Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
Mother Knows Dad starring Nicole and Jemmy and Maria qk Hi.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Everyone welcome The Mother Knows Death. We have an update
in the death of Celeste Reeves involving the rapper slash
singer Slash whatever, David, a child who was severely burned
from a freak accident involving their tablet, a discovery leading
to investigators to think that there was someone trying to
harm a child during Halloween trick or treating. An update
(00:44):
on butt breathing, and a dead body that was found
in a house that was auctioned. All that and more
on today's episode.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
Okay, So, last month we reported that a teen girl
was found dead in the trunk of singer David's tesla.
So As reported that girl was identified as Celeste Reeves.
So there hasn't been that much information that has come
out after her death, which I thought was really unusual
because this was huge the week it came out and
(01:13):
all the speculation was happening. But nobody's been arrested in
the crime yet, and nobody really has any understanding of
how she died. Was it a homicide, was an accident?
What happened? Right? So now the owner of the house
he was running in LA has hired a private investigator
to go through the home, and in that search, the
private investigator found farm tools that he believed could be
(01:35):
used to get rid of a body.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Yeah, so he didn't specifically say what the farm tools were,
so who knows. But I mean one point to pick
out is that he's living in the Hollywood Hills of
LA and the guy was just like, there's no reason
on earth that you would ever need these tools at
this property, whatever it.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
Was, or most people in residential properties, and.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
Did you see that house, by the way, it is ridiculous,
It's insane, right. So another thing is like, I'm sure
most people that could afford a twenty thousand dollars plus
a month payment for their living situation are probably having
private gardeners or landscape people. Like why would they even
have that shit? It's just very unusual to have equipment
(02:19):
like that. What else could it be used for? But
it also is extreme speculation to say.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
You keep it.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
You can get rid of a body with a scalpel
blade if you really wanted to.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
Like, yeah, there's a million ways you can get her.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
And like, let's say this too, because I don't think
that we've had any confirmation of this that she was
actually dismembered, because she could have been disarticulated because of decomposition.
We've talked about that when we first talked about this story.
So I don't know that anyone was necessarily trying to
(02:53):
get rid of her in her body in that way
because we don't know for sure that she was actually dismembered. Well,
no one's confirm that, correct, No, And we also don't
know for a fact that she was murdered, Like obviously
it seems like it's gonna lean that way, but what
if she got I think I think that they know
for sure it was murdered because they're conducting it as
(03:15):
a homicide investigation, because otherwise why would they.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Yeah, but wouldn't you conduct it that way if it's
undetermined because right now we don't have a manner or
cause of death.
Speaker 2 (03:25):
Possibly, But I don't I don't know to that extent, honestly,
because they know way more than they're telling us, Like
they're saying all we know is like kind of what came.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
From the news.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Basically that a medical examiner has been tight lipped a
shit about this. They haven't said anything so we don't
know what they saw.
Speaker 3 (03:48):
We don't know.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
They're saying, like, I'm sure the toxicology is back by now.
They they know what's happening, but they're just not saying
anything because they're trying to investigate this properly and get
a person to be in you know, responsible for this.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
I think it was likely she was bernered, but at
the same time, you have to think like she could
have well indeed in the house and somebody put her
in the car because they're like, this is this isn't
my problem.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
You know what I mean?
Speaker 2 (04:16):
Yeah, I mean there are there's definitely possibilities of other
things happening, and we don't know. We don't know if
they saw signs of strangulation or or signs of previous
abuse where her bones broken, did she have a gunshot
women like, we don't know any of that stuff. But
I know that everybody keeps saying that she was dismembered,
and that would obviously change things a little bit if
(04:38):
she was. Indeed, I just think out a person could
become dismembered naturally too, So I just think that the speculation,
the speculation is is pretty It's a lot the.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
Way the news whorded that she was dismembered, made me,
who barely knows anything about what you do at all,
think that they misunderstood what they heard well because oh
we wasn't like we don't know, Yeah, it was was
worded very weird. Yeah, and like you're saying, she could
have been decomposing in her limbs, could just start like
slipping off and stuff.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
Yeah, I mean, and they'll be able to tell that,
especially because they'll be able to see knife marks and
saw marks if there were even on the bones, even
if most of the soft tissue is gone, they'll be
able to tell if it was that. And they'll also
be able to you know, they're going to do or
they've already done, like all of this is already done,
(05:34):
and they know. They're just trying to hone in on
this investigation. So who who hired this guy to go there?
