Smashed Atoms and Woke Up in the Wrong Timeline

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
Thank you so much for tuning into the WBM podcast.
This is one of your hosts.
It's your boy, merc Yo.

Speaker 3 (00:12):
it's your boy X-Fan, and it's your boy, oski, in the
mix, in the mix, we're back,we're back, we're back, we're
back.

Speaker 1 (00:20):
Have you guys not noticed?
We're back in full swing.
In full swing, guys.
We have one hell of an episodelined up for you this week, like
we do every week.
Baby boy.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
We are talking.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
It's been a hell of a month.
It has been a while, guys.
I'm so excited we got aconspiracy theory.
We're going to do a rabbit hole, doug, it's going to be so fun,
take the pill.

Speaker 2 (00:38):
Take the pill, just the red one.
The blue one doesn't matter.

Speaker 1 (00:41):
Take them together.

Speaker 3 (00:42):
Follow the white rabbit.
It's the same pharmacy.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
Don't do the Will.

Speaker 1 (00:44):
Smith thing though.
Okay, all right, you good what.
You haven't seen that video.
Let's not even go down thatrabbit hole.
Anyway, ladies, and gentlemen,hit that music.
Let's go, let's go.
Thank you guys for helping mefumble through that.

(01:07):
We are back.
We are back.

Speaker 2 (01:10):
We are back.
Oh man, All right bro, it feelsgood to be back, my guy.

Speaker 1 (01:15):
It's been a good week man.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
It's been a good week guys.
I want to thank everybody whotuned in to our last episode
about the Super Bowl.

Speaker 3 (01:20):
Yeah, our Kendrick Lamar is the new Captain America
.

Speaker 2 (01:24):
That's right.
Thank you, Kendrick Lamar isthe new Captain America.

Speaker 3 (01:25):
That's right.
We got a lot of positivefeedback on that one some people
like our Captain America, hottakes they said people want to
talk about Dragon Ball, butwe're going to hold it off on
that till oh shit, my bad that'sthat boomer alarm.

Speaker 2 (01:39):
That's that boomer alarm.

Speaker 3 (01:41):
But yeah, no, we're going to save Dynamo for next
week my boy, vegeta, is just oneof us Straight Goonin' out
there.

Speaker 1 (01:48):
We're going to save it for next week, hold it like
clean clothes.

Speaker 3 (01:51):
That's all I'm saying .
Hold it like clean clothesain't no lie, I would have too
yeah absolutely.
Anyways, we're going to holdoff for one more week on Dynamo,
because next week's episode isgoing to hold off for like one
more week on Daima, because nextweek's episode is going to be
Fuego Zenkai Maximum Power, andwe're going to revisit Cobra Kai
later in our season, justbecause we're going to give

(02:14):
Homeboy some time to finish it.
Yes, it's a lot.

Speaker 1 (02:17):
This guy needs some time.
He's like I got to watch allthree movies Low key.

Speaker 2 (02:20):
I'm finishing up Castlevania, but I get it.

Speaker 3 (02:23):
I'm almost done.
It's really good.

Speaker 1 (02:25):
See, we should just deep dive, See look, he just
wants to watch the trailers.
I tell him just to watch thesnippets we're going to hold up
on cover.
We'll get there.

Speaker 2 (02:31):
We'll get there.
We'll get there.

Speaker 1 (02:33):
We got a whole year we got plenty of time.

Speaker 3 (02:38):
I'm excited for you guys this season.
It's going to be weird, youknow.

Speaker 1 (02:41):
Oh yeah, man, we're going to break off the beaten
path for a little bit and we'regoing to talk some conspiracy
theories for you guys.
Who wants to start first?
I'll go on mine.

Speaker 2 (02:49):
Okay, man.
So actually I was going to doone of our classic segues,
because you were talking aboutDragon Ball, jesus that was
quick and I think, like in theworld chaos, to this town, and
then she's the one sending thefighters, she's the one making

(03:09):
profit off of this.
You know.

Speaker 3 (03:12):
Didn't one of the background characters in Super
like, oh, that's capsule corpover there.
They're always doing weirdexperiments.

Speaker 1 (03:17):
They are.

Speaker 3 (03:17):
They're always doing weird shit over there, and then
there's like a weird conspiracyguy in the background is like,
oh, they probably got aliensover there which they did have
aliens over there ironically, Ido imagine like Capsule Corp in
the Dragon Ball universe is likeCERN in our universe.
Oh that's cool.
Volma is working on theparticle accelerator.

Speaker 2 (03:39):
It's always something and they always be like.
There's no way you can put ahome bicycle in a capsule.

Speaker 1 (03:44):
There's no way it put a home bicycle in a capsule.
There's no way.
It makes no sense.
How could they do?

Speaker 3 (03:46):
that you know, that's super true.

Speaker 2 (03:48):
She told a story that she went to a different planet.
How?

Speaker 3 (03:50):
yep, that's right.
You know she's retrofittingalien technology, like it's easy
yeah for her.

Speaker 2 (03:56):
You know it's either her or tony stark that have like
high level genius Bola did thiswith a bunch of, with a bunch
and a king, and a four and aking with no dragon balls, you
know max bro.

Speaker 1 (04:10):
You know what makes me trust me.
The only time she struggledwith technology is when it came
from a different dimension.
That was the only time shestruggled with fucking
technology she still kind offixed it.

Speaker 3 (04:17):
I mean, yeah, but she's still.
Yeah, she still figured it out.

Speaker 1 (04:22):
But anyway, yeah, no, they totally get shit 1,000%.
There's no way that they don'tget fucking hate mail.
They got lawyers.
They're probably getting suedleft and right.
I'm surprised we don't seeBulma in court a lot.
Why isn't she stressed?

Speaker 2 (04:37):
Nah, but that's their conspiracy, Because we can see
it as the audience we know.

Speaker 1 (04:42):
But the people there, there, yeah, they probably hate
the fuck out of them, bro.

Speaker 3 (04:45):
Yeah, yeah, they get elon because they get the uh,
they get the cover story.
Remember, like uh, from uh saland even from boo.
I think the cover story is uh,um, what's his name?

Speaker 1 (04:56):
mr satan, mr satan he's the one that saved the
world.

Speaker 3 (04:58):
He's the one that saved the world from the aliens
oh, there's even a cover storyto cover up the conspiracy that
is Goku and the Saiyans thatstory.

Speaker 1 (05:05):
I'm telling you.
That's the message.
There's conspiracy theories outthere that don't make sense,
that we all just accept man forreal.
I'm just saying.

Speaker 3 (05:11):
I don't know, that was just random.
I like how we're breaking it.
There's a cover story that theyfeed the media.
Okay, in that universe butconspiracy.

Speaker 2 (05:19):
We're of a secret organization, secret deals or
secret everything, because Iremember Reading one of the
books by this famous author, danBrown, the guy that wrote the
Da Vinci Code, but one of myfavorite books Was called the
the, the word, anyway.

Speaker 3 (05:35):
Long story, short, but his favorite book.

Speaker 2 (05:37):
And long story short, the bad guy, malak, was his
name, like.
Picture him Like all, like Bold,naked but with blue tattoos,
like symbolism, right.
So the goal in the book, uh, themain bad guy was to expose
secret organizations within thegovernment, but specifically
list out the name of thosehigh-ranking members like
senators, judges, and prettymuch all over through the book,

(05:58):
like people were trying to stop.
The bad guy who are these peoplewas like the director of cia,
obviously the main character,who is the guy that plays tom
tom hanks in the book, right,and the director, defeat fbi
trying to start the bag, allright, and so they lay out their
argument of why, like he, thebad guy, could not do this, like
why he could not reveal.
And then in the book I recallthem saying that it's because

(06:20):
the, the audience or the people,the masses, could not
comprehend or understand thereason they did these rituals,
because they are aligned with arituals that were of that of the
founding fathers, just thatthey didn't do it in public and
they never exposed it becausethey were supposed to be about
uh, organizations and theseorganizations believe it or not,

(06:42):
however you want to argue likethey had, you know they paint
the founding fathers like veryenlightened, thoughtful people.
It's like it's kind of hard forlike these, like farmers you
know, to rebel against thebiggest uh army of the world,
which was the the the uk empireyeah, the british and so.
But they're in that book, thatfbi director, cia director and
the tom hanks character who'slike you are him You're pretty

(07:04):
much listening to why you shouldgo about and defend these
secret organizations, and sothey do.
Stop the bad guy from exposingto the public, because he was
exposed by showing that therituals they did and exposed who
these people were.
And it was nothing differentthan doing something like I did
for my fraternity, pretty muchlike a candle, something weird,

(07:26):
drinking something weird and youknow I forget, he wasn't a frat
right, I'm gonna give you side,I would say right what did?
he do his knees so like, sothat's like these, these, uh.
So there's like experience,like they always insist skull
and bones and yell, but they theargument is like you don't

(07:48):
understand because like they areso ancient and old, that like
they're for the masons and thatlike they have a set goal.
You know what, have you spreadchristianity or have the ideals
of democracy?
Um, but that's one of the uh,my favorite books is it kind of
like wants to break down why youshould be okay with like secret
organizations?
But I was like nah, bro, exposehim bro.

(08:09):
I was kind of ready for the badguy in that book, you know yeah
, I mean they always talk aboutthat's.

Speaker 3 (08:13):
The counter argument is like well, if you expose this
, it's gonna break the world.
You know it's gonna break theinternet, like you know.

Speaker 1 (08:27):
Yeah everything goes out the window.
The lost symbol.

Speaker 2 (08:29):
Thanks, suki, the lost symbol.
Ah, that's the name of the book.
That's the book, yeah.

