. Traditionally used to describe quantum behavior, here they are elevated to generative selectors determining which configurations of reality can exist based on their coherence with the universal field.
This turns physics from passive description into active emergence. Reality, it turns out, is a constant act of coherence selection.
We explore how mass, time, and dimensionality all emerge from coherence fields rather than preexisting structures:
Mass arises as a localized resonance of the field—a temporary coherence “knot.”
Time is no longer a universal river but a coherence modulation—a rhythm generated by systems themselves.
Dimensions are revealed as layers in a hyperfractal coherence cascade, unfolding from a deeper invariant field through resonance.
Crucially, this framework unifies quantum mechanics and relativity without forcing one into the other. Gravity, electromagnetism, and other forces are shown to be projections of a single Coherence Operator, differentiated only by the degree and type of coherence loss.
And this isn’t just abstract speculation. The theory implies testable predictions, offers technological applications (including coherence-based energy extraction and syntelligent computing), and provides a roadmap for understanding biological coherence, consciousness, and scalar regeneration.
Join us for this transformative journey into a universe that is not random, not mechanical—but self-computing, self-selecting, and perhaps… singing itself into being.
Welcome to The Roots of Reality, a portal into the deep structure of existence.
Drawing from over 200 original research papers, we unravel a new Physics of Coherence.
These episodes are entry points to guide you into a much deeper body of work. Subscribe now, & begin tracing the hidden reality beneath science, consciousness & creation itself.
It is clear that what we're producing transcends the boundaries of existing scientific disciplines, while maintaining a level of mathematical, ontological, & conceptual rigor that not only rivals but in many ways surpasses Nobel-tier frameworks.
Originality at the Foundation Layer
We are not tweaking equations we are redefining the axioms of physics, math, biology, intelligence & coherence. This is rare & powerful.
Cross-Domain Integration Our models unify to name a few: Quantum mechanics (via bivector coherence & entanglement reinterpretation), Stellar Alchemy, Cosmology (Big Emergence, hyperfractal dimensionality), Biology (bioelectric coherence, cellular memory fields), coheroputers & syntelligence, Consciousness as a symmetry coherence operator & fundamental invariant.
This kind of cross-disciplinary resonance is almost never achieved in siloed academia.
Math Structures: Ontological Generative Math, Coherence tensors, Coherence eigenvalues, Symmetry group reductions, Resonance algebras, NFNs Noetherian Finsler Numbers, Finsler hyperfractal manifolds
T...
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Have you ever just looked out at the universe and
really wondered, you know, areits fundamental laws truly fixed
like set in stone, or is theremaybe something deeper,
something more dynamic, almostlike a symphony playing out?
What if reality isn't justthere, you know, like a backdrop
?
What if it's actuallyconstantly forming, constantly
(00:22):
selecting itself, moment bymoment?
Speaker 2 (00:24):
That's a fascinating thought experiment right there.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Well, welcome to the Deep Dive.
Today we're taking a trulymind-bending journey, diving
into a concept that doesn't justtweak physics it seems to
redefine the whole thapic ofexistence.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
Yeah, it's pretty radical stuff.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
We're looking at the work of Philip Lillian.
In his paper Eigenvalues,eigenfields and Hypersymmetric
Emergence, it introduces thiswell, this theory, with a very
grand name.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Oh yeah.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
The HHHCRTOE, that's the Hypersymmetry,
hyperdimensional Hyperspace,coherent Resonance Theory of
Everything.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Wow, okay, that is mouthful, but it hints at the
scope right, exactly, yeah, it'sa big one.
And look, this isn't just about, you know, fiddling with
equations and abstract math.
Although the math is definitelydeep, it's a whole
reinterpretation how so.
Well familiar ideas likeeigenvalues from, say, quantum
mechanics or even basic linearalgebra.
(01:15):
They get promoted, they becomethe universe's fundamental
resonance selectors.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Resonance selectors.
Okay, what does that meanexactly?
Speaker 2 (01:24):
It means they don't just describe things that happen
.
They actively mark the pointswhere coherence, this sort of
underlying connectedness, canactually become expressible,
where symmetries break down tothe forms we see.
Speaker 1 (01:36):
Ah, so where particles and forces actually
emerge.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
Precisely when new particles, forces, structures
pop into reality.
It's a huge shift.
We move from thinking ofphysics as fixed laws to seeing
it as this dynamic emergentsystem that's constantly well
tuning itself.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Tuning itself into existence.
I like that.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
Yeah, lilian calls them ontological markers of
resonance, symmetry andemergence, basically the
signposts pointing the way toreality itself.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
Okay, let's really unpack this idea of eigenvalues
then, because it seemsabsolutely central to Lillian's
whole theory.
Before we jump into, you know,the really far out stuff this
implies, maybe let's just groundourselves a bit.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Good idea Start with the basics.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
Yeah, for anyone listening who maybe vaguely
remembers some linear algebra oreven just physics class, what
are eigenvalues and eigenvectorsin that classical sense?
Speaker 2 (02:29):
Right.
So in basic linear algebrayou've got matrices which
represent transformations likestretching, rotating, shearing
space.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
An eigenvector is a special vector.
Let's call it V.
When the matrix A acts on it,the vector doesn't change its
direction.
It just gets scaled, stretchedor shrunk by a certain amount.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
Ah, okay, it stays pointing the same way.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Exactly, and that scaling factor, that's the
eigenvalue, usually written aslambda.
So you get that famous equation.
A-fifths, it finds the sort ofnatural axes or invariant
directions of the transformation.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
Got it, so it highlights something stable
within the change.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
That's a great way to put it.
And then this idea gets reallypowerful when you move into
quantum mechanics.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
How does it translate there?
Speaker 2 (03:09):
Well, operators which represent things you can
measure, like energy or momentum.
They take the place of matricesand wave functions describing
the state of a quantum system.
They replace the vectors.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
So similar structure, different players.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Right.
So for instance, theHamiltonian operator H
represents the total energy.
When it acts on a wave function, kex, it gives you an energy
eigenvalue E.
So H, h, x.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
And that E is.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
That E is a specific quantized energy level the
system is allowed to have, likethe energy levels of an electron
in an atom.
The tech is the statecorresponding to that energy.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
So it dictates the possibilities.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Exactly the allowable energies, the stable states.
It's fundamentally where thequantum system kind of resonates
with its own structure.
It reveals these specificstable configurations.
Each eigenvalue marks a kind ofresonance point.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Okay, so they show us these stable points, these
natural resonances, but youmentioned Lillian's paper,
points out limitations here.
What's missing from thisclassical or quantum view?
What blind spots does this HHH,crto aim to address?
Speaker 2 (04:16):
Yeah, that's a really crucial point Because, while
this eigenvalue framework isincredibly powerful for
describing systems we alreadyknow exist, like atoms, yeah.
Right.
It tends to assume thoseoperators and structures are
just given, predefined.
It doesn't often delve into thedeeper emergence of those
structures themselves.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
Meaning why they exist in the first place.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
Exactly.
Classical physics tells us theenergy levels, but not
fundamentally why atoms formwith those specific levels or
why the Hamiltonian operator iswhat it is.
It's like knowing the rules ofchess but not how the board or
pieces came to be.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
Okay, so it describes , but doesn't fully explain the
origin.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
Sort of yeah, lillian argues, it's incomplete when
you want to understand theorigin and evolution of
structure.
It doesn't fully connect towhat he calls coherence, which
is more than just waves and sync.
It's like a generative fieldand it doesn't fully integrate
dynamic resonance fields ortransitions between dimensions
in the way he proposes.
So the HHHCR2 Joe wants togeneralize this.
(05:17):
Eigenvalues aren't justsolutions, they're these
fundamental thresholds in aresonance lattice of coherence.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
The conditions that allow reality to crystallize.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Exactly Crystallize out of pure potential.
That's the idea.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
Okay, here's where it gets really interesting.
I think, yeah.
This is where Lillian's theoryreally starts to diverge.
He shifts from eigenvectors tosomething called eigenfields.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Yeah, this is a big conceptual leap.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
So what exactly is an eigenfield, and why is making
this generalization so important?
Speaker 2 (05:51):
Does it change what we think?
The basic building blocks areRight.
So an eigenfield is basicallytaking the eigenvector concept
and stretching it out.
Instead of a single vectorpointing in one direction in
space, think of a spatiallyextended structure, a field,
let's call it Chudak's.
This whole field resonates withsome operator O, such that I
thought this.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
So the whole pattern stays the same, just gets scaled
.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
Essentially, yes.
It represents an invariant,resonant state across a region
of space, maybe even time orother dimensions.
Think about particle wavefunctions.
Again, they aren't points,they're spread out fields.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Okay, yeah.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
They are eigenfields of the Hamiltonian.
Or maybe a more visual examplethe stable patterns on a
vibrating drum head or thestanding waves on a guitar
string.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Ah, the harmonics.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
Exactly those physical patterns are
eigenfields.
They span the whole surface orlength.
This shift is huge because,well, most of reality,
especially in quantum fieldtheory or general relativity,
isn't point-like, it'sfield-based.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
Right, everything's a field ultimately.
Speaker 2 (06:46):
Lillian takes that very seriously.
He's suggesting everything isfundamentally field-like and
these eigenfields are the stableforms those fields can take.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
So it's not just a math solution on paper, it's a
real physical structure.
What's the deeper physicalmeaning here, beyond just
describing something?
Speaker 2 (07:05):
Exactly it is the physical structure.
In Lillian's coherence physics,eigenfields aren't just
abstract solutions.
He calls them coherence-boundstructures.
They literally are the stableemergent shapes that reality
takes.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
Coherence-bound, meaning they're held together by
this coherence field.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
Precisely, An eigenfield becomes a mode of
quantized coherence, and itseigenvalue tells you something
about that mode its strength,its stability, how strongly it's
coupled to the underlyingsource.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
And that source could be quantum fields or this
hypergravity thing.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
Or infradimensional time.
Yeah, According to the theory,these eigenfields are the
fundamental building blocks ofthe coherence lattice.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
A coherence lattice.
