December 19, 2024 • 31 mins
Fannie Willis, the prosecutor at the heart of the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump, has been disqualified. What does this stunning decision mean for the case? We tackle the explosive allegations of Willis's inappropriate conduct and her tangled relationship with Nathan Wade, a top prosecutor, that led to this dramatic legal twist. With the Georgia Court of Appeals' move casting a long shadow over the integrity of public officials, we dissect the implications for the legal proceedings and the broader landscape of American politics. From questions about political motivations to the media's role in covering such controversies, this episode leaves no stone unturned.
Join us as we unravel the controversy surrounding Willis, delving into accusations of power abuse and misappropriation of public funds. We explore the celebrations among Trump supporters, like Leo Tyrell, and speculate on Willis's potential White House connections. This episode challenges the fairness of legal processes and highlights public skepticism about political interference and accountability. The conversation extends beyond Georgia, touching on other legal challenges facing Trump, such as dismissed charges related to January 6th and classified documents. Tune in for a raw, unfiltered look at the shifting legal and political landscape and ponder the future of high-profile trials in America.
RyanFSamuels.com
https://www.mypatriotsupply.com/?_ef_transaction_id=&oid=1&affid=176&source_id=RyanSamuels
https://theryansamuelsshow.myshopify.com/
https://twitter.com/RyanFSamuels
https://www.facebook.com/TheRyanSamuelsShow/
https://rumble.com/user/RyanFSamuels
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1ha_kVpgTc6K2cvbPVKGjQ
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hey, Ryan, I just stare at.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Ryan Donald Trump Jr.
Hush to see you.
Hey everybody, I want y'all tocheck out a fellow Marines.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
My name is Ted Nugent and I got a call from my buddy,
ryan F Samuels, and he wants meto tell you that he's a working
hard playing all American.
Son of a who is celebrating God, family country.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Welcome to the Ryan Samuels Show, one of the top
political podcasts in the UnitedStates, where we have a healthy
distrust for government andmainstream media.
The Ryan Samuels Show is a raw,unfiltered look at American
politics.
Follow on Facebook, Twitter,YouTube, Rumble and all podcast
platforms.
Here is your host, Ryan Samuels, and all podcast platforms.
(00:44):
Here is your host, Ryan Samuels.
Speaker 4 (00:48):
Hello patriots.
What a great day to be anAmerican.
Fannie Willis has gottenspanked again.
For the last time, she is done.
She has officially been removedfrom the case where they are
persecuting Donald Trump forelection interference in Georgia
(01:11):
, which is nonsense.
Now we covered this prettyextensively when it originally
happened.
The case is nonsense.
It's complete, completely bogus.
They have really nothing to goon.
Then it turns out that shehired a special prosecutor and
is paying them with all thedonations she's getting from
campaign funds and they're yeah,they're, they're.
(01:34):
They're sleeping with eachother.
They're going on lavishvacation.
She's paying him hundreds ofthousands of dollars in fake con
consulting fees from the city.
It went to a board of appealsand it was removed.
Listen to me this is why ourpublic officials are morons.
They're idiots.
(01:55):
You have Fannie Willis, whoclearly a DEI hire, clearly a
DEI hire.
You get to the position whereyou're the district attorney in
Georgia.
You go after a former presidentwhile you're banging somebody
who's working for you andmisappropriating departmental
funds and using them, stealingmoney from taxpayers and going
(02:20):
on lavish vacations.
What are you doing?
What are you doing If you goafter Donald Trump?
They're going to be looking atyou with a microscope, obviously
, but no, because you're a lowIQ person and this is where we
are.
So we're going to cover this.
What the ruling means thecomplete and utter meltdown from
CNN, losing their minds, andthey're losing their business as
(02:44):
well.
However, don't forget hit thatlike, share and subscribe button
.
Do not forget to follow formore content.
Go to buymeacoffeecom,backslash Ryan F Samuels.
You can buy a coffee for $5 anddonate to the show Head to
ryanfsamuelscom, and sign up forour newsletter.
(03:05):
You guys are doing a great jobwith that.
We have plenty of people umsigning up and we're going to
have a big, major announcementthat only the subscribers it's
free to sign up for thenewsletter on our website,
absolutely free, and there'sgoing to be a major surprise for
all of you coming for the firstfor after the first of the year
(03:27):
.
So we're going to cover this indepth.
I got some really good videos.
Don't go anywhere, we'll beright back.
The best thing in life that youcan do always is to be prepared.
Be prepared for anything.
With my patriot supply, theleading provider of high-quality
, long-shelf life emergency foodkits designed to empower you
(03:47):
and your family to stayself-sufficient during any
crisis, ensuring your safety andfreedom when it matters most.
Be self-reliant withhigh-quality, long-lasting
emergency food in your pantry.
Mypatriotsupply has a varietyof options and is always
(04:08):
American-made.
Don't be caught unprepared.
Stock your pantry withMyPatriotSupply's emergency food
kits, providing nutritiousmeals for weeks and even when
disaster strikes.
You cannot rely on society inan emergency crisis.
Get your three-month supply kitright now by clicking the link
(04:29):
in the description or scanningthat QR code on this screen.
So let's listen to this clipfrom CNN.
Speaker 5 (04:41):
We begin this hour with breaking news just into CNN
the Georgia prosecutor leadingthe state's election
interference case againstPresident-elect Donald Trump is
now disqualified.
Cnn's Caitlin Polance is herewith more Caitlin.
What can you tell us about this?
This is just coming in in thelast several minutes.
This is a big development.
Speaker 6 (05:00):
A big development, and a big development that
Donald Trump has wanted for along time that case against him
in Georgia, the criminal casewhere it's accusing him and
several others of a racketeeringconspiracy related to the 2020
election.
It's already been paused.
Now it's not even backburnered.
The Georgia Court of Appeals isnow saying that Fannie Willis,
(05:23):
the leader of the prosecutionagainst Donald Trump, the
district attorney in FultonCounty, georgia she should be
disqualified from being able tobring that case.
The Georgia Court of Appeals issaying that it's a significant
appearance of impropriety causedby the conduct of a public
prosecutor.
That is Willis, how she behaved, how she was speaking about the
(05:47):
case about Trump publicly,about how she was having a
relationship with the topprosecutor that was concealed in
this, a man named Nathan Wade.
All of that Previously, thetrial level judge had looked at
and said Fannie Willis can stayon this case.
We're not dismissing theindictment, but the Court of
Appeals is now taking anotherlook and saying no, the trial
(06:08):
judge was wrong.
Fannie Willis should bedisqualified from continuing to
lead this case.
