Talk Radio Potpourri

Today's batch contains the aromas of Sen. Ricketts, Trump spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, longshoremen, and more.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Scott Vordies welcoming back to the program. Nebraska Senator Pete Rickett, Senator,
good morning, Good morning.

Speaker 2 (00:06):
How are you doing, Scott.

Speaker 1 (00:07):
Wonderful, great to have you with us here. Yesterday, you
and Iowa Senator Jony Ernz teamed up for a bill
specifically to deport some individuals from this country. Can you
go into details on this for us please. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (00:23):
One of the things that was recently disclosed by the
Department of Homeland Security is that we have tens of
thousands of people who are convicted illegal immigrants who are
convicted of different crimes, whether it's murder, sexual assault, or
things like that. Our bills specifically targets legal immigrants who
are convicted of sex crimes of you know, a sexual assault,

(00:44):
that sort of thing, to make sure that they get deported.
Part of the problem we have is the sanctuary cities
is that they won't cooperate with Immigration's custom enforcement to
deport these people who are convicted of these crimes. And
so what Jonay and I are trying to do is
really get this done so that we can get ICE
to arrest these people and deport them out of our country.

(01:08):
There's no reason that we should be protecting these people
in sanctuary cities. We need to get them out of
our country.

Speaker 1 (01:13):
Well, I'm sure some people hear this and say, we
can't already do this. We need to have a separate
bill specifically for this.

Speaker 2 (01:21):
Yeah, No, isn't that crazy. Isn't that crazy? We have
to do this, But that's part of the problem. We
have these woke people in these big cities who are
saying they're not going to cooperate with his immigration and
customers enforcement. And we also need to make sure this
is a priority for them to be able to deport
the people who are convicted at crimes. But yes, we

(01:42):
need to call attention to this. We need to get
this done, and this is one of the things will
help make our country safer.

Speaker 1 (01:48):
Can you speak to this allegation here from Kamala Harris.
We heard it from Tim Walls and the vice presidential
debate the other night that Trump and Republicans in the Senate,
like you killed what would have been a great bipartisan
border control bill because Trump said it would have been
damaging to his campaign. Can you speak to that.

Speaker 2 (02:07):
Yeah, this is just pure to magoggery and they know
it because President Biden when he You know, first of all,
all along we said that Biden had the same authority
President Trump did when President Trump brought illegal crossings to
a forty year low, and Biden said he needed a bill.
So this bill was negotiated. But when the bill didn't pass,

(02:27):
Biden went ahead and issued his own executive order. But
in his executive order, he set the emergency level at
half of what it was in the bill. So even
Biden knew the bill was bad because the emergency level
was set too high. And I might point out, guess what,
Biden just reduced that emergency level again. So in the
bill was five thousand illegals crossing the border. Biden's first

(02:51):
executive order was twenty five hundred, and now Biden's taking
it down to fifteen hundred because all that's he knows
that's still way too many illegal people crossing our board.
So that was a terrible bill. Biden knew it. Harris
knows that, Walls know it. I've met bears for Tim
Walls even bringing it up in the debate. I just
lost so much respect for Walls during that debate. He

(03:11):
was so bad.

Speaker 1 (03:12):
Well he's a fellow Nebraska, you.

Speaker 2 (03:14):
Know, Yeah, he was at one time, but let me
tell you he's been in Minnesota too long.

Speaker 1 (03:20):
Senator Pete Ricketts of Nebraska with us here on Nebraska's News,
Weather and Traffic station. I want to ask you about
a couple of other things. Here. FEMA's director My Orcus,
or Homeland Security Director my Orcis, is saying that FEMA,
the Federal Emergency Management Agency, doesn't have enough money to
help those impacted by Hurricane Helene. He's hoping that the

(03:41):
Senate might be able to return from recess and provide
some more funding to assist these people. On top of that,
many of them, like ninety five plus percent of the
people impacted by this hurricane across these states don't have
flood insurance, and so they're afraid their insurance company is
going to say, hey, sorry, tough deal with it, and
they'll be looking at the government for assistance. What should

(04:04):
be the role of government here is there? Has the
government done enough? Can you do more? What is happening here?

Speaker 2 (04:12):
Well, of course, I'm always willing to return to work.
One of my complaints about Chuck Schumer, the Democrat leader
of the Senate, is that this year he has let
us out early cut off you know weeks or you
cut us off start a week's late, hasn't had us
in session. So we have only been a or scheduled
being session twenty nine weeks this year out of fifty two.

(04:34):
And you know, most Nebraskans know that you start off Monday,
you work till Friday, worked the weekends if you need
to get the job done. So you know, we haven't
been working. But also Chuck Schumer has not been bringing
up our appropriations bills to get passed. He hasn't brought
up a single one for us to vote on this year.
And this is part of the broken process that Chuck
Schumer runs. And when you have a broken process, you

(04:56):
get a broken product. And that's we see some of
the results in this right now where Steve is saying
they don't have enough money. Well, you run on continuing
resolutions and you don't pass bills. This is Chuck Schumer's fault.
I mean, he hasn't even brought up on a National
Defense Authorization Act, which is one of the things we've
passed every year to defend this country. So it's not
surprising to me that we have this kind of dysfunction

(05:18):
in the government when Chuck Schumer is running a dysfunctional Senate.

Speaker 1 (05:21):
There'll be people who are underwater in North Carolina say,
I'm tired of you guys pointing fingers at each other.
We need help. Now. The federal government has flood insurance
under its purview, they won't give it to people who
are in floodplains, and the people who are outside of
it is so cost prohibitive that they can't afford to
buy it. Now they might need it, and this is

(05:42):
going to be a pretty ugly problem. Is this a
function of government to step in and help these homeowners
rebuild if their insurance companies say nothing we can do
for you.

Speaker 2 (05:52):
Yeah, I mean, this is one of the functions that
we do as a government, right We take care of
people in our country when we have disasters like this,
things that are unfl we're seeing, you know, this was
one of the biggest hurricanes we've had in our country's history.
We do step up in help, and like I said,
I'm willing to come back and get what it takes
to get you know, do what it takes to get
this done, to be able to help out folks in

(06:12):
North Carolina and Georgia. That's what we do as a country.
But again, it's just frustrating to see that FEMA is
already saying that they're in trouble because of the broken process.
Chuck Schumer is running in the US Senate. But I'm
always wanting to come back, get work and get the
job done. That's what we do in Nebraska.

