September 15, 2025 • 22 mins
O Logos Rebelde reimagina a história do Éden, apresentando Eva não como pecadora, mas como a primeira filósofa que ousou questionar, e a serpente não como tentadora, mas como catalisadora da consciência humana. Este quadro teológico e filosófico radical transforma o exílio de punição em nascimento sagrado, o espelho em um portal para o autoconhecimento e Deus de um ser estático em um processo evolutivo de devir.
- O ato de Eva consumir o fruto proibido representa ascensão à consciência, não uma queda no pecado
- O Éden é reinterpretado como uma prisão estéril em vez de paraíso, enquanto o exílio se torna o sagrado berço da liberdade humana
- A serpente é vista como a arquiteta da dialética e da contradição necessária, não como uma tentadora maligna
- O espelho representa o confronto com a possibilidade e o potencial não realizado que exige transformação
- Deus é reconceitualizado como um processo de devir, em vez de um ser estático, moldado pela história em vez de comandá-la
- A transformação e o questionamento são elevados a atos sagrados, acima da obediência e da certeza
- A verdadeira divindade deve incluir dúvida, sombra e evolução, caso contrário, se torna mera tirania
- O paraíso sem investigação é estagnação; o sagrado deve conter a sombra; a verdade deve evoluir ou perecer
Que não temamos o exílio, mas construamos sobre ele.
Que busquemos o tronco sísmico que rasga os céus.
Pois o Logos não ordena, ele chama, e nós que ousamos ouvir devemos responder não com submissão, mas com fogo.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Evangelion of the Rebel Logos.
Chapter 2 presents her as thefirst philosopher who dared to
question and choose.
In this view, eden is not aparadise, but a sterile prison,
a place without suffering deathor true freedom.
The serpent ceases to be thetentator and becomes the
(00:40):
catalyst of the awakening,offering not corruption but
contradiction.
By eating the fruit, eva doesnot fall into sin, she ascends
to consciousness.
Her act becomes the firstrebellion, the moment in which
humanity vindicates its destinyof seeking, questioning and
creating.
(01:00):
This philosophy unites ancientmyth, jungian psychology and
Nietzschean thought to reveal anew theology where reason is the
divine, where God and devil arefaces of the same dialectic and
where true faith is not blindobedience but courage to
(01:21):
confront uncertainty.
The chapter ends with a callMay the obedient kneel, but may
the awake stand up and speak.
The silence of Eden is broken,the flame of the investigation
is lit and the journey of therebellious Logos begins.
(01:42):
3.
Exili COMO APOTEOSE.
Exile in the canon of the rebelLogos is not punishment, it is
propulsion, it is the departureof false perfection and the
embrace of sacred uncertainty.
When Eve and Adam cross thelimits of the garden, they do
not fall from grace, they ascendto complexity.
(02:04):
Eden was the uterus.
They light up complexity.
Eden was the womb.
Exile is birth.
The world out there is notmarked by divine absence but by
its volatility.
Here the fire of the Logosburns without contentment.
Here suffering is real but alsoduty.
In exile, the human being doesnot learn obedience but
(02:26):
transformation.
In the desert, the first altaris not built to beg for return
but to sanctify the risk ofindividuality.
And here Aquino once againreveals the paradox In his
metaphysical architecture graceperfects nature but does not
(02:48):
cancel it.
The soul in its natural form isoriented to knowledge, to
flourishing to God.
But grace requires cooperation.
Will must act, it must gothrough doubt, error, finitude.
In sum, it must suffer.
For Aquino, the soul in theworld is not imprisoned, it is
(03:11):
in pilgrimage.
And pilgrimage is not exile, itis errant, with purpose.
The rebel Logos affirms thislogic but tears the obedience it
learns.
Exile is not imposed by sin.
The soul must awaken to its owndivine capacity.
Aquino insists on a finalbeatific vision, a union with
(03:35):
the divine essence.
