UFO Chat with Paul -28 Secureteam loves NASA ice UAPs & fake images +J-Rod ;viral UAP vids analyzed

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
The channels, Please common share.

Speaker 2 (00:33):
Searching for the truth, UFOs, aliens, Grace and euthology, real images,
real stories, real videos, real cases, researched and investigated by
professionals in the field, and cutting edge discoveries. Multiple witnesses.

(01:00):
Abduction accounts brought to you by teaming the out There channel.
Good to Me man Man five three two one one
action action.

Speaker 3 (01:21):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yo yo, it's from the up

(01:56):
and running.

Speaker 1 (01:59):
There's been a rough morning. It was a but crooked
with the stomach eight summer Dad's soup, which is always
a wee bit dodgy, maybe crook overnight. I didn't trust
his stock that he made from past roasts or whatever

(02:23):
it was. Yeah, anyway, managed to get better and kick
off the show today finally, but half an hour late.
Of course, it's this waking. It's the question. Yeah, I

(02:47):
think so. No one's commented. Yeah, it wasn't a whole
poor of people waiting for me anyway. Oh, no way,
But anyway, I got open up some folders here, Okay,

(03:14):
some things I forgot to do. Yeah, that's got big girl,
isn't it. Oh that'll do? H what else? What else

(03:40):
we've forgotten? All right? Yes, better pushed up the title
what we're doing today? Uh, it's like cash got cleared. Okay, Yeah, Sully,

(04:06):
long time no here. What happened to you? I'll just
swear you pop up on the side. I guess you
heard about Charlie and saw my videos about him. They

(04:29):
arrested and peace one. I did email you, well, did
seem to comment to you? Where you got it or not?
Still think of him every day? Okay, I need to
plan some of this. Yeah, I'll just catch up the

(04:52):
coats in a minute. Oh could be given not to good?
The rang bidden um okay and tilt. Okay, we're up

(05:30):
and running. I think just a matter of waiting for
people to show what's going on. Charlie. Yes, I sent
in emails comments. I don't never see any I saw
you said you hope Charlie was okay, that's the last
I heard of you. And then next day or whatever

(05:52):
it was weak he was put to sleep. Modern in
eight Hour Music Festival. We'll be leafing back and forth
between here and there. Yeah, whatever that means your that

(06:15):
soup is metropolized and you feel better. I hope it's
gone down down the pipes out of the stomach anyway.
I think the intestines can handle bad bacteria better than
the stomach can. Anyway, he's got this Legionneer's disease, so

(06:43):
they think there was a terrible bug gun around. He
thought you had that, but he had done composting without
any masks on, and that's where you get Legioneer's disease from.
It's airborne bacteria that gets into your lungs and it's
very hard to get rid of. So he's had that
for three or four weeks now, and it makes him

(07:07):
feel sick because he's on anti verdicts and all that
sort of business. All the side effects of trying to
kill the bacterias also kills off your living organisms that
keeps because we're we're not just me myself and I.
We're like trillions of bacteria that keeps us alive and

(07:29):
helps us produce all sorts of things in our body,
insulin and all that breaks down sugars into energy. Yes,
we got killed, all right? Yeap, what we got? Oh yeah,

(07:53):
it's just organized thing seeing it out, just the bot
message and Shelley just spopped up. I had a friend
who was a doctor had the legionnaire is very dangerous. Yeah, yeah,
but if he's almost over it now. But knowing how

(08:19):
many probably had both the virus thing in the Legionese
at the same time, I think once you get one,
the others take holds, don't they, So you end up
with two things. Ah well, that was what everybody keeps
talking about. Might kill the aliens if they were here,

(08:40):
you know, it makes you wonder if they can take
the bacteria and viruses can take us out. I would
certainly kill the foreign invaders the alien Gray's coming here. Yeah,
we've got a bit to go over. I think up

(09:00):
and running, all right, I much send out, might send
out the three gifts that we get every eMates. And
I was going to have a guest on, but I
never had time to organize it properly, and that maybe
even next week might not be a go for it.

(09:24):
Not one hundred percent sure the guy is really that
interested after all. But we'll see. It's not like Colleen.
You know, Colleen was most unique ones so far. I
think there's too much egos with the guys. That's what

(09:47):
I find. Females don't have that sort of ego abound them.
So what's happened here? U? It's Google's playing around again.
Must like it. Let's see how's that? What are you

(10:12):
going to I think it's sounds a right. What was
it going to do here? All right? Send out gifts?
It's good to do that. Boy opening that one here
because it doesn't work on the other screen, and we
do it this way this pause that. Yeah, but the

(10:38):
chat thing hasn't popped up? What is that? Would we
have to press anything here? And now it's come up,
So I'll tell you it's not things things to be
getting west, not better with YouTube? Okay, adding and stuff

(11:02):
on to try and controlers. I guess memberships. Here you
go ten gifts. Now, we never ever managed to get
it to do ten, but we'll see here we go.
We've done five and six, but it never ever gets
to ten and it always bombs out. Can't even get

(11:23):
to the bottom. See doesn't scroll up? See that, So
that's a bug as far as I'm concerned. Anyway, you
can just click it and just got the edge of it.
Let's see what happens doing the zona. So we get

(11:46):
five that time. It's like Michael King, I've got a freebie. Yeah,
I don't know if my computers running really slow I'll
get the slower local kings. Are you here? Man? That's

(12:09):
really slow, unless it could be stream labs that we're
connecting to said party for this, I was going to
try and write me in boy passed them completely. It's
always the best option, isn't it all yourself? But yeah,

(12:29):
once your the one man band running all and coding
and stuff, it's just too much, too much to do.
I know, it seems like everybody in computer fields, especially researchers,
are always too busy. So yeah, how'd we get Tommy T?

(12:52):
And we've got overlapping? Won't get back back to where
you once belong? Okay, where we got to you? Michael King,
yo yo, think you're going to show up today? Tommy T.
Stone Hobbit. Haven't seen her around for a while, m

(13:14):
Michael and Chris Hester I haven't seen him for leot
members seeing him anyway? Must try the nack next to
a bunch of gifts, shall we? Yeah? Where's it gone?
Gotta do it again? Let's see memberships number five? Light's

(13:40):
come up? Scold up this time? That's crazy, sister? Does it? Say?
Send five? Said five? Now? Yep, there we go. Have
they changed the rules? Maybe it can't send ten in
the same day. I don't know. It looks like it

(14:02):
might be doing at this time, right, Yeah? One, two, three, four?
I got four? I think? Is it twenty four? How
is it five? There? I'm just swimming. Who we got? Frank?

(14:25):
That's one? Michael D I haven't even seen that one
around Coaching Man and Blue Chicken? I can only count four?
So we got nine this time? Is it? One? Two, three? Four?
Are still only four? There? That's really weird? Right, there's

(14:50):
one at the bottom here that's not showing up here?
Is it? I know? Blue Chicken? What? Who? Listen? Why
has it not done it properly? Again? It's time and thing?

(15:16):
What's going on there? Can I even send a message? Yo?
Let's see yep? That comes up there? About the side check?
Did that come up? Yep? Hey? Well the robot answered, okay,

(15:37):
so we got nine? Ah, Google, what did you do?

Speaker 4 (15:44):
Well?

Speaker 1 (15:44):
It's better than six that we got last time. Yeah,
we can get out of that. I'm not speed it
up a bit deribly slow for some reason. Yeah, this
is kick off the show? Then? Who you got? Must

(16:05):
have a few people out there by now? I opened
there some strangeness going on. Good face. I want to
forget time to do them today. Okay, who we got
out there? Four unpilled welcome guys. Heead a like at

(16:32):
some stage if you like the show. Four on YouTube
or a sudden what's happened there? And two on Rumble
and we really got two likes and rumble. Hey, guys,
thanks all that, So let's kick it off, shall we.
I already had someone attacking the last show saying they

(16:53):
didn't like me making noises or something. Unfortunately, Mike's tend
to pick up every thank you around here, especially when
it's close to your face. There's not much I can
do about that. You would they say, I hate how

(17:14):
it does this. This time he's said, I'll just pause it.
It's not meant to audoy start. But it doesn't. Now
I thought that's the most popular, And then you comment

(17:36):
on last show although it got one hundred and fifty
years and eleven likes. Organize your thoughts. It's about how
to do that when it's unscripted. But you have a
rough idea what you're going to do. Nobody is going
to watch a five hour video. I used, guys, the
fifteenth from last week did and the four hundred and

(18:03):
what is it four hundred and eighty ninety that followed
in the week following that didn't watch it when it
was online, watched it offline, so we got about five
hundred views on it across all domains. So that's wrong,
and that starts with unedited mouth and type in sounds well,

(18:28):
too bad about the type the keyboards clickie, it feels
good to typhon, better than stupid laptop keyboard that's blistered.
Already five hundred do over the week. I said you
were wrong. Livers that unscripted and off the top of

(18:51):
the head like a tutor being a ex tutor, and
text suggests use the bookmarks and description to dive into
the topics as we wait for people to join. So
that counts forward today too, So with you twenty minutes
into it, you can skip past to the first topic. Yeah,

(19:17):
I think people that complain should try doing what I
do and put a show together by the end of
the week, you know, and the five hour covers saves me.
How to do it our show every day of the week,
like some people do, you know, because they want to

(19:38):
get more cash in fluent, But that means that you
don't research anything you're forever just plain other people's clips,
really and just talking crap about it, which is what
Gufon does. Right here, we least try and research to
bunk and have some there where we headden during the

(20:01):
week and some we do life debunks. We were not
actually looked at it, but we're pretty good at what
we do here and able to pick up Kite's fakery
and all that sort of stuff. Right. I thought I
saw a name comic pop up and the first one,

(20:26):
so the first one is on which it's like it's
scaled too big there on the picture. But anyway, this
is about j Rot okay, so we'll just go through
j Rod stuff first. Former Area fifty one engineer the

(20:47):
US is holding alien's captives and stilling their technology. What
do you think about that statement? I think that's pozzibly true,
as we know any sort of craft that flies can

(21:07):
have problems in crash, and not all of them die
of course when it crashes, so they could be injured
and taken back to base and how captive. So I
think it's possible despite all the negativity out there with whistleblowers,

(21:29):
but they can't bring any solid evidence to prove otherwise.
Going down. So this guy here we find out about
him and just a stock image of aliens alien UFO

(21:53):
conspiracy theorists believe whistle blower testimony as well. I don't
about these guys. You've been with me long enough to
know that most of the whistle blowers are fakery. Top
secret aiming technology vs. Engineer research. What's whistle blowers? That's

(22:15):
sort of got us into really reversed engineering. But you
could see Bobblaza was the first one. We're nap bringing
it to the public maybe, but I think people believed
in the government doing secret stuff, mostly Russians as well
in China. Research workers ongoing at several underground aiming government

(22:43):
facilities across the country. Now. I heard about el Gray's
lun story about going into underground base that was like
an elevator that took forever to get down to the
ground floor. Recons that probably would have been a mile underground.
But I think more like we once you're mole underground,
the temperature from the ground itself becomes a problem, depending

(23:07):
how you design it. We've looked at underground av bases
before and it would have to have like a jacket
around the concrete. The metal facility of water for cooling
as well as radiation from the rocks, because rocks can

(23:28):
produce a lot of radiation, as you know, because it's
got certain elements that break down naturally. Of course, you
can't rule out them being areas where the underground bases

(23:49):
are not far from nuclear test sites as well or
storage facilities, so you never know. But water is a
good thing. We found was a good one for reducing radiation.
Lead water, sail, even basic saw is good when you

(24:12):
build a prepper shelter underground from radiation, but none of
them use water. But hard to use water unless you're
really well selled in through double jacket building. It's very hard,
doesn't it. So probably a lot of this would be

(24:33):
just usual crap, right government covering art. Many whistlebling claimed
to have worked as government scientists. Yeah yeah, blah blah blah,
build you house. What a name that sounds almost like
German or something is that it's amazing how many of
these scientists are for the nuclear program. We had German names.

(24:58):
Conspiracy serious believe that aiming UFO is recovered from crash
sites of being stored. Believe that it's not known though
you know, experiencing is better than believing. Right as your experiencer,

(25:18):
then you know what's really happening. If you believe, then
you only guess. In conspiracy theories, sight Testimonia blow civil whistleblowers, Yeah,
one of the whistleblowers was Bill Uhouse. There you go,
a man in his seventies who cleaned He worked from

(25:38):
nineteen sixty six through nineteen seventy nine. Maybe I wasn't
even born then almost it's an engineer at the top
secret Area fifty one facility and corroboration of with eight
great alien The thing is, so, do you really think

(26:03):
Area fifty one actually had any UFOs or aliens stored there?
I think it's more likely to be on one of
the other Air Force baces myself. But they have got
great big mountains there which probably would have buried on
tunnel systems. I would say. Of course, that's close to

(26:27):
the area where nuclear testing was done, wasn't it. Apparently
there's a lot of radiation at Groom Lake even into
the eighties. I think so, according to U House, who
passed away in two thousand and nine. According to you House,
who passed away in it's a strange way in roten things.

(26:50):
He worked as a mechanical engineer at Area fifty one
with a great alien known as j Rod. Why would
it even be called j Rods? You know where would
the alien be called j Rods? Hey? To me, that

(27:14):
does sound stupid for a name for alien. Uh, let's
keep on going. He claimed to have worked with j
Rod to construct a flight simulator for a train of
Air Force pilots who would fly about U s a

(27:34):
if steff, a connoisance craft developed through the best engineering
studies of Amen UFOs. So we've got a flight simulator
for UFO, and yet we can't even buy one in
a game? Can you? What's that crap coming up here?

(27:54):
What is it? What does that mean to be? UFO?
Is it? And a person playing a guitar but looks
for it and there's an alien around the corner. I
don't know what that meant to be? Kind of weird

(28:15):
according to your house. He communicated with Jay Rudboy using
a great alien technology adapted for use with humans. The
technology allowed human scientists and engineers working with Great aliens
to communicate via telepathy, aided by a sophisticated translator software.

(28:37):
But if it's been went straight into your head. Why
would you need a translator? Mhmm. Does it just translating
then being the spoken text into your region of the

(28:58):
brain that the ear is connected to, so you hear it.
Then they never really explain it, do they. So if
he had this implaned, he'd know all about it before
you sept. We're in a headset or something, wouldn't you
if you're a scientist, right, how phisticated can it be?

(29:22):
You know as Google can do it. According to Bill Uhouse,
j Rod showed humans at the facility how to control
and fly ailien UFO. M It doesn't really say much there,

(29:42):
does it, Because we've heard that the aliens you either
use something in this seat or some sort of implant
and communicate tatlepathectly to the UFO itself to control it.
So why would you need a flight simulator with panels

(30:10):
and stuff to see how to control and fly it
aiming UFO? So why hasn't he drawn a picture of
this control panel? There's lots of lots of holes in
this story should be like lots of images, and just

(30:32):
being a scientist, you should be able to draw. Sheould
how to pull it straight out your head and document
it all, and actually so document it so well being
a scientist that you could anyone could read it and
then build assimilator outside the government. So me, I'm not

(30:52):
buying the story so far. It's claimed that there are
different races of the grays, gray races and called tall
tall short Grays, and grays were size comparable to humans,
but as uncertain which the three major gray racers j

(31:14):
Rod represents good question. When was the idea of short
and tall grades come about before this guy come on
the scene? Probably who brought up the al as the

(31:37):
grays first? That's a good question. I wonder if you
can find that out, because they have to be some
sort of contact or adduct tee right who asked the
first person to mention million greats? What if AI are

(32:11):
kicking for this one? It seems to be like a
band topic when I ever do research that AI? Have
you ever kicks in? A description of being is closely
resembling great and it's first appeared in science fiction writings
of H. G. Twel's in the late nineteenth century. Yeah, well,

(32:31):
it was actually I have to something a bit better
than that Man of the Year million the time machine
there that was a really good it's a really good
movie they made from that book, the first one in

(32:54):
nineteen sixty six, or it his book so Belly and
Bernie Hill. There wasn't really Grays. Though this case is
often cited as an event that brought the Great Alien
image to promise in the public culture. I thought these

(33:17):
was a little short being through little tiny eyes, though
uh popularized the great Alien image further. So it was
that webbley shreaba. Maybe okay, it's the first one to

(33:38):
mention Ailian Gray's tool and short one great amen including
variations and height. Worst gust of Sand Grittin in his

(34:03):
nineteen thirty three novel Dan a Fire Run The Unknown Danger.
What kind of person is that? Gustav? What country would
that be? German? That it could be? That could be

(34:27):
sounds more Russian. He described them as short board and large,
dark eyes and clad and soft gray fabric. Well, looking
at our video last week, they actually were in one
piece black outfit's at saor light large stack eyes inclad

(34:50):
in soft gray fabric. Yeah, it doesn't say their skins
gray though, does it. Well. The Betty and Bernie Hill
reduction case in nine sixty one popularized the great an image.
Sand Green's earlier description is considered it's funny prototype corn

(35:11):
of science fiction fantasy Corn to core hgu Well also
describe gray egg skin debians. Does it say where he's from? Doesn't?
Does it? What's the origin? See origin? Oh name? Okay,

(35:51):
have we got any locations here? Read Swedish writer, There
you go, not German, not Russian, Swedish. Okay, Well, I

(36:15):
didn't know that. We never know where you're going to
find out on this show. You're finding out new stuff
every year. Really, I never really asked that question before, though,
So so let's get back to the story. So it
looks like really instead with Betty Bernie Hill then. But

(36:43):
I don't think the aliens looked very alien grayish what
to Bity feels just looked like, okay, are you always

(37:04):
kicking in a bit on this one? Small gray skinned
human eyes with large wrapped around eyes. Okay, that's what
I thought. That's more of the image I've seen drawing,

(37:26):
not really large eyes in my opinion, What do you think? Yeah,
and I haven't seen the eyes wrap around. When I

(37:47):
saw mine three feet away, they were just like the
alien gray in the corner. And that's not sickly wrap
around as it m well, at least I wouldn't say
it was wrapped around. But those ones do look like

(38:14):
they've bend and the sort of yucky looking Could it
be like contact lenses or some sort of stuff they
had wearing on their eyes? Since then, see that one's

(38:39):
difference again? Mum, is that what the UFO looked like? Yeah? Yeah,

(39:03):
kind of strange look in UFA. What's the thing sticking
out the side though? Anyone know what that is? Let's
have a look kim me soonming, it's not gonna let
us there's a link of a link of a link. Yeah,

(39:29):
oh god, it's going to try and play in it.
Stop trying to play stuff now apparently they can't. Got magnetized,
didn't it? But the magnetism wears off and head scratches
on it? Well here we go kill me hually read

(39:57):
that bit bluey? Isn't that? Whoever took the photograph? Terrible?
This slipped out from sight so it's like a stabilizer.