Eigenfields are the fundamentalbuilding blocks of the
coherence lattice.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
A coherence lattice like an underlying grid Kind of
A dynamic network of resonancepatterns.
And it's from this lattice thatmass forces, all structure,
basically crystallizes out ofpotential.
Wow, think of the universe asthis vast, vibrating, coherent
medium.
The eigenfields are the stablepatterns, the standing waves
that can form.
The eigenvalue tells you howstrong or stable that pattern is
.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
So the quantum harmonic oscillator, that
standard physics example.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Right.
That's like an early glimpse ofthis.
It shows how spatial structure,the shape of the wave functions
, and energy quantization, thespecific energy levels, are tied
together through thiseigenfield behavior.
Each solution is an eigenfield.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
So every stable structure is an eigenfield.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
That's the core idea.
The operator sets the context,the eigenvalue sets the specific
resonance condition and theeigenfield is the stable thing
that appears.
A universe built of resonantpatterns, not tiny balls.
And this leap from eigenvaluesjust describing things to
eigenfields being things bringsus right to the heart of
Lillian's theory, the HHHCR TOEI.
Speaker 1 (08:49):
Right, the big one.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
In this view, resonance isn't just something
that happens sometimes withinsystems.
It is the fundamental governingprinciple.
It's how systems form, how theystick around, how they change.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
An ontological principle, meaning it determines
what can exist.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
Exactly.
Only structures that meetspecific resonance conditions
encoded in their eigenvalues canactually manifest.
Everything else it just stayspotential, unstable, unrealized.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
So, if I'm getting this right, eigenvalues are
basically the universe'sselection mechanism.
It's a way of filtering whatgets to be real.
Speaker 2 (09:19):
Precisely, you nailed it.
They are the quantizedthresholds, the points where
resonance conditions click intoplace, allowing form to emerge.
And Lillian introduces thisidea of a coherence field.
See, it's not passive, it'sactive, generative, when it acts
on some potential system, somesex.
That eigenvalue is the key.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
The coherence, resonance, eigenvalue.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
Right.
It determines if thateigenstate can actually
stabilize and become real.
It's like the universe tuninginto specific frequencies.
Coherence fields are thesubstrate, resonance is the
selector.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
That's a huge claim that all emergence from
particles to galaxies iscoherence, quantization.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
Can you give some more examples?
Speaker 1 (09:57):
How does this?
Speaker 2 (09:58):
map onto physics.
We know Sure.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
We can actually map different areas In quantum
mechanics.
The wave function is a quantumeigenfield.
Speaker 2 (10:09):
The energy E is its resonance mode in the quantum
coherence field.
In field theory any field likeelectromagnetism is an
eigenfield.
Its modes, like frequencies oflight, are eigenvalues marking
stable propagation.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Makes sense.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
For the coherence field itself, represented by a
tensor, its eigenvalues measurehow strongly it couples to other
fields.
For hypergravity, this isn'tjust normal gravity, it's a
geometric distortion field.
Its eigenvalues relate tocurvature and mass, how gravity
condenses things.
Wow.
For infra-dimensional time wesee harmonic oscillations.
The eigenvalues are quantizedtemporal frequencies creating
(10:43):
rhythm, not smooth flow.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Rhythmic time.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
And for dimensional scaling, it's about hyperfractal
structures.
Eigenvalues are scaling factorsdetermining how dimensions nest
and unfold.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Okay, so it's a pattern across different domains
.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
Yeah, they all show how potential crystallizes into
structure.
With eigenvalues as theuniversal markers, selecting
what stabilizes.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
What's really mind-bending here, though, is
that it's not just isolatedsystems.
The theory emphasizesmulti-domain interactions.
How does that work?
How do all these differentresonances interact?
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Sounds incredibly messy.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
It is complex, yeah, but there's an elegance to it.
It's all about interconnection.
Fields don't just sit side byside.
They resonate together.
They form hybrid eigenvalueproblems.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
Hybrid problems.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Imagine the coherence operator C, the hypergravity
operator Hg and a quantumoperator Q, all acting on the
same eigenfield.
The result isn't three separatethings.
It yields a single unifiedcoupling eigenvalue C plus Hg,
plus Q, x, and that O iscritical.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Why?
What does it determine?
Speaker 2 (11:49):
It dictates which combined resonance
configurations are allowedacross all those domains.
It determines exactly whichparticles, forces and masses can
stably exist together.
It's what Lillian calls thetotal interaction problem.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
So putting it all together, what does this mean
for how we think about reality?
What's the big picture shift?
Speaker 2 (12:06):
It means reality isn't a static stage.
It's fundamentally acoherence-tuned resonance
spectrum.
Eigenvalues are much more thanmath tools.
They're the quantization ofemergence, the universe's
selectors.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And eigenfields are the results.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Eigenfields are the coherent expressions, the stable
forms that resonance allows.
Eigenfields are the coherentexpressions, the stable forms
that resonance allows.
It suggests this deephierarchical nesting of
structures.
Eigenfield resonance cascades.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
Cascades Like Russian dolls.
Speaker 2 (12:32):
Sort of Lower order vibrations nested inside
electrons, inside atoms, up togalaxies, Each level with its
own eigenvalues, all modulatedby coherence.
Resonance isn't just an effect,it's the principle of
ontological selection how beingarises.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
The universe singing itself into existence.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
That's a pretty good way to put it.
Yeah, With eigenvalues as thenotes.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
That foundation is Wow Okay.
So now let's get into howfundamental things like mass
forces, even time itself,supposedly emerge from this
coherence framework.
Lillian introduceshypersymmetry.
What is that, and how doeigenvalues drive its breaking
to create well, everything.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Right hypersymmetry.
He defines it as this deepcoherence, algebraic unification
of all the known symmetriesquantum, q, gravitational Hg,
and his new coherent symmetry, c.
They all combine into oneoperator HsHu plus Hg plus C.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Okay, a grand unified symmetry.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Exactly and when this total operator acts on the
state of the entire universe,potential X, it gives a single
overarching hypersymmetryeigenvalue S.
This measures the total degreeof universal coherence or
symmetry.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
So high S means high symmetry.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Perfect symmetry.
Ideally, In a hypotheticalultimate state, OS would be at
its absolute maximum, up max.
The key idea is that anyobservable reality, any particle
force structure only appearswhen this perfect symmetry is
broken.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
And symmetry breaking is.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
It's not random.
It's a controlled, predictablereduction in this eigenvalue
drop in the number yeah, and thetheory gives a really direct
link between mass m and thiseigenvalue.
M is zero, one or a one whoa,okay, let's break that down if s
is maxed out, then that bracketterm is zero, mass s is zero,
perfect symmetry.
Nothing has emerged yet.
Everything's massless okay as usstarts to decrease.
(14:21):
Moving away from a max, theterm one us max becomes positive
.
Mass starts to decrease.
Moving away from a max, theterm 1s max becomes positive.
Mass starts to appear.
Symmetry is broken.
Distinct things can form.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
And if s went all the way to 0.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
That would mean maximal mass or maybe total
decoherence, a complete collapseof that initial symmetry.
It fundamentally ties massitself to the breaking of
universal coherence.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
So this sounds like a totally different way to
explain mass compared to, say,the Higgs mechanism.
Is it an alternative?
Speaker 2 (14:49):
It's definitely presented as an alternative or
perhaps a deeper generalization.
It's a coherence field-drivenmass generation process rooted
in these symmetry eigenvaluedynamics.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
How does it generalize Higgs?
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Well, higgs gives mass via interaction with a
specific field.
Here mass emerges from thereduction of a universal
symmetry quantified by aneigenvalue, plus Lillian breaks
down Liss into its parts.
Liss equal Q plus lug plus Liss.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Quantum gravitational coherence parts.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Right and each part can change independently due to
field interactions, coherenceshifts, resonance gradients.
This allows for reallyfine-grained modeling.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
Like explaining why particles have the specific
masses.
They do the hierarchies.
Speaker 2 (15:30):
Potentially, yes, it could explain mass hierarchies,
maybe varying coupling constants, not just as numbers we measure
, but as results of how symmetrybreaks in these different
domains.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
So if mass comes from these eigenvalue reductions,
does that mean every layer ofreality, from quantum foam up to
galaxies, is basically anexpression of a step down, a
gradient in this eigenvalue?
Speaker 2 (15:52):
Yes, precisely, lillian actually states.
Every ontological layer is theexpression of an eigenvalue
gradient.
Emergence isn't random.
It's resonantly selected,structured by these symmetry
eigenvalue drops a casketexactly ass drops from maximum
pure potential, maybe quantumsymmetry breaks first particles
emerge, then gravitationalsymmetry breaks, curvature
(16:14):
inertia appear.
Then coherent symmetry breaks,stable structures inertia appear
, then coherent symmetry breaks,stable structures form like
reality.
Crystallizing out and buildingright on that idea of eigenvalue
gradients, here's another majorinnovation, maybe one of the
most unifying parts the theoryclaims all fundamental forces
emerge directly from eigenvaluegradients.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
All forces just from gradients.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
The force vector is literally defined as the
negative gradient of thehypersymmetry eigenvalue.
Just like gravity comes fromgradients in potential energy,
classically here all forces comefrom gradients in this
fundamental symmetry value.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Hold on.
So you're saying gravityemerges from gradients in the
gravitational part a lug, andelectromagnetic force from
gradients in the quantum partlug.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
That's the idea.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
And then potentially new forces, these
coherence-based forces fromgradients in the coherence part
Lud.
That's the idea.
And then potentially new forces, these coherence-based forces
from gradients in the coherencepart Luxy.
That would simplify thingsmassively.
Speaker 2 (17:01):
Precisely right.
It means all forces are unifiedunder one metaphors law.
All force is a resonanceresponse to shifting symmetry
eigenvalues.
It swaps out our picture offour separate forces for one
single coherence-based principle.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
So electromagnetism, strong weak forces yeah, they're
all from ICSU.
