Bolton Raid: DOJ's Power Play or Legitimate Action?

Send us a text

Support the show

RyanFSamuels.com

https://www.mypatriotsupply.com/?_ef_transaction_id=&oid=1&affid=176&source_id=RyanSamuels

https://theryansamuelsshow.myshopify.com/

https://twitter.com/RyanFSamuels

https://www.facebook.com/TheRyanSamuelsShow/

https://rumble.com/user/RyanFSamuels

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1ha_kVpgTc6K2cvbPVKGjQ

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:59):
Thank you.
Thank you, we'll see you nexttime, mike.

Speaker 2 (01:50):
Mike.
Welcome on, guys, I'm here.

(02:22):
We got a really good showcoming tonight.
Hang in there.
We got people piling in man.
We got a really good showcoming tonight.
Hang in there, we got peoplepiling in man.
We got a lot of people tonight,a lot of big news we're gonna
go over.
So just hang in there.
We're coming.
One minute 22 seconds to go bignews.
Hit that like, share andsubscribe button.

(02:45):
Share, share, share, like, like, like.
Drop your comments and let'sget this ball rolling.

Speaker 1 (03:00):
We'll be right back.

Speaker 2 (03:59):
Good evening and welcome to the Ryan Samuel Show.
We're here, we're live.
We got some really big storiestonight, all three stories we're
going to do.
We're so big I almost had tosplit them up, but I said you
know what?
These are the three biggeststories in the country.
We're going to cover them.
I got some inside informationtoo that you're going to only

(04:21):
hear here and nowhere else.
So, as per usual, we're goingto do three topics one hour.
Let's kick it off.
The first topic is GhislaineMaxwell transcript was released
today.
It's 12 hours, don't worry.

(04:42):
I went through the trouble ofgoing through it and finding out
what was said and what wasgoing on.
And are we suspicious or not?
That's what we're going to talkabout.
John Bolton yes, the formerNational Defense Secretary has
been raided by the FBI.
Is it legitimate?

(05:02):
Is it a political ploy?
These are questions that I wantto know.
And then the creme de la creme,probably the biggest story and
the best part about this storyis nobody on earth is talking
about it, and that is the UnitedStates of America is about a

(05:24):
pubic hair away from layingwaste to drug cartels in
Venezuela and Mexico.
Some information was released.
Ships have been launched,they're ready to go to war and
we're going to talk about that.
So we will cover all threetopics right after this.

Speaker 3 (05:46):
Hey, Ryan.
Hi, this is Sarah Palin.

Speaker 4 (05:48):
Ryan Donald Trump, Jr Hogs to win, see ya.
Hey everybody, I want y'all tocheck out a fellow Marine's ball
catch.

Speaker 5 (05:55):
My name is Ted Nugent and I got a call from my buddy,
ryan F Samuels, and he wants meto tell you that he's a working
hard, playing all-American sonof a who is celebrating god
family country.

Speaker 4 (06:08):
Welcome to the ryan samuels show, one of the top
political podcasts in the unitedstates, where we have a healthy
distrust for government andmainstream media.
The ryan samuels show is a raw,unfiltered look at american
politics follow on facebook,twitter, youtube, rumble and all
podcast platforms.
Here is your host, ryan Samuels.

Speaker 2 (06:33):
All right, we're back , we're live.
So last night I thought Ireally thought I was live on
Instagram.
I was not live on Instagram,Although I am live on Instagram
now for the first time inhistory.
What an amazing day.
What an amazing day Finally.
Anyway, it's a little wonky.
I can't do it through this bigstudio and these flat screen TVs

(06:55):
.
I got to do it through a littlescreen on the side.
A little weird there Instagram.
But anyway, that's besides thepoint.
That's not what we're here totalk about.
We are here to talk about thebig news, and we're going to
start with John Bolton Now.
John Bolton was a member of thefirst Trump administration.

(07:16):
Okay, he was very supportive ofthe raids at Mar-a-Lago.
He was on MSNBC collectingpaychecks, talking about how
awesome it is and how great itis, and I'm going to back that

(07:38):
up with receipts.
Okay, let's listen to hisinterview from the day that they
raided Mar-a-Lago on MSNBC.

Speaker 7 (07:48):
Any given moment.
But I don't think he caredabout the classification system.
I don't think he appreciatedthe sensitivity of this
information and he didn'tappreciate the sensitivity of
how it was often acquired theso-called sources and methods.
So this had been briefed to himbefore I arrived.
It was repeated frequently.

(08:08):
I think it simply had no impacton him whatever.

Speaker 2 (08:12):
There's a couple of different.
The craziest part about this isJohn Bolton was raided by the
FBI for mishandling classifieddocuments, and not for just
having them, mind you, but usingthem as a resource for his new
book.
Now, that is obviously theaccusation.

(08:34):
We don't know if that is trueor accurate at this moment in
time.
The right wing media is goingto tell you that that's the case
.
The left wing media is going totell you that that's not.
The.
The left wing media is going totell you that that's not the
case, and I'm going to try totell you the truth.
So John Bolton is being raidedby the same agency that raided
Donald Trump, for the exact samereason.

(08:57):
There's only one difference.
There's a there's a differentpresident for each of them.
Let's listen to what else hehad to say.

Speaker 8 (09:18):
Ways that people think about this and people who
are not friendly to thepresident.
For each of them, let'scareless.
He's not that smart.
He just, if you want to.
He took these things almost bymistake and now he's basically
stamping his feet and sayingthey're mine.
I don't want to give them up.
Give me a sense of where youthink the truth lies with
respect to Trump's intelligence,carelessness and the degree to

(09:39):
which he might've brought motiveto bear on taking these
documents out of the White Houseand keeping them for this long
at Mar-a-Lago.

Speaker 7 (09:49):
Well, I don't.
It's very hard to speculate onmotive other than that he liked
cool things.
He saw things that he so hewanted to take them, and he was
pretty much able to take them,and not just on classified
information matters, on allkinds of things that crossed his
desk.
Some days he liked to eat a lotof French fries.
Some days he took classifieddocuments.

(10:10):
He wanted them.
Why did he want them?
Because he could get them.

Speaker 2 (10:13):
Well, I mean, what the hell is this guy talking
about?
You just made all of that up.
This guy is the former head ofthe National Security Agency.
He used to be the head honcho,the big boy over there, and like
, oh, some days the presidentliked french fries, some days he
liked to take classifieddocuments.
Like you're just making that up.

(10:35):
Like clearly, you're justmaking that up.
Anybody with common sense cantell You're just like, oh, I
don't know why he wanted to takethem, because it was a BS case.
The question is Is this case aBS case and is this a legitimate
pursuit, or is it retaliatoryby Donald Trump?
And that's the question thatneeds to be answered.

(10:57):
Listen, any growth in the powerof the federal government or
state government or even yourlocal government is a problem.
The government has killed morepeople than cancer.
I say that just about everynight on this show because it's
true Government that governsbest governs the least.
So let's look into this just alittle bit further and let's see

(11:23):
if we can pull up anything here.
Here is a news story about JohnBolton being raided by the FBI.