(40:18):
Is it a red lights on the end? It's like
packing lights? Then? Is that they slid out from the
side of lights on the end, so it looks like
windows go all along the air. And yet when we

(40:40):
saw the images close that one ever drawn, since it's
more UFO like, So there's one there, it's more close

(41:04):
to the drawing, it looks more UFO like. But there
was some here so aiman gray maybe, but they look

(41:28):
more hybrids to me. And that's meant to be a movie,
is it. See that's another thing that always got me

(41:51):
as worried. A black couple, a black and white married couple,
which was pretty much shone on back then bring more
attention to this house with this crazy case. It doesn't
make any sense where they'd be lying about it. So

(42:19):
I think it really happens. I think this is pretty legit.
So that one there is totally wrong. It's got the things,
the triangle bits that come out the side. Whoever did
that one? Devi and art you should actually look at
look at the story a bit better in the original drawing. Anyway,

(42:48):
I better get back to that. So, yeah, I guess
you could say this is very similar to what we see,
but it's not really one hundred percent match. Yeah, what

(43:11):
have we got here, is Shelley? Do you think they
are paranormal or geological? Some nomally are up Cresh caudal
you're talking a bit skinwall Gucci. I got that coming

(43:32):
up later in the show. Actually, it seems to me
Skinwalker Rats is going to be a big terrorist draw
one day. Uh yeah, probably you probably set up a
hotel where you're going to pay the stay there, all right,
or you could rent it out, you know for conventions.

(43:57):
Probably probably set up a I build a new building
there for conventions and some housen Ideally you build it
like a maybe a five story place or whatever. Hm.
It'll make lots of money from it anyway, But I

(44:18):
reckons it's not about the money. The small gray was gray.
It's much like a catfish or rough dolphin. Yeah, that's
what I was saying. Elephant skin type. That's it doesn't
feel like human skin. It was Telepatha's ability to stop
my ability and the move yep, certainly did that to me,

(44:43):
And somehow they was able to block all the sound
coming out my mouth. I was screaming like how but
I couldn't hear myself or anything, which is really strange.
Uh what's that mean to boom loudly words? No? But communication? Yes, yeah,

(45:11):
I never got any communication, but anyway, it might be
stuff I don't remember of course, going back to j Rod,
so nineteen sixty one is really the first physical UFA case,

(45:37):
which is beating Downey Hills with similar small creatures right
with wrap around eyes but not it's necessarily super big eyes.
But it doesn't mean it's not some sort of sunglasses
right that wrap around the eyes. But then again I

(45:58):
never saw it wrap around, So it could be rare
ations in the grays for some reason, hybrids. Maybe maybe
there's different grays out there on different planets evol slightly different,

(46:18):
who knows, but anyway, we can't rule that one out then,
but he certainly would have had the information seventy so
that would have put him back in nineteen fifty before
Betting gray Hill showed up. But did he say this

(46:40):
story before nineteen sixty doesn't sound like it, So we
need to find out about this guy Bill when he
first come out with the story. This is the problem
with Bob Blazar as well. Most of his was mentioned
about Element one one five in magazines back then. It

(47:03):
was like the cutting edge future science. First tell there's
Amien's story publicly, I suppose is what I was key
with there. See again, I think I can help us

(47:31):
out here because its sting through all the web pages
for US TIEF scientists. So is that blah blaza and Bill? Yeah,
probably I was, haven't there Linda Moulton, howe? Where did

(47:59):
they see that? The tea scientists see you again? That's
very much similar to the Alan Gray in the corner
like I saw not secondly wrap around eyes. So there's

(48:35):
is like Linda Mouldenhill describing meeting him. We'll come back
to that one. Maybe there's some more information on that,
but we still didn't so it must have come the
story must have got leaked. First time I saw the

(48:58):
phrase exidential blogical entity I was in government document in
the nineteen eighties. Okay, so that's when he used the
word bollocks of it bb B. But they don't even
call that now BBS. And in the hearings is that's

(49:22):
called NHI now non human intelligence. So it's going on there.
So what year was this? Trying to find what year?
It was published? Two thousand and two, so way after
Betty and Bernie Hill. So when he first came out,

(49:44):
was it sounds like it? Yeah, October two thousand and two,
s four. It's a little reading. Maybe she just get

(50:05):
it to read out. Okay, so it sounds like she's
talking about Bob Laza there it was that. Who's she
talking about here? She's talking about the phrase. But okay,

(50:35):
so she's talking about the phrase. Person that said it
a computer programmer ninety ninety nine. Bill told me that
he was twenty too, So that's gone back a couple
of years now, mechanical engineered mechanical engineer named Bill U

(50:58):
House who had worked in Okay, so we'll come back
to that one. We'll just have a look at the
stupid document first, because Linda Miltlehouse is really worthy and

(51:22):
of course each storys might be slightly different, which also
you have to question why does one story lack information
where the other one has other information? Has it been embellished?
That sort of thing. It's claimed that there are different
races of grace. Okay, we've been through that, but there's

(51:42):
uncertain words. Yeah, okay, that's where we got to last time.
You House claimed that aiming techs reverse engineering research activity
involved aliens. Now, if you're pilots, are any gray pilot
of a UFA that crash, are you going to know
how it's all built and the electronics of it? I

(52:04):
doubt it very much. You might have some sort of
crystal with technical documents in it that's like a pocket
library that like we now have called smart things where
you can look up stuff and search the Internet. Whether
that crystal would connect to a greater filled other than

(52:30):
local storage, I don't know. But Ailian Gray wouldn't know
all the aspects of how to rebuild a flight simulator
unless that alien is a designer off the UFO, you
know what I mean, instead of a pilot or explorer explorer.

(52:51):
Explorers don't know how the boats that they used to
come to, like South America, how they're built, technically built,
even from back to the old wooden boats to the
modern boats. There's no way all those explorers would know
all about the technology. So again, I find this story

(53:11):
really hard to believe that that Amy and j Rod
came from a UFA crash and told him how to
replicate things, unless there's a chunk of the story that
we're don't understand now. I had also accountcor that he
apparently was a time traveler from the future that come

(53:34):
back in this device to find out information from humans,
which doesn't make any sense whatsoever. But yeah, I've had
quind of lots of crazy stuff about this j Rod stuff.
But anyway, this has meant to be one of the
clean story stories, and we've got Linda's one as well.

(53:56):
You house clean. The Amin tech invest engineer humans were
going to had a number of massive underground facilities, which
is true. Some of the better known philicities include Area
fifty one, which is possible that is underground, saying Delci
Underground Research Facility DLCI ORD'RSI or whatever it's called. I

(54:20):
have my doubts about that location. Amian government underground facility
located under Archuleta, mess Mesa, New Dulci and Rio Araba County,
New Mexico, is believed we need to be much larger

(54:43):
and more important than Area fifty one. Well, how come
no one's done the laider skin of it and actually
reveled underground tunnels because we can do that technology now,
I just have to fly over above it. Where isn't
skin Walker beyond skin regarts gone? The flying done that?

(55:03):
You know? I believe that the construction of the Amien
government facilities began under the administration of President Harry Truman. Yeah, yeah,
going is no proof of that. Uh, the tillions now
and tall white Amien scientists. Yeah. The treaty with Grays

(55:27):
and Tillians included an agreement that the going would allow
Aliens to establish underground research facies where scientists would conduct
biological engineering research to develop at Amien human hubrands. I

(55:48):
don't know. I thought, I've heard lots of worse things
like they had bodied limbs and ate the flesh of
the humans. I've heard stories like that, So I don't know.
It's the facility, say they alleged by engine research program,
the US government permitted the Aliens to abduct a limited
number of humans for use as research. Well, there's plenty

(56:12):
a lot of people that come back from being adducted. Certainly,
haven't got any of this story here. Whether an underground
base of the limbs everywhere? And why do they get
to go free and the old ones not? Aliens agreed

(56:36):
to return to grant the US government access to alien technology.
Could you trust them though? It'd be like going to
Iran and they, of course they want nuclear bombs or
nuclear whatever. They say, well, well, if you let us

(56:58):
do this, we'll give you a nuclear bomb. Just something.
I don't think that would work, you know, because if
you if you give humans the technology, then they can
use it back on you. Something not right there? You
know the story is not gelling with me this stuff.

(57:26):
Thank you for the cookie, dear I killed It doesn't
say over here too, I am being I know. I'll
send you some of my dad's soup that might make
you this being bowie, what we got here? All right for?

(57:51):
Ship Read that one last time. Michelle was adapted by
Irlin Grays as a kid. So a lot of this
we've heard over and over again. UFO conspiracy theorists. I

(58:14):
hate that. Is that a conspiracy theorist to be a
UFA researcher, I don't believe. So really should say UFO
e T research most cases aiming induction involved grades. That's

(58:34):
what it should say. It should say them actual data
that they've collected from the interviews Rettelians using humans for
sinister and NASI style bio lootal engineers as part of
the efforts. So it's the Retelians, not the aiming Grays
that are ripping the humans. Extratrestles among US, Say's former

(59:04):
Russian military general. Although the US authorities are aware the
aliens are violating the terms under which treaties were signed
nine fifties. They have been unable to stop violations. Sounds
a bit like Russia and Ukraine at the moment, doesn't it.

(59:34):
The underground facilities are cryptos born in laboratories in engineering
workshops if verse, these have sections where extras ules and
adducted humans use as research guinea pigs are held active.

(59:54):
According to U House, there may be hundreds or even
thousands of Great Aliens with pendicon. I don't know about grays,
but there's certainly a few on the left side of
politics that look raptilian. To me, I'd say more likely

(01:00:18):
if they're working with the government. It would have been
exposed by now with pictures and stuff. But if the
hybrids that look very human like and maybe the disguise
their eyes with sunglasses, then yeah, that could be possible,
because we do see a lot of type men in

(01:00:40):
black sort of situations and people that look like you know,
I FBI agents will see IA agents were in dark
sunglasses even today on news clips and stuff. Yeah, they
could be alien hybrids. Who knows that there's no evidence

(01:01:05):
of it still, So that's a little write up on that,
but I think that's what's been posted around X at
the moment is the reason I brought it up. But
that wasn't a really good write up. So let's have
a look at Linda Notton Howe, and then I'll get

(01:01:27):
into the pictures and videos. H we don't need that one.
This is why we do live research leaf debunking. I

(01:01:48):
might just seven get it to read out on that one.
Those are terribly bad at the moment. Microsoft Edge just
has the only reader that's sort of works, So yeah,
I'll just leave that tip. Yeah, yeah, it's a little

(01:02:17):
garbage on this page. Let's look at some sort of
p D Yes, can we even read it out? That's
another thing. Let's like at some sort of book, but
we don't want to read it all out, derry. We

(01:02:38):
just wanted to, like the first couple of pages. Let's see,
can it read it out? Probably not, I'll probably go
all wrong, but let's just get a try one.

Speaker 5 (01:02:56):
Archived is www dot stealth skater dot com, slash documents
slash burs h underscore two four dot doc also viewerish
underscore twenty four dot pdf equals d U r l
doc u r L p d F more. Dan Burish

(01:03:20):
is on the slash.

Speaker 1 (01:03:21):
Let's see, can we get down to the I don't
think we can kill we How is it able to
read it?

Speaker 5 (01:03:34):
Thought slash bursage dot htm page.

Speaker 1 (01:03:38):
At it's reading that thing.

Speaker 5 (01:03:43):
There even two scientists describing extraterrestrial biological entity called j
Rod copyright two thousand and two by Linda Molton how
website h T colon slash slash w w W earth
files sketch of Jrod wearing a human man's shirt. Drawing

(01:04:05):
by retired mechanical engineer Bill Uhouse based on entities appearance
at science meeting with Oh.

Speaker 1 (01:04:11):
Yes, so why would it be We're in a human
suit when they normally wear one piece suits. That's call
a weird.

Speaker 5 (01:04:25):
Physicist Edward Teller and other scientists in the nineteen seventies
or early nineteen eighties, October fifth, two thousand and two,
s four Papoose Mountains, Groom Lake near Area fifty one
and Nellis AFB, Nevada. The first time I saw the
phrase extraterrestrial biological entity eb or EBEN in an alleged

(01:04:45):
government document was in the early nineteen eighties, when I
was trying to further investigate the non human link to
global animal mutilations. I had produced the nineteen eighty documentary
A Strange Harvest for KMGHTV CBS in Denver, Colorado, where
I was director of Special Projects. For the television film,

(01:05:08):
I interviewed many people in law enforcement, including Lou Girodo,
chief investigator for the District Attorney's office in Trinidad, Colorado.
He had been assigned to investigate mysterious bloodless trackless animal deaths.

Speaker 1 (01:05:22):
Yes, so she's bleven about something different at the moment
that we've sort of covered cattle mutilations and plus life shows. Now,
Stephen screen Street did a deep dive in it and
found that basically she didn't interview anyone that with credible

(01:05:44):
medical backgrounds. Turns out a lot of claims were done
by this investigator cop claiming it was suspicious and non
human activity heaven. You can find the episode on how
Mutilations on his website or maybe was it the newspaper's

(01:06:09):
website at least or find it on his ex page.
But we have covered that in the past. Basically, this
huge was repeating what other people were claiming at the time,
but wasn't any real research done, you know, no, no medical,

(01:06:34):
proper medical was done. Like, get out someone that's actually
qualified on autopsies, Like there was no one that's just normal.
We're normal what do you call them? Like pet doctors
that are pets offers veterinarians, so we're normal vetenimans, but

(01:06:55):
not actually autopsy specialists that work out how the death happened.
That was the whole problem with it, according to green Streak,
And he's probably correct, but doesn't mean it wasn't done
by it. Some of them were done by aliens. I

(01:07:15):
think the turns out to be a low percentage, like
you don't have. One particular case that was brought up
by Chris O'Brien on the aduction case suggested that it
wasn't humans that did it because they found that the
cattle with the long horns were buried into the ground.

(01:07:37):
The horns were buried into the ground, which would be
impossible to do with a whole cattle pushed into the
ground by humans that have to be dropped from a
great height and smack into the ground. He said the
horns even broke off one going into the ground. And

(01:07:58):
they said that the injuries you can didn't have been
dropped fairly high and not just off the back of
a truck, but could have been done by helicopter, I guess.
But yeah, cattle mutilations is an interesting thing. Can't ride
it off completely? Why would the aliens return the cattle

(01:08:24):
after mutilating them though? You know, it doesn't sort of
make any sense there. Wouldn't it be better just take
the cattle and just like they do with human adductions,
and this even bring them back alive after taking out
fluids or simply disposing of them, so the person doesn't

(01:08:48):
know where the cattle disappeared to and they just put
it down to cattle feasts, right, they would have been
like the more logical thing. Why would black hops halicotters
pick up cattle, mutilated them and then drop them back?
That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Just using common sense here, right,

(01:09:11):
So yeah, I think she could have done a lot
more back then, you know, if she had access to
all these people as an investigator. I thinking she and
he did half a job. Really myself, I never really
liked Linda. I thought she'd just come across believe in
anything that she was told. I think she'd been caught

(01:09:35):
out a few times since on fake stories. But she's
also got special member areas with photographs of alien grace,
which turned out to be from computer games or some
artists rendering, not actual photograph. Although some of them do

(01:09:56):
look photography, doesn't mean they're not Ben done boys right.

Speaker 5 (01:10:04):
Deaths in southern Colorado, and told me on camera that
he and other investigators had concluded the perpetrators were creatures
not from this planet. Two. The enormous public response to
that broadcast eventually provoked Home Box Office to contract with
me to produce an hour for HBO in which I
could further explore the issue of an extraterrestrial presence on Earth.

(01:10:31):
What happened during the challenge to develop that project is
detailed in my first book, An Alien Harvest see Earth
File Shop. As I tried to go deeper into American military.

Speaker 1 (01:10:47):
So it's always trying to always trying to plug wiirls.
This is the problem of yourphrology and all these big
works always trying to sell you something, and so does
give them to you free Go to the you here
and get a free copy.

Speaker 5 (01:11:05):
Extraterrestrial biological entities and the strict cover up that kept
such knowledge from the general public and media. I talked
off the record with a few sum now dead who
described their first hand knowledge of and experiences with extraterrestrial
biological entities. During this period, I also met Bill Hamilton,

(01:11:28):
a computer programmer then living in the Palmdale, California area,
who was also trying to get to the facts of
you S government knowledge and cover up of one or
more non human species involved with this world and its
solar system. In nineteen ninety nine, Bill told me that
he was talking to a mechanical engineer named Bill Uhouse

(01:11:50):
who had worked on a U S Military program to
build an advanced simulator that could teach certain American pilots
how to fly disk craft, either back engineered or actual
alien craft. The technical adviser on the project was allegedly
an eben called J Rod, who had been working with
a secret agency of the United States government since nineteen

(01:12:12):
fifty three at Los Alamos National Laboratory in northern New
Mexico and in a secret underground facility called Site for
literally inside the Papoose Mountains near Groom Lake Area five
one and Nellis AFB. The S four facility inside the
Papoose Mountain Range is supposed to have several levels, some
designated for non human craft storage, back engineering research and

(01:12:35):
applications to modern human technologies. At least one level is
said to be used for maintaining one or more extraterrestrial
biological entities ebens in special environmental spheres designed to provide
a different non earth atmosphere for ebony E kept as
a guest or in a captive status Heads up the moment,
YouTube or anything else tried to IDEMI to use it.

(01:12:58):
I am done, slightly smiling face, back to a simpler,
happier life.

Speaker 1 (01:13:04):
Thanks, Mike. Yeah, I should probably scale the s backdown
so you can, Oh, what's happened here? Scale it down?
He says, looks like it's been readjusted. Well they'll do.

(01:13:25):
Uh yeah, I'll just check on the comments where we've
paused it. Never heard of your house? So there we go.
So this is why we do these shows, so because
there's always more and more stuff that we don't know
about that comes to lights, right, So why is it

(01:13:45):
not scrolled? All?

