The Secret Takeover: How Central Banking Enslaved the World - Cause Before Symptom /w Urban - Urban Odyssey

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:22):
Music. Music.

(01:43):
Music. Howdy to everybody.

(02:05):
Glad to see you guys. Welcome back to cause before
symptom. It is your guest host Urban,
back with you again tonight. I apologize, I was little under
the weather yesterday so didn't have a stream.
I didn't expect to do that, but I'm back with you guys today.
How's it going, Boots? How's it going, Claire?
How's it going, R Gurdison? Glad to see the usuals.

(02:28):
Let's see. Get my chat up with me.
I'm getting the hang of this. I'm getting the hang of this.
I hope you guys are doing well tonight.
You guys having a good weekend? Doing anything for Labor Day?
Let's see, let me make myself a little bit bigger.

(02:48):
Too big. There we go There you go.
Now you can see me. Hey, what's going on, Amanda?
What's going on, guys? Yeah, So happy Labor Day.
It's a it's it's shocking that the years gone by so fast.

(03:12):
My birthday snuck up on me. My birthday was August 4th, but
snuck up on me. I didn't even after 21, You, you
don't pay any attention to it. But yeah, I've been oh, yeah.
That's what's going on. It's Labor Day on Monday.

(03:35):
Labor Day, I mean, everyone has fun for Labor Day.
They, yeah, they do fireworks all over.
I don't know where I, I think James told me that the majority
of the people who watch this show are on the East Coast.
I, I'm in Ohio, I'm on the East Coast, but he's on the West

(03:56):
Coast and he's, you know, the times like 3 hours different.
And so I stay up late because when he does the show, he's
doing it at 9:00 PM and I'm doing it at midnight.
So, but what I was looking into recently was a book that was
discussing the history of, you know, central banking and, and

(04:21):
Federal Reserve Bank and stuff like that.
And I, I found a very interesting video, watched a few
minutes of it. And I thought I would watch it
with you guys because it seemed to be a very well done video.
It's only about 30 minutes long.And then I might go with some of
the articles that I've done on Eustis Mullins.

(04:45):
Eustis Mullins was the guy who wrote like one of the original
expose books on the Federal Reserve.
He also did a book on the City of London connection to the
Federal Reserve. And I think he's passed, he's
passed away now. But he was, he was really big in
that section. He he was one of the early

(05:05):
greats, but I thought it would be interesting because this goes
over some of the some of the connections to the Bank of
England and how that all ties into kind of what was going on
before what we see today. You know, there were let's see
the the Federal Reserve Bank wasthe third Federal Bank of the

(05:28):
United States because we had you'll see you'll see this when
we go through the video. But the first bank was quickly
abolished. The second bank was the one that
Andrew Jackson famously put downand then the Federal Reserve
Bank is the third, you know, United States Federal Bank, but

(05:50):
it's not federal whatsoever. So y'all know that, but this
goes into some of the lead up toit.
So I thought that would be interesting to share with you
guys called House central banking, how central banking
ruined this world and I couldn'tset it better myself at all.
So let's see boom, there we go that then I'll make myself

(06:18):
smaller. I can shrink myself.
I I mean, I guess when people like a lot of professional
streamers or whatever, they haveall kinds of buttons set up that
will do this for you. But I have to do it all manually
by myself, so got to give me a second.
But yeah, let's get it started. Usually the act of lending money

(06:41):
with interest. It's nothing new.
It's been around whether deemed legal or illegal, moral or
immoral, for centuries. Nowadays, it's the backbone of
the worldwide economy. An average person might not see
anything wrong with such a stateof affairs.
As a matter of fact, most peopleparticipate in it without even
considering its roots. They just think of it as a tool.

(07:03):
It means getting a loan or a mortgage, getting a new car, new
house. Most people also will go for
entire lives cursing for circumstances, for savings being
devalued, there being less and less work opportunities, life
being made harder by these obnoxious taxes, recessions
happening every 15. Glad to see y'all glad you're

(07:26):
joining me tonight. But someone is responsible for
such a state of affairs. All these individuals
responsible at a place in history, they have worked to
bring about the exact set of circumstances that we get.
Bigger there we. Go for financial conquest of the
world for usury. But how would usually itself a

(07:46):
pretty narrow concept, managed to be the vehicle for a small
group of people to achieve worlddomination?
Well, that's the point of this video.
Look how it actually happened. Actually, you know what, forget
about it. In the interest of not getting
struck down, this video is just conspiracy theories.
That's the book right there. Well, that's one book.

(08:07):
There's a few people who have written about this, but that
it's called a History of CentralBanking and there's quite, a
quite a history to it. And in his video is false and
made-up what I'm. Going yes, this is all false and
made-up. We don't none of this is real.
Obviously a conspiracy theory. This guy, I watched a few of his

(08:27):
other videos. This is the best part in some of
his other videos. I don't know, it might be this
one, I can't remember, but he's like, we're going to have to,
we're going to have to refer to them as the Brazilians because
if not, your video will be naked.
And it's true on YouTube. Thankfully, Rumble, you don't
have any problems. Rumble has, of course, got Nick

(08:48):
Fuentes, so anything's possible.Is just making stuff up and also
another important thing. Yes, Boots, thank you.
Ethnic and religious group most responsible and known for usury
and. Money.
Yeah, Here it is. It is.
Here it is. Because of course you can't call
them by their real name and not have your video removed.

(09:09):
Can't call them by their real name.
Just proves my point, but whatever.

(10:28):
None. England this island that was
wrought with conflict in the early medieval due to settling
and raiding from various post barbarian people groups.
You know, we watched with the subtitles.

(10:48):
Centuries be at the centre. How many of you guys like
subtitles? I think most of you do never.
Be devised. But for now, let's focus on how
it even came to be the first monetary system to be
constituted entirely within the structures and kierarchies of
England and not be dependent on a foreign power like the case of
Roman coinage. Would be created by King OFA

(11:11):
that ruled the Kingdom of Mercy in the 8th century.
Would go on to be a system basedon silver coinage on the account
of gold being scarce in the region.
One notable thing the king did was he prohibited usury that his
successor would expand on throughout the 10th and 11th
centuries, culminating in Edwardthe Confessor decreeing that any

(11:33):
usurer be banished for life. But why did many European
rulers? I meant to say this, the the
little intro segment of the intro was pretty good, but one
thing they don't talk much about, you never hear this is
the story with James Garfield, who was one of the probably most

(11:58):
unknown presidents that we've ever had.
I think it I'm bad with years. He was president right in the
18, probably 18, seventies, 1880s tail end of the the 19th
century, he was assassinated andpeople hardly ever think of him

(12:19):
when they think of presidents who were assassinated.
Of course it was the same same script every single time.
It was a crazy. They have been using the same
formula all these years. They got it.
They get a crazy, you know, let's see, Lee Harvey Oswald.
They had John Wilkes Booth, Pierre Guto, I think was the guy

(12:42):
who shot Garfield. All these people, same profile.
They are rejects of society. They're down on their luck.
They've been made crazy. Might have been his vice
president. Was the guy with the sideburns.
The most, probably the most forgotten president we've ever
had, Chester Arthur. Most people have never heard of

(13:05):
him. And it's because, as a matter of
fact, there's a weird story withChester Arthur.
He may 50% chance may have been secretly born in Canada and
before he died. This is the reason he's so
unknown. Before he died he literally

(13:25):
burned all of his personal documents so there's literally
no information on who he ever was.
So my guess is exactly what it looks like.
Have some guy assassin. Because James Garfield was well
liked and he was a very smart person.
He was the president who could write with both hands.
He could he was left and he could do left and right hand and

(13:47):
I think he could do one languagein one hand and one language in
another, but he was fairly well liked.
He's going to had said stuff about the bank and I I'm
curious. I might find the answer in a
minute, but said something aboutthe bank gets assassinated.
Then this obscure guy who was hewas, the way that they described

(14:08):
Chester Arthur was that he was acorrupt politician for the most
part, but as soon as he became president, he shocked everybody
and he was not as corrupt as they thought he would be.
So that's his story. So have have some crazy guy
assassinate the president and then have this obscure puppet
step in and then have him destroy all the evidence.

(14:30):
He probably destroyed all the evidence of it before he died.
So this happened before guys. Same same things happened
before. Period.
Despise usury? Well, one thing is that when
you're a monarch trying to consolidate power in your hands,
you don't want any aspiring opposition that also wants that
power. Whether it's the landed nobility

(14:52):
seeking to tear you down, or in this case, a growing merchant
class, Money knows no morality and no borders, and as history
is about to show, these financiers that sprung up from
the mercantile class would go onto, in the most clandestine and
slimy ways, use that money to bind many to her credit and

(15:12):
secure power. This happened because money was
just like it is nowadays, a shortcut to power, and most of
the medieval royalty saw these usurers as trying to cheat the
system by trying to access powerthrough money without having any
heritage, any familial bonds or history with her domains they

(15:33):
were expanding into. They were unlawful invaders.
Keen medieval rulers saw these money lenders as dirty players
and a genuine threat to security.
Another thing was how the Christian Church would also take
a stance against usury, rooted in the tradition of the greatest
European thinkers like Seneca orAristotle, who claimed that the

(15:55):
act of taking interest for moneyis natural and vile.
The church would generally abideby these rules in its early
years, but it would still participate in a hard to define
Gray area by, for example, investing into a business or
individual and binding that person lawfully to pay out a
dividend back to the church officials.