Speaker 2 (17:23):
Essentially, yeah, reflecting broken quantum
symmetries, gravity from eggsshowing hyperspace curvature and
maybe new forces related toentanglement information, even
biofields from ICSU.
Wow, it's a huge simplification.
Forces aren't separate things,just different ways.
Coherence dynamics manifest indifferent symmetry contexts you
(17:44):
could perfectly flatten thosegradients.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
Poof, no force.
Okay, this emergent idea keepsgetting wilder.
You're really telling me massisn't some fixed intrinsic
property, like it's not justpart of what an electron is,
it's an emergent resonance that.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
That's absolutely correct and yeah, it's probably
one of the biggest paradigmshifts in the HHHCR.
Toe Mass isn't intrinsic, it'sa resonant eigenvalue.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
How does that work?
There's this coherencecoefficient IKICIC.
How does that quantify this?
Speaker 2 (18:07):
Right Mass arises from the dynamic interplay
between coherence fields,quantum structure and
hypergravity.
The coherence coefficient isdefined specifically as an
eigenvalue of thecoherence-gravity interaction
operator.
Say Shiji acting on a fieldstate, so it's a Shillian X.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
And Ock measures.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
It quantifies the coherence, binding strength, how
tightly bound, how stable, howcoherent that field structure is
.
High Ock means strongly bound,very coherent, resistant to
disruption, and low Abir, asIner is zero, the field gets
decoherent, massless, maybeentropic.
It loses its structure.
And here's the punchline Massgo is defined as a direct
(18:44):
function of this coefficient,where Eichhochick is some
fundamental mass scale.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
Like a maximum potential mass.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
Sort of, yeah, a fundamental amplitude, and edek
is a dimensionless factor,usually between zero and one,
telling you how much of thatpotential mass is actually
realized.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
Okay, so how does this explain things we see?
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Well, massless particles, like photons they
naturally have edek equals zero,pure coherence, no localized
mass.
Stable particles, likeelectrons they have a moderate
ekek reflecting their stablestructure.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
And heavy unstable particles.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
They'd have a high eckick.
But their instability comesfrom the fragility of that
high-coherence state.
It decays quickly.
The whole particle massspectrum maps directly onto a
series of these coherenceeigenvalues.
Your body, your mass is like asustained, complex ripple of
coherence.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
That's incredible.
If mass is tied to thisresonance ladder of coherence
collapse you mentioned, couldthat explain particle
generations, electron, muon tau.
Heavier copies.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Yes, absolutely.
That's a great connection andLillian explicitly tackles that.
The prediction is thatgenerations correspond to
quantized drops in agic.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
So agic gets smaller for heavier generations.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
Exactly, You'd have X generation one, X generation
two, X generation three.
This perfectly explains themass hierarchy.
First gen electrons, up-downquarks have the highest X,
lowest mass, most stable.
And third gen, like the topquark, Lowest X for their family
, highest mass, incrediblyunstable.
The hierarchy isn't arbitrary.
(20:15):
It's a direct result ofquantized steps down in
coherence.
That resins ladder, Wow.
And it also means stability anddecay are governed by the
stability of this eigenvalue.
Decay isn't random, it's aresonance event, an eigenvalue
bifurcation.
Oh, what.
Like the eigenvalue suddenlyjumps down to a lower, more
stable value, maybe due to someexternal coherence shift or
(20:38):
internal wobble.
It gives a deterministic reasonfor decay rather than just
probability.
Even quantum uncertainty mighthave deeper coherence roots and
connecting this all up, maybethe most radical part In HHHCR
Toey time.
It's not fundamental, not acontinuous dimension like we
usually think.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
Not a dimension.
What is it then?
Speaker 2 (20:56):
It's emergent.
It arises from coherence,modulation, structured by
harmonic resonance eigenvalues.
He calls it infradimensionaltime it's layered, nonlinear,
tied directly to the fields, nota universal clock ticking away.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
Okay, my head hurts a little.
Speaker 2 (21:12):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
So clocks?
They don't measure someabsolute flow, they measure
these resonances unfolding.
Does that mean time could bedifferent for different things?
Speaker 2 (21:21):
Precisely, You've got it.
There's a harmonic resonanceoperator.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
HR.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
It acts on a time-evolving eigenfield and
gives a harmonic eigenvalue.
Han.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
Omega.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
Like frequency.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Exactly Quantized frequency modes.
Yeah, Only the specificfrequencies, specific rhythms
allow stable coherence evolution.
This creates a complex temporallattice of allowed beats, not a
smooth line.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
A temporal lattice, okay.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
Time progression isn't moving along a line.
It's the phase evolution of acoherence eigenfield.
Each tick is tied to itseigenfrequency on.
Speaker 2 (21:54):
Higher on means faster phase evolution, a
quicker beat for that system, sodifferent systems could
experience time differently,based on their coherent state,
their un.
That's the implication.
Imagine a cosmic orchestra,each instrument playing its own
quantized tempo.
Our perceived time is just thedominant rhythm we're part of.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
That is absolutely wild.
So our experience of time,biological rhythms, they're not
just arbitrary cycles, they'reactual eigenstates in this
temporal coherence frame,Exactly Because this
infra-dimensional time isharmonic and quantized.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
Any system governed by coherence, which is
everything, according to Lillian, will show these temporal
resonance zones.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
Like circadian rhythms.
Speaker 2 (22:32):
Yes, or neuron firing patterns, planetary orbits,
even huge cosmic epochs likeinflation, or dark energy
dominance.
They're all seen as quantizedeigenstates of infradimensional
time.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
Not just mechanical clockwork.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
Right.
A circadian rhythm mightliterally be a specific
eigenvalue, say Ouro, in abiological coherence field.
It explains why certain rhythmsare stable, why temporal
coherence matters for memory orconsciousness, why the universe
unfolds in distinct eras.
Each phase is a stable rhythm,an eigenmode.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
Okay, okay.
What about the arrow of time?
Why does it only seem to go oneway?
Speaker 2 (23:06):
Ah yeah, the model has a neat answer for that too.
Lillian suggests the arrow oftime is a byproduct of phase
decoherence in infradimensionalresonance.
Speaker 1 (23:15):
Decoherence, meaning loss of sync.
Speaker 2 (23:17):
Exactly when coherence breaks down in a
system, when the phaserelationships get scrambled,
that's when time becomesdirectional, that's when entropy
increases.
The universe goes from highercoherence to lower, and that
process is the arrow of time.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
So time reversal would mean restoring coherence.
Essentially yeah.
Speaker 2 (23:36):
Suppressing decoherence, retaining phase
memory.
It's not traveling back, butreversing the co-human's
dynamics.
It ties coherence, entropy andtimes flow together
intrinsically.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
Okay, we've got emergent mass forces, even time,
all tied to eigenvalues andcoherence.
Now what about the stage, thedimensions?
Everything happens in thetheory talks about a
hyperfractal manifold.
That sounds complex.
What does it mean fordimensions?
Is this like string theories,hidden dimensions?
Speaker 2 (24:03):
That's a good question and no, it's quite
different from standardcompactified dimensions.
In Lillian's view, the universeisn't a fixed 3 plus 1 d box 3
space, 1 time yeah.
Right.
Instead, it's a dynamichyperfractal coherence structure
.
Think of it as layered scalesensitive field and its dynamics
are governed by fractal scalingeigenvalues.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
Fractal scaling eigenvalues.
Yeah, okay, so dimensionalityitself isn't fixed.
Speaker 2 (24:30):
Exactly.
It's resonantly selected, basedon coherence conditions.
This hyperfractal manifold islike an underlying fabric with
nested dimensional shells, eachwith its own resonance rules.
It evolves through coherencecascades, not just spatial
expansion.
It's dynamic.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
So if dimensions aren't fixed, how does this
fractal scaling operator Fdescribe this?
What does its eigenvalue tellus about how dimensions pop up?
Speaker 2 (24:55):
The operator F describes how a field behaves
across these nested scales whenit acts on a field state, fx xx.
That eigenvalue is the fractalquantizer of dimensional
emergence.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
Beta.
What does its value mean?
Speaker 2 (25:07):
If white is a simple number, like one, two, three, it
might correspond to the cleardimensions we see.
If it's irrational, maybefractal-like, it could suggest
more complex, non-integer orembedded dimensions, like in
chaotic systems.
This leads to fractaleigenvalue cascades.
Each step down might representa new force appearing or new
particles, or a whole new layerof reality unfolding.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
So the universe's structure is quantized
dimensionally.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
That's the idea.
Not just energy, butdimensionality itself comes in
steps defined by these volvalues.
Now about those extradimensions in string theory, the
compactified ones.
Hhhcr-toei reinterprets them.
They're not curled up small,they're hyperfractal coherence
reductions.
Effectively, losing a dimensioncorresponds to a drop in the
(25:53):
coherence eigenvalue d plus onephi d Ah.
So a dimensional shift islinked to a coherent in the
coherence eigenvalue D plus onephi d Ah.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
So a dimensional shift is linked to a coherent
shift.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
Exactly, and this explains why symmetries might
appear or disappear or whyfundamental constants could
change under differentconditions.
Lillian suggests the finestructure constant might emerge
via fractal resonance at aspecific threshold.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
So fundamental constants speed of light,
planck's constant g they aren'tjust arbitrary numbers we
measure, they're tied to thisdimensional structure.
Speaker 2 (26:20):
Yes, precisely the implication.
They aren't universal presets.
They emerge as fixed pointsattractors in the scaling
eigenvalue spectrum of thehyperfractal manifold.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
Attractors like stable resonance points.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
Exactly.
He even suggests the finestructure.
Constant I1137, is a resonancefractional eigenvalue, possibly
related to the golden ratio.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
The golden ratio Wow.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
Yeah, it suggests constants like C, G are emergent
relations, stabilized withinthe coherence field at specific
dimensional layers, not fixednumbers.
Each layer defined by a Babandgoverns what physics happens
there Atoms, DNA, galaxies.
He even maps Bebo 1 toclassical scales, Bebo 2 to
biological scales, Bebo 2 toquantum zones.