Speaker 5 (11:32):
I did not realize this, but there was a probe
going on when President Trumpwas in office last time because
John Bolton wrote a book and heviolated his NDA.
The president said in doing itand he felt as though there were
classified information in thatbook.
The probe dropped when JoeBiden became president, so is
this picking up where that leftoff?

Speaker 9 (11:52):
David, it's possible.
I don't know with 100 percentcertainty, but it is notable,
guys, that John BoltonAmbassador Bolton's security
clearances were stripped earlierthis year by President Trump.
Tulsi Gabbard, the director ofnational intelligence.

Speaker 2 (12:07):
They stripped security clearances of 37 people
37, not just John Bolton.
Ok, the Russiagateinvestigation is most likely
going to be tied to this.
Ok, there's a couple of thingsgoing on here.
The first thing is that thereare statute of limitations on
this case with John Bolton.

(12:28):
The statute of limitations endsat the end of this next month.
Okay, at the end of Septemberis when it ends.
So October 1st the statute oflimitations sunsets on any
charges against John Bolton.
Therefore, they had to go now.
The problem with that, and theperceived problem with that, is
that it's premature.

(12:49):
So do they actually have theevidence that they need or is
this just going to be a popcornfart?
Did the FBI do this, cause allthis, this stuff?
This is Donald Trump's reallyfirst time going after somebody

(13:09):
with the deal with the DOJ andcash fatale and Dan Bongino,
these this is the stuff there'sworking for.
There's going to be more.
This is not the first one, butthey better have some evidence
that they find in this guy'shouse or this is just a big
nothing and it really needs tobe legitimate, and I think Dan

(13:32):
Bongino is well aware of that,and Kash Patel.
I don't think they would havedone this just to fail Again.
I think Pam Bondi is an issue.
I think she was an issue whenshe was in Florida.
I've never liked Pam Bondi.

(13:52):
She's very anti-gun, but she'salso incompetent.
She's incompetent.
So we're going to see justexactly what this brings forward
and brings to light.
I hope, I hope.
I hope this is just thebeginning of a series of raids.
I want to see Letitia James.

(14:15):
Letitia James should be infederal prison for the rest of
her life, and so should KathyHochul.
They should be in federalprison.
No mercy, a right trial, aright jury.
But they should go to federalprison for abusing the justice
system that they did anddisgracing the American people

(14:36):
with what they did with thatsham trial of Donald Trump.
That was a frigging joke and itwas a scam.
And, as we talked about lastnight, the New York state
district, the New York stateSupreme court, which is the step
below the appellate court, theappellate court is actually what
you would call the Supremecourt in any other, in most
other states.
It's still got one step to go.
We talked about this all lastnight, but that was a joke and

(14:58):
it should.
It should have been thrown out.
I do not anticipate theappellate court is going to keep
it.
Let's listen to what CNN had tosay about John Bolton.

Speaker 10 (15:09):
We're following major breaking news this morning
that continues to unfold.
The FBI, conducting a court,authorized search at the home of
John Bolton as part of anational security investigation.
That is, according to a sourcefamiliar with the matter, a ton
of questions around this rightnow.

Speaker 2 (15:23):
Our CNN crew has been on the ground on the scene this
morning, observed I love thephoto they use of this guy where
he looks like he just crappedhis pants because he should be
absolutely terrified.

Speaker 10 (15:36):
FBI personnel near Bolton's home, even seeing
personnel go into his home.
John Bolton, as you all know,is President Trump's former
national security advisor and aformer US ambassador to the UN.
In recent years, he has becomea prominent critic of the
president, ever since he leftthe first Trump administration.

Speaker 2 (15:53):
This is what I'm saying the left wing media is
going to make this about.
Oh, he's a critic of PresidentTrump, of President Trump.
He also may have ties toRussiagate and the leaking of
classified information to try tomake Donald Trump look bad and
prevent him from obtaining thepresidency for the second term.
He may be involved with theconspiracy of Russiagate.

(16:17):
There's many things thatthey're not mentioning in CNN,
because CNN is friggin' dog crap.

Speaker 10 (16:27):
As recently as this week, he spoke to us about
President Trump's meeting withVladimir Putin.

Speaker 7 (16:35):
Well, I think it's a reflection of just how confident
the Russians feel they haveescaped the sanctions that have
been threatened by PresidentTrump.
They've heard Secretary ofState Rubio say on Sunday we're
not going to sanction thembecause it will cause diplomatic
efforts to fail.

Speaker 2 (16:51):
Why would you sanction them?
You're trying to end the war.
You're trying to end the war.
Why would you cause a rift inthe middle of negotiations?
That seems common sense, andthis guy's supposed to be a
diplomat.
Isn't that very diplomatic toput sanctions on a country
you're trying to negotiate withand stop the killing of

(17:12):
thousands of people every day?

Speaker 7 (17:16):
Trying to keep the table set so that things work
out in their direction.

Speaker 10 (17:22):
That was just a couple days ago, cnn's Caitlin
Polanski joining us now.
Caitlin, you brought us thisbreaking news and you have some
new reporting already.
What's going on?

Speaker 2 (17:30):
I'm sorry, but I need to know what Caitlin's pronouns
are, because I have no ideawhat that thing is.

Speaker 11 (17:38):
That's right, kate.
We can confirm according to alaw, according to a person
familiar with this investigation, that the probe it's related to
the possible retention ofnational security information.
So a little bit more specificon what we know about this
investigation, this search thatthe FBI is conducting of John

(18:00):
Bolton's home.
Not only is it about nationalsecurity, it is about the
retention of national securityinformation.
Often, kate, that looks likeare there classified documents
being kept outside of where theyshould be kept?
That often is what we see ininvestigations like this.

Speaker 2 (18:18):
The classified documents thing is the catch-all
for the FBI.
It sounds like I want you guysto know and understand, okay, if
you've never worked in a placelike I was in the military.
I worked with the nuclearweapons.
We had secret clearances andtop secret clearances and there
was classified informationeverywhere, but everything was

(18:40):
classified information.
What Donald Trump has for lunchis classified information.
Where he had lunch isclassified information.
What Donald Trump has for lunchis classified information.
Where he had lunch isclassified information.
You know the time.
If somebody keeps a log of thetime he went to the bathroom,
that's classified information.
So if you kept a menu and youtake your menu home, that could
be considered classifiedinformation.

(19:01):
So understand, they say itbecause it's loud and it's scary
.
My thing is is that is KashPatel and Dan Bongino using this
as a pretext before the statuteof limitations run out so that
they can get the ball rollingand then add more charges as
they investigate?
And this was their foot in thedoor to get the warrant to find

(19:22):
other things.
To get the warrant to findother things.
Now, if this guy had so muchtime to clean up everything, all
his communications, all thedocumentation he kept, whether
he's talking to Obama aboutRussiagate.
All of this is speculation,just 100%.

(19:42):
Just so you know.
All right, we have Ruby's CoveGuest House commenting.
I do not know him, but itsounds like he supports Trump.
Is that correct?
Peace, well, if you left,you're not going to know.
Is that like peace out?
Like back in the 90s, when Iwas a kid we would say peace and
it meant see you later, friend,or toodaloo, bye-bye.