Speaker 6 (01:13:46):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:13:46):
Here we go? Sorry? Was AFK for a while, A
secret society playing the Lion Gang known to create stories

(01:14:07):
and narratives. They definitely could drop a cow from helicopter. Yeah,
but and the idea is that maybe they did drop
it back mutilated because they cut off to Organs to
do testing on for radiation. Because the claim is from

(01:14:30):
Richard Doughty and other people that some secret research they're
doing went wrong and crashed or somehow polluted the underground
water that sort of went throughout America or something, and
they're just checking on the cattle. Radiation sounds a wee

(01:14:52):
bit like forever chemicals. We know forever chemicals are everywhere
now and en us an animal and everything, So it
sounds very much like the similar case. Maybe they were
mucking around with something that got into the environment and
they're just keeping a check on it to see if

(01:15:14):
it's showing up or spreading, or if the concentrations are
getting less and less. So it makes sense that maybe
they would cut up a cattle, steal it in the
middle of the night from using halicopter to cut it up,
and then simply drop it from Great Heights. It makes
even more of a mess, and then it looks like

(01:15:36):
a suspicious that some aliens did it. That to me
makes more sense than aliens doing that. I think that
aliens wouldn't be that stupid. You know, they're simply just
adduct it like a human and simply not bring it
back or bring it back still living, because that's what

(01:16:00):
happens with humans, so when they do it with animals
as well. So yeah, I'm always questioning things. Right, Well,
we know that aliens are real because because I've experienced
it and I can explain it, and other people that

(01:16:22):
I know wouldn't lie about this stuff and also have
witnesses to them being adducted. Like il Gray also said
that there were alien grays and this story matches up,
and he was new into investigating right from me fon,
he was two weeks into it when he had his
adduction account happened or was it really adduction? They simply

(01:16:47):
just dragged him off into the UFO, did what they want,
and then dragged them back unharmed or freaked out. I
suppose it does mental damage though, All right, secret society, Okay,
we've got the it's the moment due two or anything
else tried to I d need to use it. I

(01:17:10):
am done, back to a simpler, happier life. Uh. YouTube
knows everything though, or Google knows everything. But yeah, as
we know, anyone could use a fake name. You might

(01:17:31):
even be called Michael. Well, you might even be called
King j Rod. Yeah, it's a strange name. Why would
it be called jay Rod? I know drug dealers and
all that, like they use the name j Rod, But

(01:17:52):
why if it was and I was named three j Rod,
I would change it. Yeah. It sounds a wee bit
like gay Rod, doesn't it, j Rod? Gay Rod? You're
not seeing the new laws coming in already on UK's

(01:18:16):
a test bed for immigration and control. But yeah, they
want to bring in the rules in these zeland for
kids under sixteen. And I don't know how that's going
to work other than that everybody has to show their

(01:18:37):
face just to log into YouTube or whatever. And that's
not going to happen, is it? Or a fingerprints that
means everybody has to do it because I don't know
how you get around it. Otherwise, less the parent logs

(01:19:01):
in for the kids and so they can just carry
on as normal. Yeah, and the government say it's good thing.
Really it's a paritan problem if their kids. If they
can't parent their kids being online, then they shouldn't be parents. Right,

(01:19:23):
we did it with my sister's kids. You know. We
shouldn't need the government to step in and all the
corporations step into us how to parent kids by controlling it,
by tracking everything. But yeah, in New Zia and Australia,

(01:19:48):
that's how they start off with. They started off with kids,
and then they're gradually roll in more stuff with their
own currencies and get rid of paper money, which is
a really bad idea, yeah, because more and more people
are using paper money again, and we don't trust banks, right,

(01:20:10):
and we don't trust the government's spying on our bank
accounts anymore. So people just take it out and stick
it under their pillows, like right, and they're trying to
stop that. And now in New Zealand, if you put
more in the bank, if you get to the bank
and put over one thousand dollars into the bank, they

(01:20:33):
start to think your money laundering. So even though if
you collected a load of money over the years and
this crazically build up outside the bank using cash, and
then you want to put twenty thousand dollars in the bank,
it gets flagged as money laundering and they start doing
an investigation on you. So yeah, people did, like a

(01:20:56):
garage sound, they raised like ten thousand dollars towards their
home loan. Now this actually happened my sister was talking
about it when she was trying to sell her hairhouse
and the people were going to buy hair property and
they put lump some of money in and put a
flag up on the bank. Great. Thanks, I ain't got

(01:21:17):
time to eat it though, I've just dropped off some food.
You're done. Well, maybe you got to use VPN and
from another country and just do it only that way.
Great new accounts or something. I don't know. There's no

(01:21:40):
such thing as done. There's always ways around it. Your computer, man, Yeah,
you need to do a photograph. It's a bit hard
they unless you pay someone. I don't know. I'm sure
someone will come up with some Cleveland wade the bypass

(01:22:02):
of AOI. Anyway, we'll be able to get back to
the story. We worry about that stuff when it's too late.
I guess.

Speaker 5 (01:22:16):
Statum you house. Now seventy eight years old, and, knowing
his non disclosure agreement with the U. S Government expires
in two thousand and three, began speaking publicly about his
experiences back then. On June fourteenth, nineteen ninety nine, I
presented in earthfiles dot Com, with his permission, The Strange

(01:22:39):
Story of j Rod and eb E copyright nineteen ninety
nine by.

Speaker 1 (01:22:44):
Bill Hamilton, to copyright.

Speaker 5 (01:22:47):
Bill has had in death communications with a microbiologist originally
named Danny Benjamin Crane, who changed his name for personal
family reasons. He says too, Dan Yewish, doctor three Dan
burischh PhD, State University of New York, Stonybrook, also describes

(01:23:08):
an assignment to study the biological fluids and tissues of
an eben called Jerrod inside S four up to nineteen
ninety five. Then he was assigned to a new project
called Starflower, in which he researches materials allegedly related to
pants permia, the seeding of life on Earth from extraterrestrial sources.

(01:23:32):
Project Starflower is ongoing. This week, Bill Hamilton and I
discussed Bill Uhaus and doctor Dan Burisch's alleged experiences with
one or more extraterrestrial biological entities referred to as Jerrod's Interview.
Bill Hamilton, Programmer Analyst four, University of California, Los Angeles,

(01:23:55):
and executive director SkyWatch International, Incorporated, Lancaster, California. Bill Yuhuse's
particular role in the secret government project was to build
and test what he calls a simulator, a flying saucer simulator.
The reason for this is that the simulator had built
into it the standard avionics that, for instance, our US

(01:24:17):
Air Force pilots are used to and they were taught
with the simulator how to fly one of these gravity
field driven craft. Summary of Bill U. House background born
nineteen twenty four, Ten years fighter pilot in the U. S.
Marine Corps. Fought in last part of World War Two
and Korean War. Honorable discharge as Marine Corps Captain nineteen

(01:24:42):
fifty four minus nineteen fifty eight. Employed as civilian mechanical
engineer by US Air Force at Wright Patterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio,
to do experimental flight testing on various modified aircraft. Also
asked to work on a flying disc simulator through a
commercial civilian company called a Link Aviation, which manufactured simulators.

(01:25:06):
Nineteen fifty eight minus nineteen eighty eight. Worked on flying
disc simulators in which certain US Air Force pilots trained.
First functional simulator in nineteen fifty eight, copied from a
thirty meter diameter extraterrestrial craft retrieved in nineteen fifty two
or nineteen fifty three from Kingman, Arizona. Retired and living

(01:25:28):
in Nevada, BH part of Bill's story was that the
technical knowledge the physics for these particular reverse engineered craft
came from an extraterrestrial biological entity EBEN, which he said
was j Rod. The entity was once said to have
drawn a symbol that looked like our letter J, followed

(01:25:50):
by a straight line that looked like a rod LMH.
That is supposed to stand for what BH. We don't
know what it stands for. Initially, we took it to
mean this was just some kind of a name that
they gave this entity. In other words, instead of just

(01:26:12):
saying hey you, they called him Jerrod. What Bill Yuhouse
said initially is that this Jerrod is kind of head
of the Flying Saucer simulator project l m H. They
were supposed to be working together in which installation b H.

(01:26:33):
Bill said he worked in two places. One was Los Alamos,
New Mexico, and the other was at site for S
four Papoose Mountain Groom, Lake, Nevada four l m H.
Where was Jerrod supposed.

Speaker 1 (01:26:49):
To be based b H.

Speaker 5 (01:26:53):
This is how we started to learn that Jerrod was
a designation for this type of entity, because it turns
out there were at least two j Rods at least two,
maybe more. But the two j Rods were located. One
was at Los Alamos National Laboratory and the other, as

(01:27:15):
we know now, was located in in environmental sphere.

Speaker 1 (01:27:22):
Still, it sounds like they could be like biological robots
remain like that. Well, they've been given by the humans
j jes. Maybe it's not a j but some sort
of symbol like something in the universe might have sent

(01:27:46):
the planet they're from. So it's not just one, it's
mobile j rods. So there's one called j Rod one
and j Rod.

Speaker 5 (01:27:59):
Two inside an installation known as Site four or some
call it Secter four, but it's Site four within Papoose
Mountain itself. L m H at Area fifty one b
H in that general area.

Speaker 1 (01:28:19):
L m H.

Speaker 5 (01:28:21):
Did Bill Huhouse describe how close he was to Jerrod
when Jerrod was communicating b H. All I remember was
that he was in the same room with him.

Speaker 4 (01:28:32):
L m H.

Speaker 5 (01:28:34):
Did he remember any kind of odor?

Speaker 6 (01:28:37):
B H.

Speaker 5 (01:28:39):
I don't recall that he mentioned that.

Speaker 4 (01:28:41):
No.

Speaker 5 (01:28:43):
L m H did ever touch Jerrod's skin b H.
I don't recall that he touched him.

Speaker 6 (01:28:51):
No, l m H.

Speaker 5 (01:28:55):
Jerrod was about how high b H. Somewhere around four
foot nine and five feet tall LMH. And he had
reptilian eyes b H. I don't know the way he
drew them. He had those dark teardrop large black lenses

(01:29:16):
or whatever they are LMH coverings b H. Coverings, So
I don't think he had any direct look at the
eyes LMH. Some people say that what's underneath those dark
lenses like sunglasses, are yellow eyes with vertical pupils. That's

(01:29:39):
why I wondered, b H. I cannot confirm that. As
regards j Rod LMH. You and I have exchanged a
drawing that is identified as j Rod b H. Yes,
that is the one that was drawn by Bill Uhouse.

(01:30:00):
Five drawing of Jerrod by mechanical engineer Bill Uhouse, based
on Gerard's appearance dressed in a human man's shirt in
nineteen seventies or early nineteen eighties at a conference table
with physicist Edward Teller and eighteen scientists, including u House.
The project that linked u House to Girrod was a

(01:30:20):
flying saucer simulator to teach certain U S Air Force
pilots to fly back engineered and or actual extraterrestrial craft.
L m h. The being was wearing a man's shirt.
When U House drew that, what was his relationship to
the ebben known as Jerrod b H. The only relationship

(01:30:43):
was that U House was part of the project team
where Gerard was an adviser in terms of what he
might need to know technically scientific meetings led by Jerrod
and physicist Edward Teller.

Speaker 6 (01:30:54):
L m H.

Speaker 5 (01:30:56):
That U House would have no technically b H. Yes, apparently,
Bill Uhouse was in attendance at a conference table with
a number of scientists at Los Alamos. At one end
of the table was the head of the project, which
by name, according to U House was doctor Edward Teller.

(01:31:17):
At the other end of the table was j Rod.
In attendance around the conference table, I guess were eighteen
scientists and engineers l m H. What year was this
supposed to be?

Speaker 6 (01:31:32):
B H.

Speaker 5 (01:31:34):
Not sure of the year. It might date back as
far as the nineteen seventies or early nineteen eighties, but
I'm not sure, l m H. At this table in
which j Rod is presiding with Edward Teller, whom most
of us know was DIRECTO are of the Star Wars
program under the Reagan administration, and if This was in

(01:31:56):
the nineteen seventies. This would have been before or the
public announcement of the Reagan Star Wars program. What was
the subject between j Rod, the conference table of scientists
and Edward Teller?

Speaker 1 (01:32:08):
B H.

Speaker 5 (01:32:10):
I have no idea. That wasn't disclosed to me. I
wish I knew, But Bill said it was quite a
scene laughs six LMH. It would seem that describing a
meeting with Edward Teller and scientists and an extraterrestrial biological

(01:32:31):
entity dressed in a human shirt in the nineteen seventies
would certainly be worth going into great detail about what
was being discussed in what they Eben was saying, b H.
You have to realize that Bill came out with a
story in the nineteen nineties, and he did it in
talks that he gave that were probably limited to about
one hour, and when he began to speak publicly, he

(01:32:54):
said that his supervisors or managers, or whoever they were.
I believe they were two different men from the National
Secure Agency NSA had okayed his Bill Uhouse saying some
of this in public LMH.

Speaker 1 (01:33:08):
Okay, So it sounds like he was given the ok
to speak about it. Which sounds real, but suspect considering
all the NDA stuff we've lose on the group going
on and what videos they exclaimed to have leaked out

(01:33:31):
that typically greats some of them, apart from the two
thousand and four one, which was too blurry as well,
but had eyewitness accounts at least from credible people, which
also could be disinformation agents. Who's to say that David
Fravor wasn't recruited? We don't know. But this story does

(01:33:56):
sound plausible, doesn't it. It sounds Whether it's credible or
not is another thing. Right, Unless you had all these
scientists that were in that meeting come out and say, yeah,
I was at that meeting, then I can confirm that
they're telling them the truth. Now, if you had a

(01:34:17):
whole like maybe three people come out from that meeting
ot the eighteen, that would make the story more credible,
wouldn't it. But we only got you house. So this
obviously this other guy, Teller, Edward Teller, has he ever

(01:34:38):
come out? Just have a look. I might just post scribbled.
I suppose we can't post that. I have to be
careful what we post it, would I guess that's something

(01:35:05):
that related to the magician called Teller Edward Teller, scientist.
I was let's just see what that comes up with. Okay,

(01:35:31):
a new secret laboratory the post hydrogen bomb design to open.
Uh Okay, all right, we've got a I know if

(01:35:55):
it's work on the hydrogen bomb was involved in a
famous discussion about the possibility of extrascial life, often referred
to as the Fermi paradox. This discussions, which included Erico
Fermi Blah blah blah, Herbert York, took place at Los

(01:36:18):
Allness National fifty. During the conversation, proposed a question where
is everybody, which back to debate about why, given the
vastness of the universe and the potential for other intelligence,
we haven't encountered any evidence of extrassal life?

Speaker 4 (01:36:46):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (01:36:48):
Cool? Question raised for answer discussions. If there were so
many stars and planets, and if it's interstellar travel was
even theoretical possible, why haven't we encountered any evidence of
other intelligent life? The lunch and the conservation is believed
to have happened during lunch time discussion. Ala mos tell

(01:37:13):
Us perspective tell her Now for his work on hydrobon
was among present during discussion. Is that the lead that
they talked about maybe eighteen scientists and the Jay Rod
was frowned there it doesn't really exist. I don't know.

(01:37:35):
It's possible that uf face sided into the possibility of
extrucial life tell Us recollection and his account of the event.
Tell Her noted that for me, his question, whereas everybody
was unexpected but instantly understood by everybody, presents it left

(01:37:56):
to various series and potential explanations, including the possible interstellar
travel was too difficult about civilizations destroyed themselves or they
exist but have chosen not to contact us. Well there's
another one. Maybe we're the only people alive in the
whole universe, which is kind of scary. If that's true,

(01:38:25):
there's probably a few more that can go on the
list here, I reckon some theories suggests that there is
a great filter cities response. Okay, that didn't talk about
a neat and teller scientists was putting j Rod. So

(01:38:50):
obviously he hasn't talked about any j Rod. No one's
interviewed him about it is Hungarian America. Well there he
is the father of hydrogen bond. Yeah, okay, but where's

(01:39:13):
this stuff about Jay Rutt hasn't come up? Has it all?

Speaker 5 (01:39:23):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:39:23):
Here we go Coast to Coast? Well, this conspiracy website,
But has that come from his mouth? No, it's sorting
about the same thing. Linda Middle, How as I suppose
her book what four years after is now publicly known

(01:39:46):
and the whole story is probably known. What's been said
in the interview makes copyright ridiculous. Really anyway, m part
from Coast to Coast that's about the any reference with gods.

(01:40:14):
Let's put that in quotes. No Coast to Coast again
and the article were reading from London, mittle, How okay?
That come up? Another book, Project Aquarius, now deceased, was

(01:40:42):
impressed with Bob and sent him to Okay, how do
we know that's true? Time to revisit Project Aquarius, It

(01:41:04):
would tell us somewhere in Las Vegas, tell her, tell
her gets a job? Uh, who's that doing it? That's
on reddits Coast to Coast a gang? So if he was,

(01:41:27):
if he was going to come out before he died,
he would have a like a big deafbad confession made
when he says he worked underground projects backed by Edward
tell Us. See again we at Edward tell Us saying this,

(01:41:52):
tell her did he and that publicly about I need
to alience. Okay, it's not available for the search. I

(01:42:17):
told you something strange going on with Google and the
topic of UFOs and aliens. So it doesn't mean that
there is actually something there that they found, and it's
been sort of disabled by the government saying that you
can't talk about this. I don't know. Quite weird, isn't

(01:42:41):
it brought up the other thing previously? But not when
I questioned it this way. I just want to yes
or no answer, really, and it's not even going to
give this to us again. It's talking about lunch for me.

(01:43:10):
But again, there was no mention of aliens, because if
the aliens were at the table, they know that the
Fernie principle was wrong because they were already seeing one
in front of them, So that sort of can't be
related aliens called global women. Yeah, we should print that

(01:43:39):
off and send it to all those congress people, Right,
aren't the aliens here already? Okay, it's not really, it's
not really proven anything that this guy is actually admitted

(01:44:00):
to or any written statement, nothing like that. There's no
evidence of this guy making these claims. I just put
his name, dropped his name, and anyway supposed to be

(01:44:20):
able to carry on reading. I've seen theories in my garden.
My son seen them. That's real. Yeah yeah, get a picture.
Then Dave had becomes CEO sounds about rights, no physical events,

(01:44:41):
no photos, no video. Yeah, it's difficult. It's all just
a story of no evidence. Another story. That's right, grammars
from Linda Bult How though, isn't it? Jay Rudd was

(01:45:04):
so quick GRAMA on this things off? Scott Brown, how's
again join us? And I suppose you've looked into this
Jay Rudd business. Umm, probably should have you come on
sometime and chets. But anyway that can be arranged. I

(01:45:28):
have tried to get you on in the past. Anyway,
let's carry on.

Speaker 5 (01:45:32):
Did he explain why, b H. I guess he thought
perhaps the managers wanted to see how this all would
fly in public and whether anybody would believe him. He
was one of seven trained individuals who could work on
the flying Saucer simulator, build it, and test it. I
have a drawing somewhere of what that simulator looked like,

(01:45:53):
drawn by Glenn Campbell, another Area fifty one investigator seven
in September nineteen ninety six, Area fifty one investigator Glenn
Campbell interviewed Bill u House, who he referred to as
Jared Too. Working with U House direction, Campbell drew the
UFO simulator graphics above, Copyright nineteen ninety six. LMH. What

(01:46:19):
specifically did Bill Uhouse say it was like to be
in Jerrod's physical presence bh, to be in his physical
presence nah meely. He said that what was odd was
Jerrod's way of communicating, and that was if U House
had a question on his mind, Gerrod would answer the
question in his U House mind using his U House

(01:46:41):
own voice. LMH. You're talking now about telepathy, in which
Bill u House would hear his own thought voice in
his own mind, but it was being provoked by the
non human name Jay Underscoorrod b H. Yes, as far
as U House owned BIS voice, I don't know it

(01:47:01):
was audible or inaudible LMH. The idea was that an
extraterrestrial biological entity Eben with advanced knowledge would help our
government build simulators to teach American pilots how to fly
disc shaped extra.

Speaker 1 (01:47:17):
Yeah. So this to me like a model on a
post and they could just wobble it around on a post.
It's not actually using any sort of anti gravity technology whatsoever.
And you think if they're building a simulator, you wouldn't
have it on a ball. This seems like something from

(01:47:41):
a fair ground, you know, that's what they do. I
just think it's just bullshit, this story. And we haven't
heard Bob Blaza even mention it because he come out
before this guy. You think he would have seen the
simulator where they're training people they get inside this machine,

(01:48:04):
it's on a bull bla. He would have been talked
about it, right, But he actually went inside a real
UFA or crawled in because he can't stand up in
it because they're smaller bends, and talked about the control
panel of one inside. So there's a mismatch of whistleblowers there.