(16:18):
And as a result, collecting returns that can't really be
called interest, but act very much like it, with periodic
payments of a sum higher in value when at first invested.
Apart from this, the church would for a long time fight
usury and recognize the threat it posed political stability
inspiring many medieval rulers to abide by this doctrine.

(16:42):
The first mass arrival of money lenders in England happened
coincidentally with the entranceof Brazilians into the country.
I cannot possibly fathom a connection being made between
the two, but alas, one thing that has to be noted is the fact
of how, after the defeat of KingHarold the Second by William the
Conqueror in 1066, the victorious Norman king invited

(17:07):
the Brazilians to move from her Norman domain into newly
conquered England and for the first time in centuries allowed
the usury to be practiced on the.
Sorry I I I was found an articlebecause I was curious on the
whole assassination of Garfield and I'll show it to you shortly.

(17:30):
Under his own protection, the sources, however limited, we
could possibly maybe just quote the deals that he might have
received funding from said moneylenders for his campaign and in
return allowed them to expand their financial operation into
England, the Brazilians. For the Brazilians would.
Go on to be under constant royalprotection, seeking safety under

(17:53):
the wings of the monarch, presumably.
You guys with me here financial.Favors or.
Even thanks for the follow on kick.
Trade up financial dependency ofthe crowd.
The Brazilians money. Just remember that guys, the
Brazilians, the. Users The new Norman aristocracy
was, as it was seen for the longest time, as a foreign

(18:13):
entity by the native English commoners and nobility alike.
As a matter of fact, the money lenders in this period would go
on to issue loans with interest rates of up to 33% per year on
land mortgage by the nobles and up to 300% per year on tools
with the laborers. Within just over a century since

(18:34):
viral arrival, they have managedto assume ownership of around
1/4 of all English lands. By his death in the late 12th
century, Aaron of Lincoln Financier was supposedly the
wealthiest man in England on thebasis of his liquid assets.
Trump. That was a good one.
Henry the Second. During this period, the state

(18:57):
would go on to become the enforcer of the will of these
usurers and would exact payment almost in the exact same way it
exacted taxes. The everyday operation of these
money lenders was so successful because ever since they came
into England, they were always intertwined and incorporated

(19:18):
within the ruling in Norman aristocracy.
To say that with such a hierarchy being present, the
commoners, the clergy and the nobility alike dislike the
Brazilians would be an understatement.
Culminating in violence eruptingaround 1190 with many Brazilians
being slaughtered and verbonds being burned, freeing up a lot

(19:40):
of population from debt. As a result, the monarchy
doubled down on exacting the interest of money lenders and
and now each loan taken by a noble was to be registered and
it's fulfillment was to be keenly followed by the royal
authorities. As a result, many nobles falling
on hard times would lose their lands and property that would be

(20:01):
seized by the king for himself. Discontent with the worsening
state of affairs, the nobles would repeatedly revolt,
culminating with Edward the First being forced to abolish
all forms of usury. Here's a Here's an interesting
tidbit. Interesting tidbit in the Magna
Carta. As it happens, at that time,

(20:26):
England was Catholic. The Magna Carta was something
that King John was pressured into doing by the nobility.
They say it was the first step in democracy.
Maybe it was, but not democracy for the average person.
It was democracy for the nobles,and the nobles pressured him
into it. But the Pope was not going to

(20:47):
have it. The Pope did not want that done.
He was not in. The Pope did not support the
Magna Carta and essentially he, the Pope at the time, put
pressure on King John and King John signed a contract with the
Pope that said if I enter back into this agreement, all of

(21:11):
England becomes papal church, you know, church land owned by
the church. And him having so he hadn't
signed the Magna Carta yet, the nobles wanted him to sign Magna
Carta. He was holding off because the
Pope did not want him to do it. He signed it.

(21:32):
And so the Pope, having signed that agreement, arguably has
right to the land of England andnobody knows about it.
Apparently it was done in the background.
It's very possible. I know I kind of butchered that
at the end, but I'll I'll recap.The nobles wanted King John to
sign the Magna Carta. The Pope said no, so they had to

(21:54):
force King John into doing it. King John had agreed not to sign
the charter to the Pope. If he did, all of England would
go to the Pope. He signed the charter.
Arguably, England went to the Pope of.
The 13th century and compelling the Brazilian population of
16,511 to leave England forever.It would be just one of the very

(22:19):
numerous expulsions of the Brazilians throughout European
history and would also, by complete coincidence, ushering
the age of prosperity in England.
From the 13th century onwards, England experienced what we
could call a golden age as not only the debt but the taxes were
moderate, pay was decent and as a result of the many laborers

(22:43):
having more free time with up to180 days in the year being
holidays, we saw the construction of some of Europe's
greatest cathedrals. It is said that the living
standard of 15th century Englandwould only be surpassed in the
19th century. Unfortunately, with a more
strained political situation andcomplacency from the crown, such

(23:05):
a state of affairs would not last and a blatant disregard the
lessons learned in the past would cause the island nation to
spiral and commit the mistake, the consequences of which we can
still see this very day. But let's not get too ahead of
ourselves. It's the year of 1492 and the

(23:29):
English are still enjoying a period of relative prosperity.
And this year, a very notable population of Spanish Brazilians
and Muranos had been Brazilians that converted to Christianity
voluntarily or by force but still practiced for religion in
secret would be banished from Spain.
They weren't particularly liked to say the least, mostly as a

(23:53):
result of being seen as traitorous because of their
alliance and cooperation with the many Muslim rulers which had
occupied the Iberian peninsula from the 8th to the 15th
century. With the Reconquista drawing for
a successful end, their entire population would be banished and
would start seeking new domains to expand into.

(24:14):
The thing is, however, money lending was decried as a moral
by the Church, especially when practiced by a Christian lending
money to other Christians. It would become increasingly
popular in the highly mercantileseafaring cities on the European
shores. Even on the overwhelmingly
Catholic Mediterranean coast, there were many European and
Brazilian banking families in Italy being sheltered by city

(24:37):
elites from having to abide by the Christian moral code, being
allowed to pay a very low fine. That, rather than actually
deterring the bankers from practicing usury, made them even
more entrenched by whittling away at the smaller aspiring
competition. It is very well known that the
Vatican would borrow money oftenfrom the 14th to the 16th

(25:01):
century, going against its own teachings.
But one thing that might partially explain this hypocrisy
it's how far of the Pope's ruling from the 15th and 16th
centuries. Were bankers.
Came from a very influential Italian.
They were bankers. Called Medici, financiers would
bribe the Church with preferablerates and donations to keep

(25:24):
themselves afloat and flourishing in a highly
mercantile economy, and so many popes would shelter usurers
under their own wings and rely on them for financial support.
But unlike the more secular states of Northern Europe, the
Mediterranean bankers would still be trumped in power and
reach by the Church, always being the stronger institution

(25:47):
and very often coming into conflict with the Brazilian
banking families, especially when Italian families would have
so much influence over the Church as to have the Pope from
their own family. The existence of such a massive
financial institution like the Catholic Church still impeded
the growth of bankers not associated with it, and

(26:08):
especially the Brazilian ones, them being of course seen as
competition. And so most Brazilians, banished
from Spain, would seek greener pastures elsewhere.
The Church, despite its size, would still bend the knee before
the financiers. Later on, as in the 19th
century, would become the domainof the Rothschilds.

(26:29):
The bankers didn't forget about the Church, which for a long
time argued against them and wasgenerally a foreign in
Versailles. The Rothschild family would
become the treasurers and financiers of the Papal State
which translated into a subjugation of the Catholic
Church as they now held the strings over the ones great

(26:50):
institution. Centuries later but they still
got the revenge. Bear in mind the Rothschild
family name as they will become of paramount importance later
down the line. Coming back into the main
timeline, the obvious destination for the banished
Brazilians at the time was Holland in generational conflict

(27:11):
with the Spanish crown that was encroaching on Dutch soil and
messing with Dutch interests. As a result of this political
tension, the Dutch would overwhelmingly partake in the
Protestant Reformation in opposition to the Catholic
Church as it was seen as an extension of the Spanish crown.
This anti Catholicism, hailing from the conflict and the dire

(27:32):
need for resources and against the formidable opponent and a
strong seafaring mercantile economy made the Netherlands a
perfect home base for any aspiring financier and banker.
Open economies like the Netherlands at the time were
very reliant on foreign imports to fuel growth, so they ended

(27:53):
up. There I think it's funny, like
when you go and you look at modern history, you know, for
instance, maybe for some other people it's different, but for
me, one of the more obscure times in the historical timeline
is the 16 hundreds of, you know,the 17th century.
It's a little obscure. I mean, there's a lot of things

(28:15):
that happened before it, a lot of things that happened after
it, but you don't hear of much in in the 17th century.
And I think it's funny when you hear, you know, people talking
about it, referencing it. They're like, nobody knows why
this was what they did or nobodyknows why they did this random

(28:36):
thing. It's like once you understand
that there's definitely a lot going on in the background, you
can only guess. So to an extent they're right,
but you can only guess. But you can make educated
guesses as to what was really going on in the background.
And, and if you're trained well,you could start to pick up, you
know, bread crumbs. It's interesting.