(20:04):
Hey Terry, how are you?
Thanks for commenting?
So listen, we don't know.
He does not support Trump.
Okay, to answer your question,he does not support Trump.
He has never supported Trump.
Maybe he pretended to at times,but he definitely does not.
Just so we're clear and youunderstand the document.

(20:29):
The classified documents thingis the new friggin catch-all man
, it's, it's the cop smellsmarijuana in your car.
Oh, I smell marijuana in yourcar.
I mean, cops say that even whenthere's no marijuana and you
really can't challenge it, theycould just get in your car that
way, depending on where you,where you live, but that's a
pretext to get in the car.
You're basically trusting thepolice officers.

(20:49):
Honesty, right, the court isgoing to take the cop's word
against yours, so but that's thething.
If you say I smell marijuana inthe car and you get in the car
and you don't find marijuana.
You kind of look like an idiot.
And then what Right you got toput in a report?
You look like a fool, but inthe police department nobody

(21:10):
cares.
I'm talking about thissituation, the national.
This is national news.
This is going to be this is thebiggest, one of the biggest
stories of the presidency ofDonald Trump.
They better make sure that theyfind something.
So let's finish this up withthey, them or whoever this thing
is.

Speaker 11 (21:28):
But we're still waiting to hear more of what
this is.
The FBI they are at work stillon that scene in Maryland where
John Bolton's home is.
They took bags out of theirvehicles to bring inside.
There were four or six agents.
They have those blazers on, sayFBI, in the back.
So this is quite an observablescene right now, very different

(21:51):
than when the retention ofnational security information
was being investigated during asearch of Donald Trump's
Mar-a-Lago property three yearsago.
John Bolton he has not beencharged with anything here.
He's not been in government forsix years.
He did write a book and wasunder investigation when soon
after he left the Trumpadministration in 2020.

(22:14):
He was being investigated atthat time by a federal grand
jury in Washington on thepossible disclosure of
classified information in thatbook and he was not charged
there.
So, looking at the possibilityof a through line, it seems to
be more likely, given that thisis about the retention of
national security information.

(22:34):
There hasn't been a formalcomment yet that we have
received from John Bolton orfrom his lawyer.
He was unaware of the.
FBI activity this morning.
He wasn't home at the time.

Speaker 2 (22:46):
Also understand.
There is a likelihood that thisguy may have gotten a heads up.
Okay, this guy is a member ofthe actual deep state.
He's been at the highest levelsof governments for decades.
His connections are up downinside and out.
I hope Kash Patel and DanBongino know that and took extra

(23:06):
precaution.
But there is a likelihood that,hey, maybe this guy got a text
message.
He was the head of the NationalSecurity Agency.
They have access to things thatyou wouldn't even dream of.
This is the same agency thatwould have listened to everybody
speaking in the whole world,because your phone was sitting
on the counter and EdwardSnowden blew the lid on.

(23:28):
So there, there is a chancethat he maybe get the heads up
and everything's gone.
He'd be an idiot.
If he still has it five yearslater, he'd be an idiot.
That's why I'm saying this isthere's more to this.
There's something more to this.
They're looking for somethingelse.
This is a reason for them toget the warrant.

Speaker 11 (23:49):
We also are waiting to see if the administration
will say anything publicly.
So far, some cryptic messagesposted on social media by the
two top officials at the FBIKash Patel, the FBI director, on
the Platform X writing.
Kash Patel, the FBI director,on the Platform X, writing no

(24:09):
one is of the law.
Fbi agents on mission.

Speaker 2 (24:11):
That was right after 7 am this morning.
That is the most amazing thingin the world, because that's
what they did to Trump when theyhad those 34 fake felony
accounts.
Every politician was like noone is above the law and no one
is above the law.
So this is just a big F?
You to them and I couldn't behappier.
I couldn't be happier.
I just want to make sure it'slegit.

Speaker 11 (24:32):
And then the deputy FBI director, dan Bongino,
posting public corruption willnot be tolerated, not mentioning
John Bolton by name in eitherof those.
In either of those things, thisis a situation that would be
court authorized.
So the FBI would have gone to acourt with the help of Justice
Department prosecutors, askingto have the approval of a search

(24:55):
like this take place.
They would have had to haveprobable cause to do this, but
that, as we know, is a far, farlong way from potential charges
and also potential trial,anything like that.
Kate Long long way from that.

Speaker 2 (25:11):
I am almost certain that they are going to indict
John Bolton.
I would put money on it.
I wonder if it's available tobet on money on it.
I wonder if it's available tobet on.
But for certain, the thingabout the Trump administration,
donald Trump now, what he has todo, he's.

(25:32):
They forced him to do this.
Okay, what Donald Trump has todo is he has to put himself in a
position to where, when heleaves office, nobody is ever
going to be able to mess withhim again.
So all of his political enemieswho are now screaming at the
top of their lungs oh, oh, myGod, yeah, this is lawfare.

(25:56):
Like I don't care, I don't care.
The Democratic Party set theprecedence for this.
They set the precedence forthis.
When Donald Trump was rerunningfor his second term, they
brought it up.
Well, you're going to go afteryour political opponents.
He's like no, I'm not, he lied.
Of course he lied.
He has to.
He has no recourse to stop themfrom coming after him when he

(26:20):
gets out, unless he totallycrushes his enemy.
He has to totally crush themjust so that he could survive,
so they won't try to put him infederal prison for the rest of
his life.
This is going to be the firstof many.
I do think there's a deeperstory here.
Here's footage of John Boltoncoming back to his house after

(26:44):
he found out that the FBI wasthere.

Speaker 14 (26:46):
We're going to get back to that in just a second,
but here's live pictures of whatwe believe is John Bolton
returning home.
We had a picture of this SUVleaving his office a short time
ago and now it looks like it'smade its way with about a
30-minute trip to his home andthere's the ambassador coming up
, briefcase in hand, waving tothe assembled media and going

(27:06):
inside the front door of thehome.
We will see.
It doesn't look like it at thispoint if he decides to come out
and talk.
I mean, john Bolton does talkto the media an awful lot, but
he has chosen to remain silentat this point.
Of course, nicole Parker iswith us and, nicole, it looks as
though this investigation, atleast the search of Bolton's

(27:28):
home and his office, has wrapped.
What do you expect might be inthe boxes that came out at the
hands of FBI agents, and wheredoes this go next?

Speaker 2 (27:36):
I love when they ask dumb questions like that what do
you think is in the boxes thatcame out at the hands of FBI
agents?
So where does this go next?
I love when they ask dumbquestions like that what do you
think is in the boxes?
What do you think is in theboxes of the FBI?
Like it's just dumb questions?
So we're going to see whathappens with this.
We're going to follow itclosely.

(27:57):
His here is well.
Here's his neighbor.
Okay, so they're obviouslyfriends, right?
This is John Bolton's neighbor,neighbor who comes out to the
press to advocate for JohnBolton and say that Trump and
wearing a shirt that says Trumpis a national disgrace.

(28:18):
Okay, let's hear what he has tosay.