Speaker 1 (27:05):
A deep mathematical order linking dimension and
reality.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
So to formally describe how all these fields
and dimensions interact, thetheory introduces a really key
object the coherence tensor.
Speaker 1 (27:15):
Another tensor, okay, how is this one different?
Speaker 2 (27:18):
It's a big generalization.
It represents the flow ofcoherence and information across
the whole hyperfractal manifold.
It generalizes spacetime'smetric tensor from gravity and
the stress-energy tensor fromfield dynamics.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
It combines them.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
It generalizes them but critically adds structure,
resonance, coherence gradients,hyperfractal modulation across
dimensions.
Formally it's defined using thecoherence eigenfield kun square
square.
It measures field alignment,coherence, density, phase
concurrence.
It's the blueprint of coherencestructure.
Speaker 1 (27:51):
That sounds incredibly powerful.
So how does this tensor explainforces?
We said there were eigenvaluegradients before.
Is there a link?
Absolutely coherent structure.
That sounds incredibly powerful.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
So how does this?
Speaker 1 (27:55):
tensor explain forces .
We said they were eigenvaluegradients before.
Is there a link?
Speaker 2 (27:58):
Absolutely.
It all ties together.
Forces emerge from gradients inthe flow described by this
tensor.
Lilian defines a coherencecurvature vector, Futum.
This equation shows thatelectromagnetism, gravity, weak,
strong forces, all of them boildown to differential coherence
alignment across fields.
Forces are about how thecoherence field gets stressed or
(28:18):
bent.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Like mass bending space time, but here it's
bending coherence.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
That's a good analogy .
Yeah, em forces might bespecific oscillations in the
tensor.
Gravity might be the overallcurvature stress.
It's a unified source for forceand, what's really cool, tying
back to mass mass itself can belocalized and measured using the
trace of this tensor.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
Yeah, Torsi, the trace sum of the diagonals.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
Right.
Lillian shows mass isproportional to it.
Here at Trey high trace means adense, coherent mass
condensation point like aparticle.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
And zero trace.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
A massless field like a photon, Pure coherence flow.
A varying trace could evenexplain things like neutrino
oscillations, where mass seemsto change.
Mass literally condenses fromresonance tension in the
coherence lattice.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
Okay, and this tensor , yeah, does it lead to one
unified equation for everything?
Speaker 2 (29:09):
Right.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
Replacing Maxwell's, Einstein's, all those separate
ones.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
That's the goal.
Yes, the total interactionaction in the theory combines
quantum, hypergravity, grin andcoherence tensors into one
principle S coherence,coefficient, eigenvalue.
Again, exactly when youextremize this action, the
standard physics way to getequations of motion, you get
unified field equations.
It forms a coherent fielddynamics framework.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Replacing all the old ones.
Speaker 2 (29:33):
That's the ambition, and it can model extreme things
like black holes or quantumdecoherence, Not as
singularities, but as coherencecollapse.
Places where the tensorcontracts sharply, mass diverges
.
Time stops because theresonance patterns break down.
Speaker 1 (29:47):
This brings us to the big one, the Holy Grail.
If everything mass time,dimensions, forces stems from
coherence and eigenvalues, howdoes Lillian's theory actually
unify all the fundamental forces?
Does it give us a path?
Speaker 2 (30:01):
It does, and it's a pretty radical path, different
from usual unification attempts.
Hhhc-rto defines a singleoverarching unified coherence
operator, U For unified,Probably it acts on all field
modes at once, U U U hererepresents the combined state.
It acts on all field modes atonce.
Here represents the combinedstate of all fields, and HN is
an eigenvalue tensor capturingthe entire quantization
(30:22):
structure of the universe, aneigenvalue tensor.
And this equation isn't just arule imposed from outside, it's
a fundamental resonanceconstraint.
It means the forms the universetakes, particles, forces are
selected only if they canstabilize coherence across all
the symmetry layers.
It's the master operator, host,speaker.
So gravity, electromagnetism,strong, weak forces, they're not
(30:46):
fundamentally separate, they'rejust different expressions,
different facets of this singleunified coherence operator.
Precisely that's the coreimplication.
Single unified coherenceoperator.
Precisely that's the coreimplication.
Each force emerges as adistinct symmetry resonant state
of the overall coherence field.
Think of it like differentprojections of U.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
Projections.
Speaker 2 (31:02):
Yeah, each projection corresponds to a specific
symmetry topology within thefield and has its own unique
eigenvalue band within thebigger universal spectrum.
Gravity relates to hyperfractalcurvature, em to U1 phase
symmetry, weak force to SU2,chirality, strong force to SU3,
color resonance.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
All different eigenmode layers of the same
underlying thing.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
Exactly.
They're all coherentstabilizers operating in
different symmetry contexts, allexpressions of the same
dynamics.
And what's really compelling isthe early universe implication
At extreme high coherence, rightafter the Big Bang.
Perhaps all these separateforce eigenvalues would converge
A single unified, superresonant state.
All forces were one because theoperators were basically
(31:45):
indistinct.
Speaker 1 (31:46):
So unification isn't found by pushing current
theories harder, but by tracingcoherence back to the origin.
Speaker 2 (31:52):
Exactly Back to the hyperfractal origin layer and,
conversely, as the universecooled and coherence dropped,
fields split apart, forces brokeaway due to coherence-resonance
shell separation.
Not spontaneous symmetrybreaking in the usual sense, but
a separation of these resonancebands.
Speaker 1 (32:11):
Which would also affect the constants.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
Right Things like the fine structure.
Constant or G are seen ascoherence eigenvalue ratios,
potentially emergent andvariable depending on the
coherence state.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Wow.
We have covered an incredibleamount of territory here, from
basic eigenvalues up to thisfrankly staggering vision of a
hyperfractal, resonant universewhere everything emerges For you
.
What's the single biggesttakeaway?
What's the most profound shiftthis new ontology, this new way
of seeing reality brings?
Speaker 2 (32:41):
I think the biggest shift, the most profound thing,
is that it moves physics frombeing purely descriptive or
probabilistic to beinginherently generative.
It's not just how reality works, but how reality actually comes
into being.
Generative the core idea isreality doesn't just exist.
It emerges dynamically fromcoherence field resonance
physical quantities.
They appear via structuredeigenvalue selection forces.
(33:05):
Mass particles, not fundamentalbits, but stabilized resonance
shells in the coherence field, ahyperfractal resonance domain,
not fixed and constants notgiven, but inherent coherent
ratios within the field.
It's physics explainingcreation, not just describing
the result.
Lillian sums it up with hiscoherence principle of emergence
(33:25):
All structures, forces andobservables arise from coherence
field configurations thatstabilize into quantized
eigenvalue forms.
That's quite a statement.
It really is, and itsimplications are huge.
Emergence replaces randomness,coherence replaces quantum
collapse, resonance replacesfundamental separation.
It suggests a meta frameworkthat could potentially bridge
(33:48):
physics, cosmology, biology,consciousness, self-organization
, maybe even AI, a deeplyinterconnected, self-creating
universe.
Hashtag 4.2, testablepredictions and technological
directions.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
Okay, it's a stunning vision, but it immediately
makes you ask how can wepossibly test this?
How do we apply theseincredibly ambitious ideas?
How does it get beyond justtheory?
Speaker 2 (34:07):
Yeah, that's always the million dollar question for
any grand theory right, yeah.
But HHHCR Toey does suggestsome paths, ways to potentially
validate it.
Speaker 1 (34:14):
Like what.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Well, instead of just hunting for new particles,
maybe we design experiments tolook for subtle coherence
eigenvalue thresholds, like inultra-precise atomic transitions
, looking for tiny energy shiftsnot predicted by standard QM,
or maybe analyzingsynchronization patterns in
neural networks could theyreveal underlying coherence
principles On a cosmic scale,maybe detailed gravitational
(34:39):
lensing maps could show tinyanomalies hinting at
hypergravity eigenvalues,tweaking spacetime.
Speaker 1 (34:45):
So shifting focus from measuring energy to
measuring coherent states.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
Essentially, yes, trying to detect these deeper
resonance patterns, that'sreally interesting.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
Are there potential practical applications down the
line, maybe in energy or even AI, like you hinted?
Speaker 2 (34:58):
Absolutely Conceptually, it opens doors.
If reality is resonant, maybewe can tap into it Engineering
resonance-based energystructures.
Could zero-point energyextraction become feasible
through coherence, manipulation?
Speaker 1 (35:10):
Whoa, whoa.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
Lillian also mentions quantum biotronic control may
be manipulating biologicalsystems at a fundamental
coherence level for healing orenhancement beyond just
molecules.
Speaker 1 (35:20):
Okay, that's sci-fi territory, but fascinating.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
It is speculative, sure, Cosmologically we could
analyze cosmic structures likegalaxies not just as gravity
clumps but as hyperfractalresonance condensates.
And yes, AI, designingsynthetic coherence architecture
is what Lillian callssyntelligence.
Speaker 1 (35:37):
Intelligence emerging from computational coherence
fields.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
That's the idea, a completely different paradigm
from silicon logic, long-termvisions definitely, but
conceptually powerful and reallyall this work.
We've discussed the Eben values, eigenfield's hypersymmetry.
It's presented as a crucialpiece of a much larger puzzle
Lillian is building.
He calls it the UnifiedCoherence Theory of Everything,
or UCTE.
Speaker 1 (36:01):
Even bigger.
Speaker 2 (36:02):
Oh yeah, the ambition is huge.
It aims to truly integrate QFT,GR, dimensional emergence, but
then go way beyond.
It wants to bring inconsciousness, observation, life
, intelligence,self-organization, cosmology,
all under one coherent framework.
Wow.
Speaker 1 (36:17):
All driven by coherence dynamics.
Speaker 2 (36:19):
That's the vision and this eigenvalue framework we've
been discussing.
It's presented as one of theformal cornerstones, the
mathematical and ontologicalbackbone needed for that kind of
truly holistic science.