(28:58):
Very easy to subdue, with that being an easy task of
monopolizing the right to issue credit to the people importing
said goods by creating private banks, which is what the
Brazilians did and still do best.
During the 16th and 17th centuries, the Netherlands would
enjoy an economic golden age with the Iberian Brazilians

(29:20):
bringing huge amounts of capitalinto the country.
Within a few generations, usury and banking would flourish and
would dominate the Dutch economyfor the next few centuries.
Of the most influential and wealthy people in the whole
Netherlands being the aforementioned money lenders,
the Netherlands would go on to become, for the longest time a

(29:40):
base of operation for these Brazilian financiers trying to
expect. How many of you like how many of
the the people watching it doesn't matter where you're
watching, how many of you guys are into history or or study
history? If you don't, it's OK.
I'm just curious. What I am really kind of eager
to do is now that I've kind of Substack is doing well, my

(30:07):
YouTube channel is doing well, this Rumble channel is doing
well. I really want to start taking
advantage of it by just polling.You know, something on YouTube
that you can do is you can do channel posts and you can do
polls or you can do quizzes or whatever.
And it's really, it's a great advantage if you have, you know,

(30:28):
even 1000 people, 2003 thousand people.
Which of these four things do you think is best or just, you
know, just to get a temperature or get a gauge a pulse on your
viewership? Yeah, that's good.
I've definitely done that. I'm with you on that 100%.

(30:49):
I just asked because I was sitting here thinking when I was
young, when I was like 131415, Iwas really into history.
Like what I would do is I would just ask a question.
I would go on Wikipedia, go on, you know, find something.
But then you just fall down a rabbit hole.
Just literally what you, you know, you start clicking into

(31:10):
Wikipedia and before you know it, two hours have gone by and
you're like 50 entries in. And I would watch a lot of the
historical shows on TV, some of them good, some of them better.
For instance, like the Tutors, which was a Showtime, I think it
was Showtime. Brilliant, absolutely brilliant

(31:31):
series. It was like a big, probably one
of the biggest series of that time on TV.
It was like 2006, 2007 I think. But I was really immersed in it.
So you know, the idea of history, like it was something
that I knew about. And Fast forward to today,

(31:55):
looking at all of this stuff, it's, it's a little nice having
a generalized bit of history knowledge.
Yeah, Claire, that's perfectly fair.
I'm with you 100%. What I have.
So what I have learned to do my my method, it's not foolproof.
For instance, I, I definitely get into revisionist history,

(32:17):
which you know, means like alternate history.
I think it's good to hear different viewpoints, but the
Trivium method, I don't know howmany of you have heard of the
Trivium method. The first step is grammar.
You need to get, for instance, if your reality is made out of
language and words, then you need to get as many words in

(32:38):
your vocabulary as possible. In this step can be
encapsulated. And if there's a word that you
hear or see that you don't understand, you don't know what
that word means. Do you take it upon yourself to
look it up to see what the word means, or do you just say, I
don't know, I don't care? That's the first step.
But it also involves getting information from as many

(32:58):
different sources as possible onall sides.
The more data, the better you want.
You need a data set. Is what you're doing OK?
So I try to aggregate things. So for instance, if I say
something or I base a line of historical reasoning on it, what

(33:18):
I'll do is I'll generally try togo, it's what I have a lot of
data on. If I have 5-6 books that paint a
similar enough picture, just, you know, from different
viewpoints, then it's safe to take a bit of a core.
You know, you don't want to, youdon't want to lock it in as

(33:40):
100%, but it's like, OK, this seems to be what's happening.
And honestly, the most importantpart of the whole thing is I
just don't ever think I've got it solved all the way.
I don't think I have a an accurate picture.
And because of that, I'm always willing to hear other sides of

(34:02):
reasoning. Maybe this happened.
Well, and what about this? It's it's a good way to to judge
things like that. But as to what you said, it's
true. You will never have a fully
accurate picture of history and that's why to a certain extent,
the Bible is very important. And one of the things that I've

(34:27):
thought for a long time, I'm going to get to that boots.
One of the things I thought for a long time was, do Christians
or anyone practicing faith, do they have an obligation to at
least, like, I don't mean obsessively, compulsively study

(34:47):
history, but they have an obligation to at least, I don't
know, question or look or learn where their own faith came from
and what the basic history of their faith is.
And I, I didn't know the answer.And you know, I, I eventually
came to my, this is my thinking,I think so I, I, I do.
And I've actually heard it in this analogy of the two

(35:09):
witnesses. So there are two witnesses in
the Bible. And the idea is that the Bible
and Scripture, God's word is one, but the second is history.
And it's only when you you have the two.
That's why there's two. That's, you know, there's not
one witness, There's two. You need to do the duality.
So if you want to look at the Bible by itself, well, OK, maybe

(35:32):
it's just a fairy tale. But if you look at history by
itself, why are all these crazy things happening in history?
But when you put the two together, the Bible and history,
they confirm and validate and affirm each other.
When you look at the Bible, it'shis prophecy is history written
in advance. And so you look at the Bible and

(35:55):
then you look at prophecy and you, you have the two witnesses.
They are what? Witness and confirm God's word,
God's prophecy, God's existence.Boots, I, I had saw what you
said. I just wanted to finish my line
of thought better. You said I like studying the war
for Southern independence. They call it the Civil War.

(36:17):
My dad said look it up. Because when you win the war,
you write history. You're not, you write history
your way, not actually what really happened.
Well, honestly, at this point, the way you describe it, the
idea of it's just something thatyou were taught by your dad,
that's a big part of it because you got to remember history was

(36:39):
passed down orally for the longest time, and that that does
write itself into history. It's like some of history was
probably lost just because people kept retelling the story
slightly differently. But yeah, so I mean, I obviously
you know who I am, but I believethere's definitely some

(37:03):
deliberate obfuscation with withhistory.
Absolutely, you're right. History is written by the
vicars, so. And for influence.
And in this case, they had set their eyes on England in the

(37:25):
16th century, during the reign of Queen Elizabeth the 1st small
numbers of Muranos Brazilians, that being nominal converts to
Christianity, would start being LED into.
England also, what I've got is the conversos, a lot of these
people who he's talking about, basically they were Jewish

(37:46):
people who were forced. Some of them, you know,
willingly converted to Catholicism, you know, obviously
as a way to escape the Inquisition because they, you
know, they say, oh, you know, in, in Islam, they will kill you
if you don't convert. And OK, in some cases that's
true, but the Catholic Church was doing that a long time ago.

(38:08):
So Islam has been around for a long time.
But the Catholic Church literally, if you OK any, and
I've covered this with you before, any of the torture
devices, you know, that you see on Facebook like, oh, this was a
medieval torture device. The the classic ones, the Iron
Maiden, all of that stuff came from the Inquisition, the

(38:29):
Catholic Church. It's, it's that's good area.
That's I don't live far from anyof those areas.
I'm I'm near Ohio, Kentucky, really nice areas.
Yeah. It's let's see, the cities are
OK since Cincinnati is the closest city to me.

(38:50):
There are some bad parts of Cincinnati.
Don't get me wrong. Once you go into the college
areas, it's OK. Some of the places down there
are cool. If you go to the river, the Ohio
River, it's nice. Kentucky, it's got nice stuff.
Newport's nice. But there are some scenic parts

(39:11):
of Cincinnati. That part of Ohio, Kentucky,
those are beautiful areas. Indiana's not bad.
Indiana's nice fresh air out in Indiana the.
Rapidly growing financial dependency of European rulers on
money lend to them by said usurers, with interest rates on

(39:32):
loans to the Crown or Treasury exceeding 20 and 30% per year
and 60 to 80% with loans given to poor workmen.
Despite the legal limit of the time being only 6% per year for
entrance into England would alsomark the humble beginnings of
fractional reserve banking. That being a system where the

(39:52):
bank would provide receipts, that being bills of exchange of
any form without covering the full sum of all the money owed
to their clients with reserve capital increasing efficiency
and profits, but making the system a highly unstable and
often fraudulent. But let's focus on the larger
political state during the 16th century, upon close observation
of which we can determine a great deal of motives that

(40:16):
indicate a great deal of involvement of these foreign
money lenders in English politics.
First of all, in 1534, the Church of England was
established as an independent entity from the Catholic Church,
marking the first crack in English religious unity.
If you wanted to, let's say, increase your influence over the

(40:36):
English people. Now see, I I have the document
pulled up, but there's a lot there.
I'm not going to get into that totally, but the case that I
mentioned earlier with the Catholic Church having a claim
to England as property, a contractual claim, that would,

(40:56):
that would put the Protestant Reformation in a whole new
light. I mean, maybe he broke from the
church because he didn't want torecognize that authority.
Henry the Eighth, I mean, sure he was, he was doing the thing
with his wife, all the 8 wives too.
But again, they can't tell you the the full thing.

