Fightin' Women, Poopy Housing and more

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Scott VORGIEZ, I don't expect we're going to listen in
on this for longer than the next couple of minutes,
but I at least wanted to get this give and
take out there, since we spent so much time in
the last hour listening in on the confirmation hearing for
Trump's Secretary of Defense nominee Pete Hagsath, who is either

(00:20):
an alcoholic philanderer who's guilty of assault, or he's a
decorated Army veteran working to restore a warrior ethos to
the Pentagon that it has been missing for years. And
part of that was evident in the give and take
between Pete Hegseth and a couple of different senators. Jeans Shaheen,

(00:41):
Democrat from New Hampshire, was grilling him on his opinions.
He stated that women should not be in combat roles.
She didn't really give him a chance to respond. So
up next, after Shaheen got her shots in, there's Lucy
with her my crophone still on. It's okay, better that

(01:02):
than a stream of curse words. So after Shaheen, if
you're going to do that, do it on the air.
We all want to hear that after Shaheen got her
shots in. Then it went to Senator Tom Cotton, Republican
from Arkansas, who said, all right, let's pick this up,
let's keep this conversation going here about women in combat roles,

(01:22):
and talked about that with Pete Hegseth, and I really
appreciated his answer in this quick give and take.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
You served, I assume you served with women who were
on the front lines as well as that concer. And
were those women anything other than skilled, brave, and honorable
in their service?

Speaker 3 (01:40):
They were some of the best soldiers I worked with.

Speaker 2 (01:43):
So women have been serving in combat for a long time.
Women have been serving in combat units like infantry battalions
for a long time, in roles like medics or mechanics,
who what have you. So what we're talking about here, specifically,
is women in ground combat roles, in jobs like infantrymen
or artillery men or special forces. Until about ten years ago,

(02:03):
that wasn't the case. Under Secretary Panetta, those roles were
opened up to women to serve in. As President Trump
indicated all that he plans to rescind or alter that guidance.

Speaker 3 (02:17):
You're correct to point out, Senator, that these are the
decisions that the commander in chief will have the prerogative
to make. He has not indicated me to me that
he has plans to change whether or not women would
have access to these roles. However, I would point out
ensuring that standards are equal and high is of importance
to him and great importance to me, because in those

(02:39):
ground combat roles, what is true is that the weight
of the ruck on your back doesn't change, the weight
of the one to five to five round that you
have to carry doesn't change, the weight of the two
forty provo machine gun you might have to carry doesn't change.
And so whether it's a man or a woman, they
have to meet the same high standards and Senator in
any place where those things have been eroded or in

(03:01):
courses criteria have been changed in order to meet quotas,
racial quotas, or gender quotas. That is putting a focus
on something other than readiness, standards, meritocracy, and lethality. So
that's the kind of review I'm talking about, not whether
women have access to ground combat.

Speaker 1 (03:22):
Okay, Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth. There, what we've heard
thus far this morning is democrats trying to paint him
as someone who is not qualified for this role, not
ready for this role, who is bringing politics to this role.
And we've heard a lot of Pete Hegseth in his
own words here throughout the morning. You're going to hear

(03:45):
more if you listen to Fox News updates here on
eleven to ten kfab throughout the day. This confirmation hearing
will go on for the next several hours. We're not
going to be listening in on all of it. Klay
Travis and Buck Sexton will have more but to say
that this election, in this past November, is about this

(04:06):
very different feeling that so many Americans have about what
they see happening in this country on all different fronts,
whether it's wildfire readiness, whether it's what's going on in
our education front, in our schools, what's going on in
our military, what's going on at a Colorado apartment complex

(04:26):
where armed members of a Venezuelan gang were caught on
video setting up an American camp for their Venezuelan gang
in a Denver suburb that was Aurora, Colorado, and Trump
called it out and people are like, oh my gosh,

(04:48):
you know that's absolutely crazy. You know to say that
you're pointing out what some people saw on some video
and tried to say, this is what's going on around
the country. Absolutely terrible. Well, the American people know what's
been happening here with illegal immigration and some of the

(05:09):
really really bad dudes who've been coming up through our
southern border completely allowed into this country, and what's been happening.
It's worth noting here. I bring that up because this
morning we learn that that apartment complex in Aurora, Colorado,
where we saw Venezuelan gang members hanging out, going door
to door, basically intimidating people in there, the city of

(05:30):
Aurora has pursued a lawsuit to declare all but one
building at that complex a criminal nuisance. Officials have asked
a judge to close that property in the meantime, and
they say the situation reached a breaking point following the
violent kidnapping an assault of two residents last month, several

(05:56):
months after Trump brought it up on the campaign trail
and in the debate. I forget if it was against
Biden or Harris, in which debate Trump brought this up,
but he pointed out, this is what's going on in
this country, and he announced he'd launch Operation Aurora to
focus on deporting members of recognize gangs and terrorists organizations.