Speaker 15 (28:23):
All of this retribution and vengeance and
using the DOJ and the FBI andthe power of government to go
after anybody who disagrees withhim is frightening, and it's
only going to get worse if wedon't do something to make it
stop.
I don't know if you guys canhear that.
It sounds like it's only goingto get worse if we don't do
something to make it stop Idon't know if you guys can hear
that.

Speaker 2 (28:39):
It sounds like it's really low.
Basically, he's saying exactlywhat I what I said.
Everybody's going to say thatpeople are that donald trump is
using the, the department ofjustice, to go after his
political enemies.
Here's JD Vance.
Jd Vance was doing an exclusivewith Meet the Press and he was

(29:01):
asked about John Bolton, andlet's listen to JD Vance's
response.

Speaker 17 (29:06):
He's a frequent critic of President Trump's.
He's also on Kash Patel'senemies list.
The administration has alreadyrevoked his security clearance
secret service protection.
Is Ambassador Bolton beingtargeted because he's a critic
of President Trump?

Speaker 18 (29:23):
No, not at all, and in fact, if we were trying to do
that, we would just throw outprosecutions willy-nilly, like
the Biden administration, dojdid, prosecutions that later got
thrown out in court.
If we bring a case and ofcourse we haven't done that yet,
the Department of Justice hasnot done that yet.
We are investigating AmbassadorBolton, but if they ultimately
bring a case, it will be becausethey determined that he has
broken the law.
We're going to be careful aboutthat, we're going to be

(29:44):
deliberate about that, becausewe don't think that we should
throw people.
Even if they disagree with uspolitically, maybe, especially
if they disagree with uspolitically, you shouldn't throw
people willy nilly in prison.
You should let the law drivethese determinations, and that's
what we're doing.

Speaker 17 (29:57):
But you know, a lot of people have already looked at
this and said this looks a lotlike retribution.
Is this retribution?

Speaker 18 (30:04):
Well, who has said it looks a lot like retribution?
Kristen, a lot of people whotried to throw Donald Trump in
prison for completely fakecharges that were later thrown
out by multiple different courts.
I suspect that if the media andthe American people let this
case actually unfold, if theylet the investigation unfold as
it's currently doing, they'regoing to find out that what
we're doing is being verydeliberate and being very driven

(30:26):
by the national interest and bythe law here, and that's as it
should be.

Speaker 2 (30:31):
I love JD Vance.
He could just answer anyquestions so eloquently and give
you an actual response.
So here's MSNBC, of coursetrying to lay cover for John
Bolton, as they particularly do.
This is the last video.

(30:54):
Then we got to move on becausewe're running out of time, but
let's just watch MSNBC.

Speaker 19 (31:01):
He thought that the president's summit in Alaska
with Vladimir Putin was going tobe a disaster.
In fact, even before the summitoccurred, he said that he'd
Trump had handed Putin a win.
In fact, trump took went tosocial media to criticize Bolton
for those comments and now, afew days later, we have this.
We don't know there's a link,but we certainly know this is a
president who has promisedretribution.
Yeah, mrs Chilton.

Speaker 2 (31:24):
When did he ever promise retribution?

Speaker 20 (31:29):
Never it really is.
Listen, john Bolton and Idisagreed on many things back in
the days when I was serving inpublic office, but I don't think
very many people that know JohnBolton would argue that his
beliefs were intellectuallysound.

(31:50):
You could disagree with him andthat he gave a they're laying
cover for him.

Speaker 2 (31:55):
They're trying to make him out to be like some,
some hero of the government,only because Trump opposes him.
Now, if he supported Trump,they'd be vilifying him.
That's what they would do,because they're the left and
they're freaking insane.
So we're going to cover that.
You know, obviously we don'tknow much.
I got the alert, so I wasnotified about it, that it was

(32:19):
possibly happening at like seven, 30 this morning.
I I believed it, but we'll, Ithink I and then I threw a video
out like right after, like ateight or nine o'clock or
something like that, to talkabout it.
So not really much else hascome out through the day.
The other big news has come outand that's Ghislaine Maxwell's

(32:39):
interviews with the Departmentof Justice have been released,
and what they don't do is theydon't vilify Trump or the Trump
administration.
Actually, quite the opposite,quite the opposite.
She actually comes out and sayssome very nice things about
donald trump, but why?
All right, so we all know that.

(33:01):
Jeffrey epstein, this is likebeating a dead horse, but we
don't know what's going on withthat.
Okay, a couple of things.
Everybody's screaming aboutthese epstein files, the left.
It's like every freaking everypost I put.
There's like 20 leftists thatgo oh, release the Epstein files
.
Oh, my God, release the Epsteinfiles.
Listen, this happened years ago, over the course of almost a

(33:30):
decade.
If you think that JeffreyEpstein was working for Mossad
or CIA or any of these things,that people believe, any of
these conspiracies, do you thinkthat these people who went in
there and allegedly killed himjust kept the files in case
somebody wanted to read them oneday?
You don't think they just gotrid of them and they don't exist

(33:53):
anymore, exist anymore.
So you're talking about thismassive conspiracy, this master,
massive cover-up, who superninja'd inside of a, of a
freaking cell where the guy wassleeping silently, strangled him
in less than a minute ofmissing video that happened to

(34:14):
be right on the money from oneminute before midnight, which
logically sounds like the tapeswere resetting snuck in there,
kept out, had this secret littlemicrofilm of files of all of
the bad things that they did,and then they handed it to the
FBI and said put this in adrawer in case one day somebody

(34:35):
wants to know what we did, incase one day somebody wants to
know what we did.
No, if that is the case whichI'll tell you is unlikely.
If that is the case, then guesswhat?
The files are gone, dude.
They burned them.
They're out of there.
They're, they're, they're goneaway.
Now there are some people whorubbed elbows with jeffrey
epstein that, I think, did somebad things alongside Jeffrey

(34:58):
Epstein.
One of them is Bill Gates,because Bill Gates number one is
a nerd.
Okay, he's a frigging nerd,that's okay.
I love nerds, I do.
I'm a nerd.
I mean, I read.
I got books behind me.
It's the Harvard classics man.
I love to read.
I'm a nerd, but I'm not as bigof a nerd as Bill Gates.

(35:22):
And he's asked a question on PBSabout his time with Jeffrey
Epstein and this dude's lying.
He's lying.
Let's break it down.
Let's watch this, and thenwe're going to get to Ghislaine
Maxwell her actual transcripts,her voice.
They're coming up next.
Before we go any further, makesure you hit that like, share
and subscribe button.
Like this video, drop a comment, visit the shop.

(35:44):
I just got these new hats andthese don't tread on me hats
with a little six sempertyrannis on the side.
They're on sale right now atryanfsamuelscom slash shop.
You can also donate to the showat RyanFSamuelscom slash donate
.
Crowdfunding is what keeps thisgoing Subscriptions, donations

(36:04):
and clothing purchases.
This is the only way we cangenerate income so that we can
stay on the air and deliverquality content like this every
single day.
Here's Bill Gates beingconfronted about his time with
Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 21 (36:16):
You had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein
who, when you met him 10 yearsago, he was convicted of
soliciting prostitution fromminors.
What did you know about himwhen you were meeting with him,
as you've said yourself, in thehopes of raising money?
You know I had dinners with him.
I regret doing that.