(41:16):
You could possibly exploit this new found division within the
church to, under the guise of a religious war, seize the control
of the government by picking or creating a side to the conflict.
And make and I'm sorry that I keep pausing.
I know that's annoying, but I amof the belief now, and this is a

(41:36):
really kind of a recent thing that I recognized.
I am of the belief that if you want to understand what a
potential civil war would look like in our modern day and age,
it's going to be a religious war, which particularly the
American Civil War was not it. I know people are going to

(41:57):
correct on that, but not like I'm thinking of.
I think that the next civil war,should it happen, will be much
like the English Civil War back in the 1600s.
I think that's what a modern civil war would look like.
And so that's what's got me kindof interested in this part of
history, because the English Civil War was a religious war,

(42:20):
but you have all this banking stuff going on in the
background. That side entirely dependent on
your funding and in return if they will do your bidding.
That's exactly what happened in 17th century England when the
flames of religious decision were fanned, with Puritans being
agitated against the Anglicans. Another important aspect to keep

(42:40):
in mind is help. And the Puritans, funny enough,
all of these evangelicals in Congress, they are
restorationists. They are almost Puritan.
Puritan teachings put Braziliansin a more favorable light due to
very strict focus on basing the religious identity on the Old
Testament way. More Hey, I'm sorry to hear

(43:01):
that, Boots. At the time.
That's screwed Israel descrabbly.
Father of Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote that the
nation was artfully divided intoSabbatarians and Sabbath
Breakers. How long ago was that, Boots?
Broke out between the Anglicans and the Puritans, with the
latter winning under the commandof Oliver Cromwell with his New

(43:22):
Model Army. Cromwell was known as someone,
and I quote particularly well disposed towards the Brazilians
and. So here's He liked the
Brazilians. Frequent dealings Cromwell,
because of his strained relationship with the assembly,
had to rely on funding from Goldsmiths.
There's. No the.

(43:42):
Influence. I'm sorry, I'm not trying to do
this, but how many of you guys have ever seen the movie?
It's called Cromwell and it was about the English Civil War.
Now, this was a movie back in the 80s, I think, and of course
the movie was much better than anything they could make today
because it was made a while back.

(44:02):
But it was a great, brilliant movie.
The money lenders in funding Cromwell's military operation,
with names such as Manasseh, then Israel and Fernandez
Karvajal having petitioned for the entrance of Brazilians into
England and directly arranged financial favors.
Cromwell's connection to money lenders is undeniable, as a

(44:25):
letter from him to Ebenezer Pratt, a financier living in
Germany, shows how much of what he did was only possible due to
the financial support from the Brazilians.
In return for financial support,we'll advocate the admission of
Jews into England. This, however, impossible while

(44:45):
Charles still living. Charles cannot be executed
without trial. Adequate grounds for which do
not at present exist therefore advise that Charles be
assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements
for procuring an assassin. Though willing to help him in
his escape, he would go on to purge the House of Commons in

(45:07):
order to make a vote condemning the King Charles to death, and
when no English lawyer was readyto draw charges against the
King, he enlisted the help of a Dutch lawyer called Isaac
Dorislaus. Regicide having taken place,
Charles the Second, the executedKing's son, would be the last
monarch to issue banknotes entirely within his own right as

(45:30):
he passed 2 acts that would set in motion one of the most
profoundly important transfers of wealth and power in human
history. Firstly, in 1663, the Act for
the Encouragement of Trade, which allowed exporting of all
foreign coin or bullion of gold or silver free of interdict,
regulation or duties of any kind.

(45:53):
This meant that foreigners couldnow accumulate wealth with gold
and silver outside of England itself.
That meant a transfer of wealth outside the jurisdiction of the
Crown and the possibility of creating banks completely
independent of the English state.
The second act was passed in 1666, called the Act for the

(46:13):
Encouragement of Coinage. It gave private individuals, in
this case bankers, the right to mint coins within the
institutions of the Royal Mint, which allowed these financiers
to collect senorage at being profit coming from the
different. Funny enough, 1666 was a very
interesting year. Talk about the obscure 1600s.

(46:37):
A lot of things happened in 1666.
They also passed the say stay QVtrust.
I think that's how you say it, but it has to do with this idea
that basically all unclaimed property, if there was property
that was unclaimed, they would assume after so much time that

(46:59):
the person who held the propertywas lost at sea, missing, dead,
lost at sea, and then they wouldobviously put the property into
a trust. Between the production cost of
minting a coin and the perceivedmarket value of that coin, which
is usually higher than the production cost in which in turn

(47:23):
and allows to take profit from introducing coins to the market.
This basically surrendered the control over the.
Money. Oh wow, that's crazy.
Said money lenders, meaning thatthey could deflate and inflate
the currency to their liking. But let's not get too ahead of
ourselves. At the dawn of the 17th century,
the previously mentioned Charlesthe Second had a brother, James

(47:44):
the Second, who would rule for barely three years as a result
of being overthrown by a Dutch Prince, William of Orange.
At this point in history, the fact of the Netherlands role as
a base of operations for money lenders wanting to expand their
domain becomes very apparent. What doesn't help their case is
how John Churchill, the Duke of Marlboro in James.

(48:07):
'S Marlboro asserted him up. Wonder if is this the cigarette
guy? It could very well could be.
From a Dutch merchant. And another interesting thing I
found out about James the Second.
So James the Second, as a matterof fact, he was, it's called the
Glorious Revolution. I'm not quite sure.

(48:31):
Basically he, James the Second left.
Where did he go? He went to the College of
Clement, which was a Jesuit university.
And according to the Encyclopedia Freemasonry, it was
at the College of Clement, the Jesuit college where James the

(48:52):
Second had devised plans for a Scottish Rite of Freemasonry to
be set up to restore the Stuart Scottish line to the throne of
England. And so at the top, the Scottish
Rite, a lot of that doctrine waswritten by Jesuits at the

(49:16):
College of Clement for James theSecond.
Yeah. Most history, there's got to be
enough truth mixed in to make itmake sense, you know, to make
logical sense enough for people to bite.
But obviously some of their tactics are, for instance, they

(49:37):
will take and they will mix in one very well placed deliberate
falsehood into an otherwise truescenario.
But that falsehood is designed to basically perfectly misdirect
somebody. So you'll make them go right
when they should have gone left.Some of the tactics are really

(49:58):
advanced, but that is one of themost simple ones that I see a
lot of. From On the Medina, which
weakened the king enough to cause him a loss to William of
Orange. This seizure of power by the
Dutch Prince would be another important element to the
historical puzzle of central banking, as during his reign he

(50:19):
would surrender the right of thecrown, free of debt and interest
to the private financiers now flooding the country, and would
go on to establish the national debt.
Let's pause for a moment. How was it that the Brazilian
bankers managed to enact so muchinfluence on European rulers and

(50:39):
politicians that they always would find or manufacture some
person that would do verbidding first of all?
Good for him, Booth. Is a very profitable business.
It allows to, not. I would have to the.
Poor falling on a hard times trying to make ends meet, but
also the royalty in desperate need of a cash infusion just to

(50:59):
keep them afloat on the political state.
So let me just say this real quick.
James the Second goes to the College of Clement.
He is Scottish. He is the Stuart Scottish line.
William of Orange was Dutch. He was the German Hanover line.

(51:24):
That is a German Dutch line. We all know that the Royals were
Nazis. Well, that that's who just came
over and replaced James the Second.
So the Scottish Rite was set up by James the Second, according
to the Encyclopedia Freemasonry,to restore the Scottish claim to
the throne. Now one thing that I am

(51:48):
interested in all in thinking about this is the City of
London. One of the things, if you don't
talk about the City of London, had it been exerting a lot of
force at this time? And so there was definitely the
American Revolution. As a matter of fact, what was
going on in the colonies, there was a lot of a dispute between

(52:10):
the City of London, the Parliament and the King.
So there's a lot of tension going on there and I would like
to know more. Dire circumstances don't
discriminate, and as a result itallows these morally destitute
enough to Leech off human misfortune and mistakes.
In European history could alwaysfind a desperate noble, an

(52:31):
extremely ambitious aristocrat, important people that need just
that one loan, just one monetaryinfusion to get going again.
And that's how you bind not onlythe poor commoners, but the
influential nobles, all the heads of the nations, for your
credit, your money. It's a Fairpoint scorpion.
Second of all, why were they so successful in subduing state by

(52:55):
state? Brazilian morality works
different. To your, there's morality.
I sit here and I think there's alittle bit, at least for me
there, there's definitely a little bit of a romantization of
history. You know, when you explore the
art and the writing and, and just the culture of it, the way

(53:16):
it's presented, either way, it is it, there's a bit of an like
a, an interest in it. It doesn't necessarily have to
be negative. There's plenty of interesting
positive things in history, you know, for instance, the the way
they used to do architecture andstuff like that, that that
really fascinates me. But yeah, it doesn't, it doesn't

(53:36):
have to be negative. You could always you know it is
what you make of it or what you look for.
They did and still do believe themselves to be superior to
outsiders. Not only that, also as a result
of that feeling of supremacy, allow for a worse treatment of
the outsiders of the religion, as according to their scriptures

(53:56):
you can cheat, mistreat and scamany outsider to their faith they
form extremely. Hermetic.
The Brazilians would not do that.
Marry. Outside for societies and as a
result accumulate and retain wealth more efficiently.
I don't think the Brazilians would do something like that.
Which was told that all people are going to be judged equally,

(54:18):
but to swindle and cheat is in no case acceptable.
Christian Scripture reinforce the feeling.
I don't know if I'm reading thatright, what do you mean?
R Garrison building used to perform in the past.
Empathy or pity towards non believers, not superiority or

(54:38):
didn't make much mention of the God's particular affection
towards them. More focusing on universalism.
Better see the difference in morality.
Let me ask you a question. Have you ever seen a Brazilian
religious mission? Yeah, me neither.
Yeah, the Brazilians do not recruit They that's one thing.