Speaker 1 (36:31):
Well, to wrap things up, the paper ends with a really
powerful, almost poetic linethat seems to capture it all.
Speaker 2 (36:37):
Ah yes, he concludes.
When the universe coheres, formarises.
When form resonates, fieldsemerge.
When fields stabilize,constants are born.
This is not the end of physics,it is its awakening.
Speaker 1 (36:51):
Chills.
That really does sum it up,moving from describing what is
to understanding how it allcomes into being through
resonance.
Hashtag, hag, outro, and that'sour deep dive into Phil
Ballouian's truly groundbreakingvision of physics.
It really makes you wonder,doesn't it?
If everything we see,everything we are, is
fundamentally a form ofresonance, what signals are we
(37:11):
still missing?
What harmonies are playing outthat we just don't hear yet?
What if the universe isn'tsilent in those vast empty
spaces?
What if it's singing thisincredibly complex symphony of
coherence and we're only juststarting to figure out how to
listen?
Definitely something to mullover, indeed.
Thank you so much for joiningus on the Deep Dive.
We hope this exploration intothe HHHC Artaud has maybe
sparked some new questions,given you some new ways to
Have you ever just looked out at the universe and
really wondered, you know, areits fundamental laws truly fixed
like set in stone, or is theremaybe something deeper,
something more dynamic, almostlike a symphony playing out?
What if reality isn't justthere, you know, like a backdrop
?
What if it's actuallyconstantly forming, constantly
(00:22):
selecting itself, moment bymoment?
Speaker 2 (00:24):
That's a fascinating thought experiment right there.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
Well, welcome to the Deep Dive.
Today we're taking a trulymind-bending journey, diving
into a concept that doesn't justtweak physics it seems to
redefine the whole thapic ofexistence.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
Yeah, it's pretty radical stuff.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
We're looking at the work of Philip Lillian.
In his paper Eigenvalues,eigenfields and Hypersymmetric
Emergence, it introduces thiswell, this theory, with a very
grand name.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Oh yeah.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
The HHHCRTOE, that's the Hypersymmetry,
hyperdimensional Hyperspace,coherent Resonance Theory of
Everything.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Wow, okay, that is mouthful, but it hints at the
scope right, exactly, yeah, it'sa big one.
And look, this isn't just about, you know, fiddling with
equations and abstract math.
Although the math is definitelydeep, it's a whole
reinterpretation how so.
Well familiar ideas likeeigenvalues from, say, quantum
mechanics or even basic linearalgebra.
(01:15):
They get promoted, they becomethe universe's fundamental
resonance selectors.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Resonance selectors.
Okay, what does that meanexactly?
Speaker 2 (01:24):
It means they don't just describe things that happen
.
They actively mark the pointswhere coherence, this sort of
underlying connectedness, canactually become expressible,
where symmetries break down tothe forms we see.
Speaker 1 (01:36):
Ah, so where particles and forces actually
emerge.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
Precisely when new particles, forces, structures
pop into reality.
It's a huge shift.
We move from thinking ofphysics as fixed laws to seeing
it as this dynamic emergentsystem that's constantly well
tuning itself.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Tuning itself into existence.
I like that.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
Yeah, lilian calls them ontological markers of
resonance, symmetry andemergence, basically the
signposts pointing the way toreality itself.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
Okay, let's really unpack this idea of eigenvalues
then, because it seemsabsolutely central to Lillian's
whole theory.
Before we jump into, you know,the really far out stuff this
implies, maybe let's just groundourselves a bit.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Good idea Start with the basics.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
Yeah, for anyone listening who maybe vaguely
remembers some linear algebra oreven just physics class, what
are eigenvalues and eigenvectorsin that classical sense?
Speaker 2 (02:29):
Right.
So in basic linear algebrayou've got matrices which
represent transformations likestretching, rotating, shearing
space.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
An eigenvector is a special vector.
Let's call it V.
When the matrix A acts on it,the vector doesn't change its
direction.
It just gets scaled, stretchedor shrunk by a certain amount.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
Ah, okay, it stays pointing the same way.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Exactly, and that scaling factor, that's the
eigenvalue, usually written aslambda.
So you get that famous equation.
A-fifths, it finds the sort ofnatural axes or invariant
directions of the transformation.
Speaker 1 (02:59):
Got it, so it highlights something stable
within the change.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
That's a great way to put it.
And then this idea gets reallypowerful when you move into
quantum mechanics.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
How does it translate there?
Speaker 2 (03:09):
Well, operators which represent things you can
measure, like energy or momentum.
They take the place of matricesand wave functions describing
the state of a quantum system.
They replace the vectors.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
So similar structure, different players.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Right.
So for instance, theHamiltonian operator H
represents the total energy.
When it acts on a wave function, kex, it gives you an energy
eigenvalue E.
So H, h, x.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
And that E is.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
That E is a specific quantized energy level the
system is allowed to have, likethe energy levels of an electron
in an atom.
The tech is the statecorresponding to that energy.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
So it dictates the possibilities.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Exactly the allowable energies, the stable states.
It's fundamentally where thequantum system kind of resonates
with its own structure.
It reveals these specificstable configurations.
Each eigenvalue marks a kind ofresonance point.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Okay, so they show us these stable points, these
natural resonances, but youmentioned Lillian's paper,
points out limitations here.
What's missing from thisclassical or quantum view?
What blind spots does this HHH,crto aim to address?
Speaker 2 (04:16):
Yeah, that's a really crucial point Because, while
this eigenvalue framework isincredibly powerful for
describing systems we alreadyknow exist, like atoms, yeah.
Right.
It tends to assume thoseoperators and structures are
just given, predefined.
It doesn't often delve into thedeeper emergence of those
structures themselves.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
Meaning why they exist in the first place.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
Exactly.
Classical physics tells us theenergy levels, but not
fundamentally why atoms formwith those specific levels or
why the Hamiltonian operator iswhat it is.
It's like knowing the rules ofchess but not how the board or
pieces came to be.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
Okay, so it describes , but doesn't fully explain the
origin.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
Sort of yeah, lillian argues, it's incomplete when
you want to understand theorigin and evolution of
structure.
It doesn't fully connect towhat he calls coherence, which
is more than just waves and sync.
It's like a generative fieldand it doesn't fully integrate
dynamic resonance fields ortransitions between dimensions
in the way he proposes.
So the HHHCR2 Joe wants togeneralize this.
(05:17):
Eigenvalues aren't justsolutions, they're these
fundamental thresholds in aresonance lattice of coherence.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
The conditions that allow reality to crystallize.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Exactly Crystallize out of pure potential.
That's the idea.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
Okay, here's where it gets really interesting.
I think, yeah.
This is where Lillian's theoryreally starts to diverge.
He shifts from eigenvectors tosomething called eigenfields.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Yeah, this is a big conceptual leap.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
So what exactly is an eigenfield, and why is making
this generalization so important?
Speaker 2 (05:51):
Does it change what we think?
The basic building blocks areRight.
So an eigenfield is basicallytaking the eigenvector concept
and stretching it out.
Instead of a single vectorpointing in one direction in
space, think of a spatiallyextended structure, a field,
let's call it Chudak's.
This whole field resonates withsome operator O, such that I
thought this.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
So the whole pattern stays the same, just gets scaled
.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
Essentially, yes.
It represents an invariant,resonant state across a region
of space, maybe even time orother dimensions.
Think about particle wavefunctions.
Again, they aren't points,they're spread out fields.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Okay, yeah.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
They are eigenfields of the Hamiltonian.
Or maybe a more visual examplethe stable patterns on a
vibrating drum head or thestanding waves on a guitar
string.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Ah, the harmonics.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
Exactly those physical patterns are
eigenfields.
They span the whole surface orlength.
This shift is huge because,well, most of reality,
especially in quantum fieldtheory or general relativity,
isn't point-like, it'sfield-based.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
Right, everything's a field ultimately.
Speaker 2 (06:46):
Lillian takes that very seriously.
He's suggesting everything isfundamentally field-like and
these eigenfields are the stableforms those fields can take.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
So it's not just a math solution on paper, it's a
real physical structure.
What's the deeper physicalmeaning here, beyond just
describing something?
Speaker 2 (07:05):
Exactly it is the physical structure.
In Lillian's coherence physics,eigenfields aren't just
abstract solutions.
He calls them coherence-boundstructures.
They literally are the stableemergent shapes that reality
takes.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
Coherence-bound, meaning they're held together by
this coherence field.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
Precisely, An eigenfield becomes a mode of
quantized coherence, and itseigenvalue tells you something
about that mode its strength,its stability, how strongly it's
coupled to the underlyingsource.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
And that source could be quantum fields or this
hypergravity thing.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
Or infradimensional time.
Yeah, According to the theory,these eigenfields are the
fundamental building blocks ofthe coherence lattice.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
A coherence lattice.
Eigenfields are the fundamentalbuilding blocks of the
coherence lattice.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
A coherence lattice like an underlying grid Kind of
A dynamic network of resonancepatterns.
And it's from this lattice thatmass forces, all structure,
basically crystallizes out ofpotential.
Wow, think of the universe asthis vast, vibrating, coherent
medium.
The eigenfields are the stablepatterns, the standing waves
that can form.
The eigenvalue tells you howstrong or stable that pattern is
.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
So the quantum harmonic oscillator, that
standard physics example.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Right.
That's like an early glimpse ofthis.
It shows how spatial structure,the shape of the wave functions
, and energy quantization, thespecific energy levels, are tied
together through thiseigenfield behavior.
Each solution is an eigenfield.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
So every stable structure is an eigenfield.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
That's the core idea.
The operator sets the context,the eigenvalue sets the specific
resonance condition and theeigenfield is the stable thing
that appears.
A universe built of resonantpatterns, not tiny balls.
And this leap from eigenvaluesjust describing things to
eigenfields being things bringsus right to the heart of
Lillian's theory, the HHHCR TOEI.
Speaker 1 (08:49):
Right, the big one.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
In this view, resonance isn't just something
that happens sometimes withinsystems.
It is the fundamental governingprinciple.