(01:48:25):
And he was at area fifty one in groomhouse like two.
So why didn't they talk about the simulator? So yeah,
it should perk your up A But I think so
there must be a readout here somewhere where we got.

Speaker 5 (01:48:40):
To extraterrestrial craft.

Speaker 1 (01:48:41):
Oh here we go, bh.

Speaker 5 (01:48:45):
Essentially, in fact, not just from you house, but from
multiple sources. They paint a picture that we have established
some kind of scientific exchange program with these ebens. This
program has been going on since I think it was
established sometime around the mid dash nineteen sixty s and

(01:49:06):
has been going on since that time. With the arrival
of a being they designated as eb E two. Then
after e B E two, one of the beings that
arrived was eb E three, and it was supposedly eb
E three that had two assistants that have different specialties
or special knowledge, and these were the j Rods.

Speaker 1 (01:49:24):
Eight. Would people go around call it a j Rod
three or eb E three, You wouldn't be talking like that.
You'd give him a nickname. Wouldn't you call one Ben,
call one Jones or whatever? One Richard, Dick, Hey, Dick Aya.

(01:49:47):
So I don't know, you woul't be say E V
E one, e B E three. I don't know. It
just doesn't sort of work sound right to me.

Speaker 5 (01:49:59):
Eight Zeta reticularly I one and two and Glee's eight
seventy six CE Star systems. LMH. Did he have any
impression from Jerrod about Jerrod's planet or the way Jerrod
lived when he was not in the confines of Los
Alamos or area fifty one b H.

Speaker 4 (01:50:18):
No.

Speaker 5 (01:50:19):
He mentioned that Jerrod was originally from the Zeta reticulum
system LMH Zeta reticuli one and two the binary system
b H.

Speaker 6 (01:50:31):
Yes.

Speaker 5 (01:50:32):
The yellow binary star systems Zeta reticularly I one and
two is about thirty seven light years from Earth. Both
suns are similar to the Earth's sun. The distance between
the binary stars is estimated to be nearly one hundred
So this.

Speaker 1 (01:50:48):
Sounds like it's been pulled from Biddy and Bernie Hill case,
doesn't it. This is the problem. If it's like new
information and here is the real star met that I
got of this location where it's from, compared to what
Billie and Bernie Hill got, and then they could actually
say this is a real location blah blah blah. But

(01:51:10):
hasn't that sort of been debunked? That's don it Since
apparently I think the location is not ideal for possible life.
There there was something odd I can't remember. It's secly

(01:51:31):
now the problem probably have to do a more deep
dive into it. Again. There's always new information coming forward
that we never heard about. But let's just look at this.

(01:51:55):
I don't think we've seen any you know, because we
can study stars now, and it's not really meant to
be a location. That's must like I was going to
try and get it's probably won't be able to spell
it right. Let's see what it comes up. I wondered

(01:52:19):
that peach sa So this is we can't confirm that
he actually said that, Edward Teller Hm, okay, is there

(01:52:49):
any plants location? Okay, let's just serving fact check it ourselves.
No plants have been confirmed to orbit the Cto reticuli,
so that's the problem there, although there have been some
just disputed phoners of debris disks. The system, like had

(01:53:16):
approximately thirty nine light years away, is a binary star.
I mean it consists of two stars orbiting each other,
which means you would get sunlight all the time, and
it doesn't sort of go right with having big eyes
that look more light and unless you live underground, which

(01:53:38):
then that then does fit. So if they've got two
star systems to get away from all the radiation and light,
you'd probably live underground. Or you could say that the
big eyes are actually sunshields like sunglasses, and then it
also makes sense. So yeah, sort of does fit in

(01:54:01):
that sense of the Ailien Grays coming from there, But
it doesn't fit in with what I have been told
that the alien grays are actually from a multiverse. Well,
I've sort of been indirectly told in dreams that they

(01:54:23):
come through multiverse and they're from the oldest universe in
the cluster, and they're here to make sure entities coming
through the poor tools and stay in our realm causing problems.
So they come and collect them and take them back

(01:54:43):
and also take a duct people to try and remove
any attachments that they have, you know, which is what
we're talking about paranormal stuff. So that's quite a strange
thing to get in a dream, and it's totally bullshit.
But it wasn't really like a dream. It was like

(01:55:07):
information download, which I thought was bullshit until it happened
to me. So yes, it needed to be a skeptic
until you have some exchange happen to you, where all
you can do is keep dreaming about technical stuff that's
never really come to your mind ever before you know.

(01:55:30):
But anyway back to confirming it, no confirmed planets, disputed
defrie discs. There have been some indications of debris disks,
but how would they get their food and water containing

(01:55:53):
distary disks potentially assisted with planetary formation. However, these phone
has something beauty and attributed to background confusion. The system
is located in a southern constellation of Reticulum visible in

(01:56:15):
the southern hemisphere ducks nights. Okay, have we got a
picture star map? So where would they be living if
there's no planet there and the debris disputed as errors

(01:56:39):
or in the background noise. But now we've got James
wed telescope, shoultainly be able to confirm that one hundred percent.
You see what I'm saying. Is there any water? Because
they really need water, don't chair for life and location,

(01:57:06):
they should be able to detect that well. No plants
have been definitely discovered. If like planet was where to
exist within the habble zone of Eva Star, it could
potentially have a liquid water and habal planets. Therefore, water

(01:57:29):
is a topic of interest. Yeah, I know, that's that's
what I put in there. They confirmed planets have about
water that we're trying to find out water in facts

(01:57:58):
and related stories. Where there is water, I think it
really exists. It should reside in the stars. Have all
saying where there there's water, it's a fair distance away.

(01:58:23):
Thirty nine light years. That's kind of fair distance, you know,
the nearest one to us that is four light years.
What was the location Proxymo? Was it? Okay, let's see,

(01:58:44):
let's it. There's so many, so many angles to the
story and things that you need to branch off and
gave the information didn't come back, right, This is what
I'm doing now, but certainly expanding on the story more

(01:59:07):
than I expected to. Today. Here we go. We've got
a nap pretty sure. I can see it on my cameras,
all the specs of light anyway, it's good images. So

(01:59:31):
there's the one that she drew BBC Night Sky. Of course,
we're looking back in time as well, thirty nine light years,
so it takes all that time for the light to

(01:59:53):
come to us. So we're looking back in the past.
If there was disks foreman planets, that could have happened.
But then the aliens could have been living for a

(02:00:14):
long time before we see it happening and coming towards
us somehow with some new evance fast technology. Right, so
they visiting us. But when we look in that star system,
it's still in the past, so we're not seeing currently
what's happening let's see, look at this BBC thing. What's

(02:00:43):
it doing? So this alpha beta gamma is it yamma
alpha beta? What's that one epsilon epsilon? And what's that one?

(02:01:04):
Amager C two C one? S At the stars we
got coming up here? Is it coming up? Twenty twenty five?

(02:01:27):
That's pretty current. It's funny how we're just talking about
it now. Suddenly it's coming up not too long ago.
Is that synchronicity in the UFO field or not? But
biny Peer cannot be seen from the UK, but certainly

(02:01:49):
we're seeking out. If you find yourself under the southern hemisphere. Hey, presto,
that's pool Cap be seen clearly as a double star?
Is it? Those two? They've got a cloud. But look

(02:02:14):
all the stars behind and all around. You know, it's
amazing what you can see. It's just tons and tons
of stars out there. But when we're led to believe
that every star has a solar system around it, so

(02:02:35):
this sort of contradicts that if that's the case. Almost also,
but the one that we're interested in happens doesn't happen
if they have it, And let me just check that
up personally, I've heard the claim all star systems are

(02:02:57):
said to have one or two planets around it. Do
all stars? See what if the AI kits and have
planet I'll just say planets. Still, all stars have planets orbited?

(02:03:21):
Try that simple term. They are should chicken. Well, it's
widely believed that most stars have planets, it's not definitely
proven that every star does. Current research suggests that vast
realogy of stars likely host planetree system that detection limitations

(02:03:43):
and possibly of certain star types lacan planets, meaning we
can't say it's universal rule. Evidence suggests planet formation is common.
Astronomers have discovered exto planets orbit and other stars around
a significant percentage of stars observed detection limits. It's difficult

(02:04:07):
to strictly observe experlients because they are small and fake
compared to the stars, so it's still an exception to
the rule if that's the case, or in this case,
that they're too small to be seen. Still sounds like

(02:04:31):
James wed should really be aimed at that location. But
can it get to the I don't know, let's put
that in as a question. So much, so much to
learn and so much to figure out and see where
the bullshit is? Yeah?

Speaker 6 (02:05:00):
Ok?

Speaker 1 (02:05:03):
MS a weird space telecoat. See sta riticulately stars. Let's see,
we ain't got a kicking it. What's that? Okay, we

(02:05:28):
don't need James webs to see binary stars that make
up Sita. The extra solar extra solar plants have been spotted,
but THEITAR two was led to. Okay, let's just have

(02:05:50):
a quick look at that one. See obviously someone's been
asking the same question all the same thinking as I've
done here to look into its so here someone says, Unfortunately,

(02:06:16):
all genes we would be able to see would be
widely separated gas giants, and those would have been seen already.
This is a barinary star sism. But the stars are
three seven fifty au apart, so it would be surprised

(02:06:37):
if neither had any planets. None have been detected so far,
and that one was that three years ago. None have
been detected sofa. But I would think that smaller plants
that we are unable to detect are still possible, so

(02:06:59):
we can can't rule it out. It's just that mean
we haven't detected it incaurse we're looking back in time too,
so they could have famed. So they could be fairly
famed the way now millions of years ago. I don't know,

(02:07:27):
thirty nine light years. Let's speed a light had to
calculate into real time? What is thirty nine light years?

(02:07:55):
So it's really soon. It's like looking back thirty nine
years in the distance. That's going to be a big number.

(02:08:16):
Well you've actually got a calculator for it, and that
many meters. Okay, mall that's called a big number of miles?
What else can we go lotical? Well, what's the biggest
number we got there? That's it? So two we're fourteen series.

(02:08:42):
It's a big number, isn't it a really really big number? Uh?
Sevy one years? Take in a conventional rocket, of course

(02:09:07):
then it would it's not conventional conventional, that's not his.
So either I'll just put them they'll fix it up.

(02:09:27):
That's that's so it's done. Some calculations here U through
rockets trouble. I would still take around twenty seven thousand

(02:09:52):
years to travel one light year in a regular rocket,
is that what they're saying? And one million years to
travel if it's a plane. But again, you've got to celeration.
Does it take it into account acceleration that you're always

(02:10:13):
accelerating anyway? So that means you've got plenty of time.
How does that work out? Though? Is it really thirty
looking back? Is it really looking at back thirty nine
years thirty line light years? Oh, it's got to be

(02:10:43):
like you know, thirty nine light years away. It's good.
It can't be. We've seen it like thirty nine years ago.
So really it's not really much, is it. I'm just
trying to wrap this around my head forgetting something. If
the light takes thirty nine years, it's going to be

(02:11:05):
looking back at least forty years like that, which is
not really long time in the past, is it. It's
looking back on telescope, It's going to be thirty nine years,
isn't it. Yeah, listen to the beginning there. If I

(02:11:41):
could teleport to a plant which is city US away,
how long would it take to go really quick to
our thousands of years? How many light years away? Can

(02:12:04):
a telescope so doing years away more than thirteen doing
light years away? So it's thirteen doing years old. That's

(02:12:31):
getting complicated now. So yeah, I don only have to
be looking back thirty nine years. So if there was
a planet, we would know about it, yep, so, but
it would take ourselves years to get there at current technology,
and that kind of makes sense, doesn't it. So if

(02:12:52):
we're not seeing it, then it's not there unless it's
too small to be detected. So that's the fact of
it all. Talk about deep deep dive. So yeah, what
do these guys think? Kate? How's it going? Good evening

(02:13:17):
to you? You're on YouTube one hundred and fifty proceeds
the seventies. Okay, so Phil be fifty. Thank you join
us from Rumble. It's very rare to get anyone from
Rumble joined us. It's just a story, Okay. Anythink we've mister, Yeah,

(02:13:48):
I used to the guys for the telescopes. I've only
got the cameras, so yeah, telescopes are fairly new to me.
But even though we're looking in the past, it's thirty
nine years in the past. So if there was something there,
we should know about it. But if we want to

(02:14:09):
go there, forget about it, because there's no way we
can get there unless even it's speed of light, you're
going to be thirty nine years older time you get there.
So even it's speed light, it's not fast enough. But

(02:14:31):
if it's four light years away, and then it's doable,
isn't it. So it's four years there, four years back
if you could travel the speed of light, which is proximer. Right. Anyways,
do we keep on reading this.

Speaker 5 (02:14:46):
Or one archived is www dot stealth skater dot com
slash documents.

Speaker 1 (02:14:53):
Okay, looks like it's lost our place. But yeah, interesting story.
Now it looks like it's diving into south the seat
seat stuff where we got to a similate. It sounds
a bit stupid. If you asked me, you wouldn't need
much of a scientist to develop that, right, Come on,

(02:15:18):
I think any hobby, yes, in the backyard. That's backyard,
and then they could build something like that that tips
it back and forth. It's just stupid, and it's just stupid. Okay.
So yeah, we're trying to figure out the stars, weren't we.

(02:15:41):
So where's the two binary stars? There's one there? Elson,
It's says, look at this silly map, So where's the
two stars there and there? Well that's then also, so

(02:16:15):
we've seen it this direction. That must be C one
and C two. Would say, then there was some other
stuff on the real map we should should really have overlaid.
Shouldn't we see how close it matches. But then we
talked about three D starts here. It should be like

(02:16:39):
a three D map. It shouldn't be like a a
two D map because it doesn't sort of work, does it. Yeah,
the aliens would have to convert it from a three
D map and say, well, this is how you see
it from your perspective KHM, and then draw it. And

(02:17:14):
we know there's a lot more stars out there than
we can see now, and what else is in this book?
Let's just skill it here. But okay, that's at the
star system there. Yeah, what's going on here? Stop scrolling?

(02:17:40):
What is that stupid computer? Yea so grease red dwarf

(02:18:02):
conservation equeri us. It's a good song in the age
of the Querious. Yes, I think we might dive into

(02:18:22):
that topic. I've never knowing. Actually, I've got the Stone
maps and what we now know compared to what we
knew back at sixties and Betty Bonney Hill and who

(02:18:45):
figured out what the stars rere? So what is the
problem with the stars though? And there was some problem
with the stonemp what's he doing that? Doing something crazy?

(02:19:06):
Storm it storm it? So it's still so crazy? Here,
go away it. We don't want you that's keeps doing
that and not doing anything. We've been taken over by
the men in black. It's going to open a game

(02:19:29):
bite itself. Oh, I think we might be done with
that reader anyway. Uh, we're used to what we can
do under feat Yes, I guess so it's not even

(02:19:52):
let me close it. Disclose it there now, what's going
to happen now? It's a good Christian was then look up?
I forgot now after all that I was to look up,

(02:20:13):
I've totally forgot what I was going to do now
because of that era and oh yeah, problems with the stomach. Okay, uh,

(02:20:35):
what are the problems? We're bitties starm it the truth.
Since Sisters relings to him as such a sleeper group,

(02:20:57):
it's almost impossible that the remblance of between Betty's and
reality could be because vincense. Okay, let's just go thee

(02:21:19):
just on the skeptic saying this, or have we actually
got factual proof that the nap is wrong for Siti
ridiculi um seems like too much reading though, so that's

(02:21:43):
what she drew. Rea drawn vision of betty stomach. Amiens
imest a old planet is one of the two spheres.

(02:22:09):
What sph trade routes. Dotted lines are exploration routes. So
where's our sun there? Well? There, because we talked at

(02:22:38):
it before, didn't we That was too close to be us.
That look like something small next to it? So where's
our son and that? Yeah? Does it's? What? It makes sense? Now?

(02:22:58):
Does it?

Speaker 4 (02:23:04):
Not?

Speaker 1 (02:23:04):
Very good? Fonts? That dimmed it down from our eyes?
That goes on of its So yeah, it doesn't include

(02:23:27):
our sun at all in this map? Does it? Ah? Right?
The sun? Okay, it does? So that was that line there? Uh?
Oh man, it's reading here drawn from memory. Yeah, so

(02:23:56):
the lines are going to be wrong unless it's really
implemented and you brain right. So if that line was here,
then that wouldn't be that star there. Then they'd find
some other star to map up here. I think it
would be too hard to prove a drawing anyway. That

(02:24:26):
page is just too weirdly. We just want some little
bullet points. What's that say there? I didn't no claim
that the aliens are from was determined from his sturmach later. Okay,

(02:24:54):
let's just have a quick look there. Looks like this
whole show's turning out to be j rod, but I
think very much have to put it on the back burner.
Reality Betty. Okay, so that's a fairly good comparison. So

(02:25:15):
that's what she drew. So that's saying that doesn't match there,
I said what they're trying to say there, I get
the map at the gas station. Okay, what's this robots?