(54:59):
Somebody pointed that out and I was shocked that I'd never
thought of that before. A lot of other religions at
least are a little bit more forefront with trying to convert
people, specifically Christianity.
Islam is to a certain degree. I don't know about Hinduism.
And Judaism isn't either more ofa proselytize.

(55:21):
I think that's what that means. On preaching to others, but
rather on keeping that enlightenment within their own
societies in a more consolidatedfamilial and tribal structure.
As opposed to Christianity whichis based on preaching the truth
to as many as possible, trying to allow as many as possible to
have a chance at achieving salvation.

(55:42):
Implanting these people in a society as a minority will in
turn amplify the majority populations hate for hermetic,
non assimilationist, superioritycomplex fueled attitude and
further stoke the Brazilians pride and disdain of outsiders.
It's a sort of feedback loop where you end up with the
natives increasingly disliking the Brazilians for who they are

(56:05):
and vice versa. The Brazilians had the perfect
combination of the morality based on in Group loyalty paired
with a disdain of outsiders and a non assimilationist attitude
combined with being barred from participating in most trades.
As a result of reciprocal dislike from the natives, they

(56:26):
ended up dominating the banking sector while exploiting the.
Weaknesses. Oh, yeah, man, Like I said,
that's, that's exactly what I'm referring to it.
And you, you articulated that perfectly.
It really is. It's like just the the what do
they call them? Like the aqueducts or the the
sewers? The way that Rome had that set

(56:48):
up all those years ago. That was just brilliant.
Amanda says Catholics are now telling people a spirit.
No, I don't know. Let's see.
That's Well, all right. That's a good point.
See the thing about Catholicism,a lot of times they vote with
Republicans because of the pro, you know, the pro-life.

(57:11):
But oddly enough the Catholic Church is liberal as hell.
They are having, and again, I don't know, back if you go back,
oddly enough to Leo the 13th andin the, let's see, the end of
the 1800s, who is Pope? He issued A encyclical that was

(57:36):
very similar to the Communist Manifesto only a few years after
the Communist Manifesto. The Catholic Church is very
communist. For instance, Catholic churches
all for open borders. And they say that from inside
the Vatican where there's a big wall around in a private army.
So. But other than that, they vote

(57:58):
Republican, but they're liberal.Of the European people bit by
bit trapping entire nations independency to their money now
knowing the brief historical background surrounding this
transfer of wealth and power of paramount importance between
what we could consider a largelydomestic population and the
foreign and coordinated influence we can start

(58:21):
approaching the. S church and state are not mixed
all the way yet. They're getting there and
they're getting started, but this is not as bad as it's going
to be. The Bank of England, it's going
to be much worse. 1994 it would lend the money at interest to
the king in order to pursue war,which would rack up further debt
and further dependency of the Crown on said institution, but

(58:42):
also expand the money lenders usurious domain.
Key to understanding the nefarious nature of the
establishment of the Bank of England is analysing the very
bill that was passed that made the Bank operational was itself
passed, with only 42 members being present in the House of

(59:02):
Commons out of the total 514. Such was the case because the
vote was called in the middle ofthe summer, and most members of
the House were away in the countryside tending to farming
duties, as most of them were rural noblemen.
The title of the bill, just likethe previously mentioned acts
that laid the foundation, made little mention of the intended

(59:25):
establishment of the Bank of England, as the bill itself was
called. An Act granting to their Majesty
several raids and duties upon tonnage of ships and vessels,
upon beer, ale and other liquors.
It's interesting, why? Why would these people not
reveal their intentions to the general public and instead hide

(59:45):
and in the most secretive ways try to take over, never
revealing the real intentions? It's almost like what we're
doing is extremely malicious andis the equivalent of a hostile
takeover, with the final goal being the total usurpation of
all productivity in a society. What made the banks so
disastrous? For the English people is it was

(01:00:08):
structured around regulating themoney supply, so the issuing of
money is being torn away from the government itself and
creating a second state with an estate, a central bank.
The thing is, managing fiscal policy and the treasury is
basically the best shortcut to power.
You usurp the only meaningful resource in the entire

(01:00:30):
government, More important than the army, more important than
any treaty or support of the people.
What happened in England was nothing short of just a power
transfer, nothing different fromtaking over the government.
Except the only thing the financiers did differently is
they didn't make any glaring changes to the system and kept

(01:00:51):
the forms of all the relevant. With the monarch being
supposedly the head of the state.
This might be hard to conceive of, but what happened is a
hidden government was imposed onto an already existing one.
When you control the ability of the state to issue currency,
when you control the credit thatthe state receives, when you

(01:01:12):
manage the state's reserves, youcan basically through this back
door manage every other aspect of the state from commerce to
foreign policy. What I'm talking about, when I
mentioned the transfer of wealthand power is exactly this.
A second ceiling to an already existing government, a
usurpation of power from what wecan see as the head of the

(01:01:34):
state, into the hands of a clandestine group of financiers.
Every time a new central bank gets instituted by these
Brazilian financiers, What we'retalking about is at its core,
nothing more than a takeover of the government, a subjugation of
the entire state apparatus. It is an invasion, but with the

(01:01:54):
difference. But it doesn't instantly remove
all signs of the old regime. It doesn't depose of old forms
of the government, but rather stealthily implants itself into
it. Alongside indebting the Crown to
the money lenders, the ACT also introduced numerous new taxes
that were supposed to pay interest on all present and

(01:02:17):
future debts, including a land tax, paper tax, full tax, SALT
tax, time tax, window tax, tax bachelors and most importantly,
an income tax levied at 20% applying to all sources of
revenue. But what was the real purpose of
a bank like this? As a matter of fact, what is the
purpose of any other central bank modelled after the Bank of

(01:02:39):
England present today? Were you to believe the
mainstream narrative, you'd be told that they provide credit,
managed currency, deal with monetary policy, provide
stability, but wait, provide stability.
Up to this point, they've been only inciting wars and
manipulating markets. Why would the state surrender
its right to issue currency freeof debt and interest?

(01:03:00):
Wouldn't that make for a more flexible fiscal policy?
Why does issuing Fiat currency carry interest?
Why are all of these central banks being instituted by
foreigners? It's almost like they're a back
door into controlling the government.
Now that's that's crazy. That can be.
As a matter of fact, these banksonly exist because our ancestors

(01:03:21):
lost the fight with this Kabala financiers.
There's no other reason as to why, only why is that their
chains of dependency. These banks are like watchtowers
in a prison. They're monuments to our own
subjugation. And when you go through the
history of their establishment, we're always instituted through
intrigue and force, never merit.By 1722, majority of the bank's

(01:03:44):
shares were owned by such English sounding family names as
the Medina da Costa, Fonseca, Enriquez, Nunez, Salvador and
Teixeira de Matos. After the American War of
Independence, the national debt soared to 176,000,000 lbs.
England would fervor its debt with each war it fought, and

(01:04:05):
unsurprisingly, there would be many wars against countries that
for a long time oppose the creation of a sin.
One thing that I didn't know if it was going to mention or not,
because he's got a few videos talking about this book, The
First Bank of the United States was set up by Alexander Hamilton

(01:04:26):
who basically kind of sold us out.
But after George Washington said, you know, George
Washington warned against the Illuminati, they just don't tell
you about that letter ever. But Washington was well aware of
the Illuminati's. He he called them Jacobins.
They were called the Jacobins. And there's actually a magazine
there. There was a magazine called

(01:04:47):
Jacobin. Jacobin is what the Illuminati
was referred to in Washington's time because they were involved
in the French Revolution, the reign of Terrors or Jacobins.
But it's, it's a bit interesting.
The the first bank had established itself and then it

(01:05:13):
went on to basically scam America.
It went on to have its calls in America before the turn of the
1800s. And so when the 1800s rolled
around and Jefferson was president in the bank came up
for a charter to be renewed. Jefferson put an axe in it first

(01:05:38):
bank. And that was shortly right
before the War of 1812 when the British came and burned the
White House and most of Washington, DC.
And so it's very clear to anybody looking that the War of
1812 was in retaliation for Jefferson axing the First Bank.

(01:06:03):
Central bank on their lands. Each war would not only give an
opportunity for financial expansion for the bankers, but
it would also in and out of itself necessitate increased
spending and as a result would further increase the national
debt. And now every central bank from
the 18th century through the 20th century would be created in

(01:06:24):
the image of the Bank of England.
But let's go back to the second-half of the 17th century,
as I want to illustrate an interesting theory.
A few years before the Bank of England was established, there
already existed a central bank in Sweden, which, unlike the
English 1, wasn't instituted by the same cabal of financiers,

(01:06:45):
but rather by a merchant named Johan Palmstruk, which wasn't
much affiliated with the Brazilian bankers of the
Netherlands and England. He was allowed by the Swedish
king to take deposits and issue loans as he would play an
important role in financing military expenditure.
That's only for the lay people because as as it would happen,

(01:07:08):
there were a few connections between the Freemasons and the
church leadership. For instance, it was widely
believed that the the Masons hadsomething to do with the murder
of probably John Paul the 1st and recently in the 70s and

(01:07:30):
Clement the whatever that shut down the Jesuits.
I think that the Jesuits and theFreemasons had a lot of overlap
in the people they were dealing with.
It was like the mob dealing withthe CIA.
They all exist in this underbelly.
So you're, no, you're right. There is a papal bull that
forbids Catholics from being Freemasons.