Speaker 1 (08:32):
Well, I'm going to co-sign with you on that because
, like, there are parts ofhistory that have to be erased,
that people can't know of, likegiants.
If giants are they now, whydon't they exist?
Now?
We gotta get into some reallyweird stuff.
But I mean, and the same thing,that, just as dragons are the
same thing, why are there giant,continental, you know, in years
and thousands of no, noconnections with these people.

(08:53):
Dragons come up in allmythologies, right, they all
look similar.
They can all have either thickbodies and you know who actually
looks similar is the japaneseuh interpretation in the aztecs,
as far as like, when they havethose.
But why, why, why fire, whywings, like, and what you know I
mean.
So, when you said that, andthen, like I said, there's
things of giants, right, davidand goliath, right, we use it as
a metaphor I'm like, oh, he wasjust a really big man.
What if he really was a giant?

(09:14):
Where?
Where are the bones of david atthis point?
Or the goliath at that point,like, but it would contradict
with history, it wouldn't makesense.
So, even if you found bones andhistory gets lost in the
smithsonian as an example, ifthat's the only fucking record
of it they ever had and theyjust lost it.
That now it's gone history nolonger exists.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
The thing is like that is like my place is like
how over exaggerated could beright because, like the giants
writers, are we talking likepeople?
Like, like they look like theway they picture.
It is like these people arelike 10 feet tall, like you know
, 20 feet tall, yeah, or is itmore like because they were like
so malnutritioned back then,like they're tiny people.
When you see people from likethe south sudan, who pretty much
all them are, you know,basketball players, yeah, like I

(09:54):
get it, like you, I would too,if I saw a seven foot eight foot
man walking around and I'm likeI just got a egypt malnourished
.

Speaker 3 (10:04):
Showed up here.
You know he'll go.
We'll be looking at him like Yo, you know like land of giants.

Speaker 2 (10:08):
But I don't know, it's like or.

Speaker 3 (10:10):
Jack or something.

Speaker 1 (10:10):
However but then you.

Speaker 2 (10:11):
Land of giants, but okay, look, but here that's my
ground, that's my ground.
But then as you go, somethinglike looking like Shang Long
right In China in that area,it's like how did you know?
It's like I get it, you know.
But there's so manyimaginations that, like I'm
thinking of a snake like in theair breathing fire or what have

(10:36):
you, or shoots lightning out ofhis asshole or whatever you
would say, but there's a wholebody of ocean separating that.
You know, I have another littlegranite conspiracy and I
believe, uh like, uh like peoplethat travel, people, that it's
the samoan islands.
What have you, you know, like,maybe they, maybe they like, you
know, because they travel, soyou know, in the middle of
pacific, right on the twig, theycould have somehow got to, you

(10:58):
know, met some mexican and then,and then, like three month
voyage, you know well, I meanthe distance back there.

Speaker 3 (11:04):
people migrated from China, russia through the Bering
Strait right Through themountains and shit bro.
Yeah, they would find.
No, they migrated to Alaska.

Speaker 1 (11:13):
Oh yeah, through the natural land.

Speaker 2 (11:14):
Well, I'm talking about the people from, like the
Samoa Islands who, like when thepocket civilization developed
there in that area, they didn'tcross, like I believe that they
were good at like.
Well, today, you know, I lookat the stars like damn, I can't
see no stars.
But back then they'd be like,okay, I know how to get to you
know over there, Istanbul fromhere, and like I can imagine
having no concept of likeextreme fear.

(11:34):
Like in the twig I get like.
You see, moana.

Speaker 1 (11:45):
Yeah, like I was terrified in no, no, no lights,
no light but these guys singingthe song, you know.

Speaker 2 (11:47):
But the little guitars, you know, they make it
beautiful, they make it.
They made to singapore, do youknow?
Like hey, I got this chicken,I'm gonna trade it with these
seashells and the estic empire.
And I can believe I can seethem making it like knowing the
routes, the ocean currents, likeI can see them like, in that
sense, that's my ground there,like the bering strait is one
thing, but them going to thePacific Ocean, I can also
believe that.

Speaker 3 (12:04):
You know, I can believe that yeah, but they even
figure out navigating like.

Speaker 1 (12:08):
That is why right yeah, it's crazy when, like, we
try to see one man try to swimacross this ocean and shit like
that right, and you're like, ohman, it's impossible, there's no
way any human being could do it.
You're like if you had a squadof motherfuckers everybody's
squeezing on one boat and it'slike, all right, bro, if you
don't make this, you're gonnadie.
Like we do it and we're likeman, it's really cold out here.
I remember when it was reallywarm in my bed.
You know what I'm saying.
Like gosh, I wish I can listento my music right now.

(12:28):
Fuck, I just lost my airpod inthe ocean.
You know like thesemotherfuckers are holding on for
dear life.
This is it, bro, you're notgonna make it after this.
Like human body.
You know, like adrenaline is amotherfucker.
We've done some impossible shit, you know, in in the heat of
the battle.
So I'm like it's very possible.
Look, we see the samoans aslike people left on the island,
right, but how did they getthere to begin with?
There's no way to just randomcivilizations I can imagine.

Speaker 2 (12:49):
And they, but they themselves, like that's the
thing.
Like, also writes the passagesyou know how culturally divided,
like hey, if you can make it tothat side of town, you know
you're, you can become a tribeleader.
You know like the greeks woulddo it?
Hey, send it, no, no, you callthat the trojans, the Spartans.
Send the kids to the wolves,comes back hey, hey, hey you're
one of them, you know, which iswild today like no, I love my

(13:09):
baby.
I can never do that.
I would never do that yeah, butI can see that, like culturally,
like in those areas, it's like,hey, you can make it.
Go find something from aforeign land, bring it back.
You're the chieftain, you outthere.
You know, hey, this is bitchesfrom like Aztec, you know.

Speaker 1 (13:24):
Yeah, and you didn't have the next season of anything
.
Look what I brought FatassAztec woman.

Speaker 2 (13:29):
You know what.

Speaker 3 (13:32):
To this day, all civilizations got a weakness
from fake Latinas.

Speaker 1 (13:35):
Bro, look what did they rely on.

Speaker 3 (13:36):
There are Aztec bitches in the jungle, bro.

Speaker 1 (13:38):
All you gotta do, I'm telling you you can climb.

Speaker 2 (13:40):
these women would go he would do the impossible.
You know what I'm saying?
This guy right here would belike if there was, you were back
.
Then, bro, tell me you wouldn'tgo looking for giants
absolutely bro, four months inthe ocean for some ass for the
astacusi oh shit, all right, soanyway that's uh but.
But I can see, like that's myconspiracy, I'm dumbing down on

(14:04):
the ingenuity of humankind where, like, they were so bold and
brave back then, like at somemeasure, there of course there's
fear right, it's always fearbut to a degree it was like
faced like, and they did crazyshit, like so I can see someone
going to the to mainland chinafrom a nowhere island, like look
what I brought back.
You know, you know, jayden,whatever the fuck you know, yeah
, yeah stuff like that yeah, butthat desire for like well

(14:26):
that's the thing they could justlike look, look at this cruel
picture and then likeimagination starts flowing
fucking dragons, giants and shit.
Because, okay, egyptians, onething right, but it took god
himself to break down theobjection.
But before that they had torule something.
So they had to go go meet withthe Babylon's, navigate in the
middle of nowhere, africa, meetthe, the what do you call those?

(14:46):
The, the more civilization.
And then they interacted withshit Like hey, we got sand,
y'all had this shit in thejungle.

Speaker 1 (14:54):
You know you can make glass with this.
Nah, what the fuck?
Nah, shut up, Shut.

Speaker 2 (14:57):
And then they're like look, this is a lion, We'll
give you like 10 metric tons ofsand for like some, for two
lions that they have like a fuckton of them in the back, you
know, and then some lions, andthen like they're both, like bro
, we just sold them sand, bro,we just sold them lions.

(15:17):
I can see that happening.

Speaker 1 (15:20):
You know that's history bro.

Speaker 3 (15:23):
Welcome to WBN.

Speaker 1 (15:28):
All right, can I go on my, my conspiracy?

Speaker 3 (15:29):
yeah yeah, so I got a little rant right the giants or
the dragons no, it's neither.

Speaker 1 (15:33):
Uh, I'm actually uh.
I believe the us is keeping itspeople sick through poor food
and bad medicine.
Not a ridiculous thing to say.
Not a ridiculous thing to saybut here.
But here's the proof that Ihave to go back it up.
Now.

Speaker 2 (15:45):
I'm about to get an email, because here's crazy
right Like you're like wow.
I'm about to get an email.
What did I do to you?

Speaker 1 (15:53):
This is the shit that I found that was mind-blowing
to me, don't?
Speak so loud next to my phone.
No well, it's already beenconfirmed that the giant tobacco
industries have bought into thefood industry, right?
Oh yeah that's for sure, andwe're talking Kraft's and
General Mills.

(16:13):
So anything Kraft's cheese,General Mills cereal, all those
things that you see out there,right, why is tobacco buying
into the food industry?
It doesn't make sense.
Like what do cigarettes andfood have anything to do in
common with each other?

Speaker 3 (16:25):
Right.
Well, it was that whole thingthat the tobacco industry was
trying to stay relevant andtrying to keep their labels off
boxes.

Speaker 2 (16:33):
I recall a story too about a member that we all know
that quit tobacco andimmediately jumped into sugar.
Yeah, so imagine they did that.
It's like they sent theirlobbyists and their lawyers to
be like hey, crazy coincidencethat once they start smoking our
shit, they're jumping into this.

Speaker 3 (16:49):
It's just as addicting.

Speaker 2 (16:51):
I can be like bro, if 10% of my stocks into that say
less Absolutely.