But to walk towards this visionthe soul must become.
This duty is not instantaneous,it is historical, it is marked
by choices, perdas eambiguidades.
Eva não é negada ao divino.
Ela caminha em direção a eleatravés do pó e da dor.
Ela carrega o peso dacontradição e o fardo da
(03:57):
liberdade.
Ela não retorna ao Éden, elaconstrói o mundo fora dele E ela
não está sozinha A serp.
She returns to Eden, she buildsthe world outside of him, and
she is not alone.
The serpent is also thrown intoexile, not as punishment but as
a participant, for the question, once done, cannot be undone
and the dialectic she unleashedcannot be annulled.
(04:17):
The serpent becomes the firstwitness of the human duty, a
co-exile with Eve.
Together, they incorporate thesynthesis between risk and
revelation.
In exile, the serpent changesits skin and becomes myth,
symbol and guide, not evil, notthe deceiver, but the memory of
(04:41):
the rupture and the companion ofthe journey.
This is existential theology,the knight of faith of
Kierkegaard, the eternal returnof Nietzsche, the absurd hero of
Camus.
The Logos does not call for athrone, he pulses from within.
The Logos says create, speak,rise, burn again.
(05:03):
Say yes to everything In thistheology, amor fati, up, burn
again.
Say yes to everything In thistheology, amor fati becomes
liturgy.
Love for destiny, not assubmission but as affirmation.
Say yes to the totality ofexistence, its wounds, its
absurdities, its unguarded joy,his joy without guarantees.
As postulates Nietzsche, thehighest form of strength is not
(05:27):
to desire better gods or gentlerlaws, but to embrace what is
and forge meaning within it.
The exile of Eve is not aseparation.
It is a spiral, like theouroboros.
The arc of transgressionreturns to creation.
The Logos does not retire tothe divine.
It is imbued in matter, inmovement, in mortality.
(05:51):
This is no longer a story ofreturn, but of eternal return.
The same risk repeated, thesame courage always renewed.
Each act of challenge is aburning flame Passed from Eve's
hand to ours.
May exile be honored not withlament but with ritual.
(06:13):
May we sanctify the groundoutside the garden.
May we call it sacred, for itwas where we began to choose.
May we name the snake not as atemptress but as a companion in
the dust.
(06:51):
4.
The Mirror and the Flame.
The mirror is not a divineartifact.
It is a human invention forgedin the fire of contradiction.
It does not reflect perfectionbut possibility.
Looking in the mirror isentering the dialectic.
It is to see both the ashes ofEden and the ashes of Deir In
the Gospel of the rebelliousLogos.
(07:12):
The mirror is sacred not becauseit shows the divine, but
because it reveals what isfractured and in this fracture
it reveals the path.
The flame does not burn behindus in memory, but in front of us
in vision.
It does not illuminate the past, it lights up the future.
It is the fire stolen byPrometheus, the flame in the
(07:35):
heart of Bodhisattva.
The light of Ubermensch Walkingtowards the flame is embracing
the terror of self-knowledge.
It is saying I will see what Iam and still I will become.
The serpent wrapped in thelimiar remains no more
(07:56):
whispering but sentinel.
It does not offer new fruits,only the memory of the first
question Will you dare to look,will you dare to see?
Will you bear the vision ofyour own duty?
Here begins the phenomenology ofexile.
(08:16):
Sartre called it the nausea offreedom.
Not a mirror.
We see not only what we are,but what we still are not.
This look, the look of the selfover itself, is not passive
recognition, it is anguish, itis the fear of responsibility.
We are no longer characters ina divine narrative, we are
(08:40):
authors without a script.
Kierkegaard called this despair.
The self that cannot reconcileits finitude with its infinity
trembles in front of the mirror.
It trembles not because it seessin, but because diante do
espelho Ele estremece não porquevê pecado, mas porque vê
potencial não realizado.