It would be a long process, orit will be a long process to
replace her, which is why I saythis case is dead in the water
now without Fannie Willis, theperson who was leading this case
against Donald Trump in FultonCounty.
And just to keep tabs on howmany cases there are against
(06:30):
Donald Trump criminally theother two in federal court
January 6th and classifieddocuments.
Those are dismissed.
And then the additional case inNew York City where he was set
to be sentenced that sentencingis now not happening.
City, where he was set to besentenced that sentencing is now
not happening.
So as Donald Trump enters thepresidency, each of these courts
that is handling a criminalcase is essentially removing
(06:52):
that issue from him to have todeal with in any period of time
in the near future.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
So much winning.
I'm not even tired of all ofthis winning.
I want to keep winning.
We won again today.
Donald Trump came out and saidafter we talked about yesterday
about what Congress was tryingto do, they were trying to sneak
in raises and do all this dipin the budget bill.
Donald Trump came out and saidany Republican who votes yes for
(07:21):
this bill, I am going to find acandidate and run them against
you.
You will vote no on this billor you will run the risk of not
being in Congress.
That's exactly what we need.
And guess what's happening?
It's looking like it's dead inthe water.
But there's one thing that CNNreporter left out of that report
, conveniently from the appealscourt, is that not only did she
(07:45):
act with impropriety, but thatshe specifically targeted Donald
Trump and it wasn't justified.
So, yeah, that case is done.
They're saying oh, the chargesweren't dropped.
Well, guess what?
They're not going to goanywhere.
They're not going to goanywhere.
This is the biggest politicalcomeback in American history and
Donald Trump is back on topwith the majority of support
(08:08):
from the American people.
Fannie Willis her career isdone dead, as it should be.
Alvin Bragg should be next.
Speaker 3 (08:16):
We got some breaking news Got to get to Fulton County
, georgia, and here we go.
A Georgia Court of Appeals hasdisqualified the Fulton County
DA, fonny Willis, from thatelection interference case.
It's coming down right now.
The case against Trump and morethan a dozen others already
largely stalled, as you know.
The new ruling means that itwill be up to the prosecuting
(08:39):
attorney's counsel in the stateof Georgia to find another
prosecutor to decide on the case, to take it over and make a
decision as to whether or notthey continue with a prosecution
of the incoming president.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
Well, the answer to that is going to be a no.
They're not going to prosecutethe incoming president or the
outgoing president.
This whole thing is theincoming president or the
outgoing president?
This whole thing is completelyjustified.
It's completely warranted.
This is a major win.
Guys and girls, you should becelebrating.
(09:15):
This is massive.
This was the last case that waskind of really hanging out
there and it really exposes thelawfare of the Democrats.
The appeals court said no, whatare you doing?
You cannot do this.
So Judge Jeanine came out andmade an announcement Again.
I haven't listened to it, butshe's great, I love her.
(09:36):
She did a promo for my buddiesat the Don't Unfriend Me show.
Listen to this.
Speaker 7 (09:43):
So the Georgia Court of Appeals has removed Fannie
Willis and her office from theprosecution of Donald Trump and
18 co-defendants, saying thattheir behavior inappropriately
affected the indictment, andthey can no longer represent the
state of Georgia or the peoplein this case against Donald
(10:04):
Trump and 18 co-defendants.
The Court of Appeals took greatpains to describe the fraud that
both Fannie Willis and NathanWade used in alleging that they
did not have an affair untilafter they started working
together, and the exorbitantamount of money $654,000, that
(10:26):
Fannie Willis paid Nathan Wade,a guy who had never tried a
felony case in his life, to bein charge of a very complicated
RICO case, and that money wasused for extravagant gifts and
vacations for the two of them.
Folks, this is not how thecriminal justice system works.
This is not how DAs behave, andthe arrogance that the two of
(10:49):
them showed as this case wasunfolding and being torn apart
was incredible to people likemyself, who would never dream of
doing anything like this.
So it's about time they wereboth removed from the case.
She will never be able toprosecute Donald Trump, and the
court took a very extrememeasure here because their
(11:11):
behavior was outrageous andpolitical.
Speaker 4 (11:15):
Yes, and understand that she's talking about the
state.
She paid Nathan Wade sixhundred and fifty four thousand
dollars To to assist her inprosecuting Donald Trump, and
then he used that money to payfor vacations, expensive
(11:38):
clothing, and so essentially itwas laundering.
All right, I'm going to pay you$600,000.
You're going to give me back$200,000.
That's it and it was.
She should be disbarred.
She should be removed.
That may be a possibility.
She may very well um getdisbarred, and I'm sure there's
(11:59):
going to be a complaint with the, with the state bar of georgia,
and she may very well bedisbarred.
She shouldn't just not be ableto try donald trump again.
She should never be able to tryanybody again.
She's a joke.
She's got the IQ of an Italiansausage.
Here is a piece of the orderfrom the Supreme Court.
(12:23):
After carefully considering thetrial court's finding in its
orders, we conclude that iterred by failing to disqualify
DA Willis and her office.
The remedy crafted by the trialcourt to prevent an ongoing
appearance of impropriety didnothing to address the
appearance of impropriety thatexisted at times when DA Willis
was exercising her broadpre-trial discretion about who
(12:47):
to prosecute and what charges tobring.
While we recognize that anappearance of impropriety
generally is not enough tosupport disqualification.
This is the rare case in whichdisqualification is mandated and
no other remedy will suffice torestore public confidence in
the integrity of theseproceedings proceedings.
(13:17):
So there's nothing else thatcan be done to restore the
confidence of the people in thearea than to disqualify Fannie
Willis.
So this is cause for totalcelebration.
(13:43):
Let's celebrate just real quick.
Now why you say is she a boatrigger?
But fatty, only make my leadbigger.
Now why you say is she a boatrigger?
Speaker 8 (13:51):
but fatty, only make my lead bigger.
Now why you say is she a boatrigger?
But fatty, only make my leadbigger.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Fanny the Thot, always at thebeauty salon with her baby Louis
Vuitton on the hunt of arms.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
She said talk to my.
Speaker 4 (14:11):
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Thank you, fanny.
You are a disgrace to thepublic.
You're a disgrace to theAmerican people.
You should be ashamed ofyourself.
Your family should beembarrassed by you and who you
(14:39):
are and what you represent.
You have totally disgraced thetrust of the American people
Totally disgraced.
Here is another clip from theruling.
Defendants argue that thefinancial arrangement created an
incentive to prolong the case,but in fact, there is no
indication the district attorneyis interested in delaying
anything.