Speaker 1 (16:55):
So how do you guarantee that your stocks don't
go up though?
Continue to make addictive food.
But if cigarettes don't give afuck what they do to you, they
just want to return customerbase.
It'll give you cancer, it'llkill you, bro, if you keep on
doing this shit.
But they don't give a fuck,they just want you to buy the
next pack.
They were able to sell tochildren at one point.
Kids could buy cigarettes to acertain point and then they're

(17:29):
like all right, we got to stopthese little bastards.
And guess what?
I can't advertise a cigarettecommercial, but I can advertise
frosted flakes a trick monsterenergy drinks.
Tricks are for kids.

Speaker 3 (17:37):
You know what I'm saying.

Speaker 1 (17:37):
Tricks are for kids, after all, right but and so I
know somebody who's onimmunosuppressants right, they
weaken your white blood countfor anti-rejection medicine, for
surgeries and things like that.
Her doctor told her hey, yourimmunonumbers are kind of off.
You should probably drink asoda whenever these numbers are

(17:58):
off.
And she said a soda.
She said, yeah, they actuallyhelp lower your white blood
count.
So, basically, if you're on theverge of getting sick and you
want to guarantee that you'regoing to get sick, just eat
sugar and you'll get sick.
That's how it happens.
So again, High fructose.
High fructose corn syrup orwhatever.

Speaker 3 (18:15):
It is right, yeah, the corn syrup.

Speaker 1 (18:17):
So again, what isn't that shit in whenever it comes
to sugar?
But again, you keep these kidssick.
But how do you make sure thatthey stay sick if they continue
to get addictive medicines?
They don't.
They don't cure people, bro.

Speaker 3 (18:30):
They just treat symptoms, because a cured person
is one less customer that theyhave inside their beds.
So that last content creatorthat went down that ran,
disappear.

Speaker 2 (18:37):
Man, I'm just saying, look, no, I do it because it
was like.
I guess it makes me think likeI have to, somehow in my own
brain like think boring is cool,right Cause, if I add sugar to
my coffee this morning, right,it's delicious, but I'm like I'm
, I'm, I am myself becoming likeyou know, hurting myself in the
long run, where I should acceptthe fact that coffee should be
fucking disgusting.

(18:58):
And if I'm going to drink it,you know, drink and get black,
you know, and I do every once ina while.
But it's fucking tough, you know, because I want that sugar
craving, you know.

Speaker 1 (19:06):
Because the way that they market it to the American
people, the culture is now it'squick, fast, cheap and easy.
That's what we want, and if wecan't get that then it's more
inconvenient to us.
But everything that's quick,fast, cheap shit.
Because when you go to ItalyRFJK Jr said this shit the best
he's like you go to Italy,there's six ingredients in

(19:27):
fucking pizza, bro.
That's it.
People lose weight, thecholesterol goes down when they
do all this shit Just in thetomato sauce.
You go to Little Caesars rightnow, bro, and you grab the
fucking can off the label.
Why, why are they and what arethey in there, bro?

Speaker 3 (19:42):
There's some comparisons, yeah, with Europe,
like for the same company andfor tricks.
That's an example Trick cerealhere has 60 ingredients.
Trick cereal in Europe has, youknow 10.

Speaker 1 (19:53):
Absolutely.
And why?
It's because the FDA hasallowed them to say, hey, the
right motherfuckers have rubbedthe right elbows to say, hey, do
me a favor, bump that number upup a little bit more, a little
bit more and a little bit more.
And every time that they can,they can continue to lie.
They don't have to have actualtests or fucking numbers, bro.
They can pay off the medicalcompanies or doctors, bro, to
just write fucking vouchers orsay waivers or whatever the fuck
it is, just to get the passiveapproval on it.

(20:15):
Everybody's just looking for apaycheck at the end of the day.
And the fact is that childrenare being subsidized and stuff,
bro.
That it's it.
There are some things thatcause cancer out there, bro.

Speaker 2 (20:23):
That nobody's stopping, it's true, because
even the sugar's different, likein Coca-Cola in Mexico, because
even there is cane sugarcompared to here, Like over
there, it has to be cane sugar.
And even then they tell you hey, the little labels today in
Coca-Cola be like hey, FYI,excessive amount of sugar.
Like there's a corner, a bigyellow sticker that says hey,
FYI, even the chocolate milk.
Sometimes it's like you knowthose coffees to go and then you

(20:43):
buy, like you know, I gotta gosomewhere for the family in
Mexico I need some coffee.
It'll tell you right there inthe corner it's Nestle Coca-Cola
.
What have you?

Speaker 3 (20:50):
big yellow sticker, mindful, extensive amount of
sugar and you always have thatbig label with two stop signs.
It's like excessive sodium andexcessive sugar.
Yes, yeah, absolutely,absolutely.

Speaker 2 (21:00):
Absolutely.
So even there like somecountries like, yeah, man, even
some other countries like noticeof that, like hey, what the
fuck is in these ingredients?

Speaker 1 (21:05):
Yeah, and the US is trying to alter that man, Even
when it comes to the corn thatwe're talking about.
That I dropped in the chat In.
Mexico.
That's right.
They're trying to get into thegenetically modified corn to
then alter that shit becausethat doesn't reproduce.
The corn that's have in the uscannot.

(21:26):
As a matter of fact, it rotsthe soil and it cannot be used.
You have to get new seeds andgo to a new little spot in order
for that shit to fucking workin that area.
Um, they are trying to forcemexico to do that, but in doing
so they're going toautomatically spread that to the
natural crops.
They're altering the wholefucking genetic pool, making
them rely on the gmo crops that,uh, the us owns, because they
own money in corn and fuckingsugar, bro, like it's insane.
But again, this is likemandated for everyone.

(21:48):
Nobody knows.
It's all about the money, it'sjust terrible.

Speaker 2 (21:51):
It reminds me of that Kodak problem where, like Kodak
, the famous company with thepictures, some people don't know
what that is actually.
When the digital world wasbefore it was film Kodak had put
so much billions of dollars inalready like film, like in
warehouses and stuff.
But the world they had inventeddigital before Sony and other

(22:13):
companies.

Speaker 1 (22:13):
They did.
They already knew it existed.

Speaker 2 (22:15):
But they'd rather not go through the avenue,
therefore, because, well, whatam I going to do with all this
money?
I've already invested I need tosell it, but that caused them
their downfall.
I imagine the same thing withthe seeds.
It's need to sell it, but thatcost them their downfall.
I imagine the same thing withthe seeds.
I already put so much money inthese engineers and these
chemists and their studies forthem to do something.
How about for the flu shot, bro?
Because it's not so complex.
It's like, hey, just farm more.

(22:36):
I'll never forget this oneepisode in Shark Tank where this
lady had created biscuitcookies and then they sent her
to this.
Uh, there's one of the guys.
One of the guys bought herbusiness, right, but then
invented, invited a differentchef to change her formula to
make it more what's he calledcost effective.
You know what cost effectivemeans?

(22:57):
Right, that I lower the cost tomake it, but increase the price
, right?
So he was starting.
He's like, instead of this,we're gonna do this because this
allows us to stick like thisand this, this does this.
You know, but the whole reasonwhy she was famous to make these
biscuit cookies was it came outof flour eggs.
You know the same thing thatshe just made it smaller.
That was it Right and for somereason it was like not good

(23:18):
enough.
We're going to change to thesekinds of pastries, which I can
see what it is.
I think the whole thing is likeyes, tomato is just tomato,
right, but I I think it'scheaper if I add right, yeah, if
I get everybody else in on it,I can get out and also kickbacks
and shit.

Speaker 1 (23:30):
It's like people put theirproducts in there.
They're like, well, we'll giveyou this, we'll get.
You can get these fucking loans, these rights, whatever the
fuck it may be.
Yeah, but um, it's all aboutmoney also, because every single
year, a flu shot is given.
I haven't gotten sick, bro, inyears and I haven't gotten a
fucking flu shot, but I wasgetting the flu whenever I was
getting the flu shot.
However, if you tell people Igot a cure for the flu and
you'll never have to get anothershot again, how much money is

(23:52):
out on fucking Walgreens and CVS?
For all the thousands ofdollars, if not millions and
billions of dollars, they get afucking flu shots a year, and
that's just one that you get tocharge the insurance company for
all.
Did you know that if youactually?
Uh, so Scoob got her, her, herkidney transplant one of our,
our people that we had on the onthe show in the process, she
now has to take 18 medicationsright, just for daily shit.

(24:12):
She did the research and shefound out that in Europe they do
stem cells and in doing thestem cells she would have been
limited to three medications,but that wouldn't have worked.
The FDA doesn't approve stemcell research, right?
That's still risky andexperimental shit and you can't
bill your insurance fucking$10,000 for medications you know
X amount of times a month forthat exact same shit.
It's all money, bro, and Ifucking hate that the US.

(24:33):
It's a pay to win.
It used to be free to play,it's now pay to win.

Speaker 3 (24:37):
That's the deletion, bro.
The US was never free to playknow what.

Speaker 1 (24:47):
They sold it to us like that.
How about that?
It's a great american dream.

Speaker 2 (24:49):
Bringing it back to last week's episode about the
super bowl.
That's it, bro.
But I mean, mr lamar, do youreally know how to play this
game?

Speaker 1 (24:53):
yeah, it was never for the play, but immigrants
still come over to this day, bro, I just want to come over here
and live the american dream.
I want to work hard, start mybusiness and do my shit, but
even then, even the people thatdo that, bro, are still working
for the rest of their lives.
They ain't made it out ofnothing.

Speaker 3 (25:04):
What's their retirement?
Look like the Americantribute's not real anymore, yeah
man.
And it's so fucked up.

Speaker 1 (25:08):
It's not what it used to be.
That's what I'm saying it usedto be.
They used to make you think itwas free to play.

Speaker 3 (25:19):
They used to give you a hashtag chest yeah, bro.
Or a srana.