(01:07:52):
But that doesn't mean they, you know, they're priests.
And because they're priests, they're good with God.
And so if they're going to be a Freemason, it's OK because
they're priests. It's like they don't practice
what they preach. They they're molesting children.
You think they care if they're not allowed to be Freemasons?
Well, that's if you tell them you're a Freemason.

(01:08:13):
You don't have to tell them thatyou're a Freemason.
You just go and you don't say anything.
And Freemasons can identify eachother without being spotted.
In knowing that, let's look intohow if you are theoretically in
charge of a financial institution could destroy
another financial establishment.Your competition, so-called bank

(01:08:36):
run or bank panic is when the wider public is convinced that a
bank is going to fail due to a perceived inability to cover the
people's deposits with real money and simple terms.
Many banks back then where and especially going into the modern
period, are fractional reserve banks, meaning that they only
hold a small. Yeah, that's a fair fairpoint.

(01:08:58):
Cash relative to the people's deposits and loans in any
fractional Reserve Bank. If every or even every other
person that has money deposited in Cent Bank was to demand a
payout of that money, that bank who would not have the capital
to do it as most of it is lockedin investments, bonds,
securities and debt, so only a fraction of cash remains as

(01:09:20):
actual reserves. With normal traffic.
That system works fine as peoplegenerally don't demand huge
withdrawals, and if they do, thebank will in due time transfer
that money into the reserve and into the hands of the customer.
But when a rumor compelling people of the bank's financial
trouble is spread, or general instability is present,

(01:09:42):
indicating a possibility that ofthe money that you deposited at
that bank being at risk, people will in turn resort to as
quickly as they can, withdrawingas much money as they can from
said bank as a response to save what they can.
The problem lies in the very fact that every fractional

(01:10:03):
Reserve Bank won't have full cover of all deposits, and the
simple rumor is enough to cause insolvency and collapse.
A bank. Now the Stockholm's bank, as it
was called in its final iteration, would pioneer the use
of banknotes to cover for its small and fragile reserves.
You see, this was a fractional Reserve Bank, meaning it only

(01:10:25):
kept small amount of reserves incopper, silver and gold relative
to the amount of loans and banknotes it was issuing.
This model wasn't particularly new at the time and would go on
to completely dominate global banking in the current times,
but in the 17th century it was still pretty primitive and
potentially very volatile and unstable.

(01:10:45):
Key to understanding the story is remembering that the Hong
Kong Banco was a largely independent initiative and as a
result would be targeted by the English Dutch financial
establishment in a more or less directed effort to uproot their
competition. First of all, the English, Dutch
speculators would manipulate theprice of copper in Sweden which

(01:11:07):
the bank heavily relied on for its reserves as Sweden employed
A largely copper backed currency.
Second of all, after causing thecopper prices to fall, the
speculators rushed to get for bank notes exchanged into
copper, which the bank didn't have enough in its reserves due
to poor risk management. Combined with the exploitation

(01:11:30):
by the speculators of the very fractional reserve nature of the
bank. This caused a liquidity crisis
when people learned about the insolvency of the bank.
And even more, worsen the situation by attempting to
withdraw over deposits at once, which even a healthy fractional
Reserve Bank wouldn't be able todo, and especially 1 being

(01:11:54):
heavily speculated against by anorganized force.
This resulted in a panic and collapsed the establishment on
the bones of which a central bank sprung up, owned and
managed by individuals associated with the English
Dutch banking establishment. You want to know what sort of
political system is most oppressive to the common man?

(01:12:15):
It's one where the masses don't even know who was in charge.
And guess what? That's exactly the position that
the bankers have secured for themselves.
Usually we think of all sorts ofabsolutist regimes, totalitarian
states, as the worst when it comes to the treatment of its
people. But in such systems, the ruler,

(01:12:36):
the government or the party, it's still vulnerable.
The people know and see clearly where the repression is coming
from, and they can focus their anger against them.
But with bankers, if they're notpublic personalities, they don't
show themselves at all. They remain hidden behind the
governments they have taken over.
As a result, the oppressed people only know to blame the

(01:12:58):
government and politicians, which can be deposed as quickly
as they were instituted. The financiers can just create
another government, another monarch, another party.
This is the most oppressive formof government because every bout
of dissatisfaction from the masses is focused against a
disposable entity and not the real source of suffering and

(01:13:20):
injustice. That's a fair way to put it.
As a result, can get away with ruining people's livelihoods for
recessions, bank runs, inflationary and deflationary
spirals, revolutions, wars, supply shocks, pamphleteering,
speculation runs. Because in each case the people
will be manipulated into blamingA scapegoat like the government

(01:13:40):
or another country are simply untouchable because how can you
fight someone you don't even know exists?
With England and Sweden now under the financiers control,
they set Versailles on 2 particular countries.
The US and France for North American endeavors, which are

(01:14:02):
probably the most relevant ones today, are too complex to just
tack on to this video and will be talked about in detail in the
second part. But the French episode warrants
a look into as it will set the stage for their future world
domination. Going into the 18th century
history of Western Europe was going to witness an ironic

(01:14:22):
sequence of events. Remember the Norman Conquest of
England which introduced a largescale organized usury into
England? Well, in a sick twist of fate,
the English, or rather the many bankers now holding considerable
power over the crown, will try for almost a century to
establish a centralized, usurious system of banking in

(01:14:44):
France. An interesting turn in the
history of European banking is the story of the Royal Bank of
France that sprung up after the death of the infamous Sun King
Louis the 14th. It was established by a Scotsman
called John Law with the permission of the state and
became the first ever central bank in France in 1718.

(01:15:06):
The key factor in this scenario is the fact that said bank most
likely didn't receive support from the English Dutch financial
establishment and most likely was a largely independent affair
just like the Stockholms Bangkokwhich also was seen by said
banking establishment as. I mean, when you're running a
country can't do that because all right, all right, let me

(01:15:28):
give you a perfect analogy. If your body, your body stops
pumping blood, you will die and your body will rot.
It'll turn into nothing putrification.
So if a country is not spending money, and money is water in the
legal maritime system, but it's being upgraded to air for the

(01:15:51):
Internet, but if a country is not spending money and not
taking on debts, it's like there's no blood pumping in the
body and so it rots away. Competition.
What supports this theory is thefact that merely 2 years later,
the bank went under as a result of a panic being spread around
about the bank's supposed inability to cover its banknotes

(01:16:15):
with gold and resulted with people withdrawing for deposits
and actually causing insolvency problems.
Search for. Yeah, but that's very
unpredictable. I mean, all this stuff has to be
a like, for instance, that requires the other person have
exactly what you need. And so then you generalize, you

(01:16:35):
say, well, then we won't have the problem if we created
currency, OK, great. But then we need to have a
fractional reserve currency so that when people have the bank
hold their money that the bank can make money on that money.
And so then you have bank runs and you have borrowing and then
you have interest and money is very intricate, interesting

(01:17:02):
system. But it's going again a square
digital. So it's called going to be code
based in the future, which is a lot that remains to be seen with
that. I don't, I don't know a lot of a
lot of it because that's yet to come where it's just starting.
But I think they, I think the elite have to do this in their

(01:17:23):
opinion because the age of Pisces was a water based system.
Pisces is a water sign and so money is water currency.
But the Age of Aquarius, oddly enough, Aquarius is an air sign
and so they are upgrading the system from a water based

(01:17:47):
currency system to an air based Internet.
You know, Wi-Fi waves or whatever air.
Or perpetrators guilty of sinking the first central Bank
of France. Well, you can't do that when
you're running a country and you're doing nothing but sitting
there and voting on things. Decades during the French
Revolution, they counterfeited French currency and caused

(01:18:09):
financial chaos, seeing any independent bank in France
direct threat to their monopoly.Leading up the revolution,
almost 50% of the state expenditures were allocated to
paying interest by the French state.
Private banks operating all throughout France would soon
have for influence curbed by 1 ambitious Frenchman.

(01:18:32):
Napoleon was known as a particularly astute political
leader who would keenly observe and fight any attempts at
instituting a. The hand that gives us above,
the hand that takes money, has no motherland.
Financiers are without patriotism and without decency.
Their sole objective is gain. It's true.

(01:18:55):
Foreign. Bank.
He also had a lot to say about the Jesuits.
French soil. He believed it was imperative to
keep foreign financiers out if you want a prosperous and strong
state and instituted a bank thathe would have notable influence
over as he made himself president of the bank.
Abolish the rights of rival private banks to issue bank

(01:19:18):
notes and supervise the creationof money and credit.
The side note People think that every country that exists and is
relevant to some extent has to have national debt.
That the head of a state being financially bound to money
lenders is just a natural courseof action.