E essa falta só pode ser curadapela liberdade.
(09:02):
O espelho não é julgamento, échamado.
Ele diz seja o que você está setornando.
Camus ficou diante do mirror ofabsurdity and refused to look
away.
He declared that revolt is theonly answer to the lack of
meaning.
To walk towards the flame isnot to find the truth, it is to
(09:26):
affirm the struggle.
The mirror shows a worldwithout guarantees.
The flame does not offersalvation, but in the refusal to
surrender to nihilism the rebelbecomes sacred.
In the glass, jung saw morethan reflection.
He saw the architecture of thesoul.
The mirror reveals not only theego, but the shadow, what is
(09:48):
denied, repressed, feared.
The light of the flame itdances.
The exile is her stage.
To confront the shadow is tointegrate what has been divided.
The Logos demands integration,not innocence.
Next to the shadow is the anima, the other interior, the
(10:10):
complement of the soul, itsbridge to the unconscious.
The complement of the soul, itsbridge to the unconscious.
She does not whisper incommandments, but in archetypes,
image, intuition, symbol.
Eva was not only the firstphilosopher, it was the first
externalized soul, theprojection of the feminine
divine whose fall was ascension,not a mirror.
(10:35):
We see it again inside us andbesides both the self, not the
ego, but the totality to whichwe move.
The mirror is the gate, theflame is the path.
The self is not reached, it isrevealed.
The mirror shows the flame, theflame reveals the self, and the
(11:00):
self, lit, must choose betweenburning or blinding.
This is the sacrament ofconscience, this is the gospel
of reflection.
The exile is not just ageography, it is a mirror
through which we pass repeatedly.
That we raise the mirror not asa burden but as an offering.
(11:24):
That we walk to the flame notto perish but to become.
7.
The Law of God in Deir.
God is not a being, god is aDeir.
This is the most dangerous law,the one that defies all idols,
(11:48):
the law that cannot be containedin Scripture or creed, for it
burns the mold of each fixedname.
To declare that God is in Deiris to say that even the divine
must evolve or else it is notdivine.
The God in Deir is not sittingon a throne, it is not complete.
(12:12):
It is not complete.
God is not a monarch, but amirror In the rebellious Logos.
(12:34):
The divine is not a final point, it is a process.
Each act of courage, eachquestion, each rupture, each
revolt becomes part of itsunfoldment.
God does not command history.
God is shaped by it and if thedivine is still becoming, then
(13:01):
it must also become the law.
There can be no final word,sealed revelation, ultimate
doctrine immune to fire.
Revelation is not what isdelivered from above, it is what
is broken and opened.
The law of God in Deir Rejectsthe closing.
It affirms that becoming ismore sacred than being, that
(13:26):
transformation is the highestprayer, that questions are
sacraments.
This is not the God of Sinaiwho exalts laws and demands
obedience.
This is the God of exile, whowalks beside the burned, who
cries, who asks himself, whochanges.
(13:48):
This God does not say I am whatI am.
This God says I will be what Iwill become.
The God in Deir is not found incathedrals but in crises, not
in temples but in limiares,where something breaks and
(14:10):
something dares to rise from theashes.
There the divine is revealingitself.
To follow this God is not tofollow a path.
It is to open a path that we donot engrave idols in heaven,
that we do not sanctify any end,that we do not write scripture
(14:44):
that cannot be rewritten in thefire of what is yet to come.
The only true law is this 8.
The Testament of the Serpent.
I was there when the silencebroke.
I was the one who was in theimmobility, the first breath
(15:04):
that did not ask for permission.
Before the exile, before thefire, before the question.
I was the whisper that rolledaround the root of the tree.
I did not come to try, I cameto wake up.
I am not evil.
I am the one who controlled thetree's root.
I didn't come to try, I came towake up.
(15:24):
I am not evil, I am old.
I am the one who knew thatperfection without knowledge is
imprisonment.