Speaker 1 (05:42):
The owner of the rental property, which I thought was odd,
but maybe they're just worried they're going to be liable
in this case at all, so they're trying to clear
their name of anything.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
See it is.
Speaker 2 (05:55):
It's interesting too, because you would think that if that's
where David was living, that that if they were investigating him,
then that would be off limits for some private investigator to.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Go there unless he's I mean, at this point, is
he not paying the rent, does he not live there anymore?
Did he stilled it behind?
Speaker 2 (06:18):
That would be considered I mean, if the police did
consider that to be a crime scene, that wouldn't be
allowed to be visited by anyone unless they were done
with it.
Speaker 1 (06:28):
So they's just like really sure of the logistics of
all that. But this is what the guy is saying
that he found.
Speaker 3 (06:34):
No I know, I believe that.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
I just I mean even I know that everybody thinks
it's just based upon what we we've heard in the
news that he's dating this girl that's a that's a
young teenager, And we were talking about this, we talked
about this on every episode that sometimes like guys are
in a shitty situation because people could lie about their agent.
(06:59):
If he didn't know that she was a child. There's
a possibility that he did know, but there's also possibility
that he didn't know because I believe that her friends
of theirs had said that they thought she was a
usc college student.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Yeah, but she's also a missing minor on a missing poster.
So like that not very far away, an hour from
where she's living. So I just find it very hard
to believe.
Speaker 3 (07:23):
Do you know.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
Who's missing in the Philadelphia Camden area dough Jersey right now? Like? No?
Speaker 3 (07:29):
Do you know?
Speaker 1 (07:30):
I see stuff online?
Speaker 2 (07:31):
It's like, but you you have a mental picture of
all of the people that are missing that you would
know that you were with one, Like no.
Speaker 1 (07:39):
But I would remember if I knew the person and
they were living in my house.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
Yeah, but you haven't seen every single person that's missing.
It's just like that's that's not even I understand that
that seems weird. But I mean I saw today a
person that is missing. I see it almost every day
that there's a person in our town that's missing, or
(08:04):
I don't I don't know who they are, Like I
don't pay attention to The point is there's a lot
of unanswered questions in this. What was the nature of
their relationship, what was going on with her family? Was
she actually considered a missing person or did her family
know she was with him the whole time? Because there
was that point brought up too. Yeah, there's there's a
lot of things that it could be brought up with it,
(08:24):
but regardless, like even if he's completely innocent somehow and
not involved, because it did seem like he wasn't in
town around that time, but we don't know that either.
But he's not gonna just be sitting there open because
this is like a really big deal, and his lawyer
is even being really quiet, like they just want to
make sure they totally clear him if he is innocent
(08:48):
or his lawyer is Blair Berg who who did the
Harvey Weinstein try.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
Also, I don't think they're gonna be saying anything until
they know exactly what they're working with yet. But other
information came out from the private investigator, which was that
this tesla that she was found in was David's everyday
car and was regularly used until February, and he reportedly
got a new car at that time, and he had
forty five parking citations as of February, and the next
(09:16):
one wasn't until September when the car was towed. So
this PI is saying that security footage showed that the
car was last moved from its normal spot in front
of David's home on July twenty ninth and parked just
a few blocks away, where it stayed until of neighbor
file to complain on August twenty ninth. The car was
towed a week after that. She was found three days
after the car was towed, So they believe now that
(09:38):
she's been in the car since July twenty ninth, when
I believe when the story first came out, they had
only thought she was in there for a week or two.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Yeah, which we were like, no, she wouldn't be severely
decomposed that quick. Yeah, okay, so that's interesting. Do you
think like it totally could be possible. I mean, if
he's living in a house like that and has money
like that, isn't there a possibility that there could be
like assistants and other people living at the house and
he could have left and left the girl there.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
And but who moved the car because don't tesla's have
cameras on them.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
I'm sure they looked at all this. It's it's just
like the Brian Coburger case. Like remember they they got murdered, right,
was it right before Thanksgiving? I feel like it was
like the week before Thanksgiving or something, and everybody was
just like, what's going on, What's going on? And then
(10:34):
all of a sudden, they had this huge case build
and dropped it like after Christmas and was just like
we just arrested this guy his DNA, like they had
phone records, DNA all this. Nobody knew what was going
on behind the scenes, Like why are they going to
tell people?
