April 27, 2025 • 19 mins
Nostradamus and even Nikola Tesla predicted that women would rule in the future. This episode discusses the dystopian future without women taking the lead.
Referenced in this Episode:
Women Woman is Boss - Interview with Nikola Tesla in 1926: https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/when-woman-boss
Nostradamus: A History of the Future by Peter Lorie
Submit a question for the show:
support@drjennymartin.com
Connect:
https://twitter.com/JennymartinDr
https://drjennymartin.substack.com/
https://drjennymartin.com
#women #prophecy #transhumanism
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:06):
Welcome to the Why Didn't I Knowpodcast.
This is episode 30, and we aretalking about women being the
answer for the future ofhumanity.
What do I mean by that?
What I mean is multipleprophecies showing that there is
(00:29):
a destined future for women to.
Lead the consciousness on theplanet.
There is a book on theprophecies of Notre Damas, if
you're not familiar with him.
He was, he lived in the 15thcentury and he wrote in sort of
(00:52):
cryptic terms, a whole myriad ofdifferent events that he
predicted would happen in thefuture.
The reason why he wrote in such.
Kind of cryptic language is thathe didn't want it to be
apprehended by the authoritiesof the day and his work shut
down.
(01:13):
So he wrote in this kind ofcoded language that people have
been working to decode eversince then.
But he predicted the collapse ofthe Twin Towers in nine 11, the
rise of Hitler, theassassination of GFK.
He has definitely providedevidence that he was tapping
(01:34):
into an awareness, and one ofthe things that he tapped into
was an awareness that women willrise up, not to dominate
humanity, but to really bring anew level of consciousness and
awareness to the planet and.
(01:56):
You know, it's really hard toput dates on this stuff because
he was writing so long ago, buthe knew that that was a future.
Interestingly enough, a personcompletely separate from Notre
Damas is the inventor, thebrilliant man named Nicola
(02:19):
Tesla, who had this samerevelation, he was not a
prophetic person.
He was actually a scientist, aninventor, Invented over 700
different brilliant breakthroughinventions and provided the
basis of the cell technologythat we still use today.
He was a real forward thinkerand a brilliant man who seemed
(02:43):
to almost download hisinventions from another
dimension.
In an interview with him inCollier's magazine in 1936, he
stated, And the article isentitled, when Women Is Boss.
I'll link it down below thisepisode.
(03:05):
He talked about that in nature.
For instance, he mentioned thehoneybees.
There's a queen bee and shereigns over all the honeybees
and there is a natural order anda natural, uh, symmetry that
happens in the bee community, inthe honey bee community.
(03:27):
And he stated that.
This would be what would bebeneficial for humanity.
Now, what Nicola Tesla and alsoNotre Damas was were tapping
into is not something that hasnot been known in ancient times.
There have been cultures wherewomen were in charge.
(03:53):
Now, I'm not talking aboutdominating men because very
typically.
When women do take that type ofleadership power position, they
typically don't do it to squashthe other people around them.
It's much more of an egalitariansystem.
(04:15):
Renee Isler.
She is still alive to myunderstanding.
She's historian and has writtensome amazing books on this very
subject.
The Chalice and the Blade is anexcellent book to resource.
This whole idea of what it waslike when women did hold the
(04:35):
power and how that is the onlyway to restore society, for
instance.
Technology is a powerful tool,but it can go in a very
destructive way.
It can be used in a verydestructive way, or it can be
used in a very beneficial wayfor humanity.
(04:58):
Right now, we're on theprecipice of technology,
fundamentally changing what itmeans to be human.
Yeah, there is the talk oftranshumanism, and if you have
never heard of that, look upsomeone by the name of Ray
Kurzwell.
He is the chief visionary for AIat Google, and he envisions in a
(05:23):
very short order in a decade orso that we will all be merged
with machines.
There will be.
Technological implants in US,and every baby born will have a
brain chip in their head, and hesays it's to make them more
competitive in a verytechnologically advanced
(05:43):
society.
But what we need to understandis we're altering fundamentally
what it means to be humanchanging.