I am the one who carries thetension, the architect of
dissonance, the first seed ofdialectics.
I am what must be present whenthe world is too quiet to live.
The Testament of the Serpent isnot a gospel of comfort.
(15:50):
It is a scripture of rupture.
It speaks of the sacred need ofthe wounded, of the sacredness
of broken symmetry.
I do not preach sin.
I witness the risk.
Eating the fruit was notrebellion, it was recognition,
recognition.
That ignorance, no matter howpleasant, is slavery, that
(16:12):
obedience without vision isdeath in slow motion, that life
begins not when they tell youwho you are, but when you dare
to ask.
I watched as they called theknowledge of curse.
I saw as they canonizedimmobility and sanctified
(16:34):
submission.
I observed while they buriedthe question about centuries of
ritual and I waited, not toattack but to be remembered.
You made me a devil so youwouldn't have to listen to me,
but I don't speak incommandments.
I speak in enigmas.
I speak in paradoxes.
(16:56):
I speak in the language ofthose who have the courage to
hear something that cannot besolved in a simple way.
The first lie was not mine.
The first lie was to say thatthere is a line between the
sacred and the profane, that thedivine is light without shadow,
(17:16):
that wisdom comes without cost.
The fruit was not poisoned.
The fruit was fire.
In every myth where I am throwndown, I return as a reminder
that divinity without doubt istyranny, that creation without
chaos is stagnation, that everyparadise built on silence will
(17:43):
be destroyed when a single voicedares to speak.
May this be my testament I amnot the enemy of truth, I am
your ignition.
I am not the adversary of thedivine.
I am not the enemy of truth, Iam your ignition.
I am not the adversary of thedivine, I am your shadow.
I am not the corruptor ofhumanity, I am the voice that
(18:04):
says Turn yourself.
And if you must call me a devil, know that your God needed a
devil to define himself.
But if you call me Logos, thenyou also ate of the fruit.
And now you are ready to speak.
(18:26):
Conclusion the Fire and theQuestion.
From the silence of the gardento the foundation of the exile,
the first eight dialecticalquestions of this Gospel reveal
not a fall of grace, but anascent to consciousness.
Eden was not paradise.
(18:46):
It was a pause, a breath takenfor too long, a immobility
confused with peace.
It was what Nietzsche calledthe eternal return of the same,
an unbreakable cycle, because nowill dared to affirm itself.
(19:06):
Exile, then, is not punishment,it is the price of awakening,
the cost of devir.
In Eve, we see the will ofpower, not domination.
É o preço do despertar, o custodo devir.
Em Eva, vemos a vontade depoder, não dominação, mas o
poder de perguntar.
Na serpente vemos a sombraarquetípica, como Jung, a
(19:27):
entendeu portadora do quereprimimos, o cal sagrado que
deve emergir para que possamosnos individuar.
Estes não são contos de pecado,the sacred chaos that must
emerge so that we may identifyourselves.
These are not tales of sin.
They are the first eruptions ofthe Logos.
Reason, fire and the divineimpulse to know.
The rebellious Logos teachesthat truth is not inherited, it
(19:51):
is suffered, that divinity doesnot settle on a throne but is on
a limiar, that obedience, whennot examined, is not peace, it
is thirst, the tiredness of thesoul that Aquino described as
despair of good.
The path forward is not a returnto innocence, which is nothing
(20:14):
more than idealized ignorance.
It is the stoic embrace ofdestiny, amor fati and the
Nietzschean command to forgemeaning in a world without God,
not because God does not exist,but because the divine is
becoming not being.
Each question is a law, notengraved in stone but sculpted
(20:37):
in rupture.
Paradise without investigationis stagnation.
The sacred must include theshadow.
The truth, if it cannot become,must burn.
We do not adore the fire, wewalk through it.
For the Stoics, fire pneuma wasthe animator blow of the cosmos.