(06:19):
So set up camp in this country. Aurora, Colorado, a
very liberal bastion there, Denver suburb just said yeah, for
the sake of our residence, there's been too much violent
kidnapping and assault of the residence here. Maybe we should
shut this place down. What took them so long? Now

(06:40):
that's in Denver area. What are the accusations against a
housing community here in downtown Omaha. I will tell you.

Speaker 4 (06:49):
Next scots where you're going News Radio eleven ten kfab
The community of Aurora, Colorado is shutting down that housing
there where a venice.

Speaker 1 (07:00):
The Swalen gang decided to make it their Denver area
front to their gang operations, which I imagine are probably
more than selling cookies or popcorn or whatever it is
that they do. So that's happening there in Denver. Across America,
Starbucks has just decided that if you don't buy anything

(07:21):
at Starbucks, you can't just hang out in there all day.
You can't live at Starbucks. All of the homelessness that
has been taking up camp in various Starbucks locations is
now a reversal of this policy that they set up
in twenty eighteen, saying, look, we're going to allow people

(07:42):
to be here. If they want to use the bathroom,
if they want to hang out here, you can come
in here and find someplace warm. Well, people like me said,
this is going to cause people to be living and
showering in at Starbucks bathrooms. This is not going to
be good for your customers. This is not going to

(08:02):
be good for a lot of these stores, especially in
the big cities. And Starbucks said, oh my gosh, come on, people,
what are you talking about. Well, they just decided to
change that policy. Apparently there were too many people living
at Starbucks. There was violence, harassment, threatening language, people inside
drinking alcohol. They don't serve that at Starbucks. They've been
smoking there. What do you mean I can't smoke pot

(08:24):
right here at Starbus. This is Starbucks asking customers for
money right there in the store. That's starbucks job to
ask customers for money. You can't be panhandling in the store.
All of this which has caused people to say, you
know what, maybe I'll go to Scooters or whatever. Starbucks
has been losing out on customers since this, so Finally

(08:47):
they said, you know, out of concern for our customers
and our employees, we decided to say you can't just
hang out at Starbucks. You've got to be a paying
customer to spend some time in our stores. What a concept, right,
that's a decision just made yesterday by Starbucks here in Omaha.

(09:14):
It's noted here in the story from k ETV News
Watch seven. It says city View apartments boast of breath
taking views. Now they're talking about the downtown skyline. They're
at twenty second and Saint Mary's Avenue. These are the
high rise apartments there kind of in the vicinity, right
across the street from the children's museum. Lucy, I noticed

(09:37):
you don't spend a lot of time at the children's museum.

Speaker 5 (09:41):
What if there weren't so many kids.

Speaker 4 (09:42):
Now here's the part of the show where Lucy says
she's glad she doesn't have kids.

Speaker 1 (09:47):
But you're familiar with the city View apartments there the
high rise towers. They're at Omaha Housing Authority Complex there
at twenty second in Saint Mary's. The website says we
have breath taking views. The residents say, yeah, we have
to hold our breath because of all the feces in
the hallways. It doesn't say who or what is responsible,

(10:10):
but residents spoken to by k ETV Newswatch seven mentioned
several security concerns, broken doors, trash, and the aforementioned organic
material in the hallways. Elevator is frequently broken down, you know,
because you're living on the twelfth floor and you can't

(10:33):
get up and down the stairs. Elevator is kind of
your friend there. Elevators are frequently broken at this place,
bedbugs throughout the community, holes in the wall, heating issues,
which has been more prevalent here recently. One guy said,
I've got to sleep under as many blankets as I
can wrap around myself like a human burrito, just so

(10:56):
I don't freeze to death in here. And then on
the other side of that, also got the mold where
some people do have enough heat or moisture to create mold,
and the roaches. So all of this is what is
what people are accusing the landlords at this particular apartment
complex of not dealing with k ETV reached out to

(11:22):
the landlords, a Florida based owner and management company, and
they have not returned requests for comment, but they've had
their local property manager shoeing the media out of the site.
They said a resident invited us inside, but the news
crew was turned away by property management. You can't do that.

(11:42):
For resident invites you inside her home, then there's nothing
that the local property management can say. This woman's name
is Melissa. He said, I've lived here about three years,
and especially over these about the last half year or so.
The situation's not viable for human people, is what she said. Quote,

(12:03):
not viable for human people unquote when you can't even
have viable conditions for human people. She says, I'm pursuing
a duct because I can't leave my lease early. I'm
going to lose out on this money, which I can't do.
She said, I'm pursuing a doctor's note to allow her

(12:25):
to leave my lease early. She's got several rounds of
radiation that's affected her lungs. She says, they're black mold
in the building. I can't stay here, so, she says,
I when I'm going through the building, I carry a
weapon with me, a non lethal weapon as I go

(12:47):
through the hallways. I refuse to leave my unit at night.
Omaha police have had twenty seven police reports in the
vicinity in the last month. This is just one residence.
I wonder how many residents are like, oh, I'm good,
you know, no big deal. I kind of like it.

(13:11):
I heard Gary Seidelmeyer and Jim Rose talking this morning
on kfab's Morning News about being a landlord and how
much of this is the fault of the landlord or
property manager, and how much of this is really the
fault of some residence, not all, but some residence. You'll
have as many people who live in conditions like this

(13:34):
to say, my landlord's terrible. You'll have as many landlords
that say, let me tell you about some of the
residents that we deal with that we can't do anything about.
They're just completely trashing the place. Meanwhile, I don't know,
let me put yourself in what I hope are the
steel toed boots of the residence in a community like this.

(13:58):
And this is not the only one here in the
Omaha area that have to deal with these conditions. This
happens all over the country. And you're one of the
good ones. You try and take care of your place,
you pay your rent on time. You don't want to
be terrorized like this, whether it's by humans, or insects
in your own home and you feel like there's nothing

(14:20):
you can do. It's disgusting, Lucy, it's disgusting.

Speaker 5 (14:27):
I will. I was wondering these buildings, these apartments are
in these are all government assistance or I don't know,
does work.

Speaker 1 (14:39):
I don't know about all they've had Omaha Housing enforcement there.
I don't know if it's Omaha Housing Authority. I may
have confused that with the Omaha Housing and enforcement there.
I don't know that it's. Oh, there might be some
people who get some of that ass stants who live here.

(15:01):
We're not talking about, you know, some regency condos. I
can tell you that, right, I understand that, But with
the I don't know what a cost to live there,
With the cost of housing and rent, they're probably paying
quite a bit more than we'd probably expect to live
in conditions like this. And then they look and go, oh,

(15:22):
I just break my lease and move. You can't be
out that money. Move where someplace twice the rent. Some
of these people, I'm sure they can't afford it, otherwise
they would, so I don't.

Speaker 5 (15:33):
Know, Okay, I was going down the path that if
this was a government building, but there is a difference
between a government run housing area. Is that correct?

Speaker 1 (15:48):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (15:49):
Does that exist? I guess is a better way of asking.

Speaker 1 (15:51):
Yes. But we've also had stories here in the past
year in Omaha of people noting some of the same
conditions in Oaha properties.

Speaker 5 (15:59):
So well, then it's pretty easy to figure out that
even if you aren't part of a government agency, then
you watch what the government is doing themselves, and you
know nothing's going to happen to you. You could just
you can treat the people that are renting from you
any way you want, because there are there are no consequences,
and that is despicable.

Speaker 1 (16:20):
The city has sent in the fire chief. Fire Chief
Kathy Boseman said, one of my biggest concerns in that
building is addressing a broken fire alarm system. I'm guessing
that is pretty low on the totem pole of concerns
for most of the residents there, who would be probably
quite happy if the building burned to the ground, sometimes
with them in it. But she's looking at it from like,

(16:44):
what can we do if someone lives in squalor, There's
really not much we can do about that. If we
have a broken fire alarm system, well, then that issue
is okay. If we have violations of city code or
fire code or whatever, we can address that. But we
can address it in one of two ways. Either we

(17:04):
tell a landlord who might be an absolute slum lord, hey,
you got to pay a fine, I'm not going to
pay the fine. Or because I have to pay these fines,
I'm going to jack up the rent, and I got
to tell the people living there, hey, your rent next
month is gonna be higher because I had to pay
a bunch of fire codes because you guys were damaging
all the fire alarms and all the rest of this stuff.
Or you condemned the building. And where did these people go?

Speaker 4 (17:27):
Then?

Speaker 1 (17:28):
You know, it wasn't that long ago. I was living
downtown Omaha in a low rent apartment. I largely felt safe.
There were some interesting people kind of walking here and there,
but I largely felt safe. I think they didn't mess
with me, figuring, well, he lives here too, he doesn't
have anything, why would we bother him. But it felt

(17:51):
it was clean, and I felt like the landlord was
I didn't really have to call him very much, but
I felt like if I had any issues to address,
call my landlord who was here in omaha, which I
think is important and they would address them. But I
don't know that you have that in so many different

(18:12):
ways today, whether it's your boss or your landlord. Sometimes
it's all been kind of impersonalized.

Speaker 4 (18:20):
Is that a word?

Speaker 5 (18:21):
That's how it can be today. If you had a
landlord who had a building who that was decent as
far as water and heat and mold and the things
that just the basic stuff. It doesn't have to be fancy.
But if you had a landlord with a building like
that and you rented it to people and you made

(18:42):
them adhere to certain specific rules or they would be
evicted immediately, and our eviction laws were able to be
followed enacted. I can't think of the word I'm thinking
of it, but sure enforced. Sorry, Yeah, And if our
eviction laws are able to be enforced, you would not

(19:04):
have this problem because you have good and decent people
that want to take care of where they live, but
does but they don't make a lot of money. I
would say that that person out far out numbers the
people who are in some of these buildings like you
sort of.

Speaker 1 (19:22):
Yeah, I just feel I don't feel bad at all
for the people who live in places like this and
trash it and don't take care of it, which is
increasingly larger percentage of renters and even some cases homeowners,
Like you're paying yourself every month, and this is the
way you treat your property. I feel really bad though,
for the people who have to live around it, whether

(19:43):
it's your neighbor in your neighborhood of homes, or whether
it's your neighbor in an apartment or some sort of housing.
I feel terrible for these people because the options for them,
like where am I going to go? What can I afford?
Are really really slim, really interest a couple of political
battles that have been waged here regarding the LA wildfires.

(20:06):
That goes beyond the lack of water coming from the
fire hydrants, goes beyond really a lack of general preparedness
for something like this. Instead, we had, for example, Donald
Trump Junior went on Twitter and he made some sarcastic,

(20:30):
satirical comment saying, look, of course the LA Fire Department
donated a bunch of their supplies to Ukraine. Of course,
there has been a lot of conversation about how much
should we provide Ukraine in terms of supplies, in terms
of weapons in terms of money and for how long

(20:52):
should we do this? So apparently the LA Fire Department
had donated surplus supplies and equipment in twenty twenty two
to Ukraine. And of course the accusation here from Trump
Junior is maybe they'd have more equipment if they hadn't

(21:13):
donated it to an ongoing war that we really shouldn't
have that much to do with. It seems to be
a Donald Trump junior a saint well. Vladimir Zolensky responded
not to Trump Junior specifically on Twitter, but it certainly
looks like the word got back to him, especially since

(21:35):
this word came from the incoming American administration, that this
guy's going to be asking for money and support from
so Zelenski, the President of Ukraine comes back and says,
today I instructed Ukraine's Minister of Internal Affairs and our
diplomats to prepare for the possible participation of our rescuers

(21:56):
in combating the wildfires in California. There is extremely difficult
and Ukrainians can help Americans save lives. And he went
on to say, I've got one hundred and fifty firefighters
ready to assist, and we're already coordinating with the relevant
channels within the US to be able to provide these resources.
I thought the situation was so dire in Ukraine, they're

(22:19):
trying to get any man, woman and child to pick
up a rock and battle the Russians. Here, we've got
able bodied firefighting presumably men, not that if women would
be able to do this as well, certainly they can.
But I'm picturing certainly able bodied people who should be
fighting the Ruskies every day in Ukraine. Like, oh yeah,
we got these guys just sitting around. They can go

(22:40):
to LA and they can help with the wildfire battling. Wait,
we don't have firefighters across America who can come there
and get there fast enough and be good enough to
deal what's going on in Los Angeles. We're getting them
from Ukraine. The whole situation's just weird. It's just weird.

(23:03):
You were trying to say.

Speaker 5 (23:05):
Well, I think if you can't see that, there is
something and I'm not putting on a tinfoil at but
there is something that does not add up. By listening
to that one statement that we're going to send firefighters
to California to help with the wildfires from the Ukraine.

(23:26):
Deep in a war zone where they would need firefighters
with all the bombings that they can't afford any of
their own equipment that were are they are these one
hundred and fifty firefighters. Are they going to bring the
equipment back? And they just put it all on the
ship and just ride it back here.

Speaker 1 (23:46):
They're going to bring that equipment back, and the Taliban's
going to bring back the equipment they got from the
US military, and that Bungle would draw from Afghanistan and
that's all going to happen. So, as I said, the
reason why he's doing this is they're trying to make Nay.

Speaker 5 (24:00):
That's my point.

Speaker 1 (24:01):
America has since someone else is gonna be right in
the checks. Now we have a new commander in chief.
And it should be noted Lucy never has to put
on the tinfoil hat. She's already wearing it mostly. Now
regarding the firefighters in Los Angeles, apparently people are dressing
as firefighters and showing up and looting homes. I guess

(24:22):
they're they're getting by security fronts going hey, we're we're firefighters.

Speaker 5 (24:27):
Where are they getting this from? David Muir?

Speaker 1 (24:30):
I don't know what a David Murror is.

Speaker 5 (24:32):
Oh, you didn't see that.

Speaker 1 (24:34):
No, what's who?

Speaker 5 (24:35):
What the reporter channel ABC? I think David Muir?

Speaker 1 (24:39):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (24:40):
Am you?

Speaker 1 (24:40):
I r I yes, okay, yeah.

Speaker 5 (24:42):
That had his his fire firefighting coat on, but when
he turned around you could see that they had put
clothes pins on the back to make it look more slimmer.

Speaker 1 (24:51):
I didn't see that. No, these are people. Well, it's Hollywood,
so there's all kinds.

Speaker 5 (24:56):
Of kids California costume.

Speaker 1 (24:58):
Supplies around there. So people are just dressed up as firefighters.

Speaker 5 (25:01):
They don't have to pay for anything that they any
laws they break, there are no consequences. That's why people
are leaving. And I pray for the people, the good
people who stay.

Speaker 4 (25:12):
Right.

Speaker 1 (25:13):
Well, it's a beautiful I know.

Speaker 5 (25:16):
Beautiful, but it was the last time I was there,
right sixteen years ago.

Speaker 1 (25:20):
As long as you don't have to, you know, step
over the homeless gang members, illegal immigrants who have populated
the place. But it's it's I mean, like if you're
if you've got a security perimeter. And we saw what
happened with this this past year in Omaha, tornadoes hit,
among other places, Elcorn. The law enforcement set up a

(25:41):
perimeter and people were trying to sneak in and go
looting in there, and they were nabbed quite a bit,
and people, apparently the criminals thought maybe we shouldn't try
and go in there. Seems like guys are getting arrested.
I heard about it on the AM radio. But you know,
if you sneak in in the middle of the night,

(26:02):
that's one thing. But to just walk up to security
dressed as a firefight. You got your fissure Price plastic
firefighters hat on and a firefighter's coat that you got
on eBay and you're like, I'm a firefighter, Like, really,
didn't I see you just drive up in a Ford escort.
Where's your fire truck? We don't need we don't need

(26:24):
firefighters without water. We already have that, so right, very
strange that this is what's happening now in some of
these areas of Los Angeles. Another political battle, though Speaker
of the House Mike Johnson has been suggesting We're going
to send some aid to California, some financial aid, but

(26:47):
there will be conditions on the aid sent to California.
Hasn't been specific, but Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House,
has said, quote, obviously there has been water resource mismanagement,
forest management, mistakes, all sorts of problems, and it does
come down to leadership. And it appears to us that

(27:09):
state and local leaders were derelict in their duty in
many respects. There should probably be conditions on any aid.
I don't know if he's talking about up and beyond
what FEMA is doing, but there should probably be conditions
on any aid delivered to California, because why would we
just keep throwing money down this hole that's going to

(27:31):
be wasted by the terrible leaders of this area. He says.
We've had some discussion among Republicans of tying aid to
a debt ceiling increase, but we've got to make sure that.
All right, here's some money. But here's what you're going
to do in the future. You've got to be able
to take care of this take care of that same

(27:51):
thing here in Omaha. Buddy of mine sent me a
text yesterday. Danny sent me a text yesterday and said,
what's been going on in Omaha to try and be
more prepared, better prepared for our next windstorm or tornadoes
or whatever? What about like power lines and so forth?
And I said, well, in this case, OPPD Power Company

(28:12):
says we do hope to in the future do a
better job of burying power lines where we can or
but you understand, it's not like if the house burns
down and we rebuild it and change everything in the rebuild.
In the case of some of these windstorms and in
some of the tornado situations where houses weren't leveled, people

(28:35):
lost power, transformers go and we just needed to reconnect
as quickly as possible. So if people have been without
power for three or four days, where we're not going
to be like, hey, you've already been without power for
four days, what's another month, and we'll try and recompletely
redo all the lines here, which will probably take longer
than a month to bury the power lines in this

(28:57):
part of the city. They're not going to do that.
They're just going to reconnect and then in the future
hope that they can get around to doing something more
meaningful so that this kind of thing stops happening. But
like everything that costs a ton of money, it costs
a ton of money, more money than it did a

(29:17):
couple of years ago, and the more they wait on it,
the more it's going to cost a whole bunch of
more money. So they say We're going to try and
do some things in the future to be better prepared
for this kind of thing, with whether it's taking care
of tree limbs over power lines or burying power lines
or whatever. But the reality is, I don't know that

(29:41):
they ever will. They just say they will. They might
do a few things, but the day to day responsibilities
they have with the manpower and the money that they
currently have is a little slim to say. And we're
also going to do a whole lot more with the
same amount of money in people we currently have. Now,
it's just the math doesn't math on any of this.

(30:07):
Governor Gavin Newsom has already tried to expedite the process
of rebuilding that infrastructure, which they can, and he gave
a broad executive order that suspends California's environmental rules so
that people and businesses can start over more quickly without
additional red tape, government intervention, and in some cases more money.

(30:30):
So in order to get through what has been an
incredibly rigid environmental environment in California, they literally had to
burn down before they realized, maybe we don't need to
do this, Maybe we don't need to do that. In
some cases, if you wanted even a small development project,

(30:51):
you had to submit to environmental reviews that looked at
everything from wildlife to noise and traffic and other aspects
of whatever the environmental lobby thought might be impacted before
they would even sign off on it. If you wanted
to do even a small development project in California, that
wouldn't take weeks or months to get approved, it would
take years. Governor Newsom has said, we're waiving a lot

(31:16):
of that. We're not saying, yeah, just rebuild everything with asbestos.
It'll be fine. But they're not going to jump to
the hoops of the environmental lobby, which pretty much spells
the end of the political future of Gavin Newsom. I
imagine as Republicans don't like him and now Democrats are
gonna hate him. Texas is not so sure that you're

(31:37):
in good hands with all State, as the State of
Texas has just filed suit against the insurance company all
State saying that they gathered location data from more than
forty five million customers, which was then sold or otherwise
used to build the world's largest driving behavior database and

(32:00):
to fire raising insurance rates. What I don't get here
is you sign up to have your insurance company in
all states, not the only one you sign up at.
The insurance companies say we can put a tracker on
your phone and monitor good driving habits, and if you
drive well, then you can see a reduction in the
rate of your insurance. The flip side of that is,

(32:22):
if you drive like a bat out of hell, you
just like the rest of us, and your rates can
be raised. But people have to opt into that, right.
I'm not sure that Texas has a leg to stand
on here, but sounds like the Attorney General is a
bad driver.

Speaker 4 (32:38):
Scott Voices mornings nine to eleven on news radio eleven
ten KFAB