Speaker 1 (25:21):
Now they want to See.
Look, the Hextech chest used tobe the industries, the
facilities they used to have thefactories inside the inner city
.

Speaker 2 (25:28):
Oh, we're talking about League guys, and they took
it away.
They took it away.

Speaker 1 (25:32):
They took away the industry, the Hextech chest bro.

Speaker 3 (25:34):
They need to get rid of that CEO.
That's it, bro Again, andthat's the argument for League.

Speaker 2 (25:38):
Like not enough people are buying our stuff.
Like we need more money to makethis.
You know yes.

Speaker 1 (25:43):
When the profits have been at the highest.
Bro, it's just like.
Again, it's like why isn't thisenough?

Speaker 3 (25:47):
Yeah, the profits have already been at the highest
.
Why are you going to take awaythe free stuff?
And it's the same thing, thoughit's like.

Speaker 1 (25:53):
why are you continuously taking away from
the people?
Exactly After how many billionsis enough?
Billions?

Speaker 2 (25:57):
It reminds me of this one story about how Ford,
carter Ford, was the billionsthat he was making.
He was trying to expand thecompany and give money to his
employees.
Now, suki, correct me if I'mwrong on this one, you know,
guys, please.
Obviously, but for allunderstanding, he got sued by
Dodge Brothers about how hisduty a fiduciary duty, which

(26:22):
means a monetary duty, that hisobligation is not the worker but
the stakeholders, those thatinvested to the company.
Therefore, if Ford was going todo that, it threatened Dodge's
you know point of view ofinvesting for the shareholder,
the people that invested fortheir company, that the
employees themselves, which was,from what I'm understanding,

(26:43):
was for idea was like.
Well, the whole reason.
You know I have money which islike not for me, but to share
with those that you know.
And because he too came from a,I believe he came.
He didn't come from a silverspoon, if I'm right, you know,
he actually came from thetrenches as well.

Speaker 3 (27:01):
Great question.
Yeah, if I'm not wrong, suki,let us know.

Speaker 2 (27:03):
That being said, since that happened, since the
Florida, the company cannotbecause of that lawsuit.
A company has to, by obligation, focus on the shareholders, not
necessarily the needs of theiremployees.

Speaker 3 (27:18):
The crazy thing about that story is Dodge won.
They won that case.
What, yes it?

Speaker 2 (27:23):
happened.
That's why I bring it up.

Speaker 3 (27:24):
Henry Ford ended up not even being to like Raise the
wages of their employees.
Not, he raised them, but not asmuch as he wanted, like there
was a cap that he had to likestop at Because Dodge won the
case.
Wow.

Speaker 2 (27:35):
Yeah, so like, even then, like it's your money, you
can do what you want with it.
But even then, his hands weretied.

Speaker 3 (27:41):
Handicapped.
I mean this was in the 1920s,so before the Great Depression.

Speaker 1 (27:45):
Yeah, but still, though, even now, that shit
wouldn't happen.

Speaker 2 (27:47):
You don't know that.
You know what I mean.
It could happen, bro.
I mean you never know.

Speaker 1 (27:50):
But I can see that.

Speaker 2 (27:51):
I can see that you know less insulin.
You know that could be insulin.
People with diabetes, you know,or what have you?
You hear it all the time.
This company went to 5, boy,you know.
But some people needed to live,you know, yeah, yeah, well, and
some people risk it, like Irather died and paid this amount
, which is crazy, you know, man.
But you know, you know, youknow I have heaven for good, you

(28:12):
know, no, take your medicine,yeah, no.
But there's people like that,you know, be careful.
Hey, me, me, I'm one of them.
Like, if I get sick, I'm gonnalike the mainly urge to muscle
through it.
But I'll be honest, bro, if Ilive right now in amsterdam, I'm
going to like the mainly urgeto muscle through it.
But I'll be honest, bro, if Ilive right now in Amsterdam, I'm
walking to the doctor broCoffee and everything I still
might talk.

Speaker 3 (28:32):
We're in Europe.
Okay, let's go over to thedoctor.

Speaker 2 (28:34):
But here is like do I want to pay that medical bill?
I want to pay that medical bill.

Speaker 3 (28:39):
I can't afford that medical bill.
I got insurance.
I still can't afford that stillcan't afford that.

Speaker 1 (28:47):
I don't want to be that copay, you know?
Nah, bro, I hate it.
I hate that shit.
Uh, my next thing I was gonnago on was vaccines.
Uh, vaccines are bad.
I don't know, I don't knowenough about it.
Again, I need to educate myselfmore.

Speaker 3 (28:55):
What's his name?
The I'm tight backs guy thatdropped the sign to a point.
Oh yeah, yeah rfk jr.

Speaker 1 (29:01):
Yeah, he's gonna go on that ramble, but here's my
thing.
So he's actually not againstvaccines, bro's like.
As long as they're tested andthey have the proof on them, I
don't have a problem backing upthe fucking vaccine.

Speaker 2 (29:09):
Yeah, well, like I get it Like chicken.

Speaker 3 (29:18):
Okay, you drank too much of that Kool-Aid, sir.

Speaker 1 (29:20):
No, no, no, Let me finish.

Speaker 2 (29:21):
Let me finish absolutely.
Polio is terrible, chicken poxbad, bad right.

Speaker 1 (29:25):
So here's my thing.
Bill Gates is and created the,the World Health Organization,
the WHO.
Right, he runs WHO at thispoint.
Bill Gates is heavily investedin vaccines.
He's heavily, he's heavilyinvested in vaccines and he
actually owns.
Well, he believes indepopulation.
We all know this.
Yes, does he?
He does.
He said there's too many peopleon human earth, but he has only

(29:45):
one kid.
What does he know?
He knows that there's too manydamn people is what he said, and
it's on multiple interviews.

Speaker 2 (29:51):
It's not like a one-time thing, bro.
He can't even keep his bitch inline.
Fuck does he know.

Speaker 1 (29:55):
So, that being said, think about it, me or him?

Speaker 3 (29:59):
Who said?

Speaker 2 (29:59):
depopulate Give it.

Speaker 1 (30:02):
We got to depopulate is what he said.
And then he's actually alsoheavily invested in mosquito
farms.

Speaker 2 (30:07):
If you can't, even keep your house in order.
How are you going to keep thatwhole plant in order?
I don't want to fucking hearfrom a man who is the third
richest billionaire and thenhe'll cry about his business.
I would have had like 25countries worth of like girls,
bro, if I was him.

Speaker 1 (30:21):
So Bill Gates is also heavily invested in mosquito
farms, all vaccinated.

Speaker 3 (30:25):
He's heavily invested in mosquito farms All
vaccinated.

Speaker 1 (30:26):
He's heavily invested in mosquito farms no mosquitoes
anywhere, yeah, so look, he'sinvested in mosquito farms in
California, giant fuckingfacilities that have like over,
let's say, 20 million fuckingmosquitoes.
Did you know that if you givethese motherfuckers the right
shit and you can send thesemosquitoes out in public and
it's basically like your ownimmunizations, say you can give
these mosquitoes either I thinkyou can genetically alter them

(30:47):
or the shit that you know theyhave to, like feed off the
source.

Speaker 2 (30:49):
That's too much, man I can actually picture like
nanorobots, though Sure Likenanomosquitoes.

Speaker 3 (30:54):
Sure, that's the research.
That's where the research issupposed to be going.
Yeah, you know, in order tohelp everybody, let's just, you
know, vaccinate everybody thisway, through mosquitoes.
So everybody this way throughmosquitoes.
So instead of asking it's notsomething bad.
Well, the research, the richer.
This research is for a goodpurpose absolutely well, that's
what we assume right, becausehere's my thing here's.

Speaker 1 (31:11):
Here's my thing, because why would people do bad
things, right?
Why would the government do badthings with shit?

Speaker 3 (31:16):
right.
Bill gates already has enoughmoney, so I don't think with him
.
It's about their money.
Oh, let me finish though?

Speaker 1 (31:20):
right, because you make sure, you want to make sure
that you live long enough tohave your money, be able to
spend all your money, right?
So all that shit being said anddone, um, with the depopulation
shit, the vaccination shit, didyou know that back in the us in
the 70s the autism rates usedto be anywhere from one in five
to one in ten thousand kids?
When you jump to the 90s itjumps up to one in 1500.
Now today it's one in 36 kidswho have autism.
How many stories do you know ofkids getting vaccines?

(31:42):
And that we know one randomperson who, like little Jimmy
done, got that shot, bro, and hewas never the same afterwards.
Wait, wait, pause.
Answer the question.
Yes or no, you know one person,right?

Speaker 2 (31:52):
I don't know anybody.
You don't know a single person.
Do you don't know a singleperson?

Speaker 1 (31:56):
No, no, no, Not that you personally know, but has
told you a story like that oflike my little Jimmy doesn't get
shots.

Speaker 3 (32:01):
That's a real hard pill to swallow.
Vaccines can't cause autism.

Speaker 1 (32:04):
I didn't say that.
I didn't say that I can believeit.

Speaker 2 (32:07):
But the thing is, it depends how you take it, bro,
because at the end of the day wegot messy.
I'm not saying that children?

Speaker 1 (32:11):
no, I'm not saying that vaccines are causing autism
.
What I'm asking you is do youknow the story?
Do you know stories of storythat have said, hey, ever since
then, so-and-so was never thesame.

Speaker 2 (32:32):
Yes, okay, so do you know the same thing too?

Speaker 1 (32:43):
No, you've never had that thing.
Oh okay, why my thing?
The reason I said that wasgathered on it.
Who's gathering that data?

Speaker 3 (32:47):
Who's gathering, that research, that right there,
that story?
That's what it is.
It's misinformation.
It's a story Like okay, I neverheard that story, but he heard
it from his aunt.