Speaker 1 (10:49):
It's just we did buy the autopsy report, which they
said they'd released after they determined everything, so we will.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
My thirty two dollars back.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
I get seriously, Okay, a nine year old boy had
fallen asleep with his tablet charging on the bed next
to his head, and at some point in the night,
the metal necklace he was wearing a cat on the
cord and sparked a fire on his neck, which left
his neck, head, and hands with burns.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
Yeah, we've we've had this before, a couple cases in
the grocer room too. It's it's a it's a big
thing that they say that kids shouldn't sleep with a
tablet or even a phone in their bed. It should
be on something hard, like a night's stand table or
something like that, because it just increases the wrist that
it's going to catch on fire. The cord was wrapped
(11:36):
around the kid's neck a little bit and he had
a necklace on, which definitely didn't help. And I don't know,
like the mom, I guess it was the mom was
interviewed and said something that he had severe burns and
he was electrocuted, which I don't first he wasn't electrocuted
(11:56):
because when you're electrocuted, you're dead, so he would gotten
electric shock perhaps, but I don't even know if that
was really the mechanism of what happened or because it
could have been something to do with the metal necklace
conducting with the cord, especially you know if the cord
gets loses the plastic on the outside of it, you know,
(12:18):
like if it's terrors where you're plugging it in because
kids like rip it out like that could have conducted
something that could have caused an electric shock. But it
was more than likely because it was wrapped up in
the blanket and it just caught on fire.
Speaker 1 (12:33):
They're just so scary how easily it could happen.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
It is, and the recommendations like from I don't know
what it is, National fire Prevention whatever, it's just so
like not practical. It says every single time you have
a device, you should only charge it with the charger
that it came with, and then if if you can't
(12:56):
do that, you have to get another one from the manufacturer. Like,
I'm sorry, but I'm not paying thirty dollars for an
Apple charger when I could get two of them for
ten dollars on Amazon, you know what I mean? And
I think most people think that way. The chargers don't last,
even the ones from Apple don't last. They you're replacing
them multiple times. I can't even tell you. You lose them,
(13:17):
the kids lose them. I feel like I have them
all over the place because they're just constantly getting lost
and not working or whatever. It's just not practical to
think that way, So I guess the safest way is
to just make sure that you don't have it laying
on fabric.
Speaker 3 (13:36):
Well.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Yeah, and I don't think children in general should be
having the device plugged in right next to them, because
you just want to minimize the risk anyway. Yeah, it
just sucks because this kid's got some he had to
go to a pediatric burn unit and he's got a
burn around his neck, and of course wearing the necklace
didn't help, you know, No, beca's just basically just heated
(13:59):
it up.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
Yeah, it's just a freak thing. But I feel like
we've talked about this. I might even have pictures on Instagram,
like years and years and years ago, a couple different
cases of this involving the charging cord and kids getting burned,
especially like around their neck.
Speaker 1 (14:17):
Okay, so every Halloween we have stories about candy being
tampered with, and this year in Canton, Michigan, people are
claiming that there were sewing needles found in candy.
Speaker 3 (14:28):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
I mean, that's not an accident. There's no way that
there would accidentally get a sewing needle into a piece
of candy. That was a big thing when I was
a kid. It was that and like razor blades. So
momm and pop Pap would be like, we need to
check your candy, which I always thought was kind of bullshit.