(01:19:38):
The case couldn't be any furtherfrom the truth.
There have been many countries that went for long periods of
time with the heads of state nothaving to borrow any money this
mainstream. All right, We're not fast
enough. Yeah.
So these are examples of countries without a central
bank, the Byzantine Empire, medieval European states, the

(01:19:59):
early and middle Ottoman Empire,the Mongols, China, and at
various times in its history, colonial America.
That's true and. The heads of state not having to
borrow any money. This mainstream economic take
that if you want to run a politically relevant country you
have to have an institution of national debt makes little
historical sense, as Napoleon for example, in order to finance

(01:20:20):
his wars all over Europe did everything to not fall into
debt. He sold Louisiana to the United
States, he subsisted off of looting his armies did.
The French economy was also in genuinely good shape, managing
to become very self reliant and productive.
Not to mention the fact that having control over your own
State Bank allows you to have a very flexible fiscal policy that

(01:20:44):
weavers foreign manipulation andsubterfuge to a large degree.
Napoleon was his own banker and financed his campaigns almost
entirely by way of production oracquisition instead of
borrowing. If this guy drink when most of
Europe was against him, still managed to avoid unnecessary
debt for the longest time. I think it gives good evidence

(01:21:06):
that the national debt doesn't have to be a necessary evil that
exists, as some say that every aspiring country has to
participate in. To say that the financiers
behind the Bank of England were fuming at such a display of
financial sovereignty would be an understatement as according
to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Rothschilds pledged £100

(01:21:30):
million to the anti French Coalition during the Napoleonic
Wars. After Napoleon's defeat and
subsequent comeback at Waterloo.Nathan Rothschild financed all
of the belligerents, including France herself, skillfully
indebting all the sides and yet making Napoleon loose.

(01:21:52):
So after all of this, what's thebig thing about usury?
Well, one thing is that through it expressed itself a force that
went on to seize absolute power all over the world.
That's going to be the subject of Part 2.
But what's relevant is the fact that nobody knows about this,
that nobody understands who holds actual power over Western

(01:22:15):
governments, that the masses pick and choose for leaders but
have no idea that Hoover electing to power still serves
bankers first. I think it's our fault that we
got swindled like this. That's what happens when you
make mistakes. The fact that these financiers
managed to assume power like this is quite frankly

(01:22:37):
astonishing, as through methodically eroding away at the
power structures of the West, they've managed to completely
ensnare it. The fact is that we can learn
from these mistakes, but what's the point of it since all of
these events have already playedout?
The lesson from this video is not that usury itself is some
sort of a greatest evil, as these financiers didn't just

(01:22:58):
achieve power through money lending alone.
Usury was always a stepping stone.
They expanded, they swindled, they conquered, they used every
political trick there is to get where they are now.
I don't want the take away from this video or the second part to
be that usury is lay bad, but rather that people that used it

(01:23:20):
as a means to an end are vile. If you wonder why the world is
in such a dysfunctional state, look no further than the history
of central banking and the people behind it.
There it was. Y'all, what do you think?
I think that was a good video. Another one that's just came

(01:23:40):
out. This right here is by Robert
Seffer, or Seffer, I don't know how you say it, but his videos
are really good. This is about the rise of Jewish
power. Maybe we'll watch that one
tomorrow together. So yeah, I think that's a good

(01:24:01):
idea. I think we'll do that.
But what I'm going to do, as a matter of fact, is I'm going to
give you guys a link and share the book that he he showed at
the beginning that he based thisoff of.
If you guys would like to read it I will send a link out in the
chat right now because I think it's it's a book worth reading.

(01:24:28):
There it went. All of them at once.
Yeah. That's a link to the book.
I don't know if it went on Rumble.
See. Nope.
There it is. We don't have all of them, but

(01:24:50):
Rumble. OK, Don't want.
Yeah, guys, definitely read thatbook for yourself.
It's really good. What else was I gonna do?
I just want to go over this realquick.

(01:25:11):
The whole thing with Garfield. Awesome.
Yeah. Let's see.
OK, Yeah, this is exactly what Iwas looking for.
So I told you at the beginning of the video, one of the most
obscure assassinations was JamesGarfield, and I found an article

(01:25:36):
on it. It says, as with JF KS
assassination, there were several, several groups and of
useful idiots. And as a matter of fact, sure,
we'll do something like that. We'll watch the the rise of
Brazilian power tomorrow. But yeah, the term conspiracy

(01:25:57):
theorist. And here's where a lot of people
say that originated with the Kennedy assassination.
As a matter of fact, it it originated with the Garfield
assassination. I, I found traces of the term
conspiracy theorists being used all the way back with this.
So it was almost in a way like James Garfield was the first JFK

(01:26:19):
in a way that rhymed. So as with JF KS assassination,
there were several groups usefulidiots to draw into a plot. the
US was highly infected, as it isnow with religious cults and
they're flying monkeys. Garfield directly addressed to
Mormonism during his inauguration.
Mormons have been fiercely independent and conspiratorial

(01:26:40):
throughout the 19th century. Yeah, the Mormons were very much
conspiracy theorists. The Mormons were ordered to be
exterminated in Missouri, and they were very much independent.
They were almost anarchists, libertarians.
Garfield says the Mormon Church not only offends the moral sense

(01:27:02):
of manhood by sanctioning polygamy, which they did, but
prevents the administration of justice through ordinary
instrumentalities of law. My judgement is the duty of
Congress to prohibit within its jurisdiction all criminal
practices, especially of that class, which destroys the family
relations and endangers the social order.
Fair enough. They did want to.

(01:27:26):
The Mormons wanted to install a Mormon as president.
And I I believe that ultimately came to a head with 2012 when
they tried to put Mitt Romney in.
And I think it failed. I mean, obviously Romney didn't
get elected, but I think that was their attempt at putting a
Mormon in his president. I don't think, I don't think
America, Mormonism is so small. I don't think enough Americans

(01:27:49):
would ever. I don't think Americans would
elect a Mormon. That might have been one of the
reasons he lost. So it it it starts going into
the person who assassinated Garfield.
Somebody by the name of Edward Charles Spitzka profiled the
assassination of the assassin ofJames Garfield, who was named

(01:28:13):
Charles Julius Guto. In his trial, Guto's trial, he
described the perfect controlledassassin zombie then and now.
And this is where it gets interesting.
Let's see. Yeah.
It's true. Absolutely.
History is full of, like people said, history is written by the

(01:28:34):
victors. They often.
Yeah, they often did do that. All right, let's see.
So this is a quote from the Assassin's trial.
Gito had lived an immoral life, and this is profiling the robo
zombie assassins. Like the same people who are
doing what they did now. Yeah.

(01:28:56):
Brigham Young. Yeah, he is.
Have you guys Boots? I'll be surprised if you haven't
seen. Have you seen A Hell on Wheels,
the TV show? That was a great show, but it
gets into some of the Mormon stuff going on.
It's a really good show. I I started to rewatch it, but I
haven't, I fell off on it, but Ilike that show.
It's good show. Yeah.

(01:29:19):
So they're describing the assassin Guiteau suffered from a
mental condition that prevented him from understanding morality
in the 1st place. So basically he was a
psychopath. He calls this moral insanity.
Something we might record today is sociopathy, which he
described as a person might haveshared my screen.

(01:29:41):
This is my bad one. Second I thought I was.
Yeah. There you go.
Here we go. I think that's good.
OK. Which he described as a person

(01:30:02):
who is born with so defective, so defective a nervous
organization. I used all together deprived of
that moral sense. There you go booze.
I I just I knew already I was going to be very surprised if
you hadn't seen that. It's like, if not, you should

(01:30:23):
watch it. But it's great series.
I like it because you get that the look into the Native
Americans one and you also get alook into the Mormons too too
and you get a look at the plots going on with the people who are

(01:30:43):
investing. You know, the the credit mobile
mobile a scandal. However you say it very
interesting and I think it does does well to in my opinion.
I mean for ATV show, yeah, absolutely.
So John Gray, the Superintendentof the Utica State Hospital and

(01:31:06):
the chief medical witness for the prosecution, also offered
insights into a man who is both depraved and harbored illusions
of grandeur. He says.
I see nothing but a life of moral degradation, moral
obliquity, profound selfishness,and no disregard for the rights
of others, Grace said at trial. I see no evidence of insanity,

(01:31:29):
but simply a life swayed by his own passions.
Thus, like many other controlledassassins, comes the crazy lone
wolf theory. Did they ever pause to ponder
theories that insiders could have killed Garfield to protect
their own interests? Maybe par for the course
stalwart newspaper New York Times immediately ran cover

(01:31:52):
against. And, yeah, see here it is a
conspiracy theory. On July 5th, just three days
after Garfield was shot, New York Times declared no possible
conspiracy. That was quick.
Nothing to see here. Move along.
What's quick? Giteau?
Yeah. Came straight out of the cult
world. His mother had died when he was

(01:32:12):
7. Giteau was raised by an abusive
and erratic father, profoundly religious.
His father became a convert to the utopian communalism of John
H Noya is young Gitau was very much impressed with the dark,
bearded Noya's who often called on Charles's father to exchange
religious revelations. Eventually, when Gitau left

(01:32:34):
home, he joined the utopian religious sect.
The Oneida community and Oneida,NY, like the Mormons, is called,
practice polyamorous relationships.
So sex magic. Yeah.
Yep. How long were you?
Grant was another interesting character.