What it means to have anindependent thought changing
what it means to haveimagination.
And changing what it means tofeel emotion and be close to
other people.
I will venture to say if therewere women.
(06:07):
In charge in Silicon Valley orin charge of making these
decisions at the very highestlevels in government, we would
not have this kind offundamentally changing of
biology.
It's almost as if there is anintention to actually erase
(06:31):
gender, to erase women.
And to play God.
Now, why do I say that?
Well, this version oftranshumanism will change how we
reproduce.
There's already some predictiveprogramming of that out there.
There's a movie a while ago thatshowed people having babies, not
(06:54):
in a mother's womb, but in a podexternally, so technologically.
Reproduced kind of like adystopian matrix movie.
And so this is changing what itmeans to be human.
And I do not believe, I may betoo Pollyanna about this, but
(07:17):
historically, if you look atsome of Renee's Eisner's work
and so forth, there is apropensity for women to use the
power for the beneficial, use ofall rather than for control.
And when you understand whattranshumanism is, what this new
(07:39):
technology that's coming in isall about, and what is gonna
happen is it's going to be veryhard to have a differing opinion
and speak your mind if yourthoughts are actually being
controlled externally by adevice that's not really.
(07:59):
You are not ultimately incontrol of whoever produces the
technology can flip a switch andcause you to think in a certain
way.
So what does that do todissenting opinions?
What does that do to people notwanting to go along with the
group mentality?
It really squashes that and.
(08:21):
We do not see that in culturesthat were egalitarian or
cultures that were run by women,and so we're on the precipice of
some really big changes inhumanity, and having women
reclaim their voices is soimportant.
I mean, it's interesting.
(08:42):
Back in, I think it was in 2016.
There was the first robotactually attained citizenship in
Saudi Arabia.
That robot was named Sophia.
Now this Sophia robot went ontalk shows and basically had the
(09:07):
appearance.
At least in the front of afemale, and her name was Sophia.
Now, why is that important?
Sophia has always been the name,especially in Western esoteric
tradition of the divinefeminine, of the wisdom of the
divine, and has is a feminine,divine feminine.
(09:32):
So to replace.
The intelligence with aartificial intelligence and to
usurp the whole idea of Sophiais strategic, I mean, I also
think about the fact that isis,if you googled the word isis.
(09:55):
Before the terrorist groupclaimed it as their own, you
would see ISIS being a verypowerful female deity in Egypt,
and you would learn about thatpowerful female divine.
Entity.
But now if you Google ISIS, youare going to be immediately
(10:17):
shown really dark images ofterrorist group and learn about
terrorism.
It's a co-opting of the languageand it induces a certain
forgetfulness, or even foryounger people, they never even
learn that ISIS was a verypowerful female.
(10:38):
And it was a religion.
The, the religion of ISIS wasvery powerful.
And let's just talk about whatare we losing when we lose
Sophia as the original divinefeminine and isis, the original,
divine, feminine.
What we're losing is what theyrepresented, and that was a
(10:59):
fusion of science and religionknown as alchemy.
Alchemy shows up in earlyChristianity.
Alchemy shows up in the religionof Isis and alchemy is
essentially what thetranshumanist folks are.
Working on inverting a verydistorted view of alchemy.
So alchemy is not the HarryPotter alchemy that became
(11:23):
famous and popular, but alchemy,if you really look into it as a
profound science and art, Imean.
Isaac Newton, the founder ofModern Science, wrote over a
million words on alchemy that wedidn't discover until after his
death when they got sold at anauction in Sotheby's in in the
(11:44):
1930s.
The reason why he was sointerested in Alchemy is because
he knew that that's where thepower lied.
It wasn't just science divorcefrom.
Religion, divorce from spiritualunderstanding.
And it wasn't just spiritualitywithout a powerful understanding
(12:05):
of science, it was the mergingof both.
And what Alchemy represented wasthe access to the substrate of
matter, to the very fabric ofspace, time to the aspect of our
being that is not material.