Speaker 2 (32:56):
Oh, no, I recall seeing it, but I'm not going to
say injection, but I'm going tosay pills, because that's why
it's misinformation.

Speaker 3 (33:03):
That's why it's misinformation.
He tells me a story that heheard from his aunt that
so-and-so that Jimmy was neverthe same after he took some
pills.
All of a sudden I take that tobe true, but I don't know, and
maybe he's on and wasn't sureabout that story, but you're
assuming that that'smisinformation though.

Speaker 1 (33:17):
What if the stories actually are true, though, and
they actually are factual?
You're just assuming that theinformation is misinformation
though, but the numbers that arefactual?
Then bro the numbers of numbersjumping from one to 1,500 to
one in 36.
Yeah, you could say but there'salso the death toll has spiked.
Okay, so look, from 1990, thevaccine shots that we had were

(33:38):
10.
From the ages of one through 10, you got 10 vaccine shots.
Now, from the age of two, rightnow it's 27 vaccine shots that
you get.
Why?

Speaker 3 (33:46):
Technology investments.

Speaker 1 (33:47):
We find more vaccines Technology investments, but
what was wrong with the vaccinesthat you got?
From one to 10, that you gotwere 10 shots.
Now, at the age of two, you get27.
Technology is investable, yetwe're still getting increased
rates of autism and all theseother fucking negative things
that are going on in the US.
It doesn't make sense, bro.
You're trying to say that it'smisinformation that's spreading
that, but there are actualnumbers.

Speaker 3 (34:05):
You still don't have a connection.

Speaker 1 (34:06):
From the ages of 1-10 .
When we were kids, they were 10shots.
From the ages of 1-10, from the90s, now from the ages of 1-2,
there are 27 vaccines and allyou can tell me is that science
has improved.

Speaker 3 (34:18):
But yet our numbers there are 1 in 1500.

Speaker 1 (34:23):
From the 90s.
From now it's 1 in 36.
I can tell you right now I knowthat I didn't have 17
additional shots when I was thatage, till now, in a much
shorter gap.
Why and what are in thesevaccines, can you tell me Well?

Speaker 2 (34:35):
that's the thing I was going to go back to this
real quick.
Taking it back to the stories,I do recall the amount of
children back in the day thatwere taking pills for ADHD,
specifically the ones that werelike methamethafetamine.
Yes, so I do.
That's one consequence I dorecall, because I do remember
that there is some kind ofbelieve it, there's some kind of
affects your frontaldevelopment, your frontal lobe,

(34:56):
Frontal cortex yes, because youhave until you're 25.
So I do recall that.
That the kids, yes, because Ido remember talking to them and
they'd be like yeah, you know,I'm one person, if I take the
pills I'm more calm, but that's,you know, that's the what do
you call it?
The Adderall.
So you know, so I do know, thatthe consumption of Adderall did
increase, specifically in thewhat do you call it?
In the mid-90s.

(35:21):
And yes, just because scienceincreased doesn't mean because,
likein, you know, the fan, allthat stuff, you know, and they
lost billions in the lawsuit forthat at the same time, it's
like I see how, because it'slike technology does have
expanded people to living,because some of these children
would have died in the winter,some of these children would
have died during the plague.
Some of these children were not, did not develop enough immune
system to do it and I'm justsaying to educate yourself on

(35:42):
vaccines.

Speaker 1 (35:42):
That's all I say yeah , and that's the.

Speaker 2 (35:44):
There's nothing wrong with that, because I remember
this one economist saying it'skind of like if you don't speak
the language of economy it'skind of like the theology from
back in the 1500s You're justpoor over the weak.
Same thing with medicine.
Right, it's like if you don'tspeak the language, you are just
.
You know, you don't know whatyou're talking about, you know.

(36:04):
It's like nothing wrong withlike, you know expressing like
hey, you might not have adoctorate degree, but it doesn't
stop you from reading andresearching, like these two good
kind of things.
Yeah, absolutely.
But I do want to answer that onebefore you jumped in, it was a
yes, not injections, but yes,pills.
I do remember the amount ofconsumption pills due to
Adderall.
Today, 30 years later, it'slike hey, we're pretty much
putting methamphetamine in thesekids.

(36:25):
Yes, they're dosage, but at theend you still got to consider
hey, it's still methamphetaminethat these children are
absorbing, instead of havingthem like hey, exercises or
reading or white noise or otherkind of avenues than using these
kinds of pills, because it'squite cheap and some parents are
like, hey, fuck it, it'sscience, I'll give my kid the

(36:46):
pill.
And then there's a parents.
They're like no, fuck, that'smethamphetamine.
You know, back in 95 and 92they would have thought you were
crazy.
You know, in 96, like, what areyou talking?

Speaker 3 (36:53):
about.
You know, a lot of theseconditions went undiagnosed,
like in the 60s and 70s.

Speaker 2 (36:57):
You know what I'm saying yeah, but it's more like
it should have been treated morelike all right, since your kids
hhd go work out or read a book,you know, put the tv down
because that that that increasesyour your you know living with
it.

Speaker 3 (37:08):
Yeah, learn to live with it exactly, absolutely like
.
We're like now, everybody's inthe spectrum to a certain extent
, but you don't realize wealways been yeah, absolutely,
absolutely, absolutely well,that's my little soapbox that I
had for it, bro.

Speaker 1 (37:21):
Like I said, I was just like I was on this rabbit
hole, like I said, because evenoxycodone was the same, or
oxycodone whenever that companyoriginally existed.
They were peddling a highlyaddictive drug that nobody knew
that they lied for for years andthen finally, when the story
broke, they end up paying likefucking, half a billion or a
billion and that's it.

Speaker 2 (37:35):
Nobody went to jail, that's it nobody went to jail.

Speaker 3 (37:38):
The product was still on the market for like.
Even now.

Speaker 1 (37:40):
We don't know the long-term effects of taking
oxycodone for 50 years.
We don't know what it is fortaking adderall for 50 years,
like we don't know what that'sgoing to do to the kids of the
kids that have that shit that'strue and I mean it's so many
things again like we're just soquick to rush in, we assume that
everything is good right,because I've always I got
pressured to get the covet shot,bro, like by my parents.

Speaker 2 (37:56):
I didn't necessarily want to do it, because I just
didn't know right, but theairport, the, the, yeah, I
needed, it was one shot, yeah,but I mean like even with your
own family.

Speaker 1 (38:05):
You're gonna get pressured.
You're gonna get like well, whydon't you?
You got these shots, you gotthese shots.
There was nothing wrong withthese shots whenever you got
them, but I'm like well, what'schanging this shot?
Well, there was never a covetshot back when we were kids.
Why are we taking this soblindly now, though?

Speaker 3 (38:16):
because they just say to do it covet is a new disease
.

Speaker 1 (38:18):
yeah, what would they just again like?
There were other things thatthey had, bro.
Like they, they, they said somany other different people have
came out since then to say, hey, this worked and this got shut
down by the government.
Mass production of this couldhave been used.
They didn't want to do that,but they wanted to push these
vaccines that were brand new,that were quote unquote being
worked on and they had to getpeddled out by the government,
because if you could buysomething over the counter, that
would have helped COVID.
How much people, all thosebillion dollar industries, bro,

(38:41):
popped up because of COVID, allbecause these vaccines had to
get out.
The same companies that havemade the companies have now came
up with like cures for some ofthe fucking diseases that are
going to come up for after thefucking uh for, for bad shit
that goes down wrong with people20 years down the line.

Speaker 2 (38:53):
I also put it like it's our Western glasses, like
our Western glasses, likewhenever these things happen,
because once it flew over Italy,we started caring right Cause
asia areas.
They were like, oh, you know,just in their day, it didn't
really matter, but once it flewto italy.
You know western countries toldme to alert.
You know it's the end of theworld for all of us, is it?
And then they were doing likefake propaganda.
There were bodies in ecuadorbeing stacked in the middle of

(39:14):
the roads which is being wrapped, but that was all.
It was all bs like, to acertain degree getting.
You see sweden doing the?
Uh, what do you call it?
The?
Uh, nobody's vaccinated.
But I'm in the public, justread it out.
You know toughing that shit outor what have you?
Yeah, yeah, so it's like 50, 50cases like I can see, like you
using both.
It's like I can't breathe.

Speaker 1 (39:31):
Yeah, go take the cover, bro yeah, you know and
see, and that was the reason Ieven fucked up on this is
because I started asking aibecause my thing I'm like ai
isn't biased, right, it only cananswer the questions that I
give it.
So I started asking questionslike, hey, is it possible that
this is going on with this?
And it's like, as a matter offact, yeah, the ex-ceos work for
these people from from tobaccothat work for this.

Speaker 3 (39:49):
Now I have a conspiracy, specifically that,
is it possible?
Ai is gonna say yes, based onwhat I found online, and there's
so much misinformation onlinethat the ai will not be able to
answer that answer differentlyone way or the other, even the
way you pose the question.
Is it possible?
Yeah, anything is possible.

Speaker 2 (40:09):
Or is it answering me just because I want to hear it.
That way I can tell the AI goodjob, ai like a reward system.
Or is also the AI just jumpingaround answers just to give me a
cohesive answer?

Speaker 1 (40:22):
But it could be wrong .

Speaker 2 (40:24):
I have those three things on the AI that I think is
just bouncing up an echochamber.

Speaker 3 (40:29):
You know, I mean all AI is right now.
All AI is right now is a verysuper advanced Google engine.

Speaker 2 (40:35):
Yes, I don't like people that confuse AI with God,
right?
Yeah, that's a very big problem.

Speaker 3 (40:41):
Right now it has its limitations, but you can use it.