(01:32:55):
So Grant had his problems, and Ithink that he was a general who
came in and was elected president.
But then he was filled with a lot of bad people in the
background. What they were doing was they

(01:33:17):
they had schemes and scams running and either Grant knew
about it or he didn't know aboutit.
What happened was, I do believe that somebody had been caught in
a scheme or some type of corruption and he basically
sided with the person and refused to fire that person.
So either he was not able to punish the people involved

(01:33:42):
because they were too close to him, or he was in on it.
Yeah. I don't know.
But Grant was interesting. A lot of very shady stuff went
on with Grant because after Grant, I believe, I believe it
was Rutherford B Hayes who was elected after.
And that was the there, it was the most obscure and the most

(01:34:05):
rigged election in American history was the election right
after Grant. That was like the height of the
federal government corruption, But I don't know you could make
a case either way, He demonstrated, he told the
assessment, demonstrated lifelong pattern of being a
complete authoritarian follower.But this devotion was punctuated

(01:34:29):
later with hostility. I have, he says.
I have perfect, entire and absolute confidence in him.
His his spiritual leader. Ito wrote of his.
Yeah, Google. There it is.
Before fleeing twice and threatening Doyas with
blackmail. Yeah, it sounds like he was in a
cult. That's true.
Fair enough. Shades of Satanism not to be

(01:34:52):
taken lightly. By 1875, Beto's father thought
his son had been possessed by Satan.
His sister's physician had him declared insane after he
threatened her with an axe. Even Noya is a man who practiced
the life of free love, polyamorism and preached that
Jesus had returned to earth in the year 70 AD.
Later wrote prosecutors that Ghetto's insanity had always

(01:35:15):
consist of vicious and irresponsible.
So the guru of this cult is calling this guy crazy?
Makes sense. Regardless, Ghetto showed ample
confidence. He first attempted to launch a
religious newspaper called the New York Theocrat, but this
failed and Ghetto was obliged toreturn to Anita for a time.
He left for good in November of 1866 after quarrel with Noeus

(01:35:39):
over compensation that Charles Felton's due to him, and Chicago
well clerking was a law firm. He married an attractive 16 year
old girl named Annie Bunn, who would testify that she had been
much impressed with her husband's piety.
She soon began to have second thoughts.
However, Ghito had no money withwhich to indulge his expensive

(01:36:00):
taste in their life together was1 long round of sneaking out
with the best hotels, being evicted from comfortable
boarding houses and cheating merchants.
As the satanic type who made hispresence known, Gateau had to
have attracted the attention of crime syndicate boy boys with
AZ. That's true.

(01:36:22):
That's true. Boots, carpetbaggers, the car.
So you would probably be able toanswer that question.
The carpetbaggers, I know they were the people who they were
not wanted. They were seen as lowly.
I know that from the name. I've heard the name before, but
I can't remember who they were, if they were former Confederates

(01:36:45):
or if they were people who were going to towns they had never
been before. Maybe you can tell me what that
means fully. But, yeah, either way, the boys
looking for effective minions. Thus, he entered Republican
politics as Grant. As a Grant.
There you go. As a Grant supporter.

(01:37:08):
Chester A Arthur, a compromise choice for vice president on the
Garfield ticket, was a Yeah, a member of the Stalwarts, I guess
that. Yeah, that was their little
club. Yeah.
That makes sense, Boots. The storyline about Guto was
quite inconsistent. He was considered a nut and an

(01:37:28):
unwanted intruder when he hung around governmental quarters
nagging to see the president. But in a written disposition to
the court and Vice President, Arthur admitted that he had met
Guto as of A10, possibly as manyas 20 times.
That's interesting, mostly in New York City, party officials
caved and allowed him to deliver1 incoherent speech to a small

(01:37:51):
group of black voters in New York City.
Isn't that something he was allowed to be a hanger on at HQ
where we suggest nefarious elements and agents had the
opportunity to groom, coax and prep this unbalanced individual
into the assassination? This is an intelligence
provocateur movement used frequently in the modern era and

(01:38:12):
most certainly in the case of Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby.
This seems honestly like the first JFK, A pretense and a back
story was concocted that Guto had shot Garfield because he
didn't get a plum governmental appointment for his support.

(01:38:33):
The back story scam. What does it say?
An office or your life. The death of James Garfield.
Wikito couldn't finish doc. Yeah, this was crazy.
Basically, he shot Garfield and Garfield could have survived,
but these doctors were dirty andnasty and medical technology had

(01:38:55):
not advanced. And so he died slowly from
infection. Very bad.
Yeah. And another thing that's
interesting is that when this guy assassinated Garfield, he
said immediately he exclaimed that Arthur had been made

(01:39:19):
president. So it's like he was doing this
so that the next guy could take over.
Yeah, here it is right there. The president's tragic death was
a sad necessity. Bill, you tighten Republican
Party and say the Republic. Again.
Another thing about the Republican Party, Republican

(01:39:41):
there was basically after the Civil War, you had a long row of
Republicans there. There were almost no Democrats.
See. Yeah, the assassin told police.

(01:40:01):
I am a stalwart and Arthur is president of the United States
now. Yeah, so.
Something was off at trial, Gateau elaborated.
I went off the off of the inspiration of the deity.

(01:40:23):
I never would have shot the president on my own personal
account. Off the off of the inspiration
of the deity. OK, It's an interesting book,
The book The Trial of the Assassin.
Gateau describes his alleged state.
He had no source of income, no lecturing, no books to sell, no

(01:40:44):
bills to collect. He had no family.
He had never had any friends. Sounds just like these P it
literally what are you talking about?
It's literally like the same people that they have today.

(01:41:06):
His clothes shabby enough, enough when he reached
Washington even were even deteriorating even in March, the
snow on the ground. He went about without boots or
an overcoat. Oh, I don't know.
There was. I don't know who you're
referring to. Yeah.
So this guy was literally like the people that like it's the

(01:41:28):
same formula over and over again.
Yeah, interesting. Is this so is this based on like

(01:41:54):
a a real figure or are you just describing the story?
Because I, I think it might havebeen based off of a real figure
and I just don't know which one it was.
Yeah, basically a lot of people know this part, that the doctors

(01:42:16):
killed him just because they didn't know what they're doing.
I wonder if McKinley was also assassinated.
Yeah, it says may have, in fact been a target of the usual
suspects. Yeah, it it, I would be very

(01:42:43):
surprised if a lot of this stuffgoing on in the background
wasn't to do with banking because conveniently all of the
presidents who've ever been assassinated have been very,
they have done important things in the banking of the country.
Oh, yeah, that makes sense. Yep.

(01:43:05):
Absolutely, yeah, the Civil War is very interesting.
A lot of, I've seen a lot of good points for the whole Jesuit
involvement, but I've also heardgood points for, as always,
there are a lot of people, players in the game.

(01:43:26):
It's it's never just one group of people.
Everybody's got a vent. Anybody who's got a vested
interest has a vested interest. So if you've got money in,
you've got money in. It doesn't matter if you're just
that or the other. A lot of people are stand to to
gain or lose. But, yeah, another interesting

(01:43:47):
thing is the assassination of Joseph Smith, the Mormon
founder. His final words were the Masonic
distress signal, and he didn't get to finish it because they
shot him. Yeah.
It was a big shootout. Yeah.

(01:44:08):
All right. Well, that concludes the stuff
that I wanted to show you tonight.
So yeah, we will do a Part 2 andwe're going to watch the the
rise of Jewish Brazilian power. My bad Brazilian power.
But I'm I truly hope you guys learned something.

(01:44:30):
That's, that's what I'm here foris if, if you guys learn one new
thing, nothing is a worthless experience.
So with that being said, guys, I, I, I don't have anything else
tonight. I'm going to close it out unless
anybody else has any comments orlast sentiments.
But yeah, I greatly appreciate everybody showing up.

(01:44:52):
I'll, I'll be back tomorrow and,and we'll do a continuation.
Add in any notes or commentary. You know my witty commentary
that you all here come here for the usual.
This is the usual suspects that show up to cause before symptom
and yeah guys if or whatever you're on any platform if you if
you hit the like button, it's free doesn't cost a thing and it

(01:45:16):
it really helps us out wherever we're at whatever channel we're
on. So,
yeah, absolutely Grant was very and all of the stuff that I've.

(01:45:37):
Most of what I know about Grant was that he was really talented
as a general. I mean that it's well known that
Grant was one of those who was very much a general.
But then when he made the transition, it was like
Eisenhower. Eisenhower was another one like
that. When he made the transition into
the presidency, as a matter of fact, Eisenhower also was very,

(01:46:00):
he basically did what the establishment wanted because he
didn't have much of a footing inthe establishment.
He had a war background, same with Grant and again, all the
corruption going on in the background.
He was a a general and when he he came in to become president,
he, he really was out of his element.
So makes sense. But ladies and gentlemen, I've

(01:46:28):
been your esteemed guest host tonight.
I hope you all have a wonderful rest of your night.
Absolutely. And it really is.
It is the the good generals thatmake history.
Almost every war has got them. The Joan of Arc back in the 100
years war. Really.

(01:46:52):
I didn't know that. Absolutely Interesting.
Yeah. The good and the bad and the
ugly. I always think of that because,
you know, there's like it's thatmovie is a very long movie.
The good and the bad and the ugly.
That's a good. There's the they call it the

(01:47:13):
Dollars trilogy because there's three, but they the stories are
slightly different, but they're all kind of based on like
they're the Westerns, but it's like Clint Eastwood plays the
same character. Thanks.
So check it out, buddy. But yeah, Clint Eastwood plays
the same character on all three of them, basically, but the

(01:47:34):
stories are slightly different. But it goes on during the Civil
War. And that's part of that movie,
the good and the bad, the ugliest taking place during the
Civil War. All right, guys, I appreciate
it. I hope you guys enjoyed the
show. I will see you all again
tomorrow.

All Episodes

The Secret Takeover: How Central Banking Enslaved the World - Cause Before Symptom /w Urban

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

24/7 News: The Latest

Dateline NBC

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Secret Takeover: How Central Banking Enslaved the World - Cause Before Symptom /w Urban