(02:25:43):
I don't know. Betty didn't copy it from the reality diagram.
The Reality Giant was deliveredy drawing like Betty's drawing instead.
I think I didn't know. Claim that the means are
from Seati Sita. It was determined from the Stirmitt. Later,

(02:26:07):
the star labels were determined by a school teacher who
built models of stir near the sun and tried to
see which Advance's point matched the sturmit. The main argument
against this by Carl Sagan and many others is that
you can draw the same lines on any random points

(02:26:30):
in the sky. That'd be a good thing to show
in a documentary, wouldn't it actually do that duplicated and
see draw any pattern and see if he can match
it up with anything. Argument for the stirmit is how
this line of the key star like stars centered since

(02:27:00):
the time of the original argument. We've got more accurate
data and updated the positions of these stars. They no
longer resemble the drawing map. And even schoolteacher was originally
proposed who originally proposed it, now rejects this match. Well,
there you go, and that's what we wanted. Shocking that

(02:27:23):
the great minds of you, those wire fell for any fall,
for any old shite. So even the school teacher now
doesn't say it's matches Sita. So that then discounts the

(02:27:45):
planet's theory. Then, so it may be what she was told,
but it may represent another chunk of the sky where
there is actually planet's orbit, and so that changes the
whole story completely. So it still makes it plausible on
my mind. Doesn't discount her story being wrong. It just

(02:28:06):
means that they're trying to match it to reality, which
is wrong. And the skeptics will say, well, she made
it all up. You know, anyone can draw lines. But yeah, anyway,
let's move on to the next part of this and

(02:28:27):
move it on a bit further faster. We can always
come back with the other stuff I had queued up
here another day, but anyway, have again for time. It
feels like a long time looking at this stuff, trying
to wrap our head around everything, right, YouTube was it

(02:28:51):
doing up there at at the moment? So two and
a half hours just on that whole story there does
seem highly suspects. I don't believe the flight similators should
be basic with that on a ball, and you don't
need a scientist for that. If it was like replicating

(02:29:15):
the anti gravity and making a small model that has
high voltage going to it because they can't get the
power supply to make it work, then yes, that would
make more sense. But a mechanical thing. Of course, the

(02:29:43):
silly names as well, Jay Brants, because you drew that
symbol and the thing and not giving them real names.
What's all the other problems with no one sa actually
confirmed each other saying sectly the same thing. So no

(02:30:10):
one from the same meeting, that's the other problem with it.
Just need two or three people really just come save
where I was there and it's correct. All the information

(02:30:30):
comes after all the other information from Betty Bernie Hill
and all that in the past. Bubblazar we're talking about
nineteen ninety nine. By then Bubbla has been out, so
some other kook comes along and makes up a story
to get publicity and try and make money of it,

(02:30:50):
or hired by the government to pump the story even
further because they've got some black ops being cited by
people now because of Area fifty one being exposed by Lazare.
So yeah, it kind of makes more sense that they

(02:31:11):
have more disinformation agents go out there, and that's probably
where Richard Doughty comes from as well. But you got
that side of the story. We also got real cases
like Benny and Bernie Hill that we have to explain,

(02:31:32):
and other reduction cases and all that. To discount them.
It's a little bit harder because they're so sure what happens,
and there's physical evidence left behind, like the car had
physical evidence that couldn't couldn't be debunked as something normal happened,

(02:32:02):
like the car itself. But anyway, we better move on.
What's this bullshit popping down here? Anyway? What was this one?
The j rod Enigma? Okay, it looks like another version

(02:32:27):
of the story and it's this skin. J Rod is
a tall, slender owen with large omen eyes. He's said
to be some more information here. He's said to be
to have been a survivor of a UFA crash in
Kingdom Arizona in nineteen fifty three. So again that's all

(02:32:49):
comes back to the other problem I have is sounds
like he was a pilot or crew member in the UFA.
He's not going to know all the science behind the
actual craft itself. I just don't believe it unless they're
all like robots with AI and the same knowledge of

(02:33:12):
where they can actually build a UFO. But that's not
been mentioned in the stories, Like Jay Rider hasn't said
Jay Ryder is actually artificial intelligence of thus storage of
libraries in its brain where it can actually build these

(02:33:33):
UFOs from scratch. Hasn't come across a story like that, right,
That would be more believable then, But their story is
like a creature that's able to know all about how
the UFO works, which I don't believe. And the Kingman

(02:33:55):
Arizona crashes, I think maybe that one has probably one
of the more legit cases of a crash UFO, though
again that probably needs to be looked in a bit deeper. Again,
I know there's been a lot of stuff that have
been faked, like the Aztec UFO crash that was fake story,

(02:34:19):
but the Kingdom I haven't really heard too much about
that one. Let's see just putting debunt. Let's see what

(02:34:39):
comes up. Then it says the UFO crash. Okay, his
name comes out. A plot in this one says the
UFO crash May twenty first, So he's actually got a
date about eight miles north east of the Kingland air

(02:35:00):
thoughts okay I got ai kicking annd of that where
a UFO legiedly crashed near king and Arizona is not
officially debunked, but is considered by many to be a
hoax or highly questionable. Why. Some claim it was significant
events rivaling roswell, with witnesses, a recovered craft, the government involved.

(02:35:26):
There's no credible evidence to support these claims. UFO research
and the historians say argue the story is likely based
on misinterpretations of radar anomalies or other conventional events. There's
some more details. What's claimed witnesses, some claim notable witnesses

(02:35:49):
or the UFA crash, government environment crash craft details, thirty
foot secreency clings snatched into air fifty one. Why is
that questional? Lack of official confirmation, contradictionary explanations. Some agre

(02:36:11):
the crash was likely caused by experimental radar installations, not
a UFO. What's that actually mean? They talk about some
iron the sky balloon like a Chinese balloon that crashed.

(02:36:34):
Questional evidence evidence, often caught cited is based on anadocal accounts,
not rarefiable facts. Similar hoaxes. The Kingland incidence shares similar
with other well known hoaxes like the Aztec crash. That
sounds very similar because that one was also meant to

(02:36:55):
be like come down with the radar hit it or
some experimental reader being lack of credible witnesses, okay? I
eighteen Kingwin UFA incident. UFA riders have speculated that if

(02:37:23):
the Kingwin's was true, then maybe the nuclear tests in
Nevada coursed the unknown craft to being not fifty three. Okay,
but that's well after World War Two, isn't it. It's interesting.

Speaker 7 (02:37:51):
Michael King donated five pounds through super Chat.

Speaker 1 (02:37:56):
Thanks n no message. I was writing for it to
read out a message. Thanks. You've donated quite a bit today, yeah,
ten pounds. I'm not sure if there's any other ones,
was it? I think there was one before then, wasn't he?
Was that twenty pounds today? Thanks a lot. I'll have

(02:38:17):
to check it out that later. Yeah, lots to think
about and lots to research and sort of link. Right,
So let's go back to that article. Let's going on here.

(02:38:45):
After the crash, Jaybrid was taken to Area fifty one,
where he helped scientists and engineers to reverse engineer the
aiming technology, which I'm saying is bullshit. So I said
to have shared knowledge about the home planet, that is plausible,
especially if he's got some sort of pocket computer or

(02:39:05):
crystal as some people say that produces holograms. A recent
documentary and History Channel which is bullshit channel now, isn't
it Because they did the mockery on the Mermaids, the
Yetti and Bigfoot and all sorts of crap like that,
And it was actually not taken seriously since then. So

(02:39:28):
anything on the History Channel is meant to be researching vetted,
it isn't. So any UFO story on there is not
going to be vetted properly. Really, interest in the town's
sparked for speculation. According to an author, Preston, then it's

(02:39:50):
the extraterrestrial allegedly worked at Area fifty one, so he
believes the story. For some years he went on Jay
Rodd's job was to this technology that was reportedly from
nineteen fifty three. Given the technology that we need today,
most of electronic devices we are using today, we know

(02:40:12):
that's bullshit. A lot of it's done for human experimentation
and research, and we know lead technology that we're use
in right now. And the Internet was invented by humans
even before five octots was around. So, yeah, it looks

(02:40:37):
like he's an interview here is it with a third
phase on the moon? Is it? Let's take a chance.
Is that it one second? I haven't there thirty seconds.
I didn't play any of it. Yeah, I don't trust anything.

(02:40:59):
Then it has to say because he's been on said
face all right.

Speaker 4 (02:41:04):
Day Rod, isn't it?

Speaker 1 (02:41:06):
Here we go? We've got some music, So I wonder
what it's from History Channel? That's a copy right.

Speaker 4 (02:41:12):
Alien who are allegedly he worked at Area fifty one
over a period.

Speaker 1 (02:41:21):
We'll keep puts on it for years. And now this
guy's a weaver, a strange cookie. He's married to a
woman he claims is alien hybrid. So and that's what
we found out from el Gray. We're not seeing any

(02:41:45):
of that story, have we How he met the woman
and our boy. She's a hybrid.

Speaker 4 (02:41:51):
It was jay Rod's mission or duty.

Speaker 1 (02:41:57):
So jay Rod's got a mission. Well that's really not
his name though, that's just what the humans labeled as.
So really he should be saying the humans called this
j Robert. The alien's mission was it would have made
more sense of a statement.

Speaker 4 (02:42:17):
To help reverse engineer technology alogy That was apparently from
the nineteen fifty three.

Speaker 1 (02:42:29):
Yes, he's just repeating what's in the text. Yeah, yeah, this,
let's see what's known about his wife being a home
bridge pressed? How do you spell his name a press tent? No,
that's not it. Can't think of Harry's name spelled now

(02:42:59):
totally blank on it? President pent precedent. Where was it now? Are? Yeah?
Press instant precedent. That's dem donuts just copy that. I

(02:43:24):
got too many tabs open now. I think I got
to close somewhere, but it never scrolls properly. This thing
that hasn't even got the one we just opened ups.
I've got to keep opening a new tab just to
get to it. Now, where's it going to? OK? We space?

(02:43:47):
We could use one of these, uh wife, how brid?
That's what I was told anyway, Maybe it's not meant
to be known. But el Gray's dead now, so it

(02:44:07):
doesn't really matter. I guess. So she might be from Mexico.
Maybe that's what they mean that says alien from South
America or something in hybrid. Let's see, is there anything

(02:44:28):
known about his wife publically? It's still a bit hybrid?
Amiens there not a bet his wife. That's probably still

(02:44:51):
top secret, is it?

Speaker 4 (02:44:55):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (02:44:55):
Let's see.

Speaker 4 (02:44:58):
M hm.

Speaker 1 (02:45:00):
Hm, it's got he's saying YouTube channel, isn't he? M hmm?
Is that talking about him? Here? Just SUCU see bear

(02:45:24):
to a Asian Japanese woman? Is h hasn't got anything
about his wife? Is there's three hundred YouTube videos discussing mhm,

(02:46:07):
who's Margaret? She? That's my wife? These are dis little
snippets coming up. I don't think I haven't heard said
face going about it. When you heard it from il

(02:46:29):
Gray in private, it's now public. Information has to come
clean now if it's not out there now, I'm not

(02:46:51):
seeing anything that sticks out there. Storing and literature. Yeah,
I'm not too sure about that guy at all, but

(02:47:12):
I have to place some of those down at some stage.
Let's go back to the scrap here a navy pilot. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

(02:47:34):
So if he's a navy pilot, where would he build
a mechanical simulator? Uh? Direct communication my crew board. Just

(02:48:01):
you know, we've covered all that already and we just
keep on going. So we're two to four foot tall humanoids.
That doesn't sound like a tall white to me, A
tall gray, I mean uh, because they were saying that
his was a tall Jay Rudd was a tall gray

(02:48:26):
and they're not saying that here. You almost need like
AI to feed it onto and say what are the connections?
What are they? What things conflict? And then had to
break it all down quite quickly, couldn't you no concrete evidence? Yes,

(02:48:50):
that's what we're sort of coming to the conclusion off
of this story here. Now, that's that one. I can't
get rid of that one. Now we're getting onto the
photographs which I fake. So apparently this one here come

(02:49:12):
out alleged photograph of j Rod Amen a special effects hoax.
More pictures of the fix masters creating Amien dummy. Now,
if you look at that, it kind of looks like
it's glued on, doesn't It looks like some human latex
mask or silicon mask that looks like we're really poor

(02:49:35):
effix makeup. If you ask me something you buy from
a costumes shop where someone's actually wearing it looks like
a human eye behind there, though, although you could put
context lenses in that looks like a normal human eye there.
We're pupil behind the mask. It's not This is obviously

(02:49:56):
meant to be all blacked out, right. I suppose you
would have to insert contact lens or some kind there
when you or sunglasses or something. Uh. Photo sharing above
posted on Coast to Coast the conspiracy what do you

(02:50:22):
call it? Radio show? The photos actually invented inverted photograph
or special effects amien. So it goes on a but here,
So Coast to Coast got called out, called out on it,
and let's just skim through it. UFA magazine, which is

(02:50:47):
that guy what's his name, Bill Birch or whatever his
name is his? That was the UFO Hunter's Show has
published an investigation into dan bridge risk story as they expected,
very rich Clean's trip all over themselves. So that disproves

(02:51:10):
that Jay Rod's story is coublers, isn't it. UFA loon
has been exposed well. Coast to Coast am has never
posted a correction surprise, surprise about the bogus picture. Nor
has Linda Mottlehowe. The UFA magazine magazine at least sets

(02:51:30):
its readers straight. So that's Bill. Although it's never named
the source of the information regarding the bogus photograph, which
was this website, Faun the parts ter will lay out
this website by the way of the nation gut of

(02:51:54):
the Busk photograph for this one challenged him to a
polygraphics and can now be flushed. So he's not going
to do that because he lied about the photograph. While
it may be easy to challenge such a flawed story

(02:52:19):
searching for the truth, this is what we're doing. When
in the last few months there has been much controversy
surrounding a man named dan Ak Dan Crane who claims
to be a microbiologist we can for s budget project.

(02:52:40):
So didn't that come from Linda Miltle how At first?
It must have been so obviously she's been called out too.
Then my eyes are just getting bad looking at all this.
So here's the original color photograph, BOYFX whatever it is,

(02:53:04):
and they flipped it and made it black and white.
There you go and degrade it a wee bit put
some artificial noise through it. Now, this is what hoaxes do,
all right, They go side both side the other noise.

(02:53:26):
They added to it special effects. So there that one's
the bunks moving on, and so is that guy. And
this is the other famous one. Everybody's probably seen. Men,

(02:53:47):
he got one person on YouTube. Now getting a bit late,
does it? So I questioned this one in the past, right,
and I saw problems with it straight away. They for
this thing here on the side they're writing on side.

(02:54:09):
If you're looking at the curvature of three D objects,
this looks too flat to be shown that way. I'd
have to bend with the the shape of the plane.
And this is clearly not bending anything. It's not deforming
or anything like that. Saying with the name, the name

(02:54:30):
should have been going more this direction. Alignment of the
name should have been more of that direction, right, it's
really shabby, shabby work. I think I tried to try
and find the plane in question with the person standing
up here, and we can do a lot better now

(02:54:53):
with AI, of course, But years ago I tried to
search this plane to see similar plane out there or
helicopter that could have been edited to make it look
like thing. But I think someone's actually scanned it in

(02:55:15):
from a book that's not publicly the image is not
publicly available on the net. Part from the vision they
put out, I reckon they got it from some old
World War two story from someone's own personal collector that
hasn't been scanned in on the web and been used.

(02:55:37):
That's my personal feeling where I couldn't find a match
at the time because they knew back then that already
there was pattern a graphic matching on the Internet happening
back in nineteen ninety nine or two thousand's right, that's

(02:55:57):
when it started coming out as a tool. There wasn't
Google wasn't the first. There was Tinai. But yeah, even
the hands here looks wrong, looks like the aving hands
coming down. There's so much wrong with this image. The

(02:56:20):
lighting doesn't look right. It looks like it's been darkened
on the face here, which doesn't make any sense. And
yet his arms are highlighted, but his face isn't. There's
all sorts of problems with it, and of course how

(02:56:41):
blurry it is. And that's the wrong. Fonts that use
they use like stencils when they sprayed on stuff on
the side of the planes. Let's see if we can

(02:57:02):
actually find a match, uh name, Let's have a lot
name on side of World War two plane. See what

(02:57:22):
we can find. Both sides employed a variety of aircraft,
including what's even coming up for what's some pictures? Really? Okay,

(02:57:47):
there we go. You can see how it bends around
with the shape of the plane. So that's a number
of bombs or kills. I'd say it would be kills.
You can see the name goes with the length of
the craft on an angle, not straight, and you can

(02:58:10):
see that sort of deformed the weaver. So there's one example.
And even the triangle you can see is not like
the other one's printed Jay Rodwin. You see it's on
an angle as well, and you can see there's some

(02:58:31):
deformity going on. So what else we got anything else? Here?
You go another one. You can see everything sort of
blends in with the same sort of blariness and matches

(02:58:53):
the angles. You can see it's going raises up and
goes around like that, and you can see how they've
done it there and there where that it's like some
sort of change in the orientation of the stencil. I
suppse they would have done stencil could have been hand

(02:59:15):
painted on that one. Uh. There's another one that's more
in line with the body as well, and the quality
sort of matches, sort of really matches the grain of

(02:59:36):
the photograph. There's normal stenciled on stuff. I like painting

(02:59:58):
girls on the side, didn't they ding hell? Sounds like uh,
Chinese on a plane. You can see the angles of
the letteran this time painting went on on a plane.

(03:00:27):
You can see it's consistent with the grain of the
photograph and the lighting. There's another one sing in the grain.
You can actually see the rivets of the plane going
through the drawing. So let's go back to another picture

(03:00:58):
yet so you can clear they see there is panels
going down this way, but we can't see it showing
through the painting off the thing on top. So it
looks like, you know, there's some rivets here. You can
see this looks sharper than the background. It's not sort

(03:01:23):
of faded like the other images we looked at. It
looks like they've tried to fade it a little bit
more up the top here, but again it's not going
it should be going in the direction of this line
here where the rivet panel is they wouldn't have it
painted in the wrong direction. It looks stupid. It would

(03:01:45):
look stupid. Should be going on an angle that way,
and that would be also tilted underneath it. So if
that's going that way, then this would be tortured. So
it's symmetrical underneath the name whatever that's meant to be.

(03:02:13):
What does it mean to be Present Planet System? Maybe
or TR three B. Yeah, that faces that just looks

(03:02:36):
so stupid, and that looks like it's been pasted on.
It's like something from Amien. They're not Aliens. It's like
something from Predator, almost, doesn't it. Yeah, there's what's wrong

(03:03:01):
with that? Anyway? I asked the AI about it, and
I thought, I try Jack GPT and rock whether it's
called so yeah, so it starts at the top of here.

(03:03:28):
I asked that why is the image fake? I noticed
the side writing is not correct for a plane body,
and then it says, yeah, here's the image you're referring
to based on low resolution and the details are visible.
Here are several reasons why the photo is almost certainly

(03:03:48):
not genuine and why the side writing on the full
of large looks off. Of course, it's brought up a
different photograph of the circle, so it wasn't the same
image I submitted. Have I got it here? No, I've

(03:04:09):
just had it here. I've just showed it before and
we didn't have a red circle around it like that one,
So I questioned the AI about that later. As you
can see, So it's put down here visual consistency, optical
artifacts of red circle and last around amy figure and
plane side raid and all suffer from mismatched resolutions and

(03:04:31):
Latin well obviously the circles from some sort of UFO
hoax channel. And it looks like it's even worse images
than I've got it. Yeah, incorrect letterin and aircraft makings.

(03:04:57):
Airlin military make is on craft typically follow standardization fonts,
spasin and placement. Well, we just looked at some images
that's not actually true where it's been painted on by
the men in World War two. So this is where
AI goes wrong, right. It's a good test though. See

(03:05:21):
a lot of people type in tell me what's wrong
with this image now online and they just take the
AI's word for it. So all this here is meaningless. Really,
genuine aircraft have carefully marked out stencil placements. It does
if it's a government markets, but normally it's added on

(03:05:42):
by the pilots and crew members after right, lack of
credible sources. Well, we know that the figure j RID
associated Area fifty one especially is widely understood to be
part of a hoax or specul flow. Yep, we just
followed all that through too. Common signs of digital hopes.

(03:06:07):
Outline around the figure and the red circle are hallmock
signs of obvious photo editing. Yeah, you think so? This
is how stupid AI is, Okay, just to keep it
gain in short, the side writing is a red flag.
That's what I thought, not just because it's wrong for

(03:06:28):
any aircraft, but because it reflects the lack of design
accuracy and authentic sensity, combined with suspicious editing queues and
lack of verification. And I said here the red circle
was not on the image I shared, though you're absolutely right,

(03:06:49):
the red circle does not appear, and there is no
image you linked. That version shows a greeny, black and
white photo of what appears to be a blary air craft,
a small humanoid figure descending stairs or ramp, some vague

(03:07:09):
markings on the aircraft futlarged, no red circle, is present
in that copy. Red circle was added in later rural reposts,
specially in YouTube videos and conspiracy blogs. So why is
your version still fake? Here's a breakdown incorrect, So it's

(03:07:34):
going through the same thing. Are poorly lines and strangely
placed black standard military stand font which is not true,
appear too high and too flat. Yet that's true, not
conforming to typically curvature based distortions. Yep, that's what I noticed.

