July 16, 2025 • 33 mins
Here are my thoughts, "Conspiracy Lucy" Chapman's thoughts, and even Sen. Grassley's thoughts on this scandal.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Scott Vorhees. This is an email I got from Coraley
the other day, said mister Vorhees. He sent this to
Scott at kfab dot com. That would be via the
Zonkers custom Woods in box. Mister Vorhees, I would be
really interested to hear your take. And I don't blame
(00:23):
him for asking, because we haven't talked about this the
last couple of weeks. So let's get into it. He says,
I'd be really interested in hearing your take on this
Trump Epstein cover up thing, if you're so inclined that is.
I responded with, why do you think I was invited
(00:44):
to those parties? He said, You're right, you are in
a bad mood today, Lucy and I might have to
form a verbally battered by Scott's support group, all right, as.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Not feeling battered yet? No, and you won't well, there's
two hours to go.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
You won't feel bad. You should never feel battered on
this program. You should never feel bad.
Speaker 3 (01:13):
Now.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
A lot of times I do that, but I try
and do it in such a way as you don't
see it coming. So the infighting within MAGA, I mean,
certainly the Democrats are just loving this. They're Michael Jackson
in the theater with popcorn gift. Right now, they're just
loving this as if you're not really familiar with all this.
(01:36):
Attorney General Pam Bondi of the Trump administration had made
some comment about, oh, yeah, I got because they asked
her about some of the Epstein files, client lists and
some other stuff. She goes, it's all on my desk
and I need to review it. And people took that as, oh,
there is a client list, presumably of the rich and powerful.
(01:56):
As I don't think Jeffrey Epstein was taking just some
schlub he met at a home superstore warehouse, like, hey,
you're here looking for ballpeen hammers. I'm here looking for
ball peen hammers. You know, after this, we're going to
go to my private island where I've got all sorts
of illicit and horrible things going on. Are you in?
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Jeff right, Jeffrey, But jeff yeah, that's fine.
Speaker 4 (02:19):
Okay, let's go.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
Let's let's give it a shot. Why not. You know
I always say no to these things, but let's do it.
So presumably it was rich and powerful people in Hollywood,
in politics, in business, and maybe the British Royal family.
So the question had to do with whether there was
a client list and there was some other stuff, and
(02:41):
Attorney General Bondi said, yeah, it's all on my desk.
I need to review it. And people like, oh, there
is there is a client list. I wonder whose name
is on it. And then they came out, they being
whether it's Attorney General Pambondi or other high ranking officials
within the Trump administration like Cash Betel of the FBI
(03:02):
and Dan Bongino and others, all came out and said yeah,
there's nothing there. And President Trump is downplayed at saying yeah,
there's nothing there.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Now you got the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson,
urging the Justice Department to make public all of its
files related to Jeffrey Epstein. He said on a podcast yesterday,
it's a very delicate subject, but you should put everything
out there. Let the people decide it. This renewed call
(03:34):
for transparency, as the Trump administration says, we've looked at
all of it. There's nothing there. Now. This has led
people to say, oh, so Trump's name was on it.
Trump is going down to the Epstein private island for
illicit activity with underage slaves. So no wonder. He wants
(03:56):
to cover it up. And he's got all his people
there bonding, and bon Gino and all the rest of
these guys. They're all doing his dirty work. Trump's name
is on it. All right, Let's explore that for a moment.
You know, who else had access to all this information
that the Trump administration has? The Biden administration, the Obama
(04:22):
Clinton Biden machine had access to all this information. You
don't think if Trump's name was on there, they would
have This would have been the super Bowl halftime show
a year ago, year and a half ago, right, Yeah,
(04:45):
for your super Bowl halftime entertainment this year, it's going
to be members of the Biden Justice Department and any
deposed FBI directors you know from the Obama administration. Anyone
who Trump has ever made fun of. Rosie O'Donnell's going
to be a part of this and others. And we're
(05:06):
as the super Bowl halftime show, We're gonna read the
client list of those who are hanging out with Epstein
and doing horrible things. Chief among those names Donald J. Trump.
This would have been the super Bowl halftime show.
Speaker 4 (05:19):
I would have watched that game.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
Even Lucy would have been interested in that game. So
the Biden administration and all that democratic machine, all the
whether it's the president himself or the auto pen anyone,
they would have had all those details and we didn't
hear anything about it. So do I believe Trump's name
(05:45):
is on there? But there are pictures of the pictures
of Epstein with everybody. Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy guy
who liked hanging around with power. And when he was
hanging around with power, like, hey, let's get a picture
of you guys, all right, let's get a picture. And
that's how these things go. You're hanging around in parties. Hey, hey,
(06:06):
you guys, get together, Let's get a picture of you guys.
So I don't believe that Trump's name was on there,
and now he's trying to cover it up simply because
the Biden administration had access to this stuff. Which then
now we go the other way with it. People say, well,
I think that there were a bunch of high ranking
Democrat officials who had their names on there, And I
(06:27):
don't know why Trump is covering it up. Maybe because
there was some sensitive names on there from his own party.
Do you think that President Trump would want to cover
these things up to protect them. Let's say their names
are on there, be them Democrats or Republicans. I don't
get the sense there are too many people in Congress
of either political stripe who are all that loyal to
(06:50):
President Trump. So let's say there's high ranking Democrat and
Republican names on there. Do you think President Trump would
contact them and say, look, we don't need anyone to
know about this. It's not a big deal. So I'm
just I'm surprised my name wasn't on there. I was
(07:11):
down there all the time, and you know you saw
me there. So hey, let's just sweep this under the rug. Right,
it's not let's just get back to work here. The
guy's dead. No one needs to know about this stuff.
Do you think that something like that would be happening?
Or let's say those names are on there, do you
think President Trump would be lording it over them for votes?
(07:32):
You know, since this Epstein stuff seemingly was given over
to the Trump Justice Department, suddenly a lot of votes
in Congress have gone his way. Now, no Democrats have
been voting for him, but he really hadn't needed those votes.
So if those names are on there, and Trump knows
whose names are on there. I wouldn't be I wouldn't
(07:54):
be terribly surprised if he would just lord those least
tell hey, we can release this stuff, or you can
vote from my big, beautiful bill. You know, the choice
is yours. But I don't see him doing that either,
because anything this administration does or tries to do ends
up getting leaked. Something this big, that has been seen
(08:20):
by so many high ranking Republican and Democrat officials hasn't
been leaked, which then goes back to another thing that
happens with all these different presidential administrations. Oh, they all
have these we know what's going on. Bill Clinton kills people.
He and Hillary Clinton are killing people. Anyone whoever looks
(08:42):
at them funny winds up dead. Which is an interesting
link that I don't know that anyone has ever really
been able to follow through on. I admit that there's
a lot of a lot of questions there, But if
people are just darn sure, Oh yeah, Hillary Clinton strangled
Vince Foster with his own shoelaces. We know how this
stuff works. And then what Then there was President Bush.
(09:05):
President Bush was called by his detractors the dumbest president
this country has ever seen this guy. If if you
gave him a fork and a map, he wouldn't be
able to eat a plate of spaghetti. This guy is
so stupid. All he was Condell's entire life. Hey Georgie,
what do you want to do? You want to own
a baseball team? Here's a baseball team. Hey Georgie, you
(09:27):
want to be governor of Texas? Why not? Let's have
you be a right, everyone, George's gonna be governor of Texas. Hey,
way to go, George. Hey George, you want to be president.
You want to be president, don't you, George? Oh, George,
you're gonna love being president. Okay, you'll be president. And
he goes to be president. You know, that's all his
detractors ever said about President Bush is this guy is
a moron. And then they would say, also, he's a
(09:50):
criminal mastermind who was able to mastermind and then cover
up nine to eleven, one of the worst thing that's
ever happened. Everyone's had a chance to take a look
at this, and there are people that say, oh, yeah,
President Bush, he orchestrated this and covered it up. Now,
(10:11):
wait a second, I thought he was too dumb to
predict six o'clock at five point thirty, but he orchestrated
Mastermind and covered up nine to eleven. You can't have
it both ways. So, I mean, anytime you get an administration,
there's always oh, we know, we know. And with this
(10:32):
one is we know that Trump was down there on
the island with Epstein. All the rest of these are,
by the way, the same people, So we know that
Trump was in cahoots with Vladimir Putin. Nothing there. So
what's most likely in this, I'm sorry to disappoint you,
(10:54):
but what's most likely in this is there's no client list.
There's I'm not saying that there weren't high ranking people
within business, politics, Hollywood who were engaging horrible things. Wait,
I believe there were.
Speaker 4 (11:14):
Wait, but I.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Don't think Jeffrey Epstein is keeping it all in a
ledger now unless like, hey, I've got you know, in
case that something comes back blows back on me, I'm
taking all you guys down with me. So I got
all the files right here. What are the files? A
client list? Yeah, we know you did this. Why is
Jeffrey Epstein wrote your name down on a piece of
paper so that proves it? That doesn't prove anything, And
(11:39):
it doesn't seem like that list exists now by virtue
of her and the way she said, wait, sounds like
Lucy has a conspiracy theory. I want to hear your
thoughts on this, Lucy Chapman next, Scott Vories News Radio
eleven ten kfab only email says Scot, I've been hearing
(12:01):
about this Epstein fellow lately. Can you start at the
beginning and explain what the deal is with him? Why
can't they just ask him who his clients were? Only?
I am fluent in sarcasm. Thank you very much for
that email. Like Christmas Lights, Epstein didn't hang himself. I
firmly believe that, and I know the Trump administration has
(12:24):
come out and said, yeah, it turns out that we
don't think he was murdered. He killed himself. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (12:31):
I know.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
It's incredible. I mean, the thing was so bungling stupid
that you almost have to believe that no one would
be so dumb as to orchestrate something that says, all right,
the man is in jail here on suicide watch, tied
into human trafficking and underage this and drug that and
(12:54):
all this horrible stuff, and he's on suicide watch in
this private. Let's make sure the security cameras are pointed
the other direction, and we'll tell the staff members the
prison guards. Hey, Bill said you should go on break. Oh,
Bill said it, okay, I'll go on break. And then
they go on break, and what do you know, during
(13:15):
that time, Epstein kills himself. It sounds so implausible. I
don't I still don't know that I believe it. But
the people came back and said, yeah, that's what happened.
So either they did it or that's what happened. So
now we have this idea about whether or not there's
(13:37):
an Epstein client list of rich and powerful people who
Epstein's like, all right, I'm keeping notes on all this.
I got pictures, I got video, we got pictures of
this guy doing that and she's doing that, and we
got it all there, and all the Democrats and Republicans
swamp people got together and they said, let's just make
all this go away. And President Trump had his onions
(14:00):
in the Justice Department come out and say, yeah, you
know what, nothing there, And people are like, I don't
believe any single one of you. So Lucy is the
official conspiracy theorist on this program. All right, Lucy, let's
see what you got.
Speaker 4 (14:17):
Oh, I thought you were going to play something there
has a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 2 (14:22):
Basically, what we're talking about when we say list of names,
that's those are flight logs. So if your name appears
on a flight log, everybody has to be recorded on
the at least your name has to be recorded in
the flight logs. That's just the I believe that's the
FAA rules. Yes, So if you're on that list one time,
(14:45):
if I see your name on there one time, I'm
not going to automatically say, oh, you're a terrible You've
done terrible things to people, because I am sure that
there are people on it one time that think, oh,
I'm going to go to this private island with these
rich and famis people and hang out, and once they
get there they see maybe a little bit of stuff
(15:05):
because if your first time on there, they're not gonna
invite you into all of the nastiness, so they see
the little stuff going on.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
I'm done.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
So if somebody's name shows up on that flight list once,
I'm going to say, what did you know? And why
didn't you say anything about anything? If you did know
as far as the things that he was accused is
accused of doing those girls. If you look at look
at some of the testimony of the girls that were
(15:34):
there that talked about it, they were not forced to
go to that island. They were coerced, they were given gifts,
they were promised money, and once they got there, then
they all of the terrible stuff happened. This is according
to their testimonies. Then all of the other terrible stuff happened.
So when they leave, run away, get away, whatever, let go,
(15:58):
they're told, nobody is going to believe you because you
came here on your own. We gave you gifts, you
accepted them. This is all just based on what I have.
Speaker 4 (16:09):
Experienced like that, but just the stories we hear.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
I'll join you on a conspiracy theory. Didn't one of
these formerly young women who's now I don't know, in
her thirties, the one who accused Prince Andrew, didn't she
just recently, just in the last few weeks, suddenly wind
up dead of quote, natural causes or whatever the heck.
Speaker 4 (16:31):
One of them did.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
I don't know if it was her, it was her, Okay, yeah,
one of them just died, certainly.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
And so people look at this and go if someone
turned this into Hollywood as a script, they'd look at
it and go, this is boring and predictable. There's no
twist here. People expect this to happen.
Speaker 2 (16:47):
Well, that's the thing, and that leads me into my
next topic. The whole script idea of this is a
long game. This is possibly something that Trump is doing
knowing full well everything that's behind it.
Speaker 4 (17:01):
But he has to he's playing a long game.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
Should should we ask Senator Chuck Grassley about this?
Speaker 4 (17:07):
No?
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Yes, yes, but one more okay, one more point. Oh
so if you were doing all the things he's accused
of doing, and who's he Epstein Epstein and Giselle? Is
that just whatever?
Speaker 4 (17:22):
Her name is?
Speaker 2 (17:23):
His partner, Galaine Galline is actually in prison, but we
don't actually know why she's in prison.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
Well, because she she was basically the human trafficker. She
would find these find them.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
And course, okay, so if if he's doing all of
these terrible things, you don't think he's got a lot
of proof about the people involved. Of course he does.
It's not on a flight list. A flight list tells
you nothing.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
Yeah, well, people say that he had all this video
evidence of everything going on, He had all security camera
footage and all this stuff. For whatever reason, I don't know,
I look at this from the rich and powerful and
all that to something that some of us are familiar
with and is not a rich and powerful thing, and
that is Girl's Gone Wild. So this past spring, we
(18:13):
were in the Ozarks and we were chatting up this
bartender and I don't know how, but it eventually comes
out that she was one of those girls who was
in not only the Girl's Gone Wild video, but the
commercials promoting buying the Girl's Gone Wild videos. If you're
not familiar, it's a bunch of girls like on spring
break parties stuff like that, and they're like, hey, you know,
(18:34):
take your top off. We you know, they flashed the
camera and all this stuff. And she was one of
those girls. And she was so on every one of
these late night commercials. You know, here's this girl and
she's just this girl who is in party cob or whatever,
and she's like, craziest thing ever. I don't know what
I was thinking. I was like nineteen years old, super stupid,
(18:54):
and I got to live with this the rest of
my life. So when you're talking about these girls who
suddenly now I mean those were just idiot rednecks flashing
a couple of bucks for these girls, and they got
them on camera and all this. You feel horrible for
these girls. When you've got rich and powerful people, wealthy,
deep pocketed, rich and powerful people, Hey, come to the island,
(19:14):
have a good time. It's gonna be a great time.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Hey.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
And now that you're here, if you do this, you
can make even more money. The situations people find themselves
in and when they are faced with I can't believe
I'm here right now in the midst of this situation.
It's it happens to people. It's disgusting, and there are
(19:41):
all kinds of things that happen to people. I mean,
I don't know if you've ever been at a party
with people doing horrible stuff and suddenly you're like, I
can't believe I'm in this room. Someone just offered me
cocaine or whatever, and you're like, how in the world
did this happen? Stuff happens to regular people. I feel
awful for these girls. They got to live with this
(20:03):
for the rest of their lives. And these you know guys,
whether they're the girls on Wild Guys or the Epstein guys,
they all just think it's a lot of fun.
Speaker 2 (20:10):
The girls going wild thing. They're gonna just be fine.
They're gonna be just fine enough. You had if you
had a dollar for every woman go down the Bourbon Street,
or go down to any river, go to any area
where there's boating, if you had a dollar for every
woman who flashed people, you would you could quit your job.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Yes, but there's a difference between that quick thing and
then you know, like you're on every late night commercial
on Comedy Central for the next several years.
Speaker 4 (20:37):
That is an aspect.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
Yeah, you know, let's ask Senator Grassley about the Epstein list,
and just just to close that point out. Though, I
don't feel bad for these guys who are having the
guys who are having fun, like, hey, this is a
great party. These girls are crazy.
Speaker 3 (20:52):
You know.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
I feel bad for these girls. They got to live
with this the rest of their lives. Fox News Updating
just a moment, Senator Grassley, next, Scott Boys, welcoming back
onto the program right now, Iowa. Senator Chuck Grassley, Senator, good.
Speaker 3 (21:05):
Morning, always glad to be with you.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
We've been talking this morning about the Epstein stuff, and
I know that you're among those who as chair of
the Senate Judiciary Committee, You've had a chance to review
some of this related to potential rich and powerful individuals,
including those in politics, associated with human trafficking and other
(21:32):
crimes related to the wealthy businessman Jeffrey Epstein. Everyone's pointing fingers,
everyone is trying to implicate everyone else. What can you
tell us about the Epstein files, what exists, what doesn't exist,
and what confidence you have in this administration and Attorney
general to let us know about it.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
Generally, not just related to the Epstein case, but you
know my approach to government oversight and making sure the
executive branch faithfully excludes the laws that more transparency, the
more transparency you have, the more accountability you have. So
I would say I'm still on that kick, not in
(22:18):
a specific way of criticizing Pam Bondi because I don't
know what she knows, but I have had requests in
both under the Biden administration and now under the Trump
administration for more documents. I would say that my investigation
(22:40):
that I'm not going to get into detail on, is
more focus and the general approach of what you've been
reading or seeing on DV and reading, and I'm just
pushing for more transparency and more documents. But I'm not
one of these people in a position to say whether
(23:03):
or not the entire file should be opened. I'd have
to have more information on that, but I would expect
if people in our government, both under the Biden administration
or the Trump administration, knows that crimes have been committed,
then I expect prosecution of those people that have committed
(23:25):
the crimes.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
Do you think Epstein committed suicide.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
I don't have any basis other than what I've seen
on television on that subject, and I don't think that's
enough information for me to be able to answer your question.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
It's pretty hard to get information out of people, isn't it.
I know you've been trying to get more details about
what happened a year ago Sunday in Butler, Pennsylvania. What
more can you tell us about that assassination attempt on
Donald Trump's life?
Speaker 3 (23:58):
Well, two sundays ago, I release or no last Sunday,
I released the Government Accountability Office GL that says that
there was a lot of mistakes made by Secret Service,
and basically I made the whole report public people can
(24:20):
read it. But there were certain things that really ought
to cause shock to people when the Secret Service had
information from the intelligence community that there might be a
problem in regard to Trump, and that information was never
(24:41):
passed down to the grassroots. There were several misinterpretations or
misunderstandings or lack of communication between local law enforcement and
the Secret Service. There's things dealing with with the small
(25:02):
planes that make a difference about them not working, and
the people that could fix it were not qualified to
correct drones. And if that had been operational, it may
have alerted us to the killer to a greater extent,
(25:23):
and things of that nature. But I think that as
Juesiciary Committee Chairman, I included one in seven tens billion
dollars for Secret Service in the One Big Beautiful Bill,
(25:43):
and I'm going to continue writing herd on oversight to
push for change within the Secret Service.
Speaker 1 (25:52):
Talking here with Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, I know that
you've been I mean, in the hours after that attempt
on Trump's life a year ago Sunday, you were on
social media letting us know whatever it is that you
could find out about what had happened. I know you'll
continue to do that on that front and so many others.
Let's talk about the votes yesterday in the United States
(26:15):
Senate to among other things, defund public broadcasting. We're not
at the point where that vote has happened yet. What's
going on with that issue? Should public broadcasting PBS NPR
be defunded from what taxpayers provide them? And what's going
on with this vote?
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Now, Okay, you'll have to remind me about the farm baill,
But let me answer your first question not before I
speak about public broadcasting. What we're talking about is nine
billion dollars is less than one tenth of one percent
(26:52):
of all the money the federal government spends, and you're
having great controvert see over that. It reminds me of
a speech I recently read re read that I gave
in nineteen eighty five, where I was advocating freezing the
budget of eighty five over eighty four, and I was
(27:14):
challenging my colleagues that if you can't, if an agency
can't live on the same money for two years in
a row, there's really something wrong. So you get back
to the same point, if we can't get by with
one tenth of one percent of all the money we're spending,
which is in this recision bill, we're in pretty bad
(27:37):
shape here in Washington. Now, everybody listing in Nebraska and
Iowa would applaud that nothing's going right here in Washington,
d C. In regard to public broadcasting, most public broadcasting
funding doesn't come from the federal government. In fact, federal
funding accounts for somewheres in the neighborhood into fifteen percent
(28:01):
of the operation costs of public media. At least in
my state of Iowa. This package will not cause local
media stations to go off the air. Although a change
in federal funding would surely lead to some programming adjustments.
The recision package has not yet been finalized that maybe
(28:25):
today or tomorrow Senate amendments may change the level of
approved federal funding for public broadcasting. So it's hard for
me to draw a conclusion where the exact bottom line
is going to be for it. But that gives you
the general approach.
Speaker 1 (28:42):
Thank you. What is happening on a farm bill?
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Yeah, well, don't forget. In the one big beautiful bill,
the Reconciliation Bill, we increase reference pricing. I'll give you
an example, corn from Zree seventy nine to four to ten.
We increase improved the crop insurance program, we put money
in for sale of export products promoting it, and then
(29:11):
we also had more money for research. Now that's probably
only ten percent of a five year farm bill, but
it's the part that deals mostly with helping family farmers
sue the safety net. So the other nine or ten titles,
(29:33):
I just would answer your question. Bottom line this we're
about eighteen months ahead of last year because last year,
last Congress, nothing happened until September in the House. Nothing
happened at all in the United States Senate. And now
we have the same House Appropriation or same House Agriculture
(29:55):
Committee probably putting out roughly the same bill, and we
have a Republican chairman of the Egg Committee that agrees
with what the House committee is doing. So I think
we're about eighteen months ahead of two years ago.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
Finally, Senator, this news is just breaking out of Syria,
and I'll give you as much information about it as
we have here, but I want to lead into it
by saying it this way. You've been in the United
States Senate for a few years, shall we say? During
that time, Russia has picked fights with everybody, and there's
always been unrest and oftentimes problems, violent problems in the
(30:33):
Middle East. President Trump has said We're going to bring
peace to the Middle East. We're going to get Russia
to back off of Ukraine. These things have not happened.
And moments ago it appears that Israel has launched an
air strike into the Syrian capital of Damascus. We don't
have any more details about it than that, but that's
what Fox News is reporting right now. Do you do
(30:57):
you have confidence in President Trump to do these things
that he's pledged he can do in terms of Russia,
in terms of the Middle East, And is that too
big an ask to put on any American president.
Speaker 3 (31:12):
An American president can't control what the leaders of any
other countries do, friend or enemy. The ones that are
somewhat dependent on the United States might have to listen
to the president of the United States. But you can
look at what Israel did in Iran. The President was
(31:34):
trying to stop that first strikes that happened of the
first of the Twelve day War last month, and Israel
went ahead, and don't forget back. In nineteen eighty one,
Israel didn't listen to anybody and destroyed the nuclear capability
of Iraq and the whole world was in an uproar,
(31:58):
but looking back at what happens when these countries are
developing nuclear weapons, everybody look back and say, Israel did
the right thing. Now. I don't know what this attack is,
but Israel does have the capability of making a very
(32:18):
targeted attack. It isn't like just blowing up the whole community.
Speaker 1 (32:25):
Yeah, we'll have to find out more here throughout the day,
and I'll let you get back to work. I appreciate
the time, as always, Senator, I'm glad.
Speaker 3 (32:33):
To go back to work, but I consider talking to
you and the people of Nebraska and Ioway as part
of my work.
Speaker 1 (32:40):
Well. I hope we had a strenuous time here today
and I wanted to make sure that you were you
were putting in the work this morning, Senator. As always,
thank you very much for the time.
Speaker 3 (32:51):
God bless you. Goodbye Scott for these mornings nine to
eleven on news radio eleven ten KFAB
Scott Vorhees. This is an email I got from Coraley
the other day, said mister Vorhees. He sent this to
Scott at kfab dot com. That would be via the
Zonkers custom Woods in box. Mister Vorhees, I would be
really interested to hear your take. And I don't blame
(00:23):
him for asking, because we haven't talked about this the
last couple of weeks. So let's get into it. He says,
I'd be really interested in hearing your take on this
Trump Epstein cover up thing, if you're so inclined that is.
I responded with, why do you think I was invited
(00:44):
to those parties? He said, You're right, you are in
a bad mood today, Lucy and I might have to
form a verbally battered by Scott's support group, all right, as.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Not feeling battered yet? No, and you won't well, there's
two hours to go.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
You won't feel bad. You should never feel battered on
this program. You should never feel bad.
Speaker 3 (01:13):
Now.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
A lot of times I do that, but I try
and do it in such a way as you don't
see it coming. So the infighting within MAGA, I mean,
certainly the Democrats are just loving this. They're Michael Jackson
in the theater with popcorn gift. Right now, they're just
loving this as if you're not really familiar with all this.
(01:36):
Attorney General Pam Bondi of the Trump administration had made
some comment about, oh, yeah, I got because they asked
her about some of the Epstein files, client lists and
some other stuff. She goes, it's all on my desk
and I need to review it. And people took that as, oh,
there is a client list, presumably of the rich and powerful.
(01:56):
As I don't think Jeffrey Epstein was taking just some
schlub he met at a home superstore warehouse, like, hey,
you're here looking for ballpeen hammers. I'm here looking for
ball peen hammers. You know, after this, we're going to
go to my private island where I've got all sorts
of illicit and horrible things going on. Are you in?
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Jeff right, Jeffrey, But jeff yeah, that's fine.
Speaker 4 (02:19):
Okay, let's go.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
Let's let's give it a shot. Why not. You know
I always say no to these things, but let's do it.
So presumably it was rich and powerful people in Hollywood,
in politics, in business, and maybe the British Royal family.
So the question had to do with whether there was
a client list and there was some other stuff, and
(02:41):
Attorney General Bondi said, yeah, it's all on my desk.
I need to review it. And people like, oh, there
is there is a client list. I wonder whose name
is on it. And then they came out, they being
whether it's Attorney General Pambondi or other high ranking officials
within the Trump administration like Cash Betel of the FBI
(03:02):
and Dan Bongino and others, all came out and said yeah,
there's nothing there. And President Trump is downplayed at saying yeah,
there's nothing there.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Now you got the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson,
urging the Justice Department to make public all of its
files related to Jeffrey Epstein. He said on a podcast yesterday,
it's a very delicate subject, but you should put everything
out there. Let the people decide it. This renewed call
(03:34):
for transparency, as the Trump administration says, we've looked at
all of it. There's nothing there. Now. This has led
people to say, oh, so Trump's name was on it.
Trump is going down to the Epstein private island for
illicit activity with underage slaves. So no wonder. He wants
(03:56):
to cover it up. And he's got all his people
there bonding, and bon Gino and all the rest of
these guys. They're all doing his dirty work. Trump's name
is on it. All right, Let's explore that for a moment.
You know, who else had access to all this information
that the Trump administration has? The Biden administration, the Obama
(04:22):
Clinton Biden machine had access to all this information. You
don't think if Trump's name was on there, they would
have This would have been the super Bowl halftime show
a year ago, year and a half ago, right, Yeah,
(04:45):
for your super Bowl halftime entertainment this year, it's going
to be members of the Biden Justice Department and any
deposed FBI directors you know from the Obama administration. Anyone
who Trump has ever made fun of. Rosie O'Donnell's going
to be a part of this and others. And we're
(05:06):
as the super Bowl halftime show, We're gonna read the
client list of those who are hanging out with Epstein
and doing horrible things. Chief among those names Donald J. Trump.
This would have been the super Bowl halftime show.
Speaker 4 (05:19):
I would have watched that game.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
Even Lucy would have been interested in that game. So
the Biden administration and all that democratic machine, all the
whether it's the president himself or the auto pen anyone,
they would have had all those details and we didn't
hear anything about it. So do I believe Trump's name
(05:45):
is on there? But there are pictures of the pictures
of Epstein with everybody. Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy guy
who liked hanging around with power. And when he was
hanging around with power, like, hey, let's get a picture
of you guys, all right, let's get a picture. And
that's how these things go. You're hanging around in parties. Hey, hey,
(06:06):
you guys, get together, Let's get a picture of you guys.
So I don't believe that Trump's name was on there,
and now he's trying to cover it up simply because
the Biden administration had access to this stuff. Which then
now we go the other way with it. People say, well,
I think that there were a bunch of high ranking
Democrat officials who had their names on there, And I
(06:27):
don't know why Trump is covering it up. Maybe because
there was some sensitive names on there from his own party.
Do you think that President Trump would want to cover
these things up to protect them. Let's say their names
are on there, be them Democrats or Republicans. I don't
get the sense there are too many people in Congress
of either political stripe who are all that loyal to
(06:50):
President Trump. So let's say there's high ranking Democrat and
Republican names on there. Do you think President Trump would
contact them and say, look, we don't need anyone to
know about this. It's not a big deal. So I'm
just I'm surprised my name wasn't on there. I was
(07:11):
down there all the time, and you know you saw
me there. So hey, let's just sweep this under the rug. Right,
it's not let's just get back to work here. The
guy's dead. No one needs to know about this stuff.
Do you think that something like that would be happening?
Or let's say those names are on there, do you
think President Trump would be lording it over them for votes?
(07:32):
You know, since this Epstein stuff seemingly was given over
to the Trump Justice Department, suddenly a lot of votes
in Congress have gone his way. Now, no Democrats have
been voting for him, but he really hadn't needed those votes.
So if those names are on there, and Trump knows
whose names are on there. I wouldn't be I wouldn't
(07:54):
be terribly surprised if he would just lord those least
tell hey, we can release this stuff, or you can
vote from my big, beautiful bill. You know, the choice
is yours. But I don't see him doing that either,
because anything this administration does or tries to do ends
up getting leaked. Something this big, that has been seen
(08:20):
by so many high ranking Republican and Democrat officials hasn't
been leaked, which then goes back to another thing that
happens with all these different presidential administrations. Oh, they all
have these we know what's going on. Bill Clinton kills people.
He and Hillary Clinton are killing people. Anyone whoever looks
(08:42):
at them funny winds up dead. Which is an interesting
link that I don't know that anyone has ever really
been able to follow through on. I admit that there's
a lot of a lot of questions there, But if
people are just darn sure, Oh yeah, Hillary Clinton strangled
Vince Foster with his own shoelaces. We know how this
stuff works. And then what Then there was President Bush.
(09:05):
President Bush was called by his detractors the dumbest president
this country has ever seen this guy. If if you
gave him a fork and a map, he wouldn't be
able to eat a plate of spaghetti. This guy is
so stupid. All he was Condell's entire life. Hey Georgie,
what do you want to do? You want to own
a baseball team? Here's a baseball team. Hey Georgie, you
(09:27):
want to be governor of Texas? Why not? Let's have
you be a right, everyone, George's gonna be governor of Texas. Hey,
way to go, George. Hey George, you want to be president.
You want to be president, don't you, George? Oh, George,
you're gonna love being president. Okay, you'll be president. And
he goes to be president. You know, that's all his
detractors ever said about President Bush is this guy is
a moron. And then they would say, also, he's a
(09:50):
criminal mastermind who was able to mastermind and then cover
up nine to eleven, one of the worst thing that's
ever happened. Everyone's had a chance to take a look
at this, and there are people that say, oh, yeah,
President Bush, he orchestrated this and covered it up. Now,
(10:11):
wait a second, I thought he was too dumb to
predict six o'clock at five point thirty, but he orchestrated
Mastermind and covered up nine to eleven. You can't have
it both ways. So, I mean, anytime you get an administration,
there's always oh, we know, we know. And with this
(10:32):
one is we know that Trump was down there on
the island with Epstein. All the rest of these are,
by the way, the same people, So we know that
Trump was in cahoots with Vladimir Putin. Nothing there. So
what's most likely in this, I'm sorry to disappoint you,
(10:54):
but what's most likely in this is there's no client list.
There's I'm not saying that there weren't high ranking people
within business, politics, Hollywood who were engaging horrible things. Wait,
I believe there were.
Speaker 4 (11:14):
Wait, but I.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Don't think Jeffrey Epstein is keeping it all in a
ledger now unless like, hey, I've got you know, in
case that something comes back blows back on me, I'm
taking all you guys down with me. So I got
all the files right here. What are the files? A
client list? Yeah, we know you did this. Why is
Jeffrey Epstein wrote your name down on a piece of
paper so that proves it? That doesn't prove anything, And
(11:39):
it doesn't seem like that list exists now by virtue
of her and the way she said, wait, sounds like
Lucy has a conspiracy theory. I want to hear your
thoughts on this, Lucy Chapman next, Scott Vories News Radio
eleven ten kfab only email says Scot, I've been hearing
(12:01):
about this Epstein fellow lately. Can you start at the
beginning and explain what the deal is with him? Why
can't they just ask him who his clients were? Only?
I am fluent in sarcasm. Thank you very much for
that email. Like Christmas Lights, Epstein didn't hang himself. I
firmly believe that, and I know the Trump administration has
(12:24):
come out and said, yeah, it turns out that we
don't think he was murdered. He killed himself. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (12:31):
I know.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
It's incredible. I mean, the thing was so bungling stupid
that you almost have to believe that no one would
be so dumb as to orchestrate something that says, all right,
the man is in jail here on suicide watch, tied
into human trafficking and underage this and drug that and
(12:54):
all this horrible stuff, and he's on suicide watch in
this private. Let's make sure the security cameras are pointed
the other direction, and we'll tell the staff members the
prison guards. Hey, Bill said you should go on break. Oh,
Bill said it, okay, I'll go on break. And then
they go on break, and what do you know, during
(13:15):
that time, Epstein kills himself. It sounds so implausible. I
don't I still don't know that I believe it. But
the people came back and said, yeah, that's what happened.
So either they did it or that's what happened. So
now we have this idea about whether or not there's
(13:37):
an Epstein client list of rich and powerful people who
Epstein's like, all right, I'm keeping notes on all this.
I got pictures, I got video, we got pictures of
this guy doing that and she's doing that, and we
got it all there, and all the Democrats and Republicans
swamp people got together and they said, let's just make
all this go away. And President Trump had his onions
(14:00):
in the Justice Department come out and say, yeah, you
know what, nothing there, And people are like, I don't
believe any single one of you. So Lucy is the
official conspiracy theorist on this program. All right, Lucy, let's
see what you got.
Speaker 4 (14:17):
Oh, I thought you were going to play something there
has a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 2 (14:22):
Basically, what we're talking about when we say list of names,
that's those are flight logs. So if your name appears
on a flight log, everybody has to be recorded on
the at least your name has to be recorded in
the flight logs. That's just the I believe that's the
FAA rules. Yes, So if you're on that list one time,
(14:45):
if I see your name on there one time, I'm
not going to automatically say, oh, you're a terrible You've
done terrible things to people, because I am sure that
there are people on it one time that think, oh,
I'm going to go to this private island with these
rich and famis people and hang out, and once they
get there they see maybe a little bit of stuff
(15:05):
because if your first time on there, they're not gonna
invite you into all of the nastiness, so they see
the little stuff going on.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
I'm done.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
So if somebody's name shows up on that flight list once,
I'm going to say, what did you know? And why
didn't you say anything about anything? If you did know
as far as the things that he was accused is
accused of doing those girls. If you look at look
at some of the testimony of the girls that were
(15:34):
there that talked about it, they were not forced to
go to that island. They were coerced, they were given gifts,
they were promised money, and once they got there, then
they all of the terrible stuff happened. This is according
to their testimonies. Then all of the other terrible stuff happened.
So when they leave, run away, get away, whatever, let go,
(15:58):
they're told, nobody is going to believe you because you
came here on your own. We gave you gifts, you
accepted them. This is all just based on what I have.
Speaker 4 (16:09):
Experienced like that, but just the stories we hear.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
I'll join you on a conspiracy theory. Didn't one of
these formerly young women who's now I don't know, in
her thirties, the one who accused Prince Andrew, didn't she
just recently, just in the last few weeks, suddenly wind
up dead of quote, natural causes or whatever the heck.
Speaker 4 (16:31):
One of them did.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
I don't know if it was her, it was her, Okay, yeah,
one of them just died, certainly.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
And so people look at this and go if someone
turned this into Hollywood as a script, they'd look at
it and go, this is boring and predictable. There's no
twist here. People expect this to happen.
Speaker 2 (16:47):
Well, that's the thing, and that leads me into my
next topic. The whole script idea of this is a
long game. This is possibly something that Trump is doing
knowing full well everything that's behind it.
Speaker 4 (17:01):
But he has to he's playing a long game.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
Should should we ask Senator Chuck Grassley about this?
Speaker 4 (17:07):
No?
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Yes, yes, but one more okay, one more point. Oh
so if you were doing all the things he's accused
of doing, and who's he Epstein Epstein and Giselle? Is
that just whatever?
Speaker 4 (17:22):
Her name is?
Speaker 2 (17:23):
His partner, Galaine Galline is actually in prison, but we
don't actually know why she's in prison.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
Well, because she she was basically the human trafficker. She
would find these find them.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
And course, okay, so if if he's doing all of
these terrible things, you don't think he's got a lot
of proof about the people involved. Of course he does.
It's not on a flight list. A flight list tells
you nothing.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
Yeah, well, people say that he had all this video
evidence of everything going on, He had all security camera
footage and all this stuff. For whatever reason, I don't know,
I look at this from the rich and powerful and
all that to something that some of us are familiar
with and is not a rich and powerful thing, and
that is Girl's Gone Wild. So this past spring, we
(18:13):
were in the Ozarks and we were chatting up this
bartender and I don't know how, but it eventually comes
out that she was one of those girls who was
in not only the Girl's Gone Wild video, but the
commercials promoting buying the Girl's Gone Wild videos. If you're
not familiar, it's a bunch of girls like on spring
break parties stuff like that, and they're like, hey, you know,
(18:34):
take your top off. We you know, they flashed the
camera and all this stuff. And she was one of
those girls. And she was so on every one of
these late night commercials. You know, here's this girl and
she's just this girl who is in party cob or whatever,
and she's like, craziest thing ever. I don't know what
I was thinking. I was like nineteen years old, super stupid,
(18:54):
and I got to live with this the rest of
my life. So when you're talking about these girls who
suddenly now I mean those were just idiot rednecks flashing
a couple of bucks for these girls, and they got
them on camera and all this. You feel horrible for
these girls. When you've got rich and powerful people, wealthy,
deep pocketed, rich and powerful people, Hey, come to the island,
(19:14):
have a good time. It's gonna be a great time.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Hey.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
And now that you're here, if you do this, you
can make even more money. The situations people find themselves
in and when they are faced with I can't believe
I'm here right now in the midst of this situation.
It's it happens to people. It's disgusting, and there are
(19:41):
all kinds of things that happen to people. I mean,
I don't know if you've ever been at a party
with people doing horrible stuff and suddenly you're like, I
can't believe I'm in this room. Someone just offered me
cocaine or whatever, and you're like, how in the world
did this happen? Stuff happens to regular people. I feel
awful for these girls. They got to live with this
(20:03):
for the rest of their lives. And these you know guys,
whether they're the girls on Wild Guys or the Epstein guys,
they all just think it's a lot of fun.
Speaker 2 (20:10):
The girls going wild thing. They're gonna just be fine.
They're gonna be just fine enough. You had if you
had a dollar for every woman go down the Bourbon Street,
or go down to any river, go to any area
where there's boating, if you had a dollar for every
woman who flashed people, you would you could quit your job.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Yes, but there's a difference between that quick thing and
then you know, like you're on every late night commercial
on Comedy Central for the next several years.
Speaker 4 (20:37):
That is an aspect.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
Yeah, you know, let's ask Senator Grassley about the Epstein list,
and just just to close that point out. Though, I
don't feel bad for these guys who are having the
guys who are having fun, like, hey, this is a
great party. These girls are crazy.
Speaker 3 (20:52):
You know.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
I feel bad for these girls. They got to live
with this the rest of their lives. Fox News Updating
just a moment, Senator Grassley, next, Scott Boys, welcoming back
onto the program right now, Iowa. Senator Chuck Grassley, Senator, good.
Speaker 3 (21:05):
Morning, always glad to be with you.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
We've been talking this morning about the Epstein stuff, and
I know that you're among those who as chair of
the Senate Judiciary Committee, You've had a chance to review
some of this related to potential rich and powerful individuals,
including those in politics, associated with human trafficking and other
(21:32):
crimes related to the wealthy businessman Jeffrey Epstein. Everyone's pointing fingers,
everyone is trying to implicate everyone else. What can you
tell us about the Epstein files, what exists, what doesn't exist,
and what confidence you have in this administration and Attorney
general to let us know about it.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
Generally, not just related to the Epstein case, but you
know my approach to government oversight and making sure the
executive branch faithfully excludes the laws that more transparency, the
more transparency you have, the more accountability you have. So
I would say I'm still on that kick, not in
(22:18):
a specific way of criticizing Pam Bondi because I don't
know what she knows, but I have had requests in
both under the Biden administration and now under the Trump
administration for more documents. I would say that my investigation
(22:40):
that I'm not going to get into detail on, is
more focus and the general approach of what you've been
reading or seeing on DV and reading, and I'm just
pushing for more transparency and more documents. But I'm not
one of these people in a position to say whether
(23:03):
or not the entire file should be opened. I'd have
to have more information on that, but I would expect
if people in our government, both under the Biden administration
or the Trump administration, knows that crimes have been committed,
then I expect prosecution of those people that have committed
(23:25):
the crimes.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
Do you think Epstein committed suicide.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
I don't have any basis other than what I've seen
on television on that subject, and I don't think that's
enough information for me to be able to answer your question.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
It's pretty hard to get information out of people, isn't it.
I know you've been trying to get more details about
what happened a year ago Sunday in Butler, Pennsylvania. What
more can you tell us about that assassination attempt on
Donald Trump's life?
Speaker 3 (23:58):
Well, two sundays ago, I release or no last Sunday,
I released the Government Accountability Office GL that says that
there was a lot of mistakes made by Secret Service,
and basically I made the whole report public people can
(24:20):
read it. But there were certain things that really ought
to cause shock to people when the Secret Service had
information from the intelligence community that there might be a
problem in regard to Trump, and that information was never
(24:41):
passed down to the grassroots. There were several misinterpretations or
misunderstandings or lack of communication between local law enforcement and
the Secret Service. There's things dealing with with the small
(25:02):
planes that make a difference about them not working, and
the people that could fix it were not qualified to
correct drones. And if that had been operational, it may
have alerted us to the killer to a greater extent,
(25:23):
and things of that nature. But I think that as
Juesiciary Committee Chairman, I included one in seven tens billion
dollars for Secret Service in the One Big Beautiful Bill,
(25:43):
and I'm going to continue writing herd on oversight to
push for change within the Secret Service.
Speaker 1 (25:52):
Talking here with Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, I know that
you've been I mean, in the hours after that attempt
on Trump's life a year ago Sunday, you were on
social media letting us know whatever it is that you
could find out about what had happened. I know you'll
continue to do that on that front and so many others.
Let's talk about the votes yesterday in the United States
(26:15):
Senate to among other things, defund public broadcasting. We're not
at the point where that vote has happened yet. What's
going on with that issue? Should public broadcasting PBS NPR
be defunded from what taxpayers provide them? And what's going
on with this vote?
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Now, Okay, you'll have to remind me about the farm baill,
But let me answer your first question not before I
speak about public broadcasting. What we're talking about is nine
billion dollars is less than one tenth of one percent
(26:52):
of all the money the federal government spends, and you're
having great controvert see over that. It reminds me of
a speech I recently read re read that I gave
in nineteen eighty five, where I was advocating freezing the
budget of eighty five over eighty four, and I was
(27:14):
challenging my colleagues that if you can't, if an agency
can't live on the same money for two years in
a row, there's really something wrong. So you get back
to the same point, if we can't get by with
one tenth of one percent of all the money we're spending,
which is in this recision bill, we're in pretty bad
(27:37):
shape here in Washington. Now, everybody listing in Nebraska and
Iowa would applaud that nothing's going right here in Washington,
d C. In regard to public broadcasting, most public broadcasting
funding doesn't come from the federal government. In fact, federal
funding accounts for somewheres in the neighborhood into fifteen percent
(28:01):
of the operation costs of public media. At least in
my state of Iowa. This package will not cause local
media stations to go off the air. Although a change
in federal funding would surely lead to some programming adjustments.
The recision package has not yet been finalized that maybe
(28:25):
today or tomorrow Senate amendments may change the level of
approved federal funding for public broadcasting. So it's hard for
me to draw a conclusion where the exact bottom line
is going to be for it. But that gives you
the general approach.
Speaker 1 (28:42):
Thank you. What is happening on a farm bill?
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Yeah, well, don't forget. In the one big beautiful bill,
the Reconciliation Bill, we increase reference pricing. I'll give you
an example, corn from Zree seventy nine to four to ten.
We increase improved the crop insurance program, we put money
in for sale of export products promoting it, and then
(29:11):
we also had more money for research. Now that's probably
only ten percent of a five year farm bill, but
it's the part that deals mostly with helping family farmers
sue the safety net. So the other nine or ten titles,
(29:33):
I just would answer your question. Bottom line this we're
about eighteen months ahead of last year because last year,
last Congress, nothing happened until September in the House. Nothing
happened at all in the United States Senate. And now
we have the same House Appropriation or same House Agriculture
(29:55):
Committee probably putting out roughly the same bill, and we
have a Republican chairman of the Egg Committee that agrees
with what the House committee is doing. So I think
we're about eighteen months ahead of two years ago.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
Finally, Senator, this news is just breaking out of Syria,
and I'll give you as much information about it as
we have here, but I want to lead into it
by saying it this way. You've been in the United
States Senate for a few years, shall we say? During
that time, Russia has picked fights with everybody, and there's
always been unrest and oftentimes problems, violent problems in the
(30:33):
Middle East. President Trump has said We're going to bring
peace to the Middle East. We're going to get Russia
to back off of Ukraine. These things have not happened.
And moments ago it appears that Israel has launched an
air strike into the Syrian capital of Damascus. We don't
have any more details about it than that, but that's
what Fox News is reporting right now. Do you do
(30:57):
you have confidence in President Trump to do these things
that he's pledged he can do in terms of Russia,
in terms of the Middle East, And is that too
big an ask to put on any American president.
Speaker 3 (31:12):
An American president can't control what the leaders of any
other countries do, friend or enemy. The ones that are
somewhat dependent on the United States might have to listen
to the president of the United States. But you can
look at what Israel did in Iran. The President was
(31:34):
trying to stop that first strikes that happened of the
first of the Twelve day War last month, and Israel
went ahead, and don't forget back. In nineteen eighty one,
Israel didn't listen to anybody and destroyed the nuclear capability
of Iraq and the whole world was in an uproar,
(31:58):
but looking back at what happens when these countries are
developing nuclear weapons, everybody look back and say, Israel did
the right thing. Now. I don't know what this attack is,
but Israel does have the capability of making a very
(32:18):
targeted attack. It isn't like just blowing up the whole community.
Speaker 1 (32:25):
Yeah, we'll have to find out more here throughout the day,
and I'll let you get back to work. I appreciate
the time, as always, Senator, I'm glad.
Speaker 3 (32:33):
To go back to work, but I consider talking to
you and the people of Nebraska and Ioway as part
of my work.
Speaker 1 (32:40):
Well. I hope we had a strenuous time here today
and I wanted to make sure that you were you
were putting in the work this morning, Senator. As always,
thank you very much for the time.
Speaker 3 (32:51):
God bless you. Goodbye Scott for these mornings nine to
eleven on news radio eleven ten KFAB
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!