Jerome Corsi – Author, Co-Founder Gods Five Stones.com Joins Houston Morning News

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, the battle around states. We'll be keeping an

(00:01):
eye on all of them, including Arizona. Five fifty two
is our time, and this story is out of Arizona where.
On the September twenty seven, twenty twenty four, Federal District
Court Judge Michael T. Liberti rendered a decision in a
case American encre versus Adrian Fontes that weaponized algorithms embedded
in various state Board of Elections official voter registration databases.

(00:25):
Sounds complicated, But the guy who wrote the story, Jerome, course,
he is here with us. He's an author and co
founder of God's Five Stones dot com. To explain us
to us in Layman's terms, here, what did this judge
decide and how does this potentially impact elected results in Arizona.

Speaker 2 (00:43):
Well, at first, I steal with what the judge decided.
Judge Libertie was looking at a twenty twenty two election
in Arizona, the midterm election, and in that election, Cochise
County refused to certify the election Cochies County one to
do a hand count of the ballots. They didn't trust
the what was coming out of the computers, and Fante

(01:07):
had prohibited that handcount from being done. And in fact,
what they did was they told the Coaches County they
had to certify the election. Well, Coaches County refused to
certify the election. So Clantes, under some manuel that he
had written a couple of years earlier, had a rule
which said he could have a county refused to do

(01:31):
certify an election, he could canvass the entire state and
bypass that county, which Fante did. So the US District
Court and Judge Labertie, who comes out of Arizona, by
the way, that was unconstitutional, disenfranchised the voters in Cochise County.

(01:51):
Their votes were not counted. So what this does. It
empowers a county commissioner and to say the election is
fraudulent and I'm not going to certify it. So any
county supervisor in Arizona that decides the twenty twenty four
election is not kosher. That is, somehow or other there's

(02:11):
been fraud could not certify the election, and there's no
way that the Secretary of State can force them to
do it. Now the issue is okay, let's stop with there,
because then I'll explain the issue of the algorithms. Yeah,
go ahead, ask the question.

Speaker 3 (02:27):
Well, my question was, so, in essence, if a county,
a single county, does not certify its votes, does that
then make an entire state board of electors? What they
get put on hold? What happens to the entire state,
because that's what's going to happen coming up.

Speaker 2 (02:46):
Well, everything gets put on hold because you can't have
a election where one county says there's been fraud and
won't certify it. That puts the entire state on hold.
It's the duty of these of the you know, the supervisors,
to determine whether or not the election was certifiable, whether
it was legitimate, and if one county says it wasn't legitimate,

(03:09):
then the entire states on hold. So that's powers a
given county to object to what's going on. It's a
very powerful decision, I think, a very important one, and
I think it's constitutionally rooted and that the job of
a supervisor is to determine whether or not the election
has been legitimate, and if you don't allow that to

(03:32):
be done, the supervisor has no reason to be looking
at an election. Now, the problem is that we're finding
and godsfivestones dot com reports it that there are secret algorithms.
There are codes written into many of the state databases,
and we just started looking at the Arizona State database yesterday.
But what these codes do, and they're really intelligence agency

(03:55):
quality codes, they allow completely fictitious voters to be created.
These voters get legitimate state ID and they're available to
be used at mail in fraud. Someone who is running
the computer system can vote at will these fictitious voters
and they look like they're real. So it is a

(04:16):
real problem. We find algorithms. We find algorithms in the
Arizona State of database at the Secretary of State level,
we find an algorithm. The state has a problem in
any given county can say you can't can't certify an
election if the state database has a algorithm in it.

Speaker 1 (04:37):
We are we are out of time. So let me
let me ask you very quickly. Do you suspect that
this is going on in other battleground states or is
this a uniquely Arizona problem.

Speaker 2 (04:47):
We've already found it in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and so we
think it's probably very ubiquitous across the country. We found
it about ten states so far.

Speaker 3 (04:56):
It's going to be a very tough election location coming.

Speaker 1 (05:01):
Up, Jerome Corsi, thanks for bringing it to us. We
appreciate it. Author and co founder of God's Five Stones
dot com This Jerome Corsi