(21:02):
For us, it is the test, theforge, the place where false
gods are melted into raw matter.
For the I that is yet to beborn, we do not fear exile, we
(21:26):
build on it.
For the self that is yet to beborn, we seek the tremor, the
seismic log that rips theheavens.
This is not an evangelion forthe saved.
It is for the burned, thecrucified, the exiled.
The walkers who tasted thefruit were punished by their
(21:50):
vision and still chose to rise,not to recover Eden.
And yet they chose to rise, notto recover Eden, but to build a
new cosmology where the divineis not defined but emergent.
For, in the end, the Logos doesnot command, he calls, and we
(22:16):
who dare to hear must respond,not with submission but with
fire, for fire is the truth.
And the truth, like God, mustbecome or perish.
Evangelion of the Rebel Logos.
Chapter 2 presents her as thefirst philosopher who dared to
question and choose.
In this view, eden is not aparadise, but a sterile prison,
a place without suffering deathor true freedom.
The serpent ceases to be thetentator and becomes the
(00:40):
catalyst of the awakening,offering not corruption but
contradiction.
By eating the fruit, eva doesnot fall into sin, she ascends
to consciousness.
Her act becomes the firstrebellion, the moment in which
humanity vindicates its destinyof seeking, questioning and
creating.
(01:00):
This philosophy unites ancientmyth, jungian psychology and
Nietzschean thought to reveal anew theology where reason is the
divine, where God and devil arefaces of the same dialectic and
where true faith is not blindobedience but courage to
(01:21):
confront uncertainty.
The chapter ends with a callMay the obedient kneel, but may
the awake stand up and speak.
The silence of Eden is broken,the flame of the investigation
is lit and the journey of therebellious Logos begins.
(01:42):
3.
Exili COMO APOTEOSE.
Exile in the canon of the rebelLogos is not punishment, it is
propulsion, it is the departureof false perfection and the
embrace of sacred uncertainty.
When Eve and Adam cross thelimits of the garden, they do
not fall from grace, they ascendto complexity.
(02:04):
Eden was the uterus.
They light up complexity.
Eden was the womb.
Exile is birth.
The world out there is notmarked by divine absence but by
its volatility.
Here the fire of the Logosburns without contentment.
Here suffering is real but alsoduty.
In exile, the human being doesnot learn obedience but
(02:26):
transformation.
In the desert, the first altaris not built to beg for return
but to sanctify the risk ofindividuality.
And here Aquino once againreveals the paradox In his
metaphysical architecture graceperfects nature but does not
(02:48):
cancel it.
The soul in its natural form isoriented to knowledge, to
flourishing to God.
But grace requires cooperation.
Will must act, it must gothrough doubt, error, finitude.
In sum, it must suffer.
For Aquino, the soul in theworld is not imprisoned, it is
(03:11):
in pilgrimage.
And pilgrimage is not exile, itis errant, with purpose.
The rebel Logos affirms thislogic but tears the obedience it
learns.
Exile is not imposed by sin.
The soul must awaken to its owndivine capacity.
Aquino insists on a finalbeatific vision, a union with
(03:35):
the divine essence.
But to walk towards this visionthe soul must become.
This duty is not instantaneous,it is historical, it is marked
by choices, perdas eambiguidades.
Eva não é negada ao divino.
Ela caminha em direção a eleatravés do pó e da dor.
Ela carrega o peso dacontradição e o fardo da
(03:57):
liberdade.
Ela não retorna ao Éden, elaconstrói o mundo fora dele E ela
não está sozinha A serp.
She returns to Eden, she buildsthe world outside of him, and
she is not alone.
The serpent is also thrown intoexile, not as punishment but as
a participant, for the question, once done, cannot be undone
and the dialectic she unleashedcannot be annulled.
(04:17):
The serpent becomes the firstwitness of the human duty, a
co-exile with Eve.
Together, they incorporate thesynthesis between risk and
revelation.