(14:59):
Indeed, the record is quite tothe contrary.
Before the relationship came tolight, the state requested that
trial begin less than sixmonths after the incident.
Soon thereafter, the stateopposed severance and objestic
defendants did not demand theirstatutory right to a speedy
child.
The state argued that it onlywanted to try the case once,
assuming that such a trial wouldhave affirmed after any
(15:23):
necessary post-convictionappeals.
The state amended its proposedtimeline on november 2023 to
request that the trial commenceless than one year after the
return of the indictment.
And even before the indictment,the district attorney approved
a grand jury presentment thatincluded fewer defendants than
(15:43):
the special purpose grand juryrecommended in some.
The district attorney has notin any way acted in conformance
with the theory that shearranged a financial scheme to
enrich herself or endear herselfto Wade by extending the
duration of this prosecution orengaging in excessive litigation
.
(16:09):
Just insane, insane.
And you know what's scary.
You know the scariest thingabout all of this?
The scariest thing about all ofthis is that these people were
in power and had the power to doit.
How many people think aboutthis?
This puts all of herconvictions in jeopardy, fannie
(16:33):
willis, because she's proven toact in impropriety in an illegal
matter, in an unethical matter,um, in this case, to the point
where an appeals court removedher from it.
So that sets a precedence whenall of these people that were
convicted that she can tried andhad convicted.
Now all of a sudden they go tothe Supreme, they appeal and say
(16:55):
, hey, fannie's a criminal,fannie was wrong, fannie's
improper.
And she did the same thing inmy trial.
Guess how many cases are goingto get overturned.
Watch, watch.
Here's Leo Tyrell.
Speaker 8 (17:09):
Here's Leo Tyrell.
Hi, leo 2.0 here, big timeTrump supporter, december 19th
2024.
I'm very happy President Trumpis going to be our next
president, but I have great newsfor MAGA and for America and
for the rule of law.
Fannie Willis has been removedas prosecutor in the case
(17:31):
against President Trump thatridiculous Georgia case where
Fannie Willis brought thesefrivolous regal charges against
Trump.
She's been removed by theGeorgia appellate court.
She's been kicked off the case.
She is no longer involved inthe case.
You know what that tells you isno longer involved in the case.
(17:51):
You know what that tells you.
It tells you that the rule oflaw will eventually prevail.
Fannie Willis filed thosecharges against Trump for
political reasons.
She met with the White Houseofficials and I will tell you
right now.
Give me a chance to investigateFannie Willis and I want her to
(18:15):
confess that she was motivatedto bring these ridiculous
charges against Trump by theWhite House.
Every Democrat tried to stopPresident Trump from running for
office.
They failed.
President Trump is now our nextpresident and there is going to
be price to pay for those whoparticipated in election
(18:38):
interference for those whobasically filed frivolous
lawsuits for those who createdfrivolous charges.
Do you hear me Liz Cheney?
Do you hear me Letitia James?
Do you hear me Alvin Bragg?
Do you hear me Jack Smith?
You better lawyer up right now.
Speaker 4 (18:57):
Hell yeah.
Speaker 8 (18:58):
God bless America, god bless President Trump, god
bless you.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
Hell yeah, they better lawyer up and dude.
I really hope that he usesevery power that he has as the
president of the united statesand just destroys the lives of
all of these people who, um, whohave just just ruined donald
(19:28):
trump, ruined his reputation,made people hate him, mean he
came out on top in the endanyway.
Laura Loomer, who is fun towatch, found Fannie outside
after the ruling, and let'slisten to this.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
Hey Fannie, how come you haven't complied with the
Judiciary Committee's requestfor your communications with the
January 6th Committee?
Did Joe Biden promise you aposition at the DOJ during his
second administration?
Speaker 4 (19:57):
That's her boyfriend pushing the camera away.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
Are you going to be having Grey Goose tonight,
paying in cash?
Speaker 4 (20:04):
You say that Donald Trump is violating the law, but
you haven't even sent yourcommunications with the j6
committee that was requested bythe judiciary committee good
morning, congressman thompsonpretty funny how nobody is above
(20:31):
the law, except for Fannie oranybody who's saying that,
anybody who's sitting theresaying that nobody is above the
law and they're lying, they'relying.
Insanity.
(20:57):
Here is um trump's a lawyer.
It looks like this is there areone of the one of her arguments
.
Let's just listen to thisthere's um.
Speaker 9 (21:10):
one of the other things I did was I did open
records for the White Houseaccess and we had records that
Ms Willis and the mayor ofAtlanta were at meeting with the
vice president.
Speaker 10 (21:25):
Okay, and so this is the access history.
How does that work?
The White House keeps recordsof anybody that comes in and has
any kind of official meeting,for sure.
Speaker 9 (21:34):
Yes, and my understanding is it's highly
regulated who can access theWhite House, and so you have to
apply in person or apply aheadof time, and then they give you
a time when you make theappointment, and they give you a
time when you're allowed to bein and when you have to be out
by and they track you and I meanthat makes sense.
They don't want anybody, youknow, lingering in the White
House, but they keep that.
And so these are.
They're called WAVE records, Ibelieve is what they're called,
(21:56):
and I'm not sure what that's anacronym for, but they're
publicly available, they're openrecords.
Speaker 10 (22:04):
And this record that's shown on the screen shows
Fannie Willis was a visitorwith V POTUS.
I presume that's Vice Presidentof the United States.
Speaker 9 (22:09):
Yes, yes, it was.
Speaker 4 (22:11):
So Fannie went, the Fulton County District Attorney
met with Kamala Harris, the VicePresident of the United States,
and then decided to go afterDonald Trump.
Come on, are you kidding me?
How many county like littlecounty DAs are meeting with the
(22:33):
vice president or president ofthe United States?
And then you just happened togo out and prosecute the person
who was their sworn enemy.
Speaker 10 (22:45):
Really, and what was the date of that back in?
Was that February, sometime of23?
Speaker 9 (22:53):
February 28, 2023.
Speaker 10 (22:55):
Is that before the indictment?
Speaker 9 (22:57):
Yes.
Speaker 10 (22:57):
Okay, any further explanation of why Ms Willis was
meeting with the Vice Presidentof the United States?
Speaker 9 (23:06):
No, I know Dexter Bonds and I believe that's the
same one that Mr Dickinson, themayor of Atlanta, was also there
.
Speaker 4 (23:16):
The mayor of Atlanta.
Speaker 10 (23:18):
We'll take a short break.
We've been going at this for awhile.
Let's take somewhere between afive and ten minute recess and
we'll be back.
Speaker 4 (23:26):
I hope Fannie Willis ends up in federal prison.