It's how systems form, how theystick around, how they change.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
An ontological principle, meaning it determines
what can exist.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
Exactly.
Only structures that meetspecific resonance conditions
encoded in their eigenvalues canactually manifest.
Everything else it just stayspotential, unstable, unrealized.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
So, if I'm getting this right, eigenvalues are
basically the universe'sselection mechanism.
It's a way of filtering whatgets to be real.
Speaker 2 (09:19):
Precisely, you nailed it.
They are the quantizedthresholds, the points where
resonance conditions click intoplace, allowing form to emerge.
And Lillian introduces thisidea of a coherence field.
See, it's not passive, it'sactive, generative, when it acts
on some potential system, somesex.
That eigenvalue is the key.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
The coherence, resonance, eigenvalue.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
Right.
It determines if thateigenstate can actually
stabilize and become real.
It's like the universe tuninginto specific frequencies.
Coherence fields are thesubstrate, resonance is the
selector.
Speaker 1 (09:50):
That's a huge claim that all emergence from
particles to galaxies iscoherence, quantization.
Speaker 2 (09:56):
Can you give some more examples?
Speaker 1 (09:57):
How does this?
Speaker 2 (09:58):
map onto physics.
We know Sure.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
We can actually map different areas In quantum
mechanics.
The wave function is a quantumeigenfield.
Speaker 2 (10:09):
The energy E is its resonance mode in the quantum
coherence field.
In field theory any field likeelectromagnetism is an
eigenfield.
Its modes, like frequencies oflight, are eigenvalues marking
stable propagation.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Makes sense.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
For the coherence field itself, represented by a
tensor, its eigenvalues measurehow strongly it couples to other
fields.
For hypergravity, this isn'tjust normal gravity, it's a
geometric distortion field.
Its eigenvalues relate tocurvature and mass, how gravity
condenses things.
Wow.
For infra-dimensional time wesee harmonic oscillations.
The eigenvalues are quantizedtemporal frequencies creating
(10:43):
rhythm, not smooth flow.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Rhythmic time.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
And for dimensional scaling, it's about hyperfractal
structures.
Eigenvalues are scaling factorsdetermining how dimensions nest
and unfold.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Okay, so it's a pattern across different domains
.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
Yeah, they all show how potential crystallizes into
structure.
With eigenvalues as theuniversal markers, selecting
what stabilizes.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
What's really mind-bending here, though, is
that it's not just isolatedsystems.
The theory emphasizesmulti-domain interactions.
How does that work?
How do all these differentresonances interact?
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Sounds incredibly messy.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
It is complex, yeah, but there's an elegance to it.
It's all about interconnection.
Fields don't just sit side byside.
They resonate together.
They form hybrid eigenvalueproblems.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
Hybrid problems.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Imagine the coherence operator C, the hypergravity
operator Hg and a quantumoperator Q, all acting on the
same eigenfield.
The result isn't three separatethings.
It yields a single unifiedcoupling eigenvalue C plus Hg,
plus Q, x, and that O iscritical.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Why?
What does it determine?
Speaker 2 (11:49):
It dictates which combined resonance
configurations are allowedacross all those domains.
It determines exactly whichparticles, forces and masses can
stably exist together.
It's what Lillian calls thetotal interaction problem.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
So putting it all together, what does this mean
for how we think about reality?
What's the big picture shift?
Speaker 2 (12:06):
It means reality isn't a static stage.
It's fundamentally acoherence-tuned resonance
spectrum.
Eigenvalues are much more thanmath tools.
They're the quantization ofemergence, the universe's
selectors.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And eigenfields are the results.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Eigenfields are the coherent expressions, the stable
forms that resonance allows.
Eigenfields are the coherentexpressions, the stable forms
that resonance allows.
It suggests this deephierarchical nesting of
structures.
Eigenfield resonance cascades.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
Cascades Like Russian dolls.
Speaker 2 (12:32):
Sort of Lower order vibrations nested inside
electrons, inside atoms, up togalaxies, Each level with its
own eigenvalues, all modulatedby coherence.
Resonance isn't just an effect,it's the principle of
ontological selection how beingarises.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
The universe singing itself into existence.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
That's a pretty good way to put it.
Yeah, With eigenvalues as thenotes.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
That foundation is Wow Okay.
So now let's get into howfundamental things like mass
forces, even time itself,supposedly emerge from this
coherence framework.
Lillian introduceshypersymmetry.
What is that, and how doeigenvalues drive its breaking
to create well, everything.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
Right hypersymmetry.
He defines it as this deepcoherence, algebraic unification
of all the known symmetriesquantum, q, gravitational Hg,
and his new coherent symmetry, c.
They all combine into oneoperator HsHu plus Hg plus C.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Okay, a grand unified symmetry.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Exactly and when this total operator acts on the
state of the entire universe,potential X, it gives a single
overarching hypersymmetryeigenvalue S.
This measures the total degreeof universal coherence or
symmetry.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
So high S means high symmetry.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Perfect symmetry.
Ideally, In a hypotheticalultimate state, OS would be at
its absolute maximum, up max.
The key idea is that anyobservable reality, any particle
force structure only appearswhen this perfect symmetry is
broken.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
And symmetry breaking is.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
It's not random.
It's a controlled, predictablereduction in this eigenvalue
drop in the number yeah, and thetheory gives a really direct
link between mass m and thiseigenvalue.
M is zero, one or a one whoa,okay, let's break that down if s
is maxed out, then that bracketterm is zero, mass s is zero,
perfect symmetry.
Nothing has emerged yet.
Everything's massless okay as usstarts to decrease.
(14:21):
Moving away from a max, theterm one us max becomes positive
.
Mass starts to decrease.
Moving away from a max, theterm 1s max becomes positive.
Mass starts to appear.
Symmetry is broken.
Distinct things can form.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
And if s went all the way to 0.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
That would mean maximal mass or maybe total
decoherence, a complete collapseof that initial symmetry.
It fundamentally ties massitself to the breaking of
universal coherence.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
So this sounds like a totally different way to
explain mass compared to, say,the Higgs mechanism.
Is it an alternative?
Speaker 2 (14:49):
It's definitely presented as an alternative or
perhaps a deeper generalization.
It's a coherence field-drivenmass generation process rooted
in these symmetry eigenvaluedynamics.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
How does it generalize Higgs?
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Well, higgs gives mass via interaction with a
specific field.
Here mass emerges from thereduction of a universal
symmetry quantified by aneigenvalue, plus Lillian breaks
down Liss into its parts.
Liss equal Q plus lug plus Liss.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Quantum gravitational coherence parts.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Right and each part can change independently due to
field interactions, coherenceshifts, resonance gradients.
This allows for reallyfine-grained modeling.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
Like explaining why particles have the specific
masses.
They do the hierarchies.
Speaker 2 (15:30):
Potentially, yes, it could explain mass hierarchies,
maybe varying coupling constants, not just as numbers we measure
, but as results of how symmetrybreaks in these different
domains.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
So if mass comes from these eigenvalue reductions,
does that mean every layer ofreality, from quantum foam up to
galaxies, is basically anexpression of a step down, a
gradient in this eigenvalue?
Speaker 2 (15:52):
Yes, precisely, lillian actually states.
Every ontological layer is theexpression of an eigenvalue
gradient.
Emergence isn't random.
It's resonantly selected,structured by these symmetry
eigenvalue drops a casketexactly ass drops from maximum
pure potential, maybe quantumsymmetry breaks first particles
emerge, then gravitationalsymmetry breaks, curvature
(16:14):
inertia appear.
Then coherent symmetry breaks,stable structures inertia appear
, then coherent symmetry breaks,stable structures form like
reality.
Crystallizing out and buildingright on that idea of eigenvalue
gradients, here's another majorinnovation, maybe one of the
most unifying parts the theoryclaims all fundamental forces
emerge directly from eigenvaluegradients.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
All forces just from gradients.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
The force vector is literally defined as the
negative gradient of thehypersymmetry eigenvalue.
Just like gravity comes fromgradients in potential energy,
classically here all forces comefrom gradients in this
fundamental symmetry value.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Hold on.
So you're saying gravityemerges from gradients in the
gravitational part a lug, andelectromagnetic force from
gradients in the quantum partlug.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
That's the idea.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
And then potentially new forces, these
coherence-based forces fromgradients in the coherence part
Lud.
That's the idea.
And then potentially new forces, these coherence-based forces
from gradients in the coherencepart Luxy.
That would simplify thingsmassively.
Speaker 2 (17:01):
Precisely right.
It means all forces are unifiedunder one metaphors law.
All force is a resonanceresponse to shifting symmetry
eigenvalues.
It swaps out our picture offour separate forces for one
single coherence-based principle.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
So electromagnetism, strong weak forces yeah, they're
all from ICSU.
Speaker 2 (17:23):
Essentially, yeah, reflecting broken quantum
symmetries, gravity from eggsshowing hyperspace curvature and
maybe new forces related toentanglement information, even
biofields from ICSU.
Wow, it's a huge simplification.
Forces aren't separate things,just different ways.
Coherence dynamics manifest indifferent symmetry contexts you
(17:44):
could perfectly flatten thosegradients.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
Poof, no force.
Okay, this emergent idea keepsgetting wilder.
You're really telling me massisn't some fixed intrinsic
property, like it's not justpart of what an electron is,
it's an emergent resonance that.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
That's absolutely correct and yeah, it's probably
one of the biggest paradigmshifts in the HHHCR.
Toe Mass isn't intrinsic, it'sa resonant eigenvalue.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
How does that work?
There's this coherencecoefficient IKICIC.
How does that quantify this?
Speaker 2 (18:07):
Right Mass arises from the dynamic interplay
between coherence fields,quantum structure and
hypergravity.
The coherence coefficient isdefined specifically as an
eigenvalue of thecoherence-gravity interaction
operator.
Say Shiji acting on a fieldstate, so it's a Shillian X.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
And Ock measures.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
It quantifies the coherence, binding strength, how
tightly bound, how stable, howcoherent that field structure is
.