Speaker 2 (40:47):
The biggest thing about it it it's not self-aware.
Yeah, I can use it as aself-aware like a mirror where,
like it's like, hey, you know,these are things that I notice,
what am I looking at?
And they're gonna be like, well, this is what I, this is what
you're what, this is what you'retrying to say.
You know what have you?
I guess I can see ai for that,but that echo chamber, I'm kind
of a conspiracy.
I need to be careful because Ialso believe outside forces,
right, may have access to thoseanswers.

(41:08):
Where, like, have us, I'm likeit, it may, I may not know, but
somehow it has pulled my datainto specific niche and it's
like, hey, these kinds of peopleanswer them, this stuff we all
have a.
We all have a dark web profileeither to sedate or to entice
for a motive.

Speaker 3 (41:27):
Does that make sense?

Speaker 1 (41:28):
We're all part of the algorithm, just got to get back
from the Matrix, bro.

Speaker 2 (41:34):
Well, that's the thing the Matrix wants to keep
you in the Matrix, becauseoutside the Matrix is scary.

Speaker 3 (41:37):
So is he going to sedate you, to keep you like,
hey, this is.

Speaker 2 (41:41):
Depending on your function, if he's going to go to
work, if he's going to make youintense?

Speaker 3 (41:44):
Is it going to like oh okay, well, he can manage to
lose a little more time here.
Your battery, your battery,yeah, so it kind of fills it up
that way.
But that's the Matrixconspiracy.
I don't know if we're in theMatrix, did you see, videos
about it, that it's gettingcloser and closer to that point
where, like, we really might beinside a simulation.

Speaker 2 (42:01):
And you know, I want to see a matrix where people
want to go into the matrix Likeno, I want this, I want to be in
that bathtub.
I don't want to suffer, I don'twant to do this, but you're
going to give me my life.
I wanted and I don't have tomove anything.
Put me there.

Speaker 1 (42:12):
That's the crazy shit that gets people.
I can see that.

Speaker 2 (42:14):
I can see that That'd be a billionaire.
Yes, but it won capsule.
But you thought you had a longand beautiful life and you know
you had all that shit.
I want to see a people runningtowards the gates of the Matrix.

Speaker 1 (42:32):
The part about it is I can see that's so real dog,
Put me in.

Speaker 2 (42:37):
And the first Neo that dies trying to stop them
from doing that like no.
And then that's where the movieends.

Speaker 3 (42:42):
The first Neo dies trying to save people who want
to do do this let's go back intothe matrix, lore bro that's
what I'm saying prequels of allthe neo timelines, you know
that's what the first one diesthe first one tries to save us
but we want that the machinesmade a matrix, that where the
matrix was perfect.
So let's see that perfectmatrix where it failed because
too many people were figuringout that it was too perfect yeah

(43:05):
, the architect.

Speaker 1 (43:05):
The architect even says that this is like your
seventh attempt, or some shitlike that.

Speaker 2 (43:08):
That's what I'm saying Number two should come
out and be like, yeah, thatwould be cool.

Speaker 1 (43:11):
That would be cool as fuck to see.

Speaker 2 (43:13):
And this dude, like everything, he's a politician at
one point, he's like a prophetat one point.
It's like you know picking theblock.
You know I was trying to do theTupac rap.
You know I'm picking the lock.
I'm coming through the doorblasting.
There you go.
That's how it's supposed to go.
That was Tupac, yeah.

Speaker 3 (43:34):
I'll cut out the other side, Thanks man, no man.

Speaker 1 (43:38):
But I agree.
I think that would be acrazy-ass fucking sequel or like
a big-ass movie.
Bro, give me a three-hour cutof six different Neos going
crazy shit, and then it endswith, like the other Neo opening
the door and look, that's howit connects to the series.

Speaker 2 (43:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (43:51):
That would be cool as fuck, dog.

Speaker 2 (43:52):
Oh yeah, it just starts with him waking up in
front of his computer like thefirst one.
That just connects right to thefirst one yeah, back, that's
right, that's it.

Speaker 1 (44:06):
Hey dog, get us up with that sisters hit us, up,
hit us up.
Oh shit, I ain't gonna lie bro.
We shouldn't be looking at that, oh man but I can see that.

Speaker 2 (44:15):
I can see that, I can always see the humanity,
because I'm thinking about thehunger games, I'm thinking of
the stuff you're saying I cansee humanity being like give me
the matrix, like give me, giveme that, give me the sugar.

Speaker 1 (44:24):
See, look, I could see that shit.
Have you guys seen severance?
It kind of connects where it'slike, where severance is like,
uh, you can separate your mind,basically where you have a
regular life outside of work,but as soon as you walk through
your work doors, oh, I heardabout that movie.

Speaker 3 (44:36):
I thought it was a good, great concept, but like
his work self is like leavingtips for his other self to find
yeah, bro, but like you neverknow, though, because once you
step into work, you're a totallydifferent person.

Speaker 1 (44:44):
So it's like are you a prisoner of your own job.
You can't leave that areabecause as soon as you leave,
you're somewhere else, and theonly way you're conscious is
when you're back in there.

Speaker 2 (44:51):
You know the other thing about it.
What was the name of that moviewith Schwarzenegger when he
went to Mars?
Oh, total, recall you can arguethat that's like a side story
of the matrix.
You could argue that like it'ssomebody in the capsule, like
that whole story you know I'm inwithin the film if I'm making

(45:13):
sense exactly.

Speaker 3 (45:18):
This was all exactly because he wanted that.

Speaker 2 (45:21):
Yeah, would it go home?
You know if I go to work hewanted.

Speaker 3 (45:24):
He wanted to find a darker beauty in Mars.
That's right.
And that's what he ended upwith.

Speaker 2 (45:28):
You know what's crazy Can't divorce his wife, so he
shoots the bitch, you know.
She was like hold on.

Speaker 1 (45:34):
You know, leonardo DiCaprio does it in Inception
too.
Bro, he'd rather live the lie.

Speaker 2 (45:38):
You can argue.

Speaker 1 (45:39):
The argument is right .

Speaker 2 (45:40):
That's another story within the Matrix.

Speaker 3 (45:42):
Well, he does it in the one where he goes to that
crazy island.

Speaker 1 (45:46):
Oh, shutter Island, Shutter Island.

Speaker 3 (45:47):
Yeah, he'd rather live the life or die with it.

Speaker 2 (45:50):
Yeah.
Once he found out that he was amurderer, you guys ever see the
episode of Black Mirror whereHomeboy dies.

Speaker 1 (45:56):
But it took him like three seconds, but he lives like
six months, oh months, oh no.
Have you seen that?
We're like he.
Uh, there's a vr headset thathe logs into, right bro.
But as soon as he logs in itthe story transpires and a bunch
of crazy shit he thinks is in ahorror video game.
He gets all the way home andlike shit's all fucked up.
It's been like three to sixmonths after this and ultimately
at the very end he gets home,his mom's all fucked up,
everything's glitching and hefucking dies right in in in his

(46:17):
head.
When they go back to real life,he's like another dead one.
How long was that?
She's like six seconds.

Speaker 2 (46:24):
Smile.
Go to the next one.

Speaker 1 (46:25):
Yeah, bro, but to him it was all this time that it
fucking transpired.
So what if that was it?
Look bro, you're going to goout.
It'll be quick, painless,you'll never know, but you'll
get like 10 years Perfect life.

Speaker 2 (46:36):
Pretty much.

Speaker 3 (46:38):
Did you ever watch the remake with Colin Farrell?

Speaker 2 (46:40):
No, I didn't, I didn't watch.
It Was it good?

Speaker 3 (46:42):
I watched it, but I can't remember it, so it must be
forgettable.

Speaker 1 (46:46):
I remember the first one, or did?

Speaker 3 (46:48):
you watch?

Speaker 1 (46:51):
it, oh, it's all in your mind, bro, oh man.

Speaker 3 (46:56):
Do you guys want to end it here I?

Speaker 2 (46:58):
don't know.

Speaker 3 (46:59):
I don't know if we got time to go into timeline.

Speaker 1 (47:02):
Damn, that was loud.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, I guess we don't have time to
go into timeline.

Speaker 3 (47:06):
I was just about to pull it up.
Wait, there we go.

Speaker 1 (47:11):
He just had his research ready.
My bad, I thought you weresaying like yeah, I don't know
I'm saying do you want to?

Speaker 3 (47:16):
I was going to give you the option.

Speaker 1 (47:23):
Yeah, I can make it quick.

Speaker 2 (47:24):
No, no no, do you want to or not?
I do.
Can you edit that back?
I'm sorry, I thought you werequeuing.
No, it was a segue.
My bad.

Speaker 3 (47:27):
Segway better, bro.
Do we have time to go intotimelines?
Yes, yeah, dude, you didn'teven let me finish the question,
bro, you didn't segue it.
No, I was like Do you think wehave time to go into timelines?
Because, it's a pun.
Time to go into timelines.

Speaker 1 (47:48):
Time is relevant, bro .
How is?

Speaker 3 (47:49):
that a bad segue Layers, layers.

Speaker 1 (47:51):
See, look, he heard you, but he wasn't listening.

Speaker 3 (47:54):
In that moment.
I'm going to cut it so that thenext 20 minutes are in that
moment.

Speaker 1 (48:00):
Look in the other timeline.

Speaker 3 (48:01):
he caught the segue and it's like seamlessly, I
swear moment.
Look in the other timeline hecaught the segue I see what you
did there.

Speaker 2 (48:08):
I thought it was a verbal nudge.

Speaker 1 (48:11):
You just do it twice.

Speaker 2 (48:13):
I swear I thought it was a verbal nudge, like yo.

Speaker 3 (48:16):
I was honestly asking if y'all wanted to.

Speaker 1 (48:19):
I do want to see this because I have seen something
about this.