Speaker 1 (06:28):
A couple more minutes here with Senator Pete Ricketts, as
that is happening along East Coast and Gulf Coast states.
We've got the long shoreman strike affecting ports along East
Coast and golf course Golf Coast ports, and Kamala Harris
says this strike is about fairness. Foreign own shipping companies

(06:49):
have made record profits and executive compensation has grown. The
long shoreman, who play a vital role transporting essential goods
across America, deserve a fair air of these record profits.
They were offered a fifty percent raise. They said, no,
what do you think about this strike? And has the
Biden Harris administration done enough to stop it?

Speaker 2 (07:10):
Well, the Biden Harris administration hasn't done anything. I mean
that's part of the problem. They haven't done anything on
this long shortman strike. They haven't done anything about our economy.
They haven't done anything about, you know, supporting our allies
at Israel. I. Mean, this is a do nothing administration clearly,
you know. We what we would hope is that they'd
be able to negotiate and get this done. The Biden

(07:32):
Harris administration has created record inflation, so it's not surprising
that working people want to get a raise, right, the
wages are not keeping up with the inflation that Biden
and Harris have created. Now there's other things like, you know,
we got to be able to allow to use innovation,
so that's kind to be going to have to be
part of the deal. We got to work for shortage
in this country. So what I would hope is that

(07:53):
two sides would be able to come together and frankly,
maybe put this off just a little bit longer. Because
we got a disaster in the southeast of the United
States that we got to take care of. We need
to be able to bring in materials, we need to
be able to build.

Speaker 1 (08:07):
And finally on disasters. The Middle East continues to be
a major issue. As Iran tried to shell Israel with
a number of rocket strikes. The incredible Israeli rocket shield
was able to take care of almost all of them,
but their ally. President Joe Biden, who should be a

(08:27):
bigger ally, says that he would not support an attack
on Iran's nuclear sites by Israel, which says, number one,
Iran has nuclear sites, and number two, we're telling the
enemy what we will or won't do in war footing.
What do you think of these comments by President Biden?

Speaker 2 (08:47):
This is just further demonstration of how weak Biden is. Frankly,
the reason Iran attacked Israel directly is because of Biden's weakness.
He has said we have an ironclad relationship with Israel,
fails to demonstrate that he backs away from him Israel.
This is one of our strongest allies in the Middle East.
It's just pathetic what Biden has done, and is frankly

(09:09):
that behavior that has encouraged Iran to do this. Iran has
been attacking not only Israel, but they Caan't death to
America as well. They are paying for the Hezbolah, the
huthis Amas, so they've been attacking us through their proxies
and now they're bold enough to attack Israel's directly because
of Biden's weakness. What we need to do is remember

(09:31):
We need to have peace through strength. But these are dictators.
All they understand is force. Reagan took care of this
back in the eighties when the Iranians tried to think
one of our navy ships, we started thinking their ships.
And guess what, they stopped doing it. They stopped attacking
this because they figured it out that they respected strength.
They were respected when we struck back. Israel needs to
strike back. We need to let them do what they

(09:52):
need to do to defend themselves, and we need to
support them when they do it. And nothing should be
off the table. If they're going to go strike their
nuclear facilities, let them strike nuclear site. So they're going
to go after oil, let them go after oil. And
here's another couple of things we can do. We can
start enforcing the sanctions on them. President Trump was able
to bring down Iran's foreign reserves from one hundred and

(10:12):
twenty two and a half billion dollars to less than
fourteen billion dollars, so iron couldn't afford to give money
to Hamas or hasbal law. And now this Biden administration
is allowed over one hundred billion dollars in oil money
to float to them. They freed up six billion dollars
in frozen astions for a run on nine to eleven.
That's how terrible this administration is. So let's put sanctions

(10:35):
back on and then let's stop funding terrorist organizations like UNDRA,
you know, the United Nations Working Relief Agencies for Palestine
the Middle East. That's one of the organizations that Hamas
used to you know, cover their operations and attack. Is
we all on October seventh. We need to have some
strength out of this administration to sell these dictators. We're

(10:56):
not going to take it, and we support our allies
when they do the same.

Speaker 1 (10:59):
Senator Pete Rack, it's appreciate the conversation as always, thank
you so much for joining us today.

Speaker 2 (11:04):
Great Thankscott, thanks for having me.

Speaker 1 (11:05):
On here on news radio eleven ten kfab. You don't
have to buy all the toilet paper you see. Bananas though,
might be a different issue. I'll tell you how this
doc worker strike might impact you here in the weeks
ahead if it goes on that long. That's next, Scott Byes.
I've been having fun throughout the morning here getting to

(11:26):
know a guy named Harold Daggett. Colorful is mister Daggett
The seventy eight year old head of the International Longshoreman's Association.
I think is clearly enjoying his moments here in front
of the camera, including this exchange with a Fox News reporter.

Speaker 3 (11:44):
You are going to grind the economy to a halt
here on the East Coast and the Gulf Coast.

Speaker 4 (11:47):
All right, I'll spend it now because you have Fox News.

Speaker 3 (11:53):
Are you worried? Are you worried the.

Speaker 1 (11:56):
Desy the capital to settle this thing?

Speaker 3 (11:59):
Are you worried that the strike is going to hurt
the everyday American? The farmers.

Speaker 5 (12:02):
I need to read.

Speaker 3 (12:03):
They reached the export market.

Speaker 1 (12:04):
They're telling me that they're gonna hurt them.

Speaker 4 (12:06):
You start to realize who the long shoreman are, right,
nobody can keeper never gave it about us until now
when they finally realized that the chain is being broke
now cause.

Speaker 1 (12:17):
Won't come in. Food won't come in, clothing won't come in.

Speaker 4 (12:22):
You know how many people depend on odd jobs half
the world.