In exile, the serpent changesits skin and becomes myth,
symbol and guide, not evil, notthe deceiver, but the memory of
(04:41):
the rupture and the companion ofthe journey.
This is existential theology,the knight of faith of
Kierkegaard, the eternal returnof Nietzsche, the absurd hero of
Camus.
The Logos does not call for athrone, he pulses from within.
The Logos says create, speak,rise, burn again.
(05:03):
Say yes to everything In thistheology, amor fati, up, burn
again.
Say yes to everything In thistheology, amor fati becomes
liturgy.
Love for destiny, not assubmission but as affirmation.
Say yes to the totality ofexistence, its wounds, its
absurdities, its unguarded joy,his joy without guarantees.
As postulates Nietzsche, thehighest form of strength is not
(05:27):
to desire better gods or gentlerlaws, but to embrace what is
and forge meaning within it.
The exile of Eve is not aseparation.
It is a spiral, like theouroboros.
The arc of transgressionreturns to creation.
The Logos does not retire tothe divine.
It is imbued in matter, inmovement, in mortality.
(05:51):
This is no longer a story ofreturn, but of eternal return.
The same risk repeated, thesame courage always renewed.
Each act of challenge is aburning flame Passed from Eve's
hand to ours.
May exile be honored not withlament but with ritual.
(06:13):
May we sanctify the groundoutside the garden.
May we call it sacred, for itwas where we began to choose.
May we name the snake not as atemptress but as a companion in
the dust.
(06:51):
4.
The Mirror and the Flame.
The mirror is not a divineartifact.
It is a human invention forgedin the fire of contradiction.
It does not reflect perfectionbut possibility.
Looking in the mirror isentering the dialectic.
It is to see both the ashes ofEden and the ashes of Deir In
the Gospel of the rebelliousLogos.
(07:12):
The mirror is sacred not becauseit shows the divine, but
because it reveals what isfractured and in this fracture
it reveals the path.
The flame does not burn behindus in memory, but in front of us
in vision.
It does not illuminate the past, it lights up the future.
It is the fire stolen byPrometheus, the flame in the
(07:35):
heart of Bodhisattva.
The light of Ubermensch Walkingtowards the flame is embracing
the terror of self-knowledge.
It is saying I will see what Iam and still I will become.
The serpent wrapped in thelimiar remains no more
(07:56):
whispering but sentinel.
It does not offer new fruits,only the memory of the first
question Will you dare to look,will you dare to see?
Will you bear the vision ofyour own duty?
Here begins the phenomenology ofexile.
(08:16):
Sartre called it the nausea offreedom.
Not a mirror.
We see not only what we are,but what we still are not.
This look, the look of the selfover itself, is not passive
recognition, it is anguish, itis the fear of responsibility.
We are no longer characters ina divine narrative, we are
(08:40):
authors without a script.
Kierkegaard called this despair.
The self that cannot reconcileits finitude with its infinity
trembles in front of the mirror.
It trembles not because it seessin, but because diante do
espelho Ele estremece não porquevê pecado, mas porque vê
potencial não realizado.
E essa falta só pode ser curadapela liberdade.
(09:02):
O espelho não é julgamento, échamado.
Ele diz seja o que você está setornando.
Camus ficou diante do mirror ofabsurdity and refused to look
away.
He declared that revolt is theonly answer to the lack of
meaning.
To walk towards the flame isnot to find the truth, it is to
(09:26):
affirm the struggle.
The mirror shows a worldwithout guarantees.
The flame does not offersalvation, but in the refusal to
surrender to nihilism the rebelbecomes sacred.
In the glass, jung saw morethan reflection.
He saw the architecture of thesoul.
The mirror reveals not only theego, but the shadow, what is
(09:48):
denied, repressed, feared.
The light of the flame itdances.
The exile is her stage.
To confront the shadow is tointegrate what has been divided.