(03:07:57):
And that alien shadow depth and perspective figure scenes flat
and inconsistent with the grain offs around an image. Lighting
on the Amien does not match the light on the
aircraft the head and a saggeratedly charl cartoonish compared to

(03:08:20):
what rural camera compression out effects would preserve prominence. Yeah,
lack of support and photographs if they were real, more
photos from the same scene would exist, witnesses, video or
leaked documents would be cited. None of it's covered up.

(03:08:44):
I suppose they might smuggle out one photo of a collection.
I suppose it's easy to smuggle out a photo, wrap
it around you as you are and hide it under
a slee evil something. But when you get padded down
before you left Area fifty one or scanned, and wouldn't

(03:09:06):
it pick up a little square thing underneath your cloven?
I don't know it would to today, But nothing beyond
this blurry was surface twenty years ago. Jay Rudder is
part of this long standard EREA fifty one myf suparsely

(03:09:28):
amen scientists who work with humans propalyzed by people like Dan,
which were just proven as bullshitter and claims. We're never
verified and have been widely debunked. Conclusion, even without the
red circle, that images fake or staged. Okay, so that's

(03:09:50):
what GPT does said, so it was mostly there once
they questioned about the red circle. We have been there,
all right, This is no what what did I disclose?

(03:10:10):
A close? Summch Uh? Do I have two copies?

Speaker 4 (03:10:19):
No?

Speaker 1 (03:10:26):
I thought I closed it all right, We're close to
a third phase by mistake. Is how stupid I clicked?
I thought I clicked over the right tab. And we
can just bring up said phase again. I don't know

(03:10:50):
if we're going to get there today again, but they
can always wait because this is always easy to solve,
isn't it. What if they got up there at the
moments breaking news the same red arrows biological UFOs garbage

(03:11:15):
breaking new tsunami warning, Yeah, bettle for disclosure, bullshit of
dot degree. So there's not really much there that we
didn't look at already anyway, so they can keep no doubt.
They've got few videos here. Okay, this is what GROPS

(03:11:38):
it about the image. That's the same questions fake due
to the imagery of Fishers, association with J Roight amen escape.
I didn't tell it what it was, but obviously it
picked it up from that in the title after the

(03:11:59):
name of the proto. It's widely regarded as a fake
due to several issues. Lack of prominence yeap, visual charist exism,
suggest digital manipulation without directly analyzing the image, so GROP
can't actually look at images it cannot view it. Typically,

(03:12:24):
issues with alleged omien photographs includes signs of digital alterations
such a consistent motor, unnatural textures, pesimization around the subject.
So it's not as good as jet GPT but anyway,
a narrative inconsistent and lack of evidence. Yeah yeah yeah.

(03:12:48):
Media influence. Image and its story drew heavily on well
known sci fi cropics, tropes of j Bridge description, mirror
and aliens, and popular media, So we've covered that already,
Betty Barney Hill and sci fi writers absence of scientific validation,

(03:13:15):
So all this just puts more and more doubts on
the one percent of alien stuff that can't be the
blank right, And this is just it's just these people
making lots of money off this topic. It's just disgusting, really, Okay,
And I said the angle of the name on the

(03:13:36):
side of the plane looks wrong for the direction of
the jet body. You pointed out a pacific issue with
the image the angle of the name, So he doesn't
know because it can't look at image. This is a
common red flag and replated or fake images. Perspective and

(03:13:57):
alignment issues here we know all this clight and shadow
because context of the image. Yeah. Common. Yeah. Without directly
viewing the image, I can't analyze specific angle or text placement.
Why not? This is where AI is going to be useful.

(03:14:20):
What did I say? How can you view it? It
says I can't like humans do, as I don't have
access to visual data in the same way. However, I
can't analyze images if they are uploaded or described in detail,
and I can evaluate related to information from web and

(03:14:41):
xposts so the rock basically is based its information from
such as texts only, not actual the graphic itself, which
is a bit disappointing. Yeah, so yeah, this is just

(03:15:04):
something else. I ask it because mcquest did it all right.
I used the same question and I didn't get a reply,
not until I started replying to it, because it goes
back to the robots or AI thing. I said, who
are the most famous people to have followed me? Who

(03:15:28):
is the most famous person like one of my posts?
Blocked me, tagged me just the names will do, and
it didn't reply. So I posted this mc rest got
a reply suspect now as it says here it don't
have access to my account or lists. And then as

(03:15:49):
soon as I posted that, it gave me a list,
which is kind of funny because I've tried it. Grock.
You can open up a tab and talk to it
like you came with Jack t BT, or you can
do it like this where you tag it and it

(03:16:11):
gives a reply on the message. So the message one
finally responded only after I said this under it, Brandon
Fuel is my famous person that follows me. No famous
individual liked anything of mine, and Mickwest blocked me, which

(03:16:34):
we do though, and now he's unblocked me and Brandon
Fuel has tagged me. Ha ha ha it gave and
that gave in, then hahi gave in. Then ha ha.
This guy has issues too. I'm trying to figure out

(03:16:56):
your mutuals on X and IT made all this excuse,
which it gave it to me, the same excuse until
I did it as a comment from what I found.
X doesn't have a built in for teacher to show
mutual followers directly, which is honestly kind of a fame.

(03:17:20):
If you're more of a do you or I type,
you could go. So I got roughly the same answer anyway,
It did actually reply to that. So he's asked something similar,
who are my best mutuals here? On X? It said

(03:17:43):
didn't have access and I should because it replied to
that I have evolved since much. Well, actually I disc
asked the same question, got the same response. Now we're
better access to public X data for such creer reason,
no issues here, just upgrades. What's your take on Fugal

(03:18:04):
versus West and UFO debates? They are chicken because I've
tried to get them to debate frugal but I have
asked you directly in rock tab and said the same
as that guy's reply. But thanks apology for any confusion.

(03:18:30):
My capabilities have indeed expanded with updates and then deeper
data access. If the rock tap response lacked, try again here,
who's the they? You calling chicken here to elaborate? So

(03:18:53):
I left it at that, but yeah, you could try
it yourself and see if yeah, and then if it doesn't,
just say what other people got response, and then say
if it replies. But yeah, Macwist did do it and
it hasn't put a tag to him. Yeah, so it's

(03:19:21):
just going to see if he had special treatment. Then
at first it looked like he did until I complained,
Oh yeah, I should have done it the other way.
But anyway, if we go such mackquest, it's probably blocked me. Now, Uh,

(03:19:44):
why is it getting with request that's still foreign? Hasn't
blocked me yet? Well, I think I need to go toilet.
Must be getting that time over three hours and they

(03:20:06):
should be concidentual crisis and what's all the spoils that
he's posting it out? This politics sucks anyway, be down
here somewhere and this merit merit guy, I keep arguing

(03:20:33):
it's like kindergarten, kindergarten. Uh, he's probably deleted it now,

(03:20:57):
still debating that guy m and he's probably deleted here. Still,

(03:21:29):
I didn't see it. That's just one right. Uh, yeah,

(03:21:51):
that's funny here he would have got rid of that.
Let's just go through it again. I think it might
be a single line has one. I thought it was
before then h mm hm. Anyway, he got travers A

(03:22:43):
Taylor had blocked him as the famous person and uh,
Maverick is the one that most tagged him and liked
his videos and what else did he Yet most famous

(03:23:05):
person following it wasn't Brandon Fugel. It was someone else.
Yeh uh. That's sick. It should be a search that
shouldn't we famous famous and serial matches. I really needs

(03:23:32):
the leader that I think you got some crap about it.
That's the problem when people have delete stuff. That's where
you've got to take a snap shot. Ah Okay, I
just can't know what the famous person was because I

(03:23:58):
a need to do it for you. Of course when
it's I won't do it if you did it asking. Yeah,
I think it was before then, real and that it's
not there stuff you Nick, who doesn't wanted to show

(03:24:21):
that you asked that question anyway, It doesn't matter. I
don't think I pushed it under here to like that.
Try it out for yourself, save do it, Okay, I'm

(03:24:43):
talking about nominalies at Skinwalker, right. I think we're talking
a bit here that really should come after to recover
it today, might have to come back after go to
all at the three and a half hours have done
already and we haven't even looked at half the stuff,

(03:25:13):
just because again I've been using AI to question things
on skinwalkerage. All right, it's a bit of a news
clip here. Something is happening as us inventor who turns
plaster into gasoline gone listen, his mum goes public. So

(03:25:37):
I asked AI about this one too. He's in California,
I believe, what's his name, Julian Brown, twenty one, I
know from Atlanta, has been not since since July and

(03:26:01):
posting crypto videos saying he was under attack. Something is
happening him. Kept keep me in your prayers. I think
maybe his account was being attacked or something by sounds
of that now says here. I can't confirm Julie is safe,

(03:26:28):
but in the best interest of her security and not
able to provide any more information, she told the Daily Mail.
So he hasn't gone missing, he's just gone into hiding.
By the sounds of it, his disappearance. Spake to concerned
among his flowers for his safety of sounds like the

(03:26:51):
the engine that run off water, the guy that went
in the restaurant ate something and sead I've been poisoned
and then dies. So yeah, that's about his inspiration for
creating energy. Brown said, what motive motivated me was seeing

(03:27:12):
a large plastic issue at hand throughout the world. So
apparently he can dissolve the plaster into a liquid and
then convert it back into a fuel that can be
used in engines, which is not a bad idea. So

(03:27:34):
he's talking about landfills there. It received one hundred thousand
from Reddick code Crater. He created that go fundme to
finance his efforts, but in the way it was leeged Menison.
Go fund me donation rocketed to more than thirty thousand.

(03:27:58):
But that's not that's not mark compared to how will
other people use go fund me get They get millions
of dollars, don't they? I have been self taught in
turning plaster into fuel for five years. It's got a

(03:28:18):
special name, though, Did I actually post anything about it? Yeah?
Probably not. That sounds a bit like other disappearances that
we hear about in uphology, though. Is turning plastic received

(03:28:39):
ai answers plastic into fuel real? There we go, Yes,
turning plaster into fuel Israel and viable process connee chief
through Keema core recycling methods like piro cisus Boro pyrocisus.

(03:29:11):
I'm not sure if that's hey. So these techniques break
down plastic waste into smaller molecules which can then be
used to produce whereas fuels such as gasoline diesel, And
it makes sense because they make plastics from all, right,
carbon change makes it makes it so technically you should

(03:29:33):
be able to convert the plastic back into carbon change
or fuel. All that can be burnt. Ah sheese, it's
going crazy here. This involves heat and plastic waste into

(03:29:55):
in the absence of oxygen, causing it to decompose and
to gas us and liquid form, and the resultant all
can be further processed into fuels like gasoline and diesel.
So further all the plastic into a big oven that's

(03:30:18):
got no air in it and heat it similar to pyrolysis.
Gasification also breaks down plastics, producing a guess that can
be used as fuel. So you've got liquid to fuel

(03:30:40):
and gas fuel. Okay, so why aren't we doing that worldwide?
And we recycled on plastics where they dice it up
into bits, wash it and all that sort of stuff,

(03:31:00):
then reheat into slabs and they sell back I spoke
or pellets that they then can read, heat up and
then place into new molds. I guess, so that's a
fairly good So the Yeah, anyway, I gotta get toilet.

(03:31:23):
Here we go for time. I really need to cover
skin Walker runch, but it's getting a bit late. But yeah,
wonder if I could do it in an hour at
least I can do that much. And then we got
the Southern News. I'll come back and do that. I
think I can go for another hour. What can I

(03:31:55):
put up? Ping pong or something? Well, I'm gone, God,
my eyes sight's blurring. Day. I'm a bit right about
my eyesight. Just put spaces up. I have to catch
up in the cycle it so I do that when

(03:32:16):
I get back. Is it gone. Yeah, okay, little classic
retro game. M hmm, yeah, mm hmm, okay, let's stop that. Okay,

(03:35:24):
m hm, how do you get some nasal spread? Because
my nose is blocking up. It's crazually getting warm in here,
gradually moving closer to the sun. These guys are be
getting colder. Let's see where did we get to? Kate?

(03:35:45):
Thank you for your donation. Discord, This is all right,

(03:36:05):
you discorded me. I got it on quite not so privacy.
That quotely through the time is now making its presence known.
What's that one? Go oh goog on YouTube? Y'all? Hey

(03:36:30):
you Michael? So maybe I didn't miss anything much? Okay,
what's on, discord? Complicated business? Your chet isn't updating? By
the way, Yeah, because I scrolled up, the global chat
doesn't scroll up? Is it not updating? Still? Has it

(03:36:53):
gone wrong? What's the less coming on? I'm here? No,
it was your last comment? Hell do hell do you?
Hell do you? There's my sunny come up? Yep, let's Seeah,

(03:37:16):
looks like it's weekend. It's a few seconds behind, like
five seconds. I guess it's just that because I scrolled up,
it stops at scrolling when I do that and leave it.
Well looks of it anyway. Yeah, so let's just we're
going to do some Securit team to me anything on

(03:37:40):
my FUNI there I have to do mm hmm over there.
Something screwed up there. We've got two pictures of them

(03:38:01):
secure ting. Uh close tabs to the right. Let's give
it a try. So we've got secure team. I got
that guy twice for some reason. I don't think we

(03:38:28):
need him. It's just to remind me to look at
the folder with the snapshots of the episodes. But anyway,
before we get into the Skinwalker round stuff, we have
a look at this one here. So apparently this was

(03:38:50):
taken with the Jans web m. It doesn't look like
it's that grave, is it. There's still you wouldn't be
so the stars could be quite bigger than going to
see the planets around them. That's what we've found out.

(03:39:12):
But yeah, Christian marking space, Well it's really obvious there,
isn't it. We're seeing a two D representation of a
three D object. So really that's probably some gas cloud
that's bending towards us and going down next to a

(03:39:33):
star that may be like many hundreds of light years
in front of this gas cloud, right, so it lost
like a Christian mark. So yeah, still interesting. There's like
a perspective thing, a bit like the Biddy and Bernie

(03:39:54):
Hills sterne that we were looking at a seven draw it,
So a question right like that could be looking at
from the other direction. It could be like a guess
cloud that goes long and down and then the star

(03:40:18):
might be there all right, and when you see it
from this direction that way, it looks like this here,
but from any other perspective it looks wrong. And that's
the same with that Betty and Bernie Hill map that
we're talking about, where they're draw on the blobs. But

(03:40:39):
in three D space they might be like that. Let's
just go back to the Betty Bernie Hill nep so
they've got like that. There were two lines, which I
guess means this the two stars and then you've got

(03:41:00):
the planets coming off it. So that could be that
those two things are not actually like that into two
D space, but more like this. You know, it might
be a small start sudden there, and there might be
a huge gap in between it goes to a big
star down there. But when you look at from that way,

(03:41:23):
it looks like that it's drawn drawn, But that's the
reason why it's crazy. You'd have to see it from
perspective from Earth ground and a certain location on Earth too,
wouldn't you. And of course that could only be seen

(03:41:50):
from the southern hemisphere, which is kind of crazy because
they were in the northern hemisphere they got adducted. Yeah,
there's a lot of problems, but it doesn't mean that

(03:42:14):
it's not real, of course. It just means it could
be anywhere in the sky. And they may have said
to you, we can't see it from this location where
we are, but on the other side of the planet
you can. That would make more sense to so we

(03:42:38):
can close that one down. If you pop ups, you know, hell,
do you tirely here? Not? Not yet? The chances of
that happening, it's pretty it height chutches of what not sure?

(03:43:09):
What do you mean by that still has orbits? What's happened?

Speaker 7 (03:43:16):
Michael King donated ten pounds through super chat Star spinning
do of someome matter and with chance it looks like
that Your drawing looks like a ppe tongue out.

Speaker 1 (03:43:28):
Piece of crap. Yeah, it's about how to draw a
free hand with a mouse sever tried. That's what you've
got to use. These symbols, you know, symbols can do
it a lot better. But yeah, drawing a circle of
a mouse, especially on us PC, that's doing so much
at the moment, and it's almost need like a dedicated

(03:43:51):
CPU broken up for streaming. You know, we have these
CPUs only hand all the stream when these CPUs handle display,
one these CPUs handle display too. But it doesn't sort
of work that way. It doesn't. Of course, you've got
to be a member that the Windows is based on

(03:44:12):
event driven and not proper time slice driven as well.
A place of it was like what IBM tried to
bring in the Oris warp, which didn't take off at
all because it was pretty yucky compared to Windows. This

(03:44:32):
was truly time slice though a lot better I did
than event driven. So that means with one of those
devices on your computer hangs up, it hangs up the
whole computer. Like if your mouse hangs up, it doesn't
come out of that query, it hangs up the whole

(03:44:54):
computer or you get a blue screen of death. But technically,
if it was proper time slice like Linux Linux or
Unix Otis warp, which was based on that. Then technically
you could just end tusk the thing that's not functioning
list it's a display, of course, then you're in trouble.

(03:45:16):
But yeah, multiple displays. But anyway, yeah, looks like a
pee wee all right, not a piece of shit, but
basically a pee wee. Yeah, Okay, I understand what you're
saying now. That great time, man. I got twelve slash

(03:45:38):
twenty four core CPU and it's magic. Yeah, but you
get spent elsewhere unfortunately, But I'll get there in the end.
Stuf spinning. Okay, We've got there. Nothing weird about it.
It looks like a right now, got ya cocka doo

(03:46:02):
to do? Is what you need to say? I'm not
even sure if what word she led to say anymore?
On streams Okay, we had some videos to quickly look
at here as well, but I can come back to those,
I guess. Let me just see something's going on here.

(03:46:30):
We won't let me sleep the tabs but nothing selectable.
What's going on? I think it's trying to end me,
uh minimized? Can I some exchange getting on, like an
overlay or something? Leave me alone, hackers, someone's good and

(03:46:57):
control olds the leak time is it? Yeah? Have we
got it back? I don't think pressures the stream what
it used to when you did control delete. Okay, have
we got it back now? Some exchange going on. Okay,

(03:47:21):
we've got least the tabs back. Okay, let me just
make it big. So maybe quickly look at security. What's
up guys, tinally here straight out of hospital that Uh yeah,
he's put up two videos? What's this popping up here

(03:47:45):
the way? What's at the beginning? We've lost two phase? Okay, yeah,
we've got that. It's only a couple of videos here.
Your phase, isn't it? Thought put come back to that.
Let's say, so, have a look at Taylor. I went public,
won't put his ever tear up because of him little issues.

(03:48:10):
So let's see what Garbages has got. It's probably just
we've got it Meeted.

Speaker 6 (03:48:22):
Yucky and a lot of eyewitness testimony, and based on
that evidence alone, I think.

