Rage to Revolution: The Psychology of Protests

Send us a text

The psychology of protest weaves a fascinating tapestry of human motivation, social dynamics, and strategic action that shapes how change unfolds in our world. What drives someone to stand in the rain holding a sign when they could be comfortably at home? Why do some movements transform society while others fizzle despite passionate supporters?

We peel back the layers of protest psychology to reveal the delicate dance between anger and hope that fuels collective action. Anger provides that initial spark, pushing people from passive frustration into active resistance, but without hope—the belief that change is possible—that energy quickly burns out. Meanwhile, fear and learned helplessness lurk as powerful demotivators, keeping many silent despite their deepest convictions.

The social dimension proves equally crucial, as we explore how the bandwagon effect, emotional contagion, and identity politics create powerful currents that sweep individuals into movements larger than themselves. From the Montgomery Bus Boycott's laser-focused strategy to Occupy Wall Street's passionate but diffuse energy, we examine what separates effective protests from those that simply make noise. Most valuably, we distill eight practical strategies that amplify your voice whether you're marching in the streets or advocating for change within your own home: clarity of purpose, community building, strategic timing, creative approaches, peaceful methods, media leverage, influential support, and persistent follow-through.

Whether you're a seasoned activist, considering your first protest, or simply trying to be heard in everyday life, these insights provide a roadmap to making your voice matter when the stakes are high. Subscribe now to continue exploring the unscripted terrain of human psychology that shapes our world in ways both seen and unseen.

References:

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Chan, C., Lee, F. L. F., & Chen, H.-T. (2020). Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill Movement: Mobilization and outcomes. Journal of Democracy, 31(4), 132-147.

Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.   

Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Rev. ed.). Harper Business.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.

Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell Publishers.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.

McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press. 

McAdam, D., & Su, Y. (2002). The war at home: Antiwar protests and congressional voting, 1965 to 1973. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 696-733.

Muñoz, J., & Anduiza, E. (2019). ‘If a fight starts, watch the crowd’: The effect of violence on popular support for social movements. Political Studies, 67(2), 485-504.   

National Action Network. (n.d.). Rev. Al Sharpton

Support the show

The goal of The UnScripted Mind Podcast is to give you fresh perspectives, practical insights and tools you can use to give you more choices, self-awareness and control of

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Is your protest sucking?
Are you not getting the changesyou had hoped for?
Are you not feeling heard?
It's a challenging thing, buton any given day we can turn on
the news and we can see peopleprotesting around the world for
myriad reasons.
The question is, why do they doit?
Is it effective?
What drives people to thinkthis will actually change

(00:22):
anything?
Today, we're peeling back thecurtain on the psychology of
protesting.
We're unpacking the mentaltriggers and revealing eight key
things you can do to amplifyyour voice, whether that's
raging on the street or juststrategizing and trying to make
changes in your own home.
On this episode of theUnscripted Mind, we're diving
headfirst into the madness andthe meaning behind the mayhem.

(00:44):
Welcome to the Unscripted Mind,where our goal is to give you
fresh perspectives, practicalinsights and tools you can use
to give you more choices,increase your awareness and have
better control of your feelings, reactions and behaviors.
I'm Jim Cunningham, a licensedprofessional counselor, and

(01:06):
today we're unpacking publicprotests and why people do it.
We'll explore the psychologicalfactors at play, like the fire
of anger or the weight ofhopelessness that can either
push you out the door or keepyou on the couch.
Plus, I'll share eightpractical ways that you can
crank up your chances of beingheard, whether that's in the

(01:26):
home or on the street, becauseshouting into the void isn't the
goal right.
So what's going on in our headswhen we decide to march or to
stay home, and how can you makeyour voice matter when the
stakes are high?
Ever wonder why people take tothe streets waving signs and
shouting slogans, or why someprotests spark real change while

(01:47):
others just fizzle out.
First of all, this, like mostof things in psychology, is kind
of complicated.
Robert A Heinlein said man isnot a rational animal, he's a
rationalizing animal, whichsuggests that humans don't
always act rationally, butrather they often try to justify
their actions and decisionswith rational arguments, even if