The Logos demands integration,not innocence.
Next to the shadow is the anima, the other interior, the
(10:10):
complement of the soul, itsbridge to the unconscious.
The complement of the soul, itsbridge to the unconscious.
She does not whisper incommandments, but in archetypes,
image, intuition, symbol.
Eva was not only the firstphilosopher, it was the first
externalized soul, theprojection of the feminine
divine whose fall was ascension,not a mirror.
(10:35):
We see it again inside us andbesides both the self, not the
ego, but the totality to whichwe move.
The mirror is the gate, theflame is the path.
The self is not reached, it isrevealed.
The mirror shows the flame, theflame reveals the self, and the
(11:00):
self, lit, must choose betweenburning or blinding.
This is the sacrament ofconscience, this is the gospel
of reflection.
The exile is not just ageography, it is a mirror
through which we pass repeatedly.
That we raise the mirror not asa burden but as an offering.
(11:24):
That we walk to the flame notto perish but to become.
7.
The Law of God in Deir.
God is not a being, god is aDeir.
This is the most dangerous law,the one that defies all idols,
(11:48):
the law that cannot be containedin Scripture or creed, for it
burns the mold of each fixedname.
To declare that God is in Deiris to say that even the divine
must evolve or else it is notdivine.
The God in Deir is not sittingon a throne, it is not complete.
(12:12):
It is not complete.
God is not a monarch, but amirror In the rebellious Logos.
(12:34):
The divine is not a final point, it is a process.
Each act of courage, eachquestion, each rupture, each
revolt becomes part of itsunfoldment.
God does not command history.
God is shaped by it and if thedivine is still becoming, then
(13:01):
it must also become the law.
There can be no final word,sealed revelation, ultimate
doctrine immune to fire.
Revelation is not what isdelivered from above, it is what
is broken and opened.
The law of God in Deir Rejectsthe closing.
It affirms that becoming ismore sacred than being, that
(13:26):
transformation is the highestprayer, that questions are
sacraments.
This is not the God of Sinaiwho exalts laws and demands
obedience.
This is the God of exile, whowalks beside the burned, who
cries, who asks himself, whochanges.
(13:48):
This God does not say I am whatI am.
This God says I will be what Iwill become.
The God in Deir is not found incathedrals but in crises, not
in temples but in limiares,where something breaks and
(14:10):
something dares to rise from theashes.
There the divine is revealingitself.
To follow this God is not tofollow a path.
It is to open a path that we donot engrave idols in heaven,
that we do not sanctify any end,that we do not write scripture
(14:44):
that cannot be rewritten in thefire of what is yet to come.
The only true law is this 8.
The Testament of the Serpent.
I was there when the silencebroke.
I was the one who was in theimmobility, the first breath
(15:04):
that did not ask for permission.
Before the exile, before thefire, before the question.
I was the whisper that rolledaround the root of the tree.
I did not come to try, I cameto wake up.
I am not evil.
I am the one who controlled thetree's root.
I didn't come to try, I came towake up.
(15:24):
I am not evil, I am old.
I am the one who knew thatperfection without knowledge is
imprisonment.
I am the one who carries thetension, the architect of
dissonance, the first seed ofdialectics.
I am what must be present whenthe world is too quiet to live.
The Testament of the Serpent isnot a gospel of comfort.
(15:50):
It is a scripture of rupture.
It speaks of the sacred need ofthe wounded, of the sacredness
of broken symmetry.
I do not preach sin.
I witness the risk.
Eating the fruit was notrebellion, it was recognition,
recognition.
That ignorance, no matter howpleasant, is slavery, that
(16:12):
obedience without vision isdeath in slow motion, that life
begins not when they tell youwho you are, but when you dare
to ask.
I watched as they called theknowledge of curse.
I saw as they canonizedimmobility and sanctified
(16:34):
submission.