High Ock means strongly bound,very coherent, resistant to
disruption, and low Abir, asIner is zero, the field gets
decoherent, massless, maybeentropic.
It loses its structure.
And here's the punchline Massgo is defined as a direct
(18:44):
function of this coefficient,where Eichhochick is some
fundamental mass scale.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
Like a maximum potential mass.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
Sort of, yeah, a fundamental amplitude, and edek
is a dimensionless factor,usually between zero and one,
telling you how much of thatpotential mass is actually
realized.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
Okay, so how does this explain things we see?
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Well, massless particles, like photons they
naturally have edek equals zero,pure coherence, no localized
mass.
Stable particles, likeelectrons they have a moderate
ekek reflecting their stablestructure.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
And heavy unstable particles.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
They'd have a high eckick.
But their instability comesfrom the fragility of that
high-coherence state.
It decays quickly.
The whole particle massspectrum maps directly onto a
series of these coherenceeigenvalues.
Your body, your mass is like asustained, complex ripple of
coherence.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
That's incredible.
If mass is tied to thisresonance ladder of coherence
collapse you mentioned, couldthat explain particle
generations, electron, muon tau.
Heavier copies.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Yes, absolutely.
That's a great connection andLillian explicitly tackles that.
The prediction is thatgenerations correspond to
quantized drops in agic.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
So agic gets smaller for heavier generations.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
Exactly, You'd have X generation one, X generation
two, X generation three.
This perfectly explains themass hierarchy.
First gen electrons, up-downquarks have the highest X,
lowest mass, most stable.
And third gen, like the topquark, Lowest X for their family
, highest mass, incrediblyunstable.
The hierarchy isn't arbitrary.
(20:15):
It's a direct result ofquantized steps down in
coherence.
That resins ladder, Wow.
And it also means stability anddecay are governed by the
stability of this eigenvalue.
Decay isn't random, it's aresonance event, an eigenvalue
bifurcation.
Oh, what.
Like the eigenvalue suddenlyjumps down to a lower, more
stable value, maybe due to someexternal coherence shift or
(20:38):
internal wobble.
It gives a deterministic reasonfor decay rather than just
probability.
Even quantum uncertainty mighthave deeper coherence roots and
connecting this all up, maybethe most radical part In HHHCR
Toey time.
It's not fundamental, not acontinuous dimension like we
usually think.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
Not a dimension.
What is it then?
Speaker 2 (20:56):
It's emergent.
It arises from coherence,modulation, structured by
harmonic resonance eigenvalues.
He calls it infradimensionaltime it's layered, nonlinear,
tied directly to the fields, nota universal clock ticking away.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
Okay, my head hurts a little.
Speaker 2 (21:12):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
So clocks?
They don't measure someabsolute flow, they measure
these resonances unfolding.
Does that mean time could bedifferent for different things?
Speaker 2 (21:21):
Precisely, You've got it.
There's a harmonic resonanceoperator.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
HR.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
It acts on a time-evolving eigenfield and
gives a harmonic eigenvalue.
Han.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
Omega.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
Like frequency.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Exactly Quantized frequency modes.
Yeah, Only the specificfrequencies, specific rhythms
allow stable coherence evolution.
This creates a complex temporallattice of allowed beats, not a
smooth line.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
A temporal lattice, okay.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
Time progression isn't moving along a line.
It's the phase evolution of acoherence eigenfield.
Each tick is tied to itseigenfrequency on.
Speaker 2 (21:54):
Higher on means faster phase evolution, a
quicker beat for that system, sodifferent systems could
experience time differently,based on their coherent state,
their un.
That's the implication.
Imagine a cosmic orchestra,each instrument playing its own
quantized tempo.
Our perceived time is just thedominant rhythm we're part of.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
That is absolutely wild.
So our experience of time,biological rhythms, they're not
just arbitrary cycles, they'reactual eigenstates in this
temporal coherence frame,Exactly Because this
infra-dimensional time isharmonic and quantized.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
Any system governed by coherence, which is
everything, according to Lillian, will show these temporal
resonance zones.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
Like circadian rhythms.
Speaker 2 (22:32):
Yes, or neuron firing patterns, planetary orbits,
even huge cosmic epochs likeinflation, or dark energy
dominance.
They're all seen as quantizedeigenstates of infradimensional
time.
Speaker 1 (22:44):
Not just mechanical clockwork.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
Right.
A circadian rhythm mightliterally be a specific
eigenvalue, say Ouro, in abiological coherence field.
It explains why certain rhythmsare stable, why temporal
coherence matters for memory orconsciousness, why the universe
unfolds in distinct eras.
Each phase is a stable rhythm,an eigenmode.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
Okay, okay.
What about the arrow of time?
Why does it only seem to go oneway?
Speaker 2 (23:06):
Ah yeah, the model has a neat answer for that too.
Lillian suggests the arrow oftime is a byproduct of phase
decoherence in infradimensionalresonance.
Speaker 1 (23:15):
Decoherence, meaning loss of sync.
Speaker 2 (23:17):
Exactly when coherence breaks down in a
system, when the phaserelationships get scrambled,
that's when time becomesdirectional, that's when entropy
increases.
The universe goes from highercoherence to lower, and that
process is the arrow of time.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
So time reversal would mean restoring coherence.
Essentially yeah.
Speaker 2 (23:36):
Suppressing decoherence, retaining phase
memory.
It's not traveling back, butreversing the co-human's
dynamics.
It ties coherence, entropy andtimes flow together
intrinsically.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
Okay, we've got emergent mass forces, even time,
all tied to eigenvalues andcoherence.
Now what about the stage, thedimensions?
Everything happens in thetheory talks about a
hyperfractal manifold.
That sounds complex.
What does it mean fordimensions?
Is this like string theories,hidden dimensions?
Speaker 2 (24:03):
That's a good question and no, it's quite
different from standardcompactified dimensions.
In Lillian's view, the universeisn't a fixed 3 plus 1 d box 3
space, 1 time yeah.
Right.
Instead, it's a dynamichyperfractal coherence structure
.
Think of it as layered scalesensitive field and its dynamics
are governed by fractal scalingeigenvalues.
Speaker 1 (24:25):
Fractal scaling eigenvalues.
Yeah, okay, so dimensionalityitself isn't fixed.
Speaker 2 (24:30):
Exactly.
It's resonantly selected, basedon coherence conditions.
This hyperfractal manifold islike an underlying fabric with
nested dimensional shells, eachwith its own resonance rules.
It evolves through coherencecascades, not just spatial
expansion.
It's dynamic.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
So if dimensions aren't fixed, how does this
fractal scaling operator Fdescribe this?
What does its eigenvalue tellus about how dimensions pop up?
Speaker 2 (24:55):
The operator F describes how a field behaves
across these nested scales whenit acts on a field state, fx xx.
That eigenvalue is the fractalquantizer of dimensional
emergence.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
Beta.
What does its value mean?
Speaker 2 (25:07):
If white is a simple number, like one, two, three, it
might correspond to the cleardimensions we see.
If it's irrational, maybefractal-like, it could suggest
more complex, non-integer orembedded dimensions, like in
chaotic systems.
This leads to fractaleigenvalue cascades.
Each step down might representa new force appearing or new
particles, or a whole new layerof reality unfolding.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
So the universe's structure is quantized
dimensionally.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
That's the idea.
Not just energy, butdimensionality itself comes in
steps defined by these volvalues.
Now about those extradimensions in string theory, the
compactified ones.
Hhhcr-toei reinterprets them.
They're not curled up small,they're hyperfractal coherence
reductions.
Effectively, losing a dimensioncorresponds to a drop in the
(25:53):
coherence eigenvalue d plus onephi d Ah.
So a dimensional shift islinked to a coherent in the
coherence eigenvalue D plus onephi d Ah.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
So a dimensional shift is linked to a coherent
shift.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
Exactly, and this explains why symmetries might
appear or disappear or whyfundamental constants could
change under differentconditions.
Lillian suggests the finestructure constant might emerge
via fractal resonance at aspecific threshold.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
So fundamental constants speed of light,
planck's constant g they aren'tjust arbitrary numbers we
measure, they're tied to thisdimensional structure.
Speaker 2 (26:20):
Yes, precisely the implication.
They aren't universal presets.
They emerge as fixed pointsattractors in the scaling
eigenvalue spectrum of thehyperfractal manifold.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
Attractors like stable resonance points.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
Exactly.
He even suggests the finestructure.
Constant I1137, is a resonancefractional eigenvalue, possibly
related to the golden ratio.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
The golden ratio Wow.
Speaker 2 (26:43):
Yeah, it suggests constants like C, G are emergent
relations, stabilized withinthe coherence field at specific
dimensional layers, not fixednumbers.
Each layer defined by a Babandgoverns what physics happens
there Atoms, DNA, galaxies.
He even maps Bebo 1 toclassical scales, Bebo 2 to
biological scales, Bebo 2 toquantum zones.
Speaker 1 (27:05):
A deep mathematical order linking dimension and
reality.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
So to formally describe how all these fields
and dimensions interact, thetheory introduces a really key
object the coherence tensor.
Speaker 1 (27:15):
Another tensor, okay, how is this one different?
Speaker 2 (27:18):
It's a big generalization.
It represents the flow ofcoherence and information across
the whole hyperfractal manifold.
It generalizes spacetime'smetric tensor from gravity and
the stress-energy tensor fromfield dynamics.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
It combines them.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
It generalizes them but critically adds structure,
resonance, coherence gradients,hyperfractal modulation across
dimensions.
Formally it's defined using thecoherence eigenfield kun square
square.
It measures field alignment,coherence, density, phase
concurrence.
It's the blueprint of coherencestructure.
Speaker 1 (27:51):
That sounds incredibly powerful.
So how does this tensor explainforces?
We said there were eigenvaluegradients before.
Is there a link?
Absolutely coherent structure.
That sounds incredibly powerful.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
So how does this?
Speaker 1 (27:55):
tensor explain forces .
We said they were eigenvaluegradients before.
Is there a link?