This is like the teapot domescandal.
It's amazing.
This is Fannie.
If you remember Fannie when shehad to take the stand when they
found out about this affair andall of the lying and all the
money spending, this is her onthe stand and she's just a
(23:51):
maniac.
Speaker 11 (23:51):
I always have cash at the house.
That has been, I don't know,all my life.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
So they're asking her hey, where are you getting all
these money?
You're going on all theselavish vacations, cruises, the
Bahamas.
Where are you paying all thisfrom?
Oh, I just have cash at thehouse.
Speaker 11 (24:13):
If you're a woman and you go on a date with a man,
you better have $200 in yourpocket.
So if that man acts up, you cango where you want to go.
So I keep cash in my house andI don't keep cash as good in my
purse like I used to.
I don't go on many dates, butwhen you go on a date you should
have cash in your pocket.
Speaker 9 (24:31):
So my question was where did that cash originally
come from, If it didn't come outof the bank?
Speaker 11 (24:35):
Cash is fungible.
I had cash for years in myhouse.
So for me to tell you thesource of when it comes from,
when you go to Publix and youbuy something, you get $50, you
throw it in there.
It's been my whole life.
When I took out a large amountof money on my first campaign, I
kept some of the cash of that.
To tell you, I just have cashin my house.
(24:56):
I don't have as much today as Iwould normally have, but I'm
building back up now.
You just put money in.
It's a very good practice.
I would advise it to all women.
You can't identify when youcame into this cash or where the
cash came from.
I didn't say I couldn'tidentify it?
Speaker 4 (25:13):
Yes, you did.
That's exactly what you justsaid.
Speaker 11 (25:15):
Nobody gives me anything.
I am sure that the source ofthe money is always the work,
sweat and tears of me.
What you asked me for is whendid the money go in there?
What I am trying to tell you isso I got divorced in 2005 from
my husband.
Speaker 4 (25:30):
Oh, I wonder why.
Speaker 11 (25:34):
No, no, no, it's important.
You said where did the moneycome?
Speaker 7 (25:36):
from, and I need to tell you where the money came
from.
Speaker 11 (25:37):
And so for many, many years I have kept money in
my house.
That money, in my worst days,has probably only been $500 or
$1,000.
At my best days I probably had$15,000 in my house of cash.
Speaker 9 (25:54):
At all times there's going to be cash in my house or
wherever I'm laying my head, themoney that you paid Mr Wade,
the cash in October of 2022, youdo not know where that money
came from.
Speaker 11 (26:01):
I do know where it came from.
It came from my sweat and tears, you know which job it came
from.
Speaker 9 (26:06):
Did it come from Fulton County or did it come
from a private job?
It?
Speaker 11 (26:08):
came from?
I don't, I'm not, what are youtalking about?
So it could have come from aprivate job, because before I
was DA I was in private practice, so I earned money during that
time period.
Speaker 9 (26:19):
That's probably in there.
So she went and asked foradditional budgetary money.
She needed a higher budget.
So for those 55 people, shewent and asked for more money
because she didn't have enoughmoney and once she was awarded
that, it's her position now thatshe can spend that money
however she wants.
Speaker 10 (26:33):
Doesn't have to use it for 55 new staff.
She can use it for specialattorney general.
Speaker 9 (26:38):
Yes.
Speaker 10 (26:38):
Not attorney general .
Special counsel Right yes.
Speaker 9 (26:41):
Essentially that is their argument in their reply
briefs that they filed in courtthat they have inherent
authority.
They don't have to comply withthe county ordinances, don't
have to comply with the statute.
Speaker 10 (26:51):
So they don't have to comply with our state statute
.
Speaker 9 (26:54):
That they have.
Once they're awarded the budget, they can use that budget.
However, I mean how theirmotion and I'm happy to send the
motion, it's public record, buthow their motion argued it was
if they get $5 million, they canpay that to one person if they
want, as long as you know,because the voters authorized
(27:17):
her to do that.
So the county, their position,is the county authorizes a
budget and she can pretty muchhas inherent authority to do it,
however.
Speaker 4 (27:21):
So just so you understand this, fannie willis
falsely went to the city andsaid hey, hey, I need more money
, I need to hire more staff, weneed 55 people.
So 55 people is going to cost Xamount of money.
I need this, I need that, Ineed blah, blah, blah, blah blah
the city budgeting office orthe mayor's office, whoever they
(27:44):
go yeah, no, no problem, we'llget you that money.
If you really need that for 55people, get you that money.
If you really need that for 55people, we will get you that
money.
And she turns around and takesthe money for 55 people and
gives it to one person, which isNathan Wade, her boyfriend, who
then takes her on all of theselavish trips that she apparently
(28:09):
paid for with cash that she hasno idea where it came from.
This should be more than beingremoved from the case.
This should be a complete auditfrom the IRS, investigation
from the FBI.
She should go to federal prison.
(28:30):
This is money laundering.
She stole money from the city.
Then she turns around andpeople call her out on it and
says, hey, this is a statestatute that you have to use
this money for this reason.
This is a city ordinance thatyou have to use this money for
the reason that you originallyrequested it, and her answer is
turn, turns around and says now,screw you, screw you.
(28:55):
I don't have to do that.
No, I can use it however I wantto, because the people gave me
that power when they voted me,and I don't have to abide by the
state law by saying I, fanniewillis, I above the law.
That's literally what she'ssaying in that statement.
Speaker 10 (29:13):
Even though she specifically asked for the money
to prosecute backloggedhomicide cases in Atlanta.
Speaker 9 (29:18):
Yes.
Speaker 10 (29:19):
Okay, what's your opinion on that?
You think the statute or countyprocedures permit that?
Speaker 9 (29:27):
No, I do not, and I cited several different county
ordinances.
So when I read the statute,when I read 15-1820, and it
makes sense, you know it makessense intuitively, as lawyers.
When we bill, someone isreviewing our bills.
I mean, that's just.
You know that's the process.
If you're in private practice,you know your client authorizes
your bills.
If you're doing public defensewhich I've done, public defense,
(29:49):
I've done appointed work youknow the governing agency
approves my bills and they willcut them.
They will regularly cut them ifthey're too high, and so
there's always some type ofbudgetary authority that's
reviewing everything.
So I thought it was verystrange that in this case there
isn't one and that there'sreally no oversight, because it
is public money.
So I know that it's an electedofficial, but it it is public
(30:10):
money.
So I know that.
I know that it's an electedofficial, but it's still public
money, and I don't live inFulton County.
Speaker 4 (30:16):
So yes, it's public money, which means the official
doesn't own it.