Speaker 2 (36:39):
Look at him.
Look at him.
I regret doing that.

Speaker 22 (36:47):
He had relationships with people he said you know
would give to global health,which is interest I have.
You know, not nearly enough.
Philanthropy goes in thatdirection.
You know those meetings were amistake.
They didn't result in what hepurported and I cut them off.
You know that goes back a longtime ago now.

(37:08):
There's, you know, so there'snothing new on that.

Speaker 21 (37:11):
It was reported that you continued to meet with him
over several years and that inother words a number of meetings
.
What did you do when you foundout about his background?

Speaker 22 (37:23):
Well, you know, I've said I regretted having those
dinners, and there's nothing,absolutely nothing new on that.

Speaker 21 (37:31):
Is there a lesson for you, for anyone else looking
at this?
Well, he's dead.

Speaker 5 (37:40):
So you know in general, you always have to be
careful.
He's dead.

Speaker 2 (37:46):
In general, you always have to be careful.
Is he talking about himself oris he talking about Jeffrey
Epstein?
Listen, there's stuff that hasmy antennas tinging with this
case.
That has my antennas tingingwith this case, but when you get
down to the core of it, listen.
At the end of the day, mostconspiracies are just completely
wrong, and I'll tell you whythey're wrong.
Because the average citizen whohas never spent any time in

(38:09):
government and I've spent timeat some of the highest levels in
government with top secretclearances.
I was privy to stuff at a youngage okay, all of this is
verified.
You can Google me and find it.
It's there.
Okay, the one thing you need tolearn about the United States
government and super secretconspiracies is this they're

(38:32):
fucking incompetent.
The government could fuck up acup of coffee.
It is next to impossible forthem to pull anything off along
those lines, something thatintricate and advanced.
Okay, they're.
They're incompetent.
All right, that's my experiencewith the federal government,

(38:57):
but doesn't mean it's not true.
Maybe I wasn't privy to thehighest levels and I thought I
was, but they kept me out of itand acted like they were
incompetent for a reason.
That could be true too.
All right.
Here is so Ghislaine Maxwell.
There's no video, this is justaudio.
She went to, she had a meetingwith the Department of Justice

(39:20):
and she was interviewed.
Okay, to which she mentions inthe interview that Donald Trump
was a great gentleman, that hewas perfect in every way, he
never acted any wayinappropriate.
Let's listen to this.

Speaker 24 (39:31):
Photographic evidence.
I'm not sure that even the FBIwould take that.
Well, maybe today, butcertainly not back then, would
take that seriously.
So you have to have somethingto say.
Hey, you know, look, I've gotthis video of you doing terrible
things and you need to.
So I built those houses, manyof them those houses, many of

(39:59):
them.

Speaker 2 (39:59):
She's talking about the notion that there's hidden
cameras in the walls and that hewas recording these massages
with famous people to use it asleverage against them.
Okay, is that possible?
Yeah, but is it probable?
No, because even when gatheringintelligence, you catch more
flies with honey.
It's not a movie with honey.
It's not a movie, man, you know.
It's not a movie where they'reholding you hostage with

(40:20):
blackmail.
They're coming as your friendswith a smiling face is what
they're doing and they'regaining trust.
They're not holding you hostage.

Speaker 24 (40:33):
That's not typically the best way to get
intelligence.

Speaker 2 (40:35):
She's saying she built them, she decorated them.

Speaker 24 (40:37):
The electrician's in for the wiring.
I never wired, nor saw a singlehouse that had any type of
inappropriate let's say videosurveillance.
And I'll define that for youInappropriate surveillance would
mean in a bathroom, in abedroom, in any private area of

(41:00):
a home.
In a room where there weremassages given Inappropriate I
would say.
I would define a photographicevidence.

Speaker 2 (41:09):
She's saying she was involved with everything.
She's already been convicted ofthis crime.
There is no reason to lie onher behalf.
I mean, she's not gettinganything out of it, you know,
like at all.
I mean, what's she getting outof it?

(41:30):
She's not promised to leave.
If she had this informationagainst highly influential
people and there were hiddencameras, wouldn't she use that
as leverage and be like oh hey,donald Trump's the president,
hey, I got video of you diddlingkids in a safety deposit box
that I'm going to call somebodyand they're going to go pick up,
unless you give me a pardon andget me out of here.

(41:52):
Don't you think she'd be doingthat?
Don't you think Jeffrey Epsteinwould have been doing that?
The other part, too, that youhave to remember is like two
weeks before he killed himself.
He attempted to kill himselfand failed All right.
So remember that.
Let's get back to these tapeshere.
Here is a report from ABC News.

Speaker 25 (42:16):
And then we begin with our top story this hour.
The House Oversight Committeesays the Department of Justice
has turned over thousands ofpages related to convicted sex
offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The committee is calling it aquote first production, seeing
as the DOJ has only partiallymade good with delivering the
files days late on its Tuesdaydeadline.

(42:37):
Made good with delivering thefiles days late on its Tuesday
deadline.
House Oversight Chairman JamesComer was directed with the
subpoena, or he was directed tosubpoena the material after a
bipartisan vote by the committeelast month.
Meanwhile, the JusticeDepartment has released the
transcript and audio from DeputyAttorney General Todd Blanch's
closed-door interview withEpstein's co-conspirator Glenn
Maxwell last month.
Abc News Washington DC BureauManaging Editor Catherine

(43:00):
Falders and ABC legalcontributor Bernarda Villalona
join me now for more on this.
And, catherine, I want to startwith you.
What do we know about what'sbeing handed over today and when
will the remainder of thesefiles be delivered?

Speaker 13 (43:12):
Well, it's a good question.
We don't know exactly what theDepartment of Justice hasn't
turned over to the HouseOversight Committee Remember
what the House.

Speaker 6 (43:20):
Oversight.

Speaker 13 (43:20):
Committee was requesting was the full and
unredacted Epstein files, if youwill, that large tranche of
documents that the FBI and DOJconducted their review over and
then decided back in July thatthey wouldn't be releasing any
more of those publicly.
That's what the committee isrequesting Now.
What we do know has been turnedover, at least in part, is the

(43:42):
interview that the deputyattorney general, todd Blanch,
did with Jeffrey Epstein'sformer associate, ghislaine
Maxwell.
That interview occurred.
It was a highly unusual setting.
It occurred last month overnine hours.
The Department of Justice hasturned over that transcript and
that audio to Congress and nowhas released that publicly.
So that is at least one highlyanticipated document that has

(44:05):
now been released publicly bythe Department of Justice.
So exactly what the departmenthasn't turned over to Congress,
what they intend to withhold,whether that's for any
privileged information or forvictims' names or what have you.

Speaker 2 (44:20):
That's such a load of crap, man, that's such a load
of crap.
That's always been a load ofcrap.
Oh, I don't want to turn itover to because of the victims.
Listen, if the victim is makingaccusations against the citizen
, whether they're guilty or not,okay, that should be public
information.
They pulled the same friggingstupid crap with grand juries.