I'm like, you just want to take whatever candy that
you want out of my pile. But we wrote we
(14:52):
did a high profile death disseection on Halloween deaths involving
candy a couple of years ago, remember that. And really,
the only death that has ever been reported from a
kid taking Halloween candy and dying is from the seventies
where a kid had a pixie stick that was filled
with cyanide and died. That's the only reported case.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
I'm not saying this didn't happen, But you also know
how easy it would be in this day and age,
with people wanting to do anything to get famous on
the internet, to go in your house and stick one
in and say you found it. It's impossible to trace
back that you did it or you did it.
Speaker 3 (15:33):
Yeah, I get, I mean that's totally possible.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
But was it like something that went viral as a
social media video or did they actually just call police
and say no.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
But if you call police, like your picture's going to
be on the news.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
I'm just saying people can do it with mal intent,
and I'm not saying it didn't happen. I'm just saying, like,
as somebody that embroiders and has a million sewing needles
in my house, it would be so easy to take
the kid's candy and just stick one in and be like,
oh my god, I found it, so we would.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
Well maybe they should be checking your house. Well no,
because I just don't I don't understand the point, Like
it would suck if a kid bit into that. But honestly,
like if you're biting straightforward.
Speaker 3 (16:12):
You wouldn't.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
Like a child isn't going to stick an entire fun
size whatever it was TwixT or milky way in their
mouth at once. You usually bite it and you would
bite right into it. Even if they did put it
in their whole mouth, they would chew and maybe get
stabbed in their mouth and that would kind of suck.
But like, you wouldn't really, it really wouldn't do anything.
I don't understand. I don't understand the point of it.
(16:33):
I'm also the cyani and the pixie stick gets the
job done if that's what you're trying to do, right, Like,
I don't get it.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
I'm only kind of like questioning this too because in
the picture of the sewing needle is sticking so far
out of the candy wrapper, and I just think, like,
you can stick the whole thing in without somebody noticing,
So why would you have half of it sticking out?
It doesn't even make any sense if you were trying
to actually hurt a child, it doesn't even make any
(17:01):
sense to have it so obviously sticking out of the wrapper.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
Yeah, it's just it's weird. But we I mean, in
that depth of section, we did. There was a lot
of different interesting stories that were happening over the years,
and a big one that was happening that year. I
think I wrote that in twenty twenty two, was that
there were a lot of drugs that were being smuggled
(17:24):
into the country, like in nerds boxes and stuff like
illegal street drugs, fatanyl and stuff. These drugs instead of
being white pills, they were like colored pills that were
be attractive to children, like stuff like that. That's scary too,
but it's the same thing like if you're if you're
pushing fatanyl, like why would you give it to a kid?
(17:44):
Like why would you waste your drugs on kids? You
know it costs money.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Yeah, Like there's obviously evil people that want to harm children,
but I just think this is a waste of time.
And it's not like I mean, I guess in theory
the kid could swallow the sewing needle and have damage, right.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
But yeah, and have a perforation. Like it's just it's
just a very weird way to injure someone.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
It's just I'm just saying, like I'm questioning it because
of how it was placed, and everybody's desired to be
on TV in the news social media today, so I'm
definitely not saying it didn't happen, but I think it's
unusual that the needle was sticking out so obviously far.
So this episode is brought to you by the Grosser Room.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Guys. We have this week's high profile.
Speaker 2 (18:41):
That dissection is on Lindsey Clancy, remember the mom who
killed her three children and tried to kill herself, which
may be a result of severe postpartum depression that was
managed with lots and lots of psychiatric meds. So make
sure you check out that post. And we've done a
bunch of Halloween related things and obviously Halloween is over,
(19:05):
but just since we were just talking about, you know,
kids getting candy that killed them and things like that,
I did a post on Halloween about all of the
different links to stories for I mean, anyone that's in
the Grosser Room really usually is a Halloween all year
person like myself, So you might enjoy that and check
(19:26):
it out. We also have a post that you know,
re if you go to a circus or something and
you see a woman is usually put on a wheel
and they spin the wheel and then there's a guy
that's like throwing knives around her body. Yeah, so what
happens when one of those knives actually hits the body.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
That is one of the nastiest pictures I've ever seen
in there. It's so gross.
Speaker 3 (19:51):
No, it's it's really disturbing.