(02:11):
those actions are driven byemotions, biases or other
factors.
So we'll cover some of thereasons and contributing factors
, but this is far from acomprehensive list and, at the
end of the day, each person'smotives may vary greatly.
So why do people protest?
At its core, it's about beingfed up, like our Wi-Fi drops for

(02:33):
the 10th time and you finallycall to yell at the cable
company.
Protests happen when folks feelignored, powerless or angry
about something they considernot right.
Maybe it's a law that they feelis a punch in the gut or a
system that's been grindingpeople down for years.
It's that moment when silencefor them isn't an option anymore

(02:55):
.
For example, think of the civilrights movement or women's
suffrage.
People didn't just wake up oneday and decide to march for fun.
They were pushed by a mix ofhope and frustration, a belief
that things could change if theymade enough noise.
But not everyone grabs amegaphone, some stay quiet, and
that's where psychology startskind of kicking in.

(03:17):
So what are the psychologicalfactors that drives a lot of
this?
So what's going on when wedecide to protest or not?
Psychologically it's a tug ofwar between motivation and
roadblocks.
First there's the anger part ofit, like a spark that ignites
when you see something unjust.

(03:37):
Studies show anger can be ahuge driver in these protests.
It's like rocket fuel foraction.
And then there's hope, thatlittle voice saying maybe this
can work.
Without it you're just yellingat a brick wall, and who's got
the energy for that?
But here's the flip side.
Fear and apathy can slam on thebrakes for people.

(03:58):
Fear of arrest, judgment oreven failure it's like a wet
blanket on that.
Spark judgment or even failure.
It's like a wet blanket on thatspark and apathy.
That's when we get so burnedout that we think what's the
point?
We just feel overwhelmed and weshut down.
Psychologists call this learnedhelplessness when you've
screamed into the void too longand start believing it'll never

(04:21):
echo back.
Connection matters too.
You ever notice protests feellike a big, messy family reunion
.
That sense of we're all in thistogether, what experts call
collective efficacy, can pullpeople out of their shells.
But if you feel alone it's likeshowing up to a party where you

(04:41):
don't know anybody.
That's kind of awkward.
So anger and hope push us.
Fear and isolation tends tohold us back, and it's a mental
balancing act.
But there are other big factorsthat can influence people and
whether they decide to protestor not.
One big one is the bandwagoneffect.
Most of you have probably heardof this.

(05:02):
Think of it like this have youever decided to watch a show
just because everyone else istalking about it?
Protesting can be very similar.
When people see large numbersof others participating, it can
create a sense of momentum andlegitimacy, making them more
likely to join in.
I'll reference a lot ofresearch here and that'll all be

(05:22):
listed down below in thecomments.
There are a number ofresearchers that have explored
how this sense of collectiveefficacy and shared identity
fuels participation.
It's like, hey, a lot of peopleare caring about this.
Maybe I should too, so that's abig deal.
There's also the emotionalcontagion portion of this, and

(05:43):
that's not to be underestimated.
Ever been in a crowd wheresomeone starts cheering or
chanting and suddenly you'redoing it even without thinking
about it?
That's emotional contagion inaction.
Emotion, whether it's anger,excitement or even a sense of
solidarity, can spread rapidlythroughout a crowd, motivating
people to act collectively.
Studies on crowd behavior likethose by Hatfield, capasio and

(06:05):
Rapson, highlight how weunconsciously mimic and
synchronize our emotions withthose around us.
It's like the collective moodthat just sweeps you up.
And let's not forget aboutidentity.
Our sense of belonging tocertain groups, whether it's
based on shared values,ethnicity, political beliefs,

(06:25):
can be a very powerful motivatorfor protest.
When an issue threatens ourin-group or aligns with our
group's values, the desire toexpress solidarity and defend
our identity can drive us to thestreets.
Think of being at a profootball game.
Right, there's two groups ofpeople cheering for two
different teams, and we have todefend our own.