The public, who pays the taxes,owns it.
Like share, subscribe commentdown below.
Do you think Fannie Willisshould go to federal prison?
I want to know your opinion.
Write it into the show Text.
(30:37):
It in it's in the description.
Click on the button.
You can text it in yes, fannieWillis should go to prison.
Yes, fannie Willis should go toprison, or yes.
You have three options yes, yes, yes or yes.
If you say no, let me know.
I want to know if there'sanybody out there who thinks
that fanny willis, this criminal, should not go to prison.
Thank you for tuning in.
Hit that like, share andsubscribe button.
(30:59):
Don't forget follow, follow,follow this channel.
If you're on the podcast, hitthat download button and I will
see you next time.
Hey, Ryan, I just stare at.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Ryan Donald Trump Jr.
Hush to see you.
Hey everybody, I want y'all tocheck out a fellow Marines.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
My name is Ted Nugent and I got a call from my buddy,
ryan F Samuels, and he wants meto tell you that he's a working
hard playing all American.
Son of a who is celebrating God, family country.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Welcome to the Ryan Samuels Show, one of the top
political podcasts in the UnitedStates, where we have a healthy
distrust for government andmainstream media.
The Ryan Samuels Show is a raw,unfiltered look at American
politics.
Follow on Facebook, Twitter,YouTube, Rumble and all podcast
platforms.
Here is your host, Ryan Samuels, and all podcast platforms.
(00:44):
Here is your host, Ryan Samuels.
Speaker 4 (00:48):
Hello patriots.
What a great day to be anAmerican.
Fannie Willis has gottenspanked again.
For the last time, she is done.
She has officially been removedfrom the case where they are
persecuting Donald Trump forelection interference in Georgia
(01:11):
, which is nonsense.
Now we covered this prettyextensively when it originally
happened.
The case is nonsense.
It's complete, completely bogus.
They have really nothing to goon.
Then it turns out that shehired a special prosecutor and
is paying them with all thedonations she's getting from
campaign funds and they're yeah,they're, they're.
(01:34):
They're sleeping with eachother.
They're going on lavishvacation.
She's paying him hundreds ofthousands of dollars in fake con
consulting fees from the city.
It went to a board of appealsand it was removed.
Listen to me this is why ourpublic officials are morons.
They're idiots.
(01:55):
You have Fannie Willis, whoclearly a DEI hire, clearly a
DEI hire.
You get to the position whereyou're the district attorney in
Georgia.
You go after a former presidentwhile you're banging somebody
who's working for you andmisappropriating departmental
funds and using them, stealingmoney from taxpayers and going
(02:20):
on lavish vacations.
What are you doing?
What are you doing If you goafter Donald Trump?
They're going to be looking atyou with a microscope, obviously
, but no, because you're a lowIQ person and this is where we
are.
So we're going to cover this.
What the ruling means thecomplete and utter meltdown from
CNN, losing their minds, andthey're losing their business as
(02:44):
well.
However, don't forget hit thatlike, share and subscribe button
.
Do not forget to follow formore content.
Go to buymeacoffeecom,backslash Ryan F Samuels.
You can buy a coffee for $5 anddonate to the show Head to
ryanfsamuelscom, and sign up forour newsletter.
(03:05):
You guys are doing a great jobwith that.
We have plenty of people umsigning up and we're going to
have a big, major announcementthat only the subscribers it's
free to sign up for thenewsletter on our website,
absolutely free, and there'sgoing to be a major surprise for
all of you coming for the firstfor after the first of the year
(03:27):
.
So we're going to cover this indepth.
I got some really good videos.
Don't go anywhere, we'll beright back.
The best thing in life that youcan do always is to be prepared.
Be prepared for anything.
With my patriot supply, theleading provider of high-quality
, long-shelf life emergency foodkits designed to empower you
(03:47):
and your family to stayself-sufficient during any
crisis, ensuring your safety andfreedom when it matters most.
Be self-reliant withhigh-quality, long-lasting
emergency food in your pantry.
Mypatriotsupply has a varietyof options and is always
(04:08):
American-made.
Don't be caught unprepared.
Stock your pantry withMyPatriotSupply's emergency food
kits, providing nutritiousmeals for weeks and even when
disaster strikes.
You cannot rely on society inan emergency crisis.
Get your three-month supply kitright now by clicking the link
(04:29):
in the description or scanningthat QR code on this screen.
So let's listen to this clipfrom CNN.
Speaker 5 (04:41):
We begin this hour with breaking news just into CNN
the Georgia prosecutor leadingthe state's election
interference case againstPresident-elect Donald Trump is
now disqualified.
Cnn's Caitlin Polance is herewith more Caitlin.
What can you tell us about this?
This is just coming in in thelast several minutes.
This is a big development.
Speaker 6 (05:00):
A big development, and a big development that
Donald Trump has wanted for along time that case against him
in Georgia, the criminal casewhere it's accusing him and
several others of a racketeeringconspiracy related to the 2020
election.
It's already been paused.
Now it's not even backburnered.
The Georgia Court of Appeals isnow saying that Fannie Willis,
(05:23):
the leader of the prosecutionagainst Donald Trump, the
district attorney in FultonCounty, georgia she should be
disqualified from being able tobring that case.
The Georgia Court of Appeals issaying that it's a significant
appearance of impropriety causedby the conduct of a public
prosecutor.
That is Willis, how she behaved, how she was speaking about the
(05:47):
case about Trump publicly,about how she was having a
relationship with the topprosecutor that was concealed in
this, a man named Nathan Wade.
All of that Previously, thetrial level judge had looked at
and said Fannie Willis can stayon this case.
We're not dismissing theindictment, but the Court of
Appeals is now taking anotherlook and saying no, the trial
(06:08):
judge was wrong.
Fannie Willis should bedisqualified from continuing to
lead this case.
It would be a long process, orit will be a long process to
replace her, which is why I saythis case is dead in the water
now without Fannie Willis, theperson who was leading this case
against Donald Trump in FultonCounty.
And just to keep tabs on howmany cases there are against
(06:30):
Donald Trump criminally theother two in federal court
January 6th and classifieddocuments.
Those are dismissed.
And then the additional case inNew York City where he was set
to be sentenced that sentencingis now not happening.
City, where he was set to besentenced that sentencing is now
not happening.
So as Donald Trump enters thepresidency, each of these courts
that is handling a criminalcase is essentially removing
(06:52):
that issue from him to have todeal with in any period of time
in the near future.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
So much winning.
I'm not even tired of all ofthis winning.
I want to keep winning.
We won again today.