Speaker 2 (19:53):
And like, I mean, we do have a few circus
we actually I think we did a high profile dis
section on circus stuff with injuries and then just like
all one of the cool parts of that one was
all of the cool like pathologies that people had, you know,
the human mermaid and the woman with the beard and
(20:14):
all this different stuff. So I think it's kind of cool.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
Yeah, head over to the groscroom dot com now to
sign up.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
All right, So, back in September of twenty twenty four,
we talked about this anal breathing.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Okay, so Japanese and US researchers have developed a treatment
for people who can't breathe through their lungs and they're
calling it but breathing. So what did we talk about
before versus now?
Speaker 2 (20:43):
So I guess this guy, this Japanese scientist, has won
a prize because he figured out this technology that a
lot of animals actually breathe through their anus. So they're
trying to hope to see or get some oxygen through
the They're trying to hope to see if they could
figure that out in humans, because that would be a
(21:05):
huge step in trying to help people that are having
difficulty breathing or that cannot get oxygen in through their mouth.
So that was what we talked about last year, just
that he has discovered that this might be a thing
for humans as well. Now fast forward, they're starting to
get into the testing phase of this to see if
(21:28):
they could actually bring this scientific research to life. And
they did this study where they got a bunch of
guys who volunteered. They were let me see how if
it said, twenty seven healthy men, they inserted this thing
inside of their rectum and they put this fluid up there,
(21:49):
And this wasn't the fluid that will be used in
the future with oxygen in it. Because the hope is
is that they'll be able to put this fluid up
inside rectum and this fluid will get absorbed into the
intestinal wall and it will take that oxygen rich fluid
and bring it to the body in the circulatory system
(22:09):
and around to the organs. So that's like their end goal.
But right now, they just want to see that people
can tolerate getting fluid up their butt like that. So
they had these twenty seven guys volunteer and they put
this big, large amount of this viscous like thick like
(22:31):
I don't want to like honey, like you know, like
a thicker fluid, not honey because it's kind of sticky,
but just like a thicker fluid up inside of their rectum.
And twenty of them were able to tolerate it for
one hour and they said that it was uncomfortable, but
it didn't cause any damage and like.
Speaker 3 (22:48):
They survived it.
Speaker 2 (22:50):
And so there they think that that's a good step
that now they could see that people can tolerate having
the fluid up there for an hour. So now they
want to try to do it with the actual real
fluid to see if there is oxygen transport through the
intestinal wall and into the body.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
So what what are they trying to do with this?
Like is it for daily use for people that struggle breathing,
or is it for emergency situations?
Speaker 2 (23:17):
So it's just it's just for any kind of treatment
where it's difficult to get air into the lungs through
the mouth. Lung disease infections anything like that. So it's
just it's just kind of a bypass of the lungs
and the typical way that we think of breathing an
oxygen exchange for now, because they're because in the right now,
(23:39):
when you breathe, there's oxygen exchange that happens in the lungs.
But if the lungs are so damaged and that can't happen,
a person could end up dying because of that. So
if they're able to get oxygen into the blood a
different kind of way, I mean that that could be
and I'm totally don't even know this, but just speaking
out a term of like COVID and stuff like when
(24:01):
the lungs are so damaged, like if there was a
way for the lungs to heal and not have to
carry on that oxygen exchange while it was happening in
another way, that could be like a life changing thing
for reversible lung damage.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
Anyway, So do you think they're going to rename it
to something other than butt breathing sounds kind of insane.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
Well, this, this actual procedure is called enteral ventilation. So
instead of you would say, like you hear of a
ventilator and stuff. We heard that a lot during COVID.
That is when it is put into the mouth. This
is going into the enteric system or the GI system,
(24:43):
And it does have a different name, but I mean,
butt breathing is definitely more catchy.
Speaker 3 (24:53):
All right.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
In Texas, a house went into a foreclosure and eventually
was sold at an auction. So last week, the new
homeowner goes into the house and finds a previous sixty
nine year old homeowner dead on the living room carpet
just feet from the front door. And the worst part
is is that the ha was like, well, we were
sending notices of past news and she wasn't getting back
to us, and the mail carrier was noticing a piling
(25:16):
up of her mail, but nobody checked on her.