(06:46):
Research in social identitytheory shows how our group
memberships influence ourbehavior and attitudes,
especially in collective action.
It's about standing up for us.
Now remember I said we'rerationalizing animals, right?
Well, this comes into play withwhat researchers sometimes call

(07:07):
rationalizing behavior.
We might feel a strongemotional pull or protest, and
that our brains work to findlogical reasons to justify that
feeling.
We might tell ourselves we'reout there to make a difference,
to educate others or to holdpower accountable.
While these might be genuinegoals, I think the initial spark

(07:28):
might be more emotional.
This idea is addressed invarious other studies on
cognitive dissonance andmotivated reasoning, see
Festinger and Kunda in 1990 and1957.
So this is not new researchSuggesting we often seek out
information and justificationsthat align with our pre-existing

(07:48):
beliefs and actions.
So now let's weigh the scales.
Protesting's got its highs andit's got its lows.
On the pro side, it's amegaphone for the voiceless.
Think of the 1963 March onWashington Hundreds of thousands
demanding equality and bam,civil Rights Act comes into play

(08:09):
a year later and ironically,you're getting a hundred
thousands of people there.
And this is before social media.
It's like planting a seed thatgrows into something massive.
Protests can shift culture,spark laws and remind the
powerful that people aren't justbackground noise.
Here's the con, though.
It's not a magic wand.

(08:30):
You might march for days andget crickets or, worse worse
backlash, tear gas arrests.
Take the 2020 George Floydprotests Millions marched,
policies changed in some places,but others doubled down on
resistance.
It's like tossing a pebble intothe pond Sometimes you get
ripples, sometimes it just sinks, but there's burnout, marching

(08:55):
in the rain for weeks.
Really, that's a recipe forexhaustion.
So it's a gamble Big winspossible, but no guarantees.
Now let's consider the pros andcons of the impact of adding a
prominent figure like, say, alSharpton, to show up to your
protest.
When someone with nationalrecognition lends their voice

(09:16):
and presence to a cause, it canhave a multifaceted impact.
On one hand, their involvementcan instantly amplify the
message, drawing significantmedia attention and potentially
broadening public awareness ofthe issue.
Sharpton, for example, has along history of this and
involvements in civil rightsactivism, and has often been
instrumental in bringingnational focus to issues of

(09:38):
racial injustice.
His presence can lend a senseof legitimacy and urgency to the
cause, potentially mobilizing awider range of supporters who
might not have been engagedotherwise.
Beyond that, his experiencesand connections with political
and media circles can providevaluable resources and platforms

(09:58):
for the protesters' demands.
However, the involvement ofsomebody like Sharpton can also
be a double-edged sword.
While his presence can elevatethe profile of the protest, it
can also become a focal point ofcriticism and controversy,
overshadowing the core issues.
Critics might question hismotives or past actions, and

(10:21):
this sometimes can detract fromthe message the protests are
trying to convey.
Whether his involvement isquantifiable in terms of direct
policy change is difficult toeven say in hindsight, as policy
shifts are usually the resultof a lot of different factors.
Research hasn't specificallyquantified the amount of a
single individual like Sharptonon protest outcomes.

(10:43):
However, studies on socialmovement success emphasize the
importance of media attention.
Let's talk wins and flops.
What are the best protests?
Well, they're like a perfectlybaked cake Right ingredients,
right timing, perfect.
Take the Montgomery bus boycottin 1955.
The clear goal end bussegregation.

(11:05):
Smart strategy hit them in thewallet with a boycott, unified
community.
Everyone from Rosa Parks to thelocal preacher was in the
result Segregation on busescrumbled.
It worked because it wasfocused, organized and
relentless, contrast that withthe Occupy Wall Street movement,
the vibe was electric Peoplemad about inequality, camping

(11:29):
out, chanting we are the 99%,but the goal A little fuzzy, no
clear.
Here's exactly what we want.
It's like throwing a partywithout telling anyone the dress
code Lots of energy, but itfizzled without a punchline.
The lesson Clarity andcoordination win, chaos and
vagueness lose.

(11:50):
Okay, so if you're ready to makesome noise on your own that
actually sticks, whether againon the street or at your house,
here are eight ways to up yourgame, but there are some pros
and cons, of course.
Number one know your why.
Be crystal clear on what youwant.
The best way to get what youwant study show is to ask.

(12:11):
Vague rants are like shoutinginto a fog.
No one knows where you're going, what you're doing or what you
want, so you're not going to getthe results.
Number two build a crew.
Solo acts rarely move mountains.
Strengthen numbers like a choirharmonizing instead of a lone
karaoke singer.