Speaker 2 (27:58):
Absolutely.
It all ties together.
Forces emerge from gradients inthe flow described by this
tensor.
Lilian defines a coherencecurvature vector, Futum.
This equation shows thatelectromagnetism, gravity, weak,
strong forces, all of them boildown to differential coherence
alignment across fields.
Forces are about how thecoherence field gets stressed or
(28:18):
bent.
Speaker 1 (28:19):
Like mass bending space time, but here it's
bending coherence.
Speaker 2 (28:23):
That's a good analogy .
Yeah, em forces might bespecific oscillations in the
tensor.
Gravity might be the overallcurvature stress.
It's a unified source for forceand, what's really cool, tying
back to mass mass itself can belocalized and measured using the
trace of this tensor.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
Yeah, Torsi, the trace sum of the diagonals.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
Right.
Lillian shows mass isproportional to it.
Here at Trey high trace means adense, coherent mass
condensation point like aparticle.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
And zero trace.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
A massless field like a photon, Pure coherence flow.
A varying trace could evenexplain things like neutrino
oscillations, where mass seemsto change.
Mass literally condenses fromresonance tension in the
coherence lattice.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
Okay, and this tensor , yeah, does it lead to one
unified equation for everything?
Speaker 2 (29:09):
Right.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
Replacing Maxwell's, Einstein's, all those separate
ones.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
That's the goal.
Yes, the total interactionaction in the theory combines
quantum, hypergravity, grin andcoherence tensors into one
principle S coherence,coefficient, eigenvalue.
Again, exactly when youextremize this action, the
standard physics way to getequations of motion, you get
unified field equations.
It forms a coherent fielddynamics framework.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Replacing all the old ones.
Speaker 2 (29:33):
That's the ambition, and it can model extreme things
like black holes or quantumdecoherence, Not as
singularities, but as coherencecollapse.
Places where the tensorcontracts sharply, mass diverges
.
Time stops because theresonance patterns break down.
Speaker 1 (29:47):
This brings us to the big one, the Holy Grail.
If everything mass time,dimensions, forces stems from
coherence and eigenvalues, howdoes Lillian's theory actually
unify all the fundamental forces?
Does it give us a path?
Speaker 2 (30:01):
It does, and it's a pretty radical path, different
from usual unification attempts.
Hhhc-rto defines a singleoverarching unified coherence
operator, U For unified,Probably it acts on all field
modes at once, U U U hererepresents the combined state.
It acts on all field modes atonce.
Here represents the combinedstate of all fields, and HN is
an eigenvalue tensor capturingthe entire quantization
(30:22):
structure of the universe, aneigenvalue tensor.
And this equation isn't just arule imposed from outside, it's
a fundamental resonanceconstraint.
It means the forms the universetakes, particles, forces are
selected only if they canstabilize coherence across all
the symmetry layers.
It's the master operator, host,speaker.
So gravity, electromagnetism,strong, weak forces, they're not
(30:46):
fundamentally separate, they'rejust different expressions,
different facets of this singleunified coherence operator.
Precisely that's the coreimplication.
Single unified coherenceoperator.
Precisely that's the coreimplication.
Each force emerges as adistinct symmetry resonant state
of the overall coherence field.
Think of it like differentprojections of U.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
Projections.
Speaker 2 (31:02):
Yeah, each projection corresponds to a specific
symmetry topology within thefield and has its own unique
eigenvalue band within thebigger universal spectrum.
Gravity relates to hyperfractalcurvature, em to U1 phase
symmetry, weak force to SU2,chirality, strong force to SU3,
color resonance.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
All different eigenmode layers of the same
underlying thing.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
Exactly.
They're all coherentstabilizers operating in
different symmetry contexts, allexpressions of the same
dynamics.
And what's really compelling isthe early universe implication
At extreme high coherence, rightafter the Big Bang.
Perhaps all these separateforce eigenvalues would converge
A single unified, superresonant state.
All forces were one because theoperators were basically
(31:45):
indistinct.
Speaker 1 (31:46):
So unification isn't found by pushing current
theories harder, but by tracingcoherence back to the origin.
Speaker 2 (31:52):
Exactly Back to the hyperfractal origin layer and,
conversely, as the universecooled and coherence dropped,
fields split apart, forces brokeaway due to coherence-resonance
shell separation.
Not spontaneous symmetrybreaking in the usual sense, but
a separation of these resonancebands.
Speaker 1 (32:11):
Which would also affect the constants.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
Right Things like the fine structure.
Constant or G are seen ascoherence eigenvalue ratios,
potentially emergent andvariable depending on the
coherence state.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Wow.
We have covered an incredibleamount of territory here, from
basic eigenvalues up to thisfrankly staggering vision of a
hyperfractal, resonant universewhere everything emerges For you
.
What's the single biggesttakeaway?
What's the most profound shiftthis new ontology, this new way
of seeing reality brings?
Speaker 2 (32:41):
I think the biggest shift, the most profound thing,
is that it moves physics frombeing purely descriptive or
probabilistic to beinginherently generative.
It's not just how reality works, but how reality actually comes
into being.
Generative the core idea isreality doesn't just exist.
It emerges dynamically fromcoherence field resonance
physical quantities.
They appear via structuredeigenvalue selection forces.
(33:05):
Mass particles, not fundamentalbits, but stabilized resonance
shells in the coherence field, ahyperfractal resonance domain,
not fixed and constants notgiven, but inherent coherent
ratios within the field.
It's physics explainingcreation, not just describing
the result.
Lillian sums it up with hiscoherence principle of emergence
(33:25):
All structures, forces andobservables arise from coherence
field configurations thatstabilize into quantized
eigenvalue forms.
That's quite a statement.
It really is, and itsimplications are huge.
Emergence replaces randomness,coherence replaces quantum
collapse, resonance replacesfundamental separation.
It suggests a meta frameworkthat could potentially bridge
(33:48):
physics, cosmology, biology,consciousness, self-organization
, maybe even AI, a deeplyinterconnected, self-creating
universe.
Hashtag 4.2, testablepredictions and technological
directions.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
Okay, it's a stunning vision, but it immediately
makes you ask how can wepossibly test this?
How do we apply theseincredibly ambitious ideas?
How does it get beyond justtheory?
Speaker 2 (34:07):
Yeah, that's always the million dollar question for
any grand theory right, yeah.
But HHHCR Toey does suggestsome paths, ways to potentially
validate it.
Speaker 1 (34:14):
Like what.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Well, instead of just hunting for new particles,
maybe we design experiments tolook for subtle coherence
eigenvalue thresholds, like inultra-precise atomic transitions
, looking for tiny energy shiftsnot predicted by standard QM,
or maybe analyzingsynchronization patterns in
neural networks could theyreveal underlying coherence
principles On a cosmic scale,maybe detailed gravitational
(34:39):
lensing maps could show tinyanomalies hinting at
hypergravity eigenvalues,tweaking spacetime.
Speaker 1 (34:45):
So shifting focus from measuring energy to
measuring coherent states.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
Essentially, yes, trying to detect these deeper
resonance patterns, that'sreally interesting.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
Are there potential practical applications down the
line, maybe in energy or even AI, like you hinted?
Speaker 2 (34:58):
Absolutely Conceptually, it opens doors.
If reality is resonant, maybewe can tap into it Engineering
resonance-based energystructures.
Could zero-point energyextraction become feasible
through coherence, manipulation?
Speaker 1 (35:10):
Whoa, whoa.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
Lillian also mentions quantum biotronic control may
be manipulating biologicalsystems at a fundamental
coherence level for healing orenhancement beyond just
molecules.
Speaker 1 (35:20):
Okay, that's sci-fi territory, but fascinating.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
It is speculative, sure, Cosmologically we could
analyze cosmic structures likegalaxies not just as gravity
clumps but as hyperfractalresonance condensates.
And yes, AI, designingsynthetic coherence architecture
is what Lillian callssyntelligence.
Speaker 1 (35:37):
Intelligence emerging from computational coherence
fields.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
That's the idea, a completely different paradigm
from silicon logic, long-termvisions definitely, but
conceptually powerful and reallyall this work.
We've discussed the Eben values, eigenfield's hypersymmetry.
It's presented as a crucialpiece of a much larger puzzle
Lillian is building.
He calls it the UnifiedCoherence Theory of Everything,
or UCTE.
Speaker 1 (36:01):
Even bigger.
Speaker 2 (36:02):
Oh yeah, the ambition is huge.
It aims to truly integrate QFT,GR, dimensional emergence, but
then go way beyond.
It wants to bring inconsciousness, observation, life
, intelligence,self-organization, cosmology,
all under one coherent framework.
Wow.
Speaker 1 (36:17):
All driven by coherence dynamics.
Speaker 2 (36:19):
That's the vision and this eigenvalue framework we've
been discussing.
It's presented as one of theformal cornerstones, the
mathematical and ontologicalbackbone needed for that kind of
truly holistic science.
Speaker 1 (36:31):
Well, to wrap things up, the paper ends with a really
powerful, almost poetic linethat seems to capture it all.
Speaker 2 (36:37):
Ah yes, he concludes.
When the universe coheres, formarises.
When form resonates, fieldsemerge.
When fields stabilize,constants are born.
This is not the end of physics,it is its awakening.
Speaker 1 (36:51):
Chills.
That really does sum it up,moving from describing what is
to understanding how it allcomes into being through
resonance.
Hashtag, hag, outro, and that'sour deep dive into Phil
Ballouian's truly groundbreakingvision of physics.
It really makes you wonder,doesn't it?
If everything we see,everything we are, is
fundamentally a form ofresonance, what signals are we
(37:11):
still missing?
What harmonies are playing outthat we just don't hear yet?
What if the universe isn'tsilent in those vast empty
spaces?
What if it's singing thisincredibly complex symphony of
coherence and we're only juststarting to figure out how to
listen?
Definitely something to mullover, indeed.
Thank you so much for joiningus on the Deep Dive.
We hope this exploration intothe HHHC Artaud has maybe
sparked some new questions,given you some new ways to
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.