(44:43):
Oh, the grand jury meetingsecret.
Why, this is how a grand juryworks.
Okay, a police officer goes tothe district attorney or the
state attorney or the attorneygeneral's office and says, hey,
listen, this person committedthis crime.
We want a warrant for theirarrest, or they just arrest them

(45:05):
at the crime scene and thenthey arrest them.
Then the prosecutor or thedistrict attorney, assistant
attorney general, they take theevidence to a grand jury and all
of the evidence gets presentedto a grand jury and then the
grand jury says, yes, indictthem, or no, don't, don't indict
them.
The indictment percentage islike 100 percent.

(45:27):
That's where the saying comesthat a grand jury would indict a
ham sandwich.
But all of these conversationsin the frigging grand jury room
are confidential.
So what if the prosecutor isjust making crap up and gets an
indictment illegally?
You think that doesn't happen?
I mean you think that doesn'thappen?

(45:51):
It happens every day.
Of course it does.
There was just an attorney in amurder trial who had to
apologize for using AI togenerate text messages that she
presented as evidence.
That was not real, because theydon't care about the truth.
They care about convicting you.

(46:13):
If it's your job to convict you, that's all they care about.
So the Ghislaine Maxwell thetranscripts are out.
They're about 12 hours longwith all of them.
All right, I have some snippetshere we're going to listen to.
Here's a clip from Fox News.
Let's watch this.

Speaker 16 (46:37):
If you were to take Ghislaine Maxwell at her word
here and I think all of us, youwill and the rest of the
esteemed panel are looking atthis like come on, we understand
that there's likely a lot beingheld back or outright falsehood
at this point, although it'd betough to prove some of those
falsehoods, it depends.
This is, I think, a momentwhere we have to ask hold on a

(46:58):
second.
If she's unmotivated here totell the truth, what are we
going to get out of this?
And I think that that's whereyou have to see other aspects of
this trial coming together,because she's telling us that,
essentially, the onlycriminality that occurred here
was Jeffrey Epstein's, that hehid, that even she who was so
close to him didn't know about.

(47:18):
It's just not credible.
It's just not credible.
That part of it, I think, iswhere it most obviously falls
apart.
If you were to take GhislaineMaxwell, she's saying that she
does not believe that Jeffrey.

Speaker 6 (47:32):
FD killed himself.
Ghislaine Maxwell Well today.

Speaker 2 (47:35):
Does she actually believe that?
I mean, I really don't know.
He did not die by suicide.
This is this is the recordingof her saying that.

Speaker 6 (47:45):
So you think he did not die by suicide?
Given all the things we justtalked about, I do not believe
he died by suicide.
No, and do you believe?

Speaker 26 (47:54):
that.
Do you have any speculation orview of who killed him?

Speaker 24 (48:01):
No, I don't killed him.
I no, I don't.
I certainly never witnessedpresident in any of I don't
recall ever seeing him in hishouse.
For instance, I actually neversaw the president in any type of
massage setting.
I never witnessed the presidentin any inappropriate setting in
any way.
The president was neverinappropriate with anybody.

(48:21):
In the times that I was withhim he was a gentleman in all
respects.

Speaker 2 (48:26):
Okay, that's what she's saying.
Is she saying that because it'sthe truth about Donald Trump?
Or is she saying that becauseshe's hoping he'll give him a
pardon as long as she playsballs, plays balls, plays ball.
So, but she doesn't believethat he killed himself.
At least that's what she'ssaying.

(48:47):
Here's more audio.
Let's listen to this.
This one's pretty interesting.

Speaker 24 (48:53):
I do not.

Speaker 6 (48:56):
And do you remember, would you have been the one to
do that, or would somebody elsehave done that?

Speaker 24 (49:06):
I did ask some people.
I don't remember Mr Trump, Idon't remember who I did ask,
but Epstein also asked peoplehimself directly.
So it could have happened thatway, if it happened at all.

Speaker 12 (49:18):
If it happened at all 12 hours of audio.
Excuse me, I was incorrect.
Tom Winters back with us.
12 hours of audio?
She doesn.

Speaker 6 (49:26):
I was incorrect, tom Winters back with us 12 hours of
audio.
She doesn't recall a lot, so donot recall.
Is really difficult tochallenge from a standpoint of
perjury, lying, those type ofthings.
It's just, I don't remember, soyou can't prove that I lied to
you.
If I can't tell you what I hadfor lunch last Thursday, I
probably can't.
But on the other hand, ifyou're asking me what I had for
lunch today, there would beevidence in the trash can of my

(49:46):
office and it might be a littlebit more difficult to prove for
me to not prove otherwise that Iwould have known about that.

Speaker 2 (49:52):
So this is what's wrong with the media.
Just because there's food in mytrash can, doesn't mean that
I'm the one that ate it, unlessyou have video surveillance
saying I was the only personthere that day, that would be
different.
So Ghislaine Maxwell is sayingthat Donald Trump is 100%
innocent.
He was not involved in anything.

(50:12):
Couple of things.
Yeah, donald Trump and JeffreyEpstein were neighbors.
Number one, number two themassage therapist one of the
victims.
The massage therapist one ofthe victims.
I'm going to just Google this.
I can't really do two things atonce.
I apologize, virginia, virginia, jeffrey, right.

(50:40):
So she put out a post on Xsaying she's one of the victims
of Jeffrey Epstein.
Here I'm going to pull this upso you can see.
These are some of thesuspicious things.
This is her with Prince Andrewokay, famous picture.
She's one of the victims.
She's been vocal.
She put out on Twitter that Ifeel like my life is in danger.

(51:03):
I am not suicidal If anythinghappens to me.
Just know I did not commitsuicide.
That's not a quote, that's justa generalization of what she
said.
But she came out and said that,okay, and you know what
happened.
Shortly after that, she,frigging, committed suicide,
allegedly All right, this girlused to work at Mar-a-Lago for

(51:27):
Donald Trump.
This is one of the things thatis not helping him with this
situation.
Obviously, donald Trump has arelationship with Jeffrey
Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Donald Trump did ban.
This is on record.
He banned Jeffrey Epstein fromMar-a-Lago permanently over
inappropriate behavior towardswomen and underage women.

(51:49):
He banned him and kicked himout ofago.
I don't think Donald Trump didanything at all, because if he
did, it would have been anothercharge they would have been able

(52:13):
to throw on him when they werethrowing charges at him left and
right.
It doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make any sense.
If the left had access to allthese Epstein files, they had
the FBI that was rating him overclassified documents.
They never did anything overJeffrey Epstein.
It's BS.
The story's not there.

(52:33):
Donald Trump didn't do anything.
Even Ghislaine Maxwell herselfsays Donald Trump didn't do
anything.
You could make the argument thatshe's doing that to get on his
good side, to get a pardon, butthat's freaking reach.
I don't.
I don't think there's much tothe epstein story at all.
I think when you keep things asecret, they catastrophize

(52:53):
themselves.
Okay.
So when you keep secrets, the,the, the legend become, they
grow out of control.
That's what happens when youkeep grand jury indictments
closed and it makes everybodysuspicious.
And now donald trump stuck withthis because he promised he was
going to release the epsteinfiles, which they're being as

(53:14):
transparent as possible.
They released the video from theholding cell.
They released the transcriptfrom the doj.
You know, you could say that,hey, she could have used that as
leverage if she did see himinappropriately and if she
didn't get her way, he wouldgive he needs to give her a
pardon.
I mean, I don't know it is.