Donald Trump came out and saidafter we talked about yesterday
about what Congress was tryingto do, they were trying to sneak
in raises and do all this dipin the budget bill.
Donald Trump came out and saidany Republican who votes yes for
(07:21):
this bill, I am going to find acandidate and run them against
you.
You will vote no on this billor you will run the risk of not
being in Congress.
That's exactly what we need.
And guess what's happening?
It's looking like it's dead inthe water.
But there's one thing that CNNreporter left out of that report
, conveniently from the appealscourt, is that not only did she
(07:45):
act with impropriety, but thatshe specifically targeted Donald
Trump and it wasn't justified.
So, yeah, that case is done.
They're saying oh, the chargesweren't dropped.
Well, guess what?
They're not going to goanywhere.
They're not going to goanywhere.
This is the biggest politicalcomeback in American history and
Donald Trump is back on topwith the majority of support
(08:08):
from the American people.
Fannie Willis her career isdone dead, as it should be.
Alvin Bragg should be next.
Speaker 3 (08:16):
We got some breaking news Got to get to Fulton County
, georgia, and here we go.
A Georgia Court of Appeals hasdisqualified the Fulton County
DA, fonny Willis, from thatelection interference case.
It's coming down right now.
The case against Trump and morethan a dozen others already
largely stalled, as you know.
The new ruling means that itwill be up to the prosecuting
(08:39):
attorney's counsel in the stateof Georgia to find another
prosecutor to decide on the case, to take it over and make a
decision as to whether or notthey continue with a prosecution
of the incoming president.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
Well, the answer to that is going to be a no.
They're not going to prosecutethe incoming president or the
outgoing president.
This whole thing is theincoming president or the
outgoing president?
This whole thing is completelyjustified.
It's completely warranted.
This is a major win.
Guys and girls, you should becelebrating.
(09:15):
This is massive.
This was the last case that waskind of really hanging out
there and it really exposes thelawfare of the Democrats.
The appeals court said no, whatare you doing?
You cannot do this.
So Judge Jeanine came out andmade an announcement Again.
I haven't listened to it, butshe's great, I love her.
(09:36):
She did a promo for my buddiesat the Don't Unfriend Me show.
Listen to this.
Speaker 7 (09:43):
So the Georgia Court of Appeals has removed Fannie
Willis and her office from theprosecution of Donald Trump and
18 co-defendants, saying thattheir behavior inappropriately
affected the indictment, andthey can no longer represent the
state of Georgia or the peoplein this case against Donald
(10:04):
Trump and 18 co-defendants.
The Court of Appeals took greatpains to describe the fraud that
both Fannie Willis and NathanWade used in alleging that they
did not have an affair untilafter they started working
together, and the exorbitantamount of money $654,000, that
(10:26):
Fannie Willis paid Nathan Wade,a guy who had never tried a
felony case in his life, to bein charge of a very complicated
RICO case, and that money wasused for extravagant gifts and
vacations for the two of them.
Folks, this is not how thecriminal justice system works.
This is not how DAs behave, andthe arrogance that the two of
(10:49):
them showed as this case wasunfolding and being torn apart
was incredible to people likemyself, who would never dream of
doing anything like this.
So it's about time they wereboth removed from the case.
She will never be able toprosecute Donald Trump, and the
court took a very extrememeasure here because their
(11:11):
behavior was outrageous andpolitical.
Speaker 4 (11:15):
Yes, and understand that she's talking about the
state.
She paid Nathan Wade sixhundred and fifty four thousand
dollars To to assist her inprosecuting Donald Trump, and
then he used that money to payfor vacations, expensive
(11:38):
clothing, and so essentially itwas laundering.
All right, I'm going to pay you$600,000.
You're going to give me back$200,000.
That's it and it was.
She should be disbarred.
She should be removed.
That may be a possibility.
She may very well um getdisbarred, and I'm sure there's
(11:59):
going to be a complaint with the, with the state bar of georgia,
and she may very well bedisbarred.
She shouldn't just not be ableto try donald trump again.
She should never be able to tryanybody again.
She's a joke.
She's got the IQ of an Italiansausage.
Here is a piece of the orderfrom the Supreme Court.
(12:23):
After carefully considering thetrial court's finding in its
orders, we conclude that iterred by failing to disqualify
DA Willis and her office.
The remedy crafted by the trialcourt to prevent an ongoing
appearance of impropriety didnothing to address the
appearance of impropriety thatexisted at times when DA Willis
was exercising her broadpre-trial discretion about who
(12:47):
to prosecute and what charges tobring.
While we recognize that anappearance of impropriety
generally is not enough tosupport disqualification.
This is the rare case in whichdisqualification is mandated and
no other remedy will suffice torestore public confidence in
the integrity of theseproceedings proceedings.
(13:17):
So there's nothing else thatcan be done to restore the
confidence of the people in thearea than to disqualify Fannie
Willis.
So this is cause for totalcelebration.
(13:43):
Let's celebrate just real quick.
Now why you say is she a boatrigger?
But fatty, only make my leadbigger.
Now why you say is she a boatrigger?
Speaker 8 (13:51):
but fatty, only make my lead bigger.
Now why you say is she a boatrigger?
But fatty, only make my leadbigger.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Get down, girl go ahead, getdown.
Fanny the Thot, always at thebeauty salon with her baby Louis
Vuitton on the hunt of arms.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
She said talk to my.
Speaker 4 (14:11):
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Thank you, fanny.
You are a disgrace to thepublic.
You're a disgrace to theAmerican people.
You should be ashamed ofyourself.
Your family should beembarrassed by you and who you
(14:39):
are and what you represent.
You have totally disgraced thetrust of the American people
Totally disgraced.
Here is another clip from theruling.
Defendants argue that thefinancial arrangement created an
incentive to prolong the case,but in fact, there is no
indication the district attorneyis interested in delaying
anything.
(14:59):
Indeed, the record is quite tothe contrary.
Before the relationship came tolight, the state requested that
trial begin less than sixmonths after the incident.
Soon thereafter, the stateopposed severance and objestic
defendants did not demand theirstatutory right to a speedy
child.
The state argued that it onlywanted to try the case once,
assuming that such a trial wouldhave affirmed after any
(15:23):
necessary post-convictionappeals.
The state amended its proposedtimeline on november 2023 to
request that the trial commenceless than one year after the
return of the indictment.
And even before the indictment,the district attorney approved
a grand jury presentment thatincluded fewer defendants than
(15:43):
the special purpose grand juryrecommended in some.
The district attorney has notin any way acted in conformance
with the theory that shearranged a financial scheme to
enrich herself or endear herselfto Wade by extending the
duration of this prosecution orengaging in excessive litigation
.
(16:09):
Just insane, insane.
And you know what's scary.
You know the scariest thingabout all of this?
The scariest thing about all ofthis is that these people were
in power and had the power to doit.
How many people think aboutthis?
This puts all of herconvictions in jeopardy, fannie
(16:33):
willis, because she's proven toact in impropriety in an illegal
matter, in an unethical matter,um, in this case, to the point
where an appeals court removedher from it.
So that sets a precedence whenall of these people that were
convicted that she can tried andhad convicted.
Now all of a sudden they go tothe Supreme, they appeal and say
(16:55):
, hey, fannie's a criminal,fannie was wrong, fannie's
improper.
And she did the same thing inmy trial.
Guess how many cases are goingto get overturned.
Watch, watch.
Here's Leo Tyrell.
Speaker 8 (17:09):
Here's Leo Tyrell.
Hi, leo 2.0 here, big timeTrump supporter, december 19th
2024.
I'm very happy President Trumpis going to be our next
president, but I have great newsfor MAGA and for America and
for the rule of law.
Fannie Willis has been removedas prosecutor in the case
(17:31):
against President Trump thatridiculous Georgia case where
Fannie Willis brought thesefrivolous regal charges against
Trump.
She's been removed by theGeorgia appellate court.
She's been kicked off the case.
She is no longer involved inthe case.
You know what that tells you isno longer involved in the case.
(17:51):
You know what that tells you.
It tells you that the rule oflaw will eventually prevail.
Fannie Willis filed thosecharges against Trump for
political reasons.
She met with the White Houseofficials and I will tell you
right now.
Give me a chance to investigateFannie Willis and I want her to
(18:15):
confess that she was motivatedto bring these ridiculous
charges against Trump by theWhite House.
Every Democrat tried to stopPresident Trump from running for
office.
They failed.
President Trump is now our nextpresident and there is going to
be price to pay for those whoparticipated in election
(18:38):
interference for those whobasically filed frivolous
lawsuits for those who createdfrivolous charges.
Do you hear me Liz Cheney?
Do you hear me Letitia James?
Do you hear me Alvin Bragg?
Do you hear me Jack Smith?
You better lawyer up right now.
Speaker 4 (18:57):
Hell yeah.
Speaker 8 (18:58):
God bless America, god bless President Trump, god
bless you.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
Hell yeah, they better lawyer up and dude.
I really hope that he usesevery power that he has as the
president of the united statesand just destroys the lives of
all of these people who, um, whohave just just ruined donald
(19:28):
trump, ruined his reputation,made people hate him, mean he
came out on top in the endanyway.
Laura Loomer, who is fun towatch, found Fannie outside
after the ruling, and let'slisten to this.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
Hey Fannie, how come you haven't complied with the
Judiciary Committee's requestfor your communications with the
January 6th Committee?
Did Joe Biden promise you aposition at the DOJ during his
second administration?
Speaker 4 (19:57):
That's her boyfriend pushing the camera away.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
Are you going to be having Grey Goose tonight,
paying in cash?
Speaker 4 (20:04):
You say that Donald Trump is violating the law, but
you haven't even sent yourcommunications with the j6
committee that was requested bythe judiciary committee good
morning, congressman thompsonpretty funny how nobody is above
(20:31):
the law, except for Fannie oranybody who's saying that,
anybody who's sitting theresaying that nobody is above the
law and they're lying, they'relying.
Insanity.
(20:57):
Here is um trump's a lawyer.
It looks like this is there areone of the one of her arguments
.
Let's just listen to thisthere's um.
Speaker 9 (21:10):
one of the other things I did was I did open
records for the White Houseaccess and we had records that
Ms Willis and the mayor ofAtlanta were at meeting with the
vice president.
Speaker 10 (21:25):
Okay, and so this is the access history.
How does that work?
The White House keeps recordsof anybody that comes in and has
any kind of official meeting,for sure.
Speaker 9 (21:34):
Yes, and my understanding is it's highly
regulated who can access theWhite House, and so you have to
apply in person or apply aheadof time, and then they give you
a time when you make theappointment, and they give you a
time when you're allowed to bein and when you have to be out
by and they track you and I meanthat makes sense.
They don't want anybody, youknow, lingering in the White
House, but they keep that.
And so these are.
They're called WAVE records, Ibelieve is what they're called,
(21:56):
and I'm not sure what that's anacronym for, but they're
publicly available, they're openrecords.
Speaker 10 (22:04):
And this record that's shown on the screen shows
Fannie Willis was a visitorwith V POTUS.
I presume that's Vice Presidentof the United States.
Speaker 9 (22:09):
Yes, yes, it was.
Speaker 4 (22:11):
So Fannie went, the Fulton County District Attorney
met with Kamala Harris, the VicePresident of the United States,
and then decided to go afterDonald Trump.
Come on, are you kidding me?
How many county like littlecounty DAs are meeting with the
(22:33):
vice president or president ofthe United States?
And then you just happened togo out and prosecute the person
who was their sworn enemy.
Speaker 10 (22:45):
Really, and what was the date of that back in?
Was that February, sometime of23?
Speaker 9 (22:53):
February 28, 2023.
Speaker 10 (22:55):
Is that before the indictment?
Speaker 9 (22:57):
Yes.
Speaker 10 (22:57):
Okay, any further explanation of why Ms Willis was
meeting with the Vice Presidentof the United States?
Speaker 9 (23:06):
No, I know Dexter Bonds and I believe that's the
same one that Mr Dickinson, themayor of Atlanta, was also there
.
Speaker 4 (23:16):
The mayor of Atlanta.
Speaker 10 (23:18):
We'll take a short break.
We've been going at this for awhile.
Let's take somewhere between afive and ten minute recess and
we'll be back.
Speaker 4 (23:26):
I hope Fannie Willis ends up in federal prison.
This is like the teapot domescandal.
It's amazing.
This is Fannie.
If you remember Fannie when shehad to take the stand when they
found out about this affair andall of the lying and all the
money spending, this is her onthe stand and she's just a
(23:51):
maniac.
Speaker 11 (23:51):
I always have cash at the house.
That has been, I don't know,all my life.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
So they're asking her hey, where are you getting all
these money?
You're going on all theselavish vacations, cruises, the
Bahamas.
Where are you paying all thisfrom?
Oh, I just have cash at thehouse.
Speaker 11 (24:13):
If you're a woman and you go on a date with a man,
you better have $200 in yourpocket.
So if that man acts up, you cango where you want to go.