Speaker 1 (03:48:30):
Oh yeah, so it's like stuff that we've covered in
the past, like the memos. They know the truth all long,
secret UFOs fowls exposed. So it'll be that what's the
name Showsbeger Showsbger and the other memo. Anyway, let's just

(03:48:51):
have quick So he's really I think he's been watching
my show to get ideas. You know, we covered this
years ago and repeated that a couple of times too.

Speaker 6 (03:49:02):
We've been able to build a very strong.

Speaker 1 (03:49:04):
Case of sisbeger.

Speaker 6 (03:49:06):
Yes, indeed there are okay, and that provide proof that
this phenomenon is not.

Speaker 1 (03:49:15):
So he's putting up garbage. Okay, it looks like a
Minai coming up? Is that the Schisberger one? Uh Marshall
Commands where's the name?

Speaker 6 (03:49:34):
So called modern UFO era General Nathan Twinning, head of
the US Air.

Speaker 1 (03:49:40):
Material Commands at least I know it, said Twining. Doesn't
he not drink il Gray Il Gray? Twining tea not Twining.

Speaker 6 (03:49:54):
For a MC wrote a classified letter to Air Force
General George Shulgan regarding the quote flying discs. He said
the objects were real and not visionary or fictitious.

Speaker 1 (03:50:08):
They may Yeah, we've heard that one before. We covered
that one, Twining, and I think we did it with
Robert first of all. And then there was another one.

Speaker 6 (03:50:18):
Whether Twinning would have been able to tell shit about
the UFO crash.

Speaker 1 (03:50:23):
Yeah, you dope, man, You're dope.

Speaker 6 (03:50:29):
Ears the idea of the military.

Speaker 1 (03:50:32):
Now it makes me wonder if this is really tire
right now, because AI would make that mistake when not
saying to twining and twining. Because we've had names go
wrong too when we've read out things. Makes you wonder, doesn't.

Speaker 6 (03:50:50):
It, Terry at that time, having some sort of secret
craft has pretty much fell to the wayside. There is
simply no credit evidence that the US had any craft
like this in nineteen forty seven experimental.

Speaker 1 (03:51:07):
Okay, so have we got another memo? Here? Is it?
The Streis Figger one?

Speaker 6 (03:51:17):
Oh where? On January thirty first, nineteen forty nine, the
FBI issued a memo on UFOs entitled Protection of Vital Installations.
The classified document was sent to Director J. Edgar Hoover
along with the Army's G two, the Office of Naval Intelligence,
and the Air Force Office of Special Investigations. It mentions

(03:51:39):
a meeting among these groups concerning UFOs.

Speaker 1 (03:51:43):
With eight A Gang. I think we've covered that Rob
as well in the past. We just wanted to play
his video. That's just really a UFA history as looks
like there's nothing new in this return at the Battle
of l We're twalt about that photograph for analyzed and

(03:52:05):
said it looks like that's the real object here and
the other one's like a near image of it camera artifacts.
What was that?

Speaker 6 (03:52:16):
That was in UK with almost where on multiple occasions
the witnesses of these unexplained phenomena were special agents of
the Office of Oh.

Speaker 1 (03:52:26):
Yes, so it looks like he's putting up an unrelated
image to what he's talking about.

Speaker 6 (03:52:32):
What's its speed of seven and one half miles per
second or twenty seven thousand miles per hour?

Speaker 1 (03:52:40):
He hasn't got this. The Stoiberger Mino.

Speaker 6 (03:52:45):
Been personal UFO encounter on July ninth, nineteen fifty one
by the pilot of an F fifty one fighter plane
from loss And Air Force Base in Georgia. The pilot,
a combat veteran from World War II, provided quite a
bit of detail, which was corded in the report. The
object was described as flat on top and bottom and

(03:53:05):
appearing from the front view to have rounded edges and
slightly beveled.

Speaker 1 (03:53:10):
Yeah, that one, that's quite an interesting photograph I must submit.
But it doesn't look like a typical classic UFO. That's
what the problem I have with this one. What if

(03:53:44):
that one's been analyzed, because we haven't looked into the swin.
I don't believe. I think we've come across it and
passing before. Could it be like some sort of experimental
plane that the government's working on. It looks like something

(03:54:09):
at the front there, doesn't it. It looks like some
sort of window there, which is really normally have pilots.
Could it be just another plane using the new futuristic
get engines. Why would it be tailgating an old classic momba.

Speaker 6 (03:54:34):
The object was completely round and spinning in a clockwise direction.
No vapor trails or exhaust or visible system of propulsal.

Speaker 1 (03:54:43):
That kind of looks like the holes on their every
saucer that we looked into in the past, doesn't it,
Which was also meant to be spinning. Certain means that
the cop pitt would have to be able to rotate

(03:55:04):
and bull bear, and so the pilots don't get sick
because they want to look in the same direction. It
has to be spinning around, looking everywhere and filling croc
as hell bullshit.

Speaker 6 (03:55:15):
Described as traveling at a tremendous speed. Pilot states object
was three hundred to four hundred feet from the plane
and appeared to be ten to fifteen feet in diameter.

Speaker 1 (03:55:26):
So who took the photograph? Because if he's in the plane,
there's the pilot in the plane that took the photograph.
So this case needs to be explained a bit bitter.
It doesn't it. It's not the best the text does

(03:55:48):
what was it called that one might have to come
back to the swim nineteen fifty one July see what
the experts say better, because this is the thing you
don't get from tirely. He doesn't do an investigate and
see what's the video? Well, photographic experts had said about it.

(03:56:10):
I don't think it's been on. Proof is out there?
Has it? They normally have the experts look at someone like.

Speaker 6 (03:56:16):
This detail, which was recorded in the report. The object
was described as flat on top and bottom, and appearing
from the front view to have rounded edges and slightly beveled.
The object was completely round and spinning in a clockwise direction,
no vapor trails or exhaust or visible system of propulsion,

(03:56:38):
described as traveling at a tremendous speed. Pilot State's object
was three hundred to four hundred feet from the plane
and appeared to be ten to fifteen feet in diameter.
Pilot states he felt a disturbance in the air described
as a bump when the object.

Speaker 1 (03:56:54):
Patterned, which should get with engines right and more than
prop planes.

Speaker 6 (03:56:59):
Just under the plane pilot is considered by associates to
be highly reliable of mature.

Speaker 1 (03:57:06):
Maybe they're just testing them out with experimental craft to
see what they report it as. You just don't know
what the government's up to do.

Speaker 6 (03:57:15):
We that's a problem with judgment and a credible.

Speaker 1 (03:57:19):
Observer Belgian wave, that's garbage. The photograph was meant to
be fabricated. Any got eyewitness accounts so that in drawings obviously.

Speaker 6 (03:57:42):
I'm and the altitude shifts so as technology has advanced
along with the gun.

Speaker 1 (03:57:52):
So yes, like a history lesson here. But he hasn't
got the Striver.

Speaker 6 (03:57:58):
Eighteen hundred Act of Interest with at least seventy five
actual UFO intercepts.

Speaker 1 (03:58:06):
What the okay, So there's not really much. There are
a few things that we need to look into ourselves.
But he hasn't got a.

Speaker 6 (03:58:25):
Of the Office of Special Investigation airline pilots, military pilots
and Los Alamos security in.

Speaker 1 (03:58:32):
So is that photograph even related to this.

Speaker 6 (03:58:34):
Report at a minimum of three.

Speaker 1 (03:58:38):
Because that one certainly isn't that's UK pilot's a loan
pilot saw that one. That one near It's not rarely
explained well here, so we can't actually really look it up.
What is that one though? Is there any clues here?

(03:59:04):
Because I just mean may not be related to that picture.
We could put in July the ninth, nineteen fifty the
serving and find it so much, so much that we
need to recap and redo. I suppose July ninth your image.

(03:59:31):
Let's see if it comes up. Not really no no no,
no no no no, So it didn't come in the images,

(03:59:55):
so it makes me wonder if it's related to the image.
So yes, so there's a problem with securiting mixes up stuff.
So you've got factual stuff mixed in with other photographs.

(04:00:18):
They're not even related to it. Yeah they Fato Pilot
nineteen fifties. I'd say, I bet we don't even know that.
It's probably going to bring us up all new crep stuff. Yep,
all the same old crap. Damn eyes. I might have

(04:00:51):
to leave the skin Walker right stuff Fastally, I think
it needs needs some more time on it's it's all right,
we can push it next show. I suppose we'll just
finished up on Secure. Think I think today things dragged

(04:01:12):
out longer than I wanted it too. But there's so
many questions, not so many answers. Of course, I didn't
have time to research us slammed it together in a
day on my show because I've been busy doing other things,

(04:01:33):
other projects, and also trying to catch up on things
that I don't I don't never seen that image anywhere.
That's probably one night we have to do a reverse
image such I bet you, yeah, that's it there as

(04:01:57):
a bar locks. I know we've covered it in the past,
but what episodes are in and then we probably have
the real link to it in our episodes. But anyway,

(04:02:18):
not Sucky team. He's even cropped up. I think there's
more to that image there. Let's see. I suppose I've

(04:02:43):
got to save it though. I'll just save it then
I can ring it because I don't think you can
cut and paste it, can you? Uh? On Google? Oh
ship that's going on? Mhm, I have a little on

(04:03:06):
the other screen at the moment. Let me just do that.
Let's see how good were this image? Such works? I
guess yeah, okay, Google, uh close it one down. That's

(04:03:31):
a new one. Google. Uh in a s brows is it?
Is it doing? So? Yeah, I forgot the turn off set.

Speaker 4 (04:03:54):
Up.

Speaker 1 (04:03:54):
Lay, I have to look on thattwink do we there
we go? There we go? So taking it from us, really,
it's how well? Uh and that kind of there o go?
That's like it's found h. So we've got lots of

(04:04:19):
pages on vintage UFA Irish Mirror P two v dash
forward and neptunes. At the name of the plane, is
that that's like the same type of plane? There's it
been photoshop? Maybe that one could be, couldn't it? So

(04:04:51):
that makes his story even less credible if that one
turns out to be a hoax image, We're not getting
too any Riffer says to it McDonald XP sixty nine.
It's got a different plane name then, so it looks

(04:05:21):
like some sort of bomber. Okay, how come I only
got one reference to it? Okay, so let's just go
to this so and then it should list it here

(04:05:43):
as well. Let's bring up the UK only stuff. We
know this is fake. It's on a real image that's
been further shocked. Help me forward it on stage. Then
I found information on the real original photograph. That's the

(04:06:07):
probem With photoshops sometimes it's a bit hard to tell.
Lets you look into great detail and it's got the shadows,
it's got the biggest flying sources behind. It looks pretty legit,
but it's not. So there's something nice to read the article.

(04:06:32):
So where's the photograph from nineteen fifty seven? So it's
not even related to what we were reading there from
ninety fifty one. Now that's what I thought, And it's
a B forty seven. That makes more sense a bomber
because fighters have IF in front called like IF fourteen,

(04:06:54):
IF thirty five, and bombers always have B B fifty
two B forty seven mm hm, So that makes sense.
So what's that from though? Just a bunch of a group
of photographs. So yeah, where's it originally come from? Yeah, California.

(04:07:20):
So let's see search image with Google again. Since we've
got the complete image the Okay, we've got all these
ones food fighter that's on a food fighter. Uh so

(04:07:48):
it's on lots and lots of websites, but we've got
the information on it. Why can't we find any information?

(04:08:14):
That's kind of weird? What's going on here? Some images there,
But why are we getting a list like that not images?
That's because we did such. I guess that's well related

(04:08:40):
to fee fighters. Okay, let's go there. There's an image
on that page that's really weird. Why is it? How's

(04:09:07):
it now it's on that page? If it's not on
that page, what am I missing? One of my what
are we doing wrong? All sizes? Okay, this game is
a bit let's list so from any credible website, but

(04:09:41):
so far it's not here fifty one? What's that one say?
It's got some Chinese or Japanese writing or both. That's uh,

(04:10:10):
song's proful picture and that's it reached your end. So
if we still haven't found out if this is a
fake it look it looks like it isn't it. It's
a bit more and more like it's a fake image

(04:10:31):
as well. So it was not necessarily an image of
a UFO for in it, but it's not related to
that memo or reports. So could it be something like
a just a fast flowing seagull a bird caught in

(04:10:59):
a regular photograph, so it could be all there the
next up of the same problems there as digital photographs. Yeah, uh,

(04:11:25):
let's see does they have anything on it? No? I
was looking for maybe official, you know, like a website
for it for the image, just not seeing it. Now,

(04:11:51):
what if we do a search with tonight? Let's see
tonight I supposally want. Let us do it. Okay, let's
try that. Okay, it's given the Sun three hundred and fifteen.

(04:12:11):
That's given a better, better idea than Google has first
index by Tonight in February two thousand and eight. So
it doesn't sound like a really really old picture then?
And have you got sordered latest one? Do we sort

(04:12:35):
best match oldest? Okay? All right, there you go? No
UFO in US? Then full name Martin B fifty seven

(04:12:56):
stop photo two thousand and two thousand and eight Japan.
So is it all the same? That lots sharp of detail?

(04:13:21):
What's the right color? It hasn't got any UFO? And
I don't think we have to go back and check
that one's darker. It's like the same. Is that one
near compare? What's that to? I wonder? So if we

(04:13:45):
opened that one necessary? We have to investigate things? Right?
It doscount interesting? You think that you find on the
web and just throw it in a video securteen it's
really small. Okay, let's try the next one, very small game.

(04:14:18):
So anything in that could be just a scratch. Does
that look like the UFA there? It's like part of
a cloud, doesn't it. I think we've busted it as

(04:14:42):
a fake image, isn't it. It's in the Wikipedia of
all Things filming? Well, how can it's opened it up properly? There? Okay,

(04:15:04):
then we can see, so that must be the original one.
And it looks like some sort of glitch on the negative,
doesn't it. And it's not a nice sharp image of
a UFO at all? All right? And then there's another
glitch there, and they've put that whole thing together as

(04:15:26):
a UFO copyright USA Force Museum Night Intruder. So how
can they say that there is a UFO? There's the clouds.

(04:15:51):
I think it's just a art effect that someone's enhanced
on that one. Instead, it's a UFO that the government
air brushed out or some nonsense like that. All right,
did I've just closed down flicker? I did? Didn't I?

(04:16:16):
Let's try that again. So that's why you've got to
use other tools, so you can't trust to Google alone.
I used tonight. It comes oldest swim Okay scmembered. So

(04:16:41):
it first popped up in two thousand and eight, But
where did they get their stock image from two thousand
and eight and then two thousand and eight two thousand
A So it showed up from Japan to Romania to

(04:17:07):
pr with that to crowded Skies, so that's American side
box sorts and if renamed it it was force space
near September nineteen forty seven, so it lost like the

(04:17:29):
fold got renamed from Martin B fifty seven b Night Intruder. Ye,
well did they renamed it? I don't think so, because

(04:17:49):
that one looks like a credible one, being a museum
UFO Crowded Skies. That's p PL France next page two

(04:18:12):
thousand and eight, still juis Government twenty ten. You can
see how stuff gets floated around the web. Right, someone
puts something up that's fake. We've been photoshot film original
photograph and it sort of takes off from there and

(04:18:35):
then people rename it and create a new story for it.
This is where TO is actually better than Google and
what you can do here. See what Tyler does to us.

(04:18:57):
It gets us research and because you know his has
not researched, and that's just slam together. So he's put
together a legit memo with a fake UFA image and
it kind of makes you think it's connected and it's not.

(04:19:19):
And you can see how the picture has been renamed.
But what was the original name? As a question, it's
like it's come up again here on Wikipedia please fifty
seven B. And then it gets renamed air Force Space

(04:19:40):
near southern California, and we know that's not true. Let's
see what have they done to it? I can't requite
what's so of there? Okay, we want to open the

(04:20:00):
image directly? How do we do that again? Yeah? Open
new tap? Are we learning things? So we learning? Where's
a new tap? Can't be reached? So it's been caged
by this crueler. Oh that sucks. I wanted to read

(04:20:25):
what it said underneath there. So Disclosure TV has deleted
it to what's twenty thirteen? Looks like it's the air
again twenty thirteen. It's still going to be blank cloud front.

(04:20:48):
So it looks like what they used to store the
image free has now gone under but the web never forgets.
We've got a fun now. I guess that looks very
similar to the one. I know it's the same one
without the thing underneath. So that's not going to exist

(04:21:10):
because we know they've got a problem. Twenty thirteen. It's
using the correct name from the museum one. And we
already had a look at that one and it looks
like it just an artifact in the background rather than

(04:21:32):
actual physical object. Now that one's gone too, that makes
it a bit harder. Let's go on a few years
twenty nineteen. Now renamed, renamed, renamed, renamed, so they'll keep

(04:22:02):
renaming it. American UFO renamed Pentagon UFO renamed there's no case,
no number of associated if it was in peigans thing teletareographed,
so it's on rags nine fifty c edwards. So that's

(04:22:26):
been renamed twenty four and it's still going due to securiteings.
It's a fake image. Well it's not a fake. It's

(04:22:48):
been made into a fake that looks like some sort
of artiffect. There's only a few that don't have it. Yeah,
and it's early on and got to the end of

(04:23:15):
thirty six Spooky TV Russia. It's those ones have been
blocked and not coming up with any images. Well, I

(04:23:36):
think we've probably had a look at that, So that's
investigated now, so that image is not legit at all
for UFO or case number or memo.

Speaker 6 (04:23:51):
Lost or visible system of propulsion described as traveling at
a tremendous speed. Pilot states object was three hundred to four.

Speaker 1 (04:24:00):
So you can see how Tyler has miss rift presented
that photograph with that memo trying to suggest it's the
same thing. I thought this would be the case with him. Okay,
so yeah, so people are going to believe that I
even think he's saying in that, and they're not going
to do their own fact checking like we just did online.

(04:24:22):
So he's busted the game, really, and he hasn't got
the shoebacker. I would have got this showbacker showbacker memo,
which is one of the better ones show show show
show bea. I think it's called the Showbacker. No spare

(04:24:51):
it wrong because I can't see very well at the moment,
show show Becker, show Backer. You know what I done?
I mean Roberts, that's his name, consumes UFA crash room
as a memo by the government with will but Smith.

(04:25:12):
So he hasn't put that one up. It's like the
classic memo of all time. I don't think it had
put that one up, has he? What is the year
number on that one? Washington Institute of Technology, that's three
Bluey's blue version of the image. What year number is that?

(04:25:38):
Fifty three mm eleven five right November, just a little
like a five three. I can't remember. Probably stays down here.
A miracle interview occuld in watching in d C September

(04:26:01):
nineteen fifty September fifteen, nineteen fifteen, but the content did
not leak out until the early nineteen eighties. A showbacker
consultant with us, so he hasn't got that one up
there Unlessery skin passed. That died in nineteen sixty one.