(53:35):
There are things that aresuspicious, but when you look at
the totality of thecircumstances, it's just not
there for me.
I've been wrong before and Iwill own it if I am, but the
United States has basicallydeclared war on the drug cart.
Fentanyl addiction, cocaineaddiction, whatever it's a

(53:59):
problem.
Hundreds of thousands of peopleare dying from these fentanyl
and fentanyl accidental deaths.
I mean, kids are touching itand they're dying because their

(54:21):
mom had it on one of their drugsor their aunt had it on one of
their drugs.
The cartels continue to smuggleit into the United States.
The Trump administration.
What they have done is theyhave classified the drug cartels
as a terrorist organization.
That is new.

(54:42):
That's never been done before.
There's only one reason toclassify somebody as a terrorist
organization.
That is new, that's never beendone before.
There's only one reason toclassify somebody as a terrorist
organization and that is thatyou're going to just wipe them
off the map.
So I'm getting word and acouple other people podcasters,

(55:06):
investigative journalists aregetting word that mid-September
we're going to see a militaryaction against the drug cartels.
You that listen to me, you knowI fully am like basically
anti-war with this.
Let's go to town.
This is a situation where theUnited States would actually be

(55:29):
100% justified in sending themilitary in to take these
organizations out.
I mean, this needs to be done.
They're murdering our peoplewould be a situation where the
United States would becompletely just and throwing the
entire United States MarineCorps in clearing houses door to
door, room by room, and murkingfrigging drug cartel drug lords

(55:52):
.
Let's listen to the news storyabout the Navy destroyers
deployed to Venezuela.

Speaker 26 (55:58):
Now there are three guided missile destroyers
deploying off the coast ofVenezuela.
It's all part of PresidentTrump's plan to help combat drug
cartels in Latin America.
For more.
Now we are joined by nationalsecurity correspondent Liz
Landers, who's been tracking allof this.
And Liz, what is the US plan inVenezuela?

Speaker 12 (56:18):
Yeah, andrew.
Well, while the world has beenfocused on these peace talks
that President Trump isattempting to broker between
Russia and Ukraine, the US hasslowly been building up a large
military presence in theCaribbean, near Venezuela.
A source familiar told ScrippsNews that the move is part of
President Donald Trump's effortto combat those threats from
Latin American drug cartels.
The source confirming toScripps News that three US

(56:42):
guided missile destroyers theUSS Gravely, uss Jason Dunham
and the USS Samson are beingdeployed in these efforts.

Speaker 2 (56:51):
So when I was stationed I was stationed at
Kingsway, Georgia, when I didthe nuclear weapon security.
That's where the United StatesNavy's Atlantic Fleet of Nuclear
Weapons is there was a Marinethere who was there before,
right before I was there.
He had just left.
He went over overseas.
He was standing post.
A terrorist got out of a car,dropped a grenade.

(57:13):
He jumped on the grenade andshielded everybody around him.
His name was Jason Dunham.
Okay, that's who this ship isnamed after.
Just a fun fact.

Speaker 12 (57:23):
Hell of a marine Also reporting that the ship
should arrive there imminently,off the coast of Venezuela.
So this will bring the militaryposture to about 4,000 sailors
and marines, and the broaderregion will also have several
P-8 spy planes, warships and atleast one attack submarine that,

(57:43):
according to Reuters, nowSecretary of State Marco Rubio
was asked about the US militarygoing after drug traffickers
late last week.

Speaker 23 (57:52):
Listen to what he said there are designated
narco-terrorist groups operatingin the region, some of them
utilizing international airspace, international waters to
transmit poison into the UnitedStates, and those groups will be
confronted.
The president's made that clearfrom the time he operated.

Speaker 12 (58:13):
Venezuelan President , nicolas Maduro, announcing on
Monday that his country willmobilize more than 4 million
militia members, saying that themilitias will be quote prepared
.
Four million militia members,saying that the militias will be
quote prepared, activated andarmed throughout Venezuela.
So he said in this televisedaddress on Monday that we will
quote defend our seas, our skiesand our lands.

(58:34):
We liberated them, we guard andpatrol them.

Speaker 2 (58:42):
No empire will touch the sacred soil of Venezuela,
nor should it touch.
So she, she, she misrepresentedthe p8.
She called it a spy plane.
It's not a spy plane, it's asub hunter.
So what cartels do is cartels.
They have submarines, likeliterally submarines that they
stuff full of cocaine orwhatever and then they smuggle

(59:02):
them into into various countries.
The p8 is a sub hunter so itwas specifically designed to
hunt down russian submarineswhich are, like the united
states, are nuclear capable sotheir p8s and are off the coast
of jackson, florida, out of theNaval Air Station NAS

(59:28):
Jacksonville.
The subhunters are out thereall the time.
They're looking for enemysubmarines off the coast to see
if the Russians are in strikingdistance.
That's literally somebody's MOSin the military that they do
all the time.
These guys are being forwarddeployed to search for drug sub
hunters.
The destroyers are going tolaunch missiles into and start

(59:50):
they're going to start doingmissile strikes on drug cartel
leaders, kingpins, this is thestuff that's going to come.
This has to happen.
This should have happened yearsago.
So what we did with the war ondrugs with ronald reagan is we
went after the users and the Imean primarily the users and the
small time dealers.
You got to go to the source,and taking out the source of all

(01:00:13):
the redistribution is what'sgoing to finally put an end to
it.
The problem is, is the UnitedStates of America is compromised
.
The CIA makes a ton of money.
Cia agents who are, who haveinfiltrated the drug cartels,
are getting frigging money, dude, and they're getting frigging
money.
They're, they're, they're drugkingpins, sending back

(01:00:34):
information, but they're livingthat lie.
So there's, there's, there's.
The drug cartels have so muchmoney that if we're, they know
we're coming.
I'm interested to see whatthey're going to do.
I am If they're just going tolay down their guns and run away
, which I think is a probability, because there's a difference
when you fight for money andwhen you fight for principle.

(01:00:57):
When you're fighting forprinciple, it's different.
For principle, it's differentwhen you're a post 9-11 Marine
and you want to go freaking,kill every terrorist that exists
on earth.
That's different than the guywho's like oh, I'm here for free
college.
There's different.
There's principle.
There's, you know.
Or the Islamic jihadist fighterthat came into Iraq and to

(01:01:19):
Fallujah from Libya.
Right, those are different.
Okay, is it drug cartel?
Do they have really somethingthat they fight and believe for
I don't think so.
I don't think they're going toput up too much of a fight.
They might.
I would be surprised.
I would bet that most of themrun away, but I'm sure a lot of
them are going to be hopped upon.

(01:01:40):
Whatever the heck it is they'reselling are?