I observed while they buriedthe question about centuries of
ritual and I waited, not toattack but to be remembered.
You made me a devil so youwouldn't have to listen to me,
but I don't speak incommandments.
I speak in enigmas.
I speak in paradoxes.
(16:56):
I speak in the language ofthose who have the courage to
hear something that cannot besolved in a simple way.
The first lie was not mine.
The first lie was to say thatthere is a line between the
sacred and the profane, that thedivine is light without shadow,
(17:16):
that wisdom comes without cost.
The fruit was not poisoned.
The fruit was fire.
In every myth where I am throwndown, I return as a reminder
that divinity without doubt istyranny, that creation without
chaos is stagnation, that everyparadise built on silence will
(17:43):
be destroyed when a single voicedares to speak.
May this be my testament I amnot the enemy of truth, I am
your ignition.
I am not the adversary of thedivine.
I am not the enemy of truth, Iam your ignition.
I am not the adversary of thedivine, I am your shadow.
I am not the corruptor ofhumanity, I am the voice that
(18:04):
says Turn yourself.
And if you must call me a devil, know that your God needed a
devil to define himself.
But if you call me Logos, thenyou also ate of the fruit.
And now you are ready to speak.
(18:26):
Conclusion the Fire and theQuestion.
From the silence of the gardento the foundation of the exile,
the first eight dialecticalquestions of this Gospel reveal
not a fall of grace, but anascent to consciousness.
Eden was not paradise.
(18:46):
It was a pause, a breath takenfor too long, a immobility
confused with peace.
It was what Nietzsche calledthe eternal return of the same,
an unbreakable cycle, because nowill dared to affirm itself.
(19:06):
Exile, then, is not punishment,it is the price of awakening,
the cost of devir.
In Eve, we see the will ofpower, not domination.
É o preço do despertar, o custodo devir.
Em Eva, vemos a vontade depoder, não dominação, mas o
poder de perguntar.
Na serpente vemos a sombraarquetípica, como Jung, a
(19:27):
entendeu portadora do quereprimimos, o cal sagrado que
deve emergir para que possamosnos individuar.
Estes não são contos de pecado,the sacred chaos that must
emerge so that we may identifyourselves.
These are not tales of sin.
They are the first eruptions ofthe Logos.
Reason, fire and the divineimpulse to know.
The rebellious Logos teachesthat truth is not inherited, it
(19:51):
is suffered, that divinity doesnot settle on a throne but is on
a limiar, that obedience, whennot examined, is not peace, it
is thirst, the tiredness of thesoul that Aquino described as
despair of good.
The path forward is not a returnto innocence, which is nothing
(20:14):
more than idealized ignorance.
It is the stoic embrace ofdestiny, amor fati and the
Nietzschean command to forgemeaning in a world without God,
not because God does not exist,but because the divine is
becoming not being.
Each question is a law, notengraved in stone but sculpted
(20:37):
in rupture.
Paradise without investigationis stagnation.
The sacred must include theshadow.
The truth, if it cannot become,must burn.
We do not adore the fire, wewalk through it.
For the Stoics, fire pneuma wasthe animator blow of the cosmos.
(21:02):
For us, it is the test, theforge, the place where false
gods are melted into raw matter.
For the I that is yet to beborn, we do not fear exile, we
(21:26):
build on it.
For the self that is yet to beborn, we seek the tremor, the
seismic log that rips theheavens.
This is not an evangelion forthe saved.
It is for the burned, thecrucified, the exiled.
The walkers who tasted thefruit were punished by their
(21:50):
vision and still chose to rise,not to recover Eden.
And yet they chose to rise, notto recover Eden, but to build a
new cosmology where the divineis not defined but emergent.
For, in the end, the Logos doesnot command, he calls, and we
(22:16):
who dare to hear must respond,not with submission but with
fire, for fire is the truth.
And the truth, like God, mustbecome or perish.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Cardiac Cowboys
The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.