But is spiritual and there's ascience to that.
(12:28):
And it represents not just ourbodies, it represents the entire
fabric of space time.
So there was a science calledalchemy that had to do with
being able to transmute,transform this basic substrate,
the prima material, this basicsubstance.
And if you had access to that,you were basically had the
(12:51):
powers to co-create with God.
Now, the early alchemistsbelieved in a higher power.
They believed in God, and therewas an honoring of a higher
power.
You do this in service of withthe will of God.
Whether you call God a woman ora man, but you do this in
(13:12):
service of that God of God.
Now, the alchemy that we see intranshumanism has no God, and in
fact, it completely inverts theprinciples of alchemy.
So one of the principles oforiginal alchemy is you work
with nature.
You don't manipulate nature.
(13:34):
What alchemy in thetranshumanist.
Movement has become, is natureis flawed.
That's their belief in thetranshumanism.
Nature is flawed, it's weak,it's limited, and we need to
bring in our manmade inventions.
(13:54):
And they are manmade to acertain extent.
There's a lot more men involvedin this movement than very few
women.
And so to bring in these manmadeinventions and to transmute what
it means to be human bybasically making cyborg by
(14:15):
making us.
A version of humanity that hasnever existed before.
That's transmutation.
And that is alchemy.
Alchemy is creating somethingnew out of something that is
current, transmuting thesubstance.
But we were created by ourcreator to be able to transmute
(14:37):
our own consciousness.
And to be less material and moreof our ethereal body as we raise
our vibration, raise ourconsciousness and alchemy in the
religion of isis.
In early Christianity, beforesome of the people like
Augustine got involved andcompletely removed the idea of
(15:01):
sex being.
The way to do this and removethe power of women.
When women and sex were viewedas powerful in the first and
second century in Christianity,this alchemy was a path of
resurrection.
You could say the gospel ofPhilip says, everyone needs to
(15:21):
resurrect.
What is it talking about?
It's not talking about aphysical death and suffering.
It is talking about and rebirth.
It's talking about if you readthe coded language in the Gospel
of Philip, for instance, it'stalking about the bridal
chamber.
That is a metaphor for a sacredsexual ritual, a sacred sexual,
(15:49):
and it's through love andpleasure, not through hanging on
a cross and.
Being tortured, that you get thebreakthrough, that you get the
rebirth, and it's not abouthaving to leave your physical
body in order to become a newcreation.
(16:09):
The gospel of Phil very muchsays, we're still in our
physical body, but we see lifeanew.
We look at life anew.
Everything is transformed infront of us because we are.
Accessing the world from ahigher vibration, and it's a
sacred sexual ritual that got usthere.
(16:29):
Well, in the transhumanismversion of this, forget the sex.
You won't even be having sexwith another human in their
dystopian uh, idea.
You will be hooking your body upto AI to get some kind of
neurochemical excitement.
It's not the transformationalsex that we knew in these
(16:51):
alchemical rituals.
But it is that transformation.
The rebirth in transhumanism hasnothing to do with sex.
It has to do with an externallyimposed change that happens to
your body to permanently alterit forever, and it will
(17:14):
disconnect you from yourconnection to the divine because
the technology becomes God andyou're.
Access of being able to accessother dimensions other than
what's controlled by thetechnology.
It's a false utopia that they'resuggesting.
Some of the figures like PeterThiel and so forth are coming
(17:36):
out saying, we are going tousher in a golden age with this
technology.
And what does that sound like?
That sounds like what every.
Indigenous, and even the Bibletalks about in terms of a golden
age, but it wasn't meant to be.
We were outsourcing our divinityand outsourcing our
(17:56):
transformation to a false God,to a machine.
And what we need to realize isthis power is within ourselves.
It's an opportunity for us,especially as women, to use our
(18:19):
own consciousness to choose whatand discern what is right for
us, and also to raise ourfrequency.
Through spiritual practice,through sexual practice, so that
we don't become as easilymanipulated by all of the way
(18:41):
that they're dressing up some ofthese different changes in
society.
Making it sound very alluringand, and very seductive, you
could say.
So there's an opportunity.
But I believe the universe hasmade ready for women to take the
reins and to step into morepowerful positions for the good
(19:05):
of all.
And that's what I will leave youwith today.
Thanks for listening.
Have a great day.
Take care
Welcome to the Why Didn't I Knowpodcast.
This is episode 30, and we aretalking about women being the
answer for the future ofhumanity.
What do I mean by that?
What I mean is multipleprophecies showing that there is
(00:29):
a destined future for women to.
Lead the consciousness on theplanet.
There is a book on theprophecies of Notre Damas, if
you're not familiar with him.
He was, he lived in the 15thcentury and he wrote in sort of
(00:52):
cryptic terms, a whole myriad ofdifferent events that he
predicted would happen in thefuture.
The reason why he wrote in such.
Kind of cryptic language is thathe didn't want it to be
apprehended by the authoritiesof the day and his work shut
down.
(01:13):
So he wrote in this kind ofcoded language that people have
been working to decode eversince then.
But he predicted the collapse ofthe Twin Towers in nine 11, the
rise of Hitler, theassassination of GFK.
He has definitely providedevidence that he was tapping
(01:34):
into an awareness, and one ofthe things that he tapped into
was an awareness that women willrise up, not to dominate
humanity, but to really bring anew level of consciousness and
awareness to the planet and.
(01:56):
You know, it's really hard toput dates on this stuff because
he was writing so long ago, buthe knew that that was a future.
Interestingly enough, a personcompletely separate from Notre
Damas is the inventor, thebrilliant man named Nicola
(02:19):
Tesla, who had this samerevelation, he was not a
prophetic person.
He was actually a scientist, aninventor, Invented over 700
different brilliant breakthroughinventions and provided the
basis of the cell technologythat we still use today.
He was a real forward thinkerand a brilliant man who seemed
(02:43):
to almost download hisinventions from another
dimension.
In an interview with him inCollier's magazine in 1936, he
stated, And the article isentitled, when Women Is Boss.
I'll link it down below thisepisode.
(03:05):
He talked about that in nature.
For instance, he mentioned thehoneybees.
There's a queen bee and shereigns over all the honeybees
and there is a natural order anda natural, uh, symmetry that
happens in the bee community, inthe honey bee community.
(03:27):
And he stated that.
This would be what would bebeneficial for humanity.
Now, what Nicola Tesla and alsoNotre Damas was were tapping
into is not something that hasnot been known in ancient times.
There have been cultures wherewomen were in charge.
(03:53):
Now, I'm not talking aboutdominating men because very
typically.
When women do take that type ofleadership power position, they
typically don't do it to squashthe other people around them.
It's much more of an egalitariansystem.
(04:15):
Renee Isler.
She is still alive to myunderstanding.
She's historian and has writtensome amazing books on this very
subject.
The Chalice and the Blade is anexcellent book to resource.
This whole idea of what it waslike when women did hold the
(04:35):
power and how that is the onlyway to restore society, for
instance.
Technology is a powerful tool,but it can go in a very
destructive way.
It can be used in a verydestructive way, or it can be
used in a very beneficial wayfor humanity.
(04:58):
Right now, we're on theprecipice of technology,
fundamentally changing what itmeans to be human.
Yeah, there is the talk oftranshumanism, and if you have
never heard of that, look upsomeone by the name of Ray
Kurzwell.
He is the chief visionary for AIat Google, and he envisions in a
(05:23):
very short order in a decade orso that we will all be merged
with machines.
There will be.
Technological implants in US,and every baby born will have a
brain chip in their head, and hesays it's to make them more
competitive in a verytechnologically advanced
(05:43):
society.
But what we need to understandis we're altering fundamentally
what it means to be humanchanging.
What it means to have anindependent thought changing
what it means to haveimagination.
And changing what it means tofeel emotion and be close to
other people.
I will venture to say if therewere women.
(06:07):
In charge in Silicon Valley orin charge of making these
decisions at the very highestlevels in government, we would
not have this kind offundamentally changing of
biology.
It's almost as if there is anintention to actually erase
(06:31):
gender, to erase women.
And to play God.
Now, why do I say that?
Well, this version oftranshumanism will change how we
reproduce.
There's already some predictiveprogramming of that out there.
There's a movie a while ago thatshowed people having babies, not
(06:54):
in a mother's womb, but in a podexternally, so technologically.
Reproduced kind of like adystopian matrix movie.
And so this is changing what itmeans to be human.
And I do not believe, I may betoo Pollyanna about this, but
(07:17):
historically, if you look atsome of Renee's Eisner's work
and so forth, there is apropensity for women to use the
power for the beneficial, use ofall rather than for control.
And when you understand whattranshumanism is, what this new
(07:39):
technology that's coming in isall about, and what is gonna
happen is it's going to be veryhard to have a differing opinion
and speak your mind if yourthoughts are actually being
controlled externally by adevice that's not really.
(07:59):
You are not ultimately incontrol of whoever produces the
technology can flip a switch andcause you to think in a certain
way.
So what does that do todissenting opinions?
What does that do to people notwanting to go along with the
group mentality?
It really squashes that and.
(08:21):
We do not see that in culturesthat were egalitarian or
cultures that were run by women,and so we're on the precipice of
some really big changes inhumanity, and having women
reclaim their voices is soimportant.
I mean, it's interesting.
(08:42):
Back in, I think it was in 2016.
There was the first robotactually attained citizenship in
Saudi Arabia.
That robot was named Sophia.
Now this Sophia robot went ontalk shows and basically had the
(09:07):
appearance.
At least in the front of afemale, and her name was Sophia.
Now, why is that important?
Sophia has always been the name,especially in Western esoteric
tradition of the divinefeminine, of the wisdom of the
divine, and has is a feminine,divine feminine.
(09:32):
So to replace.
The intelligence with aartificial intelligence and to
usurp the whole idea of Sophiais strategic, I mean, I also
think about the fact that isis,if you googled the word isis.
(09:55):
Before the terrorist groupclaimed it as their own, you
would see ISIS being a verypowerful female deity in Egypt,
and you would learn about thatpowerful female divine.
Entity.
But now if you Google ISIS, youare going to be immediately
(10:17):
shown really dark images ofterrorist group and learn about
terrorism.
It's a co-opting of the languageand it induces a certain
forgetfulness, or even foryounger people, they never even
learn that ISIS was a verypowerful female.
(10:38):
And it was a religion.
The, the religion of ISIS wasvery powerful.
And let's just talk about whatare we losing when we lose
Sophia as the original divinefeminine and isis, the original,
divine, feminine.
What we're losing is what theyrepresented, and that was a
(10:59):
fusion of science and religionknown as alchemy.
Alchemy shows up in earlyChristianity.
Alchemy shows up in the religionof Isis and alchemy is
essentially what thetranshumanist folks are.
Working on inverting a verydistorted view of alchemy.
So alchemy is not the HarryPotter alchemy that became
(11:23):
famous and popular, but alchemy,if you really look into it as a
profound science and art, Imean.
Isaac Newton, the founder ofModern Science, wrote over a
million words on alchemy that wedidn't discover until after his
death when they got sold at anauction in Sotheby's in in the
(11:44):
1930s.
The reason why he was sointerested in Alchemy is because
he knew that that's where thepower lied.
It wasn't just science divorcefrom.
Religion, divorce from spiritualunderstanding.
And it wasn't just spiritualitywithout a powerful understanding
(12:05):
of science, it was the mergingof both.
And what Alchemy represented wasthe access to the substrate of
matter, to the very fabric ofspace, time to the aspect of our
being that is not material.
But is spiritual and there's ascience to that.
(12:28):
And it represents not just ourbodies, it represents the entire
fabric of space time.
So there was a science calledalchemy that had to do with
being able to transmute,transform this basic substrate,
the prima material, this basicsubstance.
And if you had access to that,you were basically had the
(12:51):
powers to co-create with God.
Now, the early alchemistsbelieved in a higher power.
They believed in God, and therewas an honoring of a higher
power.
You do this in service of withthe will of God.
Whether you call God a woman ora man, but you do this in
(13:12):
service of that God of God.
Now, the alchemy that we see intranshumanism has no God, and in
fact, it completely inverts theprinciples of alchemy.
So one of the principles oforiginal alchemy is you work
with nature.
You don't manipulate nature.
(13:34):
What alchemy in thetranshumanist.
Movement has become, is natureis flawed.
That's their belief in thetranshumanism.
Nature is flawed, it's weak,it's limited, and we need to
bring in our manmade inventions.
(13:54):
And they are manmade to acertain extent.
There's a lot more men involvedin this movement than very few
women.
And so to bring in these manmadeinventions and to transmute what
it means to be human bybasically making cyborg by
(14:15):
making us.
A version of humanity that hasnever existed before.
That's transmutation.
And that is alchemy.
Alchemy is creating somethingnew out of something that is
current, transmuting thesubstance.
But we were created by ourcreator to be able to transmute
(14:37):
our own consciousness.
And to be less material and moreof our ethereal body as we raise
our vibration, raise ourconsciousness and alchemy in the
religion of isis.
In early Christianity, beforesome of the people like
Augustine got involved andcompletely removed the idea of
(15:01):
sex being.
The way to do this and removethe power of women.
When women and sex were viewedas powerful in the first and
second century in Christianity,this alchemy was a path of
resurrection.
You could say the gospel ofPhilip says, everyone needs to
(15:21):
resurrect.
What is it talking about?
It's not talking about aphysical death and suffering.
It is talking about and rebirth.
It's talking about if you readthe coded language in the Gospel
of Philip, for instance, it'stalking about the bridal
chamber.
That is a metaphor for a sacredsexual ritual, a sacred sexual,
(15:49):
and it's through love andpleasure, not through hanging on
a cross and.
Being tortured, that you get thebreakthrough, that you get the
rebirth, and it's not abouthaving to leave your physical
body in order to become a newcreation.
(16:09):
The gospel of Phil very muchsays, we're still in our
physical body, but we see lifeanew.
We look at life anew.
Everything is transformed infront of us because we are.
Accessing the world from ahigher vibration, and it's a
sacred sexual ritual that got usthere.
(16:29):
Well, in the transhumanismversion of this, forget the sex.
You won't even be having sexwith another human in their
dystopian uh, idea.
You will be hooking your body upto AI to get some kind of
neurochemical excitement.
It's not the transformationalsex that we knew in these
(16:51):
alchemical rituals.
But it is that transformation.
The rebirth in transhumanism hasnothing to do with sex.
It has to do with an externallyimposed change that happens to
your body to permanently alterit forever, and it will
(17:14):
disconnect you from yourconnection to the divine because
the technology becomes God andyou're.
Access of being able to accessother dimensions other than
what's controlled by thetechnology.
It's a false utopia that they'resuggesting.
Some of the figures like PeterThiel and so forth are coming
(17:36):
out saying, we are going tousher in a golden age with this
technology.
And what does that sound like?
That sounds like what every.
Indigenous, and even the Bibletalks about in terms of a golden
age, but it wasn't meant to be.
We were outsourcing our divinityand outsourcing our
(17:56):
transformation to a false God,to a machine.
And what we need to realize isthis power is within ourselves.
It's an opportunity for us,especially as women, to use our
(18:19):
own consciousness to choose whatand discern what is right for
us, and also to raise ourfrequency.
Through spiritual practice,through sexual practice, so that
we don't become as easilymanipulated by all of the way
(18:41):
that they're dressing up some ofthese different changes in
society.
Making it sound very alluringand, and very seductive, you
could say.
So there's an opportunity.
But I believe the universe hasmade ready for women to take the
reins and to step into morepowerful positions for the good
(19:05):
of all.
And that's what I will leave youwith today.
Thanks for listening.
Have a great day.
Take care
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.