(12:31):
Number three pick your moment.
Timing is everything.
Strike when the iron's hot,like during a news cycle that's
already buzzing about your issue.
Now you can still have theperfect amount of timing and
have it planned perfectly, andthen, based on the news cycle,
something big could happen andjust kind of overrun you anyway.
So there's always that risk.

(12:52):
Number four get creative.
Signs and chants are cool, butthink bigger.
The AIDS quilt in the 1980sheart-wrenching and
unforgettable stand out like aneon sign in a blackout.
But number five is staypeaceful.
Violence can drown your messagein chaos.
Peaceful persistence, likeGandhi's salt march keeps the

(13:13):
focus on your cause and not getdistracted by the mayhem and the
perceived injustice that theviolence is causing.
Number six leverage media.
Social media is your megaphone.
A viral hashtag can reachmillions.
Think hashtag me too.
Number seven get an eliteambassador.
The arrival of a well-knownfigure like Sharpton, as we

(13:36):
discussed, can be a powerfulcatalyst, bringing attention and
resources, but it also carriesa risk of becoming a distraction
or a target for criticism,highlighting the delicate
balance within social movementsand the complexities of public
perception.
And finally, number eight yougot to follow through.
Don't just march and ghost.
Push for meetings, laws,something tangible.

(13:59):
It's like planting a gardenYou've got your water and after
it, the seeds go in.
These aren't foolproof, butthey're like tuning your guitar
before a gig Better odds ofhitting all the right notes.
All the right notes.
So how do these eight criterionapply to protests that involve

(14:19):
passive street blocking or maybegluing yourself to the pavement
, as some have done, to disruptnormal activity?
Well, passive street blockingand gluing are effective for
spotlighting issues.
Media creativity make them.
Potent, but weak at sustainingcoalitions and securing change.
Impotent but weak at sustainingcoalitions and securing change.
See, success stops at awarenessunless paired with negotiation

(14:40):
or policy leverage, as historysuggests that research shows.
Extreme tactics boost awarenessbut erode identification, as
people resent inconvenience overempathy.
In short, gluing yourself tothe street or blocking traffic
grabs the eyes but rarely shiftslevers of power without broader

(15:01):
strategy.
Finally, how does all of thisapply when you just want to see
change in your own life, in yourown home?
Ironically, a lot of the sameprinciples apply as effective
tactics to influence people orthe situations in your personal
life, and it involves adaptingthese core principles clarity,
collaboration, timing,creativity, peacefulness,

(15:24):
amplification, credibility andpersistence to everyday
scenarios like persuading afriend, negotiating, work or
even family dynamics.
So I'll give you an example.
You imagine you want yourfamily to eat healthier.
What is your?
Why?
I want us to cook fresh mealsthree times a week for better
energy.
Nice, clear, succinct.

(15:44):
Get a crew together.
Get your cousin or other peopleon board who are also
interested in eating healthier.
Find that right moment.
Pitch it after a sluggishholiday meal when everybody
feels horrible and is dozing offin the lounger.
And then get creative.
Cook a killer veggie dish asproof.

(16:04):
Keep it peaceful, though.
No violence Suggest.
Don't guilt.
Trip people into doing thisMedia Well.
Share a recipe video in thefamily chat.
Find an ambassador so thatcousin that brags about their
own gains and they can show upand show the end results to
motivate people.
And then follow through.

(16:26):
Plan a grocery run together.
Get everybody involved and theresult well, you're more likely
to get buy-in If you think ofChialdini, who's social proof
and liking research.
Your crew and your creativitymake it fun, not forced.
So to wrap up, yes, protests canchange laws.
They can shift minds or canjust make you feel less alone in

(16:49):
your rage, but don't expectmiracles unless you've got a
million friends and a saintlystreak.
Next time you see a protest,tip your hat to the dreamers,
the screamers and the guy in thechicken suit.
They might just be ontosomething, or maybe not.
Thanks for checking us out onthe Unscripted Mind today.
If you found this episodehelpful, share it with somebody

(17:09):
who might need it Also.
Please subscribe, follow us andleave a review.
If you have any questions ortopics you'd like us to cover,
please include that also.
Until next time, remember lifedoesn't come with a script, so
embrace the unexpected, cherishthe unplanned, always stay
curious and have an amazing day.
We'll see you next time on theUnscripted Mind.