So I keep cash in my house andI don't keep cash as good in my
purse like I used to.
I don't go on many dates, butwhen you go on a date you should
have cash in your pocket.
Speaker 9 (24:31):
So my question was where did that cash originally
come from, If it didn't come outof the bank?
Speaker 11 (24:35):
Cash is fungible.
I had cash for years in myhouse.
So for me to tell you thesource of when it comes from,
when you go to Publix and youbuy something, you get $50, you
throw it in there.
It's been my whole life.
When I took out a large amountof money on my first campaign, I
kept some of the cash of that.
To tell you, I just have cashin my house.
(24:56):
I don't have as much today as Iwould normally have, but I'm
building back up now.
You just put money in.
It's a very good practice.
I would advise it to all women.
You can't identify when youcame into this cash or where the
cash came from.
I didn't say I couldn'tidentify it?
Speaker 4 (25:13):
Yes, you did.
That's exactly what you justsaid.
Speaker 11 (25:15):
Nobody gives me anything.
I am sure that the source ofthe money is always the work,
sweat and tears of me.
What you asked me for is whendid the money go in there?
What I am trying to tell you isso I got divorced in 2005 from
my husband.
Speaker 4 (25:30):
Oh, I wonder why.
Speaker 11 (25:34):
No, no, no, it's important.
You said where did the moneycome?
Speaker 7 (25:36):
from, and I need to tell you where the money came
from.
Speaker 11 (25:37):
And so for many, many years I have kept money in
my house.
That money, in my worst days,has probably only been $500 or
$1,000.
At my best days I probably had$15,000 in my house of cash.
Speaker 9 (25:54):
At all times there's going to be cash in my house or
wherever I'm laying my head, themoney that you paid Mr Wade,
the cash in October of 2022, youdo not know where that money
came from.
Speaker 11 (26:01):
I do know where it came from.
It came from my sweat and tears, you know which job it came
from.
Speaker 9 (26:06):
Did it come from Fulton County or did it come
from a private job?
It?
Speaker 11 (26:08):
came from?
I don't, I'm not, what are youtalking about?
So it could have come from aprivate job, because before I
was DA I was in private practice, so I earned money during that
time period.
Speaker 9 (26:19):
That's probably in there.
So she went and asked foradditional budgetary money.
She needed a higher budget.
So for those 55 people, shewent and asked for more money
because she didn't have enoughmoney and once she was awarded
that, it's her position now thatshe can spend that money
however she wants.
Speaker 10 (26:33):
Doesn't have to use it for 55 new staff.
She can use it for specialattorney general.
Speaker 9 (26:38):
Yes.
Speaker 10 (26:38):
Not attorney general .
Special counsel Right yes.
Speaker 9 (26:41):
Essentially that is their argument in their reply
briefs that they filed in courtthat they have inherent
authority.
They don't have to comply withthe county ordinances, don't
have to comply with the statute.
Speaker 10 (26:51):
So they don't have to comply with our state statute
.
Speaker 9 (26:54):
That they have.
Once they're awarded the budget, they can use that budget.
However, I mean how theirmotion and I'm happy to send the
motion, it's public record, buthow their motion argued it was
if they get $5 million, they canpay that to one person if they
want, as long as you know,because the voters authorized
(27:17):
her to do that.
So the county, their position,is the county authorizes a
budget and she can pretty muchhas inherent authority to do it,
however.
Speaker 4 (27:21):
So just so you understand this, fannie willis
falsely went to the city andsaid hey, hey, I need more money
, I need to hire more staff, weneed 55 people.
So 55 people is going to cost Xamount of money.
I need this, I need that, Ineed blah, blah, blah, blah blah
the city budgeting office orthe mayor's office, whoever they
(27:44):
go yeah, no, no problem, we'llget you that money.
If you really need that for 55people, get you that money.
If you really need that for 55people, we will get you that
money.
And she turns around and takesthe money for 55 people and
gives it to one person, which isNathan Wade, her boyfriend, who
then takes her on all of theselavish trips that she apparently
(28:09):
paid for with cash that she hasno idea where it came from.
This should be more than beingremoved from the case.
This should be a complete auditfrom the IRS, investigation
from the FBI.
She should go to federal prison.
(28:30):
This is money laundering.
She stole money from the city.
Then she turns around andpeople call her out on it and
says, hey, this is a statestatute that you have to use
this money for this reason.
This is a city ordinance thatyou have to use this money for
the reason that you originallyrequested it, and her answer is
turn, turns around and says now,screw you, screw you.
(28:55):
I don't have to do that.
No, I can use it however I wantto, because the people gave me
that power when they voted me,and I don't have to abide by the
state law by saying I, fanniewillis, I above the law.
That's literally what she'ssaying in that statement.
Speaker 10 (29:13):
Even though she specifically asked for the money
to prosecute backloggedhomicide cases in Atlanta.
Speaker 9 (29:18):
Yes.
Speaker 10 (29:19):
Okay, what's your opinion on that?
You think the statute or countyprocedures permit that?
Speaker 9 (29:27):
No, I do not, and I cited several different county
ordinances.
So when I read the statute,when I read 15-1820, and it
makes sense, you know it makessense intuitively, as lawyers.
When we bill, someone isreviewing our bills.
I mean, that's just.
You know that's the process.
If you're in private practice,you know your client authorizes
your bills.
If you're doing public defensewhich I've done, public defense,
(29:49):
I've done appointed work youknow the governing agency
approves my bills and they willcut them.
They will regularly cut them ifthey're too high, and so
there's always some type ofbudgetary authority that's
reviewing everything.
So I thought it was verystrange that in this case there
isn't one and that there'sreally no oversight, because it
is public money.
So I know that it's an electedofficial, but it it is public
(30:10):
money.
So I know that.
I know that it's an electedofficial, but it's still public
money, and I don't live inFulton County.
Speaker 4 (30:16):
So yes, it's public money, which means the official
doesn't own it.
The public, who pays the taxes,owns it.
Like share, subscribe commentdown below.
Do you think Fannie Willisshould go to federal prison?
I want to know your opinion.
Write it into the show Text.
(30:37):
It in it's in the description.
Click on the button.
You can text it in yes, fannieWillis should go to prison.
Yes, fannie Willis should go toprison, or yes.
You have three options yes, yes, yes or yes.
If you say no, let me know.
I want to know if there'sanybody out there who thinks
that fanny willis, this criminal, should not go to prison.
Thank you for tuning in.
Hit that like, share andsubscribe button.
(30:59):
Don't forget follow, follow,follow this channel.
If you're on the podcast, hitthat download button and I will
see you next time.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.