Speaker 3 (48:22):
So the great timeline shift.
A lot of people, everybodytalks about it online.
We're on a different timeline.
All the Mandela effects Likethe fruit of the loom.
Did it ever have the cornucopiain the background?

Speaker 2 (48:34):
How do you guys see it?
I do remember it.
I remember the cornucopia.

Speaker 3 (48:40):
There's never been a cornucopia, so I don't know.
I mean, there's a lot ofdifferent Mandela effects, so
everyone links it back to CERN,when they activated the particle
accelerator in 2009.
No CERN in Europe.
In Europe, okay.

Speaker 1 (48:54):
Oh.

Speaker 3 (48:54):
Yeah, you know about CERN, right, we talked about it
yeah.

Speaker 1 (48:58):
I didn't know that CERN was.
I think I said this last time.
I didn't know.
It was a real thing in reallife.

Speaker 3 (49:01):
It's a real thing.

Speaker 2 (49:02):
They're the ones that did the particle accelerator
the real life particleaccelerator To my knowledge, a
particle accelerator is like youput smash two atoms right, Just
to break it right and see, like, what the atom is, to find
what's called what they call theGod particle.
The God particle means justpretty much like the magnet
particle, t-pain walks in, right, okay, who's the first?
Who's going to jump on him?
Me, exactly.
So T-Pain is that particle.

(49:23):
That's exactly what we'retrying to find.
Okay, me and Oski would be like, wow, t-pain, but we wouldn't
jump right on it, right, sothat's what it is.
So that's what happened.

Speaker 3 (49:37):
Yeah, so just to smash atoms Makes sense For the
rest of this argument, we'recalling Cully the T-Pain
particle.

Speaker 2 (49:41):
Please, there you go.
Yes, there you go, that's whathappened?
They activated the particleaccelerator.
That's what it means.

Speaker 3 (49:47):
Now, they didn't find the T-Pain particle right away,
Okay, but they did activate theparticle accelerator and due to
this quantum science beingactivated, that's when the
timeline split happens.
That's one of the first liketimeline split that happens.
Now, when did the dark timelinestart?
People are saying the darktimeline started all the way
back in 9-11.

Speaker 1 (50:06):
Which makes sense.

Speaker 3 (50:07):
Damn.
So when particle acceleratoractivated in 2009,.
It split the timeline.
It's going back to 9-11.

Speaker 1 (50:14):
What the fuck.

Speaker 3 (50:15):
Yeah, because in one timeline, the world is filled
with fear, which is the darktimeline that we're on, and in
another timeline, fear didn'tlike grasp the world as bad as
it did in this timeline.
Yeah, if you just shift thatone event right there, bro, that
one world event 9-11 stillhappened, like it still happened
in both timelines, but in onetimeline fear like took a hold

(50:35):
of all of us in the othertimeline, like solidarity or
something we are the world thisunfortunate tragedy has brought
the American people closertogether than it ever has before
.

Speaker 1 (50:48):
ladies and gentlemen, this is a breaking of a new
peace in America, you know, likein the world.

Speaker 3 (50:53):
But in our timeline, in the real life that we know,
we went into the dark timeline,oh shit, and a lot of different
things happened.
Now cut to 2016, 2016.
Harambe dies in our timelineand apparently it's hilarious
because apparently Harambe deathis like one of the what do they
call?

Speaker 1 (51:11):
it.

Speaker 3 (51:11):
It's a canon event, it's a fix point it's like one
of the fix points where if hedies it changes everything.
But if it doesn't save thegorilla, save the gorilla, save
the gorilla, save the gorilla,save the world.
But it's like, it's like a realthing, it makes sense.
So in the darkest timeline,harambe dies.
What happens?

(51:32):
2016, election year.
So many people wrote in Harambefor president-elect.
No, they didn't bro, they saidthat.
So many people wrote it in as ajoke because Harambe yeah that
it gave the edge for the Trumpto win in 2020.

Speaker 2 (51:49):
What I don't know how to play Batman, sorry.

Speaker 3 (51:53):
So that is the event that happened in the dark
timeline, which is our timelineNow there is a split.
This is another point where thetimeline split Because in the
original timeline, in the goodtimeline, the true timeline,
harambe lives, harambe lives.
Trump doesn't win.

Speaker 2 (52:08):
Because there's no need to put the name there.

Speaker 1 (52:12):
Nobody writes in Harambe.
Yo Damn.

Speaker 3 (52:16):
Hey, that's good.
It's the first thing I thinkabout.

Speaker 1 (52:18):
So Hillary wins.

Speaker 2 (52:20):
Dead-ass butterfly effect.
Bro Low-key butterfly effect.

Speaker 1 (52:23):
Different outcome possibly for the COVID as well.

Speaker 2 (52:28):
A butterfly wings can cause a hurricane in this side
of the world.

Speaker 3 (52:31):
A good administration would have changed everything,
wow.
Keep going bro, the only reasonall these people are being so
loud about being so bold, aboutbeing their true selves, about
doing Roman salutes.
I was about to do it.
I was like no, they're onlybeing so bold and emboldened

(52:53):
because of Trump winning threetimes or twice now.
Had he not won, they wouldn'thave gotten so emboldened.
Damn, that's true.
That's a whole other thing.
All right, keep it going.
Fast forward a couple years,2023.
Cern activates the particleaccelerator again, again, and we
find the T-pain particle Nice.

Speaker 2 (53:12):
Oh.

Speaker 3 (53:13):
They did discover the T-pain particle.
We know more about quantumscience.
Now, nice, there's a lot morethat we know about it.
Do we understand the Godparticle?
Do we know exactly what it is?
No, we know what it is.
Now it's been discovered whatThey've seen T-Pain in concert
Damn.

Speaker 2 (53:29):
In live.

Speaker 1 (53:30):
Yes, no VR.
That's crazy.

Speaker 2 (53:32):
The whole thing is that they want to quantify why
some Merck particles run fasterto this T-Pain particle Compared
to X4 particles and X-ticoparticles.
That's the whole reason behindit, like why did these?
Why does oxygen, you know, notmix with whatever the uranium?
But why H, you know?

Speaker 3 (53:51):
But we've seen it.
We've seen it Like they've seenit in experiments.

Speaker 2 (53:55):
Oh, they can't believe it.

Speaker 3 (53:56):
Because of quantum science, we're able to see that
it's there Well, it's there andout there.

Speaker 1 (54:00):
at the same time, lost his monocle.

Speaker 3 (54:03):
Sure, that's when we get more Mandela effects.
Yeah, every time they isolate.
He never had a monocle.
That's what makes me so mad.
That doesn't make sense.
He didn't have a monocle.

Speaker 1 (54:11):
Right, did he?
No?
Did he have a monocle?

Speaker 2 (54:18):
See, look.
But then Jim Carrey was like oh, the Monaco.

Speaker 3 (54:19):
No, he always had a Monaco.
I'm sorry, but he had a MonacoI remember.
Are we about to look it upright now?
No, no, no, no, you're from adifferent timeline.
He is from a different timeline.

Speaker 2 (54:27):
I remember the Monaco .

Speaker 1 (54:28):
No, then yeah, so we're all on the same thing.
Then, bro, I remember that'swhat they say and that's why the
particle accelerator activating.

Speaker 3 (54:42):
Oh, you didn't know about this Mandela effect.
Yeah, bro, that's what it is.
That happened in 2023, sir.

Speaker 1 (54:50):
He lost a monocle in 2023.

Speaker 2 (54:52):
All those Mandela effects are real things that
actually happen, but every timethe particle accelerator.

Speaker 1 (54:56):
No, they're lying bro , he always had a monocle.

Speaker 3 (54:57):
I remember it.
Nah the dark timeline thatwe're on, he never had a monocle
.

Speaker 2 (55:00):
This is going to sound weird, but I do not
Tasmania or New Zealand, but Ido remember another island next
to Australia.

Speaker 3 (55:09):
Madagascar.

Speaker 2 (55:10):
No, not that one, bro .
Not New Zealand, madagascar,but I remember I don't know if
it was Tasmania, but they weretalking about there was an
island that was big, like sideto Australia as well.
That was on the map Also theManila.
This is another one I see,Besides the Bernstein bear or
the the Bernstein bears or theBarnstein bears or whatever the
fuck.

Speaker 1 (55:27):
I'm like they were the Bernstein bears.

Speaker 3 (55:28):
I never read that fucking book as a kid so I got
You're like whatever.

Speaker 2 (55:33):
Fruit Loops was another one.

Speaker 3 (55:39):
Fruit of the Loom.
That was the one that kind ofstarted the split in the
timeline, the one that werecognized.

Speaker 1 (55:44):
The one that people recognized Definitely.

Speaker 3 (55:46):
The one that right away is like boy ain't no way.
And in 2023, in the truetimeline, in the timeline that
we're not on, in the truetimeline, in 2023, capitalism
fails In 2023?
In 2023.
In 2023.
Like eventually, and not thatit fails, but we move away from
it.

Speaker 2 (56:05):
And stop buying shit.

Speaker 3 (56:06):
Yes, Really Well, you know, like it doesn't fail,
like America doesn't fail, wejust move away from this
capitalist ideology.
Like we finally revolt againstthe insurance companies See, yes
, we finally revolt against, youknow, capitalist companies not
paying their employees.
Like capitalism fails in thetrue timeline.

Speaker 2 (56:26):
And another part of the conspiracy is that okay?

Speaker 3 (56:28):
well, the billionaires are the ones that
have all the money.
And the billionaires fund CERN,which could fund the particles
earlier, which could fund allthis research, to keep us in the
dark timeline, so they couldkeep all their money.
That's why we hopped away fromthe true timeline.
Bro, that's a great one In thetrue timeline, they lose and we
hop away to the dark timeline.
Who?