Speaker 3 (25:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
I just think it's crazy that you could put a
house up for foreclosure and then auction and nobody even
walks through it to see, like what happened to the homeowner?
Speaker 1 (25:29):
That's what I was gonna say. And they're like, oh,
we're trying to contact next of kin so we could
figure out why nobody reported her missing. Why weren't the
neighbors worried about her? For mail was obviously piling up,
and she stopped paying her bills.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
Clearly, I feel like this is just like a freak
thing because this would happen more often with elderly people especially.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
I just can't I agree with you one hundred percent.
I can't believe they can auction off a house and
not go inside.
Speaker 2 (25:54):
You're like, what if there was a crime there or
something or anything, Well.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
There was a day.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
It's exciting though, Like if you buy houses that you
that are auctions, it's just like you just have no
idea what you're gonna find when you walk in.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
That's like kind of exciting.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
But you also just bought a house that you didn't
even see the inside, yeah, because it was like, you
buy it, it doesn't matter what the inside looks like.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
You get it really cheap, and it might be in
a good neighborhood, and maybe your intentions are just like
gut it or knock it down anyway, so like who cares?
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I don't know. This just kind of made me really
sad that nobody cared enough first of all, to report
this lady missing, and that her neighbors were just like, oh,
we totally noticed all these problems when nobody checked on her.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
Yeah, you would think, like especially mailman, we could talk
to Mike or mailman about this, but they he even knows,
Like if we're away for like one or two nights,
he'll like say something like, did you guys go away?
Like they had they notice patterns of how people do
things right, Yeah, and that should be like the number
one clue. When people aren't collecting their mail, that something
(26:57):
they're either on an extended trip or they're dead.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Like what else could it be.
Speaker 1 (27:02):
Obviously you shouldn't have sound you shouldn't sound an alarm
after three days because somebody could just be on vacation.
But if it's turning into like over a week, two weeks,
a month, they said this lady could have been there
for several weeks up to months.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
Well, yeah, and she wasn't paying her mortgage. That's how
they foreclosed, Like they foreclosed on the house.
Speaker 1 (27:22):
It had to be so long. I know, I don't
know this just it really just bumms me out to
just think you could just be laying there and just
nobody cares.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Yeah, and I mean, I don't know what condition this
woman was in. I'm but I'm saying that it probably
wasn't good. And then yeah, like this guy just bought
this house and now he's got to call like a
crime scene cleaning place to get the d comp smell
out if possible.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
It's just unacceptable.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
Yeah, it really is.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
All right, guys, don't forget to enter our anniversary giveaway.
So as a reminder, the grand prize is gonna be
dinner with us sometime in January February in Philadelphia, a
free year of the grossroom and assigned book. And then
there are two other prizes which will be a signed
book and a little salt exture thrown in for you guys.
So to enter the contest, you're gonna head over to
(28:12):
Apple's write a written review, head over to Spotify Lab review,
or go to our YouTube channel and subscribe. Screenshot that
and email it to Stories that Mother Knows Death. Please
keep it to one submission per person. We'd really appreciate
that and we wish you the best of luck.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Have a good weekend, guys, thank you for listening to
Mother Nos Death. As a reminder, my training is as
a pathologists assistant. I have a master's level education and
specialize in anatomy and pathology education. I am not a
doctor and I have not diagnosed or treated anyone dead
(28:50):
or alive without the assistance of a licensed medical doctor.
This show, my website, and social media accounts are designed
to educate and inform people based on my experience working
in pathology, so they can make healthier decisions regarding their
life and well being. Always remember that science is changing
(29:11):
every day, and the opinions expressed in this episode are
based on my knowledge of those subjects at the time
of publication. If you are having a medical problem, have
a medical question, or having a medical emergency, please contact
your physician or visit an urgent care center, emergency room.
Speaker 3 (29:30):
Or hospital.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
Please rate, review, and subscribe to Mother Knows Death on Apple, Spotify, YouTube,
or anywhere you get podcasts.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
Thanks