Speaker 1 (12:26):
Yeah, that's Harold Daggett, leader of the International long Shoreman's Association.
And I agree with the emailer earlier that says man.
He sounds like Costanda's Costanza's dad. On Seinfeld, I got
a lot of problems with your people. Yeah, it's Frank.
He's Frank Costanza. As far as mister Daggett goes, he,

(12:52):
according to the US Labor Department, made seven hundred and
twenty eight six hundred and ninety four dollars as head
of the International Longshoreman's Association in twenty twenty three, and
during that same year, on top of that, another one
hundred and seventy three thousand and forty dollars as president
emeritus of the Mechanics Local Chapter at Port Newark. This

(13:16):
guy is pulling down nine hundred thousand dollars a year,
and good for him. I don't care. But to stand
there and say you're a man of the people when
your people were offered a fifty percent raise in the
next six years, and he's like, no, we want seventy

(13:38):
seven percent, and we want you to guarantee that our
jobs won't be automated. How can management guarantee that jobs
won't be automated when we don't know what the needs
will be in the years to come. We don't know
how many employees we're going to have, we don't know
how additional workload we're going to have. And maybe it'll
be something like what has happened another jobs, including lots

(14:01):
of union jobs. You got a guy standing there making
fifty bucks an hour, and what he used to do
busting his hump, he now pushes a button. He still
gets paid the same because union, but it's a better
life and a better job for him. Are you telling
me we don't want those possibilities? They're not going to
replace you guys with AI. Even AI can't be as

(14:23):
colorful as that guy. Dagg it. These guys were offered
a fifty percent pay raise. They're like, nah, no way.
The truckers aren't allowed to collect overtime. And as far
as this guy's saying, like if we do this, people,

(14:44):
people never gave a rip about us until now when
they finally realize what chains being broken. Cars won't come in,
food won't come in, clothing won't come in. It won't
go anywhere until truckers take it someplace. Those guys aren't striking,
those eyes, aren't getting paid overtime, even though they're working

(15:04):
a bunch of overtime. What's interesting? What's special about this?
What's going on here? As we surmise the other day,
it seems very convenient that we have labor unions going
on strike to get everyone all worried and then allow

(15:26):
for someone like I don't know, Kamala Harris to jump
in there and say I talked with the leaders both
the union and the management side, and we have found
an agreement. We are now going to move forward unburdened
by what has been And everyone says, wow, Kamala Harris
is so eloquent, and what good stuff. She's great, she's

(15:47):
my president. It seems so orchestrated to be able to
avert disaster just before people aren't able to get their bananas.
But it has been pointed out that there's one man
who can single handedly stop this today if he wants,

(16:07):
or if this drags out a little bit longer and
it ends up going for a month, and now we're
not able to get most of the bananas that are
brought into this country. Cell phone's brought into this country, computer,
automotive and mechanical parts brought into this country, not toilet paper.
Everyone heard the government and the media tell him yesterday,

(16:27):
you don't have to go and buy up all the
toilet paper. The toilet paper isn't brought in through these
ports most of it's made here at home. There's not
going to be a shortage of toilet paper. You can
trust us. We're the media and the government, and the
American people finally got together as one voice and looked
at the media, and the government said we don't trust you,

(16:48):
and they went out and did a run on toilet paper.
But it's all those other things that stand to potentially
be in very short supply. Some pharmaceuticals too. If this
drags on for three to four weeks or longer, that's
right before election time. Wouldn't it be interesting if we're

(17:09):
here on the doorstep of the nation's presidential election and
Kamala Harris is like, please, Joe, buddy, you've got to
stop this. This is very damaging. I'm not going to
get elected unless you, and you alone, as the President
of the United States, call into account here the Taft

(17:32):
Hartley Act, pausing the strike for eighty days under this
act so they can go back to the table, get
back to work. The American people feel better than make
it look like we're doing something. Come on, buddy, help
me out. Throw me a bone here. And President Biden says,
it looks like you need me now, weren't you the

(17:53):
people who forced me out, forced me out of running
for a second term, potentially being president of my country
for another four years. Seems like you didn't need me
this summer, but you need me now. Well, you know what,
I'm going to the beach.

Speaker 6 (18:10):
Scott Boyes News Radio eleven KFAB.

Speaker 1 (18:15):
Wouldn't that be interesting? Some emails First, on the long
shortman strike, Ryan says they need to get automated away.
Anyone who says we have a work shortage is wrong.
We all work to trade our goods and services. The
only way you get a work shortage is if you
have debt deficits, which is inflation paying for jobs that

(18:37):
shouldn't exist. Everyone working went in trade for others work
and not for printed dollars. Only increases productivity. That's from Ryan,
sent to Scott at kfab dot com. Jay just says
these guys don't want their jobs automated away. No automation
sounds like they're stuck in the past. Otherwise, if they

(18:58):
were truly here in the present, they wouldn't be longshoreman.
They'd be longshore people or person or purple penguins or
something like that. And let's see here, Yeah, Dave just
points out, not sure these guys are making a great
statement for not being replaced by machines. Yeah, that's from Dave,

(19:22):
said to Scott at kfab dot com. On a couple
of other topics here, Mike and Lincoln says, I was
stunned two days ago when my conservative wife, with the
exception of she is pro choice. So my conservative wife

(19:43):
said she's voting for Dan Osborne. She said, I'm tired
of Deb Fisher. She hasn't done anything. And I said
we was it because of abortion? She goes, no, it's
just because I like Dan Osborne. He's a regular dude.
That's from Mike and Lincoln said to Scott at kfab
dot com. We were talking about an hour ago, Jim

(20:03):
Rose and I were talking about whether we believe this
polling that says Dan Osborne is leading According to all
the polls, he's leading Deb Fisher in the Senate race.
Osbourne is the independent Senate candidate. And the thing that's
weird is that he's too far right on some issues
for liberals to vote for him, and he's too far

(20:25):
left on some issues for conservatives to vote for him.
So where is this support, especially in a red state,
where is it And if it's truly the Democrats going
we see an opportunity to get rid of deb Fisher.
Let's rally behind Dan Osborne. Then why isn't Preston Love
Junior and the Senate race against Pete Ricketts. Why isn't

(20:47):
he enjoying the same polling support. Preston Love Junior is
barely a blip on these these polls. But Dan Osborne,
according to a few different polling outlets, not all paid
for by the Osborne for Senate campaign, say oh yeah,
Dan Osborne, he's pulling ahead of dead Fisher. As far

(21:13):
as what's going on in the wake of Hurricane Helene
and the people who have had their homes devastated by this,
I'll tell you what too many people are afraid they're
going to be told by their insurance company. And the
assessment here of Chris in the inbox on how much

(21:33):
America should jump in and help them. That's all coming
up in two minutes. Scott Voice, Charles Emails says, Hi, Scott, Hi, Charles,
I agree with your tirade on the longshoreman strike. I
was affected by them having to be restricted in California
through the COVID lockdowns. At that time, I was selling

(21:54):
computer hardware manufactured in Southeast Asia. At one point there
were over sixty folly loaded cargo ships off the coast
of Huntington Beach and Port of Los Angeles waiting for
them to be unloaded. They worked through Gavin Newsom's lockdown
as essential personnel. Having that union boss flap his chops

(22:14):
about being unappreciated, especially after being offered a fifty percent
pay raise while many Americans are laid off and having
to start over, is insulting. And even though I know
this phrase is backwards, adding injury to insult is the
eastern Seaboard states affected by hurricane damage and the union

(22:35):
boss's tone deaf response. That's from Charles sent to Scott
at kfab dot com. The devastation caused by this hurricane
may be followed by even something more devastating, because for
those who heeded the warnings to get out of the

(22:57):
path of this hurricane, you pack up as much as
you can put into a car or take with you
on a plane or however it is. You get out
of there and you say, well, this is the priceless stuff,
the irreplaceable stuff. I think about what I would grab
in my house. You know what I would grab, Lucy,
what whatever my wife told me to.

Speaker 3 (23:19):
That's exactly right. You have learned, well, did you? I
saw a post from Scott Bayo his house seas in Florida.
His house was flooded. The main level of it. Yeah,
where he kept all of his memorabilia from nine years
old on.

Speaker 1 (23:40):
I wonder what he has. Who knows stole props from
Joni Loves Chachi and Charles in Charge?

Speaker 3 (23:48):
Maybe, But that's that all that's gone. I'm that's just
an aside. I know that means nothing nomperatively.

Speaker 1 (23:57):
It's actually the most gripping thing I've heard is that
Scott Bao may have lost something he's swiped from the
set of Happy Days.

Speaker 3 (24:08):
He had the original jacket, the you know, but it's
I've never been in that position.

Speaker 1 (24:17):
I don't even know that my brain would allow me
to fully process, like, Okay, we need to leave. You've
got a couple of minutes here to run around the
house and grab that which is most priceless.

Speaker 3 (24:29):
What's priceless?

Speaker 1 (24:30):
Well, photo albums. If it's you know, something that your
mother or grandmother passed along to you and you take.

Speaker 3 (24:37):
That, and whatever age you are.

Speaker 1 (24:39):
I'd be I'd grab my golf clubs, and my wife
would be saying, look, the kids need help carrying some
of their stuff. And you've got not only your golf clubs,
you've got a set of golf clubs you've had in
the basement you haven't even swung in over ten years.
I'm like, they're good clubs. You never know, you know.
So that's what I would do.

Speaker 3 (24:59):
Whatever age you are, none of that stuff is going
to mean anything to you in a hundred years, because
you'll be long gone. Who cares.

Speaker 1 (25:06):
I'm not going anywhere.

Speaker 3 (25:08):
I would grab medication in cash if I had any Yeah,
if I had cash, i'd grab it.

Speaker 1 (25:17):
If I had cash, i'd cash in the morning, I'd
cash in the evening. All over this land. So now
we've got the people who were able to get out
of there and think, in wonder, you know, what's going
to be left in my house when we get back,
As they've learned by now, in many instances, nothing, nothing left.
So then they reach out to their insurance company. They

(25:38):
called Jake from State Farm or some Lizard or Flow
or whoever it is, and they say, all right, well,
I guess we got to rebuild. And that's when they say, well,
it wasn't wind that damaged your house, and it wasn't
trees that fell on it, that it wasn't a tornado
that damaged your house. It wasn't a lightning strike that

(26:01):
damaged your house. It turns out it was floodwaters. And
you're like, yeah, well, I'll see that would be covered
by flood insurance. And you don't have flood insurance. Like
no one ever told me I needed flood insurance. Oh
you don't. You're not in a floodplain. So if I
was in a floodplaine, would I get flood insurance. No,
the flood insurance is taken over by the federal government,

(26:22):
and if you're in a floodplaine, then they won't actually
sell you health or flood insurance. All right, So I'm
not in a flood plane. How much if I had
bought flood insurance, Oh, it's it's cost prohibitive and unnecessary
because you're not in a floodplain. Well, my house just
got flooded yep, And too bad you don't have flood insurance.

(26:46):
The number of American homeowners across all of America who
have flood insurance is at four percent, and in North Carolina,
the assessment here is that about less than one percent
of the residences Prince and some of these people will

(27:07):
be told by their insurance company, sorry, storm surge and
flooding aren't covered by your homeowner's insurance policy. So then
what what would you do? It's is it all gone?

(27:29):
Is it all lost? Maybe? What will probably end up
being the case for these people is that the federal
government will step in. Local charities will step in and
help where they can, local government and federal government will
step in and say, look, we were able to get
some money, billions of dollars of disaster aid available to homeowners.

(27:53):
But a couple of things about that. There will be
an interest paid on it. It'll be pretty low, but
you know, we're not giving you free money. This is
a very low interest bearing loan, which is better than
nothing to be able to rebuy something you already bought
paid for. In many instances, it's now completely gone, worthless
money gone. So you've got this, which is better than

(28:16):
your other options was just to sit there and cry
about it. But even that money, if Hudd jumps in
there and says, here's some money that usually isn't distributed
for two to three years because federal government.

Speaker 3 (28:31):
So then what, well, we could just skip a payment
to Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (28:36):
Oh yeah, thank you for reminding me about this. Email
Chris Right. Chris emails Scott at kfab dot com and
he says, we send eight billion dollars to Ukraine, but
we can't afford to help the people in North Carolina
and Georgia. We need Trump and Elon Musk to go

(28:58):
in there and cut find the way and cut the waste.

Speaker 3 (29:02):
I also, and I have no validation of this other
than Twitter, but I can see where this would be
the case. That are stockpiles of equipment to for electricity,
to rebuild the electric grilled and get grid yeah grid, sorry,
get people back online? Yeah, for electricity. It's all been

(29:23):
sent to Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (29:25):
Yeah. Well, I imagine we didn't think we'd need it
in the wake of a hurricane in hurricane season.

Speaker 3 (29:30):
I wonder if they'd send it back. You think that
would happen. Well, they couldn't get it through the ports.

Speaker 1 (29:35):
That's right. They just send it back, but it won't
get through the port of Newark, that's right. So for
some people, the stuff we're describing about rebuilding and moving on.
That's way down the road. For today, it's we need
water in Ashville, North Carolina, hundreds of miles from where

(29:55):
this hurricane made landfill a landfall, but still the area
that saw some of the heaviest rainfall and flooding. There,
people don't have fresh drinking water, and so people are
trying to like build fresh water wells. They're drilling wells.
A hospital there has confirmed a well was drilled, but

(30:17):
the toilets aren't working. Doctors are just trying to be
able to wash their hands. I mean, we've seen flooding
devastation here in this area, but you can usually go
a couple of miles away and be able to find
resources you need. The resources they need to do these
things are dozens and dozens of miles away. If you're

(30:37):
at a hospital, this is the reality for you right now.
They're trying to find clean water. You know, this is
where your donations to the Red Cross, the Salvation Army,
this is where they go in there. They're bringing in
bottle water. They're trying to help with these resources, and
God bless those people for going out there and doing it.
If the name Caroline Levitt is somewhat familiar to you,

(31:01):
then probably this incident is this is the spokesperson, the
national press secretary for the Trump campaign talking with CNN's
Casey Hunt. Uh, just a few months ago around that
first CNN debate between Trump and Biden.

Speaker 5 (31:17):
At the time, Well, first of all, it's it takes
someone five minutes to google Jake Tapper Donald Trump to
see that Jake Tapper has consider present colleadene'l Hilter, ma'am,
I'm going to stop.

Speaker 7 (31:30):
If you'm stadium to attack my colleagues, I would like
to talk about you and Donald Trump, who you work for.

Speaker 5 (31:36):
I am stating facts that your colleagues have stated in
the past. Now I'm sorry, we're going to convictation.

Speaker 7 (31:41):
Caroline, thank you.

Speaker 1 (31:42):
Very much for your time, and then she ended the interview.
We welcome on to eleven ten kfab the very controversial
Caroline Levitt to welcome to eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 7 (31:53):
Hey, thank you so much, Scott. If getting kicked up
with CNN makes me controversial, consider me hard.

Speaker 1 (31:59):
It's good to be Yeah, it's good to have you here.
And I'll say right from the start of the conversation,
if you want to attack my colleagues, please feel free.
They deserve it.

Speaker 7 (32:10):
I won't do that to you. I hear the people
in Nebraska are much nicer than the people on CNN.

Speaker 1 (32:14):
We're not bad. I know that. Your boss, though, is
a little upset with Nebraska's second district potentially doing a
blue dot against the red background here with one Electoral
College vote to Kamala Harris. Maybe maybe here is this
something that the President's walking around the office turning over
trash cans and desks all mad at Omaha about No, No.

Speaker 7 (32:37):
That's not the case at all. We still maintain the
utmost confidence that we're going to win Nebraska. Is unfortunate
decision that was made by your legislature, but the show
must go on, and we're still fighting hard. President Trump
is fighting hard to not only win Nebraska, but to
win the rest of the battleground states in this country.
He's campaigning every single day on the road. He'll be

(32:58):
in Michigan giving a speech in the economy today, He'll
be in North Carolina hosting a town hall tomorrow. He'll
be in Wisconsin again over the weekend. This man is full,
full steam ahead, a pedal to the medal. Laser focus
on winning this election.

Speaker 1 (33:13):
And I know that you guys have to be very
happy with the debate performance the other night by running
made JD.

Speaker 7 (33:19):
Vance absolutely. Senator Vance was phenomenal in that debate. He
unequivocally won the night. He effectively prosecuted Kamala Harris's failed
policies and record. He outlined perfectly he and President Trump's winning,
positive vision to make this country safe and strong and
wealthy again. And he really made Governor Walls push them

(33:44):
into a tough corner and just proves that Governor Walls
is not ready for prime time. Just like Kamala Harris,
they are ill equipped to lead this country out of
the predicaments that we find ourselves in. Look, we have
a doc workers strike where American workers are fed up.
It's going to lead to a massive disruption of supply chain.
The world is on fire, Ron launching largest missile attack

(34:06):
in Israel history. We have Hurricane Helene hitting states where
there's millions of Americans still out of power. Kamala Harris
and Joe Biden are offering those victims seven hundred and
fifty dollars as if that's going to help, when they're
giving billions of dollars to Ukraine. So this administration has
been a failure. Governor Walves is in a tough spot
trying to defend it in Senator Vance absolutely one.

Speaker 1 (34:27):
If there was one moment in Senator Vance's admittedly very
strong performance the other night that had some Trump supporters
cocking their heads a little bit to the side, it
was when he said that Republicans maybe have lost the
trust of women, especially on the issue of abortion. And
now on top of that, we have quotes here from
The Guardian about the upcoming memoir from former First Lady

(34:49):
Milania Trump, where she allegedly says, why would anyone other
than the woman herself have the power to determine what
she does with her own body where she's talking to
about the right to choose here? And that caused Trump
voters to cock their heads maybe a little bit more
to the side. There is this scene as an issue

(35:11):
not just within the campaign but for the campaign in
this election which a lot of people are choosing to
vote based on pro life or pro choice.

Speaker 7 (35:21):
Is what an issue missus Trump's comments or just the
issue of abortion, is just all of it? Well, look,
I don't think so. I think that the Democrats want
to make it an issue. I don't think it is.
I think and I know based on the data and frankly,
based on the conversations that we have with voters every
single day out on the campaign trail when we're traveling
the country with President Trump. They are concerned about the

(35:43):
cost of living, the record high inflation that has been
wrought upon them by Kamalai Harris's terrible economic policies. They're
concerned if they can pay their mortgage payment that has
increased fifty percent and Kamala Harris took off it, if
they can't afford groceries that week, or gas to fill
up their gas tank or heat their home. Those are
the real concerns of Americans. And that's why President Trump

(36:04):
is leading on the issues that matter most of voters.
The economy, inflation, immigration. He's leading on all of those
because he was a successful first term president on those fronts.
He is a record to stand on. People know he
can be trusted to deliver a booming economy and put
more money back in people's pockets, and he has a
very ambitious economic plan for his second term to do

(36:25):
just that.

Speaker 1 (36:26):
I have seen as we talk here with Caroline Levittz,
a national press secretary for the Trump campaign. I've seen
conservative women, especially conservative young women like yourself, get absolutely
lit up online, like I can't believe you're turning your
back on women by siding with President Trump, who they
usually don't refer to him in those terms. Have you

(36:47):
lost friends? Have you had issues with family members because
of you apparently turning your back on women here by
siding with the Trump campaign.

Speaker 7 (36:56):
You know, there's always going to be the haters. The
haters are motivators. But you know, thankfully I have a
very good support system in my personal life of family
and friends who are supportive of what I do, even
if they don't agree with me. But I do think again,
women are more concerned right now, not so much with
the issue of abortion, but more concerned with the quality

(37:18):
of life in this country and our safety and security.
You can't be pro woman in vote Democrats. The Democrat
Party has allowed an invasion of our southern border that
has allowed millions and millions of illegal people, many of
them proving to be murderers and racists. Countless women have
lost their lives at the hands of these illegal immigrants,

(37:38):
and President Trump has gone to know the families of
these women who will never be the same. Rachel Morin
and Maryland, a mother of five who is brutally raped
and killed while she was running in her neighborhood, saying
thing with Blake and Riley down in Georgia, running on
her college campus, never to be seen or heard from
again because an illegal monster took her life. That is
every woman's worst nightmare as a woman, myself, as a mother,

(38:02):
I can tell you there's nothing worse than imagining that happening.
And so President Trump is promising to end that, to
secure our border, to deport these heinous monsters who don't
respect our nation or our nation's laws. Let us Kamala
Harris want to do. She wants to give mass amnesty
to all of the illegal immigrants she is allowed in

(38:22):
this country. She has not said she wants to deport anyone.
She's in fact, been against deportations her entire career. So
women want safety in security. We want to be able
to feel like we could walk through a major city
in this country and enjoy ourselves without getting mugged or
raped or even killed. And President Trump is clearly the

(38:44):
law and order president in this race.

Speaker 1 (38:46):
I want to ask you before we cut you Lucier
this morning, Carolyn. The response here from President Biden. He
was asked, would you support an attack on Iran's nuclear
sites by Israel? And he said the answer is no.
What do you think of not just the question but
the answer there.

Speaker 7 (39:05):
Well, Joe Biden is the reason that Iran is attacking
Israel today. He and Kamala Harris lifted President Trump's very
effective and tough sanctions on the Iranian regime. They allowed
Iran to profit more than eighty billion dollars in oil sales.
They transferred six billion dollars to the Iranians just weeks

(39:27):
before the October seventh attack on Israel, which we're coming
up on the one year anniversary of Believe It or Not.
And then after the October seventh accounts attack, they still
unfroze funds going from Iraq to Iran. So they have
emboldened the Iranians at every turn through their appeasment policies,
just like we saw during the Obama Biden administration. It's

(39:48):
more of the same and it proved just more than ever.
We need President Trump to be our commander in chief again.
We need him back in the Oval Office. The Iranians
don't want him in. That's they are attempting to take
him out. There is an ongoing plot to kill President
Trump by the Iranian regime. They have hacked our campaign.

(40:09):
They have tried to solicit the emails of our campaign
staff and give them to the Kamala and Biden campaign.
They aren't doing us to come with campaigns, They're doing
it to ours because they know President Trump served as
the greatest threat to their terrorist regime in this world.

Speaker 1 (40:25):
Yeah. I thought the question was interesting because as the
Obama and Biden administrations gave around a bunch of money
and said don't make nuclear weapons, he seemed to the
question was you do support Israel bombing these nuclear sites?
And he said no. What the answer should be Iran
doesn't have nuclear weapons because they're not supposed to. But

(40:46):
that wasn't. That wasn't what we heard there, and it
makes probably Israel real nervous in the fact that they
wouldn't be able to defend themselves from a potential nuclear
attack should make everyone very nervous. Carolin, I could talk
to you all day. I don't have that luxury. I
appreciate the time here this morning to hope to talk again.

Speaker 7 (41:03):
Hey, Well, thank you so much, and I want to
just reemphasize to Nebraska. We are going to win Nebraska
and we need you to get out and vote. I
believe early voting is underway in Nebraska, so we're encouraging
you to vote early, get your ballot in for President Trump.
We want to make this election too big to rig,
so bring your friends, bring your family with you thirty

(41:24):
three days. This is the most important election in history
and we need to win. So thank you so much
for having me and I'll definitely join you again.

Speaker 1 (41:30):
Absolutely. Thanks for being with us this morning. Caroline Levitt,
who is the national Press Secretary for the Trump campaign,
here on news radio eleven kfab. Up. Next, I have
to support something that California Governor Gavin Newsom just did
this week. I'll tell you what next.

Speaker 6 (41:49):
Scott Byes, news Radio eleven ten KFAB.

Speaker 1 (41:52):
I should probably clarify. I've gotten a couple of emails
from people based on something I said that I didn't
specify enough. There. It came out that if you live
in a floodplaine, that the government won't sell you flood insurance.
That's I think that's what I said. That's not what
I meant, I'm a knucklehead sometimes. See when I was

(42:13):
in Tanamin Square. There are a lot of people who
are in a floodplaine that tried to get flood insurance
and they were refused. Those would be those some cases.
They're five hundred some cases. There a thousand year floodplaines
not all that area which is designated as a floodplaine.

(42:34):
Not only can you get flood insurance, but it is required.
But the people who've been hit by flooding who were
then told, well, you don't have flood insurance, like, well,
we tried to get flood insurance. We were told we
couldn't get it because we weren't in a floodplaine. And
then when we really tried to push for it, it was
cost prohibitive. Well now our houses are underwater and this

(42:55):
thousand year floodplaine, Like, yeah, well you should have had
flood insurance. So we try. They wouldn't give it to us.
That's because you're not in a floodplain. Well, unless something
terrible happened, like the second terrible thing happened in the
last eighteen years in this plane. So a lot of
people if you're in a designated floodplain. You can't even
build in those areas, so a lot of people are

(43:17):
grandfathered in. People live on the river, for example, or
near some lakes. But yeah, it's it is a mess here.
We were talking about it earlier because so many people
in the Carolinas they don't have flood insurance. Less than
one percent of the area hit hardest by the floodwaters.
In North Carolina, the homeowners would have flood insurance. In

(43:40):
South Carolina it'sero point three percent. It's like one guy
named Dave that has flood insurance. So they'll be given
probably some low interest bearing loans from the federal government.
And that's just going to have to do it. I guess.
I wonder if the insurance companies will step up and

(44:04):
say we're going to cover that. I don't know. They
wouldn't have to, they could.

Speaker 3 (44:11):
I don't have to see that happening.

Speaker 1 (44:14):
And actually there are probably a lot of people going
I hope they don't because that would make my premiums
go up. Neighbor helping neighbor, I got news for you.
Your premiums are going up anyway. Now, I got to
take a moment here, got to g o t t U.
Is that how you spell that e? Is there an
e at the end? G O T t u E?

Speaker 3 (44:36):
Okay, that makes it French. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (44:40):
The teacher who taught me English didn't teach me how
to spell all of these words. I got to compliment
something that the governor of California just did this in
the past few days.

Speaker 3 (44:52):
Huh.

Speaker 1 (44:53):
I have been calling for this for years and they've
done it in the People's Republic of California. Governor Gavin Newsom,
he's a Democrat. He just signed Assembly Bill six sixty
into law. It is a means of standardizing the labeling

(45:13):
on food packages. And it's not like can you say
this is made in the USA or USDA approved, or
this is this or that or whatever. It's it's nothing
to do with any of that. It's to clear up
the confusion over all the different labels on a lot

(45:36):
of perishable food items sell buy, freshest before used by.
I have for years say, okay, so if the sell
by date is yesterday, that can I eat it today?

(45:58):
They're supposed to sell it? How long long after that?
Can I eat this food? I want a date on
the package that tells me what day and what hour
that food goes bad to the point where I die
instantaneously upon eating it, or at least start incubating something
that science has never seen before. I want to know

(46:22):
at what time I can stop eating this food and
sell by freshest before use by dates. I don't need
these guidelines. I want to know at what point. Like
same thing with my with the gauge in my car
that tells me whether I'm about to run out of

(46:43):
gas because in my car, which I like my car,
but we do we do have a little disagreement because
the light will come on and it'll say, all right,
you're you should probably get some gas soon, and it'll
say you have sixty six miles left before you run
on like that's forever. And then I'll drive two miles

(47:08):
and then it'll say you've got fifty eight miles. Wait
that the math doesn't work, and then it'll just say low.
It doesn't even give you a number, and like, what
just a couple miles ago, I had fifty eight miles.
Now it's like, am I going to run out of
gas any minute?

Speaker 7 (47:24):
Now?

Speaker 1 (47:25):
Do you not know how many miles I have? Low?
How many miles is low?

Speaker 3 (47:31):
Does it then flash a picture of a stick figure
with a gas can walking.

Speaker 1 (47:38):
I've been that guy. Have you ever run out of gas?

Speaker 3 (47:40):
I don't think so. Really, I don't think. I mean
on the road, and I don't think so.

Speaker 1 (47:44):
Twice happened to me twice.

Speaker 3 (47:46):
I guess i'd remember, huh.

Speaker 1 (47:48):
One time I was a teenager and I had to
get to work, and you get in your car like,
oh shoot, I should have gased up earlier. I can
probably make it three blocks away, made it one block
it even start, left my car there and walked the
rest of the way. But I think I probably had
to pop the clutch on that thing. Ask your parents,

(48:10):
pop the clutch? How old is this guy? And then
the other time was the infamous night when I let
the We had when I worked at the new rock
alternative one oh one nine the Edge, we had a
Hummer as our station vehicle. It was awesome. Also, we
ruined that thing by filling the whole back of it

(48:32):
full of these giant speakers so we could just pump
machine head by bush across anytime we were out at
some haunted house or strip club or whatever. As we
were broadcasting from fun nights working on the Edge, you
could do anything from anywhere. It was a great time.
So I had to drive this thing to Lincoln because
the Huskers were playing, and we were doing a thing

(48:53):
at Sandy's in Lincoln for the Husker game, and I
knew we were running low and driving back from Lincoln
passing gas station after gas station. Now, is that because
I'm an idiot kinda? But also because there was one place,
in one place only that we had a gas card,
and we were supposed to fill up this hummer with

(49:16):
gas using the gas card that was only good at
Cubbies Downtown. I was a long way from Cubbies Downtown,
but I thought, I I can probably make it and
out somewhere between Ashland and Gretna. I didn't make it.
That's a long way to walk. And there was something

(49:37):
else magical special about that night started to snow a
little bit because over the course of the next twelve
hours we would be treated to a major blizzard. This
was in nineteen ninety seven. Seven, yeah, October nineteen ninety seven,
So it was that night and if someone finally gave

(49:58):
me a ride and.

Speaker 3 (50:03):
Everybody else was driving past her laughing.

Speaker 1 (50:07):
Here's here's the here's the long version of this story
that's already too long. I walked back. I found a
gas actually, I think someone gave me a ride, and
I bought a gas can and put I was like,
I just need a little bit of gas to get
me where I'm going. So I only put in like
a gallon or so, so you so you know how

(50:29):
the rest of the story goes. I only got a
little bit, thinking good, Nope, wouldn't even start up. And
that was after the guy dropped me back off. And
at this point, I mean, it was warm that day,
it was a nice day, so I'm not dressed for
the now snowing cold weather. And I'm on the interstate

(50:49):
and the guy drops me off, like, hey, good luck,
love listening to your radio station, Like thanks brother, and
I put a little bit of gas in there. Hummer
won't start. I had to walk back to the gas
station and put more gas in it, this time enough
to get it to start. So at this point, now
I've got gas in the hummer. And here's where the

(51:11):
story actually got good. I thought, well, now it's super
late at night, it's snowing a lot. I'm not going
to take this thing back down to the garage downtown Omaha.
I'm just gonna At that point, I was twenty years old,
twenty one? How old was I? I was almost twenty
one years old. I was living at my parents' place

(51:34):
in West Omaha. So I'm just going to drive this
thing home, park it in the driveway, which means the
next morning, when there was a blizzard and no one
could get out and drive anywhere, I had a hummer.

Speaker 3 (51:45):
Except you had no gas.

Speaker 1 (51:46):
I had gas enough to go plowing through snow drifts
and drive however whenever and wherever I wanted to go.
That was a fun morning, A lot more fun than
the problem the night before I was. I thought I'd
be in trouble by letting the vehicle run out, but
I thought, well, at least no one knew about it
until people started calling my coworkers, going, hey, is everyone there? Okay,

(52:09):
I was driving by the interstate and saw your station
vehicle parked out there by itself, along I eighty forties.

Speaker 3 (52:19):
That's a great story.

Speaker 1 (52:21):
I hope, so, because I just wasted everyone's time with.

Speaker 6 (52:24):
It, Scott forties.

Speaker 7 (52:25):
Where you're knowing.

Speaker 1 (52:26):
Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmader is wrong, I think he
knows he's wrong, and I don't think he can say
all of this stuff, but looks over shoulder, looks over
other shoulder, I can say this stuff. The issue is
the number of shootings by police officers in Omaha. Last

(52:51):
year seven officer involved shootings that was ended up being
the most since twenty and sixteen. Four of them involved
the individual's being killed. That's the most since twenty ten.
We are here on October third, twenty twenty four. There
have been five this year. And in each instance you've

(53:16):
got some people saying, well, I guess they'll do an investigation,
there'll be into just a display of evidence. Let's maybe
wait and find out what happened before we just assume
what happened. And then you've got other people who already
know what happened. Cops indiscriminately killing unarmed black men who
had done nothing wrong, never did anything wrong in their

(53:38):
entire lives, and just walking along, humming a song, skipping
a little bit, and the cops are like, there's one,
get him. So Todd Schmater, Omaha police chief, was talking
about there was whether there were too many officer involved shootings.

(54:00):
How do you answer that question, Yes, one officer involved
shooting is too many, But to suggest that officers shouldn't
be able to defend themselves and the general public by
shooting at someone who has a gun pulled on them
is going to get police officers killed. So Tod Schmater

(54:21):
can't say that either. The chief can't say. By the way,
there's absolutely no point in saying, you know, here's all
these police shootings, are any of them justified? Looking at
them as a collection is asinine. Look at every single
individual situation like this deal. Just the other night, a

(54:45):
couple of Omaha police officers conducted a traffic stop on
a guy driving who's twenty two years old. His name
was Stephen Phipps. This happened five point forty five Saturday
afternoon near thirty first in Taylor Streets in Northeast Omaha.
The reason for the traffic stop was for expired plates.

(55:07):
How this should have gone? And we pulled you over
because we noticed that your plates are expired. Oh you
know what, you're right. I meant to get that taken
care of. Thank you. Well, we're gonna either issue you
a warning to get it done, or you're gonna get
a ticket. Okay, and all right, you have a good day, sir.

(55:28):
Get those plates taken care of. I will thank you.
That's how it should have gone. Instead. Driver of the
car says, you know what I ought to do. I
got to get out of the car. Sir, get back
in the vehicle. I don't need to listen to you,
sounding much like Tyreek Hill, the former chief now Miami

(55:49):
Dolphin Wide Receiver, when he got pulled over for speeding
Miami the other day. Don't tell me what to do.
Stop knocking, stop tapping on my window. Getting all mad
at the cops. This guy has told several times, sir,
please stay in your vehicle. And now you could see
the outline of a handgun in the front pocket of

(56:11):
his hoodie. This is what we saw in photographs provided
by Omaha Police per the officers' video cameras, their body
worn camera. So now he's ignoring verbal commands. They think
he has a gun. Now he runs, officers take off

(56:33):
after him. Officers are telling him to stop. He jumps
over a chain link fence. So now he's over a fence.
The officers are on the other side of this chain
link fence where they can see him remove the handgun
from his sweatshirt. That's when they open fire. And stop

(56:56):
the threat. So to say, well, there have been five
officer involved shootings so far in twenty twenty four. Is
that too many? I don't know. Let's look at this one.
You got a guy pulling a gun on you, whether
or not you're an Omaha police officer, If you have
the means to defend yourself, would you do it? Do

(57:20):
you want to go home to your family that night?
You know the family of this guy who was shot
are now coming out and saying, first of all, we
don't know why they had to shoot him eight times,
popular refrain, why couldn't they just shoot the gun out
of his hands. That happens on TV all the time,
don't you guys watch TV? Just shoot the gun out
of his hands, fire a warning shot. That's another thing

(57:44):
cops don't do in both of these instances, if you're
not trying to stop a threat by firing it, what
officers call center mass. That is all contributing to police
officers getting shot and killed. And the family says, well,
they did need to shoot him. They said, at no
time was he a threat. No, you're pulling a gun

(58:07):
when he now has the drop on officers, when he's
on one side, of the fence and they're on the
other one. No, not a threat. He was scared. You
don't think the officers were scared. They don't want to
be a part of this. You know what they want.
They want you to stop, take your ticket or get

(58:28):
arrested if you have to run from them. And you've
got a firearm. And that's the other thing. Oh, he's
got an illegal gun. He was a legal gun. This
particular guy was carrying a legal gun. So Chief Todd
Schmater says, well, he thinks one of the big reasons
why you have so many officers involved shootings in Omaha's
because the number of guns on the streets. In twenty
twenty three, the last full year obviously when these numbers

(58:50):
were available, Omaha police seized one thousand, four hundred and
sixty eight guns. He says that a lot. It's fifty
two percent more than in twenty thirteen. Yes, it's a
lot of guns. But the issue for me isn't the

(59:11):
number of guns. Like I said, this guy the other day,
he had a gun. He was allowed to have it.
He wasn't allowed to act in any of the ways
that he did. The issue is the number of people
in bolden to think they don't need to follow commands
by police officers. So every time, and I always give
the family members a pass. They had a cousin who

(59:34):
was killed, so they come out and say, my cousin
didn't deserve to die. Cop shouldn't have done that. They
their family, they lost a family member. They can say
anything they want, but like I always say, there's a
reason we don't let them decide what happens now to
the cop, because they're also saying that the family wants
the officer fired and charges filed. Quote, y'all can't keep

(59:56):
running around doing this to our young boys. Y'all have
everybody he scared unquote. Some community members, including pastors in
Northeast Omaha, have been speaking out about this. The more
you guys take the opportunity to say you cops are

(01:00:17):
terrorizing our community and you have people scared, the more
it emboldens people to do just what we've seen. In
nearly every single one of these instances, an officer is
telling you stop what you're doing, put down the gun,
show me your hands, all whatever, all these all you

(01:00:39):
gotta do is do what the cop tells you. They're
not gonna shoot you if you do what they tell you.
So why do we have officers involved shootings? Because people
are doing stupid stuff and getting themselves shot. And then
you have these alleged community leaders come out afterwards and
they support the person who is sh who was acting

(01:01:01):
like an idiot, including this person here a couple of
weeks ago, who was a dangerous gang member and drug
pusher in our community, and they're supporting him. Oh, he
didn't have a gun, he didn't need to get shot
when there's guns all over the house. And this guy's
a known gang member, criminal, multiple felon, and you're gonna

(01:01:24):
support him and not the cops. That's why so many
people get shot. Now, Officer or Chief Todd Schmater, he's
not gonna say all that, but I did.

Speaker 6 (01:01:33):
Scott Fordes NewsRadio eleven ten, Ky Fad.

Speaker 1 (01:01:39):
You don't need to go buy toilet paper today, nor
do you need to rake up and he leaves in
your yard and store them just in case you need
to use them as toilet paper, as someone pointed out
to me via the Zonker's custom woods inbox several years
several hours ago. Been on the radio a long time.
Today with my friend Lucy, we mentioned earlier, you might

(01:02:02):
have to use leaves if you can't get the TP.
Someone emailed and said, I don't know why you have
to use leaves when your neighbor's cat is right there.

Speaker 3 (01:02:13):
You're allergic, though, aren't you.

Speaker 1 (01:02:15):
Yeah, that's the reason why I wouldn't do that. Hold still,
I thought my cat was white. You don't have to
go get toilet paper or go to extreme measures. Toilet
paper is made in America. Ninety percent of that which
we consume as toilet paper is made in America. Well,

(01:02:36):
the last time there was the last time was a pandemic.
They shut down the manufacturing as well as the distribution
of toilet paper is all shut down. This is not
that bananas, though, yes it is bananas. No, I mean
we might not be able to get bananas pretty soon.
So much for leg cramps and potassium

Speaker 6 (01:03:00):
At Voise Mornings nine to eleven, Our News Radio eleven
ten KFAB