Speaker 2 (56:48):
knows man, I'm bringing it back to the original
thing I said.
Like secret organizations, theymay get together and fund this
kind of research.

Speaker 1 (56:55):
A thousand percent and they're behind it.

Speaker 2 (56:57):
Then they add some theological thing behind it,
then they add scientific thingbehind it, and then you add some
egotistical.
It is like because I'm sowealthy, they come from wealthy
family, I was I.
I was given this heavenlygospel holy duty to do stuff
like this for the sake ofkeeping things how right in
their eyes.

(57:17):
You know, because it's kind ofhard to tell people like an
example like the, the, themonarchy of the uk, what are
they called?
What's her name?
Who passed away Elizabeth, thewhole lineage.
It's kind of difficult to tellthem like hey, you guys are just
human beings.
Like how am I a human being ifmy whole family survived World
War II, world War?
I survived invasions, my familyruled half of the world.

(57:42):
So how am I wrong?
You know God put me here per se.
He's like you know who are you.
You're just, you know, anothercivilian here.
But my family has, you know,and I imagine, mix all that,
that whole mentality, we know,with science and money and
backing, I can see them doingnefarious event like this.

Speaker 1 (57:59):
Absolutely, bro, and that's and you're right Again to
all keep their money to keep usin the dark timeline.

Speaker 3 (58:05):
I mean, and then certain random particles are
there a few more times, and thetimeline merge, or the last part
of that, would be the timelinemerge that happened in 888,
which is August 8, 2024.
So that's where the timelinesmerge.

Speaker 2 (58:22):
It reminds me of the You've seen Evangelion right
merge.
It reminds me of you've seenEvangelion right yeah it reminds
me of Nerve.
Nerve is like that secret.
They did this.
They wanted to fulfill the endof the world, to stop humanity's
sadness they were trying tolike elevate to another state of
humanity yeah, a liquid jointconsciousness joint
consciousness, that's whathappened?

(58:42):
that's what the movie ends, theone that we all become that kind
of, become a liquid, like.
We all become like, yeah, yeah.
So that's the scene, that scenewhen, like, if you've seen the
movie, those memes, right, andit is on YouTube, like the world
like a bunch of big pink.
That's what the elites wantedto do in that world of
Evangelion, where they become aliquid.

(59:04):
The liquid is that liquid of ababy when you're inside the
mom's womb.
So that's what they became.
There's no humanity, you'rejust a liquid, a level of
consciousness per se.
They just kill themselves.

Speaker 1 (59:16):
The higher consciousness, yeah, but then
see, but then quote unquote theyget to live forever also.

Speaker 2 (59:20):
No, they kill themselves.
Wait, going to the consciencejust kills them.
You just became a liquid.
They became nothing.
They became pudding.

Speaker 3 (59:24):
There's different things in there, yeah.

Speaker 2 (59:27):
Yeah, to me they just committed suicide.
You know Hard curry that shit,huh Well, they took the whole
planet with them.

Speaker 1 (59:33):
There's no problem.

Speaker 2 (59:36):
They'll come and cause you that shit.
That's which is why Me and yourmother, yeah, pretty much.

Speaker 1 (59:41):
We were the reason, the big bang.

Speaker 3 (59:42):
But yeah, we merged the timelines back together.
And another reasonscientifically, on a not evil
corporation, but more of ascience discovery thing why are
we trying to merge the timelines?
Quantum science Like we're notable to discover quantum science
if we wouldn't see it.
But if we could merge thetimelines we're able to see more

(01:00:04):
of the quantum side of things.
I wonder if we're just tryingto do the whole Doctor Strange.
I mean, we're just trying tooverlap the timelines and make
them, you know, just overlapthem so we can learn more of the
universe.
That would be dope though that'sthe science discovery side of
it.
It's like there's not really anetwork of operation, but we are
messing with the timelinestrying to overlap them.

Speaker 2 (01:00:19):
And in our universe.

Speaker 3 (01:00:20):
there's no man at the end of the world trying to keep
the sacred timeline together,so we're just messing with
science that we don't understand.

Speaker 1 (01:00:28):
Yeah, there's no king of the conquerors.

Speaker 3 (01:00:30):
You know T-Pain will not be too proud of us.

Speaker 2 (01:00:34):
The T-Pain particle.

Speaker 3 (01:00:36):
The T-Pain particle.
We're digging into things thatwe don't know about and to end
it all, Microsoft.

Speaker 2 (01:00:45):
I think we were just talking about that.
Yeah, we were talking about itearlier.

Speaker 3 (01:00:47):
They talked about, they found another state of
matter, which is a quantum stateof matter, which is neither
solid not gas, not liquid.

Speaker 1 (01:00:54):
They made a computer out of it.
They called it like toughliving systems of the arm.
Yeah, yeah, something like that.

Speaker 3 (01:00:59):
I could not think of the name, but it is basically a
quantum state of matter which iscrazy it's neither here nor
there but it is there.

Speaker 1 (01:01:09):
I want to know, can I touch it?

Speaker 3 (01:01:12):
that's where I got a little confused.
It's a microchip.
It's in the microchip, right itis, but it's not so can I see
it?
That's the thing.
It's short against cat.
It's not so can I see it?
That's the thing.
It's short against cat.
It's in the box.
It doesn't make sense.
Is the cat dead or alive?
We don't know, because we don'tsee it.

Speaker 1 (01:01:32):
Oh, but it sends you up in the box.

Speaker 3 (01:01:33):
That's a quantum state.

Speaker 2 (01:01:35):
There's just so many, like so many red flags, right,
because my conspiracy now islike my conspiracy now is like
y'all just doing this shitbecause fucking China, shit on
y'all with the deep sea andy'all just trying to do whatever
y'all can.

Speaker 3 (01:01:49):
We made a new element .
They pulled a Tony Stark realquick they discovered adamantium
Facts, bro, it's like coconuthow.

Speaker 2 (01:01:57):
Okay, so how did you make it if you didn't use
anything?

Speaker 3 (01:02:00):
It just existed we just found it, because the
timeless merch emerge.
It's always existed.

Speaker 2 (01:02:05):
We're overlapping time so, as I'm saying like I
wonder if that's what we did,like we just like reach into
another, like time, pull thescience out, like oh that's what
it's supposed to be likequantum science that we talked
about it's like a bunch ofpeople working on the same
project.

Speaker 3 (01:02:19):
Yeah, and answers.
And the computer is speeding upanswers.
Yes, but why?
Because we got another timelineanswers.
But why?
Because we got another timelineworking on the answer.
Absolutely, we got anothertimeline.

Speaker 1 (01:02:25):
We got infinite timelines working on infinite
answers.

Speaker 3 (01:02:28):
We're working on the same problem on the same
computer is a quantum computer.

Speaker 2 (01:02:31):
Infinite rigs working on the same problem.

Speaker 1 (01:02:34):
Yes, and instead of taking years and thousands of
years, it's seconds.

Speaker 2 (01:02:44):
And that and that's what we wanted.

Speaker 3 (01:02:45):
We're trying to reach our ricks so we can solve our
problems.
Dang, you're using your Elkhornpopcorn.

Speaker 2 (01:02:48):
Anyway, long rant, I love it, I love it, I love this
episode.

Speaker 3 (01:02:50):
It was great.
Sources trust me.

Speaker 1 (01:02:54):
I mean don't quote me on any of this.

Speaker 3 (01:02:56):
Google Facebook, it was just a prank bro, how many
people actually wrote inHarambe's name?
I don just kidding.
Do you know how many peopleactually?

Speaker 1 (01:03:03):
wrote in Harambe's name.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I didn't do the numbers, Ididn't check.

Speaker 3 (01:03:06):
I know people actually wrote it in.
I don't think it made notenough to make a difference, but
at an event you know what'scrazy.

Speaker 1 (01:03:13):
I don't even know if what I said was right, bro,
trust me bro, I just made it allup, y'all.

Speaker 2 (01:03:21):
We'll put a big like FYI, it's for entertainment
purposes.

Speaker 1 (01:03:24):
You know, do your research.
I am not a doctor.
Please do your own research.

Speaker 3 (01:03:30):
I think we've run out of time.

Speaker 1 (01:03:31):
I think so.
I want to see Suki's take on it, though.
Bro, Damn, all you had was onejob, Suki.

Speaker 3 (01:03:37):
Why did we all go mute?
Oh, there we go, there we go.

Speaker 1 (01:03:45):
Maybe the green at the bottom.
Don't click the.
Yeah, I'm gonna unclick it.
There we go.
There we go, guys, this is sucha wonderful episode.
Thank you so much.
This is your boy.
Make sure you're quick.
Follow us on uh, instagram,twitter, youtube, tiktok, all
that jazz at wbm underscorepodcast and your boy x fair you
should be following us onspotify, apple music, amazon
music, stitcher, I heart radio.

Speaker 2 (01:04:05):
All that jazz at WBM underscore podcast and your boy
X-Fair.
You should be following us onSpotify, apple Music, amazon
Music, stitcher, iheartradio allthat jazz.

Speaker 3 (01:04:07):
And it's your boy, oscar, in the mix.
Check out the websiteWBMPodcastcom.
As always, there'll be twolinks.
Want to send us a text message?
Shout out to Devin this week.
And another one to support theshow.

Speaker 2 (01:04:23):
Click on the link the show we need it, guys.

Speaker 1 (01:04:24):
We love you, we appreciate you and we're so
fucking back.
Are you guys ready for thisseason, this one, to be a good
one?
All right, we'll see you guysnext week.
Peace.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Crime Junkie

Ridiculous History

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Smashed Atoms and Woke Up in the Wrong Timeline

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Crime Junkie

Ridiculous History

All Episodes

Smashed Atoms and Woke Up in the Wrong Timeline

On Purpose with Jay Shetty