Speaker 1 (01:01:42):
going to be hopped up on, whatever the heck it is
they're selling.
There was a ceasefire proposalput forward by both Qatar and
Egypt.
Hamas accepted it on Monday.
Israel has yet to officiallyweigh in.
I'm wondering if the US was atall involved in it, if it's
supportive of it and whether ornot the president believes
Israel should accept it.

Speaker 3 (01:01:58):
I don't think it's a coincidence that Hamas accepted
this proposal after thepresident of the United States
posted a very strong statementabout this conflict on Truth
Social yesterday.
I would refer you back to thatstatement.
As for this proposal that Hamashas now accepted, the United
States continues to discuss itand I'll let the president weigh
in on it definitively.

(01:02:19):
You're welcome, sure.
Can you describe the president'sperspective on taking a stake
in Intel in exchange for federalgrants, and is this a
Manufacturing that's critical toour national and economic
security that is, especially inregards to chips and
semiconductors which wants toput America's needs first, both
from a national security andeconomic perspective, and it's a

(01:02:41):
creative idea that has neverbeen done before, to ensure that
we're both reshoring thesecritical supply chains while
also gaining something of it forthe American taxpayer.
You're welcome, emily.

Speaker 1 (01:02:53):
Thanks, Caroline.

Speaker 2 (01:02:53):
I wanted to ask about the three US warships that are
being sent to Venezuela.

Speaker 3 (01:02:57):
There's 4,000 Marines on board Are you looking at
possibility of boots on theground there.
What I will say with respect toVenezuela?
President Trump has been veryclear and consistent.
He's prepared to use everyelement of American power to
stop drugs from flooding intoour country and to bring those
responsible to justice.
The Maduro regime is not thelegitimate government of

(01:03:17):
Venezuela.
It is a narco-terror cartel andMaduro it is the view of this
administration is not alegitimate president.
He is a fugitive head of thiscartel who has been indicted in
the United States fortrafficking drugs into the
country.

Speaker 2 (01:03:34):
Yeah, I mean you.
In a situation like this, youhave to put boots on the ground.
You have to surgically removepeople and terrorists Like you
have to take them out of thesituation.
You can't just bomb them andthen say okay, because somebody
else is just going to take over.
You have to completely do that.

(01:03:55):
And this guy is running thewhole country.
He works for the cartel.
They're compromised.
These governments arecompromised.
The Mexican government iscompromised.
They're our border.
They're a border country.
They're compromised.
The Mexican government iscompromised.
They're our border.
They're a border country.
They're compromised.
You're going to have to sendtroops in man and I fully
support it.
I do.
I think it's worth the risk.
The reward outweighs the risk.

(01:04:20):
You know it's hard to say.
It's really hard to talk about.
Maybe we may lose a couple oftroops or thousands of them.
That's a hard pill to swallow.
Trust me, I've been there.
That's a hard pill to swallow.
But hundreds of thousands ofAmericans are being killed by
this, by these people, everyyear.
And I'm not talking about theperson who chooses to take drugs

(01:04:41):
and put them in their bodies.
I'm talking about the peoplewho chooses to take drugs and
put them in their bodies.
I'm talking about the peoplethat just breathe it in because
it's in the air.
Or the little boy or littlegirl who goes to grab their
mommy's purse and she has somepill in there with fentanyl and
they just touch it with theirhand and they overdose and die.

(01:05:03):
Is the parent responsible?
Yeah, 100%.
Is the person who knowinglychooses to put that in their own
body responsible?
Yeah, 100%.
But you could stop it all andstop the countless deaths,
because it's cyclical.
Addiction is cyclical.
It's passed down fromgeneration to generation.

(01:05:26):
Trust me, I could guarantee youthat it's passed down from
generation to generation.
It is.
You have to stop it, and if youcould cut off the freaking
supply, you could literally stopit.
Yeah, will people find otherthings to do?
Absolutely, and we'll deal withit then.
But the sheer amount ofAmerican carnage that comes from

(01:05:48):
the drug cartels should behandled.
You may disagree, that's fine.
Put it in the comments.
Let me know you don't agree.
I'm all about it, man, but thatwill be our show for today.
Don't forget to go toRyanFSamuelscom slash donate and
donate to the show.
You can subscribe on Facebook.

(01:06:08):
It's about $1.99a month.
It's nothing.
It's $2.
Those things add up and theygive us our little bit, just a
little bit, to keep going everynight.
We want to bring you qualitycontent.
We want to upgrade our cameras,our lighting, our studio.
We want to bring you qualitycontent.
We want to upgrade our cameras,our lighting, our studio.
We just moved the studio acrossthe property so it's doing much

(01:06:32):
better.
We're working on some things.
I have some big, big timeplayers.
I'm talking about coming on theshow.
Don't forget, before this showyou can always watch the Don't
Unfriend Me show with MatthewSpear.
Just follow the dumb show,d-u-m show.
I'm on there quite a lot, somake sure you check that out.
They're on from seven till nine.
Don't forget to go on yourpodcast.

(01:06:53):
If you guys are listening on thepodcast, click download.
So the way that the podcastworks is the more downloads you
have.
The download is the onlystatistics that's registered.
So if you're listening,listening to it, it doesn't do
anything for us.
If you click download, itdownloads.
It doesn't take up any room onyour phone or anything like that
, but it just counts towards ourstatistics.

(01:07:16):
Okay, the podcast is definitelygrowing.
I mentioned it last night.
We're in the top 13 podcasts inthe country for for political
content, particularly freespeech, style content like
number 13,.
Not percentage but number.
We're slowly approaching thattop 10 mark.
I want to hit it.
The way we're going to do thatis with downloads.
Number one country is theUnited States.

(01:07:39):
Obviously.
Number two Germany States.
Obviously Number two Germany.
Germany is our number twocountry.
We get thousands of downloadsin Germany.
We also get thousands ofdownloads in Israel and hundreds
of downloads in Iran.

(01:07:59):
Hundreds for now, but they'relistening and it's growing.
I think it was like 10 a coupleweeks ago or something.
So it's growing, we're growingeverywhere and it's awesome, man
, and I appreciate everybody,all of the support.
Make sure you hit that likeshare and subscribe button.
Kevin Bernard, good night toyou too, my friend JD.
Fentanyl laced pills are real.
Almost killed me seven yearsago.
Yeah, jd, I'm glad you're stillwith us.

(01:08:21):
Man, that is a horrible thing,but it happens every day in this
country.
You know you think you'regetting you got a bad back or
something, and you think you'retaking a Percocet or something
from a friend and you find outit's just, you know, compressed
fentanyl or something you canoverdose and die.
It happens all the time.
That's the stuff I'm talkingabout even not.
You know you think it's Motrinor whatever.

(01:08:43):
It doesn't matter.
It has to stop, it's a problem.
So thank you for tuning in.
Download, download, download.
Visit the shop.
I got cool merch man.
This hat is awesome.
It's really, really goodquality.
It's hand, it's stitched, it'snot printed, so it'll last you a
long time.
It's got the green brim there.
Check it out.

(01:09:04):
I will see you guys on Mondaynight.

Speaker 4 (01:09:11):
Thanks for tuning in to the Ryan Samuel Show.
Don't forget to like, share andsubscribe.