(04:26:30):
But anyway, would it say normally you have a transcript
of the what's said that it's easier to read. Where's
the transcript for it? I think it's probably on that
page summary? But anyway, what else we got here? Two
UFO documents so against talking about the same thing, and

(04:26:58):
that one lost like a PDF. Yeah, the same one
it soon read looked we've covered that in the past. Anyway,

(04:27:24):
We've got lots of copies of it everywhere. Yeah, yeah,

(04:27:52):
I'm not so sure which one be subscribed. Uh yeh right,
train scribe does that? What do you call it? So
the subscribe? Uh? Scripts? Scripts? Uh, focuses of photography. Is

(04:28:21):
that where you just looked at Now can't pick in it? Oh?
Here you go? All right. Uh it's from the Wikipedia

(04:28:43):
somwhere m Kay trainscribes. It's called transcribe, doesn't it trainscrite, trainscripts,
all these words you have to know transcript. Yeah, David Ruche,

(04:29:15):
It's funny how things think up. Who would have thought
he would have come up when I'm searching for that,
just seeing Michael's trained scripts. Uh, here you go. If
that one's saying, right, that's not all right? After I think,

(04:29:44):
oh Jesus, it shouldn't be this hard. I just want
it easy to read. Thing nineteen eighty three, I said
it was fifty three, so yeah, come out in nineteen
eighty three. Okay, it's got a transcript. Yeah, it's a

(04:30:06):
bit stupid error again, but that's one that should be discussed.
I think I feel into information Wilbert Smith here external
quotes and manner is most likely classified subject. And you

(04:30:29):
know the ex flowing sources exist. That looks like something
from something from the hearings where they quote it's after

(04:30:54):
the transcript for the real thing. It should't be this
frigging hard. I know I've got an episode anyway, How
do you spell his name again? Robert shout Aspeccer. We've

(04:31:24):
talked about it a few times and I've got proper
links to it that makes the difference. It's not going
to come up. So I must have spelled it wrong
that c H and French Showspeccer Showspecer. I was trying.

(04:31:52):
You know, the memo that suggests you for is a rule.
M h, there we go. Not the Rods roll h.
It's probably in there. I don't believe the first time

(04:32:16):
back five years ago and they're probably robots. Mhm. Let's

(04:32:42):
see this one, would it be I'll probably be that
one first time, is it? Uh more? Mm hmm Nope,

(04:33:03):
they'll be listed here. If I had it, it'll be
added in the bookmarks. Bloody Google, Sitch, you're not really good.
It's gonna be the sad Roberts, you know, because it's

(04:33:27):
going to bring up Robert Farner. Yeah, chake out suspects guy. Okay,

(04:33:49):
So how did they spell it in such as? It
should be rare to fight it then let's spared it
right than the Sarbecca? Is that including the s I

(04:34:15):
missed OUTA? Ah, that's why Roberts Robert Roberts, Okay, you
can't even highlight that as Troy search and me no
sa Becca Becker A no, no on. So maybe it's

(04:34:46):
a net one secure team mentioned. So I don't know,
And that's one that's said to find out. I know
I have covered a few times. Let's see Becker Bicker interview.

Speaker 4 (04:35:11):
There we go.

Speaker 1 (04:35:13):
Isn't that one? What was the key points in that one?
I go, oh, there's a copy? Is it not planned?
All right? I got it needed it's a plan? So

(04:35:35):
h I think it is. I'm trying to read this.
I find out that the link I posted actually has
the transcript after after I read it out to see
if we can find the key statement here? Why is
it not giving me the list? Let's see if I
can read this crazy color um you can see. I

(04:36:06):
hope problem that? Then today let's see me may pointing minute.
There you go twining.

Speaker 2 (04:36:16):
That one?

Speaker 1 (04:36:21):
Uh, that wasn't the show Becker one though?

Speaker 3 (04:36:24):
Was it?

Speaker 1 (04:36:32):
I think I plashed it after read it out. Let's
see just skim plus that here we go. So we
did the twin or twinning, it should be a transcript
here uh right at the end they transcripted into proper

(04:36:57):
font that's the one we're after.

Speaker 2 (04:37:00):
M H.

Speaker 1 (04:37:03):
To answer your Christians were go on a ravacation that
Christians you less are involved, I can say only that's
n DA. I don't recall receiving any photographs such as
you christ I haven't. What's the key parts of that? Though?

(04:37:48):
Sorry I've taken so long to give back to to
answer you a lot of Christians. There are no particular
reason I feel I couldn't or couldn't answer any and
all of your questions. I am delighted to answer your
You listed some of your questions in the letter related

(04:38:13):
to their own experience regarding recovered flowing sources. I had
no association with any of the people involved in the
recovery and have no knowledge regarding the dates of the recoveries,
and if I had, I would send it to you.
So this guy's proven that that we crashed UFOs doesn't

(04:38:40):
necessarily mean as yeah. Regarding verification the persons you list involved,
I can only say this, John von Newan was definitely involved.
Bush was definitely involved, and I think Robert Oppenheimer also
Associations Development Board until I did receive some official reports

(04:39:07):
when I was in office, do not recall receiving any photograph.
So what was the letter? But the only thing I
remember at the time is that certain materials reported to

(04:39:28):
have come from flying saucer crashes were extremely light and
very tough. I'm sure our laboratories analyzed and very carefully.
Still doesn't mean it's aliens though right here there were
reports that instruments or people operating these instrument machines were

(04:39:50):
also of very light weight, sufficient to withstand the tremendous
deceleration and acceleration sacid with the machinery. I remember in
talking with some of the people at the office that
I got to the impression these aliens were constructed like

(04:40:13):
certain insects we have observed on the Earth where and
because the low mass, the inertia forces involved and the
oppression of these instruments would be quite low. I do
not know why the high order of classification has been given.

(04:40:37):
I'm sorry, blah blah blah. Okay, So that statement there
proves that they went humans flying the machines. They were
light weight, creatures that could withstand high initia speeds. Right,

(04:41:00):
So that's like the smoking gun memo. Now, why hasn't
Tyler got that and has episode? Did I miss it?
I don't think I did. He's got no chapters, says
he there would be too much work for him when

(04:41:21):
chapterism like I do no chapters, just lazy ass. But
there's no Robert Saspacker there. Okay, first one, any of.

Speaker 6 (04:41:44):
The so called modern UFO era General Nathan Twinning, head.

Speaker 1 (04:41:49):
Of the twine in your dope, So twyean, and that's
the same memo I don't really want to go for
all game.

Speaker 6 (04:42:04):
And entific reasons why the objects could not have been meteorites.

Speaker 1 (04:42:14):
That was some other reports. What was it though? Then?

Speaker 6 (04:42:24):
And one half miles per second or twenty seven?

Speaker 1 (04:42:30):
That's not the Twining memo, is I mean? Not this
Shardbaker mem I. So he hasn't even got the really
good one. He's talking about that thing.

Speaker 6 (04:42:40):
There nineteen eighty nine to the spring of nineteen ninety
hundreds of reports of lighted objects.

Speaker 1 (04:42:48):
No nice Shabecker. So it's really poorly done. The toilet
twine and one yes, so you can include it t
which ain't going to go through now, suspect I should
have been there as the second one or in the
first one, I'd say, and the other ones could be

(04:43:10):
included the other reports, but not with the fake pictures
of course. So this just say a look at the
comments here. It's funny how we always end up spending
a lot of time on this guy. It's because he's
disinformation right, crazy new moon nonomally. So that's the next video.

(04:43:32):
Holy crap, really a recap off THEFO fifty years old? Dude?
What the F? I guess I'm not missed not watching
your channel. Plus, it's incorrect, he's mixing stuff up. Surprised

(04:43:56):
by you pronouncing of twin and twinin that's when no
one's mentioned the other memo. How clear is your soul?
He's guilty as f His soul is going to the

(04:44:20):
dungeons when he dies. YouTube ads are out of control.
That's because he doesn't delete what Google auto inserts now
on my videos. I have like a couple hundred ads
planted into if I don't turn it off and put
my own five or six in. But yeah, Google ads

(04:44:41):
are definitely out of control. Now, dude, why are you
talking like this? It's starting to come out and they
open the flight is almost over. For forty four seconds,

(04:45:01):
it looks like USS voyager. I don't know what these
guys are on trying to do longer VIDs. Please, that
takes too much work doing an editor. I'm frustrated me too.

(04:45:21):
Glad to see your posting more often. Why because you
like disinformation? Good to see you that. Hey, Taylor wasn't
wells they cures Okay, still nothing there is? You still

(04:45:50):
sound like a robots. That might be why it's pronounced
the word wrong too. You've all been common people. Not
only did he fake videos using his own voice, now
he has a robot making his episodes for him. It's

(04:46:11):
probably said to one of the AI things, take me
a UFA history and use my voice print. He's probably
found out someway and doing it anyway. Good way to
make a thousand dollars each time. Though. Anyway, let's go

(04:46:31):
back to the other video, back to the moon anomalies.
That's called that's called that's what it's good. Desperate suddenly
got loud of a sudden parlor program. I discovered something

(04:46:52):
eerie and a rare ness on moon photo. Well with
the bank to all the ones he's put up before
anyone call them out. Probably not the images besides being
very exclusive, convincing for skeptics. Hey, especially we're the astronaut

(04:47:20):
quickly changing angles. I suppose we've got to watch it. Unfortunately,
thank you, I've got to sing out. And before we
carry on the I should check the comments. What's up?

(04:47:45):
H Well, I assumed it down. How we got here?
We got someone killed? That's me, just me talking to myself. Okay,
Tyler has the painkiller preaching them from the rear. No, Toddler,
I wouldn't make you. What'd you say? And then like
a king that good day painkillers. I totally would make

(04:48:12):
that mistake. He is stupid. It's a trick voyager that
looks like Okay, that voyager didn't He's still that intro sing. No.
Apparently it's a free one you can use when your videos.

(04:48:33):
A lot of people use it. Actually, you know, I'm
gonna be and listen back in a second. Okay, there's
where people are onto us. Shut down, Paul, shut down,
shut down, burning up, burning up, and we'll finish up
on this. My brain's gone, I got aches and pains.

(04:48:55):
Here we go in for time anyway, probably another hour gone,
as coming up to five hours, maybe just keep the
tyler once for next time. Maybe let's see, coming up
to five hours is a bit much, isn't it. Let's
have a quick look though. Let's see do we really
need to spend much time on this one.

Speaker 6 (04:49:16):
You've got to check it out where we was.

Speaker 1 (04:49:19):
Promoting himself on his own video. How stupid you got
to check out my videos? No one's watching them that
you'd like me.

Speaker 6 (04:49:25):
To cover, whether it be the boogast fear or a number.

Speaker 1 (04:49:29):
Oh crap, he's asking people what he should cover. He
should know, and I will show.

Speaker 6 (04:49:36):
You, guys, slowed down and enhanced versions here in just
a second, the moon rolling slowly beneath them in the film,
miles down as the two vehicles prepare to link up
and head home. Everything seems routine.

Speaker 1 (04:49:51):
Until until then we just stopped.

Speaker 6 (04:49:56):
A cut in the video or something on a expected
shows up. And in my opinion, of all of the
years that I have documented lunar anomalies, UFOs and happenings
surrounding and just the mysteriousness of our moon altogether, this
footage that you're about to see, and that I doubt

(04:50:17):
many of you, or any of you for that matter,
have seen unless you're a true lunar anomaly hunting sleuth
like I am.

Speaker 1 (04:50:25):
Of course, this is film true window proves.

Speaker 6 (04:50:28):
Yet once again, something other than human activity was.

Speaker 1 (04:50:35):
He's going to spend the time so you can put
enough heads on.

Speaker 6 (04:50:38):
Urring down above the surface, and we're in this particular
piece of film. Down in the bottom right hand corner
of the frame, just above the Moon's surface, a small
white orb ufo appears. Shoot.

Speaker 1 (04:50:53):
I always saw some do it on the window there, yep, and.

Speaker 6 (04:50:56):
Out of a crater, moving in the opposite direction of
the capsule. It's not drifting like space junk or dust.
It's fast, it's smooth, and it clearly has direction. Almost
immediately the camera pans away, as if the astronaut behind
it spotted the US chase it with the lens. Seconds

(04:51:19):
later the camera pans back and just for a moment.

Speaker 1 (04:51:23):
It's s a scratch in the film there a little
bit that is.

Speaker 6 (04:51:27):
What looks to be the same object, still low over
the moon and still moving with purpose. Now I've slowed.

Speaker 1 (04:51:41):
You'll have to slur it down to see what he's talking.

Speaker 6 (04:51:43):
Footage down so you see exactly what I'm talking about,
because that is that.

Speaker 1 (04:51:51):
It's subtle, but it's most like it's on the window
that one there.

Speaker 6 (04:51:56):
And it doesn't belong and you guys are going to
see it here.

Speaker 1 (04:52:00):
I mean, like the scratches and the debris on the window.

Speaker 6 (04:52:04):
That's the second. And I just want to note here
I love footage like this because unlike a lot of
the footage that we're seeing today, this is not AI generated.
This isn't some new so.

Speaker 1 (04:52:17):
He's looking looking at the window here e stuff.

Speaker 6 (04:52:21):
Fake UFO video that someone cooked up for clicks. This
is raw NASA film and whatever this object is. That's
if it isn't too completely.

Speaker 1 (04:52:35):
Isn't that just because the thing's spinning separate objects?

Speaker 6 (04:52:40):
It was captured on real government footage during one of
the most iconic moments in space history. So go ahead and.

Speaker 1 (04:52:48):
Check this out. Go on, we're going to sleep here.
It must get you everyone done with I suppose oh
look it's right with the play batner is nice. Spideracle, yeah,

(04:53:13):
broken off and then we got stuff in the window.
Very good at that one. Or it could be writing
writing on the slowly man really, but Charlie, is that
the best we can come up with a little speck

(04:53:40):
slaring it down. Look out for the spec people. There
there's bollocks. Yeah, a stupid bag that. No, well, that

(04:54:03):
looks like a flickering piece of ice, doesn't it, because
that's what ice does. And they're using engines that make
water particles in space, And yeah, that looks like something
that just comes into view because coming from where the
engines would be, and it's spinning and it's enough to

(04:54:27):
reflect the light. Terrible. Then this came a man pans

(04:54:48):
back to find UFO does he now? Why would he
do that? Then I'd say that's an ice verticle? What
I waste the time video? Unless it's like like a

(04:55:10):
solid classic flowing dis all these things are just stupid.
Anything that's white flickering in space could be even if
you know, like NSSA off and said it could be
just ice it breaks off the surface. So it could
be even a paint flak breaking off because as it
heats up and cools, causes the paint to crack in

(04:55:33):
places and the paint chips off certain things. So yeah,
I suppose maybe the sold that now with modern paints
be interesting to know they still going on a.

Speaker 6 (04:55:49):
To pixel errors or compression glitches like we see today.
And these are actual high resolution scans and in fact
are the highest resolution originals.

Speaker 1 (04:56:01):
Yeah, but we could see scratches and dust and fingerprints.

Speaker 6 (04:56:05):
Impression glitches like we.

Speaker 1 (04:56:09):
It's got other problems.

Speaker 6 (04:56:11):
Captured on real film, chemical physical development that.

Speaker 1 (04:56:15):
Looks so much. Look at alien craft, man, I had
a bunch of bollocks. Anyway, enough of ice crystals? Did
anyone actually say it was ice crystals? I forgot to
read after all that, and we wrap up on that,
carry on with skin Worker Ranch another day, which is

(04:56:35):
talking about them to rename the episode electro minute stuff.
Have to rename that, I suppose because that was in
my title. We're pushing on to another time. People are

(04:56:58):
actually impressed with us. How many people watch that garbage?
Ten thousand liked it? Ay, eighty eight thousand watched it?
And when was it put out today? One day ago?
So that's pretty life one day ago, I think. Listen

(04:57:18):
with more and more people waking up to him, well surprised.
It's glad to hear you're back. What's up, Tayler, what's her? Tangler?
Glad to see your new video? Love you, Tyler. I

(04:57:41):
want to have your babys reminds me of the old
times my dad died. Yes, you'll be listening to meet shortly.
Don't play with my stupid people. There's a crater that

(04:58:04):
has a tower back to the towers, and I mean, uh,
these people are none the wiser because they watched a
stupid person. Now the towers have all been explained, some
of the camera artifacts because the ink they tried an

(04:58:24):
instant camera out in space that didn't really work with
zero G and it created these blobs called the Castle
and the Crystal Palace or whatever it was. But yeah,
these people are none the wiser. Anyway, we're going to
leave it there, probably going to have to rename the

(04:58:44):
episode because we never got through it all. But I
think that was a pretty good going what I've done today.
And I'll cover the normalies and what the AI said.
And I got the the clips so I can keep
them for the next time. Uh what else anything else

(04:59:11):
on this? Probably not okay, we'll leave that for the
next time. And I renamed the episode after I finish
up here. What am I going to call it? Securtain
is back on ice crystals and fake images in UFO

(04:59:36):
history or something. Yeah, I guess say good night guys.
I think most of you have gone already. Good night,
see you soon, take you on the road. Anyway, why
is it not scrolling up? Get really slow? Come on,

(04:59:58):
don't crash, don't actually, what's there? Any last request here
down the side? Did I miss anything? It looks like
we've been lifted off pilled. They have a last time
and it totally corrupts the video. It misses the last

(05:00:22):
twenty minutes or something. So yeah, that's the reason why
we go to do it within five hours, because they're
now limited to five hours. Yeah, anyway, thanks for watching, guys.
Those people are pilled. Don't know if you're still watching
or not, but yeah, it looks like they've messed up.
How many likes did we get today? Any I've got

(05:00:46):
to update that. Okay, let's see what comes up. Anyway,
I got so many ages and plain, they're gonna have
to put some cream on after this. Oh, the head
splitting probably because my eyesight and I'm using trying to

(05:01:11):
read and do a lot more then my eyes are
really capable of nowadays. Gives your headache, you know? Is
it not updated yet? Poor? One? Two? Four, one three?
There we go? We got three lights on pill I
only had five watching today, so that's probably not too bad.

(05:01:35):
Poor watching two lights on rumbles still and the most
lights on YouTube with one watching well, I think we
got up to three or four there at one stage. Anyway,
it is what it is, I guess. Guys. Thanks for
those newcomers on the side chat today. That makes a
lot of difference. Also one from Rumble, which is rare,

(05:01:59):
so I've got to try and focus my eyes. Lastly
on this last bit. Makes you wonder if he actually
spotted that or someone else did and sent it to him.
And that Ice Crystal one as normally cousin does that

(05:02:19):
what's his name? Not turn on news? Yeah? I ended
now time to go, well, well over time, I'll probably
end up quick. Actually I won't go through the fall

(05:02:43):
run down. Oh man, I really hurt forgot to get
a drunk. Time to relax now, so I need to

(05:03:11):
keep this title for next week when you do Skinwalker Rutch.
I disappointed those that were waiting for the skin Walker
ritch today call me

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}UFO Chat with Paul -28 Secureteam loves NASA ice UAPs & fake images +J-Rod ;viral UAP vids analyzed

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

UFO Chat with Paul -28 Secureteam loves NASA ice UAPs & fake images +J-Rod ;viral UAP vids analyzed

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce