All Episodes

April 29, 2025 43 mins

Hello and welcome to World War 2 Stories. I'm your host, Steve Matthews. Today, we're examining one of the most consequential and controversial events of the Second World War – indeed, of all human history: the development and use of atomic weapons against Japan in August 1945.

In the span of three days, two bombs – one uranium, one plutonium – obliterated two Japanese cities, killed over 200,000 people, and forever changed warfare, international relations, and humanity's relationship with technology. These were not merely new weapons – they represented a fundamental shift in our species' capacity for self-destruction.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Hello and welcome to World War Two Stories.
I'm your host Steve Matthews. Today we're examining one of the
most consequential and controversial events of the
Second World War, indeed of all human history, the development
and use of atomic weapons against Japan.
In August 1945. In the span of three days, 2

(00:22):
bombs, 1 uranium, 1 plutonium, obliterated 2 Japanese cities,
killed over 200,000 people, and forever changed warfare,
international relations, and humanity's relationship with
technology. These were not merely new
weapons, they represented A fundamental shift in our species

(00:42):
capacity for self destruction. The story of the atomic bomb
encompasses brilliant scientificachievement, urgent wartime
necessity, agonizing moral choices, and devastating human
suffering. It's a narrative that continues
to spark passionate debate nearly 8 decades later.
Was the use of these weapons justified?

(01:05):
Were there viable alternatives? What lessons should we draw from
this pivotal moment? Today, we'll explore this
complex history from multiple angles.
The science behind the bombs creation, the strategic
decisions that led to its use, the devastating human impact,
and the long shadow it has cast over our world ever since.

(01:26):
This is not a simple story of heroes and villains, but a
profoundly human one, filled with brilliance and error,
courage and fear, triumph and tragedy.
Let's begin at the beginning, with the scientific
breakthroughs that made these terrible weapons possible.
Part 1. The science and development.

(01:46):
The Road to Los Alamos The atomic bomb's creation
represents one of history's mostremarkable scientific and
engineering achievements, a journey from theoretical physics
to apocalyptic reality in just afew short years.
The scientific foundations begandecades earlier.
In 19 O 5, Albert Einstein published his special theory of

(02:10):
relativity, including the famousequation E equals MC squared,
establishing that even a tiny amount of matter could
theoretically yield enormous energy.
But it wasn't until the 1930s that scientists began to
understand how this might be practically achieved.
In 1938, German chemists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann made a

(02:32):
discovery that would change the world.
While bombarding uranium with neutrons, they observed
something unexpected. Barium, an element roughly half
the mass of uranium. Their colleague Lise Meitner,
who had fled Nazi Germany to Sweden due to her Jewish
heritage, recognized the significance.
The uranium nucleus had split, releasing enormous energy.

(02:56):
She named this process nuclear fission.
The implications were immediately apparent to
physicists worldwide. If splitting a single atom
released energy and also released neutrons that could
split more atoms, then a self-sustaining chain reaction
might be possible, creating either a controlled power source
or an unprecedented explosive. In early 1939, the brilliant

(03:21):
Hungarian physicist Leo Sillard,who had conceptualized the
nuclear chain reaction years earlier, became increasingly
alarmed. If this knowledge reached Nazi
Germany, Hitler might develop anatomic bomb.
Sillard convinced his friend Albert Einstein, by then the
world's most famous scientist, to sign a letter to President

(03:42):
Franklin Roosevelt warning of this possibility.
Einstein's letter, delivered to Roosevelt in October 1939,
stated it may become possible toset up a nuclear chain reaction
in a large mass of uranium by which vast amounts of power and
large quantities of new radium like elements would be
generated. This new phenomenon would also

(04:05):
lead to the construction of bombs.
The letter's impact was an immediate Initially the US
allocated just $6000 for research.
But as World War 2 intensified and fears of a Nazi nuclear
program grew, American efforts accelerated.
By 1942, the project had a new name, the Manhattan Project, and

(04:29):
a new leader, General Leslie Groves, the engineer who had
overseen construction of the Pentagon.
Groves made a crucial and surprising choice for scientific
director J Robert Oppenheimer, Atheoretical physicist from
Berkeley with no experience managing large projects.
Despite security concerns about Oppenheimer's left wing

(04:50):
associations, Groves recognized his brilliant mind and
leadership potential, as Oppenheimer later reflected.
When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead
and do it, and you argue about what to do about it only after
you have had your technical success.
The ultimate scientific team. What followed was the greatest

(05:12):
concentration of scientific genius ever assembled for a
single project. Between 1942 and 1945, the
Manhattan Project employed over 130,000 people at secret
facilities across the United States, with a cost of nearly $2
billion, equivalent to about $30billion today.

(05:34):
The project's beating heart was Los Alamos Laboratory, a secret
city built on an isolated Mesa in New Mexico.
Here Oppenheimer assembled an extraordinary team of
scientists, including Enrico Fermi, the Italian Nobel
laureate who had created the world's first nuclear reactor,
Chicago Pile One in December 1942, proving that controlled

(05:59):
nuclear chain reactions were possible.
Hans Beta, who headed the theoretical division and
calculated the critical mass needed for a uranium bomb.
Edward Teller, the Hungarian physicist who would later become
known as the father of the hydrogen bomb.
Richard Feynman, just 24 years old at the time, who would later

(06:20):
win the Nobel Prize for his workin quantum physics.
Glenn Seaborg, who discovered plutonium 239, which would fuel
the second atomic bomb. Many of these scientists were
European emigres, having fled Nazi persecution.
The irony wasn't lost on them. They were building a weapon of
mass destruction to stop a regime that had driven them from

(06:43):
their homes. The scale of the challenge was
immense. 2 separate tracks were pursued simultaneously.
The uranium bomb which would become Little Boy in a plutonium
bomb later named Fat Man. The uranium bomb presented a
significant purification problem.
Natural uranium contains only 0.7% of the fissile isotope

(07:07):
uranium 235. The rest is non fissile uranium
238. To create a bomb, the
concentration of U235 needed to be increased dramatically, a
process called enrichment. This required massive facilities
and entirely new technologies. The largest of these facilities

(07:27):
was built at Oak Ridge, TN, a secret city that grew to 75,000
workers. At its peak, the facility
consumed more electricity than New York City, all to produce a
few kilograms of weapons grade uranium through gaseous
diffusion and electromagnetic separation.
Meanwhile, at Hanford, Washington, enormous reactors

(07:50):
were constructed to produce plutonium 239, a new element
that didn't exist in nature but could be created by bombarding
uranium 238 with neutrons. The plutonium path offered
advantages. It could be chemically separated
from uranium, rather than requiring physical separation of
nearly identical isotopes. But it also presented new

(08:12):
challenges for bomb design, the race against Nazi Germany.
Throughout this massive undertaking, one question loomed
Were the Germans ahead? The fear of Hitler obtaining an
atomic bomb first drove the project's urgency and secrecy.
This fear wasn't unfounded. Germany had been leading the

(08:33):
world in nuclear physics before the war.
The Nazi regime had access to uranium mines and occupied
Czechoslovakia and heavy water production in Norway.
They had brilliant scientists like Werner Heisenberg, who had
won the Nobel Prize in physics in 1932.
What the Allies didn't know was that the German nuclear program

(08:55):
was making critical mistakes. Hitler had dismissed theoretical
physics as Jewish science, driving many top physicists to
flee. Heisenberg had miscalculated the
critical mass needed for a weapon, believing it would
require tons rather than kilograms of uranium.
German efforts focused increasingly on nuclear reactors

(09:16):
rather than bombs. By 1944, the Allies had gathered
enough intelligence through the also's mission to confirm that
the German program posed no immediate threat.
But the Manhattan Project continued at full speed.
The tension had shifted to another enemy, Japan, the
Trinity test. Now I am become deaf.

(09:38):
By July 1945, the plutonium bombdesign was ready for testing.
The uranium gun type design was considered reliable enough to
use without testing, but the more complex implosion design
for the plutonium bomb required proof of concept.
On July 16th, 1945, in the pre dawn darkness at Alamogordo, NM,

(10:02):
the world's first nuclear explosion lit up the desert sky.
The test code name Trinity exceeded all expectations, with
a yield equivalent to about 21,000 tons of TNT.
Oppenheimer, watching the blinding flash and mushroom
cloud, recalled a line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad

(10:22):
Gita. Now I am become Death, the
destroyer of worlds. Kenneth Bainbridge, the test
director, was more blunt, telling Oppenheimer.
Now we are all sons of bitches. News of the successful test
reached President Harry Truman, who had succeeded Roosevelt
following his death in April while he was attending the

(10:42):
Potsdam Conference with Allied leaders.
The weapon they had raced to build before Germany could
develop it was now ready. But Germany had already
surrendered in May. The target was now Japan.
Part 2. The decision to use the bomb.
The Pacific War Context To understand the decision to use

(11:04):
atomic weapons, we must first understand the brutal reality of
the Pacific War in mid 1945. By summer 1945, Japan had been
largely defeated. Its Navy was destroyed, its Air
Force crippled, its cities burning from conventional
bombing. The Allied island hopping

(11:24):
campaign had pushed ever closer to the Japanese home islands,
with each battle more desperate and costly than the last.
The Battle of Okinawa, which ended in June 1945, offered a
horrifying preview of what an invasion of the Japanese
mainland might entail. Over 82 days of fighting,
approximately 200,000 people died, including 12,500 American

(11:50):
soldiers, 77,000 Japanese soldiers in as many as 100,000
Okinawan civilians, many throughmass suicide.
Driven by Japanese propaganda that American troops would
commit atrocities. Japanese soldiers fought with
fanatical determination, often to the last man.
Kamikaze attacks sank or damageddozens of American ships.

(12:14):
Civilians were caught in the crossfire or took their own
lives rather than surrender. Meanwhile, American firebombing
of Japanese cities had reached devastating levels of
destruction. On March 9th to 10th, 1945, a
single air raid on Tokyo killed approximately 100,000 people and
destroyed about 16 square miles of the city.

(12:38):
Similar raids had devastated other urban centers.
Despite these losses, Japan's military leadership refused to
contemplate surrender. Their strategy was to make any
invasion of the home islands so costly in American lives that
the US would accept the negotiated peace, allowing Japan
to maintain its military, government and imperial

(12:59):
possessions. The invasion alternative
Operation Downfall The main alternative to using the atomic
bomb was an invasion of Japan codenamed Operation Downfall.
This would have been the largestamphibious operation in history,
dwarfing even the D-Day landings.
Downfall was planned in two phases.

(13:21):
Operation Olympic targeting the southernmost island of Kyushu in
November 1945, followed by Operation Coordinate, aimed at
the main island of Hanshu near Tokyo, in spring 1946.
American military planners estimated casualty figures that
still shock today based on the experience of Iwo Jima in

(13:42):
Okinawa. They projected between 400,000
and 800,000 American casualties,including 100,000 to 250,000
deaths. Japanese military and civilian
casualties were expected to be in the millions.
These weren't just hypothetical numbers to President Truman.

(14:02):
As a combat veteran of World WarOne, he understood the human
cost of warfare intimately, he later wrote.
I knew what another war would mean.
I wanted to save American lives,Japanese lives, Allied lives.
Japan had begun training civilians, including women and
children, to resist invasion with improvised weapons.

(14:26):
Their slogan was 100 million hearts beating as one,
suggesting the entire populationof 72 million would fight to the
death rather than surrender. Additionally, Japan held over
100,000 Allied prisoners of war who are being worked and starved
to death in brutal conditions. Intelligence reports indicated

(14:47):
they would likely be executed ifJapan was invaded.
The Potsdam Declaration Before using the atomic bomb, the
Allies issued one final warning to Japan.
On July 26th, 1945, the United States, United Kingdom, and
China released the Potsdam Declaration, demanding Japan's

(15:09):
unconditional surrender. The declaration warned of prompt
and utter destruction if Japan did not surrender immediately.
While it didn't explicitly mention atomic weapons, which
remain highly classified, it wasintended as a final chance for
Japan to avoid further devastation.
Japan's Prime Minister Kantaro Suzuki responded to the

(15:31):
declaration with the word mokosatsu, which can be
translated as either no comment or not worthy of comment.
This ambiguous response was interpreted by American leaders
as a rejection of surrender terms.
We now know from Japanese records that the government was
in fact deeply divided. Military leaders remained

(15:52):
committed to fighting, while some civilian officials,
including the emperor, We're beginning to see surrender as
inevitable. However, even the peace faction
hope to negotiate more favorableterms, including preservation of
the emperor's position and avoiding occupation.
Truman's decision The final decision rested with President

(16:14):
Harry Truman, who had assumed office just months earlier
following Roosevelt's death. Truman was not initially
informed about the Manhattan Project.
Secretary of War Henry Stimson briefed him after he became
president. Truman appointed a committee of
military and civilian leaders, known as the Interim Committee,

(16:35):
to advise him on using the new weapon.
The committee, chaired by Stimson, recommended that the
bomb be used against Japan as soon as possible without
warning, and against the military targets surrounded by
civilian buildings to demonstrate its destructive
power. A group of scientists led by Leo
Sillard circulated a petition urging the president to

(16:57):
demonstrate the bomb in an uninhabited area before using it
against the Japanese city. However, this petition never
reached Truman, and military advisors argued that a
demonstration might fail or be ignored by Japanese leaders.
There were other considerations as well.
The Soviet Union had pledged to enter the war against Japan

(17:19):
three months after Germany's defeat, which would put their
entry in August 1945. American leaders worried that
Soviet involvement might lead toa division of Japan similar to
what was occurring in Germany, potentially giving the Soviets a
foothold in Asia. In the end, Truman authorized
the use of atomic bombs against Japan, later justifying his

(17:42):
decision as a way to avoid the massive casualties of an
invasion, as he put it. I regarded the bomb as a
military weapon and never had any doubt that it should be
used. Part 3 The Bombings Hiroshima A
Reign of Ruin The uranium bomb nicknamed Little Boy was loaded

(18:02):
onto AB29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay after the pilot
Colonel Paul Tibbetts mother at 8:15 AM local time on August
6th, 1945. The bomb detonated approximately
1900 feet above the center of Hiroshima.
Why Hiroshima, The city of about350,000 people was selected from

(18:27):
a list of potential targets for several reasons.
It was a significant military and industrial center,
headquarters of the Japanese Second General Army in a key
logistics hub. It had largely been spared from
conventional bombing, making it ideal for assessing the atomic
bombs effects and it's geography.

(18:47):
A flat area surrounded by hills would maximize the bombs
destructive impact. The explosion created a blinding
flash, a fireball reaching temperatures of 10,000°F in a
devastating shockwave. Within seconds, the heart of the
city was obliterated. The blast, heat and radiation

(19:09):
killed an estimated 80,000 people instantly.
By the end of 1945, the death toll would reach approximately
140,000 due to injuries and radiation sickness.
The human cost is almost impossible to comprehend.
Those closest to the hypo centerwere vaporized, leaving only

(19:30):
shadows on stone walls and steps.
Others suffered horrific burns, their skin hanging in strips
from their bodies. The blast damaged or destroyed
more than 90% of the city's buildings, one survivor, Akiko
Takakura, who is just 300 metersfrom the Hypo center, later
recalled. I was with a friend.

(19:52):
We were buried under the debris.When we were saved and able to
stand up, I looked around and saw others.
Their skin was hanging like rags.
They didn't look like people from this world.
In Washington, President Truman issued a statement.
If they do not now accept our terms, they may expect a rain of

(20:13):
ruin from the air the like of which has never been seen on
this earth. Nagasaki, the second strike.
After the Hiroshima bombing, Japan's leadership was thrown
into crisis. Reports of unprecedented
destruction trickled in, but thenature of the new weapon
remained unclear to many Japanese officials.

(20:34):
While emergency meetings were called, no immediate decision to
surrender was made. On August 8th, the Soviet Union
declared war on Japan and invaded Manchuria, delivering
another strategic blow. The next day, August 9th, a
second American B29 named Boxcarcarried the plutonium bomb Fat

(20:54):
Man toward its primary target, the city of Kakura.
However, cloud cover and smoke from earlier conventional
bombing obscured Kakura. After making three passes over
the city in With fuel running low, the crew diverted to their
secondary target, Nagasaki, a major port and industrial center
with significant Mitsubishi shipyards.

(21:17):
At 11 O 2:00 AM, the bomb detonated above Nagasaki,
creating a blast estimated at 21kilotons, more powerful than the
Hiroshima bomb. However, Nagasaki's hilly
terrain partially contain the explosion, limiting destruction
compared to the flat landscape of Hiroshima.
Nevertheless, the human toll wascatastrophic.

(21:41):
Approximately 40,000 people diedinstantly, with the total
reaching about 70,000 by the endof 1945.
The bomb destroyed roughly 44% of the city, including most of
the industrial district. The Nagasaki bombing had
particular irony. The city had been home to
Japan's largest Christian community for centuries,

(22:03):
descendants of converts from the16th century.
The Urakami Cathedral, the largest Christian Church in
Asia, was destroyed with worshippers inside.
Part 4 The Japanese surrender, The emperor's intervention, the
dual shocks of the atomic bombings and Soviet entry into
the war finally broke the deadlock in Tokyo.

(22:27):
Still, the military leadership insisted on continuing the
fight, proposing 4 conditions for any surrender, preservation
of the Emperor, self disarmament, no occupation and
Japanese LED war crimes trials. On August 10th, Emperor Hirohito
took the unprecedented step of intervening directly in

(22:47):
government affairs. In a meeting with the Supreme
Council for the Direction of thewar, he stated, I cannot bear to
see my innocent people suffer any longer.
It is necessary to endure the unendurable and suffer the
insufferable. Even then, military hardliners
attempted a coup on August 14th to prevent the surrender

(23:08):
announcement. The rebels seized the Imperial
Palace briefly, but failed to capture the recording of the
emperor's surrender speech before committing suicide.
On August 15th, 1945, the Japanese people heard their
Emperor's voice for the first time as he announced Japan's
surrender. Without directly mentioning

(23:28):
defeat, he cited a new and most cruel bomb as a reason Japan
could no longer continue the war.
The formal surrender ceremony took place aboard the USS
Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2nd, 1945, officially
ending World War Two. Were the bombs necessary?

(23:49):
The question of whether the atomic bombings were necessary
to end the war has been debated ever since.
Traditional narratives emphasized that the bombs saved
lives by avoiding an invasion. Truman later claimed they saved
half a million American lives, though this figure was higher
than contemporary military estimates.

(24:09):
Secretary of War Stimson wrote after the war that the bombs
might have saved a million American casualties and even
more Japanese lives. However, some historians argue
alternatives existed. They point to several factors
that might have led to Japan's surrender without the bombs.
The Soviet entry into the war onAugust 8th shocked Japanese

(24:31):
leaders who had been hoping the USSR might mediate A favorable
peace. Historian Tsuyoshi Hasegawa
argues this was more decisive than the atomic bombs enforcing
Japan surrender. A demonstration of the bomb on
an uninhabited area, as some Manhattan Project scientists
suggested, might have convinced Japan to surrender without the

(24:53):
massive civilian casualties. Modifying the demand for
unconditional surrender to explicitly guarantee the
emperor's position might have overcome a key obstacle to
Japanese acceptance, as this waseventually allowed anyway.
Japan was already militarily defeated, with its cities being
systematically destroyed by conventional bombing.

(25:15):
A strategy of blockade and continued conventional bombing
might have eventually forced surrender.
Others contend these alternatives were uncertain at
best. As historian Richard Frank
notes, those who contend that Japan was ready to surrender
before Hiroshima have to explainwhy that surrender did not come
even in the three days between the atomic bombings.

(25:38):
What we do know is that both atomic bombs and Soviet entry
occurred, and Japan surrendered shortly thereafter.
The counterfactual question of what might have happened
otherwise remains one of history's great unresolvable
debates. Part 5 The human impact The
Survivors Hibakusha The human cost of the atomic bombings

(26:01):
extends far beyond the immediatecasualties.
Survivors, known in Japan as hibakusha, literally explosion
affected people, faced ongoing physical and social suffering.
Many developed radiation sickness in the days and weeks
after the bombings, suffering from nausea, vomiting, hair loss
and bleeding gums. Longer term effects included

(26:25):
increased rates of leukemia and other cancers, cataracts and
other chronic health problems. Echo Talco was riding A
streetcar with her one year old son when the Hiroshima bomb
exploded, she later recalled. I clutched my son to my chest
and jumped to the ground. My son's face was bleeding
badly. He never cried, never

(26:48):
complained, but kept looking up at my face.
I begged for help from passing soldiers, but they ignored me.
He died the next day. Beyond physical injuries,
hibakusha faced discrimination and social isolation.
Many Japanese feared radiation was contagious or that survivors

(27:08):
would produce deformed children.Hibakusha often concealed their
status to avoid prejudice when seeking employment or marriage
partners. Women faced particular
challenges. Many young women survivors had
visible keloid scars from burns,making marriage prospects
difficult in a society that placed high value on female

(27:29):
appearance. There were also unfounded fears
about genetic damage affecting future generations.
Doctor Shantarohita, a military doctor in Hiroshima who survived
the bombing, devoted his life totreating hibakusha.
He described patients suffering for decades.
They carry a burden of guilt forsurviving when so many others

(27:51):
died. Many feel like they're living
with a time bomb in their bodies, never knowing when
cancers might appear. The Japanese government was slow
to provide support for hibakusha, partly because
acknowledging their suffering conflicted with the US
occupations narrative about the bombings.
It wasn't until 1957 that Japan passed the Atomic Bomb Victims

(28:14):
Relief Law, providing medical assistance to survivors.
The full human toll can never becalculated beyond the
approximately 210,000 immediate deaths in both cities.
Countless others died prematurely from radiation
related illnesses or lived with physical and psychological scars
for decades. Memory and memorialization.

(28:38):
How do communities recover from atomic devastation?
Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki wererebuilt in the post war years,
transforming from atomic wastelands to modern cities, Yet
they also became sites of memoryand peace activism.
In Hiroshima, the skeletal Dome of the former Industrial
Promotion Hall, one of the few structures left standing near

(29:01):
the Hypo Center, was preserved as the Atomic Bomb Dome, now a
UNESCO World Heritage Site. The surrounding area became
Peace Memorial Park, featuring amuseum documenting the bombing
in its aftermath. Each year on August 6th,
Hiroshima holds a peace ceremonywhere thousands gather before
dawn. At 8:15 AM, the moment of

(29:24):
detonation, a bell tolls in the city observes a minute of
silence. In the evening, lanterns
inscribed with messages of peaceare floated down the Motoyasa
River, one for each victim. Nagasaki similarly created a
peace park near the Hypo Center,featuring a massive bronze
statue with one hand pointing upward to symbolize the threat

(29:46):
of nuclear weapons and the otherextended in peace.
The annual commemoration on August 9th includes the release
of doves as symbols of peace. These cities have transformed
their trauma into a mission, as the inscription on the Hiroshima
Cenotaph reads. Rest in peace, for the error
shall not be repeated. Both cities have become centers

(30:09):
of the global nuclear disarmament movement, with their
mayors serving as presidents of the international organization
Mayors for Peace. The hibakusha themselves became
powerful witnesses. Many overcame shame and trauma
to share their experiences, believing their testimonies
could help prevent nuclear weapons from ever being used

(30:29):
again. Survivor Setsuko Thurlow, who
was 13 when the Hiroshima bomb exploded, spoke at the Nobel
Peace Prize ceremony when the International Campaign to
Abolish Nuclear Weapons receivedthe award in 2017, declaring we
must not tolerate this ultimate evil, we must eliminate nuclear

(30:49):
weapons. Part 6 the long shadow nuclear
age legacy the arms race the atomic bombings didn't end
conflict, they transformed it within four years, the Soviet
Union tested its first atomic bomb, ending the American
monopoly on nuclear weapons. The nuclear arms race had begun.

(31:13):
The escalation was breathtaking.By the 1950s, both superpowers
had developed hydrogen bombs thousands of times more powerful
than the Hiroshima. Weapon delivery systems evolved
from bombers to intercontinentalballistic missiles that could
strike anywhere in the world within 30 minutes.
At the height of the Cold War inthe 1980's, the global nuclear

(31:36):
arsenal reached approximately 70,000 warheads, enough to
destroy human civilization many times over.
The doctrine of mutually assureddestruction mad hell that
neither superpower would attack first, knowing retaliation would
be swift and devastating. Yet this balance of terror came
with immense risks. During the 1962 Cuban Missile

(32:00):
Crisis, the world came perilously close to nuclear war.
As former US Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara later
admitted, we came within a hair breath of nuclear war without
realizing it. The financial cost was also
staggering. the United States alone spent over $5.8 trillion

(32:21):
on its nuclear arsenal between 1940 and 1996, according to the
Brookings Institution. Resources that might have
addressed poverty, disease, and environmental challenges were
instead devoted to weapons of mass destruction.
Moral and ethical debates. The use of atomic bombs against

(32:42):
Japan sparked immediate ethical debates that continue today.
Many of the scientists who created the bomb expressed
regret about its use, Leo Sillard, who had initiated the
Manhattan Project with Einstein's letter, later
lamented. If the Germans had dropped
atomic bombs on cities instead of us, we would have defined the

(33:02):
dropping of atomic bombs on cities as a war crime, and we
would have sentenced the Germanswho were guilty of this crime to
death at Nuremberg. Critics have argued that
targeting densely populated cities with a weapon of
unprecedented destructiveness violated principles of just war,
particularly the protection of civilians.
Howard Zinn, historian in World War 2 Bombardier, classified the

(33:27):
atomic bombings as acts of terrorism against the civilian
population. Defenders counter that Japan's
militaristic government had mobilized its entire population
for war, blurring the distinction between combatants
and civilians. They note that conventional
firebombing had already killed more Japanese civilians than the

(33:47):
atomic bombs, and that the alternative invasion would
likely have resulted in even greater suffering.
These debates reflect deeper questions about the ethics of
warfare in the modern age. When does the goal of ending a
war justify extreme measures? Are some weapons too terrible to
use under any circumstances? Does possession of nuclear

(34:10):
weapons make their use more or less likely?
Religious leaders have been particularly vocal.
In 1981, the United Methodist Council of Bishops declared We
believe that the whole process of nuclear armament is evil.
We cannot embrace the threat to use nuclear weapons as an
instrument of national policy. Pope Francis went further in

(34:33):
2017, declaring not only the use, but even the possession of
nuclear weapons to be immoral. Nuclear weapons exist in the
service of a mentality of fear. Threatening mutual assured
destruction makes a mockery of the security of nations and
peoples arms control and disarmament efforts.
The specter of nuclear annihilation has sparked

(34:55):
numerous efforts to control and reduce these weapons.
Early proposals like the 1946 Baruch Plan for international
control of Atomic Energy failed amid Cold War tensions.
However, the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty prohibited nuclear
testing in the atmosphere, underwater, and in space, partly

(35:17):
in response to growing concerns about radioactive fallout.
The 1968 Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, NPT,
established the framework for international nuclear order.
Non nuclear states agreed not toacquire nuclear weapons, while
nuclear states committed to eventual disarmament and sharing

(35:37):
peaceful nuclear technology. The end of the Cold War enabled
significant reductions. The US and Russia have cut their
arsenals by about 85% from Cold War peaks through a series of
treaties. Today, the global inventory
stands at approximately 13,000 warheads, still enough to cause

(35:58):
global catastrophe, but a substantial reduction.
Yet challenges persist. The nuclear club has expanded to
9 nations, including North Korea, which conducted its first
nuclear test in 2006. Iran's nuclear program has
raised international tensions. India and Pakistan, nuclear

(36:20):
armed neighbors with a history of conflict, remain outside the
NPT. In 2017, a new approach emerged
with the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons,
which comprehensively bans nuclear weapons under
international law. While no nuclear armed states
have joined, supporters view it as establishing a new norm

(36:42):
against nuclear weapons, similarto bans on chemical and
biological weapons. Hibakusha have been at the
forefront of these disarmament efforts.
Summiteru Tanaguchi, who survived the Nagasaki bombing
with severe burns, testified. I want this to be the century
where we finally abolish nuclearweapons.

(37:03):
In the 21st century, we should establish a world where people
no longer hurt each other. Scientific and technological
legacy beyond their destructive power.
The Manhattan Project in the atomic bombings transformed
science, technology and the relationship between scientists
and society. The project demonstrated the

(37:25):
power of concentrated scientificeffort with adequate resources.
This big science model influenced post war research
organization. From NASA to the Human Genome
Project, nuclear technology found peaceful applications.
Nuclear power generates approximately 10% of global
electricity today. Medical radioisotopes aid cancer

(37:49):
treatment and diagnosis. Carbon dating enables
archaeological discoveries. However, the awesome
destructiveness of their creation led many Manhattan
Project scientists to question their responsibility to society,
as Oppenheimer told President Truman.
Mr. President, I feel I have blood on my hands.

(38:11):
This soul searching gave rise tonew thinking about scientific
ethics and responsibility. The Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists, founded by ManhattanProject veterans in 1945,
created the Doomsday Clock to warn humanity about
technological threats to our existence.
Scientists became more engaged in public policy, advocating on

(38:34):
issues from arms control to climate change.
The Federation of American Scientists, also founded by
Manhattan Project alumni, exemplifies this tradition of
socially responsible science. Geopolitical Transformation The
atomic bombings also reshaped global politics in profound
ways. The bombings helped establish

(38:57):
American military and technological supremacy in the
immediate post war period, enabling the United States to
shape the emerging internationalorder.
However, they also accelerated the Cold War by heightening
Soviet fears and determination to develop their own nuclear
deterrent. Japan itself underwent dramatic

(39:17):
transformation. The atomic bombings contributed
to a profound national trauma that reinforced Japan's post war
pacifism. Article 9 of Japan's
Constitution, drafted during theAmerican occupation, renounces
war as a sovereign right. Japan's self-defense forces
remain constitutionally constrained.

(39:38):
The bombings also altered how wars are fought.
Major powers no longer engage each other directly due to
nuclear risks, instead fighting through proxies or unlimited
conflicts. While this has prevented another
World War, it has not ended warfare.
The post 1945 era has seen numerous regional conflicts with

(39:59):
devastating humanitarian consequences.
Perhaps most fundamentally, the atomic bombings forced humanity
to confront its ability to destroy itself.
As Albert Einstein observed, theunleashed power of the atom has
changed everything save our modes of thinking, and we thus
drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.

(40:20):
This existential awareness has influenced everything from
international relations to popular culture, from
environmental movements to religious thinking.
It represents what philosopher Gunther Anders called the
obsolescence of humanity, the moment when our technological
power outstripped our ethical wisdom.
Conclusion, lessons and legacy Nearly 8 decades after Hiroshima

(40:45):
and Nagasaki, what lesson shouldwe draw from this pivotal moment
in human history? First, the atomic bombings
remind us of wars. Terrible human cost.
Beyond statistics and strategic calculations lie individual
human lives, children, parents, doctors, teachers, each with
their own dreams and potential. As historian John Dauer wrote,

(41:09):
war remains at its core. Organized slaughter and nuclear
weapons raise this capacity for slaughter to a new order of
magnitude. Second, they demonstrate how
technology transforms warfare, often outpacing ethical and
legal frameworks. The laws of war established
before 1945 never contemplated atomic weapons.

(41:33):
Today, emerging technologies like autonomous weapons, cyber
warfare, and biotechnology presents similar challenges.
Third, the bombings illustrate how decisions made under wartime
pressure can have consequences lasting generations.
The choice made in August 1945 still shapes our world through

(41:54):
nuclear arsenals, international institutions and collective
memory. 4th The courage and resilience of the hibakusha show
humanity's capacity to transformsuffering into purpose.
Their testimonies have helped ensure that Hiroshima and
Nagasaki remain the only instances of nuclear weapons
used in warfare so far. Perhaps the most profound legacy

(42:18):
is a question can humanity survive its own technological
prowess? The atomic bomb was the first
invention that threatened our species existence.
It would not be the last. In the ruins of Hiroshima, at
the entrance to the Peace Memorial Museum, a stone
inscription reads. We shall not repeat the evil.

(42:40):
This simple promise, neither to forget the past nor to repeat
it, may be the most important legacy of those fateful days in
August 1945. I'm Steve Matthews, and this has
been World War Two stories. Thank you for joining me on this
exploration of one of history's most consequential moments.

(43:00):
Until next time, remember that understanding our past, with all
its triumphs and tragedies, is essential to building a more
peaceful future.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Are You A Charlotte?

Are You A Charlotte?

In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.